web analytics

Cash (for the rich) in Auckland’s attic?

Written By: - Date published: 2:58 pm, June 25th, 2009 - 31 comments
Categories: uncategorized - Tags:

The soften up for the next big fire-sale of Kiwi assets is well under way in Auckland, as Rogernomics morphs into Rodneynomics.

On Tuesday 16th June the Herald published a special section “Project Auckland” sponsored by a number of companies including Deloitte’s.

In it was an article by Fran O’Sullivan called “Cash in Auckland’s attic” which began: “Should Council’s consider realising their assets rather than hanging on to them?”

Fran quoted analysis produced by Deloitte’s at the Herald’s request.

Some of Deloitte’s suggestions:

  • sale of all or part of its interest in Ports of Auckland – $588 million
  • sale of 19.9% stake in Northland Port – $23.5 million

“all or part of the capital “burden” of hese assets could be transferred to the private sector through PPP or concession arrangements:

  • sale of interest in Auckland International Airport – $248million
  • sale and leaseback..for all or part of the wastewater and water assets with a current value of $1.1billion.”

Funny how big money is a burden when it doesn’t belong to the rich. I wish.

But it makes it clear why Mark Ford is in charge of getting Auckland ready for sale.

31 comments on “Cash (for the rich) in Auckland’s attic? ”

  1. “Funny how big money is a burden when it doesn’t belong to the rich”

    What the council has now are assets, and what they will get for them is money. The ‘burden’ is having capital tied up in these assets rather than being able to spend it. I hope that clears it up for you.

    I personally would prefer that the councils have money to spend on their functions then become wannabe investors on behalf of their ratepayers.

  2. bill brown 2

    So the council sells their assets so we can have free rubbish collection until the money runs out?

    • George D 2.1

      No, the council sells the assets so the ratepayers in Epsom halve their rates bills until the money runs out.

      • bill brown 2.1.1

        Do they still get their rubbish picked up for free?

        • George D

          No, that only happens if we sell the wastewater. If we sell the Museum we get a free trip to Rangitoto.

  3. Jono 3

    It’s funny how Council development and ownership of (particularly non-core) assets is seen by those on the right as an abberation, when in fact local government in NZ has has a +130 year history of asset creation vs a 20 year history of asset destruction. Councils had road, park, land reclamation and other boards devoted to building those assets for their communities because central government and private enterprise were not interested or able. Has that situation really changed?

  4. Rex Widerstrom 4

    Ports are a commercial business utilised by very few ratepayers. Airports are a commercial business used by a larger proportion of ratepayers. Neither, however, are crucial to their wellbeing.

    Thus I see no reason why it should be wrong to discuss the possibility of selling councils’ interests in them to release capital to invest in other infrastructure (public transport, locking up more land as parks, construction of effective waste recycling operations and a host of others). There may prove to be economic arguments as to why this isn’t a good idea, but I don’t see a bunch of wharves and cranes as some sort of icon.

    Of course the important proviso to that view is that money raised from selling some assets be invested in others and not, as bill brown points out, the artificial subsidisation of core services. Or wasted on a SuperMayor and SuperCouncillors’ salaries and perks, either.

    However, because I take that view for the reasons I do, it utterly horrifies me that one could suggest selling ports in the same breath as water and wastewater. First and most importantly they are crucial to the wellbeing of every ratepayer and indeed their continued affordability by even the most impoverished resident is absolutely vital. And second they mesh far more coherently with other council core services.

    • Rex: Lots of things are crucial to people’s wellbeing but are provided by markets. Food, for example. If you’re worried about the poor missing out, you can easily provide vouchers, or just cash transfers, like we do already.

      • Rex Widerstrom 4.1.1

        Tom that’s a fair point. But I have two concerns when we’re talking something as fundamnetal as water.

        First, what if all goes horribly wrong as it did in Bolivia (and other places, though that is by far the worst example)? We can conceivably live without a port, not without drinking water.

        And second, even National has woken up to the stupidity of taxing people to funnel money, through beneficiaries, into the pockets of private enterprise and are talking of letting tenants buy their state houses, using the proceeds to build more state houses and move low income people out of private rentals, and so on.

        • Tom Mathews

          You’ll certainly get no disagreement with me that we can’t live without drinking water. Again though, the main problem is often that the poor can’t afford it.

          Prices can be contained either through opening the market up to competition, or if that is impossible, running it on a frequently renewed tender process. If the poor still can’t afford water, you subsidise it for them, give them vouchers, or (ideally) cash transfers.

          I’m certainly no expert, but it seems like none of these things happened in Bolivia, and the outcome, while tragic, was far from unpredictable.

          • felix

            Or you just pipe it to everyone’s home and let them drink it. Duh.

            It’s not that fucking difficult.

            The only problem with this approach is that no-one gets to squeeze a profit from the citizenry for the use of a publicly built and owned asset.

            What a shame.

  5. Surely the reason to keep shares in the Port and Airport is that they’re profitable businesses and you can make money out of them.

    There’s another, more ideological, argument. But basically why the heck sell stuff that makes you money?

    • George D 5.1

      Businesses sell profitable assets all the time – when they feel that investing it elsewhere will give them a better return or allow for expansion. There is no evidence provided at all that this can or should be done here, and to my knowledge no-one’s even making the argument.

  6. ” But basically why the heck sell stuff that makes you money?”

    By selling them now, you capture their future value. So the amount of money you get now should be about the same as the total amount of money you would earn off them in the long term, as well as such things can be estimated. The difference is that if you sell them, you can spend the cash now, if you need to.

    The other, you might say more ideological reason, is that in many areas, privately owned companies tend to out-perform publicly owned ones, because the incentives are superior. This isn’t always the case, most obviously for public goods, but I can’t see why it wouldn’t be for a port.

    • andy 6.1

      By selling them now, you capture their future value. So the amount of money you get now should be about the same as the total amount of money you would earn off them in the long term, as well as such things can be estimated.

      Glad your not my investment advisor. I would expect the ports of Auckland has paid itself off many times over the hundred plus years of operation.

      Sure there is a sunk cost in airports and ports, but they return a reasonable dividend that councils have come to rely on. Where will that money come from? Cuts in services and a rise in rates charged.

      privately owned companies tend to out-perform publicly owned ones, because the incentives are superior.

      Selling assets is short termism in the extreme, thought we had moved on to a more commercial model where we own the asset but it is run on a business model like Auckland Airport and Ports of Auckland.

      Also how do you accurately value a monopoly asset in a recession?

      • Tom Mathews 6.1.1

        I don’t mean to quibble, but they aren’t sunk costs, as they are retrievable. That would be the point of privatisation.

        When I say selling them now captures future value, I mean it like this. If you think that over time you will earn Y off an asset, and I offer you X such that Y>X, you won’t sell it to me. You’re only going to sell it if X is greater than or equal to Y. Likewise, I am not going to offer more than I think I will make from it. So by selling it now, you get the best guess at what it’s going to be worth in the future. You’re right that it is ‘short termism’, it just shows that you would prefer the money now, rather than later. But it is going to be roughly the same amount of money.

        Assuming that the Auckland City Council are rational payoff maximisers. Maybe they are not.

        • Pascal's bookie

          “Assuming that the Auckland City Council are rational payoff maximisers. Maybe they are not.”

          I’d say dollars to donuts they are not. Most public asset sales, as far as I can remember have been for one (or both) of two reasons.

          The ideological belief that it is not the governments business to be owning the asset. That’s fair enough, but it is a purely political question. It will be framed around efficiency or some other reason that the private sector would be better at the task, and again that’s fair enough, but it usually assumes some presuppositions that must be held to make the argument fly. Such as, ‘economic efficiency (defined within parameters x-z) is the primary consideration for determining whether the govt should own something’.

          Those presuppositions usually don’t get argued, the question gets begged, and they are where the political disagreements actually are.

          The other reason for asset sales is a short term need for the cash, usually to ‘pay off debt’. Here the decision is again, political. Politicians are looking at the books, seeing a need for more revenue, or ready cash, and making a decision. If tax rises aren’t politically viable, (which is always a hard choice), they will look at asset sales. These can be justified with all sorts of arguments.

          I guess what I’m saying is that the sort of future earnings calculation you talk about, don’t often happen in reality. They are a construct to explain what a rational price would be. In reality however, politicians decide to sell assets for any number of reasons, and then get whatever price they can for them. There will be a price that they won’t sell for, but I suspect that that price is based on what they need the money for now, rather than any actual calculations about the future earnings of the asset.

          If I’m making any sense…

          • vto

            P’s B “Those presuppositions usually don’t get argued, the question gets begged, and …”

            You are quite right. And it would be good to stretch it to that. I reckon that is an area where the left is not gaining the ground it could. If the public engaged their brains on it (stirred by left types) they would probably tend to agree with increased govt ownerhip of assets. (just. kiwirail is a bit of a push. – edit, not the land and corridor component).

      • Swampy 6.1.2

        The port is not a monopoly asset, there are other ports that will take the business and are prepared to compete.

        • Zaphod Beeblebrox

          Correct, if ARH is sold and Tauranga Ports does not buy it, we will have an effective duopoly. Marginally better.

    • Tigger 6.2

      Is now the time to sell? I mean, big ticket items like luxury cars, houses and boats just aren’t fetching top dollar. If we’re going to sell then shouldn’t we wait for a boom time?

      (the above comment in no way is meant to imply that Tigger agrees with asset selling because he doesn’t, he’s happy for the councils to own stuff).

    • So Bored 6.3

      “Selling them now to capture future value”…. you have a crystal ball?
      “As well as things might be estimated”….thats a very accurate basis for assessing our future needs.
      “Spend the cash now”…what the hell on?

      Can you gaurantee our water supply tomorrow by doing the above?

  7. Tom, if we take the port as an example, through the ARH it has provided the regional council with a huge amount of cash over the last decade or so. We may have got a “quick buck” if the port had been sold in the early 1990s, but certainly it seems like a better deal in hindsight to have kept it.

    Given that we have that hindsight, why even go there?

    • Well if that cash was predictable, it would have increased the value of the asset when we sold it off; I make that point above. People often assume that current price just represents current value, but it generally reflects future value as well, to an extent.

      If the return was unpredictable, then I think that supports getting out, because we stand to lose just as much as we stand to gain. Just because we gained in the past doesn’t mean we’ll win in the future, as the recent stock market crashes have surely shown.

      • jarbury 7.1.1

        All that means is that, practically, there’s just as much reason to sell as to not sell? I’m still somewhat unconvinced by that though – was it really a good idea to sell the railways, Telecom, etc. etc.?

        • Tom Mathews

          You’re right, if publicly owned firms were run identically to privately run firms, all we would gain is the ability to spend our money now, rather than later, plus or minus any unpredicted effects in the profitability of the assets. Whether that’s good or bad depends on the situation.

          The real debate, of course, is if they are run the same way. Here’s a paper on how firms fared after privatisation:
          It argues that most improved afterwards. Some didn’t, however, which I think suggests that the process is also important. In Telecom and probably the railways we clearly got the process wrong; we just sold off monopolies. But that doesn’t mean it can’t be done well, and to everybody’s benefit.

          The paper appears to have been commissioned by the Business Roundtable though, take from that what you will.

        • Swampy

          No problem selling the railways or Telecom, the country hasn’t lost out.

  8. Zaphod Beeblebrox 8

    One thing investors love is investing in monopoly enterprises. That way they are guaranteed a profit, despite having to take virtually no risk or creativity.
    Bankers also love investing in monopolies because they know that if profits drop a bit, prices can easily be raised.

    The fact that it requires virtually no business acumen or mangement skills are what business interests love things like public-private partnerships, SOE’s and private ownership of monopoly assets. And if the business falls over, the public is always their to bail them out.

    The real losers are the struggling businesses that are trying to raise capital in competition with the monopoly providers. They actually have to produce and compete against other businesses.

    • Swampy 8.1

      Really, this is a great description of public ownership of monopolies. Most of the time they are monopolies because the public agency that owns them decreed it would be so. Do you see that being possible in the private sector? For example until 1980s there were no private sector TV or radio networks in NZ because the government granted itself monopoly rights over these sectors.

      The port is not a monopoly, but if sale isn’t desirable, leasing out the operations is a reasonable alternative. They have I think 2 container terminals, each of these could be leased to a different company to guarantee competition. That incidentally would be a lot better than the current situation where as far as the ARC is concerned having just one port that they own is a great idea

Links to post

Recent Comments

Recent Posts

  • NZ announces a third P-3 deployment in support of UN sanctions
    The Government has deployed a Royal New Zealand Air Force P-3K2 Orion (P-3) maritime patrol aircraft to support the implementation of United Nations Security Council (UNSC) resolutions imposing sanctions against North Korea, announced Minister of Foreign Affairs Winston Peters and Minister of Defence Ron Mark. “New Zealand has long supported ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 days ago
  • Pacific trade and development agreement a reality
    Pacific regional trade and development agreement PACER Plus will enter into force in 60 days now that the required eight countries have ratified it. Trade and Export Growth Minister David Parker welcomed the announcement that the Cook Islands is the eighth nation to ratify this landmark agreement. “The agreement represents ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    6 days ago
  • Securing a pipeline of teachers
    The Government is changing its approach to teacher recruitment as COVID-19 travel restrictions continue, by boosting a range of initiatives to get more Kiwis into teaching. “When we came into Government, we were faced with a teacher supply crisis,” Education Minister Chris Hipkins said. “Over the past three years, we ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • Border exceptions for a small number of international students with visas
    The Government has established a new category that will allow 250 international PhD and postgraduate students to enter New Zealand and continue their studies, in the latest set of border exceptions. “The health, safety and wellbeing of people in New Zealand remains the Government’s top priority. Tight border restrictions remain ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • First COVID-19 vaccine purchase agreement signed
    The Government has signed an agreement to purchase 1.5 million COVID-19 vaccines – enough for 750,000 people – from Pfizer and BioNTech, subject to the vaccine successfully completing all clinical trials and passing regulatory approvals in New Zealand, say Research, Science and Innovation Minister Megan Woods and Health Minister Chris Hipkins. ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • International statement – End-to-end encryption and public safety
    We, the undersigned, support strong encryption, which plays a crucial role in protecting personal data, privacy, intellectual property, trade secrets and cyber security.  It also serves a vital purpose in repressive states to protect journalists, human rights defenders and other vulnerable people, as stated in the 2017 resolution of the ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • Ministry of Defence Biodefence Assessment released
    The Ministry of Defence has today released a Defence Assessment examining Defence’s role across the spectrum of biological hazards and threats facing New Zealand. Biodefence: Preparing for a New Era of Biological Hazards and Threats looks at how the NZDF supports other agencies’ biodefence activities, and considers the context of ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • New Approaches to Economic Challenges: Confronting Planetary Emergencies: OECD 9 October 2020
    New Approaches to Economic Challenges: Confronting Planetary Emergencies: OECD 9 October 2020 Hon David Parker’s response following Thomas Piketty and Esther Duflo. Good morning, good afternoon, and good evening, wherever in the world you might be. I first acknowledge the excellent thought provoking speeches of Thomas Piketty and Esther ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 weeks ago
  • Kaipara Moana restoration takes next step
    A Memorandum of Understanding has been signed today at Waihāua Marae between the Crown, local iwi and councils to protect, restore and enhance the mauri of Kaipara Moana in Northland. Environment Minister David Parker signed the document on behalf of the Crown along with representatives from Ngā Maunga Whakahī, Ngāti ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 weeks ago
  • New Zealand and Uruguay unite on reducing livestock production emissions
    Agriculture Minister Damien O’Connor and Uruguayan Minister of Livestock, Agriculture and Fisheries Carlos María Uriarte have welcomed the launch of a three-year project that will underpin sustainable livestock production in Uruguay, Argentina, and Costa Rica.  The project called ‘Innovation for pasture management’ is led by Uruguay’s National Institute of Agricultural ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 weeks ago
  • 3100 jobs created through marae upgrades
    Hundreds of marae throughout the country will be upgraded through investments from the Provincial Growth Fund’s refocused post COVID-19 funding to create jobs and put money into the pockets of local tradespeople and businesses, Regional Economic Development Minister Shane Jones and Māori Development Minister Nanaia Mahuta have announced. “A total ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 weeks ago
  • Health volunteers recognised in annual awards
    Health Minister Chris Hipkins has announced 9 teams and 14 individuals are the recipients of this year’s Minister of Health Volunteer Awards.  “The health volunteer awards celebrate and recognise the thousands of dedicated health sector volunteers who give many hours of their time to help other New Zealanders,” Mr Hipkins ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 weeks ago
  • Community COVID-19 Fund supports Pacific recovery
    The Minister for Pacific Peoples, Aupito William Sio says a total of 264 groups and individuals have successfully applied for the Pacific Aotearoa Community COVID-19 Recovery Fund, that will support Pacific communities drive their own COVID-19 recovery strategies, initiatives, and actions. “I am keen to see this Fund support Pacific ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 weeks ago
  • Community benefits from Māori apprenticeships
    Up to 50 Māori apprentices in Wellington will receive paid training to build houses for their local communities, thanks to a $2.75 million investment from the Māori Trades and Training Fund, announced Employment Minister Willie Jackson today. “This funding will enable Ngāti Toa Rangatira Incorporated to provide its Ngā Kaimahi ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 weeks ago
  • Training fund supports Māori jobseekers
    Rapidly growing sectors will benefit from a $990,000 Māori Trades and Training Fund investment which will see Wellington jobseekers supported into work, announced Employment Minister Willie Jackson today. “This funding will enable Sapphire Consultants Ltd. to help up to 45 Māori jobseekers into paid training initiatives over two years through ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 weeks ago
  • Ruakura Inland Port development vital infrastructure for Waikato
    The Government is investing $40 million to develop an inland port at Ruakura which will become a freight super-hub and a future business, research and residential development for the Waikato, Urban Development and Transport Minister Phil Twyford, and Māori Development Minister Nanaia Mahuta announced today. The funding has been has ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 weeks ago
  • Appointments made to Defence Expert Review Group
    Defence Minister Ron Mark announced today the establishment of an Expert Review Group to review a number of aspects of the New Zealand Defence Force’s (NZDF) structure, information management and record-keeping processes.  The Expert Review Group’s work arises out of the first recommendation from the Report of the Government’s Inquiry ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 weeks ago
  • No active community cases of COVID-19
    There are no active community cases of COVID-19 remaining in the country after the last people from the recent outbreak have recovered from the virus, Health Minister Chris Hipkins said today. “This is a big milestone. New Zealanders have once again through their collective actions squashed the virus. The systems ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 weeks ago
  • Clean energy upgrade for more public buildings
    More public buildings will be supported by the Government to upgrade to run on clean energy, the Minister for Climate Change James Shaw announced today. Minister Shaw announced that Lincoln and Auckland universities will receive support through the Clean-Powered Public Service Fund to replace fossil fuel boilers. Southern, Taranaki, and ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 weeks ago
  • Schools back donations scheme for the second year
    More schools have opted in to the donations scheme for 2021, compared to 2020 when the scheme was introduced. “The families of more than 447,000 students will be better off next year, with 94% of eligible schools and kura opting into the scheme,” Education Minister Chris Hipkins said. “This is ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 weeks ago
  • Ruapehu cycle trails gets PGF boost
    The spectacular Mountains to Sea cycle trail in Ruapehu District will receive $4.6 million in funding from the Provincial Growth Fund for two additional trails, Regional Economic Development Minister Shane Jones announced today. “This is an exciting development for the local community, and one that will provide significant economic opportunities ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 weeks ago
  • Update to air border order strengthens crew requirements
    Additional measures coming into effect on Monday will boost our defence against COVID-19 entering New Zealand through the air border, Health Minister Chris Hipkins said today. “As part of our precautionary approach and strategy of constant review, we’re tightening the requirements around international aircrew,” Chris Hipkins said. The COVID-19 Public ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 weeks ago
  • A true picture of Māori business activity
    A better picture of the contribution Māori businesses make to the economy will be possible with changes to the way information is collected about companies and trading enterprises. Māori Development Minister Nanaia Mahuta and Small Business Minister Stuart Nash have announced a new option for Māori enterprises who are part ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 weeks ago
  • PGF funding for Taranaki projects
    The South Taranaki museum, a New Plymouth distillery and a Pasifika building firm will benefit from a Government investment totalling more than $1 million, Regional Economic Development Minister Shane Jones says. The $1.05m in grants and loans from the Provincial Growth Fund (PGF) will help the recipients expand and create ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 weeks ago
  • Fijian Language Week 2020 inspires courage and strength during COVID-19 pandemic
    The Minister for Pacific Peoples, Aupito William Sio says the theme for the 2020 Fijian Language Week reflects the strong belief by Fijians that their language and culture inspires courage and strength that is strongly needed in times of emergencies, or through a significant challenge like the global COVID-19 pandemic ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 weeks ago
  • Trades training builds on iwi aspirations
    An investment of $2.025 million from the Māori Trades and Training Fund will support Māori to learn new skills while making a positive difference for their communities, announced Employment Minister Willie Jackson today. “K3 Development Limited Partnership will receive $2,025,000 for its Takitimu Tuanui apprenticeship programme, which will support the ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 weeks ago
  • Conservation Minister plants two millionth tree in Raglan restoration
    A long-term conservation project led by the Whaingaroa Harbour Care group in the western Waikato reaches a significant milestone this week, with the planting of the two millionth tree by the Minister of Conservation Eugenie Sage. “Planting the two millionth tree crowns 25 years of commitment and partnership involving Whaingaroa ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 weeks ago