Written By:
notices and features - Date published:
5:30 pm, October 7th, 2019 - 16 comments
Categories: Daily review -
Tags:
The server will be getting hardware changes this evening starting at 10pm NZDT.
The site will be off line for some hours.
tRump's green lighting Erdogan to solve his Kurdish problem is a horrifying betrayal of the west's allies in the region. Fuck!
Washington — The White House said Sunday that Turkey will soon invade northern Syria, renewing fears of a slaughter of Kurdish fighters allied with the U.S. in a years-long campaign against the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (ISIS).
The White House statement said Turkey will take custody of foreign fighters captured in the U.S.-led campaign against ISIS who've been held by the Kurdish forces supported by the U.S.
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/turkey-invade-northern-syria-take-captured-isis-fighters-held-by-kurdish-forces-white-house-says/
This is part of the reason Mattis left him.
+1 joe90. Anyone who values Trump's word on a trade deal should consider his weasel ways. And we should send our forces from Afghanistan (where they are doing no good) to support the Kurds in Syria. Kurds are getting one of the dirtiest raw deals from USA yet again, after what Bush Senior did after the first Gulf War. Would love to think that Russia may interfere with this – for the sake of the Kurds.
On the Kurdish mistrust of the US.
https://www.brookings.edu/blog/markaz/2017/11/02/masoud-barzani-and-the-roots-of-kurdish-distrust-of-the-united-states/
Shared E-scooters aren't always as 'green' as other transport options
https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2019/08/190802104535.htm
Fair Go tonight: a segment about the lack of safety belts on school buses. Wouldn't be a bad use of Nanny State to insist these transport contractors were forced to fit belts on all buses, and the Govt fund the cost. Win – Win.
Something for the Ginger fans.
https://www.rollingstone.com/music/music-news/ginger-baker-cream-dead-obituary-240630/
'tis a most excellent doco…
Where is Festival Drug testing rigorously scientifically tested?
Its not possible for ethical reasons to use people as guinea pigs for a 'random selection of street drugs'.
No testing on either humans or animals is required to establish the chemical composition of a substance. You seem to be unaware of what's actually under discussion on this subject.
"Scientifically proven to reduce risky drug taking behaviour"
Where is it 'scientific'. They just seem to offer to test some drugs, where is the science . Do you even know what that word means when comparing different situations.
One person who died at a NSW festival took 9 Ecstasy pills. That doesnt seem to be a 'quality problem"
https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2019/jan/22/drug-deaths-at-music-festivals-one-overdose-victim-took-up-to-nine-mdma-pills
Some sought medical attention , others did not. Dehydration comes into it as well
Quantity not quality is the issue . As well it doesnt seem to have entered young peoples heads that , yes you can die from popping strange pills.
Thats what I meant by a claim of Scientifically proven , when its not.
You could take a NZ major hospital, and the drug overdoses treated over a year, how many are adulterated drugs and how many are adverse reactions from 'standard' street drugs -if there is such a thing.
Festivals should have well resourced medical facilities and rehydration tents before they just offer 'testing'
http://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/SC1901/S00047/festival-drug-testing-expert-reaction.htm
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0955395918302755
Two of the three who've died in NZ after taking MDMA died because they drank too much water.
If the small town festivals I've attended over the past few years are anything to go by, most festivals do indeed have well resourced medical facilities and rehydration tents
"Scientifically proven to reduce risky drug taking behaviour"
Where is it 'scientific'. They just seem to offer to test some drugs, where is the science.
Weka's already posted the relevant info, but to summarise:
The science consists of a study in which one in five drug users disposed of their drugs after having them tested and a further one in six "moderated their consumption." That is clear evidence of the tests having "reduced risky drug-taking behaviour."
With your example of someone who died after taking Ecstasy, you're making an implied claim that safety measures are pointless unless they guarantee no-one can possibly suffer death from misadventure. That's a ridiculous approach to take.
The NZ First position is so hard to fathom… truth is if you have testing and people realize that they have purchased say bath salts or a shit meth batch pressed into a pill and not the E they thought they'll likely not take it… Less harm and likely less drugs consumed
Excess quantity of drugs taken is more of a problem than adultered ones. On site Medical treatment is more relevant factor as well, and not just a single over worked doctor plusa few St Johns volunteers.