Did Lockwood mis-speak too?

Written By: - Date published: 8:14 pm, August 5th, 2008 - 93 comments
Categories: assets, national, privatisation, slippery - Tags:

It has been revealed that Bill English isn’t the only senior Nat who has been discussing a secret agenda behind closed doors. On TV3 tonight, a recording was played of Lockwood Smith saying:

“There’s some bloody dead fish you have to swallow… to get into Government to do the kinds of things you want to do… and you have to balance up what really matters.”

“If you try to do everything differently you’ll scare the horses and under MMP it’s very hard to win.”

“Once we have gained the confidence of the people, we’ve got more chance of doing more things.”

“We may be able to do some things we believe we need to do, perhaps go through a discussion document process… you wouldn’t be able to do them straight off. … I’m hoping that we’ll do some useful things that way, that may not be policy right now.”

Earlier today, English, in a humiliating charade, appeared before journalists under Key’s gaze to ‘clarify’ that he ‘mis-spoke’ and used ‘loose language’ in his recorded comments and TV1 interview*. The revelation that Lockwood Smith was assuring delegates about the same secret agenda behind closed doors totally discredits any credibility that English’s ‘clarification’ might have had. Unless we’re expected to believe that Lockwood misspoke too….

*(so, when he said National will sell Kiwibank “eventually, but not yet”, I guess a tighter version of that would have been “we’re not telling the punters yet but we’re going to sell Kiwibank” and, when he repeatedly said Working for Families is “complex” rather than say Key understood, it a clearer verison would have been “Key is to dumb or lazy to understand pretty basic maths”).

93 comments on “Did Lockwood mis-speak too?”

  1. MonkeyKing 1

    Isn’t what he said stating the bleeding obvious? Politics is all about compromise to get what you want.

  2. Was Lockwood caught on tape? Oh well, I suppose it beats the Parliamentary video camera again.
    Corruption abound in the land of lies.

  3. Rocket Boy 3

    MonkeyKing what he said was ‘this is what we are doing to get elected, but once we get the chance we really want to do something totally different’, which is pretty much the same thing that Bill English also said.

    In my mind politics is about having principles and a vision, I would admire the National Party more if they actually said what they really wanted to do and stuck to it.

  4. MonkeyKing – “I’m hoping that we’ll do some useful things that way, that may not be policy right now.” – ‘we have plans to do things that we are purposely not openly talking about now’… that’s not compromise, that’s deceiving the public so they will give their vote to National in ignorance.

  5. mike 5

    I didn’t think even the lowly lefties would resort to dirty underhand tactics like covertly recording answers to loaded questions in order to get some sound bites.

    I would love to hear what Cullen really thinks about Tax cuts too but you wouldn’t get a Nat dress up in a cardie and filthy beard to find out.

    [mike, clearly you’re angry about the political damage this will do to National. It’s ok to be sad, just come and say that. But don’t pretend there’s some moral issue around the recording, hell even Key said ‘we’re on record 24 hours a day’ – it’s a fair cop, politicians shouldn’t be saying one thing to their supporters and another to the public. SP]

  6. Proctor 6

    You wouldn’t have to, though – would you Mike? It’s pretty clear what his position on tax cuts is.

    You don’t have to like Labour, but at least you know where they stand.

  7. forgetaboutthelastone 7

    “underhand tactics like covertly recording answers to loaded questions…”

    what do you expect when a party refuses to release any substantial policy?

  8. Matthew Pilott 8

    And what’s obvious is Cullen is a Keyensian economist, so would be happy to give tax cuts in times of economic difficulty, where available. In fact, he told people just that at Drinking Liberally. So not quite a secret there.

    It’s called consistency, which is what people can appreciate.

    This, OTOH, is inconsistency. That can be construed as deception, misleading people, lying, immoral and worse really.

    I think what this really illustrates is the problem of a carefully stage-managed campaign, in which you pretend to change your views so as to “not scare the horses” – you end up saying something ‘on mesage’ that’s so far out of line with what you really believe.
    Full credit to Naitonal for keeping the facade up for so long but tha just makes it worse now.

    Hell, maybe they’ll decide to come clean and say what they really want to do, and argue why it’s a good idea, in their eyes! (fat chance…)

    I like Cullen’s take on this:

    “He could admit that he has no intention of sticking to the centrist ‘Labour-plus’ agenda he is promising New Zealanders.

    “Or he can admit that the senior MPs around him are very happy to use him to gain power but have no intention of letting him run the show if they are elected.”

  9. Pascal's bookie 9

    “It’s pretty clear what his position on tax cuts is.”

    Yep. He’s a Keynesian. Which for those of you of a biblical tradition will find explained here

    Kinda makes me cry a little that so many righties think that just because their own position amounts to “Cut taxes on principle” that this somehow means that others just have a polar opposite view.

    You can imagine them running around calling the Pharaoh all sorts of names because he was running a cow and corn surplus, which is just clearly theft. And then when the famine arrived and the food stores are opened they’d be bleating about flip flops and calling him names again. Sad.

  10. outofbed 10

    I think all these so called fuckups from National are a textor/crosby cumming plan to lead us on the left into a false sense of security.

    I mean whats the point in going out there to get the vote out if its a foregone conclusion ?

    Talk about taking candy from a baby 🙂

  11. johndoe 11

    lol, a cumming plan 😉

  12. coge 12

    On the surface it seems journos are becoming more cunning. Technology is a wonderful thing. This sort of stuff is great for ratings I imagine. Guess none of your leaders live in glass houses. And if it’s not journos doing the bugging, then we have come to resemble a police state.

  13. outofbed 13

    A Freudian slip if ever there was one 🙂

  14. Felix 14

    “And if it’s not journos doing the bugging, then we have come to resemble a police state.”

    ??? Please explain?

    (I really do want you to explain. I have no frickin idea what that means.)

  15. DS 15

    “(I really do want you to explain. I have no frickin idea what that means.)”

    I think coge is hypothesising a situation where Labour is doing Nixon-style bugging of its opponents. You know, standard far-right conspiracy theory stuff.

  16. outofbed 16

    I guess there are few nervous senior NATS out there tonight

  17. RedLogix 17

    PascalB

    Thanks very much reminding us of Joseph. It may be very old hat, and pre-date Keynes much several thousand years… but it remains to this day a very profound story with many layers of meaning.

    It reminds us that the days of plenty can quickly turn to calamity if we fail to understand properly what true wealth is, and how to use it with wisdom and humility.

    Humility to understand that wealth is a grace, a gift that has little to do with our personal merit.

    Wisdom to spend it prudently and set some aside for the hard times that inevitably follow.

  18. coge 18

    DS. What sort of reaction would you expect if the PM’s private conversations were released into the media? (from any source)
    The whole issue is the onesidedness of these edited “leaks” Which lends itself to speculation about who or what is sanctioning these activities? Perhaps someone could clear this up for me?

    Nixon had his opponents bugged as did Stalin, but to their credit they kept the details private.

  19. gazzaj 19

    Wow, so political parties might have policies they don’t intend to campaign on and might introduce in later campaigns, or even mid-term. Big shock.

    I clearly remember Labour campaigning in 2005 on buying out Toll and repealing Section 59.

    Oh wait, no, they didn’t.

    The English and Smith comments are gaffes, they’ll be reported as gaffes, it’ll probably hurt National a little but be completely forgotten by the election.

    If it’s a sign of more to come, then yeah National has a problem. But it ain’t gonna change the result 😉 Sorry.

    [wikipedia: “A gaffe is a verbal mistake made by a company or individual, usually in a social environment. The mistake comes from saying something that is true, but inappropriate, or, what might be as bad, an erroneous attempt to reveal a truth”. English and Lockwood are speaking the truth, the only ‘mistake’ was getting caught on tape.. and that’s a good outcome for democracy, which relies on an informed citizenry, even if it’s bad for Bill and Lockwood. Also, Labour had speculated on buyin back Toll before 2005 and s59 was a members’ bill that came, Labour chose to support it, as did National. SP]

  20. Draco TB 20

    What sort of reaction would you expect if the PM’s private conversations were released into the media? (from any source)

    I’d be horrified. The problem being with this argument is that the conversations taped weren’t private.

  21. RedLogix 21

    I clearly remember Labour campaigning in 2005 on buying out Toll and repealing Section 59.

    You may have missed it on the other thread; but I think you have forgotten that:

    1. The repeal of S59 was a Green Party Private Members Bill.

    2. Around the 2005 period (I forget exactly when) after TranzRail collapsed, Labour purchased the track and formed an SOE called OnTrack. The intention was to negotiate access fees to the new operator. Unfortunately Toll played hard-ball and in the end Cullen decided that it was better to buy the whole thing, than prop up a private operator with public money.

    I’m not sure how Labour was supposed to campaign on these in 2005, given that neither policy existed at that time.

  22. VJ APU 22

    what a joke

    lockwood merely stats what goes on in the real world. in business sometimes you need to give a little to get a little and in the end everyone wins.

    there is no agenda here. did you not read the bit about discussion documents etc etc. real secret stuff those are LOL

    smacks of total desperation for the lefties to record conversations in secret and chop em up to suit eh?

  23. Quoth the Raven 23

    lockwood merely stats what goes on in the real world. in business sometimes you need to take a little to get a little and in the end everyone loses.

  24. VJ APU 24

    quoth the raven sounds jaded to me.

    its not the way i do business sunshine. if i help my customers win then I win with them

    its not rocket science

  25. vto 25

    QtR I can’t believe you said that

  26. Razorlight 26

    If people are really surprised by the contents of this recording they would be shocked by what really happens behind Caucus closed doors.

    Does anyone really think every member of the Labour or National caucus is completley comfortable with every policy decision the party makes. Helen Clark used the term, “not in the first term” numerous times in 1999. I specifically recall her saying that term when batting away questions about reducing Student Fees and Student Loans.

    Every MP has to sacrifice some things they believe in to get into power. This is hardly a scandal.

  27. coge 27

    Draco, I would dispute that conversations that take place “in house” are anything but private. People should be able to talk freely without fear. Looks like big brother has come to town. Any individual or group who sanctions such activity should be labled unprincipled. I would hope that the Labour led Govt would seek to denounce such tactics, or risk guilt by tacit approval. Otherwise
    what sort of example are they setting?

  28. Otherwise
    what sort of example are they setting?

    Jeez that’s lame. So very lame. Suck. It. Up.

  29. outofbed 29

    Supposing one suspected National was running a secret agenda
    How would one find out ?
    They have only being caught out because they are saying one thing privately and another publicly
    Why don’t they just tell everyone what they really stand for instead of being put in the ludicrous position of having to defend their support of Labours policies which they privately don’t agree with?
    I mean that is fucking stupid.
    They nearly got in last time with a right wing agenda and they would have probably got in this time with that same agenda. Then at least they could have campaigned on something they believed in, something they joined the National party for. I think most people would respect that I know I would
    Now another day goes by and another adoption and defence of another policy they don’t believe in… its a farce

    Oh well at least KIWIBANK has got some great free advertising

  30. Tanya 30

    This is just fun. Won’t change the outcome, I agree. National have a secret agenda? Really? This so-called scandal will be gone by lunch time, and Winston will be back. The real news of the day.

  31. Hmmm – that comment reminds me of occasional observer. Are you occasional observer, “Tanya”?

  32. outofbed 32

    Does anyone know what happened to the Herald porkometer ?

  33. Tanya 33

    Once again, that is my real name, Robinsod. Occasional observer? Yeah, right.

  34. Once again, that is my real name

    No it’s not.

  35. r0b 35

    Love the title of this thread. In the National Party of 2008 to tell the truth is to mis-speak. Very 1984.

  36. Tanya 36

    I decline to argue anymore. Good night, I look forward to the morning Winstonian headlines.

  37. Razorlight 37

    looks like great debate going on here this morning

  38. max 38

    Great debate as usual on the standard

  39. Here you have two leaders of National speaking their mind about matters that go against what they know is what the majority of public want.

    Kiwi’s like a bank owned by New Zealand, National wants to sell it. Kiwi’s want MFF, National wants to “change” it. Kiwi’s don’t want privatised health care, National wants to privatise it and more over they show an incredibly arrogant attitude towards “the punters” comparing them to easily panicked horses.

    They speak their mind about topics obviously discussed behind closed doors to people whom they believe have the same attitude. The only problem is that someone in the audience(a journo or someone just sick of the lies)records the conversation.

    It is almost as if National’s leaders have been caught conspiring isn’t it? LOL.

    Sort of; We will tell the suckers (the horses, the sheeple, whatever) what they want to hear and when we are in power we will do what we want (Borrow, Spend and Sell and make lot’s of money when we end up on the boards of all those privatised assets leaving the punters to sort out the debt we’ve left them with).

    Ah, John Key brings Wall street to NZ. Welcome to the real world.

  40. simon 40

    I suspect if National were more forthcoming with their policies and less secretive, then Journalists wouldn’t have to resort to guerilla tactics. They’ve played a silly game and really National are making there own bed here, but are not prepared to lie in it.

    I shall now tell a conspiracy story… 6 months after National gain the Government Writs, John key is either (a) assasinated by a little known radical group or (b) Quits due to ill health or (c) A financial scandel causes his fall (leaked by a member of the Business Roundtable) Bill English becomes PM, removes all KEYITES from positions of influence and proclaims “Yes A National Party led by John Key said “…..” But I’m not John Key and in the best interests of the New Zealand we will unfortunately have to privatise Health, Education, ACC, Kiwibank, Kiwirail…

  41. monkey boy 42

    I’m interested in this Tanya thing. Is it another poster who is male pretending to be a woman, or a previous poster with a new name? yo appear to have ‘something’ on him/her.
    Two issues; one is of privacy, the second is about blackmailing someone to suppresscomment.
    Put up or shut up rob and you too ‘Tanya’.
    Rob – your attitude comes across like a bully-boy, and begs the question, how do you ‘know’ if Tanya is misrepresenting him/herself, and also what gives you the right to exploit this info?

  42. Monkey boy – I’ve got something on lots of people (including you) and I am a bully. HTFU.

    [Tane: Sod, pull your head in.]

  43. max 44

    The incisive debate continues, not.

  44. sod, can you cool it? people have a right to privacy when they comment on a blog

  45. Billy 46

    Did anyone hear Cullen on morning report? Very slippery indeed. Resused about four times to answer whether Labour were behind the covert tapings, answering instead that he didn’t know the identity of the person who did the taping. Quite intentionally not the same thing.

    This really is a beat up of monumental proportions.

  46. coge 47

    Perhaps someone here will answer this question. Do Labour sanction the use of taped private conversations of political opponents?

  47. Billy 48

    And I notice on their 9 o’clock news bulletin, National Radio are reporting the story with the focus on who is behind the taping.

    I once played a game of soccer in which we scored a 30 metre own goal (‘keeper at the edge of the box, central defender spoon-foots over his head, one bounce, goal). This remarkable effort may just have been bested.

  48. Billy 49

    For what is “HTFU” an acronym?

  49. Billy, Cullen said he has no idea who recorded the tape.

    don’t pretend there’s some moral issue around the recording, hell even Key said ‘we’re on record 24 hours a day’ – it’s a fair cop, politicians shouldn’t be saying one thing to their supporters and another to the public

  50. Classic Crosy Textor repsonse: dont address the issue, shoot the messenger, act like nothings wrong and then press home that ‘New Zealand sucks’.

  51. Billy 52

    “don’t pretend there’s some moral issue around the recording…”

    Better tell Radio New Zealand.

    I have no doubt Cullen does not know the identity of the person who made the recording. That is not the same thing as not knowing that the recording was planned as a strategy. Cullen’s insistence on answering the question as if he were being asked who the person was, when he was really being asked did he or the Labour Party have any involvement in procuring the recording, tends to show that Labour are behind it.

    And Smith’s comments were hardly earth shattering. Was I invited to vote for Labour last election on their policy of buying back rail? Or their policy of extending Kiwisaver?

  52. Billy 53

    And whose strategy is it, leftrightout, to covertly tape private conversations at cocktail parties. Maybe there’s someone worse than Crosby Textor directing Labour’s strategy. Come

  53. coge 54

    Steve, can you please answer my question. The evidence is compelling, your willingness to sanction this activity is demonstrated in your posts of yesterday. I will speculate that you appear to be part of the pro-Labour apparatus. So on the surface
    it looks as though elements of Labour do wholeheartedly approve of the taping of opponents private conversations.

    [lprent: Coge – don’t be a ignorant dipshit. Steve has publically said before that he is more likely to vote Green than Labour.

    I think it is a bloody good idea that the hypocrites in the Nat’s are pulled up on the difference between what they say in public vs what they say in private. Writers on this site have been pointing out that is probably the case forever, based on the revelations in the Hollow Men. Looks like that has been confirmed by someone. Doesn’t look like the Nat’s have changed much – they still look shifty. Now I consider that is good information for the public to know.

    As far as I’m concerned Steve or anyone else can put posts up about this. I sanction it – if you have a problem with that then I can sanction you not being here – clear? If you take that tone (trying to tell a writer what they can post) here again, you will find out what I have a reputation of being a bastard at times.]

  54. Vanilla Eis 55

    Billy: I think the point is that Labour never ruled out the prospect of buying back rail – they’ve had a history of re-nationalising struggling infrastructure (such as Air New Zealand), and extending Kiwisaver wasn’t something wholly unexpected from them.

    National seem to be deliberately hiding some policy because they think it won’t be liked by the public, and we can’t look at the previous things they’ve done in power as a guide for what to expect – or would you like us to look more closely at the 90’s? Half of Nationals front bench was in power then too…

  55. lprent 56

    Do Labour sanction the use of taped private conversations of political opponents?

    I also wonder who did the same thing to the NZLP congress earlier this year with Mike Williams. Perhaps coge, as a National supporter/member, you could tell me if National sanctioned the use of taped closed sessions of political opponents.

    I think I’m the only known member of the NZLP of the writers on the standard. I didn’t “sanction” it – but I think it is a good idea. As Steve said – parties should not be telling their supporters one thing in private and then putting a completely different emphasis/policies in public. That is what makes politicians to look so damn shifty and unreliable.

    Could be NZF supporters. Could be green supporters. Could be anyone – could be disaffected Nat’s or Act – who knows?

    I suspect that activists of some persuasion did it off their own bat. Frankly journo’s do not seem to have the abilities to do this in NZ. Politicians tend to be too reluctant. It is left to activists to find out what is really going on, to do the blogs, to do the investigations, and to generally make sure that the public does get the information they need. Who cares if a few politicians get caught on the way through.

    They must have been pretty convincing.

  56. Aj 57

    I guess Lockwood will say he is guilty of ‘loose’ talk too. The question is, where now is the credibility of English and Smith.

    What is loose talk? is it lying? is it saying things that you don’t want heard by other people? is it being careless and letting your innermost thoughts slip out? {think Mel Gibson}

    I don’t think English/Smith want us to think they were lying or bullshitting, as it were. If they want us to think that then their political crdibility is gone.

    No, I think English just said exactly what he thinks and the expression ‘loose talk’ is just a smokescreen he’s trying to hide behind.

  57. Billy, I wouldnt be surprised if it was someone from within the party itself, just like the ‘hacked’ emails. You give National too much credit if you think that their party is full of loyal members who’ll stand by their leader.

  58. Billy 59

    leftrightout,

    Maybe you’re right. But then, why did Cullen go to such lengths to say he didn’t know who the person was (when that wasn’t what he was being asked)? If Labour had no involvement, Cullen could have avoided looking so slippery by just saying Labour had nothing to do with it.

  59. “And whose strategy is it, leftrightout, to covertly tape private conversations at cocktail parties. Maybe there’s someone worse than Crosby Textor directing Labour’s strategy”

    I suspect that even the commenters here are going to frame some of their comments as “misspeech” soon. Covertly taping conversations may not be honourable, but how many National voters would condemn Bill Sutch who was entrapped through similar circumstances?

    Secondly, as has been already suggested, this was arguably a response to the mole within the Labour conference who recorded Mike William’s comments.

    While Billy might think it is stock and trade, and even legitimate for politicians to blatantly lie to voters, many voters, including I, want to observe a higher standard of honesty and transparency in government. It’s certainly easier to run down, and downsize government if you have politicians there who don’t act in the public interest.

  60. coge 61

    Iprent. Of course peoples voting habits & memberships are their own business. What goes on in the polling booth usually stays there. I don’t belong to any political party & have not yet decided which party or candidate I will cast my vote for.

    “I didn’t “sanction it” – but I think it’s a good idea”

    Perhaps “tacit approval” would better describe your support of using taped private conversations of opponents? By your own admission you are part of your parties apparatus. And witness SP’s
    willingness to publish edited transcripts yesterday.

    The remaining evidence is equally compelling as to who or what is sanctioning this activity. Clearly Labour ministers & the PM have not been targeted. I’m sure that would make for interesting coverage. But you won’t see this, as most kiwis are fair-minded with unspoken morals. Good people would never even entertain such ideas. Clearly there is someone or more likely some political group
    with a barrow to push. The electorate deserves to have this cleared up, as the evidence does point to Labour right now.

    [lprent: Don’t be daft – I spend $15 per year to be a member. I have zero/nada/no position in the NZLP apart from being an enthusiastic volunteer for various tasks when I have time. I will admit to having wound up as a branch secretary in the past before I left that to people who like to organise.

    I’d say that Mike Williams was targeted at conference earlier this year when he was taped – perhaps you have forgotten about that? Or was that a legitimate target in your rather confused mind – was that ‘moral’?

    Presumably that tape carried other conversation as well – just nothing that was newsworthy. Does that say something about the relative levels of public/private hypocrisy between the parties?]

  61. lprent 62

    Billy – I heard part of that interview. It sounded to me like the interviewer made an assertion that it was labour party people or activists or something. Cullen said that he didn’t know who made the tape.

    The interviewer then made the same assertion several times again, and Cullen said that he didn’t know who did make the tape.

    So technically you are correct. The question wasn’t asked. Of course that just means that the interviewer was trying to be slippery by not asking the question, and trying to pass it off as an assertion.

    It souynded like whoever was doing the interviews was one of the more obnoxious fwit commentators off KiwiBlog. They try to use that same technique on the basis that if you make an assertion enough it may magically become true.

  62. Pascal's bookie 63

    The perfectly legal but dastardly spying plan wouldn’t have come to much if senior Nat MP’s agreed that the National party under Key was a new beast.

    But they don’t, so it’s news. What’s the problem?

  63. Draco TB 64

    I would dispute that conversations that take place “in house’ are anything but private.

    HC makes a good point about public life here.
    As Prime Minister Helen Clark said of Mr English being caught out: “That’s public life isn’t it – we live in a goldfish bowl. There always a possibility that anything we say can get picked up, spun around and end up on the front page of the newspaper.”

    I don’t have any qualms about our politicians being recorded saying what they believe in at what could be considered in public hearing.

  64. Andrew 65

    Ok, lets go through this one at a time shall we.

    “There’s some bloody dead fish you have to swallow to get into Government to do the kinds of things you want to do and you have to balance up what really matters.’

    Ummm, nothing wrong with that statement. National would love to replace things like WFF with something better, but cant as all the public dont want to lose what they know.

    “If you try to do everything differently you’ll scare the horses and under MMP it’s very hard to win.’

    very true, you can’t come in all guns blazing and change everything. It would deffinately stare everyone.

    “Once we have gained the confidence of the people, we’ve got more chance of doing more things.’

    Once again, no rocket science there. Once people realise you are not the monster that Labour portrays they trust you to make decisions for them and do what’s right for them.

    “We may be able to do some things we believe we need to do, perhaps go through a discussion document process you wouldn’t be able to do them straight off. I’m hoping that we’ll do some useful things that way, that may not be policy right now.’

    And finally, what’s so wrong with that paragraph … “perhaps go through a discussion document process” i think thats the key line of the paragraph.

    JESUS … JUST WHERE IS THE HIDDEN ADGENDA??? IM FU**ED IF I CAN SEE IT IN THOSE QUOTES!!!!

    Once again, it’s the lovely sensationalist media twisting the story round to make it sound worse than it is.

    [lprent: I’d suggest that you avoid using that first line (and others like it). I view it as a particular type of trolling used in KB that attempts to state assertions as facts. Just state your opinion – don’t try and dress it up into anything more. ]

  65. Pascal's bookie 66

    Coge, if there was no recording and the questioner relayed the converstation to a journo, would that be spying?

    The reason I ask is that I’m trying to find out what the problem is here.

    Is it that Nat Mp’s were tricked into saying things that they would rather not have the public hear? (Which is very close to a very famous definition of what ‘news’ is.)

    Is it that evidence exists? Should the politicians simply be allowed to claim they never said it, when they did.

    Is it that the public are aware?

    Those are all good things in my view.

  66. Daveski 67

    I tend to agree with Andrew that while the comments will sell shift some product, it’s not like there is a *detailed* hidden agenda – just core beliefs.

    I also – much to my surprise – agree with HC’s comments about the goldfish. I thought she showed a good touch there – rather than politicising it further, she made what I think is a sensible observation about the need to say what you say in public in private … or is it the other way around??

    I really don’t like the way this is going. Perhaps when the phony war is over and the election proper is underway, then we can get on to substantive matters. It’s all assumptions and supposition at present.

  67. coge 68

    So three or four posters (by their own admissions)approve of the taping of political opponents private conversation. (not interviews with journalists or reporters which are public conversations & are often released to the media)

    Is this a common practice by Govts in democratic countries?

    [lprent: What ? I haven’t heard anyone apart from yourself suggesting that any government body has done it. Shall I add you to my mental list of conspiracy theorists?

    From the quality of the recording on the TV1/3 sites, I’d say that it wasn’t particularly good equipment. Way too much background noise. I’d suspect that spooks would have better gear than that. So for that matter should journo’s – but I’ve heard some pretty bad tape from them in the past.

    Sounded like DSE level gear.]

  68. Felix 69

    Andrew that’s one interpretation, a generous one but perfectly valid.

    A more skeptical listener might take more notice of the context – that is: who the speaker was, his known political views, the nature of his likely policy desires contrasted against his party’s public position, his history of honesty/dishonesty etc.

    Then a far less generous (and equally valid) reading may emerge.

    Don’t you think it’s a little naive to remove all context from a statement and take it purely at face value?

    Perhaps it depends on the length of your political memory. Not many who were of age when Dr Smith last presided over a govt portfolio would give him much credit for speaking plainly and honestly.

    edit: coge, why do you keep saying it’s the gummint who are taping people?

  69. Andrew 70

    Dont panic lprent, just portraying my exasperation at the media/labour beat up on the so called ‘Hidden Agenda’ at the moment.

    Face it … there is no hidden agenda, i challenge anyone to show proof of otherwise. There is nothing in the two conversations of anything hidden. Labour has been more guilty of a hidden agenda than national.

    anyhoo, thats my 2 cents worth. keep on fishing. You had better warm up the opposition benches for when they belong to you.

    [lprent: I wasn’t looking at the content of the comment – just the format. It is a particular annoyance of mine because it usually leads to flamewars.
    You will probably find that some people here think differently about the relative agenda’s – but that can wait until I’m out of the BOFH role. ]

  70. Ari 71

    Did I not say that in the long term, C/T-style campaign tactics bite in the ass? I believe this is my opportunity to give Lew a big old “told you so” 🙂

  71. coge 72

    Felix, I haven’t said “the gummint is doing it”, but saying on the surface, the evidence lends itself to certain conclusions.
    I am willing to accept, however, a strident denouncement of such tactics from the Government. If such a statement ever occurs.

    I would like to thank Iprent for his or her forebearance, as I prefer posting here to say Kiwiblog where most of the posting is about mutual agreement. For now I prefer to be in the thick of it.

    [lprent: Yep – you’re usually quite an effective commentator, which of course gets you forbearance. But if you are saying government, then you’d better clarify exactly what you are referring to – spooks?. ]

  72. Andrew 73

    “Don’t you think it’s a little naive to remove all context from a statement and take it purely at face value?”

    Why not? neither you nor i was there so we don’t know the context of the conversation so we can only take it at face value.

    I am old enough to remember enough governments back to the 70’s. The national government of today is not the national government of the 80’s and 90’s. A lot of the core principals remain, but the extremist views have been all but eradicated.

    Much the same as the extreme socialist views of some in the Labour government have been watered down as well.

    whats wrong with a flatter tax structure? reducing compliance costs? give the people back more of their own money and let them decide what they want to spend it on.

    Why should i spend 1,000’s of dollars furthering my career to get a better paid job, only to be demonised by society for “earning too much”. remember 20% of the population pay 90% of the tax.

  73. Felix 74

    Let’s pretend you didn’t say “national government of today” as I’m sure you were mis-speaking 😉

    The point I was making Andrew was that if you indeed remember Dr Smith when he was in govt then you will inevitably apply certain filters to what he says as he has a proven track record of deceit.

    This is the context I referred to, not the idea that you had to be there and hear it for yourself – just that some people’s words demand very close scrutiny based on their record – and if you accept the word of someone with Dr Smith’s record you are by definition naive.

    As for “extremist views have been all but eradicated” from the Nats, can you demonstrate where this has been the case?

    As far as I can see, the extremists are all still there – especially on the front bench. To name a few there’s the two Smiths, McCully, Williamson, English, Brownlee, Ryall et al. A few moderate, centrist Nats have left but the hard-liners are all still there.

    Unless you’re suggesting that these seasoned tough right-wing political operators have all had some kind of life changing experience and no longer believe the same things they always have then your statement just doesn’t hold any water.

    The last two paragraphs of your comment are just standard Act-troll fare and don’t really warrant further comment except to wonder why you brought them up. Not really on topic but obviously the reason 20% of the population pay 90% of the tax (if those figures are accurate) is that they have well over 90% of the money. You’re smarter than that Andrew, don’t lower the discussion.

  74. Felix 75

    coge: I thought when you said

    “Is this a common practice by Govts in democratic countries?”

    you were implying that you believed the gummint here was involved.

    lprent: Yes the audio is pretty rough, could even be from a cellphone or similar device. Even budget recording gear (say a portable minidisc and a concealed lapel mic) can produce much better covert recordings.

    Of course that depends on the user knowing how to best use the gear which probably rules out spooks as well – you’d expect them to know what they were doing.

  75. Draco TB 76

    @ coge:
    When you become a politician then almost all of what you say becomes public because the public need to know. Both HC and JK have said something to this effect so going around complaining, like JK is, about these things happening is a little precious. If you don’t like it then don’t become a politician.

  76. Scribe 77

    I was overseas in 2002, and I couldn’t find the answer using a google search, so this is a genuine question.

    Did Labour campaign on the passage of the Prostitution Reform Act and the Civil Union Act in the 2002 election campaign?

  77. Scribe 78

    Sorry, that should have been 1999 for the PRA; it was introduced in 2000.

  78. r0b 79

    Scribe: Did Labour campaign on the passage of the Prostitution Reform Act and the Civil Union Act

    I don’t recall. But for the sake of argument assume that they didn’t. Your point would be that Labour did something they didn’t campaign on, har har gotcha it’s just the same.

    But it isn’t the same at all. The PRA and CUA were not major election issues that Labour made very clear statements on, and then when on to do the opposite.

    Here’s what we are looking at with National. Very clear statements (sadly lies) about preserving Labour’s KiwiBank, Working for Families etc. But speaking to the faithful their people are caught telling the truth. The real agenda is privatisation and the gutting of social services. Same old Nats.

  79. “So three or four posters (by their own admissions)approve of the taping of political opponents private conversation. (not interviews with journalists or reporters which are public conversations & are often released to the media) ”

    If you think that Ian Wishart’s off the record interview with John Tamihere was fine and acceptable, yet disapprove of National politicians being recorded against their knowledge, then you are simnply revealed as the party hack you are.

  80. Lukas 81

    only difference is that Wisharts was on the record. I have heard the voice mail of JT asking Ian not to print the story once it was already at the printers

  81. How is this a private conversation? You’ve got two public figures, talking at an event where people try don’t know including National party members, town hall staff memebers and media are present, with people milling around… this is a public conversation. It is not English and Smith having a conversation with family or friends in the privacy of their own homes.

    Moreover, what matters is what was said, not where it was said.

  82. Scribe. Not everything you do in a term in power has to be pre-announced before the election, new things come up – things like the Prostitution Reform Act, which was a private members’ bill and was a conscience vote ( members of both Labour and National voted for and against it), or the EFA which was a response to information that emerged after the 2005 campaign.

    What isn’t OK is to have policy, have plans for what you will do in government before the election, and not tell the public. That’s a secret agenda.

  83. coge 84

    Let’s say for a minute that these recordings were made by a Labour Party activist, who had misrepresented themselves to get into the conference. Then the person had one on one (clearly private) conversations with some MPs, & recorded them without the MPs consent or knowledge. Then excerpts are selected/doctored & handed to TV3. Would you consider this a principled activity? If Labour do not sanction such activity, would it not be unreasonable for the activist to be hung out to dry by the party?
    If not why not?

    [lprent: Firstly I refer you to the tapes made in closed session at the labour congress and ask you the same questions.

    Secondly, I’m a labour party member and probably would be regarded as an activist.
    I do things for the NZLP when I can. However I also do things for myself (like this site). The NZLP doesn’t run my life, and can’t tell me to do anything.

    Thirdly, I’m also a member of Southern Cross, AA, insurance schemes, investment plans, etc. They can’t tell me what to do either.

    So why do you think that Labour Party can exert ANY control on any of their activists outside of the narrow confines of the labour party meetings? ]

  84. r0b 85

    Let’s say for a minute that these recordings were made by a Labour Party activist

    Hey coge – you first. Let’s say the same (made by a National activist etc) about the tapes made of Mike Williams at the Labour Party conference. Go ahead and answer your own questions….

  85. coge 86

    Iprent. Should a principled polictical party seek to publicly disassociate itself from said activist when they had been correctly identified? Absolutely they should, as the action could damage the partys reputation. We both know if the activist acted alone, & without prior knowledge or sanction of the party, nothing could be done to prevent it.

    rOb, you should already know how I feel about private coversations,
    ANYONES private conversations, being recorded without consent. It’s a violation the majority of us do not tolerate.

    If there is more to this story to come, I expect we won’t have to wait long to hear about it.

  86. Anita 87

    coge,

    What makes something a private conversation?

    In this case English, Smith1 and Smith2 were talking in a crowded room. They were surrounded by people who could overhear the conversation, many of whom they did not know.

    Where is the line between a private conversation and a public one?

  87. coge 88

    Anita. Ultimately it is a matter of intention of the MP speaking. In these cases I believe it is likely that these conversations were one on one, or in very small groups. What is clear is the media were not being addressed. The MPs were not informed that they were being recorded, or who was doing the recording. Or that the recordings would have excerpts edited & handed to TV3.
    So I contend, as far as the MPs were concerned, they had some expectation of frank privacy.

    At this point there is media interest, so hopefully the true facts will enlighten us in the coming days.

    However you look at it, I cannot see how it could be seen as anything more than unprincipled behaviour from someone afforded an expectation of basic human trust. Please don’t tell me you agree with such activities.

  88. Anita 89

    coge,

    Would it make it more/less ok for you if the person recording was one of the people in the conversation?

    How about if they person who went to the media had overheard the conversation and repeated it without recording it?

    How about if the retelling was Nat-to-Nat? (“I was at the conference last week and I heard Bill saying … he’s so right!!”)

    If I was at a crowded cocktail party and said something indiscreet which was overheard and retold to a client or competitor I would consider it to be absolutely my fault. Shouldn’t I?

  89. coge 90

    Anita it’s not an issue of heresay, chinese whispers or other innuendo. It is a matter of intention. Someone, in all likelyhood, misrepresented themselves, entered a political opponents convention in the possession of a recording device. They then abused the position of unspoken trust they had been given. Their intention, through subsequent events, was very clear from the time they entered the venue.

    Again I ask, do you give this your approval?

  90. Anita 91

    coge,

    I don’t know enough about what happened to approve or disapprove.

    To come back to something we don’t have enough information about… you have said that your problem with the recording is that it was a private conversation.

    I have asked what makes it a private conversation – particularly given that it was a crowded space full of people who were not personally known to English, Smith1 or Smith2. You (I think) have said that it’s a private conversation because E/S1/S2 intended it to be a private conversation.

    So if I’m at a crowded cocktail party discussing work with a colleague in a way that can be overheard by anyone standing nearby, is it a private conversation? If I want it to be private does that make it private? If someone overhears my conversation and tells someone else about isn’t it my fault for being indiscreet?

  91. If this is illegal then Target is f*cked. It is so the “stolen” emails all over again. Let’s hope this time that the media look past teh misdirection…

  92. Oh and didn’t Key say it was just a consequence of being a public figure when it was Bill that was caught out?

    Or maybe it just took a day to get Crosby Textor over to do damage control…

Links to post

Recent Comments

Recent Posts

  • Candidate Survey: Western Bay of Plenty – Local Body Elections 2019
    We surveyed candidates on their attitudes to issues facing the Western Bay Region, find out what they think: “Closing the Gap” Tauranga, one of the area groups of Income Equality Aotearoa NZ Inc., has surveyed all candidates in the three local body elections to discover attitudes to some basic issues ...
    Closing the GapBy Tracey Sharp
    23 mins ago
  • Project Nettie calls on scientists to defend biology
    Please spread widely, and sign, to support science and rationalism over the new irrationalism sweeping universities and institutions.  PROJECT NETTIE Sexual reproduction, the generation of offspring by fusion of genetic material from two different individuals, evolved over 1 billion years ago. It is the reproductive strategy of all higher animals ...
    RedlineBy Daphna
    2 hours ago
  • I’m glad I don’t live in Auckland
    Just when I was thinking that Palmerston North's mayoral race (which includes a convicted child molester / public wanker and a convicted child beater) was the worst in the country, Auckland mayoral candidate John Tamihere opened his mouth:Auckland mayoral candidate John Tamihere is being slammed for using the words "sieg ...
    No Right TurnBy Idiot/Savant
    2 hours ago
  • Index of Power Update, 2018-19: China #2
    We reprint below an article from the excellent website the Economics of Imperialism by Tony Norfield This is an update of the statistics for my Index of Power, using data for 2018-19 and discussing what a country’s ranking reflects. The major change is that China’s rank has shifted up and ...
    RedlineBy Daphna
    3 hours ago
  • Climate Change: A history lesson
    Why is New Zealand climate change policy so crap? The Herald this morning has a long article on the twists and turns of climate change policy in New Zealand [paywalled / depaywall script], which shows where we've been. The short version is that the government first began worrying about this ...
    No Right TurnBy Idiot/Savant
    5 hours ago
  • What the All Blacks Mean to Us
    The All Blacks have been, for more than a century, arguably the most successful International sports team in the world. But they are more than that; even for those Kiwis who are immune to the charms of rugby (and there are more than a few), the All Blacks are ambassadors ...
    Bryan GouldBy Bryan Gould
    7 hours ago
  • No one is born into the wrong body
    A short and incredibly powerful speech from a young lesbian woman. No one is born in the wrong body. ...
    RedlineBy Daphna
    24 hours ago
  • Contempt
    Back in June, the UK Court of Appeal ruled that that country's continued arms sales to Saudi Arabia were unlawful. So you'd expect that the UK government stopped approving them, right?Of course not:The government has apologised for breaching a court ruling against the sale of weapons to Saudi Arabia that ...
    No Right TurnBy Idiot/Savant
    1 day ago
  • Covering up the cover-up
    Yesterday NZDF officials were put on the stand about the lies they had told over Operation Burnham, making implausible claims that it was all a big mistake. But along the way, we learned they had already been put on the spot about it by a previous Defence Minister, who had ...
    No Right TurnBy Idiot/Savant
    1 day ago
  • Not as important as they think they are
    Farmers have been whining a lot lately, about the methane targets in the Zero Carbon Bill, about Canterbury's proposed nitrogen limits, and about the government's new proposals to stop them from shitting in our lakes and rivers. These policies are "throwing farmers under the tractor", they will force farmers off ...
    No Right TurnBy Idiot/Savant
    1 day ago
  • Behind Every Good Woman Should Stand – Another Good Woman.
    Alone, Alone, All, All, Alone: To argue that the Prime Minister is the victim of her advisers’ failure to keep her informed may offer Jacinda some measure of exoneration – but only at the cost of casting her as a hopeless political ingénue. A star-dusted muppet, whose only purpose is to ...
    1 day ago
  • Poor quality, poorly educated kiddie ‘Journalists’ spreading fake news
    In times of hysteria about the “World coming to an end” and “rising sea levels” so-called ‘Journalists’ who can barely spell words longer than four letters are having a ball! Though the majority of the Public have worked out that manmade climate change is nothing short of pseudo-science, and the ...
    An average kiwiBy admin@averagekiwi.com
    1 day ago
  • Chris Trotter on the BFD
    I don't want to give pblicity to certain parts of the internet that are better left to fester in their own irrelevance (I know, a bit like this place) but the listing of Chris Trotter as a 'author' on Cameron Slater's spinoff website, the BFD requires some explanation.Now, I don't ...
    2 days ago
  • Sex is not a spectrum
    The text below is a Twitter thread by Heather Heying that explains the essence of sexual reproduction and it long evolutionary history. She is an evolutionary biologist and a “professor-in-exile” after she and her husband, Bret Weinstein, stood up to supporters of an enforced “Day of Absence” for white staff and teachers ...
    RedlineBy Daphna
    2 days ago
  • Climate Change: Trees, aviation, and offsets
    With crunch time for new Zealand climate policy approaching, most of the New Zealand media have got on board with a global reporting effort to cover the issue. There's one strand of stories today about polling and what it shows about changing public attitudes to the crisis, but the strand ...
    No Right TurnBy Idiot/Savant
    2 days ago
  • Pissing-Off The Israelis Is A High-Risk Strategy.
    Dangerous Foes: For those readers of Bowalley Road who feel disposed to dismiss any prospect of an Israeli destabilisation of New Zealand politics, the example of the United Kingdom repays close attention. Ever since the election of Jeremy Corbyn as leader of the British Labour Party, the Israelis have sanctioned, funded and ...
    2 days ago
  • Something to go to in Wellington
    Make It 16, the youth-led campaign to lower New Zealand's voting age, is holding an official campaign launch at Parliament this Friday from 16:30. If you'd like to attend, you can register using EventBrite here. ...
    No Right TurnBy Idiot/Savant
    2 days ago
  • A founding member responds to Peace Action Wellington
    by Don Franks It was a lovely sunny Wellington afternoon with blue skies above  the beaches.  In Courtenay Place, political activists packed out a stuffy upstairs room for an important meeting. The assembled pacifists, anarchists, communists and independent young radicals of Peace Action Wellington felt the need for a mission ...
    RedlineBy Admin
    2 days ago
  • “Mistakes and errors”
    Current and former NZDF top brass are being publicly grilled this week by the hit and run inquiry over their public responses to allegations of civilian casualties. Previously, they've claimed there were no casualties, a position which led them to lie to Ministers and to the public. Now, they're saying ...
    No Right TurnBy Idiot/Savant
    2 days ago
  • “Homosexuality is same-sex attraction and relationships, not heterosexuals with delusions of gende...
    by Rafael D. Quiles (gender-critical gay man from Puerto Rico) The writing on the wall is right in people’s faces and people just don’t see it or don’t want to. What could actually possess a heterosexual male to want to feminize himself and claim that he is a lesbian? Because ...
    RedlineBy Admin
    3 days ago
  • Trump: “Where’s my favourite dictator?”
    From the Wall Street Journal:Inside a room of the ornately decorated Hotel du Palais during last month’s Group of Seven summit in Biarritz, France, President Trump awaited a meeting with Egyptian President Abdel Fattah Al Sisi. Mr. Trump looked over a gathering of American and Egyptian officials and called out in ...
    3 days ago
  • Magdalen Burns, 1983-2019, fighter for women’s liberation
    by the Redline blog collective At Redline we are very saddened to hear of the death of Magdalen Burns who passed away on the morning of Friday, September 13 (British time). Magdalen was a great fighter for the rights of women in general and lesbian women in particular, a defender ...
    RedlineBy Admin
    4 days ago
  • Parliament and the Executive
    The Brexit issue has certainly brought with it a series of apparently difficult constitutional issues, many of them concerning the respective roles of the executive and parliament. Most of them arise because of the unwillingness of MPs, despite their professions to the contrary, to be bound by a constitutional rarity ...
    Bryan GouldBy Bryan Gould
    4 days ago
  • The Abigail Article; Martyn Bradbury’s Article, and My Response
    . . This blogpost is different to my usual format of reporting on issues… Since July 1011, I have blogged on a variety of political issues; near always political and/or environmental; mostly highly critical of the previous National Government. Other issues included Israeli occupation of Palestinian lands and repression of ...
    Frankly SpeakingBy Frank Macskasy
    4 days ago
  • Police will have to wear silly Buckingham Palace hats from now on, says Police Minister
    Those close to the Police Minister believe the initiative may be the result of Nash “seeing a great deal” on AliExpress. In a move that comes seemingly out of nowhere, Police Minister Stuart Nash announced this afternoon that he expects all frontline staff to don bearskin hats, famously worn by ...
    The CivilianBy admin
    5 days ago
  • A sensible crackdown
    The government has released its Arms Legislation Bill, containing the second tranche of changes to gun laws following the March 15 massacre. And it all looks quite sensible: a national gun register, higher penalties for illegal possession and dealing, tighter restrictions on arms dealers and shooting clubs, and a shorter ...
    No Right TurnBy Idiot/Savant
    5 days ago
  • California bans private prisons
    Private prisons are a stain on humanity. Prison operators explicitly profit from human misery, then lobby for longer prisons terms so they can keep on profiting. And in the US, prison companies run not only local and state prisons, but also Donald Trump's immigration concentration camps. Faced with this moral ...
    No Right TurnBy Idiot/Savant
    5 days ago
  • Why PPPs are a bad idea
    When National was in power, they were very keen on Public-Private Partnerships (PPPs) - basicly, using private companies to finance public infrastructure as a way of hiding debt from the public. They were keen on using them for everything - roads, schools, hospitals. But as the UK shows, that "service" ...
    No Right TurnBy Idiot/Savant
    5 days ago
  • A Movement That No Longer Moves.
    Moving And Shaking: There was a time when people spoke matter-of-factly about the “labour movement” – a political phenomenon understood to embrace much more than the Labour Party. Included within the term’s definition was the whole trade union movement – many of whose members looked upon the Labour Party as ...
    5 days ago
  • NZ ‘left’ politically embracing extreme postmodernism
    by Philip Ferguson Much of the left, even people who formally identify as marxists, have collapsed politically in the face of postmodern gender theory of the sort pioneered by American philosopher Judith Butler. For Butler even biological sex is socially constructed. “If the immutable character of sex is contested, perhaps ...
    RedlineBy Daphna
    6 days ago
  • The obvious question
    The media is reporting that the (alleged) Labour party sexual assaulter has resigned from their job at Parliament, which means hopefully he won't be turning up there making people feel unsafe in future. Good. But as with everything about this scandal, it just raises other questions. Most significantly: why the ...
    No Right TurnBy Idiot/Savant
    6 days ago
  • The moment I found out that you found out, I acted swiftly
    By Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern I am every bit as angry as you are. I am every bit as disappointed as you must be. The people with power, oversight and the ability to do something about these processes within the Labour Party should be ashamed. Whoever those people are, I ...
    The CivilianBy admin
    6 days ago
  • This is why people hate property developers
    Property developers think there is an "oversupply" of houses in Auckland:High turnover rates and falling prices may be a sign that there are too many new houses going in to some parts of Auckland, commentators say. [...] Property developer David Whitburn said there was a "bit of an oversupply" in ...
    No Right TurnBy Idiot/Savant
    6 days ago
  • Australia to Pacific: “Fuck you, you can all drown”
    World leaders are meeting in New York in two weeks for the 2019 Climate Action Summit, where they are expected to announce new and more ambitious targets to stop the world from burning. But the Australian Prime Minister won't be there, despite being in the USA at the time:Scott Morrison ...
    No Right TurnBy Idiot/Savant
    6 days ago
  • Implausible ignorance
    Labour Party president Nigel Haworth resigned yesterday over the party's sexual assault scandal. But while that's good news, its unlikely to take away the stench of a coverup. Because according to Paula Bennett in Parliament yesterday, pretty much everyone in the Prime Minister's office was involved as well:I have been ...
    No Right TurnBy Idiot/Savant
    6 days ago
  • Labour’s Fatal Flaw.
     Two-Faced? Labour insiders' commitment to the neoliberal status quo puts them at odds with their party’s membership; its trade union affiliates; and a majority of Labour voters, but this only serves to strengthen the perception they have of themselves as a special elite. Among the lesser breeds, they’ll talk up a ...
    6 days ago
  • Ten reasons the Tories do NOT want an election
    There has been a lot of talk about Boris Johnson wanting an election, and he has blustered with great gusto about 'chicken' Jeremy Corbyn refusing one, but I think there are many reasons why he is secretly glad he has been refused the opportunity:The Tories are an utter rabble,tearing themselves ...
    7 days ago
  • Prorogation Illegal, rule Scottish judges
    Scottish appeal court judges have declared that Boris Johnson’s decision to suspend parliament in the run-up to the October Brexit deadline is unlawful. The three judges, chaired by Lord Carloway, Scotland’s most senior judge, overturned an earlier ruling that the courts did not have the powers to interfere in the prime ...
    7 days ago
  • Let me explain what I meant by Everyday New Zealanders
    By Simon Bridges. The following is a press release from the office of Simon Bridges, leader of The National Party. Key ora, New Zealand. Happy Maori Language Week. Look, I’m writing to you today because I want to clear something up. There’s been a lot of kerfuffle around some things ...
    The CivilianBy admin
    7 days ago
  • Yes, the SIS is subject to the Public Records Act
    I understand there's some stuff going round about how the SIS "was removed from the list of public offices covered by the Public Records Act in 2017". The context of course being their records derived from US torture, which will be disposed of or sealed. The good news is that ...
    No Right TurnBy Idiot/Savant
    7 days ago
  • An evidence-based discussion of the Canadian fluoride/IQ study
    Dr. Christopher Labos and Jonathan Jarry discuss the recent Canadian fluoride/IQ research. They provide an expert analysis of the paper and its problems. Click on image to go to podcast. The critical debate about the recent ...
    1 week ago
  • Climate Change: Australia in denial
    Australia is burning down again, and meanwhile its natural disaster minister is denying climate change:Australia’s minister responsible for drought and natural disasters, David Littleproud, has said that he doesn’t “know if climate change is manmade”. Clarifying earlier comments that the question is “irrelevant” when considering the Coalition government’s response to ...
    No Right TurnBy Idiot/Savant
    1 week ago
  • Philippines activist speaking on the Duterte tyranny
    Auckland Philippines Solidarity is excited to host Professor Judy Taguiwalo for a speaking tour of NZ in September. She is a well-known activist in the Philippines and was a political prisoner under the Marcos dictatorship. Professor Taguiwalo briefly served as a Cabinet member under President Duterte but was forced from ...
    RedlineBy Daphna
    1 week ago
  • Disgust
    I have no special insights to offer on the Labour sexual assault coverup. All I have is disgust. Disgust that an organisation could fail its people so badly. Disgust that they punished the victims rather than the perpetrator. Disgust that its party hacks are apparently blaming the victims for demanding ...
    No Right TurnBy Idiot/Savant
    1 week ago
  • Speak Up for Women calls out Greens’ censorship
    This open letter to the Green Party was penned after an opinion piece by Jill Abigail, a feminist and founding member of the party, was censored by the Greens’ leadership. (Redline has reprinted her article here).The intolerance of the Green Party leaders and their acceptance of the misogyny of gender ...
    RedlineBy Daphna
    1 week ago
  • Member’s Day: End of Life Choice, part 3
    Today is a Member's day, and David Seymour's End of Life Choice Bill continues its slow crawl through its committee stage. They're spending the whole day on it today, though the first hour is likely to be spent on voting left over from last time. After that they'll move on ...
    No Right TurnBy Idiot/Savant
    1 week ago
  • Flight to Los Angeles turned back after passengers decide they don’t want to go anymore
    An ambitious plan to fly to Los Angeles petered out into a brief sight-seeing trip and a desire to return home and get some sleep before work tomorrow. Air New Zealand has confirmed a flight to Los Angeles last night was turned back about a quarter of the way into ...
    The CivilianBy admin
    1 week ago
  • Indigenous Futures: defuturing and futuring – an analytical framework for policy development?
    There appears to be consensus – by omission – that the concept of indigenous futures should be accepted at face value. So I scavenged the internet to see if I could locate an academic descriptor or a framework around how we think about it as a concept, and whether it ...
    EllipsisterBy Ellipsister
    1 week ago
  • Cadbury rumoured to be releasing the Pineapple Trump
    Here’s another novelty chocolate to shove in your gob, New Zealand Cadbury could be seeking to make itself great again with a rumoured new release: Pineapple Trumps, a spin on its classic chocolate-encased pineapple treat and do-it-yourself tooth remover. The global confectionery manufacturer and bumbling “before” character in an infomercial, ...
    The CivilianBy admin
    1 week ago
  • The coming resource war.
    During my time in the Pentagon I had the privilege of sitting down with military leaders and defence and security officials from a variety of Latin American nations. Sometimes I was present as a subordinate assistant to a senior US defence department official, sometimes as part of a delegation that ...
    KiwipoliticoBy Pablo
    1 week ago
  • Māori Language Week with The Civilian
    Kia ora, Aotearoa. It’s that magical time of year. Te Wiki o te Reo Māori. In English, the week that frightens talk radio. As you probably know by now, all your favourite media outlets are participating, some more successfully than others. Stuff has changed its name to Puna for the ...
    The CivilianBy admin
    1 week ago
  • Will Horizons act on climate change?
    Local body elections are coming up next month. And it looks like all Palmerston North candidates for Horizons (the Manawatu-Whanganui Regional Council) want to take action on climate change:Climate change is set to be a key issue in Palmerston North for the next three years if those wanting to get ...
    No Right TurnBy Idiot/Savant
    1 week ago
  • BORA reform is stalled
    Eighteen months ago, the government promised to strengthen the Bill of Rights Act, by explicitly affirming the power of the courts to issue declarations of inconsistency and requiring Parliament to formally respond to them. So how's that going? I was curious, so I asked for all advice about the proposal. ...
    No Right TurnBy Idiot/Savant
    1 week ago
  • Corbyn and Brexit
    As the Brexit saga staggers on, the focus is naturally enough on the Prime Minister and his attempts to achieve Brexit “do or die”. But the role played by the Leader of the Opposition is of almost equal interest and complexity. The first problem for Jeremy Corbyn is that he ...
    Bryan GouldBy Bryan Gould
    1 week ago
  • A ditch for him to die in
    Last week, English Prime Minister Boris Johnson boldly declared that he would rather die be dead in a ditch than delay Brexit. Unfortunately for him, the UK parliament accepted the challenge, and promptly dug one for him. The "rebellion bill" requires him to ask for and secure yet another temporary ...
    No Right TurnBy Idiot/Savant
    1 week ago
  • Warning! Warning! Danger Jacinda Ardern! Danger Marama Davidson! Warning!
    Lost In Political Space: The most important takeaway from this latest Labour sexual assault scandal, which (if I may paraphrase Nixon’s White House counsel’s, John Dean’s, infamous description of Watergate) is “growing like a cancer” on the premiership, is the Labour Party organisation’s extraordinary professional paralysis in the face of ...
    1 week ago
  • Union solidarity with Ihumatao land occupation
    by Daphna Whitmore Every Sunday for the past two months unionists from First Union, with supporters from other unions, have set out to the Ihumatao land protest, put up gazebos and gas barbeques, and cooked food for a few hundred locals and supporters who have come from across the country. ...
    RedlineBy Daphna
    1 week ago
  • Climate Change: The wrong kind of trees?
    Newsroom today has an excellent, in-depth article on pine trees as carbon sinks. The TL;DR is that pine is really good at soaking up carbon, but people prefer far-less efficient native forests instead. Which is understandable, but there's two problems: firstly, we've pissed about so long on this problem that ...
    No Right TurnBy Idiot/Savant
    1 week ago
  • No freedom of speech in Turkey
    Canan Kaftancioglu is a Turkish politician and member of the opposition Republican People's Party (CHP). Like most modern politicians, she tweets, and uses the platform to criticise the Turkish government. She has criticised them over the death of a 14-year-old boy who was hit by a tear gas grenade during ...
    No Right TurnBy Idiot/Savant
    1 week ago
  • Speaker: Tadhg Stopford: Why I’m standing for the ADHB
    Hi there, just call me Tim.We face tough problems, and I’d like to help, because there are solutions.An Auckand District Health Board member has nominated me for as a candidate for the ADHB, because her MS-related pain and fatigue is reduced with hemp products from Rotorua.  Nothing else helped her. If I ...
    1 week ago
  • Good little vassals
    The Inspector-General of Intelligence and Security has published their report on whether the SIS and GCSB had any complicity in American torture. And its damning. The pull quote is this:The Inquiry found both agencies, but to a much greater degree, the NZSIS, received many intelligence reports obtained from detainees who, ...
    No Right TurnBy Idiot/Savant
    1 week ago
  • Who Shall We Turn To When God, And Uncle Sam, Cease To Defend New Zealand?
    Bewhiskered Cassandra? Professor Hugh White’s chilling suggestion, advanced to select collections of academic, military and diplomatic Kiwi experts over the course of the past week, is that the assumptions upon which Australia and New Zealand have built their foreign affairs and defence policies for practically their entire histories – are ...
    1 week ago
  • The Politics of Opposition
    For most of the time I was a British MP, my party was out of government – these were the Thatcher years, when it was hard for anyone else to get a look-in. As a front-bencher and shadow minister, I became familiar with the strategies required in a parliamentary democracy ...
    Bryan GouldBy Bryan Gould
    1 week ago
  • More expert comments on the Canadian fluoride-IQ paper
    The Green et al (2019) fluoride/IQ is certainly controversial – as would be expected from its subject (see If at first you don’t succeed . . . statistical manipulation might help and Politics of science – making a silk purse out of a sow’s ear). Anti-fluoride campaigners have been actively promoting it ...
    1 week ago
  • The return to guerrilla war in Colombia
    by Gearóid Ó Loingsigh On August 29th a video in which veteran FARC (Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia) commander Iván Márquez announced that they had taken up arms again was released. There was no delay in the reaction to it, from longtime Liberal Party figure and former president Uribe, for ...
    RedlineBy Admin
    1 week ago
  • Air New Zealand identifies this enormous plot of unused land as possible second airport site
    Air New Zealand couldn’t believe its luck that this seemingly ideal piece of real estate had so far gone entirely unnoticed. Air New Zealand’s search for a site to build a second Auckland Airport may have made a breakthrough this afternoon, after employees scanning Google satellite imagery spotted a huge, ...
    The CivilianBy admin
    2 weeks ago
  • Redline on the Labour Party
    No-one on the anti-capitalist left in this country today puts forward a case that Labour is on the side of the working class.  There are certainly people who call themselves ‘socialist’ who do, but they are essentially liberals with vested interests in Labourism – often for career reasons. Nevertheless, there ...
    RedlineBy Admin
    2 weeks ago
  • New Fisk
    No Right TurnBy Idiot/Savant
    2 weeks ago
  • Labour’s failure
    When National was in government and fucking over the poor for the benefit of the rich, foodbanks were a growth industry. And now Labour is in charge, nothing has changed: A huge demand for emergency food parcels means the Auckland City Mission is struggling to prepare for the impending arrival ...
    No Right TurnBy Idiot/Savant
    2 weeks ago
  • Ardern attempts to vaccinate Clarke Gayford live on television to prove that it’s safe
    Gayford, pictured here on The Project, before things got wildly out of control. A bold public relations move by the Government to encourage parents to vaccinate their children has gone horribly wrong. Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern appeared on tonight’s episode of Three’s The Project, where the plan was for her ...
    The CivilianBy admin
    2 weeks ago
  • Has Mr. Whippy gone too far by parking on our front lawns?
    Mr. Whippy’s business model has driven it down a dark road of intimidation. Residents in major centres around the country are becoming disgruntled by the increasingly aggressive actions of purported ice cream company Mr. Whippy, who have taken to parking on people’s front lawns and doorsteps in a desperate attempt ...
    The CivilianBy admin
    2 weeks ago
  • Cleaning up the water
    Today the government released its Action Plan for Healthy Waterways, aimed at cleaning up our lakes and rivers. Its actually quite good. There will be protection for wetlands, better standards for swimming spots, a requirement for continuous improvement, and better standards for wastewater and stormwater. But most importantly, there's a ...
    No Right TurnBy Idiot/Savant
    2 weeks ago
  • Fronting up
    Today I appeared before the Environment Committee to give an oral submission on the Zero Carbon Bill. Over 1,500 people have asked to appear in person, so they've divided into subcommittees and are off touring the country, giving people a five minute slot each. The other submitters were a mixed ...
    No Right TurnBy Idiot/Savant
    2 weeks ago
  • Politics of science – making a silk purse out of a sow’s ear
    Anti-fluoride activists have some wealthy backers – they are erecting billboards misrepresenting the Canadian study on many New Zealand cities – and local authorities are ordering their removal because of their scaremongering. Many New Zealanders ...
    2 weeks ago
  • Democracy – I Don’t Think So
    So, those who “know best” have again done their worst. While constantly claiming to be the guardians of democracy and the constitution, and respecters of the 2016 referendum result, diehard Remainers (who have never brought themselves to believe that their advice could have been rejected) have striven might and main ...
    Bryan GouldBy Bryan Gould
    2 weeks ago

No feed items found.