EEC votes ‘No’ on should-a.com

Written By: - Date published: 1:45 pm, July 13th, 2009 - 15 comments
Categories: copyright - Tags: , ,

shouldcopyright

should-a.com, the site that lets you write your own parody of the upcoming referendum question, has been issued with a takedown notice by the Electoral Enrolment Centre.

It’s a shame that the EEC hasn’t had a sense of humour about this but, more importantly, it reveals once again the weakness of our free speech protections in New Zealand.

In the US, a parody or satire that uses copyrighted material is protected as fair use, which permits things like this. In New Zealand, you’re not allowed to make fun of an organisation using its copyrighted material or imitations – like party logos. this gives organisations a great tool to stomp out grassroots critics.

Creative Freedom NZ has a more detailed report here.

– Marty G

15 comments on “EEC votes ‘No’ on should-a.com”

  1. Lew 1

    What’s interesting is that, in the USA, Fair Use provisions can be applied in order to protect satirical works as free speech under the first amendment, even when the copyright holder disagrees that the use is fair (Campbell v Acuff-Rose is the usually-cited example). So the issue is explicitly political expression, whereas in NZ satire isn’t protected because there is no guaranteed protection for political speech here.

    Still, the net effect – which seems to have been that Dylan put the copyright statement and URL on each question, in order to comply with the EC’s licensing terms – isn’t so bad.

    L

  2. Graeme 2

    The Electoral Commission is not the same as the Electoral Enrolment Centre.

  3. Tim Ellis 3

    That’s a shame. There were a lot of amusing should-a expressions going up.

  4. felix 4

    Just to be clear: The site isn’t actually being taken down?

  5. Matthew Hooton 5

    Asking the question you feature above would be a more sensible use of tax dollars than the one being asked later this month. Given that $9 million is being spent on asking that question, perhaps the Prime Minister could arrange for your question to also be asked as part of the same exercise. The marginal cost could not be all that much.

    • felix 5.1

      Actually Matthew, unless you remove the word “good” the question above is just as meaningless as the current referendum.

      Jesus man, sharpen up.

      • Graeme 5.1.1

        You dispute that political parody can be good?

        • felix 5.1.1.1

          Did I? Where?

          • Graeme 5.1.1.1.1

            The common concern people have with the use of the word “good” in the actual referendum is that it implied that a smack can be used as part of good parental correction. If one disputes this, then answering the question can be tortuous.

            I don’t see that the same problem arises with the word “good” in the question “should infringing on copyright as part of good political parody be a criminal offence in New Zealand?”

            Only if one thinks that political parody cannot be good would the use of the word “good” be as bad it is in the child discipline question. It’s use in the above question does not make the question meaningless.

            • felix 5.1.1.1.1.1

              “I don’t see that the same problem arises…”

              I don’t remember saying that either. Learn to read.

              Hint: What’s the difference between “good political parody” and “bad political parody”?

              Now read the question again and stop bothering me with this dim-witted bullshit.

  6. Just to let you know – after making a few changes to the site, I seem to have convinced the EEC that they should leave the site alone.

    I suspect a few calls from media organisations helped as well – it was poised to make it into the mainstream.

    In some ways I would have liked it to go further, as I think a larger focus on the lack of fair use provisions in NZ copyright law would have been a good thing, but I probably don’t need the hassle.

    At no point was I considering removing the site, or substantially changing it.

  7. lprent 7

    Great. It has been a considerable source of amusement to me to see how tortured some of the ‘questions’ have been.

    Perhaps referendum question makers should have to spend some playtime putting their questions in front of bloggers for a month or so. Probably make the questions more readable

Links to post

Recent Comments

Recent Posts

  • Police initiatives across Auckland
    Two new policing initiatives are being launched in Auckland with the objective of preventing crime, improving community safety, and reducing reoffending. Police Minister Stuart Nash will today launch an iwi community justice panel, Te Pae Oranga, at Hoani Waititi Marae ...
    3 days ago
  • Māui dolphins deserve better
    Like many of us, I feel a deep connection to our oceans. The rich marine life that surrounds our shores is what makes our place in the world so special and why we’re so passionate about protecting it. There are ...
    GreensBy Eugenie Sage
    4 days ago
  • Fixing our broken justice system: first steps
    Justice Minister Andrew Little has revealed the first steps in fixing our broken criminal justice system, so we can make communities safer. ...
    4 days ago
  • Guide to making a submission on the Election Access Fund Bill
    Our democracy should be accessible for everyone. One of the fundamental things about civil society is that it’s supposed to be by the people, for the people. Currently, it’s harder than it should be for some people to take part. ...
    GreensBy Chlöe Swarbrick
    5 days ago
  • Ngati Tamaoho Treaty settlement third reading
    Minister for Treaty of Waitangi Negotiations Andrew Little acknowledges and welcomes the rangatira of Ngāti Tamaoho who came to Parliament for the significant third reading of their Treaty settlement legislation. ...
    2 weeks ago
  • Unacceptable culture and conduct
    Justice Minister Andrew Little and Under-Secretary Jan Logie have received the independent review into allegations of sexual misconduct, harassment and bullying at leading law firm Russell McVeagh. ...
    2 weeks ago
  • Eighty new Police recruits begin training
    Police recruitment is taking another significant step forward with the arrival of eighty new recruits who begin training today at the Royal New Zealand Police College. Police Minister Stuart Nash has extended a welcome to the recruits of Wing 319 ...
    2 weeks ago
  • Ngāi Tai ki Tāmaki Claims Settlement Bill
    Minister for Treaty of Waitangi Negotiations Andrew Little acknowledges and welcomes the rangatira of Ngāi Tai ki Tāmaki for coming to Parliament for the third and final reading of their Treaty settlement legislation. ...
    3 weeks ago
  • Multinationals to pay fair share of tax
    New measures to ensure multinational companies pay their fair share of tax will come into force next week. The Taxation (Neutralising Base Erosion and Profit Shifting) Bill tonight passed its third reading in Parliament. Revenue Minister Stuart Nash says it ...
    3 weeks ago
  • Benefit sanctions are going down
    This week we’ve seen genuine progress in turning our welfare system around, from one which punishes and stigmatizes people who need support, to one that treats them with dignity and respect. Benefit sanctions are decreasing Last month, the Minister for ...
    GreensBy Jan Logie
    3 weeks ago