Ferry ferry quite contrary

Written By: - Date published: 8:22 am, September 26th, 2024 - 24 comments
Categories: act, Christopher Luxon, climate change, Economy, infrastructure, national, nicola willis, nz first, same old national, winston peters - Tags:

Unfortunately for the Government the replacement ferry issue will not go away.

And every week it seems to get worse.

Previously they had placed great faith in private enterprise aka Bluebridge ferries providing a solution.

But one of its ferrys losing power and drifting for more than two hours and needing to be towed back to port placed a bit of a downer on that suggestion. It seems that the current government AND private enterprise are not great at keeping their assets up to date and fit for purpose.

A string of recent news stories suggests that things are not happy within the ranks of the Coalition Government. And all the stories hint that Act’s desire to nuke anything that looks like support for rail is going to attract the ire of Winston Peters in a potentially coalition threatening way.

The bad news started with this Tova O’Brien article suggesting that the parties were in disagreement with rail enabling the new ferries.

She gives this background:

iRex was scrapped way back in December, an independent ministerial advisory group was convened in February and they handed their final written report to ministers laying out options for replacement on 19 June – three months ago.

Finance Minister Nicola Willis said on 5 July that an announcement was coming soon.

So what’s the hold up?

Willis says ministers are still getting advice, testing proposals, asking questions and making sure the decisions they make are based on good information.

That certainly seems to be the case with parties seeking further information to bolster their respective views but it also appears that all three of those government parties – National, ACT, NZ First – have differing views on the best solution.

ACT has long advocated for privatisation and has recently talked up a mixed ownership model for Kiwirail.

New Zealand First is all about rail-enabled ferries, National not so much and the Finance Minister is poopooing any suggestion that Winston Peters has made rail-enablement a bottom line, “I think it would be wrong to characterise him as having expressed that as a bottom line.”

Asked by Stuff if New Zealand First is holding up the process, Nicola Willis didn’t say no, instead she replied, “we’re continuing to take advice as ministers, ministers are all engaged in the process across the three parties in the coalition.”

But when asked if the three parties in coalition are aligned as well as engaged, Willis said, “we haven’t had a final cabinet discussion so it would be premature to make any assessment.”

Tova describes the issue as “one helluva expensive impasse”.

Then Thomas Coughlan at the Herald chipped in. His take was more Government friendly. I wonder if there is a job that he is eyeing up?

But he did say this:

Willis is keeping her cards close to her chest. She hinted to RNZ’s First Up earlier this year that she was not too concerned about whether the ferries were rail-enabled or not, noting that many ferries around the world were not rail-enabled with rail freight being taken off trains and put on to boats without the need for tracks on the ships themselves.

“It happens around the world, it happens in New Zealand, there’s nothing too unusual about it,” Willis said.

However, Deputy Prime Minister Winston Peters does not share those thoughts.

When told the Government appeared to be leaning towards non-rail-enabled ferries last month, Peters responded, “who said that’s going to happen? Let’s see what happens in the end.”

Asked whether he would prefer rail-enabled ferries, Peters said: “Well, of course I would. Because for 100 years that’s what we’ve been planning to do.”

Asked if it was a bottom line, Peters said: “We don’t have bottom lines like you do – this isn’t our first rodeo”.

Coughlan reports that Treasury is in favour of South Island rail being shut down. Just what you need when you are trying to deal with a climate crisis.

Jo Moire at RNZ also chipped in and suggested that the Government was still taking advice and had not yet made a decision.

From her article:

The coalition government has been considering advice on replacement options for the Interislander ferries for several months and it could be the end of the year before a decision is made.

But Finance Minister Nicola Willis says it would be “premature” to blame that on a difference of opinion amongst the three governing parties.

Speaking to media at the prime minister’s weekly post-Cabinet press conference today, Willis said a decision would be made on a replacement service by the end of this year.

Willis did not immediately answer questions about when Cabinet had received advice from the ministerial advisory group, saying she would come back to reporters.

However, the prime minister chipped in, saying it was received “a few months ago”.

That prompted questions over whether New Zealand First was responsible for the delay in making a decision, with leader Winston Peters’ public campaign for rail-enabled ferries.

Willis said it would be “wrong to characterise [Peters] as having expressed that as a bottom line”.

Excuse me while I switch into swear mode but what the frick was the Government doing when it fricken cancelled a really good contract for the supply of rail enabled ferries and fricken putting us up for a potential billion dollar loss without getting proper advice and all so they could prance around and get their political jollies by suggesting the last Government had made a bad deal.

And drawing out the making of a decision at a time when the current ferries need to be replaced preferrably yesterday while these parties try to reconcile what at first sight look like pretty irreconcilable differences is not in the country’s best interests.

The next time the Government talks about the cost of the enabling work remind them how much they are planning to spend on their roads of National Significance program.

This issue will potentially be a coalition killer.

Stay tuned.

24 comments on “Ferry ferry quite contrary ”

  1. Tiger Mountain 1

    Any dissension in the CoC ranks has to be a good development for politics watchers. But not good for maintaining a viable maritime and rail link between the North and South Islands by the looks of it. It is not my idea of fun to be a passenger drifting on a powerless ship in Cook Strait even on a fine day, never mind the more common conditions.

    One good thing NZF’s PGF fund did was improve the prospects of restoration of rail to Northland. Various bridges instead of being replaced had the tracks lowered beneath to enable carrying of containers. A freight depot was planned for Moerewa, but a lot of the planned work has now stalled.

    More trucks are not the answer in the era of Climate Disaster.

    • Ad 1.1

      +100

      Ask the Maritime Safety team or MoT or the union. They all say same thing privately:

      Don't take the ferry it's unsafe.

  2. Bearded Git 2

    John Key's government spent over half a billion dollars fixing the Picton-Christchurch railway after the Kaikoura quake. This is a railway line that goes the length of the South Island.

    https://www.insurancebusinessmag.com/nz/news/breaking-news/quake-repair-bill-for-christchurchpicton-railway-line-could-top-500-million-165728.aspx

    It would be madness to buy non-rail capable ferries.

    Is Treasury taking into account climate change effects when it recommends closing down NZ Rail?. If it isn't then surely its advice is not consistent with the government’s commitment to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and so is worthless.

  3. Adrian 3

    Highway 1 from Picton to Christchurch and even beyond is not fit for purpose even at its current loading. There are quite substantial climbs all the way along it where trucks generally struggle to get faster than 20 kph and large distances are very winding and narrow. It would be considered a B or even C class road certainly in Europe and most other countries. The post quake rail recontruction may have cost 1 Billion as BG says but the road which runs alongside it cost around 9 (Billion to reinstate, a fairly succinct example of the cost comparison between road and rail. Then there are the towns that it crosses through, already Blenheim gets gridlock when a full ferry load passes through. This Ferry Debacle will go down in legend as one of the most stupid , shambolic cock-ups of any government in this country and thoroughly deserves to be recorded on their gravestone.

  4. Macro 4

    This CoC is not concerned about people or the catastrophic warming of the climate or anything else – it's sole concern is giving a substantial financial return to its immediate backers. It wants to run this country like a company because that is how they think. They have no understanding that a country is entirely different from a business, and the responsibility of Government is to govern the country for everyone, not just their mates.

    So rail enabled ferries, are not in their consideration – its just the cost that matters and the cheapest option is the prime consideration – and if they externalise those costs onto others so much the better.

  5. aj 5

    In a long discussion this morning he outlines a lot of truths the government want people to forget. Does put the boot in, not only to the ministers but the working group as well. Astonishing.

    Mainfreight group managing director Don Braid says not having rail-enabled ferries will be inefficient and more costly for businesses like his.

    He says it will directly lead to Mainfreight adding more than 5,000 truck-and-trailer journeys each year, further deteriorating the country's roading network.

    The company has called it 'appalling' that it was not included in the ministerial advisory group making decisions for the future of the Cook Strait rail ferry services.

    https://www.rnz.co.nz/national/programmes/ninetonoon/audio/2018957194/mainfreight-makes-the-case-for-rail-enabled-ferries

    • bwaghorn 5.1

      I'd love to what Mr Braid would think of mainfraight being allowed to own and operate the rolling stock and nz just owns the rail lines they run on. ??

  6. Tony Veitch 6

    The Natz pose as the party of business!!

    Sure, under Labour we were about to pay Ferrari prices, but we were getting Ferraris!

    Under the CoC we're still going to pay Ferrari prices, but we're going to get Toyota Corollas, and second hand ones at that!

    If Winnie is consistent, then the 'new' ferries will be rail enabled – but at a cost, both financially and harmoniously among the CoC.

    And David is already beginning to rock the good ship Luxflakes – asking to be consulted on any decisions on the Israeli warmongers before Winnie says anything! I can imagine how that was received by Winnie!

    • bwaghorn 6.1

      Yip I would have thought the obvious fix would have been for willis to go down to irex headquarters and bang heads till they got the dock repairs costs down , but throwing the baby out with the bath water proves she's either incompetent or vindictive.

    • Bearded Git 6.2

      I think we were getting Land Cruisers rather than Rav4's. Just ships that would do the job well.

      The larger capacity ferries were needed for growing passenger and freight traffic over the next couple of generations..

  7. koina 7

    Why not go full partition.

    Whites in the South Island.

    Everyone else in the North Island.

    Yes Yes Yes

    • Ngungukai 7.1

      Or run them as two separate entities, let Private Enterprise run the Ferry Link and the Free Market will let it Sink or Swim ???

    • tWig 7.2

      Sonething that has been loudly suggested by charming/sarc white supremecists highlighted by 'debunking conspiracies aotearoa' in recent years.

  8. newsense 8

    Or it’s electoral posturing?

    Though NZ First has always been a pro-rail party, if not always a pro-commuter party.

    Certainly there’s no lack of evidence that this is simply NZ’s first second wave ACT government, but aside from a few shady Shane dealings there’s not much in the way of NZ First’s contribution to the legislative slate.

  9. Ngungukai 9

    These ferries (fairies) are another Dogs Breakfast created by this NACT1st COC Up IMHO ???

  10. Phaedrus 10

    Peters has previous form here, when he refused to allow privatisation of Wellington Airport back in 1997 and crashed the National/NZ First coalition

    • James Simpson 10.1

      I don't think either Winston or National will collapse their government over boats.

      The difference from 1997 is, if Peter stops National from doing what they want, we will just carry on with the current crapped out boats. Which National will probably not be too worried about as they don't have to spend money on it.

      • gsays 10.1.1

        I wouldn't be so sure.

        The other difference between then and now is Seymour is due to become deputy PM.

        I can see Winston sinking that aspiration under the guise of ferries.

  11. Drowsy M. Kram 11

    Numbers Girl and Neighbourhood Tobacconist, Nicorette Willis is just in it for laughs the money sad

  12. PsyclingLeft.Always 12

    I had earlier included Links to….but update, well over 3000 signatures since. Positive Action : )

    https://thefutureisrail.org/

    https://thefutureisrail.org/insight

    Support Rail !

The server will be getting hardware changes this evening starting at 10pm NZDT.
The site will be off line for some hours.