web analytics

Fisking Farrar’s fisking

Written By: - Date published: 2:30 pm, July 9th, 2009 - 40 comments
Categories: election funding - Tags:

Yesterday David Farrar presented us with his analysis of Labour’s electoral finance submission. There is a lot of ‘Nya Nya I Told You So!’ in there every time Labour’s position changed from 2007 to now, and a fair bit of ‘Nya Nya They Haven’t Learned Anything!’ when its position did not change. That kind of partisan cheerleading is to be expected.

And he did make some good points about shortcomings in Labour’s submission, such as their treatment of the broadcasting allocation, their attitude towards parliamentary services expenditure during election campaigns, and their proposals to help out new parties. Despite being a proud Labour member, I agree with the general thrust of his critiques in those areas, and those positions are also reflected in my own submission.

But there are three other elements of his analysis that caught my eye:

1. Hypocrisy and Double Standards

David accuses Labour of proposing a self-serving solution that is only good for Labour. But then David’s own submission advocates no restrictions at all on budget or advertising streams for parallel campaigns, opens the door for large increases in party spending limits, retains the possibility of unlimited large corporate donations, opposes any public funding for political parties, and argues for a short regulated period where absolutely anything goes outside of the period. That sounds an awful lot like a self-serving solution for the party that gets the support of most of the wealthy people, no?

He also accuses Labour of making assertions in their submission without having evidence to back it up. But in his own submission he simply asserts that freedom of speech is more important than participatory fairness in a democracy, without presenting any evidence, and when there is actually some reasonable evidence (see paragraphs 7-8 in my submission) to the contrary. He asserts that ‘A disclosure limit of $1,000 would be far too low and discourage many supporters from donating’ without providing any evidence at all about that. And so on.

2. Silly Statements

Both the analysis of Labour’s submission and David’s own submission are liberally sprinkled with howlers. My favourites:

Commenting on Labour’s submission that any restrictions on voter registration constitute a barrier to participation, David exclaims: ‘Good God. Never before have I heard voter registration be called a barrier to participation.’ Given David is in the US, I suggest he go to the southern states and ask all the African Americans about their historical experience with restrictive voter registration laws, then come back and see if he wants to revise his statement.

Commenting on Labour’s submission about political television advertising, David says: ‘What decade are they in? How many people even watch TV ads now? Heard of My Sky.’ Earth to David: There is a world outside of Thorndon in which not everybody has My Sky. People advertise on TV because advertising on TV works.

In his own submission, David wants to allow things that are ‘unfair’ but are not ‘manifestly unfair’ on the grounds that the taller guy tends to win US Presidential elections. I am not making this up, honestly. He really submitted that to good people at the Ministry of Justice. He seems to believe that the proposed principles of electoral finance, as stated in the discussion document, would open the door to a declaration that all candidates have to be the same height. Earth to David: Come back, David! You can use your tin foil hat as a parachute.

3. Unworkable solutions

There aren’t many solutions proposed in David’s submission except for the catch-all ‘the gummint should butt out’, but some that are opposed are entirely silly. Again, my favourites:
David opposes any limit at all on how much a person or company or union can give to political parties, but says ‘if there is [a limit] it should be set as a percentage of a party’s total income.’ Which would mean that nobody would know the donation limit until after the election is over. Oops.

Voluntary compliance for parallel campaigners. Yes, we are back to voluntary compliance again. The last group who tried this on was the major industrial polluters, as I recall. And that sure worked a treat. Anyway, David reckons that we can fix the problem of parallel campaigns jamming the airwaives with unlimited ads by inducing them to voluntary accept a spending limit in return for wait for it legal advice! Because large lobbying organizations do not know any lawyers, you understand. Again, I promise I am not making this up.

– Rob Salmond

40 comments on “Fisking Farrar’s fisking”

  1. lprent 1

    In other words DPF hadn’t bothered to engage his brain?

  2. r0b 2

    Good to see you commenting and posting here Rob (note to conspiracy theorists, r0b is not Rob). Loved your stuff at 08wire!.

    Thanks for this detailed commentary. I’m not up to speed on this issue, but as I understand it the process National has set out for electoral form looks good on paper – is that right? It would be good to get genuine multipartisan agreement on this issue and put it to bed for good…

  3. lbj 3

    well, he is a rotund no-mates so it’s to be expected I guess. he’s probably in cahoots with Ian Wishart as we speak

    • Maynard J 3.1

      Thanks for that idiotic comment. So stupid you managed a complete contradiction in two sentences.

    • Ari 3.2

      Farrar’s “rotundness” has shit all to do with the fact that he is, from time to time, a partisan, hypocritical, and an intellectual lightweight.

  4. roger nome 4

    “David accuses Labour of proposing a self-serving solution that is only good for Labour. But then David’s own submission advocates no restrictions at all on budget or advertising streams for parallel campaigns”

    lol – for someone who’s been spinning disinformation for the last decade and a half or so, Farrar doesn’t half leave himself open to some obvious corkers.

    “David exclaims: Good God”

    He often plays the pompous/sanctimonious wank without knowing.

    “Heard of My Sky’

    Fark – this takes the cake. It’s like his ego pump piece where he brags about “having a chat with Michael Laws in the Koru lounge”. He’s such an elitist toss-pot, so oblivious about it. Although sometimes i wonder whether he’s just enjoying himself with a bit of post-modern self-parody – who knows.

    “the taller guy tends to win US Presidential elections.”

    I’ve seen him use this argument to justify his supporting a flat rate of tax. Something about tall guys getting all the hot girls and him not getting any compensation for being short (as if he misses out just because he’s short). Really David – don’t be so disingenuous and superficial – look at napoleon, Hitler, Churchill etc – all were short-arses like you and all beat there taller counterparts to power.

    Let’s face it – Farrar wants a plutocracy, and he’s willing to advance all manner of sophistry and intellectual contortion to promote it. Like redbaiter, and all other libertarians, in practice, he regards democracy as a synonym for “socialism” – it’s the great unwashed wielding “undeserved” power.

  5. So Bored 5

    Rather amusing that Farrar runs an opinion polling company….given his views I wouldnt trust the veracity of the results. Amazes me the way his type bust a gut trying to join with and be accepted by a political class that is set up to preclude their entry.

  6. lbj 6

    np, oxy-moron is my middle name.

    Check this out:

    http://www.should-a.com/pmv7r3

    lol

  7. roger nome 7

    “David accuses Labour of proposing a self-serving solution that is only good for Labour. But then David’s own submission advocates no restrictions at all on budget or advertising streams for parallel campaigns’

    lol for someone who’s been spinning disinformation for the last decade and a half or so, Farrar doesn’t half leave himself open to some obvious corkers.

    “David exclaims: Good God’

    He often plays the pompous/sanctimonious jerk without knowing.

    “Heard of My Sky’

    Fark this takes the cake. It’s like his ego pump piece where he brags about “having a chat with Michael Laws in the Koru lounge’. He’s such an out-of-touch elitist, yet so oblivious about it. Although sometimes i wonder whether he’s just enjoying himself with a bit of post-modern self-parody who knows.

    “the taller guy tends to win US Presidential elections.’

    I’ve seen him use this argument to justify his supporting a flat rate of tax. Something about tall guys getting all the hot girls and him not getting any compensation for being short (as if he misses out just because he’s short). Really David don’t be so disingenuous and superficial look at napoleon and Churchill etc all were short-arses like you and all beat there taller counterparts to power.

    Let’s face it Farrar wants a plutocracy, and he’s willing to advance all manner of sophistry and intellectual contortion to promote it. Like redbaiter, and all other libertarians, in practice, he regards democracy as a synonym for “socialism’ it’s the great unwashed wielding “undeserved’ power.

  8. Rob Salmond 8

    Thanks to the Standardistas for letting me post here, and thanks also to r0b for the props.

    In answer to r0b’s question, yes I think the Nats’ process for the electoral finance review is pretty good. The big test, however, will be in crafting a proposed law that really does represent a fair compromise. As roger nome points out, DPF hasn’t been especially helpful in the that regard. Fingers crossed.

  9. DPF’s critique isn’t total criticism – he even agrees with Labour in parts.

    One interesting comment that appears to have been overlooked because DPF has mentioned it is the state funding of parties. The point that DPF makes is this effectively cuts the reliance on the parliamentary wing from the rank and file membership who raise the funds.

    This would clearly have an impact on party activists – on all sides – who would be able to wield significantly less control over the parliamentarians. Certainly a point worth considering, even if DPF did raise it.

    • Pascal's bookie 9.1

      I hear what his saying, but I’m not sure that it would be as big a problem as he makes out.

      One reason people don’t get involved more at the moment with party membership and what have you, is that fund raising is such a big focus. And not what activists want to spend time doing. Removing this task from the extra parliamentary party will leave them focussed on candidate selection, canvassing, policy remits, and the other more, err, exciting bits. Ok so ‘exciting’ takes it a bit far.

      An idea for public financing I keep coming back to, (in the hope that someone will smash the shit out of it), is what I call citizen directed public financing.

      Basic idea is that every eligible voter gets to throw their allocation of the public financing at the party of their choice. $5, $10 whatever it is. This could be done when registering to vote, (which is already compulsory and the forms are sent out to everyone) by ticking a box.

      The main advantages over other forms of public financing are that:

      – It’s not up to the pollies who gets how much.

      – Voters can feel free to give their money to a party that they might not feel confident voting for because of tactical or whatever other reason. (This makes it less sucky for the smaller parties that get punished in systems based on last elections results.)

      The obvious drawback is that the parties will want to campaign for this cash, making it essentially another election. I don’t see why we have to let them. Make each party give the electoral office a 1000 word pitch which would be posted on the interwebs or something and other than that the soliciting of these funds should be illegal.

      If it works this could actually develop into a system for involving citizens more in the process. If they wished, the citizen might be able to tick another box so that the party they fund could contact them about membership or activism etc.

  10. While pleased to see Rob agrees with some of my submission, he misses the point several times.

    First of all people should note both Labour and myself have argued for no fixed limit on third party spending.

    All I have suggested for party spending limits is they should be the same today as they were in 1996 – adjusted for inflation and population. Rob also misses that my main point was suggesting the limits be set based on actual emperical research of how much you need for an effective communication campaign with three million voters.

    And yes I support the status quo in terms of donation limits and state funding.

    But to suggest all my proposals benefit National is silly. I doubt National like me advocating they should lose $1 million of broadcasting allocation. I doubt they agree with me that they should be banned from spending their parliamentary budget during the regulated period. I doubt they agree with my position that all anonymous donations should be prohibited (Labour by the way wants to keep anonymous donations). I doubt they agree with my position that they publish audited accounts.

    Yes in a couple of cases I have made assertions also without proof. But Rob misses the point again. When you are advocating that someone should be banned from doing something – the onus is on you to make your case. I don’t think one should have to prove the desirability of freedom of speech for example. Given more time (I am not a political party with staff) I could have fleshed out arguments in more detail.

    The voter registration as a barrier to participation was domestically focused. Of course in other countries decades ago bad things happened with voter registration. But I don’t think Labour’s position of labelling it a barrier to participation is healthy.

    Rob misses the point on TV advertising. My point is it is no longer such a dominant medium it needs special laws than ban parties from buying broadcasting time. There is a difference between dominant and effective. The fact a medium is effective is a reason to allow parties to advertise on it I would have thought.

    And most of all you almost maliciously mischaracterise my statement on unfairness. The point I made about taller candidates winning (which I also made to half a dozen Ministry officials at an invite only roundtable on electoral finance) is that money is not the only factor that can affect how people vote, and that there are many factors that a party or candidates can have that can seem unfair to others. Hence my suggestion the test should be manifestly unfair. Only a moron or Rob being malicious would think I was advocating candidates need to be the same height.

    And finally Rob takes the mickey out of my suggestion of a voluntary limit for parallel campaigners. He ignores the fact I suggested there be significant incentives for parallel campaigners to voluntarily register and accept the limit. But what he doesn’t point out is his beloved Labour actually advocates there be no limit at all – I at least advocated for a limit for those who voluntarily register to gain benefits.

    Rob, being based in the US, should know that the US has certain voluntary spending limits. Obama is in fact the first candidate to exceed them I think. Hence my suggestion of incentives to comply with a voluntary limit is I think quite a reasonable thing to consider. It is a halfway house between Labour that says there should be no spending limit for parallel campaigners and those who say there should be a compulsory spending limit.

    The fact any compulsory spending limit is so easy to get around (you just set up multiple third parties) is another reason I proposed a voluntary regime as an alternative.

    Anyway as I said, I am glad Rob agreed with some of my points, and we obviously disagree on others.

    • Ari 10.1

      David, just because you aren’t arguing the National Party line does not mean you’re not arguing a very pro-National Party regime after criticising the Labour Party for doing the same thing.

      Rob, being based in the US, should know that the US has certain voluntary spending limits. Obama is in fact the first candidate to exceed them I think.

      Nope, plenty of republican candidates ditched the public funding and the spending limits that went with it. Obama ditched the limits because they’re designed to impede campaigns running on big donations- and his campaign exceeded the limit using small donations.

      And most of all you almost maliciously mischaracterise my statement on unfairness. The point I made about taller candidates winning (which I also made to half a dozen Ministry officials at an invite only roundtable on electoral finance) is that money is not the only factor that can affect how people vote, and that there are many factors that a party or candidates can have that can seem unfair to others. Hence my suggestion the test should be manifestly unfair. Only a moron or Rob being malicious would think I was advocating candidates need to be the same height.

      Why didn’t you give a real example then, and point out why your solution was the best way to avoid “fairness” provisions from giving advantaged candidates a slanted playing field? Talking about statistical coincidences made your point look vexatious and self-interested. It wasn’t just the way Rob characterised your argument.

      The fact any compulsory spending limit is so easy to get around (you just set up multiple third parties) is another reason I proposed a voluntary regime as an alternative.

      I think we could consider allowing unlimited funding of paralell campaigns in return for not accepting anonymous donations or donations from funds or trusts that could potentially “launder” donations because they don’t declare their own donors.

      Honestly, if there are aggressive rules around parallel campaigns that enforce accountability and transparency, I think we can experiment with letting them spend what they like.

      What specifics did you propose for your voluntary regime, anyway?

  11. Maynard J 11

    “Only a moron or Rob being malicious would think I was advocating candidates need to be the same height.”

    Only a moron would think that is what Rob was suggesting.

    • Frank 11.1

      (which I also made to half a dozen Ministry officials at an invite only roundtable on electoral finance)

      I like the fact that even in a rebuttal comment Farrar can’t help but boast about what an insider he is. Small man syndrome?

  12. jason 12

    You sure there’s not a spelling mistake in there, fisking?

  13. Rob Salmond 13

    David

    Welcome home and I hope you enjoyed the Koru Lounge you mentioned on Kiwiblog this morning.

    Taking your points in order:

    1. I also advocated no limit to parallel campaigns, so long as there is a limit on total political donations from one source (as in the US). Without that cap, the floodgates are open.

    2. Your second paragraph contradicts itself. You first say party spending limits should be simply adjusted from 1996 levels, then call for entirely new limits based on new empirical research about communication with voters.

    3. You know as well as I do that your proposal benefits your favourite party much more than it benefits their main opponents. So quit playing all innocent. (Also, my submission seeks to limit how much a union can give to Labour, so if you are innocent of favouritism then so am I.)

    4. When you make any empirical claim about the world, **any** claim, it is your job to back it up with evidence. If you don’t have the evidence, don’t make the claim. You fell short of that standard multiple times in your submission, which is why it is pretty rich for you to get up in arms when any other submitter does the same thing.

    5. I do not really understand the democratic reason for wanting to ban same day registration. Could the real reason be that it is because most same day registrants are likely to be poor and to vote for a left-leaning party? David, tell me this: why in a democratic society should someone who wants to vote, and is entitled by citizenship etc to vote, be turned away from the polls for purely administrative reasons? How is that democratic? I agree with Labour on this one every time that happens, someone has been denied their say in their democracy, and if it is an administrative rule that causes this then the rule is a barrier to that person’s participation.

    6. Maynard J is right only a moron would think I was accusing you of actually wanting a Candidate Height Rule. What you in fact argued was that, unless “manifestly’ made it into the principles, there was a danger of some idiot getting such a rule by arguing height constituted an “unfair’ advantage. Your argument here is specious and paranoid, and I called you on it.

    7. The other argument of yours I made fun of is not specious and paranoid, it is specious and rose tinted. You argue that big spending lobby groups will accept voluntary spending limits in return for free legal advice from the EC and the threat of Duncan Garner exposing them as big spending lobby groups if they resist. That aargument is laughable. It takes a cheque for around $80million to get US candidates to agree to these limits. (And on that, George Bush operated outside of those limits at least once, and I believe twice so no Obama is not the first.)

    Yes we do agree on some stuff David. But the same old PR tricks, with the same old game of seeking to advantage your own party lying underneath, are not going to help in getting a truly multipartisan compromise. I really do want to engage constructively, but if you are going to post nonsense I am going to call it nonsense.

    • Ari 13.1

      Was it just Bush? I was under the impression that Republicans had done that before Bush.

      • Rob Salmond 13.1.1

        Ari – It is entirely possible that candidates before Bush went without FEC matching funds. Once I had found out that David’s claim about Obama was wrong, I stopped looking.

    • Anita 13.2

      OT I know, but

      Welcome home and I hope you enjoyed the Koru Lounge you mentioned on Kiwiblog this morning.

      Why does he do that? Why why why?

      🙂

  14. Rob Salmond 14

    PS – David, I did note the point you have made in a number of forums about there being many dimensions to political participation other than money, and I specifically address it in my submission.

  15. Chris Diack 15

    On the whole DPF makes a better fist of a contribution than does Rob.

    Always hang on to your fundamental freedoms when government types and academics propose “balance’ among a list of meaningless statements or objectives.

    What it invariable means is the less free approach.

    Rob does catch on to the Ministry’s compromising of the freedom of speech and its non compromising of fairness which if one reads the prose is actually about substantive fairness a particular pattern of characteristics (money or whatever) between parties and candidates. Rob calls this participation which sort of begs the question about what the Ministry’s “participation’ means.

    What he misses in his canvassing of the variety of regulatory regimes around the world is that while each is invariably justified on the grounds of fairness, what they actually have in common is the fact that each promotes the interests of incumbents and usually dominant incumbents at that.

    Surprise surprise politicians around the world (incumbents) just LOVE regulating political competition. Their key concern and focus is always challengers.

    Let us take but one small example of where Rob gets things wrong:

    “If a person can expend massive resources on election campaigning then that person’s disproportionate influence, or just as importantly that person’s perceived disproportionate influence, in the election campaign would transcend what most New Zealanders might consider “fair.’

    He goes on to add the truism that there are just so many hours in the day but money is unlimited (Obamanomics?)

    There are just so many errors. First spending does not necessarily equal influence Rob simply dresses up the old argument that money can buy votes (its called influence now) he has no faith that New Zealanders will not be beguiled by big political spenders; that they cannot “balance’ (to use Rob’s word) this information with other information and process it. Nor should they be give the opportunity to learn this skill by experience; no they must be protected and sheltered from the magic of political ad men.

    And how great a risk it is really that this would happen? Does anyone have unlimited resources (money or otherwise); and if so would they irrationally apply them in political causes as Rob suggests.

    Non Party and candidate speech problems around the world are almost entirely a creation of the regulation of candidates and parties (both donation caps and spending rules and in the States the transfer rules within parties). In fact political cause money in politics is much like water: its goes where there is least resistance and can be most efficiently utilised generally. Therefore light regulation of parties and candidates will mean that most money for political causes will flow to them. The other occasion where political money flows to non candidate non party speech is where there is a fundamental shift in the political system going on thus it’s borne of a deep dissatisfaction with incumbents. What is the State’s interest in regulating this is it always to be the case that there will be the existing array of parties and politicians? Non candidate and non party speech can be the early sign of a new party system arising (take Labour’s pre 1916 speech for example and the long slow decline of the Liberal Party electoral coalition)

    Rob goes on to support the most nutty element of US political regulation; individual donor caps. This has not worked in the States indeed because it is a rule caused fundraising inefficiency, it actually advantages the wealthy as they are best able to afford to carry the cost of this inefficiency. Nor has it broadened the class of donors contributing to US political campaigns. It tends to support richer candidates of dominant parties and favours incumbents against challangers. Obama is a good example of the power that early adoption by the Millionaire/Billionaire set can provide – forget about all the internet fundraising myths. Obama also disproves the notion that leftwing candidates are necessarily unattractive to high net worth individuals.

    Rob’s proposal supports extending regulation to non candidate and party speech a regulatory nightmare which will chill non candidate and party speech.

    It is amusing the way all the detail of Rob’s extensive regulation of speech is in his footnotes.

    Like Labour’s submission a bare pass mark.

  16. Ari 16

    Rob goes on to support the most nutty element of US political regulation; individual donor caps. This has not worked in the States indeed because it is a rule caused fundraising inefficiency, it actually advantages the wealthy as they are best able to afford to carry the cost of this inefficiency. Nor has it broadened the class of donors contributing to US political campaigns. It tends to support richer candidates of dominant parties and candidates and favours incumbents against challangers. Obama is a good example of the power that early adoption by the Millionaire/Billionaire set can provide forget about all the internet fundraising nonsense. Obama also disproves the notion that leftwing candidates are necessarily unattractive to high net worth individuals.

    The point is not to eliminate the influence of the wealthy, the point is to make it not disproportionate to the influence of other voters. Per-person caps do this nicely.

  17. Chris Diack 17

    US evidence does not support your contention Ari.

    All the evidence in the US supports the notion the rule-required fundraising inefficiency supports those who are best able to carry this inefficiency i.e. the wealthy.

    They can spend their 24hrs arranging their affairs and those of others who are like them to comply.

    The other effect of the rule is to advantage incumbants over challangers as challangers must spend a greater deal of their time fundraising in smaller increments unless they are personally very wealthy themselves. You will note the trend in the US towards candidates with a higher net worth – this has a lot to do with the crazy regulation in the US the donor cap being the most significant of these along with the rules against intra party transfers.

    There is no evidence that the individual donation cap has upped the influence of voters (or confidence in the electoral system or the range of people contributing, nor corruption – all the various justifications for it).

    As I said its the nuttiest feature of the US regulation of political competition.

  18. Rob Salmond 18

    Chris

    First, thanks for taking the time to read and think about my submission. I mean that.

    It seems that you believe David’s to be a better submission because its conclusions fit more closely with your own ideas. I make this statement based on your first two paragraphs praising freedom and bemoaning academics and bureaucrats. If that is your decision rule for a “good submission’ then that, of course, is up to you. If applied broadly, however, that kind of thinking leads people to be receptive only to ideas they already agree with, running the risk of rigid rote learning of ideals. I do not suggest you have reached that point, of course, but it is a risk.

    On the specifics:

    1. I do not agree with your contention that “each [regulatory regime] promotes the interests of incumbents and usually dominant incumbents at that.’ For example, the German public funding regime, which gives parties more money for the first few votes they receive than for the subsequent votes they receive, advantages small (often new) parties at the expense of large incumbent parties.

    2. The evidence is clear candidates or parties who raise more money get more votes. As evidence, here is what even David Farrar said on this topic in his submission: “the amount of money raised and spent by a party has relatively minor (but not nil) influence of the votes they get.’ I, of course, would disagree with David about what counts as “relatively minor’ but it is telling that even he is forced to concede that there is a positive relationship between spending money and winning votes. Note that the studies finding this control for all sorts of other possible explanations about incumbency, longevity of the incumbent, challenger quality, larger trends, etc.

    3. At first glance, your claim that a per person donation cap which has the effect of decreasing likely giving by the rich, but does not affect behavior among the non-rich, would in fact **advantage the rich** sounds like Orwellian doublespeak of the highest order. I am not saying I do not believe your inefficiency argument I just have not seen the evidence. You say there is evidence for this can you point me to it? (Note that the trend to richer candidates over time is not good evidence of this, given that it the trend continues unabated even within the same donation cap regime, and that there are other good explanations on offer, such as increasingly mediated politics etc.)

    4. You say: “Rob’s proposal supports extending regulation to non candidate and party speech a regulatory nightmare which will chill non candidate and party speech.’ That is untrue. I specifically recommend against spending limits for parallel campaigns, so long as there are per person donation caps. The only act being regulated is the donation, which is being regulated the same way regardless of the recipient. So the regulatory nightmare that wakes you in a sweat a “chilled’ sweat I guess – does not arise.

  19. Ari 19

    All the evidence in the US supports the notion the rule-required fundraising inefficiency supports those who are best able to carry this inefficiency i.e. the wealthy.

    They can spend their 24hrs arranging their affairs and those of others who are like them to comply.

    I don’t actually get what you’re trying to say here, sorry. Are you talking about spending money fundraising on behalf of a campaign, or the rich just being more willing to donate? Because I don’t know if I really mind either of those.

    The other effect of the rule is to advantage incumbants over challangers as challangers must spend a greater deal of their time fundraising in smaller increments unless they are personally very wealthy themselves. You will note the trend in the US towards candidates with a higher net worth this has a lot to do with the crazy regulation in the US the donor cap being the most significant of these along with the rules against intra party transfers.

    It would be nice if there were also limits on the amount candidates can self-fund and loan to their campaigns.

    There is no evidence that the individual donation cap has upped the influence of voters (or confidence in the electoral system or the range of people contributing, nor corruption all the various justifications for it).

    As I said its the nuttiest feature of the US regulation of political competition.

    I think nutty behaviour in the USA is probably based around not shoring up the rules properly in hopes of taking advantage of the loopholes, rather than an inherent flaw in the idea of a per-person cap.

    Also, absence of evidence is not evidence of absence. 🙂

  20. Chris Diack 20

    Rob:

    “It seems that you believe David’s to be a better submission because its conclusions fit more closely with your own ideas.’

    No on the whole his reasoning is better. Actually I disagree with DPF in a number of places he is far far too fond of regulation and enforcement for my liking.

    “I do not agree with your contention that “each [regulatory regime] promotes the interests of incumbents and usually dominant incumbents at that.’ For example, the German public funding regime, which gives parties more money for the first few votes they receive than for the subsequent votes they receive, advantages small (often new) parties at the expense of large incumbent parties.’

    Well we have had this argument before the entire German set up mitigates against quick political change that its intention. Also they have not been immune to money in politics scandals: Mrs Merkel was the bangperson for Kohl (when she was CDU party Treasurer) and he wasn’t unique he engaged in practices widespread among German political parties. German political parties are pretty sickly due to their dependence on the state funding. The Germans quite like them being creatures of the State given their history.

    “The evidence is clear candidates or parties who raise more money get more votes’

    Labour/Green spent more than National/ACT last time did they get more votes?
    ACT until the last election consistently spent more than any other non Labour/National political party did it get more votes? It sometimes was close to Labour and National in its spend has it ever got anything close to the votes or either of the broad church parties?

    Your statement is nonsense. It’s far truer to observe that incumbents tend to raise more money and get more votes than challengers. And in the US incumbents win more elections than challengers. It’s a fundamental error to assume money = votes. It really depends. Money can follow electabilty not cause it. But what isn’t disputed is the higher co relation between incumbent re-election and regulation.

    I would be interested in surveys you cite suggesting controlling for every other variable that prove the contention that money spent = votes. The “controlling’ for all these variables will tell the tale I suspect.

    “your claim that a per person donation cap which has the effect of decreasing likely giving by the rich, but does not affect behavior among the non-rich, would in fact **advantage the rich** sounds like Orwellian doublespeak of the highest order’

    I never said that I don’t know what you are on about. What I said is that rule caused fundraising inefficiency advantages those best able to carry this inefficiency – wealthy donors, wealthy candidates and those who can purchase or who hold specialist knowledge.

    The rise of the millionaire candidate in the US has resulted from the regulation of political competition there; making it hard to solicit meaningful donations advantages those who don’t have to fundraise; it also the pushes funds that would otherwise go to parties and candidates into non party and non candidate speech especially if that candidate is highly electable (attracting more financial support than they can actually take on an individual basis). The cap incentives both because of the drop in real value over time. As you know almost every electable US pol has shadow organisations – these exist almost exclusive because of the regulation – without almost all probably wouldn’t.

    “4. You say: “Rob’s proposal supports extending regulation to non candidate and party speech a regulatory nightmare which will chill non candidate and party speech.’ That is untrue. I specifically recommend against spending limits for parallel campaigns, so long as there are per person donation caps.’

    You dissemble: first you say that there is no speech urging voting for or against parties or candidates (is that not regulating non candidate non party speech?). You then want to regulate issue advocacy (whatever that is) during the regulated period by suggesting that organisations not running candidates are “political organisations’ and thus subject to your donation regulation. How on earth does one cast a rule to define “political organisation” And if it doesn not take donations at all it can freely but inefficient speak (because it cant be direct) but one that must soliticit donations must do so in small increments?

    And of course there is the arrogance of the “species politicus’; assuming that all speech about politics is “parallel campaigning’ it’s a sort of an “its all about me’ type attitude. It’s a fundamental right of New Zealanders to both bag and praise politicians what is the state interest in regulating this? The purpose of the freedom of expression is to express. Again what are you afraid of: can New Zealanders not process this information; can they not handle ideas.

    Again Rob you simply repeat the old prejudice: money spent on advocating ideas can buy elections. It’s nonsense. Money is necessary but it isn’t sufficient for political success.

    Rudely you define your “parallel campaigning” as issue advocacy – this is an extreme position.

    Trust me: you cannot “balance’ all political speech its impossible and unwise to even attempt it thankfully Labour seems to have given up on this. I don’t know why you would even attempt bring non candidate and non party speech into a regulatory regime.

    And the donation and definition rules you suggest one could drive a bulldozer through them if one had the time and money; hello Mr Wealthy again.

    Surely its better to lightly regulate candidates and parties so what most money for political causes flows there – where it is generally most efficiently spent.

    • Duncan 20.1

      Chris Diack, aren’t you the guy who tried to steal the Labour Party’s house?

      Speaking of unethical behaviour, ask Roger about that Red Seal rort he was into next time you talk to him.

  21. Chris Diack 21

    Duncan

    Ad hominem attack is sooooo boring. Try to keep up or please go onto another thread.

    I am taking the issues Rob raises seriously you should try making a tiny contribution to the sum total of human understanding too.

  22. Chris Diack 22

    Ari:

    The high net worth individuals arrange their affairs to comply with cap because they can afford to carry the costs involved in complying. Yes they also involve themselves in soliciting funds for their preferred candidates as well.

    It’s called bundling it’s a US phenomenon also entirely caused by the regulation.

    Yes high net worth candidates who do not have to fundraise in low increments are advantaged.

    Both of these advantages prompted largely by the regulation of political competition in the US results in Congressional demand for further regulation.

    As to your contention that the US does not try to enforce its regulation more money is spent on compliance and enforcement in the US than any other nation for none in the Anglo-American world have as much regulation.

    Its looks like the Robert’s Supreme Court will start rolling the regulation back the Chief Justice has said he wants to hear a case on the regulation of donations from corporations and the biographical films issue.

  23. burt 23

    All this concern for fair and balanced electoral finance laws is refreshing on the standard. The tables have changed and now DPF is defending “his team” trying to queer the pitch while you guys are opposing it.

    Politics, a game all partisans can play with great dexterity while still being too bloody stupid to notice they are just changing sides fighting over the same things all the time thinking they are better than the other team.

  24. Rob Salmond 24

    Chris

    Taking your points, again, in order:

    1. On Germany, I do not remember arguing that the German system was without blemish. But I did argue that the aspect of their system which I highlight in my submission does not, as you had claimed, advantage the incumbents.

    2. On the link between money and votes, anybody can pick out exceptions to a trend, write only the exceptions down, and then say there is no trend. But that doesn’t make the statement true. I suggest you read the studies. David Farrar has and, despite his ideological reservations, had to conclude that raising money really does help a candidate win votes, all else equal.

    3. “I never said that I don’t know what you are on about.’ Chris, take your statement immediately following that one and substitute the specific rule I proposed in place of your description of that rule as “rule caused inefficiency’, then you have a statement saying exactly what I said you said. You repeated your earlier logic as to why the rich might benefit from a per person donation cap. It **is** interesting logic. In an earlier comment you said there was some evidence to back this up. Can you point me to evidence beyond the rise of rich candidates? (As I said before, I do not find that one fact persuasive here.)

    4. On parallel campaigns, I do not think the definitional problems are as insurmountable as you appear to think they are.

    Chris, you have a position which reifies “free speech’ over other principles. I can understand how your proposals flow from that position. But I take a different view on the principles. I think that participatory fairness and freedom of speech are sometimes in conflict, and that it is not obvious that freedom of speech should win every time. So does the MOJ by the look of it, and so do most of the world’s democracies. More importantly, I have at least a little evidence that the majority of New Zealanders share my view on these principles. I have not heard evidence from the other side that their view on the principles has majority support.

  25. Chris Diack 25

    Rob:

    It’s a bit tiring to hear the “well reasonable people can disagree argument’ trotted out.

    As DPF correctly observes, it for those propose proposing removing fundamental freedoms to make out their case.

    Remember the freedom of expression is recognised in the NZBORA. Accordingly to abridge it the obligation is upon you to show that the limitation is justified; and further to outline what significant objective you seek to achieve by the limitation and whether the policy you propose is rational and proportionate.

    Substantive fairness or equity (your value of primacy) isn’t a NZBORA right. Nor is a right existing outside the NZBORA. Rather it is a mere public policy choice.

    Parliament has determined the issue of values by including the freedom of expression and not included your substantive fairness or equity.

    So Rob the duty is on those who want to remove fundamental freedoms to make out a compelling case.

    Regarding the MOJ document what you point to as a positive attribute of their work I interpret as pre judgement and poor drafting.

    Regarding what New Zealanders want regarding taxpayer contributions towards political competition, I am sure if they where aware of the probably close to $30m a triennium the taxpayer contributes towards Labour MP’s doing their jobs and competing with other parties I am sure they would say that that is enough fairness already.

    Using your numbering:

    1 Germany

    96% of all public funding goes on the parties in the Diet. One third of the Parties income is from state funding; one third from party membership and other donations and one third from levies on public officerholders for those parties. Both the members fees and the individual donations and levies are to some extent (generous) tax deductible. Parliamentary Blocs can also receive donations the transfer of which to the Party are also tax deductible.

    I should not have to say this but any funding system that relies on a formula based on previous voting in an immediate past Federal or European Election; and then on the tax deductibility of generously paid officeholder contributions at Federal, State and Municipal levels of course favours incumbents.

    That is not to mention all the funding available to party blocs at Federal, State and Municipal for their public duties. The Germans have quite some gravy train in operation.

    I mentioned the German problems not to illustrate perfection (or lack of it) but rather to show that German politicians are also functioning under the thicket of regulations and that the key justification for public funding (avoiding corruption and its appearance) doesn’t actually work even in system where the overall State contribution to political competition is very significant.

    2. On the link between money and votes, you offered research that controlled for incumbency that shows that shows those candidates getting more money win elections. I would be interested in the links to these.

    Certainly this contention isn’t supported in New Zealand. DPF has done some work on the actual returns of party donations and expenses that does not support the contention.

    I actually don’t believe that one can get meaningful research that controls for everything else but I would welcome the details of this.

    3 Individual donor caps are a rule required fundraising inefficiency by definition. I did not say that high net worth individuals benefit from them, what I said was that as candidates, donors and fundraisers they are best placed to afford to carry the costs of this inefficiency.

    It is simple economics really. To collect $20k from an individual is cheaper than collecting 20 x 1K increments. Thus the pressure goes on the reduce transaction costs. Reducing transaction costs favours the wealthy because they can afford this better.

    Rule based fundraising inefficiency must by necessity disadvantage low net worth political minority candidates since being a political minor necessarily means a narrow base of support. And so the University prof from Hyde Party might be moved to give a radical candidate 10K in one transaction but is prevented from doing so and simply isn’t rich enough to arrange is or her affairs to comply and nor to act as a fundraiser for the candidate. The Hyde Park radical must be electable enough to gainer the support of those who can arrange their affairs and those of people like them to fund, like Silicon Valley millionaires and billionaires.

    4. On parallel campaigns, you propose outlaw express political advocacy at a time when citizens are actually most interested in politics, in favour of issues based advocacy which you then propose to regulate the soliciting of donations for (which again favours high net worth individuals and organisations that don’t need popular support to provide their income. What is actually “parallel’ about issue advocacy and why isn’t this erosion of the fundamental right of New Zealanders who are not candidates or political parties to bag, praise or ignore politicians and parties in their speech?

  26. Rob Salmond 26

    Chris

    I will not be as thorough as you indoor soccer and delicious beverages beckon.

    Most importantly, if you honestly do not believe that reasonable people can disagree on controversial political issues like election financing, then you have failed to learn lesson one of political science one. Think about the depth of the arrogance contained in the statement “people either agree with me or are stupid.’

    To the numbers:

    1. Abstracting from Germany a bit, if the opposite of regulation is Darwinian free competition in which the strong survive and the weak perish, aren’t incumbents almost always “the strong’ and therefore advantaged viz the rest in free competition as well? So even if you are right about the incumbency advantage in regulated systems, removing the regulation does not remove the advantage. And, as I have pointed out, some regulatory systems have elements that try to undo some of that incumbency advantage.

    2. You ask for references: I would start with Gary Jacobson’s 1978 article in the American Political Science Review, then look at a follow-ups from Jacobson, from Don Green and Jonathan Krasno, and from Erikson and Thomas Palfrey, then look for articles that cite these or that these cite. I don’t have the URLs off the top of my head, but if you google the authors and “campaign finance’ you should find them OK.

    3. In the issue of donor caps, twice I have asked you to point me to the evidence you mentioned earlier, and twice you have not done so. If there is evidence (as opposed to “argument”), point me to it.

    4. Nobody is seeking to ban you from saying nasty things about politicians you do not like. What we are regulating is you employing others (be they newspaper printers or television technicians or pamphlet printers and deliverers etc) to bag politicians on your behalf.

  27. Chris Diack 27

    Rob

    My comment about reasonable people disagreeing is not about intelligence or an attempt to be insulting it is really about ignoring the burden of proof you carry when you advocate abridging fundamental rights like the freedom of expression. As I said Parliament has spoken about this value it has put it in the law.

    It isn’t merely a matter or taste; you have much more work to do when advocating a position that reduces the freedom of expression. Whereas, I have much less lifting to do because I support no restrictions on non candidate and non party expression; and lighter regulation of candidates and parties generally.

    1 On Germany you claimed their regulation of political competition didn’t favour incumbents I established that on the whole it very clearly does. Further, that German political parties are highly reliant on direct and indirect taxpayer support; that their entire set up mitigates against dramatic political change.

    Remember the issue is ensuring that parliament represents the major streams of political thought in New Zealand. The key to that is to ensure that challengers can make their case. Most regulation both here and abroad advantages incumbents against challengers. You are correct that Parliamentary incumbents are generally advantaged by virtue of being in Parliament that is why the regulation of political competition should not add to that as you would propose.

    Using your numbering:

    2. You mean this Prof Gary Jacobson:

    “Meanwhile, I think it would be foolish to make policy on the assumption that bias is, in fact, substantial; the greatest likelihood remains that restrictions on campaign money will have the general effect of hurting challengers (Jacobson, 1979).

    http://www.springerlink.com/content/h08j13135144qt16/

    3. You must be pre occupied by the indoor soccer Rob; have you not see the moves to regulate both bundling and the millionaire exception in Congress the irony being of course that both of these problems arise almost entirely because of the cap on individual donations.

    As I said you are attempting to introduce the most nutty element of US scheme you are going to have to do better.

    4. This statement boarders on legal illiteracy you cannot be serious.

  28. Rob Salmond 28

    Chris – This is the last time I will post on this thread. 1. On Germany, I never made the broad system-wide claim you say I made – that may have been the source of the confusion. 2. Jacobson was talking in the context of the localised, candidate centered, individualistic US system. Would the same conclusion hold in a nationalised party-based system? I don’t think Jacobson would profess to know. In addition, you have framed the whole discussion as “incubments vs challengers” whereas most political party-level competition in all PR democracies is between incumbents and incumbents. 3. I note that for a third time you have failed to supply the evidence you had earlier alluded to. 4. I’ll judge your statement that you do not intend to be insulting with a grain of salt, given your final statement about illiteracy.

Recent Comments

Recent Posts

  • Charged
    The Serious Fraud Office has filed charges against four people over National's donations scam. No-one has been named yet, because name suppression hasn't been dealt with yet, so I guess we'll just have to wait for completely coincidental resignations (cough name suppressed cough) to see if any of them are ...
    No Right TurnBy Idiot/Savant
    16 mins ago
  • So much for raising the retirement age
    For the past twenty years, the right has plotted to raise the retirement age, supposedly because preventing old people from starving to death is "unsustainable". Of course, it would also let them deliver an enormous tax cut to their cronies, which tells us that its financial sustainability is simply a ...
    No Right TurnBy Idiot/Savant
    40 mins ago
  • A squandered opportunity
    Late last year, in the face of economic bad news, the government announced a massive $12 billion infrastructure spending programme to keep the economy ticking over. Given shortages of housing and public transport, and the pressing need to decarbonise our economy, this could have been a massive opportunity to fix ...
    No Right TurnBy Idiot/Savant
    3 hours ago
  • The coronavirus outbreak: what is R0?
    There are a few misunderstandings about the coronavirus outbreak from Wuhan getting around. Below is a short explanation of one of them: what is R0, and what does it mean. Current estimates for R0 centre around the mid 2s—call it 2.5 or thereabouts—not the higher values some are scare-mongering online. ...
    SciBlogsBy Grant Jacobs
    9 hours ago
  • Global warming is happening here and now
    An excerpt from the book Cranky Uncle vs. Climate Change, released Feb 25. Signs of global warming are being observed all over our planet. Thermometers measure surface warming. Buoys sunk to ocean depths measure heat building up in our oceans. Ice is melting across our planet, with ice sheets crumbling and glaciers ...
    19 hours ago
  • Whiteness, class and the white working class
    This essay by Kenan Malik, on the controversy over the funding of scholarships for white working class boys, was originally published in the Observer on 5 January 2020, under the headline‘Bursaries don’t help when it’s not their colour that thwarts these boys’. There is a scene in Salman Rushdie’s The Satanic ...
    RedlineBy Daphna
    20 hours ago
  • We have a date
    The Prime Minister has just announced the election date as 19 September. So, its a Suffrage Day election, and well before the Trump hits the fan in the US. The no-longer-new practice of announcing the election date well in advance is good, and puts everyone on a more even footing ...
    No Right TurnBy Idiot/Savant
    1 day ago
  • With the En-ROADS climate simulator, you can build your own solutions to global warming
    This is a re-post from Yale Climate Connections Killer hurricanes, devastating wildfires, melting glaciers, and sunny-day flooding in more and more coastal areas around the world have birthed a fatalistic view cleverly dubbed by Mary Annaïse Heglar of the Natural Resources Defense Council as “de-nihilism“. One manifestation: An increasing number of ...
    1 day ago
  • The coronavirus outbreak in China: what a difference a week makes
    When it comes to emerging infectious diseases and outbreaks, so much can happen in a week. In the case of the coronavirus outbreak in China, I’ve gone from not being too alarmed, to thinking “oh, crap!”. But that still doesn’t mean we should all panic. As I’m writing this on ...
    SciBlogsBy Siouxsie Wiles
    2 days ago
  • National cries wolf over Coronavirus
    Opposition MP Michael WoodhouseLast week, the current National Party leader, Simon Bridges, claimed that the Minister of Health wasn’t leading on ‘significant issues that matter to New Zealanders within his Health portfolio’ when commenting about the Government’s response to the Coronavirus outbreak.This silly comment was made despite David Clark working ...
    2 days ago
  • Fluoridation and sex steroid hormones – or the mouse that roared
    All the recent research anti-fluoride campaigners promote as “evidence” of harm from community water fluoridation amount to cherry-picking a very few statistically significant results from a large number of non-significant results. The whole exercise is a bit like the “Mouse that Roared.” Credit: The Mouse that Roared – TMTR Intro ...
    2 days ago
  • Leave Neve alone
    Neve Te Aroha Gayford at RatanaI’m sure I’m not the only one to notice that the Ratana birthday celebrations this year were a well-attended event that went off without much of a hitch. This is in stark contrast to previous years, where some form of controversy has usually taken centre ...
    3 days ago
  • 2020 SkS Weekly Climate Change & Global Warming News Roundup #4
    A chronological listing of news articles linked to on the Skeptical Science Facebook Page during the past week, i.e., Sun, Jan 19, 2020 through Sat, Jan 25, 2020 Editor's Pick The companies that have contributed most to climate change Thought-provoking readings on those most responsible for the pollution. Sometimes, ...
    3 days ago
  • The swimming pool paradox
    It’s another warm day, but the breeze isn’t helping much, so off I go to the inviting outdoor swimming pool (banner picture) at the other end of campus. It’s an unheated pool (well, there’s no artificial heat source), which means one thing: It’s going to feel cold when I get ...
    SciBlogsBy Marcus Wilson
    5 days ago
  • 100 seconds to midnight
    The Doomsday Clock is a tracker created by he Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists for how close we are to global destruction. Created in 1947, it got worse as the Cold War started, then improved as it cooled down, then got worse again as Ronald Reagan tried to confront the ...
    No Right TurnBy Idiot/Savant
    5 days ago
  • A multitude of drops: Social tipping points in climate action
    If you’re here, you probably know that the climate crisis is upon us, that it’s getting steadily worse, and that attempts to address it haven’t worked yet. People are still driving and even advertising SUVs with impunity, and oil companies are exploring like crazy, even in New Zealand. Politically, socially, ...
    SciBlogsBy Robert McLachlan
    5 days ago
  • The Thoughtful Mr Parker.
    Stunningly Wrong-Headed: So blinded are the “left-wing” believers in free markets and free trade (like Trade Minister, David Parker) that even when they are staring directly at the wreckage of the lives and communities which these “unconscionable freedoms” (to borrow Marx’s telling phrase) have left in their wake, they cannot ...
    5 days ago
  • What’s the problem with all science being “done” in English?
    I’ve been listening to a wonderful podcast this morning which left me thinking. The podcast was a 30-min well-spent break, in the company of Daniel Midgley and Michael Gordin.  You might know Daniel Midgley from the Talk the Talk linguistics podcast. Michael Gordin is the author of “Scientific Babel”, which ...
    SciBlogsBy Andreea Calude
    5 days ago
  • Snakeflu?! An intriguing source suggested for new Chinese coronavirus
    The whole world is on edge over a coronavirus outbreak that started in early December in Wuhan City, China. The virus is thought to have first infected people working at a seafood and live animal market. So what could the original source have been? There’s no official word yet, but ...
    SciBlogsBy Siouxsie Wiles
    6 days ago
  • Simon’s Philippine jaunt: #LittleBoysPlayingToughguys
    Not too far back, Simon Bridges the Leader of the Opposition and National Party, went on an excursion to China. This was arranged not by MFAT (NZ’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade), but by their MP Jian Yang – a man who also just happened to “forget to mention” ...
    exhALANtBy exhalantblog
    6 days ago
  • Will Turia ever forgive Labour?
    Dame Tariana Turia with former PM John KeyWhat is it about Tariana Turia’s grudge against the Labour Party? Not content with attacking the Government over Whānau Ora funding, which was increased by $80 million in 2019, she has now made it personal by saying that Jacinda Ardern is out of her ...
    6 days ago
  • What are the recent fluoride-IQ studies really saying about community water fluoridation?
    Scaremongering graphic currently being promoted by Declan Waugh who is well known for misrepresenting the fluoride science This graphic is typical of current anti-fluoride propaganda. It is scare-mongering, in that it is aimed at undermining community ...
    6 days ago
  • Skeptical Science New Research for Week #3, 2020
    Biography of a policy metric Bård Lahn performs a sweeping literature review to present the history of our notion of a "global carbon budget" and how this number has come  to encapsulate a massive amount of scientific research into a useful, easily grasped tool in our policy skill set.  A ...
    6 days ago
  • Oxfam Report: Time to Care – Unpaid and underpaid care work and the global inequality crisis
    January 2020 Economic inequality is out of control. In 2019, the world’s billionaires, only 2,153 people, had more wealth than 4.6 billion people. This great divide is based on a flawed and sexist economic system that values the wealth of the privileged few, mostly men, more than the billions of ...
    Closing the GapBy Tracey Sharp
    7 days ago
  • How to avoid being a cunt to hospo workers’
    Working hospo is hard mahi for many reasons, from long hours and gruelling high-volume weekends to customers who treat us as their servants. There are always lovely and polite customers who treat hospo workers with respect and kindness but, throughout my 15-years in the biz, I’ve collected a number of ...
    PosseBy chloeanneking
    7 days ago
  • 2019-nCoV (the new coronavirus): Should we be concerned, and will there be a vaccine?
    Probably yes to both but don’t panic yet. There is a plan. What is this virus? 2019 novel coronavirus, aka 2019-nCoV, belongs to a family of viruses called coronavirus. These are very common viruses that infect a wide range of animals including humans and can cause mild to severe disease, ...
    SciBlogsBy Helen Petousis Harris
    1 week ago
  • The Chinese coronavirus outbreak: what are the options for vaccines and treatments?
    By now you’ve probably heard of the coronavirus outbreak that started in Wuhan City, China. The number of cases is rising, up to about 300 with six deaths. Cases have been reported in several more Chinese cities, including Beijing and Shanghai, as well as in Japan, Thailand, and South Korea. ...
    SciBlogsBy Siouxsie Wiles
    1 week ago
  • Educating New Zealand’s future workforce
    Judy Kavanagh Do you remember your first day at school? The education I received was for a very different world than the world of today. Along with huge social shifts there have been big changes in the New Zealand economy and the work people do. There are occupations unheard of ...
    SciBlogsBy Guest Author
    1 week ago
  • A casual attitude towards transparency
    Back in December, when the government was introducing new secrecy legislation on an almost daily basis, I posted about the Infrastructure Funding and Financing Bill. The Bill establishes a new class of public entity, "special purpose vehicles", which collect and spend public money and enjoy statutory powers. Despite this, they ...
    No Right TurnBy Idiot/Savant
    1 week ago
  • Against a carbon bailout
    If we are to avoid making the planet uninhabitable, we need to cut carbon emisisons fast. Which basicly means putting the fossil fuel industry - coal, gas, and oil - out of business. But this means that the banks and other lenders who have bankrolled the industry's environmental destruction will ...
    No Right TurnBy Idiot/Savant
    1 week ago
  • Still a criminal industry
    More evidence that the fishing industry suffers from pervasive criminality, with Forest & Bird highlighting some odd numbers in the annual statistics:The Annual Review Report For Highly Migratory Species Fisheries 2018/19 (Pg 4, Table 4) showed only 4% of commercial long lining trips for tuna and swordfish reported non-fish bycatch ...
    No Right TurnBy Idiot/Savant
    1 week ago
  • Controversy? Or Manufactroversy?
    A few days ago, New Zealand’s Minister of Education announced the wider release of a resource on climate change, which was initially trialled at a Christchurch school during 2018. According to the Minister, children will learn about “the role science plays in understanding climate change, aids understanding of both the response ...
    SciBlogsBy Alison Campbell
    1 week ago
  • The emerging coronavirus outbreak in China
    By now you’ve probably heard of the new virus causing an outbreak of severe pneumonia in China. The question on most people’s minds is, how worried should we be, especially as hundreds of millions of people will soon be travelling across China and beyond to visit family for the Lunar ...
    SciBlogsBy Siouxsie Wiles
    1 week ago
  • How did climate change get so controversial?
    An excerpt from the book Cranky Uncle vs. Climate Change, released Feb 25. Our human brain is poorly equipped to deal with a threat like climate change. Over millions of years, we’ve evolved to avoid life-threatening dangers like predators jumping out of bushes. We’ve survived by quickly detecting and avoiding immediate, short-term ...
    1 week ago
  • Farmers are ruining Canterbury’s rivers
    Its summer, so people naturally want to go for a swim. But in South Canterbury, you can't, because the rivers are full of toxic goo:As of Monday, the Waihi River at Wilson Street footbridge, Geraldine, the Waihao River at Bradshaws Bridge, and three spots on the Opihi River - at ...
    No Right TurnBy Idiot/Savant
    1 week ago
  • Sack Shane Jones
    Late last year, NZ First was caught trying to enrich itself from public office, with a dodgy forestry company linked to a number of NZ First figures sticking its hand out repeatedly for government money. Regional Economic Development Minister shane Jones' "explanations" were patently unconvincing, and his recusal from deciding ...
    No Right TurnBy Idiot/Savant
    1 week ago
  • BIG idea physics
    This morning I’ve been having a quick look through some documentation from The Ministry of Education on proposed changes to NCEA Level 1 Science. For those not familiar with the NZ secondary education system, a typical student would complete NCEA level 1 at the end of year 11.  In this ...
    SciBlogsBy Marcus Wilson
    1 week ago
  • Revolution in New Zealand? Not Even Close!
    No Fires Thanks, We're Kiwis: For the moment, in those close-to-home places where revolutions are born, there may be tetchiness and resentment, frustration and complaint, but nowhere is anybody uttering the cry that will bring a New Zealand revolution into being: “We have found the way to make tomorrow better ...
    1 week ago
  • 2020 SkS Weekly Climate Change & Global Warming Digest #3
    Story of the Week... Editorial of the Week... Toon of the Week... Quote of the Week... Graphic of the Week... Coming Soon on SkS... Climate Feedback Claim Reviews... SkS Week in Review... Poster of the Week... Story of the Week... 'It's heart-wrenching': 80% of Blue Mountains and 50% of ...
    1 week ago
  • Britain exits the European Union and takes a sharp right turn
    by John Smith  Britain’s exit from the imperialist bloc known as the European Union (EU) is now irreversible. The crushing electoral defeat of the Labour Party has dismayed many workers and youth who had placed their hopes in Jeremy Corbyn, its left-wing leader. This article assesses these historic events, neither of which ...
    RedlineBy Daphna
    1 week ago
  • 2020 SkS Weekly Climate Change & Global Warming News Roundup #3
    A chronological listing of news articles linked to on the Skeptical Science Facebook Page during the past week, i.e., Sun, Jan 12, 2020 through Sat, Jan 18, 2020 Editor's Pick The Past and the Future of the Earth’s Oldest Trees Bristlecone pines have survived various catastrophes over the millennia, and they ...
    1 week ago
  • How climate change influenced Australia’s unprecedented fires
    This is a re-post from Yale Climate Connections, and has been adapted into a new myth rebuttal on climate-wildfire connections with the short URL sks.to/wildfires Australia’s frightening bushfires, which kicked off an early fire season in September 2019, have already had cataclysmic effects, and the continent is still just in the early ...
    2 weeks ago
  • Gender Identity Ideology – A Partial Bibliography of Online Coverage
    This great resource has been contributed to Redline by Janie Doebuck. Janie made some notes on the bibliography: 1) It is by no means exhaustive. There are tons more gender critical posts, essays, articles, podcasts, youtube videos, etc. online. 2) There are links in the bibliography that are behind paywalls. There ...
    RedlineBy Daphna
    2 weeks ago
  • About those biased Oscar Nominations
    There’s been a lot written about the 2020 Oscar Nominations and their apparent lack of diversity. It’s true, there are in fact no women nominated for the Best Director and very few nominees of colour across the board. But is this a result of a biased process or a symptom ...
    2 weeks ago
  • How New Zealand media reports chronic pain
    Hemakumar Devan Around three million New Zealanders access news media (both paper and online) every week. Yes, you heard that right! So, the potential for news media to shape public health beliefs is common sense. As chronic pain affects one in five New Zealanders, we wanted to find out how ...
    SciBlogsBy Guest Author
    2 weeks ago
  • Still Waiting For American Democracy.
    Unfinished Republic: Though the United States' crimes against democracy are legion, most Americans are blissfully unaware of them. The brutal realities of American life: the officially sanctioned violence; the refusal to hold racists accountable for their actions; the seemingly endless tragedy of African-American suffering; of which White America is the ...
    2 weeks ago
  • In Outrage Over Its Bunk Science, Goop Finds Fuel for Growth
    Michael Schulson For years, experts have said that Goop, the wellness and lifestyle brand founded by the actor and entrepreneur Gwyneth Paltrow, markets pseudoscience and overblown cures. And for years, despite the criticism, Goop has just kept growing. Now the company, which was valued at $250 million in 2018, ...
    SciBlogsBy Guest Author
    2 weeks ago
  • Tobacco Excise Taxes and the Smokefree 2025 Goal: Some Ways Forward
    Janet Hoek, Richard Edwards, George Thomson, Andrew Waa, Nick Wilson Debate over tobacco tax increases has intensified as research indicates potentially conflicting policy directions. On the one hand, excise tax increases continue to stimulate quit attempts among smokers yet, on the other hand, they may lead to financial hardship for ...
    SciBlogsBy Public Health Expert
    2 weeks ago
  • Skeptical Science New Research for Week #2, 2020
    Conflation and how to fix it VIa AMS,  Raul Lejano looks at what in a layperson's thinking would be called conflation— confusion and blending of entirely different topics— when people think about climate change. Ideology and the Narrative of Skepticism  (open access) starts with some arguably frightening false connections between the science and ...
    2 weeks ago
  • ‘Cranky Uncle’ smart phone game will show you how to disarm climate deniers
    This is a re-post from Yale Climate Connections by Bud Ward (Image: Courtesy of John Cook) When it comes to climate change, it seems every family has its own version of the proverbial Cranky Uncle. An uncle, cousin, grandparent, in-law, neighbor, whatever. Just think back to the recent holiday season’s large ...
    2 weeks ago
  • Science in the ’20s – part 1
      Outrageous, immoral or downright dangerous. That’s a description of the lifestyle of women “flappers” in the 1920s. Could it apply to science (and scientists) in the 2020s? Actually, you could look back at the past decade and see those, or similar terms, used about some science and scientists. Sometimes ...
    SciBlogsBy Robert Hickson
    2 weeks ago
  • Postscript: Citizenship Granted.
    I am pleased to say that I have been granted NZ citizenship. I need to do the ceremony for things to be official, but the application was a success. I now join my son as a dual NZ-US citizen. To be fair, very little will change other than the fact ...
    KiwipoliticoBy Pablo
    2 weeks ago
  • Hard News: Music: Morales is coming
    It will be no secret to longtime readers that I, Russell Brown, love the disco.   So I'm pretty excited by the fact that one of the greats of the game is returning this summer – and also pleased to say I have tickets to give away.Legendary mixer and DJ ...
    2 weeks ago
  • The WHO Vaccine Safety Summit – from someone who was actually there
    The conspiracy I saw a new conspiracy theory flying around the other day. According to the conspiracy (that seems to originate from Del Bigtree), the World Health Organization have been ‘caught on camera’ questioning the safety of vaccines. Gosh this sounds as though someone was a mole at a ...
    SciBlogsBy Helen Petousis Harris
    2 weeks ago
  • The timely death of the British Labour Party
    Below is an article submitted to Redline by Alec Abbott  At its inception, the British Labour Party was a vehicle for the propagation of racist and imperialist views within the working-class. Such views are still widespread in the party, as they are in Europe’s Social-Democratic parties, though, in the case of ...
    RedlineBy Daphna
    2 weeks ago
  • Mystery China pneumonia outbreak likely caused by new human coronavirus
    Connor Bamford, Queen’s University Belfast Since December 2019, there has been a cluster of 59 cases of pneumonia in Wuhan, eastern China. The pneumonia is associated with a previously unidentified coronavirus related to the deadly SARS virus. Seven of those cases are thought to be serious, and one person – ...
    SciBlogsBy Guest Author
    2 weeks ago
  • Yes, koalas are cute – but should we bring them to NZ? Errm, no
    It’s been hard to miss the extreme fires raging across Australia and the tragic plight of the animals – human and otherwise – affected by the fires’ insatiable spread. I know I’ve been captivated and concerned by the tales of how Australia’s famous wildlife has been coping. Koalas approaching cyclists ...
    SciBlogsBy Sarah-Jane O'Connor
    2 weeks ago
  • National’s negative campaigning
    Anybody who looked into the Dirty Politics saga knows all too well that honesty is often in short supply within the National Party. You would think that after the exposure the John Key government received over their untruthful attack politics, the National Party would learn from its "mistakes" and leave ...
    2 weeks ago
  • Ending the government’s charade over water
    For the past decade, the government has been responding to the obvious Treaty issues raised by water allocation with the mantra that "no-one owns water". But last year, the Waitangi Tribunal ruled that actually, Māori owned it, and that those rights had never been extinguished. They recommended that iwi bring ...
    No Right TurnBy Idiot/Savant
    2 weeks ago
  • Northern Ireland joins the civilised world
    Same-sex marriage has finally become legal in Northern Ireland. But not through any decision of the Northern Irish Executive or Assembly, which has only just reformed after a three year walkout by the DUP; instead, Westminster made that decision for them. I've talked before about the constitutional impropriety of this, ...
    No Right TurnBy Idiot/Savant
    2 weeks ago
  • I had an intense conversation at work today.
    Claire Cohen-Norris volunteers with Citizens Climate Lobby as a chapter founder and leader in rural New York. Her climate advocacy sprung from her drive to provide a secure, joyful and fulfilling life for her two wonderful children. It has become a life’s mission, shared with her like-minded husband and partner. Claire ...
    2 weeks ago
  • French transport workers take on Macron over pension reform
    by John Edmundson Starting on December 5th, 2019 workers in the Parisian rail network commenced an open-ended strike in opposition to French President Emmanuel Macron’s proposed changes to their pension scheme. Rail workers in the Metro Underground have, for decades, had retirement conditions that compensate them for the low wages, ...
    RedlineBy Admin
    2 weeks ago
  • What a difference the decimal point makes
    I’m back at work following a nearly three-week break over Christmas. We were fortunate to be offered a house to stay in for a week over Christmas, which enabled us to have a holiday in Dunedin and see the extended family reasonably cheaply. But the house came with a catch:  ...
    SciBlogsBy Marcus Wilson
    2 weeks ago
  • Who’s Going To Stop Him?
    Blank And Pitiless: Having ordered the assassination of the Iranian General, Qasem Soleimani, President Donald Trump promised to reduce the cultural monuments of Iran’s 3,000 year-old civilisation to rubble if a revenge attack was mounted. A breach of international law? Certainly. A war crime? Indisputably. Who’s going to stop him? Nobody.WHAT ...
    2 weeks ago
  • A worker’s story
    This interview is from Aotearoa Workers Solidarity Movement (AWSM) and is the first of an ongoing series of interviews they plan to do with workers from various sectors who are having their well being and livelihoods damaged. They begin with an educator in Southland. Due to the attitude and actions ...
    RedlineBy Daphna
    2 weeks ago
  • 2020 SkS Weekly Climate Change & Global Warming News Roundup #2
    A chronological listing of news articles linked to on the Skeptical Science Facebook Page during the past week, i.e., Sun, Jan 5, 2020 through Sat, Jan 11, 2020 Editor's Pick Debunked Australian Bushfire Conspiracy Theories Were Pushed by Alex Jones, Murdoch Media   As unusually intense and widespread bushfires have ...
    2 weeks ago
  • J.K. Rowling, the Seattle Library, and the Issue That Must Not Be Named
    This article was submitted to Redline by Seattle-based activist Lucinda Stoan J.K. Rowling recognizes repression when she sees it.  That’s why the author of the wildly popular Harry Potter books recently tweeted in defense of Maya Forstater. Forstater lost her job for stating that sex is real and immutable. A judge ...
    RedlineBy Daphna
    3 weeks ago
  • Rules of Empire: Laws simply do not apply and “National Security” excuses all else.
    Empires rise and fall, and the American Empire is absolutely no different. But while an Empire, in order to further the footprint, it seems to pay to do one primary thing above all else: project that everything – everything – is “simply for the good of the world” at large, ...
    exhALANtBy exhalantblog
    3 weeks ago
  • Indian lessons for NZ workers – the January 8 general strike
                    by Phil Duncan On Wednesday (January 8) another massive general strike took place in India.  Some 250 million industrial workers, white-collar workers, agricultural labourers struck against the government’s economic policies and attacks on the Muslim population through new proposed citizenship rules. This ...
    RedlineBy Admin
    3 weeks ago
  • Climate Change: The action that counts
    Over on Newsroom, Professor Jacqueline Beggs writes about the action she is taking on climate change. Its the usual list: reduce meat, don't fly, consume less. I'm doing some of this myself, and none of it hurts - but the way our economic system is constructed means the impact of ...
    No Right TurnBy Idiot/Savant
    3 weeks ago
  • Fossil fuel political giving outdistances renewables 13 to one
    This is a re-post from Yale Climate Connections by Karin Kirk Corporations, special interest groups, and individuals inject billions of dollars into the American political system every year. Much of the financial support in politics is concealed from public view, as some rules – and loopholes – allow “dark money” and ...
    3 weeks ago
  • Animal response to a bushfire is astounding. These are the tricks they use to survive
    Dale Nimmo, Charles Sturt University Have you ever wondered how our native wildlife manage to stay alive when an inferno is ripping through their homes, and afterwards when there is little to eat and nowhere to hide? The answer is adaptation and old-fashioned ingenuity. Australia’s bushfire season is far from ...
    SciBlogsBy Guest Author
    3 weeks ago

  • FAQ – Everything you need to know about the Big New Zealand Upgrade
    Today, our Government announced the biggest infrastructure investment in a generation. We’re investing $12 billion to upgrade and build rail, roads, schools and hospitals across the country – modernising our infrastructure, preparing for climate change and helping to future-proof our economy. Find out everything you need to know about the ...
    3 hours ago
  • Week That Was: 2020
    We are back for 2020! From changes to Family Funded Care, to a record high number of Kiwis in construction in the trades - we're already back making progress on those long-term challenges. Read all about it and more ...
    5 days ago
  • Winston Peters: “Ihumātao deal still a long way off”
    Deputy Prime Minister Winston Peters told Mike Hosking that a settlement deal regarding Ihumātao in Auckland is still a long way off. The Maori King's flag was lowered at the site near Auckland Airport yesterday, sparking suggestions an announcement of a deal could be made by Waitangi Day. Pania Newton, ...
    6 days ago
  • Winston Peters accuses Gerry Brownlee of ‘politicising’ Holocaust memorial
    Foreign Affairs Minister Winston Peters is accusing Gerry Brownlee of "politicising" a Holocaust memorial event after the National MP questioned the lack of Kiwi representation there. The Yad Vashem World Holocaust Remembrance Centre in Jerusalem, Israel, is holding the World Holocaust Forum on January 23 to mark 75 years since ...
    6 days ago
  • Provincial Growth Fund to help Waipukurau Pā sites attract thousands of tourists
    The Ngā Ara Tipuna - Waipukurau Pā Site Interpretation project is receiving $2.798 million from the Provincial Growth Fund. It is is expected to boost the town's employment and tourism, creating sixteen new jobs once completed and attract up to 15,000 visitors a year. Parliamentary Under-Secretary for Regional Economic Development ...
    1 week ago
  • “Common sense will prevail, not extremism” Winston Peters backs Shane Jones’ pro-meat stance
    New Zealand First leader Winston Peters is backing his MPs who have spoken out against a new climate change teaching resource that advises students to eat less meat to save the planet. The new teaching resource, announced by Education Minister Chris Hipkins and Climate Change Minister James Shaw, tells students ...
    1 week ago
  • Violent assault on paramedic highlights need for law change
    Darroch Ball MP, Spokesperson for Justice Today’s horrific violent assault of an on-duty female paramedic which rendered her unconscious is truly unsettling. “Our thoughts are with the paramedic, her loved ones and the St John’s team at Warkworth Station,” says New Zealand First Justice Spokesperson Darroch Ball. “Harsher penalties for perpetrators ...
    1 week ago
  • Acting PM Winston Peters confirms NZDF troops in Iraq not hit by Iranian attacks
    Acting Prime Minister Winston Peters called for calm and diplomacy following Iranian missile strikes on bases housing United States troops in Iraq, but confirmed New Zealand's base in the country was not hit. The New Zealand Defence Force (NZDF) was earlier today investigating claims New Zealand's base in Iraq had ...
    1 week ago
  • Kaikōura $10.88 million boost in tourism & business
    Fletcher Tabuteau MP, Parliamentary Undersecretary for Regional Economic Development The Provincial Growth Fund (PGF) is investing $10.88 million to boost business and tourism opportunities in Kaikōura, Parliamentary Undersecretary for Regional Economic Development, Fletcher Tabuteau announced today. As part of the Kaikōura Marina Development Programme, the following two projects will receive ...
    2 weeks ago
  • Delivering a stable water supply to Wairarapa
    Hon. Ron Mark, New Zealand First List MP based in Wairarapa The Provincial Growth Fund (PGF) is investing $7.11 million to create a sustainable water supply for the Wairarapa. The PGF will provide a $7 million investment to Wairarapa Water Limited to progress the Wairarapa Water Storage Scheme towards procurement, consenting, ...
    2 weeks ago
  • Housing consents hit highest level since 1974
    Housing consents have hit a 45-year high, as Statistics NZ data shows a total of 37,010 residential consents were issued in the year to November --- the first time they have breached the 37,000 mark since the mid-1970s. Statistics NZ said the trend had been rising since late 2011, when ...
    2 weeks ago
  • Darroch Ball MP: “Violence against first responders is a problem on the rise”
    New Zealand First MP Darroch Ball says that a paramedic being kicked unconscious last night in an attempted burglary in Warkworth, north of Auckland, is a symptom of a larger problem. "Incidents like this are becoming more and more frequent...and it’s getting worse," Mr Ball said. The MP is pushing for ...
    2 weeks ago

  • Statement on evacuation of New Zealanders from Wuhan
    “I spoke with Prime Minister Morrison again this afternoon and we have confirmed that we will work together on a joint ANZAC assisted departure of Australians and New Zealanders from Wuhan,” Jacinda Ardern said. “Specific details of the evacuation plan, including the medical protocols that will be applied to returning ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    12 mins ago
  • The New Zealand Upgrade Programme
    Rail, roads, schools and hospitals will be built and upgraded across the country under the new $12 billion New Zealand Upgrade Programme announced by Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern. The programme: Includes investments in roads, rail, hospitals and schools to future-proof the economy Will give a $10 billion boost to New ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    4 hours ago
  • School infrastructure upgrades ramping up
    The New Zealand Upgrade Programme is already underway, with schools busy getting building work started over the Christmas break. The Coalition Government announced just before the end of last year $400 million in new funding for most state schools to invest locally in building companies and tradies to fix leaking ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    4 hours ago
  • Flicking the switch on a clean powered public service
    Our Government’s programme to upgrade infrastructure and modernise the economy will help more communities to be part of the solution to climate change through a clean-powered public service. Minister for Climate Change James Shaw today announced the first group of projects from the New Zealand Upgrade Programme’s clean powered public ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    4 hours ago
  • Government of Infrastructure delivers for New Zealanders
    Infrastructure and Regional Economic Development Minister Shane Jones says today’s capital investment announcements show the Coalition Government is the Government of Infrastructure. $7 billion in projects have been announced today as part of the Government’s $12 billion New Zealand Upgrade Programme, which will see capital spending at its highest rate ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    4 hours ago
  • Boost for child, maternity and mental health
    $300 million dollar capital investment in health, divided among four focus areas: Child and maternal health - $83 million Mental health and addiction - $96 million Regional and rural service projects – $26 million Upgrading and fixing aging hospital facilities - $75 million Contingency of $20 million The New Zealand ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    4 hours ago
  • Transport infrastructure upgrades to get NZ moving and prepared for the future
    $6.8 billion for transport infrastructure in out six main growth areas - Auckland, Waikato, Bay of Plenty, Wellington, Canterbury and Queenstown. $1.1 billion for rail. $2.2 billion for new roads in Auckland. The Government’s programme of new investments in roads and rail will help future proof the economy, get our ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    4 hours ago
  • Growing and modernising the NZ economy
    A new programme to build and upgrade roads, rail, schools and hospitals will prepare the New Zealand economy for the future, Finance Minister Grant Robertson says. “The $12 billion New Zealand Upgrade Programme uses our capacity to boost growth by making targeted investments around the country, supporting businesses and local ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    4 hours ago
  • Future proofing New Zealand’s rail
    Minister for State Owned Enterprises Winston Peters says the funding of four major rail projects under the New Zealand Upgrade Programme is yet another step in the right direction for New Zealand’s long-term rail infrastructure. “This Government has a bold vision for rail. We said we would address the appalling ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    4 hours ago
  • Delivering infrastructure for a modern NZ
    Roads, rail, schools and hospitals will be built and upgraded across the country under the $12 billion New Zealand Upgrade Programme announced today, Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern says. “This is a once in a lifetime opportunity to invest in New Zealand – modernising our infrastructure, preparing for climate change and ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    4 hours ago
  • $1.55m support for Hawke’s Bay three waters services review
    The Government is pleased to announce a $1.55 million funding contribution to assist Hawke’s Bay investigate voluntary changes to the region’s three waters service delivery arrangements. “Over the last 18 months, the five Hawke’s Bay councils have been collaborating to identify opportunities for greater coordination in three waters service delivery across ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    5 hours ago
  • Minister welcomes report of nation’s household plastic rubbish, recycling practices
    A new report on New Zealand’s plastic rubbish and recycling practices is being welcomed by the Associate Minister for the Environment Eugenie Sage.  “The report by WasteMINZ provides a valuable insight into what’s ending up in household rubbish and recycling bins around the country. It highlights the value of much ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    7 hours ago
  • Government considers retirement income policy review recommendations
    The Government is now considering the recommendations of the Retirement Commissioner’s review into New Zealand’s retirement income policies. “The review raises a number of important issues in relation to New Zealanders’ wellbeing and financial independence in retirement, particularly for vulnerable people,” the Minister for Commerce and Consumer Affairs, Kris Faafoi, ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    10 hours ago
  • PM announces election date as September 19
    The 2020 General Election will be held on Saturday 19 September, Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern announced today. “I will be asking New Zealanders to continue to support my leadership and the current direction of the Government, which is grounded in stability, a strong economy and progress on the long term ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 day ago
  • Provincial Growth Fund supports Waikato youth into constructionProvincial Growth Fund supports Waika...
    Two projects focussed on supporting Waikato youth into the construction industry have been given combined funding of just over $1 million from the Te Ara Mahi allocation of the Provincial Growth Fund, Undersecretary for Regional Economic Development, Fletcher Tabuteau announced today.  The two Te Ara Mahi PGF projects announced are: ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 day ago
  • Provincial Growth Fund supports Waikato youth into construction
    Two projects focussed on supporting Waikato youth into the construction industry have been given combined funding of just over $1 million from the Te Ara Mahi allocation of the Provincial Growth Fund, Undersecretary for Regional Economic Development, Fletcher Tabuteau announced today.  The two Te Ara Mahi PGF projects announced are: ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 day ago
  • New Zealand to support Pacific Public Sector Hub
    Foreign Affairs Minister Winston Peters today announced New Zealand’s support for a Pacific-led hub that will strengthen public services across the region. “Strengthening public services is a core focus of New Zealand’s Pacific Reset, as efforts to improve democratic governance in the Pacific contributes to a strong, stable and more ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 day ago
  • Minister pays tribute to journalist, author and broadcaster, Gordon McLauchlan
    The Minister of Broadcasting, Communications and Digital Media, Kris Faafoi, has paid tribute to well-known New Zealand author, journalist and broadcaster, Gordon McLauchlan, following Mr McLauchlan’s death today. “Gordon held a statesman-like place in New Zealand’s media, which was fittingly acknowledged in last year’s Queen’s Birthday Honours, when he was ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 days ago
  • Minister wishes best of luck to those heading back to school
    As Kiwi kids and teachers return to classrooms over the coming weeks, the families of around 428,000 students will feel a bit less of a financial pinch than in previous years, Education Minister Chris Hipkins said today. “The Government’s decision to increase funding for schools that don’t ask parents for ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 days ago
  • Health staff to meet flights from China as precautionary measure
    Public health staff will begin meeting flights from China from tomorrow, to actively look for signs of the novel coronavirus and provide advice, information and reassurance to passengers. Health Minister Dr David Clark says the additional measures are being taken following the arrival of the disease in Australia, via flights ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 days ago
  • National Yearling Sales 2020
    National Yearling Sales at Karaka   26 January 2020    [CHECK AGAINST DELIVERY] Good morning. It is a pleasure to be here on opening day of the 2020 National Yearling Sales Series. Let us all acknowledge Sir Peter Vela and the Vela family for their outstanding contribution to the New ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 days ago
  • Government and construction industry to build big, lift productivity with Transformation Plan
    Delivering the workforce and productivity gains required to build the houses, schools, roads, rail and hospitals New Zealand needs will become easier with the Government-industry Construction Sector Transformation Plan launched today, Minister for Building and Construction Jenny Salesa says. “The action plan launched today delivers on the Government’s Construction Sector ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 days ago
  • Log trains to begin on Wairoa-Napier line
    Log trains are about to start running between Wairoa and Napier following Provincial Growth Fund investment to reopen the rail line, Regional Economic Development Minister Shane Jones says. The Government invested $6.2 million to reopen the mothballed rail line which was closed after significant storm damage in 2012. “With PGF ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    4 days ago
  • Minister of Defence concludes successful visit with his US counterpart
    Minister of Defence Ron Mark met with United States Secretary of Defense Mark Esper today. “This was an excellent opportunity to meet with one of our closest security partners,” Ron Mark said. “The main focus of the meeting was to discuss challenges that New Zealand and the United States share ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    4 days ago
  • New Zealand acknowledges ICJ decision on Myanmar
    Foreign Minister Winston Peters today acknowledged the ruling of the International Court of Justice in relation to the Rohingya people in Myanmar. The ruling ordered the Government of Myanmar to take all measures within its power to prevent the commission of acts of genocide in relation to members of the ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    5 days ago
  • NZ’s trade aims advanced at Davos meetings
    A proposal to cut “trade and production-distorting subsidies” in the agricultural sector by 2030 has set out important measures to ensure a fair agricultural trading system.  Speaking after attending meetings of trade ministers in Davos, Switzerland, Minister for Trade and Export Growth David Parker welcomed the joint proposal from the ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    5 days ago
  • Great news for New Zealanders with cystic fibrosis
    Health Minister Dr David Clark says he is delighted that PHARMAC has struck a provisional deal to fund Kalydeco – a medicine which is set to improve the quality of life for about 30 New Zealand children and adults with cystic fibrosis. “While rare, cystic fibrosis is an awful inherited ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    5 days ago
  • New Zealand least corrupt country in the world
    New Zealand has regained its position as the least corrupt country in the world for the second time under this Coalition Government, says Justice Minister Andrew Little. “New Zealanders can be proud that our reputation as one of the least corrupt countries in the world has been restored,” says Andrew ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    6 days ago
  • Boost for Rēkohu/Wharekauri/Chatham Islands Community Conservation
    Community conservation in Rēkohu/Wharekauri/the Chatham Islands is receiving a boost, with grants to support local projects announced today by Minister of Conservation Eugenie Sage. “Rēkohu/Wharekauri/ the Chatham Islands are home to 20 per cent of New Zealand’s threatened bird species and 11 per cent of New Zealand’s threatened plant species. ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    6 days ago
  • Rātana Pā goes high-tech with UFB
    Iwi, hapu and visitors to Rātana Pā near Whanganui now have access to ultra-fast broadband following its connection, completed in time for annual Rātana celebrations, Regional Economic Development Minister Shane Jones says. The connection and associated hardware were funded from the Provincial Growth Fund’s $21 million Marae Digital Connectivity programme, ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    6 days ago
  • Govt’s strong financial management acknowledged
    The Government’s strong financial management and plan to future proof the economy with new infrastructure investment has gained further recognition from an international ratings agency. Credit rating agency Fitch has upgraded one of its main metrics assessing the Government’s books, lifting its foreign currency AA rating outlook to ‘positive’ from ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    6 days ago
  • Boost in Whānau Ora funding to keep changing lives
    Whānau throughout New Zealand are set to benefit from an extra three million dollars that will go directly to Whānau Ora Commissioning Agencies, the Minister for Whānau Ora Peeni Henare announced today.  Including previous funding boosts, the Agencies will now receive $87 million this year between them.  In Budget 2019 ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    6 days ago
  • More people getting into work
    The December quarter benefit numbers released today show the Government’s plan to get people off the benefit and into work is starting to pay off,” Social Development Minister Carmel Sepuloni said.   “Nearly 19,000 people cancelled their benefit and went into work in the last few months of the year – ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    6 days ago
  • Wairoa gets up to $6.1m to rebuild heart of CBD
    The Provincial Growth Fund (PGF) is investing up to $6.1 million to revitalise business and tourism opportunities in Wairoa, Parliamentary Under-Secretary for Regional Economic Development Fletcher Tabuteau announced today. The PGF is funding: Up to $4.8 million for the Wairoa Integrated Business and Tourism Facility Up to $960,000 for the ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • Major Events support for creative and cultural events
    Creative and cultural events that highlight New Zealand’s diverse culture and build national pride are set to get a funding boost through the Major Events Fund, Economic Development Minister Phil Twyford said today. The new Creative and Cultural Events Incubator, which is funded through the Major Events Fund, will open ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • Classroom internet in hundreds of schools to get a boost
    The Government has begun a massive IT upgrade to provide more seamless internet access to 200 schools around the country. Te Mana Tūhono – Technology in Schools work programme will launch with a pilot of 10 smaller state schools early this year. IT equipment that gives students access to the ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • Construction workforce, apprenticeships hit record highs
    Working with industry and committing to rebuild New Zealand’s infrastructure has produced a record high number of Kiwis working in the construction industry and learning trades, says Minister for Building and Construction Jenny Salesa. New figures available today from the Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment and the Tertiary Education ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • NZ concludes digital economy trade talks with Singapore and Chile
    A new trade agreement concluded today helps New Zealand exporters and consumers take advantage of opportunities from digital trade.    Minister for Trade and Export Growth David Parker together with Chile’s Vice Minister of Trade Rodrigo Yañez and Singapore’s Minister of Trade and Industry Chan Chun Sing, have announced conclusion of ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • Provincial Growth Fund to fund Waipukurau cultural development and tourism
    The Ngā Ara Tipuna -  Waipukurau Pā Site Interpretation project will receive $2.798 million from the Provincial Growth Fund to create an authentic cultural tourism experience, Under-Secretary for Regional Economic Development Fletcher Tabuteau announced today “The project will inform visitors about the history of six pā sites in Waipukurau with a combination ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • 21 new judges boost diversity, improve access to justice
    Twenty-one new District Court judges have been appointed in a move that will improve access to justice and boost diversity on the bench. The new judges include replacements for retirements and 10 new positions. Attorney-General David Parker today announced the 14 judges who can immediately be named, with the remainder ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago