Foreshore review dead-on

Written By: - Date published: 3:16 pm, July 1st, 2009 - 106 comments
Categories: human rights, racism - Tags:

The Foreshore and Seabed review panel have reported back with the recommendation that the law be scrapped and people be allowed to attempt to prove ownership rights over the foreshore and seabed in court as they can with any other land.

Good.

Ever since the Government issued a proclamation in 1872 to stop the Native Land Court which had been granting title to blocks of the foreshore in the Firth of Thames to iwi wanting to protect their fisheries and get slice of the gold mining action*, politicians have attempted to satisfy the rednecks by legislating away Maori property rights to the foreshore and seabed.

Let’s hope that’s done with and Maori can now have the same opportunity that anyone else would have to attempt to prove title in court.

106 comments on “Foreshore review dead-on ”

  1. Smokie 1

    The Foreshore and Seabed legislation would’ve been fine, if only they’d legislated away EVERYONE’s private property rights.

    • Zetetic 1.1

      we’re a wee way from that point, smokie.

      As long as its equal either way. Better than what we’ve had.

  2. Pat 2

    Looks like that’s an aborted attempt at a mea culpa from Eddie. Don’t worry, we know what you were trying to say but couldn’t bring yourself to say it.

    Congratulations to Tariana Turia for standing by her principles.

    • Daveo 2.1

      I’m pretty sure he’s always been against the foreshore and seabed act. There’s always been a lively debate on this issue on the left. What side were you on back in 2004 Pat? Iwi/Kiwi by chance?

    • Eddie 2.2

      I opposed the Foreshore and Seabed Act from the start because it was a suck up to the rednecks. No mea cupla on my part.

      National opposed it because they didn’t like that there was a mechanism for Maori to claim some level of rights over the f&s in it.

      • Zetetic 2.2.1

        The Foreshore and Seabed Act wasn’t racist enough for the Tories like Pat. On the Right, only Act stood for equality.

        Quietly forgotten now. Of course.

      • Tim Ellis 2.2.2

        Eddie, you seem to have a problem with your timeframe. Labour supporters often claim that it was a suck up to rednecks, but the timeframe disproves this claim as a lie.

        Michael Cullen announced the legislation just a couple of days after the court judgement, sayin gthat he would legislate to overturn the judgement and remove the right of iwi to have the issue tested in Court.

        Don Brash’s Orewa speech was many months after, and was months after the hikoi.

        The rednecks suck-up argument is a convenient excuse, but it isn’t a truthful one.

        • Eddie 2.2.2.1

          Tim. you’re just showing the problem with relaying on Farrar for your facts.

          Cullen did announce an intention to legislate to settle the issue in legislation rather than have it evolve ad hoc in the courts. It was only after Don Brash’s racist Owera speech turned the polls by 15% that Labour decided it couldn’t just legislate along the lines of the court decision.

          It was in the context of the National’s race-baiting (that carried right on to Iwi/Kiwi – and you voted for that, didn’t you Tim) that Labour did its about face because it made a decision that this wasn’t an issue to die in a ditch over (not that I ever supported what they did).

          • Tim Ellis 2.2.2.1.1

            Eddie, I voted Labour in 2002. I know you are struggling with your arguments on this issue, but honestly it is just cowardly for you to hide behind your anonymity and accuse me of race-baiting.

            Labour announced within days of the decision on June 19, 2003, that they would legislate away the Court decision. Don Brash’s speech at Orewa wasn’t until January 2004.

            Labour was already intent on writing the legislation immediately after the court decision. Nice try at blaming Don Brash for it, but it isn’t truthful and it doesn’t wash.

            • Eddie 2.2.2.1.1.1

              “Labour announced within days of the decision on June 19, 2003, that they would legislate away the Court decision”

              No they announced an intention to legislate. Not an intention to take away the right to obtain title via court action. That came later in reaction to National’s race-baiting.

              So, you voted for Iwi/Kiwi in 2005 then? Did it turn you? Or did you just turn a blind eye to the fact you were supporting a racist party because you wanted a tax cut?

            • felix 2.2.2.1.1.2

              Tim, don’t drag up the old “you’re anonymous and I’m not” line of bullshit again. As we’ve discussed before, you’re just as anonymous as anyone else here and you’d probably like to keep it that way.

            • Tim Ellis 2.2.2.1.1.3

              So, you voted for Iwi/Kiwi in 2005 then? Did it turn you? Or did you just turn a blind eye to the fact you were supporting a racist party because you wanted a tax cut?

              Eddie, coming from a person who supported a party that willingly went into coalition with, and then proceeded to protect the worst race-baiter and bigot in the recent history of New Zealand politics, that is a new low.

              Tim, don’t drag up the old “you’re anonymous and I’m not’ line of bullshit again. As we’ve discussed before, you’re just as anonymous as anyone else here and you’d probably like to keep it that way.

              Wrong, felix. I use my real name on here. I’m not using a “you’re anonymous and I’m not” line. If Eddie wants to get personal and impugn my motives, then he should at least have the courage not to do it from a position of anonymity.

            • felix 2.2.2.1.1.4

              Tim you terminal dullard we’ve been over this many times.

              If no-one knows who you are then whether you use your real name is neither here nor there.

              You’re as anonymous as anyone else here, much less so than some.

              And before you spin this into an attack on your privacy I’m not suggesting that you identify yourself either.

              I’m simply pointing out that it’s extremely hypocritical to accuse anyone here of being anonymous when by every meaningful measure you are too.

              And that you do it whenever you’re floundering. That’s what I find funny.

            • Tim Ellis 2.2.2.1.1.5

              Felix you will just have to take my word for it that I use my real name, and I have no reason not to.

            • felix 2.2.2.1.1.6

              Still irrelevant, Tim – as explained very simply above.

              Come on Tim, we all know you’re not as thick as you’re pretending to be.

        • Daveo 2.2.2.2

          National had also been running “beaches for Kiwis” billboards as far back as when English was leader. You remember those don’t you Tim? The redneck backlash had begun, it just took the disgusting and racist Orewa speech to give it a political vehicle and frighten the government into giving in to the rednecks.

          By the way Tim, where were you at the time of the Orewa speech?

          • Tim Ellis 2.2.2.2.1

            Except your timeframe doesn’t stack up Daveo. Helen Clark announced she was going to legislate against the court decision just a couple of days after the high court decision. The government then set up a review and consultation document, which reported back at the end of 2003, with options that the government adopted. The Orewa speech wasn’t until the end of January 2004.

            I don’t remember where I was at the time of the Orewa Speech, Daveo. It was mid January, so I suspect I was probably on holiday.

      • Helen 2.2.3

        [looks like she’s been banned but it’s worth remembering this dark face of the NZ right exists so I’ll let this one through]

        suck up to the rednecks.

        It’s often difficult for reasonable people to interpret the buzzwords used by those that attend the “political education” courses offered by the Labour Party Politburo.

        Here’s a quick translation guide to make The Standard a little more understandable to reasonable people.

        “Rednecks” – Kiwis.

        “The Rich” – The employed and the law-abiding.

        “The Workers” – Welfare beneficiaries and career criminals.

        “Legitimate acts of resistance against the colonial oppressors and the bourgeois class-enemies by the heroes of the oppressed proletariat, yearning to break free” – Violent crime.

        “Crime” – Caucasians driving European cars in excess of the speed limit.

        “Social Justice” – Taking from the overburdened in order to give to the undeserving.

  3. Nick 3

    Yes, good news. It’s not a difficult issue conceptually, it only remains so politically.

  4. Tigger 4

    Great, so how will National keep the rednecks happy during the inevitable discussion over how to proceed? The proposals are all laced with mines.

    Meanwhile, my husband wants to know how soon he can start charging white people to use the beach…

  5. Nick 5

    As heard on Danny Watson’s show this afternoon (he read this text out he received):

    “No nigger is going to stop me going to the beach you nigger lover”.

    Watson was saying the report was good news etc.

  6. How Key handles this issue will be fascinating. Welcome to real politic where you actually have to make a decision and live with it.

    Either he repeals and enrages his wingnut fans or he doesn’t and the agreement with the Maori Party will then surely fail. I do not see much room in the middle of this to manoeuvre in.

    I do not see it as simply as most. The FSA did allow for an application to the High Court for recognition of an existing right. If it was recognised then there was a mechanism to either create a reserve or to seek compensation. Contrary to what some commentators have said court access was preserved although modified.

    The right to seek a “title” was taken away. I had always thought that “title” was a particularly european concept and did not think this was such a bad thing. The trouble with titles is that they can be transferred and rights alienated.

    I appreciate this is somewhat nuanced view and not in keeping with the rights/no rights arguments but I never saw the issue as simple as the debate that ranged presented it to be.

    Anyway it is now Key’s baby. Best of British to him, he will need it.

    • Maynard J 6.1

      “How Key handles this issue will be fascinating.”

      Agreed. You know, I think this will be one of Key’s strengths, a tough negotiation and balancing act, with no real ideology behind him. As long as Hide keeps well away he may just come up smelling of roses – maybe that is why he is letting Hide do Auckland, as a payoff for keeping well away from this minefield.

    • mike 6.2

      “Either he repeals and enrages his wingnut fans or he doesn’t and the agreement with the Maori Party will then surely fail”

      Poor mickey doesn’t quite get how much of a winner this is for JK and the Nats.

      Mr Pragmatic will be at his best now the emotion is gone out of this this (eg: labour gone) MP and Nats will come up with an agreement cementing beach access and customary rights – deal done + JK looks the consummate mediator yet again (anti-smacking) and we move onto 2011 with the MP happy and the hapless labour party scrambling for cover.

  7. Red Rosa 7

    The National Party allowing Maori freehold title to the foreshore and seabed? No worries. Tenure review gave South Island runholders freehold title to valuable lakeshore frontage for a pittance.

    And presumably foreshore titles would be just as valuable.

    So where is the problem?

    But somehow I think JK will not use this as precedent!

    Well said MS, it is a real minefield for Key.

  8. ak 8

    …and the govt hopes to make an initial response by late August

    Ya gotta laugh….hot kumara, anyone? Stick it on the shelf with the broadband and the bike track, Mike, something’ll turn up, trust me……

  9. vto 9

    Well that seems unsurprising. And good. That law was a complete steamroll if ever there was one. It should go to court and be tested.

    But the outcome of such a court determination would not of course also be the answer to the bigger question of whether that part of our fair land concerned should be held in that way.

    There are two issues which are quite similar but quite separate. And often muddled.

  10. Tim Ellis 10

    Poor form by the Maori Party, for making this review a core issue for its support in government with National. Not very mana-enhancing to get the foreshore and seabed issue resolved, now, is it?

    Oh hang on… that’s Labour’s line…

    Looks like the Maori Party are managing to achieve for Maori what Labour took away. If they can achieve this with a National government, then it looks like there will be a permanent break with Maori voters and the Labour Party.

    • gobsmacked 10.1

      Resolved?

      It’s just getting started. But of course Tim, you’re not really interested in the actual issue at all, are you?

      • Tim Ellis 10.1.1

        Yes I am interested in the actual issue gobsmacked. Labour’s foreshore and seabed legislation in 2003 and 2004 was a major point of grievance for many Maori. It alienated Maori from the Labour Party, I believe permanently. The time since then, and in particular Labour referring to the Maori Party as the “last cab off the rank” and favouring a coalition with Winston Peters, the biggest race-baiter of modern politics, ahead of the Maori party showed Labour’s true colours.

        John Key is a pragmatist. I think New Zealanders have moved on from the divisive debates of 2003-2005, which were in a large part fuelled by Labour’s decision on the foreshore and seabed legislation. It will be great to have a solution that is acceptable to all parties.

        There were a number of left wing commentators, including some writers on this blog, who said that a deal between the Maori Party and National would not last. Mr Pierson said that the redneck element in the National Party wouldn’t allow a deal with the Maori Party. Mr Trotter claimed that conservative National voters would not stomach any deal with the Maori Party.

        How wrong they all were.

        Labour belatedly wants to come to the table on this, but they don’t seem to have learned the lesson not to patronise the Maori Party and Maori voters. The Maori Party has shown just how astute it is, and seems to be delivering exactly what its voters want.

        • gobsmacked 10.1.1.1

          Tim

          Why do you do this?

          Is it a) because you’re stupid (I don’t think so), or b) because you think we’re stupid (you’re wrong), or … c) because you believe that online debates are just a matter of repeating the same lies as often as possible, and “winning” because people eventually get bored and/or have lives? I reckon it’s c). So sad.

          Who did Maori vote for at the last election? You know the answer, and you know we know, and we can all play the Google game, so why lie about it?

          • Tim Ellis 10.1.1.1.1

            Maori voted for Maori Party MPs in their electorate vote in large numbers gs. I don’t see how the 2008 election can be seen as a win for Labour in the Maori seats. Have you got some other interpretation gs?

            Which part, specifically, of what I wrote above do you have a problem with?

            • gobsmacked 10.1.1.1.1.1

              Here are the results of the last election.

              At the bottom of the page are the Maori electorates.

              http://www.electionresults.govt.nz/electionresults_2008/electorateindex.html

              You can check each one. Maori voted Labour with their party vote, ahead of the Maori Party, and miles ahead of National. It’s a simple fact.

              Therefore, Tim’s statement that Maori are “alienated from the Labour Party” is demonstrably, entirely false.

              But you know that, and we know you know that. So I’m done with wasting my time on somebody who has no interest in good faith debate. Find some other sucker to lie to.

            • Pascal's bookie 10.1.1.1.1.2

              Which part, specifically, of what I wrote above do you have a problem with?

              Seeing you asked.

              Yes I am interested in the actual issue gobsmacked.

              Good, I’d like to hear your views on it, and how they have evloved, if they have.

              Labour’s foreshore and seabed legislation in 2003 and 2004 was a major point of grievance for many Maori. It alienated Maori from the Labour Party, I believe permanently. The time since then, and in particular Labour referring to the Maori Party as the “last cab off the rank’ and favouring a coalition with Winston Peters, the biggest race-baiter of modern politics, ahead of the Maori party showed Labour’s true colours.

              Oh. That’s not the issue, that’s a bunch of partisan horse shit.

              Obviously Labour’s legislation was a point of grievance. Not so much that Labour couldn’t get 70,000 list votes in 08 though. Perhaps they remember iwi/kiwi. Can you explain that billboard for me Tim? I’ve asked many a Nat, and yet to get an answer. It somehow fitted in with ‘mainstream’.

              What was Nationals policy about the f&s that Labour’s was the alternative to Tim? What was the policy on this issue of the party that you voted for? I’m sure you’ll be keen to relate, seeing your interest in the issue. Tell us about your thought processes over that time. Were you on any hikoi? What did you think about those that were?

              Do you think Brash would have refused a deal with WP? Do you think Brash was not a race baiter? He himself has expressed his regrets about it if I recall.

              Just so you don’t get confused by all those questions, I guess I can some them up by asking one last one that I’d like to hear the answer to, and you can use the above as a guide to the sorts of issues invloved.

              Seeing you are interested in this issue, what was National’s policy on it at the time, did you vote for it, and why do you think they changed, if they have?

          • felix 10.1.1.1.2

            Timmy writes for the lurkers. He repeats himself when he knows he’s wrong because he doesn’t care whether his arguments are reasonable.

            His goal is to fill the threads with national party talking points for the consumption of the casual readers.

            He assumes that casual readers aren’t going to follow a thread from start to finish so he doesn’t really care how inconsistent his comments are.

            In short he’s not really debating with you at all – he’s just spamming the threads.

            And yeah, it’s pretty sad.

            • Tim Ellis 10.1.1.1.2.1

              That’s right, felix, and I’m a National Party researcher working in Wellington, paid to feed talking points to, oh… I forget how your story goes. It’s very repetitive.

            • felix 10.1.1.1.2.2

              No, you’re a lowly auditor working in a bank. Who spends all day repeating national party talking points on several blogs.

              (Now you attack me for being “anonymous”.)

    • Tim

      The wingnuts will be in a frenzy if Key scraps the law. Good luck to him. His lot stirred them up. They can now deal with it.

      You should go over to kiwiblog land and make those sorts of comments there and then see what response you get.

      BTW Labour still did well with maori party votes. And after what has happened over the past 6 months I am sure that support for Labour has increased.

      • Tim Ellis 10.2.1

        BTW Labour still did well with maori party votes. And after what has happened over the past 6 months I am sure that support for Labour has increased.

        None of the polls are saying that micky.

        • Zetetic 10.2.1.1

          There haven’t been any public polls of party vote support among Maori,brainiac.

          • Tim Ellis 10.2.1.1.1

            So you’ve confirmed Zetetic that none of the polls support Micky’s contention that support for Labour has increased among Maori. Thanks, brainiac.

            What the polls do say is that support by voters nationwide for National is considerably higher than it was at the time of the election. In which case, it would be counter-intuitive to assume that support for Labour had increased among Maori, unless there was specific evidence supporting this contention.

            • Zetetic 10.2.1.1.1.1

              micky was speculating on the Maori vote. You said none of the polls say that but none of the polls are on point. So your statement doesn’t invalidate micky’s speculation at all. Has micky got proof? No but you don’t have proof for the opposite either despite your attempt to pretend the polls that have been published provide some kind of proof.

        • mickysavage 10.2.1.2

          Tim

          Check out the results for the Mt Albert byelection. According to the polls it ought to have been really really close.

          What was the result again?

          Can you remind me?

          • Tim Ellis 10.2.1.2.1

            The only Mt Albert polls I saw micky showed a very wide gulf between the Labour and National candidate. The Mount Albert polls turned out to be quite accurate.

      • mike 10.2.2

        do you mean national reviewing and soon scrapping the racist law that labour brought in – is that why maori are flocking back to labour is it mickey?

        Most ‘rednecks’ you are referring to were just mainstream NZers sick of nanny labour and it’s thieving socialist ways – they will not mind JK making a pragmatic decision. National can only gain votes from this – they knew this would be the outcome of the review when they signed up to it.

        Remember they did not need the MP to govern but chose them as a partner.

        • Zetetic 10.2.2.1

          The rednecks are the ones who National won over with their iwi/kiwi campaign. Do you think they’ve got less racist now?

          The good news is that now National has given up the race-baiting Labour doesn’t have to try to appease the rednecks so we can get rid of this law with unanimous support.

  11. vto 11

    And eddie surely this post is proof again that the red in redneck is, contrary to popular opinion, reference to labour voters.

    • gobsmacked 11.1

      “Proof” in your dictionary being defined as “XQZZZCVG<G; hubbedy guppity plop"

      You can be embarrassed by Brash, Ansell and the Orewa-utangs, but you can't just wish them away.

    • Zetetic 11.2

      Redneck was a term given to English yeoman colonists in colonial America. They would get red necks from working outside. More intense sun of the colonies than they were used back in England. These yeomen were renowned for their reactionary, conservative, and racist attitudes.

      Their cultural descendants constitute the Republican base.

      • vto 11.2.1

        Yes well times have moved on. Today the red in redneck infers labour voters. Otherwise why would eddie say … “politicians have attempted to satisfy the rednecks by legislating away Maori property rights to the foreshore and seabed” if Helen hadn’t been thinking, as always, about the vote.

        Eddie is proof. So there gobsmacked – do I have to spell everything out for the small bwains?

        And ffs zit, why am I talking to you for after that early morning calamity today..

        • Zetetic 11.2.1.1

          because you love it vto. Don’t lie to yourself.

          The rednecks are the 15% who switched to National went they went racist.

        • Pascal's bookie 11.2.1.2

          Good oh. Perhaps you can explain those iwi/kiwi billboards then vto.

          I was labeled a hater and/or a wrecker back then, so that’s how I felt. Where were you, politically speaking? Where was National?

          This attempt to put National’s rhetoric and scare-mongering down the memory hole is breathtaking. But seriously, it seems to me that you can only do so if you don’t actually care about the issue.

  12. Murray 12

    Good It was just a stupid racist act dreamed up by labour rednecks

    • Zetetic 12.1

      It was a law dreamed up to appease the rednecks who were flowing to National in droves on the back of National’s ‘iwi/kiwi-style race-baiting. National didn’t think it was racist enough that’s why they voted against it.

      • Tim Ellis 12.1.1

        Zetetic, again just because you keep repeating that doesn’t make it true. Labour announced its plans to legislate months before Don Brash made the Orewa speech.

        • Zetetic 12.1.1.1

          and you had that explained to you up above.

          can you tell me why the Tories voted against the Act? Can you admit that they thought it was too generous to Maori?

        • Pascal's bookie 12.1.1.2

          The Orewa speech was hardly National’s first damn comments on Maori issues Tim. Stop stuffing ‘uncomfortable’ shit down the memory hole.

          What was National’s reaction to the court decision?

          Here’s a story for ya:

          http://tvnz.co.nz/content/214114

          It’s about reaction to Labour’s announced intentions. Bill English and Winston Peters are saying pretty much the same thing.

          also this:

          http://tvnz.co.nz/content/205607

  13. Red Rosa 13

    Well, that’s cleared the air.

    National will repeal the Act, and ensure Maori get freehold title and/or exclusive access to the foreshore and seabed. Otherwise, what do they get?

    Or is there something I am missing?

    • Lew 13.1

      Red Rosa,

      You’re missing something. I think what you’re missing is having read the actual document, rather than the thread on The Standard.

      L

  14. Lew 14

    Actually, Eddie, while I agree with your title and the overall argument, the post is just wrong.

    The Foreshore and Seabed review panel have reported back with the recommendation that the law be scrapped

    This bit is right.

    and people be allowed to attempt to prove ownership rights over the foreshore and seabed in court as they can with any other land.

    This bit isn’t. This described the so-called “judicial option”, option 1 which the panel considered, and which they explicitly didn’t recommend. Instead, they recommended a “mixed” model encompassing aspects of the other three potential models:

    Option 4: The “mixed’ model. We favour a “mixed’ model. It combines a number of discrete components: a national settlement, allocation of rights and interests, local co-management, and an ability to gain more specific access and use rights. This model takes as its starting point that entitled Māori (i.e. those hapÅ« and iwi with traditional interests in the coastal marine area) have some form of customary or tikanga title to all of the foreshore and seabed and that the public also have interests in access and navigation over this key area. A mixed model of this kind appears to be the preferred option of those who made submissions to the Panel.

    This is on page 11 of the summary. I haven’t yet read the full document (hope to have time over the weekend).

    It’s an important distinction, because the judicial model, while it could have worked in the initial case (before the Act), after the fact it does not provide very much certainty, and no grounds for wider reconciliation on the matter. This last is the most important aspect of the review, in my view: it is focused on reconciliation as well as on redress and recognition of rights. It is a compromise solution; a mutual second-best, not an ideologically-bound all-or-nothing solution of the type Labour constructed and Brash’s National party favoured.

    L

    • Eddie 14.1

      I only had a chance to read the report in the Herald. Should have written that sentence without ‘in court’. Lucky we’ve got you Lew.

      • Lew 14.1.1

        Well, no, the whole second bit is wrong. It’s not going to be about “proving ownership rights”; that’s only a part of it. Details matter.

        But as I said: hooray!

        L

        Captcha: ‘crowned President’

        • Eddie 14.1.1.1

          ‘details matter’ . maybe on kiwipolitico, Lew 🙂

          well, i can’t see how even in the other option iwi are going to get rights recognised without proving them.. and i confess I still haven’t read the detail, but it seems impossible that the government would be allocating property rights without proof.

          • Lew 14.1.1.1.1

            Eddie,

            Surely your arguments can be both robust and right ; )

            Of course, proof will have to be part of it, but proof isn’t the hard thing to achieve – establishing a framework which will accept that proof leads to value is the holy grail here. And which will constrain the value granted such that big blocks of the foreshore and seabed can’t be sold off wholesale by a couple errant kaumatua, for instance.

            L

    • Good comment Lew

      The issue is really intricate and I believe the political debate lags way behind the legal debate.

      The “mixed model” option appeals but most of it was available under the legislation.

      If you read the Act …

      Section 33 says

      ” High Court may find that a group held territorial customary rights

      The High Court may, on the application of a group, or on the application of a person authorised by the Court to represent the group, make a finding that the group (or any members of that group) would, but for the vesting of the full legal and beneficial ownership of the public foreshore and seabed in the Crown by section 13(1), have held territorial customary rights to a particular area of the public foreshore and seabed at common law.”

      There could then be negotiation with the Crown for redress (section 37) or the establishment of a foreshore and seabed reserve and the appointment of a board of guardians to manage the reserve. The purpose of a reserve is to acknowledge the exercise of kaitakitanga by an applicant group and to permit the are to be held for the common use and benefit of the people of New Zealand.

      Also the Ngati Porou settlement recognised their rights to the foreshore in various areas. The Crown negotiation resulted in a regional settlement of issues.

      I wish the reality was as simple as the rhetoric …

      • Lew 14.2.1

        micky,

        I’m not a lawyer, but I sense there was at least as much legal uncertainty around the FSA as political uncertainty. In any case, it wasn’t a legal manoeuvre, but a political one.

        Add to which, a “reserve” is not what Māori want for the foreshore and seabed. That’s why even after signing their agreement, Ngāti Porou stated that, while it was the best deal going, it was still insufficient and they would continue to lobby for the repeal of the act.

        L

        • mickysavage 14.2.1.1

          Agreed Lew … but the legislation has lots of goodies in it …

          Section 37 of the FSA says

          … [i]f a finding is referred to the Attorney-General and Minister of Maori Affairs under section 36(1)(a), the Ministers must enter into discussions with the applicant group for the purpose of negotiating an agreement as to the nature and extent of the redress to be given by the Crown in recognition of the finding of the High Court under section 33.

          The problem is the debate is between well intentioned pakeha lawyers trying to achieve certainty and iwi trying to put into legal concepts their understanding of iwi rights to the coast. It really is vexed. What annoys some of us is that there was a well intentioned desire to resolve the matter amicably.

  15. Tim Ellis 15

    PB, you made a number of questions further up the thread.

    Obviously Labour’s legislation was a point of grievance. Not so much that Labour couldn’t get 70,000 list votes in 08 though. Perhaps they remember iwi/kiwi. Can you explain that billboard for me Tim? I’ve asked many a Nat, and yet to get an answer. It somehow fitted in with ‘mainstream’.

    I was uncomfortable with it at the time, PB, and I thought it was polarising at the time.

    What was Nationals policy about the f&s that Labour’s was the alternative to Tim? What was the policy on this issue of the party that you voted for? I’m sure you’ll be keen to relate, seeing your interest in the issue. Tell us about your thought processes over that time. Were you on any hikoi? What did you think about those that were?

    I wasn’t on any hikoi, PB. I had a number of friends and relatives who were, and I congratulated them for expressing their views. It was a challenging time, and I was thankful that they were able to express their views so peacefully. Unlike Helen Clark, I didn’t consider them to be “haters and wreckers”. I understood that they had a genuine grievance.

    I was not greatly personally affected at the time, but I understood that many Maori felt that there was a genuine grievance.

    Do you think Brash would have refused a deal with WP? Do you think Brash was not a race baiter? He himself has expressed his regrets about it if I recall.

    My understanding is that Dr Brash did not pursue a deal with WP. From people I have spoken to, he was not interested in being PM in a government that included Winston Peters. I do not believe Dr Brash was a race baiter, but I do believe he was ill-advised in pursuing the issue as strongly as he did, and I understand he has come to regret his Orewa speech as unnecessarily divisive.

    Seeing you are interested in this issue, what was National’s policy on it at the time, did you vote for it, and why do you think they changed, if they have?

    National’s policy at the time was, in my view, confused and misguided. I did not personally support it, but it was not a major issue for me personally. I think it changed because John Key saw a greater interest in forming a relationship with the Maori Party, and that settling historic grievances and putting the issue behind us was more important to him than retaining a policy that was clearly a point of major contention for Maori voters.

    I hope that helps.

    • Lew 15.1

      Tim, Brash having given and stood by the Orewa speech makes him a race-baiter.

      L

      • Lew 15.1.1

        Let’s just be clear, as well: Brash having given and stood by the speech doesn’t necessarily mean he, personally, in his heart of hearts, is racist, or a race-baiter. He was playing a role. But that’s a role you can’t play without a little bit of it rubbing off on you, and he knew the role he was playing and played it well.

        It was all bullshit, mind – John Johansson’s Orewa and the Rhetoric of Illusion paper nicely illustrates how. It seems to have been taken off the interwebs, but I’m sure if you email Jon he’d be happy to e you a copy, if you’re interested in, you know, studying the issue.

        L

        • Anita 15.1.1.1

          Lew,

          Do you believe it would have been possible for Brash to have given that speech if he had no racism in him? I will happily agree that the speech wasn’t motivated by racism, but I just can’t believe someone who was truly not racist would have gone there.

          • Lew 15.1.1.1.1

            Anita,

            Everyone has some racism in them, it just takes the right set of circumstances to bring it out.

            I found this out while living in Asia. It’s frightening.

            So while not saying Brash was free from racism, it seems likely that it was more an opportunistic thing than a dedicated and calculated part of his political or ideological core as it is for, say, Kyle Chapman.

            L

            • felix 15.1.1.1.1.1

              It’s very difficult when listening to Dr Brash speaking on certain issues to not notice some deeply racist assumptions behind his thought processes.

              All that really weird stuff he used to say about how Maoris can, sometimes, with the right training, be just as smart as, you know, normal people.

              However I don’t think he had any idea at the time just how deeply racist some of his views were.

    • Pascal's bookie 15.2

      Not much I’m afraid.

      I asked what the iwi/kiwi billboards meant, and you say that they made you uncomfortable, and that you thought them polarising.

      That’s not an answer, but it implies one I suppose. I had one in view of workplace for well over a month. It made me angry Tim. And yes it was deliberately polarising. That’s why it made me angry. I didn’t think Don was a racist, and yet there was that billboard in all it’s ‘uncomfortable’ glory. Day after day. Not being a racist, but pandering to them for electoral gain is the very definition of race baiting, is it not?

      It’s a shame that you never mentioned this campaign when saying that Labour was to blame for much of the negativity of that year.

      Don Brash signed off on that campaign Tim. He was the Leader. It was his call. His regrets after losing, I am sad to say, don’t excuse him at all. He knew at the time what he was doing, and thought it worthwhile. And it wasn’t just on this issue. The whole campaign was based on dividing the nation into ‘mainstream’ and ‘other’. If it is true that national’s positions were purely based on vote gathering, rather than any principle, that makes it worse Tim. Not better. It means that they deliberately went with that ‘uncomfortable’ stuff to cause division. I’m glad I suppose that it made you ‘uncomfortable’ though.

      I still wonder how Don would have followed through on that rhetoric had he won. I think we dodged a bullet.

      edit: shorter bookie: ‘what Lew said’.

    • Eddie 15.3

      “I did not personally support it,” you voted for it, so you did personally support it but you were willing to support racism because you wanted a tax cut.

      • Tim Ellis 15.3.1

        By that logic Eddie you supported Winston Peters, because Helen Clark and Michael Cullen defended him.

        That is silly logic Eddie. I’m not a National Party member, let alone a member of caucus. I can, and choose to disagree with National Party policies frequently. You might want to try it sometime. It’s quite liberating.

  16. Tim Ellis 16

    It’s a shame that you never mentioned this campaign when saying that Labour was to blame for much of the negativity of that year.

    I was referring PB to Eddie’s claim that the Foreshore and Seabed act was a suck-up to rednecks, that it was an inevitable consequence of Dr Brash’s race baiting. I pointed out that claim as false, since Labour clearly intended to legislate as it did, long before Dr Brash gave his Orewa speech.

    Labour knew it was going to upset many Maori from the moment the Court decision came out. It had nothing to do with Dr Brash.

    I was saddened by Dr Brash’s Orewa speech, because the National Party, particularly with Doug Graham and Jim Bolger, had gone a long way towards healing the divisions of the past, and I considered the Orewa speech to have undone a lot of that.

    There is another contextual point to note, which I think is valid. There was a genuine sense amont a sizeable degree of non-Maori that the pendulum had swung too far since the initial treaty settlements, and that Maori were receiving preferential treatment, particularly in social services. The Closing of the Gaps rhetoric from Labour during Labour’s first term was symptomatic of this. There was a genuine perception that these policies were targetted based on race, rather than need.

    That issue was never properly dealt with. As soon as Dr Brash raised the issue, he was branded a racist and howled down. When Dr Brash’s polling increased, Labour got the message, ceased calling him a racist, and then dismantled the Closing the Gaps policies and instead focussed on need.

    I think a showdown, in that climate, was inevitable. Non-Maori, rightly or wrongly, felt excluded. They had, for over a generation, been told it wasn’t appropriate to express a view that might challenge the orthodox view that all policies targetting Maori were appropriate.

    The way Don Brash handled the issue was divisive. So too was the way Helen Clark handled it. For a progressive politician, I suspect over time she will deeply regret that she sold Maori out over the foreshore and seabed issue, which she clearly did in my view, for short term political gain (and the very same expediency which seems to appal you so much about Dr Brash).

    Like Matthew Hooton, the discomfort I felt around Dr Brash’s actions was that they were contrary to his personal, liberal beliefs. I suspect many Labour voters now feel a sense of shame that Helen Clark similarly sold her progressive political beliefs down the river as well.

    I think John Key has the skills to negotiate an outcome with the Maori Party, which will see both Maori and non-Maori feel included. I hope so.

    • Tim

      “Labour clearly intended to legislate as it did, long before Dr Brash gave his Orewa speech”

      This is the bit where you lose your credibility.

      The initial comment by Cullen was to suggest that all kiwis should have access to the foreshore. The detail of the legislation was not even thought of let alone decided on at this stage.

      You really do appear to continuously support the extreme possibility of views and then claim them to be the truth.

      You would get more credibility if you allowed for the various possibilities rather than claiming that the view consistent with the conspiracy theory is the only possible reality.

      • Tim Ellis 16.1.1

        micky:

        From the Ministry of Justice website:

        On 18 August 2003, the government released draft proposals for consultation on the foreshore and seabed. An extensive consultation process followed involving 10 hui, over 50 meetings with the general public, interest and recreational groups; and a public submissions process. Over 2,100 submissions were received on the government’s proposals.

        During November and early December 2003 further consultation was carried out between the government and Maori and other sector/interest groups. Later in December, the government released its revised policy framework, with a proposed way forward.

        Following this, the Foreshore and Seabed Bill was drafted and introduced into the House of Representatives on 8 April 2004. The Bill passed its first reading and was referred to the Fisheries and Other Sea-related Legislation Committee for consideration. After six months of hearings and consideration of just under 4,000 written submissions (of which 222 were presented orally), the Committee was unable to agree to any amendments and the Bill was reported back to the House on 4 November 2004.

        The Foreshore and Seabed Act was enacted on 24 November 2004.

        That’s the official timeline. No, I don’t believe that Dr Brash’s speech in January 2004 is what determined the legislation.

        EDIT: and the link is here http://www.justice.govt.nz/foreshore/background.html

        • Pascal's bookie 16.1.1.1

          Here’s a news report from July 15, which is before 18 August for those paying attention.

          http://tvnz.co.nz/content/205607

          The National Party says government proposals to settle a row over ownership of the foreshore and seabed contradict a pledge two weeks ago to preserve them for all New Zealanders.

          On Monday, acting Prime Minister Michael Cullen said the government may allow iwi to take issues of customary rights to the Maori Land Court. His comments follow a Maori challenge to plans to legislate Crown ownership.

          Last month the government said it would legislate to keep the seabed and foreshore in Crown ownership – but it made a distinction between customary use and customary title.

          National MP Nick Smith says the change would allow the Maori Land Court to divide up the coastline, with no opportunity for non-Maori New Zealanders to have a say.

          Smith says a future government would find it hard to undo the changes….

          But but , national didn’t say anything till Orewa!! Labour wasn’t reacting to anything at all, it was all just a dreeeeeam. wiggly fingers wiggly fingers.

    • Pascal's bookie 16.2

      “I was referring PB to Eddie’s claim that the Foreshore and Seabed act was a suck-up to rednecks, that it was an inevitable consequence of Dr Brash’s race baiting.”

      Except Tim, Eddie never said it was Brash’s race baiting. Don wasn’t leader yet so his turn with the whistle was to come. It was National party rhetoric and scare-mongering that was setting the agenda leading up to the legislation. That’s what DPF’s little timeline ignores. That English and Smith et al were out there holding meetings at turning up at Marlborough rallies, and bleating about the ‘Beaches’ how the Govt had to legislate full crown title.

      See my comment at 9:02 for links.

      • Tim Ellis 16.2.1

        I’ve had a look at your links PB. They are pretty mild, and I don’t deny that National was talking about the issues.

        http://tvnz.co.nz/view/tvnz_smartphone_story_skin/255490 is a very interesting link. It shows that there was no significant shift in the polls between Labour and National until March 24, 2004. Until then, Labour was consistently tracking at least 15 points ahead of National, including throughout the time of the FS&S issue.

        Yes, the Orewa speech gave Dr Brash a significant lift in the polls, but that was the only time there was a major poll shift. The major poll shift wasn’t reported until March 24.

        Until March 24, 2004, there was little to suggest that National’s policies were getting any public traction.

        • Zetetic 16.2.1.1

          Orewa didn’t get much pick up at first. It burst into a major issue about a month later. The rednecks flooded over to National. Labour was spooked to see their led disappearing. Felt they had to follow National. One reason I vote RAM.

          • Tim Ellis 16.2.1.1.1

            Zetetic, the first poll that saw National getting any traction was on March 26, 2004. Labour introduced the legislation in early April, after many months’ consultation.

            Surely you are not so stupid/dishonest as to claim that Labour decided after the poll on March 26 to completely change direction?

        • Pascal's bookie 16.2.1.2

          “I don’t deny that National was talking about the issues.”

          It would be fairly difficult to now, but you have been implying so all along. I don’t find your link that interesting at all. English couldn’t get traction for any number of reasons. And the f&s issue had been essentially played out by Orewa. To pretend though, that Labour wasn’t responding to National’s race baiting but instead initiating that angle is simply false. That’s what the iwi/kiwi billboards were all about. As much as I hated what Labour did, National showed every sign of being much worse.

  17. RedLogix 17

    There is no question in my mind that Maori are ultimately seeking full private property title rights. All the talk of ‘freedom of public access’ is just a sop.

    Sorry but I cannot see it working. At some point, no matter how it’s spun and diced, there will arise an irreconcilable difference between iwi ‘property rights’ and ‘unfettered public access’.

    • Zetetic 17.1

      It’s all about aquaculture. Big bucks to be made. Iwi want to be the ones making them. Get the rights recognised, get the aquaculture. Oh well, it was theirs in the first place so fair enough.

      No economic interest in closing beaches (although some extremist group will do it)

  18. RedLogix 18

    No economic interest in closing beaches

    So why all the ‘closed private’ beaches you find in so many places you travel around the world?

    Fine ideals and liberal principles aside, it will end in tears.

  19. So Bored 19

    National are the party that sanctifies private property and runs policies aimed at entrenching class advantages for those that have. Whats so different about thee Maori Party? The real rub willl come the day some urban Maori family from Otara head for the beach and get denied or charged for access by the local iwi or hapu.

  20. millsy 20

    Say goodbye to the right of a family to have a day at the beach. This is one slippery slope New Zealanders are heading down. There is no reason why the iwi elite wont lock the beaches up in the future. Hell, they are doing it already in heaps of areas. And you idiots are falling for it hook like and sinker

    If Maori had their way, every lake, forest, river, mountain, beach and rock in this country would be locked up. They are doing it now. For example, DOC want to fix up an old stock tunnel on the whitecliffs walkway up here in Taranaki, but the Maori are making things difficult, and not letting them, I think that they really need to pull finger and realise that to enjoy the outdoors is a kiwi birth right.

  21. RedLogix 21

    And in among all the talk of ‘access to the beaches’, there is no mention of protecting access to the sea itself. If Zetetic is right and it is all about aquaculture rights that will lock up large areas of sheltered bays on our coastline into private property titles… will this mean that boaties will have to ask the grace and favour of the local iwi before they can push out from the local slipway on Sundays?

    Even further down the slope there remains the open question that if ‘indigenous pre-colonial’ occupation can be translated into property rights for the S&F, then it hugely lowers the barrier to applying exactly the same legal argument to the rest of NZ.

    Many years ago (in the mid 80’s) I recall meeting and having breakfast with a then Chairman of Te Arawa confederation. Back then he outlined his vision for NZ, that eventually the iwi would restore full sovereign rights over their original territories, each run as separate nation states. In complete naivety I recall asking him how he thought us Pakeha might fit in. His reply was along the line, that Maori were very generous hosts, but if we didn’t pay the rent we could go back to where we came from. I swear I’m not making this up.

    He is not known as a radical. And yet every step he outlined in his vision to me nearly 30 years ago to me, has come directly to pass. His iwi, as of yesterday, now own huge tracts of mid- NI forest and rights to much of the geothermal energy in the area. Exactly as he planned.

    Personally I thought Labour’s S&F Act was a valid and workable compromise; allowing for some rights and recognition of iwi interests in an area, but without going anywhere near what now looks like being given to Maori. Listen carefully to the language being used; in among all the soothing talk you will clearly hear an underlying and uncompromising demand from Maori to obtain full private property title rights. And once obtained the next step is to demand full control of that property.

    As some other poster very cogently pointed out, this is exactly the same question we ran into when Jim Sutton tried to reform access to public lands, potentially requiring a handful of white farmers to legally secede small, linear and defined access routes to rivers and backcountry. Recall the howls and screams over that?

  22. Red Rosa 22

    “Personally I thought Labour’s S&F Act was a valid and workable compromise; allowing for some rights and recognition of iwi interests in an area, but without going anywhere near what now looks like being given to Maori. Listen carefully to the language being used; in among all the soothing talk you will clearly hear an underlying and uncompromising demand from Maori to obtain full private property title rights. And once obtained the next step is to demand full control of that property.

    As some other poster very cogently pointed out, this is exactly the same question we ran into when Jim Sutton tried to reform access to public lands, potentially requiring a handful of white farmers to legally secede small, linear and defined access routes to rivers and backcountry. Recall the howls and screams over that?”

    Well said Redlogix, deserves a repeat.

    Given a few days’ reflection, the FSA may not look too bad after all.

    • So Bored 22.1

      Redrosa and Redlogix are onto it. As a trout fisher access to rivers has a real resonnance, privatisation of the public domain by stealth is common. Pakeha or Maori the end result of privatisation is the same for Joe or Rangi Average.

      Im all for restitution for past losses for Maori, I am not for creation of a landed class based aristocracy. The Nats are because the aristocracy of property and money like to buy and trade from one another, and this represents a whole pot more of tradable assetts carved from the public.

    • I agree with Red Rosa.

      I feel somewhat compromised however. For the first time ever my comments at kiwiblog have resulted in net positive karma. Ooooo. I think I need a shower

  23. Tim Ellis 23

    micky,

    This thread is very interesting. If this thread is anything to go by, it seems that a large proportion of left-wing voters don’t want Maori to have a share of foreshore title, and are quite happy with Labour’s decision to legislate in 2004. This does suggest that Labour wasn’t pandering to red-neck reactionaries, but expressing the Labour Party view.

    Or would you have it that it is only people from the Right who oppose redress for Maori who are red-necks?

    If Millsy, So Bored, Red Rosa, Red Logix and Zetetic had been right-wing, I can well see that Eddie would label them as racists.

    • So Bored 23.1

      Ouch! Tim,

      If it is racist to object strongly to race based priveleges or preferences I plead Guilty as charged.

      As punishment I have to go to work now…..noticed you were on the blog ALL DAY, dont you have a job to go to, or something better to do?

      • Tim Ellis 23.1.1

        I wasn’t labelling you racist, So Bored. I was pointing out that had you come from the Right with the opinions that you hold, then Eddie would label you a racist.

        Can you tell me, though, which part of Don Brash’s Orewa speech did you disagree with?

    • Tim

      “it seems that a large proportion of left-wing voters don’t want Maori to have a share of foreshore title, and are quite happy with Labour’s decision to legislate in 2004”

      My view is more nuanced than others. I am more than happy for indigenous “rights” to be recognised, and if they have been breached or confiscated then for compensation to be paid. The only caveat to this is that access to beaches should continue to be open.

      I do not want the ability for “title” to be issued because the “rights” are something that in my view should not be able to be transferred or alienated.

      I do not believe that Labour was pandering to red-neck reactionaries but attempted to reconcile the competing interests.

      National did pander to the red-neckers. They proposed abolition of title and right without compensation.

      • Tim Ellis 23.2.1

        I agree with your point, Micky, that access to beaches does need to be preserved. All of the signals from the Maori party appear to be consistent with that, irrespective of recognition of customary rights.

        Labour did abolish title and right without compensation.

        • mickysavage 23.2.1.1

          Tim

          “Labour did abolish title and right without compensation.”

          No they did not. There was the right to go to have the High Court to seek a declaration and if the claim was upheld the Crown were obliged to negotiate compensation. See sections 33 and 37 of the FSA.

          And check out the deal done with Ngati Porou.

  24. Tigger 24

    Of course, one hopes that it is Maori and not the Maori Party who get to decide what they want from this process…

Links to post

Recent Comments

Recent Posts

  • Climate Adam: Why we're still losing the fight against Methane
    This video includes conclusions of the creator climate scientist Dr. Adam Levy. It is presented to our readers as an informed perspective. Please see video description for references (if any). Carbon dioxide is the main culprit behind climate change. But in second place is methane: a greenhouse gas stronger than CO2, ...
    7 hours ago
  • Climate Change: More ETS failure
    A few weeks ago, I blogged about the (then) upcoming ETS auction, raising the prospect of it failing, leaving the government with a messy budget hole. The auction was today, and indeed, it failed. In fact, it was such a failure that no-one even bothered to bid. Its easy to ...
    No Right TurnBy Idiot/Savant
    10 hours ago
  • The Return of Jacinda.
    Oh, take me, take me, take meTo the dreamer's ballI'll be right on time and I'll dress so fineYou're gonna love me when you see meI won't have to worryTake me, take mePromise not to wake me'Til it's morningIt's all been trueEarly morning yesterday, well before dawn, doom-scrolling.Not intentionally, that’s ...
    Nick’s KōreroBy Nick Rockel
    17 hours ago
  • How good is the interim NW busway?
    This is a guest post by Pshem Kowalczyk, a long-time follower of the blog. With great fanfare, just over six months ago (on 12 November 2023), AT launched its interim busway for the NorthWest region, with the new WX express service at the heart of the changes. I live ...
    Greater AucklandBy Guest Post
    18 hours ago
  • Consumer confidence collapses after Budget, in contrast with rest of world
    The first widespread survey of consumers and voters since the Budget on May 30 shows a collapse in confidence. Photo: Lynn Grieveson / The KākāTL;DR: The belt-tightening and tax-cutting Budget delivered on May 30 has not delivered the boost to confidence in the economy the National-ACT-NZ First Government might have ...
    The KakaBy Bernard Hickey
    18 hours ago
  • The end for the Air Force 757s
    The Air Force 757 that broke down with the Prime Minister on board in Port Moresby on Sunday is considered so unreliable that it carries a substantial stock of spare parts when it travels overseas. And the plane also carries an Air Force maintenance team on board ready to make ...
    PolitikBy Richard Harman
    21 hours ago
  • At a glance – Was 1934 the hottest year on record?
    On February 14, 2023 we announced our Rebuttal Update Project. This included an ask for feedback about the added "At a glance" section in the updated basic rebuttal versions. This weekly blog post series highlights this new section of one of the updated basic rebuttal versions and serves as a ...
    1 day ago
  • It's not New Zealand they've never heard of, it's him
    Sometimes you’ll just be so dog-tired, you can only keep yourself awake with a short stab of self-inflicted pain.A quick bite of the lip, for instance.Maybe a slight bite on the tongue or a dig of the nails.But what if you’re needing something a bit more painful?The solution is as ...
    More Than A FeildingBy David Slack
    1 day ago
  • Some “scrutiny” II
    Last month I blogged about the Ministry of Justice's Open Government Partnership commitment to strengthen scrutiny of Official Information Act exemption clauses in legislation", and how their existing efforts did not give much reason for confidence. As part of that, I mentioned that I had asked the Ministry for its ...
    No Right TurnBy Idiot/Savant
    1 day ago
  • Gordon Campbell on why the Biden “peace plan” for Gaza is doomed
    After months and months of blocking every attempt by the UN and everyone else to achieve a Gaza ceasefire, US President Joe Biden is now marketing his own three-stage “peace plan” to end the conflict. Like every other contribution by the US since October 7, the Biden initiative is hobbled ...
    WerewolfBy lyndon
    2 days ago
  • Raised crossings: hearing the voice of vulnerable pedestrians
    This is a guest post by Vivian Naylor, who is the Barrier Free Advisor and Educator at CCS Disability Action, Northern Region, the largest disability support and advocacy organisation in Aotearoa New Zealand. She also advises on AT’s Public Transport and Capital Projects Accessibility Groups. Vivian has been advocating and ...
    Greater AucklandBy Guest Post
    2 days ago
  • Leaving on a Jet Plane
    So kiss me and smile for meTell me that you'll wait for meHold me like you'll never let me go'Cause I'm leavin' on a jet planeDon't know when I'll be back againOh babe, I hate to go“The true measure of any society can be found in how it treats its ...
    Nick’s KōreroBy Nick Rockel
    2 days ago
  • Bernard's mid-winter pick 'n' mix for Tuesday, June 18
    The election promises of ‘better economic management’ are now ringing hollow, as NZ appears to be falling into a deeper recession, while other economies are turning the corner. Photo: Lynn Grieveson / The KākāTL;DR: The economy and the housing market are slumping back into a deep recession this winter, contrasting ...
    The KakaBy Bernard Hickey
    2 days ago
  • Scrutiny week off to rocky start
    Parliament’s new “Scrutiny” process, which is supposed to allow Select Committees to interrogate Ministers and officials in much more depth, has got off to a rocky start. Yesterday was the first day of “Scrutiny Week” which is supposed to see the Government grilled on how it spends taxpayers’ money and ...
    PolitikBy Richard Harman
    2 days ago
  • The choice could not be more stark’: How Trump and Biden compare on climate change
    This is a re-post from Yale Climate Connections by Barbara Grady Illustration by Samantha Harrington. Photo credits: Justin Lane-Pool/Getty Images, Win McNamee/Getty Images, European Space Agency. In an empty wind-swept field in Richmond, California, next to the county landfill, a company called RavenSr has plotted out land and won ...
    2 days ago
  • Differentiating between democracy and republic
    Although NZ readers may not be that interested in the subject and in lieu of US Fathers Day missives (not celebrated in NZ), I thought I would lay out some brief thoughts on a political subject being debated in the … Continue reading ...
    KiwipoliticoBy Pablo
    3 days ago
  • Bernard's mid-winter pick 'n' mix for Monday, June 17
    TL;DR: Chris Bishop talks up the use of value capture, congestion charging, PPPs, water meters, tolling and rebating GST on building materials to councils to ramp up infrastructure investment in the absence of the Government simply borrowing more to provide the capital.Meanwhile, Christopher Luxon wants to double the number of ...
    The KakaBy Bernard Hickey
    3 days ago
  • You do have the power to change things
    When I was invited to come aboard and help with Greater Auckland a few months ago (thanks to Patrick!), it was suggested it might be a good idea to write some sort of autobiographical post by way of an introduction. This post isn’t quite that – although I’m sure I’lll ...
    Greater AucklandBy Connor Sharp
    3 days ago
  • Turning Away – Who Cares If We Don't?
    On the turning awayFrom the pale and downtroddenAnd the words they say which we won't understandDon't accept that, what's happeningIs just a case of other's sufferingOr you'll find that you're joining inThe turning awayToday’s guest kōrero is from Author Catherine Lea. So without further ado, over to Catherine…I’m so honoured ...
    Nick’s KōreroBy Nick Rockel
    3 days ago
  • Dissecting Tickled
    Hi,Tickled was one of the craziest things that ever happened to me (and I feel like a lot of crazy things have happened to me).So ahead of the Webworm popup and Tickled screening in New Zealand on July 13, I thought I’d write about how we made that film and ...
    David FarrierBy David Farrier
    3 days ago
  • New Zealand Webworm Popup + Tickled!
    Hi,I’m doing a Webworm merch popup followed by a Tickled screening in Auckland, New Zealand on July 13th — and I’d love you to come. I got the urge to do this while writing this Webworm piece breaking down how we made Tickled, and talking to all the people who ...
    David FarrierBy David Farrier
    3 days ago
  • What China wants from NZ business
    One simple statistic said it all: China Premier Li Qiang asked Fonterra CEO Miles Hurrell what percentage of the company’s overall sales were made in China. “Thirty per cent,” said Hurrell. In other words, New Zealand’s largest company is more or less dependent on the Chinese market. But Hurrell is ...
    PolitikBy Richard Harman
    3 days ago
  • Review: The Worm Ouroboros, by E.R. Eddison (1922)
    One occasionally runs into the question of what J.R.R. Tolkien would have thought of George R.R. Martin. For years, I had a go-to online answer: we could use a stand-in. Tolkien’s thoughts on E.R. Eddison – that he appreciated the invented world, but thought the invented names were silly, and ...
    3 days ago
  • 2024 SkS Weekly Climate Change & Global Warming News Roundup #24
    A listing of 35 news and opinion articles we found interesting and shared on social media during the past week: Sun, June 9, 2024 thru Sat, June 15, 2024. Story of the week A glance at this week's inventory of what experts tell us is extreme weather mayhem juiced by ...
    3 days ago
  • Sunday Morning Chat
    After a busy week it’s a good day to relax. Clear blues skies here in Tamaki Makaurau, very peaceful but for my dogs sleeping heavily. In the absence of a full newsletter I thought I’d send out a brief update and share a couple of posts that popped up in ...
    Nick’s KōreroBy Nick Rockel
    4 days ago
  • The Book of Henry
    Now in the land of Angus beef and the mighty ABsWhere the steaks were juicy and the rivers did run foulIt would often be said,This meal is terrible,andNo, for real this is legit the worst thing I've ever eatenBut this was an thing said only to others at the table,not ...
    More Than A FeildingBy David Slack
    4 days ago
  • Fact Brief – Is ocean acidification from human activities enough to impact marine ecosystems?
    Skeptical Science is partnering with Gigafact to produce fact briefs — bite-sized fact checks of trending claims. This fact brief was written by Sue Bin Park in collaboration with members from the Skeptical Science team. You can submit claims you think need checking via the tipline. Is ocean acidification from human ...
    4 days ago
  • Happiness is a Warm Gun
    She's not a girl who misses muchDo do do do do do, oh yeahShe's well-acquainted with the touch of the velvet handLike a lizard on a window paneI wouldn’t associate ACT with warmth, other than a certain fabled, notoriously hot, destination where surely they’re heading and many would like them ...
    Nick’s KōreroBy Nick Rockel
    5 days ago
  • Still doing a good 20
    Hello! Here comes the Saturday edition of More Than A Feilding, catching you up on the past somewhat interrupted week. Still on the move!Share Read more ...
    More Than A FeildingBy David Slack
    5 days ago
  • Coalition of the Unwilling?
    What does Budget 2024 tell us about the current government? Muddle on?Coalition governments are not new. About 50 percent of the time since the first MMP election, there has been a minority government, usually with allied parties holding ministerial portfolios outside cabinets. For 10 percent of the time there was ...
    PunditBy Brian Easton
    5 days ago
  • Of red flags and warning signs in comments on social media
    Somewhat surprisingly for what is regarded as a network of professionals, climate science misinformation is getting shared on LinkedIn, joining other channels where this is happening. Several of our recent posts published on LinkedIn have attracted the ire of various commenters who apparently are in denial about human-caused climate change. Based ...
    5 days ago
  • All good, still
    1. On what subject is Paul Henry even remotely worth giving the time of day?a. The state of our nationb. The state of the ACT partyc. How to freak out potential buyers of your gin palace by baking the remains of your deceased parent into its fittings2. Now that New ...
    More Than A FeildingBy David Slack
    5 days ago
  • The looting is the point
    Last time National was in power, they looted the state, privatising public assets and signing hugely wasteful public-private partnership (PPP) contracts which saw foreign consortiums provide substandard infrastructure while gouging us for profits. You only have to look at the ongoing fiasco of Transmission Gully to see how it was ...
    No Right TurnBy Idiot/Savant
    5 days ago
  • The Illusion of Power: How Local Government Bureaucrats Overawe Democratically-Elected Councillors..
    The Democratic Façade Of Local Government: Our district and city councillors are democratically elected to govern their communities on one very strict condition – that they never, ever, under any circumstances, attempt to do so.A DISINTEGRATION OF LOYALTIES on the Wellington City Council has left Mayor Tory Whanau without a ...
    6 days ago
  • Lowlights & Bright Spots
    I can feel the lowlights coming over meI can feel the lowlights, from the state I’m inI can see the light now even thought it’s dimA little glow on the horizonAnother week of lowlights from our government, with the odd bright spot and a glow on the horizon. The light ...
    Nick’s KōreroBy Nick Rockel
    6 days ago
  • Weekly Roundup 14-June-2024
    Another week, another roundup of things that caught our eye on our favourite topics of transport, housing and how to make cities a little bit greater. This Week in Greater Auckland On Monday, Connor wrote about Kāinga Ora’s role as an urban development agency Tuesday’s guest post by ...
    Greater AucklandBy Greater Auckland
    6 days ago
  • The Hoon around the week to June 14
    Photo: Lynn Grieveson / The KākāTL;DR: The podcast above of the weekly ‘hoon’ webinar for paying subscribers features co-hosts and talking with:The Kākā’s climate correspondent about the National-ACT-NZ First Government’s moves this week to take farming out of the ETS and encourage more mining and oil and ...
    The KakaBy Bernard Hickey
    6 days ago
  • Climate policy axed in broad daylight, while taxpayer liabilities grow in the dark
    In 2019, Shane Jones addressed the “50 Shades of Green” protest at Parliament: Now he is part of a government giving those farmers a pass on becoming part of the ETS, as well as threatening to lock in offshore oil exploration and mining for decades. Photo: Lynn GrievesonTL;DR: Here’s the ...
    The KakaBy Bernard Hickey
    6 days ago
  • Rage Bait!
    Hi,Today’s newsletter is all about how easy it is to get sucked into “rage bait” online, and how easy it is to get played.But first I wanted to share something that elicited the exact opposite of rage in me — something that made me feel incredibly proud, whilst also making ...
    David FarrierBy David Farrier
    6 days ago
  • Bernard's Dawn Chorus and pick 'n' mix for Friday, June 14
    Seymour said lower speed limits “drained the joy from life as people were forced to follow rules they knew made no sense.” File Photo: Lynn Grieveson / The KākāTL;DR: My six things to note in Aotearoa-NZ’s political economy around housing, climate and poverty on Friday, June 14 were:The National/ACT/NZ First ...
    The KakaBy Bernard Hickey
    6 days ago
  • Friendly but frank talks with China Premier
    It sounded like the best word to describe yesterday’s talks between Chinese Premier Li Qiang and his heavyweight delegation of Ministers and officials and Prime Minister Christopher Luxon and New Zealand Ministers and officials was “frank.” But it was the kind of frankness that friends can indulge in. It ...
    PolitikBy Richard Harman
    6 days ago
  • Skeptical Science New Research for Week #24 2024
    Open access notables Wildfire smoke impacts lake ecosystems, Farruggia et al., Global Change Biology: We introduce the concept of the lake smoke-day, or the number of days any given lake is exposed to smoke in any given fire season, and quantify the total lake smoke-day exposure in North America from 2019 ...
    6 days ago
  • Join us for the weekly Hoon on YouTube Live
    Photo by Mathias Elle on UnsplashIt’s that new day of the week (Thursday rather than Friday) when we have our ‘hoon’ webinar with paying subscribers to The Kākā for an hour at 5 pm.Jump on this link on YouTube Livestream for our chat about the week’s news with special guests:5.00 ...
    The KakaBy Bernard Hickey
    6 days ago
  • Geoffrey Miller: China’s message to New Zealand – don’t put it all at risk
    Don’t put it all at risk. That’s likely to be the take-home message for New Zealand Prime Minister Christopher Luxon in his meetings with Li Qiang, the Chinese Premier. Li’s visit to Wellington this week is the highest-ranking visit by a Chinese official since 2017. The trip down under – ...
    Democracy ProjectBy Geoffrey Miller
    6 days ago
  • The Real Thing
    I know the feelingIt is the real thingThe essence of the soulThe perfect momentThat golden momentI know you feel it tooI know the feelingIt is the real thingYou can't refuse the embraceNo?Sometimes we face the things we most dislike. A phobia or fear that must be confronted so it doesn’t ...
    Nick’s KōreroBy Nick Rockel
    7 days ago
  • Gordon Campbell on how moderates empower the political right
    Struth, what a week. Having made sure the rural sector won’t have to pay any time soon for its pollution, PM Christopher Luxon yesterday chose Fieldays 2024 to launch a parliamentary inquiry into rural banking services, to see how the banks have been treating farmers faced with high interest rates. ...
    7 days ago
  • Bernard's Dawn Chorus and pick 'n' mix for Thursday, June 13
    In April, 17,656 people left Aotearoa-NZ to live overseas, averaging 588 a day, with just over half of those likely to have gone to Australia. Photo: Photo: Lynn Grieveson / The KākāTL;DR: My six things to note in Aotearoa-NZ’s political economy around housing, climate and poverty on Thursday, June 13 ...
    The KakaBy Bernard Hickey
    7 days ago
  • Our guide to having your say on the draft RLTP 2024
    Auckland’s draft Regional Land Transport Plan (RLTP) 2024 is open for feedback – and you only have until Monday 17 June to submit. Do it! Join the thousands of Aucklanders who are speaking up for wise strategic investment that will dig us out of traffic and give us easy and ...
    Greater AucklandBy Connor Sharp
    7 days ago
  • The China puzzle
    Chinese Premier Li Qiang arrives in Wellington today for a three-day visit to the country. The visit will take place amid uncertainty about the future of the New Zealand-China relationship. Li hosted a formal welcome and then lunch for then-Prime Minister Chris Hipkins in Beijing a year ago. The pair ...
    PolitikBy Richard Harman
    7 days ago
  • Fossil fuels are shredding our democracy
    This is a re-post of an article from the Climate Brink by Andrew Dessler published on June 3, 2024. I have an oped in the New York Times (gift link) about this. For a long time, a common refrain about the energy transition was that renewable energy needed to become ...
    1 week ago
  • Life at 20 kilometres an hour
    We are still in France, getting from A to B.Possibly for only another week, though; Switzerland and Germany are looming now. On we pedal, towards Budapest, at about 20 km per hour.What are are mostly doing is inhaling a country, loving its ways and its food. Rolling, talking, quietly thinking. ...
    More Than A FeildingBy David Slack
    1 week ago
  • Hipkins is still useless
    The big problem with the last Labour government was that they were chickenshits who did nothing with the absolute majority we had given them. They governed as if they were scared of their own shadows, afraid of making decisions lest it upset someone - usually someone who would never have ...
    No Right TurnBy Idiot/Savant
    1 week ago
  • Exercising with the IDF.
    This morning I did something I seldom do, I looked at the Twitter newsfeed. Normally I take the approach of something that I’m not sure is an American urban legend, or genuinely something kids do over there. The infamous bag of dog poo on the front porch, set it on ...
    Nick’s KōreroBy Nick Rockel
    1 week ago
  • Helm Hammerhand Anime: First Pictures and an Old English ‘Hera’
    We have some news on the upcoming War of the Rohirrim anime. It will apparently be two and a half hours in length, with Peter Jackson as Executive Producer, and Helm’s daughter Hera will be the main character. Also, pictures: The bloke in the middle picture is Freca’s ...
    1 week ago
  • Farmers get free pass on climate AND get subsidies
    The cows will keep burping and farting and climate change will keep accelerating - but farmers can stop worrying about being included in the ETS. Photo: Lynn Grieveson / The KākāTL;DR: My six things to note in Aotearoa-NZ’s political economy around housing, climate and poverty on Wednesday, June 12 were:The ...
    The KakaBy Bernard Hickey
    1 week ago
  • Six ideas to secure Te Huia’s Future
    This is a guest post by our friend Darren Davis. It originally appeared on his excellent blog, Adventures in Transitland, which features “musings about public transport and other cool stuff in Aotearoa/ New Zealand and around the globe.” With Te Huia now having funding secure through to 2026, now is ...
    Greater AucklandBy Darren Davis
    1 week ago
  • The methane waka sinks
    In some ways, there may be less than meets the eye to the Government announcement yesterday that the He Waka Eke Noa proposal for farmers to pay for greenhouse gas emissions has been scrapped. The spectre of farmers still having to pay at some point in the future remains. That, ...
    PolitikBy Richard Harman
    1 week ago
  • At a glance – Does positive feedback necessarily mean runaway warming?
    On February 14, 2023 we announced our Rebuttal Update Project. This included an ask for feedback about the added "At a glance" section in the updated basic rebuttal versions. This weekly blog post series highlights this new section of one of the updated basic rebuttal versions and serves as a ...
    1 week ago
  • Climate Change: Farmers get what they wanted – for now
    Since entering office, National has unravelled practically every climate policy, leaving us with no effective way of reducing emissions or meeting our emissions budgets beyond magical thinking around the ETS. And today they've announced another step: removing agriculture entirely. At present, following the complete failure of he waka eka noa, ...
    No Right TurnBy Idiot/Savant
    1 week ago
  • Presumed Innocent?
    The blue billionaireDistraction no interactionOr movement outside these glazed over eyesThe new great divideFew fight the tide to be glorifiedBut will he be satisfied?Can we accept this without zoom?The elephant in the roomNot much happens in politics on a Monday. Bugger all in fact. Although yesterday Christopher Luxon found he ...
    Nick’s KōreroBy Nick Rockel
    1 week ago
  • Gordon Campbell on our doomed love affair with oil and gas
    What if New Zealand threw a fossil fuel party, and nobody came? On the weekend, Resources Minister Shane Jones sent out the invitations and strung up the balloons, but will anyone really want to invest big time in resuming oil and gas exploration in our corner of the planet? Yes, ...
    WerewolfBy lyndon
    1 week ago
  • Building better housing insights
    This is a guest post by Meredith Dale, senior urban designer and strategist at The Urban Advisory. There’s a saying that goes something like: ‘what you measure is what you value’. An RNZ article last week claimed that Auckland was ‘hurting’ because of a more affordable supply of homes, particularly townhouses ...
    Greater AucklandBy Guest Post
    1 week ago
  • Putin would be proud of them
    A Prime Minister directs his public service to inquire into the actions of the opposition political party which is his harshest critic. Something from Orban's Hungary, or Putin's Russia? No, its happening right here in Aotearoa: Prime Minister Christopher Luxon has announced the Public Service Commission will launch an ...
    No Right TurnBy Idiot/Savant
    1 week ago
  • Resources for debunking common solar and wind myths
    This is a repost from a Yale Climate Connections article by SueEllen Campbell published on June 3, 2024. The articles listed can help you tell fact from fiction when it comes to solar and wind energy. Some statements you hear about solar and wind energy are just plain false. ...
    1 week ago
  • Juggernaut
    Politics were going on all around us yesterday, and we barely noticed, rolling along canal paths, eating baguettes. It wasn’t until my mate got to the headlines last night that we learned there had been a dismayingly strong far right result in the EU elections and Macron had called a ...
    More Than A FeildingBy David Slack
    1 week ago
  • Numbers Game.
    Respect Existence, Or Expect Resistance? There may well have been 50,000 pairs of feet “Marching For Nature” down Auckland’s Queen Street on Saturday afternoon, but the figure that impresses the Coalition Government is the 1,450,000 pairs of Auckland feet that were somewhere else.IN THE ERA OF DRONES and Artificial Intelligence, ...
    1 week ago
  • Media Link: AVFA on post-colonial blowback.
    Selwyn Manning and I discuss varieties of post colonial blowback and the implications its has for the rise of the Global South. Counties discussed include Palestine/Israel, France/New Caledonia, England/India, apartheid/post-apartheid South Africa and post-colonial New Zealand. It is a bit … Continue reading ...
    KiwipoliticoBy Pablo
    1 week ago
  • Policy by panic
    Back in March, Ombudsman Peter Boshier resigned when he hit the statutory retirement age of 72, leaving the country in the awkward (and legally questionable) position of having him continue as a temporay appointee. It apparently took the entire political system by surprise - as evinced by Labour's dick move ...
    No Right TurnBy Idiot/Savant
    1 week ago
  • PSA: NZ's Richest Company, Zuru, Sucks
    Hi,Today the New Zealand press is breathlessly reporting that the owners of toy company Zuru are officially New Zealand’s wealthiest people: Mat and Nick Mowbray worth an estimated $20 billion between them.While the New Zealand press loses its shit celebrating this Kiwi success story, this is a Webworm reminder that ...
    David FarrierBy David Farrier
    1 week ago
  • Bernard's Dawn Chorus and pick 'n' mix for Monday, June 10
    TL;DR: The six things to note in Aotearoa-NZ’s political economy around housing, climate and poverty in the past day to 8:36 pm on Monday, June 10 were:20,000 protested against the Fast-track approval bill on Saturday in Auckland, but PM Christopher Luxon says ‘sorry, but not sorry’ about the need for ...
    The KakaBy Bernard Hickey
    1 week ago
  • In Defence of Kāinga Ora
    Given the headlines around the recent findings of the ‘independent’ review of Kāinga Ora by Bill English, you might assume this post will be about social housing, Kāinga Ora’s most prominent role. While that is indeed something that requires defending, I want to talk about the other core purpose of ...
    Greater AucklandBy Connor Sharp
    1 week ago
  • Baby You're A Rich Man
    “How does it feel to beOne of the beautiful peopleNow that you know who you areWhat do you want to beAnd have you traveled very far?Far as the eye can see”Yesterday the ACT party faithful were regaled with craven boasts, sneers, and demands for even more at their annual rally.That ...
    Nick’s KōreroBy Nick Rockel
    1 week ago
  • Stopping a future Labour government from shutting down gas exploration
    A defiant Resources Minister Shane Jones has responded to Saturday’s environmental protests by ending Labour’s offshore oil exploration ban and calling for long-term contracts with any successful explorers. The purpose would be to prevent a future Labour Government from reversing any licence the explorers might hold. Jones sees a precedent ...
    PolitikBy Richard Harman
    1 week ago
  • 2024 SkS Weekly Climate Change & Global Warming News Roundup #23
    A listing of 32 news and opinion articles we found interesting and shared on social media during the past week: Sun, June 2, 2024 thru Sat, June 8, 2024. Story of the week Our Story of the Week is Yale Climate Connection's Resources for debunking common solar and wind myths, by ...
    1 week ago
  • Fission by the river
    This is where we ate our lunch last Wednesday. Never mind your châteaux and castles and whatnot, we like to enjoy a baguette in the shadow of a nuclear power plant; a station that puts out more than twice as much as Manapouri using nothing more than tiny atoms to bring ...
    More Than A FeildingBy David Slack
    2 weeks ago

  • Prime Minister wraps up visit to Japan
    Prime Minister Christopher Luxon has just finished a successful three-day visit to Japan, where he strengthened political relationships and boosted business links. Mr Luxon’s visit culminated in a bilateral meeting with Japanese Prime Minister Kishida Fumio followed by a state dinner. “It was important for me to meet Prime Minister Kishida in person ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 hours ago
  • Major business deals signed on PM’s Japan trip
    Significant business deals have been closed during the visit of Prime Minister Christopher Luxon to Japan this week, including in the areas of space, renewable energy and investment.  “Commercial deals like this demonstrate that we don’t just export high-quality agricultural products to Japan, but also our world-class technology, expertise, and ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    10 hours ago
  • Strategic Security speech, Tokyo
    Minasan, konnichiwa, kia ora and good afternoon everyone. Thank you for the invitation to speak to you today and thank you to our friends at the Institute for International Socio-Economic Studies and NEC for making this event possible today.  It gives me great pleasure to be here today, speaking with ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    11 hours ago
  • National Infrastructure Pipeline worth over $120 billion
    The National Infrastructure Pipeline, which provides a national view of current or planned infrastructure projects, from roads, to water infrastructure, to schools, and more, has climbed above $120 billion, Infrastructure Minister Chris Bishop says. “Our Government is investing a record amount in modern infrastructure that Kiwis can rely on as ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    12 hours ago
  • Making it easier to build infrastructure
    The Government is modernising the Public Works Act to make it easier to build infrastructure, Minister for Land Information Chris Penk announced today. An independent panel will undertake an eight-week review of the Act and advise on common sense changes to enable large scale public works to be built faster and ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 day ago
  • NZ enhances North Korea sanctions monitoring
    New Zealand will enhance its defence contributions to monitoring violations of sanctions against North Korea, Prime Minister Christopher Luxon announced today.  The enhancement will see the New Zealand Defence Force (NZDF) increase its contributions to North Korea sanctions monitoring, operating out of Japan. “This increase reflects the importance New Zealand ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 day ago
  • Speech to Safeguard National Health and Safety Conference
    Good afternoon everyone. It’s great to be with you all today before we wrap up Day One of the annual Safeguard National Health and Safety Conference. Thank you to the organisers and sponsors of this conference, for the chance to talk to you about the upcoming health and safety consultation. ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 day ago
  • Ōtaki to north of Levin alliance agreements signed
    Transport Minister Simeon Brown has welcomed an important milestone for the Ōtaki to north of Levin Road of National Significance (RoNS), following the NZ Transport Agency (NZTA) signing interim alliance agreements with two design and construction teams who will develop and ultimately build the new expressway.“The Government’s priority for transport ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 day ago
  • Improvements to stopping Digital Child Exploitation
    The Department of Internal Affairs [Department] is making a significant upgrade to their Digital Child Exploitation Filtering System, which blocks access to websites known to host child sexual abuse material, says Minister of Internal Affairs Brooke van Velden.  “The Department will incorporate the up-to-date lists of websites hosting child sexual ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 days ago
  • New vaccine research aims to combat prevalent bovine disease
    A vaccine to prevent an infectious disease that costs New Zealand cattle farmers more than $190 million each year could radically improve the health of our cows and boost on-farm productivity, Associate Agriculture Minister Andrew Hoggard says. The Ministry for Primary Industries is backing a project that aims to develop ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 days ago
  • Making it easier to build granny flats
    The Government has today announced that it is making it easier for people to build granny flats, Acting Prime Minister Winston Peters and RMA Reform Minister Chris Bishop say. “Making it easier to build granny flats will make it more affordable for families to live the way that suits them ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 days ago
  • High Court Judge appointed
    Attorney-General Judith Collins today announced the appointment of Auckland King’s Counsel Gregory Peter Blanchard as a High Court Judge. Justice Blanchard attended the University of Auckland from 1991 to 1995, graduating with an LLB (Honours) and Bachelor of Arts (English). He was a solicitor with the firm that is now Dentons ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    5 days ago
  • Health workforce numbers rise
    Health Minister Dr Shane Reti says new data released today shows encouraging growth in the health workforce, with a continued increase in the numbers of doctors, nurses and midwives joining Health New Zealand. “Frontline healthcare workers are the beating heart of the healthcare system. Increasing and retaining our health workforce ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    5 days ago
  • Government to overhaul firearms laws
    Associate Justice Minister Nicole McKee has today announced a comprehensive programme to reform New Zealand's outdated and complicated firearms laws. “The Arms Act has been in place for over 40 years. It has been amended several times – in a piecemeal, and sometimes rushed way. This has resulted in outdated ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    6 days ago
  • Government delivers landmark specialist schools investment
    The coalition Government is delivering record levels of targeted investment in specialist schools so children with additional needs can thrive. As part of Budget 24, $89 million has been ringfenced to redevelop specialist facilities and increase satellite classrooms for students with high needs. This includes: $63 million in depreciation funding ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    6 days ago
  • Major health and safety consultation begins
    A substantial consultation on work health and safety will begin today with a roadshow across the regions over the coming months, says Workplace Relations and Safety Minister Brooke van Velden.  This the first step to deliver on the commitment to reforming health and safety law and regulations, set out in ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    6 days ago
  • Growing the potential of New Zealand’s forestry sector in partnership
    Forestry Minister Todd McClay, today announced the start of the Government’s plan to restore certainty and confidence in the forestry and wood processing sector. “This government will drive investment to unlock the industry’s economic potential for growth,” Mr McClay says. “Forestry’s success is critical to rebuilding New Zealand’s economy, boosting ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    6 days ago
  • Government cancels forestry ETS annual service charges for 2023-24
    Annual service charges in the forestry Emissions Trading Scheme (ETS) will be cancelled for 2023/24, Forestry Minister Todd McClay says. “The sector has told me the costs imposed on forestry owners by the previous government were excessive and unreasonable and I agree,” Mr McClay says. “They have said that there ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    6 days ago
  • Speech to the LGNZ Infrastructure Symposium
    Introduction Thank you for having me here today and welcome to Wellington, the home of the Hurricanes, the next Super Rugby champions. Infrastructure – the challenge This government has inherited a series of big challenges in infrastructure. I don’t need to tell an audience as smart as this one that ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    6 days ago
  • Government boosts Agriculture and food trade with China
    Trade and Agriculture Minister Todd McClay and Food Safety Minister Andrew Hoggard welcomed outcomes to boost agricultural and food trade between New Zealand and China. A number of documents were signed today at Government House that will improve the business environment between New Zealand and China, and help reduce barriers, including on infant formula ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    6 days ago
  • NZ and China launch Services Trade Negotiations
    Trade Minister Todd McClay, and China’s Commerce Minister Wang Wentao, today announced the official launch of Negotiations on Services Trade between the two countries.  “The Government is focused on opening doors for services exporters to grow the New Zealand’s economy,” Mr McClay says.  As part of the 2022 New Zealand-China Free Trade Agreement Upgrade ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    6 days ago
  • Prime Minister Luxon meets with Premier Li
    Prime Minister Christopher Luxon met with Chinese Premier Li Qiang at Government House in Wellington today.  “I was pleased to welcome Premier Li to Wellington for his first official visit, which marks 10 years since New Zealand and China established a Comprehensive Strategic Partnership,” Mr Luxon says. “The Premier and ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    6 days ago
  • Government and business tackling gender pay gap
    The coalition Government is taking action to reduce the gender pay gap in New Zealand through the development of a voluntary calculation tool. “Gender pay gaps have impacted women for decades, which is why we need to continue to drive change in New Zealand,” Acting Minister for Women Louise Upston ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    6 days ago
  • Funding Boost for Rural Support Trusts
    The coalition Government is boosting funding for Rural Support Trusts to provide more help to farmers and growers under pressure, Rural Communities Minister Mark Patterson announced today. “A strong and thriving agricultural sector is crucial to the New Zealand economy and one of the ways to support it is to ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    6 days ago
  • Latest data shows size of public service decreasing
    Spending on contractors and consultants continues to fall and the size of the Public Service workforce has started to decrease after years of growth, according to the latest data released today by the Public Service Commission. Workforce data for the quarter from 31 December 23 to 31 March 24 shows ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    6 days ago
  • Speech to the Law Association
    Thank you to the Law Association for inviting me to speak this morning. As a former president under its previous name — the Auckland District Law Society — I take particular satisfaction in seeing this organisation, and its members, in such good heart. As Attorney-General, I am grateful for these ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    6 days ago
  • 25 years on, NZ reaffirms enduring friendship with Timor Leste
    New Zealand is committed to working closely with Timor-Leste to support its prosperity and resilience, Foreign Minister Winston Peters says.   “This year is the 25th anniversary of New Zealand sending peacekeepers to Timor-Leste, who contributed to the country’s stabilisation and ultimately its independence,” Mr Peters says.    “A quarter ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    6 days ago
  • Inquiry requested into rural banking
    Promoting robust competition in the banking sector is vital to rebuilding the economy, Finance Minister Nicola Willis says.  “New Zealanders deserve a banking sector that is as competitive as possible. Banking services play an important role in our communities and in the economy. Kiwis rely on access to lending when ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    6 days ago
  • Ministry for Regulation targets red tape to keep farmers and growers competitive
    Regulation Minister David Seymour, Environment Minister Penny Simmonds, and Food Safety Minister Andrew Hoggard have today announced a regulatory sector review on the approval process for new agricultural and horticultural products.    “Red tape stops farmers and growers from getting access to products that have been approved by other OECD countries. ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    7 days ago
  • Government to reverse blanket speed limit reductions
    The Coalition Government will reverse Labour’s blanket speed limit reductions by 1 July 2025 through a new Land Transport Rule released for public consultation today, Transport Minister Simeon Brown says.  The draft speed limit rule will deliver on the National-ACT coalition commitment to reverse the previous government’s blanket speed limit ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    7 days ago
  • Chair appointments for NZSO, CNZ and NZ On Air
    Minister Paul Goldsmith is making major leadership changes within both his Arts and Media portfolios. “I am delighted to announce Carmel Walsh will be officially stepping into the role of Chair of the New Zealand Symphony Orchestra, having been acting Chair since April,” Arts Minister Paul Goldsmith says.  “Carmel is ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    7 days ago
  • Government focus on long-term food, fibre growth
    Food and fibre export revenue is tipped to reach $54.6 billion this year and hit a record $66.6b in 2028 as the Government focuses on getting better access to markets and cutting red tape, Agriculture Minister Todd McClay and Oceans and Fisheries Minister Shane Jones say. “This achievement is testament ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    7 days ago
  • Govt consulting on cutting red tape for exporters
    A new export exemption proposal for food businesses demonstrates the coalition Government’s commitment to reducing regulatory barriers for industry and increasing the value of New Zealand exports, which gets safe New Zealand food to more markets, says Food Safety Minister Andrew Hoggard.  “The coalition Government has listened to the concerns ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • New Zealand and Philippines elevating relationship
    New Zealand and Philippines are continuing to elevate our relationship, Foreign Minister Winston Peters says.   “The leaders of New Zealand and Philippines agreed in April 2024 to lift our relationship to a Comprehensive Partnership by 2026,” Mr Peters says. “Our visit to Manila this week has been an excellent ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • Paid Parental Leave increase to help families
    Workplace Relations and Safety Minister, Brooke van Velden says paid parental leave increase from 1 July will put more money in the pockets of Kiwi parents and give them extra support as they take precious time off to bond with their newborns. The increase takes effect from 1 July 2024 ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • Defence increases UN Command commitment
    The number of New Zealand Defence Force (NZDF) personnel deployed to the Republic of Korea is increasing, Defence Minister Judith Collins and Foreign Minister Winston Peters announced today.  NZDF will deploy up to 41 additional personnel to the Republic of Korea, increasing the size of its contribution to the United ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • New Zealand to attend 'Summit on Peace in Ukraine' in Switzerland
    New Zealand will be represented at the Summit on Peace in Ukraine by Minister Mark Mitchell in Switzerland later this week.    “New Zealand strongly supports Ukraine’s efforts to build a comprehensive, just, and lasting peace,” Foreign Minister Winston Peters says.   “Minister Mitchell is a senior Cabinet Minister and ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • Big step forward for M.bovis programme
    Farmers’ hard work is paying off in the fight against Mycoplasma bovis (M. bovis) with the move to a national pest management plan marking strong progress in the eradication effort, says Biosecurity Minister Andrew Hoggard.  “The plan, approved by the Coalition Government, was proposed by the programme partners DairyNZ, Beef ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • Build To Rent opening welcomed by Housing Minister
    Prime Minister Christopher Luxon and Housing Minister Chris Bishop formally opened a new Build to Rent development in Mt Wellington this morning. “The Prime Minister and I were honoured to cut the ribbon of Resido, New Zealand’s largest Build to Rent development to date.  “Build to Rent housing, like the ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • Agriculture to come out of the ETS
    The Government will deliver on its election commitment to take agriculture out of the New Zealand Emissions Trading Scheme (NZ ETS) and will establish a new Pastoral Sector Group to constructively tackle biogenic methane, Coalition Government Agriculture and Climate Change Ministers say. Agriculture Minister Todd McClay says New Zealand farmers ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago

Page generated in The Standard by Wordpress at 2024-06-19T13:34:09+00:00