web analytics

How did we miss the sweet spot?

Written By: - Date published: 11:15 am, April 20th, 2009 - 19 comments
Categories: climate change - Tags:

This fascinating article (with many links) describes some of the radical technologies America is considering to address the urgent problem of global warming.

… global warming is so dire, the Obama administration is discussing radical technologies to cool Earth’s air …

One such extreme option includes shooting pollution particles into the upper atmosphere to reflect the sun’s rays.

Ohh this is going to end well don’t you think? How did we get here? First the problem of global warming was too distant, too unproven, to be worth doing anything about. Now all of a sudden it is too late, too urgent, for sensible measures like reducing carbon emissions to work effectively. Now we need to start clutching at quick fix solutions. How did we miss the sweet spot? How long exactly was the window between too early and too late?

I think the author (Andrew Gilkson) pretty much sums it up:

That global climate change has reached an impasse whereby the “powers-to-be” are entertaining climate geoengineering mitigation, instead of the urgent deep reduction of carbon emissions required by science, represents the ultimate moral bankruptcy of institutions and a failure of democracy.

19 comments on “How did we miss the sweet spot? ”

  1. Bill 1

    Holdren compared the way humanity is facing dangerous climate change to passengers in a car with bad brakes heading toward a cliff in a fog, saying, “The sensible passengers will certainly say: ‘Let’s put on the brakes, even if we don’t know it will save us. It may be too late. We don’t know exactly where the cliff is…. Let’s get on with it.'”

    How about turning the bloody steering wheel? Or even better, open the doors and abandon the bullshit technology that’s carrying you over the edge?

    Em, because the particular technology is not the problem? Of course! The cliff and the fog (ie nature) is the problem. Nothing wrong with our technologies, just nature’s inability to deal with it.

    So if we tweak it here and tweak it there ( profitable) and ‘civilise’ nature in the same vein we ‘civilised’ most of humanity….make it succumb; subject it to our ‘better’ ways, make it behave ‘correctly’…then hey!…done deal, everything sweet.

    We’re fucked.

  2. jerry 2

    “So if we tweak it here and tweak it there ( profitable) and ‘civilise’ nature in the same vein we ‘civilised’ most of humanity .make it succumb; subject it to our ‘better’ ways, make it behave ‘correctly’ then hey! done deal, everything sweet.”

    Not sure if that analogy is so great – this is sort of what we achieve with immunisation which would be a stretch to argue against.

    • Bill 2.1

      I was alluding more to arrogant and destructive colonial attitudes in the section of my comment you cut and pasted, and suggesting those same attitudes are now being applied to climate change.

      I don’t think of climate change as the problem. The problem is our activity. The techno fixers want more of the same activity…just enhanced and grander in scale. In doing so they miss the whole point and will probably exacerbate climate change.

      I have not yet come across a single techno fix that upon close examination doesn’t just completely fall over. However, I notice the news outlets are developing a habit of unquestionably announcing this or that new technology as ‘the solution’ thus allowing us the illusory comfort of sitting back and leaving it to ‘them’ to develop their wee solutions and sort it all out. (microwaved woodchips was a classic of late)

      Going on your misreading of my comment’s intent. If I have a sore head then a pharmaceutical techno fix can help. But if I have a sore head because it’s jammed in a vice? Give me all the painkillers you want. The problem wont go away because the problem is not being addressed.

      • jerry 2.1.1

        If you have your head jammed in a vice perhaps antipsychotics would be in order ?

        The greatest problem (from an NZ perspective) of the problem being activity is that to substantively decrease that activity would have a fairly grave impact on our major export earners, and as many have pointed out previously any reduction in NZ activity makes not a jot of difference if the rest of the world continues as they are.

        • Bill 2.1.1.1

          The major export earners don’t give a shit about you or me or anyone else. So why should we care about their precious profits?

          There isn’t the space to go into this here, but maybe you’ll take time to contemplate all the things that are made all over the world that are nothing beyond superfluous pap…the environmental cost of built in obsolescence….the unnecessary service industries and the tiers of outlets that exist only to cater for those (unnecessary) workers …the insanity and deleterious consequences of driving to a (perhaps) unnecessary job where your primary task is to make anonymous shareholders $$$$…..the destructive technologies we could have replaced years ago were it not for vested interests and profit motives (fishing, mining, power generation techniques etc, etc)….there’s a bloody endless list of things we do and things we manufacture and extract that are of no real social worth;that we could simply disengage from and that would go some ways to alleviating the unfolding climatic disaster.

          But for the profit motive. Those ‘earners’.

          • jerry 2.1.1.1.1

            Bill raving won’t do you much good – nor will gutting the NZ farming sector do anything for the climate although it would be an excellent way to screw the country.

          • Kevyn Miller 2.1.1.1.2

            “I have not yet come across a single techno fix that upon close examination doesn’t just completely fall over.”

            If you examine Newton’s Laws and Eistein’s Theories closely closely enough they “completely fall over” too. Well, not completely of course, just a little bit here and there. Just like most techno fixes they only fall over if you are judging them as a unifying theory, which they aren’t. but they vital building blocks of one.

            That may not be a very good analogy. IMHO your analogies both need to be taken a step further to reveal root cause of the problem.

            Whose driving the car?

            If the ‘vice’ is the profit motive, then why don’t we just use our hands to undo the vice? Possibly because our hands are tied by the suprapolitical masters who have been controlling both capitalism and communism for a hundred years. Not being fascetious, just capitalism and communism have been equally disastrous for the environment and societies. Either the same perverse human nature raised the same types of monsters to the top in both in both political systems or both political systems were actually being controlled by the same people.

            If the latter is the case then history tells us they have no respect for humanity…cannon fodder mentality. As long as they think they can survive climate change then they probably think climate change is the ‘ultimate solution’ to poverty.

            If the former is the case that same perverse human nature will lead to civilisation taking ‘cutting off your nose to spite your face’ to a whole new level.

  3. John Dalley 3

    What’s more staggering about this is the fact that the NZ climate deniers, John Key, Rodney Hide and co still have their heads stuck firmly up their A***E

  4. Felix 4

    How the fuck did NZ get so stupid as to elect a bunch of retarded Actoids and Nats who think they can just ignore the world’s largest and most pressing issues?

    • Pascal's bookie 4.1

      It was their turn Felix. You elitist fuckburger. Yes they is retarded and don’t seem to be doing much with regard to the making of the sense and stuff, but it was their turn.

      And Labour was, like you, elitist see. You need to come to grips with the fact that balggedy blagh blah snargle. Shit sorry. Labour is out of touch with the people and so on, so forth.

  5. ripp0 5

    Oh lordie, I’ve no sooner commented elsewhere on the possibility of human society raising a risk PERVERSE generation or two.. than this comes up.!!

    But – and I address myself to the naughty guest blogger here – with specific oversight arising from the third paragraph down in the linked material supplied above — viz its three highly rational words “avoid rash deployment”..

    AND pertaining to the blog’s sensationalist ‘highglights or lowlights or whatever’.

    You understand my relectance to encourage certain others by using their language, terms and so on..

    That said, as a reader.. perhaps truthout has value… taken with NaCl*, of course.

    * could have those others grappling with science… eh.

  6. The Baron 6

    I disagree with the quotation included at the bottom – “…and a failure of democracy”. A bit too sensationalist for me…

    The common man has evidently not yet been convinced that the cost of change outweights the benefits of change, and hasn’t been prepared to support such policies and parties. That isn’t a failure – hell, its a FEATURE of democracy.

    Nats and ACT would be more strident in this regard if more New Zealanders were prepared to meet the costs of change via higher taxes and higher costs. But time and time again, the majority of New Zealand has said no.

    I can’t see a way around that that is democratic – apart from a long term campaign of raising awareness and convincing people that it is necessary. It is one thing for everyone here to “see the light” – how do you get everyone else on board?

    • ripp0 6.1

      how interesting that one man’s (presumed) failure is another man’s FEATURE

      oyez: and mightn’t we be a tad more charitable in recognising that truthout.org were not simply referring to enzed in their piece. IMO if they were then our blogger would have been entirely correct in describing that linked material as fascinating

    • r0b 6.2

      I disagree with the quotation included at the bottom – ” and a failure of democracy’. A bit too sensationalist for me

      Disagree why? That seems to be exactly the point to me.

      How many examples are there of democracies making hard decisions that require painful action over say a decade, in order to avoid future disaster? Serious question, I’d be interested to ponder it. Can democracies take such action, have they in the past, or is this just the first time that the situation has arisen?

      • r0b 6.2.1

        Hmmm, I’m reminded of this book:

        A talk here, that I haven’t had time to see, could be interesting:
        http://www.ted.com/index.php/talks/jared_diamond_on_why_societies_collapse.html

        • The Baron 6.2.1.1

          R0b, I heartily recommend that book – a very interesting read. And yes, plenty of parallels to this discussion.

          One of the chapters focusses on Australia in particular as a contemporary society that is managing their resources in a particularly disasterous manner, especially their water.

          Very sobering…

          • Kevyn Miller 6.2.1.1.1

            “How many examples are there of democracies making hard decisions that require painful action over say a decade, in order to avoid future disaster? Serious question, I’d be interested to ponder it. Can democracies take such action, have they in the past, or is this just the first time that the situation has arisen?”

            The purpose of democracy has become to prevent revolutionary or radical changes. The same thing happened with communism…and with corporate capitalism. We might actually be better off with a global monarchy provided the monarch is an environmental activist. I believe Monaco, Britain and several Scandinavian countries have suitably qualified candidates. A joust should sort who’s best fit for the job.

      • The Baron 6.2.2

        Very good points. And yes, interesting to ponder.

        The only example that springs to mind, and it is not a positive one, is the rallying of a war mentality, particularly in WW2. Not that that idea is an original thought I think… didn’t it come out of Al Gore’s movie?

        Democracies don’t tend to move until their are crises… how can you get a faster decision without throwing democracy out the window? And what of the consequences of that?

        Oh my oh my.

      • Draco T Bastard 6.2.3

        IMO, the big problem with democracy is that everyone needs to have access to, actually read, and understand the issues. If this was true then democracies would be able to make the hard decisions as everyone would vote for the correct action. It’s not true though and the majority of people, who haven’t taken the time to learn the issues never mind actually understanding them, manage to let themselves be led around by their nose and/or their back pocket (this is how NACT just got voted in).

Recent Comments

Recent Posts

  • Tokelau Language Week reminds us to stay united and strong
    Staying strong in the face of challenges and being true to our heritage and languages are key to preserving our cultural identity and wellbeing, is the focus of the 2020 Tokelau Language Week. Minister for Pacific Peoples, Aupito William Sio, says this year’s theme, ‘Apoapo tau foe, i nā tāfea ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 days ago
  • NZ announces a third P-3 deployment in support of UN sanctions
    The Government has deployed a Royal New Zealand Air Force P-3K2 Orion (P-3) maritime patrol aircraft to support the implementation of United Nations Security Council (UNSC) resolutions imposing sanctions against North Korea, announced Minister of Foreign Affairs Winston Peters and Minister of Defence Ron Mark. “New Zealand has long supported ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • Pacific trade and development agreement a reality
    Pacific regional trade and development agreement PACER Plus will enter into force in 60 days now that the required eight countries have ratified it. Trade and Export Growth Minister David Parker welcomed the announcement that the Cook Islands is the eighth nation to ratify this landmark agreement. “The agreement represents ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 weeks ago
  • Securing a pipeline of teachers
    The Government is changing its approach to teacher recruitment as COVID-19 travel restrictions continue, by boosting a range of initiatives to get more Kiwis into teaching. “When we came into Government, we were faced with a teacher supply crisis,” Education Minister Chris Hipkins said. “Over the past three years, we ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 weeks ago
  • Border exceptions for a small number of international students with visas
    The Government has established a new category that will allow 250 international PhD and postgraduate students to enter New Zealand and continue their studies, in the latest set of border exceptions. “The health, safety and wellbeing of people in New Zealand remains the Government’s top priority. Tight border restrictions remain ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 weeks ago
  • First COVID-19 vaccine purchase agreement signed
    The Government has signed an agreement to purchase 1.5 million COVID-19 vaccines – enough for 750,000 people – from Pfizer and BioNTech, subject to the vaccine successfully completing all clinical trials and passing regulatory approvals in New Zealand, say Research, Science and Innovation Minister Megan Woods and Health Minister Chris Hipkins. ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 weeks ago
  • International statement – End-to-end encryption and public safety
    We, the undersigned, support strong encryption, which plays a crucial role in protecting personal data, privacy, intellectual property, trade secrets and cyber security.  It also serves a vital purpose in repressive states to protect journalists, human rights defenders and other vulnerable people, as stated in the 2017 resolution of the ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 weeks ago
  • Ministry of Defence Biodefence Assessment released
    The Ministry of Defence has today released a Defence Assessment examining Defence’s role across the spectrum of biological hazards and threats facing New Zealand. Biodefence: Preparing for a New Era of Biological Hazards and Threats looks at how the NZDF supports other agencies’ biodefence activities, and considers the context of ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 weeks ago
  • New Approaches to Economic Challenges: Confronting Planetary Emergencies: OECD 9 October 2020
    New Approaches to Economic Challenges: Confronting Planetary Emergencies: OECD 9 October 2020 Hon David Parker’s response following Thomas Piketty and Esther Duflo. Good morning, good afternoon, and good evening, wherever in the world you might be. I first acknowledge the excellent thought provoking speeches of Thomas Piketty and Esther ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 weeks ago
  • Kaipara Moana restoration takes next step
    A Memorandum of Understanding has been signed today at Waihāua Marae between the Crown, local iwi and councils to protect, restore and enhance the mauri of Kaipara Moana in Northland. Environment Minister David Parker signed the document on behalf of the Crown along with representatives from Ngā Maunga Whakahī, Ngāti ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 weeks ago
  • New Zealand and Uruguay unite on reducing livestock production emissions
    Agriculture Minister Damien O’Connor and Uruguayan Minister of Livestock, Agriculture and Fisheries Carlos María Uriarte have welcomed the launch of a three-year project that will underpin sustainable livestock production in Uruguay, Argentina, and Costa Rica.  The project called ‘Innovation for pasture management’ is led by Uruguay’s National Institute of Agricultural ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 weeks ago
  • 3100 jobs created through marae upgrades
    Hundreds of marae throughout the country will be upgraded through investments from the Provincial Growth Fund’s refocused post COVID-19 funding to create jobs and put money into the pockets of local tradespeople and businesses, Regional Economic Development Minister Shane Jones and Māori Development Minister Nanaia Mahuta have announced. “A total ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 weeks ago
  • Health volunteers recognised in annual awards
    Health Minister Chris Hipkins has announced 9 teams and 14 individuals are the recipients of this year’s Minister of Health Volunteer Awards.  “The health volunteer awards celebrate and recognise the thousands of dedicated health sector volunteers who give many hours of their time to help other New Zealanders,” Mr Hipkins ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 weeks ago
  • Community COVID-19 Fund supports Pacific recovery
    The Minister for Pacific Peoples, Aupito William Sio says a total of 264 groups and individuals have successfully applied for the Pacific Aotearoa Community COVID-19 Recovery Fund, that will support Pacific communities drive their own COVID-19 recovery strategies, initiatives, and actions. “I am keen to see this Fund support Pacific ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 weeks ago
  • Community benefits from Māori apprenticeships
    Up to 50 Māori apprentices in Wellington will receive paid training to build houses for their local communities, thanks to a $2.75 million investment from the Māori Trades and Training Fund, announced Employment Minister Willie Jackson today. “This funding will enable Ngāti Toa Rangatira Incorporated to provide its Ngā Kaimahi ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 weeks ago
  • Training fund supports Māori jobseekers
    Rapidly growing sectors will benefit from a $990,000 Māori Trades and Training Fund investment which will see Wellington jobseekers supported into work, announced Employment Minister Willie Jackson today. “This funding will enable Sapphire Consultants Ltd. to help up to 45 Māori jobseekers into paid training initiatives over two years through ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 weeks ago
  • Ruakura Inland Port development vital infrastructure for Waikato
    The Government is investing $40 million to develop an inland port at Ruakura which will become a freight super-hub and a future business, research and residential development for the Waikato, Urban Development and Transport Minister Phil Twyford, and Māori Development Minister Nanaia Mahuta announced today. The funding has been has ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 weeks ago
  • Appointments made to Defence Expert Review Group
    Defence Minister Ron Mark announced today the establishment of an Expert Review Group to review a number of aspects of the New Zealand Defence Force’s (NZDF) structure, information management and record-keeping processes.  The Expert Review Group’s work arises out of the first recommendation from the Report of the Government’s Inquiry ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 weeks ago
  • No active community cases of COVID-19
    There are no active community cases of COVID-19 remaining in the country after the last people from the recent outbreak have recovered from the virus, Health Minister Chris Hipkins said today. “This is a big milestone. New Zealanders have once again through their collective actions squashed the virus. The systems ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 weeks ago