web analytics

How would Nats cut tax? Where would the money come from?

Written By: - Date published: 10:54 am, September 16th, 2008 - 22 comments
Categories: election 2008, national, slippery, tax - Tags:

Bill English has confirmed that National still intends to give the average worker a $50 tax cut. That’s $18 a week more than they will get in Labour’s tax cuts after 2011.

If National’s would increase the cut for all taxpayers by around $18 a week it would cost nearly $3 billion a year. In reality, that won’t happen because Key has said there will be no additional tax cuts for low-income workers.

So, what form of tax cut could deliver $18 a week for someone on the average wage of $46,000? Cutting the 33% rate to 29% would do it. The cost would be about $600 million a year, the 1,400,000 million people with incomes below $20,000 would get nothing and the 230,000 people earning $80,000 plus would get $46 more a week. Basically, tax cuts for the rich. Of course, that does nothing about the dreaded 39% tax bracket and you would have the economic purists still in tears about the gap between top income tax rate and the corporate rate but it would cost a billion to bring it down to 33%.

So, where would the money come from for these tax cuts for the rich? Even the cheap option costs $600 million – hardly chicken feed. It’s not going to be funded from cutting waste. Just get the idea out of your head. For all their chirping, National has identified only 1% of the waste that would need to be cut to fund even their cheapest tax cut option. National hasn’t talked about spending cuts anything like $600 million a year; indeed, they have had to guarantee to maintain Labour’s spending in all major areas except education. There’s virtually more cash surpluses either. That only leaves one option… and it becomes clear why National is so desperate to borrow more and sell-off our assets.

[numbers from Treasury]

22 comments on “How would Nats cut tax? Where would the money come from? ”

  1. Gustavo Trellis 1

    Maybe treasury made a mistake? You know…again.

  2. The PC Avenger 2

    One thing to keep in mind is that National appears to be driving towards making SOE’s (such as TVNZ) produce a profit. As Gordon Campbell suggests, it’s pretty likely that this is to generate the funds to pay for their tax cuts.


  3. insider 3

    More pertinently, where will the money come from for the expected labour promises/bribes, given that the cupboard is apparantly bare and nothing more could possibly be spent that isn’t already being spent. More borrowing is apparantly reckless.

    So that leaves only one option to fund more spending – more tax.

  4. insider. we don’t know the scale of the spending in those promises so we can’t make any serious comment about them. hasn’t stopped you though.

    There is basically no more money in the kitty for the next year, a bit more in the out years but not billions.

  5. kk 6

    Hey, insiders is onto something: “More borrowing is apparently reckless.” – you been following the financial turmoil in the US mate? It’s got Key’s philosophy written all over it

  6. Pascal's bookie 7

    “How would Nats cut tax? Where would the money come from?’

    That’s just an old political battle from the past Steve, that the National Prty doesn’t want to talk about.

  7. NeillR 8

    According to the link to treasury you provided, the top 15% of taxpayers (those who earn over $60k) pay 53% of the income tax. So if there were to be tax cuts it should go to those who actually pay the most – you say that those at the bottom get nothing, but they pay nothing so where’s the problem?

    [“The rich pay more tax so they should get the biggest tax cuts.” non sequitur. SP]

  8. Phil 9


    Barak Obama claims he will deliver a tax-cut package by going through federal spending line-by-line and cutting unnecessary or wasteful initiatives. The Dem’s cheer loudly, and the Indy’s nod approvingly.

    John Key claims he will deliver a tax-cut package by going through government spending line-by-line and cutting unnecessary or wasteful initiatives. Bloggers at TheStandard gasp in horror, and draw comparisons with cheese.

    What a funny world we live in.

  9. Matthew Pilott 10

    Phil – the two are incomparable. If I were you, I’d just be thankful that we don’t have the US’ excess of pork-barrel spending that Obama is attacking. I can think of an example here – $1bn for home insulation, tacked onto the ETS. Not a real example, because it is relevant to the bill. In the US, you’d get $500m for a Senator’s pet project, like an industrial plant, tacked onto S59 or something equally ridiculous.

  10. Matthew Pilott 11

    NiellR, the top 15% of tax-payers earn what percentage of New Zealand’s income?

    Hint: more than that percentage of tax you quoted.

    Think about that for a sec.

  11. Phil 12


    Fair point.

    But, how many voters in NZ are capable of differentiating the two?
    Probably less than you or I think…

  12. Felix 13

    Well Phil, so far in my (not very statistically sound) survey it’s come out at about 2 to 1.

  13. gobsmacked 14

    The big story on tax in the US campaign is Alan Greenspan – a hero to many conservatives, including John Key, who used to be on his team. Greenspan has attacked the McCain tax plan:

    “I’m not in favor of financing tax cuts with borrowed money”.

    It would be interesting to know what John Key thinks of his former mentor’s view.

  14. Stephen 15

    The Rudd government made a similar commitment to cut waste, but it was in the form of something like a ‘all Ministries reduce your budget by 5%’ edict.

  15. Matthew Pilott 16

    Phil – a good comparison would be comparing what, specifically, they’ve identified as waste – I wonder how many grams of mainland cheddar Obama would get for the average US citizen. I wouldn’t be surprised, though, if they are both as vague as each other – that is also something they superficially have in common.

    P.s. ‘fewer’ than you think! Don’t let those billboards corrupt you!

  16. Pascal's bookie 17


    Pile on 😉

  17. Well if National really thinks it can make enough fiscal room to cut tax, I suggest it start right now, as a show of good faith to the public of New Zealand, and “less bureaucrat” the Opposition researcher for a senior Nat who spends part of their day, while on the state payroll, digging up dirt on the left, and then blogging under the nom-de-plume “steady eddie”.

    Lest this person be unmasked.

  18. Jasper 19

    Well, if it’s raining on November 8th, National will have a chance to cut funding across all levels.

    If it’s fine, they may not.

    Labour better be praying for fine weather. Their core voters seem to melt in the rain and don’t have cars.

    I wonder if any KFC’s or Maccas in South Auckland will be set up as Polling Booths… certainly be able to kill two birds with one stone there. Get a feed and cast a vote.

  19. insider 20


    The home insulation fund IMO is classic pork barrelling. Getting taxpayers to fund a pet project that would otherwise not fly and questionable paybacks

  20. Matthew Pilott 21

    I can see your point, but it is in line with what the greens stand for, and isn’t the worst type – it can benefit anyone, not a specific area or group. Since it’s also related to the bill being passed it’s not a clear-cut bribe for support!

    Questionable paybacks? I thought that the argument was very compelling actually, what about it didn’t work for you?

  21. insider. you don’t understand the definition of pork-barrelling.. it’s when a representative gets the Government to fund projects specifically for their electorate that is not logically or ideologically justified but will help them win re-election. If you think the Greens only want to insulate the houses of the poor to get more votes you’ve got a pretty distorted view of humanity and a frankly ignorant view of the Greens… maybe you should get along to a Greens event and meet these people.. then you could really start to consider yourself an insider

Recent Comments

Recent Posts

  • Government's response to preliminary referendums' results
    Minister of Justice Andrew Little has acknowledged the provisional results of the two referendums voted on in the 2020 General Election. New Zealanders were asked whether they supported the proposed Cannabis Legalisation and Control Bill, and whether they supported the End of Life Choice Act 2019 coming into force. On ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 days ago
  • New testing requirements for international maritime crew arriving in NZ
    The Government is moving to provide further protection against the chance of COVID-19 entering New Zealand through the maritime border.  “Yesterday I instructed officials to consult with the maritime sector around tightening of the requirements for international maritime crew entering the country,” Health Minister Chris Hipkins said.  “Ultimately, this will ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 days ago
  • Fast-tracked Northland water project will accelerate economic recovery
    The Government has welcomed the decision to approve a new water storage reservoir in Northland, the first of a number of infrastructure projects earmarked for a speedy consenting process that aims to accelerate New Zealand’s economic recovery from Covid-19.  The Matawii Water Storage Reservoir will provide drinking water for Kaikohe, ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    4 days ago
  • Tokelau Language Week reminds us to stay united and strong
    Staying strong in the face of challenges and being true to our heritage and languages are key to preserving our cultural identity and wellbeing, is the focus of the 2020 Tokelau Language Week. Minister for Pacific Peoples, Aupito William Sio, says this year’s theme, ‘Apoapo tau foe, i nā tāfea ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • NZ announces a third P-3 deployment in support of UN sanctions
    The Government has deployed a Royal New Zealand Air Force P-3K2 Orion (P-3) maritime patrol aircraft to support the implementation of United Nations Security Council (UNSC) resolutions imposing sanctions against North Korea, announced Minister of Foreign Affairs Winston Peters and Minister of Defence Ron Mark. “New Zealand has long supported ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 weeks ago
  • Pacific trade and development agreement a reality
    Pacific regional trade and development agreement PACER Plus will enter into force in 60 days now that the required eight countries have ratified it. Trade and Export Growth Minister David Parker welcomed the announcement that the Cook Islands is the eighth nation to ratify this landmark agreement. “The agreement represents ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 weeks ago
  • Securing a pipeline of teachers
    The Government is changing its approach to teacher recruitment as COVID-19 travel restrictions continue, by boosting a range of initiatives to get more Kiwis into teaching. “When we came into Government, we were faced with a teacher supply crisis,” Education Minister Chris Hipkins said. “Over the past three years, we ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 weeks ago
  • Border exceptions for a small number of international students with visas
    The Government has established a new category that will allow 250 international PhD and postgraduate students to enter New Zealand and continue their studies, in the latest set of border exceptions. “The health, safety and wellbeing of people in New Zealand remains the Government’s top priority. Tight border restrictions remain ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 weeks ago
  • First COVID-19 vaccine purchase agreement signed
    The Government has signed an agreement to purchase 1.5 million COVID-19 vaccines – enough for 750,000 people – from Pfizer and BioNTech, subject to the vaccine successfully completing all clinical trials and passing regulatory approvals in New Zealand, say Research, Science and Innovation Minister Megan Woods and Health Minister Chris Hipkins. ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 weeks ago
  • International statement – End-to-end encryption and public safety
    We, the undersigned, support strong encryption, which plays a crucial role in protecting personal data, privacy, intellectual property, trade secrets and cyber security.  It also serves a vital purpose in repressive states to protect journalists, human rights defenders and other vulnerable people, as stated in the 2017 resolution of the ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 weeks ago
  • Ministry of Defence Biodefence Assessment released
    The Ministry of Defence has today released a Defence Assessment examining Defence’s role across the spectrum of biological hazards and threats facing New Zealand. Biodefence: Preparing for a New Era of Biological Hazards and Threats looks at how the NZDF supports other agencies’ biodefence activities, and considers the context of ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 weeks ago