web analytics

HRC calls for consultation on fire at will

Written By: - Date published: 4:17 pm, December 10th, 2008 - 18 comments
Categories: national/act government - Tags: ,

This just in: the Human Rights Commission has called for the fire at will bill to be put to select committee:

The Human Rights Commission has urgently requested the Government to reconsider its decision not to allow the 90-day bill to go to a select committee.

“Rushed legislation is potentially risky legislation and this is a fundamental change to employment law which requires serious consideration,” said Equal Employment Opportunities Commissioner, Dr Judy McGregor.

In letters to the Ministers of Labour and Justice, the Commission said “The select committee process is an important check and balance where both employers and employee rights can be debated in a measured way. Submissions to select committees reinforce democratic principles of transparency, participation and accountability.”

Some readers may recall the fuss the right made about the HRC’s issues with the Electoral Finance Bill (and continued to make even once the HRC said it was happy with the Bill after it was amended).

I wonder if they’ll now take up the HRC’s advice on National and Act’s abuse of process with the same gusto?

18 comments on “HRC calls for consultation on fire at will ”

  1. sweetd 1

    But the bill is not rushed, there has been plenty of discussion in it already. Refer to it already going through select committee and having changes made. This is not the same as the EFA with its 1000 amendments.

  2. Tane 2

    sweetd, no one believes that. Try answering the quesitons I asked about the changes to the bill here. Face it, the HRC has called the Government on its shit. Now’s the time to show some humility and allow a proper debate on the bill.

  3. atavism 3

    So, anyone with some photo shop skills want to have some fun:

  4. sweetd 4

    Tane, who doesn’t believe that. Everyone I have spoken to support this bill, and most already operate under or create a similar situation. Its all about giving employers the same rights that workers have at the moment to quit at will. This will get more people into employment, its a good bill.

  5. Tane 5

    I’m not going to argue the point with an ideological right-winger. But I think your hypocrisy over the HRC says it all.

    atavism – gold.

  6. sweetd 6

    tane, it you can’t argue your point, then refrain from labeling people.

    I have no hypocrisy over the HRC, as I said this was well discussed last time at the select committee and changes were made because of.

  7. Tane 7

    Dude, look at the last 20 posts. The point has been argued. I’m not going to waste my time trying to convert ideologues.

  8. Sweetd: Tane, who doesn’t believe that.

    The HRC?

  9. Chris G 9

    Sorry, why is parliament running under urgency at the moment anyway?

    Is the sky falling and the only people who know about it are our MPs?

  10. ak 10

    On a matter of pay-back, Fire At Will sounds scary enough…. “FAWwwwwwww……”

    NACT says it gave warning…..”FAW!”

    but to Carry it Under Urgency reveals the true tory message……”FAWC-UU!!!”

    as you were

  11. Bill 11

    Is it just me, or has the msm bought and intent on recycling the line that the 90 day bill is all and only about allowing employers to fire over performance?

    If so ( it’s basically all I’ve heard), do they really not understand that bosses can be right vindictive bastards and visit grief upon employees for a whole raft of reasons unrelated to performance?

    Do they really not understand that this law change allows a boss to fire an employee for any of one of those other reasons and avoid any accountability?

    I’ve been fired a couple of times. Under the ECA because a bosses relative ‘came on board’ and there was only one full time vacancy. So my casual status progressed to unemployed status. Second time because a prick in middle management didn’t like me much.

    Under the ERA I’ve had bosses trying the same crap and they have been unsuccessful only because I know the law and how it protects me.

    The same cannot be said for the countless employees (usually young and in the service industries) who get their hours incrementally reduced and ‘walk’ because a) they do not understand current legislation and b) find the whole prospect of challenging unfair dismissal too onerous.

    Now what? Oh yeah. No point in encouraging those youngsters to stand up for themselves ’cause the law wont let them. And no point in the likes of me standing up for my rights for the same reason.

    To reiterate. On EVERY occasion a boss has tried to fire me ( several in total) it has NEVER been performance related. Under the ECA they could get away with it. Until now, under the ERA they couldn’t.

  12. Jeremy 12

    I’ve just been fired because my employer didn’t pay me at the agreed time and I complained about it.
    If this bill makes it even easier for an employer to fire people it needs to be stopped with urgency.

  13. Lew 13

    Jeremy: Complain to the ERA while you still can. You might get reinstated, you might get compensated, at the very least you’ll know whether that was the real reason.


  14. Tane 14

    You should also consider calling the Workers’ Rights Service if you’re in Wellington. They do a lot of good work helping non-unionised workers who get shafted.

  15. Andrew 15

    Jeremy: You seriously cannot be fired for complaining that you didnt get paid at the agreed time. If what you say is true then you will be in line for a constructive dismissal lawsuit. Even under the new law you cannot be fired for these reasons.

  16. Tane 16

    Though of course you could under National’s law if your employer claimed it was for “performance” reasons.

  17. Camryn 17

    HRC? Why is Hillary Rodham Clinton getting involved in New Zealand politics?


Links to post

Recent Comments

Recent Posts

  • Government's response to preliminary referendums' results
    Minister of Justice Andrew Little has acknowledged the provisional results of the two referendums voted on in the 2020 General Election. New Zealanders were asked whether they supported the proposed Cannabis Legalisation and Control Bill, and whether they supported the End of Life Choice Act 2019 coming into force. On ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 days ago
  • New testing requirements for international maritime crew arriving in NZ
    The Government is moving to provide further protection against the chance of COVID-19 entering New Zealand through the maritime border.  “Yesterday I instructed officials to consult with the maritime sector around tightening of the requirements for international maritime crew entering the country,” Health Minister Chris Hipkins said.  “Ultimately, this will ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 days ago
  • Fast-tracked Northland water project will accelerate economic recovery
    The Government has welcomed the decision to approve a new water storage reservoir in Northland, the first of a number of infrastructure projects earmarked for a speedy consenting process that aims to accelerate New Zealand’s economic recovery from Covid-19.  The Matawii Water Storage Reservoir will provide drinking water for Kaikohe, ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    4 days ago
  • Tokelau Language Week reminds us to stay united and strong
    Staying strong in the face of challenges and being true to our heritage and languages are key to preserving our cultural identity and wellbeing, is the focus of the 2020 Tokelau Language Week. Minister for Pacific Peoples, Aupito William Sio, says this year’s theme, ‘Apoapo tau foe, i nā tāfea ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • NZ announces a third P-3 deployment in support of UN sanctions
    The Government has deployed a Royal New Zealand Air Force P-3K2 Orion (P-3) maritime patrol aircraft to support the implementation of United Nations Security Council (UNSC) resolutions imposing sanctions against North Korea, announced Minister of Foreign Affairs Winston Peters and Minister of Defence Ron Mark. “New Zealand has long supported ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 weeks ago
  • Pacific trade and development agreement a reality
    Pacific regional trade and development agreement PACER Plus will enter into force in 60 days now that the required eight countries have ratified it. Trade and Export Growth Minister David Parker welcomed the announcement that the Cook Islands is the eighth nation to ratify this landmark agreement. “The agreement represents ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 weeks ago
  • Securing a pipeline of teachers
    The Government is changing its approach to teacher recruitment as COVID-19 travel restrictions continue, by boosting a range of initiatives to get more Kiwis into teaching. “When we came into Government, we were faced with a teacher supply crisis,” Education Minister Chris Hipkins said. “Over the past three years, we ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 weeks ago
  • Border exceptions for a small number of international students with visas
    The Government has established a new category that will allow 250 international PhD and postgraduate students to enter New Zealand and continue their studies, in the latest set of border exceptions. “The health, safety and wellbeing of people in New Zealand remains the Government’s top priority. Tight border restrictions remain ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 weeks ago
  • First COVID-19 vaccine purchase agreement signed
    The Government has signed an agreement to purchase 1.5 million COVID-19 vaccines – enough for 750,000 people – from Pfizer and BioNTech, subject to the vaccine successfully completing all clinical trials and passing regulatory approvals in New Zealand, say Research, Science and Innovation Minister Megan Woods and Health Minister Chris Hipkins. ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 weeks ago