Kremlinology: National on ACC

Written By: - Date published: 10:40 am, June 16th, 2008 - 41 comments
Categories: election funding, kremlinology, same old national, workers' rights - Tags:

In most countries, accident insurance is big business. Insurers and lawyers make billions off premiums, claims, and court cases but many people don’t actually get any cover if they are injured. The Third Labour Government set up ACC to ensure everyone would have cover if they were injured. It also freed up the court system for more important things. Studies show ACC provides top-notch cover and is cost-effective.

Of course, the insurance companies lost a great money spinner and have wanted it back ever since. So, they have donated heavily to National to get ACC privatised. National did that in its dying days in 1999 but Labour reversed privatisation in 2000 just in time, as one of the major workplace insurance providers, HIH, later collapsed owing $1 billion. Privatisation of ACC remained a policy into the 2005 election, when the insurance industry gave National $1 million. National and the insurance industry agreed to keep the policy secret. But this memo leaked.

So, what’s their policy now? The hints are privatisation is still on the cards. National is still in secret talks with big business about policy. In recent days, both Bill English and Pansy Wong have been quoted talking about wanting ‘competition’. Allowing private companies to compete with ACC would see the insurers siphon off the most profitable, low-risk businesses and workers and put the principle of universal cover in jeopardy. But, hey, at least the insurers will make big bucks.

There would be no waiting until the last minute this time, either. Having learnt their lesson from 1999, National would rush through privatisation at the start of their term this time in an effort to make it harder to reverse later.

41 comments on “Kremlinology: National on ACC ”

  1. burt 1

    Of course, the insurance companies lost a great money spinner and have wanted it back ever since.

    Well they can piss off eh, the Govt’s got it back and it’s way to profitable to let it go again.

    Meanwhile low income workers subsidise rich pricks with too much time on their hands crashing their mountain bikes….

    Go Labour – random redistrubition rules.

  2. Felix 2

    It’s like deja vu all over again…

  3. erikter 3

    SP, you’re now spinning faster than a supernova.

    Why did you stop at ACC? Why don’t we nationalise all supermarkets and food stores and kill competition completely? Surely, with your impeccable logic, the state can get us food at cheaper prices, can’t it?

    Go on, nationalise telecommunications, transport, buses and taxi companies as well, in the vain hope New Zealand may rapidly become a third rate socialist nation.

  4. Felix 4

    Meanwhile low income workers subsidise rich pricks with too much time on their hands crashing their mountain bikes .

    That has to be the strangest comment I’ve seen from you burt.

    Can you expand on it at all?

  5. Tane 5

    Erikter that’s just stupid and driven by ideology.

    SP isn’t arguing that we should nationalise everything, he’s arguing that ACC makes sense to remain in its current form as it works well for people. Privatising it or opening it to competition will only degrade the quality of coverage and service that people currently receive.

    As a logical extension, yes, if you can demonstrate that public monopoly provision of other services works better than private enterprise then by all means, nationalise away. I imagine there are some services where this will be the case, and services where it will not.

    You, on the other hand, seem to be arguing that all services should be provided by the private sector, regardless of whether it actually works better for the public. How does that make any sense?

  6. Peter Nelson 6

    Labour are the party that took orders from the Kremlin.
    I now pay over $1000 PA in ACC, real cheap insurance, not, thieving bastards.

    ACC should be zero and everyone should do their own insurance. Pay the policy you want, not what the govt will give you.

    [lprent: I read the first sentence and couldn’t even categorize you as a troll – they have better imaginations]

  7. erikter 7

    Tane: “Privatising it or opening it to competition will only degrade the quality of coverage and service that people currently receive.”

    Where are the facts to substantiate this statement?

    Tane: “You, on the other hand, seem to be arguing that all services should be provided by the private sector, regardless of whether it actually works better for the public.”

    Yes, yes and yes. Show me a private company which keeps losing money year after year. There is none, because such a company would go under.

    A true free-market economy in action.

  8. Felix 8

    erikter:

    Yes, yes and yes. Show me a private company which keeps losing money year after year. There is none, because such a company would go under.

    So by your own admission you place the profits of private insurance companies ahead of the security of the people of New Zealand.

    Nice to know where you stand, now I can go back to ignoring your neanderthal idealogical gruntings.

  9. erikter. look at the states, look at how many people don’t have health insurance, let alone income insurance. ACC provides both to every new zealander at a very low price.

  10. Tane 10

    Labour are the party that took orders from the Kremlin.
    I now pay over $1000 PA in ACC, real cheap insurance, not, thieving bastards.

    Oh God, another whinging employer. What is it with these people? You give them a business environment praised by none other than the world bank as the second easiest place in the world to do business, and all they can do is complain about the few crumbs they have to pay back to society.

    Seriously, you people are parasites.

    erikter:

    The facts are in the PriceWaterHouseCoopers study.

    As for your other point, a private company in control of major public infrastructure is never allowed to fail because the consequences would be disastrous. Instead, the government bails them out. A true free-market economy in action eh?

  11. BeShakey 11

    Felix – “Yes, yes and yes. Show me a private company which keeps losing money year after year. There is none, because such a company would go under.”

    And thats one of the arguments against private provision of everything – where the costs of failure are too high. Private provision of schools – where does that leave students in a school that goes under because it doesn’t make enough money (remembering that in many cases there won’t be a feasible alternative either). Private hospitals – where does that leave patients in hospitals that go under? Of course, this doesn’t mean there shouldn’t be any private hospitals or private schools etc etc, and doesn’t help with what the ratio of public/private should be, but it does give a good reason to reject a 100% private system.

  12. burt 12

    Felix

    There are many fundamental problems with the way ACC is collected, aside from the fact it gets it’s sneaky fingers into so many areas of our life.

    For example, there is no account taken in the premiums for the level of risk people engage in outside the workplace. I could be unemployed (or rich and living off my investments) riding a mountain bike around all day and I get full cover for accidents that might occur doing that. People not riding mountain bikes, or skydiving, playing rugby etc are subsidising people who choose to do that.

    Secondly look at some of the ways ACC is collected. A friend of mine has a nice collection of vintage motorbikes ( yes he’s a rich prick ) and he wonders why he needs to pay ACC levies on every registration (all 9 of them) when he can only ride one motorbike at a time. He also pays ACC levies for his car registration and he can’t ride a motorbike and drive a car at the same time. Do you agree it makes more sense if he insures himself for driving a car and riding a motorcycle?

  13. Lew 13

    The thing about private insurance, and health service, is that no private provider wants the type of person whose risk factor outweighs their ability to pay premiums. Since poverty is often a causative factor in poor health, and dangerous jobs (forestry, etc.) are often poorly-paid, these two often go hand in hand.

    In principle, privatised insurance and health means the people who need cover the most due to poor health or dangerous work are least able to pay for it, and consequently don’t tend to get covered. And look – in practice this is exactly the case in the USA.

    Perhaps Peter Nelson, erikter and burt think that’s fine, or believe such people don’t have a right to healthcare (by virtue of the fact they can’t afford the cover they need). Is that it, guys? Or something else?

    L

  14. roger nome 14

    Market fundamentalists like erikter want 20% of the population to have no health care, no income security, no schooling. Yep, go sell that to the electorate, and see what response you get. Oh actually, no need, we already have the Act Party’s polling at 1% to show us what people think of this law of the jungle philosophy.

  15. burt 15

    Lew

    The forestry job is a bad example, as it’s work related. Work cover is a shared responsibility between the employer and the employee.

    But I guess if I’ve got poor balance, bad eyesight and an inability to judge distance and speed then there is no reason why people shouldn’t subsidise the accidents I get mountain running…. afterall I can’t afford to cover myself so why shouldn’t somebody else pay it for me?

  16. Lew 16

    burt: That’s an argument to change the premium structure of ACC, not to scrap it and replace it with a privatised system, (though in fairness you haven’t argued for privatisation on this thread, just implied your support for it).

    You still didn’t answer the rhetorical, though.

    L

  17. Rocket Boy 17

    Burt, any form of revenue collection is going to have limitations. The rating system is not perfect, neither is taxation. Generally Government (local and national) revenue is collected on a ‘those that can afford it – pay it’ model and for better or worse that is how things work in New Zealand.

    I’m an employer and think the current ACC system works very well. We pay around $1500 a year for our 7 staff whereas we paid around $20,000 a year for our various other insurances (PI, Travel, Car, Business interruption etc etc).

    It is not really fair to equate these numbers but I certainly wouldn’t trust the insurance industry to provide a better, lower cost service as a replacement for ACC, they will cherry pick the easy money then once they have control of the market start ramping up the costs and we will all end up paying, employers and employees.

  18. Felix 18

    burt, all insurance is a cross subsidy. That’s the very nature of it. And what you don’t like about ACC is exactly what I like about it – it covers everyone, all the time. That’s real security which makes NZ a better place to live, and which no private company could possibly come near to achieving.

    BeShakey, that was a quote from erikter.

  19. Janet 19

    Thank you for raising such a vital issue. There are several issues here. ACC provides the cheapest, most efficient, comprehensive and no fault compensation in the world. People from other countries come to NZ to admire it and can’t understand why we would let it be opened up to ‘choice’ ie privatisation which is a real and immediate possibility with change of govt. Other countries like Australia have only 50% or less of their population covered, and levies for some industries are huge. What does an optional scheme mean for those who are injured without insurance or injure others without insurance? Have you ever tried to claim off someone who has damaged your car but hasn’t got insurance? And that’s just a car, not a person.

    And for those people complaining about the cost of their ACC levies what if someone in their family had an accident and needed life long disability support which could be millions of dollars – aren’t they happy to subsidise them? At least in the meantime until they have their own expensive accident and realise what a great and cheap scheme we have.

    If we had an optional scheme those who didn’t have cover or couldn’t sue someone for damage would have to join the queue to get health and disability support through the Ministry of Health – meaning even less for those needing support for illness-related disability.

    Meanwhile the big insurance companies have their eyes on the huge ACC fund built up to pay all this compensation. But don’t let them have it – it belongs to the citizens of NZ.

  20. Nedyah Hsan 20

    Then of course, when you really need ACC, it refuses to come to the party.

    Lost my hearing in one ear thanks to a random attack on the street, ACC refused to pay anything as “it’s not proven that you’ve lost your hearing as it’s just your word on it”. I couldn’t be bothered arguing with them (too long, and ultimately the cost/benefit doesn’t stack up) so I just waited around for my little slice of government funding to come into my pocket to have an operation to restore my hearing.
    Then I open my latest IRD statement and find that my wages have paid a good $900 to ACC, who has some seriously incompetent fund managers.

  21. burt 21

    Nedyah Hsan

    ACC has much more important things to spend it’s money on, like advertising – all good monopolies need to advertise, especially in election years…

    Jokes aside – more people with situations like you have need to come forward. ACC is an excellent example of ideology putting the cart before the horse. One size fits none.

    We also shouldn’t forget that ACC levies went up again this year, but I guess that’s OK because it’s only nasty private enterprise who crank up premiums.

  22. Lew 22

    Nedyah Hsan: yes, it is still an insurance company; the `any excuse’ principle still applies in full.

    L

    (who has been burned by insurers too many times)

  23. BeShakey 23

    Sorry Felix, it annoyed me so I got carried away responding rather than tracking down the original.

    Still no response to the problem of provider failure in the provision of essential services though.

  24. BeShakey 24

    Nedyah Hsan – I’m sure there are some shocking stories about ACC. Personally my only shocking story is about a private provider – I had to wait round in pain while they requested a steady stream of different forms, requested them again, realised they had them already, lost them, denied all this, admitted it but requested the forms again. Eventually it was sorted (and they waived the excess), but bad customer service isn’t the exclusive domain of ACC. There is an argument that without competition poor customer service is more likely, but there are a variety of good business models to avoid this. In the end, the existence of poor customer service (in itself) isn’t a reason to scrap ACC.

  25. Universal insurance through tax is the best and cheapest way to ensure outcomes.

    Private insurance is the best way to provide profits to private insurers and desirable outcomes to cherry-pickd segments of consumers.

    ALL the evidence says the way we do it now is the best, cheapest way for the whole country and that it delivers the best outcomes for the greatest number of people.

    If National is taking bribes (um…donations) to let multi-national insurers get into the act, we need to know about that.

    Who wants US-style workers’ compensation? No RATIONAL person.

    We have to assume worst-case as National isn’t saying what they will do.

  26. erikter 26

    “If National is taking bribes (um donations) to let multi-national insurers get into the act, we need to know about that.:

    As a former employee of a multinational yourself, you should know better. You cannot make assertions like that without proof.

    Shame on you, Steve Withers.

  27. Matthew Pilott 27

    Erikter, perhaps the good book (Oxford) can assist you with the term assertion; the definition therein bares no resemblance to your use.

    people like Burt want their own cover that they sign up for (or were you talking about your motorcyclist friend?). Do you also like the idea of the ritual struggle for a payout everytime you need to make a claim? If so, you’re a real masochist!

  28. burt 28

    Matthew Pilott

    I would rather have private cover for myself and my family, however I’m not saying that the govt should not provide assistance for “some form of cover’ for people who cannot afford any real world form of insurance.

    Unlike the mentality that insists that one size fits all, some people have very low risk lifestyles and shouldn’t be paying the same as adrenalin junkies like myself. I don’t think it’s valid that we make all people fit one single system probably because I don’t have issues with private enterprise. I get a pretty free ride on ACC, sure I pay for a motorbike registration and I pay levies via my salary, but you would need to know me to understand just how often I collect, at the expense of others. Based on my lifestyle my own insurance premiums would probably end up a lot higher than the ACC levies I pay and I would be happy with that, some people would pay less and I’m sure they would also be happy with that. Couch potatoes wouldn’t be subsidising my regular injuries from the various ways I physically thrash my body.

    ACC may be a good system for the lowest common denominator, I don’t actually have an argument with that, however as I said above, nothing is stopping the govt from providing an ‘insurance subsidy’ to low income workers or providing a default level of cover for beneficiaries etc.

    If your resistance to private cover being an option is because private enterprise will profit then I think you are letting your ideology trample over common sense. If private insurance companies don’t provide cost effective cover for people who want that option then they will not stay in business unlike ACC which just cranks up it’s premiums and reduces or restricts it’s cover to balance it’s books as required. We have no control or say about how it operates and we cannot opt out. Classic monopoly situation. Always bad for consumers and always good for the monopoly owners.

  29. ghostwhowalks 29

    Even if national restores ‘competition’ for ACC.
    Note its only competition for the premiums but payments will still only be the highely regulated ACC levels we have at present.
    No ‘choice’ for the poor injured worker

  30. Felix 30

    Of course burt you could, if you think you’re getting too much out of the system, simply not claim as often. That would sort of fit with the principle that voluntarily donating to charities is a reasonable alternative to paying tax wouldn’t it?

    As for your faith in the market ensuring sensible outcomes you only need to look around the world to see how well the market serves ordinary citizens in the health sector. Why do you think it would serve ordinary people’s needs here so much better than it does in, say, the U.S?

  31. burt 31

    Felix

    A karate instructor I use to regularly train with had his nose broken 14 times, mine has only been broken 4 times and I’ll tell you what – them facial reconstruction guys don’t come cheap. Between the two of us we have probably consumed more than we will ever pay on facial surgery alone. How about dislocated shoulders, broken wrists, spinal injuries, knee reconstructions, ankle sprains, broken fingers & toes and concussion requiring time of work from other high impact sports I get into as well.

    Perhaps we should keep monopoly one size fits all ACC, I’d pay a fortune for private cover !

  32. Nedyah Hsan 32

    Burt, Lew, BS,

    No media outlet at that time was even remotely interested in another “oh ACC screwed another over” story. I bet they would now.

    As far as ACC as a service/insurance entity goes. There’s a lot of work that could be done to ensure fair weightings, but not a lot of reasons to sell it apart from “we need more money to fund tax cuts”.

    I’m far more in favour of making those of us, who can afford and do have private health insurance, eligible to receive some sort of rebate on the ACC levies – across all levies that ACC collects.

    ACC don’t have to look far to realise “you’ve got private insurance which covers you for this, not for that, so we’ll cover you for that” seeing as all insurance clients are kept in a database in Wellington.

    My own health insurance covers me for death, disability, loss of mobility and any modifications needed to make a house fit for a wheelchair and other various essentials. This costs me approx $678 a year. Far less than ACCs $800! A rebate could be based on what cover I have, how much I paid. In this example, I would see a rebate of being around 40% of ACC paid. $320 back in the pocket would go some way to lessening the impact as that’s just under half my actual insurance costs.

    At least this way, those who can’t afford it, still have some assistance for receiving help. Those who can afford don’t feel so burnt by the notion of “free loaders”

  33. Lew 33

    burt/Nedyah Hsan: The trouble is that competition is a trojan horse for privatisation. Your rationales are good, and in principle I like two-tier public-private systems, but in insurance it doesn’t work, and here’s why:

    1. ACC becomes optional for those who have made alternative private arrangements.

    2. Wealthy, healthy people working in non-hazardous jobs with safe hobbies sign up with private providers at a token rate which reflects their extremely low risk profile. These people stand to gain most from private cover.

    3. Fit, wealthy people with dangerous hobbies or recreational habits (like you) sign up for premium insurance at a high premium which guarantees them top-class service. High risk, high cost, but they can afford it.

    4. ACC is left having to cater for poor people in generally worse health, who tend to work in dangerous jobs and may or may not have hazardous hobbies, ie: the most demanding, least-profitable, least able to pay customers.

    5. ACC haemorrhages money and struggles to provide services for its clients, driving marginal cases (people who can nearly afford private insurance) into the arms of private providers, which worsens ACC’s problems. THis becomes a cycle.

    6. Eventually ACC reaches breaking point, public confidence in the system is so low, and private insurance is so entrenched that the only politically viable option is to privatise it wholesale, with an attached `rescue package’ settlement of billions to make its customer base attractive to a buyer.

    I have no problem with insurers making profits. I have a problem with insurers being able to cherry-pick from NZ’s populace, which is what will happen under a `choice’ model. It’ll leave the people who most need insurance without any viable options.

    A lot of the complaints about ACC are along the lines of `I’m subsidising you’ or `you’re subsidising me’. Yes, that’s what’s happening. People in civilised society subsidise each other. In this case the system is Pareto efficient, which is a fancy way of saying `nobody loses, some people win’.

    In the real world, it doesn’t get much better than that.

    L

  34. Snelly Boy 34

    Seems to be an awful lot of misconception here today.

    Those advocating for the ‘privatisation’ of ACC what are you actually seeking?

    Is it opening up the provision of solely work place ACC coverage and claim servicing to compettition from the privatye insurance market as occurred in the last Nat led govt?

    Or is some complete jettison of ACC in favour of free market utopia which it appears a number of posters are advocating?

    For those “free loaders” you can’t have your cake and eat it too. To ditch the universal coverage of ACC would have to come with the removal of the no fault principle underpinning ACC.

    If that happens watch out for your massive cost increases. Not only the cost to the employer of increased business insurance premiums but private motor and contents (personal liability) insurance as well.

    Knock me over in your car and brain damage me even more than now and stare down the barrel of a lawsuit in the order of $10m to $15m.

    Do you want a system like the UK where an employee has to sue a ngeligent employer to access any form of compensation?

    Saying that, having a system which is the envy of the rest of the world means the fundamentals of ACC will never be touched by either side of the political spectyrum.

    As a senior member of the insurance industry I can vouch that what both the indutsry and the nats are after is a repeat of 1999.

    Personally, I feel it’s a mistake for there really isn’t any sound reason to do so. The supposed rationale of private bieng able to provide claim services cheaper and more effciiently is founded on only one thing and that’s getting people back to work quicker one way or another.

    The motivation of achieveing greatest profit possible doesn’t sit easy with work place insurance as the rest of the world has proven.

  35. andy 35

    Burt

    Tell your guy to work on his blocks, 14 times thats poor technique 🙂

    What about the elderly, the cover they would have to purchase would financially break them according to their risk.

    osu.

    Snelly boy,

    Very interesting.

    As a senior member of the insurance industry I can vouch that what both the indutsry and the nats are after is a repeat of 1999.

    Wow!

  36. r0b 36

    Between the two of us we have probably consumed more than we will ever pay on facial surgery alone. How about dislocated shoulders, broken wrists, spinal injuries, knee reconstructions, ankle sprains, broken fingers & toes and concussion requiring time of work from other high impact sports I get into as well.

    Are we all mad cycling martial artists here? Burt, it’s probably too late, but take care of yourself. I picked up my share of injuries from a couple of decades of martial arts, and I’m paying for it now. These things often find a way to come back and bite you later.

  37. Felix 37

    The motivation of achieveing greatest profit possible doesn’t sit easy with work place insurance as the rest of the world has proven.

    That’s the thing. None of these are new ideas, we only have to look around the world to see exactly how these various private models function over time.

    There’s simply no good reason to swap an imperfect system for an absolutely failed one.

    Oh and burt, please be careful 🙂

  38. i had a bit of experience with the fall-out from National’s attempts to privatise ACC.
    Accountability? never from private insurers – they go to phenomenal lengths, and invest a lot in lawyers to eschew any coverage.

  39. r0b 39

    Hey sprout – welcome back!

  40. cheers r0b, nice to be back.

  41. Hardy 41

    We have been appalled by a private workplace insurance provider’s
    treatment towards one of our family.
    After an unsuccessful shoulder op the P.W.I.P. totally denied having any further responsibility to to continue any care of the person hurt in a workplace accident
    Now two and a half years later, six Doctors, of which four say further surgery is required for the original injury the two others could actually be deemed to have a conflict of interest in the matter, are still refusing to acknowledge what some top Specialists have determined needs to occur ,so the battle continues.
    There have also been three Solicitors involved( sadly two being useless) numerous reviews,court appears and $20,000 in legal fees which has us lead to the realisation ,if this families experience is anything to go by, A.C.C. contracting out to private workplace providers will become an even bigger nightmare for workers if National adopts this as policy should they take over the reins

    ANYONE ELSE OUT THERE WHO’S FOUND OUT THE HARD WAY??
    WONDERING ALSO HAS ANYONE SUCCESSFULLY SUED A.C.C. FOR SOMETHING SIMILIAR??

Recent Comments

Recent Posts

  • Middle East, Africa deployments extended
    The Government has approved two-year extensions for four New Zealand Defence Force deployments to the Middle East and Africa, Defence Minister Judith Collins and Foreign Minister Winston Peters announced today. “These deployments are long-standing New Zealand commitments, which reflect our ongoing interest in promoting peace and stability, and making active ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    4 hours ago
  • Climate Change Commission Chair to retire
    The Climate Change Commission Chair, Dr Rod Carr, has confirmed his plans to retire at the end of his term later this year, Climate Change Minister Simon Watts says. “Prior to the election, Dr Carr advised me he would be retiring when his term concluded. Dr Rod Carr has led ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    6 hours ago
  • Inaugural Board of Integrity Sport & Recreation Commission announced
    Nine highly respected experts have been appointed to the inaugural board of the new Integrity Sport and Recreation Commission, Sport & Recreation Minister Chris Bishop says. “The Integrity Sport and Recreation Commission is a new independent Crown entity which was established under the Integrity Sport and Recreation Act last year, ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    8 hours ago
  • A balanced Foreign Affairs budget
    Foreign Minister Winston Peters confirmed today that Vote Foreign Affairs in Budget 2024 will balance two crucial priorities of the Coalition Government.    While Budget 2024 reflects the constrained fiscal environment, the Government also recognises the critical role MFAT plays in keeping New Zealanders safe and prosperous.    “Consistent with ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    11 hours ago
  • New social housing places to support families into homes
    New social housing funding in Budget 2024 will ensure the Government can continue supporting more families into warm, dry homes from July 2025, Housing Ministers Chris Bishop and Tama Potaka say. “Earlier this week I was proud to announce that Budget 2024 allocates $140 million to fund 1,500 new social ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    13 hours ago
  • New Zealand’s minerals future
    Introduction Today, we are sharing a red-letter occasion. A Blackball event on hallowed ground. Today  we underscore the importance of our mineral estate. A reminder that our natural resource sector has much to offer.  Such a contribution will not come to pass without investment.  However, more than money is needed. ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 day ago
  • Government sets out vision for minerals future
    Increasing national and regional prosperity, providing the minerals needed for new technology and the clean energy transition, and doubling the value of minerals exports are the bold aims of the Government’s vision for the minerals sector. Resources Minister Shane Jones today launched a draft strategy for the minerals sector in ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 day ago
  • Government progresses Māori wards legislation
    The coalition Government’s legislation to restore the rights of communities to determine whether to introduce Māori wards has passed its first reading in Parliament, Local Government Minister Simeon Brown says. “Divisive changes introduced by the previous government denied local communities the ability to determine whether to establish Māori wards.” The ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 day ago
  • First RMA amendment Bill introduced to Parliament
    The coalition Government has today introduced legislation to slash the tangle of red and green tape throttling some of New Zealand’s key sectors, including farming, mining and other primary industries. RMA Reform Minister Chris Bishop says the Government is committed to  unlocking development and investment while ensuring the environment is ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 day ago
  • Government welcomes EPA decision
    The decision by Environmental Protection Authority (EPA) to approve the continued use of hydrogen cyanamide, known as Hi-Cane, has been welcomed by Environment Minister Penny Simmonds and Agriculture Minister Todd McClay.  “The EPA decision introduces appropriate environmental safeguards which will allow kiwifruit and other growers to use Hi-Cane responsibly,” Ms ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 day ago
  • Speech to Employers and Manufacturers Association: Relief for today, hope for tomorrow
    Kia ora, Ngā mihi nui ki a koutou kātoa Tāmaki Herenga Waka, Tāmaki Herenga tangata Ngā mihi ki ngā mana whenua o tēnei rohe Ngāti Whātua ō Ōrākei me nga iwi kātoa kua tae mai. Mauriora. Greetings everyone. Thank you to the EMA for hosting this event. Let me acknowledge ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 day ago
  • Government invests in 1,500 more social homes
    The coalition Government is investing in social housing for New Zealanders who are most in need of a warm dry home, Housing Minister Chris Bishop says. Budget 2024 will allocate $140 million in new funding for 1,500 new social housing places to be provided by Community Housing Providers (CHPs), not ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 days ago
  • $24 million boost for Gumboot Friday
    Thousands more young New Zealanders will have better access to mental health services as the Government delivers on its commitment to fund the Gumboot Friday initiative, says Deputy Prime Minister Winston Peters and Mental Health Minister Matt Doocey.  “Budget 2024 will provide $24 million over four years to contract the ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 days ago
  • Residential Tenancies Amendment Bill passes first reading
    The Coalition Government’s Residential Tenancies Amendment Bill, which will improve tenancy laws and help increase the supply of rental properties, has passed its first reading in Parliament says Housing Minister Chris Bishop. “The Bill proposes much-needed changes to the Residential Tenancies Act 1986 that will remove barriers to increasing private ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 days ago
  • Montecassino Commemorative Address, Cassino War Cemetery
    Standing here in Cassino War Cemetery, among the graves looking up at the beautiful Abbey of Montecassino, it is hard to imagine the utter devastation left behind by the battles which ended here in May 1944. Hundreds of thousands of shells and bombs of every description left nothing but piled ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 days ago
  • First Reading – Repeal of Section 7AA of the Oranga Tamariki Act 1989
    I present a legislative statement on the Oranga Tamariki (Repeal of Section 7AA) Amendment Bill Mr. Speaker, I move that the Oranga Tamariki (Repeal of Section 7AA) Amendment Bill be now read a first time. I nominate the Social Services and Community Committee to consider the Bill. Thank you, Mr. ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 days ago
  • First reading of 7AA’s repeal: progress for children
    The Bill to repeal Section 7AA of the Oranga Tamariki Act has had its first reading in Parliament today. The Bill reaffirms the Coalition Government’s commitment to the care and safety of children in care, says Minister for Children Karen Chhour.  “When I became the Minister for Children, I made ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 days ago
  • China Business Summit 2024
    Kia ora koutou, good morning, and zao shang hao. Thank you Fran for the opportunity to speak at the 2024 China Business Summit – it’s great to be here today. I’d also like to acknowledge: Simon Bridges - CEO of the Auckland Chamber of Commerce. His Excellency Ambassador - Wang ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 days ago
  • Assisted depatures from New Caledonia
    Foreign Minister Winston Peters has confirmed a New Zealand Government plane will head to New Caledonia in the next hour in the first in a series of proposed flights to begin bringing New Zealanders home.    “New Zealanders in New Caledonia have faced a challenging few days - and bringing ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 days ago
  • Assisted departures from New Caledonia
    Foreign Minister Winston Peters has confirmed a New Zealand Government plane will head to New Caledonia in the next hour in the first in a series of proposed flights to begin bringing New Zealanders home.  “New Zealanders in New Caledonia have faced a challenging few days - and bringing them ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 days ago
  • Government to rollout roadside drug testing
    The Coalition Government will introduce legislation this year that will enable roadside drug testing as part of our commitment to improve road safety and restore law and order, Transport Minister Simeon Brown says.  “Alcohol and drugs are the number one contributing factor in fatal road crashes in New Zealand. In ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    4 days ago
  • Minister responds to review of Kāinga Ora
    The Government has announced a series of immediate actions in response to the independent review of Kāinga Ora – Homes and Communities, Housing Minister Chris Bishop says. “Kāinga Ora is a large and important Crown entity, with assets of $45 billion and over $2.5 billion of expenditure each year. It ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    4 days ago
  • Pseudoephedrine back on shelves
    Associate Health Minister David Seymour is pleased that Pseudoephedrine can now be purchased by the general public to protect them from winter illness, after the coalition government worked swiftly to change the law and oversaw a fast approval process by Medsafe. “Pharmacies are now putting the medicines back on their ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    4 days ago
  • New Zealand-China Business Summit
    Tēnā koutou katoa. Da jia hao.  Good morning everyone.   Prime Minister Luxon, your excellency, a great friend of New Zealand and my friend Ambassador Wang, Mayor of what he tells me is the best city in New Zealand, Wayne Brown, the highly respected Fran O’Sullivan, Champion of the Auckland business ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    5 days ago
  • New measures to protect powerlines from trees
    Energy Minister Simeon Brown has announced that the Government will make it easier for lines firms to take action to remove vegetation from obstructing local powerlines. The change will ensure greater security of electricity supply in local communities, particularly during severe weather events.  “Trees or parts of trees falling on ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    6 days ago
  • Wairarapa Moana ki Pouakani win top Māori dairy farming award
    Wairarapa Moana ki Pouakani were the top winners at this year’s Ahuwhenua Trophy awards recognising the best in Māori dairy farming. Māori Development Minister Tama Potaka announced the winners and congratulated runners-up, Whakatōhea Māori Trust Board, at an awards celebration also attended by Prime Minister Christopher Luxon and Finance Minister ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    7 days ago
  • DJ Fred Again – Assurance report received
    "On the 27th of March, I sought assurances from the Chief Executive, Department of Internal Affairs, that the Department’s correct processes and policies had been followed in regards to a passport application which received media attention,” says Minister of Internal Affairs Brooke van Velden.  “I raised my concerns after being ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • District Court Judges appointed
    Attorney-General Judith Collins has announced the appointment of three new District Court Judges, to replace Judges who have recently retired. Peter James Davey of Auckland has been appointed a District Court Judge with a jury jurisdiction to be based at Whangarei. Mr Davey initially started work as a law clerk/solicitor with ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • Unions should put learning ahead of ideology
    Associate Education Minister David Seymour is calling on the Post Primary Teachers’ Association (PPTA) to put ideology to the side and focus on students’ learning, in reaction to the union holding paid teacher meetings across New Zealand about charter schools.     “The PPTA is disrupting schools up and down the ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • Craig Stobo appointed as chair of FMA
    Commerce and Consumer Affairs Minister Andrew Bayly today announced the appointment of Craig Stobo as the new chair of the Financial Markets Authority (FMA). Mr Stobo takes over from Mark Todd, whose term expired at the end of April. Mr Stobo’s appointment is for a five-year term. “The FMA plays ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • Budget 2024 invests in lifeguards and coastguard
    Surf Life Saving New Zealand and Coastguard New Zealand will continue to be able to keep people safe in, on, and around the water following a funding boost of $63.644 million over four years, Transport Minister Simeon Brown and Associate Transport Minister Matt Doocey say. “Heading to the beach for ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • New Zealand and Tuvalu reaffirm close relationship
    New Zealand and Tuvalu have reaffirmed their close relationship, Foreign Affairs Minister Winston Peters says.  “New Zealand is committed to working with Tuvalu on a shared vision of resilience, prosperity and security, in close concert with Australia,” says Mr Peters, who last visited Tuvalu in 2019.  “It is my pleasure ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • New Zealand calls for calm, constructive dialogue in New Caledonia
    New Zealand is gravely concerned about the situation in New Caledonia, Foreign Minister Winston Peters says.  “The escalating situation and violent protests in Nouméa are of serious concern across the Pacific Islands region,” Mr Peters says.  “The immediate priority must be for all sides to take steps to de-escalate the ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • New Zealand welcomes Samoa Head of State
    Prime Minister Christopher Luxon met today with Samoa’s O le Ao o le Malo, Afioga Tuimalealiifano Vaaletoa Sualauvi II, who is making a State Visit to New Zealand. “His Highness and I reflected on our two countries’ extensive community links, with Samoan–New Zealanders contributing to all areas of our national ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • Island Direct eligible for SuperGold Card funding
    Transport Minister Simeon Brown has announced that he has approved Waiheke Island ferry operator Island Direct to be eligible for SuperGold Card funding, paving the way for a commercial agreement to bring the operator into the scheme. “Island Direct started operating in November 2023, offering an additional option for people ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • Further sanctions against Russia
    Foreign Minister Winston Peters today announced further sanctions on 28 individuals and 14 entities providing military and strategic support for Russia’s invasion of Ukraine.  “Russia is directly supported by its military-industrial complex in its illegal aggression against Ukraine, attacking its sovereignty and territorial integrity. New Zealand condemns all entities and ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • One year on from Loafers Lodge
    A year on from the tragedy at Loafers Lodge, the Government is working hard to improve building fire safety, Building and Construction Minister Chris Penk says. “I want to share my sincere condolences with the families and friends of the victims on the anniversary of the tragic fire at Loafers ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • Pre-Budget speech to Auckland Business Chamber
    Ka nui te mihi kia koutou. Kia ora and good afternoon, everyone. Thank you so much for having me here in the lead up to my Government’s first Budget. Before I get started can I acknowledge: Simon Bridges – Auckland Business Chamber CEO. Steve Jurkovich – Kiwibank CEO. Kids born ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • New Zealand and Vanuatu to deepen collaboration
    New Zealand and Vanuatu will enhance collaboration on issues of mutual interest, Foreign Minister Winston Peters says.    “It is important to return to Port Vila this week with a broad, high-level political delegation which demonstrates our deep commitment to New Zealand’s relationship with Vanuatu,” Mr Peters says.    “This ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • Penk travels to Peru for trade meetings
    Minister for Land Information, Chris Penk will travel to Peru this week to represent New Zealand at a meeting of trade ministers from the Asia-Pacific region on behalf of Trade Minister Todd McClay. The annual Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC) Ministers Responsible for Trade meeting will be held on 17-18 May ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago

Page generated in The Standard by Wordpress at 2024-05-24T09:26:55+00:00