ManBan!

Written By: - Date published: 10:00 am, July 6th, 2013 - 221 comments
Categories: democratic participation, dpf, feminism, labour, making shit up, sexism - Tags:

A great joke has been played on the mainstream media: they have bought, hook, line and sinker, into W****O**-type spin.  They have been exposed as a bunch of followers, desperate to land the next hilarious 140-character-one-liner, to prove their relevance … without really understanding just how much they’ve been played.

Here’s a few of the problems with the “man ban” narrative which anyone with half a fucking clue about the functioning of political parties and society in general might have cottoned on to.

We don’t have a meritocracy even if you ignore silly identity politics

A lot of people are having a fucking whinge because oh my goooooooooooood, if you only select womeeeeeeeeeeeeen then what about the meeeeeeeeeeeeen.  It should just be on merit!  Merit alone!

Here’s the problem – and again, this is if you completely ignore things like sexism (or insist despite the mountains of evidence that they don’t exist):

When there are five candidates running in your electorate – say, four party candidates from National, Labour, the Greens and ACT, and one independent – do you honestly believe that they are objectively the five best possible candidates for your electorate?

I’m certainly no National supporter.  I have significant issues with their policies, approaches, and general existence.  Even I cannot believe, however, that Aaron bloody Gilmore was the best National Party member to run for Christchurch East, nor that he was the 56th best National Party member overall.

There are many reasons people get to stand for parties, or even as independents, in our electorates.  There are many reasons people get placed on their party’s list.  You honestly want to sit there and say that ~the people get to decide~ when there’s bureaucracy, factionalism, and a shitload of money at stake?

And that’s ignoring the obvious disparities of gender, race and class between “who’s in Parliament” and “who’s in New Zealand”.  That’s ignoring the lifestyle constraints on MPs and other elected representatives – constraints which massively favour the privileged classes.

If you think “but merit” is an argument against gender-balancing strategies, you’re saying everything is already done on merit.  Trying taking that thought through to its logical conclusion.  Then look at yourself in the mirror and say “Wow, I’m a racist, misogynist piece of shit.”

There’s a difference between “making the grade” and “being the best”

Another illusion created by this argument is the idea that “the best” candidate should always win.  But that’s not really how it has to go.

Let’s assume there’s a basic standard for party candidates – a history of party involvement, good local knowledge,  basic electability (and see “not a fucking meritocracy” above for why this is more a wishlist than a reflection of the current situation in any party.)

If you have candidate A who’s lived in the area for ten years, owns the local fish’n’chip shop, has a great name for punning on and is pretty likeable, compared with candidate B who’s lived in the area for twelve years, runs a stall at the market selling organic salami, has a surname beginning with A and is pretty likeable … is the difference between victory and defeat going to be that significant?

Is it going to crush the hopes and dreams of your party to pick basically-electable Candidate A – who happens to be a woman, or a man of colour, or a person with a disability, or a woman of colour with a disability – over basically-electable Candidate B, who’s another white dude?

Sports metaphor:  in order to try out for swim team, you must complete [swimming task A] in under 3 minutes.  Kid 1 does it in 2:58.  Kid 2 does it in 2:53.  According to the “but merit!!!” arguers, you must choose Kid 2.  Even though Kid 1 might have a better attitude, or comes from a shitty home and needs the self esteem boost.

They both passed the mark.  Nothing wrong with taking other things into account after the fact.

(Of course, this raises a far broader, more complex issue of what constitutes “merit”.  In my books, ensuring a diverse range of viewpoints is about merit, because we know that more diverse groups make better decisions.  But that’s a whole book’s worth of discussion.)

Party conferences throw up ridiculous shit all the time

This is what got me.  Apparently for a few brief wonderful moments yesterday afternoon, TV3 had a story up on their website about the Labour Party introducing a Bill to change the law around candidate selection in every electorate.

I can see where the mistake comes from: when everyone’s squawking about something, you probably assume it’s serious.

But … it’s really not.

It’s a draft policy remit from a party committee which is going to the conference to be discussed and potentially included in the party’s rules, which would allow individual electorates to voluntarily request that only women be shortlisted if the party council agrees on a case-by-case basis.

fry

… fuck me, the fucking Amazons are storming the Bastille with fucking laser-cannons.  Hide your menfolk!

It’s not even a fucking quota, people

See above.

The painful/hilarious side of this is, of course, that the UK Conservatives are looking to introduce much the same process – but without the voluntary factor.  Yep, they’re going to mandate when winnable seats have to run women candidates.  But figuring this out would require Googling, paying attention to UK politics or following Andrew Geddis on Twitter.  Clearly, far to hard when you can just badger David Shearer into making stupid statements.

~

(Image from Hark, A Vagrant. No, not the Futurama one.)

~

ETA: Mod note:  There are literally four other posts on this issue at The Standard, with hundreds of comments on them.  You want to discuss sexism?  Go here.  Gender balance across other parties?  Here.  The proposal itself?  Here.  Other reactions?  Here.  I’m not interested in rehashing every single “Labour hates men” “this makes them unelectable” “lol sex changes” comment which has already been thrashed to death.  

This post is about the misconceptions being thrown around in a media which copy-pastes from rightwing blogs.  It’s not a place to propagate them.

221 comments on “ManBan! ”

  • Comments are now closed

  1. jaymam 1
    6 July 2013 at 10:24 am

    All parties should have some kind of independent advisor that they can run ideas with, in case those ideas are stupid. Somehow, political parties seem blind to the effect certain stupid ideas will have and which will be quoted by their enemies for years. I did offer advice to Labour when I was a member but that was ignored, so I left. Is it the “can’t see the wood for the trees” effect?

    [QoT: This is not a “party idea”. Re-read the post and try again. There are already multiple posts debating the value of the proposal. If you want to comment on that you may do so there.]

    • chris73 1.1
      6 July 2013 at 10:30 am

      Thats quite a good idea

    • Te Reo Putake 1.2
      6 July 2013 at 10:38 am

      I’ll stick with democracy, ta Jayman. btw, have you spotted the contradiction between your idea for an ‘independent’ advisor and your toy chucking when your advice when you were a member was ignored? Or are you just suggesting you should be that independent adviser? They wouldn’t listen to me when I was a member, they really must listen to me when I’m not.

      Also interested to know why think discussing ways of advancing women within Labour is stupid.

      • One Anonymous Knucklehead 1.2.1
        6 July 2013 at 10:48 am

        The discussion isn’t stupid. The non-decision to wait for Cameron Slater to initiate the debate was though. Beyond stupid, in fact: the sort of blunder that only a complete tool would make.

        • weka 1.2.1.1
          6 July 2013 at 10:54 am

          a toolbox of complete tools in fact.

          • Bearded Git 1.2.1.1.1
            6 July 2013 at 8:51 pm

            The way it should have been handled was to throw back in the journalists faces the fact that National has 16 women and 43 men in it’s caucus.”I’m sorry Mr. Gower but it is National that has the problem here not Labour.” Shearer’s response-weak, woffly; what’s new?

      • saarbo 1.2.2
        6 July 2013 at 10:49 am

        Spot on!

    • One Anonymous Knucklehead 1.3
      6 July 2013 at 1:07 pm

      Labour needs to put someone on Whale duty figuring out what Lusk’s lines will be and pre-empting them. Not a bad idea Jaymam. Kind of obvious though.

    • jaymam 1.4
      8 July 2013 at 4:55 pm

      QoT: This is not a “party idea”
      Clearly it IS a party idea. Sue Moroney said so, and I have not seen an official Labour Party contradiction of that.

      Sue Moroney said: We all agree in the Labour Party that we want 45% [women] in the next [election]
      ttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HjJZw54WRs8

  2. chris73 2
    6 July 2013 at 10:27 am

    Of course once again its everybody else who just doesn’t understand, if only the people and the media understood what Labour were doing they’d know its for their own good…

    It was handled badly and the response was poor, deal with it.

    [QoT: No, chris, you deal with reading my post. The last sentence acknowledges this was handled badly. That doesn’t change the fact that it’s a non-story, at least compared to how it’s been portrayed by the media.]

    • BM 2.1
      6 July 2013 at 10:36 am

      Yep, everyone else is so fucking dumb and ill informed, that’s the problem

      Maybe QOT need to break out of her insular little sect and go talk and mingle with others who aren’t tofu eating anarcho lesbian feminists.

      This idea within your little group may be seen as the greatest thing since sliced bread but outside that wee cloistered environment it’s a totally different world and unfortunately for you every one thinks this idea is shit.

      [QoT: this is your only warning, and I’m only leaving it here as evidence of why the rest of your derailing, abusive, irrelevant comments will be summarily deleted.]

      • weka 2.1.1
        6 July 2013 at 10:49 am

        BM, if you don’t come across feminists in your day to day life, you might want to ask yourself why*. Because I certainly do, it’s normal in NZ for women to be feminist (even those that don’t use the term).

        *three guesses:

        One, you simply ignore women who talk feminism, or you are tone deaf to women talking about issues that are important to women.

        Two, the women around you avoid talking feminism in front of you because you are so unpleasant.

        Three, there are plenty of feminist women around you but they don’t use the word feminist because of bigots like you.

    • One Anonymous Knucklehead 2.2
      6 July 2013 at 10:42 am

      It was handled badly, which allowed the complete misrepresentation of the circumstances and substance of the proposal, so no wonder the response was poor.

      As for dealing with it, the Labour Party needs a leader first.

      • BM 2.2.1
        6 July 2013 at 10:59 am

        The only way this idea was ever going to fly is if people like Trevor Mallard, Damian O’Conner, David Shearer got in behind it and explained why it’s needed and how it’s going to improve parliament, blah, blah etc.

        If the individuals who are going to be most disadvantaged got up and supported it, people may then think, “Hmm this idea must have some merit, you wouldn’t have the guys agreeing with it if it wasn’t needed”.

        On the flip side it may also enforce the perception that the Men within Labour are a bunch of brow beaten individuals led around by the nose.

        • One Anonymous Knucklehead 2.2.1.1
          6 July 2013 at 11:06 am

          The “perception”? Looks more like an unsubstantiated smear from a partisan hack to me.

          The worst thing that can be said about them (in this context) is that they owe their positions to their gender, but the problem is far worse in National.

          Speaking of which, do you think that the fact that only sixteen out of fifty nine National MPs are women is a result of the endemic gender bullying in right-wing circles?

        • deemac 2.2.1.2
          6 July 2013 at 2:27 pm

          so we have to wait for the less progressive men to support any policy about women? And that’s not at all sexist…
          The NZLP website has over 60 pages of policy stuff but our journos are too lazy to read that.
          Should the party staff be able to anticipate which tiny bit of that Whale Oil is going to seize on? If you think you can anticipate that, you should apply for a media management job immediately!

          • handle 2.2.1.2.1
            6 July 2013 at 2:33 pm

            Labour needs to be ready to counter anything scumbags like Slater run with. It is not that hard to predict and be ready.

            • One Anonymous Knucklehead 2.2.1.2.1.1
              6 July 2013 at 4:00 pm

              No, it isn’t. “What will the enemy do” is a basic part of any policy debate.

  3. Toby 3
    6 July 2013 at 10:27 am

    We in the Labour Party look forward to Moira Coatsworth’s and Tim Barnett’s resignation. The latter, in particular is a disgrace to the Labour Party, he has only ever used the party to further his own agendas and people. Bring back Mike Williams and Mike Smith. They had credibility and good political instinct. Coatsworh and Barnett are fruit loops.

    [QoT: this is not relevant to the post.]

    • deemac 3.1
      6 July 2013 at 2:27 pm

      is that the royal “We”?

    • JK 3.2
      6 July 2013 at 5:33 pm

      Who is the “we in the Labour Party”, Toby ? It is certainly not I. Tim B is doing okay while Mike Smith in his former position was a muddler of the first degree with NO political instinct.

  4. Rogue Trooper 4
    6 July 2013 at 10:43 am

    it has been informative watching the MSM tele presenters / auto-cue writers repeat the schoolyard meme (boys aren’t allowed, not even to watch).

    and Mike Williams? – “it’s sexism”. hmmm.

    Quote of the yesterday : “poor old David Shearer, now there is a man whose a victim”.
    -Judith Collins (Winston Smith / chris73 woulda’ got there jollies with that one; Yes? ).

  5. Roflcopter 5
    6 July 2013 at 11:09 am

    The problem is more fundamental than what the media are saying.

    That Labour feels the need to propose rules to increase the number of women representatives in the party shows that they have essentially failed in their ability to seek out, encourage and support more women into the world of politics, at a core level. Doing so would have seen a natural increase in the number and quality of women, and negate the need for an ambulance at the bottom of the cliff proposal.

    This is what the media are banging on about… not the fact that there’s these new proposed rules floating about, but the fact that Labour, who purport to support huge diversity/equity within the party, feel the need to actually make rules to cover the fact they suck at practicing what they preach.

    • QoT 5.1
      6 July 2013 at 11:15 am

      Clearly you’ve been reading different media to me, Roflcopter, because all I’ve seen is a swathe of “but we had a woman Prime Minister so sexism doesn’t exist” and “David Shearer can’t control his party” (because Patrick Gower doesn’t understand how political parties work) and “PC gone mad”.

      If the media wanted to “bang on about” the lack of representation of women in politics, that would be, well, probably really terrible, but at least relevant to an existing issue. And they’d have to look at National too, and it’s complete lack of action on the even greater lack of gender balance.

      You are welcome to provide citations to the contrary, of course.

      • Roflcopter 5.1.1
        6 July 2013 at 11:46 am

        I’m probably not expressing this as well as I should, so apologies QoT.

        What I’m trying to get at is that fundamental gender balance issues should not need to be addressed by Labour proposing rules that force the balance. Labour (or any party for that matter) need to step back at a deeper level to develop themselves an environment where gender balance doesn’t need to be thought about, it happens naturally. What they are currently doing is proposing stuff that says they suck at doing that, and the media is calling them out on it.

        National are just as bad, they recognise it, and just like Labour, need to step back at a deeper level to develop appropriate environments where gender balance doesn’t need to be thought about, it happens naturally. Unlike Labour, what they won’t do is propose rules to cover their shortcomings.

        The media suck in general, but in this case, where they are clearly calling Labour out on their shortcomings, you would at least hope Labour would see that and step back to look at the deeper issues that puts them where they are currently.

        • QoT 5.1.1.1
          6 July 2013 at 12:06 pm

          You do have a point, Roflcopter, but the fact is that the two options which are now presented are:

          (a) do something small and tactical like introduced optional women-only lists;

          (b) destroy patriarchy.

          I am all in favour of B. But we don’t get to B without taking steps like A.

          • Roflcopter 5.1.1.1.1
            6 July 2013 at 12:35 pm

            I guess that’s where I sort of differ from your thinking.

            I’m more of the thinking that A delays, or even sets back, any moves necessary to achieve B.

            I’m more than happy for the media to continue to call out anyone on stuff like A, because the more people are held to account for thinking along the lines of A, the greater the chance the people will take a good long hard look at themselves and realise that B is where their heads needed to be at in the first place. This is the only way progress will be made.

            Blaming the media is a cop-out.

            • QoT 5.1.1.1.1.1
              6 July 2013 at 1:13 pm

              God, I’m over the “waaaaaah, cop-out” line. The media’s just slightly influential, you know.

              And if you think A is the reason no one makes “proper” moves towards B, I suggest you go do some homework.

              • Roflcopter …
                6 July 2013 at 1:23 pm

                Put it this way, if B was the norm, A wouldn’t have happened, there wouldn’t be a story, and you wouldn’t need to be writing this piece.

                A is not the way to get to B, it’s just something done to make people feel good.

                • One Anonymous Knucklehead …
                  6 July 2013 at 1:48 pm

                  Even if that were true, “feeling good” has a positive effect on confidence and therefore ability. Not to mention electability.

                  • Akldnut …
                    7 July 2013 at 11:02 am

                    Why couldn’t it have be an unwritten policy/guideline over the formal written one, then this discussion wouldn’t even need to take place and Labour would be scoring big on being the most inclusive party to choose from.

                • QoT …
                  7 July 2013 at 11:05 am

                  And you base this on what?

                  • Akldnut …
                    7 July 2013 at 11:27 am

                    Wishful thinking, if it was already being done then there wouldn’t be a need to make it a written rule, this would all be moot.

        • Draco T Bastard 5.1.1.2
          6 July 2013 at 4:14 pm

          That’s what they’ve been doing for quite some time and it’s not working.

          Here’s the thing: IMO, putting in place these policies will help bring about that natural balance while not doing so will help prevent that natural balance due to the momentum of the present imbalance.

    • deemac 5.2
      6 July 2013 at 2:30 pm

      er, no it isn’t. The media have been repeating Whale Oil’s meme and totally failing to report the facts. Pretty normal for them really.

      • Roflcopter 5.2.1
        6 July 2013 at 2:40 pm

        In headline only….

        The facts are clear: Labour feel the need to make rules to cover the fact they suck at practicing what they preach. They got called out on it.

  6. Descendant Of Sssmith 6
    6 July 2013 at 11:11 am

    Nah it wasn’t handled badly it was something completely misrepresented by the right.

    Their response to it is as stupid as yelling fire in a picture theatre when there isn’t one.

    If only the media got as worked up about real removals of liberties in this country such as removing voting rights from prisoners, illegally stopping them smoking, imprisoning people for using drugs, banning begging, increased powers of searching your homes without a warrant, the various bits of legislation re Chch, the abuse of urgency, and so on.

    The media have been unintelligent and Pavlovian in their responses.

    The desire to get any story out first on the net means they can be led by the nose when you tap into the writers own prejudices towards sensationalist shit.

    Slater and his co-writers tap into that.

    Shearers response was pretty crap as well. He doesn’t do the “nothing to see here move on” anywhere near as well as Key.

    • One Anonymous Knucklehead 6.1
      6 July 2013 at 11:16 am

      Of course it was handled badly: the media environment is what it is, Lusk and his sock-puppet should never have been in a position to break the story.

      • Descendant Of Sssmith 6.1.1
        6 July 2013 at 11:30 am

        Nah once you buy into “the perception is reality” bullshit you are doomed to chase your tail on everything.

        Whoever started using that phrase as a management meme should be sent to Pluto.

        The “perception” of the proposal and the reaction to that “perception” is miles out of kilter with the reality.

        If the media had any credibility they’d report on the reality.

        • One Anonymous Knucklehead 6.1.1.1
          6 July 2013 at 11:48 am

          Who’s buying into it? Question: did the publicity vacuum (prior to yesterday) serve the interests of the Labour Party?

      • Don't worry be happy 6.1.2
        6 July 2013 at 12:08 pm

        Maybe Labour have a ‘Plan Ban’ as well…seems to have kicked in about the time we had Goff foisted on us.

    • RedLogix 6.2
      6 July 2013 at 11:25 am

      Between QoT’s post and this comment more or less said everything that needed saying here.

      Everyone with half a brain cell needs to stop and think about this incident; the pig arrogant, deeply entrenched sexism it has revealed across the whole of this nation lies bare to be seen.

      It’s the same shit Clark and Gillard had to swim through, the same shit women everywhere have to fend off daily. The same shit any man who refuses to ape the staunch machismo manboy culture has to keep his mouth shut about … lest more shit get shovelled down it.

      Depressing and contemptible are the two words that describe how I feel about what has happened here. And my respect to those of you with the sheer energy and guts to fight back on it.

      Thanks.

      • deemac 6.2.1
        6 July 2013 at 2:31 pm

        +1

      • Draco T Bastard 6.2.2
        6 July 2013 at 4:18 pm

        +1

      • mickysavage 6.2.3
        6 July 2013 at 10:19 pm

        Agreed RL.

      • LynWiper 6.2.4
        7 July 2013 at 9:05 am

        +1 totally agree RL

      • farmboy 6.2.5
        7 July 2013 at 10:44 am

        dont forget to lift up your dress when you sit down to pee,ya pansy

        • Te Reo Putake 6.2.5.1
          7 July 2013 at 10:50 am

          Excellent riposte, farmboy. I too remember the sixties and the terrific fun to be had accusing people of being homosexual because you can’t outhink them. Reminds me of an old joke:

          Farmboy is in court, accused of molesting a sheep. The judge gives him a withering look and asks if the sheep was a ram or a ewe.

          “A ewe your Honour! Whaddya think I am, queer?”

          • farmboy 6.2.5.1.1
            7 July 2013 at 10:59 am

            haha not bad you must be gutted we the most successful farmers in the world.Funny how people on here get all up in arms about gay jokes,untill directed at farmers, kind of fucked up but keep it up im amused

            • weka 6.2.5.1.1.1
              7 July 2013 at 12:02 pm

              If by most successful farmers you mean leading the charge in completely fucking the environment while lining their pockets, then stand up and take a bow.

              (of course we also have some outstanding sustainabilty farmers here too, but I suspect that wasn’t what you mean).

            • Draco T Bastard 6.2.5.1.1.2
              7 July 2013 at 12:20 pm

              It’d be interesting to see just how successful if you were actually held to account (ie, had to actually look after the environment) and didn’t get any government subsidies. I suspect that you’d be whinging that it was all too hard.

              • farmboy …
                7 July 2013 at 8:17 pm

                [QoT: Bored now.]

                • RedLogix …
                  7 July 2013 at 8:36 pm

                  @ farmboy.

                  When I read your comments what I see is exactly the same behaviour as goes on in schoolyard bullying. You have made no argument of any sort, produced any evidence or tried to engage in conversation.

                  Of course this being the internet you can’t reach out and physically abuse us, but you are attempting to impose your emotional and psychological dreck upon us.

                  For the most part the people here simply shrug it off; we’ve lived through this kind of shit being dumped on us all our lives. We’ve learned that stooping to your level merely betrays our own values. There’s no satisfaction in that.

                  So feel free to troll away farmboy. It means little to us and if it somehow gives you a warm sticky feeling … then what’s the harm?

      • Macro 6.2.6
        7 July 2013 at 9:04 pm

        Excellent comment RL totally agree.
        Am very disappointed in some of the nonsense being spouted – would hope we were past that sort of crap – but obviously not.

      • Huginn 6.2.7
        8 July 2013 at 8:36 am

        +1, here too

    • David H 6.3
      6 July 2013 at 11:30 am

      But that’s just typical right wing media policy, find what the left is doing, and get slimebucket to write some crap that really has nothing to do with the original draft policy, Call their tame Journo and hey presto, no Shonkey vs Kim Dot Com. Instead all we have are these pathetic headlines.

  7. vto 7
    6 July 2013 at 11:17 am

    So QoT, how do you deal with this msm problem?

    Seems more smarts needed to ensure the correct picture is picked up and portrayed in the media.

    More smarts.

    • QoT 7.1
      6 July 2013 at 11:26 am

      Well, that’s where we can start discussing the response from the Labour Party itself. I think if you’ve failed to stop a story breaking and being misrepresented, like this, you have to be bloody quick and decisive in your response, and stop people like Josie fucking Pagani from making things worse.

      • vto 7.1.1
        6 July 2013 at 11:39 am

        One thought: It seems the problem stemmed from schemes hatched in the bowels of the Labour Party and then discussed and promoted among the party. Hair-brained schemes, good and wise schemes, forward-thinking schemes, backwards-looking schemes, all sorts of schemes. Perhaps it is right here that the brakes need to go on lest these schemes get out and tarnish the entire Labour Party, which is what they do.

        It is no good trying to explain to the public that these things are only discussion points / part of a regional concference thingy / caucus thingy. Those explanations don’t wash with the public – they have no idea what they are and all they hear is what is printed in the media. This is a reality.

        So, in light of that, perhaps some tighter control of schemes and ideas. Either ban them from open discussion or create a separate place within the party where new ideas are discussed and formed (which is confidential). Or some other mechanism to control this type of discussion.

        Personally, Labour is a mainstream party and as such should not be bothering itself with ideas and schemes that are more fringe. Let other fringe parties attend to them and let those fringe parties bring the discussions into the public arena.

        Here is another mechanism – plant a plant in the Nats and learn how they do it….

        • Descendant Of Sssmith 7.1.1.1
          6 July 2013 at 11:49 am

          It is no good trying to explain to the public that these things are only discussion points

          I think the reverse. That is what should happen. I can’t see any reason to treat the public as stupid or to not convey the truth.

          Style over substance just pisses me off.

          Just tell the truth – consistently and regularly and build a reputation for not bullshitting.

          • vto 7.1.1.1.1
            6 July 2013 at 12:01 pm

            I appreciate that DoS, and the public are surely not stupid I agree. And neither has any mention of bullshit been made.

            But the issue is, as QoT states, the manner in which the media operates. And the manner in which people consume news – quickly and briefly. Sure, they will understand about discussion points, if they have the time to read a whole lot, but they generally don’t have the time to read the detail. This manner of operation seems to work against the manner you describe and this man ban is a perfect illustration.

            I guess you can fight it if you want and continue as you wish, but don’t expect the results to be any different. Or, you can adjust the method of operation to suit this reality, and that should not involve treating people as stupid or bullshitting them either. Surely the intended result can still be arrived at.

        • weka 7.1.1.2
          6 July 2013 at 11:56 am

          Gender equity is not fringe, and it’s been on the agenda in society for a long time.

          By bowels of the Labour party I assume you mean the memberhip?

          I can sympathise to an extent with the desire to go secret (the GP ban on media at their last AGM for instance), but there are other ways to handle this. The fact that after a couple of days we have no idea who developed the proposed rule change, why it was a rule change and not some other kind of discussion, why it wasn’t alongside other gender equity proposals, how the process of development was managed particularly in relation to LECs and National Council and the PR dept of Labour… the fact that we don’t know those things tells me that Labour have pretty disfunctional internal systems. Do they even talk to each other? Did the person who put forward the final version of the rule change talk to the person who prepared teh document and did they discuss this with Labour party PR strategists?

          • vto 7.1.1.2.1
            6 July 2013 at 12:05 pm

            That seems to be the problem to me weka – a disfunctional operating system for the Labour Party. It needs to be sharpened up to a knife edge, not blundering around making great blunt hacks at things and leaving a worse mess.

            Sharp knife for sharp incisions.

            Blunt knife equals mess.

          • Rogue Trooper 7.1.1.2.2
            6 July 2013 at 1:07 pm

            well, Louisa Wall is publicly in support of the proposal weka
            http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=10895113

            • Alanz 7.1.1.2.2.1
              6 July 2013 at 4:32 pm

              As a man with balls and proud testosterone surging through my red hot blood veins, I support the proposal and thank Louisa.

              And thanks be given to so-called men like Shane Jones, in a party that would be better off without him, who demonstrate the value of ensuring such a policy does go through for the Labour Party.

              Next policy proposal please.

          • The Fan Club 7.1.1.2.3
            6 July 2013 at 6:05 pm

            Weka, look, the thing is, this is in fact stuff that’s in the public arena. Barnett’s presser details this.

            The fact that after a couple of days we have no idea who developed the proposed rule change,

            (A) inside baseball and no-one cares anyway, and (b) in fact, this has been put out.

            why it was a rule change and not some other kind of discussion, why it wasn’t alongside other gender equity proposals,

            It was. It really, really was tried up with so many other proposals. The media didn’t cover them! There’s not a lot Labour can do about that, because guess what? “Culture changes” and so-on are boring and not newsworthy material.

            how the process of development was managed particularly in relation to LECs and National Council and the PR dept of Labour…

            Yes, god knows bureaucratic details of internal constitutional changes are exactly what will get lapped up…; also am pretty sure that Coatsworth and Barnett were briefing on this from lunchtime the day it broke…

            If Labour were to manage it’s internal process even more with an eye to PR, we may as well give and go home as far as having an open, democratic membership goes.

      • weka 7.1.2
        6 July 2013 at 11:44 am

        This from Jan Logie at the Greens, in response to Women’s Affairs Minister Jo Goodhew criticising the quota, saying people should be selected on their merit

        There is a wealth of evidence that shows entrenched gender bias is a reality. This article demonstrates it in the sciences:

        “To test scientist’s reactions to men and women with precisely equal qualifications, the researchers did a randomized double-blind study in which academic scientists were given application materials from a student applying for a lab manager position. The substance of the applications were all identical, but sometimes a male name was attached, and sometimes a female name.

        Results: female applicants were rated lower than men on the measured scales of competence, hireability, and mentoring (whether the scientist would be willing to mentor this student). Both male and female scientists rated the female applicants lower.”

        If the Minister of Women’s Affairs doesn’t recognise gender bias then we really are in trouble.

        I’m not saying quotas are necessarily the answer but it makes sense that they should be considered as a response to bias let alone historical discrimination. They’ve worked really well for us in the Green party.

        http://www.greens.org.nz/node/31702

        See Labour, and MSM, it’s really not that hard.

      • Jimmie 7.1.3
        6 July 2013 at 12:03 pm

        [QoT: You will go much further in life (or, at least, in getting your comments through moderation) if you don’t use phrases like “feminist rants” as pejoratives and also don’t throw out ridiculous straw arguments.]

      • Sponge 7.1.4
        6 July 2013 at 10:04 pm

        Wasn’t Josie a Labour candidate?

    • vto 7.2
      6 July 2013 at 11:28 am

      Coatsworth showed no smarts. In fact the reverse, she showed negative smarts. She didn’t just do the right thing badly, she did the wrong thing correctly.

      Smart, accurate and detailed thinking and actions are required if you want to avoid this problem again.

      smart

      accurate

      detailed

    • David H 7.3
      6 July 2013 at 11:59 am

      For the last year we have had a sycophantic media, and Key could have eaten live babies on the 6pm news and still got away with it.
      However things are starting to change, and John Key the Teflon PM is now the Badly tarnished PM with a convenient case of amnesia. But the MSM, and TV MSM in particular are still kissing Keys arse. And with Gower around to make shit up, and stir the pot, and all the other Free to air channels are just as bad. And on the Nation this morning, the main story/joke was the Man ban. FFS No John Key getting his arse handed to him by KDC and looking like the school bully and acting like it as well.
      And the the story was supposed to run for the weekend, then along come Labour riding the light blue horse to save the NATS from a weekend of embarrassment. No wonder the voters are deserting them in droves

      • RedLogix 7.3.1
        6 July 2013 at 12:48 pm

        Key could have eaten live babies on the 6pm news and still got away with it.

        And pronounced them delicious. Our entire political scene at the moment alternates between boring, drearily incompetent and disgusting.

        • karol 7.3.1.1
          6 July 2013 at 5:27 pm

          This week I’ve heard some very anti-John Key stuff raised by people I don’t usually talk politics with. There’s obviously a few people out there who are not taken in by the dominant pro-Key MSM spin. Some people who just see him as a con man that doesn’t have the interests of the majority of Kiwis at heart.

          • handle 7.3.1.1.1
            6 July 2013 at 5:37 pm

            “Some people” does not win an election.

            • karol 7.3.1.1.1.1
              7 July 2013 at 6:55 am

              They may be “some people”, handle. But to me they seem to be pretty “ordinary”, or “everyday” kinds of people. I was surprised to hear them express such strong anti-Key views.

          • Mary 7.3.1.1.2
            6 July 2013 at 11:11 pm

            But can that stuff get through the teflon? The weakness of our opposition might suggest it can’t, in my humble opinion, of course.

  8. Descendant Of Sssmith 8
    6 July 2013 at 11:21 am

    I can also see no good reason why Shearer, Mallard, etc have to explain it.

    They didn’t propose it.

    It’s obviously much too difficult to talk to the actual person who proved it about why and clearly BM needs a man’s opinion on it to be able to consider it’s relevance. Not that he’s really interested of course.

    Sometimes explaining just feeds the trolls.

  9. Blue 9
    6 July 2013 at 11:39 am

    The media are idiots, and you can’t really expect them to be anything else. As soon as someone coins a catchy term like ‘manban’ which will get people frothing appropriately, you can give up on any attempt at rational, balanced coverage.

    The problem is that Labour doesn’t understand this, and therefore keep on handing their enemies sticks to beat them with. This proposal, no matter how well-intentioned, is electoral suicide no matter how it is spun, and should never have seen the light of day.

    It’s yet another symptom of the current Labour party malaise – incompetence, ill-discipline and a tin ear for political realities.

    • BM 9.1
      6 July 2013 at 11:46 am

      True, it’s gone the way of the fart tax.

      From this point on this policy will be nothing but an anvil around the neck of the labour party.
      For a start it’s completely destroyed the next labour conference any positive rah rah stuff will be totally drowned out and destroyed by the ‘manban’ vote.

      Starting to feel a bit sorry for o’l Dave.

  10. Matthew Hooton 10
    6 July 2013 at 11:42 am

    You make good points re meritocracy (or lack of it). My party is one where Clem Simich beat David Kirk for the Tamaki nomination in 1992. Whatever arguments can be made against the manban proposal, arguing the status quo is a meritocracy isn’t one of them.

  11. Dazzer 11
    6 July 2013 at 11:52 am

    [QoT: Please read the mod note at the bottom of the post, then take your comment to an appropriate thread.]

    • Dazzer 11.1
      6 July 2013 at 12:01 pm

      [QoT: Funnily enough, I’m more than happy to keep moderating people when they try to play the “you just hate disagreement” card. See the many disagreeing comments I let through which manage not to be rude and derailing.]

  12. Tigger 12
    6 July 2013 at 11:54 am

    Great post, Q.

    “And that’s ignoring the obvious disparities of gender, race and class between “who’s in Parliament”.

    Sexual orientation too. Notice the drop in Labourite out gay men? Carter, Chauvel – gone. I link it to the hate directed at them by O’Connor and others, the ‘gaggle of gays’ BS. Same will happen here. Now women will be blacklisted because choosing them looks PC. This was a hamfisted way to go about this. Policy is fine but did anyone think how this would read. It’s hurt, not helped this cause.

    I’d also like to see more Maori candidates in general electorates. And more disabled MPs. Question is – are policies like this the best way to make it happen?

    • One Anonymous Knucklehead 12.1
      6 July 2013 at 11:59 am

      Of course they aren’t: quotas may have their place but they’re way down the list behind, for example, Spencer vs. MoH etc.

    • weka 12.2
      6 July 2013 at 11:59 am

      “Question is – are policies like this the best way to make it happen?”

      Discussion of proposed policies is one good thing to make it happen. And that’s what should be happening, both within Labour, and within the wider community via the media (if the media served democracy, rather than themselves).

    • QoT 12.3
      6 July 2013 at 11:59 am

      Well, Tigger, the merits of more proportional representation are being discussed in other posts – including the fact that there’s a lot of research to show that just saying “we want more women/POCs/PWDs” pretty much never achieves proportionality.

    • Descendant Of Sssmith 12.4
      6 July 2013 at 12:00 pm

      There’s never a best way. There’s only different ways.

      • Draco T Bastard 12.4.1
        6 July 2013 at 4:45 pm

        That would be incorrect, there is a best way but we just don’t know it as of this moment in time and thus will need to discuss it and try a few options until we do find it.

  13. unpcnzcougar 13
    6 July 2013 at 12:07 pm

    Apologise in advance if this isn’t the correct thread for this comment – as a female and mother I would like to see a quota system in place for men teaching at Primary/Intermediate/High School.

    I sense this is one of the reasons why boys are trailing behind girls at schools and the times I see this issue discussed privately or publically it is akin to talking about the elephant in the room.

    [QoT: Wow, you’re right, this isn’t the correct thread for this comment. What on earth would make you think it was? We have Open Mike posts for a reason.]

  14. One Anonymous Knucklehead 14
    6 July 2013 at 12:08 pm

    How best to approach the problem of media incompetence?

    1. Make better media and out-perform the existing lot with fact-checked well-written and resourced commentary.

    What does “better” media look like? Examples abound, pick your favourite.

    • infused 14.1
      6 July 2013 at 12:46 pm

      I thought you’d already know by now. News isn’t news, it’s entertainment. Hence why this shit all got blown up.

      Ain’t anybody got time for news.

      IMO, all could have got shut down very easily from shearer. But he let it go on for 24 hours.

      • One Anonymous Knucklehead 14.1.1
        6 July 2013 at 12:50 pm

        That must explain why the BBC makes so much money. No, wait…

        Well written fact-checked journalism is far more entertaining than partisan crap.

        • infused 14.1.1.1
          6 July 2013 at 12:52 pm

          [QoT: Deleted. infused wore out his welcome last time.]

          • One Anonymous Knucklehead 14.1.1.1.1
            6 July 2013 at 1:01 pm

            Which probably accounts for sites like this getting so many hits per month, and the decline in newspaper sales.

            How has it come to this? A dull bean-counter approach to the news – too much “cost-cutting”, the result: under-resourced desk-bound journalists.

            Even neo-liberals rely on accurate information from time to time.

          • weka 14.1.1.1.2
            6 July 2013 at 3:49 pm

            Another brilliant and insightful contribution to the discussion there infused.

  15. Yes 15
    6 July 2013 at 12:13 pm

    It’s about handling your own press and PR. Labour failed at both of them

    • QoT 15.1
      6 July 2013 at 12:16 pm

      Nobody’s denying this. But it’s also about lazy media not even having the nous to ask basic questions – or alternatively, knowing full well they’re talking shit, but knowing they’ll get a headline or two and no one (outside of say leftwing blogs) will take them up on it.

      • infused 15.1.1
        6 July 2013 at 12:48 pm

        [QoT: infused, after the last time? I’m still not happy with you commenting on my posts.]

        • One Anonymous Knucklehead 15.1.1.1
          6 July 2013 at 12:54 pm

          Two reasons they don’t need to are the lack of competition, and that partisan crap is cheaper to write.

    • One Anonymous Knucklehead 15.2
      6 July 2013 at 12:24 pm

      That’s part of it, but there’s another part. An illustration:

      “The Labour Party’s feet of clay stumbled again today, as they let a golden opportunity to lead the gender debate go begging.

      Instead, it was left to National Party boot-boy Cameron Slater to break his own version of the story, which he did with typical disregard for the facts.

      What this says about the state of our two main political parties – one unable to speak and the other unable to speak the truth, is another matter, but it has certainly done nothing for the gender debate.”

      You see? Balance. Not that hard is it?

  16. Pete 16
    6 July 2013 at 12:31 pm

    Railing against the media for simplifying a story down to the point of a two word sound bite is very much like King Canute trying to hold back the tide. We don’t live in a world where the media behaves as it should behave, instead the left needs to adapt and front-foot every message. And I don’t think that should be as hard as we might think. We’re not looking for the hearts and minds of the whole population. Just 50% + 1 of the people who show up to vote.

    • Colonial Viper 16.1
      6 July 2013 at 6:16 pm

      And this is the reality. As opposed to the Left hypothesizing on remaking the world on some fantastic image.

      • QoT 16.1.1
        6 July 2013 at 6:27 pm

        Really, CV? You think that’s what’s going on here?

        Pete: my post doesn’t argue anything differently. I can, magically, be annoyed by the state of our media AND annoyed by Labour’s failure to deal with it at the same time!

  17. Jackal 17
    6 July 2013 at 12:43 pm

    If politicians were appointed on merit, there would likely be more female representatives than men. That’s because females are usually more qualified and are more likely to make a business succeed when they’re running things…at least that’s what the research shows. It’s a pity the mainstream media has chosen to rely on misogynistic based speculation instead of the facts.

    • One Anonymous Knucklehead 17.1
      6 July 2013 at 12:44 pm

      Given full equality (and as Chomsky said of Capitalism – “Show me some!”) I’m pretty sure that women can screw things up as badly as men. Exhibit a: Paula Bennett.

    • TheContrarian 17.2
      6 July 2013 at 2:04 pm

      “females are usually more qualified and are more likely to make a business succeed when they’re running things…at least that’s what the research shows”

      Got a link to this research?

    • Jimmie 17.3
      6 July 2013 at 7:11 pm

      Trouble is Labour is not exactly overflowing with successful business men or women.

      Plenty of academics and career politicians (and ex unionists) but as for successful ex business men/women apart from possibly Shane Jones it would be hard to name anyone else.

      • One Anonymous Knucklehead 17.3.1
        7 July 2013 at 7:42 am

        Hard for you perhaps, but then your lying Prime Minister has never run a business in his life either, and neither has your finance minister, who has lived off the public teat all his working life. Stephen Joyce’s claim to fame is the bankruptcy of everything he touches. Need I go on?

        It must be noted here that Labour are better economic managers than National too; higher gdp, balanced books etc.

        So not only do the so-called-but-actually-not “business friendly” National Party have less economic credibility, they are handicapped by the revolting culture of gender bullying that promotes dropkick incompetents like Aaron Gilmore (and Jimmie) over talented women. Shall we talk about David “receivership” Bennett?

        Most of them are only MPs because of their sex.

        • farmboy 17.3.1.1
          7 July 2013 at 10:51 am

          bill english owns farms mate case you dont know that is a business

          • Te Reo Putake 17.3.1.1.1
            7 July 2013 at 10:58 am

            Which he doesn’t personally run. He’s the owner, not the manager. Where is Dipton anyway? Does English know?

          • One Anonymous Knucklehead 17.3.1.1.2
            7 July 2013 at 11:57 am

            “Owns farms”

            Well, I suppose when you’re so corrupt you tell lies about your accommodation for money, it makes sense to buy up assets with your ill-gotten gains, but as TRP said, best leave the running to someone else. Perhaps someone with personal integrity and good business sense, because if Bill English ran his farms the way he repeatedly crashes this economy he might as well change his name to Crafar.

  18. Bill 18
    6 July 2013 at 12:56 pm

    Given that parliament and msm, both reflect and are examples of the nature of power in society – ie, are patriarchal – then how could the msm be anything but critical of any idea (good or bad) designed to challenge the power structures that also run through their own organisations? It’s not that such a challenge would be ‘unthinkable’…but it sure as fuck wouldn’t come ‘naturally’. What comes ‘naturally’ are precisely the types of lines we are getting from them, and those lines require no spin to be generated.

    I’m not suggesting that makes what they are saying acceptable or wholly inevitable. Just that these lines are a consequence of their own culture and not a glitch or an example of stupidity that they themselves might remedy or not repeat in the future: that would require the msm being spun.

    • weka 18.1
      6 July 2013 at 2:21 pm

      Maybe, but I cant help but think that there have been times in the past when the issue of equity for women in parliament would have been handled better by the MSM. Think Kim Hill on Nine to Noon instead of Kathryn Ryan. I fear we have lost ground in the past few decades in terms of how we talk about gender issues publicly.

      • Colonial Viper 18.1.1
        6 July 2013 at 6:18 pm

        That probably goes for most issues of public and civil importance

  19. Rogue Trooper 19
    6 July 2013 at 1:27 pm

    you may have seen this Bryce Edwards summary Queen, lamenting the focus on “identity politics” generally;
    -60-80% of New Zealanders are ‘working- class’ , depending on the sociological definition one uses.
    -concern over the blindness to economics, inequality and power (which, ironically, are arguments for quota)
    -essentially “Pagani is asserting that class and economics are more important than gender and feminism”
    -Labour lacks representation from lower socio-economic groups (once again, societal sectors disproportionately containing females: single parents, low-wage earners etc).

    Moi? realpolitik.

    ps. The Standard et al; get a mention.

    • Pascal's bookie 19.1
      6 July 2013 at 1:50 pm

      Pagani et al have an argument that gets trotted (heh) out all the time around identity issues.

      They are sad and angry that the left attracts votes from the liberal middle class, and that it isn’t as strong among the working class as it ought to be.

      The argument goes that it is the middle class liberalism which has pulled Labour to the center and that it is driving out the working class conservatives. And to an extent, there may be some truth there ( a sliver). But we rarely get to see data.

      More to the point is that the Labour hasn’t moved to the center by adopting identity issues. That is grade A toxic bullshit. This is easily demonstrated by how the right reacts to identity politics.

      The left has moved to the center by abandoning things like redistribution as anything other than a band aid. That, surprise surprise, is what is hurting them in the working class. Labour abandoned the working class conservatives not by adopting identity politics, but by abandoning fighting for the working class.

      The only thing Pagani ( and Shane Jones and numerous others) seem to have to offer the working class, is conservatism on identity issues. Now how the fuck is that a left wing thing to do? Let alone a Labour party thing to do.

    • QoT 19.2
      6 July 2013 at 2:14 pm

      I’m seriously disappointed in Bryce’s column, to be honest. The argument only works if you presume that the “60-80% working class” group doesn’t include working-class Maaori, working-class women, working-class people with disabilities, working-class queer people.

      The only other thing I would add, besides +1-ing everything PB said, is that I also find it hilarious for people to say Labour should ditch identity politics for working-class politics. As though it’s only evil feminists and brown people who have been stopping Labour from giving a shit about economic disparity, and not the centre-right tendencies of many of its senior people.

      • handle 19.2.1
        6 July 2013 at 2:30 pm

        Yes, that ‘either-or’ argument has always been weak.

      • Rogue Trooper 19.2.2
        6 July 2013 at 2:38 pm

        + , now you know my thoughts on IP, yet, as handle identifies, it is ‘this’ and ‘that’. Still, there is the environment to consider.

      • weka 19.2.3
        6 July 2013 at 2:51 pm

        “The argument only works if you presume that the “60-80% working class” group doesn’t include working-class Maaori, working-class women, working-class people with disabilities, working-class queer people.”

        It also presuposes that working class people aren’t politicised around ethnicity, gender, disability etc. Which is a bloody patronising generalisation.

        This also from Bryce

        “The Maori Party’s major weakness appears to have been its core model of operating as an ethnicity-based party, independent of class and other political forces”

        He really hasn’t been paying attention has he. What does he think that split between the MP and Mana was about?

      • Mary 19.2.4
        6 July 2013 at 7:22 pm

        Why does the Labour Party think that women should want to be part of them, anyway? Those who think this must believe Labour’s got something to offer in the first place. Maybe Labour’s problem is simpler than they think?

    • weka 19.3
      6 July 2013 at 2:48 pm

      I’m still waiting for someone to explain why class politics aren’t identity politics too.

      • handle 19.3.1
        6 July 2013 at 2:49 pm

        Lack of imagination.

      • QoT 19.3.2
        6 July 2013 at 2:51 pm

        Because identity politics are bad and class politics are good. It’s simple, really.

        • weka 19.3.2.1
          6 July 2013 at 2:56 pm

          I assume it’s because class politics came early on when only men could vote and be MPs. So class got defined as proper politics, because that was the primary battle amongst white men. Not like that trendy lefty (oh dear) stuff that comes later (and can always be put aside until the time is right).

      • Rogue Trooper 19.3.3
        6 July 2013 at 4:00 pm

        nested hierarchies

      • Descendant Of Sssmith 19.3.4
        6 July 2013 at 5:17 pm

        Can’t explain wrong thinking so no explanation can be given.

        Simply by virtue of discrimination those who are disadvantaged via identity are more like to have lower earning opportunity and are more likely therefore to be working class.

      • Colonial Viper 19.3.5
        6 July 2013 at 6:57 pm

        “I’m still waiting for someone to explain why class politics aren’t identity politics too.”

        A: academically, class politics are certainly a kind of identity politics. In practice, issues of class often overrule, superceed or at least modify the considerations or experience of other forms of identity politics.

        As an example, old money class, wealthy, well educated business professional and gay.

        • QoT 19.3.5.1
          6 July 2013 at 7:00 pm

          Dude, seriously. Google “intersectionality” before you embarrass yourself further. All forms of privilege can mitigate other forms of oppression, all forms of oppression can interact to create extra levels/types of disadvantage.

          • Sosoo 19.3.5.1.1
            6 July 2013 at 11:33 pm

            I’m sure that poverty stricken children would love to spend their time contemplating concepts from the lightweight side of the social sciences (a fact which makes your patronising tone that much more amusing). Or perhaps they’ll spend their time thanking the identity politics brigade whose myopia, selfishness and egotism made it certain that they would live under another three years of a hostile National government.

            When people tell you to shut up, it isn’t always because they are the evil patriarchy. Sometimes it’s because you’re screwing it up for everyone, including yourselves.

            [QoT: Your wilful misreading of the post will be left unedited here so people can see exactly why any future comments of yours will be deleted. You think poverty-stricken children don’t feel the effects of racism, sexism, or ableism? It’s not “lightweight social sciences”, it’s their lived experience.

            Thanks for the early tip, though, it’s good to be forewarned that Labour’s inevitable fuckup at the next election will yet again be blamed on its critics and not its leaders.]

            • McFlock 19.3.5.1.1.1
              7 July 2013 at 12:00 am

              The kids wouldn’t be poverty-stricken if mum was paid as much as a man, and wasn’t limited to low-paid jobs with flexible working hours because kids finish school at 3.

            • karol 19.3.5.1.1.2
              7 July 2013 at 7:07 am

              And the Key government gets replaced with…. what?

              We currently have a very some fairly traditionally male-dominated government, which is prioritising masculine value: values that foreground a version of the economy that equates a strong economy with commercial activity. It includes the increasing marginalisation of community and public sector work that makes a significant contribution to the public good. And it is largely women, waged and on benefits, who are taking the brunt of this in Key’s “war on the poor”.

              Yet Team Shearer’s response is to be every bit as masculinist as Team Key, and to embrace a return to misogynistic dark ages as a way to court the (male?) working class vote. Shearer’s failure to comment of Shane Jones (blatantly offensive towards women), looks to me like a return to Shearer’s fiddler-on-the-roof style. (Referring to Jones labeling women politicians as “geldings”).

              I find Team Shearer’s inadequacies on so many fronts, to be thoroughly depressing.

              • Rogue Trooper …
                7 July 2013 at 11:36 am

                regarding the ‘public sector’, man, are they laying back and takin’ it with the widespread utilization of personality tests ; they are even being used to screen for casualties of downsizing (redundancies).

              • weka …
                7 July 2013 at 11:44 am

                I’d have to reread it, but I thought Jones was calling Labour men geldings for letting wimmin try and run the show again (geldings being castrated male animals). Either ways its deeply misogynistic and offensive.

          • Colonial Viper 19.3.5.1.2
            7 July 2013 at 12:18 am

            Intersectionality, you planning to win many votes with that?

            • McFlock 19.3.5.1.2.1
              7 July 2013 at 12:25 am

              not the Waitakere Man vote (well, maybe some of the gay ones).

            • QoT 19.3.5.1.2.2
              7 July 2013 at 11:13 am

              You mean, would I, if I were in a political campaign, try to understand the many different types of power and oppression which affect people’s lives in order to relate my policies to their needs, and assume this would endear me to them?

              Why don’t you have three guesses at the answer.

              • Colonial Viper …
                8 July 2013 at 1:55 am

                So now you’re going to campaign to the wider electorate through analysing their needs as people based on concepts of intersectionality and other related approaches, in order to change for the better the conditions of power and oppression that they live under.

                Very cool.

            • weka 19.3.5.1.2.3
              7 July 2013 at 11:49 am

              BAU with the patriarchy, you planning to win many votes with that CV? How’s it going so far for Labour?

              And then what happens if by some fluke Labour manage to get enough votes to form a govt? After the election won’t be the time to look at all the non-rich, white, male people’s needs, because Labout will need time to get settled in. A year later won’t be the right time either, because they’ll have had a leadership coup and need time to recover (all that nasty media coverage). Two years later, still no, because now they need time to cement the Real policies they were elected on. Two and half years, nope, because now there is an election. See how this works?

              But thanks for the scraps thrown from the table in the meantime.

              • Colonial Viper …
                8 July 2013 at 2:03 am

                “See how this works”

                We both recognise that things are not working for Labour and have not been for a long time.

                If you think “patriarchy” is a major cause of that, I hope you can help get rid of it asap so Labour can start smashing National in the polls.

                At 50% female MPs instead of 41%, Labour would have 3 more women MPs today out of 34. Should make a big difference to how the electorate views how ready Labour is to govern, and hence bring a win in 2014 into grasp.

  20. QoT 20
    6 July 2013 at 3:02 pm

    Yep. Kinda proves my point.

  21. Populuxe1 21
    6 July 2013 at 4:22 pm

    If Labour is as dedicated to gender equality among it’s MPs as it claims to be and should be, they should have been able to handle it within the list of their own accord, and by making a special effort in recruitment and candidate training. That would have caused far less of a confused furore than this tin-eared presentation of the idea in question. Labour’s primary and overriding concrn right now should be galvinising support, not scaring the horses, and getting the scumlords of NACT out of power if there is any part of the country left worth saving.

    [QoT: Yet again we’re characterising this draft remit as though it’s official Labour Party leadership-endorsed policy. And we’re going to stop doing that.]

    • Populuxe1 21.1
      6 July 2013 at 5:16 pm

      Even not treating it as Labour Party leadership-endorsed policy (which obviously it isn’t because Mumblefuck has clucked), why not offer a remit that tackles things at the culture level using the perfectly adequate tools already in place in the party and isn’t going to play directly into the hands of the right wing? How did it get out there in the first place? And to rephrase, the primary and overriding concern of all cliques and interest groups within Labour right now should be galvinising support, not scaring the horses, and getting the scumlords of NACT out of power if there is any part of the country left worth saving.

    • The Fan Club 21.2
      6 July 2013 at 5:55 pm

      Poppy, what makes you think we haven’t tried that, darling?

      It isn’t the list either. It’s the electorates. Do try and keep up…

      • Populuxe1 21.2.1
        7 July 2013 at 11:58 am

        The electorates might just possibly want a say before something that dramatic is imposed on them, whereas you can pretty much put anyone anywhere you like on the list. Don’t fuck with the electorates or they might just not vote for you. Do you even do politics, darling?

        • One Anonymous Knucklehead 21.2.1.1
          7 July 2013 at 12:02 pm

          Such an imposition, this new voluntary power would be. So onerous. Ow my back!

        • Macro 21.2.1.2
          7 July 2013 at 12:15 pm

          Do you even understand the proposal? Or are you just mouthing from empty space again? I realise you are coming from behind because as QoT has succinctly put it The Media have got their grundies (masculine underpants) in a twist in a clear attempt to kibosh the thing. But do try to keep up – the electorates will have their say in due time. And remember that > 50% of the population is female.

  22. Brett Dale 22
    6 July 2013 at 4:40 pm

    [QoT: Fuck off, Brett. You’ve ruined enough interesting threads this week.]

  23. Herodotus 23
    6 July 2013 at 5:22 pm

    How will achieving this proposed quota benefit nz and or women within nz?
    So in a few years time the gender split within labour caucus will be 50:50. What will change or what are the expectations and how do these expectations differ than without any quota ?
    Will as is current a 40% representation weaken any perspective or decision making ability by a government or parkiamnet than a 50% rep would allow?
    I have not read how this proposal other than for appearances sake will delivery anything different.

    [QoT: IT’S. NOT. A. FUCKING. QUOTA. There is also a quota proposed – which isn’t even new, as I understand, it’s changing a target which already exists. But that is not what got everyone panicky.]

    • One Anonymous Knucklehead 23.1
      6 July 2013 at 5:32 pm

      You haven’t read anything. Is that because you can’t find anything or because you haven’t looked?

      • Herodotus 23.1.1
        6 July 2013 at 7:28 pm

        If you are so well informed how about a link or 2 as to what will be achieved ? I have taken a day or 2 reading the posts and not knee jerked into responding , I have not read what this will achieve by this.
        And qot how will this achieve any seismic changes in outcomes or new outcomes that would not have occurred without such a change. Ie what difference will we see ?? Will maternity leave benefits be increase due to this, will professions dominated by women ( eg teachers, nurses) be rewarded or benchmarked against similar professions that men dominate eg police? I doubt it. So what changes ?

        • McFlock 23.1.1.1
          6 July 2013 at 7:36 pm

          What difference do we see because of the Maori seats?
          I’m sorry, my scrying glass is broken – all I know is that there will probably be a difference, and for the better.

          • Herodotus 23.1.1.1.1
            6 July 2013 at 8:02 pm

            How will it be for the better ? some detail would be appreciated.
            Will there be new policy introduced that wold not have been given the status quo, will by having ( should labour be able to govern on here own) better decision making ?

            • weka 23.1.1.1.1.1
              6 July 2013 at 8:06 pm

              Do you honestly not think that having more women in parliament will have any positive affect on how parliament deals with issues important to women?

              • Herodotus …
                6 July 2013 at 8:24 pm

                Are you saying that those currently in parliament have been lacking in putting forward issues that are not important to women ( using your phrasing) and that the male colleagues are unable to see these issues and not be supportive.
                I am sure in many cases male mp’s understand issues that are perceived important to women. They are not the racing, rugby and beer types. Good policy should be acknowledged by all.

                • McFlock …
                  6 July 2013 at 8:41 pm

                  I am sure in many cases male mp’s understand issues that are perceived important to women

                  Well, when you exclude the Jones/O’Conner types, the number of male MPs that this would apply to seems to shrink dramatically.

        • karol 23.1.1.2
          6 July 2013 at 7:56 pm

          The idea of quotas was actually something raised by Judy McGregor in her speech to the NZ Labour Party last year – it was one of at least 3 suggestions.

          It’s a pity journalists have such short term memories, and/or failed to pay attention to anything much at the conference beyond looking to see if Cunliffe was leading a rebellion.

          Damn, looking at what I posted on this last year, it’d be tempting to re-post it….. if only I knew how.

          Because, it’s pretty much in keeping with what I have been thinking about the quota issue now.

        • karol 23.1.1.3
          6 July 2013 at 7:59 pm

          Oh, and this is the actual remit proposed this year, as linked to by a Labour Party Press statement.

  24. Clive Bixby 24
    6 July 2013 at 5:24 pm

    [QoT: Fuck off, troll.]

  25. karol 25
    6 July 2013 at 5:46 pm

    Excellent post, QOT.

    I’ve been close to banging my head against the wall in frustration at the way the MSM and many others have dutifully followed the whalespew on this.

    Also I am unimpressed with Mike Williams – he needs to learn a bit about how sexism works. And Josie Pagani. And disappointed in Bryce Edwards.

    This morning I saw a front page blurb on the NZ Herald for Fran O’Sullivan’s take on it. I mistakenly thought I wouldn’t be able to stomach her addition to the outflow of misunderstanding. Actually, on reading her piece, for once I agree with some of Fran O’Sullivan’s opining. Her opening paragraph had me a bit worried as to where she was going:

    Congratulations to Party Central for putting gender equality ahead of diversity when it comes to the ranking criteria for selecting the next crop of Labour MPs.

    But then she continues:

    Quaintly, the notion that a 21st century political party might opt to use its selection process to try to make sure that as many women as men represent us in Parliament has been met with howls of derision and barely disguised outrage.

    That’s just on the Labour side of politics. Let’s point out here that the most vocal MP opponents (Yes, I am talking about you, Shane Jones and you, Clayton Cosgrove) are only there themselves by virtue of their list rankings.

    You see, not enough of those blue-collar men which these obviously middle-class male MPs now put on pedestals and consider Labour’s voting base, voted for this pair in 2011 so they could win electorate seats. Maybe a spirited woman could have done the trick?

    There is also a too-obvious presumption that the women who might come into Parliament after a bit of list manoeuvring will be unqualified for the role.

    Frankly, that is absurd. There is no reason why Labour (or any other political party – like National if it ever gets with the programme) should not seek out well-qualified female candidates and (hopefully) from a broader pool than the unionist/teacher/public servant range which has enabled Labour to become stereotyped in recent years.

    Surely, such candidates can stay focused on the major issues facing New Zealand. This is hardly a zero sum game.

    And on it goes….

    I’m not so keen on her reasoning around including gender plus ethnic and other diversity – she seems to kind of pit them against each other. But, she does seem to agree that something extra needs to be done to get a broader representation of all sections of society, including gender, ethnicity etc.

  26. karol 26
    6 July 2013 at 5:49 pm

    Is it just me, or has something strange happened to the numbering and positioning of comments?

  27. karol 27
    6 July 2013 at 6:46 pm

    I’m also disappointed in Selwyn Manning’s post on this over at the Daily Blog. Manning usually does excellent stuff, but this time….

    For instance, he says this:

    The true test of whether a policy is right or wrong is to turn it on its head. For example, would it be right to exclude women from selection? Would it be right to exclude candidates on the basis of ethnicity, race, religion, sexual orientation? No, of course not. Just as it is wrong for any entity to exclude people from employment or opportunity based on their gender.

    I haven’t seen the Nation slot, but, spot the problem with this for a discussion on the importance of gender balance:

    The Nation’s host Duncan Garner had a fabulous line up to debate all the angles: Chris Trotter, Martyn Bomber Bradbury, Jordan Williams and Labour’s own Sue Moroney.

    I guess gendering of politics (and political commentariate) runs deep.

    • karol 27.1
      6 July 2013 at 6:46 pm

      PS: On the first quote from Manning: Maori seats?

    • Rogue Trooper 27.2
      6 July 2013 at 6:47 pm

      hope to watch on the ‘morrow

    • QoT 27.3
      6 July 2013 at 6:54 pm

      AAAAAAAAARGH.

      You know what? If we had a Parliament of 80 women MPs and 40 men MPs, and women MPs were routinely placed in safe, winnable seats and high-ranking Cabinet positions and all the other systemic advantages men are currently given? It WOULD be fucking appropriate to start talking about men-only lists. But this would involve us living in a parallel fucking universe.

      Aaaaaaaaaaaaargh I’m so fucking angryyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy

      • Rogue Trooper 27.3.1
        6 July 2013 at 7:12 pm

        Here’s Everybody Loves Chris taking the low road (footpath).

        • QoT 27.3.1.1
          7 July 2013 at 11:15 am

          I’m sorry, RT. I already took a sacred vow not to read his thoughts on the matter, for the sake of my brain.

          • Rogue Trooper 27.3.1.1.1
            7 July 2013 at 12:01 pm

            was thinking, as you do, these intersections,
            -there are some people of difference in the current Labour caucus
            -the issues around political representation of identities in addition to traditional gender may be more salient to younger left voters, which has the potential to grow, or renew the Labour constituency in electorates, particularly in the significant large urban electorates.
            -However, there is a lot of suggestion in political prediction, that conservative values will have a greater influence on voting behaviour in the coming years.
            -there has been verifiable commentary in the media that older women may not be as supportive of positive discrimination as their younger, or more politicized counterparts.
            -definitely intersections of income (therefore socio-economic class) with minority identity status, along with minority identity intersecting with other social disadvantage.
            -Generation X, and older, unless personally concerned with issues of identity, may not be as motivated by the politicization of such as younger generations.
            -Successful Generation Y and older may be more concerned with the material status that has characterized the history and political influences of their cohorts, along with,say, national security and law and order.
            -There has been an obvious backlash against (even the publication of ) these proposals by both men and women representing the Left.

            Still, if the proposals are sensible enough for Colin James, I believe you can rest your case, and your moderation whip (OK, keep it cracking) 😎

      • weka 27.3.2
        6 July 2013 at 7:54 pm

        Yeah I’m gobsmacked.

        And fuck Selwyn Manning’s inane and demeaning poll at the bottom of his post. All I can take from what he has done is that he is some how offended as a man at the idea that all is not fair in the world and we might have to take some actual steps to make men share power with women.

        Someone should put Louisa Wall in charge of Labour.

        • Mary 27.3.2.1
          6 July 2013 at 9:17 pm

          She will be in charge of Labour one day…in the not-so-distant future, I hope. Not quite now, but at some point not too far away. The current problem is what to do now. Maybe we could could entice Steve Maharey into taking a sabbatical leading Labour til it’s Lousia’s time?

        • QoT 27.3.2.2
          7 July 2013 at 11:16 am

          Someone should put Louisa Wall in charge of Labour.

          SERIOUSLY.

      • karol 27.3.3
        6 July 2013 at 8:09 pm

        Good statement in the comments.

        And Selwyn’s response?

        This issue has really exposed just how deeply the masculine dominance of politics runs (as much an issue of attitude and approach as of numbers).

        I’m staggered.

        It’s not as if we also aren’t fully aware of the struggles people are dealing with in a day-to-day basis, because of poverty and the ruthlessness of our current government.

    • Mary 27.4
      6 July 2013 at 8:48 pm

      Why do some people think Jordan Williams’ views are worth reporting?

    • rosy 27.5
      6 July 2013 at 9:18 pm

      “The true test of whether a policy is right or wrong is to turn it on its head.”

      Hmm, how about we turn the current selection processes on their heads and see what happens. If it appears that one group has been favoured then maybe work out a policy to fix the process.

      Hang on….

  28. BeeDee 28
    6 July 2013 at 7:19 pm

    The present game is “Flick Chick”. and aren’t we over that!

  29. Sanctuary 29
    7 July 2013 at 12:10 pm

    I don’t much to add – these two quotes pretty much sum up my views:

    “…It’s a draft policy remit from a party committee which is going to the conference to be discussed and potentially included in the party’s rules, which would allow individual electorates to voluntarily request that only women be shortlisted if the party council agrees on a case-by-case basis…”

    And

    “…The discussion isn’t stupid. The non-decision to wait for Cameron Slater to initiate the debate was though. Beyond stupid, in fact: the sort of blunder that only a complete tool would make…”

    However, I would like to thank QoT for the time taken to moderate this comments thread. It has been a breath of fresh air to see the serial trolls dealt to in such a comprehensive way.

    The trolling of this site is so comprehensive that it wouldn’t surprise me if it was revealed to be organised and deliberate – especially as the way this story was “broken” and then repeated by the traditional media reveals the power of blogs in a world where corporate media journalists are now just tabloid keyboard jockeys who are nothing more than lazy, reactionary, repeaters of what they read on the internet.

    I guess to moderate ever thread this way would just be way, way to intensive – but it would improve the impact of this site on the credulous useful idiots who interview the internet for their tabloid fodder for the talkback Taliban, Daily Mail lite newspapers and 6pm news.

    • QoT 29.1
      7 July 2013 at 12:17 pm

      Thanks, Sanc. As you say, it’s hard work moderating threads (we all have to sleep, and most of us at TS only moderate our own stuff.) Doing it full-time would be, well, a full-time job. Hence why I maintain my own much-quieter corner of the internet for the bulk of my posts.

      • handle 29.1.1
        7 July 2013 at 12:23 pm

        I also appreciate the firmer moderation you have shown is possible here with this post, Queen. Wading through acres of trolling to read the useful stuff is often not worth the effort.

    • weka 29.2
      7 July 2013 at 12:35 pm

      I agree Sanctuary, it changes the debate hugely when that dumb shit just gets taken out.

  30. fender 30
    7 July 2013 at 8:34 pm

    Growth off the back of a natural disaster “farmboy”, people died for that growth you insensitive gas cloud.

Links to post

Recent Comments

Recent Posts

  • Infrastructure & home building slumping on Govt funding freeze
    New Zealand now has the fourth most depressed construction sector in the world behind China, Qatar and Hong Kong. Photo: Lynn Grieveson / The KākāTL;DR: These are the six things that stood out to me in news and commentary on Aotearoa-NZ’s political economy at 8:46am on Thursday, May 2:The Lead: ...
    The KakaBy Bernard Hickey
    1 hour ago

  • Brainwashed People Think Everyone Else is Brainwashed
    Hi,I am just going to state something very obvious: American police are fucking crazy.That was a photo gracing the New York Times this morning, showing New York City police “entering Columbia University last night after receiving a request from the school.”Apparently in America, protesting the deaths of tens of thousands ...
    David FarrierBy David Farrier
    4 hours ago

  • Peters’ real foreign policy threat is Helen Clark
    Winston Peters’ much anticipated foreign policy speech last night was a work of two halves. Much of it was a standard “boilerplate” Foreign Ministry overview of the state of the world. There was some hardening up of rhetoric with talk of “benign” becoming “malign” and old truths giving way to ...
    PolitikBy Richard Harman
    5 hours ago

  • NZ’s trans lobby is fighting a rearguard action
    Graham Adams assesses the fallout of the Cass Review — The press release last Thursday from the UN Special Rapporteur on violence against women and girls didn’t make the mainstream news in New Zealand but it really should have. The startling title of Reem Alsalem’s statement — “Implementation of ‘Cass ...
    Point of OrderBy gadams1000
    13 hours ago

  • Your mandate is imaginary
    This open-for-business, under-new-management cliché-pockmarked government of Christopher Luxon is not the thing of beauty he imagines it to be. It is not the powerful expression of the will of the people that he asserts it to be. It is not a soaring eagle, it is a malodorous vulture. This newest poll should make ...
    More Than A FeildingBy David Slack
    18 hours ago

  • 14,000 unemployed under National
    The latest labour market statistics, showing a rise in unemployment. There are now 134,000 unemployed - 14,000 more than when the National government took office. Which is I guess what happens when the Reserve Bank causes a recession in an effort to Keep Wages Low. The previous government saw a ...
    No Right TurnBy Idiot/Savant
    20 hours ago

  • Bryce Edwards: Discontent and gloom dominate NZ’s political mood
    Three opinion polls have been released in the last two days, all showing that the new government is failing to hold their popular support. The usual honeymoon experienced during the first year of a first term government is entirely absent. The political mood is still gloomy and discontented, mainly due ...
    Democracy ProjectBy bryce.edwards
    21 hours ago

  • Taking Tea with 42 & 38.
    National's Finance Minister once met a poor person.A scornful interview with National's finance guru who knows next to nothing about economics or people.There might have been something a bit familiar if that was the headline I’d gone with today. It would of course have been in tribute to the article ...
    Nick’s KōreroBy Nick Rockel
    21 hours ago

  • Beware political propaganda: statistics are pointing to Grant Robertson never protecting “Lives an...
    Rob MacCulloch writes – Throughout the pandemic, the new Vice-Chancellor-of-Otago-University-on-$629,000 per annum-Can-you-believe-it-and-Former-Finance-Minister Grant Robertson repeated the mantra over and over that he saved “lives and livelihoods”. As we update how this claim is faring over the course of time, the facts are increasingly speaking differently. NZ ...
    Point of OrderBy poonzteam5443
    22 hours ago

  • Winding back the hands of history’s clock
    Chris Trotter writes – IT’S A COMMONPLACE of political speeches, especially those delivered in acknowledgement of electoral victory: “We’ll govern for all New Zealanders.” On the face of it, the pledge is a strange one. Why would any political leader govern in ways that advantaged the huge ...
    Point of OrderBy poonzteam5443
    22 hours ago

  • Paula Bennett’s political appointment will challenge public confidence
     Bryce Edwards writes – The list of former National Party Ministers being given plum and important roles got longer this week with the appointment of former Deputy Prime Minister Paula Bennett as the chair of Pharmac. The Christopher Luxon-led Government has now made key appointments to Bill ...
    Point of OrderBy xtrdnry
    22 hours ago

  • Business confidence sliding into winter of discontent
    TL;DR: These are the six things that stood out to me in news and commentary on Aotearoa-NZ’s political economy at 10:06am on Wednesday, May 1:The Lead: Business confidence fell across the board in April, falling in some areas to levels last seen during the lockdowns because of a collapse in ...
    The KakaBy Bernard Hickey
    24 hours ago

  • Gordon Campbell on the coalition’s awful, not good, very bad poll results
    Over the past 36 hours, Christopher Luxon has been dong his best to portray the centre-right’s plummeting poll numbers as a mark of virtue. Allegedly, the negative verdicts are the result of hard economic times, and of a government bravely set out on a perilous rescue mission from which not ...
    Gordon CampbellBy lyndon
    1 day ago

  • New HOP readers for future payment options
    Auckland Transport have started rolling out new HOP card readers around the network and over the next three months, all of them on buses, at train stations and ferry wharves will be replaced. The change itself is not that remarkable, with the new readers looking similar to what is already ...
    Greater AucklandBy Matt L
    1 day ago

  • 2024 Reading Summary: April (+ Writing Update)
    Completed reads for April: The Difference Engine, by William Gibson and Bruce Sterling Carnival of Saints, by George Herman The Snow Spider, by Jenny Nimmo Emlyn’s Moon, by Jenny Nimmo The Chestnut Soldier, by Jenny Nimmo Death Comes As the End, by Agatha Christie Lord of the Flies, by ...
    A Phuulish FellowBy strda221
    2 days ago

  • At a glance – Clearing up misconceptions regarding 'hide the decline'
    On February 14, 2023 we announced our Rebuttal Update Project. This included an ask for feedback about the added "At a glance" section in the updated basic rebuttal versions. This weekly blog post series highlights this new section of one of the updated basic rebuttal versions and serves as a ...
    Skeptical Science
    2 days ago

  • Road photos
    Have a story to share about St Paul’s, but today just picturesPopular novels written at this desk by a young man who managed to bootstrap himself out of father’s imprisonment and his own young life in a workhouse Read more ...
    More Than A FeildingBy David Slack
    2 days ago

  • Bryce Edwards: Paula Bennett’s political appointment will challenge public confidence
    The list of former National Party Ministers being given plum and important roles got longer this week with the appointment of former Deputy Prime Minister Paula Bennett as the chair of Pharmac. The Christopher Luxon-led Government has now made key appointments to Bill English, Simon Bridges, Steven Joyce, Roger Sowry, ...
    Democracy ProjectBy bryce.edwards
    2 days ago

  • NZDF is still hostile to oversight
    Newsroom has a story today about National's (fortunately failed) effort to disestablish the newly-created Inspector-General of Defence. The creation of this agency was the key recommendation of the Inquiry into Operation Burnham, and a vital means of restoring credibility and social licence to an agency which had been caught lying ...
    No Right TurnBy Idiot/Savant
    2 days ago

  • Winding Back The Hands Of History’s Clock.
    Holding On To The Present: The moment a political movement arises that attacks the whole idea of social progress, and announces its intention to wind back the hands of History’s clock, then democracy, along with its unwritten rules, is in mortal danger.IT’S A COMMONPLACE of political speeches, especially those delivered in ...
    Bowalley Road
    2 days ago

  • Sweet Moderation? What Christopher Luxon Could Learn From The Germans.
    Stuck In The Middle With You: As Christopher Luxon feels the hot breath of Act’s and NZ First’s extremists on the back of his neck and, as he reckons with the damage their policies are already inflicting upon a country he’s described as “fragile”, is there not some merit in reaching out ...
    Bowalley Road
    2 days ago

  • A clear warning
    The unpopular coalition government is currently rushing to repeal section 7AA of the Oranga Tamariki Act. The clause is Oranga Tamariki's Treaty clause, and was inserted after its systematic stealing of Māori children became a public scandal and resulted in physical resistance to further abductions. The clause created clear obligations ...
    No Right TurnBy Idiot/Savant
    2 days ago

  • Poll results and Waitangi Tribunal report go unmentioned on the Beehive website – where racing tru...
    Buzz  from the Beehive The government’s official website – which Point of Order monitors daily – not for the first time has nothing much to say today about political happenings that are grabbing media headlines. It makes no mention of the latest 1News-Verian poll, for example.  This shows National down ...
    Point of OrderBy Bob Edlin
    2 days ago

  • Listening To The Traffic.
    It Takes A Train To Cry: Surely, there is nothing lonelier in all this world than the long wail of a distant steam locomotive on a cold Winter’s night.AS A CHILD, I would lie awake in my grandfather’s house and listen to the traffic. The big wooden house was only a ...
    Bowalley Road
    2 days ago

  • Comity Be Damned! The State’s Legislative Arm Is Flexing Its Constitutional Muscles.
    Packing A Punch: The election of the present government, including in its ranks politicians dedicated to reasserting the rights of the legislature in shaping and determining the future of Māori and Pakeha in New Zealand, should have alerted the judiciary – including its anomalous appendage, the Waitangi Tribunal – that its ...
    Bowalley Road
    2 days ago

  • Ending The Quest.
    Dead Woman Walking: New Zealand’s media industry had been moving steadily towards disaster for all the years Melissa Lee had been National’s media and communications policy spokesperson, and yet, when the crisis finally broke, on her watch, she had nothing intelligent to offer. Christopher Luxon is a patient man - but he’s not ...
    Bowalley Road
    2 days ago

  • Will political polarisation intensify to the point where ‘normal’ government becomes impossible,...
    Chris Trotter writes –  New Zealand politics is remarkably easy-going: dangerously so, one might even say. With the notable exception of John Key’s flat ruling-out of the NZ First Party in 2008, all parties capable of clearing MMP’s five-percent threshold, or winning one or more electorate seats, tend ...
    Point of OrderBy poonzteam5443
    2 days ago

  • Bernard’s pick 'n' mix for Tuesday, April 30
    TL;DR: Here’s my top 10 ‘pick ‘n’ mix of links to news, analysis and opinion articles as of 10:30am on Tuesday, May 30:Scoop: NZ 'close to the tipping point' of measles epidemic, health experts warn NZ Herald Benjamin PlummerHealth: 'Absurd and totally unacceptable': Man has to wait a year for ...
    The KakaBy Bernard Hickey
    2 days ago

  • Why Tory Whanau has the lowest approval rating in the country
    Bryce Edwards writes – Polling shows that Wellington Mayor Tory Whanau has the lowest approval rating of any mayor in the country. Siting at -12 per cent, the proportion of constituents who disapprove of her performance outweighs those who give her the thumbs up. This negative rating is ...
    Point of OrderBy poonzteam5443
    2 days ago

  • Worst poll result for a new Government in MMP history
    Luxon will no doubt put a brave face on it, but there is no escaping the pressure this latest poll will put on him and the government. Photo: Lynn Grieveson / The KākāTL;DR: These are the six things that stood out to me in news and commentary on Aotearoa-NZ’s political ...
    The KakaBy Bernard Hickey
    2 days ago

  • Pinning down climate change's role in extreme weather
    This is a re-post from The Climate Brink by Andrew Dessler In the wake of any unusual weather event, someone inevitably asks, “Did climate change cause this?” In the most literal sense, that answer is almost always no. Climate change is never the sole cause of hurricanes, heat waves, droughts, or ...
    Skeptical Science
    2 days ago

  • Serving at Seymour's pleasure.
    Something odd happened yesterday, and I’d love to know if there’s more to it. If there was something which preempted what happened, or if it was simply a throwaway line in response to a journalist.Yesterday David Seymour was asked at a press conference what the process would be if the ...
    Nick’s KōreroBy Nick Rockel
    2 days ago

  • Webworm LA Pop-Up
    Hi,From time to time, I want to bring Webworm into the real world. We did it last year with the Jurassic Park event in New Zealand — which was a lot of fun!And so on Saturday May 11th, in Los Angeles, I am hosting a lil’ Webworm pop-up! I’ve been ...
    David FarrierBy David Farrier
    2 days ago

  • “Feel good” school is out
    Education Minister Erica Standford yesterday unveiled a fundamental reform of the way our school pupils are taught. She would not exactly say so, but she is all but dismantling the so-called “inquiry” “feel good” method of teaching, which has ruled in our classrooms since a major review of the New ...
    PolitikBy Richard Harman
    2 days ago

  • 6 Months in, surely our Report Card is “Ignored all warnings: recommend dismissal ASAP”?
    Exactly where are we seriously going with this government and its policies? That is, apart from following what may as well be a Truss-Lite approach on the purported economic “plan“, and Victorian-era regression when it comes to social policy. Oh it’ll work this time of course, we’re basically assured, “the ...
    exhALANtBy exhalantblog
    3 days ago

  • Bread, and how it gets buttered
    Hey Uncle Dave, When the Poms joined the EEC, I wasn't one of those defeatists who said, Well, that’s it for the dairy job. And I was right, eh? The Chinese can’t get enough of our milk powder and eventually, the Poms came to their senses and backed up the ute ...
    More Than A FeildingBy David Slack
    3 days ago

  • Bryce Edwards: Why Tory Whanau has the lowest approval rating in the country
    Polling shows that Wellington Mayor Tory Whanau has the lowest approval rating of any mayor in the country. Siting at -12 per cent, the proportion of constituents who disapprove of her performance outweighs those who give her the thumbs up. This negative rating is higher than for any other mayor ...
    Democracy ProjectBy bryce.edwards
    3 days ago

  • Justice for Gaza?
    The New York Times reports that the International Criminal Court is about to issue arrest warrants for Israeli officials, including Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, over their genocide in Gaza: Israeli officials increasingly believe that the International Criminal Court is preparing to issue arrest warrants for senior government officials on ...
    No Right TurnBy Idiot/Savant
    3 days ago

  • If there has been any fiddling with Pharmac’s funding, we can count on Paula to figure out the fis...
    Buzz from the Beehive Pharmac has been given a financial transfusion and a new chair to oversee its spending in the pharmaceutical business. Associate Health Minister David Seymour described the funding for Pharmac as “its largest ever budget of $6.294 billion over four years, fixing a $1.774 billion fiscal cliff”. ...
    Point of OrderBy Bob Edlin
    3 days ago

  • FastTrackWatch – The case for the Government’s Fast Track Bill
    Bryce Edwards writes – Many criticisms are being made of the Government’s Fast Track Approvals Bill, including by this writer. But as with everything in politics, every story has two sides, and both deserve attention. It’s important to understand what the Government is trying to achieve and its ...
    Point of OrderBy poonzteam5443
    3 days ago

  • Bernard’s pick 'n' mix for Monday, April 29
    TL;DR: Here’s my top 10 ‘pick ‘n’ mix of links to news, analysis and opinion articles as of 10:10am on Monday, April 29:Scoop: The children's ward at Rotorua Hospital will be missing a third of its beds as winter hits because Te Whatu Ora halted an upgrade partway through to ...
    The KakaBy Bernard Hickey
    3 days ago

  • Gordon Campbell on Iran killing its rappers, and searching for the invisible Dr. Reti
    span class=”dropcap”>As hideous as David Seymour can be, it is worth keeping in mind occasionally that there are even worse political figures (and regimes) out there. Iran for instance, is about to execute the country’s leading hip hop musician Toomaj Salehi, for writing and performing raps that “corrupt” the nation’s ...
    Gordon CampbellBy lyndon
    3 days ago

  • Auckland Rail Electrification 10 years old
    Yesterday marked 10 years since the first electric train carried passengers in Auckland so it’s a good time to look back at it and the impact it has had. A brief history The first proposals for rail electrification in Auckland came in the 1920’s alongside the plans for earlier ...
    Greater AucklandBy Matt L
    3 days ago

  • Coalition's dirge of austerity and uncertainty is driving the economy into a deeper recession
    Right now, in Aotearoa-NZ, our ‘animal spirits’ are darkening towards a winter of discontent, thanks at least partly to a chorus of negative comments and actions from the Government Photo: Lynn Grieveson / The KākāTL;DR: These are the six things that stood out to me in news and commentary on ...
    The KakaBy Bernard Hickey
    3 days ago

  • Disability Funding or Tax Cuts.
    You make people evil to punish the paststuck inside a sequel with a rotating castThe following photos haven’t been generated with AI, or modified in any way. They are flesh and blood, human beings. On the left is Galatea Young, a young mum, and her daughter Fiadh who has Angelman ...
    Nick’s KōreroBy Nick Rockel
    3 days ago

  • Of the Goodness of Tolkien’s Eru
    April has been a quiet month at A Phuulish Fellow. I have had an exceptionally good reading month, and a decently productive writing month – for original fiction, anyway – but not much has caught my eye that suggested a blog article. It has been vaguely frustrating, to be honest. ...
    A Phuulish FellowBy strda221
    3 days ago

  • 2024 SkS Weekly Climate Change & Global Warming News Roundup #17
    A listing of 31 news and opinion articles we found interesting and shared on social media during the past week: Sun, April 21, 2024 thru Sat, April 27, 2024. Story of the week Anthropogenic climate change may be the ultimate shaggy dog story— but with a twist, because here ...
    Skeptical Science
    4 days ago

  • Pastor Who Abused People, Blames People
    Hi,I spent about a year on Webworm reporting on an abusive megachurch called Arise, and it made me want to stab my eyes out with a fork.I don’t regret that reporting in 2022 and 2023 — I am proud of it — but it made me angry.Over three main stories ...
    David FarrierBy David Farrier
    4 days ago

  • Vic Uni shows how under threat free speech is
    The new Victoria University Vice-Chancellor decided to have a forum at the university about free speech and academic freedom as it is obviously a topical issue, and the Government is looking at legislating some carrots or sticks for universities to uphold their obligations under the Education and Training Act. They ...
    Point of OrderBy poonzteam5443
    4 days ago

  • Winston remembers Gettysburg.
    Do you remember when Melania Trump got caught out using a speech that sounded awfully like one Michelle Obama had given? Uncannily so.Well it turns out that Abraham Lincoln is to Winston Peters as Michelle was to Melania. With the ANZAC speech Uncle Winston gave at Gallipoli having much in ...
    Nick’s KōreroBy Nick Rockel
    4 days ago

  • 25
    She was born 25 years ago today in North Shore hospital. Her eyes were closed tightly shut, her mouth was silently moving. The whole theatre was all quiet intensity as they marked her a 2 on the APGAR test. A one-minute eternity later, she was an 8.  The universe was ...
    More Than A FeildingBy David Slack
    4 days ago

  • Fact Brief – Is Antarctica gaining land ice?
    Skeptical Science is partnering with Gigafact to produce fact briefs — bite-sized fact checks of trending claims. This fact brief was written by Sue Bin Park in collaboration with members from our Skeptical Science team. You can submit claims you think need checking via the tipline. Is Antarctica gaining land ice? ...
    Skeptical Science
    5 days ago

  • Policing protests.
    Images of US students (and others) protesting and setting up tent cities on US university campuses have been broadcast world wide and clearly demonstrate the growing rifts in US society caused by US policy toward Israel and Israel’s prosecution of … Continue reading → ...
    KiwipoliticoBy Pablo
    5 days ago

  • Open letter to Hon Paul Goldsmith
    Barrie Saunders writes – Dear Paul As the new Minister of Media and Communications, you will be inundated with heaps of free advice and special pleading, all in the national interest of course. For what it’s worth here is my assessment: Traditional broadcasting free to air content through ...
    Point of OrderBy poonzteam5443
    5 days ago

  • Bryce Edwards: FastTrackWatch – The Case for the Government’s Fast Track Bill
    Many criticisms are being made of the Government’s Fast Track Approvals Bill, including by this writer. But as with everything in politics, every story has two sides, and both deserve attention. It’s important to understand what the Government is trying to achieve and its arguments for such a bold reform. ...
    Democracy ProjectBy bryce.edwards
    5 days ago

  • Luxon gets out his butcher’s knife – briefly
    Peter Dunne writes –  The great nineteenth British Prime Minister, William Gladstone, once observed that “the first essential for a Prime Minister is to be a good butcher.” When a later British Prime Minister, Harold Macmillan, sacked a third of his Cabinet in July 1962, in what became ...
    Point of OrderBy poonzteam5443
    5 days ago

  • More tax for less
    Ele Ludemann writes – New Zealanders had the OECD’s second highest tax increase last year: New Zealanders faced the second-biggest tax raises in the developed world last year, the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) says. The intergovernmental agency said the average change in personal income tax ...
    Point of OrderBy poonzteam5443
    5 days ago

  • Real News vs Fake News.
    We all know something’s not right with our elections. The spread of misinformation, people being targeted with soundbites and emotional triggers that ignore the facts, even the truth, and influence their votes.The use of technology to produce deep fakes. How can you tell if something is real or not? Can ...
    Nick’s KōreroBy Nick Rockel
    5 days ago

  • Another way to roll
    Hello! Here comes the Saturday edition of More Than A Feilding, catching you up on the past week’s editions.Share ...
    More Than A FeildingBy David Slack
    5 days ago

  • Simon Clark: The climate lies you'll hear this year
    This video includes conclusions of the creator climate scientist Dr. Simon Clark. It is presented to our readers as an informed perspective. Please see video description for references (if any). This year you will be lied to! Simon Clark helps prebunk some misleading statements you'll hear about climate. The video includes ...
    Skeptical Science
    5 days ago

  • Cutting the Public Service
    It is all very well cutting the backrooms of public agencies but it may compromise the frontlines. One of the frustrations of the Productivity Commission’s 2017 review of universities is that while it observed that their non-academic staff were increasing faster than their academic staff, it did not bother to ...
    PunditBy Brian Easton
    6 days ago

  • Luxon’s demoted ministers might take comfort from the British politician who bounced back after th...
    Buzz from the Beehive Two speeches delivered by Foreign Affairs Minister Winston Peters at Anzac Day ceremonies in Turkey are the only new posts on the government’s official website since the PM announced his Cabinet shake-up. In one of the speeches, Peters stated the obvious:  we live in a troubled ...
    Point of OrderBy Bob Edlin
    6 days ago

  • This is how I roll over
    1. Which of these would you not expect to read in The Waikato Invader?a. Luxon is here to do business, don’t you worry about thatb. Mr KPI expects results, and you better believe itc. This decisive man of action is getting me all hot and excitedd. Melissa Lee is how ...
    More Than A FeildingBy David Slack
    6 days ago

  • The Waitangi Tribunal is not “a roving Commission”…
    …it has a restricted jurisdiction which must not be abused: it is not an inquisition   NOTE – this article was published before the High Court ruled that Karen Chhour does not have to appear before the Waitangi Tribunal Gary Judd writes –  The High Court ...
    Point of OrderBy poonzteam5443
    6 days ago

  • Is Oranga Tamariki guilty of neglect?
    Lindsay Mitchell writes – One of reasons Oranga Tamariki exists is to prevent child neglect. But could the organisation itself be guilty of the same? Oranga Tamariki’s statistics show a decrease in the number and age of children in care. “There are less children ...
    Point of OrderBy Bob Edlin
    6 days ago

  • Three Strikes saw lower reoffending
    David Farrar writes: Graeme Edgeler wrote in 2017: In the first five years after three strikes came into effect 5248 offenders received a ‘first strike’ (that is, a “stage-1 conviction” under the three strikes sentencing regime), and 68 offenders received a ‘second strike’. In the five years prior to ...
    Point of OrderBy poonzteam5443
    6 days ago

  • Luxon’s ruthless show of strength is perfect for our angry era
    Bryce Edwards writes – Prime Minister Christopher Luxon has surprised everyone with his ruthlessness in sacking two of his ministers from their crucial portfolios. Removing ministers for poor performance after only five months in the job just doesn’t normally happen in politics. That’s refreshing and will be extremely ...
    Point of OrderBy poonzteam5443
    6 days ago

  • 'Lacks attention to detail and is creating double-standards.'
    TL;DR: These are the six things that stood out to me in news and commentary on Aotearoa-NZ’s political economy in the two days to 6:06am on Thursday, April 25:Politics: PM Christopher Luxon has set up a dual standard for ministerial competence by demoting two National Cabinet ministers while leaving also-struggling ...
    The KakaBy Bernard Hickey
    6 days ago

  • One Night Only!
    Hi,Today I mainly want to share some of your thoughts about the recent piece I wrote about success and failure, and the forces that seemingly guide our lives. But first, a quick bit of housekeeping: I am doing a Webworm popup in Los Angeles on Saturday May 11 at 2pm. ...
    David FarrierBy David Farrier
    6 days ago

  • What did Melissa Lee do?
    It is hard to see what Melissa Lee might have done to “save” the media. National went into the election with no public media policy and appears not to have developed one subsequently. Lee claimed that she had prepared a policy paper before the election but it had been decided ...
    PolitikBy Richard Harman
    6 days ago

  • Skeptical Science New Research for Week #17 2024
    Open access notables Ice acceleration and rotation in the Greenland Ice Sheet interior in recent decades, Løkkegaard et al., Communications Earth & Environment: In the past two decades, mass loss from the Greenland ice sheet has accelerated, partly due to the speedup of glaciers. However, uncertainty in speed derived from satellite products ...
    Skeptical Science
    7 days ago

  • Maori Party (with “disgust”) draws attention to Chhour’s race after the High Court rules on Wa...
    Buzz from the Beehive A statement from Children’s Minister Karen Chhour – yet to be posted on the Government’s official website – arrived in Point of Order’s email in-tray last night. It welcomes the High Court ruling on whether the Waitangi Tribunal can demand she appear before it. It does ...
    Point of OrderBy Bob Edlin
    7 days ago

  • Who’s Going Up The Media Mountain?
    Mr Bombastic: Ironically, the media the academic experts wanted is, in many ways, the media they got. In place of the tyrannical editors of yesteryear, advancing without fear or favour the interests of the ruling class; the New Zealand news media of today boasts a troop of enlightened journalists dedicated to ...
    Bowalley Road
    7 days ago

  • “That's how I roll”
    It's hard times try to make a livingYou wake up every morning in the unforgivingOut there somewhere in the cityThere's people living lives without mercy or pityI feel good, yeah I'm feeling fineI feel better then I have for the longest timeI think these pills have been good for meI ...
    Nick’s KōreroBy Nick Rockel
    1 week ago

  • “Comity” versus the rule of law
    In 1974, the US Supreme Court issued its decision in United States v. Nixon, finding that the President was not a King, but was subject to the law and was required to turn over the evidence of his wrongdoing to the courts. It was a landmark decision for the rule ...
    No Right TurnBy Idiot/Savant
    1 week ago

  • Streamlining Building Consent Changes
    The Government is making it easier for minor changes to be made to a building consent so building a home is easier and more affordable, Building and Construction Minister Chris Penk says.      “The coalition Government is focused on making it easier and cheaper to build homes so we can ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    5 hours ago

  • Minister acknowledges passing of Sir Robert Martin (KNZM)
    New Zealand lost a true legend when internationally renowned disability advocate Sir Robert Martin (KNZM) passed away at his home in Whanganui last night, Disabilities Issues Minister Louise Upston says. “Our Government’s thoughts are with his wife Lynda, family and community, those he has worked with, the disability community in ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    16 hours ago

  • Speech to New Zealand Institute of International Affairs, Parliament – Annual Lecture: Challenges ...
    Good evening –   Before discussing the challenges and opportunities facing New Zealand’s foreign policy, we’d like to first acknowledge the New Zealand Institute of International Affairs. You have contributed to debates about New Zealand foreign policy over a long period of time, and we thank you for hosting us.  ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    17 hours ago

  • Accelerating airport security lines
    From today, passengers travelling internationally from Auckland Airport will be able to keep laptops and liquids in their carry-on bags for security screening thanks to new technology, Transport Minister Simeon Brown says. “Creating a more efficient and seamless travel experience is important for holidaymakers and businesses, enabling faster movement through ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    19 hours ago

  • Community hui to talk about kina barrens
    People with an interest in the health of Northland’s marine ecosystems are invited to a public meeting to discuss how to deal with kina barrens, Oceans and Fisheries Minister Shane Jones says. Mr Jones will lead the discussion, which will take place on Friday, 10 May, at Awanui Hotel in ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 day ago

  • Kiwi exporters win as NZ-EU FTA enters into force
    Kiwi exporters are $100 million better off today with the NZ EU FTA entering into force says Trade Minister Todd McClay. “This is all part of our plan to grow the economy. New Zealand's prosperity depends on international trade, making up 60 per cent of the country’s total economic activity. ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 day ago

  • Mining resurgence a welcome sign
    There are heartening signs that the extractive sector is once again becoming an attractive prospect for investors and a source of economic prosperity for New Zealand, Resources Minister Shane Jones says. “The beginnings of a resurgence in extractive industries are apparent in media reports of the sector in the past ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 day ago

  • Ō-Rākau Remembrance Bill passes first reading
    The return of the historic Ō-Rākau battle site to the descendants of those who fought there moved one step closer today with the first reading of Te Pire mō Ō-Rākau, Te Pae o Maumahara / The Ō-Rākau Remembrance Bill. The Bill will entrust the 9.7-hectare battle site, five kilometres west ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 days ago

  • Government to boost public EV charging network
    Energy Minister Simeon Brown has announced 25 new high-speed EV charging hubs along key routes between major urban centres and outlined the Government’s plan to supercharge New Zealand’s EV infrastructure.  The hubs will each have several chargers and be capable of charging at least four – and up to 10 ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 days ago

  • Residential Property Managers Bill to not progress
    The coalition Government will not proceed with the previous Government’s plans to regulate residential property managers, Housing Minister Chris Bishop says. “I have written to the Chairperson of the Social Services and Community Committee to inform him that the Government does not intend to support the Residential Property Managers Bill ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 days ago

  • Independent review into disability support services
    The Government has announced an independent review into the disability support system funded by the Ministry of Disabled People – Whaikaha. Disability Issues Minister Louise Upston says the review will look at what can be done to strengthen the long-term sustainability of Disability Support Services to provide disabled people and ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 days ago

  • Justice Minister updates UN on law & order plan
    Justice Minister Paul Goldsmith has attended the Universal Periodic Review in Geneva and outlined the Government’s plan to restore law and order. “Speaking to the United Nations Human Rights Council provided us with an opportunity to present New Zealand’s human rights progress, priorities, and challenges, while responding to issues and ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 days ago

  • Ending emergency housing motels in Rotorua
    The Government and Rotorua Lakes Council are committed to working closely together to end the use of contracted emergency housing motels in Rotorua. Associate Minister of Housing (Social Housing) Tama Potaka says the Government remains committed to ending the long-term use of contracted emergency housing motels in Rotorua by the ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 days ago

  • Trade Minister travels to Riyadh, OECD, and Dubai
    Trade Minister Todd McClay heads overseas today for high-level trade talks in the Gulf region, and a key OECD meeting in Paris. Mr McClay will travel to Riyadh to meet with counterparts from Saudi Arabia and the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC). “New Zealand’s goods and services exports to the Gulf region ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 days ago

  • Education priorities focused on lifting achievement
    Education Minister Erica Stanford has outlined six education priorities to deliver a world-leading education system that sets Kiwi kids up for future success. “I’m putting ambition, achievement and outcomes at the heart of our education system. I want every child to be inspired and engaged in their learning so they ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 days ago

  • NZTA App first step towards digital driver licence
    The new NZ Transport Agency (NZTA) App is a secure ‘one stop shop’ to provide the services drivers need, Transport Minister Simeon Brown and Digitising Government Minister Judith Collins say.  “The NZTA App will enable an easier way for Kiwis to pay for Vehicle Registration and Road User Charges (RUC). ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 days ago

  • Supporting whānau out of emergency housing
    Whānau with tamariki growing up in emergency housing motels will be prioritised for social housing starting this week, says Associate Housing Minister Tama Potaka. “Giving these whānau a better opportunity to build healthy stable lives for themselves and future generations is an essential part of the Government’s goal of reducing ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 days ago

  • Tribute to Dave O'Sullivan
    Racing Minister Winston Peters has paid tribute to an icon of the industry with the recent passing of Dave O’Sullivan (OBE). “Our sympathies are with the O’Sullivan family with the sad news of Dave O’Sullivan’s recent passing,” Mr Peters says. “His contribution to racing, initially as a jockey and then ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 days ago

  • Speech – Eid al-Fitr
    Assalaamu alaikum, greetings to you all. Eid Mubarak, everyone! I want to extend my warmest wishes to you and everyone celebrating this joyous occasion. It is a pleasure to be here. I have enjoyed Eid celebrations at Parliament before, but this is my first time joining you as the Minister ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 days ago

  • Government saves access to medicines
    Associate Health Minister David Seymour has announced Pharmac’s largest ever budget of $6.294 billion over four years, fixing a $1.774 billion fiscal cliff.    “Access to medicines is a crucial part of many Kiwis’ lives. We’ve committed to a budget allocation of $1.774 billion over four years so Kiwis are ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 days ago

  • Pharmac Chair appointed
    Hon Paula Bennett has been appointed as member and chair of the Pharmac board, Associate Health Minister David Seymour announced today. "Pharmac is a critical part of New Zealand's health system and plays a significant role in ensuring that Kiwis have the best possible access to medicines,” says Mr Seymour. ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    4 days ago

  • Taking action on Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorder
    Hundreds of New Zealand families affected by Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorder (FASD) will benefit from a new Government focus on prevention and treatment, says Health Minister Dr Shane Reti. “We know FASD is a leading cause of preventable intellectual and neurodevelopmental disability in New Zealand,” Dr Reti says.  “Every day, ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    5 days ago

  • New sports complex opens in Kaikohe
    Regional Development Minister Shane Jones today attended the official opening of Kaikohe’s new $14.7 million sports complex. “The completion of the Kaikohe Multi Sports Complex is a fantastic achievement for the Far North,” Mr Jones says. “This facility not only fulfils a long-held dream for local athletes, but also creates ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    5 days ago

  • Diplomacy needed more than ever
    Foreign Minister Winston Peters’ engagements in Türkiye this week underlined the importance of diplomacy to meet growing global challenges.    “Returning to the Gallipoli Peninsula to represent New Zealand at Anzac commemorations was a sombre reminder of the critical importance of diplomacy for de-escalating conflicts and easing tensions,” Mr Peters ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    5 days ago

  • Anzac Commemorative Address, Buttes New British Cemetery Belgium
    Ambassador Millar, Burgemeester, Vandepitte, Excellencies, military representatives, distinguished guests, ladies and gentlemen – good morning and welcome to this sacred Anzac Day dawn service.  It is an honour to be here on behalf of the Government and people of New Zealand at Buttes New British Cemetery, Polygon Wood – a deeply ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    6 days ago

  • Anzac Commemorative Address – NZ National Service, Chunuk Bair
    Distinguished guests -   It is an honour to return once again to this site which, as the resting place for so many of our war-dead, has become a sacred place for generations of New Zealanders.   Our presence here and at the other special spaces of Gallipoli is made ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    7 days ago

  • Anzac Commemorative Address – Dawn Service, Gallipoli, Türkiye
    Mai ia tawhiti pamamao, te moana nui a Kiwa, kua tae whakaiti mai matou, ki to koutou papa whenua. No koutou te tapuwae, no matou te tapuwae, kua honoa pumautia.   Ko nga toa kua hinga nei, o te Waipounamu, o te Ika a Maui, he okioki tahi me o ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    7 days ago

  • PM announces changes to portfolios
    Paul Goldsmith will take on responsibility for the Media and Communications portfolio, while Louise Upston will pick up the Disability Issues portfolio, Prime Minister Christopher Luxon announced today. “Our Government is relentlessly focused on getting New Zealand back on track. As issues change in prominence, I plan to adjust Ministerial ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago

  • New catch limits for unique fishery areas
    Recreational catch limits will be reduced in areas of Fiordland and the Chatham Islands to help keep those fisheries healthy and sustainable, Oceans and Fisheries Minister Shane Jones says. The lower recreational daily catch limits for a range of finfish and shellfish species caught in the Fiordland Marine Area and ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago

  • Minister welcomes hydrogen milestone
    Energy Minister Simeon Brown has welcomed an important milestone in New Zealand’s hydrogen future, with the opening of the country’s first network of hydrogen refuelling stations in Wiri. “I want to congratulate the team at Hiringa Energy and its partners K one W one (K1W1), Mitsui & Co New Zealand ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago

  • Urgent changes to system through first RMA Amendment Bill
    The coalition Government is delivering on its commitment to improve resource management laws and give greater certainty to consent applicants, with a Bill to amend the Resource Management Act (RMA) expected to be introduced to Parliament next month. RMA Reform Minister Chris Bishop has today outlined the first RMA Amendment ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago

  • Overseas decommissioning models considered
    Overseas models for regulating the oil and gas sector, including their decommissioning regimes, are being carefully scrutinised as a potential template for New Zealand’s own sector, Resources Minister Shane Jones says. The Coalition Government is focused on rebuilding investor confidence in New Zealand’s energy sector as it looks to strengthen ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago

  • Release of North Island Severe Weather Event Inquiry
    Emergency Management and Recovery Minister Mark Mitchell has today released the Report of the Government Inquiry into the response to the North Island Severe Weather Events. “The report shows that New Zealand’s emergency management system is not fit-for-purpose and there are some significant gaps we need to address,” Mr Mitchell ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago

  • Justice Minister to attend Human Rights Council
    Justice Minister Paul Goldsmith is today travelling to Europe where he’ll update the United Nations Human Rights Council on the Government’s work to restore law and order.  “Attending the Universal Periodic Review in Geneva provides us with an opportunity to present New Zealand’s human rights progress, priorities, and challenges, while ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago

  • Patterson reopens world’s largest wool scouring facility
    Associate Agriculture Minister, Mark Patterson, formally reopened the world’s largest wool processing facility today in Awatoto, Napier, following a $50 million rebuild and refurbishment project. “The reopening of this facility will significantly lift the economic opportunities available to New Zealand’s wool sector, which already accounts for 20 per cent of ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago

  • Speech to the Southland Otago Regional Engineering Collective Summit, 18 April 2024
    Hon Andrew Bayly, Minister for Small Business and Manufacturing  At the Southland Otago Regional Engineering Collective (SOREC) Summit, 18 April, Dunedin    Ngā mihi nui, Ko Andrew Bayly aho, Ko Whanganui aho    Good Afternoon and thank you for inviting me to open your summit today.    I am delighted ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago

  • Government to introduce revised Three Strikes law
    The Government is delivering on its commitment to bring back the Three Strikes legislation, Associate Justice Minister Nicole McKee announced today. “Our Government is committed to restoring law and order and enforcing appropriate consequences on criminals. We are making it clear that repeat serious violent or sexual offending is not ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago

  • New diplomatic appointments
    Foreign Minister Winston Peters has today announced four new diplomatic appointments for New Zealand’s overseas missions.   “Our diplomats have a vital role in maintaining and protecting New Zealand’s interests around the world,” Mr Peters says.    “I am pleased to announce the appointment of these senior diplomats from the ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago

  • Humanitarian support for Ethiopia and Somalia
    New Zealand is contributing NZ$7 million to support communities affected by severe food insecurity and other urgent humanitarian needs in Ethiopia and Somalia, Foreign Minister Rt Hon Winston Peters announced today.   “Over 21 million people are in need of humanitarian assistance across Ethiopia, with a further 6.9 million people ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago

  • Arts Minister congratulates Mataaho Collective
    Minister for Arts, Culture and Heritage Paul Goldsmith is congratulating Mataaho Collective for winning the Golden Lion for best participant in the main exhibition at the Venice Biennale. "Congratulations to the Mataaho Collective for winning one of the world's most prestigious art prizes at the Venice Biennale.  “It is good ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 weeks ago

Page generated in The Standard by Wordpress at 2024-05-01T22:12:32+00:00