web analytics

More confusion from National over bulk funding

Written By: - Date published: 5:02 pm, November 7th, 2007 - 39 comments
Categories: education, national - Tags: ,

Some people just never learn. After National’s conflicting statements on bulk funding the other day you’d have thought they’d get their messages in order, if not their policies. But take a look at these comments from Alan Peachey in Parliament yesterday:

Hon Marian Hobbs: Has the Minister seen any reports on alternative approaches to supporting our 21st century education system?

Hon Chris Carter: Indeed I have. I have seen two reports in the last week advocating conflicting approaches to education policy. One report pledges a solid commitment to the reintroduction of bulk funding of teachers’ salaries, and the other states that bulk funding is “not currently in our thinking”. Amazingly, both these statements were made by National’s education spokespeople, Allan Peachey and Katherine Rich, last week. Someone should give Mr Peachey another copy of The Hollow Men, because he appears to have missed the caucus strategy on how to hide the party’s true agenda of privatisation, cuts, and old, failed policies like bulk funding.

Allan Peachey: I raise a point of order, Madam Speaker. I was the principal of a bulk-funded school for a long period of time, and I take personal exception to the comments the Minister just made about the policy. I ask that he apologise and withdraw.

Madam Speaker: That is not a point of order.

So National’s associate education spokesman is still promoting bulk funding. It’s time for National to get its act together and give us a clear answer: is bulk funding National Party policy or not?

39 comments on “More confusion from National over bulk funding ”

  1. Benodic 1

    These clowns are a laughing stock. They can’t even get their house in order and yet they expect us to let them run the country?

  2. I love it how the Standard blithely links to its own previous post on an issue, as if it has some kind of authority, when the standard’s own bloggers get the shit-kicked out of them in the argument.

    And Benodic has the gall to call US the laughing stock.

    Really, Tane, you shouldn’t link to your own posts where your arguments get thoroughly trashed. It’s just a further reminder of how unsustainable your opinions are.

  3. Tane 3

    Which of The Standard’s bloggers got the “shit kicked out of them” over at the other post? I can see an argument between you and another commenter about Alan Peachey’s credentials as an educator, but there’s nothing to contradict National’s confusion on bulk funding.

    When your two education spokespersons can’t even agree on bulk funding you deserve to be called a laughing stock.

  4. Tamaki resident 4

    IP – what point are you trying to make about the post? Is it that Allan Peachey is right in saying that bulk funding is National Party policy?

  5. You’ve got it the wrong way around, Tane. Bulk funding of all schools is current National Party policy. Katharine Rich has reservations about the policy, but as yet the policy hasn’t changed. Peachey is in favour of the current policy, and he points to the stunning success of Rangitoto College under his leadership under bulk-funding.

    Will Katharine Rich win the argument against bulk-funding? I bloody well hope not. Schools need to have far more flexibility over the employment of teachers. For far too long the PPTA have had far too much influence in schools.

    Peachey is merely expressing current National Party policy, and his success under that policy.

  6. Benodic 6

    Nice try IP, but bulk funding was National’s 2005 election policy. You can’t say their 2005 policy is their 2008 policy – they’ve claimed that themselves many a time when trying to defend the policies of the Brash era. National don’t have an education policy, that’s why Rich said it’s not currently in their thinking. Peachey’s just off-message and out of control. At least that’s what I hope it is. You’re sounding pretty desperate, eh?

  7. gobsmacked 7

    The leader of the National party is John Key. The education spokeswoman is Katherine Rich. If they aren’t speaking for the party, who is? Some guy on a blog?

    The Press, Sept 29:

    Key said yesterday the party was likely to dump bulk funding as a policy at the next election. …

    Key said education spokeswoman Katherine Rich was not in favour of bulk funding and the party was considering her position. No formal decision had been made and the matter had yet to go before caucus. Rich said yesterday that bulk funding was “not currently in our thinking” and was “unlikely to form part of the party’s 2008 manifesto”.


    Peachey can cling to “no formal decision” if he wants, but it’s a pretty leaky life raft.

  8. milo 8

    Could you rein in your brownshirts over at Kiwiblog? They are engaging in pretty systematic and inhumane personal abuse. I don’t mind a bit of political argy-bargy, but this is purely personal, not political, and looks like a deliberate policy to try to drive D4J off the deep end.

    I didn’t think those were the sort of values Labour stood for.

  9. r0b 9

    “Could you rein in your brownshirts over at Kiwiblog?”

    Who are you addressing Milo? As far as I know this blog is just a loose affiliation of individuals – there is no “your”, and certainly no control of random commenters like me.

    I don’t know what’s happening at Kiwibog and I’m not going to look. But if Milo is right then can I add my voice to his. Let’s not provoke people with obvious and serious issues. Hard politics, fine, but please can we try not to stoop to their level of personal attacks.

  10. Benodic 10

    Isn’t it funny how the right-wingers think every leftie is somehow affiliated to and controlled by the standard? Grow up guys.

  11. Camryn 11

    Benodic – Tane and other lefties are similarly prone to silly things like suggesting DPF is running off official talking points, or claiming Poster X and Poster Y are the same person. Unfounded assertions are equally ridiculous from both sides.

    N.B. A suitable rebuttal of this post will not consist of “but they arrrrree”.

  12. Camryn 12

    Let’s wrap this one up…

    Lefties: It’s healthy for a party to have debate on policy, and to change policy at times. All parties clearly do both of these things. It’s even healthy for a single party to maintain a diversity of opinion within its MPs, espcially National and Labour. Both are large camps that bring together multiple opinions around an approximate political slant.

    Righties: Is is, however, idiotic to conduct policy discussions in the media. The party should have a single clear policy, and the message should either be “We’re working on it, no further detail at this time” or “The policy is [blah blah]”. If a member absolutely must comment in the media, perhaps to appeal to his/her particular constituents, the format should be “Party policy is [blah blah / under discussion], but my personal opinion is [blah blah]. I believe this view represents my constituents and I’ll be promoting the position in our internal policy discussions”.


    P.S. I actually prefer my politicians to be slightly gaff prone, since those that really know how to play the political game tend to get away with more scams and corruption. Helen Clark really knows how to play the political game.

  13. r0b 13

    Oh Camryn – you were doing quite well right up until your “PS”.

    Post Hollow Men, I really don’t know how the right can accuse Labour of “scams and corruption” with a straight face, I really don’t. Have you no shame at all? National will not be free of the stench of corruption until it has totally renewed its front bench.

  14. Robinsod (moderator) 14

    But National’s policy is bulk funding. They just don’t ant to say so yet. Naughty Peachy.

  15. Pablo 15

    Milo, you’re confusing your insults. Brownshirts are from the other side of the political tracks. Your correct historical parallel for the left should have been something like “rein in your Red Guards over at Kiwiblog”

  16. Camryn 16

    rOb – I couldn’t help myself.

    We’ve reached a point where it boils down to opinion re: Hollow Men. I’m aware that Don Brash screwed up by not admitting he met the EB. There were also apparent plans to lie about other things in the stolen emails. Still, I don’t agree that anything in that incident was corruption. I won’t be convinced otherwise and I won’t be so presumptuous as to try to convince you that you’re wrong either.

    Still, the reason we know that Brash is now gone is that he was gaff prone, thus strengthening my assertion that it’s a good trait in politicians. If they’re going to lie (and they will) then they’d best be bad at it. Taito too. DBP too.

    My dig at Helen is just opinion too. She’s so damn politically sharp that she can get away with all kinds of things. I will admit that “scams and corruption” was an inflammatory choice. I’ll rephrase: she subverts and changes rules, tears away at traditions, applies double standards and generally abuses her intelligence and political talent to be a horrible horrible person.

  17. Robinsod (moderator) 17

    Cam – Helen is a lovely person – you should meet her some day. I’m interested you say “stolen” emails again (it’s the stock misdirective response to Hollow Men). I got another sweet tip about these just a few days ago. It seems three boxes of emails, memos etc were sent out to interested parties by that staffer Brash had an affair with after she found out about his other affair with Foreman. One of those boxes was sent to Winston. I’m not telling about the other two but I know who passed them on to Hager. What’s happened to that investigation anyway? Are the Nats still not cooperating?

  18. Benodic 18

    Camryn you obviously haven’t read the Hollow Men if you think it’s just about the Brethren. That’s just one chapter of an entire book about National’s attempts to sell NZ’s interests out to its business mates while lying and dogwhistling the public to cover their tracks. As r0b says, the stench of corruption will follow National so long as the current lot are in charge.

  19. r0b 19

    “rOb – I couldn’t help myself.”

    Camryn, you seem like a reasonable person. We may not agree, but I get the feeling we can at least have a rational conversation! Welcome to The Standard, I hope you choose to stay a while.

  20. insider 20

    What exactly is the problem with bulk funding that it gets people all aquiver? If a school believes it will be better off managing its own funding, isn;t that a good thing to encourage?

  21. Tane 21

    insider, the PPTA has a pretty good retrospective on bulk funding here:


    (word doc, 150k)

  22. The anti-bulk funding argument is a highly sophisticated one. Universities and tertiary institutes–many of the latter being smaller than some of the largest schools–are bulk funded. Government departments are bulk funded. Schools’ operations are bulk funded.

    But heaven forbid that schools are bulk funded for teachers’ salaries. Boards of Trustees just can’t be trusted to pay more to attract particular skill sets of teachers.

  23. Policy Parrot 23

    Bulk funding would be a huge disaster like it was last time.

    BOT members tear up the appropriations budget, and have the option to spend money on non-educational and “pet projects” that benefit their own children rather than the school.

    Case in point: A BOT member at one school’s rugby team was bought jerseys, boots and gear out of the school budget. Half of transport was paid for (and this was considerable as it was a rural school).

    This is the kind of abuse that should not be allowed, but it will be under bulk-funding. Education will be farmed out to the ‘lowest-bidder’ as teachers are asked to ‘name their price’ and BOT parents will employ the lowest bidder rather than the most qualified teacher.

  24. Robinsod (moderator) 24

    It’s also worth noting that bulk funding could be used to reduce teacher’s bargaining power. In the past bulk funded schools have found their funding becomes static (which means falling in real terms). Often the first place they looked to save money was in support staff salaries (teachers were not paid from bulk funds). The result was a decline of skilled support staff and a corresponding decline in the quality of administration and special needs support. There was also massive managerial rorting at bulk funded schools including three members of the Principal’s Association who went on a tax-payer funded bike tour of Europe. Guess who one of them was…

  25. I agree, Policy Parrot. Bulk funding works in every government department, every CRI, every tertiary institute, every early childhood institute, but there’s no way it can work in primary and secondary schools, because they are completely different organisms. Just because private schools are bulk funded is no reason to think state schools should get away with it.

    Robinsod, don’t tell lies. Bulk-funded schools out-performed non-bulk funded schools during the 1990s by wide margins. There were no incidents of schools receiving less under the bulk-funded system than centralised funding. You are confusing this with scare-mongering by the PPTA: the PPTA claimed it was the Government’s intention to gradually lower the teacher salary grant. That never happened.

    Parrot, why don’t you just be up front with what you mean, rather than coming up with bullshit excuses. You don’t want bulk funding of teacher salaries because that would undermine the power of the PPTA. You don’t care about the lot of teachers. There is a major shortage of quality teachers in New Zealand schools. The PPTA has done nothing to address quality teaching issues. They are perfectly comfortable running a monopoly union that has nothing to do with teaching children or improving educational quality. The Labour Party benefits enormously from the cushioned position the PPTA is in.

    The real reason you oppose bulk funding, Parrot, is because of the massive electoral and financial advantage the PPTA gives to the Labour Party. As soon as bulk funding of teacher salaries comes in, schools can actually pay teachers on performance.

  26. insider 26

    Seems the real issue for PPTA is, does funding reflect/protect real wage costs. That;s a legitimate argument for a union to make but not a deal breaker I would have thought if the funding formula was adequate.

    Budgets can be easily isolated. Businesses don;t allow money to slush around between sectors so why would schools. Bad budget management or financial abuse is not an argument against bulk funding.

    Can’t agree on the lowest bidder argument – what parent is really going to accept that approach (unless you are arguing for removal of zoning…). Schools are already restricted in who they can employ because of budget limits so first year teachers are often attractive. Bulk funding seems to offer the ability to provide greater flexibility.

    I have seen that you don’t need excellent teachers in every role – life is not like that – but leadership in key positions can be critical. If you have the flexibility to beef up those positions and improve a school by being able to offer more attractive terms, wouldn;t that be a good thing. It may be as simple as paying the principal more.

    What the system relies on though is well informed and skilled administration by boards and heads, and of course that is not always guaranteed. That is why I favour caution as for small schools or in low decile areas they just may not be up to doing the job, despite best intentions.

  27. dancer 27

    i missed this post until now – but what i’m really interested in is that bulk-funding is still National party policy. They’ve done so much “re-positioning” that i’m having trouble telling what they currently stand for. so can someone direct me to a National mp/ policy paper that actually says they will do it?

  28. Sam Dixon 28

    dancer – ‘but then Labour will just steal it!’

    No, wait, that was last year’s excuse.

    Um, edcuation policy, um,… tax cuts?

  29. Ah, Dancer. As opposed to the repositioning Labour has done over carbon credit trading, the “core benefit” it’s been working on for the last EIGHT years, the fart tax, Closing the Gaps, amendments to the RMA, Helen Clark’s reversal of position on smacking law, Labour’s vehement u-turn on anonymous donations to political parties–the so-called big issue of electoral finance that it oh-so-conveniently ignored–and now the colossal reversal of Labour’s proud, eight-year long tradition of ignoring any opportunity to cut taxes?

    So, Sam, when is Labour going to announce its tax policy? You’ve become a rather hollow man calling for National to announce its own tax regime, given that Cullen has said he’s not making any announcements until the 2008 budget.

  30. Robinsod 30

    IP – I worked in a bulk-funded school in the late 90’s. I know what I saw. I’ve noticed every time I tell you a fact you don’t like you call me a liar. Is your sense of self-importance so fragile you can’t face simple truths? You should go back to doing whatever you do as a day job and forget about your political analysis fantasies. Your “insights” might impress folk around the water cooler at work but here you’re just a punter embarrassing himself.

  31. You’re a fantasist, Robinsod. You haven’t produced any evidence for any of your so-called “factual” claims. You put up wpurious arguments–such as the outrageous lie that Allan Peachey led a school into near financial collapse on the one hand, and that he was responsible for Selwyn College’s many failures on the other–and then when you’re shot down with ACTUAL evidence, such as ERO reports, you go running for cover.

    Robinsod, you’re just cranky that you can’t sustain any argument. Instead of reality, you peddle lies.

  32. Robinsod 32

    IP – I never said anything about Peachy. That was another commenter. Your doing the lying boy..

  33. You’re quite right, Robinsod. I stand corrected. That was not you, but another faceless pinko named Sprout who made the spurious claims about Peachey.

    I do apologise for confusing the two of you.

  34. Robinsod 34

    Yeah you got it wrong and now you’re throwing insults about to try and cover it up. Does calling me a “faceless pinko” make you feel better about being wrong? And I noticed you used “spurious” again. I assume you did so to mask your shame at mistyping it the first time? You’re an amateur Prick. Go home before you embarrass yourself any more.

  35. Perhaps, Robinsod, you are so unaccustomed to people apologising to you that you can’t take the apology graciously. That’s sad.

  36. Robinsod 36

    You describe me as “Another faceless pinko”? And you really expect me to take that apology sincerely? I mean let’s be frank here pal, I’ve done you a favour by biting at your backhanded apology ‘cos I’ve given you the chance to feel you have the moral high-ground (and you’ve milked it in a snide and ugly way by replying with a slightly higher register than is usual for a blog comment).

    But sure, I’ve slighted you, I’m a liar, you’re intellectually and morally superior to me blah, blah, blah. Whatever gets you through the night bro – you have some transparent self-esteem issues prick. I can see them and I’m pretty sure others can too.

  37. Camryn 37

    Benodic – It’s true, I haven’t read it. I’ve been in the US since before it was released. I will attempt to get my hands on it at some point.

    Robinsod – I am actually open to the possibility they were ‘leaked’ not stolen. Still, I’m also open to the possibility that Hager’s book is more fiction and fantasy than fact. Like I said to Benodic, I’ll have to read it. It all may boil down to views on privatization. I think it increases efficiency for users too, so long as it’s done well (e.g. not creating a monopoly like Telecom, although that was probably rushed for a reason) and as long as the government plays it’s part (i.e. regulates well, drops taxes a little to reflect services no longer provided, provides safety net for those in strife paying for things). In that sense, I don’t care if Brash planned some privatizations as long as he was going to follow due process. It is an issue over which National can easily be beaten with a big PR stick though… privatization is a bit like ripping a plaster off. It needs to happen but no-one wants to be told about it first. Brash chose to be deceitful and ended up paying the price. The problem is, if National is honest and can’t overcome public disdain then they’ll stay in Opposition until the shit hits the fan again (a la 1984) and then they have to come and fix it in a more drastic way and be hated for how painful it is like the various Rogernomics-era Labour politicans are. The fact that it’s better to take some painful moves in good times rather than when it gets bad is a hard political message to sell, but we’d all be better off in the long run.

    rOb – Thanks. I’m quite happy to post on here. It seems more civil over here than on Kiwiblog, although it’s often all the same people on both sides so I don’t understand why that’s so.

  38. Robinsod 38

    Camryn – I just don’t see the need for privitisation because I think there are accountability issues when the public interest diverges from the shareholder’s interests. I just don’t trust business to put the national interest and the interests of the public ahead of their own profits. The experience of the privatisation of rail, power and other critical infrastructure in the 80’s and 90’s does nothing to assuage my distrust. Neither does the liberalisation of South American economies. Or 90’s Russia. In fact I can’t see where it’s worked for the people of any nation.

  39. r0b 39

    Camryn – “The problem is, if National is honest and can’t overcome public disdain then they’ll stay in Opposition until the shit hits the fan again (a la 1984) and then they have to come and fix it”

    That’s interesting. 1984 was an extraordinary year coming out of the extraordinarily perverse Muldoon government. What makes you think that something like that is ever going to happen again? What is going to go wrong that National (heaven help us) are going to be needed to fix it?

    “It seems more civil over here than on Kiwiblog, although it’s often all the same people on both sides so I don’t understand why that’s so.”

    There is some overlap in the two groups, and also some differences. That seems to be enough to raise the tone here at The Standard. Long may it continue.

Recent Comments

Recent Posts

  • NZ announces a third P-3 deployment in support of UN sanctions
    The Government has deployed a Royal New Zealand Air Force P-3K2 Orion (P-3) maritime patrol aircraft to support the implementation of United Nations Security Council (UNSC) resolutions imposing sanctions against North Korea, announced Minister of Foreign Affairs Winston Peters and Minister of Defence Ron Mark. “New Zealand has long supported ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 days ago
  • Pacific trade and development agreement a reality
    Pacific regional trade and development agreement PACER Plus will enter into force in 60 days now that the required eight countries have ratified it. Trade and Export Growth Minister David Parker welcomed the announcement that the Cook Islands is the eighth nation to ratify this landmark agreement. “The agreement represents ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    6 days ago
  • Securing a pipeline of teachers
    The Government is changing its approach to teacher recruitment as COVID-19 travel restrictions continue, by boosting a range of initiatives to get more Kiwis into teaching. “When we came into Government, we were faced with a teacher supply crisis,” Education Minister Chris Hipkins said. “Over the past three years, we ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • Border exceptions for a small number of international students with visas
    The Government has established a new category that will allow 250 international PhD and postgraduate students to enter New Zealand and continue their studies, in the latest set of border exceptions. “The health, safety and wellbeing of people in New Zealand remains the Government’s top priority. Tight border restrictions remain ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • First COVID-19 vaccine purchase agreement signed
    The Government has signed an agreement to purchase 1.5 million COVID-19 vaccines – enough for 750,000 people – from Pfizer and BioNTech, subject to the vaccine successfully completing all clinical trials and passing regulatory approvals in New Zealand, say Research, Science and Innovation Minister Megan Woods and Health Minister Chris Hipkins. ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • International statement – End-to-end encryption and public safety
    We, the undersigned, support strong encryption, which plays a crucial role in protecting personal data, privacy, intellectual property, trade secrets and cyber security.  It also serves a vital purpose in repressive states to protect journalists, human rights defenders and other vulnerable people, as stated in the 2017 resolution of the ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • Ministry of Defence Biodefence Assessment released
    The Ministry of Defence has today released a Defence Assessment examining Defence’s role across the spectrum of biological hazards and threats facing New Zealand. Biodefence: Preparing for a New Era of Biological Hazards and Threats looks at how the NZDF supports other agencies’ biodefence activities, and considers the context of ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • New Approaches to Economic Challenges: Confronting Planetary Emergencies: OECD 9 October 2020
    New Approaches to Economic Challenges: Confronting Planetary Emergencies: OECD 9 October 2020 Hon David Parker’s response following Thomas Piketty and Esther Duflo. Good morning, good afternoon, and good evening, wherever in the world you might be. I first acknowledge the excellent thought provoking speeches of Thomas Piketty and Esther ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 weeks ago
  • Kaipara Moana restoration takes next step
    A Memorandum of Understanding has been signed today at Waihāua Marae between the Crown, local iwi and councils to protect, restore and enhance the mauri of Kaipara Moana in Northland. Environment Minister David Parker signed the document on behalf of the Crown along with representatives from Ngā Maunga Whakahī, Ngāti ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 weeks ago
  • New Zealand and Uruguay unite on reducing livestock production emissions
    Agriculture Minister Damien O’Connor and Uruguayan Minister of Livestock, Agriculture and Fisheries Carlos María Uriarte have welcomed the launch of a three-year project that will underpin sustainable livestock production in Uruguay, Argentina, and Costa Rica.  The project called ‘Innovation for pasture management’ is led by Uruguay’s National Institute of Agricultural ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 weeks ago
  • 3100 jobs created through marae upgrades
    Hundreds of marae throughout the country will be upgraded through investments from the Provincial Growth Fund’s refocused post COVID-19 funding to create jobs and put money into the pockets of local tradespeople and businesses, Regional Economic Development Minister Shane Jones and Māori Development Minister Nanaia Mahuta have announced. “A total ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 weeks ago
  • Health volunteers recognised in annual awards
    Health Minister Chris Hipkins has announced 9 teams and 14 individuals are the recipients of this year’s Minister of Health Volunteer Awards.  “The health volunteer awards celebrate and recognise the thousands of dedicated health sector volunteers who give many hours of their time to help other New Zealanders,” Mr Hipkins ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 weeks ago
  • Community COVID-19 Fund supports Pacific recovery
    The Minister for Pacific Peoples, Aupito William Sio says a total of 264 groups and individuals have successfully applied for the Pacific Aotearoa Community COVID-19 Recovery Fund, that will support Pacific communities drive their own COVID-19 recovery strategies, initiatives, and actions. “I am keen to see this Fund support Pacific ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 weeks ago
  • Community benefits from Māori apprenticeships
    Up to 50 Māori apprentices in Wellington will receive paid training to build houses for their local communities, thanks to a $2.75 million investment from the Māori Trades and Training Fund, announced Employment Minister Willie Jackson today. “This funding will enable Ngāti Toa Rangatira Incorporated to provide its Ngā Kaimahi ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 weeks ago
  • Training fund supports Māori jobseekers
    Rapidly growing sectors will benefit from a $990,000 Māori Trades and Training Fund investment which will see Wellington jobseekers supported into work, announced Employment Minister Willie Jackson today. “This funding will enable Sapphire Consultants Ltd. to help up to 45 Māori jobseekers into paid training initiatives over two years through ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 weeks ago
  • Ruakura Inland Port development vital infrastructure for Waikato
    The Government is investing $40 million to develop an inland port at Ruakura which will become a freight super-hub and a future business, research and residential development for the Waikato, Urban Development and Transport Minister Phil Twyford, and Māori Development Minister Nanaia Mahuta announced today. The funding has been has ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 weeks ago
  • Appointments made to Defence Expert Review Group
    Defence Minister Ron Mark announced today the establishment of an Expert Review Group to review a number of aspects of the New Zealand Defence Force’s (NZDF) structure, information management and record-keeping processes.  The Expert Review Group’s work arises out of the first recommendation from the Report of the Government’s Inquiry ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 weeks ago
  • No active community cases of COVID-19
    There are no active community cases of COVID-19 remaining in the country after the last people from the recent outbreak have recovered from the virus, Health Minister Chris Hipkins said today. “This is a big milestone. New Zealanders have once again through their collective actions squashed the virus. The systems ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 weeks ago
  • Clean energy upgrade for more public buildings
    More public buildings will be supported by the Government to upgrade to run on clean energy, the Minister for Climate Change James Shaw announced today. Minister Shaw announced that Lincoln and Auckland universities will receive support through the Clean-Powered Public Service Fund to replace fossil fuel boilers. Southern, Taranaki, and ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 weeks ago
  • Schools back donations scheme for the second year
    More schools have opted in to the donations scheme for 2021, compared to 2020 when the scheme was introduced. “The families of more than 447,000 students will be better off next year, with 94% of eligible schools and kura opting into the scheme,” Education Minister Chris Hipkins said. “This is ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 weeks ago
  • Ruapehu cycle trails gets PGF boost
    The spectacular Mountains to Sea cycle trail in Ruapehu District will receive $4.6 million in funding from the Provincial Growth Fund for two additional trails, Regional Economic Development Minister Shane Jones announced today. “This is an exciting development for the local community, and one that will provide significant economic opportunities ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 weeks ago
  • Update to air border order strengthens crew requirements
    Additional measures coming into effect on Monday will boost our defence against COVID-19 entering New Zealand through the air border, Health Minister Chris Hipkins said today. “As part of our precautionary approach and strategy of constant review, we’re tightening the requirements around international aircrew,” Chris Hipkins said. The COVID-19 Public ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 weeks ago
  • A true picture of Māori business activity
    A better picture of the contribution Māori businesses make to the economy will be possible with changes to the way information is collected about companies and trading enterprises. Māori Development Minister Nanaia Mahuta and Small Business Minister Stuart Nash have announced a new option for Māori enterprises who are part ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 weeks ago
  • PGF funding for Taranaki projects
    The South Taranaki museum, a New Plymouth distillery and a Pasifika building firm will benefit from a Government investment totalling more than $1 million, Regional Economic Development Minister Shane Jones says. The $1.05m in grants and loans from the Provincial Growth Fund (PGF) will help the recipients expand and create ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 weeks ago
  • Fijian Language Week 2020 inspires courage and strength during COVID-19 pandemic
    The Minister for Pacific Peoples, Aupito William Sio says the theme for the 2020 Fijian Language Week reflects the strong belief by Fijians that their language and culture inspires courage and strength that is strongly needed in times of emergencies, or through a significant challenge like the global COVID-19 pandemic ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 weeks ago
  • Trades training builds on iwi aspirations
    An investment of $2.025 million from the Māori Trades and Training Fund will support Māori to learn new skills while making a positive difference for their communities, announced Employment Minister Willie Jackson today. “K3 Development Limited Partnership will receive $2,025,000 for its Takitimu Tuanui apprenticeship programme, which will support the ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 weeks ago
  • Conservation Minister plants two millionth tree in Raglan restoration
    A long-term conservation project led by the Whaingaroa Harbour Care group in the western Waikato reaches a significant milestone this week, with the planting of the two millionth tree by the Minister of Conservation Eugenie Sage. “Planting the two millionth tree crowns 25 years of commitment and partnership involving Whaingaroa ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 weeks ago