NRT: “A stupid idea”

Written By: - Date published: 10:28 am, November 28th, 2016 - 90 comments
Categories: feminism, gender, national - Tags: , , , ,

I/S at No Right Turn writes:


“A stupid idea”

That’s what John Key thinks of equality around the Cabinet table:

Prime Minister John Key says the idea of promising a gender-balanced Cabinet is “stupid” because appointments are made on talent, not gender.

Speaking on The Nation on Saturday, Key dismissed the call made by Equal Employment Opportunities Commissioner Jackie Blue, who would like Key to follow in the footsteps of Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau, who last year unveiled a Cabinet which was half female.
[…]
But Key told Nation host Lisa Owen “it would be stupid” to promise a gender-balanced Cabinet.

And then he trotted out the usual excuse that Cabinet appointments are made on “merit”. Yeah, right. I think Murray McCully, Tim Groser, and Sam Lotu-Iiga are proof of the absurdity of that idea. But even if we accept it, it just pushes the question back another level, from “why doesn’t National select women as Cabinet Ministers” to “why doesn’t National select women as candidates / MPs?” And I think we all know the answer to that question…

90 comments on “NRT: “A stupid idea” ”

  1. Stunned Mullet 1

    It does seem a daft idea. Most people in NZ would be happy with competent ministers before we start making sure we have particular allocations of gender/race/disability/religion etc etc

    • One Anonymous Bloke 1.1

      We already have allocations based on gender and ethnicity. White males are the beneficiaries.

    • If you think this is a daft idea you’re basically saying you think women are stupider than men, or admitting that your preferred party and/or government (whatever that is) can’t recruit enough talented women to fill out half of their cabinet allocation.

      The Greens gender-balance their entire party list, and they still end up with a little more of their talent on the female side of the equation. Labour isn’t doing quite as well, but that’s because they run a lot of white men in electorates, and they have a firm policy of putting the wrong people on the front bench in general.

      National are absolutely abysmal. Partially that because not enough talented women put their hands up for their list, and partially it’s because their list, like Labour’s, is ordered in a smoky back-room full of party hacks. I know talented women who were on their list but below the threshold ever likely to get into Parliament that are more qualified to be making decisions than some of their current ministers. It’s not enough to put qualified women onto your list, you’ve got to give them winnable positions ahead of men (and sometimes, other women) who are just seat-fillers.

      • Katipo 1.2.1

        Exactly, if there is an unjust power imbalance it should always be those that hove the power to do the right thing and take the initiative to redress it. Chris Rock made a similar argument when talking about race relations……

        “So, to say Obama is progress is saying that he’s the first black person that is qualified to be president. That’s not black progress. That’s white progress. There’s been black people qualified to be president for hundreds of years. If you saw Tina Turner and Ike having a lovely breakfast over there, would you say their relationship’s improved? Some people would. But a smart person would go, “Oh, he stopped punching her in the face.” It’s not up to her. Ike and Tina Turner’s relationship has nothing to do with Tina Turner. Nothing. It just doesn’t. The question is, you know, my kids are smart, educated, beautiful, polite children. There have been smart, educated, beautiful, polite black children for hundreds of years. The advantage that my children have is that my children are encountering the nicest white people that America has ever produced. Let’s hope America keeps producing nicer white people.”

    • Zid 1.3

      Well the idea didn’t exactly work for Cunny and his man ban. Will you lefties ever learn to listen to your constituency?

      • McFlock 1.3.1

        [gets popcorn, waits for moderator]

      • Wow are you wrong, the idea actually had support and was popular with engaged Labour voters.

        It was only sexist media articles that spun the whole thing out of control that were against it, until they attracted The Usual Suspects. Lord knows if any of them would actually vote National just because Labour will have more women- a lot of them voted for Clark even though they didn’t like feminists.

        You’ll also notice nobody’s ever bothered to attack the Greens for already doing the same thing, because everyone knows it works for them. They’ve extended their policy to wanting to negotiate for gender-balance in their cabinet positions in any coalition government too, and again, nobody batted an eyelid.

        Labour can do the same, it just needs to select talented people instead of more Mallards.

        • In Vino 1.3.2.1

          Love that last sentence!

        • Pete George 1.3.2.2

          “They’ve extended their policy to wanting to negotiate for gender-balance in their cabinet positions in any coalition government too, and again, nobody batted an eyelid.”

          Wanting to is one thing, but perhaps no one realistically expects they can dictate what sort of Labour MPs and possibly NZ First MPs can be a part of a Cabinet.

          If Labour named their Cabinet MPs, and NZ First named their cabinet MPs, would the Greens ensure gender balance by only putting forward female MPs if that was needed for overall?

          Or do they simply mean they will negotiate to supply a balance in their own MPs?

          • Matthew Whitehead 1.3.2.2.1

            Your last sentence is accurate. The Greens will, as part of their coalition negotiations, ask that any cabinet appointees from their own party be for equal numbers of men and women, at least assuming they get an even number of positions. (I expect they will ask for an extra woman if they get an odd number, but they may leave it up to the discretion of the Labour Party)

            • Kevin 1.3.2.2.1.1

              But I suspect PG already knew that.

              • Probably, he’s a long-established troll who’s great at misreading posts, but the issue is that if you don’t address him, someone else comes along and thinks he has a point somehow, so then you’re stuck arguing with someone whose opinion actually matters, so unless he gets moderated it’s better to reply.

    • AB 1.4

      In general, balance is the best way of ensuring competence.

      But it’s not really selection based on competence anyway – competence doesn’t come into it. It’s really about sharing the same worldview, set of beliefs, networks and habits of mind. People with power select people who comfortably reflect back their own way of thinking.

      And in any case I don’t think the addition of right-wing women to a cabinet of right-wing men benefits humanity in any way. I’m old enough to find right-wing women even more appalling than right-wing men – some old-fashioned, residual belief that women are intrinsically more human and nurturing and less inclined to sociopathic beliefs

      • garibaldi 1.4.1

        Quite agree AB, their caring, nurturing instincts seem to go out the window. It’s the same in Real Estate. Male agents tend to be less backstabbing than the female agents.

  2. Key says doing as Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau has done would be “a stupid idea”. I thought he was glad-eyeing Trudeau. Stunned Mullet comes out in solidarity with Key, his “man”, against the idea of having more women in decision making positions – will wonders never cease? Where’s James? Pucky? BM? The rest of the old boys crew? Is there a game on?

    • Cinny 2.1

      Maybe all cabinets should have an equal balance of men and women regardless of the government in power… now that would be interesting.

      I’d be pissed off to be offered a job based on gender rather than talent, mind you i’ve been turned down for jobs based on gender, and that’s pissed me off too. It’s a complex subject,

      However, if there was a rule to say there must be gender balance within cabinet, that would be rather awesome. Gosh there are some talented intelligent women on the left, looking forward to next year when they will be in government.

    • Stunned Mullet 2.2

      Robert – I don’t know where you get the idea that my comment was ‘in solidarity with Key’.

      I was making what I thought was a rather obvious observation that most people would expect Ministerial positions in government to be filled with the most competent person for the job regardless of who that person might be, it is just a shame that the pickings amongst the MPs are not what might be considered competent outside of parliament.

      • Sorry, Stunned, I lumped you in with the obvious crew. I think that if there was an expectation that the balance would be equal or close to it, the downstream effect would mean that the gender balance would level early on and this debate would be unnecessary. Knowing that males will dominate the top roles will have effects on women considering the path to the top. Key’s comments cement an unbalanced view, such as might be held by people other than your good Stunned self.

        • wellfedweta 2.2.1.1

          Key’s comments promote a meritocracy, where women and men compete on a level playing field for cabinet positions. Of the current Ministers, 10 out of 25 (40%) are women. Women don’t need quota’s.

          • Matthew Whitehead 2.2.1.1.1

            Women don’t want to have to rely on quotas. They want to be getting around 50% of leadership positions because people realise that women actually are talented, and that their experiences are relevant to senior positions.

            But the upside of parties enforcing quotas is that it instills those values in the party, creates a culture where women are viewed that way, and then later on you can just lift the quota because some cabinets will have a lot more than 50% women, so it becomes okay when other cabinets have less.

            • wellfedweta 2.2.1.1.1.1

              “But the upside of parties enforcing quotas is that it instills those values in the party, creates a culture where women are viewed that way…”

              Or, it makes people question which women are there on merit, and which are not.

              • One Anonymous Bloke

                Just as we know for a fact that the white men certainly aren’t there on merit.

                • wellfedweta

                  That doesn’t address my point. Quota’s result in people being in positions for reasons other than merit. That leads to people questioning the ability of those who are there on merit.

                  • One Anonymous Bloke

                    Quota’s result in people being in positions for reasons other than merit.

                    Do they?

                    I know that’s a common line that people who oppose such measures trot out ad nauseam. Is it true, though?

                    Certainly it’s true of the current situation, where people get advanced beyond their abilities on the grounds of being white and male.

                    Whereas if we look at the Green Party, perhaps you can give me an example of an MP or list member who isn’t there on merit.

                    • wellfedweta

                      “Do they?”

                      Yes.

                      “…where people get advanced beyond their abilities on the grounds of being white and male.”

                      You’re living in another century.

                      “Whereas if we look at the Green Party, perhaps you can give me an example of an MP or list member who isn’t there on merit.”

                      Is that a rhetorical question?

                  • One Anonymous Bloke

                    Whereas right now, the favouring (cf. R vs. Bartlett) of men over women achieves precisely the same outcome.

                    • wellfedweta

                      Favouring any person over another in selection for reasons other than merit is wrong. Quotas don’t fix that, they simply replace one error with another.

                    • One Anonymous Bloke

                      That doesn’t follow: we already have a problem – privilege is a crutch for the incompetent (don’t tell me you haven’t met any). Quotas reduce the problem.

              • Do you question if any of the female Green MPs are there on merit? Because I guarantee you Green supporters disagree. Every woman on that list is qualified to be in Parliament. The only “advantage” they get is that the list alternates between women and men, because the Greens believe women deserve to be in Parliament in equal numbers.

                Do you question if any of the male MPs from the National Party earned their list positions on merit? If not, why not? Because I think it’s obvious that the examples I gave earlier have not earned their list positions. (Hell, arguably some of them shouldn’t even be Ministers at all) Why is it okay for men to be in positions they haven’t earned but somehow a quota is unacceptable? Because what this indicates to me is you believe that women somehow posess less then half of the talent and experience in the world. And that’s simply not true. Women are just as likely to be talented and have valuable life experiences as men, it’s just a matter of whether we recognise it or not.

                • wellfedweta

                  Again, your bias to preventing you making an objective assessment. If you cannot see the shortcomings of, say Materia Turei, I can’t help you.

                  “Why is it okay for men to be in positions they haven’t earned…”

                  It isn’t.

                  “Because what this indicates to me is you believe that women somehow posess less then half of the talent and experience in the world. ”

                  No. I just don’t believe women need quota’s. And I don’t believe we need gender balance for the sake of feeling good.

                  • One Anonymous Bloke

                    *Metiria.

                    You’re missing the point. Women don’t need quotas: we will have a better representational democracy when Parliament is genuinely representative.

                    It’s not for women, it’s for everyone. Even the poor mollycoddled white men will have to become stronger once they aren’t leaning on that crutch of privilege any more.

                    • wellfedweta

                      ‘Everyone’? So you do agree with quota’s for gender, sexuality, ethnicity, culture….?

                      And there is no white male privilege….it is an invention of failed middle aged liberals. But neither should there be. People achieve on merit, not quota’s. We don;t need them.

                  • One Anonymous Bloke

                    …failed middle aged liberals…

                    …and the Supreme Court. Get over it.

                    PS: seriously: you can offer advice about quotas when you’ve learnt to spell it.

                    • wellfedweta

                      Which Supreme Court? Which case? Which quota’s?

                      On one hand you say women don’t need quota’s, on the other you advocate them. Which is it?

                    • One Anonymous Bloke

                      Quotas: the plural of quota is quotas. Not quota’s: the apostrophe denotes possession.

                      R vs. Kristine Bartlett.

                      In fact, I said we all need them, which you might have picked up on if you weren’t still learning English.

                      I can sense this disability of yours will impel you to ask “why (we all need them)?”, despite the fact I’ve already explained why. Please make an effort to grasp the argument before asking the question.

                    • wellfedweta

                      “R vs. Kristine Bartlett.”

                      What does that case have to say about quota’s? That’s right, nothing.

                    • One Anonymous Bloke

                      It speaks to male privilege. If you think quotas (please note the grammar) aren’t part of that conversation that’s* your crutch.

                      Lean on it.

                      *literally, the crutch of you.

                    • wellfedweta

                      “It speaks to male privilege.”

                      But nothing about quota’s.

                  • Firstly, there’s no apostrophe in the plural “quotas.” (“Quota’s” means “of or pertaining to a quota”) If you’re going to keep talking about them, you might as well stop punctuating the word incorrectly.

                    Meyt isn’t some sort of superwoman with no flaws, sure, but as someone who was a successful corporate lawyer, and given her record in Parliament, I would put her up against, say, Judith Collins any day, given they have similar experience pre-Parliament, and similar levels of ambition within their parties. (Meyt is a co-leader, Collins wants to take over from Key when he walks) The Greens lost some things and gained others when Jeannette retired and Meyt won the selection to replace her. Overall I think she’s grown into the role very well, and I actually view her as the stronger half of the leadership team currently.

                    Gender balance isn’t for the sake of feeling good. The fact is, different decisions (better, in my view) get made once you start including women around the table and giving them the opportunity to have their voices heard, as women largely have different life experiences and therefore different approaches and perspectives to men. For example, most new trends in city planning come from focused work around serving the needs of women, because they’ve found that doing so makes the design better for everyone else, too. It’s not about feeling good about ourselves, it’s actually about realising that different people are different, and that there are valuable perspectives to be had by having a diverse leadership team that actually make your team better when compared to an equally qualified team that was made up of, for example, almost exclusively white men, it just requires a bit more willingness to get used to having different people in the seats.

                    The fact is, you don’t actually seem to acknowledge that quotas come with benefits as well as possible downsides. I agree in the long run, quotas or other forms of affirmative action aren’t a permanent solution and should be repealed when they’ve done their work. But they’ve proven very valuable as a short-term measure to help us solve other problems that are easier to solve with women in leadership positions, (because often it takes a woman to figure out the inequalities women suffer in a system) and I look forward to the day when it’s a matter that’s not for debate that on average we expect all of our leadership positions to be roughly evenly distributed between men and women, and it just happens as part of good organisational practice, because that will indicate we’ve solved a lot of the structural problems that made quotas a practical solution.

                    • wellfedweta

                      Quotas (there we are FIFY) and affirmative action achieve nothing, other than to make white middle class liberals feel better.

                      As to Metiria Turei, the best thing I can say is to point you to this video http://www.inthehouse.co.nz/video/46833, in which she demonstrated she knew nothing about the current tenancy laws in NZ. MT has repeatedly shown her unsuitability for her position, and is perhaps the best argument yet that the Greens form of quota (where there MUST be both a male and female leader) simply promotes people above their level of incompetence.

                    • Actually Meyt doesn’t demonstrate any lack of understanding of the law, as 42-day notices on property sales are absolutely a thing. (see https://tenancy.govt.nz/ending-a-tenancy/change-of-landlord-or-tenant/sale-of-a-house/) Paula Bennet is trying to shift the debate by saying that most eviction notices are 90 days, (which is entirely possible as the law only gives you three grounds for a 42-day notice) and intention to sell has to be notified, then a sale has to be ready to go ahead before a 42-day notice is given, but Meyt is concerned that even with the notice of intent to sell, that 42 days can be too short, as a notice that the landlord intends to sell the property could go nowhere sometimes, so it’s a little difficult to gauge for tenants if they actually need to be looking for alternative accomodation or not as of the initial notice, and they get zero advance warning if the landlord or their family actually wants to occupy their rented property, it’s 42 days then they’re out.

                      What that exchange shows, if anything, is the relative importance of property rights vs stability of living situation for renters for each party.

                      Paula Bennet doesn’t actually manage to contradict a single thing Metiria is asking about, so I’m not sure how you consider this incompetence. Rather, it just illustrates the difficulties of trying to communicate complex concerns in a format that requires brief questions and doesn’t really allow for statements from the Opposition. It’s very difficult to avoid these kind of “dismissals using context” that Paula is using here in question time, as often the sorts of complicated formulations needed to side-step them either make the question too long, prompting the speaker to intervene, or they bring up quirks of standing orders that allow the minister to dodge the question in a different way. (such as addressing one part of a two-part question and not specifying which part they addressed) Granted, I’m sure Labour ministers have used this against National Party questions, too.

                      I’m done arguing with you about the merits of quotas, which you clearly are making no attempts to understand. They are a tool, like any other, and useful in certain situations.

      • Except in any workplace with reasonable HR practices women are just as likely to be talented as men, if they’re given the opportunities.

        National doesn’t have enough talented women because they don’t put enough women on their list, they don’t put the women high enough on their list, and they don’t mentor the women they have in Parliament to be leaders, so we end up with Paratas and Tolleys far more often than we get Nikki Kayes or Katherine Richs, who as much as you disagree with them, actually do know how to hit the broad side of a barn in a debate, and actually have some basic understanding of policy, which as far as I’m concerned overqualifies them for a National Party cabinet.

        You pick the most talented people for cabinet, sure. But if you’ve picked your party list and electorate candidates right, you should have more options than you have positions. You should be able to worry about things like gender parity, and who gets roles they want rather than just roles they’re needed in. Anyone who’s in the core of the party should be already qualified for cabinet or being groomed for cabinet. It’s okay to have first-term MPs around that aren’t ready yet, but anyone you’re keeping around after their first go should have the talent to get there if they respond well to their mentors. We have enough talent in NZ to have a 120 member parliament, in my opinion, (even though National and Labour are both picking wrong) so we have enough talent to have 60 women in parliament, and half of cabinet be women.

        • wellfedweta 2.2.2.1

          Your premise about National’s list is based on your misconception that quota’s are best. It’s circular reasoning. Merit in list selection will lead to merit in Caucus and Cabinet. And as my other posts prove, National currently has a higher proportion of women in cabinet that either the last Labour cabinet or the current Labour caucus. So, you’re just plain wrong.

          • Matthew Whitehead 2.2.2.1.1

            I don’t think quotas are best. (edit: in fact, I explicitly argued against a particular quota in my latest blog) I think quotas are a way to address the intangibles (or at least, less obvious factors) that bias decisions until the institutional culture has been re-trained to view women as something approaching genuinely equal. I’m open to alternative measures that work, for instance one thing I support to advocate gender equality is public disclose of average pay gaps by various organisations, to create upward pressure on women’s wages to generate good PR. That doesn’t rely on quotas or affirmative action at all, it relies on public shaming, and is a solution that a capitalist would love. 🙂

            As for National, it doesn’t select its list on merit. If it did, it would let the members have an indicative vote on the list, and publish the differences between the final list and the vote. But let’s look at the 2014 list. Simon Bridges, a seat filler who can’t keep his portfolios straight, is listed in the position above Nikki Kaye, who even the opposition respect and is widely regarded as the most competent woman in Cabinet. Murray McCully is ranked higher than Amy Adams, and although they’re both arguably bad, at least Amy isn’t a waste of space whose scandals are a drag on the Government. Chester Borrows is a freaking deputy Speaker and is being convicted from running over the feet of protestors, when Louise Upston is ranked lower and debates better, even if she’s not exactly stellar. (And note that I got to three specific examples without even resorting to Sam Loto-Iiga, who’s even worse than Melissa Lee, so bonus comparison for you)

            And despite all of this, we have wastes of space like Parata ranked as if she’s a heavyweight ready for a senior portfolio, and scandal magnets who couldn’t win a liberal vote if they showed up dressed in drag like Collins lined up as a potential successor to Key.

            Women in general are too rare, and too low on National’s list, and the ones they do rank highly are terrible MPs who are drags on the party there for tokenism or because they prevent factional war. Talented women interested in politics, one of whom I know personally, have left the party after being placed in unwinnable positions on the list.

            • wellfedweta 2.2.2.1.1.1

              ” If it did, it would let the members have an indicative vote on the list, and publish the differences between the final list and the vote.”

              Your assuming ‘merit’ is better determined by one group more than another. Unless you can substantiate that claim, that argument is a fallacy.

              The rest of your argumentation is based on your own prejudices, not actual facts. And you haven’t addressed my point that 40% of Nationals Ministers are women. The evidence shows National to promote women in a higher rate than Labour. Fact.

              • One Anonymous Bloke

                You haven’t explained why you think the fact that National are doing better on this front than Labour (assuming that they are – I can’t be bothered checking your sums) means your opinion of quotas is correct.

                Right now, the situation – backed up by evidence and at least one high court ruling, is that certain people are being advantaged by either positive discrimination in their favour, or that others are being discriminated against.

                Since you’re so concerned about perception, perhaps you can explain why it’s fair to white males that they are tarred with this privileged brush. Can’t compete on a level playing field or something? Whaddarya?

                • wellfedweta

                  “You haven’t explained why you think the fact that National are doing better on this front than Labour (assuming that they are – I can’t be bothered checking your sums) means your opinion of quotas is correct.”

                  Let me help.

                  National promote on merit. More women in ministerial positions.
                  Labour promote on genital configuration. Less women in ministerial positions.

                  Women don’t need quota’s.

                  “… perhaps you can explain why it’s fair to white males that they are tarred with this privileged brush.”

                  Yes, I have pondered this. It seems to be a naive view of the world by social justice warriors who are seriously detached from reality. I tend to ignore them.

              • Uh, yes? By definition if merit is any measurable quality, the ability to perceive it will differ.

                The reason I say holding at least an indicative vote on the ordering of their list is an excellent way to establish merit is because for an MP, the easiest way to measure their merit is their appeal to voters, and party members are voters you know are going to be voters for your party, so you know they will have an incentive to be honest in evaluating your MPs.

                The list I have of Cabinet has 7 women out of 20 cabinet members, but we can call that 40% if you like. 40% is 10% too low. That is all I really need to say on the fact that National have a few female ministers in its cabinet, but I’m sure you’ll want details.

                During the fifth Labour Government, there were 28 total cabinet-level ministers (although a couple of them were technically outside cabinet due to being from minor parties) 8 of them were women. (or 28.5%) While this was too low as well, Labour has finally acknowledged that equal gender representation in their party is necessary, and I expect their next cabinet to be much more equal.

                By the same method of counting, 10/31 of the members of cabinet during the fifth National government are women. That would be 32.25%. (the number is lower than current women serving in cabinet because by this method of counting, women have been moved around between cabinet positions, but the overall number hasn’t exactly increased over time, and the men are in positions that change more often, inflating their share of the total. Unfortunately I couldn’t find a list of Clark’s various cabinets so had to look at all her cabinet-level ministers instead) While this is better, it’s also eight years later, so it’s what I would expect given the progress of time. National haven’t taken any particular additional effort to include more women in their caucus and mentor them to be ready for the front benches, they’ve just been careful to promote the women they already have, in some cases arguably because of tokenism.

                It’s also reasonable to point out that Clark was the first woman elected as Prime Minister, and was already facing criticism that her government was dominated by feminists and lesbians early into her term, and of “social engineering.” She had to be careful not to stoke that perception too much while still making progress. In contrast, when Key appoints more women than Clark does, because the sexists are already on his side, they don’t feel worried, especially as they know a man is still in charge, but because he’s also the first man to hold the office after our first two women Prime Ministers, he’s expected to have made some progress, so he’s dragged literally any woman he can (and arguably, at least three he shouldn’t) into Cabinet to make it look like he’s being progressive, despite the fact that he can’t get many into his actual party.

                • wellfedweta

                  “…party members are voters you know are going to be voters for your party, so you know they will have an incentive to be honest in evaluating your MPs.”

                  Party, members may know nothing about a candidate. Look at the unmitigated disaster Labour’s leadership selection is.

                  “40% is 10% too low.”

                  Says who? What is the objective basis for such a claim?

                  “The list I have of Cabinet has 7 women out of 20 cabinet members, but we can call that 40% if you like.”

                  There are three ministers outside of cabinet. 2 are women.

                  Your last paragraph is a hilarious attempt at self justification. Clark was an excellent PM in many respects, but you might want to consider why during her tenure the proportion of female cabinet ministers actually declined.

                  • Labour’s leadership selection was not a disaster. It was caucus rebelling against a legitimate leader that caused the disaster, which is unsurprising as Labour members have little say on who becomes part of caucus.

                    Party members are the best equipped to judge candidates of all the practical options. If you leave it to party officials, frequently the ordering will reflect the MPs that please the party organisation rather than MPs that are popular with the public or effective as MPs, as we see with the National Party list. (which you still refuse to defend) If you let anyone who wants to vote have a say, then potentially members of other parties will try to “sabotage” your list by voting for the worst MPs. If you want to have any sort of indicative list vote in a closed list system, it realistically has to be restricted to members.

                    The objective basis for why 40% of cabinet being women is 10% too low is based on the principle of representative democracy, which is supposed to be one of the philosophies behind our government. The idea is that Parliament should, on average, roughly resemble the people in its demographics and ideologies. Given our population is roughly 50.1% women and 49.9% men, you would actually expect the average to skew slightly female on that principle, but it’s reasonable to just say let’s make things even.

                    If you want to count ministers outside of cabinet, we should be talking about 40% of ministers rather than 40% of cabinet, but that’s no problem. I compared cabinets to cabinets because I couldn’t find data on ministers outside cabinet for the fifth Labour government.

                    As for who says we should gender-balance cabinets- why exactly do you think this idea of gender-balance in politics keeps coming up? The answer is because people are asking for it,

                    I don’t need to justify Labour’s choices because I’m not actually a Labour supporter, I support the Greens, who have been for equal representation from the word go. I talked about it because you brought up the perpetual “but what about Labour eight years ago?” objection. The issue with that is that support for equal gender representation has been growing over time, so it isn’t a fair comparison. If I compared the fifth Labour government to the fourth National one, I expect the gender gap there would be quite noticeable as well. That’s not “self-justification.” It’s putting events in context, so please stop it with your childish ad-hominem attacks on my credibility. You’re supposed to play the ball, not the player. 😉

                    • wellfedweta

                      “Party members are the best equipped to judge candidates of all the practical options.”

                      I disagree. Most members will have little or no knowledge of the candidates. Although that may not be true of Labour, who have only a handful of members.

                      “Labour’s leadership selection was not a disaster.”

                      It was and it is. Labour currently have a leader who was spurned by the vast majority of his own Caucus. He is a union puppet, who will never get Labour elected into government.

                      “The objective basis for why 40% of cabinet being women is 10% too low is based on the principle of representative democracy”

                      So, there should be not only gender quota’s but race quota’s, sexuality quota’s, culture quota’s, religion quota’s…
                      You also make the assumption a man cannot represent a woman, a woman a man, a gay man a straight man….which is bs.

                      “The answer is because people are asking for it,”

                      No, they’re not. A small number in a single focus echo chamber may be, but the general population are more sensible.

                    • One Anonymous Bloke

                      @wellfedweta

                      You make the mistake of confusing representation with experience: diversity of experience is where it counts when it comes to representational democracy.

                      The Supreme Court is not an echo chamber: men (especially white men) are bludging off the system, wrapped in cotton wool, mollycoddled, welfare dependent: whatever other smears you righties love to fling about whenever you discriminate against people.

                      Please learn to spell the plural of quota.

                    • Well this Weta seems to be stuck on repeat and more interested in bashing Labour than discussing the issue, so I’m done with it. 😉

                      His problem is one of grammar, not of spelling, doesn’t realise that you’re not supposed to use apostrophes for plurals. 😉

    • james 2.3

      Im here – I agree with Key – its a stupid idea.

  3. Cinny 3

    It should always be the best person for the job. However there really aren’t that many competent women in the outgoing government. There’s your answer 🙂 And why are women reluctant to join the National Party? Maybe because competent women aren’t stupid.

    Outgoing PM will be shutting down the subject because his gender balance is way way out easier not to talk about it than acknowledge it

    • Gosman 3.1

      Please let you be someone who helps develop a campaign position for a let wing political party. I would so love it to see the left fight the next election with gender being prominent in their policy settings.

    • james 3.2

      “It should always be the best person for the job.” – So you agree with Key ? because that is in effect what he is saying – and not Andrew Little who leads a party who has a plan for 50% women in cacaus despite them being the best person for the job or not?

    • wellfedweta 3.3

      40% of the current Ministers are women. In the last Labour Cabinet, only 3 out of 15 (20%) were women.

      With the ‘man-ban’, in today’s Labours Caucus, 12 out of 31 (39%) are women.

      So despite the ‘quota’, Labour’s own caucus is less gender equal that Nationals Ministers.

  4. Rosemary McDonald 4

    When it comes to ‘stupid ideas’, Our Leader is an expert.

    And Idiot Savant is soooo right about poor old Sam Lotu IIga….the man is just so….unsuited….for any ministerial responsibility.

  5. framu 5

    “appointments are made on talent, not gender”

    strangely enough – they can be made on both.

    Much like minority places at uni, you still need to be qualified for the role, with gender becoming just another aspect that gets considered

    • Or you know, you accept as a given that women are likely to be talented at similar rates to men given the same life experiences, and put programs in place to aggressively mentor women (and anyone else who’s under-represented, like queer people, or Māori, or Asian New Zealanders, and so on) who have the innate talents needed so that they’re able to contest the relevant leadership positions.

      • framu 5.1.1

        that too – or rather, that first

        Just pointing out that the idea of seeking gender balance doesnt negate a requirement for talent.

        more speaking to the “hired on merit alone” argument than anything else

        • Yeah, the issue is that when internal promotions are an option for a vacancy, that’s when you should have been thinking about this diversity mentoring stuff for months or years in advance. Just looking at who merits a position at the time of hiring is shallow stuff, especially in a political party where there’s a reasonable expectation that each internal faction should be grooming its own young(er) talent for prime positions in the party, as you know you have a “workforce” that’s likely to stay locked in for three years at a time.

      • wellfedweta 5.1.2

        Why? Why are the groups you mention so entitled?

        • They’re not entitled. They’re equal, and they’re talented, and they work hard, and they have the social skills needed, just like white men, so you would expect that over time (I understand changing cultures can take a few years to get results, that’s OK) their representation in leadership positions, both in government and private sectors, would approach a representative average. (for women, that’s 50%. For others, the hard numbers are a little more difficult to agree on, but they should still have a say and be represented fairly)

          It’s people who look like me (but probably aren’t bi) who are entitled. We think it’s okay that men get two-thirds of leadership positions. We think it’s okay that government and the private sector leadership is siginificantly whiter than it should be. I disagree with that. I want to know when someone says I’m talented, or important, or listens to me, that I’ve actually earned it, and it’s not because they’re thinking in terms of structural racism, or sexism, or heteronormativity, assuming they don’t know I’m queer.

  6. Nick 6

    I question the word ‘talent’…shonkeys greatest talent is lying

    • garibaldi 6.1

      I question the theory that it should be the best person for the job. If that is the case how come we have such a crap Cabinet? !

  7. james 7

    Labour promised a gender quota of at least 50% women for 2017.

    Wonder if they are still on track for that:

    http://www.stuff.co.nz/national/politics/9357211/Labours-gender-quota-gets-go-ahead

    At the moment – they are running quite a lot lower at the moment – will be interesting to see how they meet their commitment.

    • Gosman 7.1

      I suspect the selection of the candidate for Hutt South was influenced by their genda quota (even if just subconsciously). Their selection was certainly the choice of Labour HQ. Not that the new candidate stands much of a chance of victory.

    • Gosman 7.2

      I suspect the selection of the candidate for Hutt South was influenced by their gender quota (even if just subconsciously). Their selection was certainly the choice of Labour HQ. Not that the new candidate stands much of a chance of victory.

    • To be fair Labour has a harder job of things than the Greens because they have electorate MPs, which means you have to kick some men out of safe Labour seats in order to approach the desired quota.

      Labour has bigger problems than gender parity though, they still haven’t managed to make a coherent ideology known to the public, they’re more defined by what they’re against than what they’re for.

      • Zid 7.3.1

        Oh so true

      • james 7.3.2

        Yep – just read their rules:

        “The Moderating Committee must, in determining the list, ensure that for any percentage of the Party Vote likely to be obtained, and taking into account the electorate MPs likely to be elected with that level of Labour support, the resultant Caucus will comprise at least 50% women.”

        So is it right – or even a good idea that some candidates in safe seats may have to be replaced, or other very capable males on the list being dropped down – simply because Labour MUST ensure that caucus is at least 50% women?

        Is that ensuring that the best person gets the job?

        • Oh, it’s absolutely right that men lose safe seats to women. That part I have no problem with.

          What I don’t trust Labour to do is to eject the right ones from safe electorates, and replace them with effective women who actually deserve a safe seat, like Louisa Wall. Mallard, for instance, should be much lower on the party list AND running in a competitive electorate, so that we know he’s actually out there campaigning for the list vote and inpiring non-voters into Labour’s camp. A unifying and Labour-specific political philosophy and message should be agreed on, and caucus members who can’t get behind it should either quit or fight it out in competitive electorates to prove their message resonates better than the one the party chose.

          Doing it right, of course, will cause divisions within caucus. It might risk another rebellion like what Cunliffe incurred. But honestly, it’s overdue, and it’s causing these races to be close, rather than simply ousting key in a landslide, so for the medium term, it’s a political strategy move, not just a rejuvenation one. They could even throw a few women out the door if they’re a drag on the party and replace them with new faces. Annette King comes to mind, she should have been mentoring a replacement or two for a few terms now.

          The other thing they could do is hold a vote for their members and affiliates on their list, and base selections loosely around that vote. That ensures accountability for list MPs, and helps identify new talent that core supporters actually believe in. They’ve already conceded they have to give members a say on the leader, so why not the party list too?

      • alwyn 7.3.3

        “you have to kick some men out of safe Labour seats”

        Just what are these “safe Labour seats” you are talking about?
        I had a brief look at the results in some of the Labour seats held by men. It isn’t terribly scientific because I only looked at seats I knew were held by Labour male MPs and I only looked at those in the first part of the alphabet.

        Looking at Dunedin North, Hutt South, Mana, Mt Albert, Mt Roskill, Napier and New Lynn I see that in every one of these electorates a male Labour MP won the seat but that in every case National got a larger Party vote than did Labour.
        Are these “safe Labour seats” or did a Labour candidate win the seat because he was a better candidate?
        In seats like Mangere a Labour man won the seat and the Labour Party beat National in the party vote but that seat is about as likely to be won by National as Labour is to beat Key in Helensville.

        If you replaced all of the candidates with a Labour woman, obviously a new candidate in the electorate, would they win, or would the electorate seat go to the National Party?
        Just what do you mean by a “safe Labour seat” anyway?

        • james 7.3.3.1

          Alwyn,

          Indeed you are correct – and my way of wording was – well – pretty confusing to say the least.

          You are 100% – that is down to an effective MP as opposed to being a safe labour seat (I was meaning more safe for labour – because of the MP if you get my drift).

          So to counter this – there will have to be more women on the list and higher – and men lower.

          Using the 50% in the last election even Andrew Little would not have gotten in on his list position. (according to kiwiyouknowwhat).

          Question – if Andrew Little fails to win a seat (again), and there needs to be x women at the top of the list to make the 50% – what gets changed – does Andrew go down the list to ensure the 50% gender balance as per the rules – or does he get a free pass based on his position and being the best person to be the Labour leader?

        • 2014 is an interesting year for evaluating safe seats because of the ABC rebellion during the campaign where they tanked the Party Vote. It’s also worth noting that you can’t compare straight labour-national in party votes in determining safe seats as there is a high incidence of vote-splitting among all the minor parties, and that seats get “safer” or more “dangerous” depending on who’s viewed as having political momentum, hence why a lot more Auckland electorates were in contention under this Government than have been previously. Arguably a reasonable comparison would be some sort of average between the current Labour/National candidate splits and the Labour Party Vote + Green Party Vote – Green Candidate Vote vs National Party Vote.

          The great thing about the electorate vote is that you don’t lose a seat for Labour if you lose an electorate. You can put a young star into Hutt South or one of the previously safe Auckland seats while putting them low on the list, and see what happens. You could also use it to test public perception on a backbencher who could be a potential frontbencher, like Louisa Wall, and say: “You need to get within 5% of our previous incumbent’s result here to prove you can campaign like a front-bencher,” or something similar.

          Remember, Georgina Beyer did great in a very rural and highly conservative part of the country as well, so you can reasonably put some women into the competitive seats and they’ll manage to win them despite expectations of sexism if they’re actually good politicians. Men will vote for women by a pretty good margin if they know how to fight.

          • alwyn 7.3.3.2.1

            “You need to get within 5% of our previous incumbent’s result here to prove you can campaign like a front-bencher”.
            Well, if that rule had been in place there would be one Andrew Little who would never have made it into Parliament.
            Rather a good thing for New Zealand, what?

            • Matthew Whitehead 7.3.3.2.1.1

              Yeah can’t say I disagree with more methods for the public to hold candidates accountable.

              Not that I view electorates as being the only or even best way of achieving that, but high-stakes electorate contests are better than leaving good candidates too low on the list, or cutting them off from the front benches despite being obviously superior to many of the party “leaders.”

              And yes, Andrew Little isn’t a particularly good leader. The thing is, as Key has proven, you don’t particularly need to be a leader to be an effective Prime Minister, you just need to be responsive to your party and to the country as a whole. A fast follower with their own bottom lines isn’t too much worse than a leader.

  8. james 8

    I wonder what poll results / estimates they will use to look at the percentage of party vote?

Links to post

Recent Comments

Recent Posts

  • At a glance – Does CO2 always correlate with temperature?
    On February 14, 2023 we announced our Rebuttal Update Project. This included an ask for feedback about the added "At a glance" section in the updated basic rebuttal versions. This weekly blog post series highlights this new section of one of the updated basic rebuttal versions and serves as a ...
    1 hour ago
  • Bernard’s six-stack of substacks at 6.06 pm on Tuesday, March 19
    TL;DR: In today’s ‘six-stack’ of substacks at 6.06pm on Tuesday, March 19:Kāinga Ora’s dry rot The Spinoff DailyBill McKibben on ‘Climate Superfunds’ making Big Oil pay for climate damage The Crucial YearsPreston Mui on returning to 1980s-style productivity growth NoahpinionAndy Boenau on NIMBYs needing unusual bedfellows Urbanism SpeakeasyNed Resnikoff's case ...
    The KakaBy Bernard Hickey
    3 hours ago
  • Relentlessly negative
    Negative yesterday, negative today. Negative all year, according to one departing reader telling me I’ve grown strident and predictable. Fair enough. If it’s any help, every time I go to write about a certain topic that begins with C and ends with arrrrs, I do brace myself and ask: Again? Are ...
    More Than A FeildingBy David Slack
    4 hours ago
  • Scoring 4.6 out of 10, the new Government is struggling in the polls
    Bryce Edwards writes –  It’s been a tumultuous time in politics in recent months, as the new National-led Government has driven through its “First 100 Day programme”. During this period there’s been a handful of opinion polls, which overall just show a minimal amount of flux in public support ...
    Point of OrderBy poonzteam5443
    4 hours ago
  • Promiscuous Empathy: Chris Trotter Replies To His Critics.
    Inspirational: The Family of Man is a glorious hymn to human equality, but, more than that, it is a clarion call to human freedom. Because equality, unleavened by liberty, is a broken piano, an unstrung harp; upon which the songs of fraternity will never be played. “Somebody must have been telling lies about ...
    4 hours ago
  • Don’t run your business like a criminal enterprise
    The Detail this morning highlights the police's asset forfeiture case against convicted business criminal Ron Salter, who stands to have his business confiscated for systemic violations of health and safety law. Business are crying foul - but not for the reason you'd think. Instead of opposing the post-conviction punishment and ...
    No Right TurnBy Idiot/Savant
    5 hours ago
  • Misremembering Justinian’s Taxes.
    Tax Lawyer Barbara Edmonds vs Emperor Justinian I - Nolo Contendere: False historical explanations of pivotal events are very far from being inconsequential.WHEN BARBARA EDMONDS made reference to the Roman Empire, my ears pricked up. It is, lamentably, very rare to hear a politician admit to any kind of familiarity ...
    5 hours ago
  • Bryce Edwards: Scoring 4.6 out of 10, the new Government is struggling in the polls
    It’s been a tumultuous time in politics in recent months, as the new National-led Government has driven through its “First 100 Day programme”. During this period there’s been a handful of opinion polls, which overall just show a minimal amount of flux in public support for the various parties in ...
    Democracy ProjectBy bryce.edwards
    6 hours ago
  • Bishop scores headlines with crackdown on unwelcome tenants – but Peters scores, too, as tub-thump...
    Buzz from the Beehive Housing Minister Chris Bishop delivered news – packed with the ingredients to enflame political passions – worthy of supplanting Winston Peters in headline writers’ priorities. He popped up at the post-Cabinet press conference to promise a crackdown on unruly and antisocial state housing tenants. His ...
    Point of OrderBy Bob Edlin
    7 hours ago
  • Will it make the boat go faster?
    Ele Ludemann writes – The Reserve Bank is advertising for a Diversity, Equity and Inclusion advisor. The Bank has one mandate – to keep inflation between one and three percent. It has failed in that and is only slowly getting inflation back down to the upper limit. Will it ...
    Point of OrderBy poonzteam5443
    10 hours ago
  • Bryce Edwards: Is Simon Bridges’ NZTA appointment a conflict of interest?
    Last week former National Party leader Simon Bridges was appointed by the Government as the new chair of the New Zealand Transport Agency Waka Kotahi (NZTA). You can read about the appointment in Thomas Coughlan’s article, Simon Bridges to become chair of NZ Transport Agency Waka Kotahi The fact that a ...
    Democracy ProjectBy bryce.edwards
    10 hours ago
  • Is Simon Bridges’ NZTA appointment a conflict of interest?
    Bryce Edwards writes – Last week former National Party leader Simon Bridges was appointed by the Government as the new chair of the New Zealand Transport Agency Waka Kotahi (NZTA). You can read about the appointment in Thomas Coughlan’s article, Simon Bridges to become chair of NZ Transport Agency ...
    Point of OrderBy poonzteam5443
    10 hours ago
  • Bernard's Top 10 @ 10 'pick 'n' mix' at 10:10am on Tuesday, March 19
    TL;DR: My top 10 news and analysis links this morning include:Today’s must-read: Gavin Jacobson talks to Thomas Piketty 10 years on from Capital in the 21st Century The SalvoLocal scoop: Green MP’s business being investigated over migrant exploitation claims Stuff Steve KilgallonLocal deep-dive: The commercial contractors making money from School ...
    The KakaBy Bernard Hickey
    10 hours ago
  • Bernard's six newsy things on Tuesday, March 19
    It’s a home - but Kāinga Ora tenants accused of “abusing the privilege” may lose it. Photo: Lynn Grieveson / The KākāTL;DR: The Government announced a crackdown on Kāinga Ora tenants who were unruly and/or behind on their rent, with Housing Minister Chris Bishop saying a place in a state ...
    The KakaBy Bernard Hickey
    12 hours ago
  • New Life for Light Rail
    This is a guest post by Connor Sharp of Surface Light Rail  Light rail in Auckland: A way forward sooner than you think With the coup de grâce of Auckland Light Rail (ALR) earlier this year, and the shift of the government’s priorities to roads, roads, and more roads, it ...
    Greater AucklandBy Guest Post
    13 hours ago
  • Why Are Bosses Nearly All Buffoons?
    Note: As a paid-up Webworm member, I’ve recorded this Webworm as a mini-podcast for you as well. Some of you said you liked this option - so I aim to provide it when I get a chance to record! Read more ...
    David FarrierBy David Farrier
    15 hours ago
  • Bernard’s six-stack of substacks at 6.06 pm on March 18
    TL;DR: In my ‘six-stack’ of substacks at 6.06pm on Monday, March 18:IKEA is accused of planting big forests in New Zealand to green-wash; REDD-MonitorA City for People takes a well-deserved victory lap over Wellington’s pro-YIMBY District Plan votes; A City for PeopleSteven Anastasiou takes a close look at the sticky ...
    The KakaBy Bernard Hickey
    1 day ago
  • Peters holds his ground on co-governance, but Willis wriggles on those tax cuts and SNA suspension l...
    Buzz from the Beehive Here’s hoping for a lively post-cabinet press conference when the PM and – perhaps – some of his ministers tell us what was discussed at their meeting today. Until then, Point of Order has precious little Beehive news to report after its latest monitoring of the ...
    Point of OrderBy Bob Edlin
    1 day ago
  • Labour’s final report card
    David Farrar writes –  We now have almost all 2023 data in, which has allowed me to update my annual table of how  went against its promises. This is basically their final report card. The promise The result Build 100,000 affordable homes over 10 ...
    Point of OrderBy poonzteam5443
    1 day ago
  • “Drunk Uncle at a Wedding”
    I’m a bit worried that I’ve started a previous newsletter with the words “just when you think they couldn’t get any worse…” Seems lately that I could begin pretty much every issue with that opening. Such is the nature of our coalition government that they seem to be outdoing each ...
    Nick’s KōreroBy Nick Rockel
    1 day ago
  • Wang Yi’s perfectly-timed, Aukus-themed visit to New Zealand
    Geoffrey Miller writes – Timing is everything. And from China’s perspective, this week’s visit by its foreign minister to New Zealand could be coming at just the right moment. The visit by Wang Yi to Wellington will be his first since 2017. Anniversaries are important to Beijing. ...
    Point of OrderBy poonzteam5443
    1 day ago
  • Gordon Campbell on Dune 2, and images of Islam
    Depictions of Islam in Western popular culture have rarely been positive, even before 9/11. Five years on from the mosque shootings, this is one of the cultural headwinds that the Muslim community has to battle against. Whatever messages of tolerance and inclusion are offered in daylight, much of our culture ...
    1 day ago
  • New Rail Operations Centre Promises Better Train Services
    Last week Transport Minster Simeon Brown and Mayor Wayne Brown opened the new Auckland Rail Operations Centre. The new train control centre will see teams from KiwiRail, Auckland Transport and Auckland One Rail working more closely together to improve train services across the city. The Auckland Rail Operations Centre in ...
    2 days ago
  • Bernard's six newsy things at 6.36am on Monday, March 18
    Photo: Lynn Grieveson / The KākāTL;DR: Retiring former Labour Finance Minister Grant Robertson said in an exit interview with Q+A yesterday the Government can and should sustain more debt to invest in infrastructure for future generations. Elsewhere in the news in Aotearoa-NZ’s political economy at 6:36am: Read more ...
    The KakaBy Bernard Hickey
    2 days ago
  • Geoffrey Miller: Wang Yi’s perfectly-timed, Aukus-themed visit to New Zealand
    Timing is everything. And from China’s perspective, this week’s visit by its foreign minister to New Zealand could be coming at just the right moment. The visit by Wang Yi to Wellington will be his first since 2017. Anniversaries are important to Beijing. It is more than just a happy ...
    Democracy ProjectBy Geoffrey Miller
    2 days ago
  • The Kaka’s diary for the week to March 25 and beyond
    TL;DR: The key events to watch in Aotearoa-NZ’s political economy in the week to March 18 include:China’s Foreign Minister visiting Wellington today;A post-cabinet news conference this afternoon; the resumption of Parliament on Tuesday for two weeks before Easter;retiring former Labour Finance Minister Grant Robertson gives his valedictory speech in Parliament; ...
    The KakaBy Bernard Hickey
    2 days ago
  • Bitter and angry; Winston First
    New Zealand First Leader Winston Peters’s state-of-the-nation speech on Sunday was really a state-of-Winston-First speech. He barely mentioned any of the Government’s key policies and could not even wholly endorse its signature income tax cuts. Instead, he rehearsed all of his complaints about the Ardern Government, including an extraordinary claim ...
    PolitikBy Richard Harman
    2 days ago
  • 2024 SkS Weekly Climate Change & Global Warming News Roundup #11
    A listing of 35 news and opinion articles we found interesting and shared on social media during the past week: Sun, March 10, 2024 thru Sat, March 16, 2024. Story of the week This week we'll give you a little glimpse into how we collect links to share and ...
    2 days ago
  • 2024 SkS Weekly Climate Change & Global Warming News Roundup #11
    A listing of 35 news and opinion articles we found interesting and shared on social media during the past week: Sun, March 10, 2024 thru Sat, March 16, 2024. Story of the week This week we'll give you a little glimpse into how we collect links to share and ...
    2 days ago
  • Out of Touch.
    “I’ve been internalising a really complicated situation in my head.”When they kept telling us we should wait until we get to know him, were they taking the piss? Was it a case of, if you think this is bad, wait till you get to know the real Christopher, after the ...
    Nick’s KōreroBy Nick Rockel
    2 days ago
  • Bring out your Dad
    Happy fourth anniversary, Pandemic That Upended Bloody Everything. I have been observing it by enjoying my second bout of COVID. It’s 5.30 on Sunday morning and only now are lights turning back on for me.Allow me to copy and paste what I told reader Sara yesterday:Depleted, fogged and crappy. Resting, ...
    More Than A FeildingBy David Slack
    3 days ago
  • Bring out your Dad
    Happy fourth anniversary, Pandemic That Upended Bloody Everything. I have been observing it by enjoying my second bout of COVID. It’s 5.30 on Sunday morning and only now are lights turning back on for me.Allow me to copy and paste what I told reader Sara yesterday:Depleted, fogged and crappy. Resting, ...
    More Than A FeildingBy David Slack
    3 days ago
  • Bring out your Dad
    Happy fourth anniversary, Pandemic That Upended Bloody Everything. I have been observing it by enjoying my second bout of COVID. It’s 5.30 on Sunday morning and only now are lights turning back on for me.Allow me to copy and paste what I told reader Sara yesterday:Depleted, fogged and crappy. Resting, ...
    More Than A FeildingBy David Slack
    3 days ago
  • The bewildering world of Chris Luxon – Guns for all, not no lunch for kids
    .“$10 and a target that bleeds” - Bleeding Targets for Under $10!.Thanks for reading Frankly Speaking ! Subscribe for free to receive new posts and support my work.This government appears hell-bent on either scrapping life-saving legislation or reintroducing things that - frustrated critics insist - will be dangerous and likely ...
    Frankly SpeakingBy Frank Macskasy
    3 days ago
  • Expert Opinion: Ageing Boomers, Laurie & Les, Talk Politics.
    It hardly strikes me as fair to criticise a government for doing exactly what it said it was going to do. For actually keeping its promises.”THUNDER WAS PLAYING TAG with lightning flashes amongst the distant peaks. Its rolling cadences interrupted by the here-I-come-here-I-go Doppler effect of the occasional passing car. ...
    3 days ago
  • Manufacturing The Truth.
    Subversive & Disruptive Technologies: Just as happened with that other great regulator of the masses, the Medieval Church, the advent of a new and hard-to-control technology – the Internet –  is weakening the ties that bind. Then, and now, those who enjoy a monopoly on the dissemination of lies, cannot and will ...
    3 days ago
  • A Powerful Sensation of Déjà Vu.
    Been Here Before: To find the precedents for what this Coalition Government is proposing, it is necessary to return to the “glory days” of Muldoonism.THE COALITION GOVERNMENT has celebrated its first 100 days in office by checking-off the last of its listed commitments. It remains, however, an angry government. It ...
    3 days ago
  • Can you guess where world attention is focussed (according to Greenpeace)? It’s focussed on an EPA...
    Bob Edlin writes –  And what is the world watching today…? The email newsletter from Associated Press which landed in our mailbox early this morning advised: In the news today: The father of a school shooter has been found guilty of involuntary manslaughter; prosecutors in Trump’s hush-money case ...
    Point of OrderBy Bob Edlin
    3 days ago
  • Further integrity problems for the Greens in suspending MP Darleen Tana
    Bryce Edwards writes – Is another Green MP on their way out? And are the Greens severely tarnished by another integrity scandal? For the second time in three months, the Green Party has secretly suspended an MP over integrity issues. Mystery is surrounding the party’s decision to ...
    Point of OrderBy poonzteam5443
    3 days ago
  • Jacqui Van Der Kaay: Greens’ transparency missing in action
    For the last few years, the Green Party has been the party that has managed to avoid the plague of multiple scandals that have beleaguered other political parties. It appears that their luck has run out with a second scandal which, unfortunately for them, coincided with Golraz Ghahraman, the focus ...
    Democracy ProjectBy bryce.edwards
    4 days ago
  • Bernard’s Dawn Chorus with six newsey things at 6:46am for Saturday, March 16
    TL;DR: The six newsey things that stood out to me as of 6:46am on Saturday, March 16.Andy Foster has accidentally allowed a Labour/Green amendment to cut road user chargers for plug-in hybrid vehicles, which the Government might accept; NZ Herald Thomas Coughlan Simeon Brown has rejected a plea from Westport ...
    The KakaBy Bernard Hickey
    4 days ago
  • How Did FTX Crash?
    What seemed a booming success a couple of years ago has collapsed into fraud convictions.I looked at the crash of FTX (short for ‘Futures Exchange’) in November 2022 to see whether it would impact on the financial system as a whole. Fortunately there was barely a ripple, probably because it ...
    PunditBy Brian Easton
    4 days ago
  • Elections in Russia and Ukraine
    Anybody following the situation in Ukraine and Russia would probably have been amused by a recent Tweet on X NATO seems to be putting in an awful lot of effort to influence what is, at least according to them, a sham election in an autocracy.When do the Ukrainians go to ...
    4 days ago
  • Bernard’s six stack of substacks at 6pm on March 15
    TL;DR: Shaun Baker on Wynyard Quarter's transformation. Magdalene Taylor on the problem with smart phones. How private equity are now all over reinsurance. Dylan Cleaver on rugby and CTE. Emily Atkin on ‘Big Meat’ looking like ‘Big Oil’.Bernard’s six-stack of substacks at 6pm on March 15Photo by Jeppe Hove Jensen ...
    The KakaBy Bernard Hickey
    4 days ago
  • Buzz from the Beehive Finance Minister Nicola Willis had plenty to say when addressing the Auckland Business Chamber on the economic growth that (she tells us) is flagging more than we thought. But the government intends to put new life into it:  We want our country to be a ...
    Point of OrderBy Bob Edlin
    4 days ago
  • National’s clean car tax advances
    The Transport and Infrastructure Committee has reported back on the Road User Charges (Light Electric RUC Vehicles) Amendment Bill, basicly rubberstamping it. While there was widespread support among submitters for the principle that EV and PHEV drivers should pay their fair share for the roads, they also overwhelmingly disagreed with ...
    No Right TurnBy Idiot/Savant
    4 days ago
  • Government funding bailouts
    Peter Dunne writes – This week’s government bailout – the fifth in the last eighteen months – of the financially troubled Ruapehu Alpine Lifts company would have pleased many in the central North Island ski industry. The government’s stated rationale for the $7 million funding was that it ...
    Point of OrderBy poonzteam5443
    4 days ago
  • Two offenders, different treatments.
    See if you can spot the difference. An Iranian born female MP from a progressive party is accused of serial shoplifting. Her name is leaked to the media, which goes into a pack frenzy even before the Police launch an … Continue reading ...
    KiwipoliticoBy Pablo
    4 days ago
  • Treaty references omitted
    Ele Ludemann writes  – The government is omitting general Treaty references from legislation : The growth of Treaty of Waitangi clauses in legislation caused so much worry that a special oversight group was set up by the last Government in a bid to get greater coherence in the public service on Treaty ...
    Point of OrderBy poonzteam5443
    4 days ago
  • The Ghahraman Conflict
    What was that judge thinking? Peter Williams writes –  That Golriz Ghahraman and District Court Judge Maria Pecotic were once lawyer colleagues is incontrovertible. There is published evidence that they took at least one case to the Court of Appeal together. There was a report on ...
    Point of OrderBy poonzteam5443
    4 days ago
  • Bernard's Top 10 @ 10 'pick 'n' mix' for March 15
    TL;DR: My top 10 news and analysis links this morning include:Today’s must-read: Climate Scorpion – the sting is in the tail. Introducing planetary solvency. A paper via the University of Exeter’s Institute and Faculty of Actuaries.Local scoop: Kāinga Ora starts pulling out of its Auckland projects and selling land RNZ ...
    The KakaBy Bernard Hickey
    4 days ago
  • The day Wellington up-zoned its future
    Wellington’s massively upzoned District Plan adds the opportunity for tens of thousands of new homes not just in the central city (such as these Webb St new builds) but also close to the CBD and public transport links. Photo: Lynn Grieveson / The KākāTL;DR: Wellington gave itself the chance of ...
    The KakaBy Bernard Hickey
    4 days ago
  • Weekly Roundup 15-March-2024
    It’s Friday and we’re halfway through March Madness. Here’s some of the things that caught our attention this week. This Week in Greater Auckland On Monday Matt asked how we can get better event trains and an option for grade separating Morningside Dr. On Tuesday Matt looked into ...
    Greater AucklandBy Greater Auckland
    5 days ago
  • That Word.
    Something you might not know about me is that I’m quite a stubborn person. No, really. I don’t much care for criticism I think’s unfair or that I disagree with. Few of us do I suppose.Back when I was a drinker I’d sometimes respond defensively, even angrily. There are things ...
    Nick’s KōreroBy Nick Rockel
    5 days ago
  • The Hoon around the week to March 15
    Photo: Lynn Grieveson / The KākāTL;DR: The five things that mattered in Aotearoa’s political economy that we wrote and spoke about via The Kākā and elsewhere for paying subscribers in the last week included:PM Christopher Luxon said the reversal of interest deductibility for landlords was done to help renters, who ...
    The KakaBy Bernard Hickey
    5 days ago
  • Labour’s policy gap
    It was not so much the Labour Party but really the Chris Hipkins party yesterday at Labour’s caucus retreat in Martinborough. The former Prime Minister was more or less consistent on wealth tax, which he was at best equivocal about, and social insurance, which he was not willing to revisit. ...
    PolitikBy Richard Harman
    5 days ago
  • Skeptical Science New Research for Week #11 2024
    Open access notables A Glimpse into the Future: The 2023 Ocean Temperature and Sea Ice Extremes in the Context of Longer-Term Climate Change, Kuhlbrodt et al., Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society: In the year 2023, we have seen extraordinary extrema in high sea surface temperature (SST) in the North Atlantic and in ...
    5 days ago
  • Melissa remains mute on media matters but has something to say (at a sporting event) about economic ...
     Buzz from the Beehive   The text reproduced above appears on a page which records all the media statements and speeches posted on the government’s official website by Melissa Lee as Minister of Media and Communications and/or by Jenny Marcroft, her Parliamentary Under-secretary.  It can be quickly analysed ...
    Point of OrderBy Bob Edlin
    5 days ago
  • The return of Muldoon
    For forty years, Robert Muldoon has been a dirty word in our politics. His style of government was so repulsive and authoritarian that the backlash to it helped set and entrench our constitutional norms. His pig-headedness over forcing through Think Big eventually gave us the RMA, with its participation and ...
    No Right TurnBy Idiot/Savant
    5 days ago
  • Will the rental tax cut improve life for renters or landlords?
    Bryce Edwards writes –  Is the new government reducing tax on rental properties to benefit landlords or to cut the cost of rents? That’s the big question this week, after Associate Finance Minister David Seymour announced on Sunday that the Government would be reversing the Labour Government’s removal ...
    Point of OrderBy poonzteam5443
    5 days ago
  • Geoffrey Miller: What Saudi Arabia’s rapid changes mean for New Zealand
    Saudi Arabia is rarely far from the international spotlight. The war in Gaza has brought new scrutiny to Saudi plans to normalise relations with Israel, while the fifth anniversary of the controversial killing of Jamal Khashoggi was marked shortly before the war began on October 7. And as the home ...
    Democracy ProjectBy Geoffrey Miller
    5 days ago
  • Racism’s double standards
    Questions need to be asked on both sides of the world Peter Williams writes –   The NRL Judiciary hands down an eight week suspension to Sydney Roosters forward Spencer Leniu , an Auckland-born Samoan, after he calls Ezra Mam, Sydney-orn but of Aboriginal and Torres Strait ...
    Point of OrderBy poonzteam5443
    5 days ago
  • It’s not a tax break
    Ele Ludemann writes – Contrary to what many headlines and news stories are saying, residential landlords are not getting a tax break. The government is simply restoring to them the tax deductibility of interest they had until the previous government removed it. There is no logical reason ...
    Point of OrderBy poonzteam5443
    5 days ago
  • The Plastic Pig Collective and Chris' Imaginary Friends.
    I can't remember when it was goodMoments of happiness in bloomMaybe I just misunderstoodAll of the love we left behindWatching our flashbacks intertwineMemories I will never findIn spite of whatever you becomeForget that reckless thing turned onI think our lives have just begunI think our lives have just begunDoes anyone ...
    Nick’s KōreroBy Nick Rockel
    5 days ago
  • Who is responsible for young offenders?
    Michael Bassett writes – At first reading, a front-page story in the New Zealand Herald on 13 March was bizarre. A group of severely intellectually limited teenagers, with little understanding of the law, have been pleading to the Justice Select Committee not to pass a bill dealing with ram ...
    Point of OrderBy poonzteam5443
    5 days ago
  • Gordon Campbell on National’s fantasy trip to La La Landlord Land
    How much political capital is Christopher Luxon willing to burn through in order to deliver his $2.9 billion gift to landlords? Evidently, Luxon is: (a) unable to cost the policy accurately. As Anna Burns-Francis pointed out to him on Breakfast TV, the original ”rock solid” $2.1 billion cost he was ...
    5 days ago
  • Bernard's Top 10 @ 10 'pick 'n' mix' for March 14
    TL;DR: My top 10 news and analysis links this morning include:Today’s must-read: Jonathon Porritt calling bullshit in his own blog post on mainstream climate science as ‘The New Denialism’.Local scoop: The Wellington City Council’s list of proposed changes to the IHP recommendations to be debated later today was leaked this ...
    The KakaBy Bernard Hickey
    5 days ago
  • No, Prime Minister, rents don’t rise or fall with landlords’ costs
    TL;DR: Prime Minister Christopher Luxon said yesterday tenants should be grateful for the reinstatement of interest deductibility because landlords would pass on their lower tax costs in the form of lower rents. That would be true if landlords were regulated monopolies such as Transpower or Auckland Airport1, but they’re not, ...
    The KakaBy Bernard Hickey
    5 days ago
  • Cartoons: ‘At least I didn’t make things awkward’
    This is a re-post from Yale Climate Connections by Tom Toro Tom Toro is a cartoonist and author. He has published over 200 cartoons in The New Yorker since 2010. His cartoons appear in Playboy, the Paris Review, the New York Times, American Bystander, and elsewhere. Related: What 10 EV lovers ...
    6 days ago
  • Solving traffic congestion with Richard Prebble
    The business section of the NZ Herald is full of opinion. Among the more opinionated of all is the ex-Minister of Transport, ex-Minister of Railways, ex MP for Auckland Central (1975-93, Labour), Wellington Central (1996-99, ACT, then list-2005), ex-leader of the ACT Party, uncle to actor Antonia, the veritable granddaddy ...
    Greater AucklandBy Patrick Reynolds
    6 days ago
  • I Think I'm Done Flying Boeing
    Hi,Just quickly — I’m blown away by the stories you’ve shared with me over the last week since I put out the ‘Gary’ podcast, where I told you about the time my friend’s flatmate killed the neighbour.And you keep telling me stories — in the comments section, and in my ...
    David FarrierBy David Farrier
    6 days ago
  • Invoking Aristotle: Of Rings of Power, Stones, and Ships
    The first season of Rings of Power was not awful. It was thoroughly underwhelming, yes, and left a lingering sense of disappointment, but it was more expensive mediocrity than catastrophe. I wrote at length about the series as it came out (see the Review section of the blog, and go ...
    6 days ago
  • Van Velden brings free-market approach to changing labour laws – but her colleagues stick to distr...
    Buzz from the Beehive Workplace Relations and Safety Minister Brooke van Velden told Auckland Business Chamber members they were the first audience to hear her priorities as a minister in a government committed to cutting red tape and regulations. She brandished her liberalising credentials, saying Flexible labour markets are the ...
    Point of OrderBy Bob Edlin
    6 days ago
  • Why Newshub failed
    Chris Trotter writes – TO UNDERSTAND WHY NEWSHUB FAILED, it is necessary to understand how TVNZ changed. Up until 1989, the state broadcaster had been funded by a broadcasting licence fee, collected from every citizen in possession of a television set, supplemented by a relatively modest (compared ...
    Point of OrderBy poonzteam5443
    6 days ago
  • Māori Party on the warpath against landlords and seabed miners – let’s see if mystical creature...
    Bob Edlin writes  –  The Māori Party has been busy issuing a mix of warnings and threats as its expresses its opposition to interest deductibility for landlords and the plans of seabed miners. It remains to be seen whether they  follow the example of indigenous litigants in Australia, ...
    Point of OrderBy Bob Edlin
    6 days ago

  • Government moves to quickly ratify the NZ-EU FTA
    "The Government is moving quickly to realise an additional $46 million in tariff savings in the EU market this season for Kiwi exporters,” Minister for Trade and Agriculture, Todd McClay says. Parliament is set, this week, to complete the final legislative processes required to bring the New Zealand – European ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 hours ago
  • Positive progress for social worker workforce
    New Zealand’s social workers are qualified, experienced, and more representative of the communities they serve, Social Development and Employment Minister Louise Upston says. “I want to acknowledge and applaud New Zealand’s social workers for the hard work they do, providing invaluable support for our most vulnerable. “To coincide with World ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    8 hours ago
  • Minister confirms reduced RUC rate for PHEVs
    Cabinet has agreed to a reduced road user charge (RUC) rate for plug-in hybrid electric vehicles (PHEVs), Transport Minister Simeon Brown says. Owners of PHEVs will be eligible for a reduced rate of $38 per 1,000km once all light electric vehicles (EVs) move into the RUC system from 1 April.  ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    10 hours ago
  • Trade access to overseas markets creates jobs
    Minister of Agriculture and Trade, Todd McClay, says that today’s opening of Riverland Foods manufacturing plant in Christchurch is a great example of how trade access to overseas markets creates jobs in New Zealand.  Speaking at the official opening of this state-of-the-art pet food factory the Minister noted that exports ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    11 hours ago
  • NZ and Chinese Foreign Ministers hold official talks
    Minister of Foreign Affairs Winston Peters met with Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi in Wellington today. “It was a pleasure to host Foreign Minister Wang Yi during his first official visit to New Zealand since 2017. Our discussions were wide-ranging and enabled engagement on many facets of New Zealand’s relationship with China, including trade, ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 day ago
  • Kāinga Ora instructed to end Sustaining Tenancies
    Kāinga Ora – Homes & Communities has been instructed to end the Sustaining Tenancies Framework and take stronger measures against persistent antisocial behaviour by tenants, says Housing Minister Chris Bishop. “Earlier today Finance Minister Nicola Willis and I sent an interim Letter of Expectations to the Board of Kāinga Ora. ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 day ago
  • Speech to Auckland Business Chamber: Growth is the answer
    Tēna koutou katoa. Greetings everyone. Thank you to the Auckland Chamber of Commerce and the Honourable Simon Bridges for hosting this address today. I acknowledge the business leaders in this room, the leaders and governors, the employers, the entrepreneurs, the investors, and the wealth creators. The coalition Government shares your ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 days ago
  • Singapore rounds out regional trip
    Minister Winston Peters completed the final leg of his visit to South and South East Asia in Singapore today, where he focused on enhancing one of New Zealand’s indispensable strategic partnerships.      “Singapore is our most important defence partner in South East Asia, our fourth-largest trading partner and a ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    4 days ago
  • Minister van Velden represents New Zealand at International Democracy Summit
    Minister of Internal Affairs and Workplace Relations and Safety, Hon. Brooke van Velden, will travel to the Republic of Korea to represent New Zealand at the Third Summit for Democracy on 18 March. The summit, hosted by the Republic of Korea, was first convened by the United States in 2021, ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    4 days ago
  • Insurance Council of NZ Speech, 7 March 2024, Auckland
    ICNZ Speech 7 March 2024, Auckland  Acknowledgements and opening  Mōrena, ngā mihi nui. Ko Andrew Bayly aho, Nor Whanganui aho.  Good morning, it’s a privilege to be here to open the ICNZ annual conference, thank you to Mark for the Mihi Whakatau  My thanks to Tim Grafton for inviting me ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    4 days ago
  • Five-year anniversary of Christchurch terror attacks
    Prime Minister Christopher Luxon and Lead Coordination Minister Judith Collins have expressed their deepest sympathy on the five-year anniversary of the Christchurch terror attacks. “March 15, 2019, was a day when families, communities and the country came together both in sorrow and solidarity,” Mr Luxon says.  “Today we pay our respects to the 51 shuhada ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    4 days ago
  • Speech for Financial Advice NZ Conference 5 March 2024
    Speech for Financial Advice NZ Conference 5 March 2024  Acknowledgements and opening  Morena, Nga Mihi Nui.  Ko Andrew Bayly aho, Nor Whanganui aho. Thanks Nate for your Mihi Whakatau  Good morning. It’s a pleasure to formally open your conference this morning. What a lovely day in Wellington, What a great ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    4 days ago
  • Early visit to Indonesia strengthens ties
    Foreign Minister Winston Peters held discussions in Jakarta today about the future of relations between New Zealand and South East Asia’s most populous country.   “We are in Jakarta so early in our new government’s term to reflect the huge importance we place on our relationship with Indonesia and South ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    5 days ago
  • China Foreign Minister to visit
    Deputy Prime Minister and Minister of Foreign Affairs Winston Peters has announced that the Foreign Minister of China, Wang Yi, will visit New Zealand next week.  “We look forward to re-engaging with Foreign Minister Wang Yi and discussing the full breadth of the bilateral relationship, which is one of New Zealand’s ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    5 days ago
  • Minister opens new Auckland Rail Operations Centre
    Transport Minister Simeon Brown has today opened the new Auckland Rail Operations Centre, which will bring together KiwiRail, Auckland Transport, and Auckland One Rail to improve service reliability for Aucklanders. “The recent train disruptions in Auckland have highlighted how important it is KiwiRail and Auckland’s rail agencies work together to ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    5 days ago
  • Celebrating 10 years of Crankworx Rotorua
    The Government is proud to support the 10th edition of Crankworx Rotorua as the Crankworx World Tour returns to Rotorua from 16-24 March 2024, says Minister for Economic Development Melissa Lee.  “Over the past 10 years as Crankworx Rotorua has grown, so too have the economic and social benefits that ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    5 days ago
  • Government delivering on tax commitments
    Legislation implementing coalition Government tax commitments and addressing long-standing tax anomalies will be progressed in Parliament next week, Finance Minister Nicola Willis says. The legislation is contained in an Amendment Paper to the Taxation (Annual Rates for 2023–24, Multinational Tax, and Remedial Matters) Bill issued today.  “The Amendment Paper represents ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    5 days ago
  • Significant Natural Areas requirement to be suspended
    Associate Environment Minister Andrew Hoggard has today announced that the Government has agreed to suspend the requirement for councils to comply with the Significant Natural Areas (SNA) provisions of the National Policy Statement for Indigenous Biodiversity for three years, while it replaces the Resource Management Act (RMA).“As it stands, SNAs ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    5 days ago
  • Government classifies drought conditions in Top of the South as medium-scale adverse event
    Agriculture Minister Todd McClay has classified the drought conditions in the Marlborough, Tasman, and Nelson districts as a medium-scale adverse event, acknowledging the challenging conditions facing farmers and growers in the district. “Parts of Marlborough, Tasman, and Nelson districts are in the grip of an intense dry spell. I know ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    5 days ago
  • Government partnership to tackle $332m facial eczema problem
    The Government is helping farmers eradicate the significant impact of facial eczema (FE) in pastoral animals, Agriculture Minister Todd McClay announced.  “A $20 million partnership jointly funded by Beef + Lamb NZ, the Government, and the primary sector will save farmers an estimated NZD$332 million per year, and aims to ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    5 days ago
  • NZ, India chart path to enhanced relationship
    Foreign Minister Winston Peters has completed a successful visit to India, saying it was an important step in taking the relationship between the two countries to the next level.   “We have laid a strong foundation for the Coalition Government’s priority of enhancing New Zealand-India relations to generate significant future benefit for both countries,” says Mr Peters, ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    6 days ago
  • Ruapehu Alpine Lifts bailout the last, say Ministers
    Cabinet has agreed to provide $7 million to ensure the 2024 ski season can go ahead on the Whakapapa ski field in the central North Island but has told the operator Ruapehu Alpine Lifts it is the last financial support it will receive from taxpayers. Cabinet also agreed to provide ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    6 days ago
  • Govt takes action to drive better cancer services
    Health Minister Dr Shane Reti says the launch of a new mobile breast screening unit in Counties Manukau reinforces the coalition Government’s commitment to drive better cancer services for all New Zealanders. Speaking at the launch of the new mobile clinic, Dr Reti says it’s a great example of taking ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    6 days ago
  • Govt takes action to drive better cancer services
    Health Minister Dr Shane Reti says the launch of a new mobile breast screening unit in Counties Manukau reinforces the coalition Government’s commitment to drive better cancer services for all New Zealanders. Speaking at the launch of the new mobile clinic, Dr Reti says it’s a great example of taking ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    6 days ago
  • Work begins on SH29 upgrades near Tauriko
    Unlocking economic growth and land for housing are critical elements of the Government’s plan for our transport network, and planned upgrades to State Highway 29 (SH29) near Tauriko will deliver strongly on those priorities, Transport Minister Simeon Brown says. “The SH29 upgrades near Tauriko will improve safety at the intersections ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    6 days ago
  • Work begins on SH29 upgrades near Tauriko
    Unlocking economic growth and land for housing are critical elements of the Government’s plan for our transport network, and planned upgrades to State Highway 29 (SH29) near Tauriko will deliver strongly on those priorities, Transport Minister Simeon Brown says. “The SH29 upgrades near Tauriko will improve safety at the intersections ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    6 days ago
  • Fresh produce price drop welcome
    Lower fruit and vegetable prices are welcome news for New Zealanders who have been doing it tough at the supermarket, Finance Minister Nicola Willis says. Stats NZ reported today the price of fruit and vegetables has dropped 9.3 percent in the 12 months to February 2024.  “Lower fruit and vege ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    6 days ago
  • Statement to the 68th United Nations Commission on the Status of Women
    Tēnā koutou katoa and greetings to you all.  Chair, I am honoured to address the sixty-eighth session of the Commission on the Status of Women. I acknowledge the many crises impacting the rights of women and girls. Heightened global tensions, war, climate related and humanitarian disasters, and price inflation all ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    6 days ago
  • Speech to the 68th United Nations Commission on the Status of Women (CSW68)
    Tēnā koutou katoa and greetings to you all.  Chair, I am honoured to address the 68th session of the Commission on the Status of Women. I acknowledge the many crises impacting the rights of women and girls. Heightened global tensions, war, climate related and humanitarian disasters, and price inflation all ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    6 days ago
  • Government backs rural led catchment projects
    The coalition Government is supporting farmers to enhance land management practices by investing $3.3 million in locally led catchment groups, Agriculture Minister Todd McClay announced. “Farmers and growers deliver significant prosperity for New Zealand and it’s vital their ongoing efforts to improve land management practices and water quality are supported,” ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    6 days ago
  • Speech to Auckland Business Chamber
    Good evening everyone and thank you for that lovely introduction.   Thank you also to the Honourable Simon Bridges for the invitation to address your members. Since being sworn in, this coalition Government has hit the ground running with our 100-day plan, delivering the changes that New Zealanders expect of us. ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • Commission’s advice on ETS settings tabled
    Recommendations from the Climate Change Commission for New Zealand on the Emissions Trading Scheme (ETS) auction and unit limit settings for the next five years have been tabled in Parliament, Climate Change Minister Simon Watts says. “The Commission provides advice on the ETS annually. This is the third time the ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • Government lowering building costs
    The coalition Government is beginning its fight to lower building costs and reduce red tape by exempting minor building work from paying the building levy, says Building and Construction Minister Chris Penk. “Currently, any building project worth $20,444 including GST or more is subject to the building levy which is ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • Trustee tax change welcomed
    Proposed changes to tax legislation to prevent the over-taxation of low-earning trusts are welcome, Finance Minister Nicola Willis says. The changes have been recommended by Parliament’s Finance and Expenditure Committee following consideration of submissions on the Taxation (Annual Rates for 2023–24, Multinational Tax, and Remedial Matters) Bill. “One of the ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • Minister’s Ramadan message
    Assalaamu alaikum. السَّلَام عليكم In light of the holy month of Ramadan, I want to extend my warmest wishes to our Muslim community in New Zealand. Ramadan is a time for spiritual reflection, renewed devotion, perseverance, generosity, and forgiveness.  It’s a time to strengthen our bonds and appreciate the diversity ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • Minister appoints new NZTA Chair
    Former Transport Minister and CEO of the Auckland Business Chamber Hon Simon Bridges has been appointed as the new Board Chair of the New Zealand Transport Agency (NZTA) for a three-year term, Transport Minister Simeon Brown announced today. “Simon brings extensive experience and knowledge in transport policy and governance to the role. He will ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • Speech to Life Sciences Summit
    Good morning all, it is a pleasure to be here as Minister of Science, Innovation and Technology.  It is fantastic to see how connected and collaborative the life science and biotechnology industry is here in New Zealand. I would like to thank BioTechNZ and NZTech for the invitation to address ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • Progress continues apace on water storage
    Regional Development Minister Shane Jones says he is looking forward to the day when three key water projects in Northland are up and running, unlocking the full potential of land in the region. Mr Jones attended a community event at the site of the Otawere reservoir near Kerikeri on Friday. ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • Government agrees to restore interest deductions
    Associate Finance Minister David Seymour has today announced that the Government has agreed to restore deductibility for mortgage interest on residential investment properties. “Help is on the way for landlords and renters alike. The Government’s restoration of interest deductibility will ease pressure on rents and simplify the tax code,” says ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • Minister to attend World Anti-Doping Agency Symposium
    Sport and Recreation Minister Chris Bishop will travel to Switzerland today to attend an Executive Committee meeting and Symposium of the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA). Mr Bishop will then travel on to London where he will attend a series of meetings in his capacity as Infrastructure Minister. “New Zealanders believe ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago

Page generated in The Standard by Wordpress at 2024-03-19T07:33:28+00:00