Thought I'd get in before the Open Mike adopts its new norm of debate pattern…
Have been walking with a group of mostly rural women and overheard the leading group of three discuss politics. Luxon was described as not up to it and I think the field is open for some headway to be made among rural women who are a bit more centrist than Groundswell-oriented right wingers.
Some of these walkers are not well-informed and have social media and mass media driven misinformation for example about why nurses are emigrating and to what jobs, and the effect of minimum and family wage increases upon the cost of living.
Another told me she hated paradise ducks and believed that they were imported by early colonialists.
Very fit, older women, great walkers and talkers but not open to challenge; so as a new man in the group but known already to be of the Left through my previous public persona I will bite my tongue and wait for inclusion.
Interesting to get those views, though, and also to be receiving the local MPs newsletters which are also a window into the world of the Right.
The latest offering # 95 dismisses Labour's achievements over five years as bumper sticker policies, whereas National's education and electricity reforms will be world beaters.
And they are in big numbers, now in European times, because as herbivores with a taste for seed and grain their native habitat was hugely increased by open field farming. Where I am sitting now I see flocks of starlings in hundreds which fed on the ripening oat crop on the other side of the river, upon the leavings after harvest along with ducks, gulls and now sheep, and then fly off a hundred metres to dine on grapes. I have seen two paradise ducks here to raise a brood of eleven which they proudly paraded past my patio last season, but hundreds of starlings swirling in flocked flight.
Yes, the Paradise Shellducks are very good parents. The ones I know usually fledge as many as they hatch as the male is very aggressive. The main predators of the ducklings are big eels, but if the parents don't put the little ones in the water too early, they tend to be OK.
"Nothing like listening to joe/jill public to make you realize how unengaged and/or thick a lot of them are."
And the task is to persuade enough of them to return a good government in five months time by being educated and reminded enough to see through the miasma of misinformation, the whinging, the lies and the greed.
bwaghorn – As I’ve got older, I’ve come to the conclusion that people who see things differently than how I see things, doesn’t make them thick.
Looking back, when I was 18, I was at “peak intelligence” I knew absolutely everything and I was totally awesome. Then over the years my 6 pack turned into a keg, and I slowly realised that I didn’t know that much at all.
What I do have now is life experience, so what have I’ve learned? That people who believe that they have the answers are generally a walking talking example of Dunning-Kruger. They themselves have no idea how stupid they are, and they inflict their stupidity on others.
When you hear people regurgitate half arsed talking points and blindly belive mistruths, that's thick , having different opinions is is not,
Although one would think that once the written word,and science came into life we would easily be following the what worked best last time this happened method, Of government
That is why I think Labour needs to look at the degree of difficulty on some of its policy statements.
My view is that they may be pitched to an expectation of the general public having more ability to assimilate information and tease out the issues than they really have.
"When you hear people regurgitate half arsed talking points and blindly belive mistruths"
everyone whether they are left, right , center or non aligned does this though… The left , center and right constantly quote half truthes to back up their prejudices.
All Individuals in the general public will believe something that is bullshit and and untrue.
What is concerning is seeing people on the left increasingly unwilling to engage and win over people who believe some shit the left doesn't believe in, because the right is damn well willing to engage and win over people who disagree with them.
They may disagree with the left on how to do it, but Most kiwis don't want austerity, most kiwis want housing to be a human right and want far,far,far far more houses built, most kiwis believe in a minimum gauranteed standard of living, want better transport, far better healthcare and wanna eradicate poverty..
Its crazy that the left fail so often, to focus on engaging with the public on the things the majority agree with us on and instead we focus more on what we disagree with the public on.
Often it seems that the left want to write issues off and they do this by saying that person is alt right or right wing or a Nazi. And for those people on the left who do this, then its game over for that idea, belief, person etc etc. frankly its weak.
Good people Mac1 and good women as I am sure you know. They have their urban counterparts but neither have had the opportunity to hear the other side of the argument. When they do, it does not mean they change their loyalty but rather they have a better understanding of how others are faring and feeling. That is a good start.
Over the years I have had more friendships with women who come from 'the other side' than I have on my own side. When it comes to friendship, politics does not loom large.
So many political pundits saying Jacinda didn’t achieve much on promised policies. I know we’re not supposed to use the Covid word as an excuse anymore. However when the entire government, including the civil service, is consumed for the best part of 3 years dealing with the pandemic, how was the PM supposed to deliver other policies?
And yet, listen to Ardern's valedictory from Wednesday and she enumerated some of her achievements. Policies and positive social action was taken by her government.
For example, around our Grey Power table we mention winter warmth payments, a big rise in Super. We drive with a reduction in fuel taxes. We receive free vaccines and boosters, prescription subsidies, cheaper travel.
Thanks, Anker. There are opportunities for us to get out of our bubbles. For me Grey Power, walking groups, public meetings of all sorts, health support groups, Friday night sessions over a good Imperial Stout, as tonight hopefully will be….
I would be interested in the discussion as to why nurses are emigrating and to what jobs – my feeling is that some is normal wanting to see more of the world; for some wage comparisons are not particularly important, for others they will not allow for the need for medical insurance, or for many service costs being higher due to those higher basic salaries.
Regarding Labour's achievements, it would be good to have more than bumper stickers so that we can give a convincing argument about the real substance of those achievements – there was a good chart illustrating the ''leading the world'' performance in keeping deaths due to Covid lower than anywhere else; but there does not seem to be a repository of such convincing material in a form that can be included in social media or an email.
Nurses are just a subset of the workforce which turns over with the natural occurrences such as overseas experience, as you point out. They leave for pay, conditions and career opportunities.
But we are also suffering from the government not reacting quickly enough to immigration settings. And it was warned.
As for "illustrating the ''leading the world'' performance in keeping deaths due to Covid lower than anywhere else", you might need to think again. In deaths per capita, we sit at 820, which 111th highest in the world out of 229, and are just shy of the world dpc of 877.
[I’ve asked you 2 days ago to provide the URLs and use blockquotes (see Mod note here: https://thestandard.org.nz/go-well-jacinda-2/#comment-1943828). Two of the four embedded hyperlinks in your comment are actually direct quoted text but they are without quote marks. You replied with “Got it, thanks. Apologies.” (https://thestandard.org.nz/go-well-jacinda-2/#comment-1943895). I don’t like having to waste my time and having to ask multiple times. If you say “YES” but mean “NO” then I won’t trust you because I cannot take you on your word here. Do you understand what this means for you? – Incognito]
Blockquotes do start with a rather large quote mark that is very easy to spot:
This is what a blockquote looks like.
Blockquotes start on a new line and add an extra empty line (white space) at the end, which makes them even more distinguishable from the (other) commentary.
Alternatively, you add the quotation marks yourself at the start and end of the quoted text, for example, “this is what a blockquote looks like”.
Embedded links are best for single or combined words, e.g., in Wikipedia when full links would break up the flow of text too much.
Italics (or bold) are good for emphasis of single or a few words, not for highlighting a whole string or block of text.
Other commenters manage without problem.
You did not query this 2 days ago and agreed and apologised – can I take you on your word or not?
Please stick with the programme and stop wasting my time – I’ve been patient with you.
I'm trying to follow, but there are multiple other posts here that are not done in the way you describe, including this one from Peter below https://thestandard.org.nz/open-mike-07-04-2023/#comment-1944185. I have also posted using this same format (as have others) for a long time, so why the inconsistency?
“Frustrated New Zealand-trained migrant nurses are planning to leave the country because they cannot find an immediate path to residency, just as the government tries to entice foreigners to fill thousands of jobs in hospitals, aged care and clinics.”
For someone who’s of above-average intelligence and capability (based on your extensive track record here and all the info you’ve provided about your activities elsewhere), you seem rather obnoxious following a simple and clear request.
You’ re also arguing with a Mod about someone else, which is begging for self-martyrdom, as is clearly described in this site’s Policy (https://thestandard.org.nz/policy/#banning).
Peter followed what I described: he used manual quotation marks at the start and end of the quoted sentence and even put it as a separate alinea. No embedded link, italics, or change in font colour.
He also provided the full URL starting with “https:// …”. It is an awful title and URL, but that’s on Shayne Currie and NZ Herald.
Peter’s comment did not need modding, but you seem to think that you know better – you don’t and you were not merely asking.
I’ve reached the end of the line on this with you.
I don't have too much sympathy for Garner, after all the station ratings were shite. However, from the outside looking in, the process does seem to have been particularly brutal. There are ways of handling these situations that give the people affected (and I'm talking specifically about people who are not highly paid media 'personalities') more dignity and space to process what is happening.
Mmmm. They only 'lost their jobs in front of the country, live' – because they didn't respect the employment process (a meeting scheduled for midday) – and chose to release this information 'live', earlier.
At that stage there were, I'm sure, staff who didn't know. Garner and Tova O'Brien removed their opportunity to have this information conveyed to them in a way which was 'fair, reasonable, and dignified' (good faith is a totally separate issue)
I understand and accept that they were hurt and distressed by the situation. But they also acted unprofessionally.
It did feel like the Smiling Assassin meeting the Wolf of Wall Street meeting the Apprentice, very cutthroat old school. Behind the scenes, reputations need to be upheld.
How do they expect women to answer the call to get vaccinated before giving birth to protect their baby when NZR keeps exhorting 'pregnant people' to get their jab before giving birth? I am sick of these ridiculous pronouns that cancel women. even the newsreader on the 11am news hesitated before saying it for the second time. Sorry not up yet so can’t link.
Amazing how we got through the entirety of "Blue September" (Prostate Awareness Month) without a single man being referred to as a prostate owner, a testicle bearer, a penis person or an ejaculator.
Just shows that this is all about erasing women for the benefit of gender ideology.
SPC – As a card carrying “bloke” I can assure you that no man would dream of wanting to give birth. From what I’ve been told, it’s an extremely painful process, and to top it off being pregnant is extremely uncomfortable and you’re not allowed to drink for nine months.
In fact the only time that 'trans men" seem to hit the headlines is when they do that most female of all things and give birth. Somehow that "gender dysphoria" does not seem to apply.
My youngest niece has managed to get off side with a clique at her work. She’s pregnant, & she’s been called a pregnant person, and she’s replied that she’s a pregnant woman!
She was called into a meeting with her manager (male) and told that she’s making some people (a transgender women and her 4 or 5 trans allies, all gay or bisexual men by the way) feel unsafe. For the following reasons; she’s 25 & married (so too conservative for her age), pregnant with 4th child (this makes a transgender woman at her work feel uncomfortable), has had a baby shower with the gender of the baby revealed (offensive to transgender women), she’s a European woman married to an Asian man (So she’s taking advantage of a person of colour).
Her manager pointed out that it’s all BS, however he’s obligated to have the discussion with her. The workplace has the Rainbow Tick so he’s basically covering his butt.
Goodness. I do hope she's documenting all of this. Sounds like a PG case for workplace bullying, if it continues. None of the elements revealed have anything to do with her work or workplace – they're her private business (marital status, pregnancy, number/sex of children, race of SO – all prohibited grounds for discrimination)
I'd also be cautious about the meeting with the manager. If it is recorded that she's had a 'counselling' meeting – that goes on her HR record. And, if/when the manager leaves, and a one less in contact with the real world arrives, it could be used against her.
I'd follow up with the union (if she's a member) – and get them to help her draft an email to the manager – basically saying: Thanks for the meeting. At which we agreed that ….. (all the above points), have nothing to do with my work or performance; and that any complaints made about them, have been proven to be groundless.
Does anyone else find it …. ironic…. that the woman is being mis-gendered: her preferred group noun is "women", rather than "people" – with the qualifying adjective 'pregnant' indicating her current gestational status.
If someone tells me their preferred pronoun is ‘her’ – I would be downright rude to refer to her as ‘them’ – just because that’s my preferred pronoun.
I'd also be cautious about the meeting with the manager. If it is recorded that she's had a 'counselling' meeting – that goes on her HR record. And, if/when the manager leaves, and a one less in contact with the real world arrives, it could be used against her.
That kind of thing is not uncommon. I had it happen to me years ago.
Two former senior public servants approached me with a serious allegation. I made it clear to them it was false and since nothing further happened I thought it was the end of the matter. But further down the track – and after a prolonged period of bullying, intimidation and other disturbing incidents – I was to discover the allegation had been placed on record and never rescinded. It ended up causing me a huge amount of trouble and distress.
I later learned a jealous acquaintance (a woman) had made the allegation and the recipients chose to accept it without any attempt to seek verification. My word was apparently not regarded as good enough.
join a union that supports women's sex based rights (Free Speech Union probably)
find a GC lawyer
join or contact Speak Up For Women, they've got experience now with legal issues.
None of the above mean having to take action now, they're insurance. Her boss might be covering his butt, and if push comes to shove he's not going to side with her.
Yeah she is a member of the union, and I believe that she’s casually mentioned that her Dad & older sister are lawyers.
I think this is just one clique defending their turf so to speak. My niece and tall, slim, educated, elegant, private school educated (I’m from the poor side of family), she’s always been very independent and strong willed. So others are drawn to her. I think she has often been excluded from the popular clique, but she’s always developed her own clique, which can be threatening to those with low emotional intelligence.
But she’s working for a bank, well paid, looked after. So definitely doesn’t want to leave.
The only thing I would add to Weka's advice is for her to always have a support person if she's called to a meeting, and to ensure any future meetings are documented. Also, you say that she doesn't want to leave. I get that, but I have seen this scenario play out and there is a good chance her colleagues could make things very unpleasant for her. In that situation, unless she is extremely resilient and thick skinned, it can be better for a person's health just to walk away.
Start with a time lines then flesh this out with copies of emails, texts, updates on group conversations. Keep off site ie not on main bank server/keep copy printed out in locked private drawer.
This is a ghastly sounding case and I may be wrong but I thought there were special provisions about not denigrating a woman because of pregnancy.
Yes thanks Molly….I used to have all this stuff at my finger tips.
When I was working if you made a big P of your self about another's pregnancy and more or less the door was waiting, after a process. When Maternity leave first came in we had a spate of grumpy males thinking that women had just got an advantage…..
You know an advantage to go along with the mostly lower salary starting rates, lower rates all round because of broken service,…….etc etc.
How can a natural process make people feel uncomfortable. It is not as if a pregnancy can be left at the lift door and picked up after leaving work.
There is so much more, loss of good soil land for housing and the NACT Labour agreement to allow urban area development free for all (and end earlier focus on transport spine development – real urban planning).
And lest we forget, the old pre Super City Auckland had plans to prevent building in areas recently flooded …
The woke give Sean Plunket a good hating. In my opinion after reading this article, their cause may have been better served by keeping their gobs shut.(?)
One thing that really worries me about the Trans movement is their possible influence on impressionable youngesters – kids trying to find their way in life, who are having trouble fitting in, who are looking for answers.
The chap in this clip became trans after listening to a podcast and finding enlightenment- he was really a woman. He had that affirmed by all those close to him. Yet under questioning by the speaker his tenuous arguments as to why he's a woman fell apart and he reverted to that great woke talisman of protection, he was feeling unsafe.
The clip unfortunately has Conservative commentary. Sorry about that. Just skip along to different parts.
More bad journalism in my opinion. It went way off track into Maori Trans feeling unsafe with the type of rhetoric Sean was spouting, to colonialism, you name it. There was little focus on the topic.
One person interviewed said he was instrumental ( complained to Twitter) with getting Plunket banned from Twitter. Sean has now been reinstated. Maybe that was one reason to delete the article?
The link is to a talk that a right wing speaker Matt Walsh gave.
I linked to the extract when a trans medic was not able to answer of what they would do, EMT wise, when confronted with a man who said they were having a miscarriage.
This link is to the concluding parts of the speech he gave
Matt Walsh
There were a number of trans people in the audience tonight and I ended my speech speaking directly to them. The truth is that I’m actually trying to help these people, unlike all of those who “affirm” them
I have commented before that quite bit of the thoughtful work on the trans debate/ideology seems to be coming from the right.
I hope these links are clickable to the actual parts of the speech.
ETA I am coming to the thought that what the trans lobby is doing is actually cruel to the well meaning individuals who spoke. Rather than saying men can be women, ie changing biological sex which is impossible, the call could be better made as an acceptance of the gender that a person wants to be identified as.
The need would then move to accepting people as they want to present themselves rather than trying to force a biological impossibility on the population.
The thing about Matt Walsh is that he speaks simple truth. He appeared on an episode of Dr Phil, and was by far the most coherent voice. This link is to the full video to provide context. The salient exchanges are from 12:30, where Matt debates the definition of woman.
Thanks I have watched the whole speech. He is a great speaker.
I did hesitate to put the link to the trans medic up as it was from a RW commentator. I started putting the links up yesterday including a couple from an, also RW group, called Gays against Grooming.
MW also is an anti-feminist patriarch who wants to roll back women's rights. Who are you trying to convince here? Because progressives will have a hard time believing him once they know who he is (despite his videos being good at explaining the issues).
Matt Walsh has views I don't agree with. Posie Parker has views I don't agree with. There are many people who have views we may not agree with, but speak powerfully into certain issues. I just happen to believe that on this issue, he nails it.
sure, but you're rw, yeah? From the left and for feminists, it's not a matter of 'disagreeing with' him, it's the fact that he actively is seeking to remove womens rights.
I mean, I get it, I was going to write a post with that video in it, but I'd have to spend 600 words pointing out how much of an arsehole he is to women and what that means in the sex/gender wars.
Very annoying that the video does such a good job of showing the issues.
The problem that weka does not want to say out loud is simple and obvious. In very simple terms left wing feminism spent decades telling us that gender roles do not matter and women can do anything men do if they want to.
Then came along the trans crowd who bizarrely insist that biological sex does not matter and men can be women if they want to. Similar logic, just the consequences are reflected back onto women in a way they quite reasonably do not like.
Of course social conservatives never really agreed with either proposition, and that they are the firmest and clearest opponents of trans ideology is only to be expected. That feminists find this very annoying is also very predictable.
Well it turned out that when women obtained access to any traditional male role they liked, it was the largely high status professional, political or physically undemanding roles they had in mind. Dirty, dangerous and unpleasant jobs undertaken in all weathers – like sewerage maintenance for example – were not what they chose at all. Turned out the traditional, patriarchal oppressive male gender roles were not always as wonderful as they were made out to be.
But that is a small matter. More interesting was the idea that males and females were – other than the bare biological essentials – interchangeable in their gender roles as parents, and if women could do anything men could, then logically fatherhood could be generally regarded as optional, or dispensed with altogether.
For most people sex is essentially a private matter, marriage being a public institution intended to protect families – and at root is a social contract between a biological man and woman that was of mutual benefit to both parents and especially their children.
And the further we publicly moved away from this ideal, the less comfortable they became.
My general point being that for most people traditional gender roles still carry real significance – no matter how patriarchal and oppressive the feminists tell us they are.
You might be interested in this blogpost by Maya Forstater, (who won a tribunal case in the UK, which said her statement that sex was binary and immutable was worthy of respect in a democratic society):
…While I recognise the painful split that Jane describes, her division of the two teams into “true feminists” and “gender-critical identitarianism” is off the mark.
I think what we are seeing is the contradictions of a philosophy that does not make sense (it envisages a world where male violence is universal, but not biological; where women and men’s interests are negotiated on a “sex-class” basis; where family can be replaced by collective, and where prosperity exists without capitalism). It is another case of when ideology meets reality.
By contrast, what might be called “Mumsnet feminism” focuses on the messy material reality of mothers, fathers (good and bad, present and absent) and children, who need care and protection. It may be low on theory but it can see gender ideology and queer theory for what it is; an attack on the social structures that protect children (many of which are derided as part of the patriarchy by those who see the world this way).
A key theme running through criticisms of the “populists” in the magazine is disapproval at calling-out the behaviour of male sexual deviants in dresses, and at “othering” people who pretend to be the opposite sex….
Yes that post navigates the perilous shoals of this debate rather well. If I might quibble on some aspects with the author, I would imagine we could at least have a fine constructive conversation on the basis of what she has expressed here.
The idea that we have a soul that regardless of our sex, stands equally alongside all other humans before our creator, should not be so lightly discarded. In my view it is the basis for the claim that all people are equal before the law, to be accorded equal dignity and opportunity, and lies at the core of our common humanity and universal rights.
But this does not mean all humans are equivalent, or equally interchangeable, in every context. While a soul is an essentially immaterial abstraction, our physical bodies are not. And the multitude of ways in which these bodies differ matters a great deal in the way we should treat people in order to be just.
By way of a trivial illustration – if my partner and I take a day trip somewhere, the more art galleries and museums we can pack in the happier she will be. On the other hand if I can find an unexplored bush track I will be happy. Treating us both the same erases these interests and preferences and neither of us will be happy. On the other hand if we mutually respect each other's differences and constructively accommodate them – taking turns at doing art galleries and bush tracks, or somehow combining both – the outcome is more likely to be good for both of us.
All three of your comments are thought provoking and succinct, thank you.
"Of course social conservatives never really agreed with either proposition, and that they are the firmest and clearest opponents of trans ideology is only to be expected. "
This is an especially interesting comment. I am, in many ways, a social conservative, and my position on trans ideology comes from 2 places.
1. Much of the trans ideology is coming from a place of denying objective reality. Trans women are not women. They cannot ever fully understand what it is to be a woman, and accommodating the idea that they can is delusional.
2. I am pro woman. I believe women have a right to establish rules around their own spaces to the exclusion of others if that makes them safe.
Rather than address the issues being faced by the trans community in a meaningful way, we are listening to a small but vocal representation that is increasingly pushing a violent and divisive agenda.
Thanks for your comments RL.
I think you have got the biology/gender stuff a bit confused. This old feminist was always saying that 'women can do anything' -sure some things may be difficult strength-wise but we can do anything or should be given the chance to. We were not fighting on gender grounds as sex/gender were indistinguishable in those days.
My sister, slightly younger than me, still works in a male dominated, physically tough mainly outdoor environment. As she has got older she has looked at mechanical aids mainly in lifting that have been useful.
So useful that the business is now using them across the whole workplace. This is because they protect younger backs as well as older backs, workers do not get so physically tired and are able to really look at the intrinsically valuable areas of work not the manual labour parts. So smaller slighter people of both sexes can be employed and keep on being employed.
I have come across this view that because women made a thing of 'women and girls can do anything' ie not tied to the home or traditional sex role stereotypes that our 'punishment', often described in words like 'irony' is that now we are to put up with the trans community trying to change the meaning of biology,
This is far from ironic to me. It smacks of a barely suppressed glee that women have got 'what they should have known was coming to them, perhaps they/we should have 'known better.'…..I reject this framing.
The patriarchy is reasserting itself. This I have no problem in agreeing with. I can run an argument that seeing as men want to wear dresses and go into women's toilets and changing rooms that this is just 'boys being boys' and nothing to get concerned about.
The other view is that the patriarchy has said 'this is what we want to do so get out of our way'. The patriarchy supports men whether they call/are themselves men or we females call them transwomen.
Of course they have 'handmaidens', who support the idea. Riley Gaines found the handmaidens for the trans community shrieking and pulling at her as she made her way out of SFSU.
Simone de Beauvoir “the oppressor would not be so strong if he did not have accomplices among the oppressed”
While traditional roles or mother (at home), father(at work) children suit many people they do not suit everybody. If it is one thing that has happened is that there is greater flexibility across roles, timing of work etc. I think this has benefited males as well as females.
I don't believe it is useful to frame the concern for women as being only 'feminists' who are concerned. Many of the women I speak to etc were profoundly upset by 25/3 where they saw other women prevented from doing something they wanted to do. Some of these women are, I believe, on the cusp of thinking the election should/could be a single issue women's rights election.
The right has been at the forefront, it seems, of being able to articulate the concerns of women.
So however we got to the dominance of 51% of the population by a despotic 3-5 % of the population, whether the patriarchy is stirring and pushing back etc, the longer the left leaves it the more chance there is of a single issue going with the party that 'sees' women……and it ain't Labout at the moment.
I think you have got the biology/gender stuff a bit confused.
Yes, I generally avoid this topic and accept that others will disagree with my not always fluent efforts at expressing my thoughts on this.
This old feminist was always saying that 'women can do anything' -sure some things may be difficult strength-wise but we can do anything or should be given the chance to.
For certain I have affirmed the right to equal opportunity; but that does not imply everyone will choose equally. Nor should they be forced to.
On average men are more interested in things, bonding in teams while facing challenge, are somewhat more aggressive anda a disagreeable. Women on average are more interested in people, bonding socially while nurturing and are more vulnerable to negative emotion and physical threat.
But there is considerable overlap as well; there are plenty of men with very feminine personality structures, and vice versa. But in general while each sex is broadly capable of doing what the other does, it does not mean they will necessarily want to. Instead diverging gender roles assert themselves, like weeds in a vege garden, no matter how much we officially disapprove of them.
In my view the core mistake- cheered on by the post-modernists- was to argue that this meant all gender roles were an ephemeral social construct that could be engineered into any shape we pleased. Or if erased them altogether a wonderful new utopia would ensue.
So for decades the western world has set about dismantling the 'patriarchy' delivering societies in which women are demonstrably freer to choose their destiny than anywhere else on earth, or in our known history. Yet it is not clear that for all this effort, anyone is much the happier.
While traditional roles or mother (at home), father(at work) children suit many people they do not suit everybody.
And yes most people are willing to allow wiggle room at the margins. If a family chooses this dynamic – and it works for them – then few people might concern themselves with it.
What you write here brings to mind a couple we met at a marina some years back. She was definitely more on the masculine side and was very much the 'skipper', in charge of their boat, it's maintenance and operation, while he was very comfortable looking after finances, provisioning and navigation usually the domain of the woman. For them it worked just fine and no-one else cared a rat's patui about it.
But where people would push back is the activists proposition that somehow this couple were morally superior for having 'smashed the patriarchy'.
But (as always) the question is …how do we develop a social contract (and legal framework) that recognises both gender AND individual differences that is fair WHILE maintaining a functioning society?
Feminism is now claimed by a wide diversity of people holding different and often conflicting views. For me, it holds the same information about someone as calling them left or right-wing. There is no longer a coherent definition of those terms that is universally accepted, so I now try to avoid any of them in conversation and exchanges.
The same is true of the word and concept of "patriachy". Academic feminists have a detailed explanation of the term and concept and how it manifests, to the point where the word is lost in the explanation. Others use it as the whole argument and conclusion, ie. Domestic violence against women is because of the patriachy. When you ask what the definition of patriachy is from those who use it in such a way, you will often have different answers, mostly incoherent.
Female and male bodies are different, and those differences play a part in our experiences and our lives.
"More interesting was the idea that males and females were – other than the bare biological essentials – interchangeable in their gender roles as parents, and if women could do anything men could, then logically fatherhood could be generally regarded as optional, or dispensed with altogether."
That's not an unfounded criticism to my mind. Many forget that everything has costs – whether intended or not. They should be acknowledged – and hopefully mitigated – when celebrating what you see as success. Or alternatively, acknowledged and considered too high a price to pay.
"But there is considerable overlap as well; there are plenty of men with very feminine personality structures, and vice versa. But in general while each sex is broadly capable of doing what the other does, it does not mean they will necessarily want to. Instead diverging gender roles assert themselves, like weeds in a vege garden, no matter how much we officially disapprove of them.
In my view the core mistake- cheered on by the post-modernists- was to argue that this meant all gender roles were an ephemeral social construct that could be engineered into any shape we pleased. Or if erased them altogether a wonderful new utopia would ensue."
I agree with what you have written here. I also believe that alongside this, has come an implied criticism of the conservative family, and those who do choose or find themselves in what others will designate as traditional roles. The demand for neutral acceptance of alternative choices, is often not accompanied by the neutral acceptance of others who make what is seen as traditional choices.
The supposedly benign prefix "cis" is often used as a pejorative. Cis-het, I have only seen used as an insult.
Kellie-Jay Keen is upfront about her concerns and that she will work with anyone who is concerned. Clips of her visit to the Heritage Foundation in America, show that she did not have to inform those she met about her concerns – they were already well informed. That is not often the case with any supposed progressives that deign to meet her. The Heritage Foundation offered to assist in any way that was acceptable to her.
Established feminists in the UK, have reacted very strongly to Kellie Jay Keen’s popularity with women who are not politically identifiable as left-wing.
A concerted and unrelenting campaign of critique and denigration has been active over the last years. Public declarations of distancing, has allowed groups to promulgate the unfounded accusations of Nazism, racism and far-right affiliations along with criticisms of not supporting reproductive rights – without providing evidence. Despite these accusations being debunked many times the declarations – in all their smug pompousness – remain.
The blogpost I linked to was a reply to a series of essays written by a variety of academic feminists who asked for written responses. (Link from the article) Needless to say, they didn't like the one above.
NZ based women – behind the authority of Feminist Named Organisations – but also using the cowardly cloak of anonymity – duplicated both the approach and accusations of such UK feminists.
I personally consider both groups have culpability in the violence that took part in Albert Park against the #LetWomenSpeak event. They repeated what they should know to be unfounded accusations, and provided supposedly legitimate references for others to smear and defame Kelly-Jay Keen Minshull and the event.
(Note: Just for added context. Kellie-Jay Keen is responsible for the first Women – Adult Human Female billboard going up, in Black and White in 2018. She's been merchandising that definition in that form on t-shirts, posters, signs and stickers ever since, and it has become ubiquitous in the movement. However, it is grammatically clumsy – it should be adult female human. When her USA tour was announced, an announcement was also made that the Standing For Women group intended to make a documentary. Within a few months – those who criticised her most publicly had produced a documentary – called "Adult Human Female" with black and white branding, and described it as coincidental. Like the women's organisations who defamed her before her arrival, they are capitalising on the increased attention without giving credit to the person and organisation who created it.)
First I should say thank you for your views. I agree with many of them. Where I soon lose agreement is where I sense that the argument is, this suits most of us so therefore it is the way to go.
Being governed is a matter of consent by those being governed. The current system and many religions give room for most to exist so we accept them. This does not mean it is a perfect system, just that we don't see another that is better.
I call 'the system' the patriarchy and couple it with religion. I don't have the rigorous definition of patriarchy that some have – for me it is broadly the status quo. (the status quo built on eons of similar status quos. Where change is observable but may be barely moving as a way of moving the lives of everyone forward) Of course the status quo is like a breathing animal whose lungs expand and contract. So I wouldn't see the yachting couple as smashing the patriarchy. I think also that the patriarchy is inherently regressive, so that is why I say it is reasserting itself. It feels as if the we are regressing not moving forward. That the beneficiaries of this are male can lead to a thought that if the patriarchy is the status quo, it is possibly regressive ie not suiting the needs of all, in particular not hearing the voices of women then we see the growth of parties for specific parts of our society eg KJM proposed party called Party of Women.
So I believe in families, in stable units to bring up children, and to provide help and stability after those children have gone, so access to good health, education and opportunities for children and their families, no matter how these are made up.
What I don't believe in is a system so rigid that these are our only concerns. We should be in a society where our lives are measurably different, in a better way, than those who have gone before.
As a result of the current debate I have thought long and hard about the utility of the concept of gender. To me a census question, a very mixed up census question, about gender has great interest from a sociological point of view just as the influence of religion does. Sociologists interrogate this data and make observations on thought trends in our society.
To answer a census question on gender with Moon gender, gives nothing to health, education, super planners.
The key planning-useful questions are
woman, man, male child, female child
age
ethnicity/race
time lived in NZ
where born
All of these can give hard information to planners on the types of facilities we should be providing as we look ahead.
We could ask a question
who do you identify as?
male
female
another question, specify
prefer not to answer
This may give sociologists material and it is possible that coupled with age, women, male (ie biological or born sex) question some interesting ideas could come forward in the movement of thought.
I have read both of your comments immediately above and appreciate both. If I have not anything substantive to add at this moment it is because in the past this topic has often become a messy conversation – and I want to properly consider everyone's contribution, rather than charging in deeper.
(Also my apologies for some of the grammatical horrors in my comments. I have always been a very fast reader, but the downside is that when I am proof-reading inside this very narrow edit box, I am prone to missing or duplicating words at the line returns. I probably should get into the habit of typing in a proper word editor and then pasting over.)
I have always wanted the left to be on the ball in writing/interviewing on this issue.
I have said a couple of times that I have found good explanatory material on the right. I always caveat my links. I explained that Walsh was RW.
I want someone who can explain the issues, no more no less. Surely if we caveat the other aspects then progressives can decide whether or not to open the links.
Ok, then remove the interview I put up please. marshall/walsh.
How do you suggest we cover the points if the left is not generating much thoughtful material and we want to quote from something not from the left.
Yesterday I linked to GAG site and put a link in so people could see where on the political spectrum they come from.
I always thought that a note to say he is not from the left or is from the right was sufficient but am happy to caveat in whichever way you want.
Like Weka I see ‘feminism as women’s liberation’, and for me it is movement of many houses.
It's not that he's RW. There are decent RW people in the world. It's that he is a man with a lot of power that is actively trying to remove women's rights.
I want someone who can explain the issues, no more no less. Surely if we caveat the other aspects then progressives can decide whether or not to open the links.
There are a few problems with this position. One is that the liberals who might be persuaded will be put off again when they find out who Walsh is and what his politics are. A huge part of the war is because progressives want to be kind to trans people and feel good about their own politics, and then they see the counter to their politics coming not just from the right but the far right and fundamentalists, which makes it much harder to accept the ideas.
another problem is that nearly everything MW is saying has already been said in the past by feminists and better. The analogy about humans being bipedal and a one legged person still being human? here's Jane Claire Jones saying it in 2021.
There have been multiple conversations on twitter about categories, how humans use them to make sense of the world, and how to explain this to people running the counter argument about women without a uterus aren't women.
One of the big challenges atm is that the right are getting to set the narrative on gender ideology especially in NZ. If you believe that the war has to be won at any cost then one can ignore this I guess. But Plunket didn't have the rights of women in mind when he asked Hipkins the question. Part of it is that he's trying to undermine the left so they don't win the election. Plunket understands the political significance of the question and what played out in the UK, and I would guess he understands that the left in NZ doesn't get it, yet.
When we use right wing and far right sources to promote our position and do so in such a casual way, we feed the right getting to determine the narrative. And that's not going to serve women in the medium and long term.
I get how tempting it is, it's very easy when MW lays it out so clearly to share the video. But that puts material out there by someone who is strongly in favour of limiting women's rights. And that shifts the overton window away from our rights. We might win on self ID but lose abortion rights.
I had a talk with Australian and NZ feminists on a twitter Space last night, and talked this through because I wanted to write a post using MW's videos, precisely because they were so good at demonstrating the issues. I had this idea that I would write about who Walsh is and why he is such a big problem for feminists, but in the end I was convinced by others that it's not worth it. We should be amplifying the voices of people whose politics we want to see in the world.
ARGHHHH. Just stop it. Do you think humans who lose a leg stop being human? Or do you think humans without two legs mean humans are not bipedal. What about people with six fingers? I guess either they're not human or humans don't have five fingers right??? THIS IS IDIOTIC. https://t.co/Qao8mjsZ0z
Female humans are the class of humans who differentiated down the developmental pathway that leads to be able to perform a certain reproductive function. And the fact that accident, illness or developmental anomaly means some of them can't perform that function doesn't make them 'not female' any more than a mug with a crack in it becomes 'not a mug,' or a car whose engine won't start becomes 'not a car,' or a chair with a broken leg becomes 'not a chair.'
Nor does the fact that a mug has a crack in it make it any other number of things that won't hold liquid, like 'a colander' or 'a sieve.' You may as well be arguing that bc some chairs have broken legs any other thing that you can't sit on, like, say, a pine cone, is a chair.
And now you will turn around and say 'you are evil because you are saying infertile people are broken.' They are not broken as humans. Their reproductive function is not working. That causes a lot of people pain. That pain will not be helped by playing silly ass word games.
The problem now is that MW's video can show the concept without people having to think about it much. They will get it intuitively. He is very good at this.
I'm not saying never use his material. I'm saying do it consciously and with awareness of who he is and what he is going, and make it very clear to others what is going on.
Thank you Weka. I am grateful for the way in which you have enriched my knowledge about these issues. I do appreciate that it is beguiling to read/listen to someone eg Matt Walsh who seems to get it.
One of the big challenges atm is that the right are getting to set the narrative on gender ideology especially in NZ. If you believe that the war has to be won at any cost then one can ignore this I guess.
I don't want this at all. Every time the Nats have got in with their shrinking govt policies etc it has meant hard times. As a superannuitant I have even less $$$ to come and go on than I had as a salaried person.
Many of the women I speak to/know were truly horrified by 25/3 and are coming very close to single issue. They do not like the thought of losing access to women only toilets and changing rooms. Many have children and grandchildren playing sport & see how dangerous it can become……though some sports are moving to protect women on fairness grounds.
It would be so easy for the right to commit to revising this legislation or tightening the safe spaces provisions and many may rush over.
I was talking on Twitter about the possible effects on women's ability to want to go out if all cinema restrooms etc have to be shared with males. Then there are toilets and changing areas in workplaces. If these are all unisex which seems likely then these are not a women friendly solution.
I have worked in two workplaces with these in them and they were awful as the men users did not leave the places as most women would. In fact some women could be found doing general tidy ups in the toilets….others just ducked out to a nearby Dept store that still had a powder room/lounge.
We speculated that if these reactions of not going out for recreation cinemas/sport and then inadequate facilities for women in workplaces then women are home shackled and housebound as badly as the Victorian times.
When women were striving to get ahead in the workforce the pee leash was a great restrictor.
Also I read some correspondence about women in the south of England pushing back against mixed male female changing areas being built as a 'Changing Village' (universal vomiting sounds the world over to this phrase) A few cubicles but mainly open space around the walls.
It is revealing what people do when their leadership jobs end.
Jacinda Ardern signed up with the Speaker Booking Agency for ‘’paid corporate appearances only’’. She is heading overseas to front the Christchurch Call and the Windsors’ royal environment awards. Not child poverty and affordable housing then.
But the article is about health. She lauds the attack on centralisation by Rob Campbell and National (ignores the impact debt had on Health Board finances and capacity and the post code lottery on access to services under that system).
And advocates for private sector funding of hospital and health services building – the old model allowed government funding but boards had to provide a return (the cost of which deterred anyone asking for a new building until they had to). She would just bypass the government funding and has a rent cost for private sector profit (another step to privatisation).
j pagani is a shit stirrer, no friend of the left. here's a more balanced view of politicians subsequent careers. (omits the murky dealings of paula benefit, jami-lee ross and several others)
A few days ago I heard or read, sorry can't remember where, mad-cow you know, an economics commentator was castigating Adrian Orr for punishing us for imported inflation, fuel, machinery etc, etc. I got to thinking about that and realised that he left out an equally valid culprit and that is "exported "inflation. The high price of our high quality meat here is the huge demand for it from the USA most of which ends up minced in hamburgers for MacDonalds, a fact I was unaware of until I was enlightened by a beef farmer mate. The world price for milk is directly responsible for the cost of cheese, baby formula and all kinds of other dairy products including of course milk itself. Many other products such as fish, some veggies and many others probably cause the same problem.
The answer cannot be ringfencing our in -demand products so that they are more affordable locally as that means producers would need to be compensated for the lost earnings and any failure to do so would be politically untenable. In some ways it is already happening as cost of living adjustments to the less well off mask the discrepancy.
God, politics is difficult and not a lot of people know that.
The problem of dairy prices in NZ owes much to Fonterra charging NZers the same prices as their products cost fob on foreign wharves. What little regulation we have never touched the practice – a prime instance of greedflation.
So transactivists destroy a mural to babies who died as a result of shaken baby syndrome (abuse)
Trans activists in France have destroyed a mural for infant victims of 'shaken baby syndrome' – a form of severe brain trauma caused by abuse. The activists reportedly said they had targeted the memorial because it was created by "transphobic feminists."
This is sounding more and more like a book burning, witch finding mob than a movement dedicated to moving society forward.
We need some bonfires, sticks, stocks, pools, inflamed unseeing/unknowing followers and we will be back in the Dark Ages…….oh wait 25/3/23
I ‘hear’, taps side of nose, that people may know the identity of the ‘person’ who punched the 70 year woman in the head fracturing her skull on 25/3.
Obv don’t feel comfortable linking. it may be just speculation.
According to the L’Amazone member, a group of “men and trans women” purporting to advocate for transgender causes and against fascism and islamophobia announced their presence, yelling, “Paris Antifas!” CAP and L’Amazone yelled back, “Male violence, MRAs!” The pro-trans, Antifa organization screamed, “Transphobes!” The L’Amazone member said a huge crowd began chanting over and over: “One TERF, one bullet – social justice.”
Anybody can call themselves "Antifa". It is not like the Boy Scouts, you don't get franchise rights.
In the UK – the black clad masked lads who turn up to shout abuse at women are dubbed "Black Pampers", (Pampers are a brand of nappies) and the ones in Melbourne (average age 17), playing at being Nazis were dubbed the "Black Shorts".
However, it is all the same male aggression and misogyny.
Yes, I understand your point. I am just wondering out loud whether (at least in some instances) the trans movement is being hi-jacked by other agenda's.
LB I don't think the trans agenda is being hi-jacked.
I think the trans agenda is now big enough that it is attracting all sorts of hangers on who may be peripherally attached philosophically to parts of it. Some of these will be pornography adjacent and some will have even less desirable aims. To push the boundaries as it were.
I would not be surprised if we saw moves to lower the age of consent, cater for more bizarre kinks such as Man/Boy love groups. Some are concerned that sexualising children through transitioning may play into the hands of groomers, this is a fear in the USA. I have not seen it here.
Others will be attracted by more common place views, to tag along for the possibility of violence.
As Visubversa says
However, it is all the same male aggression and misogyny.
I think that the human-rights framework is the way to resolve the question of how society should treat people who identify as transgender (respect their basic human rights and liberties, but don’t respect their fantasy).
But how will it resolve the changing rooms, sports etc issues?
Perhaps the human rights for women are those at UN level rather than the 'NZ as a country' human rights level. I don't think the protection of women's safe spaces in NZ legislation is especially immune from legal attack.
This is an excellent article and draws on the ideas of safety and how instinctive markers that women have carried through life may be blunted, confused as if we have been subjected to the effects of rohypnol
One of the biggest obstacles to halting the stampede over women’s rights is pronoun and preferred name ‘courtesy’. People severely underestimate the psychological impact to themselves, and to others, of compliance.
the use of pronouns such as 'she' to describe 'he' (male bodied) can dull our senses
They dull your defences. They change your inhibitions. They’re meant to. You’ve had a lifetime’s experience learning to be alert to ‘him’ and relax to ‘her’. For good reason. This instinctive response keeps you safe. It’s not even a conscious thing. It’s like your hairs standing on end. Your subconscious brain is helping you not get eaten by the sabre tooth tiger that your eyes haven’t noticed yet.
Good read including a couple of exercises, and no these do not give you credits for any exam.
Mainstream discourse is a complete wasteland. @SophRiver (🔒) describes the problem well:
Envy. Entitlement. Destructiveness. This is part of the toxic mix that is bottled inside of the identity activists operating with a licence from elites in NZ.
Most in our MSM then spin the story of 'victims'- cherry picking data, ignoring violence, speaking to one side only.
Also, the univariate fallacy is deployed again and again and again by MSM and spun with a huge conceptual leap of faith into religious nonsense.
eg There is a difference in health outcomes between two groups = health system is racist.
All relevant variables need to be ignored: poverty, lifestyle, quality of housing, jobs, education, diet etc.
These are the variables which would make a difference if addressed. Instead we rinse and repeat on one button.
We seem to have turned from the path of truth and shared humanity where complex issues require complex solutions to one where simplistic rhetoric is deployed on repeat.
That quote from SophRiver certainly resonates with me.
Here is my diagnostic tool rob. I look at the outcomes – if the outcome is more division and exploiting social fault lines to accumulate moral or political power, then I know to avoid associating with them.
If the outcome drives toward unity and a visible, concrete progress toward real-world, universal solutions, then I will cheer them on, and watch to see what lessons can be learned.
Looking at outcomes or consequences is a reasonable rule of thumb that I tend to use as well. However, it has limitations, especially when dealing with wicked problems and social messes. This can be illustrated with metaphors such ‘death by thousand cuts’ or ‘the last drop in the bucket overflowing’, et cetera. Complex multi-dimensional non-linear interactions with time lags cannot be measured or managed by a snapshot in time.
I have now lived long enough to see a cabinet minister go both barrels on their Prime Minister and not get sacked.It used to be that the PM would have a drawer full of resignations signed by ministers on the day of their appointment, ready for such an occasion. But ...
This session will feature Simon McCallum, Senior Lecturer in Engineering and Computer Science (VUW) and recent Labour Party candidate in the Southland Electorate talking about some of the issues around AI and how this should inform Labour Party policy. Simon is an excellent speaker with a comprehensive command of AI ...
The proposed Waimate garbage incinerator is dead: The company behind a highly-controversial proposal to build a waste-to-energy plant in the Waimate District no longer has the land. [...] However, SIRRL director Paul Taylor said the sales and purchase agreement to purchase land from Murphy Farms, near Glenavy, lapsed at ...
The US Foreign Corrupt Practices Act has been a vital tool in combatting international corruption. It forbids US companies and citizens from bribing foreign public officials anywhere in the world. And its actually enforced: some of the world's biggest companies - Siemens, Hewlett Packard, and Bristol Myers Squibb - have ...
December 2024 photo - with UK Tory Boris Johnson (Source: Facebook)Those PollsFor hours, political poll results have resounded across political hallways and commentary.According to the 1News Verizon poll, 50% of the country believe we are heading in the “wrong direction”, while 39% believe we are “on the right track”.The left ...
A Tai Rāwhiti mill that ran for 30 years before it was shut down in late 2023 is set to re-open in the coming months, which will eventually see nearly 300 new jobs in the region. A new report from Massey University shows that pensioners are struggling with rising costs. ...
As support continues to fall, Luxon also now faces his biggest internal ructions within the coalition since the election, with David Seymour reacting badly to being criticised by the PM. File photo: Lynn Grieveson / The KākāLong stories short, the top six things in Aotearoa’s political economy around housing, climate ...
Not since 1988 when Richard Prebble openly criticised David Lange have we seen such a challenge to a Prime Minister as that of David Seymour to Christopher Luxon last night. Prebble suggested Lange had mental health issues during a TV interview and was almost immediately fired. Seymour hasn’t gone quite ...
Three weeks in, and the 24/7 news cycle is not helping anyone feel calm and informed about the second Trump presidency. One day, the US is threatening 25% trade tariffs on its friends and neighbours. The reasons offered by the White House are absurd, such as stopping fentanyl coming in ...
This video includes personal musings and conclusions of the creator climate scientist Dr. Adam Levy. It is presented to our readers as an informed perspective. Please see video description for references (if any). Wherever you look, you'll hear headlines claiming we've passed 1.5 degrees of global warming. And while 2024 saw ...
Photo by Heather M. Edwards on UnsplashHere’s the key news, commentary, reports and debate around Aotearoa’s politics and economy in the week to Feb 10 below. That’s ahead of live chats on the Substack App and The Kākā’s front page on Substack at 5pm with: on his column in The ...
Is there anyone in the world the National Party loves more than a campaign donor? Why yes, there is! They will always have the warmest hello and would you like to slip into something more comfortable for that great god of our age, the High Net Worth Individual.The words the ...
Waste and fraud certainly exist in foreign aid programs, but rightwing celebration of USAID’s dismantling shows profound ignorance of the value of soft power (as opposed to hard power) in projecting US influence and interests abroad by non-military/coercive means (think of “hearts and minds,” “hugs, not bullets,” “honey versus vinegar,” ...
Health New Zealand is proposing to cut almost half of its data and digital positions – more than 1000 of them. The PSA has called on the Privacy Commissioner to urgently investigate the cuts due to the potential for serious consequences for patients. NZNO is calling for an urgent increase ...
We may see a few more luxury cars on Queen Street, but a loosening of rules to entice rich foreigners to invest more here is unlikely to “turbocharge our economic growth”. Photo: Lynn Grieveson / The KākāLong stories short, the top six things in Aotearoa’s political economy around housing, climate ...
Let us not dance daintily around the elephant in the room. Our politicians who serve us in the present are not honest, certainly not as honest as they should be, and while the right are taking out most of the trophies for warping narratives and literally redefining “facts”, the kiwi ...
A few weeks ago I took a look at public transport ridership in 2024. In today’s post I’m going to be looking a bit deeper at bus ridership. Buses make up the vast majority of ridership in Auckland with 70 million boardings last year out of a total of 89.4 ...
Oh, you know I did itIt's over and I feel fineNothing you could say is gonna change my mindWaited and I waited the longest nightNothing like the taste of sweet declineSongwriters: Chris Shiflett / David Eric Grohl / Nate Mendel / Taylor Hawkins.Hindsight is good, eh?The clarity when the pieces ...
Photo by Towfiqu barbhuiya on UnsplashHere’s what we’re watching in the week to February 16 and beyond in Aotearoa’s political economy around housing, climate and poverty:Monday, February 10The Kākā’s weekly wrap-up of news about politics and the economy is due at midday, followed by webinar for paying subscribers in Substack’s ...
A listing of 23 news and opinion articles we found interesting and shared on social media during the past week: Sun, February 2, 2025 thru Sat, February 8, 2025. This week's roundup is again published soleley by category. We are still interested in feedback to hone the categorization, so if ...
Today, I stumbled across a Twitter Meme: the ending of The Lord of the Rings as a Chess scenario: https://x.com/mellon_heads/status/1887983845917564991 It gets across the basic gist. Aragorn and Gandalf offering up ‘material’ at the Morannon allows Frodo and Samwise to catch Sauron unawares – fair enough. But there are a ...
Last week, Kieran McAnulty called out Chris Bishop and Nicola Willis for their claims that Kāinga Ora’s costs were too high.They had claimed Kāinga Ora’s cost were 12% higher than market i.e. private devlopersBut Kāinga Ora’s Chair had already explained why last year:"We're not building to sell, so we'll be ...
Stuff’s Political Editor Luke Malpass - A Fellow at New Zealand IniativeLast week I half-joked that Stuff / The Post’s Luke Malpass1 always sounded like he was auditioning for a job at the New Zealand Initiative.Mountain Tui is a reader-supported publication. For a limited time, subscriptions are 20% off. Thanks ...
At a funeral on Friday, there were A4-sized photos covering every wall of the Dil’s reception lounge. There must have been 200 of them, telling the story in the usual way of the video reel but also, by enlargement, making it more possible to linger and step in.Our friend Nicky ...
Skeptical Science is partnering with Gigafact to produce fact briefs — bite-sized fact checks of trending claims. This fact brief was written by Sue Bin Park from the Gigafact team in collaboration with members from our team. You can submit claims you think need checking via the tipline. Is methane the ...
The Government’s idea is that the private sector and Community Housing Providers will fund, build and operate new affordable housing to address our housing crisis. Meanwhile, the Government does not know where almost half of the 1,700 children who left emergency housing actually went. Photo: Lynn Grieveson / The KākāLong ...
Oh, home, let me come homeHome is wherever I'm with youOh, home, let me come homeHome is wherever I'm with youSongwriters: Alexander Ebert / Jade Allyson CastrinosMorena,I’m on a tight time frame this morning. In about an hour and a half, I’ll need to pack up and hit the road ...
This is a post about the Mountain Tui substack, and small tweaks - further to the poll and request post the other day. Please don’t read if you aren’t interested in my personal matters. Thank you all.After oohing-and-aahing about how to structure the Substack model since November, including obtaining ...
This transcript of a recent conversation between the Prime Minister and his chief economic adviser has not been verified.We’ve announced we are the ‘Yes Government’. Do you like it?Yes, Prime Minister.Dreamed up by the PR team. It’s about being committed to growth. Not that the PR team know anything about ...
The other day, Australian Senator Nick McKim issued a warning in the Australian Parliement about the US’s descent into fascim.And of course it’s true, but I lament - that was true as soon as Trump won.What we see is now simply the reification of the intention, planning, and forces behind ...
Among the many other problems associated with Musk/DOGE sending a fleet of teenage and twenty-something cultists to remove, copy and appropriate federal records like social security, medicaid and other supposedly protected data is the fact that the youngsters doing the data-removal, copying and security protocol and filter code over-writing have ...
Jokerman dance to the nightingale tuneBird fly high by the light of the moonOh, oh, oh, JokermanSong by Bob Dylan.Morena folks, I hope this fine morning of the 7th of February finds you well. We're still close to Paihia, just a short drive out of town. Below is the view ...
It’s been an eventful week as always, so here’s a few things that we have found interesting. We also hope everyone had a happy and relaxing Waitangi Day! This week in Greater Auckland We’re still running on summer time, but provided two chewy posts: On Tuesday, a guest ...
Queuing on Queen St: the Government is set to announce another apparently splashy growth policy on Sunday of offering residence visas to wealthy migrants. Photo: Lynn Grieveson / The KākāLong stories short, the top six things in our political economy around housing, climate and poverty on Friday, February 7:PM Christopher ...
The fact that Waitangi ended up being such a low-key affair may mark it out as one of the most significant Waitangi Days in recent years. A group of women draped in “Toitu Te Tiriti” banners who turned their backs on the politicians’ powhiri was about as rough as it ...
Hi,This week’s Flightless Bird episode was about “fake seizure guy” — a Melbourne man who fakes seizures in order to get members of the public to sit on him.The audio documentary (which I have included in this newsletter in case you don’t listen to Flightless Bird) built on reporting first ...
This is a re-post from Yale Climate Connections by Karin Kirk The 119th Congress comes with a price tag. The oil and gas industry gave about $24 million in campaign contributions to the members of the U.S. House and Senate expected to be sworn in January 3, 2025, according to a ...
Early morning, the shadows still long, but you can already feel the warmth building. Our motel was across the road from the historic homestead where Henry Williams' family lived. The evening before, we wandered around the gardens, reading the plaques and enjoying the close proximity to the history of the ...
Thanks folks for your feedback, votes and comments this week. I’ll be making the changes soon. Appreciate all your emails, comments and subscriptions too. I know your time is valuable - muchas gracias.A lot is happening both here and around the world - so I want to provide a snippets ...
Data released today by Statistics NZ shows that unemployment rose to 5.1%, with 33,000 more people out of work than last year said NZCTU Te Kauae Kaimahi Economist Craig Renney. “The latest data shows that employment fell in Aotearoa at its fastest rate since the GFC. Unemployment rose in 8 ...
The December labour market statistics have been released, showing yet another increase in unemployment. There are now 156,000 unemployed - 34,000 more than when National took office. And having thrown all these people out of work, National is doubling down on cruelty. Because being vicious will somehow magically create the ...
Boarded up homes in Kilbirnie, where work on a planned development was halted. Photo: Lynn Grieveson / The KākāLong stories short, the top six things in our political economy around housing, climate and poverty on Wednesday, February 5 are;Housing Minister Chris Bishop yesterday announcedKāinga Ora would be stripped of ...
This week Kiwirail and Auckland Transport were celebrating the completion of the summer rail works that had the network shut or for over a month and the start of electric trains to Pukekohe. First up, here’s parts of the press release about the shutdown works. Passengers boarding trains in Auckland ...
Through its austerity measures, the coalition government has engineered a rise in unemployment in order to reduce inflation while – simultaneously – cracking down harder and harder on the people thrown out of work by its own policies. To that end, Social Development Minister Louise Upston this week added two ...
This year, we've seen a radical, white supremacist government ignoring its Tiriti obligations, refusing to consult with Māori, and even trying to legislatively abrogate te Tiriti o Waitangi. When it was criticised by the Waitangi Tribunal, the government sabotaged that body, replacing its legal and historical experts with corporate shills, ...
Poor old democracy, it really is in a sorry state. It would be easy to put all the blame on the vandals and tyrants presently trashing the White House, but this has been years in the making. It begins with Margaret Thatcher and Ronald Reagan and the spirit of Gordon ...
The new school lunches came in this week, and they were absolutely scrumptious.I had some, and even though Connor said his tasted like “stodge” and gave him a sore tummy, I myself loved it!Look at the photos - I knew Mr Seymour wouldn’t lie when he told us last year:"It ...
The tighter sanctions are modelled on ones used in Britain, which did push people off ‘the dole’, but didn’t increase the number of workers, and which evidence has repeatedly shown don’t work. Photo: Lynn Grieveson / The KākāLong stories short, the top six things in our political economy around housing, ...
Catching you up on the morning’s global news and a quick look at the parallels -GLOBALTariffs are backSharemarkets in the US, UK and Europe have “plunged” in response to Trump’s tariffs. And while Mexico has won a one month reprieve, Canada and China will see their respective 25% and 10% ...
This post by Nicolas Reid was originally published on Linked in. It is republished here with permission. Gondolas are often in the news, with manufacturers of ropeway systems proposing them as a modern option for mass transit systems in New Zealand. However, like every next big thing in transport, it’s hard ...
This is a re-post from The Climate BrinkBoth 2023 and 2024 were exceptionally warm years, at just below and above 1.5C relative to preindustrial in the WMO composite of surface temperature records, respectively. While we are still working to assess the full set of drivers of this warmth, it is clear that ...
Hi,I woke up feeling nervous this morning, realising that this weekend Flightless Bird is going to do it’s first ever live show. We’re heading to a sold out (!) show in Seattle to test the format out in front of an audience. If it works, we’ll do more. I want ...
From the United-For-Now States of America comes the thrilling news that a New Zealander may be at the very heart of the current coup. Punching above our weight on the world stage once more! Wait, you may be asking, what New Zealander? I speak of Peter Thiel, made street legal ...
Even Stevens: Over the 33 years between 1990 and 2023 (and allowing for the aberrant 2020 result) the average level of support enjoyed by the Left and Right blocs, at roughly 44.5 percent each, turns out to be, as near as dammit, identical.WORLDWIDE, THE PARTIES of the Left are presented ...
Back in 2023, a "prominent political figure" went on trial for historic sex offences. But we weren't allowed to know who they were or what political party they were "prominent" in, because it might affect the way we voted. At the time, I said that this was untenable; it was ...
I'm going, I'm goingWhere the water tastes like wineI'm going where the water tastes like wineWe can jump in the waterStay drunk all the timeI'm gonna leave this city, got to get awayI'm gonna leave this city, got to get awayAll this fussing and fighting, man, you know I sure ...
Waitangi Day is a time to honour Te Tiriti o Waitangi and stand together for a just and fair Aotearoa. Across the motu, communities are gathering to reflect, kōrero, and take action for a future built on equity and tino rangatiratanga. From dawn ceremonies to whānau-friendly events, there are ...
Subscribe to Mountain Tūī ! Where you too can learn about exciting things from a flying bird! Tweet.Yes - I absolutely suck at marketing. It’s a fact.But first -My question to all readers is:How should I set up the Substack model?It’s been something I’ve been meaning to ask since November ...
Here’s the key news, commentary, reports and debate around Aotearoa’s political economy on politics and in the week to Feb 3:PM Christopher Luxon began 2025’s first day of Parliament last Tuesday by carrying on where left off in 2024, letting National’s junior coalition partner set the political agenda and dragging ...
The PSA have released a survey of 4000 public service workers showing that budget cuts are taking a toll on the wellbeing of public servants and risking the delivery of essential services to New Zealanders. Economists predict that figures released this week will show continued increases in unemployment, potentially reaching ...
The Prime Minister’s speech 10 days or so ago kicked off a flurry of commentary. No one much anywhere near the mainstream (ie excluding Greens supporters) questioned the rhetoric. New Zealand has done woefully poorly on productivity for a long time and we really need better outcomes, and the sorts ...
President Trump on the day he announced tariffs against Mexico, Canada and China, unleashing a shock to supply chains globally that is expected to slow economic growth and increase inflation for most large economies. Photo: Getty ImagesLong stories short, the top six things in our political economy around housing, climate ...
Photo by Towfiqu barbhuiya on UnsplashHere’s what we’re watching in the week to February 9 and beyond in Aotearoa’s political economy around housing, climate and poverty:Monday, February 3Politics: New Zealand Government cabinet meeting usually held early afternoon with post-cabinet news conference possible at 4 pm, although they have not been ...
Trump being Trump, it won’t come as a shock to find that he regards a strong US currency (bolstered by high tariffs on everything made by foreigners) as a sign of America’s virility, and its ability to kick sand in the face of the world. Reality is a tad more ...
A listing of 24 news and opinion articles we found interesting and shared on social media during the past week: Sun, January 26, 2025 thru Sat, February 1, 2025. This week's roundup is again published soleley by category. We are still interested in feedback to hone the categorization, so if ...
What seems to be the common theme in the US, NZ, Argentina and places like Italy under their respective rightwing governments is what I think of as “the politics of cruelty.” Hate-mongering, callous indifference in social policy-making, corporate toadying, political bullying, intimidation and punching down on the most vulnerable with ...
If you are confused, check with the sunCarry a compass to help you alongYour feet are going to be on the groundYour head is there to move you aroundSo, stand in the place where you liveSongwriters: Bill Berry / Michael Mills / Michael Stipe / Peter Buck.Hot in the CityYesterday, ...
Shane Jones announced today he would be contracting out his thinking to a smarter younger person.Reclining on his chaise longue with a mouth full of oysters and Kina he told reporters:Clearly I have become a has-been, a palimpsest, an epigone, a bloviating fossil. I find myself saying such things as: ...
Warning: This post contains references to sexual assaultOn Saturday, I spent far too long editing a video on Tim Jago, the ACT Party President and criminal, who has given up his fight for name suppression after 2 years. He voluntarily gave up just in time for what will be a ...
New Zealand First has today introduced a Member’s Bill which would restore decision-making power to local communities regarding the fluoridation of drinking water. The ‘Fluoridation (Referendum) Legislation Bill’ seeks to repeal the Health (Fluoridation of Drinking Water) Amendment Act 2021 that granted centralised authority to the Direct General of Health ...
New Zealand First has introduced a Member’s Bill aimed at preventing banks from refusing their services to businesses because of the current “Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) Framework”. “This Bill ensures fairness and prevents ESG standards from perpetuating woke ideology in the banking sector being driven by unelected, globalist, climate ...
Erica Stanford has reached peak shortsightedness if today’s announcement is anything to go by, picking apart immigration settings piece by piece to the detriment of the New Zealand economy. ...
Our originating document, theTreaty of Waitangi, was signed on February 6, 1840. An agreement between Māori and the British Crown. Initially inked by Ngā Puhi in Waitangi, further signatures were added as it travelled south. The intention was to establish a colony with the cession of sovereignty to the Crown, ...
Te Whatu Ora Chief Executive Margie Apa leaving her job four months early is another symptom of this government’s failure to deliver healthcare for New Zealanders. ...
The Green Party is calling for the Prime Minister to show leadership and be unequivocal about Aotearoa New Zealand’s opposition to a proposal by the US President to remove Palestinians from Gaza. ...
The latest unemployment figures reveal that job losses are hitting Māori and Pacific people especially hard, with Māori unemployment reaching a staggering 9.7% for the December 2024 quarter and Pasifika unemployment reaching 10.5%. ...
Waitangi 2025: Waitangi Day must be community and not politically driven - Shane Jones Our originating document, theTreaty of Waitangi, was signed on February 6, 1840. An agreement between Māori and the British Crown. Initially inked by Ngā Puhi in Waitangi, further signatures were added as it travelled south. ...
Despite being confronted every day with people in genuine need being stopped from accessing emergency housing – National still won’t commit to building more public houses. ...
The Green Party says the Government is giving up on growing the country’s public housing stock, despite overwhelming evidence that we need more affordable houses to solve the housing crisis. ...
Before any thoughts of the New Year and what lies ahead could even be contemplated, New Zealand reeled with the tragedy of Senior Sergeant Lyn Fleming losing her life. For over 38 years she had faithfully served as a front-line Police officer. Working alongside her was Senior Sergeant Adam Ramsay ...
Green Party co-leader Marama Davidson will return to politics at Waitangi on Monday the 3rd of February where she will hold a stand up with fellow co-leader Chlöe Swarbrick. ...
Te Pāti Māori is appalled by the government's blatant mishandling of the school lunch programme. David Seymour’s ‘cost-saving’ measures have left tamariki across Aotearoa with unidentifiable meals, causing distress and outrage among parents and communities alike. “What’s the difference between providing inedible food, and providing no food at all?” Said ...
The Government is doubling down on outdated and volatile fossil fuels, showing how shortsighted and destructive their policies are for working New Zealanders. ...
Green Party MP Steve Abel this morning joined Coromandel locals in Waihi to condemn new mining plans announced by Shane Jones in the pit of the town’s Australian-owned Gold mine. ...
The Green Party is calling on the Government to strengthen its just-announced 2030-2035 Nationally Determined Contribution (NDC) under the Paris Agreement and address its woeful lack of commitment to climate security. ...
Today marks a historic moment for Taranaki iwi with the passing of the Te Pire Whakatupua mō Te Kāhui Tupua/Taranaki Maunga Collective Redress Bill in Parliament. "Today, we stand together as descendants of Taranaki, and our tūpuna, Taranaki Maunga, is now formally acknowledged by the law as a living tūpuna. ...
Labour is relieved to see Children’s Minister Karen Chhour has woken up to reality and reversed her government’s terrible decisions to cut funding from frontline service providers – temporarily. ...
It is the first week of David Seymour’s school lunch programme and already social media reports are circulating of revolting meals, late deliveries, and mislabelled packaging. ...
The Green Party says that with no-cause evictions returning from today, the move to allow landlords to end tenancies without reason plunges renters, and particularly families who rent, into insecurity and stress. ...
The Government’s move to increase speed limits substantially on dozens of stretches of rural and often undivided highways will result in more serious harm. ...
In her first announcement as Economic Growth Minister, Nicola Willis chose to loosen restrictions for digital nomads from other countries, rather than focus on everyday Kiwis. ...
The Government’s commitment to get New Zealand’s roads back on track is delivering strong results, with around 98 per cent of potholes on state highways repaired within 24 hours of identification every month since targets were introduced, Transport Minister Chris Bishop says. “Increasing productivity to help rebuild our economy is ...
The former Cadbury factory will be the site of the Inpatient Building for the new Dunedin Hospital and Health Minister Simeon Brown says actions have been taken to get the cost overruns under control. “Today I am giving the people of Dunedin certainty that we will build the new Dunedin ...
From today, Plunket in Whāngarei will be offering childhood immunisations – the first of up to 27 sites nationwide, Health Minister Simeon Brown says. The investment of $1 million into the pilot, announced in October 2024, was made possible due to the Government’s record $16.68 billion investment in health. It ...
New Zealand’s strong commitment to the rights of disabled people has continued with the response to an important United Nations report, Disability Issues Minister Louise Upston has announced. Of the 63 concluding observations of the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (UNCRPD), 47 will be progressed ...
Resources Minister Shane Jones has launched New Zealand’s national Minerals Strategy and Critical Minerals List, documents that lay a strategic and enduring path for the mineral sector, with the aim of doubling exports to $3 billion by 2035. Mr Jones released the documents, which present the Coalition Government’s transformative vision ...
Firstly I want to thank OceanaGold for hosting our event today. Your operation at Waihi is impressive. I want to acknowledge local MP Scott Simpson, local government dignitaries, community stakeholders and all of you who have gathered here today. It’s a privilege to welcome you to the launch of the ...
Racing Minister, Winston Peters has announced the Government is preparing public consultation on GST policy proposals which would make the New Zealand racing industry more competitive. “The racing industry makes an important economic contribution. New Zealand thoroughbreds are in demand overseas as racehorses and for breeding. The domestic thoroughbred industry ...
Business confidence remains very high and shows the economy is on track to improve, Economic Growth Minister Nicola Willis says. “The latest ANZ Business Outlook survey, released yesterday, shows business confidence and expected own activity are ‘still both very high’.” The survey reports business confidence fell eight points to +54 ...
Enabling works have begun this week on an expanded radiology unit at Hawke’s Bay Fallen Soldiers’ Memorial Hospital which will double CT scanning capacity in Hawke’s Bay to ensure more locals can benefit from access to timely, quality healthcare, Health Minister Simeon Brown says. This investment of $29.3m in the ...
The Government has today announced New Zealand’s second international climate target under the Paris Agreement, Climate Change Minister Simon Watts says. New Zealand will reduce emissions by 51 to 55 per cent compared to 2005 levels, by 2035. “We have worked hard to set a target that is both ambitious ...
Nine years of negotiations between the Crown and iwi of Taranaki have concluded following Te Pire Whakatupua mō Te Kāhui Tupua/the Taranaki Maunga Collective Redress Bill passing its third reading in Parliament today, Treaty Negotiations Minister Paul Goldsmith says. “This Bill addresses the historical grievances endured by the eight iwi ...
As schools start back for 2025, there will be a relentless focus on teaching the basics brilliantly so all Kiwi kids grow up with the knowledge, skills and competencies needed to grow the New Zealand of the future, Education Minister Erica Stanford says. “A world-leading education system is a key ...
Housing Minister Chris Bishop and Associate Agriculture Minister Mark Patterson have welcomed Kāinga Ora’s decision to re-open its tender for carpets to allow wool carpet suppliers to bid. “In 2024 Kāinga Ora issued requests for tender (RFTs) seeking bids from suppliers to carpet their properties,” Mr Bishop says. “As part ...
Associate Education Minister David Seymour has today visited Otahuhu College where the new school lunch programme has served up healthy lunches to students in the first days of the school year. “As schools open in 2025, the programme will deliver nutritious meals to around 242,000 students, every school day. On ...
Minister for Children Karen Chhour has intervened in Oranga Tamariki’s review of social service provider contracts to ensure Barnardos can continue to deliver its 0800 What’s Up hotline. “When I found out about the potential impact to this service, I asked Oranga Tamariki for an explanation. Based on the information ...
A bill to make revenue collection on imported and exported goods fairer and more effective had its first reading in Parliament, Customs Minister Casey Costello said today. “The Customs (Levies and Other Matters) Amendment Bill modernises the way in which Customs can recover the costs of services that are needed ...
Minister of Internal Affairs Brooke van Velden says the Department of Internal Affairs [the Department] has achieved significant progress in completing applications for New Zealand citizenship. “December 2024 saw the Department complete 5,661 citizenship applications, the most for any month in 2024. This is a 54 per cent increase compared ...
Reversals to Labour’s blanket speed limit reductions begin tonight and will be in place by 1 July, says Minister of Transport Chris Bishop. “The previous government was obsessed with slowing New Zealanders down by imposing illogical and untargeted speed limit reductions on state highways and local roads. “National campaigned on ...
Finance Minister Nicola Willis has announced Budget 2025 – the Growth Budget - will be delivered on Thursday 22 May. “This year’s Budget will drive forward the Government’s plan to grow our economy to improve the incomes of New Zealanders now and in the years ahead. “Budget 2025 will build ...
For the Government, 2025 will bring a relentless focus on unleashing the growth we need to lift incomes, strengthen local businesses and create opportunity. Prime Minister Christopher Luxon today laid out the Government’s growth agenda in his Statement to Parliament. “Just over a year ago this Government was elected by ...
Associate Education Minister David Seymour welcomes students back to school with a call to raise attendance from last year. “The Government encourages all students to attend school every day because there is a clear connection between being present at school and setting yourself up for a bright future,” says Mr ...
The Government is relaxing visitor visa requirements to allow tourists to work remotely while visiting New Zealand, Economic Growth Minister Nicola Willis, Immigration Minister Erica Stanford and Tourism Minister Louise Upston say. “The change is part of the Government’s plan to unlock New Zealand’s potential by shifting the country onto ...
The opening of Kāinga Ora’s development of 134 homes in Epuni, Lower Hutt will provide much-needed social housing for Hutt families, Housing Minister Chris Bishop says. “I’ve been a strong advocate for social housing on Kāinga Ora’s Epuni site ever since the old earthquake-prone housing was demolished in 2015. I ...
Trade and Investment Minister Todd McClay will travel to Australia today for meetings with Australian Trade Minister, Senator Don Farrell, and the Australia New Zealand Leadership Forum (ANZLF). Mr McClay recently hosted Minister Farrell in Rotorua for the annual Closer Economic Relations (CER) Trade Ministers’ meeting, where ANZLF presented on ...
A new monthly podiatry clinic has been launched today in Wairoa and will bring a much-needed service closer to home for the Wairoa community, Health Minister Simeon Brown says.“Health New Zealand has been successful in securing a podiatrist until the end of June this year to meet the needs of ...
The Judicial Conduct Commissioner has recommended a Judicial Conduct Panel be established to inquire into and report on the alleged conduct of acting District Court Judge Ema Aitken in an incident last November, Attorney-General Judith Collins said today. “I referred the matter of Judge Aitken’s alleged conduct during an incident ...
Students who need extra help with maths are set to benefit from a targeted acceleration programme that will give them more confidence in the classroom, Education Minister Erica Stanford says. “Last year, significant numbers of students did not meet the foundational literacy and numeracy level required to gain NCEA. To ...
Foreign Affairs Minister Winston Peters has announced three new diplomatic appointments. “Our diplomats play an important role in ensuring New Zealand’s interests are maintained and enhanced across the world,” Mr Peters says. “It is a pleasure to announce the appointment of these senior diplomats from the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and ...
Ki te kahore he whakakitenga, ka ngaro te Iwi – without a vision, the people will perish. The Government has achieved its target to reduce the number of households in emergency housing motels by 75 per cent five years early, Associate Housing Minister Tama Potaka says. The number of households ...
The opening of Palmerston North’s biggest social housing development will have a significant impact for whānau in need of safe, warm, dry housing, Associate Housing Minister Tama Potaka says. The minister visited the development today at North Street where a total of 50 two, three, and four-bedroom homes plus a ...
Foreign Minister Winston Peters has announced the new membership of the Public Advisory Committee on Disarmament and Arms Control (PACDAC), who will serve for a three-year term. “The Committee brings together wide-ranging expertise relevant to disarmament. We have made six new appointments to the Committee and reappointed two existing members ...
Ka nui te mihi kia koutou. Kia ora, good morning, talofa, malo e lelei, bula vinaka, da jia hao, namaste, sat sri akal, assalamu alaikum. It’s so great to be here and I’m ready and pumped for 2025. Can I start by acknowledging: Simon Bridges – CEO of the Auckland ...
The Government has unveiled a bold new initiative to position New Zealand as a premier destination for foreign direct investment (FDI) that will create higher paying jobs and grow the economy. “Invest New Zealand will streamline the investment process and provide tailored support to foreign investors, to increase capital investment ...
Science, Innovation and Technology Minister Judith Collins today announced the largest reset of the New Zealand science system in more than 30 years with reforms which will boost the economy and benefit the sector. “The reforms will maximise the value of the $1.2 billion in government funding that goes into ...
Turbocharging New Zealand’s economic growth is the key to brighter days ahead for all Kiwis, Prime Minister Christopher Luxon says. In the Prime Minister’s State of the Nation Speech in Auckland today, Christopher Luxon laid out the path to the prosperity that will affect all aspects of New Zealanders’ lives. ...
The latest set of accounts show the Government has successfully checked the runaway growth of public spending, Finance Minister Nicola Willis says. “In the previous government’s final five months in office, public spending was almost 10 per cent higher than for the same period the previous year. “That is completely ...
The Government’s welfare reforms are delivering results with the number of people moving off benefits into work increasing year-on-year for six straight months. “There are positive signs that our welfare reset and the return consequences for job seekers who don't fulfil their obligations to prepare for or find a job ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By A J Brown, Professor of Public Policy & Law, Centre for Governance & Public Policy, Griffith University Australia has turned the corner on its decade-long slide on Transparency International’s annual Corruption Perceptions Index (CPI), once again ranking in the top ten least ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Nicole Bridges, Senior Lecturer in Public Relations and Director of Academic Program – Communication, Creative Industries, Screen Media, Western Sydney University Stock Rocket/Shutterstock For new parents struggling with challenges such as breastfeeding and sleep deprivation, social media can be a great ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Scott French, Senior Lecturer in Economics, UNSW Sydney US President Donald Trump and Prime Minister Anthony Albanese have stated an exemption for Australia from Trump’s executive order placing 25% tariffs on all steel and aluminium imported into the US is “under consideration”. ...
Analysis - Christopher Luxon's attempts to turn the tables back on the Opposition at Question Time today went down like a lead balloon, Jo Moir writes. ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Brenton Griffin, Casual Lecturer and Tutor in History, Indigenous Studies, and Politics, Flinders University American Primeval/Netflix On January 24, leaders of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, more commonly known as the Mormon Church, penned a statement condemning the ...
It comes as Whangārei District Council is under fire from the Director General of Health Dr Diana Sarfati after it voted in December against adding fluoridation to the water. ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Paul Strangio, Emeritus Professor of Politics, Monash University Is history repeating itself in Labor’s fortress state of Victoria? At the 1990 federal election, Bob Hawke’s Labor government had a near-death experience when it lost nine seats in Victoria. A furious Hawke laid ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Lisa Nissen, HERA Program Director – Health Workforce Optimisation Centre for the Business & Economics of Health, The University of Queensland Rawpixel.com/Shutterstock If you’ve tried to get an appointment to see a GP or specialist recently, you will likely have felt ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Peta Ashworth, Professor and Director, Curtin Institute for Energy Transition, Curtin University Large power grids are among the most complicated machines humans have ever devised. Different generators produce power at various times and at various costs. A generator might fail and another ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Bronwyn Orr, Veterinarian, Southern Cross University Mitchell Orr/Unsplash Late last year, rumours swirled online that HomeSafeID, a private Australian pet microchip registry, had stopped operating. On Feburary 5 2025, a notice appeared on the HomeSafeID website, ostensibly from the site’s ...
The government is taking far too long to allocate the 1500 social homes it announced nine months ago and the hold up is stalling desperately-needed homes, says a community housing provider. ...
The agency is setting a 12-week limit on how much rent debt a tenant can accumulate as part of a change in approach that will also see almost half of the outstanding dept wiped away. ...
The media is rife with headlines about people killing animals for kicks. Please don’t.In memory of an Auckland swan, a Bay of Plenty octopus and a Taranaki striped marlin.Imagine this. It’s 7.15am. You’re paddling around on a serene lake with your sweetheart. It seems likely that she’ll give ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Michelle Grattan, Professorial Fellow, University of Canberra US President Donald Trump has agreed to “consider” exempting Australia from the 25% tariff he has imposed on imports of steel and aluminium to the US. Trump gave the undertaking during a wide-ranging 40-minute ...
Pacific Media Watch Israeli police have confiscated hundreds of books with Palestinian titles or flags without understanding their contents in a draconian raid on a Palestinian educational bookshop in occupied East Jerusalem, say eyewitnesses. More details have emerged on the Israeli police raid on a popular bookstore in occupied East ...
By Caleb Fotheringham, RNZ Pacific journalist China and the Cook Islands’ relationship “should not be disrupted or restrained by any third party”, says Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesperson Guo Jiakun, as opposition leaders in Rarotonga express a loss of confidence in Prime Minister Mark Brown. In response to questions from the ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Chris Ogden, Associate Professor in Global Studies, University of Auckland, Waipapa Taumata Rau Donald Trump is moving rapidly to change the contours of contemporary international affairs, with the old US-dominated world order breaking down into a multipolar one with many centres of ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Ronnie Das, Associate Professor in Data Analytics, The University of Western Australia In the recent Border-Gavaskar series against India, Steve Smith agonisingly missed out reaching 10,000 Test runs in front of his home crowd at the Sydney Cricket Ground, falling short by ...
In a brand new documentary series for The Spinoff, comedians and best friends Brynley Stent and Kura Forrester embark on a cross-country quest to find love. Bryn & Ku’s Singles Club is a brand new documentary series for The Spinoff following award-winning comedians and friends Brynley Stent and ...
🚐 Bryn and Ku pack their bags and swap the bleak dating scene of Tāmaki Makaurau for some meet and mingle events in Ōtautahi that will take them out of their comfort zone. ❣️ Bryn & Ku’s Singles Club follows comedians Brynley Stent and Kura Forrester as they head out ...
"The relationship between China and the Cook Islands does not target any third party," the Chinese Foreign Ministry says, as opposition leaders in Rarotonga plan protest. ...
From tradwives to ‘petite blonde’ preferences, this season feels like a throwback for all the wrong reasons, writes Alex Casey. First of all: I know. Complaining about bad stuff on Married at First Sight Australia is like complaining that water is wet. But I’ve been bobbing around in these waters ...
As part of our series exploring how New Zealanders live and our relationship with money, a public servant who’s ‘trying to get better’ explains her approach to spending and saving. Want to be part of The Cost of Being? Fill out the questionnaire here.Gender: Female. Age: 24. Ethnicity: Pākehā and ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Zena Assaad, Senior Lecturer, School of Engineering, Australian National University Ziv Lavi/Shutterstock Last week, Google quietly abandoned a long-standing commitment to not use artificial intelligence (AI) technology in weapons or surveillance. In an update to its AI principles, which were first ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Brenainn Simpson, PhD Candidate, The University of Queensland Florian Nimsdorf / Shutterstock About 400 kilometres northwest of Sydney, just south of Dubbo, lies a large and interesting body of rock formed around 215 million years ago by erupting volcanoes. Known as ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Mareike Riedel, Senior lecturer in law, Macquarie University The dramatic rise in antisemitic incidents has dominated headlines in Australia in recent months, with calls for urgent action to address what many are calling a crisis. The Executive Council of Australian Jewry ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Jane McAdam, Scientia Professor and ARC Laureate Fellow, Kaldor Centre for International Refugee Law, UNSW Sydney For a long time, it seemed refugee law had little relevance to people fleeing the impacts of climate change and disasters. Nearly 30 years ago, ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Maggie Kirkman, Senior Research Fellow, Global and Women’s Health, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University Krakenimages.com/Shutterstock You’ve heard of the gender pay gap. What about the gap in medical care? Cardiovascular diseases – which can lead to heart ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Iain White, Professor of Environmental Planning, University of Waikato Getty Images Urban planning has a long history of promoting visionary ideas that advocate for particular futures. The most recent is the concept of the 15-minute city, which has gained traction globally. ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Andrew King, Associate Professor in Climate Science, ARC Centre of Excellence for 21st Century Weather, The University of Melbourne Earth is crossing the threshold of 1.5°C of global warming, according to two major global studies which together suggest the planet’s climate has ...
As support for the coalition dips, the PM and his soon-to-be-deputy have engaged in a public war of words. Stewart Sowman-Lund has the details in today’s edition of The Bulletin. To receive The Bulletin in full each weekday, sign up here. Support slips If there was ever a political honeymoon, or ...
Thought I'd get in before the Open Mike adopts its new norm of debate pattern…
Have been walking with a group of mostly rural women and overheard the leading group of three discuss politics. Luxon was described as not up to it and I think the field is open for some headway to be made among rural women who are a bit more centrist than Groundswell-oriented right wingers.
Some of these walkers are not well-informed and have social media and mass media driven misinformation for example about why nurses are emigrating and to what jobs, and the effect of minimum and family wage increases upon the cost of living.
Another told me she hated paradise ducks and believed that they were imported by early colonialists.
Very fit, older women, great walkers and talkers but not open to challenge; so as a new man in the group but known already to be of the Left through my previous public persona I will bite my tongue and wait for inclusion.
Interesting to get those views, though, and also to be receiving the local MPs newsletters which are also a window into the world of the Right.
The latest offering # 95 dismisses Labour's achievements over five years as bumper sticker policies, whereas National's education and electricity reforms will be world beaters.
Nothing like listening to joe/jill public to make you realize how unengaged and or thick alot if them are.
And paradise ducks are a barstard in big numbers
And they are in big numbers, now in European times, because as herbivores with a taste for seed and grain their native habitat was hugely increased by open field farming. Where I am sitting now I see flocks of starlings in hundreds which fed on the ripening oat crop on the other side of the river, upon the leavings after harvest along with ducks, gulls and now sheep, and then fly off a hundred metres to dine on grapes. I have seen two paradise ducks here to raise a brood of eleven which they proudly paraded past my patio last season, but hundreds of starlings swirling in flocked flight.
Yes, the Paradise Shellducks are very good parents. The ones I know usually fledge as many as they hatch as the male is very aggressive. The main predators of the ducklings are big eels, but if the parents don't put the little ones in the water too early, they tend to be OK.
I'm glad the bloody starlings are all over at your place this season Mac!
"Nothing like listening to joe/jill public to make you realize how unengaged and/or thick a lot of them are."
And the task is to persuade enough of them to return a good government in five months time by being educated and reminded enough to see through the miasma of misinformation, the whinging, the lies and the greed.
Your farm wife mates will vote national, no matter who's leading it,
Yes as 'they' say at the Southland farm of my sister & bro in law.
'If you stood a sheepdog on a mailbox with a blue ribbon around its neck many in Southland would vote for it. '
Many don't have a good choice of printed newsmedia which is still very popular, as internet connections are still not as reliable.
bwaghorn – As I’ve got older, I’ve come to the conclusion that people who see things differently than how I see things, doesn’t make them thick.
Looking back, when I was 18, I was at “peak intelligence” I knew absolutely everything and I was totally awesome. Then over the years my 6 pack turned into a keg, and I slowly realised that I didn’t know that much at all.
What I do have now is life experience, so what have I’ve learned? That people who believe that they have the answers are generally a walking talking example of Dunning-Kruger. They themselves have no idea how stupid they are, and they inflict their stupidity on others.
"Looking back, when I was 18, I was at “peak intelligence”
Wow. You were ahead of me. I didn't reach peak intelligence until my mid 20s.
I wouldn't say we were Dunning Kruger sufferers – just had more growing up to do.
Well said, Anne. I am not sure if my intelligence ever peaked at all, but would also opt for mid-20s if obliged.
The Dunning Kruger effect may be important, but I think we should not underestimate the Homer Simpson "D'oh" effect..
When you hear people regurgitate half arsed talking points and blindly belive mistruths, that's thick , having different opinions is is not,
Although one would think that once the written word,and science came into life we would easily be following the what worked best last time this happened method, Of government
I was in the bottom of a bottle fro 18 to 30 odd so knew little cared less
Tend to agree with this bwaghorn.
That is why I think Labour needs to look at the degree of difficulty on some of its policy statements.
My view is that they may be pitched to an expectation of the general public having more ability to assimilate information and tease out the issues than they really have.
"When you hear people regurgitate half arsed talking points and blindly belive mistruths"
everyone whether they are left, right , center or non aligned does this though… The left , center and right constantly quote half truthes to back up their prejudices.
All Individuals in the general public will believe something that is bullshit and and untrue.
What is concerning is seeing people on the left increasingly unwilling to engage and win over people who believe some shit the left doesn't believe in, because the right is damn well willing to engage and win over people who disagree with them.
They may disagree with the left on how to do it, but Most kiwis don't want austerity, most kiwis want housing to be a human right and want far,far,far far more houses built, most kiwis believe in a minimum gauranteed standard of living, want better transport, far better healthcare and wanna eradicate poverty..
Its crazy that the left fail so often, to focus on engaging with the public on the things the majority agree with us on and instead we focus more on what we disagree with the public on.
Often it seems that the left want to write issues off and they do this by saying that person is alt right or right wing or a Nazi. And for those people on the left who do this, then its game over for that idea, belief, person etc etc. frankly its weak.
As always the question is how…something the (modern) left appear to struggle with
Good people Mac1 and good women as I am sure you know. They have their urban counterparts but neither have had the opportunity to hear the other side of the argument. When they do, it does not mean they change their loyalty but rather they have a better understanding of how others are faring and feeling. That is a good start.
Over the years I have had more friendships with women who come from 'the other side' than I have on my own side. When it comes to friendship, politics does not loom large.
Yes, Anne. "Good people Mac1 and good women as I am sure you know." They show support, compassion, and hospitality but there are 'sides'.
So true Anne, I grew up in the city and would sometimes go and stay on Great aunt & uncles farm for school holidays.
I many respects the country folk were more open minded in some than the left wing managerial class I grew up with.
So many political pundits saying Jacinda didn’t achieve much on promised policies. I know we’re not supposed to use the Covid word as an excuse anymore. However when the entire government, including the civil service, is consumed for the best part of 3 years dealing with the pandemic, how was the PM supposed to deliver other policies?
And yet, listen to Ardern's valedictory from Wednesday and she enumerated some of her achievements. Policies and positive social action was taken by her government.
For example, around our Grey Power table we mention winter warmth payments, a big rise in Super. We drive with a reduction in fuel taxes. We receive free vaccines and boosters, prescription subsidies, cheaper travel.
A bit more than bumper stickers, that!
Thanks, Anker. There are opportunities for us to get out of our bubbles. For me Grey Power, walking groups, public meetings of all sorts, health support groups, Friday night sessions over a good Imperial Stout, as tonight hopefully will be….
I would be interested in the discussion as to why nurses are emigrating and to what jobs – my feeling is that some is normal wanting to see more of the world; for some wage comparisons are not particularly important, for others they will not allow for the need for medical insurance, or for many service costs being higher due to those higher basic salaries.
Regarding Labour's achievements, it would be good to have more than bumper stickers so that we can give a convincing argument about the real substance of those achievements – there was a good chart illustrating the ''leading the world'' performance in keeping deaths due to Covid lower than anywhere else; but there does not seem to be a repository of such convincing material in a form that can be included in social media or an email.
Oz has a shortage of nurses and is offering "locum" type rates for short term contract hires.
https://www.1news.co.nz/2023/04/03/nearly-5000-nz-nurses-have-registered-to-work-in-oz-since-august/
I know one kids are , grown escapes nz every winter to the northern oz warmth.
But the press will always boil it down to a whinge about $ government
Nurses are just a subset of the workforce which turns over with the natural occurrences such as overseas experience, as you point out. They leave for pay, conditions and career opportunities.
But we are also suffering from the government not reacting quickly enough to immigration settings. And it was warned.
New Zealand is losing nurses because of immigration rules that make them feel "unwelcome and in a permanent state of temporariness", the Government has been warned – a situation that piles pressure on a workforce contending with thousands of vacancies during a pandemic.
Frustrated New Zealand-trained migrant nurses are planning to leave the country because they cannot find an immediate path to residency, just as the government tries to entice foreigners to fill thousands of jobs in hospitals, aged care and clinics.
As for "illustrating the ''leading the world'' performance in keeping deaths due to Covid lower than anywhere else", you might need to think again. In deaths per capita, we sit at 820, which 111th highest in the world out of 229, and are just shy of the world dpc of 877.
[I’ve asked you 2 days ago to provide the URLs and use blockquotes (see Mod note here: https://thestandard.org.nz/go-well-jacinda-2/#comment-1943828). Two of the four embedded hyperlinks in your comment are actually direct quoted text but they are without quote marks. You replied with “Got it, thanks. Apologies.” (https://thestandard.org.nz/go-well-jacinda-2/#comment-1943895). I don’t like having to waste my time and having to ask multiple times. If you say “YES” but mean “NO” then I won’t trust you because I cannot take you on your word here. Do you understand what this means for you? – Incognito]
Mod note
Isn't it good enough that the links are embedded hyperlinks and are in italics? What are 'block quotes'?
Edit – I’ve just looked up the definition of ‘block quotes’ at https://www.scribbr.com/working-with-sources/block-quote/. Block quotes don’t contain quote marks. Can you clarify which it is please.
Mod note cont.:
I’ve already given the answer in my previous Mod note 2 days ago: https://thestandard.org.nz/faq/comment-formatting/#quoting.
Blockquotes do start with a rather large quote mark that is very easy to spot:
Blockquotes start on a new line and add an extra empty line (white space) at the end, which makes them even more distinguishable from the (other) commentary.
Alternatively, you add the quotation marks yourself at the start and end of the quoted text, for example, “this is what a blockquote looks like”.
Embedded links are best for single or combined words, e.g., in Wikipedia when full links would break up the flow of text too much.
Italics (or bold) are good for emphasis of single or a few words, not for highlighting a whole string or block of text.
Other commenters manage without problem.
You did not query this 2 days ago and agreed and apologised – can I take you on your word or not?
Please stick with the programme and stop wasting my time – I’ve been patient with you.
I'm trying to follow, but there are multiple other posts here that are not done in the way you describe, including this one from Peter below https://thestandard.org.nz/open-mike-07-04-2023/#comment-1944185. I have also posted using this same format (as have others) for a long time, so why the inconsistency?
Nurses plan to leave NZ over residency rules: 'I can't wait any more' | RNZ News
Got it (I think), thanks.
Mod note cont.:
For someone who’s of above-average intelligence and capability (based on your extensive track record here and all the info you’ve provided about your activities elsewhere), you seem rather obnoxious following a simple and clear request.
You’ re also arguing with a Mod about someone else, which is begging for self-martyrdom, as is clearly described in this site’s Policy (https://thestandard.org.nz/policy/#banning).
Peter followed what I described: he used manual quotation marks at the start and end of the quoted sentence and even put it as a separate alinea. No embedded link, italics, or change in font colour.
He also provided the full URL starting with “https:// …”. It is an awful title and URL, but that’s on Shayne Currie and NZ Herald.
Peter’s comment did not need modding, but you seem to think that you know better – you don’t and you were not merely asking.
I’ve reached the end of the line on this with you.
Our rate is below every nation in the EU/Europe and North America. Only Norway is close.
https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/#countries
Relevance? We are certainly not "''leading the world'' performance in keeping deaths due to Covid lower than anywhere else""
https://fortune.com/2023/04/05/end-of-capitalism-inflation-greedflation-societe-generale-corporate-profits/
Greedflation!!
How to combat it , price controlling is risky imho.
Being yanks the thought of tax and redistribute didn't enter their tiny mind
One little part in Shayne Currie's article about the closing of Today FM struck me. A quote from Duncan Garner.
“It’s appalling. We lost our jobs in front of the country, live. How that’s fair, reasonable, dignified and done in good faith is beyond me.”
Garner who with Judith Collins saw to the end of the political career Iain Lees-Galloway in front of the country, live.
https://www.nzherald.co.nz/business/justin-marshall-misses-selection-for-sky-rugby-world-cup-team-in-france-stuff-newsroom-gong-concerns-and-the-leaked-slack-messages-rnzs-ethical-dilemma-over-kiri-allan-speech-today-fm-staff-call-in-lawyers-media-insider-with-shayne-currie/MA3TB25ARJEGFBDVVIEGOQ574Q/
I don't have too much sympathy for Garner, after all the station ratings were shite. However, from the outside looking in, the process does seem to have been particularly brutal. There are ways of handling these situations that give the people affected (and I'm talking specifically about people who are not highly paid media 'personalities') more dignity and space to process what is happening.
Mmmm. They only 'lost their jobs in front of the country, live' – because they didn't respect the employment process (a meeting scheduled for midday) – and chose to release this information 'live', earlier.
At that stage there were, I'm sure, staff who didn't know. Garner and Tova O'Brien removed their opportunity to have this information conveyed to them in a way which was 'fair, reasonable, and dignified' (good faith is a totally separate issue)
I understand and accept that they were hurt and distressed by the situation. But they also acted unprofessionally.
I agree about Garner and O'Brien, but doesn't that make the process even more poorly managed? How did they find out before other staff? If Bradbury is correct, and "the decision to kill off Today FM has been made and discussed weeks ago.", then the company has made a hash of this IMHO
It did feel like the Smiling Assassin meeting the Wolf of Wall Street meeting the Apprentice, very cutthroat old school. Behind the scenes, reputations need to be upheld.
How do they expect women to answer the call to get vaccinated before giving birth to protect their baby when NZR keeps exhorting 'pregnant people' to get their jab before giving birth? I am sick of these ridiculous pronouns that cancel women. even the newsreader on the 11am news hesitated before saying it for the second time. Sorry not up yet so can’t link.
Amazing how we got through the entirety of "Blue September" (Prostate Awareness Month) without a single man being referred to as a prostate owner, a testicle bearer, a penis person or an ejaculator.
Just shows that this is all about erasing women for the benefit of gender ideology.
don't mention the AGPs.
The funny thing is, if someone does give birth while identifying as a transgender man – TVNZ would do a story about it.
SPC – As a card carrying “bloke” I can assure you that no man would dream of wanting to give birth. From what I’ve been told, it’s an extremely painful process, and to top it off being pregnant is extremely uncomfortable and you’re not allowed to drink for nine months.
Meh, it would be by C-section anyway. A natural birth, OTOH, now that would be a story!
Those born female and who then identify as transgender men and give birth to children is not that rare overseas (numbers).
https://www.nbcnews.com/feature/nbc-out/trans-dads-tell-doctors-you-can-be-man-have-baby-n1006906
https://www.theguardian.com/society/2019/apr/20/the-dad-who-gave-birth-pregnant-trans-freddy-mcconnell
In fact the only time that 'trans men" seem to hit the headlines is when they do that most female of all things and give birth. Somehow that "gender dysphoria" does not seem to apply.
My youngest niece has managed to get off side with a clique at her work. She’s pregnant, & she’s been called a pregnant person, and she’s replied that she’s a pregnant woman!
She was called into a meeting with her manager (male) and told that she’s making some people (a transgender women and her 4 or 5 trans allies, all gay or bisexual men by the way) feel unsafe. For the following reasons; she’s 25 & married (so too conservative for her age), pregnant with 4th child (this makes a transgender woman at her work feel uncomfortable), has had a baby shower with the gender of the baby revealed (offensive to transgender women), she’s a European woman married to an Asian man (So she’s taking advantage of a person of colour).
Her manager pointed out that it’s all BS, however he’s obligated to have the discussion with her. The workplace has the Rainbow Tick so he’s basically covering his butt.
Goodness. I do hope she's documenting all of this. Sounds like a PG case for workplace bullying, if it continues. None of the elements revealed have anything to do with her work or workplace – they're her private business (marital status, pregnancy, number/sex of children, race of SO – all prohibited grounds for discrimination)
I'd also be cautious about the meeting with the manager. If it is recorded that she's had a 'counselling' meeting – that goes on her HR record. And, if/when the manager leaves, and a one less in contact with the real world arrives, it could be used against her.
I'd follow up with the union (if she's a member) – and get them to help her draft an email to the manager – basically saying: Thanks for the meeting. At which we agreed that ….. (all the above points), have nothing to do with my work or performance; and that any complaints made about them, have been proven to be groundless.
I'd find a company that isn't full of idjits and go work there
it as a shocking story.
unfortunately there's a good chance her union won't support her because what she said is considered transphobic.
Free Speech Union might be the go.
Does anyone else find it …. ironic…. that the woman is being mis-gendered: her preferred group noun is "women", rather than "people" – with the qualifying adjective 'pregnant' indicating her current gestational status.
If someone tells me their preferred pronoun is ‘her’ – I would be downright rude to refer to her as ‘them’ – just because that’s my preferred pronoun.
This is why gender ideology is inherently sexist and regressive. Trans people are allowed to define their own selves, women aren't.
I use they as the default now.
That kind of thing is not uncommon. I had it happen to me years ago.
Two former senior public servants approached me with a serious allegation. I made it clear to them it was false and since nothing further happened I thought it was the end of the matter. But further down the track – and after a prolonged period of bullying, intimidation and other disturbing incidents – I was to discover the allegation had been placed on record and never rescinded. It ended up causing me a huge amount of trouble and distress.
I later learned a jealous acquaintance (a woman) had made the allegation and the recipients chose to accept it without any attempt to seek verification. My word was apparently not regarded as good enough.
Some of her options:
None of the above mean having to take action now, they're insurance. Her boss might be covering his butt, and if push comes to shove he's not going to side with her.
Yeah she is a member of the union, and I believe that she’s casually mentioned that her Dad & older sister are lawyers.
I think this is just one clique defending their turf so to speak. My niece and tall, slim, educated, elegant, private school educated (I’m from the poor side of family), she’s always been very independent and strong willed. So others are drawn to her. I think she has often been excluded from the popular clique, but she’s always developed her own clique, which can be threatening to those with low emotional intelligence.
But she’s working for a bank, well paid, looked after. So definitely doesn’t want to leave.
The only thing I would add to Weka's advice is for her to always have a support person if she's called to a meeting, and to ensure any future meetings are documented. Also, you say that she doesn't want to leave. I get that, but I have seen this scenario play out and there is a good chance her colleagues could make things very unpleasant for her. In that situation, unless she is extremely resilient and thick skinned, it can be better for a person's health just to walk away.
Also document, document, document.
Start with a time lines then flesh this out with copies of emails, texts, updates on group conversations. Keep off site ie not on main bank server/keep copy printed out in locked private drawer.
This is a ghastly sounding case and I may be wrong but I thought there were special provisions about not denigrating a woman because of pregnancy.
Is this it?
Human Rights Act (1993) – Prohibited grounds of discrimination
https://www.legislation.govt.nz/act/public/1993/0082/latest/DLM304475.html
First entry:
21 Prohibited grounds of discrimination
(1) For the purposes of this Act, the prohibited grounds of discrimination are—
(a) sex, which includes pregnancy and childbirth:
Yes thanks Molly….I used to have all this stuff at my finger tips.
When I was working if you made a big P of your self about another's pregnancy and more or less the door was waiting, after a process. When Maternity leave first came in we had a spate of grumpy males thinking that women had just got an advantage…..
You know an advantage to go along with the mostly lower salary starting rates, lower rates all round because of broken service,…….etc etc.
How can a natural process make people feel uncomfortable. It is not as if a pregnancy can be left at the lift door and picked up after leaving work.
Thanks for posting about this Terry.
Its shows the insanity of the trans rights movement.
Can somebody explain why human resources doesn't always have a standard policy which avoids being suborned into bullying employees?
An EQC person wants better decision-making as to where we build.
https://www.stuff.co.nz/opinion/131707548/we-need-to-be-smarter-about-planning-where-we-build
There is so much more, loss of good soil land for housing and the NACT Labour agreement to allow urban area development free for all (and end earlier focus on transport spine development – real urban planning).
And lest we forget, the old pre Super City Auckland had plans to prevent building in areas recently flooded …
The woke give Sean Plunket a good hating. In my opinion after reading this article, their cause may have been better served by keeping their gobs shut.(?)
https://www.stuff.co.nz/pou-tiaki/131689488/motivation-behind-broadcaster-sean-plunkets-define-a-woman-question-challenged
One thing that really worries me about the Trans movement is their possible influence on impressionable youngesters – kids trying to find their way in life, who are having trouble fitting in, who are looking for answers.
The chap in this clip became trans after listening to a podcast and finding enlightenment- he was really a woman. He had that affirmed by all those close to him. Yet under questioning by the speaker his tenuous arguments as to why he's a woman fell apart and he reverted to that great woke talisman of protection, he was feeling unsafe.
The clip unfortunately has Conservative commentary. Sorry about that. Just skip along to different parts.
that link is broken, can you please find the right one.
Sorry, Weka. I checked the link twice before posting. It worked fine. Just delete the clip.
it's not the clip it's the Stuff link. Looks like it’s been deleted by Stuff.
Yes. I'm not surprised.
was it defamatory or just really bad journalism?
More bad journalism in my opinion. It went way off track into Maori Trans feeling unsafe with the type of rhetoric Sean was spouting, to colonialism, you name it. There was little focus on the topic.
One person interviewed said he was instrumental ( complained to Twitter) with getting Plunket banned from Twitter. Sean has now been reinstated. Maybe that was one reason to delete the article?
https://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/sean-plunket-thanks-piers-morgan-posie-parker-after-twitter-ban-lifted/DZTMSYRF4BFPNCJCSU2S7VYKBY/
It was a once over lightly and critiqued Sean Plunket on his actions, full of speculations but did not once interview SP to get his side.
It was also full of borderline weird stuff to say that asking what a woman was is racist/homophobic.
????????
Interesting. Also this
https://twitter.com/psycho_milt/status/1644185102250053639
The link is to a talk that a right wing speaker Matt Walsh gave.
I linked to the extract when a trans medic was not able to answer of what they would do, EMT wise, when confronted with a man who said they were having a miscarriage.
Matt Walsh
3:08 PM · Apr 5, 2023
This link is to the concluding parts of the speech he gave
Matt Walsh
@MattWalshBlog
·
Apr 5
3:33 AM · Apr 7, 2023
Here is the link, below, to the sad interview he had with the man who was saying he was a woman.
2:27 PM · Apr 5, 2023
I have commented before that quite bit of the thoughtful work on the trans debate/ideology seems to be coming from the right.
I hope these links are clickable to the actual parts of the speech.
ETA I am coming to the thought that what the trans lobby is doing is actually cruel to the well meaning individuals who spoke. Rather than saying men can be women, ie changing biological sex which is impossible, the call could be better made as an acceptance of the gender that a person wants to be identified as.
The need would then move to accepting people as they want to present themselves rather than trying to force a biological impossibility on the population.
One of my links is broken…..aaaah
The concluding remarks from Matt Walsh
3:47 PM · Apr 5, 2023
The thing about Matt Walsh is that he speaks simple truth. He appeared on an episode of Dr Phil, and was by far the most coherent voice. This link is to the full video to provide context. The salient exchanges are from 12:30, where Matt debates the definition of woman.
Thanks I have watched the whole speech. He is a great speaker.
I did hesitate to put the link to the trans medic up as it was from a RW commentator. I started putting the links up yesterday including a couple from an, also RW group, called Gays against Grooming.
Oh oh
A great interviewer Winston Marshall interviews Matt Walsh, above
MW also is an anti-feminist patriarch who wants to roll back women's rights. Who are you trying to convince here? Because progressives will have a hard time believing him once they know who he is (despite his videos being good at explaining the issues).
Matt Walsh has views I don't agree with. Posie Parker has views I don't agree with. There are many people who have views we may not agree with, but speak powerfully into certain issues. I just happen to believe that on this issue, he nails it.
sure, but you're rw, yeah? From the left and for feminists, it's not a matter of 'disagreeing with' him, it's the fact that he actively is seeking to remove womens rights.
I mean, I get it, I was going to write a post with that video in it, but I'd have to spend 600 words pointing out how much of an arsehole he is to women and what that means in the sex/gender wars.
Very annoying that the video does such a good job of showing the issues.
Yes I'm from the political right. And I'm pro-woman. I would like to think I'm a feminist, but I don't even know what that word means any more.
I'm a fan of feminism as women's liberation
The problem that weka does not want to say out loud is simple and obvious. In very simple terms left wing feminism spent decades telling us that gender roles do not matter and women can do anything men do if they want to.
Then came along the trans crowd who bizarrely insist that biological sex does not matter and men can be women if they want to. Similar logic, just the consequences are reflected back onto women in a way they quite reasonably do not like.
Of course social conservatives never really agreed with either proposition, and that they are the firmest and clearest opponents of trans ideology is only to be expected. That feminists find this very annoying is also very predictable.
Except that in many respects 'girls can do anything'….if by that you mean (exclusion from) historical male occupations.
Whether society allows them to however is another question altogether.
@pat
Well it turned out that when women obtained access to any traditional male role they liked, it was the largely high status professional, political or physically undemanding roles they had in mind. Dirty, dangerous and unpleasant jobs undertaken in all weathers – like sewerage maintenance for example – were not what they chose at all. Turned out the traditional, patriarchal oppressive male gender roles were not always as wonderful as they were made out to be.
But that is a small matter. More interesting was the idea that males and females were – other than the bare biological essentials – interchangeable in their gender roles as parents, and if women could do anything men could, then logically fatherhood could be generally regarded as optional, or dispensed with altogether.
For most people sex is essentially a private matter, marriage being a public institution intended to protect families – and at root is a social contract between a biological man and woman that was of mutual benefit to both parents and especially their children.
And the further we publicly moved away from this ideal, the less comfortable they became.
My general point being that for most people traditional gender roles still carry real significance – no matter how patriarchal and oppressive the feminists tell us they are.
You might be interested in this blogpost by Maya Forstater, (who won a tribunal case in the UK, which said her statement that sex was binary and immutable was worthy of respect in a democratic society):
On Gender-critical disputes
@Molly.
Yes that post navigates the perilous shoals of this debate rather well. If I might quibble on some aspects with the author, I would imagine we could at least have a fine constructive conversation on the basis of what she has expressed here.
The idea that we have a soul that regardless of our sex, stands equally alongside all other humans before our creator, should not be so lightly discarded. In my view it is the basis for the claim that all people are equal before the law, to be accorded equal dignity and opportunity, and lies at the core of our common humanity and universal rights.
But this does not mean all humans are equivalent, or equally interchangeable, in every context. While a soul is an essentially immaterial abstraction, our physical bodies are not. And the multitude of ways in which these bodies differ matters a great deal in the way we should treat people in order to be just.
By way of a trivial illustration – if my partner and I take a day trip somewhere, the more art galleries and museums we can pack in the happier she will be. On the other hand if I can find an unexplored bush track I will be happy. Treating us both the same erases these interests and preferences and neither of us will be happy. On the other hand if we mutually respect each other's differences and constructively accommodate them – taking turns at doing art galleries and bush tracks, or somehow combining both – the outcome is more likely to be good for both of us.
All three of your comments are thought provoking and succinct, thank you.
"Of course social conservatives never really agreed with either proposition, and that they are the firmest and clearest opponents of trans ideology is only to be expected. "
This is an especially interesting comment. I am, in many ways, a social conservative, and my position on trans ideology comes from 2 places.
1. Much of the trans ideology is coming from a place of denying objective reality. Trans women are not women. They cannot ever fully understand what it is to be a woman, and accommodating the idea that they can is delusional.
2. I am pro woman. I believe women have a right to establish rules around their own spaces to the exclusion of others if that makes them safe.
Rather than address the issues being faced by the trans community in a meaningful way, we are listening to a small but vocal representation that is increasingly pushing a violent and divisive agenda.
FRANCE: Violent Trans Activists Force Cancellation Of Symposium Supporting Afghan And Iranian Women – Reduxx
Thanks for your comments RL.
I think you have got the biology/gender stuff a bit confused. This old feminist was always saying that 'women can do anything' -sure some things may be difficult strength-wise but we can do anything or should be given the chance to. We were not fighting on gender grounds as sex/gender were indistinguishable in those days.
My sister, slightly younger than me, still works in a male dominated, physically tough mainly outdoor environment. As she has got older she has looked at mechanical aids mainly in lifting that have been useful.
So useful that the business is now using them across the whole workplace. This is because they protect younger backs as well as older backs, workers do not get so physically tired and are able to really look at the intrinsically valuable areas of work not the manual labour parts. So smaller slighter people of both sexes can be employed and keep on being employed.
I have come across this view that because women made a thing of 'women and girls can do anything' ie not tied to the home or traditional sex role stereotypes that our 'punishment', often described in words like 'irony' is that now we are to put up with the trans community trying to change the meaning of biology,
This is far from ironic to me. It smacks of a barely suppressed glee that women have got 'what they should have known was coming to them, perhaps they/we should have 'known better.'…..I reject this framing.
The patriarchy is reasserting itself. This I have no problem in agreeing with. I can run an argument that seeing as men want to wear dresses and go into women's toilets and changing rooms that this is just 'boys being boys' and nothing to get concerned about.
The other view is that the patriarchy has said 'this is what we want to do so get out of our way'. The patriarchy supports men whether they call/are themselves men or we females call them transwomen.
Of course they have 'handmaidens', who support the idea. Riley Gaines found the handmaidens for the trans community shrieking and pulling at her as she made her way out of SFSU.
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/riley-gaines-ambushed-physically-hit-after-saving-womens-sports-speech-san-francisco-state
Simone de Beauvoir “the oppressor would not be so strong if he did not have accomplices among the oppressed”
While traditional roles or mother (at home), father(at work) children suit many people they do not suit everybody. If it is one thing that has happened is that there is greater flexibility across roles, timing of work etc. I think this has benefited males as well as females.
I don't believe it is useful to frame the concern for women as being only 'feminists' who are concerned. Many of the women I speak to etc were profoundly upset by 25/3 where they saw other women prevented from doing something they wanted to do. Some of these women are, I believe, on the cusp of thinking the election should/could be a single issue women's rights election.
The right has been at the forefront, it seems, of being able to articulate the concerns of women.
So however we got to the dominance of 51% of the population by a despotic 3-5 % of the population, whether the patriarchy is stirring and pushing back etc, the longer the left leaves it the more chance there is of a single issue going with the party that 'sees' women……and it ain't Labout at the moment.
@Shanreagh
Yes, I generally avoid this topic and accept that others will disagree with my not always fluent efforts at expressing my thoughts on this.
For certain I have affirmed the right to equal opportunity; but that does not imply everyone will choose equally. Nor should they be forced to.
On average men are more interested in things, bonding in teams while facing challenge, are somewhat more aggressive anda a disagreeable. Women on average are more interested in people, bonding socially while nurturing and are more vulnerable to negative emotion and physical threat.
But there is considerable overlap as well; there are plenty of men with very feminine personality structures, and vice versa. But in general while each sex is broadly capable of doing what the other does, it does not mean they will necessarily want to. Instead diverging gender roles assert themselves, like weeds in a vege garden, no matter how much we officially disapprove of them.
In my view the core mistake- cheered on by the post-modernists- was to argue that this meant all gender roles were an ephemeral social construct that could be engineered into any shape we pleased. Or if erased them altogether a wonderful new utopia would ensue.
So for decades the western world has set about dismantling the 'patriarchy' delivering societies in which women are demonstrably freer to choose their destiny than anywhere else on earth, or in our known history. Yet it is not clear that for all this effort, anyone is much the happier.
And yes most people are willing to allow wiggle room at the margins. If a family chooses this dynamic – and it works for them – then few people might concern themselves with it.
What you write here brings to mind a couple we met at a marina some years back. She was definitely more on the masculine side and was very much the 'skipper', in charge of their boat, it's maintenance and operation, while he was very comfortable looking after finances, provisioning and navigation usually the domain of the woman. For them it worked just fine and no-one else cared a rat's patui about it.
But where people would push back is the activists proposition that somehow this couple were morally superior for having 'smashed the patriarchy'.
All reasonable points.
But (as always) the question is …how do we develop a social contract (and legal framework) that recognises both gender AND individual differences that is fair WHILE maintaining a functioning society?
A problem for the ages.
@RedLogix
Feminism is now claimed by a wide diversity of people holding different and often conflicting views. For me, it holds the same information about someone as calling them left or right-wing. There is no longer a coherent definition of those terms that is universally accepted, so I now try to avoid any of them in conversation and exchanges.
The same is true of the word and concept of "patriachy". Academic feminists have a detailed explanation of the term and concept and how it manifests, to the point where the word is lost in the explanation. Others use it as the whole argument and conclusion, ie. Domestic violence against women is because of the patriachy. When you ask what the definition of patriachy is from those who use it in such a way, you will often have different answers, mostly incoherent.
Female and male bodies are different, and those differences play a part in our experiences and our lives.
That's not an unfounded criticism to my mind. Many forget that everything has costs – whether intended or not. They should be acknowledged – and hopefully mitigated – when celebrating what you see as success. Or alternatively, acknowledged and considered too high a price to pay.
I agree with what you have written here. I also believe that alongside this, has come an implied criticism of the conservative family, and those who do choose or find themselves in what others will designate as traditional roles. The demand for neutral acceptance of alternative choices, is often not accompanied by the neutral acceptance of others who make what is seen as traditional choices.
The supposedly benign prefix "cis" is often used as a pejorative. Cis-het, I have only seen used as an insult.
Kellie-Jay Keen is upfront about her concerns and that she will work with anyone who is concerned. Clips of her visit to the Heritage Foundation in America, show that she did not have to inform those she met about her concerns – they were already well informed. That is not often the case with any supposed progressives that deign to meet her. The Heritage Foundation offered to assist in any way that was acceptable to her.
The American #LetWomenSpeak tour documentary can be found here: https://youtu.be/QLkUQH81Tts
Established feminists in the UK, have reacted very strongly to Kellie Jay Keen’s popularity with women who are not politically identifiable as left-wing.
A concerted and unrelenting campaign of critique and denigration has been active over the last years. Public declarations of distancing, has allowed groups to promulgate the unfounded accusations of Nazism, racism and far-right affiliations along with criticisms of not supporting reproductive rights – without providing evidence. Despite these accusations being debunked many times the declarations – in all their smug pompousness – remain.
The blogpost I linked to was a reply to a series of essays written by a variety of academic feminists who asked for written responses. (Link from the article) Needless to say, they didn't like the one above.
NZ based women – behind the authority of Feminist Named Organisations – but also using the cowardly cloak of anonymity – duplicated both the approach and accusations of such UK feminists.
I personally consider both groups have culpability in the violence that took part in Albert Park against the #LetWomenSpeak event. They repeated what they should know to be unfounded accusations, and provided supposedly legitimate references for others to smear and defame Kelly-Jay Keen Minshull and the event.
(Note: Just for added context. Kellie-Jay Keen is responsible for the first Women – Adult Human Female billboard going up, in Black and White in 2018. She's been merchandising that definition in that form on t-shirts, posters, signs and stickers ever since, and it has become ubiquitous in the movement. However, it is grammatically clumsy – it should be adult female human. When her USA tour was announced, an announcement was also made that the Standing For Women group intended to make a documentary. Within a few months – those who criticised her most publicly had produced a documentary – called "Adult Human Female" with black and white branding, and described it as coincidental. Like the women's organisations who defamed her before her arrival, they are capitalising on the increased attention without giving credit to the person and organisation who created it.)
https://youtu.be/y8nViKYmEhU
@ Redlogix
First I should say thank you for your views. I agree with many of them. Where I soon lose agreement is where I sense that the argument is, this suits most of us so therefore it is the way to go.
Being governed is a matter of consent by those being governed. The current system and many religions give room for most to exist so we accept them. This does not mean it is a perfect system, just that we don't see another that is better.
I call 'the system' the patriarchy and couple it with religion. I don't have the rigorous definition of patriarchy that some have – for me it is broadly the status quo. (the status quo built on eons of similar status quos. Where change is observable but may be barely moving as a way of moving the lives of everyone forward) Of course the status quo is like a breathing animal whose lungs expand and contract. So I wouldn't see the yachting couple as smashing the patriarchy. I think also that the patriarchy is inherently regressive, so that is why I say it is reasserting itself. It feels as if the we are regressing not moving forward. That the beneficiaries of this are male can lead to a thought that if the patriarchy is the status quo, it is possibly regressive ie not suiting the needs of all, in particular not hearing the voices of women then we see the growth of parties for specific parts of our society eg KJM proposed party called Party of Women.
So I believe in families, in stable units to bring up children, and to provide help and stability after those children have gone, so access to good health, education and opportunities for children and their families, no matter how these are made up.
What I don't believe in is a system so rigid that these are our only concerns. We should be in a society where our lives are measurably different, in a better way, than those who have gone before.
As a result of the current debate I have thought long and hard about the utility of the concept of gender. To me a census question, a very mixed up census question, about gender has great interest from a sociological point of view just as the influence of religion does. Sociologists interrogate this data and make observations on thought trends in our society.
To answer a census question on gender with Moon gender, gives nothing to health, education, super planners.
The key planning-useful questions are
woman, man, male child, female child
age
ethnicity/race
time lived in NZ
where born
All of these can give hard information to planners on the types of facilities we should be providing as we look ahead.
We could ask a question
who do you identify as?
male
female
another question, specify
prefer not to answer
This may give sociologists material and it is possible that coupled with age, women, male (ie biological or born sex) question some interesting ideas could come forward in the movement of thought.
@Molly and Shanreagh
I have read both of your comments immediately above and appreciate both. If I have not anything substantive to add at this moment it is because in the past this topic has often become a messy conversation – and I want to properly consider everyone's contribution, rather than charging in deeper.
(Also my apologies for some of the grammatical horrors in my comments. I have always been a very fast reader, but the downside is that when I am proof-reading inside this very narrow edit box, I am prone to missing or duplicating words at the line returns. I probably should get into the habit of typing in a proper word editor and then pasting over.)
100% Liberty Belle
I have always wanted the left to be on the ball in writing/interviewing on this issue.
I have said a couple of times that I have found good explanatory material on the right. I always caveat my links. I explained that Walsh was RW.
I want someone who can explain the issues, no more no less. Surely if we caveat the other aspects then progressives can decide whether or not to open the links.
Ok, then remove the interview I put up please. marshall/walsh.
How do you suggest we cover the points if the left is not generating much thoughtful material and we want to quote from something not from the left.
Yesterday I linked to GAG site and put a link in so people could see where on the political spectrum they come from.
I always thought that a note to say he is not from the left or is from the right was sufficient but am happy to caveat in whichever way you want.
Like Weka I see ‘feminism as women’s liberation’, and for me it is movement of many houses.
It's not that he's RW. There are decent RW people in the world. It's that he is a man with a lot of power that is actively trying to remove women's rights.
if we're talking liberation of women, MW not only opposed dismantling of the patriarchy, he is seeking to reinforce it and make it stronger.
There are a few problems with this position. One is that the liberals who might be persuaded will be put off again when they find out who Walsh is and what his politics are. A huge part of the war is because progressives want to be kind to trans people and feel good about their own politics, and then they see the counter to their politics coming not just from the right but the far right and fundamentalists, which makes it much harder to accept the ideas.
another problem is that nearly everything MW is saying has already been said in the past by feminists and better. The analogy about humans being bipedal and a one legged person still being human? here's Jane Claire Jones saying it in 2021.
https://twitter.com/janeclarejones/status/1439503748796190728
There have been multiple conversations on twitter about categories, how humans use them to make sense of the world, and how to explain this to people running the counter argument about women without a uterus aren't women.
One of the big challenges atm is that the right are getting to set the narrative on gender ideology especially in NZ. If you believe that the war has to be won at any cost then one can ignore this I guess. But Plunket didn't have the rights of women in mind when he asked Hipkins the question. Part of it is that he's trying to undermine the left so they don't win the election. Plunket understands the political significance of the question and what played out in the UK, and I would guess he understands that the left in NZ doesn't get it, yet.
When we use right wing and far right sources to promote our position and do so in such a casual way, we feed the right getting to determine the narrative. And that's not going to serve women in the medium and long term.
I get how tempting it is, it's very easy when MW lays it out so clearly to share the video. But that puts material out there by someone who is strongly in favour of limiting women's rights. And that shifts the overton window away from our rights. We might win on self ID but lose abortion rights.
I had a talk with Australian and NZ feminists on a twitter Space last night, and talked this through because I wanted to write a post using MW's videos, precisely because they were so good at demonstrating the issues. I had this idea that I would write about who Walsh is and why he is such a big problem for feminists, but in the end I was convinced by others that it's not worth it. We should be amplifying the voices of people whose politics we want to see in the world.
another way to think about this is, how can we change the narrative on the gender/sex war so that it is progressive and feminist?
to that end, here's the whole thread from JCJ,
The problem now is that MW's video can show the concept without people having to think about it much. They will get it intuitively. He is very good at this.
I'm not saying never use his material. I'm saying do it consciously and with awareness of who he is and what he is going, and make it very clear to others what is going on.
Thank you Weka. I am grateful for the way in which you have enriched my knowledge about these issues. I do appreciate that it is beguiling to read/listen to someone eg Matt Walsh who seems to get it.
I don't want this at all. Every time the Nats have got in with their shrinking govt policies etc it has meant hard times. As a superannuitant I have even less $$$ to come and go on than I had as a salaried person.
Many of the women I speak to/know were truly horrified by 25/3 and are coming very close to single issue. They do not like the thought of losing access to women only toilets and changing rooms. Many have children and grandchildren playing sport & see how dangerous it can become……though some sports are moving to protect women on fairness grounds.
It would be so easy for the right to commit to revising this legislation or tightening the safe spaces provisions and many may rush over.
I was talking on Twitter about the possible effects on women's ability to want to go out if all cinema restrooms etc have to be shared with males. Then there are toilets and changing areas in workplaces. If these are all unisex which seems likely then these are not a women friendly solution.
I have worked in two workplaces with these in them and they were awful as the men users did not leave the places as most women would. In fact some women could be found doing general tidy ups in the toilets….others just ducked out to a nearby Dept store that still had a powder room/lounge.
We speculated that if these reactions of not going out for recreation cinemas/sport and then inadequate facilities for women in workplaces then women are home shackled and housebound as badly as the Victorian times.
When women were striving to get ahead in the workforce the pee leash was a great restrictor.
Also I read some correspondence about women in the south of England pushing back against mixed male female changing areas being built as a 'Changing Village' (universal vomiting sounds the world over to this phrase) A few cubicles but mainly open space around the walls.
Thank you again Weka.
Snarky column by J. Pagani …
This sort of nails the tone
But the article is about health. She lauds the attack on centralisation by Rob Campbell and National (ignores the impact debt had on Health Board finances and capacity and the post code lottery on access to services under that system).
And advocates for private sector funding of hospital and health services building – the old model allowed government funding but boards had to provide a return (the cost of which deterred anyone asking for a new building until they had to). She would just bypass the government funding and has a rent cost for private sector profit (another step to privatisation).
https://www.stuff.co.nz/opinion/131711380/josie-pagani–yes-minister-health-is-in-crisis
j pagani is a shit stirrer, no friend of the left. here's a more balanced view of politicians subsequent careers. (omits the murky dealings of paula benefit, jami-lee ross and several others)
https://twitter.com/attackcartoonz/status/1643832246854643712?s=20
Very grateful that I'm spending my Easter break at home – rather than trying to leave Auckland
https://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/easter-traffic-barely-moving-delays-for-aucklanders-escaping-city-in-both-north-and-south-directions/YXQOEWC3FBG75PBJUXXBPGXZ2M/
same. we should make our homes and neighbourhoods attractive so people don't feel the need to get out of them so much.
A few days ago I heard or read, sorry can't remember where, mad-cow you know, an economics commentator was castigating Adrian Orr for punishing us for imported inflation, fuel, machinery etc, etc. I got to thinking about that and realised that he left out an equally valid culprit and that is "exported "inflation. The high price of our high quality meat here is the huge demand for it from the USA most of which ends up minced in hamburgers for MacDonalds, a fact I was unaware of until I was enlightened by a beef farmer mate. The world price for milk is directly responsible for the cost of cheese, baby formula and all kinds of other dairy products including of course milk itself. Many other products such as fish, some veggies and many others probably cause the same problem.
The answer cannot be ringfencing our in -demand products so that they are more affordable locally as that means producers would need to be compensated for the lost earnings and any failure to do so would be politically untenable. In some ways it is already happening as cost of living adjustments to the less well off mask the discrepancy.
God, politics is difficult and not a lot of people know that.
The problem of dairy prices in NZ owes much to Fonterra charging NZers the same prices as their products cost fob on foreign wharves. What little regulation we have never touched the practice – a prime instance of greedflation.
They are everywhere. No heresy is permitted.
https://reduxx.info/france-violent-trans-activists-force-cancellation-of-symposium-supporting-afghan-and-iranian-women/?fbclid=IwAR0cO7Xpd9m5VH9q0eKnQvxrgjpqRSLrCU1mTTz3wk75Bc_N7_FTCLJ01ZE
Oh heavens this is frightening Visubversa.
So transactivists destroy a mural to babies who died as a result of shaken baby syndrome (abuse)
This is sounding more and more like a book burning, witch finding mob than a movement dedicated to moving society forward.
We need some bonfires, sticks, stocks, pools, inflamed unseeing/unknowing followers and we will be back in the Dark Ages…….oh wait 25/3/23
I ‘hear’, taps side of nose, that people may know the identity of the ‘person’ who punched the 70 year woman in the head fracturing her skull on 25/3.
Obv don’t feel comfortable linking. it may be just speculation.
https://www.womenarehuman.com/trans-activists-ratchet-up-violent-attacks-against-women-in-france-spain-for-international-womens-day-2021/
Antifa? Maybe there’s something else going on here? A bit of anarchy, with trans people just pawns?
Anybody can call themselves "Antifa". It is not like the Boy Scouts, you don't get franchise rights.
In the UK – the black clad masked lads who turn up to shout abuse at women are dubbed "Black Pampers", (Pampers are a brand of nappies) and the ones in Melbourne (average age 17), playing at being Nazis were dubbed the "Black Shorts".
However, it is all the same male aggression and misogyny.
Yes, I understand your point. I am just wondering out loud whether (at least in some instances) the trans movement is being hi-jacked by other agenda's.
LB I don't think the trans agenda is being hi-jacked.
I think the trans agenda is now big enough that it is attracting all sorts of hangers on who may be peripherally attached philosophically to parts of it. Some of these will be pornography adjacent and some will have even less desirable aims. To push the boundaries as it were.
I would not be surprised if we saw moves to lower the age of consent, cater for more bizarre kinks such as Man/Boy love groups. Some are concerned that sexualising children through transitioning may play into the hands of groomers, this is a fear in the USA. I have not seen it here.
Others will be attracted by more common place views, to tag along for the possibility of violence.
As Visubversa says
Thanks, Shanreagh.
I had thought
Here is a good starting point from Maya Forstater (Molly's post above)
7 April 2023 at 9:10 pm
But how will it resolve the changing rooms, sports etc issues?
Perhaps the human rights for women are those at UN level rather than the 'NZ as a country' human rights level. I don't think the protection of women's safe spaces in NZ legislation is especially immune from legal attack.
I had found this article earlier on and see that it is referenced in the Maya Forstater article as well…..thank you Molly.
It deals with the pronouns issue ( I think Incognito said he has already taken his out)
https://fairplayforwomen.com/pronouns/
This is an excellent article and draws on the ideas of safety and how instinctive markers that women have carried through life may be blunted, confused as if we have been subjected to the effects of rohypnol
the use of pronouns such as 'she' to describe 'he' (male bodied) can dull our senses
Good read including a couple of exercises, and no these do not give you credits for any exam.
This is why I am stepping back from the gender wars. Will speak about principles now and then but it's tiresome getting tangled in the weeds
https://twitter.com/caitoz/status/1643253627937767429?s=20
Mainstream discourse is a complete wasteland. @SophRiver (🔒) describes the problem well:
That quote from SophRiver certainly resonates with me.
Here is my diagnostic tool rob. I look at the outcomes – if the outcome is more division and exploiting social fault lines to accumulate moral or political power, then I know to avoid associating with them.
If the outcome drives toward unity and a visible, concrete progress toward real-world, universal solutions, then I will cheer them on, and watch to see what lessons can be learned.
Looking at outcomes or consequences is a reasonable rule of thumb that I tend to use as well. However, it has limitations, especially when dealing with wicked problems and social messes. This can be illustrated with metaphors such ‘death by thousand cuts’ or ‘the last drop in the bucket overflowing’, et cetera. Complex multi-dimensional non-linear interactions with time lags cannot be measured or managed by a snapshot in time.
do you have permission to share those tweets from behind a locked account? If not, can you please check with her that it's ok.
Will do.
Permission granted.
thank-you!