I don't know if others have already commented on this, but it is brave and wonderful that in the budget the tax rate for trusts was raised from 33% to 39%, the same as the top income tax rate, to fix the rort/anomaly where trustees used trusts to only pay 33%.
Luxon will doubtless change this back-Standard readers need watch for the Nats policy position on this.
Trust income, in short if you found yourself in the 39c tax bracket you would once you reached it put the money into a trust which would pay 33c. For it to be a worthwhile work around you needed to earn 300k and up
so people whose assets are in a trust, and are earning income from that, but whose income would otherwise be in a lower tax bracket, will pay 39% on the trust income?
ok, that makes more sense. So people who have a trust but aren't high inome earners, and who aren't trying to rort the system, can just take out the income each year and pay their normal tax on that rather than the 39%.
There is no 'rort'. Beneficiaries don't benefit from a different tax rate in the trust because as soon as they are paid a distribution, their personal tax rate kicks in.
so are Cricklewood and BG wrong when they say that the income being earned by the trust was being taxed at 33% but if it was personal income wealthy people would be paying 39%?
In the next financial year income coming into the trust will be taxed at 39%. Are you saying that if that stays in the trust until the following year but then is paid out that the beneficiary gets a rebate (assuming they pay less than 39%)?
In answer to question 1, ultimately what beneficiaries pay comes down to the nature of the distribution and the personal tax rate of the beneficiaries.
Increasing the trust tax rate to 39% is meaningless, because trustees will simply distribute all profits in the year they are earned (as most do now), and beneficiaries will pay whatever they pay, somewhere between 39% and zip.
It can be a rort. Parents who don’t have a trust have to meet the cost of their child's upkeep from their own income. With a trust, however, a child beneficiary's upkeep cost can be recovered from the trust, saving the parents a fair bit of money.
It would be useful to have legislation making it illegal to pass income to a child (or to anybody for that matter), through the use of a trust, without good reason.
I have friends who set up a trust so that they could hide income so that they could claim working for families. My understanding is that this is a widespread rort
If they are beneficiaries of the trust, the IRD will cut straight through the trust and effectively void the transactions. It’s the same scenario as gifting to avoid the cost of rest home care.
No rorts, of course – just an example of NZ punching above its weight.
Trust that Trust [October 2021; PDF]
A Practical Guide to Family Trusts in New Zealand Australasia is known to have a love affair with trusts. It is thought that New Zealand has the most number of trusts per capita of any country in the world – approximately one for every 10-15 people. Accordingly, they are integral to the fabric of not only our economy, but also of our society and have many uses as we will see.
Too much of a 'good' thing?
The Panama Papers New Zealand link revealed [6 May 2016]
New details from the Panama Papers show how a stream of foreign cash became a torrent flooding into New Zealand trusts in order to avoid tax offshore.
New Zealand, foreign trusts and the Panama papers
[8 September 2016]
These reports are of great concern to both the New Zealand Government and the IRD. There is little consolation for the IRD in the statements made by Prime Minister John Key and Revenue Minister Michael Woodhouse, that the OECD had looked at the New Zealand foreign trust rules in the past and had found no concerns.
Interestingly, in a radio interview, Gerard Ryle, a director of ICIJ reportedly stated that he had been looking at the issue of tax havens for years and New Zealand was known to be a “really soft touch”. When asked about his thought on the New Zealand Government ministers’ statements that the country was not a tax haven, Mr Ryle stated that that this was “rubbish”.
Is NZ a tax haven for the rich and dodgy? The Pandora Papers reignite the debate [6 October 2021]
Five years ago, New Zealand was rocked by a document dump which revealed the country played an important role in a money-go-round of tax evasion and money laundering used by the world’s rich and famous and the corrupt and criminal. The Panama Papers outed New Zealand as something of (if technically not quite) a tax haven and led to rapid reform of our foreign trust laws in 2017.
But this week, a far larger leak in the Pandora Papers has again raised questions about whether the country remains a dirty cog in the global engine of money laundering and tax evasion and if those reforms went far enough.
Re the rest of it – you need to read up on foreign trusts. A clue is found in your last reference and talks about the criteria for a foreign trust only being tax free when neither the settlor nor beneficiaries lived, or derived income from New Zealand.
For a few wealthy Kiwis, tax avoidance is a way of life. Sad, if you really think about it – maybe it gives them some small pleasure?
Simon Wilson: Tax avoidance is the ram-raiding of the uber-rich [8 May 2023; premium article]
For a whole day or two last month, sanity prevailed. We discovered the wealthiest among us pay, on average, less than 10 per cent tax on their income, while the rest of us pay more than 20 per cent. There was widespread shock.
There are no ifs, buts or extenuating circumstances about this. It’s wrong. Equity should be a fundamental premise of any tax system: everybody should pay their fair share.
Christchurch builder sentenced for $300,000 tax evasion [24 January 2023]
A builder caught evading more than $300,000 in tax that he deducted from his employees' wages, spent some of the money on Uber Eats and overseas travel.
…
The judge arrived at an end sentence of 12 months' home detention, saying Win avoided jail by a "small margin."
Home detention for tax evasion [24 April 2023]
In sentencing Clark, Judge Snell noted his “astonishment” at the way Clark acted in respect of the court proceedings and said he had taken the matter to every legal challenge he possibly could. He also noted the jury found Clark acted fraudulently “without any difficulty at all”.
Is the only real problem with tax evasion ‘getting caught’? So many thrilling 'stories', and this is a great opportunity to post them here. Will there be more opportunities? I do hope so.
Why poverty in New Zealand is everyone's concern
Liang describes poverty as a "heritable condition" that perpetuates and amplifies through generations: "It is also not hard to see how individual poverty flows into communities and society, with downstream effects on economics, crime and health, as well as many other systems. Loosen one strand and everything else unravels."
A Kete Half Empty Poverty is your problem, it is everyone's problem, not just those who are in poverty. – Rebecca, a child from Te Puru
Parker said new information from Inland Revenue showed an almost 50% spike in income subject to the trustee rate when the new 39% personal income tax rate came into effect.
The amount going through trusts had jumped from $11.4 billion in the 2020 tax year to $17.1b in the 2021 tax year – a $5.7b increase.
“The report also shows that a substantial number of the super-wealthy funnel their income through trusts which minimises their tax bill. This change remedies that,” Parker said.
Parker said the change would improve the fairness of the tax system.
Seems fair to me – have NAct promised to reverse it yet? Not paying your fair share of tax is an optional perk of wealth the world over.
"If you believe that "the use of trusts" and "tax avoidance" are whole different conversations, then I have an old car to sell you" – DMK
They are completely different. – LB
Nope. The clue is in the title of the article about that “silly“, “faulty and shoddy” (in your opinion) report, specifically – "spike in trust use to avoid tax."
"Nope. The clue is in the title of the article about that “silly“, “faulty and shoddy” report, specifically – "spike in trust use to avoid tax.""
Your link is to an article that includes this pearler:
Auckland University law professor Mark Henaghan said the increase was down to one thing – a growing awareness of how trusts could be used to reduce tax bills."
Seriously? The good professor ought to know there are a) many reasons people put homes in trusts that have nothing to do with tax, and b) any use of trusts to lower tax could easily be mirrored by other vehicles. Find better sources, Drowsy.
"If you believe that "the use of trusts" and "tax avoidance" are whole different conversations, then I have an old car to sell you" – DMK
They are completely different. – LB
It appears you are firmly of the opinion that "the use of trusts" and "tax avoidance" "are completely different", so let's agree to disagree. Others can make up their own mind after considering the evidence.
Tax bill improves fairness at home and abroad
[18 May 2023]
“The trustee tax change will align the trustee tax rate with the top personal tax rate of 39 per cent. There is evidence that high income earners have shifted their income to trusts to avoid the top personal rate.
“This change will mainly affect the super-trusts of the super-wealthy. In the 2021 tax year, 5 per cent of all trusts that earned some income earned 78 per cent of all trustee income. The change does not ordinarily target smaller family trusts, who can continue to use existing rules to allocate trust income to beneficiaries to be taxed at their personal rates.
Having a trust is not always evidence of an attempt to rort or tax evasion. Taking advantage of Trusts and companies set-ups is not prima facie an indication of wanting to rort.
It is only a rort really when tax is evaded.
The financial planning for tradespeople can often include trusts and companies. The prudent financial planning for people who have children from a prior relationship and/or assets from a prior relationship often use the Trust avenue to protect the children should a subsequent relationship break down. I mean why should a subsequent husband/wife be entitled to assets from a prior husband/parent who worked so hard?
Trust have always paid a higher tax rate so keeping assets for children in this way is not all beer and skittles. Neither is making payouts to beneficiaries, despite what is being said here. (There is pretty onerous record keeping involved) Many trusts have assets that are not liquid and cannot do that anyway. Many settlors of Trusts keep the assets within the trust and so any earnings are taxed at a higher rate.
I have no problem with a higher rate for tax for Trusts but long term it is not going to yield big bucks….better to spend the time and money on ways to catch the evading group (ie the large group paying less than a person on the lowest income rates, or to look at a capital gains or wealth tax or even a modest death duties regime.
I appreciate railing at the so-called tax and Trust bogey does fit in with the depression inducing cry 'its not fair' but ultimately it gets us nowhere.
"Having a trust is not always evidence of an attempt to rort or tax evasion."
"I appreciate railing at the so-called tax and Trust bogey does fit in with the depression inducing cry 'its not fair' but ultimately it gets us nowhere."
That article is full of nonsense. Take this statement:
"Because trust income can be spread across a number of beneficiaries, who are often lower earners, the income is often taxed at a lower bracket, he says."
The author fails to understand that exactly the same result can be achieved without a trust.
Which I have linked previously…The whole Mega landlord series from Stuff (who I actually rate) lifts the rock from the land"lord". Exposing what has happened to NZ.
If a property is transferred to a trust the income from that property is taxed at a much lower rate if the beneficiaries are children, than would be the case if the parents themselves continued to own the properties, and paid tax on the income from those properties at their own tax rate; assuming of course that the children's tax rates are much lower than the parents (which of course is normally the case). The parents can then charge the children for their upkeep, and be compensated thereby from their children's trust income.
It should be mandated that parents support their children themselves rather than turning that support over to a trust.
Incorrect. If the assets are held within the trust it does not matter who the proposed beneficiaries are and what their individual tax circumstances are.
So a Family Trust with a range of possible beneficiaries pays tax at the tax rate for trusts, now the highest rate. The process for allocating to beneficiaries is time- and document- intensive & the benefits so marginal, for my family Trust anyway. This is because many of the beneficiaries the Trust could allocate to now have marginal tax rates above the lowest personal tax rate, that we have not bothered.
NB One of a common way of avoding tax is simply not to pay PAYE for employees or FBT etc. While these crimes, when caught, are heavily penalised, that the financial state of many of these people ensure that tax to pay and penalties can be repaid on the 'never, never' or even if bankruptcy ensues may be paid a low rates in the $$$$
And even then, any distributions to beneficiaries attract tax at their personal tax rate, so at the top end, the 39c applies eventually anyway. Trust income can only escape the higher rate if it is retained in the Trust. The lifting of the rate is largely symbolic.
High-earning New Zealanders moved nearly $6b income a year into trusts after the Government introduced a new 39 percent personal tax rate – but now Inland Revenue will chase it down
Indeed, nothing ‘symbolic’ about $350m a year. The “m” is not a symbol but a prefix that means one has to add another six zeros to get the real figure, in real dollars.
Not going after this money would indeed be tantamount to ‘waste’, so you should be fully behind it, yet you are not, which is rather odd and counter-intuitive.
My comment was a specific reply and specifically mentioned the nearly $6b income a year by high-earning New Zealanders. (NB the “b” prefix means that you add nine zeros to the figure) So, why are you diverting, again? Instead of putting up a decent argument you divert and/or post a wall of selective quotes or links, which is your MO here.
You seem to have a real bee in your bonnet about the increase in trustee tax but no compelling counter-arguments!? Go figure!
"My comment was a specific reply and specifically mentioned the nearly $6b income a year by high-earning New Zealanders."
My comment referred to the lifting of the trust tax rate as symbolic. I then went on to demonstrate precisely how insignificant the $35m is in the context of the budget in which it was introduced. Your $6bn is irrelevant and a diversion.
"Not going after this money would indeed be tantamount to ‘waste’…"
No, it really wouldn't. As I have pointed out, there is a real chance this change could raise little additional or even less revenue.
It’s neither irrelevant nor a diversion (nice try!) but at the core of the Government decision:
“Ministers made clear then that if analysis indicated high income earners were circumventing the rate through greater use of trusts, the Government would move to address this issue.
“New information from Inland Revenue has shown an almost 50 percent spike in income subject to the trustee rate, from $11.4 billion in the 2020 tax year to $17.1 billion in the 2021 tax year. [my italics]
I then went on to demonstrate precisely how insignificant the $35m is in the context of the budget in which it was introduced.
Well, if you keep dropping zeroes it will become insignificant. However, your incorrect $35m (the correct figure still is $350m) is neither ‘symbolic’ nor ‘insignificant’ and you have ‘demonstrated’ only that you’re a disingenuous troll.
"It’s neither irrelevant nor a diversion (nice try!) but at the core of the Government decision:"
The estimated benefit from the change is $350m. I demonstrated clearly that is immaterial (and therefore symbolic) when I compared this amount to three seperate benchmarks…a) the total amount of additional tax estimated over the next four years, b) the total trustee income from 2021, and c) the % of top income earners the new 'top tax rate' would effect.
I have also demonstrated (if you had bothered to read through the thread) that the $350m may end up being much less or even zero.
You either don't have the understanding of this subject to engage in an informed matter, or you're just being a dick for the sake of it. I'll go with the latter. It's in your MO.
[You want us to believe that $6b yearly income by high-earning New Zealanders and that could net $350m in extra tax could magically disappear and become zero even, which would indeed be ‘insignificant’ as you claim. High-earning means that they are or should already be paying 39% tax on any profit, be it from a Trust or elsewhere, and regardless of how they distribute the profit. The fact that Trustee tax was 33% strongly suggests (!) that those high-earning individuals saw a strong enough reason in moving about $6b of their yearly income into Trusts. If this wasn’t a legal loophole used by high-earning New Zealanders then I’d agree that the move is ‘symbolic’. However, the numbers suggest this to be unlikely and implausible. Have the Opposition declared yet that they will repeal the decision? If not, why not? Stop trolling and stop dicking around – only because I’ve been busy you’ve got this far with your trollish claims (e.g. your BS allegation about this government wasting money on “a movie about a Green party MP” here: https://thestandard.org.nz/nationals-policy-machine-is-a-thing-to-behold/#comment-1950174). This is your warning – Incognito]
"You want us to believe that $6b yearly income by high-earning New Zealanders and that could net $350m in extra tax could magically disappear and become zero even, which would indeed be ‘insignificant’ as you claim."
Well, on the issue of significance, I'll quote Grant Robertson, who seems to agree with my assessment:
"The additional $350 million a year pales in comparison with the overall tax take, he says."
"He says 78 percent of all trustee income is earned by the top 5 percent of trusts – that’s $13.3b out of $17.1b. “This is about a small group of New Zealanders paying a little more as a result of this."
A small amount of NZ'ers. The vast majority of trusts aren't set up by the rich, and only a small number of trusts will pay the extra tax.
That should have rung alarm bells right there. Most trusts are for the benefit of less than wealthy NZ'ers, who will simply distribute all income (rather than potentially retaining some income in the trust and paying a higher tax rate) to beneficiaries on a lower tax rate.
And here's the kicker…the $350m is exactly 6% of the $6bn, meaning they are suggesting they will collect the extra tax on every cent of that income. They are dreaming.
[I can’t see anywhere where commenters here on TS and/or Grant Robertson said or implied that $350m extra tax intake is ‘insignificant’ and ‘symbolic’. It would indeed raise serious questions as to why Robertson would have made the decision if this were the case. My take is that you are twisting words & meanings & intentions, as per usual, to score your points. Essentially, you want us to believe that those high-earning New Zealanders – and you keep diverting away from this specific sub-category – shifted nearly $6b of their yearly income into Trusts and they will now hand over control of those Trust assets/income to others just to avoid paying any tax on it (“even zero”!? The mind just boggles at your naivety! Time will tell how that $6b of yearly income will be taxed or ‘vanish’ from the IRD radar, as you seem to want us believe. Frankly, I have enough of your gaslighting days here on TS and I reaffirm your Mod note and don’t want to waste anymore of my Mod time on this – Incognito]
"I can’t see anywhere where commenters here on TS and/or Grant Robertson said or implied that $350m extra tax intake is ‘insignificant’ and ‘symbolic’. "
Re Grant Robertson:
You didn't look very hard. From my comment you were moderating:
""The additional $350 million a year pales in comparison with the overall tax take, he says."
'Pales in comparison'.
Re: Other contributors:
I didn't claim they "implied that $350m extra tax intake is ‘insignificant’ and ‘symbolic’". Look back at comment https://thestandard.org.nz/open-mike-20-05-2023/#comment-1950730.
There are a number of other contributors here who have concurred with a variety of opinions I have proffered across this thread.
"you want us to believe that those high-earning New Zealanders – and you keep diverting away from this specific sub-category – shifted nearly $6b of their yearly income into Trusts and they will now hand over control of those Trust assets/income to others just to avoid paying any tax on it (“even zero”!?)
Tax is not paid on the assets in a trust, or even necessarily by those who exercise control over those assets. Tax is paid on the income from the trust (either by the trust or by beneficiaries on distribution). That $6bn you refer to will simply find its way to beneficiaries with a lower tax rate, or into other vehicles.
[I’m not too surprised that you continue to waste my time and keep digging & doubling down and now denying your own comments aka gaslighting, twisting & turning.
Have it your way: take 10 days off for ignoring several warnings about trolling and wasting moderator time – Incognito]
But if you don't need any operational income from the Trust for personal use like paying for groceries, rent, power etc., you can leave the money in the Trust. And the Trust re-invests it and earns more income at the same discounted tax rate, which you then re-invest in a spiral of increasing wealth accumulation. The accumulated wealth might not be dispersed for years, or to the next generation, where lower personal tax rates might apply.
The money-grubbing classes are very good at this sort of game – they always find a way of getting an advantage over others. Like a sewage leak, the rest of us have only a vague, passing sense that something whiffs a bit, then you pull up the floorboards and realise the whole edifice is rotten.
Because it is essentially a tax dodge. There are many shady loopholes in the tax system: this is one of them. Unfortunately the measure introduced in the budget will not achieve much because it doesn't address the main problem.
When did the ship sail? How long ago and what were the reasons for her departure? In a similar analogy, the reasons for emigration by ship in the 19th century ranged from a search for freedom and personal advancement to colonial exploitation.
Yonks ago. For years (from 2010) the highest personal tax rate was 33%, so there was no tax advantage. Before that – from the 1980's through to 2000 the highest personal tax rate was also 33%.
Look at it this way: if trusts were abolished and everyone paid the correct amount of tax on the income they derived from their assets – rents, dividends, profits, etc., would you consider they were being unfairly treated? No? But that is what is happening when income is passed to beneficiaries whose tax rate is lower. And “protecting assets” is often just a weasel word for diddling one’s creditors, including the IRD.
Yes. There are some legitimate uses for trusts, but when there is a stampede to form trusts when the top tax rate is increased from 33% to 39%, one can hardly be blamed for being suspicious.
No it isn't. Asset protection is precisely what it says. People with assets (eg property) put them into family trusts to protect them from matrimonial property claims, not tax.
No it isn't. Asset protection is precisely what it says. People with assets (eg property) put them into family trusts to protect them from matrimonial property claims, not tax.
Oh – is this where you pretend that someone so ungenerous as not to share with an intimate partner embraces the IRD like a soulmate and gives them everything they're due?
Oh you sweet summer child! Naive even by the standards of the irredeemably stupid Right.
"Oh – is this where you pretend that someone so ungenerous as not to share with an intimate partner embraces the IRD like a soulmate and gives them everything they're due?
Not necessarily just partners or spouses. Sometimes people establish trusts to protect assets from future partners of their children. You should read up on it.
Zoom……if the so-called 'intimate partner' is so ungenerous to find a new partner while still married to the first and claims the assets built up by a prior spouse/partner for the children of that marriage.
You do not appear to know what happens on marriage break-up. I had to get another mortgage to pay my former husband out. Payment being made as a single person is very different from two working and being able to pay and is pretty poor when he had not contributed half of the value….
But you go the way with the fluffy ducks and the perfect marital bliss. It does not work that way sometimes in the real world and some of us in the real world do actually want to live in the homes we built up.
And the Trust re-invests it and earns more income at the same discounted tax rate, which you then re-invest in a spiral of increasing wealth accumulation.
I somehow don't think that paying the higest rate of tax is a discounted rate!
Not all people who set up a Family Trust fall into the categories you are throwing around. I worked hard to save and get ahead and after paying out a husband who was quite happy to take half of the 'wealth' in the home I had on marriage and which he moved into I saw sense and set up a Trust to protect myself and family. I had to re mortgage the house and pay for it again. This was with all the care to separate our earnings at the time.
But you go on slamming people who have Family Trusts.
It has meant that that the earnings in the Trust are taxed at much higher rates than I would have had if I was earning but the Trust has protected me and what I have worked hard for.
The real problem, as opposed to the philosphical problem that some see of so-called 'rich pricks' and their 'mega property deals', like me apparently, is people like this:
This bloke did not pay lawful deductions made on behalf of IRD for employees kiwisaver etc and there does not appear to be any chance that he will. I mean going to prison is hardly likely to get the lost money into employees KS accounts.
I think IRD is onto the Trust tax dodgers quite promptly whereas with people like this it can take at least a year, if PAYE is paid annually for something to be seen as amiss.
With employee pay software able to generate payments to IRD weekly, fortnightly or monthly etc it is time a bit of legislative force was used to make all employers pay IRD regularly. I know large employers can be required to pay IRD for PAYE etc more than annually but looking at this person you can see how a smaller employer who is not prepared to play by the rules can have a debt mount up.
As the daughter of two accountants i know that some scummy employers do use their employees PAYE/KS etc payments to meet cash flow problems and to bankroll expansion. Hoping on the never-never that the ship might come in with additional money to fix it up before year end. Sometimes though the ship salis away and doesn't come back.
My dad had views that this is theft from IRD and a brake on the amount of money that could be used to run the country. He told his clients this and those who were not prepared to mend their ways duirng the year were dropped.
As far as my Trust is concerned the piece of mind that this has brought has been immense and I know that the Trust pays more in tax than I would pay personally but this is a small price to pay. As a retiree I am not able to meet a mortgage to pay anyone out and staying put where I am means much to me.
I don't have a trust, and no desire to have one. The notion that people with trusts are rich pricks trying to avoid tax is a common misconception among left wingers. It's part of the whole tall poppy thing we suffer from in this country.
You are 100% correct. Unfortunately the people you are responding to have zero interest in learning anything. Their motives come from a different place.
You're probably thinking of squat poppies – those morally stunted and undeserving persons that, at every opportunity, seek to avoid their social responsibilities, and imagine that, when called out, that they are victims.
Parker either doesn't have a clue, or he is simply dishonest. It showed in the silly report he had compiled about the proportion of income tax paid by the wealthy.
And I'll quote from the article:
”The Government is trying to justify this tax hike by pointing to the most wealthy,” he said. “But those people can keep money within company structures and pay the 28% company tax rate. In reality this tax grab will hit small business owners who often hold business in trusts for legitimate reasons.”
As for the quote @9:06 pm yesterday, the Taxpayers' Union's campaigns manager Callum Purves might very well say that…
Imo there's nothing honourable about tax avoidance – absolutely nothing.
Trustee tax increase 'is response to spike in trust use to avoid tax' [18 May 2023]
Australia, Canada, the United Kingdom, and the United States had broadly comparable tax regimes and trust laws to New Zealand, and all align their trustee tax rates with their top personal tax rates.
…
“The $5.7b spike in income taxed at the 33% trustee rate in the first year of the 39% top marginal tax rate is all the evidence that the Government needed to respond.”
On the other hand, the increase in the trustee tax rate to 39% with effect from 1 April 2024 should not have come as a surprise. Inland Revenue recommended the trustee rate should also be increased to 39% when the top personal income tax rate of 39% was introduced in 2021. It was only a matter of time before the trustee rate rose and the publication of Inland Revenue’s High Wealth Individual Research Project provided a clear opportunity for the Government to do so.
In the accompanying press release announcing the measure Minister of Revenue David Parker noted that new Inland Revenue information shows a near 50% increase in trust income taxable at the trustee rate from $11.4 billion in the 2020 tax year to $17.1 billion in the 2021 tax year. The top 5% of trusts with taxable income accounted for $13.3 billion or 78% of all trustee income in the 2021 tax year.
Ah, then that is the study that found "those paying the highest average effective tax rate were single, unemployed people in rented accommodation." Nice to have that cleared up.
The study done for tax consultancy OliverShaw – not a lot of "single, unemployed people in rented accommodation" on their books, to be fair.
OliveShaw – contact us today
Tax Advisory Services Tax advisory for corporate clients, corporate boards, high net worth individuals and accounting firms. https://olivershaw.co.nz/
BTW, this is about the research methodology and findings:
"Leading tax consultancy OliverShaw commissioned Australasian consulting firm, Sapere Research Group, to prepare a report on the effective rates of tax that New Zealand’s tax and benefit systems impose on the incomes of its residents. The 263-page report adopted the standard modelling methodologies used in the OECD Taxing Wages study to review the income and tax of illustrative households to calculate the average effective tax rates paid by low, medium and high-income earners in New Zealand.
“One of the questions asked is whether the very wealthy pay taxes at the same or higher rate than middle income earners,” says OliverShaw Principal, Robin Oliver. “This research shows clearly that, whether you consider taxable income or other measures, such as economic income, the answer is: ‘Yes, they do.’ The key conclusion of the Report is: “Average effective tax rates increase as the net real economic incomes of households increase.”
A far better study is the Oliver Shaw research. – LB @2:49 pm
LB, why is the Sapere study “a far better study“, in your opinion?
Tax and the economic income of the wealthy – April 2023 [PDF]
In 2022 Te Tari Taake, Inland Revenue, researched how much tax the wealthiest families in New Zealand pay compared to their economic income.
About this research
The research was done to fill in gaps in New Zealand’s understanding of the taxation and income of the wealthiest New Zealanders.
Inland Revenue gathered a lot of information from 311 of the wealthiest families in New Zealand. These families generally have a net worth of more than $50m.
This information cannot be accessed by anyone except a small project team, and will not be used for tax compliance or audit activity.
Inland Revenue also used information it already had or was publicly available
Main finding
The effective tax rate (tax paid divided by economic income) of the families we researched varied considerably, depending on how their economic income was gained from 2015 to 2021. The median (middle) effective tax rate was 8.9%.
Explanation
Compared to the rest of the population, the wealthiest people in New Zealand tend to earn more through their investments rather than from a salary or wage. The graph over the page shows the personal taxable income of the wealthiest families in New Zealand alongside
other forms of economic income.
Capital gains
Personal taxable income is only a small part of the economic income of the wealthiest New Zealand families.
Most of the capital gains made by the researched families came through increases in the value of businesses they own or control. However, economic income gained from businesses, property, and financial portfolios all had a similar impact on lowering their
effective tax rate. This group hold many of their assets in trust.
Sixty-seven percent of the economic income made by the wealthiest families in New Zealand is made in trusts.
The results in this note can be compared with those estimated by Inland Revenue’s 2023 High‑Wealth Individuals Research Project (the Inland Revenue Project), which crucially does include company taxes, trustee income, and trustee taxes in their measures. The Inland Revenue Project investigates EATRs from a cohort of New Zealand families identified as having high net worth for New Zealand, who are unlikely to be sampled by HES and, therefore, are unlikely to be included in our EATR estimates.
Together, these two projects will create a more complete picture of EATRs across the income and wealth distributions. Our HES-based modelling will provide EATRs by different income and demographic groups, including the median New Zealand family. By comparison, the Inland Revenue Project will provide insight into EATRs for the wealthiest New Zealand families. We find our most comparable population median EATRs to be consistently higher than those calculated for the high-wealth population in the Inland Revenue Project.
Your appeal to authority shows your bias. DMK rightly pointed out a possible conflict of interest that may cloud the judgement or bias the opinion of ‘the man’. This is not ‘playing the man’ per se but a good counter attack when you’ve run out of arguments and refuse to agree to disagree and insist on scoring points. Context is important, but you seem to apply it only when it suits you.
This week I’m joined by Shamubeel Eaqub, a partner at the boutique economic consultancy Sense Partners. Shamubeel is a regular commentator on economics and is the author of several books including Generation Rent. Kia ora Shamubeel, welcome to the podcast. It's been an interesting week, we've had three major reports on the true tax rate paid by the wealthy on their economic income. What have you made of all this? Are we any the wiser after these three reports?
Shamubeel Eaqub (SE): I think we are much wiser. I think we've all always suspected that the rich were not required to pay tax on a lot of their incomes. But we didn't know how much income or how much wealth there was. So, the report by IRD in particular, I think was really useful to get a much better understanding of the survey of high wealth individuals and families. Just how rich they were and just how much income they were earning from wealth alone. The report that came out the previous week from Sapere and OliverShaw Consulting I think was really poor.
I think the official report laid bare those conjectures and I think fairly largely lobbying efforts that was done in the Sapere report.
Terry Baucher (TB): Yes, the Sapere report was something, I've described it elsewhere as fairly indigestible. You had the complete difference in the conclusions the Sapere report reached that broadly speaking the wealthy were paying a fair amount of tax in line with middle income New Zealand. By contrast the reports from Treasury and Inland Revenue which show a completely different picture, with Inland Revenue concluding the median income tax rate on economic income was 8.9%, I think that raised a lot of eyebrows.
1. The IRD report is effectively a survey of 311 families. As David Reddell points out:
"we don’t tax families, we tax individuals, and most of the families studied in this report included two spouses/partners. The median individual wealth is going to have been quite a bit lower than $106 million."
2. The IRD survey didn't take into account that in NZ, tax on property is already above the OECD median. In fcat , as David Reddel notes, that was one OECD chart left out of the IRD report. Conveniently.
3. The IRD survey includes unearned (unrealised and hypothetical) income for those individuals, but exclude that same unearned income from other tax payers. David Reddell noted of Parker that
"at his talk yesterday he even seemed attracted to a capital gains tax on unrealised gains, something I’m not aware that any country does on any sort of comprehensive basis"
4. The IRD survey takes no account of the rate of inflation.
As David Reddell states:
"But it was just knowingly dishonest of IRD not to have made the adjustment and to have presented as real income what no economist will regard as real income. But it will have suited their political masters (and perhaps reflected their longstanding institutional unease with an indexed tax system)."
5. The IRD survey takes no account of improvements performed on any of those assets at the tax payers expense.
"transfer income is not treated as a negative tax in our main scenarios,"
Above that comment is table 4.1, which shows that the ETR net of transfers at each decile:
D1: -52%
D2: -55%
D3: -36%
D4: – 2%
D5: 6%
D6: 18%
D7: 21%
D8: 23%
D9: 26%
D10: 29%
The Michael Reddell critique is worth a read, but there are others. The poor quality of the IRD work smacks of political interference. Michael Reddell sums it up in this understated manner:
"Not many government department research papers – and that, we are told, is all it is – get a Foreword from a senior Cabinet minister.
My response (with help from David Reddell…
As David Reddell points out…
In fcat [sic], as David Reddel [sic] notes…
David Reddell noted of Parker that…
As David Reddell states…
The Michael Reddell critique is worth a read…
Michael Reddell sums it up in this understated manner…
LB, if you believe this wealth distribution is sustainable in the face of climate change, pandemics, food scarcity, war, environmental and economic crises et al., then I have an old car to sell you.
The point is, we can improve. And the starting point for that is to get over the awkwardness and start acknowledging the problem.
(Cough Cough)
"Hey, aaah… do you reckon we could pass something down for these guys over here?"
Sorry – getting David Parker and Michael Reddell conflated! But your pithy comment about economists and lawyers is of course quite true!
"f you think this wealth distribution is sustainable …'
Wealth and income are not the same thing and not always directly related. Nevertheless, your comment is a great segue, because the political messaging around the IRD study has cleverly conflated wealth and income to create a faux justification for more taxation.
The IRD report is fundamentally about the fairness or otherwise tax paid on income, not wealth. In fact it goes to great pains to justify itself by classifying unearned and frankly 'phantom' gains as 'income', when (ASGFIK) nowhere in the world is unearned income treated this way.
And David Parker further stokes this confusion in his opinion piece foreward:
"But these sample surveys do not provide the information we need on the true wealth – and, therefore, total income – of the wealthiest families, and the taxes they pay on that income."
Wealth and income are not the same, and Parker knows it.
Further to this, the ETR table clearly shows the tax system in NZ is already achieving significant income redistribution. We are at a point where the highest income earners pay a hugely distportionate amount of the total tax take, and a much higher ETR than low-income earners.
LB, for all the huff and puff that "the IRD report is fundamentally about the fairness or otherwise [of]tax paid on income, not wealth", isn't it up to the IRD to say what the IRD report is fundamentally about?
There are many ways to gain this money. Most people work and are paid salary or wages. Often people talk about this as their ‘income’, and it is always taxed.
Many people have investments, like savings accounts, shares or KiwiSaver. Some start businesses. Others make money by buying something of value, often property or a business, which they could sell later. Each of these things are taxed differently.
When you add up all the ways people gain the ability to spend money, that is called their ‘economic income’.
'Annual income twenty pounds, annual expenditure nineteen nineteen and six, result happiness. Annual income twenty pounds, annual expenditure twenty pounds ought and six, result misery.'
– from David Copperfield, by Charles Dickens
Not knowing the first thing about economics or accounting (as long as I've got enough money to get by, I'm happy), I googled the term 'economic income', and apparently it's a thing – go figure.
Estimating the Distribution of Wealth in New Zealand
[April 2023; PDF[
Information on wealth is also important for understanding economic income, and by extension the distributional properties of tax and transfer systems and of other economic and social policy. The Haig-Simons definition of economic income is annual consumption plus (or minus) annual wealth gained (or lost), which can be estimated only with knowledge of the wealth distribution and how it changes over time.
There is growing evidence internationally that official statistics derived from household surveys underestimate top wealth shares (Balestra & Tonkin, 2018; Vermeulen, 2018; Lustig, 2019). In response, several alternative methods have been developed to estimate the wealth distribution, often making use of supplementary datasets, such as Rich Lists (Vermeulen, 2018) or tax data (Saez & Zucman, 2016, 2022; Smith, Zidar, & Zwick, 2023), to correct for top wealth underestimation. This paper sits within this body of literature on estimating the distribution and evolution of wealth.
High Wealth Individuals research project – Look beyond the noise [17 April 2023] Effective tax rate dependent on measure of income used
An effective tax rate measures tax paid relative to a measure of income. What is included or not included within the relevant income measure will significantly impact the stated effective tax rate. This seems obvious when spelled out but easy to get lost in the hype of the moment – many will be guilty by comparison of the results to the statutory tax rates. The problem with this is that our current tax base does not tax all gains or notions of economic income.
IR’s HWI project included four separate base measures of income:
Taxable income – Broadly the income taxpayers are currently taxed on with the addition of fringe benefits Gross cash income – Taxable income + untaxed monetary receipts + untaxed realised capital gains + net gifts and windfalls (inheritances and other lump sum payments) Comprehensive income– Gross cash income + accrued capital gains on assets not sold Economic income – Comprehensive income + imputed rental income for owner-occupied property
Hmm – while there might be bugger all diferrence between 'taxable income' and 'economic income' for much of the population most of the time, I can see why 'high wealth individuals', and their accountants, might have 'concerns' about using economic income to calculate a median effective tax rate of 9.8%.
While the prime minister has said there would be "targeted support for those that need it most with the rising cost of living", this hardly points to broader systemic change. If a cost-of-living crisis is seen as a short-term economic condition, deeper problems aren't addressed.
More fundamentally, it goes against a key purpose of these targets: to have the government set goals and make budget decisions that show it takes these targets seriously.
If this or any future budget fails to project any impact on child poverty, those targets risk becoming nothing more than a Treasury spreadsheet exercise.
"isn't it up to the IRD to say what the IRD report is fundamentally about?"
Of course. My emphasis added.
"This report describes the outcomes of the High-Wealth Individuals Research Project (the Project). It contributes to this literature by investigating how much tax a group of high-wealth New Zealand families pay relative to their income – that is, their average effective tax rates (ETRs)."
and
"This report breaks new ground as ETRs for the high-wealth families (the Project population) are calculated by combining tax administration data, public data and survey data collected specifically for this Project."
The report is a 'project' about ETR's, and as table 4.1 shows, the TWG found that higher income earners pay considerable higher ETR's than those on lower incomes.
"I googled the term 'economic income', and apparently it's a thing – go figure."
It is. But is it ever used in taxing individuals? And if the IRD or David Parker were remotely honest, they would have taken into account the economic income of every earner in NZ, not just the one class they wanted to highlight.
"I can see why 'high wealth individuals', and their accountants, might have 'concerns' about using economic income"
I don't know whether they are concerned or not. But I can see why Parker and the IRD would be far less amendable to repeating study and including the impacts of the past year or so, with asset values (particularly house prices and managed funds) having fallen.
The entire exercise was political, with a predetermined outcome built in to its methodology. It was dishonest but it got the headlines the government wanted, so perhaps they're happy.
So far you've taken issue with: the [dishonest, silly, faulty and shoddy] IRD report; Attorney-General David Parker [stokes confusion and either doesn't have a clue, or is simply dishonest]; Auckland University law professor Mark Henaghan; an article on ‘Mega Landlords: 48 per cent rise in homes owned by trustees 'suggests tax avoidance' [full of nonsense]; and our Govt [The way this government wastes money, it's a drop in the bucket.]
Imho the report on the IRD project outcomes is interesting, but anyone can read this 2-page summary [PDF] and decide for themself.
The report is a 'project' about ETR's, and as table 4.1 shows, the TWG found that higher income earners pay considerable higher ETR's than those on lower incomes. – LB
The purpose of the project is no mystery, and what Table 4.1 shows is stated clearly on page 31 of the full report.
CHAPTER 1 PROJECT PURPOSE
Introduction
1.1 This report describes the outcomes of the High-Wealth Individuals Research Project (the Project). This is a research project carried out by Inland Revenue,
on the average effective tax rates (ETRs) of high-wealth New Zealand families, based on a comprehensive definition of income.
…
Table 4.1 below shows ETRs, as calculated by the TWG, based on both personal income tax and GST. The concept of income used here (total income) is similar
to taxable income. Unlike ETRs based on economic income, these ETRs do not comprehensively take account of untaxed sources of income, such as capital
gains.
But is it [economic income] ever used in taxing individuals? – LB
Elements of economic income are used in many countries for the purposes of taxing individuals. Of the seven happiest countries (all OECD members) in 2021, six had higher Tax-to-GDP ratios than NZ (ranked 9th for happiness) – go figure.
Tax compliance, public spending and happiness in Europe
[16 December 2021; summary only]
The design of policies aimed at improving individual, corporate and the well-being of nations needs them to incorporate elements of tax compliance as an objective that has economic and social implications. Individuals and corporates contribute to a fairer and more equitable society through compliance with tax obligations.
I don't know whether they ['high wealth individuals', and their accountants] are concerned [about using 'economic income' to calculate effective tax rates] or not. – LB
Although it is desirable to improve our understanding of both the equity and efficiency of the tax and benefit systems, it is also important to recognise the difficulties and considerable costs of obtaining the information required to develop a more detailed understanding of those effects.
Those costs include the potential unintended effects that such requests for information could have on savings and investments decisions (e.g. by creating a more uncertain environment for investment due to concerns that the government might be considering the introduction of comprehensive taxes on capital gains or wealth).
The reasons for concern about using 'economic income' to calculate the effective tax rates that the very wealthy 'labour' under is obvious.
Our results show that the average ETRs for the Project population, based on economic income, are significantly lower than the average personal taxable income ETR, of around 30%, for the Project population. When all sources of income and tax (except GST) are included, the family median ETR is 8.9% and the weighted-mean ETR is 9.8% (these are measures of the average ETR over the Project period).
Some wealthy individuals think the ETRs calculated using 'economic income' are problematic, and I agree with them.
"for all the huff and puff that "the IRD report is fundamentally about the fairness or otherwise [of] tax paid on income, not wealth", isn't it up to the IRD to say what the IRD report is fundamentally about?"
I answered you with a reference from the report itself.
"Some wealthy individuals think the ETRs calculated using 'economic income' are problematic, and I agree with them."
What is wealthy? Are these the 300 or so families who the report failed to recognise are actually taxed as individuals? If so. which ones? If not, who are these 'wealthy' people who are concerned? Michael Reddell doesn't appear to be wealthy.
"Maybe this excerpt from the Sapere report will help."
Not really. The accountants will be rubbing their hands together at the prospect of a new and complex taxation regime.
The concerns about changes causing a reduction in investment are valid. When low decile income earners enjoy a negative ETR, and higher income earners are carrying an increasingly disproportionate share of the tax burden, money will leave the country. It's another reason the aforesaid accountants will be loving this.
“The notion that people with trusts are rich pricks trying to avoid tax is a common misconception among left wingers.” – LB
Don’t know about “pricks”, but more likely rich than poor, surely?
What is wealthy? Are these the 300 or so families who the report failed to recognise are actually taxed as individuals? If so. which ones? If not, who are these 'wealthy' people who are concerned?
Hmm – maybe a mix of Kiwis, 'concerned' for different reasons?
For example, individuals in the 41 families who wouldn't cooperate with the IRD project, might be 'concerned' about over-taxation.
The big money up against Parker [27 April 2023]
Nearly 12 per cent (41) of the 352 families [each] with an estimated net worth of at least $20 million did not agree to respond even though the Tax Administration Act makes such surveys compulsory.
The survey started in November 2021, and the questioning was over by May last year.
As early as November 2021, there were reports that high-net-worth individuals were seeking legal advice to avoid having to participate.
At about the same time, substantial donations from some of the country’s wealthiest individuals began to flow to the National Party.
Inevitably it pitches the ordinary taxpayer against the very wealthy and National leader Christopher Luxon yesterday defended the ultra-wealthy. “It’s not the wealthy that are the problem here,” he said.
[Imagine that – National leader Luxon defending the ultra-wealthy – whatever next?!]
The IRD study found that the 311 high net-worth families had paid, on average, 8.9 per cent of their economic income (as distinct from their wages and salaries income) in tax.
While other wealthy Kiwis are concerned about under-taxation. You may not agree with wealthy Kiwis who want to pay more tax, but everyone can appreciate their point of view.
Group of wealthy New Zealanders ask to be taxed more in open letter to Government [11 May 2023]
A sobering report last month showed the wealthiest New Zealanders were paying taxes at half the rate of the average middle-class bracket.
…
In Germany, people who earn €277,826 (about NZ$479,000) or more pay a top tax rate of 45 percent. In comparison, the Netherlands' top income tax rate of nearly 50 percent kicks in far lower at €73,031 (NZ$126,000).
New Zealand's top income tax rate is 39 percent on $180,000 and above.
The letter acknowledges ongoing issues that "will require a bigger tax contribution from those who can afford it," including future-proofing infrastructure from natural disasters such as Cyclone Gabrielle, and helping fund social services at a time where one in seven kiwi children live in poverty.
It is in direct response to two reports released by Inland Revenue and Treasury on April 26, which found that 311 of Aotearoa's richest families pay an effective tax rate of 9.4%, less than half of the 20.2% rate paid by the general population.
Diana Crossan, a former high level public servant and ex-Retirement Commissioner, is a spokesperson for the campaign is. She said the New Zealand tax system doesn't collect enough money.
"We collect in our taxes somewhere around 32% of GDP and in European countries, Germany for example, it is 38%, the Netherlands 40%.
"We just don't pay the same amount of taxes as they do in other countries and we expect to have the same health system, and the same roads, the same clear rivers, the same housing and so on."
Les Mills executive director Phillip Mills said the current tax system was “broken”.
“We’ve been focused too much for too long on paying lower and lower taxes. We need to focus more on having a world-class education system and not having people living in poverty and children coming to school not having enough to eat.”
Mills said wealthy people should be paying more than they were. He would be in favour of both a capital gains tax and wealth tax.
He says it is “bad for the economy to be tax-advantaging asset classes like residential property”.
Sir Ian Taylor said there was so much talk about tax being a burden and not enough people thought about the benefits it could deliver for better access to healthcare, education and infrastructure.
Tax has been a topic of discussion in recent weeks following the Inland Revenue department’s research which found the wealthiest New Zealanders paid 8.9% tax on their incomes, on average.
A separate released by Treasury found that the country’s wealthiest 1% own more than a quarter of the country’s wealth.
"Don’t about “pricks”, but more likely rich than poor, surely?"
Somewhere in between.
"The top five percent of trusts with some taxable income in the 2021 tax year accounted for 78 percent of all trustee income ($13.3 billion out of $17.1 billion). "
As others have noted here, most trusts are family trusts, set up as vehicles to protect assets for future generations. The 'rich prick with a trust' attutide is alive and well, and ignorant.
"For example, individuals in the 41 families who wouldn't cooperate with the IRD project, might be 'concerned' about over-taxation."
Might be. Might be concerned at the government using (to quote Michael Reddell) the "coercive powers of the state" to prepare a politically motivated attack on success.
"Some of the wealthiest Kiwis in Aotearoa know they pay lower tax rates than most – and have signed a letter explicitly asking to pay more."
There's nothing stopping them. If any of them are reading this, the Treasury bank account is 03-0049-0000327-25. Fill your boots.
Now, how does one get on that 'letter'? Not by being wealthy. It's an Oxfam/Tax Justice Aotearoa publicity stunt. If you're interested you too can self identify as wealthy at An Open Letter on Tax (sharingwealth.nz).
"Don’t [know] about “pricks”, but more likely rich than poor, surely?" – DMK
Somewhere in between. – LB
"The top five percent of trusts with some taxable income in the 2021 tax year accounted for 78 percent of all trustee income ($13.3 billion out of $17.1 billion)."
"Somewhere in between" – cute. So what's the value of income from trusts set up by Kiwis living in poverty? Take your time.
The 'rich prick with a trust' attutide [sic] is alive and well, and ignorant.
You seem very prickly
"For example, individuals in the 41 families who wouldn't cooperate with the IRD project, might be 'concerned' about over-taxation." – DMK
Might be. Might be concerned at the government using (to quote Michael Reddell) the "coercive powers of the state" to prepare a politically motivated attack on success. – LB
Is there a practical diff between concerns about over-taxation, and concern about politically motivated attacks on financial success?
Those such as Seymour, Luxon and yourself, who leap to the defence of poor put-upon wealthy Kiwis, no doubt have the purest of motivations. It must be truely awful being a wealthy Kiwi, when so many people want to tax your wealth.
The point is, we can improve. And the starting point for that is to get over the awkwardness and start acknowledging the problem.
(Cough Cough)
"Hey, aaah… do you reckon we could pass something down for these guys over here?"
Some Kiwis simply can't stomach even the thought of contributing more money to our Govt by way of tax – ‘unfair‘, they cry, Unfair!
Why poverty in New Zealand is everyone's concern
Liang describes poverty as a "heritable condition" that perpetuates and amplifies through generations: "It is also not hard to see how individual poverty flows into communities and society, with downstream effects on economics, crime and health, as well as many other systems. Loosen one strand and everything else unravels."
A Kete Half Empty Poverty is your problem, it is everyone's problem, not just those who are in poverty. – Rebecca, a child from Te Puru
We can scratch deeper if you want.
If you like, but is there any need? Various motives are clear enough. For many wealthy Kiwis, current tax settings are barely tolerable – they already feel over-taxed, and inequality is certainly not their problem. Other wealthy Kiwis take a different view – maybe they're all silly, confused, dishonest, faulty and shoddy?
A taxing exercise for NZ’s wealthiest 0.01 percent
[28 April 2023]
Tax specialists OliverShaw published a report last week finding the more New Zealanders earned, the more they paid in tax – that those earning above $180,000 made up 21.2 percent of taxpayers and paid 68.5 percent of income tax in the 2021 tax year.
But I call BS. For a start, it selectively omitted the impact of GST and excises, which weigh more heavily on those on lower incomes. An earlier IRD report concluded the wealthiest Kiwis paid an effective tax rate of less than 12 percent.
Somewhere in between rich and poor does not include people in poverty, does it?
"Is there a practical diff between concerns about over-taxation, and concern about politically motivated attacks on financial success?"
Of course there is. For example, I'm concerned about both, but for different reasons. I'm concerned about high income earners paying a disproportionate share of tax, because NZ desperately needs investment. I'm concerned about politically motivated attacks on financial success because they are part of an attitude of mediocracy that is prevalent in NZ.
"If you like, but is there any need? "
Well that depends on you. You posited the idea that this letter was the work of 'wealthy' NZ'ers, which is clearly untrue. Doesn't that concern you?
The trustee can distribute, to the beneficiaries, as much, or as little, of the trust's income as he chooses. Only undistributed income is taxed at the trust rate: formerly 33%, now 39%. Distributed income is taxed at the beneficiary's rate, which can be as low as 10.5%.
"Only undistributed income is taxed at the trust rate: formerly 33%, now 39%."
Yes, that's what I've been saying. In my experience most family trusts distribute all of the income annually already. (Many of those are below the 39% threshold). Perversely, if this tax rate change prompts even more to fully distribute, and to beneficiaries on tax rates lower than 33%, it's entirely possible the government won't draw anywhere near the level of additional taxation they are forecasting.
But think of the useful mental health outlet this thread has provided for the 'its not fair' brigade who lump all people with trusts into the category of rich pricks buying mega lots of houses.
Forced birther poured $120k of his own money into an effort to force a recount of a referendum affirming abortion rights, forcing him to cheap-out on the airworthiness of the light aircraft he was rebuilding. Which then crashed and killed him.
A few months before the mid terms…(a) Chicago billionaire had gifted anti-abortion Supreme Court fixer Leonard Leo the largest known tranche of dark money in US history: $1.6 billion
The article goes on to say that that is enough money to fund two of the hugely influential conservative Heritage Foundations plus another sizeable organisation without touching the principle.
Leo is a proud "Knight of the Order of Malta" and his long career has been motivated by a fanatical opposition to women's rights to reproductive choice
What's coming for tens of millions of women is a return to the 19thC.
Directors of women’s health care services at Idaho hospitals are bracing for what’s next: 75 of 117 Idaho OB-GYNs recently surveyed by the Idaho Coalition for Safe Reproductive Health Care said they were considering leaving the state. Of those, nearly 100% — 73 of 75 — cited Idaho’s restrictive abortion laws.
An exodus could affect broader medical coverage for women who rely on OB-GYNs for routine and urgent gynecological care unrelated to pregnancy, like menstrual disorders, endometriosis, and pelvic pain.
Idaho is one of 15 states that have implemented strict abortion laws since last year’s Supreme Court decision overturning Roe v. Wade. And while there is no official nationwide count yet, anecdotal evidence shows that women’s health specialists from states where abortion is criminalized are beginning to relocate to places like Washington state, which has strong abortion rights laws.
Alan-When a cyclone causes 10 billion plus expenses that need fixing asap it is not possible to cut government expenditure unless you are proposing mother of all budget cuts to benefits and other payments that go to the less well off.
If you are getting prescriptions for drugs that are affected by Robertson's proposal there is not a single household that needs to be paying more than $100/year.
An entire household can't save more than $100/year under the scheme even if you were a family with 6 kids and were getting 20 prescriptions/month. Every single one after the first 20 in a year is free,
Rent goes up regardless of economic conditions. It doesn't matter if it's pharmacy fees or cheap offshore labour, rent always and inexorably goes up.
One thing the landlord class is very good at is extracting every last cent out of tenants, for profit. Pity they are not so good at providing housing safe from illness and fire. It's business, you know!
It's all good, renters are used to being abused as second class citizens.
Orcas have attacked and sunk a third boat off the Iberian coast of Europe, and experts now believe the behavior is being copied by the rest of the population.
Three orcas (Orcinus orca), also known as killer whales, struck the yacht on the night of May 4 in the Strait of Gibraltar, off the coast of Spain, and pierced the rudder. "There were two smaller and one larger orca," skipper Werner Schaufelberger told the German publication Yacht. "The little ones shook the rudder at the back while the big one repeatedly backed up and rammed the ship with full force from the side."
Yes Joe90, snap. I had noticed two or three reports of whale attacks in the past six months, and was wondering whether it was Nature fighting back with tooth and fin against humans and that global warming shit.
I have read elsewhere a story where orcas and humans co-operated over decades in fish drives in a harbour somewhere on the Canadian west coast, I think. Until the humans stuffed it up one year somehow, and the pact disintegrated.
A fabulous sight one autumn afternoon years ago was watching a pod of orcas playing around in the Waitematā harbour.
– Has a Non Profit called Child's Health Defence which paid for more than half of the ads on Facebook lying about vaccines, and was then barred from instagram
A deep dive into Jr's dangerous, dishonest lunacy.
/
The only ‘herd immunity’ we need is against abysmal candidates like RFK Jr. He has spent decades as a professional liar and is not the kind of person who should be anywhere near power.
[…]
Let’s establish at the outset that Robert F. Kennedy Jr. is someone who lies constantly in ways that seriously endanger the public. In fact, his lies have probably directly caused people to get sick, and possibly die.
To those who accept the scientific consensus around the efficacy of COVID-19 vaccines, someone like Kennedy can appear to be a mere “nut” or “crank.” But it’s important to understand that anti-vaxxers like Kennedy aren’t just “crazy.” They’re skilled manipulators of statistics who are great at fooling people using pseudoscience. Waving them away as
Trump is too, so not sure of the relevance. Both crazy in different ways so 'you takes your chances and you makes your choice' between whatever flavour you like.
As I have long told my US cousin the choice of the President of the US is far too important to be given to Americans…… when Trump got in we agreed that anyone other than Americans, preferably NZers, should have been given the vote for the US Pres & that way they might have avoided Trump. She's a Democrat but who knows, she's not an anti vaxxer.
Her father on the other hand used to tell all his family here in NZ that he would be coming back to NZ each time a Labour Govt got in, in the UK. But of course he never did.
On February 14, 2023 we announced our Rebuttal Update Project. This included an ask for feedback about the added "At a glance" section in the updated basic rebuttal versions. This weekly blog post series highlights this new section of one of the updated basic rebuttal versions and serves as a ...
TL;DR: In today’s ‘six-stack’ of substacks at 6.06pm on Tuesday, March 19:Kāinga Ora’s dry rot The Spinoff DailyBill McKibben on ‘Climate Superfunds’ making Big Oil pay for climate damage The Crucial YearsPreston Mui on returning to 1980s-style productivity growth NoahpinionAndy Boenau on NIMBYs needing unusual bedfellows Urbanism SpeakeasyNed Resnikoff's case ...
Negative yesterday, negative today. Negative all year, according to one departing reader telling me I’ve grown strident and predictable. Fair enough. If it’s any help, every time I go to write about a certain topic that begins with C and ends with arrrrs, I do brace myself and ask: Again? Are ...
Bryce Edwards writes – It’s been a tumultuous time in politics in recent months, as the new National-led Government has driven through its “First 100 Day programme”. During this period there’s been a handful of opinion polls, which overall just show a minimal amount of flux in public support ...
Inspirational: The Family of Man is a glorious hymn to human equality, but, more than that, it is a clarion call to human freedom. Because equality, unleavened by liberty, is a broken piano, an unstrung harp; upon which the songs of fraternity will never be played.“Somebody must have been telling lies about ...
Tax Lawyer Barbara Edmonds vs Emperor Justinian I- Nolo Contendere: False historical explanations of pivotal events are very far from being inconsequential.WHEN BARBARA EDMONDS made reference to the Roman Empire, my ears pricked up. It is, lamentably, very rare to hear a politician admit to any kind of familiarity ...
It’s been a tumultuous time in politics in recent months, as the new National-led Government has driven through its “First 100 Day programme”. During this period there’s been a handful of opinion polls, which overall just show a minimal amount of flux in public support for the various parties in ...
Buzz from the Beehive Housing Minister Chris Bishop delivered news – packed with the ingredients to enflame political passions – worthy of supplanting Winston Peters in headline writers’ priorities. He popped up at the post-Cabinet press conference to promise a crackdown on unruly and antisocial state housing tenants. His ...
Ele Ludemann writes – The Reserve Bank is advertising for a Diversity, Equity and Inclusion advisor. The Bank has one mandate – to keep inflation between one and three percent. It has failed in that and is only slowly getting inflation back down to the upper limit. Will it ...
Last week former National Party leader Simon Bridges was appointed by the Government as the new chair of the New Zealand Transport Agency Waka Kotahi (NZTA). You can read about the appointment in Thomas Coughlan’s article, Simon Bridges to become chair of NZ Transport Agency Waka KotahiThe fact that a ...
Bryce Edwards writes – Last week former National Party leader Simon Bridges was appointed by the Government as the new chair of the New Zealand Transport Agency Waka Kotahi (NZTA). You can read about the appointment in Thomas Coughlan’s article, Simon Bridges to become chair of NZ Transport Agency ...
TL;DR: My top 10 news and analysis links this morning include:Today’s must-read: Gavin Jacobson talks to Thomas Piketty 10 years on from Capital in the 21st CenturyThe SalvoLocal scoop: Green MP’s business being investigated over migrant exploitation claims StuffSteve KilgallonLocal deep-dive: The commercial contractors making money from School ...
It’s a home - but Kāinga Ora tenants accused of “abusing the privilege” may lose it. Photo: Lynn Grieveson / The KākāTL;DR: The Government announced a crackdown on Kāinga Ora tenants who were unruly and/or behind on their rent, with Housing Minister Chris Bishop saying a place in a state ...
This is a guest post by Connor Sharp of Surface Light Rail Light rail in Auckland: A way forward sooner than you think With the coup de grâce of Auckland Light Rail (ALR) earlier this year, and the shift of the government’s priorities to roads, roads, and more roads, it ...
Note: As a paid-up Webworm member, I’ve recorded this Webworm as a mini-podcast for you as well. Some of you said you liked this option - so I aim to provide it when I get a chance to record! Read more ...
TL;DR: In my ‘six-stack’ of substacks at 6.06pm on Monday, March 18:IKEA is accused of planting big forests in New Zealand to green-wash; REDD-MonitorA City for People takes a well-deserved victory lap over Wellington’s pro-YIMBY District Plan votes; A City for PeopleSteven Anastasiou takes a close look at the sticky ...
Buzz from the Beehive Here’s hoping for a lively post-cabinet press conference when the PM and – perhaps – some of his ministers tell us what was discussed at their meeting today. Until then, Point of Order has precious little Beehive news to report after its latest monitoring of the ...
David Farrar writes – We now have almost all 2023 data in, which has allowed me to update my annual table of how labour went against its promises. This is basically their final report card. The promiseThe result Build 100,000 affordable homes over 10 ...
I’m a bit worried that I’ve started a previous newsletter with the words “just when you think they couldn’t get any worse…” Seems lately that I could begin pretty much every issue with that opening. Such is the nature of our coalition government that they seem to be outdoing each ...
Geoffrey Miller writes – Timing is everything. And from China’s perspective, this week’s visit by its foreign minister to New Zealand could be coming at just the right moment. The visit by Wang Yi to Wellington will be his first since 2017. Anniversaries are important to Beijing. ...
Depictions of Islam in Western popular culture have rarely been positive, even before 9/11. Five years on from the mosque shootings, this is one of the cultural headwinds that the Muslim community has to battle against. Whatever messages of tolerance and inclusion are offered in daylight, much of our culture ...
Last week Transport Minster Simeon Brown and Mayor Wayne Brown opened the new Auckland Rail Operations Centre. The new train control centre will see teams from KiwiRail, Auckland Transport and Auckland One Rail working more closely together to improve train services across the city. The Auckland Rail Operations Centre in ...
Photo: Lynn Grieveson / The KākāTL;DR: Retiring former Labour Finance Minister Grant Robertson said in an exit interview with Q+A yesterday the Government can and should sustain more debt to invest in infrastructure for future generations. Elsewhere in the news in Aotearoa-NZ’s political economy at 6:36am: Read more ...
Timing is everything. And from China’s perspective, this week’s visit by its foreign minister to New Zealand could be coming at just the right moment. The visit by Wang Yi to Wellington will be his first since 2017. Anniversaries are important to Beijing. It is more than just a happy ...
TL;DR: The key events to watch in Aotearoa-NZ’s political economy in the week to March 18 include:China’s Foreign Minister visiting Wellington today;A post-cabinet news conference this afternoon; the resumption of Parliament on Tuesday for two weeks before Easter;retiring former Labour Finance Minister Grant Robertson gives his valedictory speech in Parliament; ...
New Zealand First Leader Winston Peters’s state-of-the-nation speech on Sunday was really a state-of-Winston-First speech. He barely mentioned any of the Government’s key policies and could not even wholly endorse its signature income tax cuts. Instead, he rehearsed all of his complaints about the Ardern Government, including an extraordinary claim ...
A listing of 35 news and opinion articles we found interesting and shared on social media during the past week: Sun, March 10, 2024 thru Sat, March 16, 2024. Story of the week This week we'll give you a little glimpse into how we collect links to share and ...
A listing of 35 news and opinion articles we found interesting and shared on social media during the past week: Sun, March 10, 2024 thru Sat, March 16, 2024. Story of the week This week we'll give you a little glimpse into how we collect links to share and ...
“I’ve been internalising a really complicated situation in my head.”When they kept telling us we should wait until we get to know him, were they taking the piss? Was it a case of, if you think this is bad, wait till you get to know the real Christopher, after the ...
Happy fourth anniversary, Pandemic That Upended Bloody Everything. I have been observing it by enjoying my second bout of COVID. It’s 5.30 on Sunday morning and only now are lights turning back on for me.Allow me to copy and paste what I told reader Sara yesterday:Depleted, fogged and crappy. Resting, ...
Happy fourth anniversary, Pandemic That Upended Bloody Everything. I have been observing it by enjoying my second bout of COVID. It’s 5.30 on Sunday morning and only now are lights turning back on for me.Allow me to copy and paste what I told reader Sara yesterday:Depleted, fogged and crappy. Resting, ...
Happy fourth anniversary, Pandemic That Upended Bloody Everything. I have been observing it by enjoying my second bout of COVID. It’s 5.30 on Sunday morning and only now are lights turning back on for me.Allow me to copy and paste what I told reader Sara yesterday:Depleted, fogged and crappy. Resting, ...
.“$10 and a target that bleeds” - Bleeding Targets for Under $10!.Thanks for reading Frankly Speaking ! Subscribe for free to receive new posts and support my work.This government appears hell-bent on either scrapping life-saving legislation or reintroducing things that - frustrated critics insist - will be dangerous and likely ...
“It hardly strikes me as fair to criticise a government for doing exactly what it said it was going to do. For actually keeping its promises.”THUNDER WAS PLAYING TAG with lightning flashes amongst the distant peaks. Its rolling cadences interrupted by the here-I-come-here-I-go Doppler effect of the occasional passing car. ...
Subversive & Disruptive Technologies: Just as happened with that other great regulator of the masses, the Medieval Church, the advent of a new and hard-to-control technology – the Internet – is weakening the ties that bind. Then, and now, those who enjoy a monopoly on the dissemination of lies, cannot and will ...
Been Here Before: To find the precedents for what this Coalition Government is proposing, it is necessary to return to the “glory days” of Muldoonism.THE COALITION GOVERNMENT has celebrated its first 100 days in office by checking-off the last of its listed commitments. It remains, however, an angry government. It ...
Bob Edlin writes – And what is the world watching today…? The email newsletter from Associated Press which landed in our mailbox early this morning advised: In the news today: The father of a school shooter has been found guilty of involuntary manslaughter; prosecutors in Trump’s hush-money case ...
Bryce Edwards writes – Is another Green MP on their way out? And are the Greens severely tarnished by another integrity scandal? For the second time in three months, the Green Party has secretly suspended an MP over integrity issues. Mystery is surrounding the party’s decision to ...
For the last few years, the Green Party has been the party that has managed to avoid the plague of multiple scandals that have beleaguered other political parties. It appears that their luck has run out with a second scandal which, unfortunately for them, coincided with Golraz Ghahraman, the focus ...
TL;DR: The six newsey things that stood out to me as of 6:46am on Saturday, March 16.Andy Foster has accidentally allowed a Labour/Green amendment to cut road user chargers for plug-in hybrid vehicles, which the Government might accept; NZ HeraldThomas CoughlanSimeon Brown has rejected a plea from Westport ...
What seemed a booming success a couple of years ago has collapsed into fraud convictions.I looked at the crash of FTX (short for ‘Futures Exchange’) in November 2022 to see whether it would impact on the financial system as a whole. Fortunately there was barely a ripple, probably because it ...
Anybody following the situation in Ukraine and Russia would probably have been amused by a recent Tweet on X NATO seems to be putting in an awful lot of effort to influence what is, at least according to them, a sham election in an autocracy.When do the Ukrainians go to ...
TL;DR:Shaun Baker on Wynyard Quarter's transformation. Magdalene Taylor on the problem with smart phones. How private equity are now all over reinsurance. Dylan Cleaver on rugby and CTE. Emily Atkin on ‘Big Meat’ looking like ‘Big Oil’.Bernard’s six-stack of substacks at 6pm on March 15Photo by Jeppe Hove Jensen ...
Buzz from the Beehive Finance Minister Nicola Willis had plenty to say when addressing the Auckland Business Chamber on the economic growth that (she tells us) is flagging more than we thought. But the government intends to put new life into it: We want our country to be a ...
The Transport and Infrastructure Committee has reported back on the Road User Charges (Light Electric RUC Vehicles) Amendment Bill, basicly rubberstamping it. While there was widespread support among submitters for the principle that EV and PHEV drivers should pay their fair share for the roads, they also overwhelmingly disagreed with ...
Peter Dunne writes – This week’s government bailout – the fifth in the last eighteen months – of the financially troubled Ruapehu Alpine Lifts company would have pleased many in the central North Island ski industry. The government’s stated rationale for the $7 million funding was that it ...
See if you can spot the difference. An Iranian born female MP from a progressive party is accused of serial shoplifting. Her name is leaked to the media, which goes into a pack frenzy even before the Police launch an … Continue reading → ...
Ele Ludemann writes – The government is omitting general Treaty references from legislation : The growth of Treaty of Waitangi clauses in legislation caused so much worry that a special oversight group was set up by the last Government in a bid to get greater coherence in the public service on Treaty ...
What was that judge thinking?Peter Williams writes – That Golriz Ghahraman and District Court Judge Maria Pecotic were once lawyer colleagues is incontrovertible. There is published evidence that they took at least one case to the Court of Appeal together. There was a report on ...
TL;DR: My top 10 news and analysis links this morning include:Today’s must-read:Climate Scorpion – the sting is in the tail. Introducing planetary solvency. A paper via the University of Exeter’s Institute and Faculty of Actuaries.Local scoop:Kāinga Ora starts pulling out of its Auckland projects and selling land RNZ ...
Wellington’s massively upzoned District Plan adds the opportunity for tens of thousands of new homes not just in the central city (such as these Webb St new builds) but also close to the CBD and public transport links. Photo: Lynn Grieveson / The KākāTL;DR: Wellington gave itself the chance of ...
It’s Friday and we’re halfway through March Madness. Here’s some of the things that caught our attention this week. This Week in Greater Auckland On Monday Matt asked how we can get better event trains and an option for grade separating Morningside Dr. On Tuesday Matt looked into ...
Something you might not know about me is that I’m quite a stubborn person. No, really. I don’t much care for criticism I think’s unfair or that I disagree with. Few of us do I suppose.Back when I was a drinker I’d sometimes respond defensively, even angrily. There are things ...
Photo: Lynn Grieveson / The KākāTL;DR: The five things that mattered in Aotearoa’s political economy that we wrote and spoke about via The Kākā and elsewhere for paying subscribers in the last week included:PM Christopher Luxon said the reversal of interest deductibility for landlords was done to help renters, who ...
It was not so much the Labour Party but really the Chris Hipkins party yesterday at Labour’s caucus retreat in Martinborough. The former Prime Minister was more or less consistent on wealth tax, which he was at best equivocal about, and social insurance, which he was not willing to revisit. ...
Buzz from the BeehiveThe text reproduced above appears on a page which records all the media statements and speeches posted on the government’s official website by Melissa Lee as Minister of Media and Communications and/or by Jenny Marcroft, her Parliamentary Under-secretary. It can be quickly analysed ...
For forty years, Robert Muldoon has been a dirty word in our politics. His style of government was so repulsive and authoritarian that the backlash to it helped set and entrench our constitutional norms. His pig-headedness over forcing through Think Big eventually gave us the RMA, with its participation and ...
Bryce Edwards writes – Is the new government reducing tax on rental properties to benefit landlords or to cut the cost of rents? That’s the big question this week, after Associate Finance Minister David Seymour announced on Sunday that the Government would be reversing the Labour Government’s removal ...
Saudi Arabia is rarely far from the international spotlight. The war in Gaza has brought new scrutiny to Saudi plans to normalise relations with Israel, while the fifth anniversary of the controversial killing of Jamal Khashoggi was marked shortly before the war began on October 7. And as the home ...
Questions need to be asked on both sides of the worldPeter Williams writes – The NRL Judiciary hands down an eight week suspension to Sydney Roosters forward Spencer Leniu , an Auckland-born Samoan, after he calls Ezra Mam, Sydney-orn but of Aboriginal and Torres Strait ...
Ele Ludemann writes – Contrary to what many headlines and news stories are saying, residential landlords are not getting a tax break. The government is simply restoring to them the tax deductibility of interest they had until the previous government removed it. There is no logical reason ...
I can't remember when it was goodMoments of happiness in bloomMaybe I just misunderstoodAll of the love we left behindWatching our flashbacks intertwineMemories I will never findIn spite of whatever you becomeForget that reckless thing turned onI think our lives have just begunI think our lives have just begunDoes anyone ...
Michael Bassett writes – At first reading, a front-page story in the New Zealand Herald on 13 March was bizarre. A group of severely intellectually limited teenagers, with little understanding of the law, have been pleading to the Justice Select Committee not to pass a bill dealing with ram ...
How much political capital is Christopher Luxon willing to burn through in order to deliver his $2.9 billion gift to landlords? Evidently, Luxon is: (a) unable to cost the policy accurately. As Anna Burns-Francis pointed out to him on Breakfast TV, the original ”rock solid” $2.1 billion cost he was ...
TL;DR: My top 10 news and analysis links this morning include:Today’s must-read:Jonathon Porritt calling bullshit in his own blog post on mainstream climate science as ‘The New Denialism’.Local scoop:The Wellington City Council’s list of proposed changes to the IHP recommendations to be debated later today was leaked this ...
TL;DR:Prime Minister Christopher Luxon said yesterday tenants should be grateful for the reinstatement of interest deductibility because landlords would pass on their lower tax costs in the form of lower rents. That would be true if landlords were regulated monopolies such as Transpower or Auckland Airport1, but they’re not, ...
This is a re-post from Yale Climate Connections by Tom Toro Tom Toro is a cartoonist and author. He has published over 200 cartoons in The New Yorker since 2010. His cartoons appear in Playboy, the Paris Review, the New York Times, American Bystander, and elsewhere. Related: What 10 EV lovers ...
The business section of the NZ Herald is full of opinion. Among the more opinionated of all is the ex-Minister of Transport, ex-Minister of Railways, ex MP for Auckland Central (1975-93, Labour), Wellington Central (1996-99, ACT, then list-2005), ex-leader of the ACT Party, uncle to actor Antonia, the veritable granddaddy ...
Hi,Just quickly — I’m blown away by the stories you’ve shared with me over the last week since I put out the ‘Gary’ podcast, where I told you about the time my friend’s flatmate killed the neighbour.And you keep telling me stories — in the comments section, and in my ...
The first season of Rings of Power was not awful. It was thoroughly underwhelming, yes, and left a lingering sense of disappointment, but it was more expensive mediocrity than catastrophe. I wrote at length about the series as it came out (see the Review section of the blog, and go ...
Buzz from the Beehive Workplace Relations and Safety Minister Brooke van Velden told Auckland Business Chamber members they were the first audience to hear her priorities as a minister in a government committed to cutting red tape and regulations. She brandished her liberalising credentials, saying Flexible labour markets are the ...
Chris Trotter writes – TO UNDERSTAND WHY NEWSHUB FAILED, it is necessary to understand how TVNZ changed. Up until 1989, the state broadcaster had been funded by a broadcasting licence fee, collected from every citizen in possession of a television set, supplemented by a relatively modest (compared ...
Bob Edlin writes – The Māori Party has been busy issuing a mix of warnings and threats as its expresses its opposition to interest deductibility for landlords and the plans of seabed miners. It remains to be seen whether they follow the example of indigenous litigants in Australia, ...
The Government has accepted Labour’s change to the Road User Charge (RUC) discount for hybrid vehicles, meaning there will still be some incentive for people to buy greener vehicles. ...
Kicking the most vulnerable people out of state housing and pushing them towards homelessness will result in a proliferation of poverty and trauma across our most vulnerable communities. ...
Te Pāti Māori co-leader and MP for Waiariki, Rawiri Waititi has penned a letter asking MPs to support his members bill to remove GST from all food. The bill is expected to go through its first reading in parliament this Wednesday. “I’m calling on all political parties to support my ...
This year is about getting real with Kiwis and discussing the tough issues, as the National Government exacerbates inequality and divides New Zealand, Labour Leader Chris Hipkins said ...
The Government adding Significant Natural Areas (SNAs) to its already roaring environmental policy bonfire is an assault on the future of wildlife that makes Aotearoa unique. ...
After 12 years of fighting to protect our moana we are finding ourselves back at square one and back at court. Today, the Environmental Protection Agency is sitting in Hawera to reconsider an application from Trans-Tasman Resources to dig up 50 million tonnes of the seabed in South Taranaki. This ...
Minister Shane Jones’ decision to step away from a seabed mining project is evidence of the murky waters surrounding the Government’s fast-track legislation. ...
The growth of Treaty of Waitangi clauses in legislation caused so much worry that a special oversight group was set up by the last government in a bid to get greater coherence in the publicservice on Treaty matters. When ministers first considered the need for tighter oversight in 2021, there ...
The growth of Treaty of Waitangi clauses in legislation caused so much worry that a special oversight group was set up by the last government in a bid to get greater coherence in the publicservice on Treaty matters. When ministers first considered the need for tighter oversight in 2021, there ...
The Coalition Government’s miscalculation saga continues as it has forgotten an eyewatering $90 million gap in its interest deductibility cost figures, say Labour Finance spokesperson Barbara Edmonds and Revenue Spokesperson Deborah Russell. ...
He Pou a Rangi Climate Change Commission has today released advice that says if the Government doesn’t act now New Zealand is at risk of not meeting its climate goals. ...
The Coalition Government has today confirmed it is abandoning first home buyers who are struggling to get ahead, says Labour Finance spokesperson Barbara Edmonds. ...
The New Zealand public voted for a change in direction at the 2023 general election and that is exactly what this coalition government has been delivering in its first 100 days. There was an immediate focus on the economy, easing the cost of living, cracking down on law and order ...
The Government has left the health system as an afterthought, announcing half-baked targets at the last minute of their 100-day plan, says Labour Health spokesperson Ayesha Verrall. ...
The National Government has spent its first 100 days stopping, cutting and reversing. They have scrapped stuff for stuff for the sake of it, without putting up any solutions of their own – and it’s hardworking New Zealanders who will pay for it. ...
Kiwis are still waiting for their promised cost of living support after 100 days of a National Government that is taking us backwards, Labour Leader Chris Hipkins said today. ...
100 days of National taking NZ backwardsThe National Government has spent its first 100 days stopping, cutting and reversing. They have scrapped stuff for stuff for the sake of it, without putting up any solutions of their own – and it’s hardworking New Zealanders who will pay for it. ...
The Government must commit to funding free and healthy school lunches, as thousands of people sign the petition to keep them, education spokesperson Jan Tinetti says. ...
If the Government was serious about moving families into public housing, they would build more houses so there is actually somewhere for people to go. ...
The free and healthy school lunches programme feeds our kids, helps them to learn, and saves families money – but it is at risk under this Government, education spokesperson Jan Tinetti said. ...
The Government’s proposed changes to Firearms Prohibition Orders (FPO) add almost nothing new and are merely an attempt to distract from its plans to loosen gun laws, police spokesperson Ginny Andersen and justice spokesperson Dr Duncan Webb said. ...
The great Victorian era English politician Lord Macauley stood in the British House of Parliament and said, "The gallery in which the reporters sit has become a fourth estate of the realm".He understood and outlined even way back then, the significant role and influence media have in a democracy. ...
"The Government is moving quickly to realise an additional $46 million in tariff savings in the EU market this season for Kiwi exporters,” Minister for Trade and Agriculture, Todd McClay says. Parliament is set, this week, to complete the final legislative processes required to bring the New Zealand – European ...
New Zealand’s social workers are qualified, experienced, and more representative of the communities they serve, Social Development and Employment Minister Louise Upston says. “I want to acknowledge and applaud New Zealand’s social workers for the hard work they do, providing invaluable support for our most vulnerable. “To coincide with World ...
Cabinet has agreed to a reduced road user charge (RUC) rate for plug-in hybrid electric vehicles (PHEVs), Transport Minister Simeon Brown says. Owners of PHEVs will be eligible for a reduced rate of $38 per 1,000km once all light electric vehicles (EVs) move into the RUC system from 1 April. ...
Minister of Agriculture and Trade, Todd McClay, says that today’s opening of Riverland Foods manufacturing plant in Christchurch is a great example of how trade access to overseas markets creates jobs in New Zealand. Speaking at the official opening of this state-of-the-art pet food factory the Minister noted that exports ...
Minister of Foreign Affairs Winston Peters met with Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi in Wellington today. “It was a pleasure to host Foreign Minister Wang Yi during his first official visit to New Zealand since 2017. Our discussions were wide-ranging and enabled engagement on many facets of New Zealand’s relationship with China, including trade, ...
Kāinga Ora – Homes & Communities has been instructed to end the Sustaining Tenancies Framework and take stronger measures against persistent antisocial behaviour by tenants, says Housing Minister Chris Bishop. “Earlier today Finance Minister Nicola Willis and I sent an interim Letter of Expectations to the Board of Kāinga Ora. ...
Tēna koutou katoa. Greetings everyone. Thank you to the Auckland Chamber of Commerce and the Honourable Simon Bridges for hosting this address today. I acknowledge the business leaders in this room, the leaders and governors, the employers, the entrepreneurs, the investors, and the wealth creators. The coalition Government shares your ...
Minister Winston Peters completed the final leg of his visit to South and South East Asia in Singapore today, where he focused on enhancing one of New Zealand’s indispensable strategic partnerships. “Singapore is our most important defence partner in South East Asia, our fourth-largest trading partner and a ...
Minister of Internal Affairs and Workplace Relations and Safety, Hon. Brooke van Velden, will travel to the Republic of Korea to represent New Zealand at the Third Summit for Democracy on 18 March. The summit, hosted by the Republic of Korea, was first convened by the United States in 2021, ...
ICNZ Speech 7 March 2024, Auckland Acknowledgements and opening Mōrena, ngā mihi nui. Ko Andrew Bayly aho, Nor Whanganui aho. Good morning, it’s a privilege to be here to open the ICNZ annual conference, thank you to Mark for the Mihi Whakatau My thanks to Tim Grafton for inviting me ...
Prime Minister Christopher Luxon and Lead Coordination Minister Judith Collins have expressed their deepest sympathy on the five-year anniversary of the Christchurch terror attacks. “March 15, 2019, was a day when families, communities and the country came together both in sorrow and solidarity,” Mr Luxon says. “Today we pay our respects to the 51 shuhada ...
Speech for Financial Advice NZ Conference 5 March 2024 Acknowledgements and opening Morena, Nga Mihi Nui. Ko Andrew Bayly aho, Nor Whanganui aho. Thanks Nate for your Mihi Whakatau Good morning. It’s a pleasure to formally open your conference this morning. What a lovely day in Wellington, What a great ...
Foreign Minister Winston Peters held discussions in Jakarta today about the future of relations between New Zealand and South East Asia’s most populous country. “We are in Jakarta so early in our new government’s term to reflect the huge importance we place on our relationship with Indonesia and South ...
Deputy Prime Minister and Minister of Foreign Affairs Winston Peters has announced that the Foreign Minister of China, Wang Yi, will visit New Zealand next week. “We look forward to re-engaging with Foreign Minister Wang Yi and discussing the full breadth of the bilateral relationship, which is one of New Zealand’s ...
Transport Minister Simeon Brown has today opened the new Auckland Rail Operations Centre, which will bring together KiwiRail, Auckland Transport, and Auckland One Rail to improve service reliability for Aucklanders. “The recent train disruptions in Auckland have highlighted how important it is KiwiRail and Auckland’s rail agencies work together to ...
The Government is proud to support the 10th edition of Crankworx Rotorua as the Crankworx World Tour returns to Rotorua from 16-24 March 2024, says Minister for Economic Development Melissa Lee. “Over the past 10 years as Crankworx Rotorua has grown, so too have the economic and social benefits that ...
Legislation implementing coalition Government tax commitments and addressing long-standing tax anomalies will be progressed in Parliament next week, Finance Minister Nicola Willis says. The legislation is contained in an Amendment Paper to the Taxation (Annual Rates for 2023–24, Multinational Tax, and Remedial Matters) Bill issued today. “The Amendment Paper represents ...
Associate Environment Minister Andrew Hoggard has today announced that the Government has agreed to suspend the requirement for councils to comply with the Significant Natural Areas (SNA) provisions of the National Policy Statement for Indigenous Biodiversity for three years, while it replaces the Resource Management Act (RMA).“As it stands, SNAs ...
Agriculture Minister Todd McClay has classified the drought conditions in the Marlborough, Tasman, and Nelson districts as a medium-scale adverse event, acknowledging the challenging conditions facing farmers and growers in the district. “Parts of Marlborough, Tasman, and Nelson districts are in the grip of an intense dry spell. I know ...
The Government is helping farmers eradicate the significant impact of facial eczema (FE) in pastoral animals, Agriculture Minister Todd McClay announced. “A $20 million partnership jointly funded by Beef + Lamb NZ, the Government, and the primary sector will save farmers an estimated NZD$332 million per year, and aims to ...
Foreign Minister Winston Peters has completed a successful visit to India, saying it was an important step in taking the relationship between the two countries to the next level. “We have laid a strong foundation for the Coalition Government’s priority of enhancing New Zealand-India relations to generate significant future benefit for both countries,” says Mr Peters, ...
Cabinet has agreed to provide $7 million to ensure the 2024 ski season can go ahead on the Whakapapa ski field in the central North Island but has told the operator Ruapehu Alpine Lifts it is the last financial support it will receive from taxpayers. Cabinet also agreed to provide ...
Health Minister Dr Shane Reti says the launch of a new mobile breast screening unit in Counties Manukau reinforces the coalition Government’s commitment to drive better cancer services for all New Zealanders. Speaking at the launch of the new mobile clinic, Dr Reti says it’s a great example of taking ...
Health Minister Dr Shane Reti says the launch of a new mobile breast screening unit in Counties Manukau reinforces the coalition Government’s commitment to drive better cancer services for all New Zealanders. Speaking at the launch of the new mobile clinic, Dr Reti says it’s a great example of taking ...
Unlocking economic growth and land for housing are critical elements of the Government’s plan for our transport network, and planned upgrades to State Highway 29 (SH29) near Tauriko will deliver strongly on those priorities, Transport Minister Simeon Brown says. “The SH29 upgrades near Tauriko will improve safety at the intersections ...
Unlocking economic growth and land for housing are critical elements of the Government’s plan for our transport network, and planned upgrades to State Highway 29 (SH29) near Tauriko will deliver strongly on those priorities, Transport Minister Simeon Brown says. “The SH29 upgrades near Tauriko will improve safety at the intersections ...
Lower fruit and vegetable prices are welcome news for New Zealanders who have been doing it tough at the supermarket, Finance Minister Nicola Willis says. Stats NZ reported today the price of fruit and vegetables has dropped 9.3 percent in the 12 months to February 2024. “Lower fruit and vege ...
Tēnā koutou katoa and greetings to you all. Chair, I am honoured to address the sixty-eighth session of the Commission on the Status of Women. I acknowledge the many crises impacting the rights of women and girls. Heightened global tensions, war, climate related and humanitarian disasters, and price inflation all ...
Tēnā koutou katoa and greetings to you all. Chair, I am honoured to address the 68th session of the Commission on the Status of Women. I acknowledge the many crises impacting the rights of women and girls. Heightened global tensions, war, climate related and humanitarian disasters, and price inflation all ...
The coalition Government is supporting farmers to enhance land management practices by investing $3.3 million in locally led catchment groups, Agriculture Minister Todd McClay announced. “Farmers and growers deliver significant prosperity for New Zealand and it’s vital their ongoing efforts to improve land management practices and water quality are supported,” ...
Good evening everyone and thank you for that lovely introduction. Thank you also to the Honourable Simon Bridges for the invitation to address your members. Since being sworn in, this coalition Government has hit the ground running with our 100-day plan, delivering the changes that New Zealanders expect of us. ...
Recommendations from the Climate Change Commission for New Zealand on the Emissions Trading Scheme (ETS) auction and unit limit settings for the next five years have been tabled in Parliament, Climate Change Minister Simon Watts says. “The Commission provides advice on the ETS annually. This is the third time the ...
The coalition Government is beginning its fight to lower building costs and reduce red tape by exempting minor building work from paying the building levy, says Building and Construction Minister Chris Penk. “Currently, any building project worth $20,444 including GST or more is subject to the building levy which is ...
Proposed changes to tax legislation to prevent the over-taxation of low-earning trusts are welcome, Finance Minister Nicola Willis says. The changes have been recommended by Parliament’s Finance and Expenditure Committee following consideration of submissions on the Taxation (Annual Rates for 2023–24, Multinational Tax, and Remedial Matters) Bill. “One of the ...
Assalaamu alaikum. السَّلَام عليكم In light of the holy month of Ramadan, I want to extend my warmest wishes to our Muslim community in New Zealand. Ramadan is a time for spiritual reflection, renewed devotion, perseverance, generosity, and forgiveness. It’s a time to strengthen our bonds and appreciate the diversity ...
Former Transport Minister and CEO of the Auckland Business Chamber Hon Simon Bridges has been appointed as the new Board Chair of the New Zealand Transport Agency (NZTA) for a three-year term, Transport Minister Simeon Brown announced today. “Simon brings extensive experience and knowledge in transport policy and governance to the role. He will ...
Good morning all, it is a pleasure to be here as Minister of Science, Innovation and Technology. It is fantastic to see how connected and collaborative the life science and biotechnology industry is here in New Zealand. I would like to thank BioTechNZ and NZTech for the invitation to address ...
Regional Development Minister Shane Jones says he is looking forward to the day when three key water projects in Northland are up and running, unlocking the full potential of land in the region. Mr Jones attended a community event at the site of the Otawere reservoir near Kerikeri on Friday. ...
Associate Finance Minister David Seymour has today announced that the Government has agreed to restore deductibility for mortgage interest on residential investment properties. “Help is on the way for landlords and renters alike. The Government’s restoration of interest deductibility will ease pressure on rents and simplify the tax code,” says ...
Sport and Recreation Minister Chris Bishop will travel to Switzerland today to attend an Executive Committee meeting and Symposium of the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA). Mr Bishop will then travel on to London where he will attend a series of meetings in his capacity as Infrastructure Minister. “New Zealanders believe ...
Pacific Media Watch Earthwise hosts Lois and Martin Griffiths. Earthwise presenters Lois and Martin Griffiths on Plains FM 96.9 community radio talk to Dr David Robie, a New Zealand author, independent journalist and media educator with a passion for the Asia-Pacific region. David talks about the struggle to raise awareness ...
Pacific Media Watch Ismail al-Ghoul, an Al Jazeera Arabic correspondent who was held for 12 hours at Gaza’s al-Shifa hospital, says Israeli forces rounded up Palestinian journalists at the facility and made them kneel on the ground for hours, while naked and blindfolded. “The occupation forces handcuffed and blindfolded us ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Tony Wood, Program Director, Energy, Grattan Institute chinasong, Shutterstock Electricity customers in four Australian states can breathe a sigh of relief. After two years in a row of 20% price increases, power prices have finally stabilised. In many places they’re ...
Chumbawamba have reportedly issued the deputy PM a cease-and-desist notice after he used their song 'Tubthumping' before his state of the nation speech. ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Deborah Lupton, SHARP Professor, Vitalities Lab, Centre for Social Research in Health and Social Policy Centre, and the ARC Centre of Excellence for Automated Decision-Making and Society, UNSW Sydney kitzcorner/Shutterstock The assertion from Queensland’s chief health officer John Gerrard that ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Peter Martin, Visiting Fellow, Crawford School of Public Policy, Australian National University Shutterstock Why are musicians so keen to get played on the radio? It can’t be because of the money. In Australia they are paid at rates so low they ...
"Farmers make a point not to tell our urban cousins how to live, yet Chlöe from central Auckland is hell-bent on having her say about farmers," says ACT Rural Communities spokesman Mark Cameron. “On her first day in the House as Green ...
Analysis by Dr Bryce Edwards – Democracy Project (https://democracyproject.nz)Political scientist, Dr Bryce Edwards. It’s been a tumultuous time in politics in recent months, as the new National-led Government has driven through its “First 100 Day programme”. During this period there’s been a handful of opinion polls, which overall just ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Tim Curran, Associate Professor of Ecology, Lincoln University, New Zealand Getty Images/Gerald Corsi In the latest move to reform environmental laws in New Zealand, the coalition government has introduced a bill to fast-track consenting processes for projects deemed to ...
Uber has argued it does not have as much control over drivers as the unions suggest, and wants a judgment ruling that drivers are employees and not contractors set aside and sent back to the Employment Court. The 2022 ruling followed a three-week hearing in which four drivers sought to ...
What can and can’t be purchased by disabled people or their carers has been slashed in an effort by the Ministry of Disabled People Whaikaha to save money. The purchasing guidelines, a set of rules that sets out what can be purchased using the various streams of Government disability funding, ...
The Treasury has published today a new Analytical Note by Tod Wright and Hien Nguyen, Fiscal incidence in New Zealand: The effects of taxes and benefits on household incomes in tax year 2018/19 . Analyses of the distributional impact of taxation and government ...
The Treasury has published today a new Analytical Note by Cory Davis, Boston Hart and Benjamin Stubbing, Household cost-of-living impacts from the Emissions Trading Scheme and using transfers to mitigate regressive outcomes . This Analytical Note ...
A coalition of public transport and climate organisations, united as ‘Transport for All’, is actively opposing the government’s transport proposals. The draft Government Policy Statement (GPS) includes plans for higher fares for public transport, ...
Greater Wellington is inviting feedback on proposed changes to its Revenue and Financing Policy. The Revenue and Financing Policy covers the Council’s various sources of funding, and how the cost of services is shared across the region. This includes ...
Labour has conceded it could have done more to deal with disruptive state housing tenants while in government but says the current coalition is going too far. ...
The band has asked their record label to issue a cease and desist to stop the NZ First leader using their 1997 hit to support his ‘misguided political views’. “I get knocked down, but I get up again,” blared through the speakers on Sunday as Winston Peters took the stage ...
By Lydia Lewis, RNZ Pacific journalist Food rationing is underway in remote areas in Papua New Guinea’s Highlands following torrential rain and flash flooding. More than 20 people have been reported dead in Chimbu Province. In nearby Enga Province, the centre of last month’s massacre, a 15-year-old boy has been ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Andrew Hughes, Lecturer, Research School of Management, Australian National University After months of debate and intrigue, the AFL’s 19th and newest team, the Tasmania Devils, finally launched its jumper, logo and colours in Devonport this week. The Devils will wear green, ...
Brannavan Gnanalingam reviews the debut novel by Saraid de Silva.One of the most baffling things for children who move to a new country is what their parents’ (or grandparents’) lives were like prior to moving – for kids in particular, they’re too busy trying to fit in in their ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Stephen Gaunson, Associate Professor in Cinema Studies, RMIT University Narelle Portanier/Binge “If you don’t know who your mob are, you don’t know who you are,” Detective Andrea “Andie” Whitford (played by Leah Purcell) is told early into the new crime ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Elise Klein, Associate professor, Australian National University It’s commonly accepted that women do the vast majority of caregiving in Australian society. But less appreciated is that Indigenous women do larger amounts of unpaid care than any other group. Working with the Aboriginal ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Adrian Beaumont, Election Analyst (Psephologist) at The Conversation; and Honorary Associate, School of Mathematics and Statistics, The University of Melbourne Joe Biden and Donald Trump have both secured their parties’ nominations for the November 5 United States general election by winning a ...
Comment: There has been a striking contrast in trans-Tasman interest about Chinese foreign minister Wang Yi’s visit to New Zealand and Australia. While the Australian press has been full of articles about the visit – including his curious decision to meet with former prime minister and China booster Paul Keating ...
After years of pressuring banks and other institutions to stop investing in fossil fuels, climate campaigners are making some progress. So how does divestment work?For years, climate activists have been pushing banks and other big institutions to divest from fossil fuels. New research from climate advocacy group 350 Aotearoa ...
For Boba, Ethan and Ashley, K-pop is a place to belong, a way to express themselves, and a bridge to connect with others. The three young Polynesians are part of a K-pop fan community in Tāmaki Makaurau. It’s one of many that have sprung up worldwide as K-pop has gone ...
For Boba, Ethan and Ashley, K-pop is a place to belong, a way to express themselves, and a bridge to connect with others. This one-off documentary presents three intimate portraits of young Polynesians who are pulled into a Korean cultural phenomenon. K-POLYS is directed by Litia Tuiburelevu, Produced by Hex ...
There’s ample evidence demonstrating free school lunch programmes provide wide benefits across schools, households and communities according to public health researchers. ACT Minister David Seymour wants to reduce the spending on Aotearoa New Zealand’s ...
By Wata Shaw in Suva Fiji is facing an exodus of Fijians as many are leaving for overseas seeking employment and education and others are migrating, says Opposition MP Viliame Naupoto. Speaking in Parliament, he said: “His Excellency’s speech (Ratu Wiliame Katonivere) comes after a little over one year of ...
The Taxpayers’ Union is welcoming comments from Christopher Luxon this morning recommitting to ‘no new taxes’ as part of Budget 2024. “Mr Luxon’s refusal at the Post-Cabinet press conference yesterday to repeat the ‘no new taxes’ promise ...
SAFE is urgently calling on the Environment Committee to reject the Government’s Fast-Track Approvals Bill, and is urging New Zealanders to rally behind the call. The proposed Bill, currently under consideration with the Environment select committee, ...
Teammates who spend all their time picking fights with spectators are only helpful for the other team, writes Madeleine Chapman. Anyone who has ever played a team sport competitively, particularly as a child and particularly, for some reason, basketball, will know that there’s a lot of politics involved. While there ...
The long-running Wellington music festival is too focused on the Jim Beam-ness and not enough on the Homegrown-ness.There is something about Homegrown that’s difficult to place. A barely perceptible-ness. Like feeling a ghost is watching you from the corner of the room but when you look, there’s nothing there. ...
The latest Ipsos New Zealand Issues Monitor reveals that fewer New Zealanders believe crime / law and order is one of the top issues facing our country. In 2018, Ipsos New Zealand started tracking the key issues facing New Zealand. In this wave ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Kate Griffiths, Deputy Program Director, Budgets and Government, Grattan Institute Australia’s political donations rules are woefully inadequate, but donations reform is finally on the agenda. The federal government has signalled its interest in reform and will soon begin briefing MPs on its ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Mark Patrick Taylor, Chief Environmental Scientist, EPA Victoria; Honorary Professor, School of Natural Sciences, Macquarie University Naiyana Somchitkaeo/Shutterstock A recent study published in the prestigious New England Journal of Medicine has linked microplastics with risk to human health. The study ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Albert Van Dijk, Professor, Water and Landscape Dynamics, Fenner School of Environment & Society, Australian National University Global climate records were shattered in 2023, from air and sea temperatures to sea-level rise and sea-ice extent. Scores of countries recorded their hottest year ...
As part of our series exploring how New Zealanders live and our relationship with money, a teacher explains why he and his partner are in frugal mode – and how they’re making it work. Gender: Male Age: 35Ethnicity: Pākehā Role: I am an intermediate school teacher and my partner is ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Sarah Bendall, Senior Lecturer, Institute for Humanities and Social Sciences, Australian Catholic University Binge Mary & George, the new British television drama series, depicts the real-life story of Mary Villiers and her son George, and their social climbing at the ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Jason Nassios, Associate Professor, Centre of Policy Studies, Victoria University This article is part of The Conversation’s series examining the housing crisis. Read the other articles in the series here. Australian state and federal governments spend money in many ways to ...
The finance minister is denying that there’s a $5.6b shortfall in paying for the government’s campaign promises, including tax cuts. At his post-cabinet press conference yesterday, the PM refused to rule out new taxes to pay for the cuts, writes Anna Rawhiti-Connell in this excerpt from The Bulletin, The Spinoff’s ...
Kāinga Ora tenants abused by their neighbours are doubting the government's crackdown on disruptive tenants will make a difference on their behaviour. ...
Kāinga Ora is New Zealand’s biggest residential landlord, housing more than 180,000 vulnerable people in more than 67,000 properties. Yesterday the government announced a crackdown on its tenants who fall behind on rent. One longtime Kāinga Ora tenant shares her experience.For 18 years I lived in a 1960s standalone ...
Why does this myth persist, and what’s the real reason our skin is suffering?It’s one of the biggest international grievances New Zealanders hold, up there with the sinking of the Rainbow Warrior and 1981’s underarm incident. We’re quick to tell international travellers that the world’s pollution led to the ...
Opinion: In a move that has shocked road safety advocates across the country, the new Minister of Transport, Simeon Brown, is poised to abandon the previous government’s speed limit reduction policy, particularly around schools. Even more alarmingly, he wants school speed limits to be variable rather than full-time, arguing ...
Auckland Council is opposing a fast-track development backed by Sir John Kirwan and Spark NZ, because it doesn’t meet stringent new climate adaptation requirements The post Surf-data centre faces new 3.8C climate warming rules appeared first on Newsroom. ...
When the Criminal Proceeds (Recovery) Act was introduced in 2009 it was firmly targeted at gangs and drugs. The legislation means police no longer need a conviction to seize assets that criminals can’t prove were paid for legitimately, as long as their alleged offences are punishable by more than a ...
Loading…(function(i,s,o,g,r,a,m){var ql=document.querySelectorAll('A[quiz],DIV[quiz],A[data-quiz],DIV[data-quiz]'); if(ql){if(ql.length){for(var k=0;k<ql.length;k++){ql[k].id='quiz-embed-'+k;ql[k].href="javascript:var i=document.getElementById('quiz-embed-"+k+"');try{qz.startQuiz(i)}catch(e){i.start=1;i.style.cursor='wait';i.style.opacity='0.5'};void(0);"}}};i['QP']=r;i[r]=i[r]||function(){(i[r].q=i[r].q||[]).push(arguments)},i[r].l=1*new Date();a=s.createElement(o),m=s.getElementsByTagName(o)[0];a.async=1;a.src=g;m.parentNode.insertBefore(a,m)})(window,document,'script','https://take.quiz-maker.com/3012/CDN/quiz-embed-v1.js','qp'); Got a good quiz question?Send Newsroom your questions. The post Newsroom daily quiz, Tuesday 19 March appeared first on Newsroom. ...
Bob’s relationship with certain members of Lincoln’s academic staff continued to deteriorate in the 1990s. Others supported him publicly, though articles such as Roland Clark’s 1993 piece in Growing Today cannot have pleased the university management. Clark wrote that Bob was selling onions from the Biological Husbandry Unit to a ...
SailGP’s races feature in-your-face action, with agile, hydro-foiling catamarans tacking and jibing for the title over several days. However, public comments ahead of the global series’ return to New Zealand have left this past year’s controversy in the shadows, as a key appointment attracts criticism from dolphin advocates. A year ...
Opinion: We are fast approaching a fundamental change in prisons. As the number of people on custodial remand looks set to overtake the number of sentenced prisoners, the main function of prisons in New Zealand may become incarcerating un-sentenced people who may not be guilty of offending. We have already ...
A huge seven months lies in store for the White Ferns, beginning this week with the visit of England and culminating with the T20 World Cup in Bangladesh in September and October. Starting on Tuesday in Dunedin, the world ranked No. 2 visitors will play five T20s and three ODIs, ...
The letters, which were published last week, were addressed to Indonesian Democratic Party of Struggle (PDI-P) Chairperson Megawati Sukarnoputri, National Democrat Party (NasDem) Chairperson Surya Paloh, National Awakening Party (PKB) Chairperson Muhaimin Iskandar, Justice and Prosperity Party (PKS) President Ahmad Syaikhu and United Development Party (PPP) Chairperson Muhammad Mardiono. In ...
Evicting more people from state housing is ignorant to the consequences of poverty, the Greens say, but the Housing Minister says it's a privilege that can be taken away if abused. ...
Evicting more people from state housing is ignorant to the consequences of poverty, the Greens say, but the Housing Minister says it's a privilege that can be taken away if abused. ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Emerald L King, Lecturer in Humanities, University of Tasmania IMDB Between Netflix’s 2023 live-action version of One Piece, and its latest take on Avatar: The Last Airbender, fans are once again asking: why are live-action anime adaptations so tricky to ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Emerald L King, Lecturer in Humanities, University of Tasmania IMDB Between Netflix’s 2023 live-action version of One Piece, and its latest take on Avatar: The Last Airbender, fans are once again asking: why are live-action anime adaptations so tricky to ...
The government says it still intends to deliver tax cuts by July, but will not lock them in until they have got them past their coalition partners. ...
https://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/new-zealand-chess-champion-sue-maroroa-jones-dies-at-32-after-giving-birth-to-second-child/I66QPHLFCJADHJOBF4K2OVYBOA/
Very sad she was a good person
Yes Barfly, our chess player son is sad as well. A complete shock.
I don't know if others have already commented on this, but it is brave and wonderful that in the budget the tax rate for trusts was raised from 33% to 39%, the same as the top income tax rate, to fix the rort/anomaly where trustees used trusts to only pay 33%.
Luxon will doubtless change this back-Standard readers need watch for the Nats policy position on this.
Agreed that is a positive takeaway from the budget…but it only addresses one part of the trust tax-evasion problem..
The operation of those trusts needs to be more transparent…
Agree with that Philip
is that income tax?
Trust income, in short if you found yourself in the 39c tax bracket you would once you reached it put the money into a trust which would pay 33c. For it to be a worthwhile work around you needed to earn 300k and up
so people whose assets are in a trust, and are earning income from that, but whose income would otherwise be in a lower tax bracket, will pay 39% on the trust income?
Yes unless they disperse the income from the trust in which case it will be paid at the recipients nominal tax rate.
ok, that makes more sense. So people who have a trust but aren't high inome earners, and who aren't trying to rort the system, can just take out the income each year and pay their normal tax on that rather than the 39%.
There is no 'rort'. Beneficiaries don't benefit from a different tax rate in the trust because as soon as they are paid a distribution, their personal tax rate kicks in.
so are Cricklewood and BG wrong when they say that the income being earned by the trust was being taxed at 33% but if it was personal income wealthy people would be paying 39%?
In the next financial year income coming into the trust will be taxed at 39%. Are you saying that if that stays in the trust until the following year but then is paid out that the beneficiary gets a rebate (assuming they pay less than 39%)?
In answer to question 1, ultimately what beneficiaries pay comes down to the nature of the distribution and the personal tax rate of the beneficiaries.
Increasing the trust tax rate to 39% is meaningless, because trustees will simply distribute all profits in the year they are earned (as most do now), and beneficiaries will pay whatever they pay, somewhere between 39% and zip.
It can be a rort. Parents who don’t have a trust have to meet the cost of their child's upkeep from their own income. With a trust, however, a child beneficiary's upkeep cost can be recovered from the trust, saving the parents a fair bit of money.
It would be useful to have legislation making it illegal to pass income to a child (or to anybody for that matter), through the use of a trust, without good reason.
how does that save the parents money?
2. School Fees paid by a trust are distributions to the beneficiaries, and so attract the recipients rate of income tax.
3. Funds used to establish a trust have already been subject to the individuals rate of income tax.
there is no rort.
I have friends who set up a trust so that they could hide income so that they could claim working for families. My understanding is that this is a widespread rort
If they are beneficiaries of the trust, the IRD will cut straight through the trust and effectively void the transactions. It’s the same scenario as gifting to avoid the cost of rest home care.
a lot of that stuff got tightened up ages ago.
No rorts, of course – just an example of NZ punching above its weight.
Too much of a 'good' thing?
Re David Parker's claims – https://thestandard.org.nz/open-mike-20-05-2023/#comment-1950631
Re the rest of it – you need to read up on foreign trusts. A clue is found in your last reference and talks about the criteria for a foreign trust only being tax free when neither the settlor nor beneficiaries lived, or derived income from New Zealand.
For a few wealthy Kiwis, tax avoidance is a way of life. Sad, if you really think about it – maybe it gives them some small pleasure?
Is the only real problem with tax evasion ‘getting caught’? So many thrilling 'stories', and this is a great opportunity to post them here. Will there be more opportunities? I do hope so.
If you believe that "the use of trusts" and "tax avoidance" are whole different conversations, then I have an old car to sell you
Seems fair to me – have NAct promised to reverse it yet? Not paying your fair share of tax is an optional perk of wealth the world over.
Re tax evasion:
https://www.ird.govt.nz/managing-my-tax/tax-crime/tell-us-about-evasion-or-fraud/report-anonymously-ir873
Just the one, as far as I can tell.
"If you believe that "the use of trusts" and "tax avoidance" are whole different conversations, then I have an old car to sell you"
They are completely different. Evidence of tax avoidance is not evidence that trusts are used for tax evasion.
Nope. The clue is in the title of the article about that “silly“, “faulty and shoddy” (in your opinion) report, specifically – "spike in trust use to avoid tax."
Why might you be finding that report so difficult to comprehend?
https://www.ird.govt.nz/managing-my-tax/tax-crime/tell-us-about-evasion-or-fraud/report-anonymously-ir873
"Nope. The clue is in the title of the article about that “silly“, “faulty and shoddy” report, specifically – "spike in trust use to avoid tax.""
Your link is to an article that includes this pearler:
Auckland University law professor Mark Henaghan said the increase was down to one thing – a growing awareness of how trusts could be used to reduce tax bills."
Seriously? The good professor ought to know there are a) many reasons people put homes in trusts that have nothing to do with tax, and b) any use of trusts to lower tax could easily be mirrored by other vehicles. Find better sources, Drowsy.
It appears you are firmly of the opinion that "the use of trusts" and "tax avoidance" "are completely different", so let's agree to disagree. Others can make up their own mind after considering the evidence.
"For a few wealthy Kiwis, tax avoidance is a way of life. Sad, if you really think about it – maybe it gives them some small pleasure?"
Do any of those examples include the use of trusts? We can have a whole different conversation about tax avoidance if you want.
Having a trust is not always evidence of an attempt to rort or tax evasion. Taking advantage of Trusts and companies set-ups is not prima facie an indication of wanting to rort.
It is only a rort really when tax is evaded.
The financial planning for tradespeople can often include trusts and companies. The prudent financial planning for people who have children from a prior relationship and/or assets from a prior relationship often use the Trust avenue to protect the children should a subsequent relationship break down. I mean why should a subsequent husband/wife be entitled to assets from a prior husband/parent who worked so hard?
Trust have always paid a higher tax rate so keeping assets for children in this way is not all beer and skittles. Neither is making payouts to beneficiaries, despite what is being said here. (There is pretty onerous record keeping involved) Many trusts have assets that are not liquid and cannot do that anyway. Many settlors of Trusts keep the assets within the trust and so any earnings are taxed at a higher rate.
I have no problem with a higher rate for tax for Trusts but long term it is not going to yield big bucks….better to spend the time and money on ways to catch the evading group (ie the large group paying less than a person on the lowest income rates, or to look at a capital gains or wealth tax or even a modest death duties regime.
I appreciate railing at the so-called tax and Trust bogey does fit in with the depression inducing cry 'its not fair' but ultimately it gets us nowhere.
"Having a trust is not always evidence of an attempt to rort or tax evasion."
"I appreciate railing at the so-called tax and Trust bogey does fit in with the depression inducing cry 'its not fair' but ultimately it gets us nowhere."
To Shanreagh…
Good comment.
"And there is this…"
That article is full of nonsense. Take this statement:
"Because trust income can be spread across a number of beneficiaries, who are often lower earners, the income is often taxed at a lower bracket, he says."
The author fails to understand that exactly the same result can be achieved without a trust.
Superb work Drowsy.
And there is this…
Which I have linked previously…The whole Mega landlord series from Stuff (who I actually rate) lifts the rock from the land"lord". Exposing what has happened to NZ.
Shame….
If a property is transferred to a trust the income from that property is taxed at a much lower rate if the beneficiaries are children, than would be the case if the parents themselves continued to own the properties, and paid tax on the income from those properties at their own tax rate; assuming of course that the children's tax rates are much lower than the parents (which of course is normally the case). The parents can then charge the children for their upkeep, and be compensated thereby from their children's trust income.
It should be mandated that parents support their children themselves rather than turning that support over to a trust.
Wrong. There are rules around what can be distributed to children under 16, and all distributions at balance date are taxed at the trust rate of tax.
"parents support their children themselves"
Well there goes working for families.
Incorrect. If the assets are held within the trust it does not matter who the proposed beneficiaries are and what their individual tax circumstances are.
So a Family Trust with a range of possible beneficiaries pays tax at the tax rate for trusts, now the highest rate. The process for allocating to beneficiaries is time- and document- intensive & the benefits so marginal, for my family Trust anyway. This is because many of the beneficiaries the Trust could allocate to now have marginal tax rates above the lowest personal tax rate, that we have not bothered.
NB One of a common way of avoding tax is simply not to pay PAYE for employees or FBT etc. While these crimes, when caught, are heavily penalised, that the financial state of many of these people ensure that tax to pay and penalties can be repaid on the 'never, never' or even if bankruptcy ensues may be paid a low rates in the $$$$
And even then, any distributions to beneficiaries attract tax at their personal tax rate, so at the top end, the 39c applies eventually anyway. Trust income can only escape the higher rate if it is retained in the Trust. The lifting of the rate is largely symbolic.
https://www.newsroom.co.nz/budget-no-major-new-taxes-but-80b-more-tax-revenue
Looks a lot more than simply ‘symbolic’ to me.
And:
So the change is forecast to contribute just 1.75% of the total additional tax NZ'ers will pay according to Treasury forecasts.
Stuffed up the block formatting, so re-posting rest of comment…
2. Total Trustee income in 2021 was $17.1bn.
Trustee tax rate to increase to 39% | Budget 2023 | Deloitte New Zealand
So the estimated $350m is just 2.05% of total trustee income from 2 years ago.
3.
Tax rate change enacted along with big-brother information gathering powers | Tax Alert | December 2020 | Deloitte New Zealand
350 million dollars a year (7 billion in 20 years) pays for a lot of cycleways and public transport.
The way this government wastes money, it's a drop in the bucket.
Indeed, nothing ‘symbolic’ about $350m a year. The “m” is not a symbol but a prefix that means one has to add another six zeros to get the real figure, in real dollars.
Not going after this money would indeed be tantamount to ‘waste’, so you should be fully behind it, yet you are not, which is rather odd and counter-intuitive.
My comment was a specific reply and specifically mentioned the nearly $6b income a year by high-earning New Zealanders. (NB the “b” prefix means that you add nine zeros to the figure) So, why are you diverting, again? Instead of putting up a decent argument you divert and/or post a wall of selective quotes or links, which is your MO here.
You seem to have a real bee in your bonnet about the increase in trustee tax but no compelling counter-arguments!? Go figure!
"My comment was a specific reply and specifically mentioned the nearly $6b income a year by high-earning New Zealanders."
My comment referred to the lifting of the trust tax rate as symbolic. I then went on to demonstrate precisely how insignificant the $35m is in the context of the budget in which it was introduced. Your $6bn is irrelevant and a diversion.
"Not going after this money would indeed be tantamount to ‘waste’…"
No, it really wouldn't. As I have pointed out, there is a real chance this change could raise little additional or even less revenue.
Correction: $350m.
Freudian slip
I see, you believe you’re a clever troll.
It’s neither irrelevant nor a diversion (nice try!) but at the core of the Government decision:
https://www.beehive.govt.nz/release/trustee-tax-change-improve-fairness
Well, if you keep dropping zeroes it will become insignificant. However, your incorrect $35m (the correct figure still is $350m) is neither ‘symbolic’ nor ‘insignificant’ and you have ‘demonstrated’ only that you’re a disingenuous troll.
Only four days ago you argued (https://thestandard.org.nz/nationals-policy-machine-is-a-thing-to-behold/#comment-1950174) about much smaller amounts being wasteful:
On the one hand, $330k is wasteful but OTOH, $35m or $350m is ‘symbolic’ and ‘insignificant’!?
For someone who doesn’t have a Trust nor the desire to have one (https://thestandard.org.nz/open-mike-20-05-2023/#comment-1950619) you have an awful lot to say about this topic, which raises the question what your agenda is with this?
Good commenters here are wasting their time engaging with you, which I have noticed and noted before.
"It’s neither irrelevant nor a diversion (nice try!) but at the core of the Government decision:"
The estimated benefit from the change is $350m. I demonstrated clearly that is immaterial (and therefore symbolic) when I compared this amount to three seperate benchmarks…a) the total amount of additional tax estimated over the next four years, b) the total trustee income from 2021, and c) the % of top income earners the new 'top tax rate' would effect.
I have also demonstrated (if you had bothered to read through the thread) that the $350m may end up being much less or even zero.
You either don't have the understanding of this subject to engage in an informed matter, or you're just being a dick for the sake of it. I'll go with the latter. It's in your MO.
[You want us to believe that $6b yearly income by high-earning New Zealanders and that could net $350m in extra tax could magically disappear and become zero even, which would indeed be ‘insignificant’ as you claim. High-earning means that they are or should already be paying 39% tax on any profit, be it from a Trust or elsewhere, and regardless of how they distribute the profit. The fact that Trustee tax was 33% strongly suggests (!) that those high-earning individuals saw a strong enough reason in moving about $6b of their yearly income into Trusts. If this wasn’t a legal loophole used by high-earning New Zealanders then I’d agree that the move is ‘symbolic’. However, the numbers suggest this to be unlikely and implausible. Have the Opposition declared yet that they will repeal the decision? If not, why not? Stop trolling and stop dicking around – only because I’ve been busy you’ve got this far with your trollish claims (e.g. your BS allegation about this government wasting money on “a movie about a Green party MP” here: https://thestandard.org.nz/nationals-policy-machine-is-a-thing-to-behold/#comment-1950174). This is your warning – Incognito]
Mod note
"Good commenters here are wasting their time engaging with you, which I have noticed and noted before."
Really? Like Shanreagh? Red Logix? Both of whom have taken the same position as I have during this thread.
No
"You want us to believe that $6b yearly income by high-earning New Zealanders and that could net $350m in extra tax could magically disappear and become zero even, which would indeed be ‘insignificant’ as you claim."
Well, on the issue of significance, I'll quote Grant Robertson, who seems to agree with my assessment:
Budget 2023: No ‘Major’ New Taxes But $80b More Tax Revenue | Newsroom
On the issue of the $350m, I'll again leave this to Grant Robertson:
Budget 2023: No ‘Major’ New Taxes But $80b More Tax Revenue | Newsroom
A small amount of NZ'ers. The vast majority of trusts aren't set up by the rich, and only a small number of trusts will pay the extra tax.
That should have rung alarm bells right there. Most trusts are for the benefit of less than wealthy NZ'ers, who will simply distribute all income (rather than potentially retaining some income in the trust and paying a higher tax rate) to beneficiaries on a lower tax rate.
And here's the kicker…the $350m is exactly 6% of the $6bn, meaning they are suggesting they will collect the extra tax on every cent of that income. They are dreaming.
[I can’t see anywhere where commenters here on TS and/or Grant Robertson said or implied that $350m extra tax intake is ‘insignificant’ and ‘symbolic’. It would indeed raise serious questions as to why Robertson would have made the decision if this were the case. My take is that you are twisting words & meanings & intentions, as per usual, to score your points. Essentially, you want us to believe that those high-earning New Zealanders – and you keep diverting away from this specific sub-category – shifted nearly $6b of their yearly income into Trusts and they will now hand over control of those Trust assets/income to others just to avoid paying any tax on it (“even zero”!? The mind just boggles at your naivety! Time will tell how that $6b of yearly income will be taxed or ‘vanish’ from the IRD radar, as you seem to want us believe. Frankly, I have enough of your gaslighting days here on TS and I reaffirm your Mod note and don’t want to waste anymore of my Mod time on this – Incognito]
Mod note
"I can’t see anywhere where commenters here on TS and/or Grant Robertson said or implied that $350m extra tax intake is ‘insignificant’ and ‘symbolic’. "
Re Grant Robertson:
You didn't look very hard. From my comment you were moderating:
'Pales in comparison'.
Re: Other contributors:
I didn't claim they "implied that $350m extra tax intake is ‘insignificant’ and ‘symbolic’". Look back at comment https://thestandard.org.nz/open-mike-20-05-2023/#comment-1950730.
There are a number of other contributors here who have concurred with a variety of opinions I have proffered across this thread.
"you want us to believe that those high-earning New Zealanders – and you keep diverting away from this specific sub-category – shifted nearly $6b of their yearly income into Trusts and they will now hand over control of those Trust assets/income to others just to avoid paying any tax on it (“even zero”!?)
Tax is not paid on the assets in a trust, or even necessarily by those who exercise control over those assets. Tax is paid on the income from the trust (either by the trust or by beneficiaries on distribution). That $6bn you refer to will simply find its way to beneficiaries with a lower tax rate, or into other vehicles.
[I’m not too surprised that you continue to waste my time and keep digging & doubling down and now denying your own comments aka gaslighting, twisting & turning.
Have it your way: take 10 days off for ignoring several warnings about trolling and wasting moderator time – Incognito]
Mod note
But if you don't need any operational income from the Trust for personal use like paying for groceries, rent, power etc., you can leave the money in the Trust. And the Trust re-invests it and earns more income at the same discounted tax rate, which you then re-invest in a spiral of increasing wealth accumulation. The accumulated wealth might not be dispersed for years, or to the next generation, where lower personal tax rates might apply.
The money-grubbing classes are very good at this sort of game – they always find a way of getting an advantage over others. Like a sewage leak, the rest of us have only a vague, passing sense that something whiffs a bit, then you pull up the floorboards and realise the whole edifice is rotten.
Ultimately the money is distributed and tax paid. Anyone can set up a trust. Do you have one? If it is so beneficial, and you don’t, why not?
If it is so beneficial, and you don’t, why not?
Because it is essentially a tax dodge. There are many shady loopholes in the tax system: this is one of them. Unfortunately the measure introduced in the budget will not achieve much because it doesn't address the main problem.
Trusts are not a tax dodge. That ship sailed a long time ago, like the use of gifting to avoid or minimise rest home costs.
Trusts are primarily used now for asset protection, particularly in conjunction with pre-nups.
When did the ship sail? How long ago and what were the reasons for her departure? In a similar analogy, the reasons for emigration by ship in the 19th century ranged from a search for freedom and personal advancement to colonial exploitation.
Yonks ago. For years (from 2010) the highest personal tax rate was 33%, so there was no tax advantage. Before that – from the 1980's through to 2000 the highest personal tax rate was also 33%.
Look at it this way: if trusts were abolished and everyone paid the correct amount of tax on the income they derived from their assets – rents, dividends, profits, etc., would you consider they were being unfairly treated? No? But that is what is happening when income is passed to beneficiaries whose tax rate is lower. And “protecting assets” is often just a weasel word for diddling one’s creditors, including the IRD.
Yes. There are some legitimate uses for trusts, but when there is a stampede to form trusts when the top tax rate is increased from 33% to 39%, one can hardly be blamed for being suspicious.
"Asset protection" is just a weasel word for tax evasion.
No it isn't. Asset protection is precisely what it says. People with assets (eg property) put them into family trusts to protect them from matrimonial property claims, not tax.
No it isn't. Asset protection is precisely what it says. People with assets (eg property) put them into family trusts to protect them from matrimonial property claims, not tax.
Oh – is this where you pretend that someone so ungenerous as not to share with an intimate partner embraces the IRD like a soulmate and gives them everything they're due?
Oh you sweet summer child! Naive even by the standards of the irredeemably stupid Right.
"Oh – is this where you pretend that someone so ungenerous as not to share with an intimate partner embraces the IRD like a soulmate and gives them everything they're due?
Not necessarily just partners or spouses. Sometimes people establish trusts to protect assets from future partners of their children. You should read up on it.
Zoom……if the so-called 'intimate partner' is so ungenerous to find a new partner while still married to the first and claims the assets built up by a prior spouse/partner for the children of that marriage.
You do not appear to know what happens on marriage break-up. I had to get another mortgage to pay my former husband out. Payment being made as a single person is very different from two working and being able to pay and is pretty poor when he had not contributed half of the value….
But you go the way with the fluffy ducks and the perfect marital bliss. It does not work that way sometimes in the real world and some of us in the real world do actually want to live in the homes we built up.
Beautiful analogy.
I can smell the aroma from here
I somehow don't think that paying the higest rate of tax is a discounted rate!
Not all people who set up a Family Trust fall into the categories you are throwing around. I worked hard to save and get ahead and after paying out a husband who was quite happy to take half of the 'wealth' in the home I had on marriage and which he moved into I saw sense and set up a Trust to protect myself and family. I had to re mortgage the house and pay for it again. This was with all the care to separate our earnings at the time.
But you go on slamming people who have Family Trusts.
It has meant that that the earnings in the Trust are taxed at much higher rates than I would have had if I was earning but the Trust has protected me and what I have worked hard for.
The real problem, as opposed to the philosphical problem that some see of so-called 'rich pricks' and their 'mega property deals', like me apparently, is people like this:
https://www.stuff.co.nz/business/132108201/company-director-jailed-after-kiwisavers-left-owing-1-million
This bloke did not pay lawful deductions made on behalf of IRD for employees kiwisaver etc and there does not appear to be any chance that he will. I mean going to prison is hardly likely to get the lost money into employees KS accounts.
I think IRD is onto the Trust tax dodgers quite promptly whereas with people like this it can take at least a year, if PAYE is paid annually for something to be seen as amiss.
With employee pay software able to generate payments to IRD weekly, fortnightly or monthly etc it is time a bit of legislative force was used to make all employers pay IRD regularly. I know large employers can be required to pay IRD for PAYE etc more than annually but looking at this person you can see how a smaller employer who is not prepared to play by the rules can have a debt mount up.
As the daughter of two accountants i know that some scummy employers do use their employees PAYE/KS etc payments to meet cash flow problems and to bankroll expansion. Hoping on the never-never that the ship might come in with additional money to fix it up before year end. Sometimes though the ship salis away and doesn't come back.
My dad had views that this is theft from IRD and a brake on the amount of money that could be used to run the country. He told his clients this and those who were not prepared to mend their ways duirng the year were dropped.
As far as my Trust is concerned the piece of mind that this has brought has been immense and I know that the Trust pays more in tax than I would pay personally but this is a small price to pay. As a retiree I am not able to meet a mortgage to pay anyone out and staying put where I am means much to me.
Liberty….why are you getting so get up if the change from 33 to 39 makes no difference? Methinks thou doth protest too much.
I don't have a trust, and no desire to have one. The notion that people with trusts are rich pricks trying to avoid tax is a common misconception among left wingers. It's part of the whole tall poppy thing we suffer from in this country.
You are 100% correct. Unfortunately the people you are responding to have zero interest in learning anything. Their motives come from a different place.
Wrong Red….read my link below. Billions are being laundered through trusts to avoid tax.
Agreed.
Why do people who are not rich pricks use trusts? Why on earth do trusts exist?
Most people with trusts are not rich.
Budget 2023: No ‘Major’ New Taxes But $80b More Tax Revenue | Newsroom
Trusts exist these days mainly for asset protection, often in conjunction with 'prenuptual' agreements.
You're probably thinking of squat poppies – those morally stunted and undeserving persons that, at every opportunity, seek to avoid their social responsibilities, and imagine that, when called out, that they are victims.
Tall poppies cheerfully bow to the common good.
Who are these 'squat poppies'? Care to name one?
The litmus test is the claim to be a tall poppy.
Real tall poppies have no need to make that claim.
Not true Liberty. Read this.
https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=https://i.stuff.co.nz/business/132079936/trustee-tax-increase-is-response-to-spike-in-trust-use-to-avoid-tax&ved=2ahUKEwj_-umru4P_AhXQklYBHYHnBhMQFnoECBEQAQ&usg=AOvVaw1cq5EJFKGkvvCYijWDhIfJ
Parker either doesn't have a clue, or he is simply dishonest. It showed in the silly report he had compiled about the proportion of income tax paid by the wealthy.
And I'll quote from the article:
Clueless, dishonest and/or just plain "silly" – you be the Judge
As for the quote @9:06 pm yesterday, the Taxpayers' Union's campaigns manager Callum Purves might very well say that…
Imo there's nothing honourable about tax avoidance – absolutely nothing.
Re tax evasion:
https://www.ird.govt.nz/managing-my-tax/tax-crime/tell-us-about-evasion-or-fraud/report-anonymously-ir873
After all, what’s sauce for the goose…
https://www.workandincome.govt.nz/about-work-and-income/contact-us/report-suspected-fraud/index.html
Parker's study was faulty and shoddy, right down to not including tax transfers. It was a politically motivated sideshow.
A far better study is the Oliver Shaw research (Rich are paying fair share of tax, research finds | Newshub).
Is that the study that found "those paying the highest average effective tax rate were single, unemployed people in rented accommodation"?
Fair's fair.
It's the study that found that not including tax transfers in a report of comparative taxation is really, really silly.
Ah, then that is the study that found "those paying the highest average effective tax rate were single, unemployed people in rented accommodation." Nice to have that cleared up.
The study done for tax consultancy OliverShaw – not a lot of "single, unemployed people in rented accommodation" on their books, to be fair.
The firms principal is a former deputy IRD commissioner. But play the man if that makes you feel better.
And Don Brash was a former Governor of the RBNZ. Your point?
BTW, this is about the research methodology and findings:
Do the wealthiest New Zealanders pay their fair share of tax? | interest.co.nz
LB, why is the Sapere study “a far better study“, in your opinion?
Is that the Parker one that doesn't take into account transfers but included unearned income?
"And Don Brash was a former Governor of the RBNZ. Your point?"
That playing the man (or in this case the organisation) is rather cheap.
Your appeal to authority shows your bias. DMK rightly pointed out a possible conflict of interest that may cloud the judgement or bias the opinion of ‘the man’. This is not ‘playing the man’ per se but a good counter attack when you’ve run out of arguments and refuse to agree to disagree and insist on scoring points. Context is important, but you seem to apply it only when it suits you.
DMK rightly pointed out a possible conflict of interest that may cloud the judgement or bias the opinion of ‘the man’.
Anyone can insinuate a conflict of interest. It's a cheap shot.
Appealing to authority is a weak & lazy shot.
"Appeaing to authority is a weak & lazy shot."
You probably should apologise to DMK. His long, but nevertheless informative posts are full of them.
He’s not on Mod watch, you are. Don’t tell me what to do here, you are not a Mod, I am.
There's an IRD one (uses data on 311 wealthy (net worth generally >$50m) NZ families) that includes all income, a NZ Treasury one, and a Sapere one.
What makes the Sapere one the best, and the IRD one "silly", "faulty and shoddy", in your opinion?
"What makes the Sapere one the best, and the IRD one "silly", "faulty and shoddy", in your opinion?"
My response (with help from David Reddell Parker, taxation, and that IRD report | croaking cassandra).
1. The IRD report is effectively a survey of 311 families. As David Reddell points out:
2. The IRD survey didn't take into account that in NZ, tax on property is already above the OECD median. In fcat , as David Reddel notes, that was one OECD chart left out of the IRD report. Conveniently.
3. The IRD survey includes unearned (unrealised and hypothetical) income for those individuals, but exclude that same unearned income from other tax payers. David Reddell noted of Parker that
4. The IRD survey takes no account of the rate of inflation.
As David Reddell states:
5. The IRD survey takes no account of improvements performed on any of those assets at the tax payers expense.
6. If you refer to page 45 of the IRD report (report-high-wealth-individuals-research-project.pdf (ird.govt.nz)), at paragraph 4.17, you will find this comment:
Above that comment is table 4.1, which shows that the ETR net of transfers at each decile:
D1: -52%
D2: -55%
D3: -36%
D4: – 2%
D5: 6%
D6: 18%
D7: 21%
D8: 23%
D9: 26%
D10: 29%
The Michael Reddell critique is worth a read, but there are others. The poor quality of the IRD work smacks of political interference. Michael Reddell sums it up in this understated manner:
"David Reddell" (or is it "Michael Reddell"?) is one (or two?) economists, "and like lawyers I can give you another one that will give a counterview."
LB, if you believe this wealth distribution is sustainable in the face of climate change, pandemics, food scarcity, war, environmental and economic crises et al., then I have an old car to sell you.
https://thespinoff.co.nz/society/16-08-2022/the-side-eyes-two-new-zealands-the-table
Nah – keep 'em hungry?
Sorry – getting David Parker and Michael Reddell conflated! But your pithy comment about economists and lawyers is of course quite true!
"f you think this wealth distribution is sustainable …'
Wealth and income are not the same thing and not always directly related. Nevertheless, your comment is a great segue, because the political messaging around the IRD study has cleverly conflated wealth and income to create a faux justification for more taxation.
The IRD report is fundamentally about the fairness or otherwise tax paid on income, not wealth. In fact it goes to great pains to justify itself by classifying unearned and frankly 'phantom' gains as 'income', when (ASGFIK) nowhere in the world is unearned income treated this way.
And David Parker further stokes this confusion in his opinion piece foreward:
Wealth and income are not the same, and Parker knows it.
Further to this, the ETR table clearly shows the tax system in NZ is already achieving significant income redistribution. We are at a point where the highest income earners pay a hugely distportionate amount of the total tax take, and a much higher ETR than low-income earners.
LB, for all the huff and puff that "the IRD report is fundamentally about the fairness or otherwise [of] tax paid on income, not wealth", isn't it up to the IRD to say what the IRD report is fundamentally about?
Not knowing the first thing about economics or accounting (as long as I've got enough money to get by, I'm happy), I googled the term 'economic income', and apparently it's a thing – go figure.
Hmm – while there might be bugger all diferrence between 'taxable income' and 'economic income' for much of the population most of the time, I can see why 'high wealth individuals', and their accountants, might have 'concerns' about using economic income to calculate a median effective tax rate of 9.8%.
Imho, this is about striking a fair balance, and we're not there yet.
"isn't it up to the IRD to say what the IRD report is fundamentally about?"
Of course. My emphasis added.
and
report-high-wealth-individuals-research-project.pdf (ird.govt.nz)
The report is a 'project' about ETR's, and as table 4.1 shows, the TWG found that higher income earners pay considerable higher ETR's than those on lower incomes.
"I googled the term 'economic income', and apparently it's a thing – go figure."
It is. But is it ever used in taxing individuals? And if the IRD or David Parker were remotely honest, they would have taken into account the economic income of every earner in NZ, not just the one class they wanted to highlight.
"I can see why 'high wealth individuals', and their accountants, might have 'concerns' about using economic income"
I don't know whether they are concerned or not. But I can see why Parker and the IRD would be far less amendable to repeating study and including the impacts of the past year or so, with asset values (particularly house prices and managed funds) having fallen.
The entire exercise was political, with a predetermined outcome built in to its methodology. It was dishonest but it got the headlines the government wanted, so perhaps they're happy.
So far you've taken issue with: the [dishonest, silly, faulty and shoddy] IRD report; Attorney-General David Parker [stokes confusion and either doesn't have a clue, or is simply dishonest]; Auckland University law professor Mark Henaghan; an article on ‘Mega Landlords: 48 per cent rise in homes owned by trustees 'suggests tax avoidance' [full of nonsense]; and our Govt [The way this government wastes money, it's a drop in the bucket.]
Imho the report on the IRD project outcomes is interesting, but anyone can read this 2-page summary [PDF] and decide for themself.
The purpose of the project is no mystery, and what Table 4.1 shows is stated clearly on page 31 of the full report.
Elements of economic income are used in many countries for the purposes of taxing individuals. Of the seven happiest countries (all OECD members) in 2021, six had higher Tax-to-GDP ratios than NZ (ranked 9th for happiness) – go figure.
Maybe this excerpt from the Sapere report will help.
The reasons for concern about using 'economic income' to calculate the effective tax rates that the very wealthy 'labour' under is obvious.
Some wealthy individuals think the ETRs calculated using 'economic income' are problematic, and I agree with them.
"So far you've taken issue with:"
Oh I've done more than that. At https://thestandard.org.nz/open-mike-20-05-2023/#comment-1950815 I set out very clearly the basis for my criticism of IRD report. The invitation is open for you to address those points, not selectively.
"Elements of economic income are used in many countries for the purposes of taxing individuals. "
What elements? Specifically where and how is unearned income taxed that is not consistent with how we treat similar income in NZ?
"Unlike ETRs based on economic income, these ETRs do not comprehensively take account of untaxed sources of income, such as capital gains."
"The purpose of 'the project' is no mystery, "
You said:
I answered you with a reference from the report itself.
"Some wealthy individuals think the ETRs calculated using 'economic income' are problematic, and I agree with them."
What is wealthy? Are these the 300 or so families who the report failed to recognise are actually taxed as individuals? If so. which ones? If not, who are these 'wealthy' people who are concerned? Michael Reddell doesn't appear to be wealthy.
"Maybe this excerpt from the Sapere report will help."
Not really. The accountants will be rubbing their hands together at the prospect of a new and complex taxation regime.
The concerns about changes causing a reduction in investment are valid. When low decile income earners enjoy a negative ETR, and higher income earners are carrying an increasingly disproportionate share of the tax burden, money will leave the country. It's another reason the aforesaid accountants will be loving this.
Don’t know about “pricks”, but more likely rich than poor, surely?
Hmm – maybe a mix of Kiwis, 'concerned' for different reasons?
For example, individuals in the 41 families who wouldn't cooperate with the IRD project, might be 'concerned' about over-taxation.
While other wealthy Kiwis are concerned about under-taxation. You may not agree with wealthy Kiwis who want to pay more tax, but everyone can appreciate their point of view.
"Don’t about “pricks”, but more likely rich than poor, surely?"
Somewhere in between.
Budget 2023: Government cracks down on trustees, increases tax rate | Newshub
As others have noted here, most trusts are family trusts, set up as vehicles to protect assets for future generations. The 'rich prick with a trust' attutide is alive and well, and ignorant.
"For example, individuals in the 41 families who wouldn't cooperate with the IRD project, might be 'concerned' about over-taxation."
Might be. Might be concerned at the government using (to quote Michael Reddell) the "coercive powers of the state" to prepare a politically motivated attack on success.
"Some of the wealthiest Kiwis in Aotearoa know they pay lower tax rates than most – and have signed a letter explicitly asking to pay more."
Tax Justice Spokesperson among the 97 wealthy Kiwis calling for higher taxes (newstalkzb.co.nz)
Huh? He signed the letter of 'wealthy kiwi's' but isn't wealthy?
We can scratch deeper if you want.
Edit – oh this is beautiful. At the foot of the list are two buttons to click if you want to donate. Not, BTW to the IRD, but to either Oxfam or TJA.
"Somewhere in between" – cute. So what's the value of income from trusts set up by Kiwis living in poverty? Take your time.
You seem very prickly
Is there a practical diff between concerns about over-taxation, and concern about politically motivated attacks on financial success?
Those such as Seymour, Luxon and yourself, who leap to the defence of poor put-upon wealthy Kiwis, no doubt have the purest of motivations. It must be truely awful being a wealthy Kiwi, when so many people want to tax your wealth.
https://thespinoff.co.nz/society/16-08-2022/the-side-eyes-two-new-zealands-the-table
Some Kiwis simply can't stomach even the thought of contributing more money to our Govt by way of tax – ‘unfair‘, they cry, Unfair!
If you like, but is there any need? Various motives are clear enough. For many wealthy Kiwis, current tax settings are barely tolerable – they already feel over-taxed, and inequality is certainly not their problem. Other wealthy Kiwis take a different view – maybe they're all silly, confused, dishonest, faulty and shoddy?
""Somewhere in between" – cute."
Somewhere in between rich and poor does not include people in poverty, does it?
"Is there a practical diff between concerns about over-taxation, and concern about politically motivated attacks on financial success?"
Of course there is. For example, I'm concerned about both, but for different reasons. I'm concerned about high income earners paying a disproportionate share of tax, because NZ desperately needs investment. I'm concerned about politically motivated attacks on financial success because they are part of an attitude of mediocracy that is prevalent in NZ.
"If you like, but is there any need? "
Well that depends on you. You posited the idea that this letter was the work of 'wealthy' NZ'ers, which is clearly untrue. Doesn't that concern you?
The trustee can distribute, to the beneficiaries, as much, or as little, of the trust's income as he chooses. Only undistributed income is taxed at the trust rate: formerly 33%, now 39%. Distributed income is taxed at the beneficiary's rate, which can be as low as 10.5%.
"Only undistributed income is taxed at the trust rate: formerly 33%, now 39%."
Yes, that's what I've been saying. In my experience most family trusts distribute all of the income annually already. (Many of those are below the 39% threshold). Perversely, if this tax rate change prompts even more to fully distribute, and to beneficiaries on tax rates lower than 33%, it's entirely possible the government won't draw anywhere near the level of additional taxation they are forecasting.
All of this is quite true LB.
But think of the useful mental health outlet this thread has provided for the 'its not fair' brigade who lump all people with trusts into the category of rich pricks buying mega lots of houses.
I've found that those who engage in trust's often are lacking in trust.
Forced birther poured $120k of his own money into an effort to force a recount of a referendum affirming abortion rights, forcing him to cheap-out on the airworthiness of the light aircraft he was rebuilding. Which then crashed and killed him.
https://www.kansas.com/news/local/news-local-obituaries/article275501041.html
Well, thats peanuts compared to whats coming.
The article goes on to say that that is enough money to fund two of the hugely influential conservative Heritage Foundations plus another sizeable organisation without touching the principle.
What's coming for tens of millions of women is a return to the 19thC.
Directors of women’s health care services at Idaho hospitals are bracing for what’s next: 75 of 117 Idaho OB-GYNs recently surveyed by the Idaho Coalition for Safe Reproductive Health Care said they were considering leaving the state. Of those, nearly 100% — 73 of 75 — cited Idaho’s restrictive abortion laws.
An exodus could affect broader medical coverage for women who rely on OB-GYNs for routine and urgent gynecological care unrelated to pregnancy, like menstrual disorders, endometriosis, and pelvic pain.
Idaho is one of 15 states that have implemented strict abortion laws since last year’s Supreme Court decision overturning Roe v. Wade. And while there is no official nationwide count yet, anecdotal evidence shows that women’s health specialists from states where abortion is criminalized are beginning to relocate to places like Washington state, which has strong abortion rights laws.
https://kffhealthnews.org/news/article/after-idahos-strict-abortion-ban-ob-gyns-stage-a-quick-exodus/
https://www.stuff.co.nz/opinion/132087748/budget-2023-grant-robertsons-budget-has-one-marker-who-matters-adrian-orr
Yep, save maybe $100-$200 per year at the pharmacy but your mortgage payments go up massively.
And pity the renters who will inevitably pay more as a consequence of this.
Alan-When a cyclone causes 10 billion plus expenses that need fixing asap it is not possible to cut government expenditure unless you are proposing mother of all budget cuts to benefits and other payments that go to the less well off.
Why did Labour rule out the use of a short term cyclone levy?
Targeting high income earners, it would have taken money out of the economy offsetting the Government expenditure on the cyclone repair.
In other words, inflation neutral.
Big Hairy News interviews Shamubeel Eaqub on Budget
Once over lightly, where Shamubeel discusses the predominant spend on infrastructure, plus Pat also asks him about Covid response spending.
What is the point (if any) that you are trying to make by posting this link?
Oh, the irony!
That was a good find
If you are getting prescriptions for drugs that are affected by Robertson's proposal there is not a single household that needs to be paying more than $100/year.
An entire household can't save more than $100/year under the scheme even if you were a family with 6 kids and were getting 20 prescriptions/month. Every single one after the first 20 in a year is free,
Arena Williams has been caught telling porkies about that.
Labour MP Arena Williams fact-checked by Twitter community note over post about scrapping of prescription fee | Newshub
Rent goes up regardless of economic conditions. It doesn't matter if it's pharmacy fees or cheap offshore labour, rent always and inexorably goes up.
One thing the landlord class is very good at is extracting every last cent out of tenants, for profit. Pity they are not so good at providing housing safe from illness and fire. It's business, you know!
It's all good, renters are used to being abused as second class citizens.
The whales know. And they hate us.
Orcas have attacked and sunk a third boat off the Iberian coast of Europe, and experts now believe the behavior is being copied by the rest of the population.
Three orcas (Orcinus orca), also known as killer whales, struck the yacht on the night of May 4 in the Strait of Gibraltar, off the coast of Spain, and pierced the rudder. "There were two smaller and one larger orca," skipper Werner Schaufelberger told the German publication Yacht. "The little ones shook the rudder at the back while the big one repeatedly backed up and rammed the ship with full force from the side."
https://www.livescience.com/animals/orcas/orcas-have-sunk-3-boats-in-europe-and-appear-to-be-teaching-others-to-do-the-same-but-why
Yes Joe90, snap. I had noticed two or three reports of whale attacks in the past six months, and was wondering whether it was Nature fighting back with tooth and fin against humans and that global warming shit.
I have read elsewhere a story where orcas and humans co-operated over decades in fish drives in a harbour somewhere on the Canadian west coast, I think. Until the humans stuffed it up one year somehow, and the pact disintegrated.
A fabulous sight one autumn afternoon years ago was watching a pod of orcas playing around in the Waitematā harbour.
So many decades, but little has changed. Just like Cash and Kristofferson wise words in the Paul Holmes clip a few days ago.
https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1659583477769990146.html
Robert F. Kennedy, Jr's. Presidential Campaign takes a kindness approach.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JYdjT75ljgs
Whereas, Trump takes a strength approach.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9zwy05u6ncg
Sure if you vote by numbers of sanctimoneous abstract nouns, go right ahead.
On the other hand if you like policy, RFK JR:
– Lobbied Congress to enable parents to evade vaccinating their children
https://people.com/health/jessica-biel-says-shes-not-against-vaccinations/
– Has a Non Profit called Child's Health Defence which paid for more than half of the ads on Facebook lying about vaccines, and was then barred from instagram
https://www.nytimes.com/2021/02/11/us/robert-f-kennedy-jr-instagram-covid-vaccine.html
– Published a book titled The Real Anthony Fauci, accusing the doctor of promoting "a historic coup d'etat against Western democracy."
– Promoted a documentary falsely claiming that vaccines give you autism
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/speaking-of-science/wp/2017/01/10/the-facts-about-vaccines-autism-and-robert-f-kennedy-jr-s-conspiracy-theory/
I'm sure he's done a lot of good particularly in environmental defences of rivers, and of course he's younger than Joe Biden.
But … nah
I don't vote in the US election.
I was merely interested in the two different campaign approaches.
RFK Jnr is a nutter. So different campaign approaches for the same fruit cake 'winner'
Would you prefer Biden to win?
A deep dive into Jr's dangerous, dishonest lunacy.
/
The only ‘herd immunity’ we need is against abysmal candidates like RFK Jr. He has spent decades as a professional liar and is not the kind of person who should be anywhere near power.
[…]
Let’s establish at the outset that Robert F. Kennedy Jr. is someone who lies constantly in ways that seriously endanger the public. In fact, his lies have probably directly caused people to get sick, and possibly die.
To those who accept the scientific consensus around the efficacy of COVID-19 vaccines, someone like Kennedy can appear to be a mere “nut” or “crank.” But it’s important to understand that anti-vaxxers like Kennedy aren’t just “crazy.” They’re skilled manipulators of statistics who are great at fooling people using pseudoscience. Waving them away as
https://www.currentaffairs.org/2023/05/rfk-jr-is-a-lying-crank-posing-as-a-progressive-alternative
And there's always the possibility that Jr's a player in one of Roger Stone's rat-fucking schemes.
Thanks, Joe.
Seems some have a bee in their bonnet re his vaccine stance.
Nevertheless, it also seems he's polling rather well regardless.
Trump is too, so not sure of the relevance. Both crazy in different ways so 'you takes your chances and you makes your choice' between whatever flavour you like.
Yes, I've seen that Trump is also polling well.
I wonder which approach American voters will favour?
As I have long told my US cousin the choice of the President of the US is far too important to be given to Americans…… when Trump got in we agreed that anyone other than Americans, preferably NZers, should have been given the vote for the US Pres & that way they might have avoided Trump. She's a Democrat but who knows, she's not an anti vaxxer.
Her father on the other hand used to tell all his family here in NZ that he would be coming back to NZ each time a Labour Govt got in, in the UK. But of course he never did.
Anti-vaccine stances are directly responsible for the return of vaccine-preventable diseases that disproportionately affect children.
Those who oppose a crank magnet who poses an existential threat to millions of children have a little more than a bee in their bonnet.
/
Is it really the anti-vaccine stance that is responsible, or could it be the failure to convincingly refute them?
Maybe those who oppose a crank magnet should be reconsidering their own tactics?