Open mike 27/03/2021

130 comments on “Open mike 27/03/2021 ”

• Comments are now closed

1. Cricklewood 1

   27 March 2021 at 7:25 am

   sigh two of my colleagues received freshly minted 90 day notices yesterday… Landlords selling up due to changes…. I guess the changes are having the desired effect not so good for solo mums thrust back into the exploding rental market…
   • KSaysHi 1.1

     27 March 2021 at 8:17 am

     Oh no, how incredibly frightening for all of them. I really hope they find somewhere that is at a minimum safe for the kids.
     • Cricklewood 1.1.1

       27 March 2021 at 8:47 am

       Yeah its not alot of fun… effects schooling as well end up having to look in the same zone… expensive to time off… moving costs… finding bond… tenancy services is running behind on bond refunds by the sounds…

       Pretty worried for one of them piles more shit on…

       Hoping but not holding my breath that govt will move quickly to help renters… to my mind if you make renters rights really strong you deflate the market anyway… would put anyone in it for the short term off…
   • Jester 1.2

     27 March 2021 at 11:04 am

     Unfortunately there will be a few landlords that decide to cash up now which was always going to happen as an unintended consequence. I fear these announcements may not be good for renters as rents will increase. Hopefully your colleagues can find another place but there is a shortage of rental places in many areas, thus the problem we have.
   • Treetop 1.3

     27 March 2021 at 12:11 pm

     I actually have a nice landlord story. A friend of mine the landlord has cut down 2 big trees, cost 8k so the homes are warmer. Landlord said he was not selling.

     Usually when costly land shaping is done either selling or a rent rise is in the horizon.

     I do have nosy extractor fan issues 24/7 where I live due to a house divided into 3 tenancies with 6 people. Loud footsteps and doors banging can also annoy me and keep me up or wake me up.

     The rental market is so tight and I have had the experience of the landlord selling and needing to move out. I had the last laugh they sold for 200k 4 1/2 years ago and the place is now worth 400k.

     Some landlords might find the price of their home dropping. I do give a thought to those struggling to pay the rent and this cannot continue.
     • Treetop 1.3.1

       27 March 2021 at 3:55 pm

       Home work for spelling. Noisy not nosy and on the horizon not in. Any other spelling errors not picked up.
2. Anker 2

   27 March 2021 at 9:16 am

   • Agree Cricklewood. Renters rights need to be very strong. Rent freeze, long tenancies. Evictions only for anti social activities that bother the neighbours or destroy property.

   I do also think it is a good sign if landlords are selling up(although very sorry for your friends). Hopefully too many who thought they would buy property to invest, changing their minds…
   • Herodotus 2.1

     27 March 2021 at 10:01 am

     How are landlords selling good? Those who rent and will never be able to buy where do they go ? Perhaps into the waiting list for a HNZ property and with the demand there. With obvious outcomes where is the govts action on coping with the consequences? A plan to build more in the future. When and what if those living in the present ???!
     • Cricklewood 2.1.1

       27 March 2021 at 10:51 am

       Thereon lies the big flaw in the govts announcement, it may slow house price inflation which has runaway but they did nothing to help renters at the same time… once again its help for the upwardly mobile.

       Further stiffening the rights of renters particularly around giving notice needed to be part of the package…

       Something like this from Switzerland perhaps…

       Tenants have the right to know the grounds for termination. Notices of termination not made in good faith (such as notice of termination because the landlord is exercising his landlord's right, or on account of the tenants' changed family circumstances) may be contested before the conciliation authority. The official notice form explains how tenants should proceed when disputing a termination.

       If the termination is likely to cause undue hardship for the tenants (financial or family difficulties, housing shortage), an extension of the term of the tenancy may be applied for at the conciliation authority.
       • Herodotus 2.1.1.1

         27 March 2021 at 11:02 am

         The other oversight I would add that in Feb 21 the average property in me rose $50,000 and our leaders talk of substainable price rises going forward 🤷‍♀️. Not of the damage done in recent times.

         I am yet to read anything or contributor here as to what this country looks like in 3,5+ years . IMO that outlook would frustrate many . As J Ritren sang “ no future, no future for me ..”

         well done to the govt for being seen to do something but deliver crap all.
         • Jester 2.1.1.1.1

           27 March 2021 at 11:36 pm

           I think you mean J. Rotten or Johnny Rotten.
       • gsays 2.1.1.2

         27 March 2021 at 5:22 pm

         "Further stiffening the rights of renters particularly around giving notice needed to be part of the package…"

         cough… rent freeze for 24 months…cough cough
     • Pat 2.1.2

       27 March 2021 at 11:56 am

       "How are landlords selling good?"

       Couple of ways….if the property was being held empty for capital gain it adds to the available stock….if the property was being used as an AirBnB, it adds to available stock.

       If future rental stock is available at a lower price the pressure to reduce rents is increased, but most important of all, the realisation that property values are no longer a one way bet will bring some sanity back to the housing market and allow us to use housing as it should be….to house our population, not as a credit line for the few who seek to extract wealth from the many (and the broader economy)

       There is no point in investors s buying property for a capital gain if there is no (or a CPI equivalent) capital gain….that capital will seek a new home, especially if they see their existing gains disappearing in a falling market.

       In short, investors selling is a symptom of changed expectations….and that is beneficial to both FHB AND renters.
       • Treetop 2.1.2.1

         27 March 2021 at 12:35 pm

         Has extending the brightline test and cutting the tax reduction on interest turned into a house being like a car sitting in the garage for years not knowing what you can sell it for?

         The housing market hopefully is going to cool by 10%. This is advantageous to everyone BUT the seller.
         • Pat 2.1.2.1.1

           27 March 2021 at 12:44 pm

           Id suggest what the extended BL test and (especially) the change to interest deductibility have done is increase the costs to investors while they wait for the capital gain…it is a signal that if you are investing in existing property for capital gain then we are going to make it hard for you…especially when aligned with the exemption for new builds….that makes the business model for many investors, especially recent investors who have paid high prices, unworkable.

           There are pretty much two questions that we are waiting to see the answer to….how many investment properties will re enter the market?…and will the Government stick to its position, or will they soften their message?

           Or put another way, who will blink first.
         • Pat 2.1.2.1.2

           27 March 2021 at 1:07 pm

           "The housing market hopefully is going to cool by 10%. This is advantageous to everyone BUT the seller."

           Dont think anyone can put a percentage on it…there are too many variables, but the sellers will not necessarily lose …if you bought your rental say 6 years ago and you sell now you take out that capital gain of around maybe 60-80% (median house 2014 $457000—median house price 2020 $725000) and not subject to BL….not a bad return Id suggest.
           • Treetop 2.1.2.1.2.1

             27 March 2021 at 1:38 pm

             Hopefully the latest changes put a brake on property investors who only buy to sell due to house prices rocketing.

             Government cannot soften their message because nothing else has worked. It's a vicious cycle as renters now need more government assistance to pay the rent and landlords know this.

             1. How to support people to pay the rent without it going into the landlords hand is what needs to be actioned?

             2. Some sort of tier percentage system on when the rental was purchased and how much the rent can increase?
             • Pat …

               27 March 2021 at 1:43 pm

               Rent caps or other forms of rent control are another option but I suspect that would only be used if there is widespread rent hikes….and as noted yesterday many landlords have already had their annual shot at rent hikes so they cant till the years is up….I dont think many of them will wait until next year to decide what to do.
             • mikesh …

               27 March 2021 at 4:41 pm

               I think that, before evicting a tenant or increasing his rent, a landlord should be required to apply to Kainga Ora for a review of the situation to determine whether the eviction/rent increase would be justified. I would regard the recovery of the no longer deductible interest as not constituting an adequate reason for either action.
         • Mindpilot 2.1.2.1.3

           27 March 2021 at 1:20 pm

           I’ve always wondered about banning tenders in the sale process. It creates a lot of anxiety which I reckon drives up the selling price as FOMO pushes people to put in bids way above the estimated value
           • arkie 2.1.2.1.3.1

             27 March 2021 at 1:28 pm

             Auctions are where the FOMO is most powerful, agents generally prefer them for that reason.
             • mpledger …

               27 March 2021 at 2:52 pm

               Auctions get the second best price (the winner only has to outbid the second best bid not bid with their top offer). Tenders means the seller gets the best price because everyone has to put in their best offer.
       • David 2.1.2.2

         27 March 2021 at 1:13 pm

         And this morning the deputy PM had fuelled the fire by “not ruling out rent freezes”. So what will landlords do … hike the rents as much as they can in the meantime to kick off any rent controls from a higher base.

         However the deputy PMs credibility went from hero to zero this week so maybe we can just ignore him and carry on.
         • Pat 2.1.2.2.1

           27 March 2021 at 1:17 pm

           Maybe you can….and maybe you cant, how much are you willing to bet?

           The investors have been offered a generous exit package, will enough of them take it or will they let greed cloud their thinking?
           • AB 2.1.2.2.1.1

             27 March 2021 at 1:54 pm

             "investors have been offered a generous exit package"

             Indeed – they get to keep the extraordinary wealth passively accumulated at the expense of others (including future generations) over the last two decades – minus a short blip post-GFC. Does anyone dare to go after some of this deplorable stash with a wealth tax – maybe to help fund a large state house building programme?
             • Pat …

               27 March 2021 at 1:58 pm

               Whats immediately more important?….giving working Kiwis somewhere affordable to live or retribution?….Id plump for the former.

               The state house building programme is underway and its acceleration is not immediately constrained by tax take.
               • AB …

                 27 March 2021 at 5:33 pm

                 The wealth accumulated in the last couple of decades is going to perpetuate unequal access to housing into the next generation through inheritance. I don't see it as retribution so much as correcting market perversity and returning to a slightly more level playing field. I do agree though that the primary purpose of a wealth tax is not raising revenue and that state house building is not tax take-constrained.
         • gsays 2.1.2.2.2

           27 March 2021 at 5:24 pm

           "…so maybe we can just …"

           Who is this we you speak of?
       • Chris T 2.1.2.3

         27 March 2021 at 9:59 pm

         Not entirely sure how say 5 separate people being forced out of a flat due to rent rises from this, for the sake of one of the few couples left, who manage to buy the flat as a home helps the 5 separate people find more affordable flats, when there are obviously less of them and the sudden demand, means the rent will just go up even more.

         People to me seem to forget some people will just never be able to afford to own a house, and have to rent.

         All this does is screw them.
         • Pat 2.1.2.3.1

           27 March 2021 at 10:46 pm

           I dont forget that at all…and is why property prices (and consequently rents) need to fall to affordable levels….10+ times median income is not that.

           "But she said there were warning signs beneath the surface and many people were still doing it tough. More than a third were still living “payday to payday”.

           “We know we are not out of the woods yet, there are more Covid-19 effects to roll through the economy and this research highlights some concerns. The fact that more than a third of people have less than a single week’s expenses available to them and almost half have less than $1000 in rainy day savings rings alarm bells for me. This puts them in a potentially vulnerable position."

           https://www.stuff.co.nz/business/300262937/new-zealanders-mostly-better-off-but-some-doing-it-tough-bank-says

           Coincidentally roughly a third of the population rent….reckon any more blood can be wrung out of that stone?
           • Chris T 2.1.2.3.1.1

             27 March 2021 at 11:54 pm

             Well yes.

             There are going to be people selling flats to couples (or other investers who sit on them for 10 years) or raising rents, to cover it, which means less flats available, which means even higher rent prices.

             You can argue all you like the rents will be too high for people to cover it, but this just means more people joing the state housing waiting list, which is getting immense.
     • Anker 2.1.3

       27 March 2021 at 12:09 pm

       • If first home buyers buy the properties landlords sell and prospective landlords change their minds and don’t but, those first home buyers will no longer need a rental. Good
       • David 2.1.3.1

         27 March 2021 at 1:32 pm

         If first home buyers buy the properties landlords selll …

         I always love this argument. If they coulda, they woulda…but they haven’t so they probably won’t
         • Pat 2.1.3.1.1

           27 March 2021 at 1:39 pm

           You mean if they coulda outbid an investor with their previously inherent advantage….lets see what happens now the competition is eased.
           • David 2.1.3.1.1.1

             27 March 2021 at 1:41 pm

             Assuming of course they have the deposit which is where I suspect the biggest issue lies.
             • Pat …

               27 March 2021 at 1:46 pm

               Whether you think it is a good use or not Kiwisaver has provided assistance for many in that space….not all granted, but enough
           • Herodotus 2.1.3.1.1.2

             27 March 2021 at 2:07 pm

             For your info Pat these investors still have an advantage – Rates, maintenance etc are still able to be deducted for a reduction of tax and still allows a cash back advantage.

             And what many have not understood these recent increases in price also distance new home purchasers with an increase of an already substantial deposit required. In feb the average price of a property increased by $50,000 a 20% deposit means that these 1st Home buyers in 28 days now required another $10,000 in deposit, and think what the impact of the increases that were achieved pre Feb 21??
             • Pat …

               27 March 2021 at 2:16 pm

               And all of that explains why prices must fall or we consign home ownership in NZ to the dustbin.(and the likely exodus of our youth offshore….again)

               The Gov have been bolder than I initially thought with this package and appear willing to accept a fall in property prices although they havnt explicitly said so…my guess is they would be happy for them to revert to what they were around a year ago ….good luck controlling the decline, theyll probably be the first in history if they pull it off, but at least theyre trying.
               • David …

                 27 March 2021 at 2:26 pm

                 That will be a sure fire voter winner for the 65% of the population who don’t rent.
                 • Pat …

                   27 March 2021 at 2:36 pm

                   I dont rent but some of my children do, so do some of my friends and who knows circumstances may decide that one day I will….why is it so difficult to understand that peoples motives are not necessarily self serving?

                   This economic model is destroying everything that was best about this country/society so you may find that many of that 65% are quite happy for the 10% of the population who are investors to lose their gravy train…especially when it is wrecking their communities
                   • Pat …

                     27 March 2021 at 2:47 pm

                     Sorry, my estimate of property investors was woefully inaccurate….the 0.03% of the population who are property investors
                   • David …

                     27 March 2021 at 2:49 pm

                     I can imagine the election proposition – vote labour, let’s get house prices falling. Sure to be a winner.
                   • Pat …

                     27 March 2021 at 2:53 pm

                     zero point zero three percent….thats one hell of a constituency
                   • David []

                     27 March 2021 at 3:00 pm

                     Oh dear Pat, you said in an earlier post Labour are being bold to be the first government in history to accept a fall in house prices.

                     That affects the 65% who own, not just the 0.3% who invest! Sure to go down well with voters.
                   • Pat …

                     27 March 2021 at 3:07 pm

                     My house value could fall 50% tomorrow and I wouldnt care, nor would my mother if hers did similarly, 50% may cause a problem for one of my children but theyd survive….dont forget roughly a third of properties in NZ are mortgage free.
                   • David []

                     27 March 2021 at 3:11 pm

                     So to clarify, do house price falls only affect 0.3% of the population as you claim Pat?
                   • Pat …

                     27 March 2021 at 3:20 pm

                     Correction on my correction….3% or roughly 150,000 property investors.
                   • David []

                     27 March 2021 at 3:27 pm

                     Yeah yeah. But you still didn’t answer the question. Guess you can’t or don’t want to.

                     It’s a beautiful afternoon, certainly up here on the Kaipara. I’ll let you get back to the vino.
                   • Pat …

                     27 March 2021 at 3:29 pm

                     "So to clarify, do house price falls only affect 0.3% of the population as you claim Pat?"

                     Obviously not, and the size of the fall will be determinant however you were asking about how voters would view house price falls and I gave you a couple of voters perspectives.

                     While there are potential downsides to property price falls there are also upsides so what is the net position?…not just for individuals but the economy as a whole.

                     And if the expectation is the current trajectory is unsustainable then the correction will happen anyway….and the greater the debt the bigger the impact when it does.

                     Some pain today or lots of pain tomorrow?

                     I know every investors thinks they will be out before that happens but history shows most mistime it.
                 • Anker …

                   27 March 2021 at 3:53 pm

                   Actually David I know of many many fhb who have the deposit, but keep missing out due to investors. They will now have far less competition and will be able to secure their own first home.

                   What I don't get about investors bleating on about interest payments no longer being tax deductable is that any good business person who took out a loan at record low interest rates should have forecasted in a potential for interest rates to increase substantially, or even for the govt to make interest no longer tax deductable. Any person with half a brain who is investing should have factored that in.. They took the risk, things change, too bad.

                   And yes bring on a rent freeze. Or even better a national rent strike.
                   • David …

                     27 March 2021 at 4:05 pm

                     A national rent strike … sounds awesome…that would solve all the issues.
                   • Drowsy M. Kram …

                     27 March 2021 at 4:26 pm

                     Or even better a national rent strike.

                     Sounds awesome – that could highlight/solve a lot of issues.

                     The case for a rent strike in New Zealand under COVID-19
                     Nevertheless, there is still a key difference between these landlords and renters: if things get really bad, they can always sell their house to pay their bills. Renters don’t have that option. This is the true class difference between those who own private property and those who don’t. It’s about material security, not varying levels of personal greed.
                   • Anker …

                     27 March 2021 at 4:29 pm

                     Glad you agree David. I see your time on the Standard is teaching you some things! Keep it up!
                   • David []

                     27 March 2021 at 5:44 pm

                     Perfect. Now we just need to work on our protest song. Here’s a starter for 10. With the brainpower here though I’m sure we can improve on it:

                     2, 4, 6, 8

                     we don’t want to pay our bills in a commy state

                     what do we want?

                     a free ride

                     when do we want it?

                     now
                   • Drowsy M. Kram …

                     27 March 2021 at 7:59 pm

                     2, 4, 6, 8
                     we don’t want to pay our bills in a commy state

                     Nice one David – cue the dancing Cossacks. Tbh, I don't know what Muldoon was so het up about. National governments always 'transfer' public assets into private hands – it's what they do.

                     Revealed: How your wealth ranks compared to other New Zealanders
                     "The bottom 10 percent has a collective $13 billion of debt. The top 10 percent has $800 billion in wealth – more than the other 90 percent combined."

                     One 'problem' facing a fairly sizable minority of NZ citizens is the inability to pay for the necessities of life, wouldn't you agree? Maybe inequality in NZ has gone a little too far…

                     Why poverty in New Zealand is everyone's concern
                     Liang describes poverty as a "heritable condition" that perpetuates and amplifies through generations: "It is also not hard to see how individual poverty flows into communities and society, with downstream effects on economics, crime and health, as well as many other systems. Loosen one strand and everything else unravels."

                     A Kete Half Empty
                     Poverty is your problem, it is everyone's problem, not just those who are in poverty. – Rebecca, a child from Te Puru
                 • KJT …

                   28 March 2021 at 2:36 am

                   Wrong target David. It is land speculators who have been getting a free ride at the expense of tenants, people who need a home and those of us who do pay taxes.

                   "Communism" is fine when they benefit, it seems.

                   If we all end up paying much higher interest rates, it will be because of their borrowing also.
3. Sanctuary 3

   27 March 2021 at 9:50 am

   Goodness me, a traitor in our midst!

   https://www.stuff.co.nz/national/politics/124674099/spies-catch-out-new-zealander-working-for-a-foreign-intelligence-agency
   • Forget now 3.1

     27 March 2021 at 10:03 am

     A foreign plot revealed coincidentally when the SIS is trying to deflect criticism and expand their surveillance powers? Must be legit.

     https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/political/439030/sis-expansion-of-data-mining-powers-not-off-the-cards-andrew-little
     • Incognito 3.1.1

       27 March 2021 at 3:29 pm

       Coincidentally, they released their Annual Report on Friday in which that information was made available to the public. Have you read the report? The photos of pristine New Zealand nature wouldn’t go amiss in a NZ Travel & Tourism brochure or a publication by DOC, all super-neutral, of course.
   • Anne 3.2

     27 March 2021 at 12:03 pm

     “… a traitor in our midst!”

     What a surprise. Never happened before?

     lightbulb moment:

     I know the identities of two NZers (maybe three) who were working for a 'foreign agency' in the 1970s and 1980s. They infiltrated the NZ Labour Party. Since the country concerned was a close geographical ally I guess that was alright. They could do what they liked and harass whoever they liked.
   • mary_a 3.3

     27 March 2021 at 1:14 pm

     @ Sanctuary (3) ' … a traitor in our midst.' Must have gone full time since quitting politics.
     • Incognito 3.3.1

       27 March 2021 at 1:45 pm

       Please don’t even go there, thanks. Some other commenter might be stupid enough to put this site at risk and that would be a real shame, don’t you agree?
       • mary_a 3.3.1.1

         27 March 2021 at 3:04 pm

         @ Incognito (3.3.1) … noted.
4. Morrissey 4

   27 March 2021 at 10:09 am

   He is the Very Model of a Modern Major-General

   Prince Harry, AKA "The Big H", that scourge of Afghani shepherds, is obviously not the only "piece of work" in the British Army….

   https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-dorset-56524730

   Connoisseurs of low-level British military scumbaggery might also like to check out the following…

   https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charles_Ingram
   • Sanctuary 4.1

     27 March 2021 at 11:01 am

     Arguably the peers of Major General Welch are far far harsher than any peer of any current UK MP…
5. Janet 5

   27 March 2021 at 10:29 am

   “emergency department struggles were symptomatic of the struggles the whole health system is facing.”

   https://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/full-corridors-overworked-staff-an-eye-opener-for-ed-visitor/T67VDH3XGPT6NTUSMWPTPTH6JI/

   https://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/code-black-at-dunedin-hospital-avoid-ed-if-possible/57SUM4GFWY73NWFJUO2HC5EFVA/

   https://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/southern-district-health-board-restricts-surgeries-as-bed-demand-soars/3PPEK6PRGYWX2PKMVNY52ZA664/

   So why is this happening, all over the country it seems?

   It its not just short staffed, it is arrivals at hospital for treatment have vastly increased – especially for this time of the year.

   Is it the same cause as the housing crises we have and clogged up Auckland streets – ie far too many new immigrants have been allowed into NZ over the last 20 years ?

   Is it the Baby Boomer generation aging ?

   Have we not been training enough of our own nurses and doctors?

   What is the root cause ?
   • greywarshark 5.1

     27 March 2021 at 11:09 am

     The roots are rotten and as every gardener knows that will cause a plant to go limp and die.
     • Janet 5.1.1

       27 March 2021 at 11:44 am

       
   • Treetop 5.2

     27 March 2021 at 12:24 pm

     The A & E model needs to change so serious cases are triaged and a separate clinic run like a GP clinic adjacent to the premises. Fully staffed GP clinics need to run over the weekend at no extra cost.

     More doctors and nurses are required. A shortage of specialists as well.
     • gsays 5.2.1

       27 March 2021 at 5:53 pm

       Had a chat with a senior ED nurse.

       There needs to be a change in the way health care is delivered.

       When someone is referred to ED/clinic etc the next steps must be available at the same time. eg Cat/MRI scan, Xray, dietician/nutrionist, mental health…

       Folk often struggle to take that morning/afternoon/hour off as it is without scheduling further engagements.
       • Forget now 5.2.1.1

         27 March 2021 at 11:57 pm

         I do like your answers at 5.3, gsays; enough so that I won't spoil them by replying directly.

         But another cause behind the ED bottleneck is the drain of nurses to MIQ, vaccination, and more rewarding private work. Public health work conditions, in Dunedin hospital at least, are apparently pretty grim at the best of times for them.
         • Incognito 5.2.1.1.1

           28 March 2021 at 10:46 am

           How is vaccination ”another cause behind the ED bottleneck”?
         • gsays 5.2.1.1.2

           28 March 2021 at 11:41 am

           The 2 ED nurses I know that are/were doing the MIQ stuff, where either working in Oz (clinic work in a remote town) or looking to exit health and grow their small dingo/digger truck business.

           Both have talked about dismay with junior/inexperienced staff, cultural politics and being too busy, too often.
   • gsays 5.3

     27 March 2021 at 6:51 pm

     From my one step removed position I would answer:

     “Is it the same cause as the housing crises we have and clogged up Auckland streets – ie far too many new immigrants have been allowed into NZ over the last 20 years ?”"

     A lot of the aforementioned immigrants, are staffing the wards and EDs. This may influence the militancy/stauchness of the workforce, therefore the nursing unions.

     “Is it the Baby Boomer generation aging ? ”

     Yes, along with increased presentations of folk who cant afford to see a GP, drug seekers, alcohol impaired, mental ill health, entitlitis etc.

     “Have we not been training enough of our own nurses and doctors?”

     Yes. Nor do we pay them well enough.

     “What is the root cause ?”

     Neo-liberalism. Letting a market decide. When your DHB has a Chief Executive Officer as the highest paid on the payroll, its a sign of the times.
6. greywarshark 6

   27 March 2021 at 11:19 am

   https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/business/439237/letters-mocking-struggling-queenstown-businesses-shock-recipients

   A random meeting between the self-centred driven entrepreneurs being lauded in this country, trying hard to acquire enough custom from those with spare everything, and someone who has to count the pennies to get near that lifestyle and resents being pushed to the fringes.

   And this is just a light touch on the cheek from the group finding social mobility difficult to achieve, tantalisingly available and then removed, perhaps in the 'gig' economy, or regularly denied and facing deprivation. Below such people are a mass who are at their wit's end, lacking wit for some time actually, becoming hopeless, munted, angry and holding in vengeful thoughts, just.
7. Grafton Gully 7

   27 March 2021 at 2:07 pm

   I saw this while looking for a source of retirement income apart from the traditional residential property, exchange traded shares, funds and fixed interest.

   "We’re on a mission to simplify investment into high growth Kiwi companies.

   "We want to make the capital market work much more efficiently for growth companies, so they can focus on selling their products to the world. We want to provide investors with a simple way to gain exposure to interesting investment opportunities – facilitating the flow of national savings into wealth-creating assets.

   We’re driven by the significant positive impact we can make by building a thriving marketplace to connect growth companies with the capital they need.

   Along the way we hope to develop the general financial literacy of the New Zealand public, and bring far more meaning and excitement to investing."

   https://www.snowballeffect.co.nz/about
8. weka 8

   27 March 2021 at 2:20 pm

   There's no cancel culture, right?

   … was policed to such an extent & I felt so unsupported that I have now taken an interruption. I really don’t know what the best course of action is now. I am a mature student and feel so bewildered by all this". pic.twitter.com/Zpt9196I4i

   — Miroslav Imbrisevic (@Miroandrej) March 25, 2021

   … This is ridiculous. I thought the whole point of university was to uphold freedom of speech and promote discussion and debate. I actually feel like quitting or starting again and choosing a diff discipline. (I’m currently in the 2nd year of a English Lit degree)." pic.twitter.com/yyxfBUYrGL

   — Miroslav Imbrisevic (@Miroandrej) March 25, 2021

   This shit should be a massive red flag for the left. Actually for everyone. Next time you see a woman being told that no-one is stopping them from speaking about their reality, understand that this is what is now routine in academia and has been increasing for quite some time. In another decade we, women, will have lost our ability to academic freedom around our own realities, and it's not like we were in a great place to begin with. And it won't end with women.

   Stories here:

   https://www.gcacademianetwork.org
   • weka 8.1

     27 March 2021 at 2:21 pm

     and this. Women students are being marked down for writing that feminism is about the liberation of women.

     When I was doing my MA I submitted an essay in which I defined feminism as a movement for women's liberation. The marker (a women's studies academic) "corrected" it from "women" to "all marginalised people". And I got 15 points lower than my average mark.

     — Roisin Martin (@RoisinMartin14) March 26, 2021
   • McFlock 8.2

     27 March 2021 at 4:04 pm

     Looks to me like "cancel culture" now excuses getting lower marks for not keeping up with the subject area or lecturer's expectations.
     • Anker 8.2.1

       27 March 2021 at 4:14 pm

       No McFlook, it looks like cancel culture to me. And it pisses me off because it is cancelling the existence of the women's liberation movement and menstruating at the very least.
       “I was encouraged to abandon about the problems menstruation posed ……..because it was deemed trans exclusionary.”

       I would be interested to hear you views on what I have written below.
       • McFlock 8.2.1.1

         27 March 2021 at 4:26 pm

         Most academic institutions have an appeals process if someone feels they have been penalised unfairly or inconsistently.

         As for your comments below, one doesn't have to be male to perv at women, so it's not as if self-id would automatically stop police or anyone else objecting to someone behaving objectionably.

         And no, zoom-calling in a conference room isn't "kosher". It might even be a criminal offence (intimate visual recording).

         btw, I’ll be offline for several hours very soon – I should have held off rather than getting into a discussion.
         • Anker 8.2.1.1.1

           27 March 2021 at 5:29 pm

           Actually McFlook you are discounting my concerns about having men who id as women in changing rooms with your glib comment about “One doesn’t have to be a man to perv at women”. I am sure I have shared many a changing room with lesbians (guess that’s who you are referring to) and I have never felt uncomfortable about any women’s behaviour in a change room. I have also NEVER heard of police being called to women’s objectionable behaviour towards other women in a change room. It is a completely different dynamic with a man. Also women often walk around without towels etc in a change room. If gender self id “women” who were really men did this it would be very unpleasant. Surely you have heard about flashers. But how could it be proved “she” just walking from the shower to “her” locker.
           I think women will feel really concerned about this, even if you men can’t imagine how that will be for a women. You have never lived with the unwanted male gaze. Have you not read the paper about how many time men have been filming women in bathrooms changerooms etc????
           • McFlock 8.2.1.1.1.1

             27 March 2021 at 11:50 pm

             I meant that, as far as I know, literally every law in NZ against indecent acts or offensive behaviour, indecent assault or sexual violation, or crimes against personal privacy uses non-gendered language.

             As for flashing in the changing rooms, sure, the possibilities for human stupidity are limitless. Some non-trans guy might try it. How do you see that conversation with the cops or changing room staff going down, realistically?
             • Anker …

               28 March 2021 at 11:38 am

               Flashing in a public change room human stupidity????? WTF McFlook. That jut tells me you know nothing about what it is like being a women. Your o.k. for men who have changed their gender to do these things and of course the police/change room staff with make it o.k………..Think by this stage the horse has bolted. If the "woman" acts like other women in the change rooms, then there will be nothing that can be done about it. All they have to do is walk from the shower to their locker without a towel with or without an erection and they are women right? Police could probably say wear a towel mate, but can't enforce.
               • McFlock …

                 28 March 2021 at 12:40 pm

                 Thinking that self-id will avoid any repercussion is the stupidity part of it.

                 So we have a flasher of the subtle breed who are acting completely normally without eye contact to see what reaction they're getting? Ok, not the usual type I've had to call the cops over back in the day, but ok. Assuming there is nothing, nothing, to show dodgy intent, they can still be barred by the facility because of their behaviour, because it makes other people uncomfortable.
                 • Anker …

                   28 March 2021 at 1:08 pm

                   Point is McFlook, I don't want men in women's changing rooms. Full stop. Most women I have run this by feel the same.

                   I understand you side with the gender self id bill/trans rights side. Yours entitled to your opinion. But I don't think your opinion on how its going to operate in women's changing rooms has any merit. It can't have. You have never been in one (I hope except maybe when you were a child).
                   • McFlock …

                     28 March 2021 at 6:55 pm

                     I didn't need to go into the women's room to control access, catch flashers, or see how people dealt with men who thought they were discriminated against because they weren’t allowed to run for women's rep positions.

                     The idea that self-id makes facilities management and the police powerless to deal with offensive behaviour just isn't reflected in the real world.

                     But transwomen being unsafe in one changing room and unwelcome in the other? That is reflected in the real world.
         • weka 8.2.1.1.2

           27 March 2021 at 6:21 pm

           "Most academic institutions have an appeals process if someone feels they have been penalised unfairly or inconsistently."

           This tells me that you have no idea what is actually going on. Academics are afraid to speak out. This isn't hyperbole. The ones that do get their office doors pissed on, they get rape and death threats, they lose their careers. The women more than the men of course. To suggest that in this environment an appeals process is going to be useful other than as a political act is incredibly naive.

           What’s happening on the left is the dismissal and the position that there is no debate, so there is no way for the issues to be aired and resolved. That too should be a big fucking red flag for the left. It’s not like the left is immune to authoritarianism.
           • McFlock 8.2.1.1.2.1

             27 March 2021 at 11:22 pm

             This tells me that you have no idea what is actually going on.

             It's a bit unfair to post links about getting marked down in assignments and then argue that anyone who responds should be responding to unmentioned but more serious complaints.

             Try writing a paper about a steady-state model of the universe sometime (as opposed to "Big Bang" theory), and see how that gets marked.
     • weka 8.2.2

       27 March 2021 at 6:14 pm

       good to know you are ok with academia redefining feminism to mean a liberation movement for all people and educating its students to that effect against the wishes of many feminists including MA students.
       • weka 8.2.2.1

         27 March 2021 at 6:18 pm

         I mean, it's always enlightening when men give away women's rights. Again. Maybe try putting up some actual arguments, I'd love to know where this goes. Feminist academics are raising the issue, and men are going, yeah, nah, nothing to worry about there.
         • Anker 8.2.2.1.1

           27 March 2021 at 9:49 pm

           Thanks again Weka. Yes I feel people are not really aware of what's going on re this issue.
       • McFlock 8.2.2.2

         28 March 2021 at 12:02 am

         Academic concepts and even disciplines get "redefined" every day. It's called "expanding the sum of human knowledge".

         And in this case it's also according to the wishes of many women, and not only trans women at that.
         • Sabine 8.2.2.2.1

           28 March 2021 at 7:08 am

           When you can not conduct a study on women (biological or trans) and you can not discuss the impact of menstruation and menstruation products when in this country we have young vaginal beings not going to school for lack of menstruation products (and maybe there even is a trans boy or five in the group ) then academia is getting dumb, and discriminatory. Cause women who identify as women and would like to get treated as such exist. And we too would like to be identified as to our on self ID. And we would like our rights, and our safety taken seriously, cause we die the world over often at the hand of penis humans.

           And i would just venture a guess that you have never refused an outing or been refused a promotion a job or such on the grounds that you may get your period, or that you may get pregnant, or that you may have given birth, or that you may have lost a pregnancy.

           So really please, take your male privilege and ask yourself why women who identify as women, who were born as women, who have born literally every man that is, need to take what little rights we have gained over the last hundred years and give it up to accomodate and be surplanted by trans women. Cause the discussion is only affecting women.
           • McFlock 8.2.2.2.1.1

             28 March 2021 at 12:40 pm

             No, it really isn't. Not according to the opponents of self-id, anyway.
             • Sabine …

               28 March 2021 at 1:43 pm

               Is this a discussion about a seat of the table and only 10 seats are there, so one needs to be knocked of to free up a seat? Or will this be a discussion about finding another seat and adding it the table?
           • Anker 8.2.2.2.1.2

             28 March 2021 at 1:11 pm

             Hear hear Sabine. Totally agree. Great stuff!
         • Anker 8.2.2.2.2

           28 March 2021 at 7:18 pm

           McFlook then what do you see as the solution for trans women in changing rooms? What if women aren't comfortable with this?

           Every concern and reservation I have have had about the gender self id bill you have dismissed. It sounds like you think women like me and there are many of us should put up and shut up. Is this how you see it?

           You can see why as feminists it is a double problem for us. A. Maybe we don't want trans women in our change rooms. B. Men such as yourself seem to be dismissing this.

           You also didn't answer whether you though it was a credible scenario that men would change their sex to have easy access to women and children. Is that o.k. by you because we can ring the police?
           • McFlock 8.2.2.2.2.1

             28 March 2021 at 8:11 pm

             1: Trans women already use womens' changing rooms.

             2: I have also listened to other non-trans women who disagree with your position. And trans women, and trans men. I suspect that you are, as they say, "on the wrong side of history", and quite possibly the legislation will change within months, regardless of any arguments here.

             3: Some feminists and non-trans women agree with you. Others disagree with you. There does not seem to be any middle ground on this issue.

             4: "Credible"? 2.5 million men, sure. Someone might try changing their birth certificate as an excuse to get unchallenged access to women and children. Will it work? Significantly less likely. Will it result in greater harm than if 50,000-odd trans people are policed about which changing rooms they go into regardless of birth certificate, not even including instances of non-trans women being challenged because they don't conform to feminine norms? I don't think so. That's why I have the position I have.
             • Anker …

               29 March 2021 at 8:55 am

               “Being on the wrong side of history” would never stop me from supporting a cause I believe in. Standing up for women’s rights is not something I d we oils drop because I might be on the wrong side of history.

               but thanks to discussion on this blog and to you I have become better informed. What I have discovered about these issues worries me more. How debate/women’s voices are being silenced. Only this weekend gone at the pride event in Wellington a woman who is a lesbian who has terminal cancer was on a stall at the event. She left the stall briefly to take scissors and tape to a group of “reefs” in this case elderly lesbians who had been banned from pride who were protesting outside. In trying to re-gain entry 4 organisers including a very large male person intercepted her, accused her of carrying an offensive weapon. She still had her bag at the stall. She stood up to them and refused to budge. They man handled her and called the police. These older women have fought the good fight for lesbian and gay rights. What sort of treatment is this? Young people gathered and started chanting fucking terfs. An aggressive and vocal minority is shutting women’s. Voices down
               Btw in the last week two cases of trans being barred from women’s changing rooms
               • McFlock …

                 29 March 2021 at 12:44 pm

                 Is that generational divide typical of your observations of the different sides to the issue?

                 It seems to be the case down here, but a heavily thespian social group in a college town is the practical definition of "sample bias".
                 • Anker …

                   29 March 2021 at 1:09 pm

                   Yes I think that is reasonably accurate, i.e. a generation divide.

                   Having read a bit more about it i.e. trans issues, I understand and feel free to disagree, that a lot of the children who identify as trans have other mental health issues such as anorexia and self harm. They also experience gender dysphoria. An approach that has been encouraged with their parents is to validate their wanting to be a different sex. This started to occur 20 years ago and so now we have a generation of young people who identify as trans. This I don't believe has ever happened before. From this point of view I acknowledge how very vulnerable some of these individuals must feel.

                   My perspective is a rigorous radical campaign has been mounted for trans rights, including the right to say there are real women. My understanding is if this is challenged is it vociferously, aggressively shot down. I think there is an enormous amount of solidarity in numbers group think going on.

                   I noticed McFlook that someone accused you of mysogeny and others implied as a man you shouldn't be taking about this issue. But I don't want to stop you from doing this, because this is a part of what I am objecting to with the trans activists. People have their voices shot down/cancelled.
                   • solkta …

                     29 March 2021 at 1:33 pm

                     other mental health issues

                     You are still denying that trans is actually a thing. A while ago i said that i see this as where the gay thing was forty years ago. Back then there was still a lot of people who saw being gay as a mental illness. Now when people say that they are not taken seriously, they are considered bigots. So yes the wrong side of history you are on this i think also.

                     It is not surprising that trans people experience mental health issues with so many people denying their identity is real:

                     https://www.stuff.co.nz/national/health/115867340/kiwi-transgender-and-nonbinary-people-at-higher-risk-of-suicide–survey
                   • McFlock …

                     29 March 2021 at 1:56 pm

                     Cheers – the accusation did give me pause for thought, but that's usually a good thing.

                     The issue of trans kids and their mental health has a fair bit of research, which is why validation starts early. The main worry is suicide and depression. But are these comorbidities, or are they the consequences of social responses to how trans people are treated by society? When social discrimination is killing people, there's a strong campaign for rights for those people. And trans people have been part of the queer rights movement all the way back to before Stonewall.

                     I have friends with trans kids (in both directions). The kids and young adults seem to be happier now than my peers from back at the same age who have since transitioned. But also the young thesps just seem more fluid and accepting of themselves and each other, by and large. Still dramas (natch lol), but less judgy of each other's bits and more willing to stand up for each other (although they still have the young person thing of going overboard without thinking, maybe like in responding to that protest you mentioned).

                     The babies my friends had in their early twenties are leaving/left the nest. They generally seem to be better people than I was (and many of my peer group) at that age.
                   • Anker …

                     29 March 2021 at 5:27 pm

                     • I am not sure where you get that I am still denying trans is a thing Solkta. Please let me know.

                     you are entitled to think it like where the gay thing was forty years ago. I accept that is your view. I see it differently. Gay people were not telling me they were really heterosexual nor were they deconstructing my identity, eg referring to me as a person who f…Ed men.
                     I was still a heterosexual woman.

                     I don’t believe I have ever been anything but pleasant and respectful when I have met trans people. You then accused me of being disrespectful about them on-line, but when challenged didn’t provide any evidence that I had been. I did a check with Mc flook who said I hadn’t been.

                     I am still reading and finding out about this stuff.

                     I am a feminist and hearing things about elderly lesbians being banned from pride, because they are not prepared to say trans women (not those who have transitioned) are real women. Said women who have been attending pride since it began don’t deserve to have 100 or so young people chanting fucking terfs at them.

                     there was a woman who happens to have terminal cancer who was staffing a stall at pride. She went out to give the protesters some tape and scissors for their banner, and when she went to go back in 4 people including a large man tried to man handle her out of the venue. She stood her ground and so they called the police. Utterly disgraceful in my opinion. Also because she had scissors caused her of carrying an offensive weapon. I mean ffs. This is disgraceful. She told them she had cancer.

                     I accept mental health issues are significant in the trans community. I did comment that they were vulnerable. Btw, I do have a criticism of the study. It really needed to have a control group of non trans young people, rather than extrapolating from other studies.

                     I still think we need to look at the Dunedin multi disciplinary study for gold standard research on this issue.
                   • McFlock …

                     29 March 2021 at 5:58 pm

                     I still think we need to look at the Dunedin multi disciplinary study for gold standard research on this issue.

                     It only has a thousand participants, so at 1%, that's 10 trans people to do the heavy lifting?

                     Surveying trans people and comparing their responses with previous and more general surveys might be the spanner for that job, rather than the dunedin study.

                     Can't see anything searching their journal publications database. But if you see an article you don't have access to, we might be able to sort something out between us. I could remember how to use dropbox, or flip email it to a mod and they can flip it to you, if willing. There's also an openaccess research site somewhere (like pirating movies, but for academic research because journals cost $$$).
                   • solkta …

                     29 March 2021 at 8:54 pm

                     @Anker

                     I am not sure that you read the words you write.

                     You said:

                     a lot of the children who identify as trans have other mental health issues such as anorexia and self harm.

                     That can only be taken to mean that you consider being trans to be a mental health issue. If that is not what you meant then why say "other"? You say offensive things and then complain when people are offended.
                   • Anker …

                     29 March 2021 at 9:43 pm

                     sorry for the confusion Solkta.

                     DSMV1 talks about gender dysphoria. and I assume that many Trans people have gender dysphoria. This would cause psychological distress.

                     I don't deny trans is a thing. Checked out some trans activist blog sites tonight as I was trying to become more informed.

                     When I trained it was called Gender Identity disorder.

                     You seem to want to cast me as anti trans. This is not true. I don't really care too much. But I do care about how women's voices are being shut down and how my identity as a women is being de-constructed.
           • Rosemary McDonald 8.2.2.2.2.2

             28 March 2021 at 8:15 pm

             Would it help if we (again) re-acquainted ourselves with the meanings of the words "sex" and "gender"?

             SUFW prefers (and why not?) the United Nations' definitions….

             …it is our recommendation that New Zealand policy makers adopt definitions set up by United Nations Equality Glossary (2017). In particular, we suggest the following:

             Sex (biological sex)

             The physical and biological characteristics that distinguish males and females.

             Gender

             Gender refers to the roles, behaviours, activities, and attributes that a given society at a given time considers appropriate for men and women. In addition to the social attributes and opportunities associated with being male and female and the relationships between women and men and girls and boys, gender also refers to the relations between women and those between men. These attributes, opportunities and relationships are socially constructed and are learned through socialisation processes. They are context/time-specific and changeable. Gender determines what is expected, allowed and valued in a woman or a man in a given context.

             Sex, what you were born with, is forever. It can't be changed.

             It is possible with a great deal of medical and surgical intervention to alter one's appearance so as to look like the other sex, but you'll still be the sex you were born with.

             Gender, on the other hand, has forever been whatever society/culture/fashion tries to dictate. Today it is possible to express yourself in whatever way floats your boat. Good on you.

             But just because you dislike wearing frocks and would not be seen dead in stilettos,and putting on make-up seems like an act of dishonesty, it does not necessarily follow that you were 'born into the wrong body'.

             Today, and because many women have fought long and hard to throw of the shackles of what we used to term 'sex-role-stereotypes', you can be yourself without have to resort to extreme medical and surgical interventions.

             What The Bill intends is to make the impossible…changing one's sex…possible.
         • jan rivers 8.2.2.2.3

           29 March 2021 at 12:01 am

           If you had any insight into how the women reading this are assessing you I'm sure you would be horrified. But honestly you clearly have no idea and little insight. It's good really seeing frank misogyny laid bare. Dissolves any illusion we can't unsee it either.
           • McFlock 8.2.2.2.3.1

             29 March 2021 at 12:28 am

             Given some of those individual's expressed opinions of trans women and many academics of any gender, I would seem to be in good company.
   • Stuart Munro 8.3

     27 March 2021 at 4:43 pm

     Having done an English degree a little over a decade ago, I ran across a little of this. Our feedback system had no box for us to object to it – but I felt it was a gratuitously offensive waste of time at my and other students' expense. If I'd wanted to do gender wars, I'd've taken a course in it – my expectations were literary, a bit of Trollope maybe. No surprise that the humanities have been obliged to downsize.
9. Anker 9

   27 March 2021 at 4:05 pm

   Thanks Weka for posting this. We need to speak up about this sort of shit.

   I commented last week about the gender self id bill and have written to the Minister about this.

   Our identity as women is being deconstructed. I read today that the term maternity care and being a mother is being challenged as the language needs to be more inclusive. As is not just women giving birth.

   I have been thinking about how sexist this is. I don't know of the equivalent i.d men being referred to as people who get erections or people who ejaculate. Yet there is an attempt to describe women as menstruaters or birthing units, or people with vaginas.

   My go to for the best information is the Dunedin Multidisciplinary study. I say this because it is a prospective study that measures health and social outcomes. I would be interested to know what the rates of trans people there are in this cohort who are now in their 40s. Unfortunately I. have not been able to find out about whether that has been published or not. I suspect the rate is extremely low.

   I am also objecting to the term Terf. When one group (trans activists) give another group a pejoritive label then it is deeply problematic to say the least.
10. Anker 10

    27 March 2021 at 4:12 pm

    More on this, I commented last week about the gender self id bill and some people poo pooed what I said.

    Anybody dare to tell me that it is fanciful to imagine a scenario where sex offenders (and other men who might want to film women changing or peeing but don't have a criminal recored), change their gender to become a women. Then merrily waltz in to changing rooms at gyms, pools, woman's stores etc. They are free to perv at women and girls, free to expose themselves to women. And then when women call the cops, the cops can only say, sorry but he is a woman. This week alone there appears to be some sort of fracas with a "person" who had the body of a man being restrained by cops because of some incident in Glasons. There was also a report about David Farrar (yes I know I have no time for him) but he was in a male change room at the gym and some goof was on a zoom conference call. Farrar wasn't sure whether it was kosher or not
11. arkie 11

    27 March 2021 at 4:15 pm

    Yet there is an attempt to describe women as menstruaters or birthing units, or people with vaginas.

    This language more about the contrary; some NB and trans-men are people with vaginas and menstruate.

    As for the t-word:

    I'm credited with having coined the word 'Terf'. Here's how it happened

    Viv Smythe

    I have no control over how others use a word that came about simply to save typing a phrase out over and over again

    https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2018/nov/29/im-credited-with-having-coined-the-acronym-terf-heres-how-it-happened
    • Sacha 11.1

      27 March 2021 at 7:46 pm

      That is a very worthwhile read, thank you. Thought she said things very clearly.

      I still believe people retain rights generally to set their own personal boundaries, individually and in groups. I, for example, avoid being in company with proudly public misogynists, but – crucially – I do not assume that every man I meet is in silent sympathy with them either. I would expect to be described as unfairly harsh if I did so, and this is where those holding exclusionary stances sometimes seem to want the impossible – to not be criticised when taking judgmental stances, especially when some of those stances involve not just social exclusion but the denial of civil rights.
      • Anker 11.1.1

        27 March 2021 at 9:47 pm

        I can only speak for myself Sacha, but what civil rights do you think I am denying?

        What Civil Rights do you think groups such as the speak up for women are denying?

        I am commenting on this issue because I am against the Gender Self ID Bill. That doesn't mean trans people can't change their sex on their birth certificate, it just means there is a process they have to go through.

        I understand some feminist groups are not wanting to involve trans women in their meetings. But I think that is their right. Our experiences from trans women are very different. We have grown up with sexism since we were young girls. They have grown up with a very difficult situation of not feeling like the sex they were assigned.

        In the 70's when I first became a feminist there were lesbian women who were separatists. So they wanted to meet and associate with each other and not with us. I had no problem with that.

        As I have posted before the language now being used by some about women (menstruators, birthing units and people with vaginas I believe de-constructs my identity as a woman. I find it de-humanizing. As already posted it has been proposed to have a judicial enquiry into the gender self id bill on the basis of it nulifying what a women is.

        I wonder what your thoughts are about what Weka is saying about academia?

        BTW you asked a question about me assault last week. I gave quite a lengthy response about what happened. I guess you missed it.
        • Forget now 11.1.1.1

          27 March 2021 at 11:46 pm

          The process of changing your birth certificate as it stands is very dehumanizing itself, as you are no doubt aware Anker. Also rather expensive.

          But it does seem appropriate that you champion separatism. Given the link explaining how an early version of TERF that never really caught on was TES (trans-exclusionary seperatist).
          • Sabine 11.1.1.1.1

            28 March 2021 at 7:18 am

            actually that could be changed easily by law.

            Go online, .govt – change birth certificate and reduce any fees. That is something government can do.

            I don't exclude Trans when i ask why i am now called a pregnant person, menstruating people etc. The question is why can we not called pregnant women? Because a transman is being a partime women in order to give birth? A man is pregnant? Really? Does that make me exclusionary?

            Maybe it should be pregnant people when talking about trans women, and maybe it should be pregnant women when a women gets pregnant? Or would that too be exclusionary?

            Before covid I had hired a transwomen. She lived for 28 years a man, and in her country that afforded her all the trimmings of male privilege, and she admits it. She is not going to be trans in her country as it would be deadly, so she came here. Do i feel her as a women? No, i don't Why – god knows, maybe its pheromone etc.? In saying that i don't feel her as a man. Go figure. But will i treat her as a women as a human being, as i would like to be treated by others, and ever now and then help her understand what it is to be women in our world, yes. Very funny tho when her boyfriend and her both applied at the same business for line cook postitions and she was offered a lower wage…….Welcome to the world of women, i said. Her look? Priceless.
          • Anker 11.1.1.1.2

            28 March 2021 at 9:42 am

            I am not aware of what is involved in changing your birth certificate. That in my opinion is not a good reason to allow gender self id. It may be that there are aspects of the process that can be altered e.g. the cost. I would need to know more about the process to understand how it is de-humanizing. Going through life most of us will encounter difficult processes.

            I am not championing separatism as such, merely offering that there are many occasions where we are all excluded from some groups.

            I am not part of any feminist group currently, so whether I exclude trans women is mute. Like Sabine when I come across Trans people, I am respectful and civil, just like I am with any person I meet. So the label Trans exclusionary seperatiist doesn't really fit.
            • Forget now 11.1.1.1.2.1

              28 March 2021 at 10:54 am

              Anker

              But surely that's the substance of the Gender Self ID Bill that you oppose?

              The legislation – Births, Deaths, Marriages and Relationships Registration bill – was introduced in August 2017…

              Currently, if someone wants to legally change their gender they need approval from a doctor or a judge.

              Medical evidence of a sex change has to be provided as well…

              In some cases, someone who wants to change their gender on their birth certificate needs to go through the family court – a process that could take up to a year.

              But the legislation would change that so that the only thing needed was a statutory declaration – an official written statement

              https://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/mothballed-gender-self-id-law-back-as-a-priority-for-govt-will-pass-this-year-minister-says/CIPLGCHFKCK5OB5MOBNYTQ36RQ/

              Sabine

              Some Intersex & NB, as well as Trans men are also people with uteri.
              • Anker …

                28 March 2021 at 11:34 am

                the current process seems appropriate to me. It is a big thing to change the sex on your birth certificate. I am sorry if it is a lengthy, expensive and difficult thing to change. Some things are e.g becoming a NZ citizen, immigrating to NZ especially under Covid. That doesn't make the processes wrong or right.

                I don't support the Gender self id bill. Labour didn't as far as I can see have it as one of their election promises.
                • Forget now …

                  28 March 2021 at 3:05 pm

                  More that NZF held it up procedurally for the three years of last term.

                  It is a small change that will mean a lot to many Aotearoans. I don't believe that you are at all sorry for those whose identities are in limbo for years if not decades (17 years being the waiting list for the bottom surgery alone, even before the Pandemic). Plus there's still a lot of room for improvement around Nonbinary people too.

                  Biblical literalism, and centuries of colonialism have not left us many examples of that. Even Takitapui feels a bit reconstructed as much as extant culture. Good to have Kerekere in the parliamentary mix though. I guess the Heritage foundation's strategy of turning those with nontraditional gender expression against one another is working out pretty well for them…

                  Rambling, but at least you know what's in the bill you are opposing now, Anker.
                  • Rosemary McDonald …

                    28 March 2021 at 4:07 pm

                    …at least you know what's in the bill…

                    https://www.legislation.govt.nz/bill/government/2017/0296/latest/whole.html#LMS55955
                    • Forget now …

                      28 March 2021 at 4:49 pm

                      RMcD, thanks for the link. I have tried to wade through the legalese of that a couple of times before, but my eyes just glaze over! The NZH summary above is more readable, though hardly complete.
                    • Anker …

                      28 March 2021 at 6:07 pm

                      Thanks Rosemary.

                      Forget now, I hear it will mean a lot to many. You don't have to believe whether I am sorry or not. You are entitled to interpret what I say any way you want.

                      I think Sabine raises a very good point about the process of immigrating here. A rigorous costly process.

                      Trans people are still entitled to identify whatever gender they want to.

                      I also agree with Greywarshark that a minority are trying to change gender and sexual identification. No one is stopping them being trans. We are talking about a significant change to official documentation.

                      As I have said before, I can't change my ethnicity (at all) or my age for that matter.
                  • greywarshark …

                    28 March 2021 at 4:26 pm

                    Bend me, break me, anyway you make me… That is how many women and people feel about this minority that have taken centre stage to turn ordinary life on its side because they have a strong desire to make change! It's a tide of demands that is flooding us trying to stuff up the whole world and our very basic identities to suit the discontented.

                    There are only so many James Morris' around; the present growth of supplicants is through a power grab by gripe-merchants over young people faced with a convusing, fast-changing world, the control of which has been wrested from the orbit of ordinary people. A majority are facing poverty and homelessness and uncertainty because of ploys of the callous people pulling golden strings at the top. The meme is education and technology is the answer for all ills yet we can see the ills clearly but nothing can or will be done till the technocrats and the pollies trying to use them, have decided on the value to them of fixing them, affecting our fate, and devised a suitable budget to display. We are drowned in theoreticians words and economic inertia and the sort of science that wants to experiment in real time on real people.

                    This struck me as pertinent; Terry Pratchett's Thief of Time excerpt:

                    The concept of 'orders' was yet another and immensely unfamiliar one for any Auditors. They were used to decisions by committee, reached only when the possibilities of doing nothing whatsoever about the matter in question had been exhausted. Decisions made by everyone were decisions made by no-one, which therefore precluded any possibility of blame. (p.314 in my p/back.)
              • Sabine …

                28 March 2021 at 2:02 pm

                I have no issues with a transman wanting to be a 'parent', I have an issue with the statements of a 'man ' being pregnant, it is the female body of that transman who is pregnant. So the fair description would be 'transman' or 'self identified other'. And then feel free to call these groups of people people. But the vast majority of pregnancy happens to women who identify as women and historically it is the women bodies have been doing all of the worlds breeding. But thanks for the education, were would i be without it. .

                And if you think that providing a medical certificate is dehumanising think about migrating. I presented several medical certificates to the immigration services, police certificates from every country i ever lived in, birth certificate, marriage certificate and photos, and letters, and more to prove that i am legally married and that my marriage was consumed. And it costs an arm and a leg and we are quite happy to demand even more from migrants today.

                Maybe we really need to re-think the term of de-humanising and realise that it is not dehumanizing to prove that you went through a process to change your physical appearance of whom you were born into your real self in order to change every offical document ever issued to you.

                .
12. Anker 12

    27 March 2021 at 5:19 pm

    • Yes trans men and non binary people have vaginas and menstruate, because they were born with women’s anatomy I assume.

    arkie, I assume you are a man? I am unhappy with my identity as a woman being deconstructed. As someone posted last week the gender self I’d bill, nulifies a women’s identity and if they try and pass I understand there will be a judicial review.

    I didn’t read the whole article about who coined the term terf. It appears to be a woman who was speaking up for transgender rights. That isn’t the issue. The issue is what happens when a term not chosen by a group is used by an opposing group in a perjorative way to write that group off.

    I belong to a number of groups that are exclusive. That is normal. I can’t join my husbands tribe because I am not Maori and he is. I very much doubt I could easily change my ethnicity. Trans people may or may not be members of groups I am a part of.

    I don’t exclude trans people when I meet them in my day to day life
13. Anker 13

    29 March 2021 at 9:53 pm

    Hi McFlook, yeah I have checked the Dunedin study and they don't seem to have done anything on Trans. I choose that study as my go to source of science, because they really are scientists who are interested in what their research discovers rather than trying to prove a theory. For example their marvellous work on self control. Not popular with many people on the left because they have an ideology that they use to explain social problems. I am not saying that some ideology doesn't explain social/health issues e.g poverty's long term effect on health outcomes, even if people become financially well off in adulthood.

    I would be interested to see the numbers who identified as Trans in the Dunedin study and at what age and what mental health outcomes and were the mental health outcomes correlated to other factors. Twelve is a very small sample, but I would be fascinated to see what the trajectory was for Trans people at all ages and stages. I would trust whatever they found.

• Comments are now closed

• Log in
• Donate
• Contribute post

• Articles RSS