C&R: A risky misuse of rates

Written By: - Date published: 12:00 pm, August 4th, 2010 - 73 comments
Categories: auckland supercity, C&R, local government, national - Tags:

Partially built white elephant - Eden Park

Risky White Elephant

As a ratepayer in Auckland city, I’m angry at reading that I’m now underwriting the revamping of Eden Park. I don’t even watch sport. There are risks that the council already faces that the money could be better spent on.

Bernard Osman pointed out yesterday that:-

Eden Park’s new business plan may not work, and poses a significant risk to Auckland ratepayers, says a confidential report.

City ratepayers have been exposed to a $40 million bill to complete the park’s upgrade for next year’s Rugby World Cup.

Auckland City Mayor John Banks – who earlier promised not to put a cent of ratepayers’ money into the project – voted with councillors in May to underwrite the $40 million shortfall for the $256 million redevelopment after the Government said its $190 million contribution was final.

The council has already put $6.5 million into Eden Park in the form of loans with a repayment holiday until 2013.

I can think of a lot of things that this kind of money could be better used at covering the councils own risk. As a owner of a previously leaky apartment, the obvious one is the massive liability that the Auckland City Council has for its slipshod approach in the past on oversight on building plans and building inspection.

The current guesstimates for the liability for ratepayers and taxpayers in the order of at least 11 billion dollars with estimates of up to 23 billion . Auckland City Council appears to be the council with the highest proportion of leaky buildings both because of the pace of building here, but also because the council was, in my opinion, grossly negligent in its duties. The courts have agreed that the councils are liable and made that quite clear in a recent judgment:-

The Court of Appeal has found that councils are liable for leaky buildings because they have a duty of care to ensure buildings are up to scratch.

The decision, issued yesterday, has been described as a “devastating blow” for councils and led to renewed calls for a joint bail-out scheme between the Government and councils.

The biggest problem is being able to start fixing the buildings before they deteriorate further. Not doing this geometrically increases the costs to the point where it is cheaper to simply bulldoze the building and rebuild rather than repairing. Starting repairs early enough in my building meant that homeowners started paying in 2005/2006 to investigate the problem before finally getting a settlement in 2009 after the repairs were almost complete. It cost about half of my purchase price from when I moved in to my brand new apartment.

Many of us, including me, were almost driven to bankruptcy to pay for the repairs. Meanwhile the city council and their insurers held out for as long as possible before finally settling a few months before the court date. As Grimshaws (a leading legal firm handling this type of case) says

The sad fact is that the individuals, companies and local authorities responsible for your leaky building or leaky home will do everything they can to avoid paying to fix the problem, unless they’re forced to.

At that, we were lucky. The buildings flaws were not inherent in the structure – I’d checked for those when I purchased in 1998. They were almost entirely the result of poor workmanship and poor enforcement of the building standards. The council had not only approved and certified our building, but they’d also done the inspection – in particular of building problems that subsequently caused failures and in the ingress of water.

Because those substantial fees that were paid for the inspection to the council, we had a relatively easy process through the legal obstructionism. We were able to get almost full restitution of direct costs because the council had a clear liability. But it doesn’t pay for the agony of scratching to find enough to pay the interest, and living in a construction site.

Others are not so lucky. Many people with leaky buildings were inspected by the fly by night inspection services with inadequate insurance that a previous National government in the 1990’s allowed to get into the law. The Citizens and Ratepayers dominated council of Auckland City at the time were one of the most irresponsible in not keeping control of the inspection process, in particular in allowing inspection by companies with inadequate insurance.

The current National lead government is promoting a scheme that will help the many leaky homeowners who were caught with inadequate building inspection companies who have since failed or gone out of business. They don’t have a existing litigation target like the the council. But it requires that the homeowner pays 50% of the costs of “homeowners’ agreed repair costs”, the councils 25% and the government 25%. The poor homeowner will be able to get loans but only if they meet bank lending criteria.

The two weasel clauses of agreed repair costs and bank lending criteria are killers. It costs a lot of money to find out the degree of a problem, which in itself whittles away your ability to service a loan. Without pulling the walls away it is frequently impossible to determine the extent of the damage. In our case we would up finding out that there was extensive and expensive damage in an unforeseen exterior walls only after the bathrooms were torn up.

This scheme still is not in place, and isn’t expected until next year at the earliest. Every year that buildings are not made waterfast increases the costs to all parties, including the ratepayers. The available details on this scheme, like many things from this clueless government, are extremely vague. Grimshaws who are probably know as much as anyone else describe it as:-

The Government recently announced a proposed scheme which it believes will assist those parties embroiled in the leaky homes saga. The scheme is apparently to start sometime next year.

At this stage, we simply do not have enough information to make any meaningful comment about it.

With this looming vast leaky bill hanging over the ratepayers of Auckland, it seems incredibly irresponsible wasting money on underwriting a risky business plan for the Rugby Union. Quite simply the Auckland City Council should be looking at how they help the homeowners that C&R shafted decades ago at the earliest opportunity. It also reduces the known potential risks and liabilities to the ratepayers from letting buildings deteriorate with the additional costs that entails.

Underwriting a white elephant like Eden Park seems like the daftest thing that that John Banks and the irresponsible C&R team have done to date.

Citizens and Ratepayers - as rotten as ever

73 comments on “C&R: A risky misuse of rates ”

  1. BLiP 1

    But . . . but . . . but . . . look, we’re having a big party!!

  2. Lanthanide 2

    “The poor homeowner will be able to get loans but only if they meet bank lending criteria.”

    You know far more about this than I ever will, but I thought part of the government’s scheme is that homeowners could get low-interest loans from the government to cover the repairs? Because obviously it is very difficult to get a loan from a bank for such a risky venture.

  3. lprent 3

    The current wording is

    This section outlines in more detail a Government proposal to establish a new financial assistance package to help homeowners repair their leaky homes faster.

    The financial assistance package will see the Government meet 25 per cent of homeowners’ agreed repair costs, local authorities contributing 25 per cent and homeowners funding the remaining 50 per cent, with a loan guarantee underwritten by the Government, provided claimants meet bank lending criteria.

    The package will be voluntary and in addition to the current disputes and litigation process for owners of leaky homes. It is also conditional on homeowners foregoing the right to sue local authorities or the Crown in relation to the claim.

    My italics

  4. Draco T Bastard 4

    What should happen is that the government should be making the funds available to get the leaky homes fixed ASAP through the RBNZ ability to print money @ 0% interest. The fault can be determined later with the people found to be at fault paying back the funds that the government made available.

    Of course, that’s just too sensible.

    • Armchair Critic 4.1

      And it also won’t happen because some of the people who are personally responsible are also ministers in the current government.

    • prism 4.2

      Well surely everything has to be looped back to private enterprise. The government reaps tax from the people, and private enterprise reaps profit, got to have the two-teat milking machine going until we’re squeezed dry. Suck sucks economics.

    • Alwyn 4.3

      Perhaps we could extend the idea.
      We could abolish all taxes and Government charges.
      Just let all Government expenditure be funded by the RBNZ creating money.

      Or is that also to sensible?

      ps I don’t actually advocate this as having any sense at all but DTB seems to be advocating something very similar. Oh, and I thought Bruce Beetham was dead.

      • Draco T Bastard 4.3.1

        Um, you missed the bit where I said that the money created would also be destroyed. So, what you said is not even close to what I proposed.

        • Alwyn 4.3.1.1

          You said later.
          How much later? Shall we say a year, or five years, or perhaps the fifteen years or so that the whole fiasco seems to have been going on.

          • Draco T Bastard 4.3.1.1.1

            At some point in some finite amount of time the matter will be settled and the money created destroyed as it needs to be. How much later isn’t really an issue.

            • Gosman 4.3.1.1.1.1

              Congratulations on promoting the Zimbabweisation of the NZ economy DTB.

              I can’t wait until I become a dollar billionaire under your proposal and have to cart around trunkloads of cash just to get a latte.

  5. rich 5

    Building inspections are just red tape that stopped honest kayweahs getting on with their lives. Oh, wait..

  6. loota 6

    Auckland rate payers are in for the $40M eden park redevelopment shortfall, huh?

    What a laugh, the Dunedin City Council put us ratepayers in for 3x that figure for their Southern White Elephant Stadium.

    They’re showing Auckland ratepayers how its really supposed to be done.

  7. Gooner 7

    Mallard’s Auckland Stadium on the waterfront would have been cheaper.

    And I bet the $30 mill chucked into the Americas Cup was money well spent.

    • lprent 7.1

      More importantly it would have helped to keep the rugby fans away from my NIMBY presence. I feel a holiday coming on about world cup time next year.

      • ghostwhowalksnz 7.1.1

        Im off to the Rugby League Series at the end of the year. No orgy of spending taxpayers money required

    • Joshua 7.2

      The 30mill for Americas cup was the best money spent in Auckland to date, the economic benefit was huge and still remands to be huge.

  8. Gosman 8

    Ummmmmm…. wasn’t it Helen Clark who was instrumental in helping N.Z. win the rights to host the Rugby World Cup?

    Personally I thought the rights should have been awarded to Japan myself but the last Labour led Government thought it would be a good thing to support.

    Central Government has already underwritten the tournament projected loss and provided the majority of funding for the Stadium upgrade.

    Given this fact I don’t see why people should moan about Auckland ratepayers having to stump up for a proportion of the costs involved in providing AUCKLAND with a suitable stadium.for this event. Aucklanders are the ones that will, on the whole, get the ongoing benefit from the stadium in future.

    • lprent 8.1

      Yeah? I haven’t been in Eden Park since I was a kid. But I’ve been under the impression that the only things that go on there are things that I’d have to pay for if I entered the stadium?

      In which case – why don’t the patrons pay for it?

      Personally I can see the point in the city assisting sports clubs for kids to play in. They largely do that by subsidizing the playing grounds. That doesn’t require any obscene over sized stadias with inadequate parking.

      I fail to see any need to subsidize what is essentially purely lazy entertainment, as much for the media as for the people paying to go.

      Perhaps you should expand your point and try to convince me?

      Then compare it with the relative importance of fixing the thousands of housing that the ‘free-market’ ideological stupidity of the last national government screwed up.

    • Draco T Bastard 8.2

      We already have a large number of stadiums in Auckland. They aren’t used all that much and I’m not too sure if they actually bring any greater benefit to Aucklanders in general. They seem to cost a hell of a lot (NSCC has been throwing huge amounts of money into the Northshore Stadium with no -ve return) and return nothing.

      Like Lprent I’m not against the councils providing a place for providing a place for children and even adults to play but once once it becomes a commercial concern such as the RWC etc then they can damn well pay for it themselves.

      • Gosman 8.2.1

        Perhaps your beloved Ms Clark shouldn’t have been instrumental in committing the country to providing top class facilities for the tournament then.

        If you have a problem with the fact that the country has to pony up all this cash for a tournament then you should really take it up with the former leader of the Labour Party and Trevor Mallard.

        • loota 8.2.1.1

          I tell you what, when Clark and Mallard committed to hosting the RWC, Government wasn’t making people redundant, freezing pay, locking out new ui students, exporting engineering jobs and cutting back home help for the elderly. Thanks to National’s hamfisted economic mismanagement that’s where we are at now.

        • lprent 8.2.1.2

          Perhaps you’d care to explain why a central government decision has much to do with my local government wasting money on the RWC when they have much more pressing obligations to their citizens that they’re royally screwing.

          You really are a ignorant dipshit who obviously hasn’t read the post…

          • Gosman 8.2.1.2.1

            Read my reply below.

            If you don’t like the consequences of decision made by the last Labour Government perhaps you should have been more vocal about it at the time.

            • lprent 8.2.1.2.1.1

              I was. I thought that spending on the whole RWC was a bloody silly idea.

              However I also didn’t think that the idiots in C&R would waste money on covering a business risk for the NZRU.

  9. Max Walker 9

    uhh Lprent – i think you’ve cocked up here. All the Auckland mayors agreed to underwrite Eden Park.

    http://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/PO1002/S00069.htm
    http://www.nzherald.co.nz/rugby-world-cup/news/article.cfm?c_id=522&objectid=10625246

    Not just Banks – but Brown too

    • lprent 9.1

      Entirely likely. I just looked at Osmans article. I’ll read the links after I bus home.

      However exactly the same thing applies because every city in Auckland has the same leaky home issues. If they’re going to throw ratepayers money around, then that should be their priority. Quite simply the councils (and their insurers) have been trying to avoid the issue for the last decade. The courts have been quite clear that they are culpable along with everyone else, and frequently more than anyone else. The delays, apart from the misery for the victims, leads to far higher bills in the long term fit the councils.

    • lprent 9.2

      Interesting. I can see Brown and Williams saying they’d support it. But I can’t see a report that their respective councils voted for it…

      Interesting.

  10. Kleefer 10

    I totally agree with you, ratepayer money should not be spent on rugby. But I suspect there are things this author would rather this money go to that other ratepayers might not agree with. Instead of creating a super-bureaucracy we should do away with councils altogether. There is not one function they perform that couldn’t be done better by competing private companies providing services to those who pay for them. End of story.

    • lprent 10.1

      What you mean like checking the buildings comply with building standards?

      You know just like we had from 1994-2004 in the competing building inspection companies?. Where a sizable proportion of those buildings had such crappy construction that in spite of being rated for a 60 year lifespan, many were falling apart after less than a decade.

      You mean that type of free-market don’t you? The common race to the bottom? That kind of a free-market failure of competing firms to provide the services that they charged for?

      If you want to be a proper dickhead ACToid, then perhaps you’d better to learn the answers to such questions…

    • Draco T Bastard 10.2

      Back in reality – the councils (and governments in general) provide necessary services better and cheaper than private enterprise. This has been proved several times over.

    • Joshua 10.3

      Everyone is missing the point on this site, Rugby is the sport we are supporting, but it’s the other benefits of such an event we are investing in. One of our biggest industries in this country is tourism, and the amount of gains we are going to get because of hosting the 3rd biggest sporting event in the world is tremendous, not to mention general retail spending because of a event this size.

      The investment is for the economic progression of all New Zealanders, not for a game of Rugby.

      Rugby is just the means to the ends

      • lprent 10.3.1

        How exactly does that help fixing leaky houses in the short term?

        I think that there are literally thousands of cases going ahead against the Auckland City Council. They take years to get to court, cost immense amounts of money, and generally sap economic performance. We’re talking tens of billions of dollars just in direct costs.

        Basically your ideas appear to have absolutely no sense of perspective. Typical ACToid response – speaking from faith rather than using your brains.

  11. G8 11

    Good article; son of C&R (slob whale) blames it all on Brown on his blogg so you must have hit his nerve.

    • lprent 11.1

      Saw that. An interesting attempt to ignore the issues in my post. I guess he couldn’t figure out an substantive argument (as usual) so went into his familiar moronic diversion routine.

  12. Joshua 12

    The main reason is because the government at the time, Labour, would of funded fully the Stadium on the Waterfront, which to be fair was the best option. However because the powers to be wanted Eden Park, in the middle of a residential area, to be upgraded, and the government threw a big sad and said they will not fund the whole thing leaving a shortfall of 40mill. Unfortunately someone had to pick up the slack, and the Eden Park management were never to be trusted with business decisions, they are effectively a bunch of politics who were campaigning for their stadium, rather than building an effective business case to justify the use. So Auckland City effectively had to fund the 40mill which was always going to be the case, so we can get our stadium of 60,000 to allow us to host the 3rd biggest sporting event in the world.

    What I’m effectively saying is they were left with no choice.

  13. Joshua 13

    Gosman – Actually it was the NZRU and in particular our captain at the time Tana who won the rights for us, but lets give credit because the government did support it, although so did the opposition in government at the time, so either way it would of gone ahead.

    lprent – It is the governments and local governments responsibility to pay as its the national economy that is going to benefit from the event. The number of tourist and the amount of exposure to NZ tourism a event of this size will provide is huge. Unfortunately allot of people seem to underestimate the size this event is and the scale of ongoing benefits for the NZ economy it will bring.

    In terms of housing, it’s important, but this is not a one or the other situation, it’s a both have to be done at some-point, however due to the window of opportunity for the World Cup, we must first concentrate on making this event a success for the benefit of New Zealand economy, and every New Zealander, we can then concentrate on helping the few negligent buyers of leaky homes at a later stage.

    Draco T Bastard – The stadium itself is not what is benefiting from the upgrade, we needed to provide a stadium of 60,000 for the world cup, the stadium will recover some cost but the majority they will not. It’s the NZ economy that will benefit from the event through tourism and retail, so it’s the Central and local Governments responsibility to progress NZs/Aucklands economy and the central and local governments responsibility to pay for the upgrade, to benefit New Zealander on a whole.

    • loota 13.1

      I think you are making an argument which says that tax payers and rate payers should pay in whole for something that mainly business (tourist operators and retailers in the big centres) are going to profit from in terms of a one off event. Is that right?

      And the funnelling off of tax payers and rate payer funds to rugby and construction special interests?

      Exactly what has happened down here in Dunedin, where you better add the $120M Dunedin City rate payers bill for the new southern stadium to the RWC public monies tab.

      • Gosman 13.1.1

        So you are not interested in seeing any more top class international games in Dunedin?

        I suppose that is a fair position to take but it kind of goes against what the last Labour Government was trying to achieve by supporting the bid to win the rights to host the 2011 tournament.

        Was there much opposition to this decsion in the Labour party by the way? Or even amongst the left wing generally?

      • Joshua 13.1.2

        I am making the argument that says the government should be investing money in which they will have the return on, when business make money who benefits? Cause the businesses I have been on the benefiters range from the;

        – Government, they gain the taxes, remembering how much tax is retained from businesses.
        – Business owners, obviously they must get a return on their investment
        – Employees, all employees of successful businesses benefit in monetary and job security ways.

        Then were do they spend there money?

        Again I think you are missing the point, it’s the not only a one off event, our public image is being sent around the world, we are advertising NZ to them, also the tourist that come here for the World cup will spend big, but if we do it right will be back with more friends. It’s got an immediate economic impact, but also a ongoing economic impact on the county.

        RUGBY IS THE MEANS TO AN ENDS.

    • Gosman 13.2

      Where was Helen Clark when the IRB was making the decision on which nation should be awarded the rights for the tournament?

      Who’s decision was it to underwrite the whole thing, which was key in convincing the IRB of the commercial viability of NZ holding it?

      • Joshua 13.2.1

        I have given credit and will give credit to the Government of the time, as I said before, however it was the NZRU and in particularly Tana who convinced the IRB New Zealand was the right place to host the cup. You don’t think Japan and the other bidders were also underwriting the whole thing? So yes that helped but it wasn’t the reason we got it, it just made us meet the requirements, it was Tana’s speech that actually won us the rights, Helen agreed to the conditions, which I give her credit for, but also believe the other parties would of done the same.

        • Gosman 13.2.1.1

          Helen Clark was right there and in fact it has been stated by a number of people that it was her personal appeal to the IRB which convinced them that the tournament should come to NZ. Trying to rewrite history now because you don’t like the consequences of that is just sad and desperate.

      • lprent 13.2.2

        Gosman: So what you’re arguing is that central government should underwrite the risks?

        I’d agree. That makes John Banks and C&R look like total suckers as well as heartless, irresponsible and stupid.

        • Gosman 13.2.2.1

          The Central Government is already underwriting the vast majority of the risk. I don’t think it is too much to expect the people of Auckland to directly take on some of that risk when they will be getting the majority of the benefits of the tournament and have already received funding from the rest of NZ for this.

          If you don’t like this then perhaps you should have been a little more vocal when Helen and Trevor were throwing their weight behind the NZRFU’s bid for the cup. That was the time to bitch about it. Not now.

          • lprent 13.2.2.1.1

            Since you’re suggesting that there was an obligation to the RWC and there is also a existing obligation to the people with screwed over leaky homes, then I’d expect to cover both of them to see C&R and John Banks announce that they’re putting up rates to cover both?

            I don’t see that happening – do you?

            In the meantime I’ll be pointing out to people with leaky homes exactly where Banks and C&R think that their priorities lie.

            • Gosman 13.2.2.1.1.1

              Fair enough if you want your council to spend money on both. However to claim that it should spend money on leaky homes INSTEAD of the RWC underwriting it plainly silly especially if you weren’t vocal in your opposition to the tournament coming here when Labour was pushing for it.

              I believe the councils position is that the RWC is a one off whereas they can deal with leaky homes over the long term, hence why they prioritse the RWC over the leaky homes.

              • lprent

                The problem is that rotting wood doesn’t prioritize. It keeps rotting at an accelerating rate until torn out and repaired.

                Not doing anything just increases the costs to repair – which is why the councils having spent the last decade trying to avoid dealing with the issue are now facing ever increasing bills as the cases come to court and the councils have to pay up.

                It is idiotic

              • lprent

                BTW: I don’t want the council to expend my rates on the RWC. That simplify the equation enough for you?

    • lprent 13.3

      Joshua: That really wasn’t the issue I was raising. The issue is that given scarce ratepayer funds and two competing obligations

      1. the poor buggers in trapped in leaky buildings largely caused by the councils screwing up on their duties
      2. the entertainment of a rugby world cup

      Then the council should put priority on the first rather than the second. John Banks and C&R generally prefer to screw the first and have photo-ops at the second. But they’re total arseholes.

      The alternative of course would be to raise rates to cover both – and I don’t see any sign of that happening – do you?

      So which side do you come down on, given that set of alternatives? Arsehole or responsible?

  14. tc 14

    C&R…Cronies and Rednecks…..an extension of that good old grammeresque thugby boys club.

    Yet again the taxpayers/ratepayers foot the bill for a game that on a global scale is a very minor sport run by a boys club of amateurs….tew/hobbs/dalton etc when they’re not troughing on the boards of finance companies.

    Money better spent on improved infrastructure with real long term benefits e.g cruise terminal/rail network….eden park is a joke and now a very expensive taxpayer funded one.

    Banksie doesn’t give an F….never has never will that takes compassion and intelligence.

    • Gosman 14.1

      So was this your position when Helen and co backed the bid to host the competition to the hilt?

      • lprent 14.1.1

        What exactly does central government have to do with a local government decision?

        Are you retarded or simply into diversion?

        • Gosman 14.1.1.1

          No, Helen Clark and co made a decision to commit New Zealand as a whole to the hosting of the tournament.

          The implications of this would be that the Central Government had to pony up the vast majority of the funds to cover the risks but that other areas that benefit directly from it, (e.g. Auckland), would need to do so as well.

          If you didn’t realise this at the time of Helen’s grand gesture then it is more fool you. I don’t see why I, as a non-Auckland, should shoulder 100 percent the risks associated with the tournament when Aucklands get the vast majority of the benefits.

          If you didn’t want to pay your share then you should have told Trevour and Helen at the time instead of moaning about the consequences now.

          • lprent 14.1.1.1.1

            I did complain at the time, and for exactly this reason – that it’d divert the local councils from their actual duties.

            That doesn’t prevent me from raising it again now for local government – which is the point that you’re trying to avoid. John Banks and C&R campaigned in 2007 on the basis of not putting money into Eden Park. Now they are underwriting the risk.

            They should be spending the ratepayers money on their leaky homes obligations instead.

            • Gosman 14.1.1.1.1.1

              Where did you do your complaining? Certainly not here as far as i can tell.

              • lprent

                You forget that I wasn’t writing posts until the end of 2008.

                Search in comments under lprent and AncientGeek and you’ll find me tearing into this issue mostly on why it was a really stupid idea to upgrade Eden Park.

                At that time the C&R position was that they weren’t going to be putting any money into Eden Park.. I guess that they were just lying – typical of them really.

            • Gosman 14.1.1.1.1.2

              What did your mates in the Labour party say to you when you complained by the way?

              I can’t imagine they were very sympathetic especially given Clark’s strong backing for the tournament when she was PM.

              • lprent

                At that time the option was that central government was to be putting up the money for the waterfront stadium. That was a far better option than doing this daft and expensive upgrade of Eden Park. All that does is increase the existing parking issues around Eden Park for residents.

                The waterfront stadium wouldn’t have diverted attention away from the councils existing obligations.

    • Joshua 14.2

      Again missing the point of investing in such a tournament.

      If the third biggest sporting event is minor I would hate to see your list of standards, the only bigger events in terms of spectators is the Soccer World Cup and the Olympics.

      Also the Cup itself is allowing for these infrastructure projects to go ahead, We would have a Cruise Ship terminal if it weren’t for the ARC, ACC, MCC and NSCC, all agreeing not to go ahead with it, although giving credit to ARC they were the only ones keen in that lot. Also rail has investment in it, be it not nearly enough, however at least it will force us to implement part of the integrated ticketing network by that time. Allot of the roading projects have or had deadlines on to complete before the Rugby World Cup, the big one the Manukau Harbour Crossing, so when the tourist get off the plane with their cars they have somewhere to go. (Obviously I believe we should be investing more in PT than we are so a bit biased there).

      So seriously before a big event like this it’s the perfect excuse to get these infrastructure projects going, the Government and Auckland City Councils in particular have lost the opportunity here, but there has been street improvements etc, for the cup.

      • lprent 14.2.1

        That wasn’t the issue – you really are squirming away from it aren’t you… It is like watching a maggot getting away from the light.

        Read the post again. The costs of not doing fixes early enough with leaky buildings keeps pushing the costs up. The court decisions to date have made it quite clear that the councils are in a large part responsible. The councils have been putting leaky home owners through hell by refusing to deal with the issues until forced to by the courts. C&R in Auckland city are amongst the worst.

        Now we see the idiots continuing to avoid their responsibilities in fixing the leaky housing infrastructure. Instead they’re pushing money away from their obligations and into white elephant projects that they can’t afford.

        I’ll give you one idea how that makes them look to the tens of thousands of people with leaky home issues around Auckland City.

  15. Nick C 15

    But wont all this spending on Edan Park, you know, create jobs and stimulate the economy ? Isnt that the nonsense that you pull out whenever someone on the left gets accused of overspending taxpayers money?

    But I guess when citizens and ratepayers are doing it…

    • lprent 15.1

      The short answer is almost certainly not – it is hard to find a case where these type of events have made a ‘profit’ for the hosting city in the short-term. You do get left with a better infrastructure.

      The question is if it is more effective use of taxpayers money right now for the councils to put money into the RWC or into fixing the existing mistakes with the costs of delay escalating all of the time.

  16. Tracey 16

    Worse still, the Trust Board could sell the naming rights to the park but dont want to, they want to preserve the name of the Park. I say sell it, we need all the money we can get. IF ‘we’ hadnt underwritten this they would be selling every square inch including the name to the highest bdidder

    Leaky Buildings, there are cheaper ways to both find the extent of damage and get repairs, without reclad, but the same industry that gave us leaky buildings now gives us the rort of fixing the leaky buildings. Almost all buildings are “investigated” by cutting holes in them and then they declare “you need a reclad”. There is plenty of research to support that this is bunkum BUT the building surveyors, the manufacturers, the builders, they want reclads, and Councils are SO scared from last time they agree.

    • lprent 16.1

      In our case there wasn’t a lot of choice about the major reclad.

      The apartment balconies were rotting back into the front wall (because the water proofing on the balconies was inadequate). All 40 balconies all had to be torn out to replace their bracing beams. With a monolithic coating that meant that most of the wall had to come out.

      As soon as that happened we were subject to having to put a cavity system into the wall by the building code. That was a good idea anyway, and probably what we’d have done to prevent other possible water ingress issues. It didn’t change the costs much.

  17. Tracey 17

    Nick C

    Would love to see your evidence that this will bring more money into NZ and Auckland than the cost to run it. NO major world event ever breaks even. That’s why Banks BS about the Olympics is just more evidence that leopard hasn’t changed his spots. He KNOWS how much an olympics costs, he knows how crippled the city that hosts it is afterwards, left tpaying it off, yet he plays on people’s sporting love with a ludicrous proposal.

  18. JonL 18

    “1. the poor buggers in trapped in leaky buildings largely caused by the councils screwing up on their duties”
    Sorry – you have the wrong idea on what Building Inspectors are responsible for. Their job is to enforce the Building Code and Building Standards as they were at the time! From 1992-2002 they were crap! You can thank the Nats and their mates in the building industry for that – mainly James Hardie and Carter Holt! As an ex ACC inspector that came onto the scene after the shit had hit the fan, what I saw astounded me, but, most of it had been legal when it was built and approved.- and, believe me, if we tried to fail stuff that complied (as I often did if I thought it wasn’t going to work), you could be sure we would be over ridden by higher up! Most of the stuff built was doomed to fail even if it did conform fully to the regulations and standards! Oh yes – the worst I saw was 2 months, from completion to start to rebuild due to rotting. You can also thank the construction companies that created a shell, built the project as quickly and cheaply as possible, then closed down, so there is no comeback! Pricks!

    • lprent 18.1

      Yes they were crap building standards – and what they were replaced with was far far better.

      However the reason that we had the councils insurers cave in and settle on our apartment block was because the building inspections at the time did not even enforce those rather pathetic standards. For that matter the building plans approved by the council had a clear violations as well.

      But the other question of liability is to do with the standards that were put in at the time by the council that you pointed out. Those were inadequate for the task as well

  19. jaymam 19

    Unfortunately politicians rely too much on “expert” advice which is faulty.
    I don’t care who decided to have the RWC in NZ, but that was a mistake in an economic sense.
    Most people just don’t have the money these days to pay hundreds or thousands of dollars for tickets and transport and accommodation.

    And the new building regs of the 1990s were a huge mistake. To hell with regulations – any architect or builder or building inpector with common sense would have known that the new methods of cheap construction were not going to last. House owners should have chosen architects and builders who were prepared to stand by their work and NOT set up a new company for each house. That should be a red flag for the owners.
    The architects and builders who have escaped their responsibilites by setting up new companies should be chased up and made to pay or never go into business again. My contact in the IRD says that they can be chased up.
    And the Councils should pay for their incompetence, especially since they used to be so difficult about petty things that didn’t matter, while allowing leaky houses to be approved.

Links to post

Recent Comments

Recent Posts

  • And I don't want the world to see us.
    Is this the most shambolic government in the history of New Zealand? Given that parliament hasn’t even opened they’ve managed quite a list of achievements to date.The Smokefree debacle trading lives for tax cuts, the Trumpian claims of bribery in the Media, an International award for indifference, and today the ...
    Nick’s KōreroBy Nick Rockel
    3 hours ago
  • Cooking the books
    Finance Minister Nicola Willis late yesterday stopped only slightly short of accusing her predecessor Grant Robertson of cooking the books. She complained that the Half Yearly Economic and Fiscal Update (HYEFU), due to be made public on December 20, would show “fiscal cliffs” that would amount to “billions of ...
    PolitikBy Richard Harman
    4 hours ago
  • Most people don’t realize how much progress we’ve made on climate change
    This is a re-post from Yale Climate Connections The year was 2015. ‘Uptown Funk’ with Bruno Mars was at the top of the music charts. Jurassic World was the most popular new movie in theaters. And decades of futility in international climate negotiations was about to come to an end in ...
    13 hours ago
  • Of Parliamentary Oaths and Clive Boonham
    As a heads-up, I am not one of those people who stay awake at night thinking about weird Culture War nonsense. At least so far as the current Maori/Constitutional arrangements go. In fact, I actually consider it the least important issue facing the day to day lives of New ...
    14 hours ago
  • Bearing True Allegiance?
    Strong Words: “We do not consent, we do not surrender, we do not cede, we do not submit; we, the indigenous, are rising. We do not buy into the colonial fictions this House is built upon. Te Pāti Māori pledges allegiance to our mokopuna, our whenua, and Te Tiriti o ...
    17 hours ago
  • You cannot be serious
    Some days it feels like the only thing to say is: Seriously? No, really. Seriously?OneSomeone has used their health department access to share data about vaccinations and patients, and inform the world that New Zealanders have been dying in their hundreds of thousands from the evil vaccine. This of course is pure ...
    More Than A FeildingBy David Slack
    17 hours ago
  • A promise kept: govt pulls the plug on Lake Onslow scheme – but this saving of $16bn is denounced...
    Buzz from the Beehive After $21.8 million was spent on investigations, the plug has been pulled on the Lake Onslow pumped-hydro electricity scheme, The scheme –  that technically could have solved New Zealand’s looming energy shortage, according to its champions – was a key part of the defeated Labour government’s ...
    Point of OrderBy Bob Edlin
    17 hours ago
  • CHRIS TROTTER: The Maori Party and Oath of Allegiance
    If those elected to the Māori Seats refuse to take them, then what possible reason could the country have for retaining them?   Chris Trotter writes – Christmas is fast approaching, which, as it does every year, means gearing up for an abstruse general knowledge question. “Who was ...
    Point of OrderBy Bob Edlin
    19 hours ago
  • BRIAN EASTON:  Forward to 2017
    The coalition party agreements are mainly about returning to 2017 when National lost power. They show commonalities but also some serious divergencies. Brian Easton writes The two coalition agreements – one National and ACT, the other National and New Zealand First – are more than policy documents. ...
    Point of OrderBy poonzteam5443
    21 hours ago
  • Climate Change: Fossils
    When the new government promised to allow new offshore oil and gas exploration, they were warned that there would be international criticism and reputational damage. Naturally, they arrogantly denied any possibility that that would happen. And then they finally turned up at COP, to criticism from Palau, and a "fossil ...
    No Right TurnBy Idiot/Savant
    21 hours ago
  • GEOFFREY MILLER:  NZ’s foreign policy resets on AUKUS, Gaza and Ukraine
    Geoffrey Miller writes – New Zealand’s international relations are under new management. And Winston Peters, the new foreign minister, is already setting a change agenda. As expected, this includes a more pro-US positioning when it comes to the Pacific – where Peters will be picking up where he ...
    Point of OrderBy poonzteam5443
    22 hours ago
  • Gordon Campbell on the government’s smokefree laws debacle
    The most charitable explanation for National’s behaviour over the smokefree legislation is that they have dutifully fulfilled the wishes of the Big Tobacco lobby and then cast around – incompetently, as it turns out – for excuses that might sell this health policy U-turn to the public. The less charitable ...
    23 hours ago
  • Top 10 links at 10 am for Monday, December 4
    As Deb Te Kawa writes in an op-ed, the new Government seems to have immediately bought itself fights with just about everyone. Photo: Lynn Grieveson / The KākāTL;DR: Here’s my pick of the top 10 news and analysis links elsewhere as of 10 am on Monday December 4, including:Palau’s President ...
    The KakaBy Bernard Hickey
    23 hours ago
  • Be Honest.
    Let’s begin today by thinking about job interviews.During my career in Software Development I must have interviewed hundreds of people, hired at least a hundred, but few stick in the memory.I remember one guy who was so laid back he was practically horizontal, leaning back in his chair until his ...
    Nick’s KōreroBy Nick Rockel
    24 hours ago
  • Geoffrey Miller: New Zealand’s foreign policy resets on AUKUS, Gaza and Ukraine
    New Zealand’s international relations are under new management. And Winston Peters, the new foreign minister, is already setting a change agenda. As expected, this includes a more pro-US positioning when it comes to the Pacific – where Peters will be picking up where he left off. Peters sought to align ...
    Democracy ProjectBy Geoffrey Miller
    1 day ago
  • Auckland rail tunnel the world’s most expensive
    Auckland’s city rail link is the most expensive rail project in the world per km, and the CRL boss has described the cost of infrastructure construction in Aotearoa as a crisis. Photo: Lynn Grieveson / The KākāTL;DR: The 3.5 km City Rail Link (CRL) tunnel under Auckland’s CBD has cost ...
    The KakaBy Bernard Hickey
    1 day ago
  • First big test coming
    The first big test of the new Government’s approach to Treaty matters is likely to be seen in the return of the Resource Management Act. RMA Minister Chris Bishop has confirmed that he intends to introduce legislation to repeal Labour’s recently passed Natural and Built Environments Act and its ...
    PolitikBy Richard Harman
    1 day ago
  • The Song of Saqua: Volume III
    Time to revisit something I haven’t covered in a while: the D&D campaign, with Saqua the aquatic half-vampire. Last seen in July: https://phuulishfellow.wordpress.com/2023/07/27/the-song-of-saqua-volume-ii/ The delay is understandable, once one realises that the interim saw our DM come down with a life-threatening medical situation. They have since survived to make ...
    1 day ago
  • Chris Bishop: Smokin’
    Yes. Correct. It was an election result. And now we are the elected government. ...
    My ThinksBy boonman
    2 days ago
  • 2023 SkS Weekly Climate Change & Global Warming News Roundup #48
    A chronological listing of news and opinion articles posted on the Skeptical Science  Facebook Page during the past week: Sun, Nov 26, 2023 thru Dec 2, 2023. Story of the Week CO2 readings from Mauna Loa show failure to combat climate change Daily atmospheric carbon dioxide data from Hawaiian volcano more ...
    2 days ago
  • Affirmative Action.
    Affirmative Action was a key theme at this election, although I don’t recall anyone using those particular words during the campaign.They’re positive words, and the way the topic was talked about was anything but. It certainly wasn’t a campaign of saying that Affirmative Action was a good thing, but that, ...
    Nick’s KōreroBy Nick Rockel
    2 days ago
  • 100 days of something
    It was at the end of the Foxton straights, at the end of 1978, at 100km/h, that someone tried to grab me from behind on my Yamaha.They seemed to be yanking my backpack. My first thought was outrage. My second was: but how? Where have they come from? And my ...
    More Than A FeildingBy David Slack
    2 days ago
  • Look who’s stepped up to champion Winston
    There’s no news to be gleaned from the government’s official website today  – it contains nothing more than the message about the site being under maintenance. The time this maintenance job is taking and the costs being incurred have us musing on the government’s commitment to an assault on inflation. ...
    Point of OrderBy Bob Edlin
    3 days ago
  • What's The Story?
    Don’t you sometimes wish they’d just tell the truth? No matter how abhorrent or ugly, just straight up tell us the truth?C’mon guys, what you’re doing is bad enough anyway, pretending you’re not is only adding insult to injury.Instead of all this bollocks about the Smokefree changes being to do ...
    Nick’s KōreroBy Nick Rockel
    3 days ago
  • The longest of weeks
    Hello! Here comes the Saturday edition of More Than A Feilding, catching you up on the past week’s editions.Friday Under New Management Week in review, quiz style1. Which of these best describes Aotearoa?a. Progressive nation, proud of its egalitarian spirit and belief in a fair go b. Best little country on the planet c. ...
    More Than A FeildingBy David Slack
    3 days ago
  • Suggested sessions of EGU24 to submit abstracts to
    Like earlier this year, members from our team will be involved with next year's General Assembly of the European Geosciences Union (EGU). The conference will take place on premise in Vienna as well as online from April 14 to 19, 2024. The session catalog has been available since November 1 ...
    3 days ago
  • Under New Management
    1. Which of these best describes Aotearoa?a. Progressive nation, proud of its egalitarian spirit and belief in a fair go b. Best little country on the planet c. Under New Management 2. Which of these best describes the 100 days of action announced this week by the new government?a. Petulantb. Simplistic and wrongheaded c. ...
    More Than A FeildingBy David Slack
    4 days ago
  • While we wait patiently, our new Minister of Education is up and going with a 100-day action plan
    Sorry to say, the government’s official website is still out of action. When Point of Order paid its daily visit, the message was the same as it has been for the past week: Site under maintenance Beehive.govt.nz is currently under maintenance. We will be back shortly. Thank you for your ...
    Point of OrderBy Bob Edlin
    4 days ago
  • DAVID FARRAR: Hysterical bullshit
    Radio NZ reports: Te Pāti Māori’s co-leader Debbie Ngarewa-Packer has accused the new government of “deliberate .. systemic genocide” over its policies to roll back the smokefree policy and the Māori Health Authority. The left love hysterical language. If you oppose racial quotas in laws, you are a racist. And now if you sack ...
    Point of OrderBy Bob Edlin
    4 days ago
  • Skeptical Science New Research for Week #48 2023
    Open access notables From this week's government/NGO section, longitudinal data is gold and Leisorowitz, Maibachi et al. continue to mine ore from the US public with Climate Change in the American Mind: Politics & Policy, Fall 2023: Drawing on a representative sample of the U.S. adult population, the authors describe how registered ...
    4 days ago
  • ELE LUDEMANN: It wasn’t just $55 million
    Ele Ludemann writes –  Winston Peters reckons media outlets were bribed by the $55 million Public Interest Journalism Fund. He is not the first to make such an accusation. Last year, the Platform outlined conditions media signed up to in return for funds from the PJIF: . . . ...
    Point of OrderBy Bob Edlin
    4 days ago
  • Weekly Roundup 1-December-2023
    Wow, it’s December already, and it’s a Friday. So here are few things that caught our attention recently. This Week in Greater Auckland On Monday Matt covered the new government’s coalition agreements and what they mean for transport. On Tuesday Matt looked at AT’s plans for fare increases ...
    Greater AucklandBy Greater Auckland
    4 days ago
  • Shane MacGowan Is Gone.
    Late 1996, The Dogs Bollix, Tamaki Makaurau.I’m at the front of the bar yelling my order to the bartender, jostling with other thirsty punters on a Friday night, keen to piss their wages up against a wall letting loose. The black stuff, long luscious pints of creamy goodness. Back down ...
    Nick’s KōreroBy Nick Rockel
    4 days ago
  • The Hoon around the week to Dec 1
    Nicola Willis, Chris Bishop and other National, ACT and NZ First MPs applaud the signing of the coalition agreements, which included the reversal of anti-smoking measures while accelerating tax cuts for landlords. Photo: Lynn Grieveson / The KākāTL;DR: The five things that mattered in Aotearoa’s political economy that we wrote ...
    The KakaBy Bernard Hickey
    4 days ago
  • 2023 More Reading: November (+ Writing Update)
    Completed reads for November: A Modern Utopia, by H.G. Wells The Vampire (poem), by Heinrich August Ossenfelder The Corpus Hermeticum The Corpus Hermeticum is Mead’s translation. Now, this is indeed a very quiet month for reading. But there is a reason for that… You see, ...
    4 days ago
  • Forward to 2017
    The coalition party agreements are mainly about returning to 2017 when National lost power. They show commonalities but also some serious divergencies.The two coalition agreements – one National and ACT, the other National and New Zealand First – are more than policy documents. They also describe the processes of the ...
    PunditBy Brian Easton
    5 days ago
  • Questions a nine year old might ask the new Prime Minister
    First QuestionYou’re going to crack down on people ram-raiding dairies, because you say hard-working dairy owners shouldn’t have to worry about getting ram-raided.But once the chemist shops have pseudoephedrine in them again, they're going to get ram-raided all the time. Do chemists not work as hard as dairy owners?Second QuestionYou ...
    More Than A FeildingBy David Slack
    5 days ago
  • Questions a nine year old might ask the new Prime Minister
    First QuestionYou’re going to crack down on people ram-raiding dairies, because you say hard-working dairy owners shouldn’t have to worry about getting ram-raided.But once the chemist shops have pseudoephedrine in them again, they're going to get ram-raided all the time. Do chemists not work as hard as dairy owners?Second QuestionYou ...
    More than a fieldingBy David Slack
    5 days ago
  • Finally
    Henry Kissinger is finally dead. Good fucking riddance. While Americans loved him, he was a war criminal, responsible for most of the atrocities of the final quarter of the twentieth century. Cambodia. Bangladesh. Chile. East Timor. All Kissinger. Because of these crimes, Americans revere him as a "statesman" (which says ...
    No Right TurnBy Idiot/Savant
    5 days ago
  • Government in a hurry – Luxon lists 49 priorities in 100-day plan while Peters pledges to strength...
    Buzz from the Beehive Yes, ministers in the new government are delivering speeches and releasing press statements. But the message on the government’s official website was the same as it has been for the past several days, when Point of Order went looking for news from the Beehive that had ...
    Point of OrderBy Bob Edlin
    5 days ago
  • DAVID FARRAR: Luxon is absolutely right
    David Farrar writes  –  1 News reports: Christopher Luxon says he was told by some Kiwis on the campaign trail they “didn’t know” the difference between Waka Kotahi, Te Pūkenga and Te Whatu Ora. Speaking to Breakfast, the incoming prime minister said having English first on government agencies will “make sure” ...
    Point of OrderBy poonzteam5443
    5 days ago
  • Top 10 at 10 am for Thursday, Nov 30
    There are fears that mooted changes to building consent liability could end up driving the building industry into an uninsured hole. Photo: Lynn Grieveson / The KākāTL;DR: Here’s my pick of the top 10 news and analysis links elsewhere as of 10 am on Thursday, November 30, including:The new Government’s ...
    The KakaBy Bernard Hickey
    5 days ago
  • Gordon Campbell on how climate change threatens cricket‘s future
    Well that didn’t last long, did it? Mere days after taking on what he called the “awesome responsibility” of being Prime Minister, M Christopher Luxon has started blaming everyone else, and complaining that he has inherited “economic vandalism on an unprecedented scale” – which is how most of us are ...
    5 days ago
  • We need to talk about Tory.
    The first I knew of the news about Tory Whanau was when a tweet came up in my feed.The sort of tweet that makes you question humanity, or at least why you bother with Twitter. Which is increasingly a cesspit of vile inhabitants who lurk spreading negativity, hate, and every ...
    Nick’s KōreroBy Nick Rockel
    5 days ago
  • Dangling Transport Solutions
    Cable Cars, Gondolas, Ropeways and Aerial Trams are all names for essentially the same technology and the world’s biggest maker of them are here to sell them as an public transport solution. Stuff reports: Austrian cable car company Doppelmayr has launched its case for adding aerial cable cars to New ...
    5 days ago
  • November AMA
    Hi,It’s been awhile since I’ve done an Ask-Me-Anything on here, so today’s the day. Ask anything you like in the comments section, and I’ll be checking in today and tomorrow to answer.Leave a commentNext week I’ll be giving away a bunch of these Mister Organ blu-rays for readers in New ...
    David FarrierBy David Farrier
    5 days ago
  • National’s early moves adding to cost of living pressure
    The cost of living grind continues, and the economic and inflation honeymoon is over before it began. Photo: Lynn Grieveson / The KākāTL;DR: PM Christopher Luxon unveiled his 100 day plan yesterday with an avowed focus of reducing cost-of-living pressures, but his Government’s initial moves and promises are actually elevating ...
    The KakaBy Bernard Hickey
    5 days ago
  • Backwards to the future
    Prime Minister Christopher Luxon has confirmed that it will be back to the future on planning legislation. This will be just one of a number of moves which will see the new government go backwards as it repeals and cost-cuts its way into power. They will completely repeal one ...
    PolitikBy Richard Harman
    5 days ago
  • New initiatives in science and technology could point the way ahead for Luxon government
    As the new government settles into the Beehive, expectations are high that it can sort out some  of  the  economic issues  confronting  New Zealand. It may take time for some new  ministers to get to grips with the range of their portfolio work and responsibilities before they can launch the  changes that  ...
    Point of OrderBy tutere44
    6 days ago
  • Treaty pledge to secure funding is contentious – but is Peters being pursued by a lynch mob after ...
    TV3 political editor Jenna Lynch was among the corps of political reporters who bridled, when Deputy Prime Minister Winston Peters told them what he thinks of them (which is not much). She was unabashed about letting her audience know she had bridled. More usefully, she drew attention to something which ...
    Point of OrderBy Bob Edlin
    6 days ago
  • How long does this last?
    I have a clear memory of every election since 1969 in this plucky little nation of ours. I swear I cannot recall a single one where the question being asked repeatedly in the first week of the new government was: how long do you reckon they’ll last? And that includes all ...
    More Than A FeildingBy David Slack
    6 days ago
  • National’s giveaway politics
    We already know that national plans to boost smoking rates to collect more tobacco tax so they can give huge tax-cuts to mega-landlords. But this morning that policy got even more obscene - because it turns out that the tax cut is retrospective: Residential landlords will be able to ...
    No Right TurnBy Idiot/Savant
    6 days ago
  • CHRIS TROTTER: Who’s driving the right-wing bus?
    Who’s At The Wheel? The electorate’s message, as aggregated in the polling booths on 14 October, turned out to be a conservative political agenda stronger than anything New Zealand has seen in five decades. In 1975, Bill Rowling was run over by just one bus, with Rob Muldoon at the wheel. In 2023, ...
    Point of OrderBy poonzteam5443
    6 days ago
  • GRAHAM ADAMS:  Media knives flashing for Luxon’s government
    The fear and loathing among legacy journalists is astonishing Graham Adams writes – No one is going to die wondering how some of the nation’s most influential journalists personally view the new National-led government. It has become abundantly clear within a few days of the coalition agreements ...
    Point of OrderBy gadams1000
    6 days ago
  • Top 10 news links for Wednesday, Nov 29
    TL;DR: Here’s my pick of top 10 news links elsewhere for Wednesday November 29, including:The early return of interest deductibility for landlords could see rebates paid on previous taxes and the cost increase to $3 billion from National’s initial estimate of $2.1 billion, CTU Economist Craig Renney estimated here last ...
    The KakaBy Bernard Hickey
    6 days ago
  • Smokefree Fallout and a High Profile Resignation.
    The day after being sworn in the new cabinet met yesterday, to enjoy their honeymoon phase. You remember, that period after a new government takes power where the country, and the media, are optimistic about them, because they haven’t had a chance to stuff anything about yet.Sadly the nuptials complete ...
    Nick’s KōreroBy Nick Rockel
    6 days ago
  • As Cabinet revs up, building plans go on hold
    Wellington Council hoardings proclaim its preparations for population growth, but around the country councils are putting things on hold in the absence of clear funding pathways for infrastructure, and despite exploding migrant numbers. Photo: Lynn Grieveson / The KākāTL;DR: Cabinet meets in earnest today to consider the new Government’s 100-day ...
    The KakaBy Bernard Hickey
    6 days ago
  • National takes over infrastructure
    Though New Zealand First may have had ambitions to run the infrastructure portfolios, National would seem to have ended up firmly in control of them.  POLITIK has obtained a private memo to members of Infrastructure NZ yesterday, which shows that the peak organisation for infrastructure sees  National MPs Chris ...
    PolitikBy Richard Harman
    6 days ago
  • At a glance – Evidence for global warming
    On February 14, 2023 we announced our Rebuttal Update Project. This included an ask for feedback about the added "At a glance" section in the updated basic rebuttal versions. This weekly blog post series highlights this new section of one of the updated basic rebuttal versions and serves as a ...
    7 days ago
  • Who’s Driving The Right-Wing Bus?
    Who’s At The Wheel? The electorate’s message, as aggregated in the polling booths on 14 October, turned out to be a conservative political agenda stronger than anything New Zealand has seen in five decades. In 1975, Bill Rowling was run over by just one bus, with Rob Muldoon at the wheel. In ...
    7 days ago
  • Sanity break
    Cheers to reader Deane for this quote from Breakfast TV today:Chloe Swarbrick to Brook van Velden re the coalition agreement: “... an unhinged grab-bag of hot takes from your drunk uncle at Christmas”Cheers also to actual Prime Minister of a country Christopher Luxon for dorking up his swearing-in vows.But that's enough ...
    More Than A FeildingBy David Slack
    7 days ago
  • Sanity break
    Cheers to reader Deane for this quote from Breakfast TV today:Chloe Swarbrick to Brook van Velden re the coalition agreement: “... an unhinged grab-bag of hot takes from your drunk uncle at Christmas”Cheers also to actual Prime Minister of a country Christopher Luxon for dorking up his swearing-in vows.But that's enough ...
    More than a fieldingBy David Slack
    7 days ago
  • National’s murderous smoking policy
    One of the big underlying problems in our political system is the prevalence of short-term thinking, most usually seen in the periodic massive infrastructure failures at a local government level caused by them skimping on maintenance to Keep Rates Low. But the new government has given us a new example, ...
    No Right TurnBy Idiot/Savant
    7 days ago
  • NZ has a chance to rise again as our new government gets spending under control
    New Zealand has  a chance  to  rise  again. Under the  previous  government, the  number of New Zealanders below the poverty line was increasing  year by year. The Luxon-led government  must reverse that trend – and set about stabilising  the  pillars  of the economy. After the  mismanagement  of the outgoing government created   huge ...
    Point of OrderBy tutere44
    7 days ago
  • KARL DU FRESNE: Media and the new government
    Two articles by Karl du Fresne bring media coverage of the new government into considerations.  He writes –    Tuesday, November 28, 2023 The left-wing media needed a line of attack, and they found one The left-wing media pack wasted no time identifying the new government’s weakest point. Seething over ...
    Point of OrderBy poonzteam5443
    7 days ago
  • PHILIP CRUMP:  Team of rivals – a CEO approach to government leadership
    The work begins Philip Crump wrote this article ahead of the new government being sworn in yesterday – Later today the new National-led coalition government will be sworn in, and the hard work begins. At the core of government will be three men – each a leader ...
    Point of OrderBy poonzteam5443
    7 days ago
  • Black Friday
    As everyone who watches television or is on the mailing list for any of our major stores will confirm, “Black Friday” has become the longest running commercial extravaganza and celebration in our history. Although its origins are obscure (presumably dreamt up by American salesmen a few years ago), it has ...
    Bryan GouldBy Bryan Gould
    7 days ago
  • In Defense of the Media.
    Yesterday the Ministers in the next government were sworn in by our Governor General. A day of tradition and ceremony, of decorum and respect. Usually.But yesterday Winston Peters, the incoming Deputy Prime Minister, and Foreign Minister, of our nation used it, as he did with the signing of the coalition ...
    Nick’s KōreroBy Nick Rockel
    7 days ago
  • Top 10 news links at 10 am for Tuesday, Nov 28
    Nicola Willis’ first move was ‘spilling the tea’ on what she called the ‘sobering’ state of the nation’s books, but she had better be able to back that up in the HYEFU. Photo: Lynn Grieveson / The KākāTL;DR: Here’s my pick of top 10 news links elsewhere at 10 am ...
    The KakaBy Bernard Hickey
    7 days ago
  • PT use up but fare increases coming
    Yesterday Auckland Transport were celebrating, as the most recent Sunday was the busiest Sunday they’ve ever had. That’s a great outcome and I’m sure the ...
    1 week ago
  • The very opposite of social investment
    Nicola Willis (in blue) at the signing of the coalition agreement, before being sworn in as both Finance Minister and Social Investment Minister. National’s plan to unwind anti-smoking measures will benefit her in the first role, but how does it stack up from a social investment viewpoint? Photo: Lynn Grieveson ...
    The KakaBy Bernard Hickey
    1 week ago
  • Giving Tuesday
    For the first time "in history" we decided to jump on the "Giving Tuesday" bandwagon in order to make you aware of the options you have to contribute to our work! Projects supported by Skeptical Science Inc. Skeptical Science Skeptical Science is an all-volunteer organization but ...
    1 week ago
  • Let's open the books with Nicotine Willis
    Let’s say it’s 1984,and there's a dreary little nation at the bottom of the Pacific whose name rhymes with New Zealand,and they've just had an election.Jesus, Mary, and Joseph, will you look at the state of these books we’ve opened,cries the incoming government, will you look at all this mountain ...
    More Than A FeildingBy David Slack
    1 week ago
  • Climate Change: Stopping oil
    National is promising to bring back offshore oil and gas drilling. Naturally, the Greens have organised a petition campaign to try and stop them. You should sign it - every little bit helps, and as the struggle over mining conservation land showed, even National can be deterred if enough people ...
    No Right TurnBy Idiot/Savant
    1 week ago
  • Don’t accept Human Rights Commission reading of data on Treaty partnership – read the survey fin...
    Wellington is braced for a “massive impact’ from the new government’s cutting public service jobs, The Post somewhat grimly reported today. Expectations of an economic and social jolt are based on the National-Act coalition agreement to cut public service numbers in each government agency in a cost-trimming exercise  “informed by” head ...
    Point of OrderBy Bob Edlin
    1 week ago

  • New Zealand welcomes European Parliament vote on the NZ-EU Free Trade Agreement
    A significant milestone in ratifying the NZ-EU Free Trade Agreement (FTA) was reached last night, with 524 of the 705 member European Parliament voting in favour to approve the agreement. “I’m delighted to hear of the successful vote to approve the NZ-EU FTA in the European Parliament overnight. This is ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 weeks ago
  • Further humanitarian support for Gaza, the West Bank and Israel
    The Government is contributing a further $5 million to support the response to urgent humanitarian needs in Gaza, the West Bank and Israel, bringing New Zealand’s total contribution to the humanitarian response so far to $10 million. “New Zealand is deeply saddened by the loss of civilian life and the ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 weeks ago

Page generated in The Standard by Wordpress at 2023-12-04T20:19:09+00:00