web analytics

Rod Oram: Burn after reading

Written By: - Date published: 7:36 pm, September 7th, 2009 - 22 comments
Categories: climate change - Tags:

As usual Rod Oram presents an insightful argument:

New Zealand’s climate change credibility is hanging by a thread. If the government indulges in bad politics on the Emissions Trading Scheme, the thread would snap. We would suffer instant, serious and long-term damage to our economy, environment and reputation.

…Would National be so reckless? Logically it wouldn’t. It seems inconceivable it could stomach the idea of turning up to the international climate change negotiations in Copenhagen in December without an ETS and only the support of Act, a tiny bunch of climate deniers. National and New Zealand would be a laughing stock.

But almost anything is possible because National has dissembled, prevaricated and otherwise failed to reveal its true beliefs on climate change in opposition and so far in government. Thus the ETS has become the litmus test of National’s political skills, its commitment to the environment and its understanding of where New Zealand’s future lies in a low-carbon world.

I can’t wait to see the outcome.

22 comments on “Rod Oram: Burn after reading ”

  1. I am not sure that National has “dissembled, prevaricated and otherwise failed to reveal its true beliefs on climate change”. It seems to me that National is doing everything it can to frustrate the development of any rational response to the threat of climate change and has been quite open about this. For instance:

    1. They signed a coalition agreement with Act which resulted in the setting up of the Select Committee that had to “review the science” as if there was a chance the science was wrong.
    2. They wanted “balance” between economic development and environmental sustainability as if this was possible.
    3. They removed the ban on new thermal power stations. Why use wind, tidal and geothermal when coal will do?
    4. They destroyed the developing biofuels industry.
    5. They reversed the ban on inefficient light bulbs in the name of “freedom” and “choice”.
    6. They have sent out many negative messages about the ETS and have caused major uncertainty in the developing market.

    And this was just within the first 100 days!

    Guess who said this?

    “How big is this risk? Many years of scientific work, summarised by the National academies of Science of all the main countries, including the United States, and by the intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, confirms the risk is serious, although uncertainty remains about the rate and timing of global climate change and its regional effects. These uncertainties are not an excuse for doing nothing.’

    You will never guess. The source is National’s Bluegreen document, page 4.

    • logie97 1.1

      Unfortunately we have a PM who does not appear to have a firm grasp on the language he speaks so what other leaders will make of him, god only knows. Will they be able to be sure that his words mean what he says? I am sure that this morning on Breakfast, Henry asked him a question to which he replied, “… I am not overtly worried or concerned…” Does that mean secretly he is?

    • Ari 1.2

      2. They wanted “balance’ between economic development and environmental sustainability as if this was possible.

      Misusing words like this is pretty much the definition of “prevaricate”.

      Their policy is pretty clear on the fact that they don’t really care about the environment, the issue is that they want to pass a gutted ETS and pass it off as having “balanced” their priorities sufficiently.

  2. Pascal's bookie 2

    At a high level, the committee’s report was encouraging. It showed very broad support for five key principles: that the science of climate change is valid; that urgent action is needed globally to tackle climate change; that New Zealand should play its part in doing so; that all sectors and all gases should be included in our response; that we must work on mitigation (by reducing emissions) and adaptation (by adjusting our economy and built-environment to cope with changes in our physical environment).

    In light of that; this

    The trouble is, National might instead engage in bad politics. In its determination to ram through its agenda, it might threaten Labour that it would seek support from Act to suspend the ETS altogether.

    becomes interesting as all hell.

    Labour should offer a deal based on it’s own, fairly timid, ETS. National is leading the government, it’s their responsibility to sort this. If Labour thinks National’s ETS is not effective enough, they shouldn’t support it. If National wants to acknowledge the problem of AGW but not do anywhere enough about it that’s National’s business and Labour shouldn’t enable them.

    National’s choice is a tough one. They’ve acknowledged the problem, but for ideological reasons, (and reasons based around their years of strategic denialism), are hesitant to do what needs to be done.

    Labour should therefore, offer them the opportunity to do right, rather than enable them to do bullshit. If they want to do bullshit, they should do it with ACT.

    • Ari 2.1

      I think you mean that Labour should offer a more aggressive deal based off its timid ETS, given that National is likely to want to delay implementation. 😉

  3. Gooner 3

    Your headline is wrong. It should be “Rod Oram: Burn before reading”.

  4. RedLogix 4

    If they want to do bullshit, they should do it with ACT.

    Jeanette Fitzsimmons is right as usual, Labour really don’t have to do anything. The default position is the existing ETS legislation passed into law last year.

    Ultimately cross party support is of course a desirable thing.. but if we are going to be politically committed to a multi-party accord on this, the result had better be worth having.

    National have dug this hole for themselves, let them find a way out.

  5. JohnDee 5

    As Janet Fitzsimons points out we already have an ETS, one that National wants to change.
    So why should Labour play ball with National. John Key did all that he could in opposition to scuttle it.
    Labour should give no ground at all and let JK stew in his own slime.

  6. ben 6

    Lots of things I don’t get

    a) why do you pass legislation before Copenhagen negotiations commence? That weakens our position

    b) how can it possibly be good for the economy or the NZ environment for NZ to pass emissions trading? At the margin, NZ makes no difference. And raising the cost of energy, which is essential for the ETS to work, cannot help the economy. There is no free lunch here. Framing the debate as something other than a trade off between options is simply false.

    c) why are climate deniers persistently lumped in with policy skeptics? This is an unwillingness to engage by Oram and many or most warmists – for good reason, there is much to debate about the climate science and climate policy in particular. One can perfectly happily accept the science, one can accept the danger of higher greenhouse gases, and can still without any contradiction reject the case for government action. You only have to believe that the costs of handing massive control over to politicians outweighs the expected benefits. I am scared of even bigger government, and the much deeper constraints on personal freedom that implies. Much, much more scared of that than a mild century-long warming that we can do little about anyway.

    d) why is the threat of retaliatory tariffs even relevant? There are two free options here: 1) if the prediction of tariffs for non-compliance turns out to be true then weigh the costs and benefits and legislate an ETS then, and only then. 2) when we legislate we’ll have the tremendous benefit of other nations’ experience to guide us. I confidently predict ETS’s will not make any difference to climate – politicians are too captured by energy interests. Knowing whether this is true or not before writing our own legislation is valuable. A carbon tax is probably a better alternative. Until the threat of tariffs materialises, it makes no sense to respond to a threat that may or may not be there when it is not a one shot deal.

    If you’re a dyed-in-the-wool believer then none of this matters, of course. This is aimed at the thinking believer (or skeptic).

    • Zaphod Beeblebrox 6.1

      Depends upon whether you want to be part of the international community. A looming problem has been identified and some solutions, you could argue whther they are the best ones or not, have been agreed upon.

      You can’t have it both ways. You can’t ask to be part of international trading agreements but at the same time opt out of agreed initiatives just because you can’t see the immediate economic benefits.

      Zimbabwe, North Korea and increasingly Fiji are taking the opt out route- do you feel we should join them?

    • Turn off the TV 6.2

      “mild century-long warming”

      That doesn’t even begin to summarise the threat we face. Beyond two degrees of warming any number of feedback loops could kick in, leading to uncontrollable warming up to no-one-knows-where. That’s not a risk humanity can take.

    • Draco T Bastard 6.3

      …than a mild century-long warming that we can do little about anyway.

      The warming won’t be for a century – it will be for millennia and it won’t be mild.

    • Con 6.4

      why do you pass legislation before Copenhagen negotiations commence? That weakens our position

      It only weakens our negotiating position if we are determined to do as little as possible. If by contrast we went to Copenhagen determined that the world should be doing an awful lot to avert the looming danger of climate change, then legislating first actually strengthens our position.

      And look, if the Copenhagen negotiations are a failure, and agreed targets were less than what our legislation committed us to, then we could always then relegislate to reduce our commitments to match what was agreed in Copenhagen.

      • mickysavage 6.4.1

        Good comment.

        One of the differences between a leftie and a wingnut is that we ask what is required of us and what can we do to help. Wingnuts ask how little can we get away with.

  7. ben 7

    Opting out, or delaying, implementation of climate policy does not mean opting out of the international community. There are many issues between nations besides climate policy.

    …immediate economic benefits.

    I’ve not seen to much that’s convincing on the intermediate or long term benefit either. All the benefits of NZ’s efforts go to other people, and the effect on climate will be indistinguishable from zero. The threat of tariffs is not a reason to make any decisions now. The argument that raising taxes on energy is good for the economy is plainly false. There is a cost to climate policy, make no mistake.

    The best argument I’ve seen is around clean and green reputation – but it is still not a very good argument because the reputation effects of climate policy are so unclear. If NZ’s reputation for clean and green relies more on untouched scenery than on emissions policy – which I strongly suspect it will – then there are no reputation effects. But let’s say it does matter to NZ’s reputation, then the lack of a climate policy can be thought of as a tax on tourism. We’ll get fewer foreigners visiting as a result. Not good. The question then is what you’d rather raise taxes on: tourism, or energy.

    • Ari 7.1

      You don’t count not being conquered for being one of the few remaining fertile pieces of land after a dramatic global warming as a benefit?

      IIRC, New Zealand, Russia, and Canada will be some of the most fertile land remaining if it’s as bad as we predict and we don’t make a sufficient go at reducing emissions.

      Climate destabilisation has very real security threats, and we’re one of the countries most vulnerable to them, as there’s no way we could afford to spend what we’d need to in order to fight off, say, China.

  8. ben 8

    Tried editing but couldn’t.

    The problem for NK, Fiji and Zim is that they have governments that are unaccountable and out of control. That is the direction (though not necessarily the end point) that climate policy takes us and why I am so concerned about it. I am not convinced climate policy can affect climate enough to justify the risk of our governments using climate policy to take everything.

    • Zaphod Beeblebrox 8.1

      Actually we are already starting to distinguish ourselves. We are the only country in the OECD that does not have vehicle emission standards (Australia is introducing them) and I am pretty sure no other OECD country has recently gutted their biofuel industry or legislated to allow more fossil fuel electiricity generation.
      If we turn up at Copenhagen with no emission standards we don’t really have many bargaining chips for the negotiations that will follow.

  9. Macro 9

    “The problem for NK, Fiji and Zim is that they have governments that are unaccountable and out of control.”
    ditto NZ

  10. youpeoplearesoboring 10

    Oram pontificates thus “New Zealand’s climate change credibility is hanging by a thread. If the government indulges in bad politics on the Emissions Trading Scheme, the thread would snap. We would suffer instant, serious and long-term damage to our economy, environment and reputation.”

    What the f*ck is Oram on about, sounds like a bunch of loaded comments, tenuous assumptions and downright bullsh*t. Nothing new there then huh.

Recent Comments

Recent Posts

  • NZ announces a third P-3 deployment in support of UN sanctions
    The Government has deployed a Royal New Zealand Air Force P-3K2 Orion (P-3) maritime patrol aircraft to support the implementation of United Nations Security Council (UNSC) resolutions imposing sanctions against North Korea, announced Minister of Foreign Affairs Winston Peters and Minister of Defence Ron Mark. “New Zealand has long supported ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    4 days ago
  • Pacific trade and development agreement a reality
    Pacific regional trade and development agreement PACER Plus will enter into force in 60 days now that the required eight countries have ratified it. Trade and Export Growth Minister David Parker welcomed the announcement that the Cook Islands is the eighth nation to ratify this landmark agreement. “The agreement represents ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • Securing a pipeline of teachers
    The Government is changing its approach to teacher recruitment as COVID-19 travel restrictions continue, by boosting a range of initiatives to get more Kiwis into teaching. “When we came into Government, we were faced with a teacher supply crisis,” Education Minister Chris Hipkins said. “Over the past three years, we ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • Border exceptions for a small number of international students with visas
    The Government has established a new category that will allow 250 international PhD and postgraduate students to enter New Zealand and continue their studies, in the latest set of border exceptions. “The health, safety and wellbeing of people in New Zealand remains the Government’s top priority. Tight border restrictions remain ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 weeks ago
  • First COVID-19 vaccine purchase agreement signed
    The Government has signed an agreement to purchase 1.5 million COVID-19 vaccines – enough for 750,000 people – from Pfizer and BioNTech, subject to the vaccine successfully completing all clinical trials and passing regulatory approvals in New Zealand, say Research, Science and Innovation Minister Megan Woods and Health Minister Chris Hipkins. ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 weeks ago
  • International statement – End-to-end encryption and public safety
    We, the undersigned, support strong encryption, which plays a crucial role in protecting personal data, privacy, intellectual property, trade secrets and cyber security.  It also serves a vital purpose in repressive states to protect journalists, human rights defenders and other vulnerable people, as stated in the 2017 resolution of the ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 weeks ago
  • Ministry of Defence Biodefence Assessment released
    The Ministry of Defence has today released a Defence Assessment examining Defence’s role across the spectrum of biological hazards and threats facing New Zealand. Biodefence: Preparing for a New Era of Biological Hazards and Threats looks at how the NZDF supports other agencies’ biodefence activities, and considers the context of ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 weeks ago
  • New Approaches to Economic Challenges: Confronting Planetary Emergencies: OECD 9 October 2020
    New Approaches to Economic Challenges: Confronting Planetary Emergencies: OECD 9 October 2020 Hon David Parker’s response following Thomas Piketty and Esther Duflo. Good morning, good afternoon, and good evening, wherever in the world you might be. I first acknowledge the excellent thought provoking speeches of Thomas Piketty and Esther ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 weeks ago
  • Kaipara Moana restoration takes next step
    A Memorandum of Understanding has been signed today at Waihāua Marae between the Crown, local iwi and councils to protect, restore and enhance the mauri of Kaipara Moana in Northland. Environment Minister David Parker signed the document on behalf of the Crown along with representatives from Ngā Maunga Whakahī, Ngāti ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 weeks ago
  • New Zealand and Uruguay unite on reducing livestock production emissions
    Agriculture Minister Damien O’Connor and Uruguayan Minister of Livestock, Agriculture and Fisheries Carlos María Uriarte have welcomed the launch of a three-year project that will underpin sustainable livestock production in Uruguay, Argentina, and Costa Rica.  The project called ‘Innovation for pasture management’ is led by Uruguay’s National Institute of Agricultural ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 weeks ago
  • 3100 jobs created through marae upgrades
    Hundreds of marae throughout the country will be upgraded through investments from the Provincial Growth Fund’s refocused post COVID-19 funding to create jobs and put money into the pockets of local tradespeople and businesses, Regional Economic Development Minister Shane Jones and Māori Development Minister Nanaia Mahuta have announced. “A total ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 weeks ago
  • Health volunteers recognised in annual awards
    Health Minister Chris Hipkins has announced 9 teams and 14 individuals are the recipients of this year’s Minister of Health Volunteer Awards.  “The health volunteer awards celebrate and recognise the thousands of dedicated health sector volunteers who give many hours of their time to help other New Zealanders,” Mr Hipkins ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 weeks ago
  • Community COVID-19 Fund supports Pacific recovery
    The Minister for Pacific Peoples, Aupito William Sio says a total of 264 groups and individuals have successfully applied for the Pacific Aotearoa Community COVID-19 Recovery Fund, that will support Pacific communities drive their own COVID-19 recovery strategies, initiatives, and actions. “I am keen to see this Fund support Pacific ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 weeks ago
  • Community benefits from Māori apprenticeships
    Up to 50 Māori apprentices in Wellington will receive paid training to build houses for their local communities, thanks to a $2.75 million investment from the Māori Trades and Training Fund, announced Employment Minister Willie Jackson today. “This funding will enable Ngāti Toa Rangatira Incorporated to provide its Ngā Kaimahi ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 weeks ago
  • Training fund supports Māori jobseekers
    Rapidly growing sectors will benefit from a $990,000 Māori Trades and Training Fund investment which will see Wellington jobseekers supported into work, announced Employment Minister Willie Jackson today. “This funding will enable Sapphire Consultants Ltd. to help up to 45 Māori jobseekers into paid training initiatives over two years through ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 weeks ago
  • Ruakura Inland Port development vital infrastructure for Waikato
    The Government is investing $40 million to develop an inland port at Ruakura which will become a freight super-hub and a future business, research and residential development for the Waikato, Urban Development and Transport Minister Phil Twyford, and Māori Development Minister Nanaia Mahuta announced today. The funding has been has ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 weeks ago
  • Appointments made to Defence Expert Review Group
    Defence Minister Ron Mark announced today the establishment of an Expert Review Group to review a number of aspects of the New Zealand Defence Force’s (NZDF) structure, information management and record-keeping processes.  The Expert Review Group’s work arises out of the first recommendation from the Report of the Government’s Inquiry ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 weeks ago
  • No active community cases of COVID-19
    There are no active community cases of COVID-19 remaining in the country after the last people from the recent outbreak have recovered from the virus, Health Minister Chris Hipkins said today. “This is a big milestone. New Zealanders have once again through their collective actions squashed the virus. The systems ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 weeks ago
  • Clean energy upgrade for more public buildings
    More public buildings will be supported by the Government to upgrade to run on clean energy, the Minister for Climate Change James Shaw announced today. Minister Shaw announced that Lincoln and Auckland universities will receive support through the Clean-Powered Public Service Fund to replace fossil fuel boilers. Southern, Taranaki, and ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 weeks ago
  • Schools back donations scheme for the second year
    More schools have opted in to the donations scheme for 2021, compared to 2020 when the scheme was introduced. “The families of more than 447,000 students will be better off next year, with 94% of eligible schools and kura opting into the scheme,” Education Minister Chris Hipkins said. “This is ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 weeks ago
  • Ruapehu cycle trails gets PGF boost
    The spectacular Mountains to Sea cycle trail in Ruapehu District will receive $4.6 million in funding from the Provincial Growth Fund for two additional trails, Regional Economic Development Minister Shane Jones announced today. “This is an exciting development for the local community, and one that will provide significant economic opportunities ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 weeks ago