web analytics

Salvation Army report finds poverty in Godzone

Written By: - Date published: 4:23 pm, February 11th, 2008 - 53 comments
Categories: articles - Tags:

salvation-army-report-feb-2008.jpgA report out today from the Salvation Army acts as a reminder that despite a suite of policies designed to improve the lives of those most in need there’s still work to be done.

Major Campbell Roberts says: “As a country we have invested hugely in core social spending, from $23b 10 years ago to $39b this year, but with very little increase in social progress. In fact, the gap between rich and poor appears to be widening.

If we are to make real social progress then we need as a country to reflect on the relative priority we give to economic issues versus social concerns. We have a duty to ensure that the most vulnerable in our society are not left behind.”

53 comments on “Salvation Army report finds poverty in Godzone ”

  1. Billy 1

    “…from $23b 10 years ago to $39b this year, but with very little increase in social progress.”

    $16b more a year for no benefit. Time to kick the middle class welfare in the guts? Time to accept that there are some problems governments are incapable of solving?

    Nah. Let’s try spending another $16b. That’ll work.

  2. East Wellington Superhero 2

    I like your selective cut and paste.

    Why didn’t you include this bit?

    “In addressing this important issue of our social priorities, we need perhaps to focus on two quite compelling moral questions what priority have we given to families and to the poor? In particular how have our personal behaviours and public policies nurtured family life and the ability of families to care for themselves?”

    Because socialism is hostile to the family. Watch the response to this question to prove my point.

    Do you folk at thestandard.org believe that traditional family of mum, dad and kids is the building block of a society and that when you damage that you damage society? And if you do believe that, should the goverment support such a traditional view? And if you do, then why hasn’t Labour supported it?

  3. Matthew Pilott 3

    EWS, I believe you are hostile to “the family” by taking a narrow perspective of a family and implying that it is the only good, decent or “right” type.

    Socialists are generally far more inclusive that the Conservative Christian Right.

    The hostility is from them, not the Left 🙂

  4. dancer 4

    ews – my understanding of the Working for Families policy was to boost incomes to those families most in need – along with other programmes like income related rents, paid parental leave, a 4th week annual leave – and the list could continue. if i had started my family under the National government there would have been no 14 weeks paid leave for me. spending time with a new baby is about as family friendly as you can get!
    i also think it’s healthy to keep asking ourselves “Can we do better”. if you’re not allowed to acknowledge some of the weaknesses how can you strive to improve?

  5. Daveo 5

    what priority have we given to families and to the poor? In particular how have our personal behaviours and public policies nurtured family life and the ability of families to care for themselves?’

    Because socialism is hostile to the family. Watch the response to this question to prove my point.

    You want to know what’s bad for families? Low wages that mean both parents have to work several jobs just to make ends meet, and the stresses that poverty and unemployment can put on a family.

    This is the fallacy of the conservative right – their own policies cause societal breakdown, and their answer is to do more of the same while moralising about gays, anti-smackers and solo parents.

    You want something tangible to help stop family breakdown? Lift wages, mandate decent overtime pay and keep unemployment low.

    What will the Right do to ensure decent incomes, low unemployment and an end to families having to work three jobs? From what we’ve seen today the answer is to scrap Working For Families and give tax cuts to the rich.

  6. r0b 6

    $16b more a year for no benefit. Time to kick the middle class welfare in the guts? Time to accept that there are some problems governments are incapable of solving?

    Billy, please tell me how market forces would solve this problem? I assume that you have a carefully thought out free market alternative to social welfare that you support, so I’d be keen to hear about it. Thanks…

  7. Tane 7

    Do you folk at thestandard.org believe that traditional family of mum, dad and kids is the building block of a society and that when you damage that you damage society? And if you do believe that, should the goverment support such a traditional view? And if you do, then why hasn’t Labour supported it?

    Supporting families is not about privileging a peculiar model of the family that arose out of 19th Century economic conditions. Like others have pointed out, it’s about making sure families have decent wages and enough work/life balance to spend some quality time together.

    As Dancer points out, there’s more to be done. I haven’t been happy with Labour’s progress. But if you think John Key and his mates at the Roundtable are going to relieve poverty you’ve got another thing coming. You strike me as someone who would benefit a lot from reading some history. Go look at the 1990s – unemployment, suicide, wages and overtime rates would be good topics to start with – then come back and tell me neoliberalism is the answer to family breakdown.

  8. outofbed 8

    that traditional family of mum, dad and kids
    Sounds like Conservative Christian Right speak

    You know, the ones the misogynistic child beaters
    Happy now EWS I said it

  9. Billy 9

    “Go look at the 1990s – unemployment, suicide, wages and overtime rates would be good topics to start with – then come back and tell me neoliberalism is the answer to family breakdown.”

    How are we going with explaining how Labour gets to blame all social problems of the ‘failed policies of the 1990s’ yet contemporaneously claim all the credit for the strong economy?

    Surely, they either have to accept the blame for social problems or admit they’ve got nothing to do with the economy. Which?

    And R0b, I’m not suggesting the market can fix these problems. But at least we’d have saved ourselves $16b for the “very little increase in social progress”.

  10. outofbed 10

    “Surely, they either have to accept the blame for social problems or admit they’ve got nothing to do with the economy. Which?”

    I guess one looks at the data one can see that the 1990’s the social problems caused by the “rights policies” is there to see
    and the data showing that under Cullens management the economy is very strong, is there to see
    Simple really

  11. r0b 11

    And R0b, I’m not suggesting the market can fix these problems. But at least we’d have saved ourselves $16b for the “very little increase in social progress’

    Billy, if you launch in with a vitriolic attack on social welfare (and the impotence of government), then you damn well better have a sensible alternative to propose. Otherwise, you’re just frothing.

    So what is it Billy, what’s your free market alternative? Just slash social welfare and screw the poor? Bring back workhouses? Is that what you want?

  12. James Kearney 12

    So Helen = Fidel?

    Your extremism is commendable Santi, nice job of internalising the Free Speech Coalition’s billboards and becoming a fully paid up member of the kiwiblog right.

  13. James Kearney 13

    Sorry, wrong thread.

  14. Archon 14

    “In fact, the gap between rich and poor appears to be widening.”

    I’m interested in how the the authors of the standard view the gap between the “rich and the poor” in terms of incomes. One of the culprits seems to be maths.

    As an example, Person A earns $25,000. Person B earns $75,000. A gap of $50,000. If you exclude all factors except for general growth and inflation, you’ve got a losing battle.

    At 4% wage growth and inflation, person A will earn around $37,000 after ten years (this assumes this person is doing the same job after 10 years i.e – no promotions). Person B will earn around $111,000 for their same job. Both people are equally better off (in % terms), but the gap has grown from $50,000 to $74,000.

    To “close” gap over 10 year, wages have to grow at 9% for person A, and 4% for person B.

    Should that be our aim?

  15. Dean 15

    “Billy, if you launch in with a vitriolic attack on social welfare (and the impotence of government), then you damn well better have a sensible alternative to propose. Otherwise, you’re just frothing.”

    r0b, if you can suggest why spending so much extra money has had very little impact then you’d better have a sensible excuse as to why the government spending money on our behalves constitutes a more equitable path for those still left wanting.

    Otherwise, you’re just reciting the party line.

  16. Billy 16

    outofbed,

    You claim it is simple. And I know all us righties are thick. So you’ll have to indulge me. Labour is presently in charge of both the economy and (if one believes governments control that sort of thing) the social environment. So they claim they’re running one brilliantly (the one that’s going well) and blame the one that’s going badly on soemone else.

    R0b, if that passes for vitriol where you come from you’d better get out more. Your policies don’t work and cost $39b a year. Get crowing I say. I once went to a lawyer who said he was shit but at least he was expensive.

  17. r0b 17

    Dean: If I agreed that the extra spending had “very little impact” – and without seeing the methodology of the study I don’t necessarily agree – then that’s what it costs. Some impact over a lot of people is still expensive. And, a more equitable path than what? I am still waiting to hear the alternative.

    Billy: To summarise. You don’t think governments can solve this problem. You want to kick the welfare system in the guts. But you haven’t a clue what to offer instead. Well Billy, criticism is easy, creating solutions is hard. If all you have to offer is easy sarcasm, well fine, carry on.

    Archon: You’re not one of Charlie’s Archons are you?

  18. lprent 18

    Sorry about the glitch.

    The database had a problem while it was running a backup. Seems to have broken an index. Now fixed after I fixed the offending file, ran a database check looking for inconsistencies and rebooted for luck.

  19. Billy 19

    And all you’ve got, R0b, is spending more of other people’s money for no real return. I know I don’t need to tell you to carry on. Still, pretend that’s compassion and I’m an arsehole if it helps.

  20. r0b 20

    And all you’ve got, R0b, is spending more of other people’s money for no real return.

    Who are you to judge real return Billy? Small improvements to the quality of life for a lot of people – who can say what that’s worth? Can you?

    Still, pretend that’s compassion and I’m an arsehole if it helps.

    I’m not claiming you’re an arsehole Billy, I’ve never met you. But I am suggesting that when dealing with real world problems, cheap sarcasm doesn’t cut it.

  21. AncientGeek 21

    EWS: the name says it all – compensating for something? Probably the lack of family by the sound of it.

    Do you folk at thestandard.org believe that traditional family of mum, dad and kids is the building block of a society and that when you damage that you damage society?

    Thats your idea of a traditional family?

    Weird – still I suppose that is the typical immigrant style. By the way, I regard immigrants as anyone whose family wasn’t here for the NZ Wars. At that I’m regarded as a radical by my extended family (who measure in the thousands). They generally put the cutoff date in the 1850’s or 1860’s. There are a few branches that considers it to be 1840.

    What I’m saying is that you have zero idea of what a family is or has been over the centuries in NZ or everywhere else. Any family that has been here for a while considers family to be far large than your minuscule definition. The type of family you are describing is an immigrant one fleeing from europe and hopelessly alienated from reality.

  22. Billy 22

    Not me judging, R0b. It was those evil right wingers at the Salvation Army working with the poor all day who said “from $23b 10 years ago to $39b this year, but with very little increase in social progress”. Sarcastic bastards.

  23. AncientGeek 23

    For the various people referring to Working For Families.

    There is a very simple rationale. What do you want, increased immigration or a better birth rate? The superannuation system has to be funded by taxpayers. At present we have a reducing birth rate.

    WWF is an attempt to at least maintain the birthrate. Anyone who has raised a family will tell you that it is a very expensive exercise. The government is trying to make it more economic for working families. We want them to carry on working to pay for the super, we also want them to have kids. Hence WWF. Looks like it is working – be a few years before we know if it works.

  24. r0b 24

    Sarcastic bastards.

    Billy, when you’re in a hole, stop digging. The first post in this thread is yours, it is a cheap sarcastic throwaway response. You have no alternatives propose. End of story.

  25. Billy 25

    Alright, R0b. You accept there’s a problem I take it. What is your solution? Does it involve pouring another $16b of other people’s money into a black hole and hoping this time it works? Or is it something else?

    Catchpa: Grand gland. Interesting, no?

  26. AncientGeek 26

    Billy: you have have a myopia problem. Basically you are short-sighted. Government is all about a 20 year timeframe (I wish the Nats would learn that).

    This government has been in for a bit over 8 years. You’d only expect that the earliest policies put in place 8 years ago should be showing progress now. Like unemployment and workforce participation for instance. And geewhiz – the report says that they are…. What was it 68.8% or the population are working – second highest in the OECD.

    This is in a country the size of the UK with 10% of its population. If we want to maintain a first world standard of living, we bloody well have to get everyone participating.

    Real wages aren’t likely to go up over the whole economy until there is effective unemployment. Now we have it and gee-whiz the wages are rising…

    After everyone starts getting a respectable income, gee-whiz wouldn’t you expect to see the problems from kids raised in deprived households 10-20 years earlier to go down… please watch this space…

    Maybe you should use that organ inside your skull and think past your so far limited lifetime… Otherwise wait until you’re ancient like me, and can see longer distance

    cap: combat pending
    ok – who said dat?

  27. r0b 27

    You accept there’s a problem I take it.

    Nope. I’m concerned to see the welfare state run effectively of course, but I’m not flipping it off with throwaway lines like you are.

  28. AncientGeek 28

    Dean:

    if you can suggest why spending so much extra money has had very little impact

    Same answer – social problems are very slow to change. Figure it, initially you wind pouring money into a very large population with limited effectiveness. As you start sorting out the problems, the population gets smaller, and the resources get larger per person. It starts getting a snowball effect and the process accelerates. But it all takes time.

    Besides that 39b figure is pretty bogus. They haven’t removed the superannuation from it. It probably accounts for more than half of the increase

  29. Billy 29

    AncientGeek, I tried reading that, but you seemed to use “gee-whiz” more than once. I am sorry, but I am just not able to take in anything containing phrases last used by 14 year olds in 1958.

    I did get as far as government is all about 20 year time frame, though. Does that mean that we have to thank the government of 1988 for the excellent economic conditions we are now enjoying? Gee wilikers, maybe you are on to something.

  30. AncientGeek 30

    Yes – it was labour.
    The restructure of the economy they did managed to survive the Nats and does constitute the major reason for the economy being the say it is now.

    Hell 1958 was before I was born… I blame it all on my parents..

  31. AncientGeek 31

    And Billy – it is good to see that you were paying attention in NZ History classes…

    cap: attire committees
    bloody fashion police

  32. Billy 32

    “Yes – it was labour.”

    Yes. I know. Just in case you are under any illusions, I consider the government we had from 1984 to November 1987 as the best in my lifetime. Doubt the authors of the Standard (diverse collective though they are, blah, blah, blah) would agree.

  33. Billy 33

    Actually, I think it was ’88.

  34. AncientGeek 34

    1984-1990. So do I. It was a hell of a time to be around NZ, and they made a hell of a lot of mistakes, but they did more things correctly than not. But I think that the results speak for themselves, 20 years later.

    On the other hand, I’ve never seen the Nats make anything apart from mistakes, when you look backwards. Short-term thinkers

  35. AncientGeek 35

    This government is doing the second part of the fix after a failure of policy from the nats in the 90’s. Having fixed the economy, they are fixing society so it is even more efficient – moving people back into being productive is a lot harder. Looks like it is slowly working as well.

  36. Archon 36

    “Archon: You’re not one of Charlie’s Archons are you?”

    R0b, no.

    …and after a Google, oh dear.

    My observation remains, that growth and inflation leads to the “gap” between “rich” and “poor” widening, even though, in percentage terms both can be equally better off.

    When is the “gap” deemed to be “closed”?

  37. Murray 37

    I think the lower socioeconomic families would be a hell of a lot better off if they stopped spending thier “free” money on pokies, piss, and pot.

  38. Phil 38

    Thansk Murray, great contribution to the debate.

  39. East Wellington Superhero 39

    By and large your responses confirmed my point. That socialism is hostile to the traditions family. And actually I meant the intergenerational family. And yes I have read history and those who harped on about 19th century industrialisation as the root of modern social breakdown is silly. The intergenerational family is pretty versatile when it comes to challenging conditions – to suggest that humanity had it easy up until industrialisation is a load of horse-poop and shows a selective reading of human history, not an appreciation of history which you claim to have.

    What the intergeneration family cannot withstand is the challenges from within – the dismantling of its natural shape and place within human society. Kids need mothers and family. Adults’ fortunes are generally better within the marriage relationship and having children tends to make human-beings more outward looking and less self-serving. Of course there will be exceptions to this – however, the exceptions to not invalidate the natural order of the family. Yet socialism is at complete odds with this order.

    I don’t give a rip if you want to label me as this or that because all it does is prove your hostility to the family. And therein lies the failure of Labour’s social policy to help Kiwi families.

  40. Sam Dixon 40

    Isn’t it a bit disingenious of the Sallies to state just the nominal increase in social spending and totally ignore inflation? In ten years, inflation has been about 30-35%. That acounts for 7-8 billion of the 14 billion increase in social spending straight off.

  41. As someone pointed out, Math will keep the gap between rich and poor widening, in pure dollar terms anyway. So long as we have inflation then the pure numerical difference will keep increasing.

    We need to look at what classifies as poor: Unable to afford Sky TV? No microwave? Using toilet paper instead of tissues? Living two families to a house? Living in a Sth American style favela (haven’t seen any of them here), living in a corner of a mudhut (none of those either).

    And this from EWS:
    Do you folk at thestandard.org believe that traditional family of mum, dad and kids is the building block of a society and that when you damage that you damage society?

    My ‘religion’ involves the individual being the building block of society. The well-being of the individual comes before the well being of the family. While that may seem me-generational, it is just as able to produce a strong society as one based on the family and is the one for which the modern post-feminist children’s-rights state is set up for. While feminism and children’s rights do tear apart the fabric of the traditional family they set the foundation for individuals to be stronger than they were previously. The losers are the previous male heads of house who lament the passing of family tradition as much as teary eyed nostalgiaics mourned the passing of the Queen Mother and all that she represented.

    So, EWS, I mourn with you. There is counselling available and I am sure you will get over it.

  42. East Wellington Superhero 42

    Kent,
    That’s the whole scandal! It isn’t the male heads of family who are mourning. You just think it is because you think they are the enemy.
    The reality is that it’s the kids who don’t have fathers that get the raw deal. It’s the mothers who are left in the position of being told that the state will look after them and their kids. They are the losers.
    Individuals as the basic unit of a society doesn’t work because kids need parents. Therefore, logically, the family must be the basic unit.

    Unless of course you think kids don’t need parents.
    Kent, do you think kids need parents or can the state be an equal substitute?

  43. Horisthebear 43

    When will people realise that the 1990s were one of the worst economic decades for New Zealand due to global circumstances, nothing to do with National Policies. Without the policies National introduced NZ Inc would have been bankrupted. Tell me this. How many of the so called failed 1990s economic policies have Labour unwound? A bit of tinkering around Labour relations and nothing else. Labour is very quick to take credit for the economic position it inheirted due to tough decisions to deregulate and reduce debt. The last 8 years globally have been the best in 50 years – this is nothing to do with Labour policies, but has been good for NZ. Has Helen Clark ever reversed the so called “Benefit cuts”? She certaintly moans about it and blames people for it. How long do I have to hear that todays youth criminals are Nationals causing – what rubbish. She has had 8 years to do something about it! Has Helen Clark stopped poverty? No it has got worse. Has she had the chance yes. Do we have the resources and money to do it. Yes. Does Labour have the will. no. And not everyone in National are neocons. Some of us have grown up in poverty.

    Putting up wages will simply mean businesses lose money and pack up and leave NZ. Don’t you think it is stupid to tax someone on $40k, and then IF they have kids give it back to them so they pay no taxes and in the meantime employ a bunch of people to unproductivitely adminstrate the lot?

  44. East Wellington Superhero 44

    Horis,
    Nice comments.

  45. Steve Pierson 45

    Horis.

    “so-called benefit cuts”. There goes your crediblity.

    and don’t call a society of 4 million individuals “NZ Inc”. This is not a company, its goal is not simply to maximise profits for its owners.

  46. East Wellington Superhero 46

    Steve,
    If NZ is not a company (and for the record I don’t think it is) then why does Dr. Cullen keeping talking about a ‘dividend’ for tax-payers?!
    What a joke.

  47. Horisthebear 47

    Steve – for the record THERE WERE BENEFIT CUTS. NATIONAL DID THEM. No argument but it was nearly 15 years ago…Helen calls them the Benefits Cuts. Hence “the so called benefit cuts”. No dispute.

    Sure the reference to NZ Inc was meant to be a reference to NZ as an entity – including the 1 million kiwis that live overseas, not as a company, it is commonly used by Mr Cullen. Clearly our collective goal is to maximise not profits but our standard of living.

  48. EWS,

    You are fighting for the past, but you are welcome to it. Clearly you are a male, perhaps with kids, perhaps not. There is nothing new about kids being brought up without fathers. Major wars during 20th century left some generations fatherless. Previously, Victorian traditions ensured that fathers were so distant that the only benefit children got was the material comforts they provided. Men have always been travelling salesmen, sailors, soldiers etc. vocations which ensure that their children are brought up by solo mothers.

    No, I’m wrong, you are fighting for something that you only imagined existed, but never did. Meanwhile, amongst all the clamouring that kids are messed up because of ‘absent fathers’, the real reasons why kids are messed up are being overlooked.

    If the young men only see male ‘role models’ like you complaining bitterly that kids are messed up because of lack of fathering, what kind of an impact is that going to have on them? History has proven over and over and over and over that fathering can be successfully achieved from a distance. The child does not have to be living with the father. The father does need to have a good relationship with the kid, which includes, as just pointed out, an absence of self-deprecatory ideas such as your complaint. If you are a father, I suggest you stop complaining and just get on with doing the job properly.

    Removing the family as prime economic unit does not remove the importance of parent child relationships.

  49. Matthew Pilott 49

    Horisthebear – I’m intrigued. Do you think Labour could have stopped poverty? I hold them in high regard, but clearly not as highly as you do!

    BTW, do Helen Clark’s tears cure cancer?

    On a serious note, it’s refreshing to hear someone anti-Labour (or so it seems) who doesn’t seem to think the main goal in life and government should be to maximise profits, but our standard of living. What would you have Labour do different?

    Given our current record employment rate, and family-targeted assistance such as WFF, child care, changes to maternity leave, annual leave, doctor subsidies and such, I’m intrigued as to your comments – surely these policies have targeted living standards, and not wealth alone?

    Also, when you say ‘putting wages up’ – is this a reference to minimum wages, or the current debate around workforce productivity and our low-wage economy? I don’t think the government will force businesses to pay workers more, but labour’s grants to R & D in NZ can only help – I’d expect to see more policy along those lines – they’re not going to demand a 10% pay rise for everyone as you imply!

  50. East Wellington Superhero 50

    Kent,
    The ideas you seem to support are folly.

    As far as ‘fathers being distant in the Victorian Age’ – are you serious? Is that the best you’ve got? Sure, some men in the past were soldiers/sailors/travelling labourers but people like my grandfather came home, so your claim hardly covers a majority of men (anyway, don’t marxist argue that all these men were trapped in factories, rather than sailing around the world?). Moreover, in such cases at least they knew they had a father that cared for them and loved them, rather than the kids I’ve worked with who only know their father as someone who impregnated their mother and then did a runner. This has a traumatic effect on these kids self-worth and their ability to live a normal life.

    Do you know many poor single mothers? Have you worked with single-parent kids? Judging by your comments I doubt you have. Forgive me if I’m wrong but in my experience people that say things like you, haven’t. Sure, they might have kids of their but they’ve never dealt with the nitty-gritty of lower socio-economic families. Most are middle-class uni grads you don’t know shit about kids in Porirua or Otara. And most don’t even have kids.

  51. Horisthebear 51

    Matthew I agree with some of what you are saying, as I think you agree a little with me – see the left and the right can debate civily. More money doesn’t stop poverty on its own – but it sure helps if done properly. My point is Labour has had 8 years to fix issues and done little for those at the bottom. The Salvation army report proves it again. sometimes listening to Helen speak you would think her tears could cure cancer and john Keys cause it! Taking from the middle classes to give back to the middle class does little for poverty at the bottom and costs the economy net net. Nearly all the policies Labour have brought in fit this. I have no problems to take from the rich to give to the poor – if it makes sense to do so and the poor can better themselves – the hand up not hand out argument. But it is stupid to tax the middle classes to give selectively back to them for social engineering the same amount less a bit. Yes I vote National and I grew up in one of the poorest places in NZ East Chch. Maybe I am a little strange – I am an economic conservative and socially liberal!

    Lets take an example, why do we have billions tied up in owning 90% of some Govt assets like air nz getting poor returns when those funds would be better spent reducing poverty there is no silver bullet – even spending decent money on getting education standards higher would be a start – half of my local schools are failing according to Ero. Clarks policy doesn’t do this it makes it worse by forcing kids who shouldn;t be in school to stay and cause trouble for the others. The issue should be to have no kids in NZ suffering from poverty. Lets us debate how we get there but some things will have be done differently as the current ideas are surely not working.

    Govt. can’t force businesses to pay more wages it can only regulate minimum wages and standards. In an economy growing at 3% if wages take more someone takes less. Or there is a switch away to capital. Normally businesses fold or move when margins are at threat as international capital is mobile and they can make more money elsewhere if costs in NZ increase relative to other places. Despite many views profit margins in most businesses in NZ outside the top 50 (many of which are in fact govt owned SOEs or regulated) are low. My employer faces a strong and agressive union who thinks 5% pa wage rises is the rule come what may.

    I do think WFF is a good idea but needs changes and I wholeheartedly support paid maternity care, but there is no point have more kids if your wife can’t even get a midwife to help or she has to go back to work when a baby is months old or can’t afford, or doesn’t have access to childcare.

  52. Phil 52

    No Horis, you’re not alone – I’m also “an economic conservative and socially liberal”…

    … Is it just me, or does that sound like the first step to recovery?

  53. Matthew Pilott 53

    Horisthebear,

    Yep, nice to not degenerate into a shouting match! I had a look at the report and thought a few things were interesting. One example is that the number of children in CYFS care is increasing.

    This can be spun two ways. One is that the Labour Government is failing children, that more are requiring full-time care and monitoring away from their parents. The other way to see it is that there is more money being spent on CYFS and on children’s welfare in general – more money to investigate referrals, more money to look after the children that most need it.

    I was also interested to see that the gap between performance of decile 1 and decile 10 schools is decreasing. Workforce participation is well up, and unemployment is down (against a growing populaion.

    While I don’t believe the government is perfect by any means, I think that it is moving in the right direction. The statement ‘Labour has had eight years to fix x is largely meaningless; there’s no defined period of time within which a problem should be seen as ‘fixed’, as long as adequate steps are being taken to properly address it.

    Your queston about SOE ownership versus cashing-up to solve contemporary issues reminds me of Norway’s Petroleum Fund. Many think that this huge fund should be cashed up to solve current social ills, whilst others maintain it should be kept for the original purpose of superannuation, and to provide a large investment fund.

    So we must ask here, what is the value of having a functional National Airline? Can the energy and transport sector be better managed (to the benefit of all New Zelaanders) privately, or publicly? If they’re sold for our benefit now, who will suffer in future? There’s always an opportunity cost, Labour believe that these assets need to be kept in state hands. Once they’re gone, they are notoriously difficult and expensive to get back.

    I support this view – we have no right to deprive future generations of valuable SOEs for our benefit.

    Quickly, on WFF – as a targeted system to those who are working and have families, to administer it through taxation would be a nightmare. I can’t think of a better way, and I haven’t heard a better suggestion – the only criticism is that it should not exist. However, if there’s been a conscious decision to target people who are working and want to have children, you’ve got to decide whether you support the policy, or don’t think it’s worth it. As you’ve probably guessed, I agree with the principle.

    Phil – ‘recovery’? What ails you? 🙂

Recent Comments

Recent Posts

  • Building consent numbers at an all-time high
    A record 41,028 new homes have been consented in the year ended March 2021 March 2021 consent numbers the highest since the 1940s Record number of new homes consented in Auckland The number of new homes consented is at an all-time high, showing a strong and increasing pipeline of demand ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    49 mins ago
  • Whānau-centred support for parents and tamariki
    Up to 60 whānau in Counties Manukau will be supported through the first three years of their parenthood by a new whānau-centred model of care, said Associate Health Minister, Hon Aupito William Sio. “Providing this support to young parents is something we have to get right. It’s a priority both ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 hours ago
  • NZ backs moves to improve global access to COVID vaccines
    New Zealand welcomes and strongly supports the announcement made by the United States Trade Representative to work for a waiver of IP protections on COVID-19 vaccines at the WTO, Trade Minister Damien O’Connor said. “New Zealand supports equitable access to COVID vaccines for all. No one is safe from the ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 hours ago
  • Tourism communities: support, recovery and re-set plan
    TIHEI MAURI ORA Tuia te whakapono Tuia te tumanako Tuia te aroha Tuia te hunga ora Ki te hunga ora Tihei Mauri ora Ka nui te mihi ki a koutou Tena koutou, tena koutou, tena koutou katoa. Thank you, Hilary and thank you, Chris, and everyone at TIA for this ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    5 hours ago
  • Support, recovery and re-set plan for tourism communities
    Five South Island tourist communities targeted for specialist support Pressure on Māori tourism operators and Conservation facilities recognised Domestic and international-facing tourism agencies put on more secure footing Long-term plan to re-set tourism with a focus on sustainability, industry standards and regional economic diversification A plan to ensure the immediate ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    5 hours ago
  • Speech on NZ Rail Plan
    Check against delivery E ngā mana, e ngā reo, e ngā karanga maha o te wa, tēnā koutou, tēnā koutou, tēnā tātou katoa. Ki ngā mana whenua o Taranaki Whānui anō nei aku mihi ki a koutou. Nōku te hōnore kia haere mai ki te whakanuia tēnei huihuinga whakahirahira. Nō ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    5 hours ago
  • Government hits massive milestone in Violence Prevention & Elimination
    Minister for Family and Sexual Violence Marama Davidson announced a major milestone at a hui in South Auckland today, with the launch of the national engagement process on the prevention and elimination of family and sexual violence. “There is no room for violence in our lives – there is no ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    5 hours ago
  • Fee waiver extended for conservation tourism businesses
    Tourism businesses operating on public conservation land will have another six months of fees waived to help them adjust to the downturn in international visitors in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic, Acting Minister of Conservation Dr Ayesha Verrall has announced. "We acknowledge it has been a difficult year for ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    5 hours ago
  • ‘Lua Wave’ to future-proof Pasifika Festivals in Aotearoa
    Pasifika festival organisers will receive additional support to adapt to the COVID-19 environment thanks to the Government’s newly launched ‘Lua Wave’ component of the Pasifika Festivals Initiative, Minister for Arts, Culture and Heritage Carmel Sepuloni announced today. “This initiative has not only been to support festival organisers to recover from ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    6 hours ago
  • Crown accounts show confidence in Govt economic plan
    The Government’s financial accounts continue to reflect the resilience of the economy and confidence in the Government’s economic recovery plan. The Crown accounts for the nine months to the end of March 2021 show both OBEGAL and the operating balance remain better than forecast in the Half Year Economic and ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    6 hours ago
  • Energy Trusts of NZ Autumn Conference
    It’s a pleasure to be here today. Thank you Karen [Sherry] for the introduction and thanks to the Energy Trusts Executive for inviting me to speak at tonight’s event. It is an exciting time to come to speak to trustees of distribution companies. For many decades the electricity industry was ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    6 hours ago
  • New partnership to grow Māori success in STEM
    A new partnership with the Pūhoro STEM Academy will support thousands more rangatahi Māori to participate and succeed in the fields of science, technology, and innovation, Associate Education Minister Kelvin Davis announced today. Since 2016, Pūhoro has worked with Māori students to build their capability and create pathways to employment ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    6 hours ago
  • Rail builds platform for economic recovery
    Transport Minister Michael Wood and State-Owned Enterprises Minister Dr David Clark today released the Government’s long term vision for a sustainable rail network that supports our economic recovery. New Zealand Rail Plan lays out how the Government is building a resilient, reliable and safe network, as well as the indicative ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    8 hours ago
  • NZ and UK agree to lift the pace of free trade talks
    New Zealand and the United Kingdom have agreed to rapidly lift the tempo of talks, as the two countries enter a new phase in free trade negotiations, Trade and Export Growth Minister Damien O’Connor announced today. “UK Secretary of State for International Trade, Liz Truss, and I spoke today about ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    19 hours ago
  • Counter-Terrorism Legislation Bill passes first reading
    The Counter-Terrorism Legislation Bill has passed its first reading and will now be considered by Parliament’s Justice select committee. “The Bill updates and improves New Zealand’s counter-terrorism legislation and ensures that the right legislative tools are available to intervene early and prevent harm,” Minister of Justice Kris Faafoi said. “The ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    20 hours ago
  • Statement on The Speaker and Annual Review Debate
    “The serious issue of alleged sexual assault and harassment at Parliament was poorly managed and inappropriately politicised last night. The tone of the debate did not reflect well on Parliament as a whole,” Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern said. “Any investigation of claims of sexual assault should be in a manner ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 day ago
  • Govt motoring towards zero-carbon buses and protecting drivers’ conditions
    Transport Minister Michael Wood is seeking feedback on options for the next phase of the Public Transport Operating Model (PTOM) review to better protect bus drivers’ pay conditions, and also achieving the Government’s target of fully decarbonising the public transport bus fleet by 2035. Michael Wood said investing in our ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 day ago
  • Drop in unemployment shows Govt economic plan is working
    The Government’s economic recovery plan continues to be reflected in the labour market, with more people in work and unemployment falling. Stats NZ figures show employment rose by 15,000 in the March quarter, with 14,000 more women in work. The unemployment rate fell from 4.9 percent to 4.7 percent. This ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 day ago
  • Government sets pay and workforce expectations for the Public Sector
    The Government’s Workforce Policy Statement issued today sets out its expectations for pay and employment relations in the Public Sector, the Minister of Finance and Minister for the Public Service say. “New Zealand has had an exceptionally successful health and economic response to COVID-19. This has been supported by the ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 day ago
  • Author Ben Brown is New Zealand’s first Te Awhi Rito Reading Ambassador
    Lyttleton writer Ben Brown (Ngāti Mahuta, Ngāti Koroki, Ngāti Paoa) will be New Zealand’s first Te Awhi Rito Reading Ambassador, promoting the value of reading for children and young people, Internal Affairs Minister Jan Tinetti announced today. A poet and award-winning author, Ben Brown writes books, non-fiction and short stories ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 days ago
  • Celebrating New Zealand’s firefighters this International Firefighters’ day
    With two fire stations already complete, and building underway on 16 fire stations around the country, today we celebrate International Firefighters’ Day for the important role firefighters have in keeping communities across the country safe, says Minister of Internal Affairs, Jan Tinetti. The work is progressing due to Government funding ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 days ago
  • Ron Brierley knighthood to go
    Ron Brierley has written to the Clerk of the Executive Council to tender his resignation as a Knight Bachelor. The Queen has been informed. The forfeiture follows the Prime Minister initiating the process to remove his Knighthood. The Clerk of the Executive Council wrote to him on 6 April 2021 ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 days ago
  • Employment boost for rural communities
    The Government is continuing to create opportunities for at-risk rangatahi overcome barriers to employment, education or training with the next tranche of He Poutama Rangatahi programmes, Minister for Social Development and Employment Carmel Sepuloni announced today. “We’re focused on supporting rangatahi to get what they need to progress in the ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 days ago
  • Pre-Budget speech to Wellington Chamber of Commerce
    Thank you for the invitation to speak today, it is great to be here.  I mean that both sincerely and literally. For this equivalent speech last year I took part virtually, beaming in from the Beehive Theatrette with only a socially distanced press gallery bearing silent witness. You are a ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 days ago
  • Budget 2021 reprioritises nearly $1 billion
    The Government’s strong pandemic response and the better than expected economic recovery means not all the money allocated in the COVID-19 Response and Recovery Fund has been spent, Grant Robertson said in his annual pre-Budget speech to the Wellington Chamber of Commerce this morning. “As part of Budget preparation I ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 days ago
  • Speech on Digital Identity Trust Framework
    I'd like to start by thanking Graeme, David and Ben from NZTech and Digital Identity New Zealand for inviting me to speak to you. I’m so sorry I can’t be there in person, but I want to acknowledge those of you who are, including some of this country’s top tech ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 days ago
  • NZ Cook Islands travel bubble significant step in COVID-19 recovery
    New Zealand Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern and Cook Islands Prime Minister Mark Brown have today announced that, pending final confirmation by New Zealand’s Director-General of Health and the Cook Islands Secretary of Health, two-way quarantine-free travel will commence between the two countries on 17 May (NZT). “Two way quarantine-free travel ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 days ago
  • Minister for State Owned Enterprises saddened by passing of KiwiRail Chair
    Minister for State Owned Enterprises, David Clark is deeply saddened to hear about the passing of KiwiRail Chairman, Brian Corban. “I know Brian was seen as a transformative leader within KiwiRail, well respected for his wisdom, honesty and sense of humour,” said David Clark. Mr Corban served as Chair of ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 days ago
  • Speech to the China Business Summit by the Minister for Trade and Export Growth
      Distinguished guests, ladies and gentlemen.  Tena koutou katoa.  Good morning. It is my pleasure to join you today for this China Business Summit – my first as Minister for Trade and Export Growth as well as Minister of Agriculture – and to have the opportunity to speak to you ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 days ago
  • Productivity Commission inquiry into immigration settings
    The Productivity Commission will hold an inquiry into immigration settings to ensure New Zealand’s long term prosperity and wellbeing, Grant Robertson and Kris Faafoi say. This inquiry, the first under the new Productivity Commission chair, Dr Ganesh Nana, will focus on immigration policy as a means of improving productivity in ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 days ago
  • Speech to China Business Summit
    Ladies and gentlemen, distinguished guests, ate marie, tena koutou katoa, good morning. I am very happy to be here with you once again at my fourth China Business Summit. Thanks again to you, Fran, for being the driving force behind this event.  As ever, I’m very pleased to see such ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 days ago
  • Speech to Te Taumata Wahine Toa Hui, Kerikeri
    I would like to begin by acknowledging a few people here today.  Firstly, Chris Karamea Insley for his hard work and commitment to the vision of Te Taumata. I’d also like to acknowledge Minister Nanaia Mahuta, New Zealand’s first Maori wahine Minister of Foreign Affairs, whom you have just heard ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    5 days ago
  • Jobs for Nature to boost employment in the South
    A suite of significant Jobs for Nature projects will boost conservation efforts and create jobs across the southern South Island, Acting Minister for Conservation Dr Ayesha Verrall announced from Te Anau today. “The Government’s Jobs for Nature programme is investing in the future of the area’s stunning environment, with projects ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    6 days ago
  • Regional economic potential unlocked as Bay of Plenty project gets underway
    A milestone for jobs, businesses and regional economic development in Bay of Plenty is being marked as construction gets underway on the multi-million dollar Ōpōtiki harbour infrastructure project. Economic and Regional Development Minister Stuart Nash has joined Whakatōhea iwi, local councils and representatives of the aquaculture and marine industry at ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    6 days ago
  • New Pilot to unlock cultural potential in communities
    Arts, Culture and Heritage Minister Carmel Sepuloni today announced Manatū Taonga (Ministry for Culture and Heritage) is now accepting applications from cultural sector organisations to host cultural activators in eight communities around Aotearoa. “This pilot, as part of Te Tahua Whakahaumaru (Creative Arts Recovery and Employment Fund), aims to build ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    6 days ago
  • Supporting New Zealanders Through Winter Months
    From tomorrow, 1 May, over one million New Zealanders receiving either a Main Benefit or New Zealand Superannuation will get more money each week through the Winter Energy Payment. “The Winter Energy Payment started as part of the Government’s December 2017 Families Package designed to help older New Zealanders and ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    6 days ago
  • New Zealand to donate 250,000 courses of COVID-19 vaccines to Fiji
    New Zealand has offered, and Fiji has accepted, sufficient doses of AstraZeneca for 250,000 people from New Zealand’s domestic vaccine portfolio, New Zealand Associate Minister of Health and Foreign Affairs Aupito William Sio and Fiji Health and Medical Services Minister Ifereimi Waqainabete announced today. “New Zealand and Fiji are working together closely to support ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    7 days ago
  • Te Ōhanga Māori Report Speech
    *Check with delivery* Insights from Te Ōhanga report First and foremost - thank you for the mahi of everyone who has been involved in producing this report. The Government needs up-to-date and accurate data on the size and scope of the Māori economy for us to understand how best to ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • New ACC Board Chair Appointed
    Minister for ACC Carmel Sepuloni is delighted to announce the appointment of Hon Steve Maharey CNZM, as a new member and chair successor for the board of ACC. He will commence as a member on 1 May 2021 and become Chair on the retirement of Dame Paula Rebstock on 31 ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • Greater role for a public forestry service
    A greater role for a public forestry service has been outlined by the Forestry Minister, to drive the focus on regional economic development, skills training, and a low-emissions future. Stuart Nash today announced Te Uru Rākau (Forestry New Zealand) will be renamed Te Uru Rākau - New Zealand Forest Service, ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago