Show pony

26 comments on “Show pony ”

• Comments are now closed

1. Ianmac 1

   4 July 2009 at 4:10 pm

   Eddie: I thought that you had something new but realised that what was new was the quotes from Fran which were so amazing. She is astute but how long has it taken her to notice the lack of Key intellect? I wonder if Fran buys stuff from e-mails offering huge sums if only she will send money soon?
2. Zaphod Beeblebrox 2

   4 July 2009 at 4:23 pm

   Why wasn’t she asking about the quality of the Nats femal caucus last year? I still don’t know why Katherine Rich left, I always felt she was the most competant of the female Nats. Bennett, Tolley and Collins don’t seem to be big players- though might be worth asking them where thay stand on the gender pay gap and the wage freeze for teachers and nurses.
   Turia also seems silent on these issues- would be good to see someone in government standing up to the boys club.
3. A. Akbar 3

   4 July 2009 at 4:29 pm

   Well this is a surprise, coming from the steadfast cheerleader of the right-wing. One wonders why she has only picked up on this now, National haven’t exactly camouflaged their agenda in this respect.
   • r0b 3.1

     4 July 2009 at 4:40 pm

     Sounds like she heard canned jokes once too often and snapped.

     Show pony – and to think we could have stuck with a war horse.
     • Weather Eye Of The North 3.1.1

       5 July 2009 at 5:51 pm

       You put it perfectly rOb – somehow I’m dispositionally inclined to go for the warhorse. And daily Key gets more and more “soggy ice cream cone” than I ever thought he could be.

       It’s encouraging though…….let them now show some metal to follow the spin. The spin devised by…..forgot their name…..the antipodean Roves.

       Enough of this pathetic “stroll down Parnell on a sunny Saturday morning…..”
4. gobsmacked 4

   4 July 2009 at 4:49 pm

   In fairness, Fran has been one of the most coherent and consistent critics of Key as PM. I don’t always agree with her, but she is independently-minded, not a hack, and not easily fooled.

   I never really know whether (most of) the rest of the media genuinely can’t see through Key, or just don’t want to. I haven’t seen an Emperor this naked since Dan Quayle.
   • Weather Eye Of The North 4.1

     5 July 2009 at 6:25 pm

     Gobsmacked – I’m shocked by your mouth girl !

     Dan Quayle……? No, not yet anyway, nor Palin The Peeper Of Russian Windows fame.

     Warning – Don’t watch Fox News….. honestly you’d think Charlton Heston had just died (the Old Nukester may well have come to think of it) Anyway, there is deep mourning over at Fox. Punctuated only by breathless anticipation of a Palin tilt at the presidency in 2012.

     Seriously though……Bill English will roll key, that’s the guts of it……that’s why Key stays with his only card – sweet blandness and “We’ll have a look at that…..”.

     Take any serious step with the risk of wide, including internecine unrest…..well, you’re back’s exposed. Better simply to idle, smile, and sometimes look hen-pecked. What a con !
5. Robert Winter 5

   4 July 2009 at 4:50 pm

   Dame O”Sullivan has been intimating concerns about the performance of the Government and the PM for some time, mainly tangentially, but consistently. One channel has been her obvious distaste for Young Master Weldon. She is, I understand, for all her politics, a firm supporter of equal opportunity, and Ms Wilkinson’s canning of the Pay and Employment Equity Unit (and, perhaps, the Government’s scandalous use of that Unit’s work in the ILO to paint a positive picture of equity issues here in NZ) may well have riled her.

   There are, I think, several things happening here. One is the expression of concern about a government that won a convincing victory, but which is now performing such that one could legitimately begin to fancy Labour’s chances in two years or so. Second, I think it’s a question of internal power struggles within the National Parfty around future leaderships, ideology and between Auckland and Wellington party bases (in particular).

   It is early days, but Mr Goff must be quietly happy at the moment. I also note that the Right blogs are becoming nastier, presumably a sign that they are upset about their hero’s performance.
6. Chris 6

   4 July 2009 at 4:53 pm

   I dun gedit. Fran wasn’t aware that the National party view women as good for making and serving the tea and scones, and not much else?? What planet is Fran on?

   I’m not even going to aswer my own question…
7. Ron 7

   4 July 2009 at 5:02 pm

   Couldn’t agree more with Zaphod about why it takes so long for “commentators” to get with the programme. In Fran’s case probably because she had to ease herself out of the Nats nether regions first.
   Reminds me of when United Future first took the stage and AFTER the election the papers were full of “shock horror did you know they’re all fundies?!”

   NZ got what it deserved. If I had a cent for every “at least we’ve got that nice John Key instead of he horrible Helen Clarke” that I’ve heard since the bloody election I could sort the national debt.

   House of cards, all hat and no horse, feet of clay. They all apply and I hope sycophants like O’Sullivan start doing their job and stay on these guys. If we play our cards right we might roll JK before the next election.

   BTW – Katherine Rich was just as pants as the rest of them. She got the nod because she lived in Dunedin, was pretty and young and married to a footy player (I tell no lie – a close associate was approached first and turned it down. The reason for the offer was explicit. Let’s not forget it was Rich who opposed a half way house for mental health patients in her community because mentally ill people are child molestors.
8. Anthony Blomfield 8

   4 July 2009 at 6:37 pm

   These people

   Tell me I looked at the list for National, Which group do you think have the most talent:

   [lprent: provide a link – don’t be a fuckwit. ]
   • Anita 8.1

     4 July 2009 at 7:00 pm

     I’m not convinced this is actually a comment so much as low tech manual spam.
     • Anita 8.1.1

       4 July 2009 at 7:02 pm

       .
       • Anthony Blomfield 8.1.1.1

         4 July 2009 at 7:04 pm

         Grow up Anita
         and use a brain cell.

         Gee girl If you under 25 then sorry. All cool else grow up.
9. Ron 9

   4 July 2009 at 7:15 pm

   re: Anthony Blomfield – can you just ban him for being a dick?
10. Anthony Blomfield 10

    4 July 2009 at 7:29 pm

    Ron.

    Could you tell me why.
11. Tom Semmens 11

    4 July 2009 at 7:32 pm

    Whilst O’Sullivan must have been living under a rock for the last twenty years not to have worked out the reactionary attitude to women that pervades conservative political parties in New Zealand, I think people ought to be more circumspect in endorsing her attacks on John Key.

    Fran O’Sullivan, like it seems most of the business journalists in New Zealand, still clings to the stale and failed ideas of the 3.6% Mussolini’s party. ACT is her true home. Fran just wants Key to play the “moral obligation to lie” card and proceed with a neo-liberal palace coup a la 1984 – which of course her and all the other business cronies would report in adoring tones as a TINA.

    Remember, she works for the Herald – the mouthpiece of the Auckland kelptocratic elite, who just want to be able to get on with looting the state, so they can join Mssrs. Faye, Richwhite, and Meyers and play at being two-bit Russian Oligarchs in their London and Geneva hideouts.
12. Anthony Blomfield 12

    4 July 2009 at 7:32 pm

    PS: National are like people on lift rafts while the Titanic Sank wait till everyone’s dead until they go back and check for survivors
13. Anthony Blomfield 13

    4 July 2009 at 7:37 pm

    Ron

    By the way. LOLL mate guess what. Your at the end.

    Your rock may cover your for a bit. LOL but when your weak and disgusting character comes out and your embarrassment for human kind. And your pathetic contribution to NZ.

    Your such a no one. Enjoy your side line comments.

    [lprent: Read the policy. It may prevent me from taking preemptive action over your self-evident narcissism and inability to have intelligent dialogue with others. In the meantime, I’ll reserve your comments for some personal embellishment.]
14. Ron 14

    4 July 2009 at 7:39 pm

    Because you’re behaving like a dick, Anthony. You posted a nonsensical post and then when someone good naturedly questioned your motives you had a go – again without much sense in the comment. If you have a point, please just make it. Preferably in English.
15. jarbury 15

    4 July 2009 at 8:07 pm

    Anthony has a life long ambition for getting banned from every forum and blog in the country.
16. Anthony 16

    4 July 2009 at 10:34 pm

    Oh Hi Jarbury,
    Hows things lol.

    Thats cause I have a brain.
    But anyway nice work with some of your stuff. What you think about the Queens wharf ideas, may build over the whole lot with a big building nice.

    Yes I should stop giving a dam I suppose.

    [lprent: I’d agree you have a brain. The question is if you have anything much above autonomic functions running on it. So far it appears to be a wasted asset based on the evidence of your comments here. ]
17. Pascal's bookie 17

    5 July 2009 at 5:18 am

    “Thats cause I have a brain.”

    Cite? 🙂
18. Anthony 18

    5 July 2009 at 9:21 am

    Well I disagree lprent.
19. lprent 19

    5 July 2009 at 9:30 am

    I can only look at the evidence of your comments. I don’t like people trying to start flamewars and who don’t contribute anything of value. They look like badly written code.

Links to post

1. ord wilson: posted on 4 July 2009 at 2:17 pm

• Comments are now closed

• Log in
• Donate
• Contribute post

• Articles RSS