The ETS is a price signal

Written By: - Date published: 9:15 am, June 25th, 2010 - 44 comments
Categories: economy, energy, ETS, jobs, leadership - Tags: , ,

There’s a rising crescendo of protest about the costs of the Emissions Trading Scheme (ETS):
Taxpayers face $1b Kyoto liability – authors
Emissions scheme could cost NZ up to $5b
Scoop Images: Emissions Trading Scheme Protest
… and so on.

All too often the commentary completely misses the point. The goal of an ETS is not just a random extra cost being imposed on the economy. The point is to serve as one of those “price signals” that economists are so fond of. The point isn’t to just blindly pay more, it is to change our behaviour so that we don’t have to. Guyon Espiner gets it, Claire Browning gets it, too many commentators do not.

Of course the Nats have completely stuffed up their ETS – in two major ways. First, they have designed a crippled, ineffectual ETS, that loads costs on to the taxpayers instead of the big polluters. Nick Smith admits that this ‘moderate’ ETS is not going to ‘result in big reductions of emissions’. Both Treasury and the Environmental Commissioner have, ever so diplomatically, called it crap. So have academics:

The authors of The Carbon Challenge – Victoria University researcher and economist Geoff Bertram and climate-change analyst and researcher Simon Terry – also describe the Government’s current ETS as “technically obsolete” and “beyond rescue” as a sustainable framework for tackling climate change. They say the scheme will not make any inroads into cutting New Zealand’s gross emissions levels.

This first stuff up is already terminal, but National are compounding it with a second. They are not responding in any positive way to what is left of their own price signal. There’s no leadership. They are not challenging the growing perception that the ETS is just a random tax with no purpose. Where’s the plan National? Where’s the way forward? The Green Party gets it. Some in the business community get it:

Top New Zealand businessmen are consummate brand builders and united by a common belief: that New Zealand is looking a gift horse in the mouth by viewing the world’s inexorable move towards a low-carbon economy as a cost, rather than an economic opportunity. …

Plenty of people get it, but the National Government does not. So they have brought us the worst of all possible ETS schemes. Badly designed and devoid of vision. An ETS with all of the costs and none of the benefits. They fully deserve the growing backlash. Nice one National – great work.

44 comments on “The ETS is a price signal ”

  • Comments are now closed

  1. Santi 1
    25 June 2010 at 10:01 am

    The point of an ETS isn’t to just blindly pay more, it is to change our behaviour

    What????? Are you a social engineer or what? Leave people alone!

    • r0b 1.1
      25 June 2010 at 10:03 am

      Hey Santi, do you support the three strikes legislation?

      • Santi 1.1.1
        25 June 2010 at 11:02 am

        I do.

        • Doug 1.1.1.1
          25 June 2010 at 11:14 am

          Social engineering.

          • Santi 1.1.1.1.1
            25 June 2010 at 11:16 am

            Yes, in the same way you remove weeds from your garden.

            • Pascal's bookie 1.1.1.1.1.1
              25 June 2010 at 11:25 am

              Nah, that’s more like an ETS or a carbon tax.

            • A Post With Me In It 1.1.1.1.1.2
              25 June 2010 at 12:39 pm

              I am not sure it is worth it considering the level of debate bein displayed…

              You are full of irony here. The point of the ETS is to remove the worst polution from our country also. Much like weeds. Obviously the national plan is intentionally crippled so I am referring to a sensible ETS which makes the polluters pay.

              If you don’t believe in GW then say so and let the discussion stop immediately. Obviously if you are a denier then the ETS is a sick joke.

              Actually NActional’s ETS AND the 3 strikes law have a lot in common:

              – Costs the taxpayers ridiculous amounts of money
              – Not based on good advice or research
              – Will not really solve the thing it was supposed to solve to any great degree
              – Is unfair
              – etc

              Thanks for making the connection. I had not thought of that angle….

            • travellerev 1.1.1.1.1.3
              25 June 2010 at 10:16 pm

              Funny, the other day I was watching criminal intend (Very un PC but I love SKY) and the three strike policy as a reason for mayhem was used as a theme. The reasoning as per the rapport: violent criminals engaged in violent crime are more likely to kill in order to avoid leaving witnesses. Wow and that is mainstream entertainment.

              Conclusion: violent dysfunctional criminals do not equate to weeds in your garden.

        • r0b 1.1.1.2
          25 June 2010 at 11:14 am

          Would it be fair to say that the point of the three strikes legislation is to change people’s
          behaviour?

          • burt 1.1.1.2.1
            25 June 2010 at 11:46 pm

            Not necessarily, if imprisonment can change behaviour well bugger me it didn’t the first two times for these guys.

            So no it’s not changing their behaviour, it’s restricting their ability to repeatedly inflict their behaviour on society.

            If we accept that there is a threshold of violent or high victim impact criminal behavior that justifies permanent incarceration then we are simply arguing about that threshold. Currently set to 3, what’s your number rOb?

            • r0b 1.1.1.2.1.1
              26 June 2010 at 12:32 am

              So no it’s not changing their behaviour, it’s restricting their ability to repeatedly inflict their behaviour on society.

              So Burt, you disagree with Judith Collins and your own MP Peter Garret that the three strikes legislation will have a deterrent effect on crime? You don’t think it’s going to socially engineer any change in behaviour at all? How could they have got it so wrong Burt?

              what’s your number rOb?

              My number is 0 Burt. Every violent crime is one too many. But you need to treat the cause, not the symptom.

    • mickysavage 1.2
      25 June 2010 at 10:35 am

      According to Santi we should ban red lights on roads. Bloody social engineers restricting man’s right to drive whenever whereever he wants to.

      • Bright Red 1.2.1
        25 June 2010 at 10:41 am

        Santi wants the Crimes Act repealed too. Damn interfering social engineering government punishing people for just doing what they want to do.

      • djp 1.2.2
        25 June 2010 at 10:50 am

        Actually uncontrolled intersections can lead to improved traffic flow and safety.. something about drivers not running on autopilot and being more aware/careful of how they drive

      • burt 1.2.3
        25 June 2010 at 11:55 pm

        Only you mickysavage would attempt to confuse a debate about social engineering by comparing utility public infrastructure with taxation to modify behaviour.

    • Lanthanide 1.3
      25 June 2010 at 10:49 am

      Do you realise that the lightbulb standards and reduced flow showerheads would have actually helped to cut back our CO2 output and thus reduced our Kyoto liability, while actually having very marginal impact on the populace overall?

      • Santi 1.3.1
        25 June 2010 at 11:06 am

        Why don’t we ration electricity as well? Kyoto is big scam. As a result of tghe ETS NZ will be channelling money to Rsussia and China. Fantastic!

        • r0b 1.3.1.1
          25 June 2010 at 11:16 am

          Channelling money overseas is silly isn’t it. That’s exactly the point of the post.

        • Doug 1.3.1.2
          25 June 2010 at 11:20 am

          We do ration electricity by making people pay for it. Economics is about how to use price signals to efficiently ration scarce resources.

          In the case of a proper ETS the scarce resource is the atmoshere/hydroshere’s capacity to absorb GHGs without having an adverse impact on society and the natural environment.

          I still prefer that we start with a universal carbon charge to get the price into the market and over time allow for a transfer to tradable permits. Setting up new markets from scratch are always subject to rent seekng behaviour from the incumbent beneficaries.

          Hey perhaps we should start calling farmers benes. Who’s up for some bene bashing?

        • rimu 1.3.1.3
          25 June 2010 at 11:24 am

          As a result of the ETS local polluters will be incentivised to find ways to do business that will results in LESS money being spent to meet our Kyoto obligations. If we do not have an ETS then the cost will still be paid but it will be by the tax payer rather than the polluter, and there will be no incentive for polluters to reduce that cost.

          The idea of paying poor countries to plant trees is a bit iffy, but that’s more to do with Kyoto than our ETS (which is a local market only)

        • kriswgtn 1.3.1.4
          25 June 2010 at 11:35 am

          Jenny Shipley signed us on to Kyoto, blame her

        • Draco T Bastard 1.3.1.5
          25 June 2010 at 3:15 pm

          We do ration electricity – using the price.

  2. marsman 2
    25 June 2010 at 10:54 am

    “devoid of vision” …..that’s National.

  3. RedLogix 3
    25 June 2010 at 1:37 pm

    Fascinating how rightwingers all worship the power of the magical ‘free market’ …until suddenly it doesn’t suit them anymore.

    In general there are only two ways for a govt to achieve anything at all:

    1. By fiat, ie law, regulation or policy to directly change behaviour.

    2. By taxation or price signals to indirectly change market behaviours.

    Changing behaviours around greenhouse gases involve just three choices:

    1. Deny there is a problem and do nothing. Comes at a high cost to our trading reputation and inevitably to the enviroment from which all our prosperity is dependent.

    2. Ration carbon usage directly by regulation. Effective …but likely to have all sorts of unintended consequences because legislation would have difficulty addressing every possible usage scenario.

    3. Employ an ETS market based system, or a carbon tax, to indirectly change behaviour. The right way to go, but only if you get the market design right. Getting it wrong as the Nats have is worse that useless.

  4. RedLogix 4
    25 June 2010 at 1:47 pm

    Fascinating how rightwingers all worship the power of the magical ‘free market’ …until suddenly it doesn’t suit them anymore.

    In general there are only two ways for a govt to achieve change; by fiat, ie law, regulation or policy to directly change behaviour; or by taxation/price signals to indirectly change market behaviours.

    Changing behaviours around greenhouse gases involve just three choices:

    1. Deny there is a problem and do nothing. Comes at a high cost to our trading reputation and inevitably to the enviroment from which all our prosperity is derived.

    2. Ration carbon usage directly by regulation. Effective but clumsy …likely to have all sorts of unintended consequences because legislation would have difficulty addressing every possible usage scenario.

    3. Employ an ETS market based system, or a carbon tax, to indirectly change behaviour. The right way to go, but only if you get the market design right. Getting it wrong as the Nats have is worse than useless.

    Sooner or later the hollowness of this ETS will become apparent to everyone, effectively propelling us into the ‘do nothing’ option. That will saddle the country with a triple whammy of costs, the cost to the taxpayer of subsidising big emitters, AND the cost to our exporters as our trading position is eroded….AND eventually with the costs imposed by global climate change.

  5. Clarke 5
    25 June 2010 at 1:57 pm

    I don’t understand why the Right have so many problems with the ETS … the purpose of the tax is that you change your behaviour by emitting less CO2, and thus evade your tax oblligations. And let’s face it, tax evasion is one of the things that the Right does actually seem to be quite good at ….

  6. dirty coal 6
    25 June 2010 at 2:14 pm

    how much would an ETS reduce NZ emissions by?

    what is the reductions that an ETS wld cause by 2020 and 2050?

    If there are not sharp emissions reductions what would the purpose of an ETS be?

  7. Roger 7
    25 June 2010 at 2:15 pm

    Typical National, it is all about image. Introduce an ineffective ETS just so they can say they did it and watered it down so that they can say they compromised with the needs of the public (who will be forced to hand over money with no end insight).

    Just like National Standards which show huge changes that will be damaging if anything but shows how focused Tolley is.

    Just like the Three Strikes law that creates the image of toughness on crime but won’t reduce crime and may increase numbers of the worst crimes committed.

    Just like the reapplying for the unemployment benefit which makes Bennett look like she wants to reduce numbers but this won’t do it.

    Just like National’s focus on building infastructure during the recession that sees them talk about a cycleway and imaginary jobs but show antipathy towards rail and real job creation.

    Sadly ignorant members of the public will look at this and say “Gee, National are concerned about the environment but also our incomes. They are concerned about all of these other issues as well, I’ll vote for them”. All the while they are paying more for everything for no reason since polluters have no incentive to reduce emmissions, their children will never see the inside of a museum since this won’t be tested, their friend gets murdered because they witness a crime committed by someone on his second strike, and his spade he bought to work on the cycleway gathers cobwebs in the shed.

    • marsman 7.1
      25 June 2010 at 4:00 pm

      Well put Roger.
      Unfortunately the longer National tries to run the country the longer the list of their self-serving,destructive policies will be.
      Can we somehow stop them in their tracks?

  8. Mike 8
    25 June 2010 at 3:34 pm

    And this is how it’ll begin to impact…

    Regular petrol goes up 3.2484 CPL (cents per litre), Premium by 3.3286, Diesel by 3.7547 and Avgas by 3.0952 as at 1 July – these are discounted rates for Government, so the public will pay more. (All incl GST btw)

    As we saw with the 2008/2009 fuel price rises, this will naturally affect the price of everything in the supermarkets as well as air travel. And then we have the GST increase.

  9. Godber 9
    25 June 2010 at 5:21 pm

    Those dumbos that believe an ets is a good idea want fucking with a baseball bat. It will rob from everyone at a time they can least afford it, achieve nothing and enrich the rich.

    No one on this planet has any evidence whatsover that global warming is anything but benefitial, so what the fuck is taxing people going to do for those people at the bottom? If you say it will save the planet go and get fucked because you know nothing.

    [Haven’t seen you here before, so this is a warning. Please read the site Policy. The kind of aggressive, content-free posting you’ve made here starts pointless flames and attracts the attention of the moderators. RL]

    • Draco T Bastard 9.1
      25 June 2010 at 11:14 pm

      No one on this planet has any evidence whatsover that global warming is anything but benefitial,

      Actually, all the evidence points to the Earth becoming uninhabitable if global climate change continues the way it is (warming). Of course, you’re just another psychopathic RWNJ that doesn’t believe in evidence as it proves you wrong.

  10. Lefty 10
    25 June 2010 at 6:07 pm

    All emissions trading schemes are scams aimed at transferring wealth from the poor to the rich and from the taxpayer to the polluter. Capitalist markets are driving the destruction of the planet.Trying to design ‘market signals’ that will prevent this is an exercise in futility. Much of the evidence on ETS schemes to date all suggests that ETS cause actual harm, especially in developing countries.

    Maintaining a reasonable standard of living requires a certain volume of carbon emissions. The challenge is to eliminate emissions that are not required. A carbon market will be no more effective in doing that than the food market is in making sure everyone is fed, or a housing market in making sure everyone is adequately housed. At best, prices can match the supply of goods or services with the supply of money, they do not ensure sensible or fair distribution or stop the production and distribution of useless or harmful products. Only regulation can do that, and even then the regulation must be a reflection of a genuine community will and consensus to tackle a problem.

    There are many simple emission reducing measures that can be regulated for with very little risk of unintended adverse consequences. The only thing stopping this happening is it require all the political parties turning their back on blind capitalist market ideology.

    The National ETS has the advantage over the Labour/Green one that it is overtly unfair and only an absolute idiot what think it is anything other than a wealth transfer whereas the Labout/Green version had a lauyer of greenwash that made it dangerous nonsense.

  11. Andy 11
    25 June 2010 at 7:13 pm

    The government climate website shows that projected emissions for 2020 will be approximately the same as 2010 with an ETS, and slightly above without.

    I was also given this information by a govt dept:


    The overall cost to consumers and businesses of the emissions trading scheme in the first year will be $400 million. From 2008 2012 the government will allocate $1.775 billion in carbon credits to the forestry sector. By honouring commitments to give credits to the forestry sector, and by softening the costs to consumers and businesses, the Government will be making a significant loss on the emissions trading scheme.

    So here’s the bad news: the ETS will cost us all, the government (i.e the taxpayer) is making a loss, and the effect on emissions will be minimal.

    China alone is adding the equivalent of an entire NZ’s worth of emissions to its output every few weeks, (a new coal power station every week) so our efforts will be wiped out in days.

    Our emissions from electricity production are around 10% of total. So even if we go to 100% renewable then it will make a max of 10% difference.

    For some reason, we seem fixated on the agricultural sector, when no one else in the world is even touching this.

    It may be a small cost initially, but once the transition phase is over we could be fast tracking to economic suicide.

    I don’t really know what kind of price signal we should be giving people. I honestly think most of the people I know live pretty sustainable lifestyles. Go to China if you want to see unsustainability.

    I

  12. Santi 12
    25 June 2010 at 7:40 pm

    The ETS is not a price signal, but simply another tax the lefties are so fond of. It will damage NZ.

    • Draco T Bastard 12.1
      25 June 2010 at 11:19 pm

      It’s supposed* to add a price to GHG emissions and thus add a price signal. See, even you should be able to understand that as it’s really really simple. The fact that this has been pointed out to you and you still fail to see just means that you’re delusional.

      * this doesn’t mean to say that it does as it’s readily apparent that it’s been designed by NACT not to and is, as a matter of fact, a transfer of wealth from the poor of NZ to the rich.

  13. Macro 13
    25 June 2010 at 7:59 pm

    It’s not as if the “govt” weren’t actually told before that the changes they were making to the ETS were crap and would result in precisely the muck that Geoff Bertram and Simon Terry are now predicting. I know I told them, and I’m sure many other submitters did too. But they chose to bulldoze their amended ETS through without any consideration to the actual consequences. They did it for the same reason that EVERYTHING else done by this “administration” is done. IMAGE. That’s what drives this crowd – they want and seek popularity so desperately that they are blind to any thing that will get in their way. They need to be liked. An ETS that will make us think before we drive our car? Forget it! Who cares about AGW really? So you want a decent shower? Ditch any suggestion about efficient plumbing, people may think that we are wanting them to have cold showers. Lets make heaps mining? Oh! your not so keen on carving up National Parks – Ok forget it. And on and on. We might as well have a PANDA for PM. NZ’s would love that! Hey I might even vote for a Panda!

  14. BLiP 14
    25 June 2010 at 10:26 pm

    The post fails to address Labour’s contribution to this shambles – the ETS model itself. A carbon tax on emitters would have been the simplest, fairest and most effective policy instrument in, if not actually reducing emissions, then spreading the cost of doing so. I’m still not sure what role the bouffant from Ohariu had to play in the formulation of this but I put it down to Labour. That National Ltdâ„¢ have taken a stupid idea and made it worse is to be expected.

    • Draco T Bastard 14.1
      25 June 2010 at 11:21 pm

      Labour did try for a carbon tax but it lost it’s principals when it gave in to the “Fart Tax” brigade.

  15. Andy 15
    26 June 2010 at 1:05 pm

    There’s a follow up story to the CFC / CDM scam here

    http://eureferendum.blogspot.com/2010/06/perverse-consequences.html

    which has no made the MSM, Le Monde

    The general idea is that the manufacturers of CFCs get paid 70 times the cost of production of the gas to destroy the gas, in the form of carbon credits, so “behaviour modification” means producing more CFCs

    It’s the perfect scam really.

  16. Margaret 16
    29 June 2010 at 11:41 am

    I mounted my own protest when John Key announced last year he was going to make taxpayers pay farmers and industrys greenhouse tax’s.

    I refuse to pay International prices at home for dairy products as well as pay their tax. One or the other, but not both.

    I have only brought Beef 3 times since last October and have not brought Lamb at all. I look for products that are other than Fonterra.

    We eat more fish, chicken and pork, getting into beans also, much more healthy as well, never realised how hard beef was on your body, you must experience it to believe it.

    If more people did that the farmers will really scream and definetly will not vote National at the next election, would’nt that be great.

Links to post

Recent Comments

Recent Posts

  • New catch limits for unique fishery areas
    Recreational catch limits will be reduced in areas of Fiordland and the Chatham Islands to help keep those fisheries healthy and sustainable, Oceans and Fisheries Minister Shane Jones says. The lower recreational daily catch limits for a range of finfish and shellfish species caught in the Fiordland Marine Area and ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 hours ago

  • Minister welcomes hydrogen milestone
    Energy Minister Simeon Brown has welcomed an important milestone in New Zealand’s hydrogen future, with the opening of the country’s first network of hydrogen refuelling stations in Wiri. “I want to congratulate the team at Hiringa Energy and its partners K one W one (K1W1), Mitsui & Co New Zealand ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    18 hours ago

  • Urgent changes to system through first RMA Amendment Bill
    The coalition Government is delivering on its commitment to improve resource management laws and give greater certainty to consent applicants, with a Bill to amend the Resource Management Act (RMA) expected to be introduced to Parliament next month. RMA Reform Minister Chris Bishop has today outlined the first RMA Amendment ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 day ago

  • Overseas decommissioning models considered
    Overseas models for regulating the oil and gas sector, including their decommissioning regimes, are being carefully scrutinised as a potential template for New Zealand’s own sector, Resources Minister Shane Jones says. The Coalition Government is focused on rebuilding investor confidence in New Zealand’s energy sector as it looks to strengthen ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 day ago

  • Release of North Island Severe Weather Event Inquiry
    Emergency Management and Recovery Minister Mark Mitchell has today released the Report of the Government Inquiry into the response to the North Island Severe Weather Events. “The report shows that New Zealand’s emergency management system is not fit-for-purpose and there are some significant gaps we need to address,” Mr Mitchell ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 day ago

  • Justice Minister to attend Human Rights Council
    Justice Minister Paul Goldsmith is today travelling to Europe where he’ll update the United Nations Human Rights Council on the Government’s work to restore law and order.  “Attending the Universal Periodic Review in Geneva provides us with an opportunity to present New Zealand’s human rights progress, priorities, and challenges, while ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 days ago

  • Patterson reopens world’s largest wool scouring facility
    Associate Agriculture Minister, Mark Patterson, formally reopened the world’s largest wool processing facility today in Awatoto, Napier, following a $50 million rebuild and refurbishment project. “The reopening of this facility will significantly lift the economic opportunities available to New Zealand’s wool sector, which already accounts for 20 per cent of ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 days ago

  • Speech to the Southland Otago Regional Engineering Collective Summit, 18 April 2024
    Hon Andrew Bayly, Minister for Small Business and Manufacturing  At the Southland Otago Regional Engineering Collective (SOREC) Summit, 18 April, Dunedin    Ngā mihi nui, Ko Andrew Bayly aho, Ko Whanganui aho    Good Afternoon and thank you for inviting me to open your summit today.    I am delighted ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 days ago

  • Government to introduce revised Three Strikes law
    The Government is delivering on its commitment to bring back the Three Strikes legislation, Associate Justice Minister Nicole McKee announced today. “Our Government is committed to restoring law and order and enforcing appropriate consequences on criminals. We are making it clear that repeat serious violent or sexual offending is not ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 days ago

  • New diplomatic appointments
    Foreign Minister Winston Peters has today announced four new diplomatic appointments for New Zealand’s overseas missions.   “Our diplomats have a vital role in maintaining and protecting New Zealand’s interests around the world,” Mr Peters says.    “I am pleased to announce the appointment of these senior diplomats from the ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 days ago

  • Humanitarian support for Ethiopia and Somalia
    New Zealand is contributing NZ$7 million to support communities affected by severe food insecurity and other urgent humanitarian needs in Ethiopia and Somalia, Foreign Minister Rt Hon Winston Peters announced today.   “Over 21 million people are in need of humanitarian assistance across Ethiopia, with a further 6.9 million people ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 days ago

  • Arts Minister congratulates Mataaho Collective
    Minister for Arts, Culture and Heritage Paul Goldsmith is congratulating Mataaho Collective for winning the Golden Lion for best participant in the main exhibition at the Venice Biennale. "Congratulations to the Mataaho Collective for winning one of the world's most prestigious art prizes at the Venice Biennale.  “It is good ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 days ago

  • Supporting better financial outcomes for Kiwis
    The Government is reforming financial services to improve access to home loans and other lending, and strengthen customer protections, Commerce and Consumer Affairs Minister Andrew Bayly and Housing Minister Chris Bishop announced today. “Our coalition Government is committed to rebuilding the economy and making life simpler by cutting red tape. We are ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 days ago

  • Trade relationship with China remains strong
    “China remains a strong commercial opportunity for Kiwi exporters as Chinese businesses and consumers continue to value our high-quality safe produce,” Trade and Agriculture Minister Todd McClay says.   Mr McClay has returned to New Zealand following visits to Beijing, Harbin and Shanghai where he met ministers, governors and mayors and engaged in trade and agricultural events with the New ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 days ago

  • PM’s South East Asia mission does the business
    Prime Minister Christopher Luxon has completed a successful trip to Singapore, Thailand and the Philippines, deepening relationships and capitalising on opportunities. Mr Luxon was accompanied by a business delegation and says the choice of countries represents the priority the New Zealand Government places on South East Asia, and our relationships in ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    4 days ago

  • $41m to support clean energy in South East Asia
    New Zealand is demonstrating its commitment to reducing global greenhouse emissions, and supporting clean energy transition in South East Asia, through a contribution of NZ$41 million (US$25 million) in climate finance to the Asian Development Bank (ADB)-led Energy Transition Mechanism (ETM). Prime Minister Christopher Luxon and Climate Change Minister Simon Watts announced ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    5 days ago

  • Minister releases Fast-track stakeholder list
    The Government is today releasing a list of organisations who received letters about the Fast-track applications process, says RMA Reform Minister Chris Bishop. “Recently Ministers and agencies have received a series of OIA requests for a list of organisations to whom I wrote with information on applying to have a ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    5 days ago

  • Judicial appointments announced
    Attorney-General Judith Collins today announced the appointment of Wellington Barrister David Jonathan Boldt as a Judge of the High Court, and the Honourable Justice Matthew Palmer as a Judge of the Court of Appeal. Justice Boldt graduated with an LLB from Victoria University of Wellington in 1990, and also holds ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    5 days ago

  • Education Minister heads to major teaching summit in Singapore
    Education Minister Erica Stanford will lead the New Zealand delegation at the 2024 International Summit on the Teaching Profession (ISTP) held in Singapore. The delegation includes representatives from the Post Primary Teachers’ Association (PPTA) Te Wehengarua and the New Zealand Educational Institute (NZEI) Te Riu Roa.  The summit is co-hosted ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    5 days ago

  • Value of stopbank project proven during cyclone
    A stopbank upgrade project in Tairawhiti partly funded by the Government has increased flood resilience for around 7000ha of residential and horticultural land so far, Regional Development Minister Shane Jones says. Mr Jones today attended a dawn service in Gisborne to mark the end of the first stage of the ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    5 days ago

  • Anzac commemorations, Türkiye relationship focus of visit
    Foreign Affairs Minister Winston Peters will represent the Government at Anzac Day commemorations on the Gallipoli Peninsula next week and engage with senior representatives of the Turkish government in Istanbul.    “The Gallipoli campaign is a defining event in our history. It will be a privilege to share the occasion ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    5 days ago

  • Minister to Europe for OECD meeting, Anzac Day
    Science, Innovation and Technology and Defence Minister Judith Collins will next week attend the OECD Science and Technology Ministerial conference in Paris and Anzac Day commemorations in Belgium. “Science, innovation and technology have a major role to play in rebuilding our economy and achieving better health, environmental and social outcomes ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    5 days ago

  • Comprehensive Partnership the goal for NZ and the Philippines
    Prime Minister Christopher Luxon held a bilateral meeting today with the President of the Philippines, Ferdinand Marcos Jr.  The Prime Minister was accompanied by MP Paulo Garcia, the first Filipino to be elected to a legislature outside the Philippines. During today’s meeting, Prime Minister Luxon and President Marcos Jr discussed opportunities to ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    6 days ago

  • Government commits $20m to Westport flood protection
    The Government has announced that $20 million in funding will be made available to Westport to fund much needed flood protection around the town. This measure will significantly improve the resilience of the community, says Local Government Minister Simeon Brown. “The Westport community has already been allocated almost $3 million ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    6 days ago

  • Taupō takes pole position
    The Government is proud to support the first ever Repco Supercars Championship event in Taupō as up to 70,000 motorsport fans attend the Taupō International Motorsport Park this weekend, says Economic Development Minister Melissa Lee. “Anticipation for the ITM Taupō Super400 is huge, with tickets and accommodation selling out weeks ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    6 days ago

  • Cost of living support for low-income homeowners
    Local Government Minister Simeon Brown has announced an increase to the Rates Rebate Scheme, putting money back into the pockets of low-income homeowners.  “The coalition Government is committed to bringing down the cost of living for New Zealanders. That includes targeted support for those Kiwis who are doing things tough, such ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    6 days ago

  • Government backing mussel spat project
    The Coalition Government is investing in a project to boost survival rates of New Zealand mussels and grow the industry, Oceans and Fisheries Minister Shane Jones has announced. “This project seeks to increase the resilience of our mussels and significantly boost the sector’s productivity,” Mr Jones says. “The project - ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    6 days ago

  • Government focused on getting people into work
    Benefit figures released today underscore the importance of the Government’s plan to rebuild the economy and have 50,000 fewer people on Jobseeker Support, Social Development and Employment Minister Louise Upston says. “Benefit numbers are still significantly higher than when National was last in government, when there was about 70,000 fewer ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    6 days ago

  • Clean energy key driver to reducing emissions
    The Government’s commitment to doubling New Zealand’s renewable energy capacity is backed by new data showing that clean energy has helped the country reach its lowest annual gross emissions since 1999, Climate Change Minister Simon Watts says. New Zealand’s latest Greenhouse Gas Inventory (1990-2022) published today, shows gross emissions fell ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    6 days ago

  • Earthquake-prone buildings review brought forward
    The Government is bringing the earthquake-prone building review forward, with work to start immediately, and extending the deadline for remediations by four years, Building and Construction Minister Chris Penk says. “Our Government is focused on rebuilding the economy. A key part of our plan is to cut red tape that ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    6 days ago

  • Thailand and NZ to agree to Strategic Partnership
    Prime Minister Christopher Luxon and his Thai counterpart, Prime Minister Srettha Thavisin, have today agreed that New Zealand and the Kingdom of Thailand will upgrade the bilateral relationship to a Strategic Partnership by 2026. “New Zealand and Thailand have a lot to offer each other. We have a strong mutual desire to build ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    7 days ago

  • Government consults on extending coastal permits for ports
    RMA Reform Minister Chris Bishop and Transport Minister Simeon Brown have today announced the Coalition Government’s intention to extend port coastal permits for a further 20 years, providing port operators with certainty to continue their operations. “The introduction of the Resource Management Act in 1991 required ports to obtain coastal ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    7 days ago

  • Inflation coming down, but more work to do
    Today’s announcement that inflation is down to 4 per cent is encouraging news for Kiwis, but there is more work to be done - underlining the importance of the Government’s plan to get the economy back on track, acting Finance Minister Chris Bishop says. “Inflation is now at 4 per ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    7 days ago

  • School attendance restored as a priority in health advice
    Refreshed health guidance released today will help parents and schools make informed decisions about whether their child needs to be in school, addressing one of the key issues affecting school attendance, says Associate Education Minister David Seymour. In recent years, consistently across all school terms, short-term illness or medical reasons ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    7 days ago

  • Unnecessary bureaucracy cut in oceans sector
    Oceans and Fisheries Minister Shane Jones is streamlining high-level oceans management while maintaining a focus on supporting the sector’s role in the export-led recovery of the economy. “I am working to realise the untapped potential of our fishing and aquaculture sector. To achieve that we need to be smarter with ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago

  • Patterson promoting NZ’s wool sector at International Congress
    Associate Agriculture Minister Mark Patterson is speaking at the International Wool Textile Organisation Congress in Adelaide, promoting New Zealand wool, and outlining the coalition Government’s support for the revitalisation the sector.    "New Zealand’s wool exports reached $400 million in the year to 30 June 2023, and the coalition Government ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago

  • Removing red tape to help early learners thrive
    The Government is making legislative changes to make it easier for new early learning services to be established, and for existing services to operate, Associate Education Minister David Seymour says. The changes involve repealing the network approval provisions that apply when someone wants to establish a new early learning service, ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago

  • RMA changes to cut coal mining consent red tape
    Changes to the Resource Management Act will align consenting for coal mining to other forms of mining to reduce barriers that are holding back economic development, Resources Minister Shane Jones says. “The inconsistent treatment of coal mining compared with other extractive activities is burdensome red tape that fails to acknowledge ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago

  • McClay reaffirms strong NZ-China trade relationship
    Trade, Agriculture and Forestry Minister Todd McClay has concluded productive discussions with ministerial counterparts in Beijing today, in support of the New Zealand-China trade and economic relationship. “My meeting with Commerce Minister Wang Wentao reaffirmed the complementary nature of the bilateral trade relationship, with our Free Trade Agreement at its ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago

  • Prime Minister Luxon acknowledges legacy of Singapore Prime Minister Lee
    Prime Minister Christopher Luxon today paid tribute to Singapore’s outgoing Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong.   Meeting in Singapore today immediately before Prime Minister Lee announced he was stepping down, Prime Minister Luxon warmly acknowledged his counterpart’s almost twenty years as leader, and the enduring legacy he has left for Singapore and South East ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago

Page generated in The Standard by Wordpress at 2024-04-23T23:05:30+00:00