The third way according to Tony Blair

Written By: - Date published: 9:06 am, June 14th, 2015 - 70 comments
Categories: Abuse of power, capitalism, class war, iraq, Politics, uk politics, you couldn't make this shit up - Tags:


There has been some talk this week about Tony Blair’s third way politics.  Some think that he has the ability to walk on water because he succeeded twice at general elections even though it was against a tired dispirited Conservative Party that had clearly gone past its use by date.  Others cannot stand his pale imitation of progressive politics and cannot forgive such sins as his acceptance of the claims of Iraq’s weapons of mass destruction, when it appears that he was told that they did not have this capacity.

And what has he done since his time as Labour PM of the UK?

Well he has made lots of money.

If you want to comprehend how much this article in yesterday’s Herald provides some information.  He has been using taxpayer’s resources, up to $35,000 NZ a week, to travel and have security so that he can further his private interests.  These include attending speaking engagements which he is being paid significant amounts for.

One example reported recently was that for a 30 minute speech to a Swedish conference he asked for asked for a £250,000 fee payable to his wife’s charity as well as £80,000 expenses.

And at the same time he has been fulfilling his role as a roving Middle East Envoy he has been furthering his commercial interests.  The conflicts involved are pretty staggering.

The article estimates that he has earned £100 million since leaving office and he expects to earn significant amounts for any speeches given.

Of course some will think that this is perfectly appropriate if not commendable and I am engaging in the politics of envy. And Labour needs to be more aspirational if it is to succeed and to applaud ambition not decry it.

But the level of Blair’s wealth and greed is staggering and his third way appears to only permit the continuation of current levels of privilege.  And it is not sustainable.

As was said by Pope Francis last year:

An economic system centred on the god of money needs to plunder nature to sustain the frenetic rhythm of consumption that is inherent to it … I think a question that we are not asking ourselves is: isn’t humanity committing suicide with this indiscriminate and tyrannical use of nature? Safeguard creation because, if we destroy it, it will destroy us. Never forget this.”

70 comments on “The third way according to Tony Blair ”

  1. r0b 1

    Some people say they don’t know what Labour stands for. I do – compassionate government.

    But I sure as hell don’t know what “the third way” stands for. Anyone?

    • Kiwiri 1.1

      For the many people affected, it is the turd way.

    • Draco T Bastard 1.2

      The Third Way stands for exactly what neo-liberalism stands for – the rich stealing from everyone else.

    • Lanthanide 1.3

      “But I sure as hell don’t know what “the third way” stands for. Anyone?”

      Getting in to power.

      • Colonial Rawshark 1.3.1

        Getting into power via corporate media and banking support.

      • David H 1.3.2

        According to the Guardian’s a Brief history of the 3rd way..

        “The so-called third way is New Labour’s attempt to build itself an ideological foundation.”

        Anyway here it is in full.

        • dukeofurl

          Anne Mellbye is a graphic designer in Oslo, doesnt seem to exist on Guardian now and only wrote minor stories about London in 2003.

          Its a worthless summary. Plus there was no such thing as New Democrats – an obvious mistake for those who know little of US- its Democratic Party for one and Clinton had little sway over individual Senators and Congressmen/women. Half of them would fit comfortably in our National party , back in those days.

    • Ovid 1.4

      Put at its most basic the Third Way is something different and distinct from liberal capitalism with its unswerving belief in the merits of the free market and democratic socialism with its demand management and obsession with the state. The Third Way is in favour of growth, entrepeneurship, enterprise and wealth creation but it is also in favour of greater social justice and it sees the state playing a major role in bringing this about. So in the words of one of its gurus Anthony Giddens of the LSE the Third Way rejects top down socialism as it rejects traditional neo liberalism.

      BBC: What is the Third Way? (1999)

      Abandoning “demand management” seems particularly problematic to me in respect of the current housing crisis. Those with a green bent who anticipate the end of growth would also reject third way-ism as it incorporates the promotion of growth as an economic tenet. Finally, there are those who view favouring enterprise and wealth creation as means of promoting inequality and insecurity amongst the workforce.

      New Zealand’s Fifth Labour Government was very much a third way administration. Under Clark, NZ shot to the top of international rankings on ease of establishing a business, an FTA was signed with China and private investment was heavily promoted with KiwiSaver. Targeted means of combating inequality like Closing the Gaps were abandoned for more general ones like Working for Families. It was when the government came to be viewed as more prescriptive – electoral finance, shower heads and lightbulbs – that Labour began losing its popularity.

      • Nessalt 1.4.1

        so when you take all mickey’s personal slurs about tony blair out of thie discussion, the third way looks pretty good. it certainly has appeal in new zealand as the description above summarises what the nacts try to look like, even if the mask slips from time to time

        • RedLogix

          Well to put it another way – the Third Way idea may have or have not merit – but it’s association with Tony Blair will forever blight it.

          • Sanctuary

            “… the Third Way idea may have or have not merit…”

            At the time it was proposed – the height of capitalist triumphalism at the fall of the USSR, the golden age of Chinese growth beginning, and the apparent victory of Thatcherism – third way politics offered a potentially attractive path to power for the centre left in the Westminster system. After all, the institutional left are used to doing deals with capitalism, are institutional organisations that now fit seamlessly with the establishment and, finally, there was work to be done for the rights of minorities.

            The problem was first the left utterly failed to understand how deadly the enemy was and is. Like Europe pre-WW2, who thought they could “manage” Hilter through appeasement, the left thought it could appease neoliberal capitalism and preserve the post war settlement’s status quo through “managing” it. Secondly, the left utterly failed to grasp that neoliberalism was about capitalism cementing into place not just an economic re-balancing but a fundamental social reversion to 19th century capitalism that undermined the traditional mass based unions that supported the political left. Thirdly, the baby-boomer “guardians” of socialism – the Paganis, Quinns, the Rogernomes in general – either simply sold out for the capitalist coin or proved to be craven cowards, too infected with middle class regard for material status and over-enamoured with the “rule of law” to fight the capitalists effectively. The only resistance came from maori, who are now also being divided into a have elite (Iwi leadership Group, any mate of Tariana Turia) and a have-not lumpen-mass.

            From this wreckage we do need new ideas to build a different left to the old one. A left that accepts that unions are no longer synonymous with workers, that radical populism should not be left to the far right, and of new sorts of ways of forcing change – not necessarily from within the establishment, or even peacefully – on capitalism. The thing about Pagani and Quinn and co is they are not offering new ideas. They are peddling a failed set of ideas, ideas that have already proven to be a blind alley and they are peddling appeasement when the time for confrontation has long past. Josie Pagani is about as useful to left today as Lord Halifax was to Churchill in 1940.

            • Draco T Bastard


            • RedLogix

              Many thanks for this Sanctuary.

              As I was hinting above in principle the notion of harnessing both the dynamic energy of capitalism with the social justice ideals of socialism looks good on paper. But ultimately it proved to be nothing more than supping with the devil.

              And in that lies an important lesson. The single overwhelming hurdle for the left is how to change the belief structures and values that neo-liberalism has infected our societies with. And I say infected, because no question it was a deliberate process. You only have to think for a few moments about the degradation of television and the vileness peddled mass entertainment.

              It has reached the stage now where the slaves, serfs and servants of this new guilded age truly believe that this is their rightful station in life.

              • The lost sheep

                ” The single overwhelming hurdle for the left is how to change the belief structures and values that neo-liberalism has infected our societies with.”

                And the answer is?

                • Sanctuary

                  ” The single overwhelming hurdle for the left is how to change the belief structures and values that neo-liberalism has infected our societies with.”

                  It seems to me the left first needs to get it’s house in order. According the AJP Taylor, the Munich sell-out by Chamberlain saw a profound shift in the mindset of the British people – from a determined post-war pacifist mood to a resigned but equally determine pre-war one when the need for war with Germany became clear. The left needs to undertake a similar switch in mindset, from the championing of an elite cadres institutional defence of the remnants of the welfare state from within the current establishment to that of an insurgency in a life and death total war that seeks change by the means at the disposal of the weak.

                  That means abandoning bourgeois notions of “moderate” protest and “reasonableness”. Go ahead, throw pigs blood on Nick Smith in protest at deaths in state housing. By all means, instruct parishioners on the correct use of church property in the repelling of riot police. It means MPs willing to go to jail (the dynamic of protest would completely change if MPs – elected representatives – dared the state to beat them and arrest them, that is why early socialists got elected – to challenge the establishment, not become part of it. What greater slap in the face than radical voters re-electing a jailed MP?). It means adopting popular radical ideas that go beyond the traditional ideology of the left (Make your party membership transparent and open to anyone, and use the internet and online voting to vote on polices and resolutions, a ban on foreign home buyers, promising a royal commission on cronyism, promising free internet to everyone as a way of increasing digital democracy, making the job of the head of the reserve bank and various SOEs electable on three year cycles are all good examples) and it means not necessarily expecting change via institutional parliamentary means but also on the street via both mass and determined localised protest (for example – the local courthouse closes? Fund the locals to occupy it, and get retired lawyers and judges to hear local cases, radicalise the locals in it’s defense and make it clear they’ll use violence if they have to, then dare the government to send in the police).

                  it means having clear policies that pass the sniff test for being leftist – yes, we will tax the rich. Yes, we will fund public transport in Auckland AND subsidise it for the poor. Yes, we will take control of the Auckland housing market and use the power of the state to drive prices down.

                  A left that did that would cause uproar in the neoliberal establishment, and force change even when not in power.

                  • RedLogix

                    It means MPs willing to go to jail

                    Pretty short list of current left-wing MP’s who’d likely do that.

                    • Sanctuary

                      That is because they are all by and large bourgeois. The middle class is toxic to radical leftism – a nice mix of Aneurin Bevan and Clement Attlees is what the left needs in power.

                    • The lost sheep

                      Pretty short list of ANYONE who is willing to do that.
                      Which seems to me to be a bit of a flaw in your plan Redlogix.

                      I’d also question whether the most effective way to change peoples belief structures and values is to create civil unrest?…..seems to me that would just be playing right into the establishment’s hands, and drive people even further away from the far left?

                      In other words, I hope this is not the best plan anyone can come up with. The Left is truly screwed if so!

                    • RedLogix

                      But we’re all middle class now 😉

                  • McFlock

                    the dynamic of protest would completely change if MPs – elected representatives – dared the state to beat them and arrest them, that is why early socialists got elected

                    Didn’t help Hone.

        • Puddleglum

          I think you may need to distinguish between rhetorical cover for actions and the actions themselves.

          Everyone claims their actions are reasonable and well-motivated and so tries to construct arguments to that end.

          Saying that what you are doing is ‘moderate’ and, politically, involves sailing between Scylla and Charybdis may be good rhetoric but if your actions show that, in fact, you are well and truly siding with either Scylla or Charybdis in sinking everyone’s ships then so much for the rhetoric.

          And, at another level, claiming that there are equally odious extremes between which you are navigating is itself a common rhetorical technique that needs some critical examination.

          If you judge a tree by its fruits then I think it’s clear that Tony Blair’s government continued with neoliberalism.

          Income inequality (a classic feature of the implementation of neoliberal policies), for example, was higher after the Blair government’s tenure than it was before.

          From 1997 – when Blair came to power – to 2000 the Gini coefficient reached an all-time peak. (See this OECD Report on UK Inequality, especially Figure 1.)

          It then dipped and returned close to that peak level by the time he ceased to be PM and then dipped slightly under Brown before he lost to the Conservative/LibDem coalition government in 2010.

        • mickysavage

          “so when you take all mickey’s personal slurs about tony blair out of thie discussion”

          You mean pointing out his level of personal wealth and greed? Why isn’t that relevant?

          And the third way is status quo which will end in tears.

          • dukeofurl

            Or you could say this as well

            “”The vast majority of Tony Blair’s time is spent on his unpaid activities, such as his charitable projects in Africa, as Quartet representative in the Middle East, and with the work of his faith foundation and sports foundation,”

            What gets me is you unquestionably repeat Tory slurs planted in the usual London newspapers.

            You wouldn’t for a minute do the same for slurs about Cunnilife, as they were designed for the same effect.
            National had one Jason Eade, the tories would have 20.
            You can see the work Helen Clark is doing now under the same sort of attack here. Luckily our newspapers are ( mostly) less ideological so little of it goes mainstream.

    • saveNZ 1.5

      Third Way, is National Lite.

      Kinda successful initially, but then voters twig on that it is making their lives worse so stop voting for it. Unfortunately it often takes the Labour party a significant amount of time to work this out (if ever) and they keep espousing the third way polices, which is actually Nat/conservative policies but a ‘lighter’ version.

      They then start fighting with their natural partners further left, confusing voters who often just switch off voting, to the benefit of the Nats/Conservatives who maintain their base as both Labour and Nats/Conservative parties agree with each other in principal on neo liberal policy (money is god and privatisation is Gods work) and foreign policy (war, trade deals etc). All the discourse is pro neo liberal at Government level and they just bicker about details. No real vision about a change in direction or against neo liberalism is picked up on.

      If you add in, dirty politics, the results seem to be slow death to Labour, who flail around and often make the situation worse by thinking they need to be more like the Nats/Concervatives to win.

  2. dukeofurl 2

    So hes raising money for Charity !

    What a terrible thing.

    Anybody on the conference dinner/lecture circuit charges money. The more money you can charge relates to how popular you are. It shortens the waiting list as well. If they dont want to pay it, there would be plenty of cheaper speakers.

    Expenses , well he has to still have security as a former UK PM.

    There cant be a former labour PM in NZ who didnt charge for some whatever conference speech. Are they to be pilloried as well.

    • mickysavage 2.1

      Did you read the part that referred to £80,000 expenses to give a speech in Sweden and that his security was being paid for by the UK taxpayer?

      • dukeofurl 2.1.1

        So the express is a mine of information. The security wages may be paid for but accommodation isnt.
        Plus he normally travels by executive jet – again for security reasons and can include his bodyguards.

        From your line of work, you would know if you are too busy and dont want a particular case, quote a very large sum and hope they go away.
        From panelbeaters to PMs they all do it .

        To me the idea of some expensive ( they would charge massive fees to attend if Clinton was there) conference about feeding the poor is too grotesque.

        Do you have an answer about the main fee payable to a charity !

      • Clemgeopin 2.1.2

        I am not defending Blair at his exorbitant fees, but aren’t the people willing to pay him so much the real mugs? They could have told him to bugger off!

        I immediately thought of the National party outfit and their cabinet club scam, ‘the cash for access to Key’ racket here!

        The people who vote for them are the mugs.

        At least Blair is an independent private individual!

        • cricklewood

          The issue isnt the fees he demands if someone wants to pay silly money to listen to Tony Blair all power to them. Its the fact that he still avails himself to tax payer funds when traveling to events to make said fees.

          • dukeofurl

            They are only paying the wages for security.

            They bump up times he has stayed for security reasons at the Ambassadors residence- that becomes luxury rooms !

            “A Foreign Office spokesman said: “As a former prime minister, we offer Tony Blair the use of FCO residences when it is possible and appropriate to accommodate him. This is a courtesy which has been offered to other former prime ministers.”

        • greywarshark

          @ Clem
          How independent is Blair? It is no doubt like so many descriptions relating to the elite these days, a compromised word. Probably on scrutiny, he would be seen as part of a tapestry of individuals moving around the financial honeypots. And following that trend that is described I think in joe 90’s quotes of pollies being in a sort of rogues line up for the wealthy and powerful to view with an eye to a future profitable niche in private enterprise.

    • RedLogix 2.2

      Not at this scale they haven’t. If that 100m quid mentioned really did ALL go to authentic charities – then good on him.

      But there is clearly a question of just how much has stuck to his fingers along the way.

      • Kiwiri 2.2.1

        For a man with so much integrity, he should open his books for all to audit and to see as to how much he has been receiving, whether he has been paying his taxes or rearranging his affairs to avoid (or even worse, evade) taxes, and how much he has raised has actually gone to the charities.

      • greywarshark 2.2.2

        Why should it be okay for millions to be paid to people who have achieved a powerful position and the confidence that goes with it to indulge in another talkfest. It’s just another example of how money can be found for and by the wealthy and kept floating around for the rich to fish up while the poor drown in their various ways because there is no talk or help or money available for them. It is bad when we get blase’ about it all when we should be really really angry.

        Thanks MS for presenting this stunning front page news about Blair and his machinations. If it is not front-page then its another sign of the blase’ blahs that have dumbed us down, or most of us.

  3. joe90 3

    It’s got a name too,

    This man had Blair Disease, named for ex-prime minister Tony Blair: the growing propensity of former heads of government to monetise their service. Blair Disease is damaging but easily cured.


    Most ex-leaders link up with the plutocratic class while still in office. These people have been planning their careers since kindergarten. They don’t leave politics and then suddenly think, “I wonder what to do?” Even while leader they’re looking ahead, and so every meeting with a rich person is a semi-conscious job interview. Furthermore, through hanging out with rich people, they start thinking of themselves as poor. The US Republican congressman Phil Gingrey spoke for struggling politicians everywhere when he grumbled: “I’m stuck here making $172,000 a year.


    It’s easy to cure Blair Disease: bar ex-leaders from doing paid work for private interests. This free measure would instantly deflate populism, keep experience inside government and attract a better class of person to the job.

    • mickysavage 3.1

      Thanks. Makes you wonder what Key has planned for when he retires …

      • Draco T Bastard 3.1.1

        I suspect he’ll go back to being responsible for helping cause global financial meltdowns and being well paid for it.

    • joe90 3.2

      Former BBC head Greg Dyke, unseated by the Blair Government in the aftermath of the Hutton Inquiry, on Tony Blair –

      Tony Blair tried to patch things up. “He invited me for tea,” recalls Dyke. “I didn’t go. My relationship with him, which wasn’t worth anything, was completely broken. I think Blair now is a very sad man, rich, but [he] betrayed everything the Labour party was about. I think he’s a bit of a shady figure. If you go around a bunch of suspect Middle Eastern governments, taking vast sums for advising them –

      • RedLogix 3.2.1

        David Kelly – a principled man ground up by the war machine.

      • greywarshark 3.2.2

        The disease that Tony Blair has – perhaps could be named MERS2 (Middle East respiratory failure). MERS1 is fairly deadly and quick. Blair’s is deadlier but slower and more complex, especially when contracted by both the aspirational wealthy and the defenceless poor. Both will come to a sad end at the end of the day.

  4. North 4

    Note – in the link above there’s reference to an alleged 100K pounds sterling payment to Cherie Blair personally, distinct from the money for charities. I recall reading about it at the time and thinking “WTF ???”. One might think that if there was nothing to it Downing Street might have said that rather than decline comment.

    • dukeofurl 4.1

      Dont believe the dirty politics stories sourced from the Tories.

      You are a fool if you believe the truth of it all

      • North 4.1.1

        I repeat – “One might think that if there was nothing to it Downing Street might have said that rather than decline comment.”

  5. Nick K 5

    He’s doing no different than what Hillary Clinton has been doing for years while she has been a politician.

    • One Anonymous Bloke 5.1

      Yes, the US Congress is a bought congress, just like the National Party is a bought party, and Tony Blair is a bought ex-politician.

      In any decent society they’d all be in jail.

  6. Wayne 6

    This item is somewhat irrelevant to his success in making Labour electable from 1994 to 1997, then winning three elections in a row.

    I know the Left, especially of the Standardnista ilk, hate Blair, but that is simply blinding you to a proper analysis as to why he succeeded.

    Hint, it wasn’t because UK Labour needed to double down on the Michael Foot approach to politics to once again look like they could be trusted to govern – quite the opposite in fact.

    By hey, if you all want to blame everything since 1984 on the “failed neo-liberal experiment” then thats your choice.

    • KJT 6.1

      Succeeded in continuing taking the wrecking ball to British society.

      The really scary thing about Neo-liberal radicals is that some of them genuinely believe their own bullshit.

      Of course your election funding dries up if you try to lead for everyone’s benefit.

      Hard to change someone’s ideas when their living depends on it.

      Who pays your bills by the way, Wayne?

    • Draco T Bastard 6.2

      The “failed neo-liberal experiment” is fucking up our environment and will most likely result in the first, and most probably the last, anthropogenic extinction level event. No amount of ZOMG, the economy’s grown is going to cover the simple fact that we’re headed for a dead end with emphasis on dead. Being popular doesn’t mean that you’re right and the evidence is that you and your ilk are seriously wrong.

      This seems to have been made specifically for RWNJs

    • Colonial Viper 6.3

      Hi Wayne, could you comment on the closeness of Blair in office, and after office, to both the corporate banking lobby, and also the military industrial lobby.

    • Hi Wayne,

      Your memory of UK elections (and UK Labour leaders) is a bit patchy.

      Leading up to 1992, Neil Kinnock was well ahead in the polls against Thatcher until she got rolled and was replaced by Major. Major won by a much diminished 21 seats down from a 102 seat majority after the previous election.

      Kinnock resigned after the 1992 defeat and was replaced by John Smith, the Shadow Chancellor of the Exchequer who had written a shadow budget leading up to the 1992 election with a rise in the top tax rate to 50p (from 40p).

      With Smith as leader, Labour rocketed ahead of the Major government by as much as 23 percentage points. He was popular and a very good debater in the House of Commons, often mercilessly and effectively mocking the government.

      Blair and Brown were, however, waiting in the wings with their neoliberal sympathies so, when Smith died at age 55 of a massive heart attack, Blair became leader.

      As the Wikipedia entry on Smith adds:

      Smith’s biographer, Mark Stuart, claimed that Smith could have won Labour a parliamentary victory in 1997 on a scale similar to that achieved by Tony Blair because of the combination of the Black Wednesday debacle and ongoing Conservative divisions over Europe between 1992 and 1997. Stuart argues that the lack of a “Blair effect” would have meant that the Conservative Party would have held slightly over 200 seats in the House of Commons, leaving the Conservatives in a position similar to that of Labour in 1983, than to the actual Conservative result in 1997

      The Conservatives actually won 165 seats in 1997. Nevertheless, all signs were that Smith also would have won that election and done so with far more traditional Labour policies and orientation.

      Perhaps not “doubling down on the Michael Foot approach to politics” but certainly not embracing an entirely foreign and heartless creed that ensures that the most vulnerable simultaneously are blamed for their own reduced prosperity while paying the price of the redistribution of wealth to those at the very top of an increasingly unequal pyramid of wealth and income.

      Labour would very likely have won in 1997 without Blair and his entirely mis-named ‘Third Way’.

      • dukeofurl 6.4.1

        Could , might have, should have.

        Fanatsy stuff, as no one else believes it.

        Smith was dead. Dead I say.

        • RedLogix

          Let me see … well thought out argument from respected commenter replete with evidence and logical reasoning, versus snarly noise. Who to believe? Choices, choices….

          • dukeofurl

            Trouble is it isnt reasoned. Falsehoods arent reason.

            Major should have lost but didnt. That was Kinnock/ Smith problem you dont talk about.

            Major won 41.9% of the vote, to labours 34.4.

            And by saying it was only 21 seats ,is because of the Liberals seats as well, Labour were behind 65 seats.

            A more likely result was a Labour or Conservative coalition with the Liberals if Smith had lived .

            Its a worse defeat than today, as the 100 they are behind now includes those seats lost to SNP which was a much smaller party then.
            No surprise there as Milliband moved the party to the left compared with Blair and Brown.

            As Smith was very dead by the time of the 97 election, you havent discussed who was the left wing leader who would win for labour.

            Thats my reasoned reply why you are talking fantasy, winning with a leader who was dead. You surely get the main point of it.

            Find me this charismatic and popular debater who wasnt Blair and could have done the things you claim.
            And another thing, win 3 elections.

        • Puddleglum

          Hi dukeofurl,

          You are quite right that I was arguing the counterfactual. That was in response to Wayne’s implied claim that only by going to Blair’s ‘Third Way’ could Labour be trusted to govern again.

          I was pointing out that polling between 1992 and 1994 suggested that Smith was presenting a more than viable electoral alternative to the then Conservative government. Yet Smith was not embracing the ‘Third Way’ that Blair popularised.

          You may think that the polling in those years was bunkum but that’s another argument.

          Put simply, from the polling that was done at the time any reasonable observer would have assumed that Smith was probably on track to be the next Prime Minister – despite that track not being the ‘Third Way’.

          Yes, “Smith was dead”. But how is that relevant to my response to Wayne?

          You should remember that all argument is conjecture based – to one degree or another – on known facts.

          For example, Wayne’s claim that Tony Blair’s approach was the best or only approach Labour could have taken is itself just conjecture based on the assumed ineffectiveness of any other course of action (and those courses of action are, of course, counterfactuals – proposals as to how things might have, should have, could have turned out).

          That is, despite the fact that other courses of action (i.e., counterfactuals) never happened Wayne has implicitly argued that they would have resulted in Labour not succeeding at the polls. Wayne, that is, has implicitly claimed that he knows the outcome of the counterfactuals (e.g., if Smith had lived).

          So if I’m talking fantasy so is Wayne. Do you follow that?

      • Keir 6.4.2

        But Smith was a “reformer” and had already appointed Blair as Shadow Home Secretary and Brown as Shadow Chancellor. He’d stood as a reformer and moderniser on the right of the party to succeed Kinnock, and in fact thumped left-wing candidate Bryan Gould to get that role.

        A Smith government wouldn’t have been significantly different to the eventual Blair government in terms of ideology or key personnel. It might have been more like Brown’s ministry than Blair’s, which would of course have been an improvement, but the counterfactual where Smith leads us to a land of milk and social democratic honey is wishful thinking.

        • Puddleglum

          Yes, during the Kinnock years Smith ‘reformed’ the voting system within Labour going for one member one vote which reduced union influence.

          Blair, however, did not just ‘reform’ the party’s systems but – highly symbolically – changed its mission (with great fanfare over Clause 4) and shifted its electoral and policy ground significantly towards the wealthier middle classes in the South of England.

          It’s worth noting that in 1997 Labour received fewer votes than Major’s Conservatives had gained in 1992 (half a million fewer). And, despite Blair’s supposed ‘charisma’ and popular appeal the 1997 election had a 6 percentage point lower turnout than in 1992.

          And, yes, you’re right that Smith would not have led the UK to “a land of milk and social democratic honey“.

          But his premiership would have undoubtedly fallen within the range of previous Labour governments in the UK – e.g., Wilson.

          Here’s another view on what similarities and differences there would have been between a Smith-led Labour government and the Blair one.

          The point is that Blair’s ‘Third Way’ was by no means the only way.

          Put another way, in this thread my point has not been that Smith would have taken the UK Labour Party to the left (from he position it held under Kinnock) but that he was popular enough to have won the 1997 election without having taken it (in policy terms) to a version of Thatcherism.

          I’m fully aware that Labour Parties in the Western World have long since lost their reforming socialist vision but where Blair took the UK Labour Party (in the name of electability) was to a place where even Rupert Murdoch felt comfortable with it.

          Murdoch’s Sun newspaper backed Blair in 1997 which is not surprising given Blair’s July, 1995 speech at the Newscorp conference in the Hayman Islands resort. In that speech Blair pontificated about the ‘moral challenge’ facing Britain (you know, the usual right wing rhetoric about personal responsibility, etc.).

          In fact, he said the ‘moral challenge’ was greater than the ‘economic challenge’ which, he explicitly stated, had been met by – guess who? – Ronald Reagan and Margaret Thatcher who had put “a greater emphasis on enterprise” and “success”.

          Further, Blair said that the same was true of press ownership whose enterprise was being stifled by government regulations (the kerfuffle at the time over ‘cross-ownership’ between print and television media.

          All music to Rupert’s ears of course.

          And all very indicative of how far to the neoliberal right Blair was willing to go.

          All I argue is that ‘There was an alternative’ to the ‘Third Way’ – and one that would have led to a Labour government in 1997.

          That was why I responded to Wayne initially.

      • DS 6.4.3

        People forget how mind-bogglingly unpopular the Tories were in 1997. Between Black Wednesday, the endless sleaze and corruption scandals, the broken promise on VAT, and the party’s endless civil war on Europe, the Tories were so utterly loathed that Labour would have won that election with Tony Benn or Dennis Skinner as leader.

  7. Vaughan Little 7

    on the Catholicism front: Ambrose of milan threatened to rxcommunicate the emperor if he didn’t publicly repent for his role in a punitive massacre of 7000 people in a city that had rioted. I’m still to hear of a priest who has spoken out in condemnation of his unrepentance following iraq. the threat of dissembling is that you yourself become disassembled as a moral agent yourself, and it’s the token of the church to watch over the careof souls of those who have come to it, as he has. frankly speaking iI find him to be a walking fuckup.

    having read thru the comments, I’m surprised that there has been so little comment or consensus on how obscene it is as a human being to charge so much to talk about anything, let alone building a better world… I’m without a shred of doubt that if I was living like that, week by week taking such huge amounts of cash to deliver so little, it would corrupt me and make me a sad sad man.

  8. Blue 8

    I found this critique of Labour’s unquestioning acceptance of neoliberalism – the ‘third way’ interesting for being in the quite Tory Evening Standard:

    Still we get ‘Labour’ pollies who think the only way to win is to be as much as possible like the Tories without actually being the Tories. The idea of real innovation and change seems to have been jettisoned by the current crop of UK wannabe Labour leaders.

  9. millsy 9

    It is worth noting that the the left, and Labour’s base did support Blair and were prepared to swallow a few dead rats to get into power. His brand only became toxic because of Iraq/Afghanistan/9-11, and after his whole crackdown on civil liberties, with CCTV cameras growing like weeds, and people getting thrown in jail because they farted at a bus stop (ASBOs), plus he never really remembered what party he belonged to.

    Contrast that with Cameron and Key, who from time to time, do remember what party they belong to, and legislate accordingly.

  10. Sable 10

    Anyone looking to Blair for answers to anything is truly lost…..

Recent Comments

Recent Posts

  • New Zealand’s minerals future
    Introduction Today, we are sharing a red-letter occasion. A Blackball event on hallowed ground. Today  we underscore the importance of our mineral estate. A reminder that our natural resource sector has much to offer.  Such a contribution will not come to pass without investment.  However, more than money is needed. ...
    9 hours ago
  • Government sets out vision for minerals future
    Increasing national and regional prosperity, providing the minerals needed for new technology and the clean energy transition, and doubling the value of minerals exports are the bold aims of the Government’s vision for the minerals sector. Resources Minister Shane Jones today launched a draft strategy for the minerals sector in ...
    9 hours ago
  • Government progresses Māori wards legislation
    The coalition Government’s legislation to restore the rights of communities to determine whether to introduce Māori wards has passed its first reading in Parliament, Local Government Minister Simeon Brown says. “Divisive changes introduced by the previous government denied local communities the ability to determine whether to establish Māori wards.” The ...
    11 hours ago
  • First RMA amendment Bill introduced to Parliament
    The coalition Government has today introduced legislation to slash the tangle of red and green tape throttling some of New Zealand’s key sectors, including farming, mining and other primary industries. RMA Reform Minister Chris Bishop says the Government is committed to  unlocking development and investment while ensuring the environment is ...
    13 hours ago
  • Speech to Employers and Manufacturers Association: Relief for today, hope for tomorrow
    Kia ora, Ngā mihi nui ki a koutou kātoa Tāmaki Herenga Waka, Tāmaki Herenga tangata Ngā mihi ki ngā mana whenua o tēnei rohe Ngāti Whātua ō Ōrākei me nga iwi kātoa kua tae mai. Mauriora. Greetings everyone. Thank you to the EMA for hosting this event. Let me acknowledge ...
    13 hours ago
  • Government invests in 1,500 more social homes
    The coalition Government is investing in social housing for New Zealanders who are most in need of a warm dry home, Housing Minister Chris Bishop says. Budget 2024 will allocate $140 million in new funding for 1,500 new social housing places to be provided by Community Housing Providers (CHPs), not ...
    2 days ago
  • $24 million boost for Gumboot Friday
    Thousands more young New Zealanders will have better access to mental health services as the Government delivers on its commitment to fund the Gumboot Friday initiative, says Deputy Prime Minister Winston Peters and Mental Health Minister Matt Doocey.  “Budget 2024 will provide $24 million over four years to contract the ...
    2 days ago
  • Residential Tenancies Amendment Bill passes first reading
    The Coalition Government’s Residential Tenancies Amendment Bill, which will improve tenancy laws and help increase the supply of rental properties, has passed its first reading in Parliament says Housing Minister Chris Bishop. “The Bill proposes much-needed changes to the Residential Tenancies Act 1986 that will remove barriers to increasing private ...
    2 days ago
  • Montecassino Commemorative Address, Cassino War Cemetery
    Standing here in Cassino War Cemetery, among the graves looking up at the beautiful Abbey of Montecassino, it is hard to imagine the utter devastation left behind by the battles which ended here in May 1944. Hundreds of thousands of shells and bombs of every description left nothing but piled ...
    2 days ago
  • First Reading – Repeal of Section 7AA of the Oranga Tamariki Act 1989
    I present a legislative statement on the Oranga Tamariki (Repeal of Section 7AA) Amendment Bill Mr. Speaker, I move that the Oranga Tamariki (Repeal of Section 7AA) Amendment Bill be now read a first time. I nominate the Social Services and Community Committee to consider the Bill. Thank you, Mr. ...
    2 days ago
  • First reading of 7AA’s repeal: progress for children
    The Bill to repeal Section 7AA of the Oranga Tamariki Act has had its first reading in Parliament today. The Bill reaffirms the Coalition Government’s commitment to the care and safety of children in care, says Minister for Children Karen Chhour.  “When I became the Minister for Children, I made ...
    2 days ago
  • China Business Summit 2024
    Kia ora koutou, good morning, and zao shang hao. Thank you Fran for the opportunity to speak at the 2024 China Business Summit – it’s great to be here today. I’d also like to acknowledge: Simon Bridges - CEO of the Auckland Chamber of Commerce. His Excellency Ambassador - Wang ...
    2 days ago
  • Assisted departures from New Caledonia
    Foreign Minister Winston Peters has confirmed a New Zealand Government plane will head to New Caledonia in the next hour in the first in a series of proposed flights to begin bringing New Zealanders home.  “New Zealanders in New Caledonia have faced a challenging few days - and bringing them ...
    3 days ago
  • Assisted depatures from New Caledonia
    Foreign Minister Winston Peters has confirmed a New Zealand Government plane will head to New Caledonia in the next hour in the first in a series of proposed flights to begin bringing New Zealanders home.    “New Zealanders in New Caledonia have faced a challenging few days - and bringing ...
    3 days ago
  • Government to rollout roadside drug testing
    The Coalition Government will introduce legislation this year that will enable roadside drug testing as part of our commitment to improve road safety and restore law and order, Transport Minister Simeon Brown says.  “Alcohol and drugs are the number one contributing factor in fatal road crashes in New Zealand. In ...
    3 days ago
  • Minister responds to review of Kāinga Ora
    The Government has announced a series of immediate actions in response to the independent review of Kāinga Ora – Homes and Communities, Housing Minister Chris Bishop says. “Kāinga Ora is a large and important Crown entity, with assets of $45 billion and over $2.5 billion of expenditure each year. It ...
    3 days ago
  • Pseudoephedrine back on shelves
    Associate Health Minister David Seymour is pleased that Pseudoephedrine can now be purchased by the general public to protect them from winter illness, after the coalition government worked swiftly to change the law and oversaw a fast approval process by Medsafe. “Pharmacies are now putting the medicines back on their ...
    4 days ago
  • New Zealand-China Business Summit
    Tēnā koutou katoa. Da jia hao.  Good morning everyone.   Prime Minister Luxon, your excellency, a great friend of New Zealand and my friend Ambassador Wang, Mayor of what he tells me is the best city in New Zealand, Wayne Brown, the highly respected Fran O’Sullivan, Champion of the Auckland business ...
    4 days ago
  • New measures to protect powerlines from trees
    Energy Minister Simeon Brown has announced that the Government will make it easier for lines firms to take action to remove vegetation from obstructing local powerlines. The change will ensure greater security of electricity supply in local communities, particularly during severe weather events.  “Trees or parts of trees falling on ...
    6 days ago
  • Wairarapa Moana ki Pouakani win top Māori dairy farming award
    Wairarapa Moana ki Pouakani were the top winners at this year’s Ahuwhenua Trophy awards recognising the best in Māori dairy farming. Māori Development Minister Tama Potaka announced the winners and congratulated runners-up, Whakatōhea Māori Trust Board, at an awards celebration also attended by Prime Minister Christopher Luxon and Finance Minister ...
    6 days ago
  • DJ Fred Again – Assurance report received
    "On the 27th of March, I sought assurances from the Chief Executive, Department of Internal Affairs, that the Department’s correct processes and policies had been followed in regards to a passport application which received media attention,” says Minister of Internal Affairs Brooke van Velden.  “I raised my concerns after being ...
    6 days ago
  • District Court Judges appointed
    Attorney-General Judith Collins has announced the appointment of three new District Court Judges, to replace Judges who have recently retired. Peter James Davey of Auckland has been appointed a District Court Judge with a jury jurisdiction to be based at Whangarei. Mr Davey initially started work as a law clerk/solicitor with ...
    7 days ago
  • Unions should put learning ahead of ideology
    Associate Education Minister David Seymour is calling on the Post Primary Teachers’ Association (PPTA) to put ideology to the side and focus on students’ learning, in reaction to the union holding paid teacher meetings across New Zealand about charter schools.     “The PPTA is disrupting schools up and down the ...
    7 days ago
  • Craig Stobo appointed as chair of FMA
    Commerce and Consumer Affairs Minister Andrew Bayly today announced the appointment of Craig Stobo as the new chair of the Financial Markets Authority (FMA). Mr Stobo takes over from Mark Todd, whose term expired at the end of April. Mr Stobo’s appointment is for a five-year term. “The FMA plays ...
    7 days ago
  • Budget 2024 invests in lifeguards and coastguard
    Surf Life Saving New Zealand and Coastguard New Zealand will continue to be able to keep people safe in, on, and around the water following a funding boost of $63.644 million over four years, Transport Minister Simeon Brown and Associate Transport Minister Matt Doocey say. “Heading to the beach for ...
    7 days ago
  • New Zealand and Tuvalu reaffirm close relationship
    New Zealand and Tuvalu have reaffirmed their close relationship, Foreign Affairs Minister Winston Peters says.  “New Zealand is committed to working with Tuvalu on a shared vision of resilience, prosperity and security, in close concert with Australia,” says Mr Peters, who last visited Tuvalu in 2019.  “It is my pleasure ...
    1 week ago
  • New Zealand calls for calm, constructive dialogue in New Caledonia
    New Zealand is gravely concerned about the situation in New Caledonia, Foreign Minister Winston Peters says.  “The escalating situation and violent protests in Nouméa are of serious concern across the Pacific Islands region,” Mr Peters says.  “The immediate priority must be for all sides to take steps to de-escalate the ...
    1 week ago
  • New Zealand welcomes Samoa Head of State
    Prime Minister Christopher Luxon met today with Samoa’s O le Ao o le Malo, Afioga Tuimalealiifano Vaaletoa Sualauvi II, who is making a State Visit to New Zealand. “His Highness and I reflected on our two countries’ extensive community links, with Samoan–New Zealanders contributing to all areas of our national ...
    1 week ago
  • Island Direct eligible for SuperGold Card funding
    Transport Minister Simeon Brown has announced that he has approved Waiheke Island ferry operator Island Direct to be eligible for SuperGold Card funding, paving the way for a commercial agreement to bring the operator into the scheme. “Island Direct started operating in November 2023, offering an additional option for people ...
    1 week ago
  • Further sanctions against Russia
    Foreign Minister Winston Peters today announced further sanctions on 28 individuals and 14 entities providing military and strategic support for Russia’s invasion of Ukraine.  “Russia is directly supported by its military-industrial complex in its illegal aggression against Ukraine, attacking its sovereignty and territorial integrity. New Zealand condemns all entities and ...
    1 week ago
  • One year on from Loafers Lodge
    A year on from the tragedy at Loafers Lodge, the Government is working hard to improve building fire safety, Building and Construction Minister Chris Penk says. “I want to share my sincere condolences with the families and friends of the victims on the anniversary of the tragic fire at Loafers ...
    1 week ago
  • Pre-Budget speech to Auckland Business Chamber
    Ka nui te mihi kia koutou. Kia ora and good afternoon, everyone. Thank you so much for having me here in the lead up to my Government’s first Budget. Before I get started can I acknowledge: Simon Bridges – Auckland Business Chamber CEO. Steve Jurkovich – Kiwibank CEO. Kids born ...
    1 week ago
  • New Zealand and Vanuatu to deepen collaboration
    New Zealand and Vanuatu will enhance collaboration on issues of mutual interest, Foreign Minister Winston Peters says.    “It is important to return to Port Vila this week with a broad, high-level political delegation which demonstrates our deep commitment to New Zealand’s relationship with Vanuatu,” Mr Peters says.    “This ...
    1 week ago
  • Penk travels to Peru for trade meetings
    Minister for Land Information, Chris Penk will travel to Peru this week to represent New Zealand at a meeting of trade ministers from the Asia-Pacific region on behalf of Trade Minister Todd McClay. The annual Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC) Ministers Responsible for Trade meeting will be held on 17-18 May ...
    1 week ago
  • Minister attends global education conferences
    Minister of Education Erica Stanford will head to the United Kingdom this week to participate in the 22nd Conference of Commonwealth Education Ministers (CCEM) and the 2024 Education World Forum (EWF). “I am looking forward to sharing this Government’s education priorities, such as introducing a knowledge-rich curriculum, implementing an evidence-based ...
    1 week ago
  • Education Minister thanks outgoing NZQA Chair
    Minister of Education Erica Stanford has today thanked outgoing New Zealand Qualifications Authority Chair, Hon Tracey Martin. “Tracey Martin tendered her resignation late last month in order to take up a new role,” Ms Stanford says. Ms Martin will relinquish the role of Chair on 10 May and current Deputy ...
    1 week ago
  • Joint statement of Christopher Luxon and Emmanuel Macron: Launch of the Christchurch Call Foundation
    New Zealand Prime Minister Christopher Luxon and President Emmanuel Macron of France today announced a new non-governmental organisation, the Christchurch Call Foundation, to coordinate the Christchurch Call’s work to eliminate terrorist and violent extremist content online.   This change gives effect to the outcomes of the November 2023 Call Leaders’ Summit, ...
    1 week ago
  • Panel announced for review into disability services
    Distinguished public servant and former diplomat Sir Maarten Wevers will lead the independent review into the disability support services administered by the Ministry of Disabled People – Whaikaha. The review was announced by Disability Issues Minister Louise Upston a fortnight ago to examine what could be done to strengthen the ...
    1 week ago
  • Minister welcomes Police gang unit
    Today’s announcement by Police Commissioner Andrew Coster of a National Gang Unit and district Gang Disruption Units will help deliver on the coalition Government’s pledge to restore law and order and crack down on criminal gangs, Police Minister Mark Mitchell says. “The National Gang Unit and Gang Disruption Units will ...
    1 week ago
  • New Zealand expresses regret at North Korea’s aggressive rhetoric
    Foreign Minister Winston Peters has today expressed regret at North Korea’s aggressive rhetoric towards New Zealand and its international partners.  “New Zealand proudly stands with the international community in upholding the rules-based order through its monitoring and surveillance deployments, which it has been regularly doing alongside partners since 2018,” Mr ...
    1 week ago

Page generated in The Standard by Wordpress at 2024-05-23T16:07:29+00:00