This is what *ending poverty* looks like in New Zealand
Written By:
- Date published:
6:05 am, June 12th, 2023 - 160 comments
Categories: election 2023, greens, james shaw, Metiria Turei, unemployment -
Tags: GMI, Guaranteed Minimum Income, ubi
James Shaw, co-leader of the Green Party of New Zealand, speaking at the launch of the Greens’ new Ending Poverty Together plan yesterday,
The Governments that we have been a part of since 2017 have lifted just shy of thirty thousand children out of poverty.
But here’s a question: why not everyone?
Why not the remaining 45,000?
For too long, governments have been tinkering at the edges instead of taking the bold decisions people need right now.
If you’re not willing to take those decisions on behalf of the people of the country you purport to lead, then why are you in politics at all?
What we do to prioritise the lives and livelihoods of those who need our support the most should be a measure of every political party.
In fact, I would argue that any party that stops short of promising to lift every family out of poverty, is actively choosing to make life harder for thousands of people.
They are essentially saying to thousands of people who cannot afford to put food on the table, that’s it. That’s your lot.
Poverty is a political choice, and the Green Party is choosing to end it.
…
What we are announcing today is a transformational new way of doing income support that will lift every single family out of poverty.
It is a plan to work together as a country to ensure everyone has what they need to thrive.
Here’s how it works.
The policy
The fully costed and phased Ending Poverty Together plan. The short explainer is here. This looks like a continuation of their welfare and tax policy development for the 2020 election. It’s socialist af. I wrote this at the time,
The Green Party’s first major election announcement is a beautifully conceived social security package based in the concepts of manaakitanga and compassion. It insists on giving people income security and treating them well. It’s fully costed, and financed by taxing some of the assets and income of wealthy people.
The gist of the 2023 policy,
Income support: a strong safety net
- everyone out of work or studying will receive a Guaranteed Minimum Income (GMI) of at least $385 in the hand per week
- additional support for solo parents, and those with disability or in hardship
- the first $10,000 of income is tax free
- remove stand downs for benefits: everyone who needs income assistance gets it immediately
- all payments are individualised, which means if you are part of the couple, you get the payment independent of any earnings your partner has.
- the abatement rate rises to $190/wk (the amount someone receiving the GMI can earn before the government starts taking back a % of benefit)
- all disabled and unwell people come under a new Agency for Comprehensive Care (replacing WINZ benefits and ACC income support)
Tax reform: how the GMI gets paid for
- a 2.5% wealth tax on assets above $2,000,000 ($4m for couples)
- a trust tax to stop wealth tax avoidance
- a top tax rate of 45% over $180,000 (people earning under $125,000 will pay less tax)
- returning the corporate tax rate to the 2008 level of 33%
There’s a lot of detail here, including the complexities of support for families, so I’m focussing on income support for those who are unemployed or those who cannot work due to disability. There are lots of detail and examples in the full policy document for people to work out different scenarios.
A few key things stand out. The removal of the stand down period means that low income people newly unemployed, studying or disabled/unwell, don’t have to scramble around borrowing money or going through the onerous process of trying to get emergency grants from WINZ. This stops people dropping further into poverty.
It also means that people who have savings don’t have to use their savings for daily/weekly living expenses. Some will say this is unfair, why shouldn’t people use their savings, but so much of WINZ policy is designed to asset strip people at the worst possible time, and this is one of the least discussed long term drivers of poverty in New Zealand.
Likewise, individualising the GMI means that individuals have the money when they need it and don’t have to be dependent on their partner. It prevents families from having their income halved.
Here’s the bit that really speaks to me of the intention to end poverty. The plan is to replace the various benefits for disabled and unwell people with a new Agency for Comprehensive Care (this also replaces ACC).
- minimum payment of 80% of the full time minimum wage. Today that would be equivalent to $767/week, compared to the current Supported Living Payment of $385/week (both figures are in the hand). This cannot be overemphasised: current SLP rates force people who cannot work due to disability to live in poverty. SLP is the long term benefit for disabled people, and we keep them in poverty, forcing them to live off any savings and then sell their assets, and then subsist.
- income support is individualised, so people in a relationship don’t become dependent on their partner
Nothing has told me more about Labour’s ‘deserving poor but really you need to get a job’ approach to welfare than the fact that they have kept the SLP rate below what it is possible to live on. The bit they don’t say out loud is that people who are permanently so disabled they can’t work are consigned to permanent poverty. It’s mind boggling that this has never been addressed but the small amounts thrown the way of SLP doesn’t change the fact that if you cannot work you are fundamentally screwed. And there’s never been any good reason for it. It’s the major flaw in Labour’s welfare, as well as most UBI policies. Speaking of which,
Why it’s not a Universal/Unconditional Basic Income
It kind of is, but it has welfare bolted on, and it takes into account the different circumstances that people have, two major differences.
The GMI is for people that need financial support because they have lost their source of income. It doesn’t get paid to everyone. It is in fact unconditional, and universal, for those who don’t have income from work, in that unlike current welfare, everyone who is eligible gets it and there are no hoops to jump through. It sits between a UBI and neoliberal welfare in that it still allows for variation in circumstances. It’s a set rate, with built in extras for children, disabled, those in hardship. But it’s more simple and less punitive than the neoliberalised welfare we currently have.
The Greens policy is streets ahead of The Opportunity Party’s UBI policy, because the Greens understand welfare and don’t see it as an add on to economic levers around income insurance. Despite well intentioned policy adjustments in recent years by TOP, their UBI fails at the fundamental level of centering people instead of economics. The difference is centering people in need and developing policy out from there and then figuring out how to pay for it. Wellbeing and manaakitanga are the point.
The politics
As always, thank-you Metiria Turei, who started the ball really rolling.
I love it when the Greens do smart and this seems like they’re back and ready to go hard on welfare reform again. It’s James Shaw announcing the plan this time, but he is introduced by Chloe Swarbrick then Marama Davidson. This is a strong team, and Shaw is up front because it’s not the leftie liberals that really need convincing, it’s the business, media and political classes and they will respond to the man in the suit. Anyone still thinking that Shaw is a neoliberal shill really isn’t paying attention. Read the speech. Listen to what all three have to say. Look at the Green MP’s social media from yesterday. This is left wing, progressive, green policy. I cannot wait to see what they do with their climate and ecology policies this year.
So, lefties, the ball is in our court. If we want left wing action on poverty instead of neoliberal centre left BAU, we have the choice to support and vote for the Greens at this year’s general election.
160 comments on “This is what *ending poverty* looks like in New Zealand ”
- Comments are now closed
- Comments are now closed
Recent Comments
- Pastor Who Abused People, Blames People
Hi,I spent about a year on Webworm reporting on an abusive megachurch called Arise, and it made me want to stab my eyes out with a fork.I don’t regret that reporting in 2022 and 2023 — I am proud of it — but it made me angry.Over three main stories ...1 hour ago - Vic Uni shows how under threat free speech is
The new Victoria University Vice-Chancellor decided to have a forum at the university about free speech and academic freedom as it is obviously a topical issue, and the Government is looking at legislating some carrots or sticks for universities to uphold their obligations under the Education and Training Act. They ...7 hours ago - Winston remembers Gettysburg.
Do you remember when Melania Trump got caught out using a speech that sounded awfully like one Michelle Obama had given? Uncannily so.Well it turns out that Abraham Lincoln is to Winston Peters as Michelle was to Melania. With the ANZAC speech Uncle Winston gave at Gallipoli having much in ...11 hours ago - 25
She was born 25 years ago today in North Shore hospital. Her eyes were closed tightly shut, her mouth was silently moving. The whole theatre was all quiet intensity as they marked her a 2 on the APGAR test. A one-minute eternity later, she was an 8. The universe was ...12 hours ago - Fact Brief – Is Antarctica gaining land ice?
Skeptical Science is partnering with Gigafact to produce fact briefs — bite-sized fact checks of trending claims. This fact brief was written by Sue Bin Park in collaboration with members from our Skeptical Science team. You can submit claims you think need checking via the tipline. Is Antarctica gaining land ice? ...23 hours ago - Policing protests.
Images of US students (and others) protesting and setting up tent cities on US university campuses have been broadcast world wide and clearly demonstrate the growing rifts in US society caused by US policy toward Israel and Israel’s prosecution of … Continue reading ...1 day ago - Open letter to Hon Paul GoldsmithBarrie Saunders writes – Dear Paul As the new Minister of Media and Communications, you will be inundated with heaps of free advice and special pleading, all in the national interest of course. For what it’s worth here is my assessment: Traditional broadcasting free to air content through ...1 day ago
- Bryce Edwards: FastTrackWatch – The Case for the Government’s Fast Track Bill
Many criticisms are being made of the Government’s Fast Track Approvals Bill, including by this writer. But as with everything in politics, every story has two sides, and both deserve attention. It’s important to understand what the Government is trying to achieve and its arguments for such a bold reform. ...1 day ago - Luxon gets out his butcher’s knife – brieflyPeter Dunne writes – The great nineteenth British Prime Minister, William Gladstone, once observed that “the first essential for a Prime Minister is to be a good butcher.” When a later British Prime Minister, Harold Macmillan, sacked a third of his Cabinet in July 1962, in what became ...1 day ago
- More tax for lessEle Ludemann writes – New Zealanders had the OECD’s second highest tax increase last year: New Zealanders faced the second-biggest tax raises in the developed world last year, the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) says. The intergovernmental agency said the average change in personal income tax ...1 day ago
- Real News vs Fake News.
We all know something’s not right with our elections. The spread of misinformation, people being targeted with soundbites and emotional triggers that ignore the facts, even the truth, and influence their votes.The use of technology to produce deep fakes. How can you tell if something is real or not? Can ...1 day ago - Another way to roll
Hello! Here comes the Saturday edition of More Than A Feilding, catching you up on the past week’s editions.Share ...1 day ago - Simon Clark: The climate lies you'll hear this yearThis video includes conclusions of the creator climate scientist Dr. Simon Clark. It is presented to our readers as an informed perspective. Please see video description for references (if any). This year you will be lied to! Simon Clark helps prebunk some misleading statements you'll hear about climate. The video includes ...2 days ago
- Cutting the Public Service
It is all very well cutting the backrooms of public agencies but it may compromise the frontlines. One of the frustrations of the Productivity Commission’s 2017 review of universities is that while it observed that their non-academic staff were increasing faster than their academic staff, it did not bother to ...2 days ago - Luxon’s demoted ministers might take comfort from the British politician who bounced back after th...
Buzz from the Beehive Two speeches delivered by Foreign Affairs Minister Winston Peters at Anzac Day ceremonies in Turkey are the only new posts on the government’s official website since the PM announced his Cabinet shake-up. In one of the speeches, Peters stated the obvious: we live in a troubled ...2 days ago - This is how I roll over
1. Which of these would you not expect to read in The Waikato Invader?a. Luxon is here to do business, don’t you worry about thatb. Mr KPI expects results, and you better believe itc. This decisive man of action is getting me all hot and excitedd. Melissa Lee is how ...2 days ago - The Waitangi Tribunal is not “a roving Commission”……it has a restricted jurisdiction which must not be abused: it is not an inquisition NOTE – this article was published before the High Court ruled that Karen Chhour does not have to appear before the Waitangi Tribunal Gary Judd writes – The High Court ...2 days ago
- Is Oranga Tamariki guilty of neglect?Lindsay Mitchell writes – One of reasons Oranga Tamariki exists is to prevent child neglect. But could the organisation itself be guilty of the same? Oranga Tamariki’s statistics show a decrease in the number and age of children in care. “There are less children ...2 days ago
- Three Strikes saw lower reoffendingDavid Farrar writes: Graeme Edgeler wrote in 2017: In the first five years after three strikes came into effect 5248 offenders received a ‘first strike’ (that is, a “stage-1 conviction” under the three strikes sentencing regime), and 68 offenders received a ‘second strike’. In the five years prior to ...2 days ago
- Luxon’s ruthless show of strength is perfect for our angry eraBryce Edwards writes – Prime Minister Christopher Luxon has surprised everyone with his ruthlessness in sacking two of his ministers from their crucial portfolios. Removing ministers for poor performance after only five months in the job just doesn’t normally happen in politics. That’s refreshing and will be extremely ...2 days ago
- 'Lacks attention to detail and is creating double-standards.'
TL;DR: These are the six things that stood out to me in news and commentary on Aotearoa-NZ’s political economy in the two days to 6:06am on Thursday, April 25:Politics: PM Christopher Luxon has set up a dual standard for ministerial competence by demoting two National Cabinet ministers while leaving also-struggling ...3 days ago - One Night Only!Hi,Today I mainly want to share some of your thoughts about the recent piece I wrote about success and failure, and the forces that seemingly guide our lives. But first, a quick bit of housekeeping: I am doing a Webworm popup in Los Angeles on Saturday May 11 at 2pm. ...3 days ago
- What did Melissa Lee do?
It is hard to see what Melissa Lee might have done to “save” the media. National went into the election with no public media policy and appears not to have developed one subsequently. Lee claimed that she had prepared a policy paper before the election but it had been decided ...3 days ago - Skeptical Science New Research for Week #17 2024Open access notables Ice acceleration and rotation in the Greenland Ice Sheet interior in recent decades, Løkkegaard et al., Communications Earth & Environment: In the past two decades, mass loss from the Greenland ice sheet has accelerated, partly due to the speedup of glaciers. However, uncertainty in speed derived from satellite products ...3 days ago
- Maori Party (with “disgust”) draws attention to Chhour’s race after the High Court rules on Wa...Buzz from the Beehive A statement from Children’s Minister Karen Chhour – yet to be posted on the Government’s official website – arrived in Point of Order’s email in-tray last night. It welcomes the High Court ruling on whether the Waitangi Tribunal can demand she appear before it. It does ...3 days ago
- Who’s Going Up The Media Mountain?
Mr Bombastic: Ironically, the media the academic experts wanted is, in many ways, the media they got. In place of the tyrannical editors of yesteryear, advancing without fear or favour the interests of the ruling class; the New Zealand news media of today boasts a troop of enlightened journalists dedicated to ...3 days ago - “That's how I roll”
It's hard times try to make a livingYou wake up every morning in the unforgivingOut there somewhere in the cityThere's people living lives without mercy or pityI feel good, yeah I'm feeling fineI feel better then I have for the longest timeI think these pills have been good for meI ...3 days ago - “Comity” versus the rule of law
In 1974, the US Supreme Court issued its decision in United States v. Nixon, finding that the President was not a King, but was subject to the law and was required to turn over the evidence of his wrongdoing to the courts. It was a landmark decision for the rule ...4 days ago - Aotearoa: a live lab for failed Right-wing socio-economic zombie experiments once more…
Every day now just seems to bring in more fresh meat for the grinder. In their relentlessly ideological drive to cut back on the “excessive bloat” (as they see it) of the previous Labour-led government, on the mountains of evidence accumulated in such a short period of time do not ...4 days ago - Water is at the heart of farmers’ struggle to survive in BeninThis is a re-post from Yale Climate Connections by Megan Valére Sosou Market gardening site of the Itchèléré de Itagui agricultural cooperative in Dassa-Zoumè (Image credit: Megan Valère Sossou) For the residents of Dassa-Zoumè, a city in the West African country of Benin, choosing between drinking water and having enough ...4 days ago
- At a time of media turmoil, Melissa had nothing to proclaim as Minister – and now she has been dem...Buzz from the Beehive
Melissa Lee – as may be discerned from the screenshot above – has not been demoted for doing something seriously wrong as Minister of ... 4 days ago - These people are not our friends
Morning in London Mother hugs beloved daughter outside the converted shoe factory in which she is living.Afternoon in London Travelling writer takes himself and his wrist down to A&E, just to be sure. Read more ...4 days ago - Some advice from our tertiary history for the University Advisory GroupMike Grimshaw writes – The recent announcement of the University Advisory Group, chaired by Sir Peter Gluckman, makes very clear where the Government’s focus and priorities lie. The remit of the Advisory Group is that Group members will consider challenges and opportunities for improvement in the university sector including: ...4 days ago
- Still no prudential regulation case around climate changeEric Crampton writes – The Reserve Bank of New Zealand desperately wants to find reasons to have workstreams in climate change. It makes little sense. They’ve run another stress test on the banks looking to see if they could find a prudential regulation case. They couldn’t. They ...4 days ago
- Bernard’s pick ‘n’ mix of the news links for Wednesday, April 24
TL;DR: These six news links stood out to me in the last 24 hours or so onWednesday, April 23:Scoop: 'Released in error': Treasury paper hints at axing $6b flood resilience plan by NZ Herald-$$$ Thomas CoughlanScoop: EY launches new misconduct review amid Fonterra ban. Fonterra tells EY to remove some ...4 days ago - How National can neutralise serious allegations of corruption should the “Fast Track” Bill becom...Rob MacCullough writes – Pundits from the left and the right are arguing that National’s Fast Track Bill that is designed to speed up infrastructure decisions could end up becoming mired in a cesspool of corruption. Political commentator ...4 days ago
- Cleaning Up After Gabrielle.
Looking at the headlines this morning it’s hard to feel anything other than pessimistic about the future of humanity.Note that I’m not speaking about the future of mankind, but the survival of our humanity. The values that we believe in seem to be ebbing away, by the day.Perhaps every generation ...4 days ago - Gordon Campbell on bird flu, AUKUS entry fees and Cindy LeeSwabbing mixed breed baby chicks to test for avian influenzaUh oh. Bird flu – often deadly to humans – is not only being transmitted from infected birds to dairy cows, but is now travelling between dairy cows. As of last Friday, Bloomberg News reports, there were 32 American dairy herds ...4 days ago
- Tolling Existing Roads
One of the government’s transport policy and agreements with it’s coalition partners made it clear that they were looking at options like tolling and road pricing. This was reinforced in it’s draft Government Policy Statement released at the start of March which made a couple of references to it. Road pricing, ...4 days ago - At a glance – The difference between weather and climateOn February 14, 2023 we announced our Rebuttal Update Project. This included an ask for feedback about the added "At a glance" section in the updated basic rebuttal versions. This weekly blog post series highlights this new section of one of the updated basic rebuttal versions and serves as a ...5 days ago
- More criminal minersWhat is it with the mining industry? Its not enough for them to pillage the earth - they apparently can't even be bothered getting resource consent to do so: The proponent behind a major mine near the Clutha River had already been undertaking activity in the area without a ...5 days ago
- Photos from the road
Photo # 1 I am a huge fan of Singapore’s approach to housing, as described here two years ago by copying and pasting from The ConversationWhat Singapore has that Australia does not is a public housing developer, the Housing Development Board, which puts new dwellings on public and reclaimed land, ...5 days ago - RMA reforms aim to ease stock-grazing rules and reduce farmers’ costs – but Taxpayers’ Union w...Buzz from the Beehive Reactions to news of the government’s readiness to make urgent changes to “the resource management system” through a Bill to amend the Resource Management Act (RMA) suggest a balanced approach is being taken. The Taxpayers’ Union says the proposed changes don’t go far enough. Greenpeace says ...5 days ago
- Luxon Strikes Out.
I’m starting to wonder if Anna Burns-Francis might be the best political interviewer we’ve got. That might sound unlikely to you, it came as a bit of a surprise to me.Jack Tame can be excellent, but has some pretty average days. I like Rebecca Wright on Newshub, she asks good ...5 days ago - In many ways the media that the experts wanted, turned out to be the media they have gotChris Trotter writes – Willie Jackson is said to be planning a “media summit” to discuss “the state of the media and how to protect Fourth Estate Journalism”. Not only does the Editor of The Daily Blog, Martyn Bradbury, think this is a good idea, but he has also ...5 days ago
- The Waitangi Tribunal Summons; or the more things stay the sameGraeme Edgeler writes – This morning [April 21], the Wellington High Court is hearing a judicial review brought by Hon. Karen Chhour, the Minister for Children, against a decision of the Waitangi Tribunal. This is unusual, judicial reviews are much more likely to brought against ministers, rather than ...5 days ago
- Both Parliamentary watchdogs hammer Fast-track billBoth of Parliament’s watchdogs have now ripped into the Government’s Fast-track Approvals Bill. Photo: Lynn Grieveson / The KākāMy pick of the six newsey things to know from Aotearoa’s political economy and beyond on the morning of Tuesday, April 23 are:The Lead: The Auditor General, John Ryan, has joined the ...5 days ago
- India makes a big bet on electric busesThis is a re-post from Yale Climate Connections by Sarah Spengeman People wait to board an electric bus in Pune, India. (Image credit: courtesy of ITDP) Public transportation riders in Pune, India, love the city’s new electric buses so much they will actually skip an older diesel bus that ...5 days ago
- Bernard’s pick ‘n’ mix of the news links at 6:36am on Tuesday, April 23
TL;DR: These six news links stood out in the last 24 hours to 6:36am on Tuesday, April 22:Scoop & Deep Dive: How Sir Peter Jackson got to have his billion-dollar exit cake and eat Hollywood too NZ Herald-$$$ Matt NippertFast Track Approval Bill: Watchdogs seek substantial curbs on ministers' powers ...5 days ago - What is really holding up infrastructureThe infrastructure industry yesterday issued a “hurry up” message to the Government, telling it to get cracking on developing a pipeline of infrastructure projects.The hiatus around the change of Government has seen some major projects cancelled and others delayed, and there is uncertainty about what will happen with the new ...6 days ago
- “Pure Unadulterated Charge”
Hi,Over the weekend I revisited a podcast I really adore, Dead Eyes. It’s about a guy who got fired from Band of Brothers over two decades ago because Tom Hanks said he had “dead eyes”.If you don’t recall — 2001’s Band of Brothers was part of the emerging trend of ...6 days ago - Bernard's six-stack of substacks for Monday, April 22
Tonight’s six-stack includes: writes via his substack that’s he’s sceptical about the IPSOS poll last week suggesting a slide into authoritarianism here, writing: Kiwis seem to want their cake and eat it too Tal Aster writes for about How Israel turned homeowners into YIMBYs. writes via his ...6 days ago - The media were given a little list and hastened to pick out Fast Track prospects – but the Treaty ...Buzz from the Beehive The 180 or so recipients of letters from the Government telling them how to submit infrastructure projects for “fast track” consideration includes some whose project applications previously have been rejected by the courts. News media were quick to feature these in their reports after RMA Reform Minister Chris ...6 days ago
- Just trying to stay upright
It would not be a desirable way to start your holiday by breaking your back, your head, or your wrist, but on our first hour in Singapore I gave it a try.We were chatting, last week, before we started a meeting of Hazel’s Enviro Trust, about the things that can ...6 days ago - “Unprecedented”Today, former Port of Auckland CEO Tony Gibson went on trial on health and safety charges for the death of one of his workers. The Herald calls the trial "unprecedented". Firstly, it's only "unprecedented" because WorkSafe struck a corrupt and unlawful deal to drop charges against Peter Whittall over Pike ...6 days ago
- Bryce Edwards: Time for “Fast-Track Watch”Calling all journalists, academics, planners, lawyers, political activists, environmentalists, and other members of the public who believe that the relationships between vested interests and politicians need to be scrutinised. We need to work together to make sure that the new Fast-Track Approvals Bill – currently being pushed through by the ...6 days ago
- Gordon Campbell on fast track powers, media woes and the Tiktok banFeel worried. Shane Jones and a couple of his Cabinet colleagues are about to be granted the power to override any and all objections to projects like dams, mines, roads etc even if: said projects will harm biodiversity, increase global warming and cause other environmental harms, and even if ...6 days ago
- The Government’s new fast-track invitation to corruption
Bryce Edwards writes- The ability of the private sector to quickly establish major new projects making use of the urban and natural environment is to be supercharged by the new National-led Government. Yesterday it introduced to Parliament one of its most significant reforms, the Fast Track Approvals Bill. ...6 days ago - Maori push for parallel government structuresMichael Bassett writes – If you think there is a move afoot by the radical Maori fringe of New Zealand society to create a parallel system of government to the one that we elect at our triennial elections, you aren’t wrong. Over the last few days we have ...6 days ago
- An announcement about an announcementWithout a corresponding drop in interest rates, it’s doubtful any changes to the CCCFA will unleash a massive rush of home buyers. Photo: Lynn GrievesonTL;DR: The six things that stood out to me in Aotearoa’s political economy around housing, poverty and climate on Monday, April 22 included:The Government making a ...6 days ago
- All the Green Tech in China.
Sunday was a lazy day. I started watching Jack Tame on Q&A, the interviews are usually good for something to write about. Saying the things that the politicians won’t, but are quite possibly thinking. Things that are true and need to be extracted from between the lines.As you might know ...6 days ago - Western Express SuccessIn our Weekly Roundup last week we covered news from Auckland Transport that the WX1 Western Express is going to get an upgrade next year with double decker electric buses. As part of the announcement, AT also said “Since we introduced the WX1 Western Express last November we have seen ...6 days ago
- Bernard’s pick ‘n’ mix of the news links at 7:16am on Monday, April 22
TL;DR: These six news links stood out in the last 24 hours to 7:16am on Monday, April 22:Labour says Kiwis at greater risk from loan sharks as Govt plans to remove borrowing regulations NZ Herald Jenee TibshraenyHow did the cost of moving two schools blow out to more than $400m?A ...6 days ago - The Kaka’s diary for the week to April 29 and beyond
TL;DR: The six key events to watch in Aotearoa-NZ’s political economy in the week to April 29 include:PM Christopher Luxon is scheduled to hold a post-Cabinet news conference at 4 pm today. Stats NZ releases its statutory report on Census 2023 tomorrow.Finance Minister Nicola Willis delivers a pre-Budget speech at ...7 days ago - 2024 SkS Weekly Climate Change & Global Warming News Roundup #16A listing of 29 news and opinion articles we found interesting and shared on social media during the past week: Sun, April 14, 2024 thru Sat, April 20, 2024. Story of the week Our story of the week hinges on these words from the abstract of a fresh academic ...7 days ago
- Bryce Edwards: The Government’s new fast-track invitation to corruptionThe ability of the private sector to quickly establish major new projects making use of the urban and natural environment is to be supercharged by the new National-led Government. Yesterday it introduced to Parliament one of its most significant reforms, the Fast Track Approvals Bill. The Government says this will ...1 week ago
- Thank you
This is a column to say thank you. So many of have been in touch since Mum died to say so many kind and thoughtful things. You’re wonderful, all of you. You’ve asked how we’re doing, how Dad’s doing. A little more realisation each day, of the irretrievable finality of ...1 week ago - Determining the Engine Type in Your Car
Identifying the engine type in your car is crucial for various reasons, including maintenance, repairs, and performance upgrades. Knowing the specific engine model allows you to access detailed technical information, locate compatible parts, and make informed decisions about modifications. This comprehensive guide will provide you with a step-by-step approach to ...1 week ago - How to Become a Race Car Driver: A Comprehensive GuideIntroduction: The allure of racing is undeniable. The thrill of speed, the roar of engines, and the exhilaration of competition all contribute to the allure of this adrenaline-driven sport. For those who yearn to experience the pinnacle of racing, becoming a race car driver is the ultimate dream. However, the ...1 week ago
- How Many Cars Are There in the World in 2023? An Exploration of Global Automotive StatisticsIntroduction Automobiles have become ubiquitous in modern society, serving as a primary mode of transportation and a symbol of economic growth and personal mobility. With countless vehicles traversing roads and highways worldwide, it begs the question: how many cars are there in the world? Determining the precise number is a ...1 week ago
- How Long Does It Take for Car Inspection?Maintaining a safe and reliable vehicle requires regular inspections. Whether it’s a routine maintenance checkup or a safety inspection, knowing how long the process will take can help you plan your day accordingly. This article delves into the factors that influence the duration of a car inspection and provides an ...1 week ago
- Who Makes Mazda Cars?Mazda Motor Corporation, commonly known as Mazda, is a Japanese multinational automaker headquartered in Fuchu, Aki District, Hiroshima Prefecture, Japan. The company was founded in 1920 as the Toyo Cork Kogyo Co., Ltd., and began producing vehicles in 1931. Mazda is primarily known for its production of passenger cars, but ...1 week ago
- How Often to Replace Your Car Battery A Comprehensive GuideYour car battery is an essential component that provides power to start your engine, operate your electrical systems, and store energy. Over time, batteries can weaken and lose their ability to hold a charge, which can lead to starting problems, power failures, and other issues. Replacing your battery before it ...1 week ago
- Can You Register a Car Without a License?In most states, you cannot register a car without a valid driver’s license. However, there are a few exceptions to this rule. Exceptions to the Rule If you are under 18 years old: In some states, you can register a car in your name even if you do not ...1 week ago
- Mazda: A Comprehensive Evaluation of Reliability, Value, and PerformanceMazda, a Japanese automotive manufacturer with a rich history of innovation and engineering excellence, has emerged as a formidable player in the global car market. Known for its reputation of producing high-quality, fuel-efficient, and driver-oriented vehicles, Mazda has consistently garnered praise from industry experts and consumers alike. In this article, ...1 week ago
- Gaza: Aotearoa Must Support Independent Investigation into Mass GravesTe Pāti Māori are demanding the New Zealand Government support an international independent investigation into mass graves that have been uncovered at two hospitals on the Gaza strip, following weeks of assault by Israeli troops. Among the 392 bodies that have been recovered, are children and elderly civilians. Many of ...2 days ago
- Release: Working together on consistent support for veterans this Anzac Day
Our two-tiered system for veterans’ support is out of step with our closest partners, and all parties in Parliament should work together to fix it, Labour veterans’ affairs spokesperson Greg O’Connor said. ...4 days ago - Release: Penny drops – but what about Seymour and Peters?Stripping two Ministers of their portfolios just six months into the job shows Christopher Luxon’s management style is lacking, Labour Leader Chris Hipkins said. ...4 days ago
- Another ‘Stolen Generation’ enabled by court ruling on Waitangi Tribunal summonsTonight’s court decision to overturn the summons of the Children’s Minister has enabled the Crown to continue making decisions about Māori without evidence, says Te Pāti Māori spokesperson for Children, Mariameno Kapa-Kingi. “The judicial system has this evening told the nation that this government can do whatever they want when ...4 days ago
- Release: Budget blunder shows Nicola Willis could cut recovery fundingIt appears Nicola Willis is about to pull the rug out from under the feet of local communities still dealing with the aftermath of last year’s severe weather, and local councils relying on funding to build back from these disasters. ...5 days ago
- Further environmental mismanagement on the cards
The Government’s resource management reforms will add to the heavy and ever-growing burden this Government is loading on to our environment. ...5 days ago - Release: RMA changes will be a disaster for environmentThe Government is making short-sighted changes to the Resource Management Act (RMA) that will take away environmental protection in favour of short-term profits, Labour’s environment spokesperson Rachel Brooking said today. ...5 days ago
- Release: Labour supports urgent changes to emergency management systemLabour welcomes the release of the report into the North Island weather events and looks forward to working with the Government to ensure that New Zealand is as prepared as it can be for the next natural disaster. ...5 days ago
- Release: Labour calls for New Zealand to recognise PalestineThe Labour Party has called for the New Zealand Government to recognise Palestine, as a material step towards progressing the two-State solution needed to achieve a lasting peace in the region. ...6 days ago
- Release: Three strikes law political posturing of worst kindThe Government is bringing back a law that has little evidential backing just to look tough, Labour justice spokesperson Duncan Webb said. ...6 days ago
- Release: Government cuts unbelievably target child exploitation, violent extremism, ports and airpor...Some of our country’s most important work, stopping the sexual exploitation of children and violent extremism could go along with staff on the frontline at ports and airports. ...6 days ago
- Three strikes has failed before and will fail againResurrecting the archaic three-strikes legislation is an unwelcome return to a failed American-style approach to justice. ...6 days ago
- Release: Environmental protection vital, not ‘onerous’The Government’s Fast Track Approvals Bill will give projects such as new coal mines a ‘get out of jail free’ card to wreak havoc on the environment, Labour Leader Chris Hipkins said today. ...6 days ago
- Ferris – Three Strikes targets those ‘too brown to be white’The government's decision to reintroduce Three Strikes is a destructive and ineffective piece of law-making that will only exacerbate an inherently biased and racist criminal justice system, said Te Pāti Māori Justice Spokesperson, Tākuta Ferris, today. During the time Three Strikes was in place in Aotearoa, Māori and Pasifika received ...6 days ago
- Release: Govt cuts doctors and nurses in hiring freezeCuts to frontline hospital staff are not only a broken election promise, it shows the reckless tax cuts have well and truly hit the frontline of the health system, says Labour Health spokesperson Ayesha Verrall. ...1 week ago
- Fast-track submissions period must be extendedThe Green Party has joined the call for public submissions on the fast-track legislation to be extended after the Ombudsman forced the Government to release the list of organisations invited to apply just hours before submissions close. ...1 week ago
- Release: Progress on climate will be undone by GovtNew Zealand’s good work at reducing climate emissions for three years in a row will be undone by the National government’s lack of ambition and scrapping programmes that were making a difference, Labour Party climate spokesperson Megan Woods said today. ...1 week ago
- Release: Dark day for Kiwi kids as a third of Govt cuts affect themNews that 1000 jobs at the Ministry of Education and Oranga Tamariki could go is devastating for future generations of New Zealanders. ...2 weeks ago
- Release: Alarm as Government signals further blow to school lunchesMore essential jobs could be on the chopping block, this time Ministry of Education staff on the school lunches team are set to find out whether they're in line to lose their jobs. ...2 weeks ago
- Oranga Tamariki cuts commit tamariki to state abuseTe Pāti Māori is disgusted at the confirmation that hundreds are set to lose their jobs at Oranga Tamariki, and the disestablishment of the Treaty Response Unit. “This act of absolute carelessness and out of touch decision making is committing tamariki to state abuse.” Said Te Pāti Māori Oranga Tamariki ...2 weeks ago
- Release: Quick, submit – stop Govt’s dodgy approvals billThe Government is trying to bring in a law that will allow Ministers to cut corners and kill off native species, Labour environment spokesperson Rachel Brooking said. ...2 weeks ago
- Government throws coal on the climate crisis fireThe Government’s policy announced today to ease consenting for coal mining will have a lasting impact across generations. ...2 weeks ago
- Release: Public transport costs to double as National looks at unaffordable roading project insteadCancelling urgently needed new Cook Strait ferries and hiking the cost of public transport for many Kiwis so that National can announce the prospect of another tunnel for Wellington is not making good choices, Labour Transport Spokesperson Tangi Utikere said. ...2 weeks ago
- Release: Cost of living in Auckland still not a priorityA laundry list of additional costs for Tāmaki Makarau Auckland shows the Minister for the city is not delivering for the people who live there, says Labour Auckland Issues spokesperson Shanan Halbert. ...2 weeks ago
- Te Pāti Māori to visit Queensland to strengthen ties with Māori in AustraliaTe Pāti Māori co-leader Rawiri Waititi, and Mema Paremata mō Tāmaki-Makaurau, Takutai Tarsh Kemp, will travel to the Gold Coast to strengthen ties with Māori in Australia next week (15-21 April). The visit, in the lead-up to the 9th Australian National Kapa haka Festival, will be an opportunity for both ...2 weeks ago
- Greens look to fast-track submissions on harmful lawThe Green Party has today launched a step-by-step guide to help New Zealanders make their voice heard on the Government’s democracy dodging and anti-environment fast track legislation. ...2 weeks ago
- Release: Govt should stop making people’s lives harder and build more homesThe National Government’s proposed changes to the Residential Tenancies Act will mean tenants can be turfed from their homes by landlords with little notice, Labour housing spokesperson Kieran McAnulty said. ...2 weeks ago
- Release: Melissa Lee missing in action on mediaThe action Melissa Lee promised to protect democracy and the media sector is missing, Media and Communications spokesperson Willie Jackson said. ...2 weeks ago
- Landlord Government leaves little hope for rentersThe Government’s announcement on tenancy rules prove that it does not care about renters. ...2 weeks ago
- Opportunity to build a more sustainable economyGreen Party co-leader Marama Davidson is calling on all parties to support a common-sense change that’s great for the planet and great for consumers after her member’s bill was drawn from the ballot today. ...2 weeks ago
- Significant step forward in fixing cruel and unjust pastA significant milestone has been reached in the fight to strike an anti-Pasifika and unfair law from the country’s books after Teanau Tuiono’s members’ bill passed its first reading. ...3 weeks ago
- Missed opportunity but NZ will surely one day recognise the right to a sustainable environmentNew Zealand has today missed the opportunity to uphold the right to a clean, healthy, and sustainable environment, says James Shaw after his member’s bill was voted down in its first reading. ...3 weeks ago
- Release: Don’t cut our lunches – clear message sent to GovernmentTens of thousands of people are demanding the Government commits to fully funding free and healthy school lunches. ...3 weeks ago
- Release: Govt makes U-turn on Suicide Prevention OfficeLabour welcomes the Government’s U-turn on the closure of the Suicide Prevention Office, says Labour Mental Health spokesperson Ingrid Leary. ...3 weeks ago
- CCC issues warning over further climate delayToday’s advice from the Climate Change Commission paints a sobering reality of the challenge we face in combating climate change, especially in light of recent Government policy announcements. ...3 weeks ago
- Pharmac Chair appointed
Hon Paula Bennett has been appointed as member and chair of the Pharmac board, Associate Health Minister David Seymour announced today. "Pharmac is a critical part of New Zealand's health system and plays a significant role in ensuring that Kiwis have the best possible access to medicines,” says Mr Seymour. ...9 hours ago - Taking action on Fetal Alcohol Spectrum DisorderHundreds of New Zealand families affected by Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorder (FASD) will benefit from a new Government focus on prevention and treatment, says Health Minister Dr Shane Reti. “We know FASD is a leading cause of preventable intellectual and neurodevelopmental disability in New Zealand,” Dr Reti says. “Every day, ...1 day ago
- New sports complex opens in KaikoheRegional Development Minister Shane Jones today attended the official opening of Kaikohe’s new $14.7 million sports complex. “The completion of the Kaikohe Multi Sports Complex is a fantastic achievement for the Far North,” Mr Jones says. “This facility not only fulfils a long-held dream for local athletes, but also creates ...1 day ago
- Diplomacy needed more than everForeign Minister Winston Peters’ engagements in Türkiye this week underlined the importance of diplomacy to meet growing global challenges. “Returning to the Gallipoli Peninsula to represent New Zealand at Anzac commemorations was a sombre reminder of the critical importance of diplomacy for de-escalating conflicts and easing tensions,” Mr Peters ...2 days ago
- Anzac Commemorative Address, Buttes New British Cemetery BelgiumAmbassador Millar, Burgemeester, Vandepitte, Excellencies, military representatives, distinguished guests, ladies and gentlemen – good morning and welcome to this sacred Anzac Day dawn service. It is an honour to be here on behalf of the Government and people of New Zealand at Buttes New British Cemetery, Polygon Wood – a deeply ...2 days ago
- Anzac Commemorative Address – NZ National Service, Chunuk BairDistinguished guests - It is an honour to return once again to this site which, as the resting place for so many of our war-dead, has become a sacred place for generations of New Zealanders. Our presence here and at the other special spaces of Gallipoli is made ...3 days ago
- Anzac Commemorative Address – Dawn Service, Gallipoli, TürkiyeMai ia tawhiti pamamao, te moana nui a Kiwa, kua tae whakaiti mai matou, ki to koutou papa whenua. No koutou te tapuwae, no matou te tapuwae, kua honoa pumautia. Ko nga toa kua hinga nei, o te Waipounamu, o te Ika a Maui, he okioki tahi me o ...3 days ago
- PM announces changes to portfoliosPaul Goldsmith will take on responsibility for the Media and Communications portfolio, while Louise Upston will pick up the Disability Issues portfolio, Prime Minister Christopher Luxon announced today. “Our Government is relentlessly focused on getting New Zealand back on track. As issues change in prominence, I plan to adjust Ministerial ...4 days ago
- New catch limits for unique fishery areasRecreational catch limits will be reduced in areas of Fiordland and the Chatham Islands to help keep those fisheries healthy and sustainable, Oceans and Fisheries Minister Shane Jones says. The lower recreational daily catch limits for a range of finfish and shellfish species caught in the Fiordland Marine Area and ...4 days ago
- Minister welcomes hydrogen milestoneEnergy Minister Simeon Brown has welcomed an important milestone in New Zealand’s hydrogen future, with the opening of the country’s first network of hydrogen refuelling stations in Wiri. “I want to congratulate the team at Hiringa Energy and its partners K one W one (K1W1), Mitsui & Co New Zealand ...5 days ago
- Urgent changes to system through first RMA Amendment BillThe coalition Government is delivering on its commitment to improve resource management laws and give greater certainty to consent applicants, with a Bill to amend the Resource Management Act (RMA) expected to be introduced to Parliament next month. RMA Reform Minister Chris Bishop has today outlined the first RMA Amendment ...5 days ago
- Overseas decommissioning models consideredOverseas models for regulating the oil and gas sector, including their decommissioning regimes, are being carefully scrutinised as a potential template for New Zealand’s own sector, Resources Minister Shane Jones says. The Coalition Government is focused on rebuilding investor confidence in New Zealand’s energy sector as it looks to strengthen ...5 days ago
- Release of North Island Severe Weather Event InquiryEmergency Management and Recovery Minister Mark Mitchell has today released the Report of the Government Inquiry into the response to the North Island Severe Weather Events. “The report shows that New Zealand’s emergency management system is not fit-for-purpose and there are some significant gaps we need to address,” Mr Mitchell ...5 days ago
- Justice Minister to attend Human Rights CouncilJustice Minister Paul Goldsmith is today travelling to Europe where he’ll update the United Nations Human Rights Council on the Government’s work to restore law and order. “Attending the Universal Periodic Review in Geneva provides us with an opportunity to present New Zealand’s human rights progress, priorities, and challenges, while ...6 days ago
- Patterson reopens world’s largest wool scouring facilityAssociate Agriculture Minister, Mark Patterson, formally reopened the world’s largest wool processing facility today in Awatoto, Napier, following a $50 million rebuild and refurbishment project. “The reopening of this facility will significantly lift the economic opportunities available to New Zealand’s wool sector, which already accounts for 20 per cent of ...6 days ago
- Speech to the Southland Otago Regional Engineering Collective Summit, 18 April 2024Hon Andrew Bayly, Minister for Small Business and Manufacturing At the Southland Otago Regional Engineering Collective (SOREC) Summit, 18 April, Dunedin Ngā mihi nui, Ko Andrew Bayly aho, Ko Whanganui aho Good Afternoon and thank you for inviting me to open your summit today. I am delighted ...6 days ago
- Government to introduce revised Three Strikes lawThe Government is delivering on its commitment to bring back the Three Strikes legislation, Associate Justice Minister Nicole McKee announced today. “Our Government is committed to restoring law and order and enforcing appropriate consequences on criminals. We are making it clear that repeat serious violent or sexual offending is not ...6 days ago
- New diplomatic appointmentsForeign Minister Winston Peters has today announced four new diplomatic appointments for New Zealand’s overseas missions. “Our diplomats have a vital role in maintaining and protecting New Zealand’s interests around the world,” Mr Peters says. “I am pleased to announce the appointment of these senior diplomats from the ...6 days ago
- Humanitarian support for Ethiopia and SomaliaNew Zealand is contributing NZ$7 million to support communities affected by severe food insecurity and other urgent humanitarian needs in Ethiopia and Somalia, Foreign Minister Rt Hon Winston Peters announced today. “Over 21 million people are in need of humanitarian assistance across Ethiopia, with a further 6.9 million people ...6 days ago
- Arts Minister congratulates Mataaho CollectiveMinister for Arts, Culture and Heritage Paul Goldsmith is congratulating Mataaho Collective for winning the Golden Lion for best participant in the main exhibition at the Venice Biennale. "Congratulations to the Mataaho Collective for winning one of the world's most prestigious art prizes at the Venice Biennale. “It is good ...1 week ago
- Supporting better financial outcomes for KiwisThe Government is reforming financial services to improve access to home loans and other lending, and strengthen customer protections, Commerce and Consumer Affairs Minister Andrew Bayly and Housing Minister Chris Bishop announced today. “Our coalition Government is committed to rebuilding the economy and making life simpler by cutting red tape. We are ...1 week ago
- Trade relationship with China remains strong“China remains a strong commercial opportunity for Kiwi exporters as Chinese businesses and consumers continue to value our high-quality safe produce,” Trade and Agriculture Minister Todd McClay says. Mr McClay has returned to New Zealand following visits to Beijing, Harbin and Shanghai where he met ministers, governors and mayors and engaged in trade and agricultural events with the New ...1 week ago
- PM’s South East Asia mission does the businessPrime Minister Christopher Luxon has completed a successful trip to Singapore, Thailand and the Philippines, deepening relationships and capitalising on opportunities. Mr Luxon was accompanied by a business delegation and says the choice of countries represents the priority the New Zealand Government places on South East Asia, and our relationships in ...1 week ago
- $41m to support clean energy in South East AsiaNew Zealand is demonstrating its commitment to reducing global greenhouse emissions, and supporting clean energy transition in South East Asia, through a contribution of NZ$41 million (US$25 million) in climate finance to the Asian Development Bank (ADB)-led Energy Transition Mechanism (ETM). Prime Minister Christopher Luxon and Climate Change Minister Simon Watts announced ...1 week ago
- Minister releases Fast-track stakeholder listThe Government is today releasing a list of organisations who received letters about the Fast-track applications process, says RMA Reform Minister Chris Bishop. “Recently Ministers and agencies have received a series of OIA requests for a list of organisations to whom I wrote with information on applying to have a ...1 week ago
- Judicial appointments announcedAttorney-General Judith Collins today announced the appointment of Wellington Barrister David Jonathan Boldt as a Judge of the High Court, and the Honourable Justice Matthew Palmer as a Judge of the Court of Appeal. Justice Boldt graduated with an LLB from Victoria University of Wellington in 1990, and also holds ...1 week ago
- Education Minister heads to major teaching summit in SingaporeEducation Minister Erica Stanford will lead the New Zealand delegation at the 2024 International Summit on the Teaching Profession (ISTP) held in Singapore. The delegation includes representatives from the Post Primary Teachers’ Association (PPTA) Te Wehengarua and the New Zealand Educational Institute (NZEI) Te Riu Roa. The summit is co-hosted ...1 week ago
- Value of stopbank project proven during cycloneA stopbank upgrade project in Tairawhiti partly funded by the Government has increased flood resilience for around 7000ha of residential and horticultural land so far, Regional Development Minister Shane Jones says. Mr Jones today attended a dawn service in Gisborne to mark the end of the first stage of the ...1 week ago
- Anzac commemorations, Türkiye relationship focus of visitForeign Affairs Minister Winston Peters will represent the Government at Anzac Day commemorations on the Gallipoli Peninsula next week and engage with senior representatives of the Turkish government in Istanbul. “The Gallipoli campaign is a defining event in our history. It will be a privilege to share the occasion ...1 week ago
- Minister to Europe for OECD meeting, Anzac DayScience, Innovation and Technology and Defence Minister Judith Collins will next week attend the OECD Science and Technology Ministerial conference in Paris and Anzac Day commemorations in Belgium. “Science, innovation and technology have a major role to play in rebuilding our economy and achieving better health, environmental and social outcomes ...1 week ago
- Comprehensive Partnership the goal for NZ and the PhilippinesPrime Minister Christopher Luxon held a bilateral meeting today with the President of the Philippines, Ferdinand Marcos Jr. The Prime Minister was accompanied by MP Paulo Garcia, the first Filipino to be elected to a legislature outside the Philippines. During today’s meeting, Prime Minister Luxon and President Marcos Jr discussed opportunities to ...1 week ago
- Government commits $20m to Westport flood protectionThe Government has announced that $20 million in funding will be made available to Westport to fund much needed flood protection around the town. This measure will significantly improve the resilience of the community, says Local Government Minister Simeon Brown. “The Westport community has already been allocated almost $3 million ...1 week ago
- Taupō takes pole positionThe Government is proud to support the first ever Repco Supercars Championship event in Taupō as up to 70,000 motorsport fans attend the Taupō International Motorsport Park this weekend, says Economic Development Minister Melissa Lee. “Anticipation for the ITM Taupō Super400 is huge, with tickets and accommodation selling out weeks ...1 week ago
- Cost of living support for low-income homeownersLocal Government Minister Simeon Brown has announced an increase to the Rates Rebate Scheme, putting money back into the pockets of low-income homeowners. “The coalition Government is committed to bringing down the cost of living for New Zealanders. That includes targeted support for those Kiwis who are doing things tough, such ...1 week ago
- Government backing mussel spat projectThe Coalition Government is investing in a project to boost survival rates of New Zealand mussels and grow the industry, Oceans and Fisheries Minister Shane Jones has announced. “This project seeks to increase the resilience of our mussels and significantly boost the sector’s productivity,” Mr Jones says. “The project - ...1 week ago
- Government focused on getting people into workBenefit figures released today underscore the importance of the Government’s plan to rebuild the economy and have 50,000 fewer people on Jobseeker Support, Social Development and Employment Minister Louise Upston says. “Benefit numbers are still significantly higher than when National was last in government, when there was about 70,000 fewer ...1 week ago
- Clean energy key driver to reducing emissionsThe Government’s commitment to doubling New Zealand’s renewable energy capacity is backed by new data showing that clean energy has helped the country reach its lowest annual gross emissions since 1999, Climate Change Minister Simon Watts says. New Zealand’s latest Greenhouse Gas Inventory (1990-2022) published today, shows gross emissions fell ...1 week ago
- Earthquake-prone buildings review brought forwardThe Government is bringing the earthquake-prone building review forward, with work to start immediately, and extending the deadline for remediations by four years, Building and Construction Minister Chris Penk says. “Our Government is focused on rebuilding the economy. A key part of our plan is to cut red tape that ...2 weeks ago
- Thailand and NZ to agree to Strategic PartnershipPrime Minister Christopher Luxon and his Thai counterpart, Prime Minister Srettha Thavisin, have today agreed that New Zealand and the Kingdom of Thailand will upgrade the bilateral relationship to a Strategic Partnership by 2026. “New Zealand and Thailand have a lot to offer each other. We have a strong mutual desire to build ...2 weeks ago
- Government consults on extending coastal permits for portsRMA Reform Minister Chris Bishop and Transport Minister Simeon Brown have today announced the Coalition Government’s intention to extend port coastal permits for a further 20 years, providing port operators with certainty to continue their operations. “The introduction of the Resource Management Act in 1991 required ports to obtain coastal ...2 weeks ago
- Fast-track Approvals Bill Presents A Serious Risk To New Zealand Exporters
“Our exporters should, therefore, be deeply concerned that the Fast-track Approvals Bill was not assessed for consistency with any of our free trade commitments prior to being introduced to the House,” says Gary Taylor, Chief Executive of the Environmental ...1 hour ago - Green co-leader James Shaw came 'very close' to resigning as minister under Labour govt
The former minister reveals he "ended up storming out" of a Cabinet meeting over disagreements on climate change and biodiversity. ...4 hours ago - NZCTU Welcomes Corporate Manslaughter Bill IntroductionNZCTU President Richard Wagstaff is calling on all political parties to support the new Member’s Bill from Labour’s workplace relations and safety spokesperson Camilla Belich MP that would ensure negligent companies are held accountable when their employees ...4 hours ago
- US election forecaster with near-perfect track record not ready call 2024 just yetA historian with an uncanny track record of predicting US election winners tells RNZ's Sunday Morning that President Biden looks to be on track for another term, but things could still go very wrong for him. ...5 hours ago
- Fish and quiz: The many uses of written parliamentary questionsMinisters have to answer thousands of written questions each year - but how are they used, and for what end? ...6 hours ago
- Former Deputy PM Paula Bennett appointed Pharmac board chairThe former National MP "brings a wealth of experience" to the role, David Seymour says. ...8 hours ago
- Inside the home of New Zealand’s greatest crime writer
Ngaio Marsh House is one of Christchurch’s best kept secrets – and contains more than a few mysteries of its own. Trust Ngaio Marsh to leave more than a few mysteries scattered through her house long after her departure. For a start, there’s the curious concrete portal in the garden, ...9 hours ago - ‘Apologies to Dvořák’: How a serenade for strings cemented one of New Zealand TV’s strongest...Appointment viewing has been lost to the mists of time, but memories of Montana Sunday Theatre can still be conjured by hitting play on a particular piece of classical music. “You’re not going to be able to sell it.” Over 30 years on, Karen Bieleski still recalls how the task ...10 hours ago
- An Ode to .. King Luxon
Performance Review King Luxon sat behind His massive polished oak desk. It is Performance Review time. There is a knock on the door. “Enter!” says the King. In steps Minister of Disabilities and Carer Pedicures, Penny Simmonds. “I can explain everything …” she begins. “Fine,” says King Luxon, pressing the ...11 hours ago - In the studio with artist power couple Claudia Kogachi and Josephine JelicichThe pair opened their first fully collaborative exhibition, Nina for Flowers, last Saturday. Gabi Lardies visited their studio to find out who Nina is and what working together was like. ‘It didn’t start out like, ‘This is a show about Nina,’” says Josephine Jelicich, gripping a thermos of peppermint tea. ...13 hours ago
- An ode to the muesli bar, a national treasureThank you, Dr Maximilian Oskar Bircher-Benner, for your brilliant invention. I’m another mid-20s Kiwi who had an OE last year. I hopped on my bicycle where France meets the Atlantic and cycled east. I pedalled through the Loire Valley, down rivers lined with willows and ancient wisteria-draped chateaus. I relished ...13 hours ago
- Government urged to hit the gas on revamp of road user chargesInfrastructure New Zealand is pushing for new road user charges to be brought in quicker to help relieve pressure on strained transport funding. ...1 day ago
- US student Palestine protests against Israel’s war on Gaza inspire global action
Asia Pacific Report From France to Australia, university pro-Palestine protests in the United States have now spread to several countries with students pitching on-campus camps. And students at Columbia and other US universities remain defiant as campuses have witnessed the biggest protests since the anti-Vietnam war and anti-apartheid eras in ...1 day ago - Former Te Whatu Ora chairperson Rob Campbell criticises Health NZ's 'savings' directi...Rob Campbell said it shows "poor management" and is "frankly irresponsible". ...1 day ago
- ‘To lead is to serve’ – Governor-General to call PM election in Solomon IslandsRNZ Pacific The race to form the next government of Solomon Islands could be a tight one, with no single party emerging from the election with enough seats to govern. Caretaker prime minister Manasseh Sogavare’s Our Party did the best, securing 15 out of the 50 seats in the House. ...1 day ago
- Bryce Edwards – FastTrackWatch: The Case for the Government’s Fast Track BillAnalysis by Dr Bryce Edwards, Democracy Project (https://democracyproject.nz) New Zealand Government’s Fast Track legislation. Many criticisms are being made of the Government’s Fast Track Approvals Bill, including by this writer. But as with everything in politics, every story has two sides, and both deserve attention. It’s important to understand what the Government ...1 day ago
- NZ and Türkiye pledge cooperation during natural disastersThe two countries have "a long history of coming to each other's aid", including after the 2023 Turkish earthquakes, Winston Peters says. ...1 day ago
- Waste not, want not: New series Food Waste Kitchen turns food trash into treasureTara Ward talks to presenter Naomi Toilalo about the new TV show that turns food waste into a three course feast. Naomi Toilalo is standing in the warehouse at Good Neighbour Tauranga, helping unpack the two-and-a-half tonnes of rejected food that will arrive at the community support hub that day. ...1 day ago
- Vaping regulations fight 'immeasurably harder' under coalition – campaignerFocus on Politics - Successive governments have claimed crack downs on youth vaping, but the bending and breaking of rules seems pervasive. ...1 day ago
- Dog of the month: Scout, who is so independent she could be a catScout is our latest Dog of the Month. This feature was offered as a reward during our What’s Eating Aotearoa PledgeMe campaign. Thank you to Scout’s human, Avril, for her support. Dog name: Scout (named after the little girl in To Kill a Mockingbird – she inherited the independent spirit ...1 day ago
- ‘I don’t know if we were brave or stupid’: Megan Alatini on changing reality TVMegan Alatini takes us through her life in TV, including ‘terrible’ daytime TV, the class of Carol Hirschfeld and her most embarrassing TrueBliss moment. When she responded to a vague newspaper ad asking “do you have what it takes to be a popstar?” 25 years ago, Megan Alatini never guessed ...1 day ago
- Behind the counter: Wellington shopkeepersA new exhibition in Wellington showcases the faces behind your local goods and services. Back in 1977, when I was a fine arts student at the University of Canterbury, I took a series of photographs of Christchurch shopkeepers. The photos were for a calendar – a project for my end ...1 day ago
- Iranian Solidarity Group New Zealand Condemns Toomaj Salehi's Death Sentence And The New Aggres...Toomaj and his resistance to tyranny through his songs have become an icon for the youth of Iran, so his sentence has hit the nation hard. Toomaj Salehi is not the first artist to pay the price for standing with the people. ...2 days ago
- Short story: Calf Creek, by Anna ScaifeMy cousin Dylan and I spotted these big eels under the bridge that summer. We watched them lounging under the dark weed, facing into the flow of water, their mouths frozen open. Dylan and I couldn’t stop thinking about those eels. The night we went down to the creek, we ...2 days ago
- Newsroom welcomes the Secret DiaryNewsroom, home of satire. My long-running weekly satirical series The Secret Diary has moved to Newsroom and will appear every Saturday, with Victor Billot’s wildly popular satirical Odes continuing to appear every Sunday. Diaries, Odes – while serious political columnists toil at meaningful opinions and stroke their chins to an ...2 days ago
- I saw ‘The Sign’, and it opened up my eyes: All the fuss around Bluey, explainedTara Ward unravels the many nuanced layers of a cartoon about talking dogs. This is an excerpt from our weekly pop culture newsletter Rec Room. Sign up here. It’s not often an episode of a children’s cartoon has adults sobbing into their sleeves, but that’s exactly what happened this week when ...2 days ago
- Jessica Tater has ambition without bordersWorking as a doctor in developing countries to help communities achieve better health outcomes is nothing short of a life goal for Jessica Tater. The University of Otago medical student has her sights firmly set on joining the international humanitarian organisation Doctors Without Borders/Médecins Sans Frontières (MSF) when she qualifies ...2 days ago
- The island where people’s stories are paramountThere’s an island in the far reaches of Auckland’s territory, sitting off the tip of the Coromandel Peninsula, 30 minutes by air from the city or four hours on the slow boat. Aotea Great Barrier is off-grid, it has a population of fewer than a thousand people … and most ...2 days ago
- Australian author leads silence protest over ‘blood debt’ owed to PapuansAsia Pacific Report An Australian author and advocate, Jim Aubrey, today led a national symbolic one minute’s silence to mark the “blood debt” owed to Papuan allies during the Second World War indigenous resistance against the invading Japanese forces. “A promise to most people is a promise,” Aubrey said in ...2 days ago
- Israel delays Gaza Freedom Flotilla departure with bureaucratic ‘block’Asia Pacific Report The Freedom Flotilla is ready to sail to Gaza, reports Kia Ora Gaza. All the required paperwork has been submitted to the port authority, and the cargo has been loaded and prepared for the humanitarian trip to the besieged enclave. However, organisers received word of an “administrative ...2 days ago
- Have New Zealanders really been ‘misled’ about AUKUS, or is involvement now a foregone conclusio...ANALYSIS: By Marco de Jong, Auckland University of Technology and Robert G. Patman, University of Otago When former prime minister Helen Clark spoke out against New Zealand potentially compromising its independent foreign policy by joining pillar two of the AUKUS security pact, Foreign Minister Winston Peters responded bluntly: On ...2 days ago
- Palestine protesters challenge TVNZ over Israeli ambassador’s ‘propaganda’Pacific Media Watch Palestine solidarity protesters today demonstrated at the Auckland headquarters of Television New Zealand, accusing the country’s major TV network of broadcasting “propaganda” backing Israel’s genocidal war on Gaza. About 50 protesters targeted the main entrance to the TVNZ building near Sky Tower and also picketed a side ...2 days ago
- Lynley Hood Opinion – Senator Fulbright must be spinning in his grave2 days ago
- Fast-track bill could affect NZ's reputation – Transparency InternationalThe ministers responsible for green-lighting major projects need to be open about potential conflicts of interest, says Transparency International. ...2 days ago
- We’re all feeling the collective grief and trauma of violence against women – but this is the pr...Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Anastasia Powell, Professor, Family and Sexual Violence, RMIT University It has been a particularly distressing start to the year. There is little that can ease the current grief of individuals, families and communities who have needlessly lost a loved one to men’s ...2 days ago
- Species living closely together in symbiosis is far older and way more common than you might thinkSource: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Gregory Moore, Senior Research Associate, School of Ecosystem and Forest Sciences, The University of Melbourne Lichen, the first described example of symbiosis. AdeJ Artventure/Shutterstock Once known only to those studying biology, the word symbiosis is now widely used. Symbiosis is the intimate ...2 days ago
- What is childhood dementia? And how could new research help?Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Kim Hemsley, Head, Childhood Dementia Research Group, Flinders Health and Medical Research Institute, College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University Olena Ivanova/Shutterstock “Childhood” and “dementia” are two words we wish we didn’t have to use together. But sadly, around 1,400 ...2 days ago
- Jobseekers get about $345 less than pensioners each fortnight. This gap is hurting, and is set to wi...Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Peter Whiteford, Professor, Crawford School of Public Policy, Australian National University The government’s Economic Inclusion Advisory Committee has just published its second report. It was set up by Treasurer Jim Chalmers and Minister for Social Services Amanda Rishworth in 2022 to provide: ...2 days ago
- Does fighting inflation always lead to recession? What NZ data tellsHere is what 60 years of New Zealand data shows us. ...2 days ago
- The government's 20 trips abroad in AprilThe government appears committed to overseas visits with 14 ministers and MPs in 18 countries this month. ...2 days ago
- Government unveils fetal alcohol guidelines, plan for diagnosis trainingThe government is promising to step up the response to Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorder, promising to boost diagnoses and raise awareness. ...2 days ago
- Labor facing heavy defeat in Queensland, but faring better in federal pollsSource: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Adrian Beaumont, Election Analyst (Psephologist) at The Conversation; and Honorary Associate, School of Mathematics and Statistics, The University of Melbourne The Queensland state election will be held in October. A YouGov poll for The Courier Mail, conducted April 9–17 from a sample ...2 days ago
- Why the potential for another Donald Trump presidency is making Iran very nervousSource: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Amin Naeni, PhD candidate at Alfred Deakin Institute for Citizenship and Globalisation, Deakin University There’s been much talk in recent months about what a possible second Donald Trump presidency in the United States could mean for Europe, Russia’s war in Ukraine, the ...2 days ago
- ‘The worst piece of law proposed since 1979’: Reactions to the Fast-track Approvals BillA brief round-up of submissions on the controversial proposed law. This is an excerpt from our weekly environmental newsletter Future Proof. Sign up here. Last week, submissions on the controversial Fast-track Approvals Bill closed just hours after the government released a list of stakeholder organisations who were sent letters advising how they could ...2 days ago
- The Friday Poem: ‘Cereal giving’ by Robin PeaceA poem from Robin Peace’s new collection Detritus of Empire: feather / grass / rock. Cereal giving I see a woman’s hands, see her curious hands break a stalk as she walks through the tall prairie, the savannah, the steppe, wherever it was. See her idly bite the grass that ...2 days ago
- The Unity Books bestseller chart for the week ending April 26The only published and available best-selling indie book chart in New Zealand is the top 10 sales list recorded every week at Unity Books’ stores in High St, Auckland, and Willis St, Wellington. AUCKLAND 1 Hemingway’s Goblet by Dermot Ross (Mary Egan Publishing, $38) A handsomely produced (debossed cover, lovely ...2 days ago
- Te Rūnanga O Ngāti Whātua Welcomes Commissioner's Decision Regarding Awataha MaraeThe Commissioner's decision validates the longstanding efforts of the local community and ensures that Awataha Marae will be managed to serve the needs of the local community, particularly for hosting tangihanga. ...2 days ago
- We reconstructed landscapes that greeted the first humans in Australia around 65,000 years agoSource: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Tristan Salles, Associate professor, University of Sydney Examples of Australian landscapes. Unsplash Seventy thousand years ago, the sea level was much lower than today. Australia, along with New Guinea and Tasmania, formed a connected landmass known as Sahul. Around this time – ...2 days ago
- What do we lose when our old suburbs disappear?Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Felicity Castagna, Lecturer, Creative Writing, Western Sydney University Day Day Market, Parramatta Photo: Garry Trinh I live on the edge of Parramatta, Australia’s fastest-growing city, on the kind of old-fashioned suburban street that has 1950s fibros constructed in the post-war housing boom, ...2 days ago
- Does fighting inflation always lead to recession? What 60 years of NZ data can tell usSource: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Michael Ryan, Teaching Fellow in Economics, University of Waikato GettyImages fatido/Getty Images There is an ongoing global debate over whether the high inflation seen in the aftermath of the COVID-19 pandemic can be lowered without a recession. New Zealand is not ...2 days ago
- After spending $700,000 on pins for Covid-19 workers, department now cutting costsA government office that set aside millions for lapel pins for pandemic workers is now looking to cut back on spending. ...2 days ago
- ‘A hell of a lot of fun’: Our reviews of Chris Isaak’s dazzling Auckland showThe ‘Wicked Game’ heartthrob is in his late 60s now. That didn’t stop him putting on a lively, goofy and very sparkly show. Apart from ‘Wicked Game’, which graces a sultry playlist of mine simply called 💋, my last sustained Chris Isaak listening session took place when I was about ...2 days ago
- The Week in Politics: Days of drama and demotionsAnalysis - Two ministers were stripped of portfolios in a warning to Cabinet, drama broke out at the Waitangi Tribunal, and the gang patch ban bill ran into opposition. ...2 days ago
- Hear me out: All I want is a TrueBliss T-shirtTara Ward makes an impassioned plea for some vital pop culture merch. In April 1999, I became obsessed with a new reality television show called Popstars. Every Tuesday night, five strangers transformed into music royalty before my very eyes as Joe, Keri, Carly, Erika and Megan were chosen to form ...2 days ago
- Solemn ANZAC dawn service at PNG’s Isurava battle memorialPNG Post-Courier In the early hours of ANZAC Day, aerial photographs captured an impressive gathering of Australians and Papua New Guineans at Isurava in the Northern (Oro) Province. The solemn dawn service yesterday was held at a site steeped in history, where some of the fiercest battles of World War ...2 days ago
- Political editors panel: A reshuffle and the fast trackListen - RNZ's Jo Moir and NZ Herald's Claire Trevett dissect the demotion of two ministers and the PM's response on Morning Report. ...2 days ago
- After-hours clinics on verge of collapse in some regionsOverworked GPs have signalled they can no longer cover, while funding is falling short. ...2 days ago
- Oranga Tamariki Axes Specialist Māori Roles, Weakens Commitment To Te Ao MāoriThe PSA is shocked that Oranga Tamariki has used the cost cutting drive to downgrade its commitment to Te Ao Māori and remove many specialist Māori roles. ...2 days ago
- China’s money only goes so far – Kokoda shows why history binds PNG and Australia in a far deepe...Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Ian Kemish, Adjunct Professor, School of Historical and Philosophical Inquiry, The University of Queensland There can be no more powerful symbol of the relationship between Australia and Papua New Guinea than the prime ministers of these neighbouring countries walking together on the ...2 days ago
- We spoke to young people about sexual consent. They understand the concept, but don’t always ask i...Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Andrea Waling, ARC DECRA Senior Research Fellow in Sex & Sexuality, La Trobe University BAZA Production/Shutterstock Sexual consent has been a major focus in Australia for the past few years. In early 2022 the federal government mandated consent education in ...2 days ago
- Longer-lasting ozone holes over Antarctica expose seal pups and penguin chicks to much more UVSource: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Sharon Robinson, Distinguished Professor and Deputy Director of ARC Securing Antarctica’s Environmental Future (SAEF), University of Wollongong, University of Wollongong Andrew Netherwood Over the last 25 years, the ozone hole which forming over Antarctica each spring has started to shrink. ...2 days ago
- Granting legal ‘personhood’ to nature is a growing movement – can it stem biodiversity loss?Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Viktoria Kahui, Senior Lecturer in Environmental Economics, University of Otago Getty Images/Amy Toensing Biodiversity is declining at rates unprecedented in human history. This suggests the ways we currently use to manage our natural environment are failing. One emerging concept focuses on ...2 days ago
- Will checking character references really help you find the best candidate for a job?Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Timothy Colin Bednall, Associate Professor in Management, Swinburne University of Technology marvent/Shutterstock Finding the best person to fill a position can be tough, from drafting a job ad to producing a shortlist of top interview candidates. Employers typically consider information from ...2 days ago
- A guide to Wellington’s best BYO restaurantsWondering where to host your next BYO? Whether its a small gathering or a massive party, we’ve got some recommendations. I was first introduced to the concept of BYOs at Dunedin’s India Gardens, a legendary but sadly defunct establishment, which purveyed enormous quantities of mango chicken to Aotearoa’s drunkest future ...2 days ago
- New rock art discoveries in Eastern Sudan tell a tale of ancient cattle, the ‘green Sahara’ and ...Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Julien Cooper, Honorary Lecturer, Department of History and Archaeology, Macquarie University Julien Cooper The hyper-arid desert of Eastern Sudan, the Atbai Desert, seems like an unlikely place to find evidence of ancient cattle herders. But in this dry environment, my new ...2 days ago
- Paul Goldsmith starts as new Media Minister replacing sacked Melissa LeeThe media industry is "under pressure", Paul Goldsmith says, but he plans to plot a path forward as he takes up the difficult role. ...2 days ago
- Media industry sheds few tears for minister LeeThe sector says it’s hopeful her replacement Paul Goldsmith will be able to throw it a lifeline, after six months with a minister deemed missing in action, writes Catherine McGregor in this excerpt from The Bulletin, The Spinoff’s morning news round-up. To receive The Bulletin in full each weekday, sign ...2 days ago
- Is NZ bringing in 'Indonesian coal every month to keep the lights on'?Analysis: The Resource Minister said it, but is it true and why does it matter? ...2 days ago
- More spending cuts needed to stablise government finances – economistThe government can't just rely on axing public sector jobs and has to do more to cut spending, says the chief economist at a free market think tank. ...2 days ago
- The government's 22 trips abroad in AprilThe government appears committed to overseas visits with 14 miniters and MPs in 18 countries this month. ...3 days ago
- Loopholes will be exploited in new vape rules – expertsThere is no doubt vape manufacturers will find and exploit loopholes in new regulations, say marketing experts. ...3 days ago
- Aotearoa Party Merges With Rock The Vote NZ Party And John Alcock Elected As Party LeaderRock The Vote NZ, known for its advocacy for minor party unity and its role within the Freedoms NZ Coalition during the 2023 General Election, celebrates this merger as a strategic enhancement of its operational strength and outreach. ...3 days ago
- After spending $2m on pins for Covid-19 workers, department now cutting costsGovernment department that spent $2m on lapel pins to honour Covid-19 workers is now looking to make cuts. ...3 days ago
- An afternoon at the Repair Café, where everyday objects get a second lifeNearly everyone has experienced the frustration of something you use breaking and being difficult or expensive to fix. Proposed legislation could change that. It’s been raining on and off all Sunday afternoon but people are lining up outside a building in a corner of Gribblehirst Park in Sandringham, Auckland. In ...3 days ago
- Dreaming of my not-wedding dayWhat does a forever relationship look like when you don’t believe in marriage? And how do you celebrate it? This essay is part of our Sunday Essay series, made possible thanks to the support of Creative New Zealand. I’m going to do it, right now. I’m going to say ...3 days ago
Excellent. Definitely a vote generator for the Greens. Covers many bases and implements more of the 2019 WEAG Report–e.g. abatement rate and individualisation. The COVID middle class second tier benefit where a partner could be in work, did not cause the sky to fall, so it is about time that 1964 style morality was dropped once and for all by MSD.
Excellent policy… possibly the best bit of policy in decades ..since the 80's.
And the brilliant part about it is that anyone earning under $125 grand…gets a tax cuts…
This is a sure vote winner for the greens…
And they are to be congratulated for coming up with such well reasoned tax reform..
This kind of policy could be a vote winner for the Greens.
IF they stick to it and stop the pointless unproductive bickering over genders and identity that just turn potential left voters off.
Agree with this view Mike the Lefty.
The identity politics schemozzle has/will cost the Greens. The effects of the No Debate BDM changes come into force on 15/6. There is still plenty of time for anguish a la Invercargill before the election, so still plenty of time to find all the signs for women's safe spaces replaced by those for transgender-women.
This policy to end poverty looks very promising…..now if they could add a sure fire environmental policy winner…….could be perfection in a party!
GC lefties and progressives have choices about how much they amplify GC issues during the election campaign, and how they do that. I can't see how undermining the Greens will help women. Less Green MPs means less more centrist BAU. GC election drama also risks Nact gaining power. It's not like any party is against self-ID.
when you speak of 'women' whom are you speaking of?
women as a class.
to pre-empt what comes next, you would reject solid lw socioeconomic policy because you also reject the GP's position on gender ideology. Despite the fact that all parties in parliament support self-ID including TPM and TOP.
This risks Nact gaining power, who will fuck over beneficiaries and low wage earners, increase wealth at the top end, and put major blocks in the way of climate action. Beggars belief that any progressive person would support that.
Weka, I respect you, and I take your point about not going on and on about gender. But it really does not beggar belief at all.
All you need is to have (or know) a child who you believe is in danger of doing something stupid and irreversible, and that will become your priority. Whether you are progressive, conservative, or martian.
No, I don't have any personal experience here, but it's not hard to get into the head of the parents who do.
I think you might have missed my point. You know I'm strongly GC right?
Say someone has a child who is in danger of wrongful transition. Literally all parties in parliament support self ID and affirmation only practice. How does not voting for the GP solve that? Worse, how does having a Nact government do anything other than make the situation worse? You think changing GI culture and law will be *easier under Nact? I'd like to see the argument made for that.
If you are saying that people vote on emotion or reaction, yes, they do. I'm pointing out the shortcomings of that approach.
I am.
And yes I am aware that you and I are both GC and see mostly eye-to-eye. I appreciate you pointing out your opinion on the shortcomings of that approach. The other opinion is: progressives will vote against their best interests and tolerate three years of bad policy if the alternative is watching your kid go through hell and feeling helpless. But I think I'll leave it at that.
it's a good conversation to nut out at another time 👍
Yes agree but The Greens have put themselves on the back foot to a certain extent. We saw Marama Davidson being so anti women that she was attending and speaking at Albert Park against those wanting to make their own minds up.
My point is/was that the policy to end poverty looks good and I would love to see a sock it to them environmental policy esp on pines as the perpetual crop/carbon trading being widened past pines, forestry clean-ups. If we have some really good policies on these two issues and a minimising or silencing on trans/self ID/anti women, while being pro safe spaces for women, pro womens sports the Greens may be able to recover some ground. Perhaps lots of ground if they remain silent on self ID/identity policies.
The point is that if councils/people become alerted from 15/6, as have the Invercargill City people, then they may not be able to prevent egg splattering all over the Greens.
I have only ever voted for the Greens as a party in national elections, tending to favour their candidates in the local body elections.
The reason for voting for the party was as a ginger group for Labour. This becomes fraught for me as at some stage the Greens had Self ID in their back pockets, I understand, when negotiating with Labour. My mind is not wide enough to think about what other nasty type unpopular policy they might have this time round. Hence the reason that I think to get back to being a good party to vote for, they need to ramp up really good policies such as this one for ending poverty, add a top notch environmental policy and drop off the weird and wonderful. Or, at least let us see the metes and bounds of the ideas they want included as part of a coalition deal.
I am not doing anything like allowing the NACTs to come through. I might vote Labour for the party while for a Green candidate …..I am not sure. The local Labour party candidate is one who shrieked outside the SUFW meeting in Wgtn when discussing the BDM amdts so I am hardly likely to vote for her. She will get in anyway as it is a safe seat.
Ending poverty is good, fair and vote enhancing policy from The Greens.
The Labour majority government pass the self ID law. I don't see them as particularly less ideologically captured than the GP.
👍
Ok, so this sounds like a centre left voting position. It's not about ending poverty or taking climate seriously (because Labour isn't doing either of those things, Labour is holding the BAU for the centre left).
IF they stick to it and stop the pointless unproductive bickering over [insert personal pet topic du jour] that just turn potential left voters off.
FIFY
that is what, 30 bucks above the current level of unemployment benefit, will it affect side benefits, will partners that are not in work and not counted as unemployed be eligible as currently a spouse/partner will not receive any benefits should the partner be above a threshold?
what type of support? Will it be tacked on the main benefits or will it be fringe benefits?
Wow, the generosity kills, but i guess its a start. And its about a saving in taxes of 1000 NZD, and not enough to even just rent an emergency hovel.
will this apply to spouses and partners of people who have income above a threshold and who are currently denied benefits on grounds of their partners income? Consider that these spouses/partners are not stood down, they are simply refused full stop.
Again, what is the threshold for couples? Would be nice to see, but can see that being dropped the first time govt has not enough money to dispense all that wealth. So really, not buying that. Also that is something that the greens could/should have tried to push through over the last 5+ years. I guess they had not enough currency cause not enough of them are in governmetn, right?
wow, 190 before tax, is gonna make a huge dent. It should be earn the money you need to get to min wage before any cutting of benefits happen. But i guess 190 a week extra is gonna bring bacon to the table.
yei, more employment for the kids of the upper middle class that just got lots of money to study something…….like gender 101 and self id.
All of that for a provisional tax on an unrealized gain that is based on the fact that government will set the government values for properties, or will it also include Savings Accounts, Shares, Kiwi Saver etc? So government sets a provisional tax for the owners of mortgages and houses or what ever ‘wealth’ they accumualated whilst working and paying income tax, gst, rates, gst, user tax, gst, etc, and always gst on all the things that they accumulated over a life time of work.
And can we mention that that is literally the policy Top tried to sell in 2016?
And despite it all, there is still not a single reason for anyone to vote for this 'environmental' troupe that things violence is a think only white cis male do (Marama Davidson), that fights 'Nazis' at women speak events (Golriz), that posts threads about non violent marches that sees one women doused with liquid, another had her jaw broken, two males arrested for physical assault (Chloe Swarbruck), that spend more money on a 'green school' then on homelessness despite a good budget being provided (James Shaw and Marama Davidson), and that is so supportive of sex work they promote it with pole polishing whilst starting one hopefuls career at earning a back benchers salary that of course will be taxed to the lowest amount any one of these guys could get by with.
But you are totally correct, between National, Labour, Green, ACT, TPM the female human being is shit out of luck. Hence for human females the questions really stands, how many dicks must i suck to pay for the provisional tax on my 'wealth'?
Still not voting Green for that reason. The party policy on Self-ID, the investment into gender ideology into education, health and opaque NGOs – the disdain shown by MPs to those who raise concerns – is enough to make me withdraw my support.
It’s also that I think the level of incompetence and ideological capture demonstrated on this issue, gives a fairly good indication of their ability and competence on others.
This is a very good point and was behind my view above
Yes it is trust, and intellectual capability that were found wanting…..I mean does any thinking person believe we can overcome/change biology? Seriously? If we seriously belive we can do this then why not turn ourselves to making gold from dross or wine from water? Or sure fire ways to remove nitrates from water?
because GI is an ideology based in caring about trans people. There are people who believe that humans can literally change sex, but most genderists don't actually think that but believe instead that gender identity is a better way of understanding humans than sex. I disagree of course, but I can easily see how someone can understand about the necessity of using science to remove nitrates from water and still care about the lives of trans people.
Further, I would say that most people in NZ have weird ideological capture when it comes to water (eg we see water as a resource to be used, and protected, but we don't see water as life). We're so steeped in this mind/body split ideology that we think water quality is about nitrate levels instead of whole ecosystems. This is the same thinking that both caused the climate crisis and is stopping us from doing the actions we know will resolve it.
"because GI is an ideology based in caring about trans people."
I don't agree. In conversations with people who support gender ideology – many of them are unable to articulate any of the current transgender perspectives – or understand the implications on the individuals they purport to support. This is especially true around the very significant impact on young gay and lesbian people looking for support from the current rainbow organisations.
If people are genuinely concerned about the vast disparate groups that now make up trans people, then their care is not predicated on ensuring best practice healthcare protocols, or age appropriate engagement, or clear support for those with same sex orientations.
I think the reasons for those supporting gender ideology, are often personal, but can be as diverse in expression and motivation as the groups under the trans umbrella currently are.
I was talking specifically about political party MPs and members (because of the idea that the Greens can't be trusted on any policy because of their GI policy). My understanding is that both Labour and the Greens have people who have trans people in their lives that they care about and this is a significant driver of the ideological position. (we see this with TS commenters as well).
My reference to nitrates was as saying if we can magic human bodies into different sexes we can magic nitrates away from our water. It was to belabour the magic thinking point by turning dross into gold etc
Of course I believe in whole eco systems and the actually the whole Maori world view on water, land etc
ae, but my point was that *most people in NZ (not you 👍) have very weird ideas about water and nature. Anti reality ideas. But they can mostly think about other things competently. The idea that someone holds strong gender ideology ideas doesn't mean they can't be trusted with other thought processes.
Molly thinks that the GP position on GI means they are incompetent in other policy areas. I'm saying this doesn't follow, with an example. And I will point out again, that all parties in parliament voted for the self ID law. So if a political party can't be trusted with government on that basis, we have no way of forming government.
Except, it didn’t spend any money, in the end.
https://www.1news.co.nz/2020/11/01/green-schools-117-million-grant-now-a-100-per-cent-government-loan/
That’s just one example taken from your inaccurate and misleading biased narrative.
$47 more/week.
Afaik supplementary benefits will remain the same for the meantime.
Abatement rate level rises to $190
GMI would be individualised, so the not working person would get it irrespective of whether they have a partner nor not, or how much that partner earns.
Much of this was covered in the post.
AFIK means you do not know but hope.
In the meantime, WINZ under a full majority Labour Government with the full support of the Green underlings is the biggest pay day lender in the country to the poorest people that are there because Labour fucked around for + years and has nothing to show for when it comes to the poor of this country.
no, it means I read that yesterday but didn't have time to find the reference. But here you go, seeing as how you apparently won't read the document yourself.
Meanwhile, you say,
Who did you vote for at the last election Sabine? And the ones before? The whole point here is that there are policies on the table to the left of Labour. And you are shitting on them (ignorantly too).
This is a good policy, one mistake the Greens should avoid is too tightly coupling the GMI and Wealth tax parts together. They are unlikely to get both in any negotiation.
The Green proposal is not the same as the TOP proposal of 2016 in any way. The Green policy is obviously compatible with the existing welfare regime, the TOP policy was basically how can we leverage welfare to get changes in fiscal policy through (some of which were quite destructive for existing welfare recipients).
Re solo parents, why not read the link to the main policy document? Benefits for families are complex, they've laid it out with examples.
People on JS pay $2,548/year in tax atm. That's how the increase to the GMI will be paid for. But the abatement rate is increasing by $30/wk, so people on JS who are looking for work will be able to supplement their income more than they can currently.
It's not intended to solve the housing crisis, that's a different policy.
Do you know what individualised benefits are? Did you read the post?
it speaks volumes that you sneer at this. Meanwhile, people who can work but don't currently will be able to more.
you're an idiot. The jobs at the new ACC will replace WINZ jobs. What the proposal does is increase income for disabled people hugely. It also removes them from the punitive bullshit cycle at WINZ. They also get supplementary benefits. What the fuck are you on about Sabine, you complain people don't have enough income and here is something really good for disabled people and you can't even acknowledge this.
What I'm seeing is a bunch of ideologically driven, ill informed whining. I don't believe you are interested in political changes that end poverty, you look like you want to sit on the sidelines and take potshots at people you don't like.
Of course i and everyone else who does not rejoice at that poor attempt at relevance is an idiot, Weka, all of us that reject this current Green Party and who will not vote for them are. Glad you told us and confirmed that for us.
actually no, I was calling you an idiot specifically because you made up some stupid shit about how the new ACC would just be about middle class jobs for uni kids.
Nothing to do with your politics about the GP but I think it’s telling that that is how you frame it.
Wot weka said..to sabine..
Addressing poverty – means to balance the percentage of the required costs of living and opportunity against the available income.
This policy is a poor attempt to draft poverty as relating to income – which requires state redistribution – using the crude yardstick of personal income and wealth, without regard to anything else.
Ian Taylor addresses this aspect in today's Herald – archived copy:
https://archive.ph/8X1A3
The really significant – and admittedly difficult to solve – ongoing contributors to poverty – housing costs, cost of living crisis, food energy and transport costs – are not adequately addressed – and any increase in these items will absorb the income increase for many, making it at best neutral – but likely one of those band-aids that doesn't stick for long before falling off. (You just hope the blood has clotted in between, but infection risk remains.)
What is needed – a policy that addresses that percentage balance of essential costs vs income – not nominal figures. One that doesn't put poorly evidenced assumptions into dictating solutions, which ignores the detrimental effects on those they do not bother to consider.
It's not a policy that inspires me. Although there are benefits to certain groups which are overdue, the overall effect I don’t think will be effective for all those that need assistance, and it may be detrimental for others who are struggling to manage currently, or are not the stereotyped wealth accumulators that they are being portrayed as.
This is silly. Political parties release their policies over time, not all in one go. This policy isn't intended to address those things. You've been commenting on politics long enough to know this, so what gives?
How would that work in practice?
Who have they not bothered to consider?
The ACC policy alone is a game changer for disabled people who can't work.
No government policy is going to be perfect. I'd like to see more detail in the critiques.
"This is silly. Political parties release their policies over time, not all in one go. This policy isn't intended to address those things. You've been commenting on politics long enough to know this, so what gives?"
Well, if you look back. I've not been impressed by their housing policies, or cost of living policies either. So, I'm consistently unimpressed – it that helps.
This is just another policy that doesn't inspire.
One constant is that I think the Green Party – along with other political parties – tend to frame problems in such a way as to be able to provide a simplistic – solution. The solution will "solve" the problems they identify, but not the underlying issues, and will often create other problems that are foreseeable but will be ignored.
This policy is not there to change the underlying factors of poverty but to garner votes and make this party relevant again, thus simplistic is good.
The greens used to be the third largest political party in NZ and now are hovering anywhere between 7 – 10 % in polls whilst ACT is polling 15 – 20%.
It is a very thinly disguised attempt at 'caring'. Never mind that Marama Davidson is Minister for the Unhoused, was given a good budget to spend on that and did fuck all with it.
IMO it wasn't a wise choice having Marama Davidson co fronting the new Ending Poverty Together plan.
Seems many dislike her, see below.
https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/national/487306/spike-in-online-hate-toward-trans-community-after-posie-parker-visit-researchers
The Disinformation Project is aptly named.
I don't deny that Marama Davidson is likely receiving a lot of online criticism, and even hateful threats from others. Unfortunately, that seems to be the nature and experience of online engagement for many. Prominent women seem to have to deal with this regardless of political or personal stance… unfortunately, many such women will always find someone willing to hate them publicly on the internet.
What the Disinformation Project does – is register only those occurrences that align with their preferred narrative. It doesn't surprise me that the report in the article is referred to from the experience of one view only. (There are a couple of examples posted yesterday on Open Mike (.https://thestandard.org.nz/open-mike-11-06-2023/#comment-1953654 ) of regular and commonplace threats received by women raising concerns, but no mention of this in the report). IRRC, no robust methodology was used nor link to source data provided. Happy to be corrected on this.
I had thought I'd bookmarked a good analysis of that specific report but it appears not.
Google – however – has provided a more recent and general critique of the organisation:
https://www.thelookingglass.co.nz/the-disinformation-project-is-infiltrating-unions-civil-service-journalism/
"…That’s why I don’t think there is any use pretending that The Disinformation Project is anything other than an actor in the (dis)information war. I can’t prove this – but state-sponsored, set up and handled by the intelligence community would be my bet.
They may be unwitting, recruited without ever realising that was what was happening – you can play to people’s egos if you’re smart. Or they may be witting – true believers, or even coerced into it.
Who knows, I don’t. But I’ve been observing the narrative of domestic extremism from the beginning, particularly in relation to New Zealand’s dissident freedom community and along with the The Disinformation Project, other academics and lobbyists, and random influencers online have been selling this narrative hard. And it’s working among at least a segment of New Zealanders."
My concern is that their influence on public discussion around the hate speech legislation, will be widely given credit by media pundits and politicians alike.
From what I've seen and personally speaking, it has nothing to do with her being a prominent women. The criticism is a result of her inaction, positions taken and comments made.
IMO she has become a huge liability that shouldn't be anywhere near this policy let alone the Green Party.
I agree.
I was commenting more on The Disinformation Project's narrative around it. But I agree that some of the criticism is more than justified.
With you there, Molly. I also question The Disinformation Project.
I agree with this point. For me it is illustrative of there being no perfect way of ensuring demographic or inclusive representation. I have felt that way the Greens leadership is selected puts a stake in the ground for diversity and so is worth persisting with. Like democracy generally it does throw up results that may not be as good as if the leadership was chosen from two talented women or two talented men.
The Greens will be backing Marama Davidson as she has come through their selection process/es. Fair enough too. Hopefully though, it does not blind them as to her ability/suitability and she is supported in the areas where she needs it.
So I agree with The Chairman about the need for a clear eyed view about her 'fronting' anything, especially given her past record of 'cis' this or that.
Many Kiwis seem to dislike certain political leaders – Clark, Ardern, Turei, Davidson. Certainly National and Act party leaders, from Key to Luxon and Prebble to Seymour, never appealed to me.
But enough about the last 30 years – "the amount of hate being directed at the Green Party co-leader Marama Davidson", Ardern et al. tells me all I need to know about today's haters.
Do you think it is wise she is co fronting this policy?
Yes. Do you think it is wise to have Davidson fronting any policy? Do you (being more left than most) think that the 2018 decision by Green party members to elect Davidson as co-leader has proved unwise?
It was inevitable, imho, that much hate would be directed at any Green MP advocating for increased redistribution of wealth as a way of addressing poverty and inequality in NZ. But don't worry, nothing will come of it – wealthy Kiwis have plenty of political clout.
https://thespinoff.co.nz/society/16-08-2022/the-side-eyes-two-new-zealands-the-table
“Do you think it is wise to have Davidson fronting any policy?”
Not now. Not only has she lost credibility, she also lacks that on the spot sharp-wittedness required to publicly sell it and successfully win debates when challenged.
As for Green party members electing her as co-leader, I think some will come to regret it.
@ Drowsy and The Chairman
I don't think it is wise she is fronting the policy, she is not nimble enough, has not got a background in competently engaging on people/economic matters, I think Chloe with her enthusiasm would have been better. I feel that MD is co fronting it as she is co-leader rather than the best person to sell it.
The Greens have a way of selecting their leaders that pays great attention to diversity. Selecting to fan/encourage diversity sometimes does not make for the best leadership but that is often not why we do this method of leadership selection. This type of leadership selection 'speaks' to the people that here is one of them (female, Maori, etc in power, it is aspirational
Unsurprising, given your comments in this thread. Otoh, Green party members have had five years to evaluate Davidson's performance as co-leader, and her position seems secure. It wasn't the (re-)election of Davidson that went to a second round last year.
Perhaps Green party members are naturally cautious – see the Green's suite of welfare and tax proposals for redistributing wealth, which are well worth considering in light of challenges Aotearoa NZ faces.
Your comments have prompted me to make my first donation to a political party this year, so thanks for that.
Cognitive dissonance, those who claim to care about poverty but won't support Greens (or Labour) because of a policy supported by all the other parties in parliament? Because someone must pay and bee seen to pay.
It's a real cart before the horse scenario, if the political right were campaigning to do something there might have been a point.
Of course, there is the option provided by a women's party protest vote.
But how often are those tactics decisive?
There has been electoral reform – MMP (successful). Those advocating drug reform got a referendum (which attracted international funding and organisation to the anti-faction – from the same groups against GI, CRT, same sex marriages, sex education in schools, public funding of contraception, CRT, prostitution and pornography).
I think you have simplified the argument or concern if you understand it at all.
The point is about trust and about points that are made in the coalition agreements but that the general electorate does not get to see prior to that. That is they are not 'fought on' during the election.
Hence the idea of mine that The Greens fight on several fronts – alleviating poverty being one and environmental matters/climate change being another.
i am most interested in those two, housing and wholesale tax reform.
Women's safe spaces and playing fair in women's sport should be taken as read. Hence my thought that as much as The Greens hope people won't vote away because of self ID/gender issues we are coming up for the time when this self ID legislation comes into force – 15/6/2. My reckoning is that we will see more of the concerns expressed about access to women's changing rooms as recently in Invercargill.
https://www.stuff.co.nz/southland-times/southland-top-stories/132012169/anger-over-gender-identity-practice-in-swimming-pool-changing-rooms
https://whatsoninvers.nz/mayor-and-council-sort-changing-room-issues-at-splash-palace/
lol, yes it does 👍
I understand you are uninspired (fair enough, not everything meets people). I was just hoping for a bit more meaty critique. This sounds all a bit vague (you don't like it a meta level that isn't that clear yet).
Ok, I understand this principle. What would you see the underlying issue is here that they're not trying to solve?
"Ok, I understand this principle. What would you see the underlying issue is here that they're not trying to solve?"
As mentioned, poverty relates to the imbalance between income and necessary expenses as opposed to looking only at nominal values.
A couple of examples:
They are not addressing the failure of working wages to keep up with basic expenditures nor the lack of sustainable working options to provide those who want it with an opportunity to work, pay all necessary bills and have a good work life balance at full-employment level. Many of those in poverty are working households.
They could remove the tax on a larger number of lower income earners – who will spend most – if not all – their income within NZ – contributing to local business and government tax take, for example. The first $10,000 is a timid move.
ah, ok I think I get it now. I agree with your definition of poverty, but think that there are distinct limits on government to be that specific. One would need to look at income, housing costs (including what part of the country they live in), other costs, capacity to increase income, whether the person intends to have children or not, needs education and so on. Can't really design social policy that assesses all that so that each individual's needs are met (although technically welfare could use a case management system for this if it were sane). So government focuses on broad measures (as they do with health, public health is for the collective not the individual, which is why we suck up vaccine reactions for the greater good).
I'm pretty sure they do address this in other policy (whether you agree with the how, it's not like they are ignoring these things) but before I go look for that, what's the in the hand difference between raising the tax free bracket (and what you you set that at), and other measures like increasing wages and lowering housing costs? Do you see a higher tax free bracket instead of the other proposals or in addition to them?
I get the advantage of getting more of your hourly rate rather than having to work more hours to get the same amount in hand, but I'm curious where the level is. Obviously we need tax paid. Is the solution a tax free $20,000 and more tax on high income earners?
Weka, I've just remembered that I thought the Green's clean car rebate was dismally conceived as well. The more I recollect, the stronger my perspective becomes.
In essence, from observation and past experience – I don't trust them to allocate ANY extra funds received for poverty in a way that is both strategic or effective.
"Is the solution a tax free $20,000 and more tax on high income earners?"
Unfortunately, if it was that simple, poverty would have been effectively addressed long ago.
what I get from that is that you think GP policy is generally ineffective, can’t be specific about how, but also can't say what should be done instead 🤷♀️
You can see why it seems vague.
"You can see why it seems vague."
Not really.
I do get into specific detail often – .https://thestandard.org.nz/open-mike-16-05-2022/#comment-1888651, more than they provide.
If such criticisms are dismissed as vague, the points do not have to be addressed.
Usually the points are glaringly obvious to me, and until they are addressed the finer detail is irrelevant.
hmm, I think that’s the second time recently where there’s been miscommunication about what I am doing. I’m not dismissing your criticisms as vague, I’m making an observation about them and leaning in and asking for more explanation. I want robust debate, and conversation with people who can take the policy and unpick it and point out the failings.
What I think you are doing is taking your past experience with GP policy and your idea that they are incompetent and using that to inform your opinion about their competency, rather than looking at the policy detail. I don’t think there is any way to address that tbh. If you start with them being incompetent then everything will be parsed through that.
(and I still don’t know what is wrong with the policy, because the two critiques didn’t stand up).
This is getting silly. First you complain it’s timid and they should do more to reduce tax on those working on lower incomes. Then at the idea of this being done, you say it's not that simple.
As for your earlier point about reducing costs – they have wanted a rent freeze for some time. And more state houses – with income related rent.
As for the other big costs people are facing, it’s either the cost of land (when buying a home) and the higher cost of mortgage – neither of which is in the inflation statistics. Until this faced up to directly – actions of the RBNZ to manage other inflation is an absurdity (they pushed up the price of land with their pandemic policy and the cost of mortgages to manage the consequences). A neo-liberal nonsense.
My position is also based on the fact that the Greens ignore those that are struggling who don't fit the easily defined poor that they use in their examples.
People on low incomes with access to free or low housing, or reduced necessary costs – are sometimes better off than those on higher incomes, with higher necessity costs and more ongoing responsibilities.
For example: I have relatives on pensions who are struggling in Auckland, while another older relative has access to council subsidised housing (was $48 p/w), and support with transport costs, leaving her with a reasonable amount of income over her utilities and food costs.
Other relatives, have relocated to the family owned house and now live there rent free as a sibling group. Their expenses are reduced to food and utilities, which means they too are able to have a reasonable excess over income.
However, I know a working couple who have taken on related children who despite working, endeavouring to pay off their mortgage on a modest home, and also looking after an elderly relative are constantly struggling financially. Their responsibilities and outgoings are rising as the children grow, and the costs of care (adult nappies etc) rise.
So, it is important for those who wish to address poverty to look at the balance of income and necessary expenses. Address the nominal amounts by all means, but have something else to capture those for whom this does not apply.
Another point – one that is often not taken into account – is the assumption that an individual's income equates to a benefit and responsibility for an individual.
There are many households that have a single tax payer. There will be a difference in tax between a household that earns over $125,000 with more than one earner, and that which relies on only one.
IIRC, this anomaly has only been mentioned by Peter Dunne many years ago, and has never been revisited.
"As for your earlier point about reducing costs – they have wanted a rent freeze for some time. And more state houses – with income related rent."
Greens can ask for a rent freeze, but unless costs of providing rentals are also frozen then they are effectively asking private landlords to subsidise the cost of housing for others. Essentially, getting them to offset successive governments failures to rein in housing inflation, and ensure provision of affordable, healthy, secure homes.
I've given up reading the Housing NZ – Kainga Ora report – because this oft repeated intention, doesn't seem to have any great direction for implementation or effect.
But your faith in delivery is stronger than mine, so fingers crossed that you are right and I am wrong. I would like the housing situation to be effectively addressed. If that means I am wrong about their methods, I'll happily be wrong.
However, I cannot change my perspective because I wish to be more hopeful, I need clear indications there is something concrete to reconsider.
Which is why going to $20,000 tax free (at a huge cost) is not the way to go – the available resources need better targeting.
It is why we have WFF and AS (related to family size and housing cost).
The Green policy is designed to focus on lack of basic income (and ease of guaranteed access – given W and I gatekeeping and bureaucracy), not do away with this.
The Ohariu (Wellington Epsom) policy to reduce tax on those on a high single income (unrelated to any actual need/hardship test). For mine it would be better to allow individual access to income support (to deny those with a disability any support if they have a working partner is really unfair policy). This better reflects the modern world, and would also allow sole partners on the DPB an easier relationship life and a simpler transition when they form partnerships (which should make for better housing utilisation).
Structural problems (from cost of land, supply of necessary infrastructure, consents and building) are not quick fixes (maybe consents for small and factory build facilitation), a rent freeze is. Complaining about a lack of focus on costs and then dismissing something that does just this is a form of obstructionism.
The quickest results come from leasing, or buying homes to rent out at affordable to income levels. At the moment the migration of workers will have more impact than state building (reduce the amount of income subsidised housing to total demand). So it is fair that the company tax rate goes up to assist with the impost. For mine we should choose the American approach of a progressive tax, more on larger more profitable companies.
Delivery requires Labour, so fingers crossed.
@ Molly 5.17pm
Brava well said, clear and accords with my perspective. I know of many of my ilk who are cash poor while thought to be asset rich. The cost of rates and water rates, where these are not based on actual use, can be plunging many into poverty. This is important as many can work budget miracles where they have control of the use of water or electricity.
Ever since I have been a tax payer we have always had reference to the new poor…..those that Molly refers to. Also the ones just outside of limits who earn slightly, and I mean slightly too much to qualify. Abating, rather than hard fixed limits, is a good thing if it can mean that some of the new poor can get a little 'gruel'.
@Shanreagh 6.25pm
Presuming Greens and Labour interface on policy, the outcome would be support to families will continue up to a higher level and with slower abatement changes (apart from the Greens bump to lower incomes and the $10,000 threshold, the issue was pressure around the $75,000-$120,000 family in higher cost environments – something not fixed by tax rate bracket tinkering).
It looks a bit sketchy.
A minimum payment of 80% of the full-time minimum wage is an improvement, however why transform ACC? What will that in itself cost? Why not keep it with MSD? Moreover, what shape will this transformation take?
Below is a snippet from an example given by the Greens
https://assets.nationbuilder.com/beachheroes/pages/17574/attachments/original/1686379147/Tax_Full_Policy_Document_v4.pdf?1686379147
So does that mean that under this transformation caseworkers (not doctors) get to say whether or not someone is eligible? And what happens if they are deemed not to be eligible but yet still can't work?
Because WINZ has a shitshow culture of abuse, paternalism, and Bennett indoctrination and many consider it too hard to change? More importantly, the current situation is that if you can't work because of an accident you get way better support than if you can't work because of illness. This is a well known inequity that's long been discussed and finally a political party is stepping up with a plan to change that. So either we shift ACC clients to WINZ (lol), or the other way around. If WINZ disabled clients go to ACC, it makes sense to reform ACC to be fit for purpose (It has some cultural issues of its own).
Whatever way the situation is resolved, it's going to take reorganisation and funding.
That's the status quo. A GP can sign the forms and WINZ can still decline the benefit. It's been like that for many years (since they brought in designated doctors). However reading the example the Greens give, I would expect that the decision is made by ACC based on medical advice (which is what happens now). With both WINZ and ACC culture change is also needed.
Indeed. However wouldn't a culture change at MSD be less costly than fully transforming ACC? Which is merely adding further complications to this policy.
Totally agree with addressing the current disparity between accident payments and illness.
This came up as part of income insurance work, and that opted for ACC over MSD/WINZ to pay and do the case management because it was easier than trying to redo MSD.
Expanding ACC to include illness was the recommendation when setting up ACC, so there's history to it as well.
However wouldn't a culture change at MSD be less costly
Given the magnitude of the change required, it would be cheaper to build new agencies from scratch and disestablish the old as the new comes into operation.
Poverty is about income. Anyone pretending otherwise is "pulling the wool".
Lack of income is the reason for all the other lacks. Beginning with choices.
Like Ian Taylor would know!!
Poverty is the gap between income and being able to afford basic needs. I know people on low incomes who would be considered poor based on that, but they're not because their housing costs are very low.
I have thought long and hard about this overnight.
1 I am not sure why it is based on not having a job, as Molly says there are people working desparately hard at multiple jobs for low pay who are still needing more support. The minimum wage and the Living wage earners are not eating choccy biscuits or finding it easy to hand over $$$ for kids school trips/uniforms etc.
It seems that the policy may be treating people as individuals, and that is good rather than the spouse of someone, meaning you don't qualify.
So would the policy mean that the mother I had helping me after I had an accident be able to not work and her family get along financially? She & her spouse worked multiple jobs, they cared for 2 school age children who could not be left at home. Both worked jobs that were at the same time. Their solution was to buy a van with a bed in the back. Whoever was working the shorter time at night had the van and the children slept in the back of the van. Oh the family was not eligible for WCC or Kainga Ora Houses and rented privately as they 'earned too much'. Assumed they got AS.
So could she give up her jobs, go on the benefit as not working and get this GMI? This woman was working to give her children opportunities. One really good thing would be for at least one of the family with multiple jobs to not need to do this so they could be at home, even before and after school, making a home and being around in the community.
This is the key failing. People's incomes may be low but because of the operation of other policies their actual net incomes are higher than you would expect.
2 I am not sure why IRD could not be more involved in identifying those with low incomes
3 without the SW system treating people as individuals then some who may be unemployed may miss out ie the spouse of someone who is working
4 what is the net in hand for an individual? They would get the jobseekers plus $385?
5 If it is aimed at those already on benefits why not just come out and say this ie an improvement to benefits. Why does it need to be tied to a wealth tax? Shouldn't we aim for people to be able to avoid poverty when they are on any sort of state support by having realistic payments?
6 Why not reform the tax system as proposed, see how it goes in bringing in more money and then look at other ways if there is a shortfall
such as
wealth tax that includes collections, real estate, shares (dividends are alreay taxed as part of income tax so this would be on the value of the holdings per annum)
Wealth tax that excludes the family home
Policies that operate at the natural changes of property ownership rather than annually. sale and death are these changes.
So we have a transaction tax at the time of sale, like the old stamp duty but augmented or a tax at the time of death before asset distribution.
Why not base it on the universality principles and rates of National Super?
Do we have figures that show that the unemployed figure more highly in poverty, than the households where every member is working at low paying jobs often all day/night
I have probably got key things wrong but having looked at both sides UBI & wealth tax neither really attracts me or make me feel that we are doing something meaningful.
The situation where people are unable to work because of disability should be treated differently from those not working – if Weka feels that this is better covered under the ACC regime then I would support this.
Individuality like NS is good.
While the GMI component of this is great there are a couple of minor weaknesses. Don't couple the GMI and Wealth tax components too tightly. The Green party is unlikely to get both in any coalition negotiation. Negotiating on the basis of both or neither will almost certainly result in neither.
If GMI gets passed then there needs to be an explanation of what that means for ending poverty. Most poverty measures relevant to NZ are relative. The existence of a poverty line doesn't go away from the policy review, in fact it's relative unimportance should be a mark of success of the policy.
I see a difference between the election campaign (telling the electorate what is possible) and the negotiation period (the pragmatics arising from how many votes they get). They should definitely be doing both the GMI and the WT in the election campaign, but I am curious now what scenario planning they have done for coalition negotiations.
Remember also that TPM may be queen maker.
The problem with separating them, is that if the Wealth tax isn't supported, the GMI isn't affordable.
The money has to come from somewhere: and kudos to the Greens for being explicit over the tax changes which would be required to meet their GMI goal.
That's entirely incorrect.
If the GMI is put into the budget then the governments payments will continue to clear just fine.
If your unclear about this fact its simply because where the money comes from is it comes from the RBNZ. The RBNZ issues in some form every single cent the government either spends or collects. It's explicitely part of the reserve bank act that the RBNZ has an absolute monopoly on doing this.
Well, you can claim this. But you'll have a hard road convincing most Kiwis that money effectively grows on trees.
If any political party proposes to increase benefits, or institute a GMI – then they have to be prepared to answer the inevitable question of "Where does the money come from"
Your belief that the RBNZ can just print whatever is needed – is the kind of quantitative easing which got NZ into the current inflationary spiral. Not too many people are happy about the resulting cost of living crisis – and they are absolutely wary about anything which might pump more gasoline on that fire.
For a start, as you have highlighted, its far from just my opinion, its also recent practice. This is just how government spending works, how its legislated and how its correctly documented. Since I've highlighted the incorrectness of your term of unaffordable you might want to put your argument across more precisely in future.
So, it seems what your actually claiming is that paying people a GMI would be inflationary. Were it going to be I certainly agree this is a reasonable poitical debate to have, if that should be a policy.
But I think it should not be difficult to convince most NZers that that narrative of the present inflationary episode is invalid for a few reasons. Firstly, multiple countries were running QE policies for a full decade (or three for Japan) prior, with ongoing low inflation rates. This indicates that QEs timing was more of a coincidence than a factor. Second, there have been obvious factors causing supply chain disruption and oil price hikes which were initially and have been subsequently discussed as causes. This has been coupled with multiple follow on profiteering decisions. For these the timing is right both for inflation starting and coming back down. This has been widely reported on as the main cause of inflation.
Third, the main economic institutions and opposition have actually blamed wage rates, not govt spending for the inflation. Though this is basically contradicted by the real wage cuts observed (prices moved and wages didn't catch up is what stats say about this). It should also be noted the RBNZ prefers to talk unemployment rates, rather than pay rates, though the mechanism is targeted to lower wage rate increases.
Fourth, the country used to function with lower wage inequality rates which would be supported by a GMI. If your claim is heading back towards mid-90s levels of income inequality is inflationary, you will need to justify why it wasn't then.
Good luck with finding any political party which will espouse your views.
I'm pretty sure the GP are not that party.
Presently we add to the money supply by getting a bank to charge (Interest) for issuing it. The only constraint being legislated reserve ratios, sometimes.
In the past Governments added to the money supply by "issuing" currency.
Of course banks and lenders don't approve as this cuts into their profits.
Please explain why one should be more "legitimate than the other?
Government issue also has the advantage that less is spent on profits for the unproductive FIRE, sector.
By the way The Proof That Banks Create Money – Positive Money “in reality in the modern economy, commercial banks are the creators of deposit money”.
“BOOK: https://positivemoney.org/modernising-money/
Why our monetary system is broken, and how to fix it.
“Money is a social invention, indeed among the most important of all social inventions. At present the right to create money has been handed over to the private businesses we call banks. But this is not the only way we could create money and, as recent experience suggests, it may be far from the best one. Read this book with an open mind and you will understand why.”
– Martin Wolf, Chief Economics Commentator, Financial Times”
The other concept is why Governments should be in deficit and avoid “starving” other sectors,
https://www.forbes.com/sites/johntharvey/2012/07/18/why-you-should-love-government-deficits/?sh=1ea08db570a5
I've disliked the positive money presentation of this subject for some time as it tends to descend into miss-leading tropes, rather than a clear explanation.
Around the brief QE period in NZ (and similar to longer ones overseas) what was happening is that the RBNZ was lending to the government to facilitate its deficit spending. Grant Robertson was directly asked if this is what was happening, but he denied it was anything unusual in that the RBNZ was just buying up the debt in the secondary bond market that had recently been bought in the primary market (mostly by large financial institutions). I'm not sure how many were convinced but apparently buying and holding the bonds for maybe a few days to a week before reselling with a small profit to the RBNZ validates the bond interest rates the government pays. The rate of profit to doing this however is very small. This is what the positive money description chooses to highlight however.
The important parts of the QE policy however were, the government has lent to itself and ends up paying itself back for this borrowing (eventually any profits the RBNZ makes are rebated to treasury anyway). The follow up might be, since the government is lending to itself, why not just setup an overdraft like account where the government clears its payments. That would be much more understandable for the public and might lead to better public spending outcomes when this basic mechanism is made visibly overt.
They also highlight reserve ratios, but reserve ratios have never been a constraint on bank lending. The OCR policy is a guarantee to banks that they can always borrow what ever reserves they need to clear payments. While there are no reserve ratios in NZ the OCR policy means if there were those reserves (even up to 100%) are guaranteed available. The actual constraint on bank lending is that the banks can find credit worthy borrowers who will pay their interest rate margin over the cash rate (over the long term).
(Note for KJT, I'm aware your well on top of this detail yourself).
They can't.
If they did we would swiftly find out who really rules New Zealand.
As we found when it was proposed the finance company charges be taxed.
I’m curious, which of the two will meet most resistance in coalition talks with Labour, GMI or wealth tax?
Hopefully we get to find that out.
https://twitter.com/AdamParsonz/status/1667791264409071616
I've seen this come up a few times. Has anyone looked at the detail? I responded with this from the policy document,
Agree, for many smaller businesses, some profits will be retained for business purposes, but anything over that is only kept in the company structure to minimise taxes. If profits are paid out as either imputed dividends or shareholder salary, the owners will pay tax at their normal marginal rates, so the company rate will not affect that.
A good policy, the Greens at their best.
Before nitpicking this policy, all other parties now must be asked for specifics about their plan to end child poverty…
They can't, because they would have to admit that it is the poor parents who need help first at not being poor so that when they have kids these kids aren't poor.
And besides did we not have a children’s commissioner? what happened to that person? Oh yea, we removed that person. https://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/PA2208/S00017/removing-childrens-commissioner-will-be-harmful.htm
I agree.
" Oh yea, we removed that person."
That's right. Why did we do that, again?
FWIW, my party vote will go to either Labour or the Greens, and with this policy the Greens have moved ahead. (The candidate vote for me in Auckland Central is easy, Chloe of course).
In the post-Cab press conference today, Hipkins will probably be asked about it, and I hope he resists the temptation to use words like "rule out" or "bottom line". He doesn't have to endorse the Greens' policy (though it would be great if he did) but he'd be making a huge mistake if he simply shut it down, like Ardern with CGT.
Labours tax policy, or complete lack there of, is the elephant in the IRD office. All other major parties now have a tax policy. Labour need to come clean on theirs so voters left and right can make a more informed decision as we move closer to the election.
Having tax policies in isolation is reasonably unhelpful under MMP.
All other major parties now have a tax policy.
Where can we find National's?
Is it the policy Luxon announced in 2022 (reverse all Labour's tax changes) or the walk-back by Willis?
If you could point us to National's income tax policy, that would be great. Because it doesn't exist.
No, it’s not just reversal of Labours new taxes. It’s also inflation adjustment to tax thresholds. Even the Greens get this with partial adjustments to their threshold.
Labour … we’re just waiting on you now.
Again …
What is National's policy on income tax?
Keep the current top tax rate, or scrap the current top tax rate?
Very simple question.
Very simple answer – keep the 39% rate.
12:57 "reversal of Labours new taxes"
2:21 "keep the 39% rate"
They can't both be true.
I don't blame you for being confused, Luxon has been all over the place on this, Nicola Willis has to keep rescuing him. But you should probably just admit that you got it wrong, and National have not announced their tax policy for the election, just like Labour. That's a fact.
Horse's mouth:
"National Party leader Christopher Luxon says he is waiting for the latest economic figures before the party releases details of its tax and fiscal plan."
https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/political/490091/luxon-wants-latest-economic-figures-before-releasing-national-s-tax-and-fiscal-plan-details
Are you thick or what? You will see I said “not just a reversal of Labours taxes …”
Please stop digging.
You originally claimed National had released their tax policy for the election.
That is false.
That's why you haven't linked to it, in any of your comments. It's impossible to link to something that doesn't exist.
Labour have said they will be releasing their own tax policy soon.
Great. I look forward to it.
So, I donated to the Greens last night, that's how much this impressed me.
I had written the Greens off, I didn't think they could talk about anything other than identity issues.
Well done to the Greens. They have made me and a lot of millennials and gen z suddenly excited for this election, because there will actually be a party campaigning on populist left economic reforms.
My only concern is that they will get distracted and caught up in irrelevant culture war bullshit as the greens tend to do and not enough voters will hear their economic policies.
If they remain focused on messaging and getting the word out so that every kiwi possible knows their economic policies, they are going to clean up.
And yes! It's time for the Greens to start differentiating themselves from labour and attacking from the left just as Act is attacking National.
This is going to steal voted from labour and top and honestly I even expect a bunch of middle voters see the proposals and switch to greens.
Bravo to the Greens, there's actually something to vote FOR this election, rather than just voting AGAINST something.
please fix your username.
Sorry I don't seem to be able to edit my username on that comment.
Tldr for the other comment I posted.
These policies have restored some of my faith in the NZ left and have got me excited.
I was going to give two ticks to TOP, now I'm party voting Green and giving Raf my electorate vote in Ilam.
This election seemed like it was going to be a slog between who could be the beigest.
Now there's going to be some actually debate around economics.
If their housing policies are just as good I'm going to start volunteering and donating monthly.
I'm really looking forward to their other policies. I was feeling pretty hohum about the election too, but this has certainly made me pay more attention. It's the smell of potential in the air.
I really hope so 🤞
"I didn't think they could talk about anything other than identity issues."
What the Greens talk about and what the media bother to report are quite different.
I'm on the Greens' mailing list (not a member) and apart from all the usual fundraising e-mails, which are common to all parties, I'd say about 90% of policy communication is related to climate change, other environment issues like mining, housing/rents, and general economic policy.
But that doesn't get enough angry clicks or talkback calls, so it's largely ignored by the daily media.
This is true and I say that criticism as a minority myself, it's just really good to see some good old left wing economics.
I really am excited for this election now.
I kinda wish they'd bring back the all party debates!
Good to see Hosking pretty mild with Shaw this morning. Civil even.
Liked the $4m cutoff.
Also first $10k tax free fully supportive.
What's the strategy for when Labour says no to all this?
pre-election or post-election?
Post
I love all of it but can't see Chippy being to interested
I expect the GP strategy post-election is the same as always, working on the pragmatics depending on how much party vote they got.
I said elsewhere that I am curious what post-election scenarios they run.
Sure, there's a whole lot of stuff that's likely still unpalatable for many, but the important thing is that it's being said continues to be said.
What I like about this kind of policy is that it simplifies and reduces reduces administrative overhead.
The simplicity of the superannuation system leads it to have a administrative overhead cost of about 2-3% of the funds disbursed.
I haven't seen any comparative data about the disbursement of other WINZ benefits, but looking at it with a overhead cost eye, I'd be very surprised if the direct administrative overhead is less than 20% of funds disbursed. It would not surprise me if it was closer to 50% of funds disbursed.
And this is before looking at the other costs of of being required to turn up at WINZ offices for pointless meetings, interviews and involuntary strange and futile 'training' courses. All of which appear to be of a punitive nature and designed to raise the costs to recipients.
If someone is on the DPB, then circumstances don't change over time and having to get to a WINZ office monthly doesn't help. Nor does getting the DPB turned off because you can't get to the WINZ office because you have a kid with a cold and can't get on a bus. Same for turning up for meeting about jobs when there are no jobs or interviews on offer or where the offer is a interview at the other end of Auckland city. All of which I have seen happen to people I know.
I have paid an awful lot of tax over the decades which doesn’t particularly worry me. I have always been able to earn more, and it does mean that there is backstop if I get health problems or finally retire.
But it infuriates me when it gets squandered providing kind of make-work and punitive silliness that appears to be the purpose of WINZ for many idiotic politicians. Silly rules make for ridiculous operational inefficiencies.
Hopefully policies like this would reduce the overheads to something closer to the efficient and productive superannuation overhead.
Well, it's the first really promising Green policy I've seen in a while.
I have a feeling that housing issues would uncover a number of faults with any money based reform however, and that some kind of regulation that contains the egregious avarice of speculators and slumlords would remain necessary to make it workable.
Now we need some real environmental policy – not hydrogen or 1080 or subsidies paid to Musk. Cleaning up our rivers seriously would be a good start.
Though I'm annoyed by the gender self-id rubbish, as the public work out it's yet another linguistic philosopher boondoggle, on the 'all truth is socially constructed' pattern, it will lose popularity, and indeed is doing so in the UK already.
So the Greens are marginally palatable again for me, which I guess is better than no options at all.
One of the big issues for most, especially solo parents, is security for their family. Have been a solo parent and really wanted to buy out the ex so I could keep the family home and kids in place during the turmoil. On the benefit with my home business it was affordable, however the benefit was/is made up of so many different components that it wasn't considered income by the bank. So although I could pay for it..I couldn't get a mortgage and be independent. I would have to sell up and illogically pay more in rent in an area away from our supports. Nuts. It's ridiculously expensive to have to do that for the government and also for a parent. I ended up in full time work but my family really suffered. And I did buy my house.
a not uncommon scenario unfortunately. I think most people fail to understand just how complicated benefit structures and rules currently are, and how often they work against concepts of social security.
Those old Housing NZ mortgages might show a solution for this going forward. IIRC they were fixed interest mortgages for up to 30 years – my friend’s family were political refugees from Chile and had one in order to purchase their state house when it became available to buy. But I don't know how the money market works now as compared to then, so whether it is still possible would be the question.
Housing affordability, security and access are a big ticket item that reduces the cost of living immensely. Addressing this – and improving access to better financial options for individuals and families – to offset the financial considerations of banks – may help.
Personal anecdata about this one. My dad had one at 7% for 25 years.
Began in the mid-70s. By the early 80s they were virtually going on their knees, begging him to pay it off early. At that stage mortgage rates were in the high teens – and trending up over 20%.
IIRC, I got a one year term deposit rate of 20 (or 25) % with Countrywide in the mid-80's.
Yes just thinking about the logical, if we were really wanting to up the numbers of home ownership with all its good aspects, aspect to having a long term loan facility. Since these state loans went down the gurgler as part of the neo lib movement they have never been looked at again or reinstated. This is despite them being a boon to those who were helped by them.
It just shows me how close we are still intertwined with this whole neo lib rubbish that a Labour Govt has not thought of or had the guts to reintroduce something like this.
We have Kiwisaver and that is great and I support the hardline on withdrawals. it is for retirement and not a defacto housing funds source.
We could look at a State Advances type home loan ability. It would fit nicely with what we all thought the Labour movement was all about.
The government provides subsidy via AS or income related rent now.
Another approach is the cost of borrowing to buy up/own property and then "rent to own" schemes (long term tenancy). Or simple sale via some sort of housing bonds – whereby investors supply funds for long term mortgages (and can sell these on that market).
That sounds good
Is the AS easily available for the type of people that Molly was writing about?
It depends on housing cost to income (is relative) – and it does include mortgage cost.
AS is asset and income tested. If you have aren't on a core benefit, this is the asset test (it's also a good example of how complicated assessing a benefit it)
https://www.workandincome.govt.nz/map/income-support/extra-help/accommodation-supplement/assets-non-beneficiaries-01.html
https://www.workandincome.govt.nz/map/income-support/extra-help/accommodation-supplement/chargeable-income-non-beneficiaries-01.html
AS is one of the gnarliest problems to solve. It's complicated, can be unfair (WINZ use 4 area categories for average housing costs that probably don't reflect current housing costs), and there is the idea that landlords increase rents because they believe that WINZ will pay the beneficiary more (govt to landlord pipeline).
Some beneficiary advocates say get rid of it, but how to transition is difficult, and housing costs do vary a fair bit.
the asset test for beneficiaries
https://www.workandincome.govt.nz/map/income-support/extra-help/accommodation-supplement/assets-beneficiaries-01.html
Yes, the end of marriages when there is a family home is a an area that deserves some focus.
For mine continuing to provide a family home to the children is part of preventing poverty.
This is an area that is still neglected in policy.
One interesting option – where the separated parents continue to co-parent – is that the kids remain in the family home, and each parent moves in for 'their' week.
It has remained resolutely unpopular with the separated parents – who want their 'own' space. But would be the best outcome for the kids (no trekking between 2 'homes', no issues with schooling continuing, or the rest of the disruption which occurs in association with the grief over parents separating).
Both parents contribute to the mortgage – with varying levels of 'ownership' accruing for differential payments following the separation: e.g. if they had 30% equity in the home at the time of separation – they get 15% each; but subsequent mortgage payments increase/decrease the share of the balance for each.
Once the kids are grown/leave home (a bit of a moveable feast these days) – the family home is sold – and the profits split according to mortgage contributions above.
Of course, this requires a fairly amicable divorce. When one party is fire-breathing vengeance personified – the best interests of the children go to the wall.
It requires
a two bedroom apartment/flat/town house for the away parent (in turns).
they each share a two bedroom place with someone else one week out of two.
one has a place of their own, and the other uses a sleep out.
It's more difficult when there is re-couplingor (or living in different areas) – and a partner has a new family home mortgage partnership. Then the government has to buy out the "absent" parent. That might reduce the shared care down to occasional times (resident parent to a sleepout) or daytime.
This was an interesting adjunct. Mortgages over time.
Norm and I had a 30 year mortgage @ 3.5% in late1972. of $10400* (from memory) plus a $5000 2nd mortgage @ 7%. for 5 years. Built by Peerless Homes plan, keys in May 1973. Lived there for 23 years.
We sold it for $ 151thou in 1996 and bought a unit for $87000.
Property one recently sold for $750thou( small 3 bed.)
Property two is now valued at $500thou. (small 2bed unit.) Been here since 1996 except for when we let it out for 5 years while we travelled in our Motorhome.
In the 80s when my Dad died I helped my mother buy a unit in Waihi (Gold Mine Town) @ 18% for $12thou of the $51thou price.
So prices and interest rates have been a seesaw.
Yep, it's back to GP party vote for me, after dallying with TMP and others. It's also good to see this policy suite supported by the more Labour-leaning on here.
Now all that needs to happen is this to be reported properly, thanks MSM!
This is a genuine question, not a criticism…
Can someone please explain how a payment to everyone will stop people being at the bottom of the heap?
I was around the public sector when accommodation supplements came in and it seemed they just went to increasing rents and left no-one genuinely better off.
It seems to me that giving everyone the same payment would just be the rising tide that lifts all boats and another catalyst for putting middle class taxes into upper class pockets.
Yet, those in the know seem to place an importance on the concept so I'm sure I'm missing something. Can someone please tell me what it is?
Thanks.
The GMI policy is not a payment to everyone, its a top up to that level for those below it.
Rental prices are often described as responding to accommodation supplement adjustments in that way. Not so clear what the facts of that matter are however because plenty of people not getting accommodation supplement also saw their rents increase at the same time frame.
But the point is that this doesn't seem to apply for a majority of price levels. The change is immediately taking income inequality back a few years in time and if you expect a huge price level adjustment to everything on that basis the question is why that didn't apply to that earlier period of the economy.
I'm struggling to find the detail on the Trust element of this policy.
If it is (as it appears from the press release) to be a flat tax on every asset owned by every trust – there are going to be a number of ordinary Kiwis affected – some of them very unfairly.
Many people don't have trusts because they are 'rich pricks' There are a lot of trusts established to protect the family home, e.g. when Dad dies, Mum has a lifetime tenancy in the house, but the asset is protected for the kids. Or to protect an inheritance for a disabled child.
This kind of protective trust is fairly common. And does a huge service in supporting those who are at risk of conmen (both Kiwi and international) asset-stripping people who are disadvantaged.
If the asset threshold of the trust tax is the same as for individuals (i.e. 2 million) – I have much less of an issue with taxing it. But, on the face of it, it appears that it applies from the first dollar of value.
One way around it, would be the legal establishment of a protective trust (one with a beneficiary who is disadvantaged in some way) – and exempt these from the trust tax up to the 2 million limit. This would have to be a legal declaration – so fraud would apply if business or wealthy individuals used this provision to hide assets.
Many people don't have trusts because they are 'rich pricks' There are a lot of trusts established to protect the family home
You mean of course to make the state pay for their residential care that they would otherwise have to pay for themselves. Winston Peters made a habit of going around New Zealand encouraging people to do this in the late 80's and early 90's. Lots of lawyers made good money from this. Of course only those who could afford lawyers and the costs of setting up a trust actually did this.
The ordinary worker who owned their own house could or did not.
There are also those who have learned to their regret that the children who were the beneficiaries of the trust oft dissolved it and sold the house from under them. I know a few who this has happened too – one parent only finding out their house had been sold when they ran into the person who had bought it in town and that person telling them they had just bought their house.
Tell me should that value built up over the years be used to pay for a person's care – usually better quality when self-paying – or be given away to greedy children.
afaik beneficiaries can't sell a house like that, only the trustees can.
but yeah, it's still very shit and elderly people are vulnerable in lots of ways.
If the beneficiaries all agree for the trust to be dissolved and the assets disbursed it can be.
In setting up the trust the person is in effect giving their assets away to the trust. The trustees have to look after the interests of the beneficiaries – not the interests of the person who put the money/house into the trust.
right, but why would the elderly person agree to that? Or are they not a beneficiary?
Often the person giving the assets is not a beneficiary.
It is why they should get independnt legal advice from a different firm than the children. One acting in the interests of the children, one in the interests of the older person.
If you put your assets in a trust and continue to use and access them as a beneficiary it can be declared a sham trust or the other beneficiaries can sue the trustees for not looking after their interests. There was a case in Palmerston North some years back where the parent used up all the money in the trust while they were alive i.e. continued to treat it as it was their own money and the children after her death successfully sued the lawyers who were trustees for neglecting their interests.
It is much more complex than people think.
https://www.trustlaw.co.nz/wp-content/uploads/2021/04/NZL343-TToNTT-Greg-Kelly-7V.pdf
In that particular case they were not. I've seen quite a few where the elderly person wasn't. Legal advice has not always been independent eg children and their lawyer convince Mum to set up a trust. Lawyer is acting on behalf of children.
In another case I was helping with a disabled beneficiary got the trust wound up via another lawyer as the trustees (bother and sister and a lawyer family friend) were essentially not disbursing anything to him as they would get the money once he died.
No, actually, I mean to protect the major asset/inheritance from a second marriage – resulting in it being willed away from the children; or from being conned by smooth-talking low-life into ….. unwise…. financial decisions.
If you've never seen either happening, then you are fortunate.
What/which Kiwis will be affected very unfairly and why, as a result of a trust tax?
I know two people, both adults with intellectual disabilities, who are beneficiaries of trusts. Set up on the death of parents, with their share of the value of the family home – the only asset; held in trust for obvious reasons – these are vulnerable people.
The value of the trusts would be well under the individual wealth tax level of $2 million in both cases. So their siblings (who are well able to look after themselves) would not be liable to pay wealth tax on their share of the inheritance; but these vulnerable individuals would be taxed on the value of the assets in their trust.
Sounds pretty unfair to me.
Life’s been unfair to those people. However, in my view, the Green policy is not affecting them if those trusts are set up properly:
https://assets.nationbuilder.com/beachheroes/pages/17574/attachments/original/1686379147/Tax_Full_Policy_Document_v4.pdf?1686379147
“pretty unfair” ≠ “very unfairly”
Why are you changing your wording?
Why are some commenters and you desperately looking for examples, real or hypothetical, to raise doubt & concern about this policy? It seems you are refusing to look at the bigger picture and are looking for any (!) excuses to dismiss it. Why?
One of the worst ‘reasons’ I’ve seen is that Marama Davidson co-fronting the policy, as Green Co-Leader, is enough to ditch the whole policy off-hand. What are such people even doing here on a Left-leaning NZ political blog??
Happy to say "very" unfairly – if it makes you happier.
And, if they will be exempt from the trust wealth surtax – then I don't have an issue, here.
Thank you for the clarification.
It was not clear from the media coverage that this was the case.
I said, at the beginning, that I'd been unable to find the details of the GP policy on trusts – apart from the once-over-lightly media coverage.
I hardly think that querying a possiblity of unfairness under the (poorly reported) trust element qualifies as "desperately looking for examples"
Indeed, I made a comment on another thread about giving kudos to the GP for providing the funding mechanism for their GBI.
And, I've made zero comment about Marama Davidson in relation to this policy. If you have a problem with another commenter saying so – raise it with them.
There is a link to the policy document in the original post.
Thank you, I apologise for missing this link in the original post.
In the post and easily found on the GP website 👍
I haven't read the whole document (although I have scanned it), but I'm finding when people ask specific questions that I can usually find the detail by doing keyword searches.
All good, I’m so much happier with consistency within and between comments in the same discussion thread.
The Green policy covers a huge area and lots of legal-technical stuff will need to be worked out. My comments are my understanding of what’s in the full policy document as it stands. I’m no trust or tax expert.
Life is unfair for many including many (most?) of the poor. Why the laser light focus on trusts set up for people with intellectual or other disabilities? What percentage of Kiwis with disabilities are beneficiaries of disabled beneficiary trusts? Inequity is present & pervasive at all levels.
The Green’s policy will help disabled people and nobody in this piece mentioned trusts.
https://www.stuff.co.nz/pou-tiaki/132303045/greens-income-guarantee-would-help-disabled-mori-in-poverty-advocates-say
So will the wealth tax catch those who have saved through kiwisaver, got to the age of being able to withdraw it. So if they have taken a bit to upgrade with a view to future proofing the house they live in the family home, there is still a balance in their name. They may be wanting to get in an annuity/pension from later. Tax is already paid on these funds.
If you include the family home and include kiwisaver I feel you are sending the wrong message. So an unintended consequence may be a lessening off of contributions if they are going to be taxed again later on them.
I feel ending poverty should be looked at separately and the changes to the mode of delivery, individualism in benefits as well as tax rate changes should be the ones we look at.
If benefits are too low then benefits are too low whether or not it is coupled with a wealth tax.
Kiwisaver isn't mentioned in the document and I agree this needs to be clarified. But perhaps you could be more specific with a scenario. Few people will have a kiwisaver and freehold home worth over $2m
Have a look at the example given at the top of pg. 15 in the full policy document.
My interpretation is that KS will be considered part of the cumulative net wealth of an individual.
thanks. Do you mean the Marion Hood one? (they called one of the people in their scenarios Robin Hood, lol).
Do you mean the private super scheme is akin to KS?
Yes and Yes
Really?
You forget about people living in cities and those who may have been dutiful in putting more than the minimum, some up to 8%, into Kiwisaver and who are yet to draw down any funds as they have not retired. Will this balance be counted in the wealth tax? KS started in 2007. So someone living in a city who started then will have 16 years of contributions so far against a possible further 24 years of working life.
My use of the word 'if' is to say that out of touch benefits exist now without being tacked on to another scheme to do the Govts job (of providing for all its citizens) by penalising others for looking after themselves.
Puny benefits should not have to be run with something like a wealth tax to make the concept of upping them legitimate. Doing that lets any Govt off the hook off the need provide a safety net for those in need. This has been part & parcel of our way of life in NZ for many years.
I do not doubt and have never doubted that benefits are not liveable on just as I don't doubt that minimum hourly rates or the even the living wage do not provide enough/any of things like choice for children's education, holidays even Christmas. I do know that the working poor who don't have access to abated rents, etc do it tough. This is becasue of the myth that working provides. Many lose variuos payments and have payments such as transport/clothing costs increase. Many belong to a union while working and that has to be paid for.
We as a country need to look straight ahead and clearly and ask ourselves why this is and what the Govt can do about it. Hiding it in some sort of snow job wealth tax just continues hiding it.
I feel certain that we should adopt wholeheartedly the tax changes suggested in The Greens paper. Make the benefits, on an individual basis, at least equal a 40 hour week on a the minumum or living wage and then see where the gap is on having funds within Govt coffers to pay.
We should have huge encouragement for all citizens to avail themselves of AS and disability payments. Those already in the system seem to no problem but where people may have no other dealings with the system there is not good take up.
I feel that your experience leads you to think that it would be better run through ACC then that is valid.
My former flatmate who was legally and congenitally blind still had to fill out paper work which seemed to infer that he may have suddenly stopped being blind. I did too with my congenital bi lateral deafness. They have modified this approach but after having his disability payment stopped because he was too slow off the mark he didn't bother from then until he moved to Aus. I have never bothered to reapply but will do so.
Really what exactly?
No, it's not that I forget, it's that I'm of the underclass who can't have KS, so I don't know what you are talking about. This is why I asked you do give some scenarios. Actual scenarios, not vagueposting that some people have paid 8% (because obviously that depends on their wages/salary), or how they have over $2m in assets but no ability to pay or defer.
The other problem I have is that you came into this debate arguing against things that didn't exist in the policy, so most of the time I can't tell if you are making a valid point or not.
It's not about making them legitimate, where did you even get that from? It's about paying for social security in NZ so that no-one has to live in poverty. If you have realistic ideas on how to do that without a wealth tax, please explain them.
From the arguments you have made so far (and I could be wrong on this), you appear to be saying that asset rich, cash poor people shouldn't have to help lift people out of poverty. You haven't explained how or why. Given the option to defer, it looks like you are making the argument that people should be able to keep their high value house capital gains. I'd like to know why.
Paying 8% does not depend on one's salary. You can pay 3-8%. Ok my own scenario. Redundancied out of full time well paid work in PS in 2005 and took early retirement.
I had a series of jobs most of which were on the minimum wage to just over the minimum wage. When I was a peak portfolio worker with three or four small jobs I earned much, much less than I was getting in the PS.
In 2007 the opportunity to put money into KS arose and I started out by putting the minimum of 3% in, even on the low wages I was on. In a later work place I was in, there was a similarly waged part-time worker who was able to put in the full 8%. I put in in 8% when my portfolios of jobs was about $30-40,000.
I do not understand the comment as to the 'under class'. Please don't call yourself or anyone else that…..Luxon's 'bottom feeders' or 'unter mensch' are horrible similar sayings.
There is nothing that stops anybody from opening a KS account. This is so that people would at least get the amount from the Govt. My niece has been on the job seeker benefit for many years with only occasional work (she has Borderline personality disorder) and she has managed to put aside contributions. My sister insisted that her children do this, opening an account for each of them. Admittedly this niece is one of those that Molly refers to with cheaper rent as she is housed in a Kainga Ora home.
The upping of the basic benefit will allow choice and hopefully more will be able to contribute at least the minimum to KS so they feel they have a $$$$ stake in the future and see themselves backing themselves to provide part of it. Hopefully those on lower incomes will be able to make a contribution if they choose to.
On the basis that if the Govt is giving away money then we should all be lining up to get it.
I do support the upping of the benefits. This should be explicit & clear -cut Govt policy and not hidden or necessarily funded by this tax.
I support the upping of the tax rates as suggested in the paper
I support benefits being individualised
I think the family home should be excluded.
I think reintroducing death duties or introducing a (transaction) tax on when a property is sold are fairer ways and provide a natural waypoint when duties or taxes are imposed.
For the long termers who are not able to work because of mental or physical disability should not be classed as not working or unemployed. They should have access to a package similar to at least the living wage or Govt super.
I have looked at the Sorted KS calculator
https://sorted.org.nz/guides/kiwisaver/kiwisaver-how-it-works/?
It explains it far better than I can and I would urge anyone to open an account.
You are incorrect as to my rationale. I am hoping that this level (above) of misinformation/politics of envy is not going public in response to queries from people in similar circumstances to me. The people you so disparage (not wanting to help lift people out of poverty) above especially once they have retired, are the backbone of the charitable sector with many working almost full time hours for little,no, or honorarium type wages. They are the ones turning up at schools to run remedial reading classes, or to coach sports teams, making curtains or quilts or running foodbanks. In the domestic sphere one I know made 40 woollen hats over a two week period as well as scarves/clothes for packages to go to HB/Gisborne to help those affected by the Cyclones. The more that is well made, warm and donated the less people have to pay to replace out of their benefits.
These are also the people that make huge contributions to charities on death. (hence my suggestion that if this taxation regime is brought into force and people defer until death that the amount they have to pay, that this is abated by the amount that is donated to charities.) I feel you will not get them on side by implying they are super rich. Many get along on their super, don't have holidays, budget and live frugally.
That is the cohort I am in now so I know more about them.
I can imagine feeling similarly peeved if I was paying huge amounts to house myself/family plus pay my way in retirement and then someone comes along and says you are a 'fat cat' and we are going to tax you. Fine budgetting often gets people a long way and they will be responding to govt initiatives like KS and working hard so they don't need to apply for social housing, so this is left to those in need.
I can't help thinking though of the person who helped me after I had an accident and the hours that she and her hsband were working. I would dearly like to hope that families like hers could have support from this. I fear though that they may not, because they are working a huge number of hours.
A Green Party member is staying with me and he says the policy is more aimed at those who are unable to work, no matter how low the unemployment numbers. So not the spouses of workers who may not be unable to get a job. . Not sure if he is correct though. Is he?
What do you mean if benefits are too low. Is that not something you accept as real?
I'm not sure what your first paragraph means. The point of the wealth tax, and income tax adjustments, is to pay for much better welfare so that no-one has to live in poverty. That includes you if you should end up in that situation.