This reeks of kickbacks

41 comments on “This reeks of kickbacks ”

• Comments are now closed

1. xtasy 1

   6 March 2013 at 10:41 am

   Very, very interesting and “disturbing” news indeed. I have in many cases on various business and economic matters had to agree with Bernard Hickey. His comments on this must be credible criticism. But on the other hand it is not surprising, as there are corruptible staff not only in finance companies, but also in NZ Immigration, and likely a few other departments, who bend the rules.

   Once there are larger sums of money and major rights or benefits involved, temptation is there. Kickbacks, now that makes for good headlines now.
2. freedom 2

   6 March 2013 at 10:49 am

   RadioLive willing to openly criticize the Government,
   up is down and cheddar is blue
   the sky is falling the sky is falling
3. tc 3

   6 March 2013 at 10:57 am

   Key stated that every Kiwi would get 2000 shares didn’t he and the registration process allows you request over 20,000k worth of shares.

   It’s gone anyway under Slippery so lets keep as many as possible in NZ and see just how ‘fair’ it ends up being.
   • freedom 3.1

     6 March 2013 at 11:05 am

     unless you work for Mighty River, then you are guaranteed $5000 of shares ? ! ? WTF
     Where are the questions from our media about that deal ?
     What are the terms for that sweet ride?
     What does “NZ based ” really mean,
     Is it just a sidestep of the Kiwis first promise?

     exhale and cry
   • Chris 3.2

     6 March 2013 at 12:46 pm

     Key promised everyone who applied for up to $2,000 worth of shares (not 2,000 shares) would get the shares they requested. You can request to purchase more (the $20,000 you talk about), but if it is oversubscribed then everyone will get their $2,000 worth (or $1,000 if you have only requested $1,000 etc) and anyone who has requested more will get less than they ask for. However, the people who have indicated their interest early on (i.e. in the next couple of weeks) will not lose as many shares through the reduction because of an oversubscription than those that do not indicate early on.

     Freedom – it is $2,000 and you have to pay for them. The deal as I understand it is that when you purchase the shares you will have to give a commitment that you are a NZ citizen I believe (I haven’t seen any information on what proof if any you will have to give but I imagine you will be required to provide some kind of evidence..

     The deal you are talking about has been in the media – that is where I learnt about it and I haven’t read that much about the whole process.
     • freedom 3.2.1

       6 March 2013 at 1:15 pm

       Chris , well d’uh really, shares cost money ? wow. now maybe try reading what was written, i was pointing to the deal for Mighty River employees, that nacts have deemed worthy of 2.5 times the stock volume available to you or I.

       It was widely reported that Mighty River staff get a guarantee of up to $5000 of shares. The Herald even had to change their article which originally reported it as 5000 shares gauranteed.

       “He also confirmed that as part of the offer, Mighty River Power employees would be guaranteed a minimum of $5000 worth of shares each in the offer if they wanted them.”
       http://www.nzherald.co.nz/business/news/article.cfm?c_id=3&objectid=10869016
       http://thestandard.org.nz/kiwis-at-the-front-of-the-queue/#comment-599099

       p.s. for your edification

       Only people who meet the following requirements can “pre-register” to buy shares:
       1. New Zealand citizen
       2. New Zealand bank account
       3. IRD number
       4. New Zealand address
       • Chris 3.2.1.1

         6 March 2013 at 1:29 pm

         Oh fair enough – I hadn’t heard about that so your original point stands then – where is the media discussion about this.

         To be honest though that part of the scheme doesn’t bother me – while they will not get any kind of overall percentage of the shares more businesses should be getting the employees investing in the company (preferably through share bonus schemes etc).
         • freedom 3.2.1.1.1

           6 March 2013 at 1:42 pm

           “businesses should be getting the employees investing in the company” something the few companies that have tried it will agree with, but first it takes an owner or owners not suckling for all they are worth at the teat of greed. good luck finding any.

           re the Mighty River bonus to staff, I have had a similar reaction from a few people these last few hours and i guess i simply don’t get why they should receive doubleplusgood share volume over a fellow New Zealander
           • Skinny 3.2.1.1.1.1

             6 March 2013 at 2:42 pm

             “Oh that will be trader John’s idea probably harks back to the days when he was trading the New Zealand currency.” That wild ride for the NZD that sent manufacturers, farmers, importers etc to the wall. 

              Key will tuck the gullible employees in sometime down the track. Bit like tranzrail shares back in the 80’s Key probably had a hand in that too.
         • alwyn 3.2.1.1.2

           6 March 2013 at 1:42 pm

           It may sound a bit odd but there is a good economic argument that employees of companies should NOT buy shares in the company, or in fact even in another firm involved in the same line of business.
           The basis of it is that if your employer gets into major problems they are quite likely to be laying off staff and you may therefore lose your job. At the same time of course the share price will have crashed and you won’t be able to sell the shares in order to get money to live on.
           • Richard29 3.2.1.1.2.1

             7 March 2013 at 2:58 pm

             Indeed. Not to mention that it is very bad practice to buy shares in just one company. It worries me to see reports that for lots of people MRP will be the first time they are buying shares. There are a lot of people who could be sinking an overly large share of their savings into a single company which is dumb.

             Far from having learned anything from the finance company collapses and poor level of financial literacy out there the government seems to be actively encouraging poor investment practice:

             – If you have a mortgage it is a bad idea to buy shares – just pay down your debt.
             – If you are saving on a less than 10 year timeframe (e.g. home deposit) you should not be putting money in shares – they are too volatile in the short term.
             – If you have a small pool of savings (<20k) then is is poor diversification to have 10% of that invested into a single company.

             Basically the only group for whom it is sensible to buy shares are Kiwisaver funds and retired baby boomers in free hold homes who already have a large pool of savings. Which begs the question why the government would be spending millions in foregone revenue from the sale to provide a 'loyalty bonus' to what is already one of the most wealthy and privileged sections of society.

             Oh that's right – it's a National Govt.
       • alwyn 3.2.1.2

         6 March 2013 at 1:33 pm

         It’s not a major point but you don’t have to supply any of those items at the Pre-register stage.
         They are only required if you later go on to buy some shares.
         Of course if you won’t be able to come up with the citizenship, bank account, IRD and address there isn’t any point in trying to pre-register.
       • xtasy 3.2.1.3

         6 March 2013 at 11:42 pm

         As far as I understand your group 1 as “NZ citizen” will also include “permanent residents”, i.e. New Zealanders who acquired residence and are resident here, probably for at lest some time (I shall hope).
4. One Tāne Huna 4

   6 March 2013 at 11:04 am

   The appropriate authority to deal with the National Party is the Serious Fraud Office.

   This is the perfect lever for the next government to use to justify annulling the sale.
5. Rodel 5

   6 March 2013 at 11:50 am

   ‘ASSET STRIPPING’ That’s the expresssion I was looking for…brilliant LPRENT!! Should be used in every conversation by every politician who opposes the asset theft.
   As in Brierly’s days perhaps the employees of Mighty River should be very afraid.

   Also…The cartoon in today’s Press (6 March) says it all
6. hellonearthis 6

   6 March 2013 at 12:48 pm

   Muldoon had think big
   Key has sell big

   both are painful for new zealand
   • Draco T Bastard 6.1

     6 March 2013 at 1:07 pm

     At least Think Big supplied us with worthwhile assets that we’re still using and would have available for another few decades at least – if this government weren’t selling them.
     • freedom 6.1.1

       6 March 2013 at 1:18 pm

       and not only is he stealing from your mokopuna, Key is landing us with bigger debt than Muldoon ever dreamed possible
     • freedom 6.1.2

       6 March 2013 at 1:18 pm

       and not only is he stealing from our mokopuna, Key is landing us with bigger debt than Muldoon ever dreamed possible
       • freedom 6.1.2.1

         6 March 2013 at 1:19 pm

         edit / delete non-functional 🙁
       • Steady Course 6.1.2.2

         6 March 2013 at 7:00 pm

         Got a link for that?
     • aerobubble 6.1.3

       7 March 2013 at 11:54 am

       Its the Big Lazy Think. Key time and again ignores consequences, commonsense, an blatantly attacks NZ, to ascribe value to his idea of the moment. We’re not worthy to have kids, to fee them if we have them, to have them taught properly, to house them healthily, and when they live in OZ they can’t even get to university. Its all about the big lazy thinking of Key, a bizarre litany of errors, flob offs, misleads, that sends the media into a coma.
7. geoff 7

   6 March 2013 at 1:18 pm

   With Tony Ryall spending so much time on MoH I am not suprised that he has
   neglected his role as the SOE minister.
8. BLiP 8

   6 March 2013 at 1:20 pm

   ‘

   We’ve known for a while that giving personal information to the government while the John Key led National Ltd™ crew is in power is a risky business. Basher Bennett set the tone when dumping on those beneficiaries who dared speak out, now Ryall is flogging off personal data belonging to anyone interested in buying back the assetts they already own. Still, good that we know about this latest malfeasance so early. What’s next . . . ?
9. BLiP 9

   6 March 2013 at 1:57 pm

   ‘

   Heh! Its just a coincidence . . . if you wanna believe a “financial advisor” and a National Ltd™ cabinet minister. I guess the ball’s in “Elizabeth’s” court now: is she an existing client?
10. tarkwin 10

    6 March 2013 at 2:06 pm

    The woman, who wants only to be known as Elizabeth???? Mr Patterson clearly leaves no stone unturned when checking the credibility of his source! If this is true someone in a call centre is down the road, I doubt it is endemic or government sponsored. And yes, before anyone asks I have been offered information from call centres that I could use to generate sales leads.
    • freedom 10.1

      6 March 2013 at 3:19 pm

      just because the reader does not get to know the name does not make the source less credible or imply the journalist did not do their duty.

      granted with the current MSM there is reasonable doubt as to what that duty is . . .

      but i think in this instance the privacy of the individual and the certainty of the event outweighs your need to destroy their life
    • QoT 10.2

      6 March 2013 at 6:07 pm

      Her privacy had already been invaded once … god only knows why she wasn’t queuing up to get it invaded all over again. 🙄
11. johnm 11

    6 March 2013 at 4:23 pm

    Kickbacks in the U$K
    The NHS is being sold of to the privateering vultures, who are going to get their filthy hands on the british peoples’ heritage of decent health care for all” 🙁 🙁 :-(. Keyboy’s after the same here.
12. Dogberry 12

    6 March 2013 at 4:49 pm

    At the risk of dampening the hysteria the webpage and 0800 number are merely there to register interest. Anyone wanting to actually proceed to buy shares will need to the sent the prospectus and other documentation, and as the Government itself is not a share broker anyone wanting to proceed will have to work through one as these are the people who deal with the share registry documentation.

    If you already have a share-broker they can act for you. If you haven’t you’ll need to find one – and whoever it is the Government will pay the fees. As it would clearly be most unsatisfactory for the Government to give all this work to one broker excluding the others, in order to be fair the work for unrepresented people will be shared around all brokers and I think it very likely that in this instance Millstone Financial Services were simply ‘allocated’ Elizabeth on her registraton of interest for this reason.

    But hey, conspiracy theories are much more fun.
    • Arfamo 12.1

      6 March 2013 at 4:57 pm

      It is impossible to dampen hysteria in today’s world. Hysteria keeps everybody warm and malleable.
13. vto 13

    6 March 2013 at 5:03 pm

    This is exactly the reason suggested for not trusting the government with census data.

    They simply cannot be trusted. End of story.
14. vto 14

    6 March 2013 at 5:04 pm

    Millstone. What a terrible name for a financial services outfit. . . .
    • freedom 14.1

      6 March 2013 at 5:59 pm

      it’s actually Milestone vto (but yours is funnier)
      http://www.3news.co.nz/Govt-says-broker-email-a-coincidence/tabid/1607/articleID/289180/Default.aspx
15. arants 15

    6 March 2013 at 7:18 pm

    Kickbacks?

    Isn’t that implicit in ‘supporting the capital markets’?
16. Tom Gould 16

    6 March 2013 at 7:25 pm

    No story here, right? Ryall says no comment, so the chooks shrug their shoulders, say okay boss, and head out for coffee. That’s how it works these days.
    • tc 16.1

      6 March 2013 at 7:39 pm

      No Comment = Damm don’t ask that. Ryall’s too smart to open his trap and BS like Key and others do.
17. johnm 17

    6 March 2013 at 8:02 pm

    Found a really great quote describing the destructive greed for profit and privatisation:

    “The blurring of the line that separates profit from state,” I wrote, “has had a far more devastating effect on American values — indeed, on the very notion that anything besides a good financial buzz even has value — than the blurring of that more famously wobbly line that separates church from state.”

    I fear this isn’t simply about occasional and inevitable corruption, but the righteous, for-profit gaming of a broken social system in the name of a privatized world. The driving force is privatization, and it seizes on divisive, us-vs.-them “ideals” as moral pretexts for intensifying the profitable breakup of the human commons — that which belongs to all of us, such as “human rights” and “justice.“
    ~Robert Koehler”
18. Richard 18

    6 March 2013 at 9:05 pm

    This is the dumbest beat-up ever.

    Everyone with a registered share trading account has received emails from their broker about the shares. I received one today as well, from my ASB Securities account. I would imagine that brokers are also emailing non-clients if they can, through any email addresses acquired from advertisers or Flybuys or whatever.

    The brokers are spamming everyone they can in the hope of bagging someone wanting to invest.

    There is literally nothing to see here, and this sort of deranged scaremongering is the very thing that discredits this site.
19. Drakula 19

    6 March 2013 at 9:29 pm

    It smells of kickbacks to me and it looks as if Milestone acquired that information illegally or if not illegally it is certainly invasion of privacy.

    Not very ethical is it.

Links to post

1. In the 2pm Daily Blog Bulletin… « The Daily Blog: posted on 6 March 2013 at 2:30 pm

• Comments are now closed

• Log in
• Donate
• Contribute post

• Articles RSS