Three strikes law is not the answer

Written By: - Date published: 12:13 pm, November 29th, 2022 - 25 comments
Categories: crime, law, law and "order", mark mitchell, national, same old national, uncategorized - Tags:

It is rather weird that the three strikes law is a, ahem, hot topic right now.

It is being held out to be a panacea to the current crime wave the right claim we are suffering from.

A high profile killing of an Auckland dairy worker has sparked considerable anger.

National and Mark Mitchell in particular have chosen to fuel that anger by demanding that the three strikes law be returned.  Even though initial indications are that the person who has been charged was extradited from Australia and may not actually be subject to the law if it was in force.

Mitchell has been reported as follows.  From Morning Report:

He said National wanted to see “proper consequences” for offenders and was “fully focused” on changing the law around discounts.

“The public of New Zealand don’t feel like there is consequences. They don’t feel safe in their houses, they don’t feel like the judicial is working in their favour at all and it’s very rare we here about victims at all these days.”

The law has a somewhat disturbed background.  Its primary proponent was someone who had been convicted of stealing a dead baby’s identity.

As I said previously the legislation was a sports slogan masquerading as a serious penal policy.  Its genesis was the US of A where an informed considered approach to criminal justice is subservient to good old boy tough on crime toting politicians.

It basically has a list of offences where first time up a defendant will be given a warning, second time up an offender serves the imposed sentence without parole and third time up unless it would be manifestly unjust an offender has to serve the maximum sentence for the offence.

It is hard to comprehend how it could have a positive effect on offence levels.  In fact the National Government was advised that the law change may result in more homicides.

It is not difficult to understand how this could work.  The ones at risk of being subject to three strikes tend to be poorly educated and either very drunk or out of their head on something or they have the type of personality that means they respond very poorly to certain circumstances or they suffer from a mental condition. They do not have law degrees or coldly measure the consequences of their behaviour if they act in a certain way.

They are almost inevitably impulsive. They will not perform a deep analysis of the likely consequences, instead they will think along the following lines, “S*&t I’m going down but if I get away I might not get caught”. It is then quite conceivable that they will kill someone to get away.

The law had come up with some batshit crazy results like the case where a prisoner was sentenced to seven years imprisonment for pinching a female prison guard’s bum.  Another person who suffered from long-standing and serious mental illness, who had been admitted at least 13 times to mental health facilities, and who suffered from schizophrenia and substance (drug and alcohol) abuse received the same sentence for an unwanted kiss on the cheek of a stranger.

This second case led the Supreme Court to decide that the sentence of seven years’ imprisonment went well beyond excessive punishment and would shock the conscience of properly informed New Zealanders, and was therefore so disproportionately severe as to breach the Bill of Rights. They also agreed that this right not to be subject to cruel or disproportionately severe punishment is not subject to the reasonable limits protection under the Act.

So suggestions of a return of the law is both an affront to the rule of law which National is meant to support and may actually increase the homicide rate.  And it will not be a panacea.

You need long term reform to achieve this.  Address poverty, improve housing standards, care for people’s health and give everyone a good education.

But these tough on crime slogans that by the looks of it do not actually apply to the offence in question do all of us a disservice.

25 comments on “Three strikes law is not the answer ”

  1. Barfly 1

    "extradited from Australia"


    • Obtrectator 1.1

      For God's sake, is this silly error going to go on and on being committed? If you extradite someone, it's because you DO want them in your country – to face justice. We certainly DIDN'T want that Aussie reject here.

  2. Lioness 2

    "a prisoner was sentenced to seven years imprisonment for pinching a female prison guard’s bum."

    "received the same sentence for an unwanted kiss on the cheek of a stranger"

    Always great to see the left minimize physical and sexual assault against woman. Perhaps this is why so many of us no longer feel safe in Aoteroa NZ.

    • mickysavage 2.1

      This is not minimising the effects of physical and sexual assault. This is wondering why these instances should attract the exact same way as the most extreme examples of the offending.

      • Lioness 2.1.1

        You are minimizing it.

        The law is called the "3 Strike Law". So for either of these offenders to have been potentially facing the the maximum potential consequence of this law they must have committed similar crimes or severe crimes at least twice previously and potentially even more times if they did so before the law was first passed.

        You use the terms "kiss on the check" and "pinch on the bum" instead of what each of those acts were, "a sexual act committed against an unwilling woman".

        You try to defend it by saying "it was just a kiss", "just a pinch". Have you considered how those effected the victims? No you haven't you have simply taken the view that the crimes didnt reall matter and could have been worse so the poor criminal shouldn't have been punished to much.

        Your attitude is why Labour is known as crim-hugging and soft on crime.

        • mickysavage

          That is quite the pivot from complaining about lack of empathy for victims to saying Labour is crim hugging and soft on crime. Criminal activity comes in all degrees of severity. To say that all offending is equally bad no matter what the circumstances is not the actions of a well run criminal justice system. Heard about proportionality?

        • DS

          There are people in prison for rape who serve less than seven years in prison.

          Do you think a bottom pinch is worse than rape? Because that's what Three Strikes says.

    • DS 2.2

      It's called proportionality. Or in this case, disproportionality.

      Frankly, seven years for a kiss on a cheek is a greater affront to the conscience than the initial kiss on the cheek.

  3. alwyn 3

    On the summary piece you get about this story you finish by saying

    "And despite there being evidence that it would actually work."

    Are you seriously suggesting that we should not do something because it would work?

    [Clearly there is a missing “no”. Have now amended – MS]

  4. Mike the Lefty 4

    The best deterrent for crime is NOT harsher sentences, it is having a state-owned, professional, well-funded police force staffed by the right people.

    Before the Bow Street Runners in the late 18th century, the system was one of hue and cry and bounty hunters, plus harsh sentences including whipping, branding and hanging.

    Harsh sentences did not reduce crime then and they won't now.

    The best thing the Labour government could do would be to separate traffic and police as used to happen. More police stations that are actually open and not shut after office hours. Police on the beat, in the community, like it used to be. Nowadays the police force is reduced to little more than a swat squad for emergencies and traffic accidents.

    There will be less crime when potential offenders fear that they WILL be caught. At the moment they reckon the odds are in their favour, and harsher sentences are just a joke to them. No offender can be sentenced if they not first caught, and if our police force is not capable of doing the job then they won't be caught.

    It will take a shitload of money, but building more prisons will take a shitload of money too.

  5. DS 5

    Three Strikes is nonsensical, evil, and stupid. It does nothing to actually deter offenders – who now have a perverse incentive to perform the worst possible form of the crime in question, since the system is now incapable of distinguishing between levels of severity.

    (Hint: that bloke who got seven years for a bottom pinch? He'd have received exactly the same sentence if he'd performed the worst possible act of indecent assault upon the woman in question).

    The kicker is that it costs the state $100,000 a year to keep someone in prison. That's the state wasting $700,000 for a bottom pinch. Talk about wasteful spending…

    That said, the Supreme Court has been been getting rather aggressive in its political interference recently. I am not so worried about this example, since it actually pertains to the judiciary's bread and butter, but honestly: even when politicians are morons, the judges need to pull their heads in. Leave the politicians to the voters.

  6. tsmithfield 6


    The peverse outcomes you described were counteracted by the fact that the judge could avoid the 3 Strikes sentencing requirement should the sentence be manifestly unjust.

    Whether the 3 Strikes law "works" depends on what is meant by "works". So far as the public is concerned, they probably think it "works" if recidivist offenders are kept off the streets for longer.

    Personally, I think the whole prison set up is counter-productive, whatever system is used.

    Firstly, I think prison should be a place where people come out better rather than worse. Secondly, I think there needs to be much more support in the community for prisoners when they return to the community.

    In order to come out better than they went in, I think prison should be seen as an intervention that enables people to have the factors in their lives that cause their behaviour to be rectified. That could mean treatment for drug addiction, fixing educatoinal defecits, teaching employable skills, anger management counselling etc.

    So far as sentence discounts for good behaviour are concerned while in prison, I would link that to making progress with respect to the factors mentioned above. So that early release is tied to reduced risk of offending.

    Then, in the community, there should be mentor programs, jobs they can immediately go to, accomodation etc.

    • lprent 6.1

      Once they get prisons to the point that people actually do come out better and are supported when out so they don't reoffend – then we can look at sentencing.

      Perhaps we could raise taxes to increase the sevices you describe to the point that they can work. I would suggest about a 10 fold increase to scanandavian levels as a starter. Because in NZ most of those services are pretty non-existant, ineffectual, or too over-worked to work.

      Probably why our reoffending rate is so damn high compared to states that don't follow Nationals persistent penny-pinching on support services.

      In the meantime National looks to me like they just like warehousing prisioners with dipshit 3 strikes sentencing. I guess that they can see a profit in it somewhere.

      I can’t. It is an uneconomic way to use my taxes to pay dividends to prison investors.

      I would prefer spending money on more police

      • tsmithfield 6.1.1

        In the meantime National looks to me like they just like warehousing prisioners with dipshit 3 strikes sentencing. I guess that they can see a profit in it somewhere.

        Iprent, that criticism is probably fair. On the other hand Labour seems really good at throwing money at problems without much in the way tangible results.

        What is probably needed in NZ is a grand coalition that lasts about 20 years so that politicians are able to implement effective policy that actually deals with the root causes of problems. At the moment politicians from both sides of the fence seem to come up with headline grabbing policies to placate their voters that don't really work in the long term.

        Maybe the adversarial style of politics will end in the future to allow such a possibility. I am not holding out too much hope though.

        • lprent

          On the other hand Labour seems really good at throwing money at problems without much in the way tangible results.

          The problem is that they don't. You have to really throw enough money and resources at any end of it to make it work and then sustain it for decades.

          It takes decades to get those types of systems working. Typically National spend all their time in opposition complaining about even trying to do it, then cut all of the programs as soon as they hit the government benches.

          Politically there is absolutely no political capital working on it because of the way that lazy right voters push it. They're not interested in fixing a social ill and making sure that it reduces. They just want a short-term fix to a long-term issue.

          NZ has about 10-11 thousand sworn police and less than 4000 odd support staff for a population that is close to 5 million people. In 1990 we had just over 5000 sworn officers for a population of 3.3 million. They are a key part of our emergency response systems.

          Despite which they still get overwhelmed when we have emergencies like the pandemic or Australia offloading their societal failures here (the 501s). We need to keep raising numbers to the point that they actually have time to deal with the low conviction rates.

          When you look at other countries our number of police per head of population is really low. And that is the case for all emergency services from everything from fire, civil defence, and our social support agencies.

          We effectively don't support dealing with people leaving prison or being 501 deported from Aussie.

          For instance I generally advise people who have to use WINS that they will have to fight to get their entitlements because the accumulated punitive idiocies that the National / Act / NZF and even Labour have piled on a basic economic function of society (employment and income transitions). They're there to handle recessions, economic structural changes, people having unexpected upsets in their life like the unexpected birth of a child, etc. They are only really funded for 'normal' operations with the kinds of government policies that they have to contend with.

          WINS seems to have an institutional preference to never tell anyone what they could do, instead always effectively pushing them towards getting evicted or not having food. Because that is what a succession of governments (mostly right ones) have told them to do. WINS attempts at job-finding, reskilling, and training are simply ridiculous.

          So you can imagine (for instance) what it is like for a 501 landing in NZ with a few bucks, not knowing anything about the system, being dumped on relatives that they don't know, and being unable to get enough money to live on. Basically if you read the 501 page from corrections you'll get the idea. Essentially shoved off the plane in a country that most have never lived in and given a few days accommodation and money. WINS will spend a lot of time getting them learning how to write a really basic CV, but not enough to find them money for their food and rent.

          This is also pretty much the same for people coming out of prison. The last thing that they want to do is to deal with prison on the outside with no real support – which outside of family (if they have any) is pretty much what they get.

          Bill English was pretty much the only politician from the right in NZ that I have ever seen looking at these kinds of issues. But he was budget constrained because conservative voters are more concerned about reducing taxes than reducing the costs of offending and re-offending to society. Instead that they just pile on useless expensive punitive laws and regulations on places like WINS that cause homelessness, offending and re-offending. Seldom spending anything at all on actual cost-saving prevention – like dealing fairly with people.

          Luxon is a just such a classic example of a right simple-minded political moron. Youth military camps FFS. Pretty clear that the lazy dimwit was never in the military and that he has absolutely no sense of either duty or perspective.

          Soldiers and the armed forces aren't there to act as fucking jailors. They train to produce soldiers capable of handling themselves in situations from combat through to extended civil emergencies. They are highly and expensively skilled at training the willing for the unexpected. I spent 7 odd years building training systems to allow soldiers (mostly offshore) better trained. The type of systems that our SAS use at their MOUT for instance, or the major exercises that the aussies hold for various nations in their training grounds.

          To even think about all that military training being wasted as jailers and training the sentenced is a expensive travesty. Plus I note that Luxon – the lazy arsehole hasn't managed to say more than a few platitudes about helping with kids released from that kind of program to reintegrate back into civilian society. I guess that as the worst type of lazy god-botherer, he just expects that to miraculously happen.

          Maybe the adversarial style of politics will end in the future to allow such a possibility. I am not holding out too much hope though.

          Until the right voters stop being simple-minded idiots concentrating on blaming others rather than caring about their society enough to concentrate on how to make it work, I can't see it changing.

          You don't have to look too far to see the political problems. I just read about the Act policy on RMA and transport. that pretty much came down to..

          If you have money and resources, ACT consider that you have a perfect right to stomp over all others by winning everything in court. Be an aggressive arsehole to your neighbours and push them into having defend themselves from your assertions of rights to be an complete arsehole. They'll run out of cash before you do – that is why arrogant arseholes should fund ACT.

          You'll note that there is absolutely no mention on how someone with few resources can defend themselves against their neighbours arbitrary actions in Act neighbourly. Yet they are expected to do so.

          It also doesn't say how you could find the kinds of scientific data collecting required to defend it for things like water pollution. I guess that again, being able to pay for tame 'experts' means that you win.

          I can't see any common ground with this kind of individualistic fuckwit with no sense of duty to our society.

          This is from the party that brought in the incredibly stupid and ineffective 3 strikes legislation as a fashion import from the prison industry in the US.

          • tsmithfield

            Hi Iprent,

            I would actually be happy to pay more taxes for what I see as critical areas for our society.

            For instance, internationally competitive wages for medical staff so we don't waste money training them up only for them to be attracted overseas by higher wages.

            Competitive salaries for teachers that attract the most gifted candidates to that role, rather than them being attracted to accountancy or something that pays better.

            Community interventions to address the endless cycle of crime, drug addiction, and welfare dependency in many of our communities.

            Once we have effectively dealt with those critical areas, then we can start to fund the nice-to-haves.

            But I am not happy to be paying more taxes when I see a lot of it being poured down the toilet on vanity projects such as the TVNZ RNZ merger, or light rail projects that are highly dubious in their completed cost and their benefit to the community. I would much rather the money spent on that be put into critical areas.

            I think all government spending needs to be put under that microscope so the fluffy stuff is pruned out, and the funds freed up put into areas that really make a difference to the long term well being of our community.

            I agree that the right can tend towards dog-wistle policies. But I also contend that the left is often ideologically driven towards spending that meets esoteric objectives rather than actually making a difference.

            That is one reason I think a grand coalition is needed. Just look at what will happen when the government likely changes next time. A lot of the stuff Labour has invested in believing it takes a long time to make a difference will likely be repealed and it will never get that chance. Whereas a long-term stable government would allow the time for positive changes to happen.

            • lprent

              If you are prepared to avoid dealing with a current problem and want to wait for an indeterminate time for one of those to have an effect on the same problem in 20-40 years – then be my guest.

              It is a worthy but in my view , a completely hypocritical and sanctimonious sentiment, albeit a mostly completely useless one based on evidence to date.

              Generally the bulk of everything you have listed goes to benefit the relatively affluent and elderly and has minimal long-term effects on the probability of crime or on re-offending after a session in prisons. That is because every time that these are tried, the benefits are diverted to affluent areas.

              The bulk of the value doesn't go to the schools that the poor go to. Not to the communities with high crime populations. Not to the areas with high unemployment. Not to health prevention programmes – but too providing health care for the voters over child-bearing age. The value invariably goes to the relatively well off communities with jobs, income, and relatively low creators or crime.

              All of these have been tried over many decades. None have been shown to have that much effect on the outcomes of kids becoming anti-social or criminal, or with dealing with the downstream effects of people being processed through our justice system. That is because of the benefit bias that shows for each of those programmes.

              Consequently we wind up shelling out money for those programmes while also continually paying the costs of crime through insurance premiums and the costs of justice and prisons.

              As MS said in the post, the only real correlations about actual crime reduction here and overseas have been with the changes in age demography (or having readily available relatively safe jobs).

              You'll note that I'm not talking about convictions or sentences. That only really seems to have a correlation with vigilante voters. The 3 strikes debacle being and obvious example. But also generally increases in sentences and mandatory minimum sentences. Those seem to have a strong correlation with increasing violent criminal acts.

              The costs of fixing at the bottom of the cliff are still there.

              The costs of reinforcing anti-social or criminal behaviour by putting people into criminal educational institutions like prisons are well known and still there. Their effect on the actual rates of re-offending has always been minimal, and in most cases on the young increases the probability of re-offence.

              Yet the only solution that fools seem to have is to either point to social programmes that don't have much effect on the outcomes. Or who want to make it worse by locking people up for longer to encourage them to become more likely to re-offend or to become more violent to avoid being caught.


              What those same fools then do is to get upset about what is known to work. Keeping most people who commit crimes out of prison, providing real training and education inside prison, providing real support after sentencing or terms in prison, and generally making it easier for people to access benefits that prevent them wanting to go back to offending. All of which is way less costly and far more effective.

              The idea would be to reduce re-offending. After all if you can do that then you have massively reduced the life-time costs of habitual re-offending on society by offenders in their late teens, 20s and 30s – the demographics of offending show that most criminal offenders start early typically as passion or anger issue and don't really stop until middle age.

              After you do that – you can start to look at how to reduce youthful offending in the first place confident that the backstop for those you miss will keep the costs to society down.

  7. Thinker 7

    Oh yes, remember David Garrett, proponent of the 3 strikes law…

    Strike 1 steal babies' identity

    Strike 2 obtain fraudulent passports

    Strike 3 assault in Tonga.

    But the sad thing is I'd give my watch to David Garrett to mind any day rather than the Dancing Perkbuster…

  8. observer 8

    It is a clear example of the irrelevance of so many "solutions", and therefore, the lack of sincerity of the politicians who propose them.

    Deterrence works when offenders think. "I won't do that, because I have weighed up the risk and reward and it is not worth it".

    Anybody who commits aggravated robbery (max penalty: 14 years) for cigarettes, booze or petty cash is not thinking much at all. If you want to make a lot of money, there are easier and safer crimes (no, I won't tell you which ones!).

    Here's what happens if you commit aggravated robbery.

  9. Tony Veitch 9

    In a nutshell, the trouble with our society is we’ve become too soft over-all. We’ve lost that toughness of our pioneers who burned the forests, broke in the land and displaced the natives.

    We need to get back to a more essential way of dealing with offenders – something along the lines of the Old Testament (Luxon’s go-to book of reference) or the Roman Empire.

    Make offenders part of our entertainment, by pitting them against each other in an auditorium like Eden Park – an eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth, a fight to the death.

    This would solve two immediate problems – it would act as a deterrence to those thinking of offending, and permanently remove most of those who had offended, thereby saving the poor hard-working taxpayer ship-loads of money.

    We need much more self-reliance and resilience and more consequences for wrong-doing. Poverty and dysfunctional Ruth-endowed families are no excuse. Everyone should aim to be a successful CEO and own seven houses, otherwise, what use is society if not to pander to our greed?

    Toughen up NZers and become successful, like our role-models to our right!


    • RedLogix 9.1

      The role of the state is to administer punishment and justice, the role of the individual to be compassionate and forgiving.

      Not the other way around.

  10. UncookedSelachimorpha 10

    Not to excuse people currently committing terrible crimes, but the more effective longterm solution for crime is better opportunity, care and support right from birth (and before birth). A lot of problems are established long before people start school. Plus we need actual support for adults and young people with problems (e.g. counselling, housing, addiction treatment etc)

    Strangely, the people and parties that shout the loudest about getting 'tough on crime', are usually the same ones with policies that entrench poverty, inequality and disadvantage i.e. tax and service cuts, 'flexible' workplaces, 'user pays' (=poor can't use) etc.

  11. Adrian 11

    We hardly hear stories of any 501s who have been able to live here without being the first item on the 6o'clock news. A nieghbour has recently had a house built by an Auckland builder who employed several 501s, very hard workers, interesting lunch companions, didn"t try to sell me any drugs or sawn-off shotguns. One was sent back because after a speeding ticket they found a many years old punch-up charge and that was enough to be separated from an 18 month child and trying to start again with no family here. I think the builder is brave, compassionit and to be congratulated.

  12. georgecom 12

    National has just reached it's 3 strikes for tired old law and order policies, slogans and rhetoric

    Labour soft on crime, boot camps, 3 strikes law

    no new thinking, no new ideas. after 5 years in opposition nothing tangible or new to offer

    If they had anything new we would be seeing ideas about stemming the flow of 501 returnees. only party doing anything in that space is Labour

  13. Paul Campbell 13

    "3 strikes and you're out" is so culturally wrong, if we must have this nonsense surely it should be "6 balls and you're over"?

Recent Comments

Recent Posts

  • Huge interest in Government’s infrastructure plans
    Hundreds of people in little over a week have turned out in Northland to hear Regional Development Minister Shane Jones speak about plans for boosting the regional economy through infrastructure. About 200 people from the infrastructure and associated sectors attended an event headlined by Mr Jones in Whangarei today. Last ...
    10 hours ago
  • Health Minister thanks outgoing Health New Zealand Chair
    Health Minister Dr Shane Reti has today thanked outgoing Health New Zealand – Te Whatu Ora Chair Dame Karen Poutasi for her service on the Board.   “Dame Karen tendered her resignation as Chair and as a member of the Board today,” says Dr Reti.  “I have asked her to ...
    11 hours ago
  • Roads of National Significance planning underway
    The NZ Transport Agency (NZTA) has signalled their proposed delivery approach for the Government’s 15 Roads of National Significance (RoNS), with the release of the State Highway Investment Proposal (SHIP) today, Transport Minister Simeon Brown says.  “Boosting economic growth and productivity is a key part of the Government’s plan to ...
    15 hours ago
  • Navigating an unstable global environment
    New Zealand is renewing its connections with a world facing urgent challenges by pursuing an active, energetic foreign policy, Foreign Minister Winston Peters says.   “Our country faces the most unstable global environment in decades,” Mr Peters says at the conclusion of two weeks of engagements in Egypt, Europe and the United States.    “We cannot afford to sit back in splendid ...
    15 hours ago
  • NZ welcomes Australian Governor-General
    Prime Minister Christopher Luxon has announced the Australian Governor-General, His Excellency General The Honourable David Hurley and his wife Her Excellency Mrs Linda Hurley, will make a State visit to New Zealand from Tuesday 16 April to Thursday 18 April. The visit reciprocates the State visit of former Governor-General Dame Patsy Reddy ...
    15 hours ago
  • Pseudoephedrine back on shelves for Winter
    Associate Health Minister David Seymour has announced that Medsafe has approved 11 cold and flu medicines containing pseudoephedrine. Pharmaceutical suppliers have indicated they may be able to supply the first products in June. “This is much earlier than the original expectation of medicines being available by 2025. The Government recognised ...
    17 hours ago
  • NZ and the US: an ever closer partnership
    New Zealand and the United States have recommitted to their strategic partnership in Washington DC today, pledging to work ever more closely together in support of shared values and interests, Foreign Minister Winston Peters says.    “The strategic environment that New Zealand and the United States face is considerably more ...
    20 hours ago
  • Joint US and NZ declaration
    April 11, 2024 Joint Declaration by United States Secretary of State the Honorable Antony J. Blinken and New Zealand Minister of Foreign Affairs the Right Honourable Winston Peters We met today in Washington, D.C. to recommit to the historic partnership between our two countries and the principles that underpin it—rule ...
    21 hours ago
  • NZ and US to undertake further practical Pacific cooperation
    Foreign Minister Winston Peters has announced further New Zealand cooperation with the United States in the Pacific Islands region through $16.4 million in funding for initiatives in digital connectivity and oceans and fisheries research.   “New Zealand can achieve more in the Pacific if we work together more urgently and ...
    22 hours ago
  • Government redress for Te Korowai o Wainuiārua
    The Government is continuing the bipartisan effort to restore its relationship with iwi as the Te Korowai o Wainuiārua Claims Settlement Bill passed its first reading in Parliament today, says Treaty Negotiations Minister Paul Goldsmith. “Historical grievances of Te Korowai o Wainuiārua relate to 19th century warfare, land purchased or taken ...
    1 day ago
  • Focus on outstanding minerals permit applications
    New Zealand Petroleum and Minerals is working to resolve almost 150 outstanding minerals permit applications by the end of the financial year, enabling valuable mining activity and signalling to the sector that New Zealand is open for business, Resources Minister Shane Jones says.  “While there are no set timeframes for ...
    1 day ago
  • Applications open for NZ-Ireland Research Call
    The New Zealand and Irish governments have today announced that applications for the 2024 New Zealand-Ireland Joint Research Call on Agriculture and Climate Change are now open. This is the third research call in the three-year Joint Research Initiative pilot launched in 2022 by the Ministry for Primary Industries and Ireland’s ...
    2 days ago
  • Tenancy rules changes to improve rental market
    The coalition Government has today announced changes to the Residential Tenancies Act to encourage landlords back to the rental property market, says Housing Minister Chris Bishop. “The previous Government waged a war on landlords. Many landlords told us this caused them to exit the rental market altogether. It caused worse ...
    2 days ago
  • Boosting NZ’s trade and agricultural relationship with China
    Trade and Agriculture Minister Todd McClay will visit China next week, to strengthen relationships, support Kiwi exporters and promote New Zealand businesses on the world stage. “China is one of New Zealand’s most significant trade and economic relationships and remains an important destination for New Zealand’s products, accounting for nearly 22 per cent of our good and ...
    2 days ago
  • Freshwater farm plan systems to be improved
    The coalition Government intends to improve freshwater farm plans so that they are more cost-effective and practical for farmers, Associate Environment Minister Andrew Hoggard and Agriculture Minister Todd McClay have announced. “A fit-for-purpose freshwater farm plan system will enable farmers and growers to find the right solutions for their farm ...
    3 days ago
  • New Fast Track Projects advisory group named
    The coalition Government has today announced the expert advisory group who will provide independent recommendations to Ministers on projects to be included in the Fast Track Approvals Bill, say RMA Reform Minister Chris Bishop and Regional Development Minister Shane Jones. “Our Fast Track Approval process will make it easier and ...
    3 days ago
  • Pacific and Gaza focus of UN talks
    Foreign Minister Winston Peters says his official talks with the United Nations Secretary-General Antonio Guterres in New York today focused on a shared commitment to partnering with the Pacific Islands region and a common concern about the humanitarian catastrophe in Gaza.    “Small states in the Pacific rely on collective ...
    3 days ago
  • Government honours Taranaki Maunga deal
    The Government is honouring commitments made to Taranaki iwi with the Te Pire Whakatupua mō Te Kāhui Tupua/Taranaki Maunga Collective Redress Bill passing its first reading Parliament today, Treaty Negotiations Minister Paul Goldsmith says. “This Bill addresses the commitment the Crown made to the eight iwi of Taranaki to negotiate ...
    3 days ago
  • Enhanced partnership to reduce agricultural emissions
    The Government and four further companies are together committing an additional $18 million towards AgriZeroNZ to boost New Zealand’s efforts to reduce agricultural emissions. Agriculture Minister Todd McClay says the strength of the New Zealand economy relies on us getting effective and affordable emission reduction solutions for New Zealand. “The ...
    4 days ago
  • 110km/h limit proposed for Kāpiti Expressway
    Transport Minister Simeon Brown has welcomed news the NZ Transport Agency (NZTA) will begin consultation this month on raising speed limits for the Kāpiti Expressway to 110km/h. “Boosting economic growth and productivity is a key part of the Government’s plan to rebuild the economy and this proposal supports that outcome ...
    4 days ago
  • New Zealand Biosecurity Awards – Winners announced
    Two New Zealanders who’ve used their unique skills to help fight the exotic caulerpa seaweed are this year’s Biosecurity Awards Supreme Winners, says Biosecurity Minister Andrew Hoggard. “Strong biosecurity is vital and underpins the whole New Zealand economy and our native flora and fauna. These awards celebrate all those in ...
    4 days ago
  • Attendance action plan to lift student attendance rates
    The Government is taking action to address the truancy crisis and raise attendance by delivering the attendance action plan, Associate Education Minister David Seymour announced today.   New Zealand attendance rates are low by national and international standards. Regular attendance, defined as being in school over 90 per cent of the ...
    4 days ago
  • World must act to halt Gaza catastrophe – Peters
    Foreign Minister Winston Peters has told the United Nations General Assembly (UNGA) in New York today that an immediate ceasefire is needed in Gaza to halt the ongoing humanitarian catastrophe.    “Palestinian civilians continue to bear the brunt of Israel’s military actions,” Mr Peters said in his speech to a ...
    4 days ago
  • Speech to United Nations General Assembly: 66th plenary meeting, 78th session
    Mr President,   The situation in Gaza is an utter catastrophe.   New Zealand condemns Hamas for its heinous terrorist attacks on 7 October and since, including its barbaric violations of women and children. All of us here must demand that Hamas release all remaining hostages immediately.   At the ...
    4 days ago
  • Government woolshed roadshow kicks off
    Today the Government Agriculture Ministers started their national woolshed roadshow, kicking off in the Wairarapa. Agriculture Minister Todd McClay said it has been a tough time for farmers over the past few years. The sector has faced high domestic inflation rates, high interest rates, adverse weather events, and increasing farm ...
    4 days ago
  • PM heads to Singapore, Thailand, and Philippines
    Prime Minister Christopher Luxon will travel to Singapore, Thailand and the Philippines this week (April 14-20), along with a senior business delegation, signalling the Government’s commitment to deepen New Zealand’s international engagement, especially our relationships in South East Asia. “South East Asia is a region that is more crucial than ever to ...
    4 days ago
  • Prime Minister launches Government Targets
    Prime Minister Christopher Luxon has announced further steps to get New Zealand back on track, launching nine ambitious Government Targets to help improve the lives of New Zealanders. “Our Government has a plan that is focused on three key promises we made to New Zealanders – to rebuild the economy, ...
    4 days ago
  • Natural hydrogen resource should be free of Treaty claims entanglement
    Natural hydrogen could be a game-changing new source of energy for New Zealand but it is essential it is treated as a critical development that benefits all New Zealanders, Resources Minister Shane Jones says. Mr Jones is seeking to give regulatory certainty for those keen to develop natural, or geological, ...
    5 days ago
  • Government responds to unsustainable net migration
    6 days ago
  • New Zealand on stage at global Space Symposium
    Space Minister Judith Collins will speak at the Space Symposium in the United States next week, promoting New Zealand’s rapidly growing place in the sector as we work to rebuild the economy. “As one of the largest global space events, attended by more than 10,000 business and government representatives from ...
    6 days ago
  • $4.9m project completed with marae reopening
    A significant marae has reopened in the heart of Rotorua marking the end of renovations for the Ruatāhuna Marae Renovation Cluster, a project that provided much-needed jobs and regional economic stimulus, Regional Development Minister Shane Jones says. Mr Jones was at the official reopening of Mātaatua ki Rotorua Marae today. ...
    7 days ago
  • Pure Tūroa Limited to operate Tūroa ski field
    Ko Tahuarangi te waka – Tahuarangi is the ancestral vessel Ko Rangitukutuku te aho – Rangitukutuku is the fishing line Ko Pikimairawea te matau – Pikimairawea is the hook Ko Hāhā te Whenua te ika kei rō-wai – Hāhā te whenua is the fish (of Māui) whilst under the ocean ...
    7 days ago
  • Methane targets to be independently reviewed
    Rebuilding New Zealand’s economy will rely on the valuable agricultural sector working sustainably towards our climate change goals.  Today, the Climate Change and Agriculture Ministers announced that an independent panel of experts will review agricultural biogenic methane science and targets for consistency with no additional warming. Agriculture Minister Todd McClay ...
    7 days ago
  • NZ and Nordics: likeminded partners
    Foreign Minister Winston Peters has highlighted the strong ties that bind New Zealand and the Nordic countries of Northern Europe during a trip to Sweden today.    “There are few countries in the world more likeminded with New Zealand than our friends in Northern Europe,” Mr Peters says.    “We ...
    1 week ago
  • First New Zealand C-130J Hercules takes flight
    The first New Zealand C-130J Hercules to come off the production line in the United States has successfully completed its first test flights, Defence Minister Judith Collins announced today. “These successful flights are a significant milestone for the New Zealand Defence Force, bringing this once-in-a-generation renewal of a critical airlift ...
    1 week ago
  • Government to rephase NCEA Change Programme
      The coalition Government is making significant changes to the NCEA Change Programme, delaying the implementation by two years, Minister of Education Erica Stanford announced today. “Ensuring New Zealand’s curriculum is world leading is a vital part of the Government’s plan to deliver better public services and ensure all students ...
    1 week ago
  • New Ngāpuhi investment fund Chair appointed
    Ben Dalton has been appointed the new board Chair of Tupu Tonu, the Ngāpuhi Investment Fund, says Treaty Negotiations Minister Paul Goldsmith and Associate Finance Minister Shane Jones. “Ben brings a wealth of experience in governance and economic development to the position. He will have a strong focus on ensuring ...
    1 week ago
  • Education should be prioritised ahead of protesting
    Students should be in school and learning instead of protesting during school hours, Associate Education Minister David Seymour says. “If students feel strongly about sending a message, they could have marched on Tuesday when there was a nationwide teacher only day, or during the upcoming school holidays. It has become ...
    1 week ago
  • Delivering on Local Water Done Well
    Cabinet has agreed on key steps to implement Local Water Done Well, the Coalition Government’s plan for financially sustainable locally delivered water infrastructure and services, Local Government Minister Simeon Brown says.  "Councils and voters resoundingly rejected Labour’s expensive and bureaucratic Three Waters regime, and earlier this year the Coalition Government ...
    1 week ago
  • Peters to visit New York, Washington D.C.
    Foreign Minister Winston Peters will engage with high-level United States Government and United Nations officials in the United States next week (6-12 April).    The visit, with programmes in New York and Washington D.C., will focus on major global and regional security challenges and includes meetings with US Secretary of ...
    1 week ago

Page generated in The Standard by Wordpress at 2024-04-12T14:36:04+00:00