web analytics

Trump impeachment trial – gold for comedians.

Written By: - Date published: 8:24 am, January 22nd, 2020 - 63 comments
Categories: Donald Trump, humour, International, us politics - Tags: ,

The hypocrisy of the defenders of Trump defenders in the US Senate is providing grist for comedians.

I particularly liked the Colbert take on it. Especially with digging out the old footage of Alan Dershowitz on previous impeachments where he changes his opinion on what the framers wanted in an impeachment as fast as he changes his underpants.

But hey, Trump wanted a television capable legal team – so why is Ken Starr on it? He has the charisma of a brick. Of course he appears to have the same problem as Alan Dershowitz. Extremely flexible logic about what the framers of the constitution considered to be impeachable offenses. I guess that in his case it means that if it doesn’t have salacious sex overtones – then it wasn’t good TV.

But of course slavish arse-licking rules rule in the Trump world. Trump once described Starr 

“I think that Ken Starr is a lunatic. I really think that Ken Starr is a disaster,” Trump said in an interview with NBC’s “Today” in 1999.

But now he relies on him to help defend his position. I wonder why?

Anyway, it will be amusing watching the Republican dominated Senate demonstrating that they really don’t take seriously anything that the makers of their constitution wrote. But as Chris Riddell of the Guardian points out, they have a problem…

 

63 comments on “Trump impeachment trial – gold for comedians. ”

  1. Incognito 1

    Compliant, complacent, complicit, gobsmacking, GOP.

    • Anne 1.1

      Corrupt, conniving, calamitous, criminally compromised GOP.

      • soddenleaf 1.1.1

        They say impeachment is a political trial, so fact evidence don't matter, that Trump will win. It is a political trial, senators will go back for re-election and they will have voted for the guy that separated babies from their mother's. The politics matters, it's a political trial, nothing says worse of Trump that him being picture with a noted child molester, or making really awful objectification comments.

        Really, do they really want to exonerate, training wheels president Trump. oh he doesnt need to follow the rules, he can ride without help, just look how great the baby is doing, so smart, so great.

        oh but it's worse, Senators back rich guy, they don't try wealthy people. What because wealthy people pay most of income taxes, geez, backward, they pay more income tax because they are more over paid than ever.

        Stalking horse, the Senate is shaking out to see which three Republicians will cross the floor, the less evidence, the fewer witness, the zero subpoenas…

        Then there is Pence, so he doesn't have three Senators who want him President? and can coax a immortality charge against Trump.

        This is why the charges are so setup, this is the hot potato lobbed into the Senate that will blowup. Now some argue let him win, sure do the damage, cast the Trump senators as Trumpites with his woeful ratings, bedfellows. And, let Trump go to the electorate, no Pense presidency, and fail around whining for the rest of his term like he has been since the start. what a big baby.

        Now for sure, managed trade with China won't last, more just a kick to get China to pony up on its activities, it was good but won't last. Sure, getting everyone, but Trump, to see how theocratic are fools in Iran. good, but essential won't can a thing. Plunge wealthy 1%ers into even more crisis by adding to cutting their taxes, oh joys of the idiot 1% class. Buffet says he should pat more not less tax than his secretary and still no boy listens to the warning.

        Trump is impeached, which ever way it goes, Trump is dumped. My money is still on Senate blinking, the only reason not to is They really hate Pense.

  2. Andre 2

    To expand a bit on what the makers of the constitution wrote, there's a series of essays written by some of the authors of the Constitution called the Federalist Papers, where they expand on the reasoning and arguments behind various parts of the Constitution. Most relevant to impeachment is Federalist 65, which contains:

    A well-constituted court for the trial of impeachments is an object not more to be desired than difficult to be obtained in a government wholly elective. The subjects of its jurisdiction are those offenses which proceed from the misconduct of public men, or, in other words, from the abuse or violation of some public trust. They are of a nature which may with peculiar propriety be denominated POLITICAL, as they relate chiefly to injuries done immediately to the society itself.

    There's also a lot of outright lying going on about "high crimes and misdemeanours", which would become immediately apparent to anyone bothering to google something like "meaning of high crimes and misdemeanours".

    In short, "high" refers to the high office with power and authority held by the miscreant, and a high crime and misdemeanour is an abuse of the power and trust placed in that high office. It is an offense against the public interest that is only possible to be committed because of that power and trust that goes with the high office, it is not possible for an ordinary citizen to commit a "high crime" because they don't have access to the levers of power and trust.

    The question of impeachment turns on the meaning of the phrase in the Constitution at Art. II Sec. 4, "Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors". I have carefully researched the origin of the phrase "high crimes and misdemeanors" and its meaning to the Framers, and found that the key to understanding it is the word "high". It does not mean "more serious". It refers to those punishable offenses that only apply to high persons, that is, to public officials, those who, because of their official status, are under special obligations that ordinary persons are not under, and which could not be meaningfully applied or justly punished if committed by ordinary persons.

    https://www.constitution.org/cmt/high_crimes.htm

  3. Ad 3

    Senate will acquit him.

    Senate will remain Republican majority.

    Acquital will greatly improve Trump's chances of re-election.

    No further action from the Supreme Court is likely.

    The Constitution will no longer be an effective check and balance against the government.

    There's no comedy in this.

    • RedLogix 3.1

      Yup. Pretty much my position as well. The Dems are overplaying a weak hand and in doing so are damaging important Constitutional safeguards.

      • Kevin 3.1.1

        If they are so easily damaged then they are pretty weak safeguards in the first place.

        I find it strange that lawmakers make such a fuss over upholding a document they so easily undermine at every opportunity.

        • RedLogix 3.1.1.1

          As others have pointed out Pelosi is no fool, she knew taking anything less than a bomb-proof impeachment case to a Republican Senate was going to fail. And she will only get one shot at it.

          If as is very likely Trump is acquitted in the House then Trump will probably get a free pass for the remainder of his second term. That isn't a good outcome.

          • joe90 3.1.1.1.1

            They could do it all again.

            While we wait for Mitch McConnell and the White House to figure out whether they can get away with beginning and ending President Trump’s impeachment trial in an afternoon, a provocative new question has been raised: Once impeachment is over, presumably with an acquittal in the Senate, could House Democrats impeach Trump for a second time?

            Don’t dismiss it as an absurd idea just yet. Not only might it happen, but it also might be absolutely necessary. At the very least, considering the possibility will help us understand just how deep our governing crisis could get if Trump wins a second term in office.

            […]

            To clarify, I’m not talking about Trump being impeached again for the misdeeds for which he is currently being called to account. I’m talking about an impeachment for new misdeeds that we have yet to discover, or that he has not yet committed but will in the future.

            http://archive.li/PQR85 (WaPo)

            • RedLogix 3.1.1.1.1.1

              Lol. A couple more failed attempts at impeachment and Trump really will become President for Life.😯

              • Macro

                I think you are really misreading the current climate in America. Yes The Chump has his loyal followers and yes he is giving them exactly what they want – but for many who voted for him in 2016 the promises are not coming true . The economy isn't delivering to them – just the few at the top of the economic pile. The environment is under attack. The Social reforms of previous years are being rolled back at a startling rate. The imprisonment of refugees and the ill treatment of Asylum seekers is not in accord with the American ideal, Plus a raft of other disagreements means he is the most unpopular President in living memory. and has been almost from his inauguration.

                Repugnant senators a leaving the senate in huge numbers – almost 20 have said they will not be seeking re-election this year. The battle for senate representation has a number of Democratic candidates polling above their GOP counterparts in what have been traditional red states.

                This impeachment is unlike Clintons the factors and the mood are very different.

                • mauī

                  Yeah, I can see it now, the people voted for change last time but the Russia and Ukraine stuff is a total deal breaker for them. So they will vote back in the latest version of what they had before – sleepy Joe.

                  • Macro

                    🙄

                    Have a look at what a local commentator in the mid-West USA has to say. This was published today -but echoes pretty much what I wrote above yesterday.

                    It's got nothing to do with the Ukraine scandal and subsequent impeachment trial. Where the Repugnant senators are doing themselves no favours by being stupidly biased. (The Turtle is now one of the least favoured Senators nation wide and there is even thoughts that even Kentucky may vote blue. For instance, he completely ignored a delegation of miners seeking support for Health issues last year which went down with the Kentucky miners like a brick. Meanwhile his wife is raking in a fortune "acting" as Sec For Transport in the TRump admin. It's graft all over and the swamp is filling up) It's got everything to do with the fact that around 60 – 65% of the American people are fed up with the Trump shenanigans, and can't wait to get rid of him.

              • joe90

                This is where the bau/both sides claptrap gets you. People are convinced that the shameless lying, rampant corruption and underlying criminality is nowt but a partisan squabble, and that there's nothing that can be done about it.

    • left_forward 3.2

      No, there is no comedy in such a sad-eyed pessimistic look into the crystal ball. Humour requires a less bleaker outlook than this.

  4. RedLogix 4

    What no-one wants to say out loud is that Trump's conversation with Zelensky was BAU for much of American politics these days. Ethically indefensible of course, but that's how the democracy sausage gets made at top and most people have a realistic sense of this. Impeach Trump on this and you've set a threshold many US politicians would stumble over at some point.

    It doesn't help their case that the Democrats have been openly employing the impeachment process against Trump from before he was elected. This matter is merely the latest in a number of attempts to remove him from office. There is every reason to think that impeachment, once considered an extreme measure of last resort, is now been used as a routine political tool. That's not too hard to frame as 'an abuse of democratic process'.

    Trump is of course a chaotic, crazy-making man. Many have drawn parallels with Andrew Jackson, who was also reviled by the elites and liberals of his day in often strikingly similar terms. Yet history now regards him as one of the more influential Presidents, coming in 7th on this wiki list. Reflexive, unthinking tribal opposition to Trump has invariably played directly into his hands, as it likely will this time when the Senate acquits him.

    And before anyone goes batshit over this comment; I was a solid Bernie supporter in 2016 and this time I'd vote for Gabbard or Yang.

    • That_guy 4.1

      Yeah, I'm gonna go batshit over this comment and say that this is just the standard "they're all as bad as each other, they're all doing it" deflection.

      I mean, thanks for the comment, it's not a pointless crazy comment, I take some of your points, but at it's heart, it's just another deflection.

      I just don't think they are "all as bad as each other".

      • RedLogix 4.1.1

        Nope. That's not what I'm saying either. In every sense Obama was objectively a way better man for the job, yet I suspect history will relegate him well down the list of importance because while he gave brilliant speeches, he finished up disappointing even his most ardent supporters. But for all his fine qualities, wasn't he immune to impeachment efforts either.

        Impeachment is a powerful political tool, and there is every incentive to over-use it. What we will see from here on in is that it will be used continuously against every President from the time they're confirmed as a candidate. All fine and good when it's your side doing it and you're convinced of the rightness of your cause. Which in Trump's case isn't hard.

        • Phil 4.1.1.1

          But for all his fine qualities, [Obama] wasn't immune to impeachment efforts either.

          Impeachment is a powerful political tool, and there is every incentive to over-use it.

          What a pathetic list that is. The entire motivation for attempting to impeach Obama amounted to Republican disgust that he had the temerity to govern while being black. The issues underlying those 'efforts' do not hold an candle to the grotesque actions of Trump.

    • That_guy 4.2

      Just to add, this is generally how the trajectory goes with Trump / Trump supporters and breathtakingly illegal and unethical behaviour.

      It's FAKE NEWS!

      It's not fake news, but it's perfectly legal!

      It's not fake news, it's not legal, but everyone's doing it, what, are you naive? <<< You are here.

    • Andre 4.3

      The effort to extort Zelensky was not BAU. The difference is it was done for the petty personal political interest of one individual. There was absolutely zero national interest reasoning involved.

      What previous presidents used their hold on the levers of power to extort foreign countries for petty personal political advantage in any kind of vaguely similar way?

      https://www.motherjones.com/kevin-drum/2020/01/ukrainegate-is-all-about-a-personal-benefit/

      Very few Democrats were trying to impeach right from the beginning. Most Democrats were trying to keep a lid on the far-left vocal activists that were indeed calling for impeachment over policy disagreements, which are not impeachable.

      Pelosi only changed position to start an impeachment inquiry once there was clear evidence of a new clear violation of the obligations of the presidency that occurred during the presidency.

      https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-49819351

      • RedLogix 4.3.1

        I'm quite clear, the Zelensky phone call was ethically indefensible. Just as I suspect Hunter Biden's role on the board of the Ukrainian Gas enterprise probably was too. No matter how squeaky clean the liberal media want to paint his role in that, it stinks. Of course a grub like Trump was going to have a sniff at it.

        As for dismissing the prior efforts to impeach Trump as a 'few far left nutters unhappy over policy differences' … I don't think so. Do I need to cut and paste the whole reference from above?

        My point is simple. Impeachment, once reserved for the most serious matters, has become an out of control circus that nobody really believes in any more. Even when probably they should.

        • Andre 4.3.1.1

          Go right ahead and paste the whole reference here. People might actually read it, research Al Green and Brad Sherman, and come to their own conclusion about whether they are fringe nutters.

          Now I'll ask again, which previous presidents withheld foreign for petty personal political benefit? Y'know, to support your assertion that it's BAU?

          Pelosi and other senior Dems did in fact quash impeachment efforts until there in fact was a clear and serious violation of constitutional obligations way beyond anything that might have previously been seen as BAU.

          Now, Hunter Biden leveraging his name and connection to Daddy into a lucrative cushy position is indeed rotten, but was also BAU (if at the lower end of BAU rottenness). But, there is zero evidence I'm aware the Joe did anything to help that little petty grift (apart from merely existing), or was even aware of it until after the fact. There is also zero evidence that any of Joe's actions actually helped Hunter or Burisma, if anything dumping the old corrupt prosecutor for a new one increased the chances of Burisma coming under close scrutiny.

          https://www.latimes.com/politics/story/2019-10-05/bidens-visits-to-ukraine-under-scrutiny

          • RedLogix 4.3.1.1.1

            Do you want argue there was no legitimate national interest in finding about Biden and Burisma? Was there no possible blackmail issue with Russian and Ukraine having potential leverage over a future President?

            Of course Trump was pursuing his own best interests; in the big picture it's what all Presidents do all the time. The relevant question is what were Trump's inner intentions in that specific conversation? Because to this point it is an assumption that he was trying to help himself for his personal benefit only.

            Everyone here is of course pre-supposing the worst about Trump; we automatically assign the lowest possible motives in everything he does, as if we can all mind-read the guy and know he is always guilty. But are you sure you want a world in which we impeach and convict people solely on your opinion of what they were secretly thinking?

            Now I'll ask again, which previous presidents withheld foreign for petty personal political benefit? Y'know, to support your assertion that it's BAU?

            President's use leverage all the time to achieve their ends, and the USA tends to have the biggest levers on the block. Does anyone think this is tiddlywinks these people play? This instance with Zelensky was an especially naked move, as I said above ethically indefensible, yet the crucial question the Senate will consider is … does it rise to the level of a crime, or crime-like action?

            • Andre 4.3.1.1.1.1

              There was no legitimate national interest in the actual actions Drumpf took and wanted with respect to Ukraine: he didn't want an investigation, he merely wanted the announcement of an investigation.

              https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2019/11/20/20974201/gordon-sondland-impeachment-hearing-testimony-biden-show-trump

              Again, please, the names of previous presidents and what actions they took to extort a purely personal petty political benefit from foreign countries, with no hint of national interest in the outcome sought? Vague insinuations don't cut it.

              The question the senate should be considering (but isn't, they're only interested in how to come out of it with the best political spin) is if the actions were "high crimes or misdemeanours". As explained in 2 above, that's very different to a mere crime.

              • RedLogix

                I've no particular beef with your argument and you make it well. All the Senate Republicans need in reality is a simple argument they can take to the public to cover their acquital. And like or not this is not going to be all that hard for them to do.

                • Andre

                  Thanks.

                  You're right, it isn't going to be hard to blow smoke to hide what a steaming pile an acquittal actually will be.

                  The question is how to get enough of the facts out there to persuade the very very small number of persuadables that this all really is not normal, it's harmful to the country and to people individually, and that it's a big enough problem to make it worth the considerable hassle to get out and vote to get rid of the problem and its enablers.

      • mauī 4.3.2

        The effort to extort Zelensky was not BAU.

        🙄

        You have a bizarre definition of extortion. Trump bought up Biden's name in passing in relation to what they were both talking about, and suggested Zelensky look at that too.

      • Bill 4.3.3

        "The effort to extort Zelensky was not BAU."

        Hmm. Threatening to with-hold aid and impose sanctions on Ecuador if it promoted breast feeding isn't quite the same…

        But anyway. The claim is that Trump said he'd with-hold military aid to a pile of fascist fucks if they didn't give him some leverage on Biden's corruption, yes?

        And those same recipients of military aid were the ones Obama refused to furnish with weaponry, right?

        And the idea of there being a "quid pro quo" is one man's "presumption" (his own phrase used in his testimony when asked where he got the idea of a quid pro quo from) – a man who wasn't even in the room at the time, right? (Sondland)

        And if there was a "quid pro quo", then how come the Banderist government of Ukraine got that military aid anyway?

        They could have got Trump on emoluments or war crimes or….and….etc. But fuck. 🙄

        (+ a fair bit of what Redlogix has written on this front)

    • Phil 4.4

      It doesn't help their case that the Democrats have been openly employing the impeachment process against Trump from before he was elected.

      That's because Trump has been obviously and fragrantly acting in violation of the emoluments clause from literally day one of his presidency. Don't blame democrats for being the only party that actually wants to do their fucking job.

      • Andre 4.4.1

        True dat. But there's the argument that it was well known that that was going to happen well before IMPOTUS somehow scammed together his Electoral College technical victory.

        • Phil 4.4.1.1

          Knowing you're going to have ethical issues because of your business interests and *not* dealing with it between election and inauguration is not ok.

      • Peter 4.4.2

        Is the emoluments clause one of the hoax ones, one of the fake ones?

        I think it's brilliant that over a couple of hundred years so many bright buggers spent their lives studying, discussing and debating and getting others to deeply consider the Constitution. And that millions more prayed to it and swore allegiance to it.

        Then one person with severe limitations of intellect and character and of 'interesting' psychological make-up comes along and it's just another piece of paper in making deals.

        • Andre 4.4.2.1

          There are actually two emoluments clauses, one domestic and one foreign. The terracotta turdface has been blatantly violating both since more or less the moment of his inauguration.

          Article 1 Section 9 Clause 8 reads:

          No Title of Nobility shall be granted by the United States: And no Person holding any Office of Profit or Trust under them, shall, without the Consent of the Congress, accept of any present, Emolument, Office, or Title, of any kind whatever, from any King, Prince, or foreign State.

          Article 2 Section 1 Clause 7 reads:

          The President shall, at stated Times, receive for his Services, a Compensation, which shall neither be increased nor diminished during the Period for which he shall have been elected, and he shall not receive within that Period any other Emolument from the United States, or any of them.

    • Drowsy M. Kram 4.5

      Playing the 'Impeachment is a "an abuse of democratic process"' card so soon? Maybe you're right – Carter (1977-1981) was the last US president not to have an impeachment resolution introduced against him. Or maybe it's just a sign of political partisan times.

      "Three presidents have been impeached in U.S. history: Andrew Johnson in 1868, Bill Clinton in 1998, and Donald Trump in 2019. Johnson and Clinton were acquitted and not removed from office. Trump's Senate trial began on January 16, 2020."
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/U.S._presidential_impeachment

    • francesca 4.6

      Apropos of your comment that Trump's Zelensky call was BAU

      here's another example of the "diplomacy" that's become a feature of US foreign policy, this time in Iraq

      https://www.mintpressnews.com/hidden-parliamentary-session-revealed-trump-motives-iraq-china-oil/264155/

      an excerpt

      "Abdul-Mahdi continued his remarks, noting that pressure from the Trump administration over his negotiations and subsequent dealings with China grew substantially over time, even resulting in death threats to himself and his defense minister:

      After my return from China, Trump called me and asked me to cancel the agreement, so I also refused, and he threatened [that there would be] massive demonstrations to topple me. Indeed, the demonstrations started and then Trump called, threatening to escalate in the event of non-cooperation and responding to his wishes, whereby a third party [presumed to be mercenaries or U.S. soldiers] would target both the demonstrators and security forces and kill them from atop the highest buildings and the US embassy in an attempt to pressure me and submit to his wishes and cancel the China agreement.”

      “I did not respond and submitted my resignation and the Americans still insist to this day on canceling the China agreement. When the defense minister said that those killing the demonstrators was a third party, Trump called me immediately and physically threatened myself and the defense minister in the event that there was more talk about this third party.”

      Classic Mafia tactics

    • Jess NZ 4.7

      Not according to the people working at the White House.

      There are numerous referenced books listing how Trump and gang's activities are qualitatively and legally different from other political gaming.

      For just one example, did you know he got his Justice Department to overrule previous memos which means that the nepotism laws don't apply to the White House?

      You can tell yourself that he's just like all the rest, but that's not true.

      https://theintercept.com/2019/10/10/trump-crimes-law/

      • RedLogix 4.7.1

        I'm not for one instant defending Trump, but he is a powerful and unpredictable opponent whom the left has consistently underestimated. It will take an accurate and competent attack to take him down. The Dems have proven remarkably incompetent at this so far and this impeachment attempt does not feel like it is a strong hand, no matter how much we would wish it to be.

        But who know, the world is full of surprises, the Senate trial has only just begun.

        • Jess NZ 4.7.1.1

          Trump is only powerful because the corrupt Republicans have, from long before his actual inauguration, refused to hold him accountable for his documented crimes. The Republicans are on record as refusing to do their job while Obama was President.

          There is some evidence the Republicans will pay for this at the polls, assuming their (also documented) gerrymandering doesn't prevent this.

  5. Agora 5

    Is it a crime in our legal system to kill someone by drone ?

    I think our legislators should consider this seriously.

    It can only be a matter of time before they start culling deer and other species in a similar way.

    [We had an agreement that you would stick to only one of your many many aliases and e-mails (i.e. Paaparakauta) but here again you failed to keep up your end of the bargain. I have wasted far too much time on you by giving you the courtesy of approvals through Pre-Moderation. Instead, you are now banned for one month; future bans will double each time – Incognito]

  6. Dennis Frank 6

    I'm waiting to see what testimony Bolton provides to the process. I see the whole thing as a credibility test – not just for the Democrats, but for both parties. Do the right stand up for their principles or do they fold?

    If Bolton finds fault in what Trump has done, that will look like a signal to genuine conservatives that the moral sanctity of the party is now being threatened by an enemy within.

    "What moral sanctity?" is a likely response, and the answer is that of the framers of the US constitution, whose task was to embed a governance system that transcended binary division. To the extent that the Republican party wants to represent that tradition (genuinely conservative), they are being tested for credibility. If they choose to be solely partisan, and not decide the impeachment on the basis of evidence, they are likely to destroy their reputation and invalidate that historical basis.

  7. Andre 7

    Here's a worthwhile essay on the phenomenon of the anti-anti-Trump left: those that try to normalise Trump or try to paint him as a product of the failings of the regular left.

    https://www.salon.com/2020/01/06/waterloo-for-the-trump-normalizers-and-quislings-you-knew-he-was-a-snake-and-you-took-him-in/

    • RedLogix 7.1

      There is nothing typical about this administration, but that Salon article adds in it's own brew of assumptions. The key para is probably this:

      None of that was true. It should be obvious by now that Trump's primary concern is his own glorification, and the closest thing he has to a political or social vision is incoherent racist paranoia mingled with fantasies of violent retribution. It might be accurate to say he longs to recreate a world in which America is an unchallenged hegemonic power, except without engaging in any of the messy and demoralizing warfare of the last 60 years.

      Yes Trump's sole priority is winning; always has been always will. But then it strays off into a weird riff "It might be accurate to say he longs to recreate a world in which America is an unchallenged hegemonic power,". Except that the USA is the world's unchallenged hegemonic power, and will remain so economically and militarily for the foreseeable future. A combination of geography, demographics and sheer military capacity ensure this is so, regardless of how much they try and screw it up.

      For instance everyone likes to think the USA is only in the Middle East to steal the oil. But why? North America is now a net exporter of oil; natural gas by production from shale oil production is essentially a free waste product, they burn much of it because they can't store or transport it. The US economy is only minimally linked to the global economy by volume of trade as a percentage of GDP. As far as they're concerned the rest of the world could vanish overnight and many American's would hardly notice or care.

      In the big picture the USA has been slowly retreating from the post WW2 Bretton Woods arrangements since the end of the Cold War. It's been a slow and patchy process, Trump is merely adding an element of the unpredictable to it. They will remain the hegemonic superpower, but ironically enough their interest in exerting that power is narrowing down to what they will think is in their best interests.

      • soddenleaf 7.1.1

        Yes, that does explain Russia and Turkey current plays… …and how Iran is losing from Lebanon to Iraq. Migrants have broken the Lebonese treasury, Syria terror state is without people to terrorise, Iraq is being bombed by Iran, Iran has even shot its own people out of the sky. This with a less engaged U.S. bring it on (SIC). Ironic how Iran killing its own reminds me of the murdered U.S. resident in the Saudi embassy. Can't really blame the leader of Saudi, and keep your own clean.

    • Dennis Frank 7.2

      Hmm, interesting thesis: "On the left, and especially on what might be termed the anti-imperialist, internationalist radical left, Trump's alleged distaste for military intervention — and the displeasure it provoked among the mainstream media and the neocon Republican establishment — worked a special kind of dark magic. [cites evidence] Out of these dark materials was born the `anti-anti-Trump left', which was of course also nourished by leftist dislike for the entire Clinton enterprise, which had conquered the Democratic Party in the early 1990s and driven it toward Wall Street money, endless strategic triangulation and a renunciation of the welfare state and progressive economics."

      "In the approximate view of the AATL, electing a pseudo-fascist buffoon as president was arguably preferable to electing a neoliberal warmonger — and might, over the long haul, lead to productive changes in the global balance of power. I've written about this previously, in August of 2018, arguing that, on one hand, the anti-anti-Trump left believed that

      Trump’s chaotic nationalism would create at least a momentary rupture in the hegemonic world order dominated by the United States — so far, so good! — which might be better overall for the future of the planet than the continuation of the “Washington consensus” under Clinton. On the other, they suspected the brutal proto-fascism of a Trump presidency might spark renewed resistance on the left and force the political establishment into major reforms.

      Still awaiting "brutal proto-fascism", pending re-election?? I agree that Trump's nationalism looks enough like a random walk to disorient those expecting US hegemony to persist as monolith. So this tribe is more thoughtful than the knee-jerk antitrumps.

  8. Ad 8

    By February Trump will be even with Biden in Florida polls. He's the only Dem who can win in the battleground states with large College votes.

    This trial should turn that key state for him.

    That's the path to victory much clearer.

    • Bill 8.1

      Don't know about that take Ad. But since Sanders will be off the campaign trail with Iowa only a few weeks away…I guess that gives Joe "keep me outa the public eye" Biden a break.

  9. Macro 9

    • joe90 9.1

      People are mobilising.

      • Macro 9.1.1

        Wow! Lets hope they are.

        Then there is this report:

        Susan Collins Takes Hours to Decide on Lunch Before Ordering Exactly What Mitch McConnell Is Having

        By Andy Borowitz

        12:25 P.M.

        WASHINGTON (The Borowitz Report)—On the first day of the impeachment trial in the United States Senate, Senator Susan Collins, a Republican of Maine, spent hours trying to decide what she would have for lunch before ultimately ordering exactly what Senator Mitch McConnell was having.

        Clutching the Senate takeout menu in her hands, Collins told reporters mid-morning that the decision of what to have for lunch was a matter of serious consideration and that she wanted to review all of the available options before selecting one.

        “I’m deeply troubled and concerned about getting this order right,” Collins said. “There are many valid choices on this menu and I don’t want to give any of them short shrift.”

        Around 11 a . m ., rumors swirled that Collins was leaning toward ordering a quinoa salad, a choice that would have set her apart from the rest of her Republican colleagues in the upper chamber.

        By noon, however, Collins emerged from her office to tell reporters that she had ordered the exact same thing that the Senate Majority Leader had chosen, a roast beef sandwich on a roll.

        PS: Anne – this is from Andy Borowitz so not to be taken seriously – but pretty much how Senator Collins operates.

        • joe90 9.1.1.1

          • Macro 9.1.1.1.1

            Yep! Her all over.

            Meanwhile – as the Repugnants continue to obfuscate, deny, and lie; the Dems knew the GOP would stonewall. So Schumer puts up the amendments and the House lays out the evidence during its time in a way Mitch can’t stop and Team Trump was not prepared for.

            good thread here:

        • Anne 9.1.1.2

          Macro @ 9.1.1

          cool

  10. Sabine 10

    oh well, at least he relesed the 192 pages two minutes before the midnight deadline.

    https://www.rawstory.com/2020/01/mick-mulvaney-released-treasure-trove-of-omb-documents-2-minutes-before-midnight/

    what did some conservatives say a few years back in regards to surveillance and such? If you have nothing to hide why do you mind? yeah, right.

  11. Adrian Thornton 11

    Trump impeachment trial – gold for comedians…bad for serious progressives.

  12. Ad 12

    Trump has got real lucky with the Chinese virus.

    It will shunt the trial to 3rd item on any news cycle.

    Softens electoral impact.

  13. Phil 13

    Trump impeachment trial – gold for comedians.

    Just to take a tangent for a minute, the idea that Trump is 'good for comedy' is a wildly misplaced claim that still comes up a lot. Comedy (in all its varieties and deliveries) requires a foundation or premise of agreed truth and reality from which to launch.

    For instance, the Dead Parrot sketch only works because we all agree that it's wrong for someone to sell you a dead animal in a pet shop. Michael McIntyre's 'Spice Rack' (one of my all time favorite comedy bits) doesn't work if you've never experienced the clutter and disorganisation of an overstocked kitchen cupboard.

    What Trump, Johnson & Co do is entirely upend and deny the very principle of truths being objective things. When that denial becomes acceptable in society, the foundations upon which comedy is built collapse.

    • Dennis Frank 13.1

      Yeah, Trump would have qualified as a comedian if he'd told the Davos elite crowd that "We're gonna plant a trillion trees right after we finish building the wall."

      Although he could possibly trump that by adding "Then my buddy Elon Musk gets to take me to Mars on his spaceship, so I can become first person to walk all over that red dirt!" 🙄

      • joe90 13.1.1

        He qualifies as a trans-national embarrassment.

        • Dennis Frank 13.1.1.1

          🤣 But y'know what? Zillions of ornery Americans will nod approvingly: "cool, he's just like us". That's how identity politics works…

Recent Comments

Recent Posts

  • New Zealand condemns Russia’s annexation attempts
    New Zealand condemns unequivocally Russia’s attempts to illegally annex Russia-occupied regions of Ukraine, Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern says. “We do not recognise these illegal attempts to change Ukraine’s borders or territorial sovereignty,” Jacinda Ardern said. “Russia’s sham referenda in Luhansk, Donetsk, Kherson and Zaporizhzhia are illegitimate, and have no legal ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    16 hours ago
  • Government provides confidence to those seeking an adventure
    With our borders opened and tourists returning, those seeking out adventurous activities can do so more safely due to the steps we’ve taken to improve the health and safety regulatory regime for adventure activities, Workplace Relations and Safety Minister Michael Wood has announced.  “We are seeing international visitor numbers begin ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    19 hours ago
  • More single-use plastics banned from tomorrow
    Single-use plastic cotton buds, drink stirrers and most plastic meat trays are among single use plastics banned from sale or manufacture from tomorrow. “This is the first group of the most problematic plastic products to be banned in a progressive phase out over the next three years,” Environment Minister David ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 day ago
  • Speech to NZDF Command and Staff College
    It’s a pleasure to join you today – and I extend a particular welcome to Marty Donoghue (a member of the Public Advisory Committee on Disarmament and Arms Control) and Athena Li-Watts (interning with me this week) who are also joining me today. On the face of it, some ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 days ago
  • Milestone of half a million mental health sessions delivered
    The Government’s flagship primary mental health and addiction programme Access and Choice has hit the milestone of delivering more than 500,000 sessions to New Zealanders needing mental health support. Health Minister Andrew Little made the announcement at ADL – Thrive Pae Ora in Cromwell which provides mental wellbeing support services ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 days ago
  • Government continues to future-proof arts, culture and heritage sector
    The Government has announced further support for the recovery and resilience of the arts, culture and heritage sector as part of its COVID Recovery Programme’s Innovation Fund. “We’re continuing to secure the recovery of our arts, culture and heritage in Aotearoa New Zealand by supporting transformational initiatives across the motu,” ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 days ago
  • Government steps up kauri protection
    The Government is delivering on an election commitment to protect kauri in our northern forests through the new National Pest Management Plan (NPMP) for the forest giant and the allocation of $32 million of funding to back the coordinated effort, Biosecurity Minister Damien O'Connor and Associate Environment Minister (Biodiversity) ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 days ago
  • Russia’s Ukraine referenda a sham
    Aotearoa New Zealand does not recognise the results of the sham referenda in Russia-occupied regions of Ukraine, Foreign Minister Nanaia Mahuta says.  “These so-called referenda were not free or fair, and they very clearly were not held in accordance with democratic principles,” Nanaia Mahuta said. “Instead, they were hastily organised ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 days ago
  • Govt invests in New Zealand’s wine future
    Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern has officially opened New Zealand Wine Centre–Te Pokapū Wāina o Aotearoa in Blenheim today, saying that investments like these give us cause for optimism for the future. Funding of $3.79 million for the Marlborough Research Centre to build a national wine centre was announced in 2020, ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 days ago
  • Appointment of Judges of the Court Martial Appeal Court
    Attorney-General David Parker today announced the appointment of Colonel Craig Ruane, Commander Robyn Loversidge, and James Wilding KC as Judges of the Court Martial Appeal Court. The Court Martial Appeal Court is a senior court of record established under the Court Martial Appeals Act 1953. It is summoned by the ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 days ago
  • Government strengthens measures to combat migrant worker exploitation
    Offence and penalty regime significantly strengthened New infringement offences for non-compliance Public register of individuals and businesses that are found guilty of migrant exploitation New community-led pilot to educate migrants workers and employers of employment rights Implemented reporting tools successfully brings exploitation out of the shadows Take-up of protective visa ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 days ago
  • Livestock exports by sea to cease
    The passing of a Bill today to end the export of livestock by sea will protect New Zealand’s reputation for world-leading animal welfare standards, Minister of Agriculture Damien O’Connor said. “The Animal Welfare Amendment Bill future-proofs our economic security amid increasing consumer scrutiny across the board on production practices," Damien ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 days ago
  • Extra measures to increase census turnout in 2023
    3500 census workers on the ground, twice as many as last census More forms to be delivered – 44% compared to 3% in 2018 Prioritisation of Māori and other groups and regions with lower response rates in 2018 Major work to ensure the delivery of a successful census in 2023 ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    4 days ago
  • Shining the light on screen workers
    Improved working conditions for workers in the screen industry is now a reality with the Screen Industry Workers Bill passing its third reading today, announced Workplace Relations and Safety Minister Michael Wood. “It’s fantastic to see the Screen Industry Workers Bill progress through Parliament. The new Act will strengthen protections ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    4 days ago
  • Mental health resources for young people and schools launched
    Associate Minister of Education (School Operations) Jan Tinetti and Associate Minister of Education (Māori Education) Kelvin Davis have today launched two new resources to support wellbeing, and the teaching and learning of mental health education in schools and kura. “Students who are happy and healthy learn better. These resources ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    4 days ago
  • Progress continues on future-proofing Auckland’s transport infrastructure
    Transport Minister Michael Wood has welcomed the latest progress on Auckland’s two most transformational transport projects in a generation – Auckland Light Rail and the Additional Waitematā Harbour Connections. Auckland Light Rail and Waka Kotahi NZ Transport Agency have named preferred bidders to move each project to their next phase, ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    4 days ago
  • Government supports local innovation in homelessness prevention
    Ten successful applicants in round two of the Local Innovation and Partnership Fund (LIPF) Close to $6 million allocated as part of the Homelessness Action Plan (HAP) Māori, Pasefika and rangatahi a strong focus Round three opening later this year with up to $6.8 million available. Government is stepping up ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    4 days ago
  • More medicines for New Zealanders, thanks to Govt’s Budget boost
    Health Minister Andrew Little is welcoming news that two more important medicines are set to be funded, thanks to the Government’s big boost to the country’s medicines budget. “Since coming into Government in 2017, the Labour Government has increased Pharmac’s funding by 43 per cent, including a $71 million boost ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    4 days ago
  • Government delivers ACC change to support 28,000 parents
    The Maternal Birth Injury and Other Matters Bill passes Third Reading – the first amendment to ACC legislation of its kind From 1 October 2022, new ACC cover to benefit approximately 28,000 birthing parents Additional maternal birth injuries added alongside new review provision to ensure cover remains comprehensive Greater clarity ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    4 days ago
  • Further cuts for East Coast tarakihi limits to rebuild numbers faster
    Commercial catch limits for East Coast tarakihi will be reduced further to help the stock rebuild faster. “Tarakihi is a popular fish, and this has led to declining levels over time. Many adjustments have been made and the stock is recovering. I have decided on further commercial catch reductions of ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    4 days ago
  • New Ambassador to Colombia announced
    Foreign Minister Nanaia Mahuta today announced the appointment of diplomat Nicci Stilwell as the next Ambassador to Colombia. “Aotearoa New Zealand’s relationship with Colombia is fast growing with strong links across education, climate change and indigenous co-operation,” Nanaia Mahuta said.  “Trade is a key part of our relationship with Colombia, ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    4 days ago
  • 3000 more RSE workers to ease workforce pressures
    The Government continues to respond to global workforce shortages by announcing the largest increase in over a decade to the Recognised Seasonal Employer Scheme (RSE), providing 3000 additional places, Immigration Minister Michael Wood and Agriculture Minister Damien O’Connor have announced. The new RSE cap will allow access to 19,000 workers ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    4 days ago
  • Sanctions on more of the Russian political elite
    Further sanctions are being imposed on members of President Putin’s inner circle and other representatives of the Russian political elite, as part of the Governments ongoing response to the war in Ukraine, says Foreign Minister Nanaia Mahuta. “Ukraine has been clear that the most important action we can take to ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    5 days ago
  • New Principal Youth Court Judge appointed
    Judge Ida Malosi, District Court Judge of Wellington, has been appointed as the new Principal Youth Court Judge, Attorney-General David Parker announced today. Born and raised in Southland, Judge Malosi graduated from Victoria University of Wellington and spent her legal career in South Auckland.  She was a founding partner of ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    5 days ago
  • Visitor arrivals highest since pandemic began
    Overseas visitor arrivals exceeded 100,000 in July, for the first time since the borders closed in March 2020 Strong ski season lifts arrivals to Queenstown to at least 90% of the same period in 2019 Australia holiday recovery has continued to trend upwards New Zealand’s tourism recovery is on its ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    5 days ago
  • Language provides hope for Tuvalu
    Climate change continues to present a major risk for the island nation of Tuvalu, which means sustaining te gana Tuvalu, both on home soil and in New Zealand Aotearoa, has never been more important, Minister for Pacific Peoples Aupito William Sio said. The Tuvalu Auckland Community Trust and wider Tuvalu ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    7 days ago
  • Minister Sio to attend Asian Development Bank meeting in Manila
    Associate Foreign Affairs Minister Aupito William Sio travels to the Philippines this weekend to represent Aotearoa New Zealand at the 55th Annual Meeting of the Asian Development Bank (ADB) Board of Governors in Manila. “The ADB Annual Meeting provides an opportunity to engage with other ADB member countries, including those ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • United Nations General Assembly National Statement
    E ngā Mana, e ngā Reo, Rau Rangatira mā kua huihui mai nei i tēnei Whare Nui o te Ao Ngā mihi maioha ki a koutou katoa, mai i tōku Whenua o Aotearoa Tuia ki runga, Tuia ki raro, ka Rongo to pō ka rongo te ao Nō reira, tēnā ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • New strategy unifies all-of-Government approach to help Pacific languages thrive
    A united approach across all-of-Government underpins the new Pacific Language Strategy, announced by the Minister for Pacific Peoples Aupito William Sio at Parliament today. “The cornerstone of our Pacific cultures, identities and place in Aotearoa, New Zealand are our Pacific languages. They are at the heart of our wellbeing,” Aupito ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • Upgrades for sporting facilities ahead of FIFA Women’s World Cup
    Communities across the country will benefit from newly upgraded sporting facilities as a result of New Zealand co-hosting the FIFA Women’s World Cup 2023. The Government is investing around $19 million to support upgrades at 30 of the 32 potential sporting facilities earmarked for the tournament, including pitch, lighting and ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • Partnership supports climate action in Latin America and Caribbean
    Aotearoa New Zealand is extending the reach of its support for climate action to a new agriculture initiative with partners in Latin America and the Caribbean. Foreign Affairs Minister Nanaia Mahuta and Agriculture Minister Damien O’Connor announced a NZ$10 million contribution to build resilience, enhance food security and address the ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • Landmark agreement for Māori fisheries celebrates 30th year
    The 30th anniversary of the Fisheries Deed of Settlement is a time to celebrate a truly historic partnership that has helped transform communities, says Parliamentary Under-Secretary to the Minister for Oceans and Fisheries Rino Tirikatene. “The agreement between the Crown and Māori righted past wrongs, delivered on the Crown’s treaty ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • Government backs initiatives to cut environmental impact of plastic waste
    The Government has today announced funding for projects that will cut plastic waste and reduce its impact on the environment. “Today I am announcing the first four investments to be made from the $50 million Plastics Innovation Fund, which was set last year and implemented a 2020 election promise,” Environment ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • Call for expressions of interest in appointment to the High Court Bench
    Attorney-General David Parker today called for nominations and expressions of interest in appointment to the High Court Bench.  This is a process conducted at least every three years and ensures the Attorney-General has up to date information from which to make High Court appointments.  “It is important that when appointments ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • Depositor compensation scheme protects Kiwis’ money
    New Zealanders will have up to $100,000 of their deposits in any eligible institution guaranteed in the event that institution fails, under legislation introduced in Parliament today. The Deposit Takers Bill is the third piece of legislation in a comprehensive review of the Reserve Bank of New Zealand Act and ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • New fund to help more Pacific aiga into their own homes
    The Government has launched a new housing fund that will help more Pacific aiga achieve the dream of home ownership. “The Pacific Building Affordable Homes Fund will help organisations, private developers, Māori/iwi, and NGOs build affordable housing for Pacific families and establish better pathways to home ownership within Pacific communities. ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • More than 100,000 new Kiwis as halfway point reached
    Over 100,000 new Kiwis can now call New Zealand ‘home’ after the 2021 Resident Visa reached the halfway point of approvals, Minister of Immigration Michael Wood announced today. “This is another important milestone, highlighting the positive impact our responsive and streamlined immigration system is having by providing comfort to migrant ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • Maniapoto Claims Settlement Bill passes third reading – He mea pāhi te Maniapoto Claims Settl...
    Nā te Minita mō ngā Take Tiriti o Waitangi, nā Andrew Little,  te iwi o Maniapoto i rāhiri i tēnei rā ki te mātakitaki i te pānuitanga tuatoru o te Maniapoto Claims Settlement Bill - te pikinga whakamutunga o tā rātou whakataunga Tiriti o Waitangi o mua. "Me mihi ka ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • 50,000 more kids to benefit from equity-based programmes next year
    Another 47,000 students will be able to access additional support through the school donations scheme, and a further 3,000 kids will be able to get free and healthy school lunches as a result of the Equity Index.  That’s on top of nearly 90% of schools that will also see a ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • Healthy Active Learning now in 40 percent of schools across New Zealand
    A total of 800 schools and kura nationwide are now benefitting from a physical activity and nutrition initiative aimed at improving the wellbeing of children and young people. Healthy Active Learning was funded for the first time in the inaugural Wellbeing Budget and was launched in 2020. It gets regional ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago