Well, kiwis voted for change apparently – no surprise that the authors of New Zealand Sucks would have to cancel Buy New Zealand before introducing Sell New Zealand…..
“Ms Bradford questioned Mr Brownlee’s decision, and said that since it began the campaign had resulted in more people supporting local products.”
Really – if Sue can provide any evidence of this it would be interesting. I doubt there is any such evidence and the money would indeed be better spent elsewhere.
This is really really sad. I felt this campaign was just starting to gain some traction, many people I know were starting to look out for NZ made goods, taking pride in supporting the locals.
The sad part is the locally made brands that have since shut up shop and gone overseas: macpac, swandry, fisher & pykael etc. and now this government is axing buying kiwi made. What a kick in the guts for our local manufacturers.
This government really is opposed to everything kiwi.
I would expect that the choice of phrase used by SP was a deliberate misrepresentation given that the decision is to review not cancel:
Minister of Economic Development Gerry Brownlee said yesterday that no more money would be committed to the campaign, unless a review showed it to be effective.
The alternative is to simply support government spending without any consideration of the benefits.
Local manufacturers want more than a tv advertising campaign. Given where there are heading, some liberalisation of employment law would be one thing that could help but we all know what the response to that would be here.
How come you refer to it as the National/Act Government when the Maori Party and UF is in it too?
[lprent: Because I know that there is a strong congruence between the right wing of the Nats in cabinet and Act. That is likely to provide the political access of this government. The Maori Party IMO doesn’t have any real allies in the Nats cabinet except for a few National Maori MP’s, only one of whom has any real standing.
IF the MP manages to make a real impact (ie not just edge stuff like UF does), then I might change my opinion.]
“On top of that, independent research carried out on the effectiveness of the Buy Kiwi Made campaign proves that consumer, retailer and manufacturer awareness and support are steadily increasing.
“The most recent evaluation, in November 2008, shows that 360,000 more shoppers think Kiwi-made than before the marketing programme began.
Would be interesting to see the actual research and how this was assessed – I would expect this to be part of the review as to how effective or not it has been.
I felt this campaign was just starting to gain some traction, many people I know were starting to look out for NZ made goods, taking pride in supporting the locals.
That’s the complete reverse of my perception. A quick survey of my colleagues – just as scientific as “many people I know” 🙂 – came to the opposite conclusion.
Those of us that already actively seek out NZ made goods where possible aren’t changing our spending patterns based on the ad, and those of us that have other priorities (price etc) we never going to change in the first place.
I don’t recall you ever asking why the righties here used to refer to the previous govt as the “Clark-Peters” govt. although it too included two other parties.
The ‘Buy NZ made campaign’ could’ve been SSSOOOOOOO much better.
The expensive ads with Oliver as a robot do nothing.
All they need is a damn good website cataloging all the NZ made stuff & an option to buy online. Then a few cheaps TV-ads directing people to the site.
“Stupidest idea to get rid of Buy NZ made campaign what the hell were they thinking?”
1) That its not the job of the government to promote one product over another. Its the job of the producers to promote their product.
2) If you really do believe in New Zealand bussinesses then stop spending money on silly ad campaigns and give them more liberalized employment laws (90 day bill etc). That way they can determine their own future.
“All they need is a damn good website cataloging all the NZ made stuff & an option to buy online. Then a few cheaps adds directing people to the site.”
lukas its pretty obvious that the 2 main players in the current govt are Nat and Act who don’t actually need the other two parties and that the Maori Party were only added as a backstop to disempower Act should the tail start to wag the dog.
Also it gives Nat the opportunity to grab more Maori left leaning voters before the next election. Still at the end of the day its exactly what the were accusing the left of being……… “A multi headed monster” (my term, as the number of heads dosn’t matter – just the fact that they’re there)
I haven’t seen the ads so I can’t comment on the value of this specific campaign, but it’s surely worthwhile to keep promoting the general principle of buying NZ made goods.
Phil’s comment above reminds me of some of the misguided comments I read after the repeal of section 59 which were along the lines of “Oh look, a kid was killed today so clearly changing that law was a waste of time”.
We’re talking about attempts to shift attitudes over the long term, changes which are measured not in months and years, but decades and generations.
The ad campaign is bad for New Zealand. Its a shocking waste of tax payers money. Here’s why:
Econ101 – Consumers that choose to spend more to buy New Zealand made purely because its from New Zealand effectively provide a subsidy to the producer.(This is not the case if the purchase of the NZ made product is rational – ie its cheaper or better quality) These consumers are subsidising inefficient businesses (if they were efficient they wouldn’t need government funded ad campaigns), This decreases consumers disposable income so they have less to spend on efficient kiwi producers. New Zealand as a whole would be far better off if inefficient producers instead moved into efficient industries. This subsidy increases producer surplus but consumer surplus is decreased by more than that increase – hence this policy results in a dead weight loss – wasted money!
I’m with NX on the website idea, though I know I personally have started spending a lot more money in shops displaying the “Buy Kiwi and we’ve got it made” stickers/signs.
Love the classic sneak tactics – “we can’t commit more cash to this unless a review shows it to be effective” … with no actual statement that a review will, in fact, be carried out.
(Sure, one could read an implication that a review will be done, but then either Brownlee’s PR advisor or the NZPA should have said “forthcoming review” to ensure clarity of meaning. No, I’m not obsessed with semantics, why do you ask?)
I like NX’s idea. Perhaps we should push for NX to be put in charge of this campaign?
Sure :). And I accept the generous salary which probably goes with the job.
Telling people to simply ‘buy NZ made’ isn’t good enough.
Information is the key. TradeMe & eBay are great for finding exactly what you want.
There are some great NZ made safety gear – likes footwear etc. Half the problem is finding where to get the stuff. So a website to tie it all together would be great.
I would also widen the website’s scope to include products made with environmental considerations – irrespective of where they’re made.
‘Conscious consumerism’ is the future in my opinion. Where people can choose to spend their money on things that are important to them.
Information is the key. All going well we wouldn’t even need the ETS/carbon trading rubbish.
“Well, kiwis voted for change apparently – no surprise that the authors of New Zealand Sucks would have to cancel Buy New Zealand before introducing Sell New Zealand ..”
I can’t better what you just said, so I’ve repeated your post.
Greg, being “efficient” is not the sole determinant of the worth of an enterprise. Many “inefficient” things (ie. the public service, Air NZ, manufacturing) are better retained locally — to do otherwise puts them at risk of insecurity/profiteering/asset stripping. Also, surely fair trade is better than “free” trade?
As it is, NZers are effectively “subsidising” profits to overseas corporations — to the tune of $5 billion (or more) per year:
Transnational corporations (TNCs) make massive profits out of New Zealand. These can truly be called New Zealand’s biggest invisible export. In the decade 1997-2006, TNCs made $50.3 billion profits. Only 32% was reinvested, and in some years more was sent overseas than was earned or the reinvestment was significantly offset by capital being taken out of the country.
Felix said on
December 8, 2008 at 11:58 am “We’re talking about attempts to shift attitudes over the long term, changes which are measured not in months and years, but decades and generations.”
That is what NZers never understood about the real legacy of the Labour plus Government.
That NZers had the energy and the independence and the confidence to complain about Labour is due in large part to Labour giving them their mana back.
The only problem with helping people is when they’re back on their feet, the last thing they want to be is forever beholden to the people who helped them. But Labour was concerned with investing in a country that could once again make its own product not be buying 3rd rate product in and losing export monies.
Daveski – I bet you hate that the Labour Government wouldn’t let employers pay Mexican wages to New Zealanders. No doubt you’ll be pleased to have the ‘NZ sucks’ National Party in. By the time N/act’s finished engineering the employment laws NZers will be leaving here to get better wages in Mexico.
Well Buy NZ hasn’t helped my biz one little bit and I have used NZ design, supply, manufacture, marketing, products, services, bloody NZ everything. Amounts to diddly squat when the cheque comes to be written. Maybe I am just too inefficient. Mind you my industry has no competition from overseas companies.
Any marketing campaign needs to have measurable results. While it sounds good for Bradford to claim 360,000 more shoppers think Kiwi-made than before, where is the proof that this is translating into dollars spent on Kiwi-made. And are the surveyed shoppers actually the target market for this campaign? Do you even know who the target market is? Low income earners? Beneficiaries? Or just ‘the rich’.
What NZ made goods are lower income earners meant to buy? Can they afford the generally higher cost of buying NZ made goods when the imported alternatives are so much cheaper and means they can still buy Christmas presents for their kids?
Do NZ made goods need to compete on price? If so are we prepared to have lower wages in order to make this possible?
If we aren’t expecting the low income earners to be part of the target market of this campaign then who is it, and what are the likely products they will buy that are NZ made?
Let’s see the business case for this campaign, and some real measurable outcomes. It seems to me that the millions of taxpayer dollars being spent on this campaign are misguided and wasteful.
Jum – you miss my point going for the dramatic riposte.
If you asked employers, I’ll bet you that the majority would suggest a raft of activities that would benefit business beyond a simple advertising campaign. No where did I infer a desire to lower wages.
My point is that an advertising campaign won’t be enough to stop manufacturers moving off shore.
-Cactus Climbing: good quality backpacks made in Christchurch
-Sistema: plastic containers
-Click-Clack: plastic containers, still local I think?
-Survival: merino thermal clothing
-CCC: Canterbury Canterbury Canterbury, used to make the old All Blacks jerseys until the rugby union sold them out to Adidas. Now makes socks and some clothing.Most stuff made at Christchurch factory, some is Chinese though.
-Rembrant: suit makers
-Chalky Digits: clothes
-Firestone: tires
How does being NZ Made make something intrinsicly better?
Should we be buying NZ made TVs?
Cars?
Should we have import controls?
Why do we need govt to tell us to buy NZ made? Why can’t we do it ourselves? Why can’t manufacturers band together, and promote it themselves. This (Buy NZ Made regardless of price or quality) is simply corportate welfare and nationalism. Not sound economic policy.
I’ll buy NZ made if I like the product (I love supporting *good* local music, food, clothing etc) and it is well priced, not because its made in NZ, but because I want it.
The ad campaign is bad for New Zealand. Its a shocking waste of tax payers money. Here’s why:
Econ101 – Consumers that choose to spend more to buy New Zealand made purely because its from New Zealand effectively provide a subsidy to the producer.(This is not the case if the purchase of the NZ made product is rational – ie its cheaper or better quality) These consumers are subsidising inefficient businesses (if they were efficient they wouldn’t need government funded ad campaigns), This decreases consumers disposable income so they have less to spend on efficient kiwi producers. New Zealand as a whole would be far better off if inefficient producers instead moved into efficient industries. This subsidy increases producer surplus but consumer surplus is decreased by more than that increase – hence this policy results in a dead weight loss – wasted money!
”
And its bad for the environment as its an ineffecient use of scarce resources.
No wonder the Greens are all for it, being environmentalists and all!
PS: how on earth do I type a pound sign? Its in the captcha!
Any of you lefties got any evidence that this campaign has resulted in the purchase of single NZ made product that would not otherwise have been bought? Warning: if anyone replies using the word “awareness” I will personally hunt you down and knee you in your soft bits.
Billy – I went from buying NZ made goods about half or the time to buying them almost exclusively. Part of the reason I was able to do this was it raised awareness amongst retailer that NZ Made was a selling point and they actually started clearly labeling goods as such…
Oh and Billy – I don’t have soft bits. I’m 100% hard-ass.
Ha! Cap is “IV Pierson”! does Steve have a habit he’d rather not talk about…
It was canceled because like a lot of the Green’s programmes it didn’t produce enough good results.
Also the concepts of the ads were wrong, it should of been buy NewZealand made because we produce the best at the best price, not just buy NewZealand made for the sake of it.
Women do most of the shopping and women are discerning shoppers. Most women I know look for NZ made things because they are good quality and different eg kumfs and minnie cooper shoes (I’ve stopped buying Minx now they’re made in China). We are very conscious that Buy NZ made also means NZ jobs as well. Women are also label readers in supermarkets.
What really urks me is when you come across a NZ brand that has traded on being quality and locally made but has recently moved to Asia e.g. Macpac, Fairydown.
They try and tell you its exactly the same quality as you’re used to. Somehow I doubt a wage slave in China is going to make an equal quality product compared to a happy worker on a decent wage in NZ.
Buy NZ made only works as a campaign, if we are thinking about campaigning about the positive things about New Zealand as a whole.
The National party don’t particularly want to arouse nationalist sentiment that might be annoying when they introduce PPPs or saying yes to whatever Australia and the U.S. say.
The things that define us, or make us nationalistic: that have been our ‘brand’ if you will are not always things this government is comfortable with.
Our environmentalism (well and truly on the wane), being tidy repsonsible kiwis, our nuclear free and independent foreign policy, our multiculturual and inclusive society, the idea of giving someone a fair go, and indeed good faith and fairness in general, the idea of looking after people who can’t look after themselves and caring for others in need…
so many of these things are well in truly at odds with the National Party or they simply don’t care about them. How can they try and talk up a brand they don’t care that much about?
I just love how Janet seems to think she represents every female in New Zealand. In fact I’m always astounded when anyone here believe they represent the whole of New Zealand. I’m sorry you don’t.
The Buy NZ campaign was pretty dire I think. I didn’t really get it. Here was some ultra-technological factory building a robot that happened to be Oliver Driver who I find awful. New Zealand doesn’t exactly build many technological things that a consumer can easily buy at the shop. The campaign was a huge misstep and personally never made me more New Zealand products.
Thus I really am not concerned that the campaign was suspended.
Perhaps the National Party think that this is the kind of thing that the business community will provide out of its evident self interest? you know like banks and lending to people who are able to pay back and that kind of thing?
It’s up to businesses to be self sustaining Paul, it would be a poor excuse for a business that relied on government funding to survive. Why should taxpayer money be spent on marketing costs for NZ businesses?
I am amused that a left wing blog is trying to defend this campaign. It’s very apparent that it’s only because it was Bradford’s project. If National had launched the campaign you would all be up in arms about it being a way for them to be lining the pockets of their business buddies.
“You should buy the best product for the best price.”
Yep, but all other things being equal, of course you should support local businesses. It keeps more money here for us and it uses less transportation which is better environmentally.
So Brett, my question is: If you have to choose between a foreign product and a local one of equal quality, how small does the price difference have to be before you’d pick the NZ product?
It sounds like you’re saying it’s zero, whereas I happily pay a few percent more to support local workers and local businesses. Why? Because I’m selfish. I want local businesses and local workers to be better off because then I’m better off in the long run.
What motivates me to buy kiwi made is that my action of buying that product is resulting in jobs for kiwi’s, keeps profits in NZ and thats good for New Zealand. The last thing I want to see is us become a nation of retailers who just sell imported junk.
I can always buy the alternative, the cheap imported shit from China, after all its the best product at the best price. But then Id be supporting one of the biggest polluters in the world, bank-rolling what is effectively slave labour and undermining local kiwi’s.
Sometimes you’ve got to ask whats behind the price tag.
Re chocolate – there is a distinct flavour difference between NZ and Australian chocolate, even that under the Cadbury brand. I think it is something to do with the lush NZ grass NZ cows eat.
GC Of course I don’t claim to represent NZ women but I have a wide circle and we discuss topics such as this. In fact were talking about this with a group just yesterday and we all agreed that we take care to buy NZ made. We don’t automatically buy Fisher and Paykel any more – in fact some actively boycott it after the NZ factory closures.
Heaven forbid that I would agree on anything with women like Judith Collins.
As a friend of mine pointed out, Labour in 1935 brought in the ethos of the Welfare State to give all New Zealanders help when they needed it. The National Party was transmogrified from the ashes of the ruling elite in 1936 to get rid of the Labour Party’s plan to be there for all NZers.
Now, I always read the rightie posts with that thought in mind.
The Left considers how they can help local business (YES, even the very businesses which would shaft them with the 90day probation period).
The Right only ever think of themselves.
This election was never about a change of face. It was about the destruction of a unifying philosophy, in order to allow for a foreign takeover bid, using divide and conquer tactics.
Consumers always will buy the best product at the best price. Putting Oliver Driver on TV telling us to pay more for a sub-standard product just because it will help the bloke down the road was never going to convince anyone at the till.
I happily pay a few percent more to support local workers and local businesses. Why? Because I’m selfish. I want local businesses and local workers to be better off because then I’m better off in the long run.
What if your “better off” comes at the expense of the chinese labourer that used to make shoes, and now gets nothing?
What do you see as a bigger loss of income: the guy that goes from NZ minium wage to the unemployment benefit OR the guy in China going from a few cents a day to nothing at all?
If only women realised that, as the major buyer or influence on buying decisions, their power is huge. If they ever decide to form a lobby group country-wide they could easily bring a company down, whatever its size.
The said company had better hope the lobby group consists of left-leaning (as I stated at 5.37) women who won’t want to damage the company or its workers!
Putting aside the obvious*, I’ve always wondered about the philosophical basis for these “buy NZ made” campaigns.
Are we saying that we should be more worried about the plight of NZers over the plight of Chinese people? Why should we care that plastic stuff comes out of China, and each time you buy plastic stuff from China the per capita GDP there gets a little bit closer to ours (but still miles behind)?
Do we care about human welfare, but only if it’s humans within our borders…?
* How can anyone complain about actually checking to see whether “Buy New Zealand made” is value for money? If I hire someone to clean my windows, I need to check that they’ve done a decent job before I decide to hire them again. I’d be a moron if, instead of checking the windows in front of me, I spent hours debating whether window-cleaners are a good idea in principle… National is absolutely within its rights to review the previous government’s expenditure and find out whether the money might be better spent on something else. That’s the job we pay them to do.
Women have organised themselves into a consumer lobby before. CARP – campaign against rising prices – was very effective in the 1960s/1970s. I think Cath Kelly, mother of the CTU’s Helen Kelly, was one of the main activists.
I think (memory hazy here) that the 3rd Labour govt’s maximum retail price (Warren Freer’s MRP campaign) was one of the results. Regulations to limit prices of consumer goods. Now wouldn’t that be a good idea again! That would shock the righties above.
I’m intrigued and suspicious. If National is so concerned about value for money re Buy NZ Made, why didn’t they check earlier and bleat then.
I guess they knew it would have made them sound like they didn’t care about small NZ business and workers pre-electionand now of course they can bleat about this and cover up on the nasty little sidelines they are pursuing, with forcing unemployment up through businesses falling over, if less attention goes on Buy NZ Made and thereby creating their dreamed of weak, desperate labour force.
NZers ‘are’ still so comfortable under the inclusive previous Government they don’t believe ‘nouveauNational’ can hurt their future. I know better.
“Buy kiwi made” was an 8 million dollar accommodation for the greens, a complete waste of money and more proof (if you needed it) of the left’s myth that throwing large amounts of cash at something will fix it. Good riddance
Buy NZ Made is a member based organisation funded by members, the Government campaign is the Buy Kiwi Made Campaign.
Buy NZ Made won 50% funding from one of the Buy Kiwi Made Campaign’s funding rounds to build a website to advertise New Zealand Made goods and to connect manufacturers, retailers and consumers with them.
This website has been up and running since September the 1st and has been advertised on web and in magazines. It has also been mentioned in the latest Buy Kiwi Made radio advertisements.
So for those of you who were wishing for a website which catalogues NZ Made goods .. your wish is granted. The website currently shows over 2000 products which is not bad for such a new site. This site is lilkely to grow considerably over the next few months.
It’s up to businesses to be self sustaining Paul, it would be a poor excuse for a business that relied on government funding to survive. Why should taxpayer money be spent on marketing costs for NZ businesses?
I am amused that a left wing blog is trying to defend this campaign. It’s very apparent that it’s only because it was Bradford’s project. If National had launched the campaign you would all be up in arms about it being a way for them to be lining the pockets of their business buddies.
Heh I had you in the grip of angry reason and then lost it all with the quote tags.
basically, mate, you are an idealogue of the worst sort. I understand the sentiment. I even appreciate that we can’t run on subsidies, and if we are doing that for profitable industries it is completely wrong.
However we don’t live in a free trade society. If you are consistent and not just an idiot troll I expect to see you supporting business taking the full cost of their carbon pollution as soon as possible.
sorry? Was that taxpayer money should not be spent subsidising business unless it is a large amount?
Realisitically in a small country government has a role to play in helping business in this way. If the National party were really nationalists, they would be doing that, instead of searching for ways to reduce costs for their chums in international cartels.
“So you are telling me that NZ made/Kiwi made is sub-standard product?’
Actually, thats what this entire campaign is doing. To me, the government steping in to promote a product suggests that the product is not good enough to be sold on its own merits and that it needs to be protected or it will not be able to compete with others.
Some people in this thread refer to a ‘New Zealand sucks’ campaign. Well clearly if they think that New Zealand products should be protected through this campaign or other measures then they are the ones who think that New Zealand products suck.
Greg, being “efficient’ is not the sole determinant of the worth of an enterprise. Many “inefficient’ things (ie. the public service, Air NZ, manufacturing) are better retained locally — to do otherwise puts them at risk of insecurity/profiteering/asset stripping. Also, surely fair trade is better than “free’ trade?
As it is, NZers are effectively “subsidising’ profits to overseas corporations — to the tune of $5 billion (or more) per year:
Transnational corporations (TNCs) make massive profits out of New Zealand. These can truly be called New Zealand’s biggest invisible export. In the decade 1997-2006, TNCs made $50.3 billion profits. Only 32% was reinvested, and in some years more was sent overseas than was earned or the reinvestment was significantly offset by capital being taken out of the country.”
Ropata – you’ve just stumbled upon the economic concept of comparative advantage. Of course transnational corporations make profits out of New Zealand. But we make a hell of a lot off our exports too. You can’t have one but not the other. Are you suggesting we cut off all trade? Comparative advantage is gained when when each country specialises in what they’re best at and trade (well there’s more to it then that but we’ll leave it there). That way each country makes the most effective use of its own resources. Protectionist measures like the ‘buy NZ made ad campaign inhibit this and its makes NZ and the rest of the world worst off.
On your other points. Air NZ and manufacturing are classic examples of industries that should not be propped up by the government. In Air NZ’s case competitors like pacific blue, quantas etc etc will keep them honest whether they’re owned by NZ or China. Manufacturing is a part of the buy NZ made answer. We should only keep manufacturing goods that we can produce efficiently. Thats why we don’t have a car industry. Its much cheaper for us to import – look to the states to see how a subsidised car industry is further crippling their economy. In the Public service efficiency results in the best result anyway – we want the services provided by the public service to cost as little as possible so we can have lower taxes and more money to spend!
I get pretty passionate about this ‘fair trade’ thing. I too want save the starving in africa. But did you know trade barriers cost the third world a hell of a lot more than the amount of aid we give them. The facts are there – google it (I can’t be bothered, its late). ‘Unfair trade’ is far far far better than no trade at all. The fact is – countries who engage in trade even if its from sweatshops improve over time – look at Japan. Buying their ‘cheap and nasty’ products is the best help we can give them.
Paul – “However we don’t live in a free trade society. If you are consistent and not just an idiot troll I expect to see you supporting business taking the full cost of their carbon pollution as soon as possible.”
Yeah sure. But a couple of points. Business won’t take the brunt of the cost, it will be passed onto the consumer – lets not forget that. Also that means some businesses get carbon credits too right, if their net emissions are negative?
I believe this is how it has to work. The cost of carbon will be a long term cost. It will not go away. We have to be prepared to pay more, and the businesses which can become the most efficient and therefore offer cheaper prices are rewarded.
This market system is something isn’t it?
This is what the Greens have been arguing for a long time.
If our business adapts like other businesses internationally, (and I’m not completely clued in on the ins and outs of a carbon trading market) yes! it would be fantastic if we could get carbon credits for nett emissions. I know some companies particularly airlines offer carbon offset options or the like where they buy or invest in tracts of forestry.
I don’t see what the problem is with this. If we don’t we are passing the bill on to our children and grandchildren, rather than attempting to recognise and deal with the problem. I also realise it is a joke to blame National solely for this. Almost everyone in NZ is complicit in inaction for too long.
Anyway that’s the theory. I did study a small bit of biology and economics, but never got near farm accounts or forrestry work.
I’m not sure if negative net emissions equals credits under the currently proposed and soon to be rehacked scheme. Anyone know?
The fact is – countries who engage in trade even if its from sweatshops improve over time – look at Japan.
I’m sure all those U.S. military Korean war contracts were helpful too, to help keep the munitions and arms factories running and turn them into car manufacturers and the like.
We should buy New Zealand for the same reason everyone else does overseas, it is a niche quality fashionable brand, and we are a unique part of it. As I mentioned above, it is hardly the most of protectionist measures out there, if it really is truly one at all.
The government is just involved in a campaign like the Woolmark or the beef and lamb campaign, but what they are selling is the quality of our country overall, which suprisingly I would say they have a stake in.
Efficiency and market clearing is a laudable goal. But your argument goes beyond economics into sovereignty. Everything can be done more efficiently. But more efficiently for whom? Without Air New Zealand there might be more efficient air travel,, but it is in New Zealand’s public good to have a national carrier who supports our tourism industry.
Manfacturing can be different, but it is sometimes very difficult to compete marketing a smaller product against mass produced brands dumped in large chain stores. Hence a little support with the marketing, and the promotion of quality behind a Made in NZ sticker.
“What if your “better off’ comes at the expense of the chinese labourer that used to make shoes, and now gets nothing?”
Didn’t I explain that I’m selfish? Anyway…
The Chinese labourers you mention have very little protection. They don’t have the workplace rights that our unions have fought hard for and won.
It’s a bit disingenuous of you to imply that you’re supporting Chinese labourers by buying goods made in China – you’re supporting their exploitation. Massive profits are made off their labour by denying them proper work rights and that’s what you’re supporting.
I prefer to support the rights of workers by buying products made by workers who have rights.
My understanding, and correct me if I’m wrong, but Ive heard that for IceBreaker its so cheap to manufacture in China that they can produce the merino wool here, ship it to China to be made into clothes, and have it shipped back again.
Now how are local manufacturers supposed to compete against that without support from the government?
Why, by lowering our workplace standards to be closer to those of China of course. I heard Roger Douglas on the radio just the other week praising the “efficiency” of Chinese industry.
Rod Donald’s legacy is a bunch of ads that make Oliver Driver appear stupider thatn he already is and make fat ad exec’s rich? That’s unspeakably sad. I thought he’d done lots of good stuff.
“basically, mate, you are an idealogue of the worst sort. I understand the sentiment. I even appreciate that we can’t run on subsidies, and if we are doing that for profitable industries it is completely wrong.”
Are you suggesting we should subsidise unprofitable industries? I’m all for helping kiwi businesses get up and running and I reckon $6.3 million would be very helpful if it was applied the right way. I had a small business myself about 5 years ago and would have loved the government to be more helpful rather than making me jump through bureaucratic hurdles. In the end I had to lay off 5 staff and find a job.
On the topic of this post, it is sensible to review any campaign to see whether it is delivering results, rather than just keep chucking money at ad agencies. There are probably some parts of the campaign that will be kept after review, such as the getnzmade.net website (which I don’t recall seeing anything about on the TV ad by the way), but the point is that reviewing the campaign is the right thing to do.
Regarding your insults, I’ll be up here on the high road mate.
Paul – on your first post, I agree. On the second, not so much:
“‘im sure all those U.S. military Korean war contracts were helpful too, to help keep the munitions and arms factories running and turn them into car manufacturers and the like.
We should buy New Zealand for the same reason everyone else does overseas, it is a niche quality fashionable brand, and we are a unique part of it. As I mentioned above, it is hardly the most of protectionist measures out there, if it really is truly one at all.
The government is just involved in a campaign like the Woolmark or the beef and lamb campaign, but what they are selling is the quality of our country overall, which suprisingly I would say they have a stake in.
Efficiency and market clearing is a laudable goal. But your argument goes beyond economics into sovereignty. Everything can be done more efficiently. But more efficiently for whom? Without Air New Zealand there might be more efficient air travel,, but it is in New Zealand’s public good to have a national carrier who supports our tourism industry.
Manfacturing can be different, but it is sometimes very difficult to compete marketing a smaller product against mass produced brands dumped in large chain stores. Hence a little support with the marketing, and the promotion of quality behind a Made in NZ sticker.”
Yeah Japan did benefit from foreign investment. Something that will happen to all third world countries as their economies improve and the risk lessens. If they can get themselves off the ground first. Why should the government sell New Zealand to New Zealanders? There may be an argument for doing this overseas but preaching to the converted is a bit silly isn’t it? And why does an air carrier have to be public owned to support our tourism industry? Surely its in any air carriers commercial interests to promote tourism. Its more benefit for them!
If your going to try and compete directly with a mass produced brand it is going to be hard. Because they’re more efficient at producing it. I’ve got no problems with making the conscious decision to buy kiwi made on the basis of quality – but what I’m saying is that if you’ve got two identical goods and one is more expensive because its kiwi made. The only people that will benefit from you purchasing the kiwi one is the producer of that good. Everyone else loses.
Felix – “The Chinese labourers you mention have very little protection. They don’t have the workplace rights that our unions have fought hard for and won.
It’s a bit disingenuous of you to imply that you’re supporting Chinese labourers by buying goods made in China – you’re supporting their exploitation. Massive profits are made off their labour by denying them proper work rights and that’s what you’re supporting.
I prefer to support the rights of workers by buying products made by workers who have rights.”
Again, this kind of statement really gets under my skin. Your supporting Chinease workers by not buying their goods. How the hell is that meant to make them better off? They’ve gone from a crap job to no job. A crap job being a hell of a lot better than no job at all.
No I’m suggesting that subsidies are not necessarily a good thing, especially as we used to have them for our most productive sectors. I notice you had no reply to why the taxpayer should be bailing out industries on Kyoto agreements. If it walks like a fish mate, irrespective of what road it’s walking on.
@Greg
I don’t know if being occupied by the U.S. after the second world war, and getting a kickstart from large military contracts, is quite the same practically and morally as buying coffee or small local industries from developing countries.
If the government doesn’t sell the New Zealand brand who will? The media relentlessly paint us disproportionantly as a country over run by crime. I remember the irony of the 90s when the only companies to use patriotism in their advertising were overseas countries- Toyota ‘welcome to our world’ and Barry Crump, McDonalds and the Kiwiburger…there are 2 or 3 other examples but I can’t think of them just at the moment.
The point with mass production is not, I don’t think, efficiency leading to the best use of scarce resources. It is that a large company can get a strong advantage in marketing its products, and getting exclusive or very favourable distribution deals, which make competing for small manufacturers (and retailers for that matter) very difficult. Not particularly perfect market stuff.
Well if one is made in New Zealand and one is made elsewhere it isn’t identical is it? There are all kinds of reasons why people choose a particular brand. Could be the safety standards of a country, where their sister lives, their human rights record, their favourite sports team, passing fads…
I understand the argument you are making, but especially in times of economic hardship, I think you will be hard pressed to find any practical examples of it in action internationally. As I said we don’t live in a free trade world, and we have to be careful with the baby and bathtub. Which is my way of saying, brain hurt, have to go work. cheers.
“Any marketing campaign needs to have measurable results. While it sounds good for Bradford to claim 360,000 more shoppers think Kiwi-made than before, where is the proof that this is translating into dollars spent on Kiwi-made. And are the surveyed shoppers actually the target market for this campaign? Do you even know who the target market is? Low income earners? Beneficiaries? Or just ‘the rich’.
What NZ made goods are lower income earners meant to buy? Can they afford the generally higher cost of buying NZ made goods when the imported alternatives are so much cheaper and means they can still buy Christmas presents for their kids?
Do NZ made goods need to compete on price? If so are we prepared to have lower wages in order to make this possible?
If we aren’t expecting the low income earners to be part of the target market of this campaign then who is it, and what are the likely products they will buy that are NZ made?
Let’s see the business case for this campaign, and some real measurable outcomes. It seems to me that the millions of taxpayer dollars being spent on this campaign are misguided and wasteful.”
The only thing you know about marketing it seems is how to spell it!!!!!
“The ad campaign is bad for New Zealand. Its a shocking waste of tax payers money. Here’s why:
Econ101 – Consumers that choose to spend more to buy New Zealand made purely because its from New Zealand effectively provide a subsidy to the producer.(This is not the case if the purchase of the NZ made product is rational – ie its cheaper or better quality) These consumers are subsidising inefficient businesses (if they were efficient they wouldn’t need government funded ad campaigns), This decreases consumers disposable income so they have less to spend on efficient kiwi producers. New Zealand as a whole would be far better off if inefficient producers instead moved into efficient industries. This subsidy increases producer surplus but consumer surplus is decreased by more than that increase – hence this policy results in a dead weight loss – wasted money!”
More like this comment is a wasted amount of internet space!!!! What a load of crap
“If your going to try and compete directly with a mass produced brand it is going to be hard. Because they’re more efficient at producing it. I’ve got no problems with making the conscious decision to buy kiwi made on the basis of quality – but what I’m saying is that if you’ve got two identical goods and one is more expensive because its kiwi made. The only people that will benefit from you purchasing the kiwi one is the producer of that good. Everyone else loses”
That is NOT what the campaign is all about agghhhh, and this just shows how agghhhh you are in the subject of marketing, in fact, business, agghhhh
“If your going to try and compete directly with a mass produced brand it is going to be hard. Because they’re more efficient at producing it. I’ve got no problems with making the conscious decision to buy kiwi made on the basis of quality – but what I’m saying is that if you’ve got two identical goods and one is more expensive because its kiwi made. The only people that will benefit from you purchasing the kiwi one is the producer of that good. Everyone else loses.”
Proves my point, you know fuck all about marketing
Just remember that those adverts and posters and what not is a very very small part of marketing. It is not the whole marketing concept, it is a piss ant in comparrison so you cant judge a marketing campagin from some dumb arse picture or advert. There is a hell of a lot to marketing than advertising!!!
And I just hope that you can forgive usBut everything must goAnd if you need an explanation, nationThen everything must goSongwriters: James Dean Bradfield / Sean Anthony Moore / Nicholas Allen Jones.Today, I’d like to talk about a couple of things that happened over the weekend:Brian Tamaki’s Library Invasion and ...
New reporting highlights how Brooke van Velden refuses to meet with the CTU but is happy to meet with fringe Australian-based unions. Van Velden is pursuing reckless changes to undermine the personal grievance system against the advice of her own officials. Engineering New Zealand are saying that hundreds of engineers ...
The NZCTU strongly supports the Employment Relations (Employee Remuneration Disclosure) Amendment Bill. This Bill represents a positive step towards addressing serious issues around unlawful disparities in pay by protecting workers’ rights to discuss their pay and conditions. This Bill also provides welcome support for helping tackle the prevalent gender and ...
Years of hard work finally paid off last week as the country’s biggest and most important transport project, the City Rail Link reached a major milestone with the first test train making its way slowly though the tunnels for the first time. This is a fantastic achievement and it is ...
Engineers are pleading for the Government to free up funds to restart stalled projects. File Photo: Lynn Grieveson / The KākāLong stories short, the top six things in Aotearoa’s political economy around housing, climate and poverty on Monday, February 17 are:Engineering New Zealand CEO Richard Templer said yesterday hundreds of ...
It’s one of New Zealand’s great sustaining myths: the spirit of ANZAC, our mates across the ditch, the spirit of Earl’s Court, Antipodeans united against the world. It is also a myth; it is not reality. That much was clear from a series of speakers, including a former Australian Prime ...
Many people have been unsatisfied for years that things have not improved for them, some as individuals, many more however because their families are clearly putting in more work, for less money – and certainly far less purchase on society. This general discontent has grown exponentially since the GFC. ...
A listing of 34 news and opinion articles we found interesting and shared on social media during the past week: Sun, February 9, 2025 thru Sat, February 15, 2025. This week's roundup is again published soleley by category. We are still interested in feedback to hone the categorization, so if ...
The Salvation Army’s State of the Nation report shows worsening food poverty and housing shortages mean more than 400,000 people now need welfare support, the highest level since the 1990s. Photo: Lynn Grieveson / The KākāLong stories short, the top six things in our political economy around housing, climate and ...
You're just too too obscure for meOh you don't really get through to meAnd there's no need for you to talk that wayIs there any less pessimistic things to say?Songwriters: Graeme DownesToday, I thought we’d take a look at some of the most cringe-inducing moments from last week, but don’t ...
Please note: I’ve delayed my “What can we do?” article for this video.The video above shows Destiny Church members assaulting staff and librarians as they pushed through to a room of terrified parents and young children.It was posted to social media last night.But if you read Sinead Boucher’s Stuff, you ...
Skeptical Science is partnering with Gigafact to produce fact briefs — bite-sized fact checks of trending claims. You can submit claims you think need checking via the tipline. Is sea level rise exaggerated? Sea levels are rising at an accelerating rate, not stagnating or decreasing. Warming global temperatures cause land ice ...
Here is a scenario, but first a historical parallel. Hitler and the Nazis could well have accomplished everything that they wanted to do within German borders, including exterminating Jews, so long as they confined their ambitious to Germany itself. After all, the world pretty much sat and watched as the ...
I’ve spent the last couple of days in Hamilton covering Waikato University’s annual NZ Economics Forum, where (arguably) three of the most influential people in our political economy right now laid out their thinking in major speeches about the size and role of Government, their views on for spending, tax ...
Simeon Brown’s Ideology BentSimeon Brown once told Kiwis he tries to represent his deep sense of faith by interacting “with integrity”.“It’s important that there’s Christians in Parliament…and from my perspective, it’s great to be a Christian in Parliament and to bring that perspective to [laws, conversations and policies].”And with ...
Severe geological and financial earthquakes are inevitable. We just don’t know how soon and how they will play out. Are we putting the right effort into preparing for them?Every decade or so the international economy has a major financial crisis. We cannot predict exactly when or exactly how it will ...
Questions1. How did Old Mate Grabaseat describe his soon-to-be-Deputy-PM’s letter to police advocating for Philip Polkinghorne?a.Ill-advisedb.A perfect letterc.A letter that will live in infamyd.He had me at hello2. What did Seymour say in response?a.What’s ill-advised is commenting when you don’t know all the facts and ...
NZCTU Te Kauae Kaimahi President Richard Wagstaff has called on OJI Fibre Solutions to work with the government, unions, and the community before closing the Kinleith Paper Mill. “OJI has today announced 230 job losses in what will be a devastating blow for the community. OJI needs to work with ...
NZCTU Te Kauae Kaimahi President Richard Wagstaff is sounding the alarm about the latest attack on workers from Minister of Workplace Relations and Safety Brooke van Velden, who is ignoring her own officials to pursue reckless changes that would completely undermine the personal grievance system. “Brooke van Velden’s changes will ...
Hi,When I started writing Webworm in 2020, I wrote a lot about the conspiracy theories that were suddenly invading our Twitter timelines and Facebook feeds. Four years ago a reader, John, left this feedback under one of my essays:It’s a never ending labyrinth of lunacy which, as you have pointed ...
And if you said this life ain't good enoughI would give my world to lift you upI could change my life to better suit your moodBecause you're so smoothAnd it's just like the ocean under the moonOh, it's the same as the emotion that I get from youYou got the ...
Aotearoa remains the minority’s birthright, New Zealand the majority’s possession. WAITANGI DAY commentary see-saws manically between the warmly positive and the coldly negative. Many New Zealanders consider this a good thing. They point to the unexamined patriotism of July Fourth and Bastille Day celebrations, and applaud the fact that the ...
The podcast above of the weekly ‘Hoon’ webinar for paying subscribers on Thursday night features co-hosts & talking about the week’s news with regular and special guests, including: and on the week in geopolitics, including the latest from Donald Trump’s administration over Gaza and Ukraine; on the ...
Up until now, the prevailing coalition view of public servants was that there were simply too many of them. But yesterday the new Public Service Commissioner, handpicked by the Luxon Government, said it was not so much numbers but what they did and the value they produced that mattered. Sir ...
In a moment we explore the question: What is Andrew Bayly wanting to tell ACC, and will it involve enjoying a small wine tasting and then telling someone to fuck off? But first, for context, a broader one: What do we look for in a government?Imagine for a moment, you ...
As expected, Donald Trump just threw Ukraine under the bus, demanding that it accept Russia's illegal theft of land, while ruling out any future membership of NATO. Its a colossal betrayal, which effectively legitimises Russia's invasion, while laying the groundwork for the next one. But Trump is apparently fine with ...
A ballot for a single member's bill was held today, and the following bill was drawn: Employment Relations (Collective Agreements in Triangular Relationships) Amendment Bill (Adrian Rurawhe) The bill would extend union rights to employees in triangular relationships, where they are (nominally) employed by one party, but ...
This is a guest post by George Weeks, reviewing a book called ‘How to Fly a Horse’ by Kevin AshtonBook review: ‘How to Fly a Horse’ by Kevin Ashton (2015) – and what it means for Auckland. The title of this article might unnerve any Greater Auckland ...
This story was originally published by Capital & Main and is part of Covering Climate Now, a global journalism collaboration strengthening coverage of the climate story. Within just a week, the sheer devastation of the Los Angeles wildfires has pushed to the fore fundamental questions about the impact of the climate crisis that have been ...
In this world, it's just usYou know it's not the same as it wasSongwriters: Harry Edward Styles / Thomas Edward Percy Hull / Tyler Sam JohnsonYesterday, I received a lovely message from Caty, a reader of Nick’s Kōrero, that got me thinking. So I thought I’d share it with you, ...
In past times a person was considered “unserious” or “not a serious” person if they failed to grasp, behave and speak according to the solemnity of the context in which they were located. For example a serious person does not audibly pass gas at Church, or yell “gun” at a ...
Long stories short, the top six things in Aotearoa’s political economy around housing, climate and poverty on Thursday, February 13 are:The coalition Government’s early 2024 ‘fiscal emergency’ freeze on funding, planning and building houses, schools, local roads and hospitals helped extend and deepen the economic and jobs recession through calendar ...
For obvious reasons, people feel uneasy when the right to be a citizen is sold off to wealthy foreigners. Even selling the right to residency seems a bit dubious, when so many migrants who are not millionaires get turned away or are made to jump through innumerable hoops – simply ...
A new season of White Lotus is nearly upon us: more murder mystery, more sumptuous surroundings, more rich people behaving badly.Once more we get to identify with the experience of the pampered tourist or perhaps the poorly paid help; there's something in White Lotus for all New Zealanders.And unlike the ...
In 2016, Aotearoa shockingly plunged to fourth place in the Transparency International Corruption Perceptions Index. Nine years later, and we're back there again: New Zealand has seen a further slip in its global ranking in the latest Corruption Perceptions Index (CPI). [...] In the latest CPI New Zealand's score ...
1. You’ve started ranking your politicians on how much they respect the rule of law2. You’ve stopped paying attention to those news publications3. You’ve developed a sudden interest in a particular period of history4. More and more people are sounding like your racist, conspiracist uncle.5. Someone just pulled a Nazi ...
Transforming New Zealand: Brian EastonBrian Easton will discuss the above topic at 2/57 Willis Street, Wellington at 5:30pm on Tuesday 26 February at 2/57 Willis Street, WellingtonThe sub-title to the above is "Why is the Left failing?" Brian Easton's analysis is based on his view that while the ...
Salvation Army’s State of the Nation 2025 report highlights falling living standards, the highest unemployment rates since the 1990s and half of all Pacific children going without food. There are reports of hundreds if not thousands of people are applying for the same jobs in the wake of last year’s ...
Mountain Tui is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.Correction: On the article The Condundrum of David Seymour, Luke Malpass conducted joint reviews with Bryce Wilkinson, the architect of the Regulatory Standards Bill - not Bryce Edwards. The article ...
Tomorrow the council’s Transport, Resilience and Infrastructure Committee meet and agenda has a few interesting papers. Council’s Letter of Expectation to Auckland Transport Every year the council provide a Letter of Expectation to Auckland Transport which is part of the process for informing AT of the council’s priorities and ...
All around in my home townThey're trying to track me down, yeahThey say they want to bring me in guiltyFor the killing of a deputyFor the life of a deputySongwriter: Robert Nesta Marley.Support Nick’s Kōrero today with a 20% discount on a paid subscription to receive all my newsletters directly ...
Hi,I think all of us have probably experienced the power of music — that strange, transformative thing that gets under our skin and helps us experience this whole life thing with some kind of sanity.Listening and experiencing music has always been such a huge part of my life, and has ...
Business frustration over the stalled economy is growing, and only 34% of voters are confidentNicola Willis can deliver. Photo: Lynn Grieveson / The KākāLong stories short, the top six things in Aotearoa’s political economy around housing, climate and poverty on Wednesday, February 12 are:Business frustration is growing about a ...
I have now lived long enough to see a cabinet minister go both barrels on their Prime Minister and not get sacked.It used to be that the PM would have a drawer full of resignations signed by ministers on the day of their appointment, ready for such an occasion. But ...
This session will feature Simon McCallum, Senior Lecturer in Engineering and Computer Science (VUW) and recent Labour Party candidate in the Southland Electorate talking about some of the issues around AI and how this should inform Labour Party policy. Simon is an excellent speaker with a comprehensive command of AI ...
The proposed Waimate garbage incinerator is dead: The company behind a highly-controversial proposal to build a waste-to-energy plant in the Waimate District no longer has the land. [...] However, SIRRL director Paul Taylor said the sales and purchase agreement to purchase land from Murphy Farms, near Glenavy, lapsed at ...
The US Foreign Corrupt Practices Act has been a vital tool in combatting international corruption. It forbids US companies and citizens from bribing foreign public officials anywhere in the world. And its actually enforced: some of the world's biggest companies - Siemens, Hewlett Packard, and Bristol Myers Squibb - have ...
December 2024 photo - with UK Tory Boris Johnson (Source: Facebook)Those PollsFor hours, political poll results have resounded across political hallways and commentary.According to the 1News Verizon poll, 50% of the country believe we are heading in the “wrong direction”, while 39% believe we are “on the right track”.The left ...
A Tai Rāwhiti mill that ran for 30 years before it was shut down in late 2023 is set to re-open in the coming months, which will eventually see nearly 300 new jobs in the region. A new report from Massey University shows that pensioners are struggling with rising costs. ...
As support continues to fall, Luxon also now faces his biggest internal ructions within the coalition since the election, with David Seymour reacting badly to being criticised by the PM. File photo: Lynn Grieveson / The KākāLong stories short, the top six things in Aotearoa’s political economy around housing, climate ...
Not since 1988 when Richard Prebble openly criticised David Lange have we seen such a challenge to a Prime Minister as that of David Seymour to Christopher Luxon last night. Prebble suggested Lange had mental health issues during a TV interview and was almost immediately fired. Seymour hasn’t gone quite ...
Three weeks in, and the 24/7 news cycle is not helping anyone feel calm and informed about the second Trump presidency. One day, the US is threatening 25% trade tariffs on its friends and neighbours. The reasons offered by the White House are absurd, such as stopping fentanyl coming in ...
This video includes personal musings and conclusions of the creator climate scientist Dr. Adam Levy. It is presented to our readers as an informed perspective. Please see video description for references (if any). Wherever you look, you'll hear headlines claiming we've passed 1.5 degrees of global warming. And while 2024 saw ...
Photo by Heather M. Edwards on UnsplashHere’s the key news, commentary, reports and debate around Aotearoa’s politics and economy in the week to Feb 10 below. That’s ahead of live chats on the Substack App and The Kākā’s front page on Substack at 5pm with: on his column in The ...
Is there anyone in the world the National Party loves more than a campaign donor? Why yes, there is! They will always have the warmest hello and would you like to slip into something more comfortable for that great god of our age, the High Net Worth Individual.The words the ...
Waste and fraud certainly exist in foreign aid programs, but rightwing celebration of USAID’s dismantling shows profound ignorance of the value of soft power (as opposed to hard power) in projecting US influence and interests abroad by non-military/coercive means (think of “hearts and minds,” “hugs, not bullets,” “honey versus vinegar,” ...
Health New Zealand is proposing to cut almost half of its data and digital positions – more than 1000 of them. The PSA has called on the Privacy Commissioner to urgently investigate the cuts due to the potential for serious consequences for patients. NZNO is calling for an urgent increase ...
We may see a few more luxury cars on Queen Street, but a loosening of rules to entice rich foreigners to invest more here is unlikely to “turbocharge our economic growth”. Photo: Lynn Grieveson / The KākāLong stories short, the top six things in Aotearoa’s political economy around housing, climate ...
Let us not dance daintily around the elephant in the room. Our politicians who serve us in the present are not honest, certainly not as honest as they should be, and while the right are taking out most of the trophies for warping narratives and literally redefining “facts”, the kiwi ...
A few weeks ago I took a look at public transport ridership in 2024. In today’s post I’m going to be looking a bit deeper at bus ridership. Buses make up the vast majority of ridership in Auckland with 70 million boardings last year out of a total of 89.4 ...
Oh, you know I did itIt's over and I feel fineNothing you could say is gonna change my mindWaited and I waited the longest nightNothing like the taste of sweet declineSongwriters: Chris Shiflett / David Eric Grohl / Nate Mendel / Taylor Hawkins.Hindsight is good, eh?The clarity when the pieces ...
Photo by Towfiqu barbhuiya on UnsplashHere’s what we’re watching in the week to February 16 and beyond in Aotearoa’s political economy around housing, climate and poverty:Monday, February 10The Kākā’s weekly wrap-up of news about politics and the economy is due at midday, followed by webinar for paying subscribers in Substack’s ...
A listing of 23 news and opinion articles we found interesting and shared on social media during the past week: Sun, February 2, 2025 thru Sat, February 8, 2025. This week's roundup is again published soleley by category. We are still interested in feedback to hone the categorization, so if ...
Today, I stumbled across a Twitter Meme: the ending of The Lord of the Rings as a Chess scenario: https://x.com/mellon_heads/status/1887983845917564991 It gets across the basic gist. Aragorn and Gandalf offering up ‘material’ at the Morannon allows Frodo and Samwise to catch Sauron unawares – fair enough. But there are a ...
Last week, Kieran McAnulty called out Chris Bishop and Nicola Willis for their claims that Kāinga Ora’s costs were too high.They had claimed Kāinga Ora’s cost were 12% higher than market i.e. private devlopersBut Kāinga Ora’s Chair had already explained why last year:"We're not building to sell, so we'll be ...
Stuff’s Political Editor Luke Malpass - A Fellow at New Zealand IniativeLast week I half-joked that Stuff / The Post’s Luke Malpass1 always sounded like he was auditioning for a job at the New Zealand Initiative.Mountain Tui is a reader-supported publication. For a limited time, subscriptions are 20% off. Thanks ...
At a funeral on Friday, there were A4-sized photos covering every wall of the Dil’s reception lounge. There must have been 200 of them, telling the story in the usual way of the video reel but also, by enlargement, making it more possible to linger and step in.Our friend Nicky ...
Skeptical Science is partnering with Gigafact to produce fact briefs — bite-sized fact checks of trending claims. This fact brief was written by Sue Bin Park from the Gigafact team in collaboration with members from our team. You can submit claims you think need checking via the tipline. Is methane the ...
The Government’s idea is that the private sector and Community Housing Providers will fund, build and operate new affordable housing to address our housing crisis. Meanwhile, the Government does not know where almost half of the 1,700 children who left emergency housing actually went. Photo: Lynn Grieveson / The KākāLong ...
The Government's sudden cancellation of the tertiary education funding increase is a reckless move that risks widespread job losses and service reductions across New Zealand's universities. ...
National’s cuts to disability support funding and freezing of new residential placements has resulted in significant mental health decline for intellectually disabled people. ...
The hundreds of jobs lost needlessly as a result of the Kinleith Mill paper production closure will have a devastating impact on the Tokoroa community - something that could have easily been avoided. ...
Today Te Pāti Māori MP for Te Tai Tokerau, Mariameno Kapa-Kingi, released her members bill that will see the return of tamariki and mokopuna Māori from state care back to te iwi Māori. This bill will establish an independent authority that asserts and protects the rights promised in He Whakaputanga ...
The Whangarei District Council being forced to fluoridate their local water supply is facing a despotic Soviet-era disgrace. This is not a matter of being pro-fluoride or anti-fluoride. It is a matter of what New Zealanders see and value as democracy in our country. Individual democratically elected Councillors are not ...
Nicola Willis’ latest supermarket announcement is painfully weak with no new ideas, no real plan, and no relief for Kiwis struggling with rising grocery costs. ...
Half of Pacific children sometimes going without food is just one of many heartbreaking lowlights in the Salvation Army’s annual State of the Nation report. ...
The Salvation Army’s State of the Nation report is a bleak indictment on the failure of Government to take steps to end poverty, with those on benefits, including their children, hit hardest. ...
New Zealand First has today introduced a Member’s Bill which would restore decision-making power to local communities regarding the fluoridation of drinking water. The ‘Fluoridation (Referendum) Legislation Bill’ seeks to repeal the Health (Fluoridation of Drinking Water) Amendment Act 2021 that granted centralised authority to the Direct General of Health ...
New Zealand First has introduced a Member’s Bill aimed at preventing banks from refusing their services to businesses because of the current “Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) Framework”. “This Bill ensures fairness and prevents ESG standards from perpetuating woke ideology in the banking sector being driven by unelected, globalist, climate ...
Erica Stanford has reached peak shortsightedness if today’s announcement is anything to go by, picking apart immigration settings piece by piece to the detriment of the New Zealand economy. ...
Our originating document, theTreaty of Waitangi, was signed on February 6, 1840. An agreement between Māori and the British Crown. Initially inked by Ngā Puhi in Waitangi, further signatures were added as it travelled south. The intention was to establish a colony with the cession of sovereignty to the Crown, ...
Te Whatu Ora Chief Executive Margie Apa leaving her job four months early is another symptom of this government’s failure to deliver healthcare for New Zealanders. ...
The Green Party is calling for the Prime Minister to show leadership and be unequivocal about Aotearoa New Zealand’s opposition to a proposal by the US President to remove Palestinians from Gaza. ...
The latest unemployment figures reveal that job losses are hitting Māori and Pacific people especially hard, with Māori unemployment reaching a staggering 9.7% for the December 2024 quarter and Pasifika unemployment reaching 10.5%. ...
Waitangi 2025: Waitangi Day must be community and not politically driven - Shane Jones Our originating document, theTreaty of Waitangi, was signed on February 6, 1840. An agreement between Māori and the British Crown. Initially inked by Ngā Puhi in Waitangi, further signatures were added as it travelled south. ...
Despite being confronted every day with people in genuine need being stopped from accessing emergency housing – National still won’t commit to building more public houses. ...
The Green Party says the Government is giving up on growing the country’s public housing stock, despite overwhelming evidence that we need more affordable houses to solve the housing crisis. ...
Before any thoughts of the New Year and what lies ahead could even be contemplated, New Zealand reeled with the tragedy of Senior Sergeant Lyn Fleming losing her life. For over 38 years she had faithfully served as a front-line Police officer. Working alongside her was Senior Sergeant Adam Ramsay ...
Green Party co-leader Marama Davidson will return to politics at Waitangi on Monday the 3rd of February where she will hold a stand up with fellow co-leader Chlöe Swarbrick. ...
Te Pāti Māori is appalled by the government's blatant mishandling of the school lunch programme. David Seymour’s ‘cost-saving’ measures have left tamariki across Aotearoa with unidentifiable meals, causing distress and outrage among parents and communities alike. “What’s the difference between providing inedible food, and providing no food at all?” Said ...
The Government is doubling down on outdated and volatile fossil fuels, showing how shortsighted and destructive their policies are for working New Zealanders. ...
Green Party MP Steve Abel this morning joined Coromandel locals in Waihi to condemn new mining plans announced by Shane Jones in the pit of the town’s Australian-owned Gold mine. ...
The Green Party is calling on the Government to strengthen its just-announced 2030-2035 Nationally Determined Contribution (NDC) under the Paris Agreement and address its woeful lack of commitment to climate security. ...
Today marks a historic moment for Taranaki iwi with the passing of the Te Pire Whakatupua mō Te Kāhui Tupua/Taranaki Maunga Collective Redress Bill in Parliament. "Today, we stand together as descendants of Taranaki, and our tūpuna, Taranaki Maunga, is now formally acknowledged by the law as a living tūpuna. ...
Labour is relieved to see Children’s Minister Karen Chhour has woken up to reality and reversed her government’s terrible decisions to cut funding from frontline service providers – temporarily. ...
The Government’s commitment to get New Zealand’s roads back on track is delivering strong results, with around 98 per cent of potholes on state highways repaired within 24 hours of identification every month since targets were introduced, Transport Minister Chris Bishop says. “Increasing productivity to help rebuild our economy is ...
The former Cadbury factory will be the site of the Inpatient Building for the new Dunedin Hospital and Health Minister Simeon Brown says actions have been taken to get the cost overruns under control. “Today I am giving the people of Dunedin certainty that we will build the new Dunedin ...
From today, Plunket in Whāngarei will be offering childhood immunisations – the first of up to 27 sites nationwide, Health Minister Simeon Brown says. The investment of $1 million into the pilot, announced in October 2024, was made possible due to the Government’s record $16.68 billion investment in health. It ...
New Zealand’s strong commitment to the rights of disabled people has continued with the response to an important United Nations report, Disability Issues Minister Louise Upston has announced. Of the 63 concluding observations of the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (UNCRPD), 47 will be progressed ...
Resources Minister Shane Jones has launched New Zealand’s national Minerals Strategy and Critical Minerals List, documents that lay a strategic and enduring path for the mineral sector, with the aim of doubling exports to $3 billion by 2035. Mr Jones released the documents, which present the Coalition Government’s transformative vision ...
Firstly I want to thank OceanaGold for hosting our event today. Your operation at Waihi is impressive. I want to acknowledge local MP Scott Simpson, local government dignitaries, community stakeholders and all of you who have gathered here today. It’s a privilege to welcome you to the launch of the ...
Racing Minister, Winston Peters has announced the Government is preparing public consultation on GST policy proposals which would make the New Zealand racing industry more competitive. “The racing industry makes an important economic contribution. New Zealand thoroughbreds are in demand overseas as racehorses and for breeding. The domestic thoroughbred industry ...
Business confidence remains very high and shows the economy is on track to improve, Economic Growth Minister Nicola Willis says. “The latest ANZ Business Outlook survey, released yesterday, shows business confidence and expected own activity are ‘still both very high’.” The survey reports business confidence fell eight points to +54 ...
Enabling works have begun this week on an expanded radiology unit at Hawke’s Bay Fallen Soldiers’ Memorial Hospital which will double CT scanning capacity in Hawke’s Bay to ensure more locals can benefit from access to timely, quality healthcare, Health Minister Simeon Brown says. This investment of $29.3m in the ...
The Government has today announced New Zealand’s second international climate target under the Paris Agreement, Climate Change Minister Simon Watts says. New Zealand will reduce emissions by 51 to 55 per cent compared to 2005 levels, by 2035. “We have worked hard to set a target that is both ambitious ...
Nine years of negotiations between the Crown and iwi of Taranaki have concluded following Te Pire Whakatupua mō Te Kāhui Tupua/the Taranaki Maunga Collective Redress Bill passing its third reading in Parliament today, Treaty Negotiations Minister Paul Goldsmith says. “This Bill addresses the historical grievances endured by the eight iwi ...
As schools start back for 2025, there will be a relentless focus on teaching the basics brilliantly so all Kiwi kids grow up with the knowledge, skills and competencies needed to grow the New Zealand of the future, Education Minister Erica Stanford says. “A world-leading education system is a key ...
Housing Minister Chris Bishop and Associate Agriculture Minister Mark Patterson have welcomed Kāinga Ora’s decision to re-open its tender for carpets to allow wool carpet suppliers to bid. “In 2024 Kāinga Ora issued requests for tender (RFTs) seeking bids from suppliers to carpet their properties,” Mr Bishop says. “As part ...
Associate Education Minister David Seymour has today visited Otahuhu College where the new school lunch programme has served up healthy lunches to students in the first days of the school year. “As schools open in 2025, the programme will deliver nutritious meals to around 242,000 students, every school day. On ...
Minister for Children Karen Chhour has intervened in Oranga Tamariki’s review of social service provider contracts to ensure Barnardos can continue to deliver its 0800 What’s Up hotline. “When I found out about the potential impact to this service, I asked Oranga Tamariki for an explanation. Based on the information ...
A bill to make revenue collection on imported and exported goods fairer and more effective had its first reading in Parliament, Customs Minister Casey Costello said today. “The Customs (Levies and Other Matters) Amendment Bill modernises the way in which Customs can recover the costs of services that are needed ...
Minister of Internal Affairs Brooke van Velden says the Department of Internal Affairs [the Department] has achieved significant progress in completing applications for New Zealand citizenship. “December 2024 saw the Department complete 5,661 citizenship applications, the most for any month in 2024. This is a 54 per cent increase compared ...
Reversals to Labour’s blanket speed limit reductions begin tonight and will be in place by 1 July, says Minister of Transport Chris Bishop. “The previous government was obsessed with slowing New Zealanders down by imposing illogical and untargeted speed limit reductions on state highways and local roads. “National campaigned on ...
Finance Minister Nicola Willis has announced Budget 2025 – the Growth Budget - will be delivered on Thursday 22 May. “This year’s Budget will drive forward the Government’s plan to grow our economy to improve the incomes of New Zealanders now and in the years ahead. “Budget 2025 will build ...
NZPF called for a slowdown of the curriculum change, asking for one subject at a time, so that teachers and principals could be fully trained and feel confident and competent to implement the changes, New Zealand Principals’ Federation (NZPF) President ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By T.J. Thomson, Senior Lecturer in Visual Communication & Digital Media, RMIT University Indonesia’s TVOne launched an AI news presenter in 2023.T.J. Thomson Generative artificial intelligence (AI) has taken off at lightning speed in the past couple of years, creating disruption in ...
Many of the young vapers interviewed by a team of public health researchers said they felt unable to resist the pro-vaping environment that surrounded them. New Zealand’s smokefree law was hailed around the world for creating a smokefree generation that would have lifelong protection from smoking’s harms. The smokefree ...
Analysis: While most Wellingtonians enjoyed a rare but unbeatable sunny day on Saturday, some New Zealand diplomats will have been briefly shocked by a screenshot making the rounds on social media showing US President Donald Trump calling us a “third world country”.The image, it appears, was a fake – certainly a ...
ActionStation Director, Kassie Hartendorp says that the Treaty Principles Bill has galvanised the biggest movement in support of Te Tiriti in modern history. ...
While it is in the interests of Wellington ratepayers to sell off this subsidy for the rich, it is unfortunate that it has come to this point. The council should have never spent a penny on this programme, and the $3.4 million spent is a flagrant abuse ...
A search for the person behind a social media account ridiculing Māori.Last week, while scrolling Facebook, I came across a post shared to the New Zealand Centre for Political Research group. The post began, “From Matua Kahurangi on X”, before pasting his critique of iwi leadership – particularly Ngāpuhi ...
On the heels of The White Lotus season three, Tara Ward travels to Koh Samui, Thailand, to live her best life as a five-star wannabe. I’ve never been one for luxury travel. Despite religiously watching TV shows like Luxury Escapes: World’s Best Holidays and harbouring grand dreams of one day ...
The Treaty Principles Bill submission hearings continue at Parliament today with a range of submitters expected including councils, iwi, community organisations and individuals. ...
It’s become of one of Christchurch’s most famous landmarks online, but why? Alex Casey steps through the portal of the brutalist Timezone. Ask anyone what Christchurch’s most iconic building is and you might expect to hear some of the dusty old classics like the Cathedral, or the Town Hall, or ...
New Zealand’s alignment with the White House is further underscored by its refusal to oppose Trump’s sanctions against the International Criminal Court (ICC). ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Amin Saikal, Emeritus Professor of Middle Eastern and Central Asian Studies, Australian National University The dismantling of the US Agency for International Development (USAID) is a serious blow to the soft power of the United States and disastrous for many poor countries ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Janet Hoek, Professor in Public Health, University of Otago Shutterstock/Aliaksandr Barouski New Zealand’s smokefree law was hailed around the world for creating a smokefree generation that would have lifelong protection from smoking’s harms. The smokefree generation would have ended sales of ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By George Disney, Research Fellow, Social Epidemiology, The University of Melbourne Edwin Tan/Getty Images When the National Disability Insurance Scheme (NDIS) was established in 2013, one of its driving aims was to make disability services and support systems fairer. However, our new ...
The resignation of the director general of health is the latest departure in what Labour is calling a ‘purge’ of health leadership. Another day, another health resignation It’s a dangerous time to be a top health executive. On Friday, Dr Diana Sarfati announced her resignation as director general of health ...
Labour and the Greens say the government should focus spending on tourism infrastructure like tracks, toilets and protection of nature instead of more advertising. ...
Hundreds of people called the former prime minister vile and dehumanising things online. Internet safety agencies did nothing - then called in the lawyers. ...
Hundreds of people called the former prime minister vile and dehumanising things online. Internet safety agencies did nothing - then called in the lawyers. ...
After a morning spent calf marking, Flock Hill Station manager Richard Hill headed up Bridge Hill – about 100km from Christchurch on the way to the West Coast – to check on a fire near the station’s boundary.It was December 5 last year, and the Craigieburn area had experienced three ...
It can’t be much of a surprise that a relatively inexperienced Act MP, handed the workplace relations portfolio, doesn’t want to entertain the country’s biggest union in her office.But it still astonishes the head of that union, the CTU’s president, Richard Wagstaff.After all, he’s met regularly with ministers of all ...
Late 21st century Christchurch will be unrecognisable when compared with Christchurch today.Flooding will prompt retreat from all eastern and many northern suburbs. These areas, together with land near the Heathcote and Avon Rivers, are in a fifty-year flood zone. Fifty-year floods can happen more than once every fifty years; there ...
Is humanising a mountain the path to real transformation, or does it signal the need for a cultural paradigm shift in the operating system? Recently, a family member shared their delight at the news of Taranaki Maunga becoming a legal person.Of course, I was pleased for the eight Taranaki ...
Why New Zealanders donate money and who they give it to – and how tools like Givealittle are changing the giving landscape.Is New Zealand really a generous country? It’s difficult to quantify. Giving to registered charities can be counted through tax returns, but giving to overseas causes, giving money ...
Loading…(function(i,s,o,g,r,a,m){var ql=document.querySelectorAll('A[data-quiz],DIV[data-quiz]'); if(ql){if(ql.length){for(var k=0;k<ql.length;k++){ql[k].id='quiz-embed-'+k;ql[k].href="javascript:var i=document.getElementById('quiz-embed-"+k+"');try{qz.startQuiz(i)}catch(e){i.start=1;i.style.cursor='wait';i.style.opacity='0.5'};void(0);"}}};i['QP']=r;i[r]=i[r]||function(){(i[r].q=i[r].q||[]).push(arguments)},i[r].l=1*new Date();a=s.createElement(o),m=s.getElementsByTagName(o)[0];a.async=1;a.src=g;m.parentNode.insertBefore(a,m)})(window,document,'script','https://take.quiz-maker.com/3012/CDN/quiz-embed-v1.js','qp');Got a good quiz question?Send Newsroom your questions.The post Newsroom daily quiz, Monday 17 February appeared first on Newsroom. ...
As the four Findlay siblings run out on the hockey turf, dressed in black with the silver fern, they take the drive and determination of their late mum with them.Emma Findlay is a Black Stick defender, on her way to Chile on Monday to play for the New Zealand women ...
COMMENTARY:By Paul G Buchanan Here is a scenario, but first a broad brush-painted historical parallel. Hitler and the Nazis could well have accomplished everything that they wanted to do within German borders, including exterminating Jews, so long as they confined their ambitious to Germany itself. After all, the world ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Michelle Grattan, Professorial Fellow, University of Canberra With the unembarrassed audacity parties show as an election nears, the government has stolen the opposition’s policy to ban foreign investors buying established homes. Treasurer Jim Chalmers and Housing Minister Clare O’Neil have announced ...
The Jewish Council’s proposals are divisive, contrary to New Zealand’s human rights framework, and ignore the rights of other ethnic minorities in Aotearoa. ...
"This is shocking, and astounding," says Augusta Macassey-Pickard, spokesperson for the group. "We knew that this process was rushed, and flawed, but this is another level of compromised." ...
This story about Tim Groser says it all too: http://www.stuff.co.nz/4785450a6160.html
Environmentalists that are not either.
Well, kiwis voted for change apparently – no surprise that the authors of New Zealand Sucks would have to cancel Buy New Zealand before introducing Sell New Zealand…..
“Ms Bradford questioned Mr Brownlee’s decision, and said that since it began the campaign had resulted in more people supporting local products.”
Really – if Sue can provide any evidence of this it would be interesting. I doubt there is any such evidence and the money would indeed be better spent elsewhere.
This is really really sad. I felt this campaign was just starting to gain some traction, many people I know were starting to look out for NZ made goods, taking pride in supporting the locals.
The sad part is the locally made brands that have since shut up shop and gone overseas: macpac, swandry, fisher & pykael etc. and now this government is axing buying kiwi made. What a kick in the guts for our local manufacturers.
This government really is opposed to everything kiwi.
I would expect that the choice of phrase used by SP was a deliberate misrepresentation given that the decision is to review not cancel:
The alternative is to simply support government spending without any consideration of the benefits.
Local manufacturers want more than a tv advertising campaign. Given where there are heading, some liberalisation of employment law would be one thing that could help but we all know what the response to that would be here.
How come you refer to it as the National/Act Government when the Maori Party and UF is in it too?
[lprent: Because I know that there is a strong congruence between the right wing of the Nats in cabinet and Act. That is likely to provide the political access of this government. The Maori Party IMO doesn’t have any real allies in the Nats cabinet except for a few National Maori MP’s, only one of whom has any real standing.
IF the MP manages to make a real impact (ie not just edge stuff like UF does), then I might change my opinion.]
HS: http://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/PA0812/S00047.htm
“On top of that, independent research carried out on the effectiveness of the Buy Kiwi Made campaign proves that consumer, retailer and manufacturer awareness and support are steadily increasing.
“The most recent evaluation, in November 2008, shows that 360,000 more shoppers think Kiwi-made than before the marketing programme began.
Would be interesting to see the actual research and how this was assessed – I would expect this to be part of the review as to how effective or not it has been.
I felt this campaign was just starting to gain some traction, many people I know were starting to look out for NZ made goods, taking pride in supporting the locals.
That’s the complete reverse of my perception. A quick survey of my colleagues – just as scientific as “many people I know” 🙂 – came to the opposite conclusion.
Those of us that already actively seek out NZ made goods where possible aren’t changing our spending patterns based on the ad, and those of us that have other priorities (price etc) we never going to change in the first place.
On both counts, that’s a failed campaign.
lukas,
I don’t recall you ever asking why the righties here used to refer to the previous govt as the “Clark-Peters” govt. although it too included two other parties.
I wonder why.
Felix, I always thought of it as having Jim and UF also.
The ‘Buy NZ made campaign’ could’ve been SSSOOOOOOO much better.
The expensive ads with Oliver as a robot do nothing.
All they need is a damn good website cataloging all the NZ made stuff & an option to buy online. Then a few cheaps TV-ads directing people to the site.
The current adds & website are flashy non-sense.
lukas, indeed it should be referred to as the 4 headed (5 if you include the co-leaders) monster that it is! Good point
Stupidest idea to get rid of Buy NZ made campaign… what the hell were they thinking?
“Stupidest idea to get rid of Buy NZ made campaign what the hell were they thinking?”
1) That its not the job of the government to promote one product over another. Its the job of the producers to promote their product.
2) If you really do believe in New Zealand bussinesses then stop spending money on silly ad campaigns and give them more liberalized employment laws (90 day bill etc). That way they can determine their own future.
“All they need is a damn good website cataloging all the NZ made stuff & an option to buy online. Then a few cheaps adds directing people to the site.”
That makes sense
Quite a good idea for a buynz.co.nz have a list of NZ retailers selling NZ only stuff. Would work quite well I’d imagine.
lukas its pretty obvious that the 2 main players in the current govt are Nat and Act who don’t actually need the other two parties and that the Maori Party were only added as a backstop to disempower Act should the tail start to wag the dog.
Also it gives Nat the opportunity to grab more Maori left leaning voters before the next election. Still at the end of the day its exactly what the were accusing the left of being……… “A multi headed monster” (my term, as the number of heads dosn’t matter – just the fact that they’re there)
“NACT” + others
I haven’t seen the ads so I can’t comment on the value of this specific campaign, but it’s surely worthwhile to keep promoting the general principle of buying NZ made goods.
Phil’s comment above reminds me of some of the misguided comments I read after the repeal of section 59 which were along the lines of “Oh look, a kid was killed today so clearly changing that law was a waste of time”.
We’re talking about attempts to shift attitudes over the long term, changes which are measured not in months and years, but decades and generations.
I like NX’s idea. Perhaps we should push for NX to be put in charge of this campaign? 😉
The ad campaign is bad for New Zealand. Its a shocking waste of tax payers money. Here’s why:
Econ101 – Consumers that choose to spend more to buy New Zealand made purely because its from New Zealand effectively provide a subsidy to the producer.(This is not the case if the purchase of the NZ made product is rational – ie its cheaper or better quality) These consumers are subsidising inefficient businesses (if they were efficient they wouldn’t need government funded ad campaigns), This decreases consumers disposable income so they have less to spend on efficient kiwi producers. New Zealand as a whole would be far better off if inefficient producers instead moved into efficient industries. This subsidy increases producer surplus but consumer surplus is decreased by more than that increase – hence this policy results in a dead weight loss – wasted money!
I’m with NX on the website idea, though I know I personally have started spending a lot more money in shops displaying the “Buy Kiwi and we’ve got it made” stickers/signs.
Love the classic sneak tactics – “we can’t commit more cash to this unless a review shows it to be effective” … with no actual statement that a review will, in fact, be carried out.
(Sure, one could read an implication that a review will be done, but then either Brownlee’s PR advisor or the NZPA should have said “forthcoming review” to ensure clarity of meaning. No, I’m not obsessed with semantics, why do you ask?)
Few reasons why I buy kiwi made (where possible):
-Local Economy. When I buy a kiwi made product that money is going to help keep locals employed.
-Ethics. The people making the goods are receiving a decent wage and working conditions.
-Quality. Generally the products are better quality and will last. They’re not going to wind up 6 months later in a landfill.
Sure :). And I accept the generous salary which probably goes with the job.
Telling people to simply ‘buy NZ made’ isn’t good enough.
Information is the key. TradeMe & eBay are great for finding exactly what you want.
There are some great NZ made safety gear – likes footwear etc. Half the problem is finding where to get the stuff. So a website to tie it all together would be great.
I would also widen the website’s scope to include products made with environmental considerations – irrespective of where they’re made.
‘Conscious consumerism’ is the future in my opinion. Where people can choose to spend their money on things that are important to them.
Information is the key. All going well we wouldn’t even need the ETS/carbon trading rubbish.
ak said on
December 8, 2008 at 10:33 am
“Well, kiwis voted for change apparently – no surprise that the authors of New Zealand Sucks would have to cancel Buy New Zealand before introducing Sell New Zealand ..”
I can’t better what you just said, so I’ve repeated your post.
Hope you don’t mind me using your words.
Come to think of it… they could have an ‘NZ made’ search option on TradeMe. The search could be refined for ‘new’ and ‘second hand’.
^ I’m sure that would be more helpful than the Oliver Robot.
Greg, being “efficient” is not the sole determinant of the worth of an enterprise. Many “inefficient” things (ie. the public service, Air NZ, manufacturing) are better retained locally — to do otherwise puts them at risk of insecurity/profiteering/asset stripping. Also, surely fair trade is better than “free” trade?
As it is, NZers are effectively “subsidising” profits to overseas corporations — to the tune of $5 billion (or more) per year:
Felix said on
December 8, 2008 at 11:58 am “We’re talking about attempts to shift attitudes over the long term, changes which are measured not in months and years, but decades and generations.”
That is what NZers never understood about the real legacy of the Labour plus Government.
That NZers had the energy and the independence and the confidence to complain about Labour is due in large part to Labour giving them their mana back.
The only problem with helping people is when they’re back on their feet, the last thing they want to be is forever beholden to the people who helped them. But Labour was concerned with investing in a country that could once again make its own product not be buying 3rd rate product in and losing export monies.
Daveski – I bet you hate that the Labour Government wouldn’t let employers pay Mexican wages to New Zealanders. No doubt you’ll be pleased to have the ‘NZ sucks’ National Party in. By the time N/act’s finished engineering the employment laws NZers will be leaving here to get better wages in Mexico.
Well Buy NZ hasn’t helped my biz one little bit and I have used NZ design, supply, manufacture, marketing, products, services, bloody NZ everything. Amounts to diddly squat when the cheque comes to be written. Maybe I am just too inefficient. Mind you my industry has no competition from overseas companies.
Any marketing campaign needs to have measurable results. While it sounds good for Bradford to claim 360,000 more shoppers think Kiwi-made than before, where is the proof that this is translating into dollars spent on Kiwi-made. And are the surveyed shoppers actually the target market for this campaign? Do you even know who the target market is? Low income earners? Beneficiaries? Or just ‘the rich’.
What NZ made goods are lower income earners meant to buy? Can they afford the generally higher cost of buying NZ made goods when the imported alternatives are so much cheaper and means they can still buy Christmas presents for their kids?
Do NZ made goods need to compete on price? If so are we prepared to have lower wages in order to make this possible?
If we aren’t expecting the low income earners to be part of the target market of this campaign then who is it, and what are the likely products they will buy that are NZ made?
Let’s see the business case for this campaign, and some real measurable outcomes. It seems to me that the millions of taxpayer dollars being spent on this campaign are misguided and wasteful.
Jum – you miss my point going for the dramatic riposte.
If you asked employers, I’ll bet you that the majority would suggest a raft of activities that would benefit business beyond a simple advertising campaign. No where did I infer a desire to lower wages.
My point is that an advertising campaign won’t be enough to stop manufacturers moving off shore.
Are things still actually being Made in NZ ? Besides food (& beverage) products, what else do we actually make in NZ ?
That NZers had the energy and the independence and the confidence to complain about Labour is due in large part to Labour giving them their mana back.
How dare that ungrateful middle class not vote for Labour after all we’ve done for you!
vidiot; houses
vidiot:
Backpacks, outdoor gear, plastic wear, clothing, bikes, furniture, jewelery, glassware, tools, software, tires, timber, wind farm turbines, boats, bedding etc.
Its out there if you look for it.
Kevin Rudd has told Australians to spend for the economy and to Buy Australian Made for the obvious benefits for Australian workers and the economy.
I notice my supermarket has labels on shelfs indicating NZ made products. I usually choose the NZ one if there is a choice.
Some brands I know of made in NZ:
-Cactus Climbing: good quality backpacks made in Christchurch
-Sistema: plastic containers
-Click-Clack: plastic containers, still local I think?
-Survival: merino thermal clothing
-CCC: Canterbury Canterbury Canterbury, used to make the old All Blacks jerseys until the rugby union sold them out to Adidas. Now makes socks and some clothing.Most stuff made at Christchurch factory, some is Chinese though.
-Rembrant: suit makers
-Chalky Digits: clothes
-Firestone: tires
Anyone want to expand? Im sure there’s more.
How does being NZ Made make something intrinsicly better?
Should we be buying NZ made TVs?
Cars?
Should we have import controls?
Why do we need govt to tell us to buy NZ made? Why can’t we do it ourselves? Why can’t manufacturers band together, and promote it themselves. This (Buy NZ Made regardless of price or quality) is simply corportate welfare and nationalism. Not sound economic policy.
I’ll buy NZ made if I like the product (I love supporting *good* local music, food, clothing etc) and it is well priced, not because its made in NZ, but because I want it.
“Greg
December 8, 2008 at 12:12 pm
The ad campaign is bad for New Zealand. Its a shocking waste of tax payers money. Here’s why:
Econ101 – Consumers that choose to spend more to buy New Zealand made purely because its from New Zealand effectively provide a subsidy to the producer.(This is not the case if the purchase of the NZ made product is rational – ie its cheaper or better quality) These consumers are subsidising inefficient businesses (if they were efficient they wouldn’t need government funded ad campaigns), This decreases consumers disposable income so they have less to spend on efficient kiwi producers. New Zealand as a whole would be far better off if inefficient producers instead moved into efficient industries. This subsidy increases producer surplus but consumer surplus is decreased by more than that increase – hence this policy results in a dead weight loss – wasted money!
”
And its bad for the environment as its an ineffecient use of scarce resources.
No wonder the Greens are all for it, being environmentalists and all!
PS: how on earth do I type a pound sign? Its in the captcha!
Any of you lefties got any evidence that this campaign has resulted in the purchase of single NZ made product that would not otherwise have been bought? Warning: if anyone replies using the word “awareness” I will personally hunt you down and knee you in your soft bits.
Billy – I went from buying NZ made goods about half or the time to buying them almost exclusively. Part of the reason I was able to do this was it raised awareness amongst retailer that NZ Made was a selling point and they actually started clearly labeling goods as such…
Oh and Billy – I don’t have soft bits. I’m 100% hard-ass.
Ha! Cap is “IV Pierson”! does Steve have a habit he’d rather not talk about…
MikeE,
Who says “Buy NZ Made regardless of price or quality”? Quote? Link? Or just paraphrasing your own arse?
Billy,
It’s all about awareness.
It was canceled because like a lot of the Green’s programmes it didn’t produce enough good results.
Also the concepts of the ads were wrong, it should of been buy NewZealand made because we produce the best at the best price, not just buy NewZealand made for the sake of it.
“It was canceled because like a lot of the Green’s programmes it didn’t produce enough good results.”
And National’s programmes produce better results?
Women do most of the shopping and women are discerning shoppers. Most women I know look for NZ made things because they are good quality and different eg kumfs and minnie cooper shoes (I’ve stopped buying Minx now they’re made in China). We are very conscious that Buy NZ made also means NZ jobs as well. Women are also label readers in supermarkets.
What really urks me is when you come across a NZ brand that has traded on being quality and locally made but has recently moved to Asia e.g. Macpac, Fairydown.
They try and tell you its exactly the same quality as you’re used to. Somehow I doubt a wage slave in China is going to make an equal quality product compared to a happy worker on a decent wage in NZ.
Buy NZ made only works as a campaign, if we are thinking about campaigning about the positive things about New Zealand as a whole.
The National party don’t particularly want to arouse nationalist sentiment that might be annoying when they introduce PPPs or saying yes to whatever Australia and the U.S. say.
The things that define us, or make us nationalistic: that have been our ‘brand’ if you will are not always things this government is comfortable with.
Our environmentalism (well and truly on the wane), being tidy repsonsible kiwis, our nuclear free and independent foreign policy, our multiculturual and inclusive society, the idea of giving someone a fair go, and indeed good faith and fairness in general, the idea of looking after people who can’t look after themselves and caring for others in need…
so many of these things are well in truly at odds with the National Party or they simply don’t care about them. How can they try and talk up a brand they don’t care that much about?
I just love how Janet seems to think she represents every female in New Zealand. In fact I’m always astounded when anyone here believe they represent the whole of New Zealand. I’m sorry you don’t.
The Buy NZ campaign was pretty dire I think. I didn’t really get it. Here was some ultra-technological factory building a robot that happened to be Oliver Driver who I find awful. New Zealand doesn’t exactly build many technological things that a consumer can easily buy at the shop. The campaign was a huge misstep and personally never made me more New Zealand products.
Thus I really am not concerned that the campaign was suspended.
Perhaps the National Party think that this is the kind of thing that the business community will provide out of its evident self interest? you know like banks and lending to people who are able to pay back and that kind of thing?
waiting with baited breathe.
It’s up to businesses to be self sustaining Paul, it would be a poor excuse for a business that relied on government funding to survive. Why should taxpayer money be spent on marketing costs for NZ businesses?
I am amused that a left wing blog is trying to defend this campaign. It’s very apparent that it’s only because it was Bradford’s project. If National had launched the campaign you would all be up in arms about it being a way for them to be lining the pockets of their business buddies.
leftrightout:
You should never buy a product just because it comes from your country.
You should buy the best product for the best price.
Where does the article you link to say that the Buy New Zealand campaign has been cancalled?
Pierson, your points would be taken far more seriously if they weren’t so well embellished with bullshit.
G
Brett,
“You should buy the best product for the best price.”
Yep, but all other things being equal, of course you should support local businesses. It keeps more money here for us and it uses less transportation which is better environmentally.
So Brett, my question is: If you have to choose between a foreign product and a local one of equal quality, how small does the price difference have to be before you’d pick the NZ product?
It sounds like you’re saying it’s zero, whereas I happily pay a few percent more to support local workers and local businesses. Why? Because I’m selfish. I want local businesses and local workers to be better off because then I’m better off in the long run.
Brett:
What motivates me to buy kiwi made is that my action of buying that product is resulting in jobs for kiwi’s, keeps profits in NZ and thats good for New Zealand. The last thing I want to see is us become a nation of retailers who just sell imported junk.
I can always buy the alternative, the cheap imported shit from China, after all its the best product at the best price. But then Id be supporting one of the biggest polluters in the world, bank-rolling what is effectively slave labour and undermining local kiwi’s.
Sometimes you’ve got to ask whats behind the price tag.
I wasn’t aware there was a Buy New Zealand campaign on…..
Chess Player
Considering chess players have to think 10 moves ahead, I’m thinking you meant to type that you were a ‘cheese maker’.
Waiting for maturity can take forever with cheese.
Regarding buying NZ Made, personally discern on two levels,
food always buy NZ made/grown products in the supermarket (unless there is not a local version available or more than 25% higher priced)*
Otherwise best value on everything else (though I avoid Norwegian, Japanese or any other whaling murdering bastard countries product)
* Does not apply to booze (though I only buy NZ wines) and chocolate
Re chocolate – there is a distinct flavour difference between NZ and Australian chocolate, even that under the Cadbury brand. I think it is something to do with the lush NZ grass NZ cows eat.
GC Of course I don’t claim to represent NZ women but I have a wide circle and we discuss topics such as this. In fact were talking about this with a group just yesterday and we all agreed that we take care to buy NZ made. We don’t automatically buy Fisher and Paykel any more – in fact some actively boycott it after the NZ factory closures.
Heaven forbid that I would agree on anything with women like Judith Collins.
As a friend of mine pointed out, Labour in 1935 brought in the ethos of the Welfare State to give all New Zealanders help when they needed it. The National Party was transmogrified from the ashes of the ruling elite in 1936 to get rid of the Labour Party’s plan to be there for all NZers.
Now, I always read the rightie posts with that thought in mind.
The Left considers how they can help local business (YES, even the very businesses which would shaft them with the 90day probation period).
The Right only ever think of themselves.
This election was never about a change of face. It was about the destruction of a unifying philosophy, in order to allow for a foreign takeover bid, using divide and conquer tactics.
Consumers always will buy the best product at the best price. Putting Oliver Driver on TV telling us to pay more for a sub-standard product just because it will help the bloke down the road was never going to convince anyone at the till.
though I only buy NZ wines
Now there is a local industry worth celebrating!
woo!
I happily pay a few percent more to support local workers and local businesses. Why? Because I’m selfish. I want local businesses and local workers to be better off because then I’m better off in the long run.
What if your “better off” comes at the expense of the chinese labourer that used to make shoes, and now gets nothing?
What do you see as a bigger loss of income: the guy that goes from NZ minium wage to the unemployment benefit OR the guy in China going from a few cents a day to nothing at all?
Janet
Totally agree.
If only women realised that, as the major buyer or influence on buying decisions, their power is huge. If they ever decide to form a lobby group country-wide they could easily bring a company down, whatever its size.
The said company had better hope the lobby group consists of left-leaning (as I stated at 5.37) women who won’t want to damage the company or its workers!
Putting aside the obvious*, I’ve always wondered about the philosophical basis for these “buy NZ made” campaigns.
Are we saying that we should be more worried about the plight of NZers over the plight of Chinese people? Why should we care that plastic stuff comes out of China, and each time you buy plastic stuff from China the per capita GDP there gets a little bit closer to ours (but still miles behind)?
Do we care about human welfare, but only if it’s humans within our borders…?
* How can anyone complain about actually checking to see whether “Buy New Zealand made” is value for money? If I hire someone to clean my windows, I need to check that they’ve done a decent job before I decide to hire them again. I’d be a moron if, instead of checking the windows in front of me, I spent hours debating whether window-cleaners are a good idea in principle… National is absolutely within its rights to review the previous government’s expenditure and find out whether the money might be better spent on something else. That’s the job we pay them to do.
Chess Player is the only person who used “awareness” who does not get a knee in the groin.
The captcha included my reasonably uncommon surname. Too spooky when added to the “Pierson” thing in ‘sod’s.
Jum
Women have organised themselves into a consumer lobby before. CARP – campaign against rising prices – was very effective in the 1960s/1970s. I think Cath Kelly, mother of the CTU’s Helen Kelly, was one of the main activists.
I think (memory hazy here) that the 3rd Labour govt’s maximum retail price (Warren Freer’s MRP campaign) was one of the results. Regulations to limit prices of consumer goods. Now wouldn’t that be a good idea again! That would shock the righties above.
Re Jimbo
December 8, 2008 at 5:54 pm
I’m intrigued and suspicious. If National is so concerned about value for money re Buy NZ Made, why didn’t they check earlier and bleat then.
I guess they knew it would have made them sound like they didn’t care about small NZ business and workers pre-electionand now of course they can bleat about this and cover up on the nasty little sidelines they are pursuing, with forcing unemployment up through businesses falling over, if less attention goes on Buy NZ Made and thereby creating their dreamed of weak, desperate labour force.
NZers ‘are’ still so comfortable under the inclusive previous Government they don’t believe ‘nouveauNational’ can hurt their future. I know better.
“Buy kiwi made” was an 8 million dollar accommodation for the greens, a complete waste of money and more proof (if you needed it) of the left’s myth that throwing large amounts of cash at something will fix it. Good riddance
Buy NZ Made is a member based organisation funded by members, the Government campaign is the Buy Kiwi Made Campaign.
Buy NZ Made won 50% funding from one of the Buy Kiwi Made Campaign’s funding rounds to build a website to advertise New Zealand Made goods and to connect manufacturers, retailers and consumers with them.
This website has been up and running since September the 1st and has been advertised on web and in magazines. It has also been mentioned in the latest Buy Kiwi Made radio advertisements.
So for those of you who were wishing for a website which catalogues NZ Made goods .. your wish is granted. The website currently shows over 2000 products which is not bad for such a new site. This site is lilkely to grow considerably over the next few months.
Go to http://www.getnzmade.net
Trina
Thanks for the correction.
Madeleine
December 8, 2008 at 5:39 pm
So you are telling me that NZ made/Kiwi made is sub-standard product?
Trina – would you care to comment on this.
Trina
Thanks for that link. That’s just the sort of website I would use when looking for specific items for the house or presents etc.
@Tim: Riiight.
Heh I had you in the grip of angry reason and then lost it all with the quote tags.
basically, mate, you are an idealogue of the worst sort. I understand the sentiment. I even appreciate that we can’t run on subsidies, and if we are doing that for profitable industries it is completely wrong.
However we don’t live in a free trade society. If you are consistent and not just an idiot troll I expect to see you supporting business taking the full cost of their carbon pollution as soon as possible.
sorry? Was that taxpayer money should not be spent subsidising business unless it is a large amount?
Realisitically in a small country government has a role to play in helping business in this way. If the National party were really nationalists, they would be doing that, instead of searching for ways to reduce costs for their chums in international cartels.
“So you are telling me that NZ made/Kiwi made is sub-standard product?’
Actually, thats what this entire campaign is doing. To me, the government steping in to promote a product suggests that the product is not good enough to be sold on its own merits and that it needs to be protected or it will not be able to compete with others.
Some people in this thread refer to a ‘New Zealand sucks’ campaign. Well clearly if they think that New Zealand products should be protected through this campaign or other measures then they are the ones who think that New Zealand products suck.
Nope. Just pissing on a dead man’s legacy.
RIP Rod Donald.
“ropata
December 8, 2008 at 12:39 pm
Greg, being “efficient’ is not the sole determinant of the worth of an enterprise. Many “inefficient’ things (ie. the public service, Air NZ, manufacturing) are better retained locally — to do otherwise puts them at risk of insecurity/profiteering/asset stripping. Also, surely fair trade is better than “free’ trade?
As it is, NZers are effectively “subsidising’ profits to overseas corporations — to the tune of $5 billion (or more) per year:
Transnational corporations (TNCs) make massive profits out of New Zealand. These can truly be called New Zealand’s biggest invisible export. In the decade 1997-2006, TNCs made $50.3 billion profits. Only 32% was reinvested, and in some years more was sent overseas than was earned or the reinvestment was significantly offset by capital being taken out of the country.”
Ropata – you’ve just stumbled upon the economic concept of comparative advantage. Of course transnational corporations make profits out of New Zealand. But we make a hell of a lot off our exports too. You can’t have one but not the other. Are you suggesting we cut off all trade? Comparative advantage is gained when when each country specialises in what they’re best at and trade (well there’s more to it then that but we’ll leave it there). That way each country makes the most effective use of its own resources. Protectionist measures like the ‘buy NZ made ad campaign inhibit this and its makes NZ and the rest of the world worst off.
On your other points. Air NZ and manufacturing are classic examples of industries that should not be propped up by the government. In Air NZ’s case competitors like pacific blue, quantas etc etc will keep them honest whether they’re owned by NZ or China. Manufacturing is a part of the buy NZ made answer. We should only keep manufacturing goods that we can produce efficiently. Thats why we don’t have a car industry. Its much cheaper for us to import – look to the states to see how a subsidised car industry is further crippling their economy. In the Public service efficiency results in the best result anyway – we want the services provided by the public service to cost as little as possible so we can have lower taxes and more money to spend!
I get pretty passionate about this ‘fair trade’ thing. I too want save the starving in africa. But did you know trade barriers cost the third world a hell of a lot more than the amount of aid we give them. The facts are there – google it (I can’t be bothered, its late). ‘Unfair trade’ is far far far better than no trade at all. The fact is – countries who engage in trade even if its from sweatshops improve over time – look at Japan. Buying their ‘cheap and nasty’ products is the best help we can give them.
Paul – “However we don’t live in a free trade society. If you are consistent and not just an idiot troll I expect to see you supporting business taking the full cost of their carbon pollution as soon as possible.”
Yeah sure. But a couple of points. Business won’t take the brunt of the cost, it will be passed onto the consumer – lets not forget that. Also that means some businesses get carbon credits too right, if their net emissions are negative?
Greg.
I believe this is how it has to work. The cost of carbon will be a long term cost. It will not go away. We have to be prepared to pay more, and the businesses which can become the most efficient and therefore offer cheaper prices are rewarded.
This market system is something isn’t it?
This is what the Greens have been arguing for a long time.
If our business adapts like other businesses internationally, (and I’m not completely clued in on the ins and outs of a carbon trading market) yes! it would be fantastic if we could get carbon credits for nett emissions. I know some companies particularly airlines offer carbon offset options or the like where they buy or invest in tracts of forestry.
I don’t see what the problem is with this. If we don’t we are passing the bill on to our children and grandchildren, rather than attempting to recognise and deal with the problem. I also realise it is a joke to blame National solely for this. Almost everyone in NZ is complicit in inaction for too long.
Anyway that’s the theory. I did study a small bit of biology and economics, but never got near farm accounts or forrestry work.
I’m not sure if negative net emissions equals credits under the currently proposed and soon to be rehacked scheme. Anyone know?
Greg,
one other thing mate:
I’m sure all those U.S. military Korean war contracts were helpful too, to help keep the munitions and arms factories running and turn them into car manufacturers and the like.
We should buy New Zealand for the same reason everyone else does overseas, it is a niche quality fashionable brand, and we are a unique part of it. As I mentioned above, it is hardly the most of protectionist measures out there, if it really is truly one at all.
The government is just involved in a campaign like the Woolmark or the beef and lamb campaign, but what they are selling is the quality of our country overall, which suprisingly I would say they have a stake in.
Efficiency and market clearing is a laudable goal. But your argument goes beyond economics into sovereignty. Everything can be done more efficiently. But more efficiently for whom? Without Air New Zealand there might be more efficient air travel,, but it is in New Zealand’s public good to have a national carrier who supports our tourism industry.
Manfacturing can be different, but it is sometimes very difficult to compete marketing a smaller product against mass produced brands dumped in large chain stores. Hence a little support with the marketing, and the promotion of quality behind a Made in NZ sticker.
cheers.
Phil,
“What if your “better off’ comes at the expense of the chinese labourer that used to make shoes, and now gets nothing?”
Didn’t I explain that I’m selfish? Anyway…
The Chinese labourers you mention have very little protection. They don’t have the workplace rights that our unions have fought hard for and won.
It’s a bit disingenuous of you to imply that you’re supporting Chinese labourers by buying goods made in China – you’re supporting their exploitation. Massive profits are made off their labour by denying them proper work rights and that’s what you’re supporting.
I prefer to support the rights of workers by buying products made by workers who have rights.
My understanding, and correct me if I’m wrong, but Ive heard that for IceBreaker its so cheap to manufacture in China that they can produce the merino wool here, ship it to China to be made into clothes, and have it shipped back again.
Now how are local manufacturers supposed to compete against that without support from the government?
leftrightout,
Why, by lowering our workplace standards to be closer to those of China of course. I heard Roger Douglas on the radio just the other week praising the “efficiency” of Chinese industry.
Just pissing on a dead man’s legacy.
Rod Donald’s legacy is a bunch of ads that make Oliver Driver appear stupider thatn he already is and make fat ad exec’s rich? That’s unspeakably sad. I thought he’d done lots of good stuff.
Felix, yes “efficiency”, just like how the public service is about to become more “efficient”…
@Paul
“basically, mate, you are an idealogue of the worst sort. I understand the sentiment. I even appreciate that we can’t run on subsidies, and if we are doing that for profitable industries it is completely wrong.”
Are you suggesting we should subsidise unprofitable industries? I’m all for helping kiwi businesses get up and running and I reckon $6.3 million would be very helpful if it was applied the right way. I had a small business myself about 5 years ago and would have loved the government to be more helpful rather than making me jump through bureaucratic hurdles. In the end I had to lay off 5 staff and find a job.
On the topic of this post, it is sensible to review any campaign to see whether it is delivering results, rather than just keep chucking money at ad agencies. There are probably some parts of the campaign that will be kept after review, such as the getnzmade.net website (which I don’t recall seeing anything about on the TV ad by the way), but the point is that reviewing the campaign is the right thing to do.
Regarding your insults, I’ll be up here on the high road mate.
Paul – on your first post, I agree. On the second, not so much:
“‘im sure all those U.S. military Korean war contracts were helpful too, to help keep the munitions and arms factories running and turn them into car manufacturers and the like.
We should buy New Zealand for the same reason everyone else does overseas, it is a niche quality fashionable brand, and we are a unique part of it. As I mentioned above, it is hardly the most of protectionist measures out there, if it really is truly one at all.
The government is just involved in a campaign like the Woolmark or the beef and lamb campaign, but what they are selling is the quality of our country overall, which suprisingly I would say they have a stake in.
Efficiency and market clearing is a laudable goal. But your argument goes beyond economics into sovereignty. Everything can be done more efficiently. But more efficiently for whom? Without Air New Zealand there might be more efficient air travel,, but it is in New Zealand’s public good to have a national carrier who supports our tourism industry.
Manfacturing can be different, but it is sometimes very difficult to compete marketing a smaller product against mass produced brands dumped in large chain stores. Hence a little support with the marketing, and the promotion of quality behind a Made in NZ sticker.”
Yeah Japan did benefit from foreign investment. Something that will happen to all third world countries as their economies improve and the risk lessens. If they can get themselves off the ground first. Why should the government sell New Zealand to New Zealanders? There may be an argument for doing this overseas but preaching to the converted is a bit silly isn’t it? And why does an air carrier have to be public owned to support our tourism industry? Surely its in any air carriers commercial interests to promote tourism. Its more benefit for them!
If your going to try and compete directly with a mass produced brand it is going to be hard. Because they’re more efficient at producing it. I’ve got no problems with making the conscious decision to buy kiwi made on the basis of quality – but what I’m saying is that if you’ve got two identical goods and one is more expensive because its kiwi made. The only people that will benefit from you purchasing the kiwi one is the producer of that good. Everyone else loses.
Felix – “The Chinese labourers you mention have very little protection. They don’t have the workplace rights that our unions have fought hard for and won.
It’s a bit disingenuous of you to imply that you’re supporting Chinese labourers by buying goods made in China – you’re supporting their exploitation. Massive profits are made off their labour by denying them proper work rights and that’s what you’re supporting.
I prefer to support the rights of workers by buying products made by workers who have rights.”
Again, this kind of statement really gets under my skin. Your supporting Chinease workers by not buying their goods. How the hell is that meant to make them better off? They’ve gone from a crap job to no job. A crap job being a hell of a lot better than no job at all.
@Tim
No I’m suggesting that subsidies are not necessarily a good thing, especially as we used to have them for our most productive sectors. I notice you had no reply to why the taxpayer should be bailing out industries on Kyoto agreements. If it walks like a fish mate, irrespective of what road it’s walking on.
@Greg
I don’t know if being occupied by the U.S. after the second world war, and getting a kickstart from large military contracts, is quite the same practically and morally as buying coffee or small local industries from developing countries.
If the government doesn’t sell the New Zealand brand who will? The media relentlessly paint us disproportionantly as a country over run by crime. I remember the irony of the 90s when the only companies to use patriotism in their advertising were overseas countries- Toyota ‘welcome to our world’ and Barry Crump, McDonalds and the Kiwiburger…there are 2 or 3 other examples but I can’t think of them just at the moment.
The point with mass production is not, I don’t think, efficiency leading to the best use of scarce resources. It is that a large company can get a strong advantage in marketing its products, and getting exclusive or very favourable distribution deals, which make competing for small manufacturers (and retailers for that matter) very difficult. Not particularly perfect market stuff.
Well if one is made in New Zealand and one is made elsewhere it isn’t identical is it? There are all kinds of reasons why people choose a particular brand. Could be the safety standards of a country, where their sister lives, their human rights record, their favourite sports team, passing fads…
I understand the argument you are making, but especially in times of economic hardship, I think you will be hard pressed to find any practical examples of it in action internationally. As I said we don’t live in a free trade world, and we have to be careful with the baby and bathtub. Which is my way of saying, brain hurt, have to go work. cheers.
“Any marketing campaign needs to have measurable results. While it sounds good for Bradford to claim 360,000 more shoppers think Kiwi-made than before, where is the proof that this is translating into dollars spent on Kiwi-made. And are the surveyed shoppers actually the target market for this campaign? Do you even know who the target market is? Low income earners? Beneficiaries? Or just ‘the rich’.
What NZ made goods are lower income earners meant to buy? Can they afford the generally higher cost of buying NZ made goods when the imported alternatives are so much cheaper and means they can still buy Christmas presents for their kids?
Do NZ made goods need to compete on price? If so are we prepared to have lower wages in order to make this possible?
If we aren’t expecting the low income earners to be part of the target market of this campaign then who is it, and what are the likely products they will buy that are NZ made?
Let’s see the business case for this campaign, and some real measurable outcomes. It seems to me that the millions of taxpayer dollars being spent on this campaign are misguided and wasteful.”
The only thing you know about marketing it seems is how to spell it!!!!!
“The ad campaign is bad for New Zealand. Its a shocking waste of tax payers money. Here’s why:
Econ101 – Consumers that choose to spend more to buy New Zealand made purely because its from New Zealand effectively provide a subsidy to the producer.(This is not the case if the purchase of the NZ made product is rational – ie its cheaper or better quality) These consumers are subsidising inefficient businesses (if they were efficient they wouldn’t need government funded ad campaigns), This decreases consumers disposable income so they have less to spend on efficient kiwi producers. New Zealand as a whole would be far better off if inefficient producers instead moved into efficient industries. This subsidy increases producer surplus but consumer surplus is decreased by more than that increase – hence this policy results in a dead weight loss – wasted money!”
More like this comment is a wasted amount of internet space!!!! What a load of crap
“If your going to try and compete directly with a mass produced brand it is going to be hard. Because they’re more efficient at producing it. I’ve got no problems with making the conscious decision to buy kiwi made on the basis of quality – but what I’m saying is that if you’ve got two identical goods and one is more expensive because its kiwi made. The only people that will benefit from you purchasing the kiwi one is the producer of that good. Everyone else loses”
That is NOT what the campaign is all about agghhhh, and this just shows how agghhhh you are in the subject of marketing, in fact, business, agghhhh
“If your going to try and compete directly with a mass produced brand it is going to be hard. Because they’re more efficient at producing it. I’ve got no problems with making the conscious decision to buy kiwi made on the basis of quality – but what I’m saying is that if you’ve got two identical goods and one is more expensive because its kiwi made. The only people that will benefit from you purchasing the kiwi one is the producer of that good. Everyone else loses.”
Proves my point, you know fuck all about marketing
Just remember that those adverts and posters and what not is a very very small part of marketing. It is not the whole marketing concept, it is a piss ant in comparrison so you cant judge a marketing campagin from some dumb arse picture or advert. There is a hell of a lot to marketing than advertising!!!