Well, kiwis voted for change apparently – no surprise that the authors of New Zealand Sucks would have to cancel Buy New Zealand before introducing Sell New Zealand…..
“Ms Bradford questioned Mr Brownlee’s decision, and said that since it began the campaign had resulted in more people supporting local products.”
Really – if Sue can provide any evidence of this it would be interesting. I doubt there is any such evidence and the money would indeed be better spent elsewhere.
This is really really sad. I felt this campaign was just starting to gain some traction, many people I know were starting to look out for NZ made goods, taking pride in supporting the locals.
The sad part is the locally made brands that have since shut up shop and gone overseas: macpac, swandry, fisher & pykael etc. and now this government is axing buying kiwi made. What a kick in the guts for our local manufacturers.
This government really is opposed to everything kiwi.
I would expect that the choice of phrase used by SP was a deliberate misrepresentation given that the decision is to review not cancel:
Minister of Economic Development Gerry Brownlee said yesterday that no more money would be committed to the campaign, unless a review showed it to be effective.
The alternative is to simply support government spending without any consideration of the benefits.
Local manufacturers want more than a tv advertising campaign. Given where there are heading, some liberalisation of employment law would be one thing that could help but we all know what the response to that would be here.
How come you refer to it as the National/Act Government when the Maori Party and UF is in it too?
[lprent: Because I know that there is a strong congruence between the right wing of the Nats in cabinet and Act. That is likely to provide the political access of this government. The Maori Party IMO doesn’t have any real allies in the Nats cabinet except for a few National Maori MP’s, only one of whom has any real standing.
IF the MP manages to make a real impact (ie not just edge stuff like UF does), then I might change my opinion.]
“On top of that, independent research carried out on the effectiveness of the Buy Kiwi Made campaign proves that consumer, retailer and manufacturer awareness and support are steadily increasing.
“The most recent evaluation, in November 2008, shows that 360,000 more shoppers think Kiwi-made than before the marketing programme began.
Would be interesting to see the actual research and how this was assessed – I would expect this to be part of the review as to how effective or not it has been.
I felt this campaign was just starting to gain some traction, many people I know were starting to look out for NZ made goods, taking pride in supporting the locals.
That’s the complete reverse of my perception. A quick survey of my colleagues – just as scientific as “many people I know” 🙂 – came to the opposite conclusion.
Those of us that already actively seek out NZ made goods where possible aren’t changing our spending patterns based on the ad, and those of us that have other priorities (price etc) we never going to change in the first place.
I don’t recall you ever asking why the righties here used to refer to the previous govt as the “Clark-Peters” govt. although it too included two other parties.
The ‘Buy NZ made campaign’ could’ve been SSSOOOOOOO much better.
The expensive ads with Oliver as a robot do nothing.
All they need is a damn good website cataloging all the NZ made stuff & an option to buy online. Then a few cheaps TV-ads directing people to the site.
“Stupidest idea to get rid of Buy NZ made campaign what the hell were they thinking?”
1) That its not the job of the government to promote one product over another. Its the job of the producers to promote their product.
2) If you really do believe in New Zealand bussinesses then stop spending money on silly ad campaigns and give them more liberalized employment laws (90 day bill etc). That way they can determine their own future.
“All they need is a damn good website cataloging all the NZ made stuff & an option to buy online. Then a few cheaps adds directing people to the site.”
lukas its pretty obvious that the 2 main players in the current govt are Nat and Act who don’t actually need the other two parties and that the Maori Party were only added as a backstop to disempower Act should the tail start to wag the dog.
Also it gives Nat the opportunity to grab more Maori left leaning voters before the next election. Still at the end of the day its exactly what the were accusing the left of being……… “A multi headed monster” (my term, as the number of heads dosn’t matter – just the fact that they’re there)
I haven’t seen the ads so I can’t comment on the value of this specific campaign, but it’s surely worthwhile to keep promoting the general principle of buying NZ made goods.
Phil’s comment above reminds me of some of the misguided comments I read after the repeal of section 59 which were along the lines of “Oh look, a kid was killed today so clearly changing that law was a waste of time”.
We’re talking about attempts to shift attitudes over the long term, changes which are measured not in months and years, but decades and generations.
The ad campaign is bad for New Zealand. Its a shocking waste of tax payers money. Here’s why:
Econ101 – Consumers that choose to spend more to buy New Zealand made purely because its from New Zealand effectively provide a subsidy to the producer.(This is not the case if the purchase of the NZ made product is rational – ie its cheaper or better quality) These consumers are subsidising inefficient businesses (if they were efficient they wouldn’t need government funded ad campaigns), This decreases consumers disposable income so they have less to spend on efficient kiwi producers. New Zealand as a whole would be far better off if inefficient producers instead moved into efficient industries. This subsidy increases producer surplus but consumer surplus is decreased by more than that increase – hence this policy results in a dead weight loss – wasted money!
I’m with NX on the website idea, though I know I personally have started spending a lot more money in shops displaying the “Buy Kiwi and we’ve got it made” stickers/signs.
Love the classic sneak tactics – “we can’t commit more cash to this unless a review shows it to be effective” … with no actual statement that a review will, in fact, be carried out.
(Sure, one could read an implication that a review will be done, but then either Brownlee’s PR advisor or the NZPA should have said “forthcoming review” to ensure clarity of meaning. No, I’m not obsessed with semantics, why do you ask?)
I like NX’s idea. Perhaps we should push for NX to be put in charge of this campaign?
Sure :). And I accept the generous salary which probably goes with the job.
Telling people to simply ‘buy NZ made’ isn’t good enough.
Information is the key. TradeMe & eBay are great for finding exactly what you want.
There are some great NZ made safety gear – likes footwear etc. Half the problem is finding where to get the stuff. So a website to tie it all together would be great.
I would also widen the website’s scope to include products made with environmental considerations – irrespective of where they’re made.
‘Conscious consumerism’ is the future in my opinion. Where people can choose to spend their money on things that are important to them.
Information is the key. All going well we wouldn’t even need the ETS/carbon trading rubbish.
“Well, kiwis voted for change apparently – no surprise that the authors of New Zealand Sucks would have to cancel Buy New Zealand before introducing Sell New Zealand ..”
I can’t better what you just said, so I’ve repeated your post.
Greg, being “efficient” is not the sole determinant of the worth of an enterprise. Many “inefficient” things (ie. the public service, Air NZ, manufacturing) are better retained locally — to do otherwise puts them at risk of insecurity/profiteering/asset stripping. Also, surely fair trade is better than “free” trade?
As it is, NZers are effectively “subsidising” profits to overseas corporations — to the tune of $5 billion (or more) per year:
Transnational corporations (TNCs) make massive profits out of New Zealand. These can truly be called New Zealand’s biggest invisible export. In the decade 1997-2006, TNCs made $50.3 billion profits. Only 32% was reinvested, and in some years more was sent overseas than was earned or the reinvestment was significantly offset by capital being taken out of the country.
Felix said on
December 8, 2008 at 11:58 am “We’re talking about attempts to shift attitudes over the long term, changes which are measured not in months and years, but decades and generations.”
That is what NZers never understood about the real legacy of the Labour plus Government.
That NZers had the energy and the independence and the confidence to complain about Labour is due in large part to Labour giving them their mana back.
The only problem with helping people is when they’re back on their feet, the last thing they want to be is forever beholden to the people who helped them. But Labour was concerned with investing in a country that could once again make its own product not be buying 3rd rate product in and losing export monies.
Daveski – I bet you hate that the Labour Government wouldn’t let employers pay Mexican wages to New Zealanders. No doubt you’ll be pleased to have the ‘NZ sucks’ National Party in. By the time N/act’s finished engineering the employment laws NZers will be leaving here to get better wages in Mexico.
Well Buy NZ hasn’t helped my biz one little bit and I have used NZ design, supply, manufacture, marketing, products, services, bloody NZ everything. Amounts to diddly squat when the cheque comes to be written. Maybe I am just too inefficient. Mind you my industry has no competition from overseas companies.
Any marketing campaign needs to have measurable results. While it sounds good for Bradford to claim 360,000 more shoppers think Kiwi-made than before, where is the proof that this is translating into dollars spent on Kiwi-made. And are the surveyed shoppers actually the target market for this campaign? Do you even know who the target market is? Low income earners? Beneficiaries? Or just ‘the rich’.
What NZ made goods are lower income earners meant to buy? Can they afford the generally higher cost of buying NZ made goods when the imported alternatives are so much cheaper and means they can still buy Christmas presents for their kids?
Do NZ made goods need to compete on price? If so are we prepared to have lower wages in order to make this possible?
If we aren’t expecting the low income earners to be part of the target market of this campaign then who is it, and what are the likely products they will buy that are NZ made?
Let’s see the business case for this campaign, and some real measurable outcomes. It seems to me that the millions of taxpayer dollars being spent on this campaign are misguided and wasteful.
Jum – you miss my point going for the dramatic riposte.
If you asked employers, I’ll bet you that the majority would suggest a raft of activities that would benefit business beyond a simple advertising campaign. No where did I infer a desire to lower wages.
My point is that an advertising campaign won’t be enough to stop manufacturers moving off shore.
-Cactus Climbing: good quality backpacks made in Christchurch
-Sistema: plastic containers
-Click-Clack: plastic containers, still local I think?
-Survival: merino thermal clothing
-CCC: Canterbury Canterbury Canterbury, used to make the old All Blacks jerseys until the rugby union sold them out to Adidas. Now makes socks and some clothing.Most stuff made at Christchurch factory, some is Chinese though.
-Rembrant: suit makers
-Chalky Digits: clothes
-Firestone: tires
How does being NZ Made make something intrinsicly better?
Should we be buying NZ made TVs?
Cars?
Should we have import controls?
Why do we need govt to tell us to buy NZ made? Why can’t we do it ourselves? Why can’t manufacturers band together, and promote it themselves. This (Buy NZ Made regardless of price or quality) is simply corportate welfare and nationalism. Not sound economic policy.
I’ll buy NZ made if I like the product (I love supporting *good* local music, food, clothing etc) and it is well priced, not because its made in NZ, but because I want it.
The ad campaign is bad for New Zealand. Its a shocking waste of tax payers money. Here’s why:
Econ101 – Consumers that choose to spend more to buy New Zealand made purely because its from New Zealand effectively provide a subsidy to the producer.(This is not the case if the purchase of the NZ made product is rational – ie its cheaper or better quality) These consumers are subsidising inefficient businesses (if they were efficient they wouldn’t need government funded ad campaigns), This decreases consumers disposable income so they have less to spend on efficient kiwi producers. New Zealand as a whole would be far better off if inefficient producers instead moved into efficient industries. This subsidy increases producer surplus but consumer surplus is decreased by more than that increase – hence this policy results in a dead weight loss – wasted money!
”
And its bad for the environment as its an ineffecient use of scarce resources.
No wonder the Greens are all for it, being environmentalists and all!
PS: how on earth do I type a pound sign? Its in the captcha!
Any of you lefties got any evidence that this campaign has resulted in the purchase of single NZ made product that would not otherwise have been bought? Warning: if anyone replies using the word “awareness” I will personally hunt you down and knee you in your soft bits.
Billy – I went from buying NZ made goods about half or the time to buying them almost exclusively. Part of the reason I was able to do this was it raised awareness amongst retailer that NZ Made was a selling point and they actually started clearly labeling goods as such…
Oh and Billy – I don’t have soft bits. I’m 100% hard-ass.
Ha! Cap is “IV Pierson”! does Steve have a habit he’d rather not talk about…
It was canceled because like a lot of the Green’s programmes it didn’t produce enough good results.
Also the concepts of the ads were wrong, it should of been buy NewZealand made because we produce the best at the best price, not just buy NewZealand made for the sake of it.
Women do most of the shopping and women are discerning shoppers. Most women I know look for NZ made things because they are good quality and different eg kumfs and minnie cooper shoes (I’ve stopped buying Minx now they’re made in China). We are very conscious that Buy NZ made also means NZ jobs as well. Women are also label readers in supermarkets.
What really urks me is when you come across a NZ brand that has traded on being quality and locally made but has recently moved to Asia e.g. Macpac, Fairydown.
They try and tell you its exactly the same quality as you’re used to. Somehow I doubt a wage slave in China is going to make an equal quality product compared to a happy worker on a decent wage in NZ.
Buy NZ made only works as a campaign, if we are thinking about campaigning about the positive things about New Zealand as a whole.
The National party don’t particularly want to arouse nationalist sentiment that might be annoying when they introduce PPPs or saying yes to whatever Australia and the U.S. say.
The things that define us, or make us nationalistic: that have been our ‘brand’ if you will are not always things this government is comfortable with.
Our environmentalism (well and truly on the wane), being tidy repsonsible kiwis, our nuclear free and independent foreign policy, our multiculturual and inclusive society, the idea of giving someone a fair go, and indeed good faith and fairness in general, the idea of looking after people who can’t look after themselves and caring for others in need…
so many of these things are well in truly at odds with the National Party or they simply don’t care about them. How can they try and talk up a brand they don’t care that much about?
I just love how Janet seems to think she represents every female in New Zealand. In fact I’m always astounded when anyone here believe they represent the whole of New Zealand. I’m sorry you don’t.
The Buy NZ campaign was pretty dire I think. I didn’t really get it. Here was some ultra-technological factory building a robot that happened to be Oliver Driver who I find awful. New Zealand doesn’t exactly build many technological things that a consumer can easily buy at the shop. The campaign was a huge misstep and personally never made me more New Zealand products.
Thus I really am not concerned that the campaign was suspended.
Perhaps the National Party think that this is the kind of thing that the business community will provide out of its evident self interest? you know like banks and lending to people who are able to pay back and that kind of thing?
It’s up to businesses to be self sustaining Paul, it would be a poor excuse for a business that relied on government funding to survive. Why should taxpayer money be spent on marketing costs for NZ businesses?
I am amused that a left wing blog is trying to defend this campaign. It’s very apparent that it’s only because it was Bradford’s project. If National had launched the campaign you would all be up in arms about it being a way for them to be lining the pockets of their business buddies.
“You should buy the best product for the best price.”
Yep, but all other things being equal, of course you should support local businesses. It keeps more money here for us and it uses less transportation which is better environmentally.
So Brett, my question is: If you have to choose between a foreign product and a local one of equal quality, how small does the price difference have to be before you’d pick the NZ product?
It sounds like you’re saying it’s zero, whereas I happily pay a few percent more to support local workers and local businesses. Why? Because I’m selfish. I want local businesses and local workers to be better off because then I’m better off in the long run.
What motivates me to buy kiwi made is that my action of buying that product is resulting in jobs for kiwi’s, keeps profits in NZ and thats good for New Zealand. The last thing I want to see is us become a nation of retailers who just sell imported junk.
I can always buy the alternative, the cheap imported shit from China, after all its the best product at the best price. But then Id be supporting one of the biggest polluters in the world, bank-rolling what is effectively slave labour and undermining local kiwi’s.
Sometimes you’ve got to ask whats behind the price tag.
Re chocolate – there is a distinct flavour difference between NZ and Australian chocolate, even that under the Cadbury brand. I think it is something to do with the lush NZ grass NZ cows eat.
GC Of course I don’t claim to represent NZ women but I have a wide circle and we discuss topics such as this. In fact were talking about this with a group just yesterday and we all agreed that we take care to buy NZ made. We don’t automatically buy Fisher and Paykel any more – in fact some actively boycott it after the NZ factory closures.
Heaven forbid that I would agree on anything with women like Judith Collins.
As a friend of mine pointed out, Labour in 1935 brought in the ethos of the Welfare State to give all New Zealanders help when they needed it. The National Party was transmogrified from the ashes of the ruling elite in 1936 to get rid of the Labour Party’s plan to be there for all NZers.
Now, I always read the rightie posts with that thought in mind.
The Left considers how they can help local business (YES, even the very businesses which would shaft them with the 90day probation period).
The Right only ever think of themselves.
This election was never about a change of face. It was about the destruction of a unifying philosophy, in order to allow for a foreign takeover bid, using divide and conquer tactics.
Consumers always will buy the best product at the best price. Putting Oliver Driver on TV telling us to pay more for a sub-standard product just because it will help the bloke down the road was never going to convince anyone at the till.
I happily pay a few percent more to support local workers and local businesses. Why? Because I’m selfish. I want local businesses and local workers to be better off because then I’m better off in the long run.
What if your “better off” comes at the expense of the chinese labourer that used to make shoes, and now gets nothing?
What do you see as a bigger loss of income: the guy that goes from NZ minium wage to the unemployment benefit OR the guy in China going from a few cents a day to nothing at all?
If only women realised that, as the major buyer or influence on buying decisions, their power is huge. If they ever decide to form a lobby group country-wide they could easily bring a company down, whatever its size.
The said company had better hope the lobby group consists of left-leaning (as I stated at 5.37) women who won’t want to damage the company or its workers!
Putting aside the obvious*, I’ve always wondered about the philosophical basis for these “buy NZ made” campaigns.
Are we saying that we should be more worried about the plight of NZers over the plight of Chinese people? Why should we care that plastic stuff comes out of China, and each time you buy plastic stuff from China the per capita GDP there gets a little bit closer to ours (but still miles behind)?
Do we care about human welfare, but only if it’s humans within our borders…?
* How can anyone complain about actually checking to see whether “Buy New Zealand made” is value for money? If I hire someone to clean my windows, I need to check that they’ve done a decent job before I decide to hire them again. I’d be a moron if, instead of checking the windows in front of me, I spent hours debating whether window-cleaners are a good idea in principle… National is absolutely within its rights to review the previous government’s expenditure and find out whether the money might be better spent on something else. That’s the job we pay them to do.
Women have organised themselves into a consumer lobby before. CARP – campaign against rising prices – was very effective in the 1960s/1970s. I think Cath Kelly, mother of the CTU’s Helen Kelly, was one of the main activists.
I think (memory hazy here) that the 3rd Labour govt’s maximum retail price (Warren Freer’s MRP campaign) was one of the results. Regulations to limit prices of consumer goods. Now wouldn’t that be a good idea again! That would shock the righties above.
I’m intrigued and suspicious. If National is so concerned about value for money re Buy NZ Made, why didn’t they check earlier and bleat then.
I guess they knew it would have made them sound like they didn’t care about small NZ business and workers pre-electionand now of course they can bleat about this and cover up on the nasty little sidelines they are pursuing, with forcing unemployment up through businesses falling over, if less attention goes on Buy NZ Made and thereby creating their dreamed of weak, desperate labour force.
NZers ‘are’ still so comfortable under the inclusive previous Government they don’t believe ‘nouveauNational’ can hurt their future. I know better.
“Buy kiwi made” was an 8 million dollar accommodation for the greens, a complete waste of money and more proof (if you needed it) of the left’s myth that throwing large amounts of cash at something will fix it. Good riddance
Buy NZ Made is a member based organisation funded by members, the Government campaign is the Buy Kiwi Made Campaign.
Buy NZ Made won 50% funding from one of the Buy Kiwi Made Campaign’s funding rounds to build a website to advertise New Zealand Made goods and to connect manufacturers, retailers and consumers with them.
This website has been up and running since September the 1st and has been advertised on web and in magazines. It has also been mentioned in the latest Buy Kiwi Made radio advertisements.
So for those of you who were wishing for a website which catalogues NZ Made goods .. your wish is granted. The website currently shows over 2000 products which is not bad for such a new site. This site is lilkely to grow considerably over the next few months.
It’s up to businesses to be self sustaining Paul, it would be a poor excuse for a business that relied on government funding to survive. Why should taxpayer money be spent on marketing costs for NZ businesses?
I am amused that a left wing blog is trying to defend this campaign. It’s very apparent that it’s only because it was Bradford’s project. If National had launched the campaign you would all be up in arms about it being a way for them to be lining the pockets of their business buddies.
Heh I had you in the grip of angry reason and then lost it all with the quote tags.
basically, mate, you are an idealogue of the worst sort. I understand the sentiment. I even appreciate that we can’t run on subsidies, and if we are doing that for profitable industries it is completely wrong.
However we don’t live in a free trade society. If you are consistent and not just an idiot troll I expect to see you supporting business taking the full cost of their carbon pollution as soon as possible.
sorry? Was that taxpayer money should not be spent subsidising business unless it is a large amount?
Realisitically in a small country government has a role to play in helping business in this way. If the National party were really nationalists, they would be doing that, instead of searching for ways to reduce costs for their chums in international cartels.
“So you are telling me that NZ made/Kiwi made is sub-standard product?’
Actually, thats what this entire campaign is doing. To me, the government steping in to promote a product suggests that the product is not good enough to be sold on its own merits and that it needs to be protected or it will not be able to compete with others.
Some people in this thread refer to a ‘New Zealand sucks’ campaign. Well clearly if they think that New Zealand products should be protected through this campaign or other measures then they are the ones who think that New Zealand products suck.
Greg, being “efficient’ is not the sole determinant of the worth of an enterprise. Many “inefficient’ things (ie. the public service, Air NZ, manufacturing) are better retained locally — to do otherwise puts them at risk of insecurity/profiteering/asset stripping. Also, surely fair trade is better than “free’ trade?
As it is, NZers are effectively “subsidising’ profits to overseas corporations — to the tune of $5 billion (or more) per year:
Transnational corporations (TNCs) make massive profits out of New Zealand. These can truly be called New Zealand’s biggest invisible export. In the decade 1997-2006, TNCs made $50.3 billion profits. Only 32% was reinvested, and in some years more was sent overseas than was earned or the reinvestment was significantly offset by capital being taken out of the country.”
Ropata – you’ve just stumbled upon the economic concept of comparative advantage. Of course transnational corporations make profits out of New Zealand. But we make a hell of a lot off our exports too. You can’t have one but not the other. Are you suggesting we cut off all trade? Comparative advantage is gained when when each country specialises in what they’re best at and trade (well there’s more to it then that but we’ll leave it there). That way each country makes the most effective use of its own resources. Protectionist measures like the ‘buy NZ made ad campaign inhibit this and its makes NZ and the rest of the world worst off.
On your other points. Air NZ and manufacturing are classic examples of industries that should not be propped up by the government. In Air NZ’s case competitors like pacific blue, quantas etc etc will keep them honest whether they’re owned by NZ or China. Manufacturing is a part of the buy NZ made answer. We should only keep manufacturing goods that we can produce efficiently. Thats why we don’t have a car industry. Its much cheaper for us to import – look to the states to see how a subsidised car industry is further crippling their economy. In the Public service efficiency results in the best result anyway – we want the services provided by the public service to cost as little as possible so we can have lower taxes and more money to spend!
I get pretty passionate about this ‘fair trade’ thing. I too want save the starving in africa. But did you know trade barriers cost the third world a hell of a lot more than the amount of aid we give them. The facts are there – google it (I can’t be bothered, its late). ‘Unfair trade’ is far far far better than no trade at all. The fact is – countries who engage in trade even if its from sweatshops improve over time – look at Japan. Buying their ‘cheap and nasty’ products is the best help we can give them.
Paul – “However we don’t live in a free trade society. If you are consistent and not just an idiot troll I expect to see you supporting business taking the full cost of their carbon pollution as soon as possible.”
Yeah sure. But a couple of points. Business won’t take the brunt of the cost, it will be passed onto the consumer – lets not forget that. Also that means some businesses get carbon credits too right, if their net emissions are negative?
I believe this is how it has to work. The cost of carbon will be a long term cost. It will not go away. We have to be prepared to pay more, and the businesses which can become the most efficient and therefore offer cheaper prices are rewarded.
This market system is something isn’t it?
This is what the Greens have been arguing for a long time.
If our business adapts like other businesses internationally, (and I’m not completely clued in on the ins and outs of a carbon trading market) yes! it would be fantastic if we could get carbon credits for nett emissions. I know some companies particularly airlines offer carbon offset options or the like where they buy or invest in tracts of forestry.
I don’t see what the problem is with this. If we don’t we are passing the bill on to our children and grandchildren, rather than attempting to recognise and deal with the problem. I also realise it is a joke to blame National solely for this. Almost everyone in NZ is complicit in inaction for too long.
Anyway that’s the theory. I did study a small bit of biology and economics, but never got near farm accounts or forrestry work.
I’m not sure if negative net emissions equals credits under the currently proposed and soon to be rehacked scheme. Anyone know?
The fact is – countries who engage in trade even if its from sweatshops improve over time – look at Japan.
I’m sure all those U.S. military Korean war contracts were helpful too, to help keep the munitions and arms factories running and turn them into car manufacturers and the like.
We should buy New Zealand for the same reason everyone else does overseas, it is a niche quality fashionable brand, and we are a unique part of it. As I mentioned above, it is hardly the most of protectionist measures out there, if it really is truly one at all.
The government is just involved in a campaign like the Woolmark or the beef and lamb campaign, but what they are selling is the quality of our country overall, which suprisingly I would say they have a stake in.
Efficiency and market clearing is a laudable goal. But your argument goes beyond economics into sovereignty. Everything can be done more efficiently. But more efficiently for whom? Without Air New Zealand there might be more efficient air travel,, but it is in New Zealand’s public good to have a national carrier who supports our tourism industry.
Manfacturing can be different, but it is sometimes very difficult to compete marketing a smaller product against mass produced brands dumped in large chain stores. Hence a little support with the marketing, and the promotion of quality behind a Made in NZ sticker.
“What if your “better off’ comes at the expense of the chinese labourer that used to make shoes, and now gets nothing?”
Didn’t I explain that I’m selfish? Anyway…
The Chinese labourers you mention have very little protection. They don’t have the workplace rights that our unions have fought hard for and won.
It’s a bit disingenuous of you to imply that you’re supporting Chinese labourers by buying goods made in China – you’re supporting their exploitation. Massive profits are made off their labour by denying them proper work rights and that’s what you’re supporting.
I prefer to support the rights of workers by buying products made by workers who have rights.
My understanding, and correct me if I’m wrong, but Ive heard that for IceBreaker its so cheap to manufacture in China that they can produce the merino wool here, ship it to China to be made into clothes, and have it shipped back again.
Now how are local manufacturers supposed to compete against that without support from the government?
Why, by lowering our workplace standards to be closer to those of China of course. I heard Roger Douglas on the radio just the other week praising the “efficiency” of Chinese industry.
Rod Donald’s legacy is a bunch of ads that make Oliver Driver appear stupider thatn he already is and make fat ad exec’s rich? That’s unspeakably sad. I thought he’d done lots of good stuff.
“basically, mate, you are an idealogue of the worst sort. I understand the sentiment. I even appreciate that we can’t run on subsidies, and if we are doing that for profitable industries it is completely wrong.”
Are you suggesting we should subsidise unprofitable industries? I’m all for helping kiwi businesses get up and running and I reckon $6.3 million would be very helpful if it was applied the right way. I had a small business myself about 5 years ago and would have loved the government to be more helpful rather than making me jump through bureaucratic hurdles. In the end I had to lay off 5 staff and find a job.
On the topic of this post, it is sensible to review any campaign to see whether it is delivering results, rather than just keep chucking money at ad agencies. There are probably some parts of the campaign that will be kept after review, such as the getnzmade.net website (which I don’t recall seeing anything about on the TV ad by the way), but the point is that reviewing the campaign is the right thing to do.
Regarding your insults, I’ll be up here on the high road mate.
Paul – on your first post, I agree. On the second, not so much:
“‘im sure all those U.S. military Korean war contracts were helpful too, to help keep the munitions and arms factories running and turn them into car manufacturers and the like.
We should buy New Zealand for the same reason everyone else does overseas, it is a niche quality fashionable brand, and we are a unique part of it. As I mentioned above, it is hardly the most of protectionist measures out there, if it really is truly one at all.
The government is just involved in a campaign like the Woolmark or the beef and lamb campaign, but what they are selling is the quality of our country overall, which suprisingly I would say they have a stake in.
Efficiency and market clearing is a laudable goal. But your argument goes beyond economics into sovereignty. Everything can be done more efficiently. But more efficiently for whom? Without Air New Zealand there might be more efficient air travel,, but it is in New Zealand’s public good to have a national carrier who supports our tourism industry.
Manfacturing can be different, but it is sometimes very difficult to compete marketing a smaller product against mass produced brands dumped in large chain stores. Hence a little support with the marketing, and the promotion of quality behind a Made in NZ sticker.”
Yeah Japan did benefit from foreign investment. Something that will happen to all third world countries as their economies improve and the risk lessens. If they can get themselves off the ground first. Why should the government sell New Zealand to New Zealanders? There may be an argument for doing this overseas but preaching to the converted is a bit silly isn’t it? And why does an air carrier have to be public owned to support our tourism industry? Surely its in any air carriers commercial interests to promote tourism. Its more benefit for them!
If your going to try and compete directly with a mass produced brand it is going to be hard. Because they’re more efficient at producing it. I’ve got no problems with making the conscious decision to buy kiwi made on the basis of quality – but what I’m saying is that if you’ve got two identical goods and one is more expensive because its kiwi made. The only people that will benefit from you purchasing the kiwi one is the producer of that good. Everyone else loses.
Felix – “The Chinese labourers you mention have very little protection. They don’t have the workplace rights that our unions have fought hard for and won.
It’s a bit disingenuous of you to imply that you’re supporting Chinese labourers by buying goods made in China – you’re supporting their exploitation. Massive profits are made off their labour by denying them proper work rights and that’s what you’re supporting.
I prefer to support the rights of workers by buying products made by workers who have rights.”
Again, this kind of statement really gets under my skin. Your supporting Chinease workers by not buying their goods. How the hell is that meant to make them better off? They’ve gone from a crap job to no job. A crap job being a hell of a lot better than no job at all.
No I’m suggesting that subsidies are not necessarily a good thing, especially as we used to have them for our most productive sectors. I notice you had no reply to why the taxpayer should be bailing out industries on Kyoto agreements. If it walks like a fish mate, irrespective of what road it’s walking on.
@Greg
I don’t know if being occupied by the U.S. after the second world war, and getting a kickstart from large military contracts, is quite the same practically and morally as buying coffee or small local industries from developing countries.
If the government doesn’t sell the New Zealand brand who will? The media relentlessly paint us disproportionantly as a country over run by crime. I remember the irony of the 90s when the only companies to use patriotism in their advertising were overseas countries- Toyota ‘welcome to our world’ and Barry Crump, McDonalds and the Kiwiburger…there are 2 or 3 other examples but I can’t think of them just at the moment.
The point with mass production is not, I don’t think, efficiency leading to the best use of scarce resources. It is that a large company can get a strong advantage in marketing its products, and getting exclusive or very favourable distribution deals, which make competing for small manufacturers (and retailers for that matter) very difficult. Not particularly perfect market stuff.
Well if one is made in New Zealand and one is made elsewhere it isn’t identical is it? There are all kinds of reasons why people choose a particular brand. Could be the safety standards of a country, where their sister lives, their human rights record, their favourite sports team, passing fads…
I understand the argument you are making, but especially in times of economic hardship, I think you will be hard pressed to find any practical examples of it in action internationally. As I said we don’t live in a free trade world, and we have to be careful with the baby and bathtub. Which is my way of saying, brain hurt, have to go work. cheers.
“Any marketing campaign needs to have measurable results. While it sounds good for Bradford to claim 360,000 more shoppers think Kiwi-made than before, where is the proof that this is translating into dollars spent on Kiwi-made. And are the surveyed shoppers actually the target market for this campaign? Do you even know who the target market is? Low income earners? Beneficiaries? Or just ‘the rich’.
What NZ made goods are lower income earners meant to buy? Can they afford the generally higher cost of buying NZ made goods when the imported alternatives are so much cheaper and means they can still buy Christmas presents for their kids?
Do NZ made goods need to compete on price? If so are we prepared to have lower wages in order to make this possible?
If we aren’t expecting the low income earners to be part of the target market of this campaign then who is it, and what are the likely products they will buy that are NZ made?
Let’s see the business case for this campaign, and some real measurable outcomes. It seems to me that the millions of taxpayer dollars being spent on this campaign are misguided and wasteful.”
The only thing you know about marketing it seems is how to spell it!!!!!
“The ad campaign is bad for New Zealand. Its a shocking waste of tax payers money. Here’s why:
Econ101 – Consumers that choose to spend more to buy New Zealand made purely because its from New Zealand effectively provide a subsidy to the producer.(This is not the case if the purchase of the NZ made product is rational – ie its cheaper or better quality) These consumers are subsidising inefficient businesses (if they were efficient they wouldn’t need government funded ad campaigns), This decreases consumers disposable income so they have less to spend on efficient kiwi producers. New Zealand as a whole would be far better off if inefficient producers instead moved into efficient industries. This subsidy increases producer surplus but consumer surplus is decreased by more than that increase – hence this policy results in a dead weight loss – wasted money!”
More like this comment is a wasted amount of internet space!!!! What a load of crap
“If your going to try and compete directly with a mass produced brand it is going to be hard. Because they’re more efficient at producing it. I’ve got no problems with making the conscious decision to buy kiwi made on the basis of quality – but what I’m saying is that if you’ve got two identical goods and one is more expensive because its kiwi made. The only people that will benefit from you purchasing the kiwi one is the producer of that good. Everyone else loses”
That is NOT what the campaign is all about agghhhh, and this just shows how agghhhh you are in the subject of marketing, in fact, business, agghhhh
“If your going to try and compete directly with a mass produced brand it is going to be hard. Because they’re more efficient at producing it. I’ve got no problems with making the conscious decision to buy kiwi made on the basis of quality – but what I’m saying is that if you’ve got two identical goods and one is more expensive because its kiwi made. The only people that will benefit from you purchasing the kiwi one is the producer of that good. Everyone else loses.”
Proves my point, you know fuck all about marketing
Just remember that those adverts and posters and what not is a very very small part of marketing. It is not the whole marketing concept, it is a piss ant in comparrison so you cant judge a marketing campagin from some dumb arse picture or advert. There is a hell of a lot to marketing than advertising!!!
Monday left me brokenTuesday, I was through with hopingWednesday, my empty arms were openThursday, waiting for love, waiting for loveThe end of another week that left many of us asking WTF? What on earth has NZ gotten itself into and how on earth could people have voluntarily signed up for ...
Hello! Here comes the Saturday edition of More Than A Feilding, catching you up on the past week’s editions.State of humanity, 20242024, it feels, keeps presenting us with ever more challenges, ever more dismay.Do you give up yet? It seems to ask.No? How about this? Or this?How about this?Full story Share ...
Determining the hardest sport in the world is a subjective matter, as the difficulty level can vary depending on individual abilities, physical attributes, and experience. However, based on various factors including physical demands, technical skills, mental fortitude, and overall accomplishment, here is an exploration of some of the most challenging ...
The allure of sport transcends age, culture, and geographical boundaries. It captivates hearts, ignites passions, and provides unparalleled entertainment. Behind the spectacle, however, lies a fascinating world of financial investment and expenditure. Among the vast array of competitive pursuits, one question looms large: which sport carries the hefty title of ...
Introduction Pickleball, a rapidly growing paddle sport, has captured the hearts and imaginations of millions around the world. Its blend of tennis, badminton, and table tennis elements has made it a favorite among players of all ages and skill levels. As the sport’s popularity continues to surge, the question on ...
Abstract: Soccer, the global phenomenon captivating millions worldwide, has a rich history that spans centuries. Its origins trace back to ancient civilizations, but the modern version we know and love emerged through a complex interplay of cultural influences and innovations. This article delves into the fascinating journey of soccer’s evolution, ...
Tinting car windows offers numerous benefits, including enhanced privacy, reduced glare, UV protection, and a more stylish look for your vehicle. However, the cost of window tinting can vary significantly depending on several factors. This article provides a comprehensive guide to help you understand how much you can expect to ...
The pungent smell of gasoline in your car can be an alarming and potentially dangerous problem. Not only is the odor unpleasant, but it can also indicate a serious issue with your vehicle’s fuel system. In this article, we will explore the various reasons why your car may smell like ...
Tree sap can be a sticky, unsightly mess on your car’s exterior. It can be difficult to remove, but with the right techniques and products, you can restore your car to its former glory. Understanding Tree Sap Tree sap is a thick, viscous liquid produced by trees to seal wounds ...
The amount of paint needed to paint a car depends on a number of factors, including the size of the car, the number of coats you plan to apply, and the type of paint you are using. In general, you will need between 1 and 2 gallons of paint for ...
Jump-starting a car is a common task that can be performed even in adverse weather conditions like rain. However, safety precautions and proper techniques are crucial to avoid potential hazards. This comprehensive guide will provide detailed instructions on how to safely jump a car in the rain, ensuring both your ...
Graham Adams writes about the $55m media fund — When Patrick Gower was asked by Mike Hosking last week what he would say to the many Newstalk ZB callers who allege the Labour government bribed media with $55 million of taxpayers’ money via the Public Interest Journalism Fund — and ...
Note: this blog post has been put together over the course of the week I followed the happenings at the conference virtually. Should recordings of the Great Debates and possibly Union Symposia mentioned below, be released sometime after the conference ends, I'll include links to the ones I participated in. ...
The following was my submission made on the “Fast Track Approvals Bill”. This potential law will give three Ministers unchecked powers, un-paralled since the days of Robert Muldoon’s “Think Big” projects.The submission is written a bit tongue-in-cheek. But it’s irreverent because the FTAB is in itself not worthy of respect. ...
One Could Reduce Child Poverty At No Fiscal CostFollowing the Richardson/Shipley 1990 ‘redesign of the welfare state’ – which eliminated the universal Family Benefit and doubled the rate of child poverty – various income supplements for families have been added, the best known being ‘Working for Families’, introduced in 2005. ...
Buzz from the Beehive A few days ago, Point of Order suggested the media must be musing “on why Melissa is mute”. Our article reported that people working in the beleaguered media industry have cause to yearn for a minister as busy as Melissa Lee’s ministerial colleagues and we drew ...
1. What was The Curse of Jim Bolger?a. Winston Peters b. Soon after shaking his hand, world leaders would mysteriously lose office or shuffle off this mortal coilc. Could never shake off the Mother of All Budgetsd. Dandruff2. True or false? The Chairman of a Kiwi export business has asked the ...
Jack Vowles writes – New Zealand is said to be suffering from ‘serious populist discontent’. An IPSOS MORI survey has reported that we have an increasing preference for strong leaders, think that the economy is rigged toward the rich and powerful, and political elites are ignoring ‘hard-working people’. ...
Chris Trotter writes – MELISSA LEE should be deprived of her ministerial warrant. Her handling – or non-handling – of the crisis engulfing the New Zealand news media has been woeful. The fate of New Zealand’s two linear television networks, a question which the Minister of Broadcasting, Communications ...
TL;DR: The podcast above features co-hosts and , along with regular guests Robert Patman on Gaza and AUKUS II, and on climate change.The six things that mattered in Aotearoa’s political economy that we wrote and spoke about via The Kākā and elsewhere for paying subscribers in the ...
Policymakers rarely wish to make plain or visible their desire to dismantle environmental policy, least of all to the young. Photo: Lynn GrievesonTL;DR: Here’s the top five news items of note in climate news for Aotearoa-NZ this week, and a discussion above between Bernard Hickey and The Kākā’s climate correspondent ...
I like to keep an eye on what’s happening in places like the UK, the US, and over the ditch with our good mates the Aussies. Let’s call them AUKUS, for want of a better collective term. More on that in a bit.It used to be, not long ago, that ...
TL;DR: The global economy will be one fifth smaller than it would have otherwise been in 2050 as a result of climate damage, according to a new study by the Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research (PIK) and published in the journal Nature. (See more detail and analysis below, and ...
New Zealand is said to be suffering from ‘serious populist discontent’. An IPSOS MORI survey has reported that we have an increasing preference for strong leaders, think that the economy is rigged toward the rich and powerful, and political elites are ignoring ‘hard-working people’. The data is from February this ...
Foreign Minister Winston Peters is understood to be planning a major speech within the next fortnight to clear up the confusion over whether or not New Zealand might join the AUKUS submarine project. So far, there have been conflicting signals from the Government. RNZ reported the Prime Minister yesterday in ...
Life throws curveballs, and sometimes, those curveballs necessitate wiping your iPhone clean and starting anew. Whether you’re facing persistent software glitches, preparing to sell your device, or simply wanting a fresh start, knowing how to factory reset iPhone without a computer is a valuable skill. While using a computer with ...
Gone are the days when communication was limited to landline phones and physical proximity. Today, computers have become powerful tools for connecting with people across the globe through voice and video calls. But with a plethora of applications and methods available, how to call someone on a computer might seem ...
Open access notables Glacial isostatic adjustment reduces past and future Arctic subsea permafrost, Creel et al., Nature Communications:Sea-level rise submerges terrestrial permafrost in the Arctic, turning it into subsea permafrost. Subsea permafrost underlies ~ 1.8 million km2 of Arctic continental shelf, with thicknesses in places exceeding 700 m. Sea-level variations over glacial-interglacial cycles control ...
The operating system (OS) is the heart and soul of a computer, orchestrating every action and interaction between hardware and software. But have you ever wondered where on a computer is the operating system generally stored? The answer lies in the intricate dance between hardware and software components, particularly within ...
Laptops have become essential tools for work, entertainment, and communication, offering portability and functionality. However, with rising energy costs and growing environmental concerns, understanding a laptop’s power consumption is more important than ever. So, how many watts does a laptop use? The answer, unfortunately, isn’t straightforward. It depends on several ...
Screen recording has become an essential tool for various purposes, such as creating tutorials, capturing gameplay footage, recording online meetings, or sharing information with others. Fortunately, Dell laptops offer several built-in and external options for screen recording, catering to different needs and preferences. This guide will explore various methods on ...
A cracked or damaged laptop screen can be a frustrating experience, impacting productivity and enjoyment. Fortunately, laptop screen repair is a common service offered by various repair shops and technicians. However, the cost of fixing a laptop screen can vary significantly depending on several factors. This article delves into the ...
Gaming laptops represent a significant investment for passionate gamers, offering portability and powerful performance for immersive gaming experiences. However, a common concern among potential buyers is their lifespan. Unlike desktop PCs, which allow for easier component upgrades, gaming laptops have inherent limitations due to their compact and integrated design. This ...
The annual inventory report of New Zealand's greenhouse gas emissions has been released, showing that gross emissions have dropped for the third year in a row, to 78.4 million tons: All-told gross emissions have decreased by over 6 million tons since the Zero Carbon Act was passed in 2019. ...
Experiencing a locked computer can be frustrating, especially when you need access to your files and applications urgently. The methods to unlock your computer will vary depending on the specific situation and the type of lock you encounter. This guide will explore various scenarios and provide step-by-step instructions on how ...
While the world has largely transitioned to digital communication, faxing still holds relevance in certain industries and situations. Fortunately, gone are the days of bulky fax machines and dedicated phone lines. Today, you can easily send and receive faxes directly from your computer, offering a convenient and efficient way to ...
In our increasingly digital world, home computers have become essential tools for work, communication, entertainment, and more. However, this increased reliance on technology also exposes us to various cyber threats. Understanding these threats and taking proactive steps to protect your home computer is crucial for safeguarding your personal information, finances, ...
In the ever-evolving world of technology, server-based computing has emerged as a cornerstone of modern digital infrastructure. This article delves into the concept of server-based computing, exploring its various forms, benefits, challenges, and its impact on the way we work and interact with technology. Understanding Server-Based Computing: At its core, ...
The absolute brass neck of this guy.We want more medical doctors, not more spin doctors, Luxon was saying a couple of weeks ago, and now we’re told the guy has seven salaried adults on TikTok duty. Sorry, doing social media. The absolute brass neck of it. The irony that the ...
Buzz from the Beehive Oceans and Fisheries Minister Shane Jones relishes spatting and eagerly takes issue with environmentalists who criticise his enthusiasm for resource development. He relishes helping the fishing industry too. And so today, while the media are making much of the latest culling in the public service to ...
Having written, taught and worked for the US government on issues involving unconventional warfare and terrorism for 30-odd years, two things irritate me the most when the subject is discussed in public. The first is the Johnny-come-lately academics-turned-media commentators who … Continue reading → ...
Eric Crampton writes – Kainga Ora is the government’s house building agency. It’s been building a lot of social housing. Kainga Ora has its own (but independent) consenting authority, Consentium. It’s a neat idea. Rather than have to deal with building consents across each different territorial authority, Kainga Ora ...
Muriel Newman writes – The Coalition Government says it is moving with speed to deliver campaign promises and reverse the damage done by Labour. One of their key commitments is to “defend the principle that New Zealanders are equal before the law.” To achieve this, they have pledged they “will not advance ...
Chris Trotter writes – The absence of anything resembling a fightback from the public servants currently losing their jobs is interesting. State-sector workers’ collective fatalism in the face of Coalition cutbacks indicates a surprisingly broad acceptance of impermanence in the workplace. Fifty years ago, lay-offs in the thousands ...
Mariupol, on the Azov Sea coast, was one of the first cities to suffer almost complete destruction after the start of the Ukraine War started in late February 2022. We remember the scenes of absolute destruction of the houses and city structures. The deaths of innocent civilians – many of ...
Lindsay Mitchell writes – Ten years ago, I wrote the following in a Listener column: Every year around one in five new-born babies will be reliant on their caregivers benefit by Christmas. This pattern has persisted from at least 1993. For Maori the number jumps to over one in three. ...
Climate change is expected to generate more and more extreme events, delivering a sort of structural shock to inflation that central banks will have to react to as if they were short-term cyclical issues. Photo: Lynn Grieveson / The KākāMy pick of the six newsey things to know from Aotearoa’s ...
It’s a simple deal. We pay taxes in order to finance the social services we want and need. The carnage now occurring across the public sector though, is breaking that contract. Over 3,000 jobs have been lost so far. Many are in crucial areas like Education where the impact of ...
Hi,A friend had their 40th over the weekend and decided to theme it after Curb Your Enthusiasm fashion icon Susie Greene. Captured in my tiny kitchen before I left the house, I ending up evoking a mix of old lesbian and Hillary Clinton — both unintentional.Me vs Hillary ClintonIf you’re ...
This is a re-post from Andrew Dessler at the Climate Brink blogIn 2023, the Earth reached temperature levels unprecedented in modern times. Given that, it’s reasonable to ask: What’s going on? There’s been lots of discussions by scientists about whether this is just the normal progression of global warming or if something ...
The schools are on holiday and the sun is shining in the seaside village and all day long I have been seeing bunches of bikes; Mums, Dads, teens and toddlers chattering, laughing, happy, having a bloody great time together. Cheers, AT, for the bits of lane you’ve added lately around the ...
Today in our National-led authoritarian nightmare: Shane Jones thinks Ministers should be above the law: New Zealand First MP Shane Jones is accusing the Waitangi Tribunal of over-stepping its mandate by subpoenaing a minister for its urgent hearing on the Oranga Tamariki claim. The tribunal is looking into the ...
Bryce Edwards writes – Politicians across the political spectrum are implicated in the New Zealand media’s failing health. Either through neglect or incompetent interventions, successive governments have failed to regulate, foster, and allow a healthy Fourth Estate that can adequately hold politicians and the powerful to account. ...
Citizen Science writes – Last week saw two significant developments in the debate over the treatment of trans-identifying children and young people – the release in Britain of the final report of Dr Hilary Cass’s review into gender healthcare, and here in New Zealand, the news that the ...
One night while sleeping in my bed I had a beautiful dreamThat all the people of the world got together on the same wavelengthAnd began helping one anotherNow in this dream, universal love was the theme of the dayPeace and understanding and it happened this wayAfter such an eventful day ...
This is a guest post by Oscar Simms who is a housing activist, volunteer for the Coalition for More Homes, and was the Labour Party candidate for Auckland Central at the last election. ...
Turning what Labour called the “holiday highway” into a four-lane expressway from Auckland to Whangarei could bring at least an economic benefit of nearly two billion a year for Northland each year. And it could help bring an end to poverty in one of New Zealand’s most deprived regions. The ...
Tonight’s six-stack includes: launching his substack with a bunch of his previous documentaries, including this 1992 interview with Dame Whina Cooper. and here crew give climate activists plenty to do, including this call to submit against the Fast Track Approvals bill. writes brilliantly here on his substack ...
On February 14, 2023 we announced our Rebuttal Update Project. This included an ask for feedback about the added "At a glance" section in the updated basic rebuttal versions. This weekly blog post series highlights this new section of one of the updated basic rebuttal versions and serves as a ...
You're in the mall when you hear it: some kind of popping sound in the distance, kids with fireworks, maybe. But then a moment of eerie stillness is followed by more of the fireworks sound and there’s also screaming and shrieking and now here come people running for their lives.Does ...
Karl du Fresne writes – There’s a crisis in the news media and the media are blaming it on everyone except themselves. Culpability is being deflected elsewhere – mainly to the hapless Minister of Communications, Melissa Lee, and the big social media platforms that are accused of hoovering ...
I don’t normally send out two newsletters in a day but I figured I’d say something about… the news. If two newsletters is a bit much then maybe just skip one, I don’t want to overload people. Alternatively if you’d be interested in sometimes receiving multiple, smaller updates from me, ...
Buzz from the Beehive David Seymour and Winston Peters today signalled that at least two ministers of the Crown might be in Wellington today. Seymour (as Associate Minister of Education) announced the removal of more red tape, this time to make it easier for new early learning services to be ...
Politicians across the political spectrum are implicated in the New Zealand media’s failing health. Either through neglect or incompetent interventions, successive governments have failed to regulate, foster, and allow a healthy Fourth Estate that can adequately hold politicians and the powerful to account. Our political system is suffering from the ...
David Farrar writes – The Broadcasting Standards Authority ruled: Comments by radio host Kate Hawkesby suggesting Māori and Pacific patients were being prioritised for surgery due to their ethnicity were misleading and discriminatory, the Broadcasting Standards Authority has found. It is a fact such patients are prioritised. ...
PRC and its proxies in Solomons have been preparing for these elections for a long time.A lot of money, effort and intelligence have gone into ensuring an outcome that won’t compromise Beijing’s plans. Cleo Paskall writes – On April 17th the Solomon Islands, a country of ...
Is speeding up the trip to and from Wellington airport by 12 minutes worth spending up more than $10 billion? Photo: Lynn Grieveson / The KākāTL;DR: The six news items that stood out to me in the last day to 8:26 am today are:The Lead: Transport Minister Simeon Brownannounced ...
The Green Party has joined the call for public submissions on the fast-track legislation to be extended after the Ombudsman forced the Government to release the list of organisations invited to apply just hours before submissions close. ...
New Zealand’s good work at reducing climate emissions for three years in a row will be undone by the National government’s lack of ambition and scrapping programmes that were making a difference, Labour Party climate spokesperson Megan Woods said today. ...
More essential jobs could be on the chopping block, this time Ministry of Education staff on the school lunches team are set to find out whether they're in line to lose their jobs. ...
The Government is trying to bring in a law that will allow Ministers to cut corners and kill off native species, Labour environment spokesperson Rachel Brooking said. ...
Cancelling urgently needed new Cook Strait ferries and hiking the cost of public transport for many Kiwis so that National can announce the prospect of another tunnel for Wellington is not making good choices, Labour Transport Spokesperson Tangi Utikere said. ...
A laundry list of additional costs for Tāmaki Makarau Auckland shows the Minister for the city is not delivering for the people who live there, says Labour Auckland Issues spokesperson Shanan Halbert. ...
The Green Party has today launched a step-by-step guide to help New Zealanders make their voice heard on the Government’s democracy dodging and anti-environment fast track legislation. ...
The National Government’s proposed changes to the Residential Tenancies Act will mean tenants can be turfed from their homes by landlords with little notice, Labour housing spokesperson Kieran McAnulty said. ...
Green Party co-leader Marama Davidson is calling on all parties to support a common-sense change that’s great for the planet and great for consumers after her member’s bill was drawn from the ballot today. ...
A significant milestone has been reached in the fight to strike an anti-Pasifika and unfair law from the country’s books after Teanau Tuiono’s members’ bill passed its first reading. ...
New Zealand has today missed the opportunity to uphold the right to a clean, healthy, and sustainable environment, says James Shaw after his member’s bill was voted down in its first reading. ...
Today’s advice from the Climate Change Commission paints a sobering reality of the challenge we face in combating climate change, especially in light of recent Government policy announcements. ...
Minister for Disability Issues Penny Simmonds appears to have delayed a report back to Cabinet on the progress New Zealand is making against international obligations for disabled New Zealanders. ...
The Government’s newly announced review of methane emissions reduction targets hints at its desire to delay Aotearoa New Zealand’s urgent transition to a climate safe future, the Green Party said. ...
The Government must commit to the Maitai School building project for students with high and complex needs, to ensure disabled students from the top of the South Island have somewhere to learn. ...
Mental Health Minister Matt Doocey and his Government colleagues have made a meal of their mental health commitments, showing how flimsy their efforts to champion the issue truly are, says Labour Mental Health spokesperson Ingrid Leary. ...
Māori are yet to see anything from this Government except cuts, reversals and taking our people backwards, Māori Development spokesperson Willie Jackson said. ...
The Coalition Government’s refusal to commit to ongoing funding for social housing is seeing the sector pull back on developments and families watch their dreams of securing a home fade away, says Labour Housing spokesperson Kieran McAnulty. ...
Changes to minimum wage and benefit indexation means many New Zealanders will get less this year, as the Government gives a big tax break to landlords instead. ...
Prime Minister Christopher Luxon has completed a successful trip to Singapore, Thailand and the Philippines, deepening relationships and capitalising on opportunities. Mr Luxon was accompanied by a business delegation and says the choice of countries represents the priority the New Zealand Government places on South East Asia, and our relationships in ...
New Zealand is demonstrating its commitment to reducing global greenhouse emissions, and supporting clean energy transition in South East Asia, through a contribution of NZ$41 million (US$25 million) in climate finance to the Asian Development Bank (ADB)-led Energy Transition Mechanism (ETM). Prime Minister Christopher Luxon and Climate Change Minister Simon Watts announced ...
The Government is today releasing a list of organisations who received letters about the Fast-track applications process, says RMA Reform Minister Chris Bishop. “Recently Ministers and agencies have received a series of OIA requests for a list of organisations to whom I wrote with information on applying to have a ...
Attorney-General Judith Collins today announced the appointment of Wellington Barrister David Jonathan Boldt as a Judge of the High Court, and the Honourable Justice Matthew Palmer as a Judge of the Court of Appeal. Justice Boldt graduated with an LLB from Victoria University of Wellington in 1990, and also holds ...
Education Minister Erica Stanford will lead the New Zealand delegation at the 2024 International Summit on the Teaching Profession (ISTP) held in Singapore. The delegation includes representatives from the Post Primary Teachers’ Association (PPTA) Te Wehengarua and the New Zealand Educational Institute (NZEI) Te Riu Roa. The summit is co-hosted ...
A stopbank upgrade project in Tairawhiti partly funded by the Government has increased flood resilience for around 7000ha of residential and horticultural land so far, Regional Development Minister Shane Jones says. Mr Jones today attended a dawn service in Gisborne to mark the end of the first stage of the ...
Foreign Affairs Minister Winston Peters will represent the Government at Anzac Day commemorations on the Gallipoli Peninsula next week and engage with senior representatives of the Turkish government in Istanbul. “The Gallipoli campaign is a defining event in our history. It will be a privilege to share the occasion ...
Science, Innovation and Technology and Defence Minister Judith Collins will next week attend the OECD Science and Technology Ministerial conference in Paris and Anzac Day commemorations in Belgium. “Science, innovation and technology have a major role to play in rebuilding our economy and achieving better health, environmental and social outcomes ...
Prime Minister Christopher Luxon held a bilateral meeting today with the President of the Philippines, Ferdinand Marcos Jr. The Prime Minister was accompanied by MP Paulo Garcia, the first Filipino to be elected to a legislature outside the Philippines. During today’s meeting, Prime Minister Luxon and President Marcos Jr discussed opportunities to ...
The Government has announced that $20 million in funding will be made available to Westport to fund much needed flood protection around the town. This measure will significantly improve the resilience of the community, says Local Government Minister Simeon Brown. “The Westport community has already been allocated almost $3 million ...
The Government is proud to support the first ever Repco Supercars Championship event in Taupō as up to 70,000 motorsport fans attend the Taupō International Motorsport Park this weekend, says Economic Development Minister Melissa Lee. “Anticipation for the ITM Taupō Super400 is huge, with tickets and accommodation selling out weeks ...
Local Government Minister Simeon Brown has announced an increase to the Rates Rebate Scheme, putting money back into the pockets of low-income homeowners. “The coalition Government is committed to bringing down the cost of living for New Zealanders. That includes targeted support for those Kiwis who are doing things tough, such ...
The Coalition Government is investing in a project to boost survival rates of New Zealand mussels and grow the industry, Oceans and Fisheries Minister Shane Jones has announced. “This project seeks to increase the resilience of our mussels and significantly boost the sector’s productivity,” Mr Jones says. “The project - ...
Benefit figures released today underscore the importance of the Government’s plan to rebuild the economy and have 50,000 fewer people on Jobseeker Support, Social Development and Employment Minister Louise Upston says. “Benefit numbers are still significantly higher than when National was last in government, when there was about 70,000 fewer ...
The Government’s commitment to doubling New Zealand’s renewable energy capacity is backed by new data showing that clean energy has helped the country reach its lowest annual gross emissions since 1999, Climate Change Minister Simon Watts says. New Zealand’s latest Greenhouse Gas Inventory (1990-2022) published today, shows gross emissions fell ...
The Government is bringing the earthquake-prone building review forward, with work to start immediately, and extending the deadline for remediations by four years, Building and Construction Minister Chris Penk says. “Our Government is focused on rebuilding the economy. A key part of our plan is to cut red tape that ...
Prime Minister Christopher Luxon and his Thai counterpart, Prime Minister Srettha Thavisin, have today agreed that New Zealand and the Kingdom of Thailand will upgrade the bilateral relationship to a Strategic Partnership by 2026. “New Zealand and Thailand have a lot to offer each other. We have a strong mutual desire to build ...
RMA Reform Minister Chris Bishop and Transport Minister Simeon Brown have today announced the Coalition Government’s intention to extend port coastal permits for a further 20 years, providing port operators with certainty to continue their operations. “The introduction of the Resource Management Act in 1991 required ports to obtain coastal ...
Today’s announcement that inflation is down to 4 per cent is encouraging news for Kiwis, but there is more work to be done - underlining the importance of the Government’s plan to get the economy back on track, acting Finance Minister Chris Bishop says. “Inflation is now at 4 per ...
Refreshed health guidance released today will help parents and schools make informed decisions about whether their child needs to be in school, addressing one of the key issues affecting school attendance, says Associate Education Minister David Seymour. In recent years, consistently across all school terms, short-term illness or medical reasons ...
Oceans and Fisheries Minister Shane Jones is streamlining high-level oceans management while maintaining a focus on supporting the sector’s role in the export-led recovery of the economy. “I am working to realise the untapped potential of our fishing and aquaculture sector. To achieve that we need to be smarter with ...
Associate Agriculture Minister Mark Patterson is speaking at the International Wool Textile Organisation Congress in Adelaide, promoting New Zealand wool, and outlining the coalition Government’s support for the revitalisation the sector. "New Zealand’s wool exports reached $400 million in the year to 30 June 2023, and the coalition Government ...
The Government is making legislative changes to make it easier for new early learning services to be established, and for existing services to operate, Associate Education Minister David Seymour says. The changes involve repealing the network approval provisions that apply when someone wants to establish a new early learning service, ...
Changes to the Resource Management Act will align consenting for coal mining to other forms of mining to reduce barriers that are holding back economic development, Resources Minister Shane Jones says. “The inconsistent treatment of coal mining compared with other extractive activities is burdensome red tape that fails to acknowledge ...
Trade, Agriculture and Forestry Minister Todd McClay has concluded productive discussions with ministerial counterparts in Beijing today, in support of the New Zealand-China trade and economic relationship. “My meeting with Commerce Minister Wang Wentao reaffirmed the complementary nature of the bilateral trade relationship, with our Free Trade Agreement at its ...
Prime Minister Christopher Luxon today paid tribute to Singapore’s outgoing Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong. Meeting in Singapore today immediately before Prime Minister Lee announced he was stepping down, Prime Minister Luxon warmly acknowledged his counterpart’s almost twenty years as leader, and the enduring legacy he has left for Singapore and South East ...
Prime Minister Christopher Luxon held a bilateral meeting today with Singapore Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong. While in Singapore as part of his visit to South East Asia this week, Prime Minister Luxon also met with Singapore President Tharman Shanmugaratnam and will meet with Deputy Prime Minister Lawrence Wong. During today’s meeting, Prime Minister Luxon ...
Foreign Minister Winston Peters has made further appointments to the Board of Antarctica New Zealand as part of a continued effort to ensure the Scott Base Redevelopment project is delivered in a cost-effective and efficient manner. The Minister has appointed Neville Harris as a new member of the Board. Mr ...
Finance Minister Nicola Willis will travel to the United States on Tuesday to attend a meeting of the Five Finance Ministers group, with counterparts from Australia, the United States, Canada, and the United Kingdom. “I am looking forward to meeting with our Five Finance partners on how we can work ...
The coalition Government has today announced purrfect and pawsitive changes to the Residential Tenancies Act to give tenants with pets greater choice when looking for a rental property, says Housing Minister Chris Bishop. “Pets are important members of many Kiwi families. It’s estimated that around 64 per cent of New ...
State Highway 1 (SH1) through Wellington City is heavily congested at peak times and while planning continues on the duplicate Mt Victoria Tunnel and Basin Reserve project, the Government has also asked NZ Transport Agency (NZTA) to consider and provide advice on a Long Tunnel option, Transport Minister Simeon Brown ...
Prime Minister Christopher Luxon and Foreign Minister Winston Peters have condemned Iran’s shocking and illegal strikes against Israel. “These attacks are a major challenge to peace and stability in a region already under enormous pressure," Mr Luxon says. "We are deeply concerned that miscalculation on any side could ...
Hundreds of people in little over a week have turned out in Northland to hear Regional Development Minister Shane Jones speak about plans for boosting the regional economy through infrastructure. About 200 people from the infrastructure and associated sectors attended an event headlined by Mr Jones in Whangarei today. Last ...
Health Minister Dr Shane Reti has today thanked outgoing Health New Zealand – Te Whatu Ora Chair Dame Karen Poutasi for her service on the Board. “Dame Karen tendered her resignation as Chair and as a member of the Board today,” says Dr Reti. “I have asked her to ...
The NZ Transport Agency (NZTA) has signalled their proposed delivery approach for the Government’s 15 Roads of National Significance (RoNS), with the release of the State Highway Investment Proposal (SHIP) today, Transport Minister Simeon Brown says. “Boosting economic growth and productivity is a key part of the Government’s plan to ...
New Zealand is renewing its connections with a world facing urgent challenges by pursuing an active, energetic foreign policy, Foreign Minister Winston Peters says. “Our country faces the most unstable global environment in decades,” Mr Peters says at the conclusion of two weeks of engagements in Egypt, Europe and the United States. “We cannot afford to sit back in splendid ...
Prime Minister Christopher Luxon has announced the Australian Governor-General, His Excellency General The Honourable David Hurley and his wife Her Excellency Mrs Linda Hurley, will make a State visit to New Zealand from Tuesday 16 April to Thursday 18 April. The visit reciprocates the State visit of former Governor-General Dame Patsy Reddy ...
Associate Health Minister David Seymour has announced that Medsafe has approved 11 cold and flu medicines containing pseudoephedrine. Pharmaceutical suppliers have indicated they may be able to supply the first products in June. “This is much earlier than the original expectation of medicines being available by 2025. The Government recognised ...
New Zealand and the United States have recommitted to their strategic partnership in Washington DC today, pledging to work ever more closely together in support of shared values and interests, Foreign Minister Winston Peters says. “The strategic environment that New Zealand and the United States face is considerably more ...
April 11, 2024 Joint Declaration by United States Secretary of State the Honorable Antony J. Blinken and New Zealand Minister of Foreign Affairs the Right Honourable Winston Peters We met today in Washington, D.C. to recommit to the historic partnership between our two countries and the principles that underpin it—rule ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Michael Sievers, Research Fellow, Global Wetlands Project, Australia Rivers Institute, Griffith University Chris Brown Humans love the coast. But we love it to death, so much so we’ve destroyed valuable coastal habitat – in the case of some types of habitat, ...
Josh Thomson on the 80s milk ad jingle he can’t stop singing, the beauty of The Simpsons, why Jersey Shore is as good as Shakespeare and more. For someone who spends a lot of time on our screens, popping up in everything from 7 Days to Taskmaster, Educators to Good ...
In apparent defiance of the Biden administration, the Netanyahu government has now initiated missile strikes against Iran. Last Saturday night (Sunday morning in New Zealand) Iran launched more than 300 drones, cruise missiles and ballistic missiles against Israeli military targets. With the assistance of US, UK and possibly French forces, ...
Māori representation brings a perspective that encompasses not only the interests of Māori communities but also a broader, holistic approach to environmental stewardship and community well-being, principles deeply embedded in Te Ao Māori (the Māori ...
The summer was wonderful. Evie was wonderful, too; finally a teenager, finally worthy of long, hot days. She shaved her legs for the first time and bought cut-off shorts from the op-shop that made them look long. She got a Warehouse singlet so tight on her new shape that her ...
When Thomas James was on his solo camp as part of Outward Bound, the keen outdoorsman didn’t find it too challenging, as others often do. In what might just be the perfect illustration of his character, he saw it as a great opportunity to solve a few problems. “I thought, ...
This week in Auckland, a group of young people took over the microphone at a ministerial press conference, to explain why they oppose the Fast-Track Approvals Bill. One young woman said, ‘We’re here because we love Aotearoa New Zealand. We want to raise our children in an environment that’s thriving, ...
From the unstable and drippy to the hi-tech and pretty, here’s our ranking of all the tunnels you can drive through in this country. The first tunnel seems to have been built in 2200BC in Babylonia, kicking off a global phenomenon for digging holes in order to get places more ...
Lucinda Bennett on the art of being greedy but resourceful. This is an excerpt from our weekly food newsletter, The Boil Up. When I picture the market, it is always this time of year. Crisp air, dripping nose, counting coins with cold fingers. Sunlight pale, filtered through specks of dew still ...
Zoë Colling’s favourite piece in the ‘That’s So Last Century’ collection is a lubrication chart for a sewing machine from the ’60s. It’s about the size of a postcard, and carefully maintained. “I like it that this piece of ephemera highlights that manual and technical side of the skill involved ...
Kia Ora Gaza A passionate haka reverberated through Auckland International Airport as a medical team of three New Zealand doctors received an emotional farewell from a big crowd of supporters before flying to Turkey to join the international Freedom Flotilla to Gaza. The doctors, who left Auckland yesterday, hope to ...
With submissions closing today, Macassey-Pickard says groups around the country have been supporting a huge range of people to make their submissions. ...
Our response to the new legislation is informed by targeted conversations with practitioners working in the system and through an implementation lens. ...
The new ‘Fast-track Approvals Bill’ would give just three Ministers the power to approve or deny development projects. They would avoid the usual checks and balances that are in place to protect rivers, land, the ocean, and communities. ...
COMMENTARY:By Eugene Doyle Helen Clark, how I miss you. The former New Zealand Prime Minister — the safest pair of hands this country has had in living memory — gave a masterclass on the importance of maintaining an independent foreign policy when she spoke at an AUKUS symposium held ...
The government's released the list of organisations provided with information on how to apply - just hours before public submissions on the bill close. ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Milton Speer, Visiting Fellow, School of Mathematical and Physical Sciences, University of Technology Sydney Before climate change really got going, eastern Australia’s flash floods tended to concentrate on our coastal regions, east of the Great Dividing Range. But that’s changing. Now ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Elizabeth Finkel, Vice-Chancellor’s Fellow, La Trobe University Sia Duff / South Australian Museum In February, the South Australian Museum “re-imagined” itself. In the face of rising costs and inadequate government funds, CEO David Gaimster, who took the reins last June, declared ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Alan Pearce, Professor, School of Allied Heath, Human Services & Sport, La Trobe University, La Trobe University This week, Collingwood AFL player Nathan Murphy announced his retirement, brought on by his concussion history and ongoing issues. The 24-year-old’s seemingly sudden retirement, ...
The Mental Health Foundation provides support and resources for those facing the loss of their job, so it’s wrong in the very week the Government adds another 1000 jobs to its tally of cuts, that this is happening. ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Alexander Howard, Senior Lecturer, Discipline of English and Writing, University of Sydney Daniel Boud/Sydney Theatre Company Decay, terror, revulsion. These are three of the central themes of Thomas Bernhard’s rarely performed play The President. The Austrian is one of the greatest ...
Prime Minister Christopher Luxon says threats by ministers Shane Jones and David Seymour to reform or close down the Waitangi Tribunal were “ill-considered”, as legal experts say the ministers may have breached Cabinet Manual conventions. “I think those comments are ill-considered and we expect all ministers to actually exercise good ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Ye In (Jane) Hwang, Postdoctoral Research Associate at School of Population Health, UNSW Sydney Shutterstock You’d be hard pressed to find any aspect of daily life that doesn’t require some form of digital literacy. We need only to look back ten ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Rob Newton, Professor of Exercise Medicine, Edith Cowan University Pexels/RDNE stock project You’re not in your 20s or 30s anymore and you know regular health checks are important. So you go to your GP. During the appointment they measure your waist. ...
A new poem by Evangeline Riddiford Graham. Mitochondrial Problem I. It was long drive to Kansas for the man and his dog but you have to understand he said She doesn’t fly. Which calls to mind not carsick shitting barking or whining but a dog who chooses not to as ...
The only published and available best-selling indie book chart in New Zealand is the top 10 sales list recorded every week at Unity Books’ stores in High St, Auckland, and Willis St, Wellington.AUCKLAND1 Hemingway’s Goblet by Dermot Ross (Mary Egan Publishing, $38)Hot off the press, this debut ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Laura Wajnryb McDonald, PhD candidate in Criminology, University of Sydney Less than 24 hours after Ashlee Good was murdered in Bondi Junction, her family released a statement requesting the media take down photographs they had reproduced of Ashlee and her family without ...
Chief executive Shaun Robinson said it has not had any government funding cut, but government-funded contracts have not kept pace with rising costs. ...
The Ministry of Health has delayed the release of its evidence brief on the safety, reversibility and mental health and wellbeing outcomes for puberty blockers. While we wait, Julia de Bres speaks to those with firsthand experience. Best practice gender-affirming healthcare is based on trans people’s self-determination and agency. The ...
Barcelona’s city streets have gone from traffic-clogged to pedestrian-friendly. How? Superblocks. Ellen Rykers explains. This is an excerpt from our weekly environmental newsletter Future Proof. Sign up here. Last week I read a great interview with renowned urbanist Janette Sadik-Khan by The Spinoff’s Wellington editor Joel MacManus: “You can reimagine streets, ...
Student groups ‘Climate Action VUW’, Schools Strike 4 Climate and VUWSA will be on the street in Wellington today, the last day for submissions on the Fast-track Approvals Bill, with a message that the fight against the Government’s ‘War on ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Sofia Ammassari, Research Fellow, Griffith University Since 2014, Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s popularity has grown exponentially – and so has the formidable organisational machine of his Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP). These two factors will be key to delivering the BJP a ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Brendon Hyndman, Associate Professor of Education (Adjunct) & Senior Manager (BCE), Charles Sturt University During COVID almost all Australian students and their families experienced online learning. But while schools have long since gone back to in-person teaching, online learning has not gone ...
Yes, they’re better for the environment. No, that’s not a good enough reason for me to use them. Once every 26 days or so, my period arrives, and if struck by an act of God, I am caught red-crotched without products. How, after 17 years of this, do I still ...
“It will cause significant harm to our environment and communities. It is completely at odds with New Zealanders’ relationship with nature and our need for a low-carbon, sustainable economic future." ...
The Chair of the National Maori Authority, Matthew Tukaki, has warned a Parliamentary Select Committee that fast-tracking legislation is a perilous practice that undermines the core tenets of democracy, transparency, and accountability. ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Tim Tenbensel, Associate Professor, Health Policy, University of Auckland, Waipapa Taumata Rau Getty Images Since coming into power, the coalition government has adopted a simple but shrewd see-how-fast-we-can-move political strategy. However, in the health sector this need for speed entails ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Anastasia Hronis, Clinical Psychologist, University of Technology Sydney Darya Sannikova/Pexels Whether you’re watching TV, attending a footy game, or eating a meal at your local pub, gambling is hard to escape. Although the rise of gambling is not unique to Australia, ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Mark Wong, Forrest Fellow, School of Biological Sciences, The University of Western Australia Have you ever wondered if there are more insects out at night than during the day? We set out to answer this question by combing through the scientific ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Carol T Kulik, Research Professor, University of South Australia IR Stone/Shutterstock In Australia, it’s not the done thing to know – let alone ask – what our colleagues are paid. Yet, it’s easy to see how pay transparency can make pay ...
The Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment (MBIE) is sounding a warning to migrants, that running foul of the law may see them leaving the country prematurely. ...
The government’s plan to get 50,000 people off jobseeker support by 2030 has had a rocky start, writes Catherine McGregor in this excerpt from The Bulletin, The Spinoff’s morning news round-up. To receive The Bulletin in full each weekday, sign up here. Beneficiary numbers are up – and so are ...
Raglan Roast is a staple of Wellington coffee culture. But with five branches across the capital, which one is the best? I am a die-hard Raglan Roast fan. It’s consistently the most affordable cafe in Wellington, and one of the only places you can get a coffee after 3pm. So, ...
Residents of University of Auckland halls are being urged to withhold their accommodation fees from May 1, in a bid to force the university to take student concerns over rent hikes seriously.The University of Auckland is facing a strike from students over the cost of on-campus accommodation. The Students ...
New Zealand and the Philippines have signed a new maritime security agreement and stated their concerns over activity in the South China Sea, as Chinese vessels continue to flout international law. Prime Minister Christopher Luxon and Philippines President Ferdinand “Bongbong” Marcos committed to signing a Mutual Logistics Supporting Arrangement by ...
The thousands of government “back-office” job cuts are causing widespread pain in the capital city. In today’s episode of The Detail, we speak to three journalists and a think tank researcher, looking at the larger picture around the cuts and what effect it will have on Wellington, a city that’s ...
Opinion: The famed American architect and urban designer Daniel Burnham once said, “Make no little plans. They have no magic to stir men’s blood!” Burnham wouldn’t have been referring to the transport plans in Aotearoa New Zealand over the past five years; projects so big they hadn’t the credibility to ...
Loading…(function(i,s,o,g,r,a,m){var ql=document.querySelectorAll('A[quiz],DIV[quiz],A[data-quiz],DIV[data-quiz]'); if(ql){if(ql.length){for(var k=0;k<ql.length;k++){ql[k].id='quiz-embed-'+k;ql[k].href="javascript:var i=document.getElementById('quiz-embed-"+k+"');try{qz.startQuiz(i)}catch(e){i.start=1;i.style.cursor='wait';i.style.opacity='0.5'};void(0);"}}};i['QP']=r;i[r]=i[r]||function(){(i[r].q=i[r].q||[]).push(arguments)},i[r].l=1*new Date();a=s.createElement(o),m=s.getElementsByTagName(o)[0];a.async=1;a.src=g;m.parentNode.insertBefore(a,m)})(window,document,'script','https://take.quiz-maker.com/3012/CDN/quiz-embed-v1.js','qp'); Got a good quiz question?Send Newsroom your questions. The post Newsroom daily quiz, Friday 19 April appeared first on Newsroom. ...
Opinion: With maths understanding at 42 percent for Year 8 students, there’s no doubt something has to be done. But how? The post Financial literacy should be on all of us appeared first on Newsroom. ...
Hineaupounamu ‘Missy’ Nuku has been scaling mountains in Canada for her college basketball team, the Lakeland Rustlers. Alberta is currently home for the 20-year-old point guard, who is in her first year of a scholarship at Lakeland College, where she is studying for a business degree. She has certainly made ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Michelle Grattan, Professorial Fellow, University of Canberra When ASIO boss Mike Burgess delivered his annual threat assessment earlier this year, he stressed the rising danger posed by espionage and foreign interference. “In 2024, threats to our way of life have surpassed ...
This story about Tim Groser says it all too: http://www.stuff.co.nz/4785450a6160.html
Environmentalists that are not either.
Well, kiwis voted for change apparently – no surprise that the authors of New Zealand Sucks would have to cancel Buy New Zealand before introducing Sell New Zealand…..
“Ms Bradford questioned Mr Brownlee’s decision, and said that since it began the campaign had resulted in more people supporting local products.”
Really – if Sue can provide any evidence of this it would be interesting. I doubt there is any such evidence and the money would indeed be better spent elsewhere.
This is really really sad. I felt this campaign was just starting to gain some traction, many people I know were starting to look out for NZ made goods, taking pride in supporting the locals.
The sad part is the locally made brands that have since shut up shop and gone overseas: macpac, swandry, fisher & pykael etc. and now this government is axing buying kiwi made. What a kick in the guts for our local manufacturers.
This government really is opposed to everything kiwi.
I would expect that the choice of phrase used by SP was a deliberate misrepresentation given that the decision is to review not cancel:
The alternative is to simply support government spending without any consideration of the benefits.
Local manufacturers want more than a tv advertising campaign. Given where there are heading, some liberalisation of employment law would be one thing that could help but we all know what the response to that would be here.
How come you refer to it as the National/Act Government when the Maori Party and UF is in it too?
[lprent: Because I know that there is a strong congruence between the right wing of the Nats in cabinet and Act. That is likely to provide the political access of this government. The Maori Party IMO doesn’t have any real allies in the Nats cabinet except for a few National Maori MP’s, only one of whom has any real standing.
IF the MP manages to make a real impact (ie not just edge stuff like UF does), then I might change my opinion.]
HS: http://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/PA0812/S00047.htm
“On top of that, independent research carried out on the effectiveness of the Buy Kiwi Made campaign proves that consumer, retailer and manufacturer awareness and support are steadily increasing.
“The most recent evaluation, in November 2008, shows that 360,000 more shoppers think Kiwi-made than before the marketing programme began.
Would be interesting to see the actual research and how this was assessed – I would expect this to be part of the review as to how effective or not it has been.
I felt this campaign was just starting to gain some traction, many people I know were starting to look out for NZ made goods, taking pride in supporting the locals.
That’s the complete reverse of my perception. A quick survey of my colleagues – just as scientific as “many people I know” 🙂 – came to the opposite conclusion.
Those of us that already actively seek out NZ made goods where possible aren’t changing our spending patterns based on the ad, and those of us that have other priorities (price etc) we never going to change in the first place.
On both counts, that’s a failed campaign.
lukas,
I don’t recall you ever asking why the righties here used to refer to the previous govt as the “Clark-Peters” govt. although it too included two other parties.
I wonder why.
Felix, I always thought of it as having Jim and UF also.
The ‘Buy NZ made campaign’ could’ve been SSSOOOOOOO much better.
The expensive ads with Oliver as a robot do nothing.
All they need is a damn good website cataloging all the NZ made stuff & an option to buy online. Then a few cheaps TV-ads directing people to the site.
The current adds & website are flashy non-sense.
lukas, indeed it should be referred to as the 4 headed (5 if you include the co-leaders) monster that it is! Good point
Stupidest idea to get rid of Buy NZ made campaign… what the hell were they thinking?
“Stupidest idea to get rid of Buy NZ made campaign what the hell were they thinking?”
1) That its not the job of the government to promote one product over another. Its the job of the producers to promote their product.
2) If you really do believe in New Zealand bussinesses then stop spending money on silly ad campaigns and give them more liberalized employment laws (90 day bill etc). That way they can determine their own future.
“All they need is a damn good website cataloging all the NZ made stuff & an option to buy online. Then a few cheaps adds directing people to the site.”
That makes sense
Quite a good idea for a buynz.co.nz have a list of NZ retailers selling NZ only stuff. Would work quite well I’d imagine.
lukas its pretty obvious that the 2 main players in the current govt are Nat and Act who don’t actually need the other two parties and that the Maori Party were only added as a backstop to disempower Act should the tail start to wag the dog.
Also it gives Nat the opportunity to grab more Maori left leaning voters before the next election. Still at the end of the day its exactly what the were accusing the left of being……… “A multi headed monster” (my term, as the number of heads dosn’t matter – just the fact that they’re there)
“NACT” + others
I haven’t seen the ads so I can’t comment on the value of this specific campaign, but it’s surely worthwhile to keep promoting the general principle of buying NZ made goods.
Phil’s comment above reminds me of some of the misguided comments I read after the repeal of section 59 which were along the lines of “Oh look, a kid was killed today so clearly changing that law was a waste of time”.
We’re talking about attempts to shift attitudes over the long term, changes which are measured not in months and years, but decades and generations.
I like NX’s idea. Perhaps we should push for NX to be put in charge of this campaign? 😉
The ad campaign is bad for New Zealand. Its a shocking waste of tax payers money. Here’s why:
Econ101 – Consumers that choose to spend more to buy New Zealand made purely because its from New Zealand effectively provide a subsidy to the producer.(This is not the case if the purchase of the NZ made product is rational – ie its cheaper or better quality) These consumers are subsidising inefficient businesses (if they were efficient they wouldn’t need government funded ad campaigns), This decreases consumers disposable income so they have less to spend on efficient kiwi producers. New Zealand as a whole would be far better off if inefficient producers instead moved into efficient industries. This subsidy increases producer surplus but consumer surplus is decreased by more than that increase – hence this policy results in a dead weight loss – wasted money!
I’m with NX on the website idea, though I know I personally have started spending a lot more money in shops displaying the “Buy Kiwi and we’ve got it made” stickers/signs.
Love the classic sneak tactics – “we can’t commit more cash to this unless a review shows it to be effective” … with no actual statement that a review will, in fact, be carried out.
(Sure, one could read an implication that a review will be done, but then either Brownlee’s PR advisor or the NZPA should have said “forthcoming review” to ensure clarity of meaning. No, I’m not obsessed with semantics, why do you ask?)
Few reasons why I buy kiwi made (where possible):
-Local Economy. When I buy a kiwi made product that money is going to help keep locals employed.
-Ethics. The people making the goods are receiving a decent wage and working conditions.
-Quality. Generally the products are better quality and will last. They’re not going to wind up 6 months later in a landfill.
Sure :). And I accept the generous salary which probably goes with the job.
Telling people to simply ‘buy NZ made’ isn’t good enough.
Information is the key. TradeMe & eBay are great for finding exactly what you want.
There are some great NZ made safety gear – likes footwear etc. Half the problem is finding where to get the stuff. So a website to tie it all together would be great.
I would also widen the website’s scope to include products made with environmental considerations – irrespective of where they’re made.
‘Conscious consumerism’ is the future in my opinion. Where people can choose to spend their money on things that are important to them.
Information is the key. All going well we wouldn’t even need the ETS/carbon trading rubbish.
ak said on
December 8, 2008 at 10:33 am
“Well, kiwis voted for change apparently – no surprise that the authors of New Zealand Sucks would have to cancel Buy New Zealand before introducing Sell New Zealand ..”
I can’t better what you just said, so I’ve repeated your post.
Hope you don’t mind me using your words.
Come to think of it… they could have an ‘NZ made’ search option on TradeMe. The search could be refined for ‘new’ and ‘second hand’.
^ I’m sure that would be more helpful than the Oliver Robot.
Greg, being “efficient” is not the sole determinant of the worth of an enterprise. Many “inefficient” things (ie. the public service, Air NZ, manufacturing) are better retained locally — to do otherwise puts them at risk of insecurity/profiteering/asset stripping. Also, surely fair trade is better than “free” trade?
As it is, NZers are effectively “subsidising” profits to overseas corporations — to the tune of $5 billion (or more) per year:
Felix said on
December 8, 2008 at 11:58 am “We’re talking about attempts to shift attitudes over the long term, changes which are measured not in months and years, but decades and generations.”
That is what NZers never understood about the real legacy of the Labour plus Government.
That NZers had the energy and the independence and the confidence to complain about Labour is due in large part to Labour giving them their mana back.
The only problem with helping people is when they’re back on their feet, the last thing they want to be is forever beholden to the people who helped them. But Labour was concerned with investing in a country that could once again make its own product not be buying 3rd rate product in and losing export monies.
Daveski – I bet you hate that the Labour Government wouldn’t let employers pay Mexican wages to New Zealanders. No doubt you’ll be pleased to have the ‘NZ sucks’ National Party in. By the time N/act’s finished engineering the employment laws NZers will be leaving here to get better wages in Mexico.
Well Buy NZ hasn’t helped my biz one little bit and I have used NZ design, supply, manufacture, marketing, products, services, bloody NZ everything. Amounts to diddly squat when the cheque comes to be written. Maybe I am just too inefficient. Mind you my industry has no competition from overseas companies.
Any marketing campaign needs to have measurable results. While it sounds good for Bradford to claim 360,000 more shoppers think Kiwi-made than before, where is the proof that this is translating into dollars spent on Kiwi-made. And are the surveyed shoppers actually the target market for this campaign? Do you even know who the target market is? Low income earners? Beneficiaries? Or just ‘the rich’.
What NZ made goods are lower income earners meant to buy? Can they afford the generally higher cost of buying NZ made goods when the imported alternatives are so much cheaper and means they can still buy Christmas presents for their kids?
Do NZ made goods need to compete on price? If so are we prepared to have lower wages in order to make this possible?
If we aren’t expecting the low income earners to be part of the target market of this campaign then who is it, and what are the likely products they will buy that are NZ made?
Let’s see the business case for this campaign, and some real measurable outcomes. It seems to me that the millions of taxpayer dollars being spent on this campaign are misguided and wasteful.
Jum – you miss my point going for the dramatic riposte.
If you asked employers, I’ll bet you that the majority would suggest a raft of activities that would benefit business beyond a simple advertising campaign. No where did I infer a desire to lower wages.
My point is that an advertising campaign won’t be enough to stop manufacturers moving off shore.
Are things still actually being Made in NZ ? Besides food (& beverage) products, what else do we actually make in NZ ?
That NZers had the energy and the independence and the confidence to complain about Labour is due in large part to Labour giving them their mana back.
How dare that ungrateful middle class not vote for Labour after all we’ve done for you!
vidiot; houses
vidiot:
Backpacks, outdoor gear, plastic wear, clothing, bikes, furniture, jewelery, glassware, tools, software, tires, timber, wind farm turbines, boats, bedding etc.
Its out there if you look for it.
Kevin Rudd has told Australians to spend for the economy and to Buy Australian Made for the obvious benefits for Australian workers and the economy.
I notice my supermarket has labels on shelfs indicating NZ made products. I usually choose the NZ one if there is a choice.
Some brands I know of made in NZ:
-Cactus Climbing: good quality backpacks made in Christchurch
-Sistema: plastic containers
-Click-Clack: plastic containers, still local I think?
-Survival: merino thermal clothing
-CCC: Canterbury Canterbury Canterbury, used to make the old All Blacks jerseys until the rugby union sold them out to Adidas. Now makes socks and some clothing.Most stuff made at Christchurch factory, some is Chinese though.
-Rembrant: suit makers
-Chalky Digits: clothes
-Firestone: tires
Anyone want to expand? Im sure there’s more.
How does being NZ Made make something intrinsicly better?
Should we be buying NZ made TVs?
Cars?
Should we have import controls?
Why do we need govt to tell us to buy NZ made? Why can’t we do it ourselves? Why can’t manufacturers band together, and promote it themselves. This (Buy NZ Made regardless of price or quality) is simply corportate welfare and nationalism. Not sound economic policy.
I’ll buy NZ made if I like the product (I love supporting *good* local music, food, clothing etc) and it is well priced, not because its made in NZ, but because I want it.
“Greg
December 8, 2008 at 12:12 pm
The ad campaign is bad for New Zealand. Its a shocking waste of tax payers money. Here’s why:
Econ101 – Consumers that choose to spend more to buy New Zealand made purely because its from New Zealand effectively provide a subsidy to the producer.(This is not the case if the purchase of the NZ made product is rational – ie its cheaper or better quality) These consumers are subsidising inefficient businesses (if they were efficient they wouldn’t need government funded ad campaigns), This decreases consumers disposable income so they have less to spend on efficient kiwi producers. New Zealand as a whole would be far better off if inefficient producers instead moved into efficient industries. This subsidy increases producer surplus but consumer surplus is decreased by more than that increase – hence this policy results in a dead weight loss – wasted money!
”
And its bad for the environment as its an ineffecient use of scarce resources.
No wonder the Greens are all for it, being environmentalists and all!
PS: how on earth do I type a pound sign? Its in the captcha!
Any of you lefties got any evidence that this campaign has resulted in the purchase of single NZ made product that would not otherwise have been bought? Warning: if anyone replies using the word “awareness” I will personally hunt you down and knee you in your soft bits.
Billy – I went from buying NZ made goods about half or the time to buying them almost exclusively. Part of the reason I was able to do this was it raised awareness amongst retailer that NZ Made was a selling point and they actually started clearly labeling goods as such…
Oh and Billy – I don’t have soft bits. I’m 100% hard-ass.
Ha! Cap is “IV Pierson”! does Steve have a habit he’d rather not talk about…
MikeE,
Who says “Buy NZ Made regardless of price or quality”? Quote? Link? Or just paraphrasing your own arse?
Billy,
It’s all about awareness.
It was canceled because like a lot of the Green’s programmes it didn’t produce enough good results.
Also the concepts of the ads were wrong, it should of been buy NewZealand made because we produce the best at the best price, not just buy NewZealand made for the sake of it.
“It was canceled because like a lot of the Green’s programmes it didn’t produce enough good results.”
And National’s programmes produce better results?
Women do most of the shopping and women are discerning shoppers. Most women I know look for NZ made things because they are good quality and different eg kumfs and minnie cooper shoes (I’ve stopped buying Minx now they’re made in China). We are very conscious that Buy NZ made also means NZ jobs as well. Women are also label readers in supermarkets.
What really urks me is when you come across a NZ brand that has traded on being quality and locally made but has recently moved to Asia e.g. Macpac, Fairydown.
They try and tell you its exactly the same quality as you’re used to. Somehow I doubt a wage slave in China is going to make an equal quality product compared to a happy worker on a decent wage in NZ.
Buy NZ made only works as a campaign, if we are thinking about campaigning about the positive things about New Zealand as a whole.
The National party don’t particularly want to arouse nationalist sentiment that might be annoying when they introduce PPPs or saying yes to whatever Australia and the U.S. say.
The things that define us, or make us nationalistic: that have been our ‘brand’ if you will are not always things this government is comfortable with.
Our environmentalism (well and truly on the wane), being tidy repsonsible kiwis, our nuclear free and independent foreign policy, our multiculturual and inclusive society, the idea of giving someone a fair go, and indeed good faith and fairness in general, the idea of looking after people who can’t look after themselves and caring for others in need…
so many of these things are well in truly at odds with the National Party or they simply don’t care about them. How can they try and talk up a brand they don’t care that much about?
I just love how Janet seems to think she represents every female in New Zealand. In fact I’m always astounded when anyone here believe they represent the whole of New Zealand. I’m sorry you don’t.
The Buy NZ campaign was pretty dire I think. I didn’t really get it. Here was some ultra-technological factory building a robot that happened to be Oliver Driver who I find awful. New Zealand doesn’t exactly build many technological things that a consumer can easily buy at the shop. The campaign was a huge misstep and personally never made me more New Zealand products.
Thus I really am not concerned that the campaign was suspended.
Perhaps the National Party think that this is the kind of thing that the business community will provide out of its evident self interest? you know like banks and lending to people who are able to pay back and that kind of thing?
waiting with baited breathe.
It’s up to businesses to be self sustaining Paul, it would be a poor excuse for a business that relied on government funding to survive. Why should taxpayer money be spent on marketing costs for NZ businesses?
I am amused that a left wing blog is trying to defend this campaign. It’s very apparent that it’s only because it was Bradford’s project. If National had launched the campaign you would all be up in arms about it being a way for them to be lining the pockets of their business buddies.
leftrightout:
You should never buy a product just because it comes from your country.
You should buy the best product for the best price.
Where does the article you link to say that the Buy New Zealand campaign has been cancalled?
Pierson, your points would be taken far more seriously if they weren’t so well embellished with bullshit.
G
Brett,
“You should buy the best product for the best price.”
Yep, but all other things being equal, of course you should support local businesses. It keeps more money here for us and it uses less transportation which is better environmentally.
So Brett, my question is: If you have to choose between a foreign product and a local one of equal quality, how small does the price difference have to be before you’d pick the NZ product?
It sounds like you’re saying it’s zero, whereas I happily pay a few percent more to support local workers and local businesses. Why? Because I’m selfish. I want local businesses and local workers to be better off because then I’m better off in the long run.
Brett:
What motivates me to buy kiwi made is that my action of buying that product is resulting in jobs for kiwi’s, keeps profits in NZ and thats good for New Zealand. The last thing I want to see is us become a nation of retailers who just sell imported junk.
I can always buy the alternative, the cheap imported shit from China, after all its the best product at the best price. But then Id be supporting one of the biggest polluters in the world, bank-rolling what is effectively slave labour and undermining local kiwi’s.
Sometimes you’ve got to ask whats behind the price tag.
I wasn’t aware there was a Buy New Zealand campaign on…..
Chess Player
Considering chess players have to think 10 moves ahead, I’m thinking you meant to type that you were a ‘cheese maker’.
Waiting for maturity can take forever with cheese.
Regarding buying NZ Made, personally discern on two levels,
food always buy NZ made/grown products in the supermarket (unless there is not a local version available or more than 25% higher priced)*
Otherwise best value on everything else (though I avoid Norwegian, Japanese or any other whaling murdering bastard countries product)
* Does not apply to booze (though I only buy NZ wines) and chocolate
Re chocolate – there is a distinct flavour difference between NZ and Australian chocolate, even that under the Cadbury brand. I think it is something to do with the lush NZ grass NZ cows eat.
GC Of course I don’t claim to represent NZ women but I have a wide circle and we discuss topics such as this. In fact were talking about this with a group just yesterday and we all agreed that we take care to buy NZ made. We don’t automatically buy Fisher and Paykel any more – in fact some actively boycott it after the NZ factory closures.
Heaven forbid that I would agree on anything with women like Judith Collins.
As a friend of mine pointed out, Labour in 1935 brought in the ethos of the Welfare State to give all New Zealanders help when they needed it. The National Party was transmogrified from the ashes of the ruling elite in 1936 to get rid of the Labour Party’s plan to be there for all NZers.
Now, I always read the rightie posts with that thought in mind.
The Left considers how they can help local business (YES, even the very businesses which would shaft them with the 90day probation period).
The Right only ever think of themselves.
This election was never about a change of face. It was about the destruction of a unifying philosophy, in order to allow for a foreign takeover bid, using divide and conquer tactics.
Consumers always will buy the best product at the best price. Putting Oliver Driver on TV telling us to pay more for a sub-standard product just because it will help the bloke down the road was never going to convince anyone at the till.
though I only buy NZ wines
Now there is a local industry worth celebrating!
woo!
I happily pay a few percent more to support local workers and local businesses. Why? Because I’m selfish. I want local businesses and local workers to be better off because then I’m better off in the long run.
What if your “better off” comes at the expense of the chinese labourer that used to make shoes, and now gets nothing?
What do you see as a bigger loss of income: the guy that goes from NZ minium wage to the unemployment benefit OR the guy in China going from a few cents a day to nothing at all?
Janet
Totally agree.
If only women realised that, as the major buyer or influence on buying decisions, their power is huge. If they ever decide to form a lobby group country-wide they could easily bring a company down, whatever its size.
The said company had better hope the lobby group consists of left-leaning (as I stated at 5.37) women who won’t want to damage the company or its workers!
Putting aside the obvious*, I’ve always wondered about the philosophical basis for these “buy NZ made” campaigns.
Are we saying that we should be more worried about the plight of NZers over the plight of Chinese people? Why should we care that plastic stuff comes out of China, and each time you buy plastic stuff from China the per capita GDP there gets a little bit closer to ours (but still miles behind)?
Do we care about human welfare, but only if it’s humans within our borders…?
* How can anyone complain about actually checking to see whether “Buy New Zealand made” is value for money? If I hire someone to clean my windows, I need to check that they’ve done a decent job before I decide to hire them again. I’d be a moron if, instead of checking the windows in front of me, I spent hours debating whether window-cleaners are a good idea in principle… National is absolutely within its rights to review the previous government’s expenditure and find out whether the money might be better spent on something else. That’s the job we pay them to do.
Chess Player is the only person who used “awareness” who does not get a knee in the groin.
The captcha included my reasonably uncommon surname. Too spooky when added to the “Pierson” thing in ‘sod’s.
Jum
Women have organised themselves into a consumer lobby before. CARP – campaign against rising prices – was very effective in the 1960s/1970s. I think Cath Kelly, mother of the CTU’s Helen Kelly, was one of the main activists.
I think (memory hazy here) that the 3rd Labour govt’s maximum retail price (Warren Freer’s MRP campaign) was one of the results. Regulations to limit prices of consumer goods. Now wouldn’t that be a good idea again! That would shock the righties above.
Re Jimbo
December 8, 2008 at 5:54 pm
I’m intrigued and suspicious. If National is so concerned about value for money re Buy NZ Made, why didn’t they check earlier and bleat then.
I guess they knew it would have made them sound like they didn’t care about small NZ business and workers pre-electionand now of course they can bleat about this and cover up on the nasty little sidelines they are pursuing, with forcing unemployment up through businesses falling over, if less attention goes on Buy NZ Made and thereby creating their dreamed of weak, desperate labour force.
NZers ‘are’ still so comfortable under the inclusive previous Government they don’t believe ‘nouveauNational’ can hurt their future. I know better.
“Buy kiwi made” was an 8 million dollar accommodation for the greens, a complete waste of money and more proof (if you needed it) of the left’s myth that throwing large amounts of cash at something will fix it. Good riddance
Buy NZ Made is a member based organisation funded by members, the Government campaign is the Buy Kiwi Made Campaign.
Buy NZ Made won 50% funding from one of the Buy Kiwi Made Campaign’s funding rounds to build a website to advertise New Zealand Made goods and to connect manufacturers, retailers and consumers with them.
This website has been up and running since September the 1st and has been advertised on web and in magazines. It has also been mentioned in the latest Buy Kiwi Made radio advertisements.
So for those of you who were wishing for a website which catalogues NZ Made goods .. your wish is granted. The website currently shows over 2000 products which is not bad for such a new site. This site is lilkely to grow considerably over the next few months.
Go to http://www.getnzmade.net
Trina
Thanks for the correction.
Madeleine
December 8, 2008 at 5:39 pm
So you are telling me that NZ made/Kiwi made is sub-standard product?
Trina – would you care to comment on this.
Trina
Thanks for that link. That’s just the sort of website I would use when looking for specific items for the house or presents etc.
@Tim: Riiight.
Heh I had you in the grip of angry reason and then lost it all with the quote tags.
basically, mate, you are an idealogue of the worst sort. I understand the sentiment. I even appreciate that we can’t run on subsidies, and if we are doing that for profitable industries it is completely wrong.
However we don’t live in a free trade society. If you are consistent and not just an idiot troll I expect to see you supporting business taking the full cost of their carbon pollution as soon as possible.
sorry? Was that taxpayer money should not be spent subsidising business unless it is a large amount?
Realisitically in a small country government has a role to play in helping business in this way. If the National party were really nationalists, they would be doing that, instead of searching for ways to reduce costs for their chums in international cartels.
“So you are telling me that NZ made/Kiwi made is sub-standard product?’
Actually, thats what this entire campaign is doing. To me, the government steping in to promote a product suggests that the product is not good enough to be sold on its own merits and that it needs to be protected or it will not be able to compete with others.
Some people in this thread refer to a ‘New Zealand sucks’ campaign. Well clearly if they think that New Zealand products should be protected through this campaign or other measures then they are the ones who think that New Zealand products suck.
Nope. Just pissing on a dead man’s legacy.
RIP Rod Donald.
“ropata
December 8, 2008 at 12:39 pm
Greg, being “efficient’ is not the sole determinant of the worth of an enterprise. Many “inefficient’ things (ie. the public service, Air NZ, manufacturing) are better retained locally — to do otherwise puts them at risk of insecurity/profiteering/asset stripping. Also, surely fair trade is better than “free’ trade?
As it is, NZers are effectively “subsidising’ profits to overseas corporations — to the tune of $5 billion (or more) per year:
Transnational corporations (TNCs) make massive profits out of New Zealand. These can truly be called New Zealand’s biggest invisible export. In the decade 1997-2006, TNCs made $50.3 billion profits. Only 32% was reinvested, and in some years more was sent overseas than was earned or the reinvestment was significantly offset by capital being taken out of the country.”
Ropata – you’ve just stumbled upon the economic concept of comparative advantage. Of course transnational corporations make profits out of New Zealand. But we make a hell of a lot off our exports too. You can’t have one but not the other. Are you suggesting we cut off all trade? Comparative advantage is gained when when each country specialises in what they’re best at and trade (well there’s more to it then that but we’ll leave it there). That way each country makes the most effective use of its own resources. Protectionist measures like the ‘buy NZ made ad campaign inhibit this and its makes NZ and the rest of the world worst off.
On your other points. Air NZ and manufacturing are classic examples of industries that should not be propped up by the government. In Air NZ’s case competitors like pacific blue, quantas etc etc will keep them honest whether they’re owned by NZ or China. Manufacturing is a part of the buy NZ made answer. We should only keep manufacturing goods that we can produce efficiently. Thats why we don’t have a car industry. Its much cheaper for us to import – look to the states to see how a subsidised car industry is further crippling their economy. In the Public service efficiency results in the best result anyway – we want the services provided by the public service to cost as little as possible so we can have lower taxes and more money to spend!
I get pretty passionate about this ‘fair trade’ thing. I too want save the starving in africa. But did you know trade barriers cost the third world a hell of a lot more than the amount of aid we give them. The facts are there – google it (I can’t be bothered, its late). ‘Unfair trade’ is far far far better than no trade at all. The fact is – countries who engage in trade even if its from sweatshops improve over time – look at Japan. Buying their ‘cheap and nasty’ products is the best help we can give them.
Paul – “However we don’t live in a free trade society. If you are consistent and not just an idiot troll I expect to see you supporting business taking the full cost of their carbon pollution as soon as possible.”
Yeah sure. But a couple of points. Business won’t take the brunt of the cost, it will be passed onto the consumer – lets not forget that. Also that means some businesses get carbon credits too right, if their net emissions are negative?
Greg.
I believe this is how it has to work. The cost of carbon will be a long term cost. It will not go away. We have to be prepared to pay more, and the businesses which can become the most efficient and therefore offer cheaper prices are rewarded.
This market system is something isn’t it?
This is what the Greens have been arguing for a long time.
If our business adapts like other businesses internationally, (and I’m not completely clued in on the ins and outs of a carbon trading market) yes! it would be fantastic if we could get carbon credits for nett emissions. I know some companies particularly airlines offer carbon offset options or the like where they buy or invest in tracts of forestry.
I don’t see what the problem is with this. If we don’t we are passing the bill on to our children and grandchildren, rather than attempting to recognise and deal with the problem. I also realise it is a joke to blame National solely for this. Almost everyone in NZ is complicit in inaction for too long.
Anyway that’s the theory. I did study a small bit of biology and economics, but never got near farm accounts or forrestry work.
I’m not sure if negative net emissions equals credits under the currently proposed and soon to be rehacked scheme. Anyone know?
Greg,
one other thing mate:
I’m sure all those U.S. military Korean war contracts were helpful too, to help keep the munitions and arms factories running and turn them into car manufacturers and the like.
We should buy New Zealand for the same reason everyone else does overseas, it is a niche quality fashionable brand, and we are a unique part of it. As I mentioned above, it is hardly the most of protectionist measures out there, if it really is truly one at all.
The government is just involved in a campaign like the Woolmark or the beef and lamb campaign, but what they are selling is the quality of our country overall, which suprisingly I would say they have a stake in.
Efficiency and market clearing is a laudable goal. But your argument goes beyond economics into sovereignty. Everything can be done more efficiently. But more efficiently for whom? Without Air New Zealand there might be more efficient air travel,, but it is in New Zealand’s public good to have a national carrier who supports our tourism industry.
Manfacturing can be different, but it is sometimes very difficult to compete marketing a smaller product against mass produced brands dumped in large chain stores. Hence a little support with the marketing, and the promotion of quality behind a Made in NZ sticker.
cheers.
Phil,
“What if your “better off’ comes at the expense of the chinese labourer that used to make shoes, and now gets nothing?”
Didn’t I explain that I’m selfish? Anyway…
The Chinese labourers you mention have very little protection. They don’t have the workplace rights that our unions have fought hard for and won.
It’s a bit disingenuous of you to imply that you’re supporting Chinese labourers by buying goods made in China – you’re supporting their exploitation. Massive profits are made off their labour by denying them proper work rights and that’s what you’re supporting.
I prefer to support the rights of workers by buying products made by workers who have rights.
My understanding, and correct me if I’m wrong, but Ive heard that for IceBreaker its so cheap to manufacture in China that they can produce the merino wool here, ship it to China to be made into clothes, and have it shipped back again.
Now how are local manufacturers supposed to compete against that without support from the government?
leftrightout,
Why, by lowering our workplace standards to be closer to those of China of course. I heard Roger Douglas on the radio just the other week praising the “efficiency” of Chinese industry.
Just pissing on a dead man’s legacy.
Rod Donald’s legacy is a bunch of ads that make Oliver Driver appear stupider thatn he already is and make fat ad exec’s rich? That’s unspeakably sad. I thought he’d done lots of good stuff.
Felix, yes “efficiency”, just like how the public service is about to become more “efficient”…
@Paul
“basically, mate, you are an idealogue of the worst sort. I understand the sentiment. I even appreciate that we can’t run on subsidies, and if we are doing that for profitable industries it is completely wrong.”
Are you suggesting we should subsidise unprofitable industries? I’m all for helping kiwi businesses get up and running and I reckon $6.3 million would be very helpful if it was applied the right way. I had a small business myself about 5 years ago and would have loved the government to be more helpful rather than making me jump through bureaucratic hurdles. In the end I had to lay off 5 staff and find a job.
On the topic of this post, it is sensible to review any campaign to see whether it is delivering results, rather than just keep chucking money at ad agencies. There are probably some parts of the campaign that will be kept after review, such as the getnzmade.net website (which I don’t recall seeing anything about on the TV ad by the way), but the point is that reviewing the campaign is the right thing to do.
Regarding your insults, I’ll be up here on the high road mate.
Paul – on your first post, I agree. On the second, not so much:
“‘im sure all those U.S. military Korean war contracts were helpful too, to help keep the munitions and arms factories running and turn them into car manufacturers and the like.
We should buy New Zealand for the same reason everyone else does overseas, it is a niche quality fashionable brand, and we are a unique part of it. As I mentioned above, it is hardly the most of protectionist measures out there, if it really is truly one at all.
The government is just involved in a campaign like the Woolmark or the beef and lamb campaign, but what they are selling is the quality of our country overall, which suprisingly I would say they have a stake in.
Efficiency and market clearing is a laudable goal. But your argument goes beyond economics into sovereignty. Everything can be done more efficiently. But more efficiently for whom? Without Air New Zealand there might be more efficient air travel,, but it is in New Zealand’s public good to have a national carrier who supports our tourism industry.
Manfacturing can be different, but it is sometimes very difficult to compete marketing a smaller product against mass produced brands dumped in large chain stores. Hence a little support with the marketing, and the promotion of quality behind a Made in NZ sticker.”
Yeah Japan did benefit from foreign investment. Something that will happen to all third world countries as their economies improve and the risk lessens. If they can get themselves off the ground first. Why should the government sell New Zealand to New Zealanders? There may be an argument for doing this overseas but preaching to the converted is a bit silly isn’t it? And why does an air carrier have to be public owned to support our tourism industry? Surely its in any air carriers commercial interests to promote tourism. Its more benefit for them!
If your going to try and compete directly with a mass produced brand it is going to be hard. Because they’re more efficient at producing it. I’ve got no problems with making the conscious decision to buy kiwi made on the basis of quality – but what I’m saying is that if you’ve got two identical goods and one is more expensive because its kiwi made. The only people that will benefit from you purchasing the kiwi one is the producer of that good. Everyone else loses.
Felix – “The Chinese labourers you mention have very little protection. They don’t have the workplace rights that our unions have fought hard for and won.
It’s a bit disingenuous of you to imply that you’re supporting Chinese labourers by buying goods made in China – you’re supporting their exploitation. Massive profits are made off their labour by denying them proper work rights and that’s what you’re supporting.
I prefer to support the rights of workers by buying products made by workers who have rights.”
Again, this kind of statement really gets under my skin. Your supporting Chinease workers by not buying their goods. How the hell is that meant to make them better off? They’ve gone from a crap job to no job. A crap job being a hell of a lot better than no job at all.
@Tim
No I’m suggesting that subsidies are not necessarily a good thing, especially as we used to have them for our most productive sectors. I notice you had no reply to why the taxpayer should be bailing out industries on Kyoto agreements. If it walks like a fish mate, irrespective of what road it’s walking on.
@Greg
I don’t know if being occupied by the U.S. after the second world war, and getting a kickstart from large military contracts, is quite the same practically and morally as buying coffee or small local industries from developing countries.
If the government doesn’t sell the New Zealand brand who will? The media relentlessly paint us disproportionantly as a country over run by crime. I remember the irony of the 90s when the only companies to use patriotism in their advertising were overseas countries- Toyota ‘welcome to our world’ and Barry Crump, McDonalds and the Kiwiburger…there are 2 or 3 other examples but I can’t think of them just at the moment.
The point with mass production is not, I don’t think, efficiency leading to the best use of scarce resources. It is that a large company can get a strong advantage in marketing its products, and getting exclusive or very favourable distribution deals, which make competing for small manufacturers (and retailers for that matter) very difficult. Not particularly perfect market stuff.
Well if one is made in New Zealand and one is made elsewhere it isn’t identical is it? There are all kinds of reasons why people choose a particular brand. Could be the safety standards of a country, where their sister lives, their human rights record, their favourite sports team, passing fads…
I understand the argument you are making, but especially in times of economic hardship, I think you will be hard pressed to find any practical examples of it in action internationally. As I said we don’t live in a free trade world, and we have to be careful with the baby and bathtub. Which is my way of saying, brain hurt, have to go work. cheers.
“Any marketing campaign needs to have measurable results. While it sounds good for Bradford to claim 360,000 more shoppers think Kiwi-made than before, where is the proof that this is translating into dollars spent on Kiwi-made. And are the surveyed shoppers actually the target market for this campaign? Do you even know who the target market is? Low income earners? Beneficiaries? Or just ‘the rich’.
What NZ made goods are lower income earners meant to buy? Can they afford the generally higher cost of buying NZ made goods when the imported alternatives are so much cheaper and means they can still buy Christmas presents for their kids?
Do NZ made goods need to compete on price? If so are we prepared to have lower wages in order to make this possible?
If we aren’t expecting the low income earners to be part of the target market of this campaign then who is it, and what are the likely products they will buy that are NZ made?
Let’s see the business case for this campaign, and some real measurable outcomes. It seems to me that the millions of taxpayer dollars being spent on this campaign are misguided and wasteful.”
The only thing you know about marketing it seems is how to spell it!!!!!
“The ad campaign is bad for New Zealand. Its a shocking waste of tax payers money. Here’s why:
Econ101 – Consumers that choose to spend more to buy New Zealand made purely because its from New Zealand effectively provide a subsidy to the producer.(This is not the case if the purchase of the NZ made product is rational – ie its cheaper or better quality) These consumers are subsidising inefficient businesses (if they were efficient they wouldn’t need government funded ad campaigns), This decreases consumers disposable income so they have less to spend on efficient kiwi producers. New Zealand as a whole would be far better off if inefficient producers instead moved into efficient industries. This subsidy increases producer surplus but consumer surplus is decreased by more than that increase – hence this policy results in a dead weight loss – wasted money!”
More like this comment is a wasted amount of internet space!!!! What a load of crap
“If your going to try and compete directly with a mass produced brand it is going to be hard. Because they’re more efficient at producing it. I’ve got no problems with making the conscious decision to buy kiwi made on the basis of quality – but what I’m saying is that if you’ve got two identical goods and one is more expensive because its kiwi made. The only people that will benefit from you purchasing the kiwi one is the producer of that good. Everyone else loses”
That is NOT what the campaign is all about agghhhh, and this just shows how agghhhh you are in the subject of marketing, in fact, business, agghhhh
“If your going to try and compete directly with a mass produced brand it is going to be hard. Because they’re more efficient at producing it. I’ve got no problems with making the conscious decision to buy kiwi made on the basis of quality – but what I’m saying is that if you’ve got two identical goods and one is more expensive because its kiwi made. The only people that will benefit from you purchasing the kiwi one is the producer of that good. Everyone else loses.”
Proves my point, you know fuck all about marketing
Just remember that those adverts and posters and what not is a very very small part of marketing. It is not the whole marketing concept, it is a piss ant in comparrison so you cant judge a marketing campagin from some dumb arse picture or advert. There is a hell of a lot to marketing than advertising!!!