web analytics

Worth a crack Nigel?

Written By: - Date published: 8:46 am, April 15th, 2011 - 22 comments
Categories: disaster, Mining - Tags: ,

Even the supporters of Deep Sea Oil Drilling admit it is risky.

Like the two rats in the old advertisement discussing the odds of going for a cheezel set in a trap, Petrobras and the Herald editor discuss the advantages of Deep Sea Oil, in the columns of the Herald.

Echoing the rat called Nigel, the Herald says “If there is, as with virtually any activity, a risk, there is also the prospect of huge reward.”

The Brazilian company is keen to take a gamble with our environment: “Petrobras’ project head Marco Toledo speaking to the Herald, said his company was accustomed to high risk.”

Both the Herald and Petrobras conclude: ‘We should take the risk.’

Like Nigel the rat and his companion, they have decided it is worth a crack, to risk snatch this tempting morsel, but like Nigel the rat, they might find, that if this trap is tripped, the consequences will be horrific and there is no escape. Not for Nigel and not for us.

Worth a crack Nigel……. Nigel?

Jenny

– – – – – – – – – – – – – – – –

The Greens have been running a very good line on this. They point out that the Yanks had tens of thousands people and has spent $39 billion on cleaning up the Deep Water Horizon spill so far. We have 400 people trained for an oil disaster and there would be no other deepsea rig nearby to drill a well like the one that eventually stopped the leak, after 800 million litres had been spilled. – Eddie

22 comments on “Worth a crack Nigel? ”

  1. M 1

    Jenny, definitely not worth a crack – it’s insanity.

    I saw BBC in the wee smalls and there was an item on the BP AGM and a protest by the people affected by the great oil blanket. These peoples lives are totally trashed and it doesn’t look like anyone has received any compensation from BP despite their protestation that they’ve paid across 20 billion.

    http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-13075151

    I also saw a report on how three generations of oyster fishers who have had their careers and lives destroyed.

    Pretty good argument for not touching the stuff in our waters or do we want to be taking a seat on the disaster train with the Japanese and Americans?

  2. higherstandard 2

    Definitely worth continuing with the surveying to find out if there is substantial oil deposit there.

    • Tigger 2.1

      After that brilliant analysis hs I am utterly convinced by you – drill, baby, drill!

      • higherstandard 2.1.1

        It wasn’t analysis, it was an opinion.

        A useful analysis is impossible to make prior to a survey being undertaken to assess whether there are any deposits and if they exist there size and the cost/benefits/risks associated with their extraction.

        • todd 2.1.1.1

          Consultation and an emergency plan should be in place before any exploration. A retrospective response even if forthcoming is not acceptable. We already know the risks involved in deep sea oil drilling, they far outweigh the 5% oil and 1% gas returns NZ gets. In comparison to our fishing and tourism industries, which earn us far more, oil is an extremely dumb move. Even if a huge field is found, what New Zealand makes from this is minimal and will most likely not cover Nationals prior investment… An investment of our tax money while they cut social spend like there’s no tomorrow and are failing to meet carbon emission reductions. Not to mention these oil companies don’t pay taxes.

          • higherstandard 2.1.1.1.1

            They are doing 2d and 3d seismic surveys – there is no drilling.

            The risks involved cannot be properly assessed until we know where the oil is and how much is there – regardless the public majority will decide whether any oil removal will go ahead down the track, not Greepeace, not Pertrobas and not the present government.

            • Draco T Bastard 2.1.1.1.1.1

              They have an obligation to drill an exploratory well and they won’t drill that unless they expect to find oil.

              Petrobras’ work programme milestones include:
              • acquiring 3,000 kilometres of two-dimensional seismic data within 18 months
              • interpreting the 3,000 kilometres of two-dimensional seismic data within 24 months
              • an option to surrender after interpretation of two-dimensional seismic data
              • acquiring 800 square kilometres of three-dimensional seismic within 36 months
              • interpreting the 800 square kilometres of three-dimensional seismic data within 42
              months
              • an option to surrender after interpretation of three-dimensional seismic data
              • drill one well within 60 months

            • todd 2.1.1.1.1.2

              The five year permit:
               
              1. 2d seismic data mapping
              2. 3d seismic data mapping
              3. Drill an exploratory well
               
              I don’t see implement safety measures or consult the public in that permit anywhere.
               
              So it is currently a decision by the Government and Petrobras. There was very little consultation with the public. Labour has not given any reference to not drilling in deep seas where the danger is increased so any reference to the public deciding through an election is rather naive.

              If Petrobras invests around 150 Million and the Government invest millions of tax dollars as well, what do you think their decision will be even with consideration to the safety and public opinion aspects? Ensuring any undertaking can be done safely and gaining the consent of the public especially those immediately affected in the event of an oil spill should be step one. Not in hindsight after investing our money in dangerous enterprises.

          • Brokenback 2.1.1.1.2

            Dear all , this is my business.
            I have worked in offshore oil exploration for 30 years .I currently work in a senior position on a deepwater exploration rig for the owners of the Deepwater Horizon .
            I have met & spoken with survivors of that disaster  , simple honest working men.

            Deepwater oil exploration, if you care to check the records , is subsatntially less risky than the Pike river for instance.

            The tragic circunstaces in the Gulf of mexico have more to do with the insidious nature of large corporates & the collusion of government agencies staffed at a political whim.

            The massive costs & risks involved in exploration preclude all but the best informed gamblers .

            To say there is no consultation over the Petrobras proposals for the Raukumara basin is naivity verging on idiocy.
            The current NZ petroleum exploration has been in place for at least 15 years with minimal variation.
            The successful tenderer for the Raukumara blocks is faced with expending ~$250 m with no guarantee of success or recuperating that investment.
            however if successful they will gain returns many times that invesmtent.High risk , high return.

            New Zealanders lost all control & advantage from their undiscovered Oil& gas resources when they stood by and let Bill Birch gift Petrocorp to Ron trotter & Fletcher Challenge for ~ 5% of its true current value.

            • Eddie 2.1.1.1.2.1

              good points.

              But “Deepwater oil exploration, if you care to check the records , is subsatntially less risky than the Pike river” isn’t the best comparison eh?
              It’s a bit like saying I’m a substantially better sprinter than a tetraplegic. Doesn’t mean I’m a good sprinter

  3. Bill 3

    Seems that everybody knows that no government is going to take serious measures to reduce oil use.

    But what about ‘everybody’? What about you?

    Do you happily jump aboard a domestic flight for work purposes?

    In the UK an employment case based on discrimination…discrimination laws are the same here in NZ…was won by a worker who was dismissed for refusing to use air transport to attend work related meetings/seminars. He successfully argued a climate collapse argument that saw the judge find that his genuine belief in climate collapse should be legally viewed as being the same as a religious belief. And that meant that the guy had been discriminated against.

    So there’s a course of action all you domestic flight hoppers could take that wouldn’t impact on you.

    But what if you’re a factory worker shuttling backwards and forwards in your car every day?

    Not so long ago, major companies ran buses to get their workers to and from work. If they could do it then, they can do it now. (Schools do it) But do you think such a demand is on any union’s horizon? Nah. Course not.

    And that’s the weakness in any anti-exploration stance. Governments know that the very people against deep sea drilling or whatever are doing sweet f.a. off their own backs to wean themselves from oil addiction. And they can contain a conflict that has only one front and that doesn’t put direct pressure on business.

    Business is by far and away the biggest user of oil products. And that includes their dependency upon workers using oil products to get to and from work. So force business to take the location of their workers into account when they are deciding where to locate. And force them to pick up the tab if they don’t.
     
     
     

    • Carol 3.1

      But do you think such a demand is on any union’s horizon? Nah. Course not.
       
      I’m not so sure about that.  I know Waitakere City Council used to have concessions for their workers who used public transport to get to and from work.  I don’t know what the situation is for the current Auckland Council, but it wouldn’t surprise me if the unions also have been pushing for such concessions.  I think some unis provide public transport concessions for staff and students, and I thought a big employer (like Telecom?) has just initiated a policy for its workers in Auckland, to encourage cycling, provide showers etc., but can’t find a link to the story I read.

    • And force them to pick up the tab if they don’t.”

      I get a ‘travel allowance’ because when I was hired twenty years ago my employer routinely paid it to anyone living more than 15km away. It hasn’t changed since I was hired and it started getting taxed sometime in the 90s. For the past eight years I’ve been taking the bus and the allowance works out to about $10 pw so it doesn’t cover the cost.

      Nevertheless, it does send the right ‘price signal’ to the employer. It also encourages employment of locals rather than communters [that was an accidental misspelling but I’m in Christchurch and it ‘spoke’ to me so I’m leaving it in – strangely appropriate] and so would encourage urban intensification which some people think is a good thing.

      Sadly, about a couple of years after I was hired my employer ceased offering the allowance to new employees (it was a ‘cost’).

      Thanks Bill for a constructive suggestion – I’d never thought of the travel allowance in that light before.

    • Draco T Bastard 3.3

      So force business to take the location of their workers into account when they are deciding where to locate. And force them to pick up the tab if they don’t.

      Actually, just force them to pick up the tab anyway. A simple law that says two things:

      1.) The business will pay the full costs of transporting the workers independent of their wages
      2.) The business will pay the worker half their hourly rate (or estimated hourly rate if on salary) or minimum wage (whichever is the greater) for the time that it takes the worker to get to and from work.

      And watch just how fast the business community will clamour for public transport and high rise apartments become vogue in the magazines.

  4. Afewknowthetruth 4

    1. The Herald has a well established record of failing to carry out investigative journalism and dodging real issues.  The Herald is business, and its business is moulding public opinion in favour of business as ususal.

    2. The entire industrial economy is predicated on the use of oil, and will collapse when global extraction decline reaches a critical point and serious shortages arise (probaby fom around 2015 onwards, perhaps before).

    3. All mainstream political parties’ policies are pro- status quo or slight tweaking of status quo, and are in denial of reality on all energy-related matters and all ecological matters. They pretend that we can somehow maintain industrial civilisation by treaking the system slightly.  Slight tweaks to the system will make almost no difference to the overall outcome and simply delay catastrophe by a few months or years.

    4. The general populace has been carefully trained to believe they are entitled to cheap fuel and that consumption of oil-based fuels is perfectly normal  -even though it is a gross aberration in the scheme of things. Nature sequestered all that carbon underground for a very good reason.

    5. The CO2 content of the atmosphere is rising faster than ever (now 391ppm and rising at over 2ppm per annum). The acknowledged ‘safe’ level is no more than 350ppm (though 300ppm  would be far better). Continued burning of fossil fuels will render most of the Earth uninhabitable within a few decades, due to positive feedbacks triggering abrupt climate change. That’s if acidification of the oceans doesn’t trigger ecological collapse first.

    6. The only solution to the mess humaniy has creatd is to shut down the entire global industrial economy  … and that certainly isn’t going to happen, since there are powerful vested interest groups working hard to prop it up for as long as possible, whatever the long term costs.

    6. Most people ignorant of the facts or couldn’t care less.

     

    • Lanthanide 4.1

      Nature sequestered all that carbon underground for a very good reason.

      Sorry, but “nature” doesn’t reason.
      And yes, truly the only way we’re going to keep up with business as usual (at least until global warming does us in) is going to be new disruptive energy technology such as fusion. While fusion remains a long shot, it’s still possible that it could become a leading producer of energy within 10-15 years time (see polywell fusion, focus fusion, and 2 or 3 others). No, I’m not a cornucopist nor believe that techno-fixes will definitely save the day, but there is a chance.

      • Afewknowthetruth 4.1.1

        You obviously don’t understand poetic use of language. The ‘reason’ nature sequestered all that carbon was to create conditions suitable for life as we know it. Okay, in practiice present life forms evolved to suit the conditions prevailing after the carbon had been sequestered. But it does amount ot the same thing. Fusion has been 10-15 years away since 1960. We don’t have another 10-15 years. Present economic arrangments won’t last another 5 years. Anyway. ‘everyone’ is running scared of anything nuclear at the moment.

  5. JJ 5

    Rats? I thought they were mice.

  6. ghostwhowalksnz 6

    Worth the risk ?

    We allready know the Pike River Coal walked away from their responsibilities when the risks  ‘ didnt all go their way’.

    Unlike BP, Petrobras has no onshore  presence  here  so  we can calculate the chances of them walking away from a major environmental hazard  as  99%.

  7. johnm 7

    Hi AFKTT
    What you say is how I understand it too, given all the highly credible people who have explained these facts to us. The subject is so painful (Involving the early deaths of so many of us) that our mind instantly rejects this information: for most to accept it is to despair. This information is ultmate grief! Our civilisation is finished?! No………….! I can’t accept that!

    • Draco T Bastard 7.1

      That certainly seems to be the reaction of a lot of people. Point out that there are physical limits that we need to live within and that we’re about to hit a wall of resource depletion and get just straight out denial as a reaction.
       
      Hell, Labour and NACT keep talking about competition in telecommunications (and elsewhere) completely oblivious that such competition must use more physical resources.

    • Carol 7.2

      I think a lot of the denial is based in more immediate issues than early death.  I think a lot of people don’t want to believe that the intensified consumerism of the last few decades will not continue indefinitely – a disbelief that there could be an end to the excess of little toys, unneccessary luxuries, intriguing distractions and shiny things, which they either own, or hope to own if they follow the NAct prescription.

Recent Comments

Recent Posts

  • New Public Housing Plan announced
    The Government has released its Public Housing Plan 2021-2024 which outlines the intention of where 8,000 additional public and transitional housing places announced in Budget 2020, will go. “The Government is committed to continuing its public house build programme at pace and scale. The extra 8,000 homes – 6000 public ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    10 hours ago
  • Prime Minister congratulates President Joe Biden on his inauguration
    Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern has congratulated President Joe Biden on his inauguration as the 46th President of the United States of America. “I look forward to building a close relationship with President Biden and working with him on issues that matter to both our countries,” Jacinda Ardern said. “New Zealand ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    13 hours ago
  • Jobs for Nature funding will create training and employment opportunities
    A major investment to tackle wilding pines in Mt Richmond will create jobs and help protect the area’s unique ecosystems, Biosecurity Minister Damien O’Connor says. The Mt Richmond Forest Park has unique ecosystems developed on mineral-rich geology, including taonga plant species found nowhere else in the country. “These special plant ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 days ago
  • Pre-departure testing extended to all passengers to New Zealand
    To further protect New Zealand from COVID-19, the Government is extending pre-departure testing to all passengers to New Zealand except from Australia, Antarctica and most Pacific Islands, COVID-19 Response Minister Chris Hipkins said today. “The change will come into force for all flights arriving in New Zealand after 11:59pm (NZT) on Monday ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 days ago
  • Bay Cadets learn skills to protect environment
    Bay Conservation Cadets launched with first intake Supported with $3.5 million grant Part of $1.245b Jobs for Nature programme to accelerate recover from Covid Cadets will learn skills to protect and enhance environment Environment Minister David Parker today welcomed the first intake of cadets at the launch of the Bay ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 days ago
  • Cook Islanders to resume travel to New Zealand
    The Prime Minister of New Zealand Jacinda Ardern and the Prime Minister of the Cook Islands Mark Brown have announced passengers from the Cook Islands can resume quarantine-free travel into New Zealand from 21 January, enabling access to essential services such as health. “Following confirmation of the Cook Islands’ COVID ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    6 days ago
  • Supporting communities and landowners to grow employment opportunities
    Jobs for Nature funding is being made available to conservation groups and landowners to employ staff and contractors in a move aimed at boosting local biodiversity-focused projects, Conservation Minister Kiritapu Allan has announced. It is estimated some 400-plus jobs will be created with employment opportunities in ecology, restoration, trapping, ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • Border exception for some returning international tertiary students
    The Government has approved an exception class for 1000 international tertiary students, degree level and above, who began their study in New Zealand but were caught offshore when border restrictions began. The exception will allow students to return to New Zealand in stages from April 2021. “Our top priority continues ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • Tiwai deal gives time for managed transition
    Today’s deal between Meridian and Rio Tinto for the Tiwai smelter to remain open another four years provides time for a managed transition for Southland. “The deal provides welcome certainty to the Southland community by protecting jobs and incomes as the region plans for the future. The Government is committed ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • New member for APEC Business Advisory Council
    Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern has appointed Anna Curzon to the APEC Business Advisory Council (ABAC). The leader of each APEC economy appoints three private sector representatives to ABAC. ABAC provides advice to leaders annually on business priorities. “ABAC helps ensure that APEC’s work programme is informed by business community perspectives ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • Govt’s careful economic management recognised
    The Government’s prudent fiscal management and strong policy programme in the face of the COVID-19 global pandemic have been acknowledged by the credit rating agency Fitch. Fitch has today affirmed New Zealand’s local currency rating at AA+ with a stable outlook and foreign currency rating at AA with a positive ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • Additional actions to keep COVID-19 out of NZ
    The Government is putting in place a suite of additional actions to protect New Zealand from COVID-19, including new emerging variants, COVID-19 Response Minister Chris Hipkins said today. “Given the high rates of infection in many countries and evidence of the global spread of more transmissible variants, it’s clear that ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • 19 projects will clean up and protect waterways
    $36 million of Government funding alongside councils and others for 19 projects Investment will clean up and protect waterways and create local jobs Boots on the ground expected in Q2 of 2021 Funding part of the Jobs for Nature policy package A package of 19 projects will help clean up ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 weeks ago
  • New Zealand Government acknowledges 175th anniversary of Battle of Ruapekapeka
    The commemoration of the 175th anniversary of the Battle of Ruapekapeka represents an opportunity for all New Zealanders to reflect on the role these conflicts have had in creating our modern nation, says Associate Minister for Arts, Culture and Heritage Kiri Allan. “The Battle at Te Ruapekapeka Pā, which took ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 weeks ago
  • Better care for babies with tongue-tie
    Babies born with tongue-tie will be assessed and treated consistently under new guidelines released by the Ministry of Health, Associate Minister of Health Dr Ayesha Verrall announced today. Around 5% to 10% of babies are born with a tongue-tie, or ankyloglossia, in New Zealand each year. At least half can ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 weeks ago
  • Prisoner disorder event at Waikeria Prison over
    The prisoner disorder event at Waikeria Prison is over, with all remaining prisoners now safely and securely detained, Corrections Minister Kelvin Davis says. The majority of those involved in the event are members of the Mongols and Comancheros. Five of the men are deportees from Australia, with three subject to ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 weeks ago
  • Pre-departure COVID-19 test for travellers from the UK and the US from 15 January
    Travellers from the United Kingdom or the United States bound for New Zealand will be required to get a negative test result for COVID-19 before departing, and work is underway to extend the requirement to other long haul flights to New Zealand, COVID-19 Response Minister Chris Hipkins confirmed today. “The new PCR test requirement, foreshadowed last ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 weeks ago