Open mike 29/05/2014

Written By: - Date published: 6:35 am, May 29th, 2014 - 98 comments
Categories: open mike - Tags:

openmike Open mike is your post.

For announcements, general discussion, whatever you choose.

The usual rules of good behaviour apply (see the Policy).

Step up to the mike …

98 comments on “Open mike 29/05/2014 ”

  • Comments are now closed

  1. karol 1
    29 May 2014 at 7:01 am

    Snowden says he work as a snoop at all levels.

    “I was trained as a spy in sort of the traditional sense of the word in that I lived and worked undercover overseas – pretending to work in a job that I’m not – and even being assigned a name that was not mine,” he said.

    He said he had worked covertly as “a technical expert” for the Central Intelligence Agency and the National Security Agency, and as a trainer for the Defence Intelligence Agency.

    “I don’t work with people. I don’t recruit agents. What I do is I put systems to work for the United States. And I’ve done that at all levels – from the bottom on the ground all the way to the top,” Snowden said.

    He said he had lectured at the Joint Counterintelligence Training Academy “where I developed sources and methods for keeping our information and people secure in the most hostile and dangerous environments around the world”.

    “So when they say I’m a low-level systems administrator, that I don’t know what I’m talking about, I’d say it’s somewhat misleading.”

    • One Anonymous Bloke 1.1
      29 May 2014 at 7:16 am

      And he’s been fibbing on his travel documents too.

      Have you ever been or are you now involved in espionage or sabotage…

    • ianmac 1.2
      29 May 2014 at 9:10 am

      Wonder if Mr Fletcher was working in the UK in the job that he says he was?

    • Populuxe1 1.3
      29 May 2014 at 8:17 pm

      So basically the CIA would phone him, and he’d say: “Have you tried switching it off and on again?”

    • joe90 1.4
      29 May 2014 at 8:37 pm

      Snowden’s NBC interview.

  3. mickysavage 3
    29 May 2014 at 8:28 am

    How bizarre that National tried to stop someone who just became a grandfather from voting for a bill for improved paid parental leave.

  4. swordfish 4
    29 May 2014 at 8:47 am

    Right my beauties, just want to build on Mickey’s (26 May) analysis of the two latest polls (One News Colmar Brunton and 3 News Reid Research:

    Not interested in analysing through rose-tinted glasses (as our Tory chums would accuse us of) but do want to keep things in perspective.

    (1) Volatility

    You wouldn’t know it from the zero-sum rhetoric constantly regurgitated by National’s bought-and-paid-for bloggers like Whaleoil and Farrar – nor from leading journos like Armstrong, Clifton and Watkins – but this year (indeed, the whole electoral cycle since the last election) has been characterised by a good deal of volatility in public opinion. Just this year alone, National’s poll ratings have bounced around between 42% and 51% and their support in 2012 and 2013 saw a very similar range of movement.

    Currently, the Nats are riding on a bit of a high, averaging 49% and the Right Bloc 52% (May average). Certainly, Whaleoil is making the most of it – with all the overblown rhetoric we’ve come to expect: “…dreadful reading for Labour”, Labour in “deep trouble” and so on (http://www.whaleoil.co.nz/2014/05/two-polls-labour-big-trouble/).

    But you can’t quite shake a profound sense of deja vu, here. Back in February-early March, National and the Right experienced an even better bounce – 5 consecutive polls giving the Nats a 50% average, with the Right Bloc as a whole on 53%. And precisely the same hyperbole (National soaring / Labour sinking ever deeper into the mire) followed. Throughout February, Whaleoil variously cast the Left as “a drowning man” (1), celebrated “National’s surge” (2), derided “Labour’s poll woes” (3) and “tensions inside caucus” (1), suggested the polls had “burst (Labour’s) bubble” (3), displayed a certain flair for the double-negative by declaring that “the polls throughout February have shown that (Labour’s) misplaced hope in a new leader was a false hope.” (3) (presumably as opposed to a thoroughly sound misplaced hope), crowed loudly that Labour had been “poll-axed” (4) with “Labour and Cunliffe sinking fast” (4), bullshitted outrageously about National’s “unprecedented levels of support” (3) apparently making it “the most popular government and Prime Minister in the modern era” (3), predicted “disaster for the Left” (5), speculating wildly that Labour was heading for a “resounding defeat” and that “Phil Goff’s record loss may well be challenged” come September. (3)

    (1) http://www.whaleoil.co.nz/2014/02/roy-morgan-poll-increases-pressure-cunliffe/
    (2) http://www.whaleoil.co.nz/2014/02/message-cunliffe/
    (3) http://www.whaleoil.co.nz/2014/02/labours-poll-woes-create-pressure-will-diamonds-coal/
    (4) http://www.whaleoil.co.nz/2014/03/labour-poll-axed-digipoll/
    (5) http://www.whaleoil.co.nz/2014/02/one-news-poll-signals-disaster-left/

    Those doyens of the Free Press – Armstrong, Clifton and Watkins et al – saw similar dire consequences for the Left and were certain that National’s poll ratings would hold, if not increase – after all, according to these leading journos, the Nats’ support levels had barely moved an inch since well before the 2011 Election. Even Chris Trotter on the Left jumped on the bandwagon, fearing it was “All over Bar the Counting”, with the Left apparently facing a far greater electoral humiliation than they could ever have dreaded.

    So what actually happened in the 4 subsequent polls of March ? Did National continue its apparently inevitable onward surge to victory ? Well, not quite. In the wake of the Oravida and Te Kohanga Reo scandals, the Nats in fact plunged 5 percentage points to a 45% average over those 4 consecutive polls, with the Right Bloc falling by a similar margin (down 4 to 49%). Seems things weren’t cast in stone afterall !

    Party support remained relatively steady in April (Nats 46% / Right 49%) and then a surge again in May to 49 and 52% for National and the Right respectively. Largely, of course, on the back of the latest 2 TV Polls which can reasonably be put down to a budget-bounce, with the Nats tentatively transgressing into Labour-lite territory. National’s spin-meisters will, of course, suggest this swing is permanent, indeed may presage an even greater surge over coming months. Mickey’s already dealt with this. All I’ll say for now is that given the demonstrable volatility in public opinion this year, I have serious doubts that National’s more softly-aligned supporters will stay in the blue corner for long. They’ve been moving back and forth for a long time now (not only between Labour and National / Green and National, but also in and out of the Undecided category).

    So at the moment, I’d take all this talk of a new upward phase for National with a pinch of the proverbial. We’ve heard it all before.

    (2) National Poll Support – Inflated in the Past and Well-Down relative to 2008 / 2011

    Let’s also remind ourselves just how piss poor National’s poll ratings have been since the last election (compared to the 2007-2011 period). The contrast is quite striking.

    But before laying out the solid numbers, I’ll just employ dear old Whaleoil himself to make my point for me. We’ve seen that Slater Jnr has made strenuous efforts this year to characterise the the polls as disastrous for Labour and brilliant for National. Go back to Whaleoil posts of 2008 and 2011 and you’ll see remarkably similar rhetoric: “Poll Devastation” (May 2008) (6), “Poll Destruction” (June 2008) (7), “Another Poll, Another Disaster for Labour” (June 2008) (8), “Labour on Perilous Downhill Slope” (June 2008) (9), “Rogue Poll Devastates Labour…Again” (september 2008) (10). And in 2011 – “Labour Poll Disaster” (early July 2011) (11), “Disaster for Hapless Labour” (July 2011) (12), “Labour’s Poll Disasters Continue” (late July 2011) (13), and finally, once again displaying a remarkably creative turn of phrase, “Labour’s Poll Disasters Continue” (October 2011) (14).

    (6)http://www.whaleoil.co.nz/2008/05/poll-devastation/
    (7)http://www.whaleoil.co.nz/2008/06/poll-destruction/
    (8)http://www.whaleoil.co.nz/2008/06/another-poll-another-disaster-for-labour/
    (9)http://www.whaleoil.co.nz/2008/06/poll-of-polls-shows-labour-on-perilous-downhill-slope/
    (10)http://www.whaleoil.co.nz/2008/09/rogue-poll-devastates-labour-again/
    (11)http://www.whaleoil.co.nz/2011/07/labour-poll-disaster/
    (12)http://www.whaleoil.co.nz/2011/07/digipoll-disaster-for-hapless-labour/
    (13)http://www.whaleoil.co.nz/2011/07/labours-poll-disasters-continue/
    (14)http://www.whaleoil.co.nz/2011/10/labours-polls-disasters-continue/

    But dig a little deeper and you’ll find one major discrepancy between then and now. Whaleoil’s headlines might be uncannily similar but National’s poll ratings certainly aint !!!

    His 2008 and 2011 posts were prompted by almost stratospheric National poll support in the mid-to-high 50s, occassionally reaching as much as 60%. His May 2008 “Poll Devastation”, for instance, alludes to a Fairfax Poll that put National at 56% – 27 points ahead of Labour, “Poll Destruction” (June 2008) focussed on National’s 55% in a One News Colmar Brunton Poll, while his 2011 posts were predicated upon Nat poll ratings of 55% ( 3 News ), 56% ( Fairfax ), 56% ( One News Colmar Brunton ) and 57% ( 3 News ).

    Fast forward to 2014 and it speaks volumes that Whaleoil is now forced to employ precisely the same hyperbolic rhetoric when National is receiving 5-10 points less in the polls. A few weeks ago (March 30), he was even reduced to acclaiming the Right’s stunning poll numbers when National were on a mere 45.9% ( 3News ) and 47% ( One News ), 10-12 points down on some of those 2011 figures. ( “Well, I’ll be Fooked” (with an Irish accent), indeed !!! ).

    And, of course, we all know precisely how “accurate” those polls of 2006-2011 were ! – the Nats took a mere 45% of the Party Vote at the 2008 Election (hardly any of the 62 polls of 08 had them that low, most put them above 50%). And they took 47% in 2011 (not one of the 125 polls carried out between Jan 2009 and the 2011 election had them that low, with the vast majority putting them over 50% and a sizeable minority over 55%).

    A few stats to back me up are on the way in the not too distant future…….

    • Tracey 4.1
      29 May 2014 at 9:08 am

      thanks for taking the time to put this together.

      The media seem oblivious to labour polling higher than on election day 2011, to come up with the bizarre conclusion that support for labour is falling.

      Also, a less reported poll shows business confidence has fallen for the third month in a row a smidge over half of businesses are optimistic.

      “New Zealand business confidence extended its slide from a record high to a third month, in the face of rising interest rates, declining dairy prices and a persistently high kiwi dollar. A net 53.5 percent of firms are optimistic about general business conditions this month, according to the ANZ Business Outlook survey, down from a 20-year high of 70.8 percent in February.”

      • phillip ure 4.1.1
        29 May 2014 at 9:20 am

        that read research polling company that is often quoted had a howler just before the last election..

        ..their last pre-election poll predicted national would get six percent higher..

        ..than they actually got on the day..

        .whoar..!..

        ..eh..?

        • Tracey 4.1.1.1
          29 May 2014 at 10:14 am

          and yet the media frequently report on high business confidence… but not this one, funny that, aye?

          • phillip ure 4.1.1.1.1
            29 May 2014 at 10:22 am

            tracey..tracey..it’s ‘eh?’…

            ..’aye’ is affirmation of others’ efforts..an underlining..

            ..and usually comes with an exclamation-mark..

            ..(‘it’s the little things’..eh..?..)

            ..and yes..maybe we need a blip-styling crowd-sourced factoid effort..?

            .maybe ‘read research overestimated nationals’ ’11 election-result by a whopping 6%’..

            ..could be the first entry..?

    • mickysavage 4.2
      29 May 2014 at 9:44 am

      Thanks Swordfish. Might convert this to a guest post.

      • swordfish 4.2.1
        29 May 2014 at 10:03 am

        Cheers, Mickey. I’ll be away from ze internet for the next 24 hours – so won’t be able to reply to anyone. But feel free to use it. (I really need to learn how to make considerably less messy – and, as you can see, in some cases outrageously unsuccessful – links though).

    • Colonial Viper 4.3
      29 May 2014 at 9:52 am

      swordfish – you pierced right into the guts of the matter.

      One thing – you said National was often polling 5% to 10% down today, compared to just a few years ago. What about Labour’s relative polling today, compared to just a few years ago? And if there is a difference in shift, where did the difference go – into the undecideds?

      • swordfish 4.3.1
        29 May 2014 at 10:20 am

        I’m in a real rush, CV. Almost out the door. But I’ll reply directly to your questions in Open Mike at some point in the next few days. Absolutely promise – because, at the same time, I want to deal with arguments by our much-loved regularTory Troll Chris73 and Bloggers like Farrar and Whaleoil that Labour and Left support was equally over-stated (therefore cancelling out any disadvantage to the Nats) and that the Tories’ dive at the 2011 Election (relative to their polling throughout the previous year) was all down to the Tea-Cup saga.

        They’re wrong on both counts. But It’ll take more time than I’ve got at the moment to set-out the figures.

      • swordfish 4.3.2
        29 May 2014 at 10:22 am

        I’ve replied to you, CV – but seems to be in moderation.

        [lprent: avoid the word “troll”. It was being overused. ]

    • Tracey 4.4
      29 May 2014 at 10:17 am

      Thought it might do swordfish’s offerings more justice if his second post was part of his initial thread?

      swordfish 7
      29 May 2014 at 9:25 am

      Here’s a few stats to highlight the degree to which support for both National and the Right Bloc was consistently over-stated (month after month) in the run-up to the last 2 elections:

      National Monthly Poll Averages 2011

      ( To read these stats, the Nats averaged 52% in the polls of January 2011 and that was 5 percentage points higher than the proportion they in fact received at the subsequent election )

      Jan 52% (+5), Feb 52% (+5), March 52% (+5), April 54% (+7), May 52% (+5), June 53% (+6), July 53% (+6), August 54% (+7), Sept 55% (+8), Oct 54% (+7), Early Nov 52% (+5), Late Nov 51% (+4), 2011 Election: 47%

      Nat Monthly Poll Averages 2008

      Jan 49% (+4), Feb 52% (+7), March 50% (+5), April 51% (+6), May 52% (+7), June 54% (+9), July 51% (+6), August 49% (+4), Sept 49% (+4), Early/Mid Oct 48% (+3), Late Oct/Early Nov 46% (+1), 2008 Election: 45%

      Right Bloc Monthly Poll Averages 2011

      Jan 56% (+3), Feb 55% (+2), March 55% (+2), April 58% (+5), May 56% (+3), June 58% (+5), July 57% (+4), August 57% (+4), Sept 59% (+6), Oct 57% (+4), Early Nov 56% (+3), Late Nov 55% (+2), 2011 Election: 53%

      Right Bloc Monthly Poll Averages 2008

      Jan 52% (=), Feb 56% (+4), March 54% (+2), April 55% (+3), May 56% (+4), June 58% (+6), July 55% (+3), August 54% (+2), Sept 54% (+2), Early/Mid Oct 53% (+1), Late Oct/Early Nov 52% (=), 2008 Election: 52%

      In January this year, National were averaging 7 points below their 2011 Jan average, in February 3 below, in March 6 below, in April 8 below and in May 3 below. The Right Bloc in January 2014 were averaging 7 below their 2011 January average, 2 below in Feb, 5 below in March, 9 below in April and 4 below in May.

      The gaps are even greater if you compare the same point in the electoral cycle (4 months out, 6 months out, 8 months out etc – given that the elections of 08 and 11 took place in Nov rather than Sept – so comparing, for example, the May 2014 stats with the July 08 and 11 stats).

    • Bearded Git 4.5
      29 May 2014 at 11:17 am

      Brilliant Sword. And all these polls are before the campaign.

      Cunliffe smart, Key looking tired. There will be no mistakes like not putting the leader on the billboards this time.

      And the Left will have the IMP as a coalition partner. 33+11+5 or 33+12+4 seals the deal.

  5. Skinny 5
    29 May 2014 at 8:52 am

    Here is an opportunity to vent your anger at Nationals # 2 snake oil salesman. The loud hailer battery will be fully charged for those that have a decent rant ready to rip.

    Let the cabinet club present know that a recent poll showed over 60% of of Kiwi’s agree that they think that the National Party’s political donation structure is cronie capitalism!

    Steve Joyce is addressing invited guests at 12:30 Friday May 30th 2014
    at the ASB area of the Kensington Park Stadium.

    If you have some issues you would like to draw to his attention this is an opportunity
    to bring a banner, placard, leaflets to politely inform his luncheon guests of your misgivings of National Party Policies.
    These may include their policies toward:

    GMOs, 
    treaty issues, the continuing theft of Maori land
    toxic mining,
    water quality,
    RMA reforms,
    preventing local government provide rules to protect us and our environment issues.
    And any other issue that gets on your goat.
    from predatory investors,
    TPPA,
    charter schools, publicly funded ‘schools for profit’ with little or no oversight,
    climate change denial and lack of response to protect dirty industry,
                                                                      
    These are only suggestions I am sure there are many others.

    • Skinny 5.1
      29 May 2014 at 9:39 am

      Please Note: To those activists that have managed to infiltrate this political donations junket you are advised not to indulge in the feast on offer.

      That is if you don’t want to risk the unpleasant experience of the sudden onset of explosive diarrhea. Just remember Stephen Joyce will be spraying enough verbal diarrhea that in itself is enough to make you vomit. So my advice is don’t subject yourself to a double dose!

      • ianmac 5.1.1
        29 May 2014 at 11:18 am

        Notice that Joyce seldom looks directly at those to whom he is speaking. Modestly eyes downcast. How sweet and demure. But the other day during QT as soon as Joyce began one of his long tedious answers Brownlie sitting beside him struggled and struggled to suppress a yawn. And failed!

        • Skinny 5.1.1.1
          29 May 2014 at 2:33 pm

          Ha ha Gerry probably had too many pork pies for lunch and needed a nanny nap, mind you he has heard the ‘same old Joyce snake oil’ day in, day out. I loved Joyce’s interview on the Nation the other week where he was quite hysterical attacking Labour’s new monetary policy.
          The jealousy of envy was very evident.

        • Anne 5.1.1.2
          29 May 2014 at 4:17 pm

          He fell asleep today – briefly. Then one eye opened and that was followed by the other…
          fascinating.

          • Skinny 5.1.1.2.1
            29 May 2014 at 4:40 pm

            What a disgrace to the hard working wood work teachers out there. Gerry being a former of that profession. If you and I openly fell asleep on the job we would rightfully expect a strum up, to think the tax payer is paying for lard arse Gerry to nod off. At least I’m being productive for the taxpayer lol.

  6. greywarbler 6
    29 May 2014 at 9:18 am

    Morning Report (give them a high-five) did a short piece on Maya Angelou USA poet, a black woman with verve and style and experiences that have destroyed others. She put it together and made a mountain. And she came down from it to write poetry and become an academic and many other things. I couldn’t see an audio link but here is youtube.

    Here is one for women and men who appreciate them.

  7. swordfish 7
    29 May 2014 at 9:25 am

    Here’s a few stats to highlight the degree to which support for both National and the Right Bloc was consistently over-stated (month after month) in the run-up to the last 2 elections:

    National Monthly Poll Averages 2011

    ( To read these stats, the Nats averaged 52% in the polls of January 2011 and that was 5 percentage points higher than the proportion they in fact received at the subsequent election )

    Jan 52% (+5), Feb 52% (+5), March 52% (+5), April 54% (+7), May 52% (+5), June 53% (+6), July 53% (+6), August 54% (+7), Sept 55% (+8), Oct 54% (+7), Early Nov 52% (+5), Late Nov 51% (+4), 2011 Election: 47%

    Nat Monthly Poll Averages 2008

    Jan 49% (+4), Feb 52% (+7), March 50% (+5), April 51% (+6), May 52% (+7), June 54% (+9), July 51% (+6), August 49% (+4), Sept 49% (+4), Early/Mid Oct 48% (+3), Late Oct/Early Nov 46% (+1), 2008 Election: 45%

    Right Bloc Monthly Poll Averages 2011

    Jan 56% (+3), Feb 55% (+2), March 55% (+2), April 58% (+5), May 56% (+3), June 58% (+5), July 57% (+4), August 57% (+4), Sept 59% (+6), Oct 57% (+4), Early Nov 56% (+3), Late Nov 55% (+2), 2011 Election: 53%

    Right Bloc Monthly Poll Averages 2008

    Jan 52% (=), Feb 56% (+4), March 54% (+2), April 55% (+3), May 56% (+4), June 58% (+6), July 55% (+3), August 54% (+2), Sept 54% (+2), Early/Mid Oct 53% (+1), Late Oct/Early Nov 52% (=), 2008 Election: 52%

    In January this year, National were averaging 7 points below their 2011 Jan average, in February 3 below, in March 6 below, in April 8 below and in May 3 below. The Right Bloc in January 2014 were averaging 7 below their 2011 January average, 2 below in Feb, 5 below in March, 9 below in April and 4 below in May.

    The gaps are even greater if you compare the same point in the electoral cycle (4 months out, 6 months out, 8 months out etc – given that the elections of 08 and 11 took place in Nov rather than Sept – so comparing, for example, the May 2014 stats with the July 08 and 11 stats).

  8. greywarbler 8
    29 May 2014 at 9:25 am

    Gerry Brownlee, Controller of Christchurch. Done the expected poor job for the people in general, (expected by me and damn I am right, when it would be better to be wrong and eat humble pie.) Have some specific people received good outcomes? A small number. But you would never know the extent of his failure when listening to him.

    He is an incredible politician, with the smooth delivery of half-truths, lies and promises that NACT specialises in. Not credible. I dub Brownlee The Incredible Hulk. No doubt this is not an original idea.

    • ianmac 8.1
      29 May 2014 at 9:44 am

      At best Brownlie is trying to prevent panic.
      At worst he is trying to cover over the huge cracks.

    • Tracey 8.2
      29 May 2014 at 10:18 am

      We should have a week where all politicians cannot open their mouths unless what they are about to say can be supported by fact.

      • greywarbler 8.2.1
        29 May 2014 at 12:24 pm

        Great idea.

        • Tracey 8.2.1.1
          29 May 2014 at 12:33 pm

          the silence would be heavenly.

          • Kiwiri 8.2.1.1.1
            29 May 2014 at 2:27 pm

            Gerry would still come across as an Incredible Sulk anyway.
            There is another word that rhymes with that but I am not bringing physical appearance into the debate. Poor attitudinal characteristics relevant for statesmanship are another matter and need to be pointed out.

  9. ianmac 9
    29 May 2014 at 9:41 am

    “An Anglican pastor has quit the church and is taking his congregation with him after the governing body moved ahead with plans to bless same-sex relationships.”
    Wonder if a follow-up will show whether the congregation did follow him in significant numbers? Times are a-changing Vicar. Keep up lad.
    http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=11263531

  10. captain hook 10
    29 May 2014 at 9:43 am

    the slimy little turd gluon espiner mentioned left wing about fifity times this morning on the right wing radio show with his other sad little righty mate. if he does it again I think I am going to upchuck about fifty weetbix!

  11. phillip ure 11
    29 May 2014 at 11:19 am

    “..How Psychedelics Are Saving Lives:

    Numerous studies show these substances are non-neurotoxic – non-addictive –

    and are having profound effects curing some of the most stubborn mental health disorders –
    by helping people purge bottled up trauma..”

    http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article38626.htm

    • bad12 11.1
      29 May 2014 at 12:32 pm

      Lolz Phillip, i can attest to a certain extent to the non-addictive nature of psychedelic substances, there’s a world of pain tho in the ”expression” of bottled up trauma, especially if expressed in a public place,

      Such pain is unfortunately not necessarily confined to those who are with the help of pyschedelic’s doing the ”expressing” it tends to also extend to the ”audience”…

      • phillip ure 11.1.1
        29 May 2014 at 3:47 pm

        during ‘the acid days’ i lived in a block of four terrace houses in darlinghurst.. that was a squat..

        ..and darlinghurst was inner-city slum then..so lots of alkies..

        ..and there was this other member of the squat..who was an awol airforce guy..

        ..and he had dropped a trip and walked away from the airforce..and had become an acid-missionary..

        ..and he took it upon himself to ‘cure’ the local alkies.

        ..(having been an alkie himself while in the airforce..).

        ..by giving them trips..

        ..so you’d come home to find smelly alkies cluttering the place up…

        ..grinning manically at you..

        ..(there was nil follow-up..so i dunno if it worked for them..

        ..but since then it has been proven to help many alkies..

        ..so i live in hope..)

    • The Al1en 11.2
      29 May 2014 at 12:55 pm

      The next time someone drops a psychedelic and thinks they can fly, please do yourself a favour and take off from the ground and not the top of a multi storey car park.

      • freedom 11.2.1
        29 May 2014 at 1:07 pm

        “The knack of flying is learning how to throw yourself at the ground and miss.” – Douglas Adams

        • Chooky 11.2.1.1
          29 May 2014 at 1:25 pm

          he must have been dreaming…this is possible in the dream world where one can defy gravity and survive..ie wake up…also there is a theory that everyday things can be solved in the dream world …but how to remember ?

          • bad12 11.2.1.1.1
            29 May 2014 at 1:54 pm

            Lolz, like i, the US military knows quite a bit about the use of pyschedelics but will never tell, like for instance the ability for those subjected to X amounts of the substance over X period of time to have an ability to look straight through walls, even those constructed of concrete, and tell what a person on the other side of it is wearing…

      • phillip ure 11.2.2
        29 May 2014 at 3:58 pm

        you get a special retro-drug-cliche award for that one..allen..

        • The Al1en 11.2.2.1
          29 May 2014 at 4:13 pm

          Didn’t say it was an original, but I’ll take the award, just as long as I don’t have to share it like lorde.

  12. Bearded Git 12
    29 May 2014 at 11:39 am

    The Peter Lyons article below from the Herald today is excellent.

    It is probably misleading in one aspect where he quotes wage growth at 14% and inflation at 10% during the term of this government. Though these figures may well be right but from various media reports I have read it would seem the bulk of the pay rises have gone to the better off leaving the bottom 50% with wages not keeping up with inflation. (I don’t have stats but would love to see some).

    http://www.nzherald.co.nz/opinion/news/article.cfm?c_id=466&objectid=11263462

  13. greywarbler 13
    29 May 2014 at 12:15 pm

    Radionz item on putting on weight – strange that it has happened in last 30 years. There is a graphic on their site with two parents both overblown. It looks as if they are out doing what the government wants them to do – consumer spending.

    The item says that NZ men have put on weight the fastest in their measurements – from OECD. Yeah we win again.

    We could come up with pub games where men rush their stomachs at each other and see how far they can bounce the other outside a circle. That would make a change from tossing dwarfs.

    http://www.radionz.co.nz/news/national/245744/obesity-among-nz-men-grows-fastest-in-world

  14. bad12 14
    29 May 2014 at 12:46 pm

    And this is how the message ran, good afternoon 2011 Green party voters, the InternetMana alliance thanks you for the big ups, but, if you voted Green in 2011 it is best to stick with voting Green again in 2014,

    There are ”other” rich sources of sourcing votes that the InternetMana alliance are excellently positioned to take full advantage of, including:

    The fast failing Maori Party, party and electorate vote,

    The tactical voters who did not vote Green last time round,

    The missing million, the vast bulk of whom are registered but did not vote in 2011…

  15. Chooky 15
    29 May 2014 at 12:47 pm

    From Martyn Bradbury

    “Why making the election a Public Holiday would lift voting numbers.

    …The fact we are one of the few democracies that can change power minus violence and intimidation should be a source of celebration and deep pride……I think that standing in line with your fellow citizens to vote is a necessary part of the engagement process and online voting doesn’t create that. Selfies proclaiming that people have voted will be a great means of building awareness, but it can’t replace the real social element of sharing the same physical space peacefully with people who have the opposite agenda that you do.

    Apart from the ease with which online voting can be hacked, the physical space sharing social interaction is a crucial democratic engagement.

    I think the reason our election should also be a public holiday is based on that shared social experience.

    http://thedailyblog.co.nz/2014/05/29/why-making-the-election-a-public-holiday-would-lift-voting-numbers/

    • Draco T Bastard 15.1
      29 May 2014 at 1:34 pm

      What “physical space sharing social interaction” are you talking about?

      • Colonial Viper 15.1.1
        29 May 2014 at 2:03 pm

        The one you don’t get while online voting and receiving an LED tan in front of your computer screen home alone.

    • bad12 15.2
      29 May 2014 at 2:02 pm

      On the same subject, voting that is of the compulsory type, there appears to be a conference going on today in Wellington where the discussion has turned to that very topic, compulsory voting,

      A professor, visiting i think from Ireland has said that if we want to have more of those able to participating then we should at least try compulsory voting,

      Judith Collins Pfft, quoted on the same subject by RadioNZ National said that Compulsory Voting would ”be less democratic”,(that begs the question that compulsory enrollment to vote must really kneecap the democratic process right),

      Bomber might be on to something there with the holiday idea, couple a day off with a compulsion to vote as the reward and we might get a far better turnout than the present…

      • Colonial Viper 15.2.1
        29 May 2014 at 2:23 pm

        A public holiday, or half a working days holiday to anyone working on the day

        • bad12 15.2.1.1
          29 May 2014 at 4:16 pm

          Nah CV, why should those who are forced to work holidays be punished, a day in lieu would fix that and they could take their holiday on a day that the whole capitalist world wouldn’t collapse because of their absence,(being also allowed to cast a special vote as well would help)…

  16. bad12 16
    29 May 2014 at 2:05 pm

    Flavell now in the Parliament is trying to get the Maori Party votes reversed and the Bill moved to a second reading,

    There is no objection and Jerry Brownlee has risen to grovel about Nationals fraudulent use of the Maori Party votes…

    • Tracey 16.1
      29 May 2014 at 2:18 pm

      but English will exercise veto anyway?

      • bad12 16.1.1
        29 May 2014 at 4:32 pm

        Yeah Tracey, to a certain extent what’s occurring is a ”beltway game” but for us political junkies and those interested enough to be taking even a minor interest what has occurred is quite enlightening,

        Take Sharples for instance, Tory Lapdog or Rangatira???, it appears from the unfolding story that all it takes for Sharples to shed any vestiges of Mana and Rangatiratanga that He may or may not have previously possessed is for a couple of the Massah Bosses in the form of Tory MP’s/Minsters to bail Him up in a Parliamentary corridor and put the hard word on Him,

        The last vestiges of the Maori Party voting base should take note,

        National of course are desperate to delay this Bill until the House rises for the election, there’s miles of Bad Bad publicity inherent in English having to use His veto to trash the extra paid parental leave that the Bill contains,

        National largely ”got away with” failing to impose its version of ”resource heaven” when it found that it couldn’t force through Legislation to impose its desired changes, simply because the toothless media hardly gave the situation a mention,

        Lolz, Grant Robertson, in a loaded question posed to Gerry Brownlee in the House this afternoon enquired whether National intended to pass some more employment Legislation befor the House rises, methinks Grant believes National will not have the numbers to pass the intended Legislation either, the subtleties of this which seemed to fly straight over Brownlees head,

        What such ”beltway games” expose where National hasn’t the numbers to pass its Legislative agenda into Law is simply a Government that is a lame-duck…

        • Tracey 16.1.1.1
          29 May 2014 at 4:37 pm

          You dont think sharples was trying to correct the problem and find out why national had cast the votes against?

          • bad12 16.1.1.1.1
            29 May 2014 at 4:49 pm

            It’s one possibility Tracey, but, from what’s i can gather, after the ”words” were had last night in the corridor, Sharples done a runner,

            He could have walked into the Chamber and simply made the Maori Party position plain by yelling ”Point of Order Mr Speaker”…

            • Tracey 16.1.1.1.1.1
              29 May 2014 at 4:59 pm

              Fair point. I dont understand why, if sharples was in the chamber, he didnt have flavell’s proxy?

              • bad12 …
                29 May 2014 at 5:53 pm

                i didn’t see the parliament in session last night Tracey, aging from what i can gather Sharples wasn’t in the chamber for the vote, the fact that the Tory MP’s managed to bail Him up in the corridor would suggest tho that He wasn’t far away,

                From one angled perception it could be suggested that Sharples deliberately let what occurred occur but there is not the slightest shred of evidence to suggest this, so i definitely wont be suggesting that Lol,

                Obviously something lead the desperate National Government to believe it could kill Maroney’s Bill by voting the Maori Party proxies the wrong way, what it was we may never know, but, don’t believe for a moment that things within the Maori Party are all sweetness and light…

                • bad12 …
                  29 May 2014 at 6:08 pm

                  As an afterthought Tracey, Flavell should have stood in the Parliament today and waved the Maori Party/National Party coalition in the air and invited them to instruct the speaker to amend last nights vote,

                  He obviously has no eye for the theatrical and even less idea of the growing elephant in the room in the form of Annette Sykes growing support back home in the Waiariki electorate,

                  Flavell in effect begging the Speaker to alter what was something of National’s making simply makes Him look weak…

  17. Tracey 17
    29 May 2014 at 2:17 pm

    Can anyone clarify the following for me?

    Since 2012, if an employee agrees, for a new position, the employer can offer a package and make its contribution inclusive of the gross salary if the employee agrees and joins kiwisaver?

    If yes, for many lower skilled folks they are effectively agreeing to pay their kiwisaver contrib and the employers?

    • Skinny 17.1
      29 May 2014 at 2:41 pm

      My advice make sure your a member of a Union, especially if your a low paid worker, do it on the down low if your afraid of that dirty 90 day trial law. Go to the CTU website for the right advice.

      • Tracey 17.1.1
        29 May 2014 at 3:26 pm

        No union option. No 90 day caluse.

        It seems the nacts have eroded this part of employment law, to save employers money and dissuade people from kiwisaver.

    • Lanthanide 17.2
      29 May 2014 at 3:37 pm

      Yes.

      Yes, many employees will be lumping the employer share of kiwisaver.

      Note that this does not apply to those on minimum wage, because minimum means minimum. For people earning the minimum, if they choose to join KS, their employer must pay the employer contribution in addition to their wage.

      • Tracey 17.2.1
        29 May 2014 at 3:39 pm

        Of course @ minimum wage. Thanks lanth. So the nats halved the govt incentive and kind of screwe a heap of others…

    • Will@Welly 17.3
      29 May 2014 at 3:47 pm

      I think it is illegal. I’m pretty sure this has been tested in the courts. It is illegal for employers to demand that employees pay both contributions.

      • cricklewood 17.3.1
        29 May 2014 at 5:55 pm

        Currently it is legal the nats changed the law making it permissible. Which a number of ratbag employers did. The court case taken by a union in the aged care sector I think argued that for those on or close to minimum wage were in reality been paid less than the legal minimum happily they were successful. On the downside the employer s then counted this as a ‘payrise’ meaning getting an award the next year is much harder.

  18. captain hook 18
    29 May 2014 at 2:50 pm

    so no news yet about the radical restructuring of the winz acts to incorporate welfare reform by stealth.
    wake up yo!

    • freedom 18.1
      29 May 2014 at 3:47 pm

      Do you have some info? I understood they were still writing the new legislation and had not released any details yet, so there is nothing to discuss but the knowledge they are writing the new legislation.

      & that is a very short and very depressing conversation 🙂

  19. Tracey 19
    29 May 2014 at 3:41 pm

    john kerry telling edward snowden to go back to the usa… The drones not located him yet???

  20. Will@Welly 20
    29 May 2014 at 3:57 pm

    New minimum ‘pay rate award’. A week can cover a fortnight. So you ‘work’ 20 hours one week, then 60 hours the next, and get paid 40 hours for both.
    Maybe an employer can get you to work 120 hours one week, then drip-feed you your pay over the next couple of weeks. How soon before this flows on to the rest of the economy?
    Imagine some of the more onerous and dangerous jobs being treated like this? Sooner or later something would have to give, and perhaps someone might be killed? Who then would be at fault? The employer, the employee, or the Government?
    Imagine also the disruption to families.

    On a separate note, Nick Smith has cancelled the Fiordland Monorail. Lets see what happens after the election!

  21. phillip ure 21
    29 May 2014 at 4:27 pm

    farrar and joe bennett talking absolute lying-shite about harre/int/mana..on panel..

    ..(even mora seems embarrassed by the relentless negativity..)

    ..i wonder if farrar was long-scheduled for today..?

    ..or if he was rushed in at the last minute..?

    ..and i never realised what a braying ignorant fucken fool bennet is..

    • bad12 21.1
      29 May 2014 at 4:45 pm

      i would suggest tho Phillip, that anyone listening to that pile of defecation from the evil baby look-a-like is either firmly in the fuck-you-Farrer camp or highly unlikely to vote InternetMana anyway,

      I keep saying this to the ‘wing-nuts’, as far as the InternetMana alliance goes, its a science fiction double feature, the ‘Wing-nuts’ attempts at disparagement are far far to late, Doctor X has already built the creature…

      • phillip ure 21.1.1
        29 May 2014 at 4:57 pm

        the big lie they all told was that the alliance-lite deal dissolves six weeks after the election..

        ..this is total bullshit..

        ..there is a scheduled meeting six weeks after the election to work out how best to work together in parliament..

        ..not an automatic dissolution..

        ..(i am surprised mora didn’t call them out on that clear error of fact..didn’t he know..?..)

        ..an error repeated/laughed at multiple times/ways..

        ..and the more i think about it..the more i want to know if farrar was actually scheduled for today..

        ..or if he was rushed in to spin..

        ..and he is doing a brilliant effort at filling up all the time with his words..controlling the message..

        ..joe bennet got about 20% of the allocated time..

        ..(and i agree the creature is already built..

        ..but you still have to be vigilant..

        ..to call out the lies..)

        • bad12 21.1.1.1
          29 May 2014 at 5:43 pm

          Another laugh out loud coincidence???, the movie moguls from five of the Hollywood big studios had their legal eagles in the High Court at Auckland today arguing the toss trying to stop Dotcom getting His seized assets back,

          i had the thought again, way too late children, Dotcom has already cashed up the InternetMana alliance so even if they could extract Him from the country befor the election, Slippery the Prime Minister will still be getting the Dotcom gift that just doesn’t stop giving, in Slippery’s case brain damage…

  22. phillip ure 22
    29 May 2014 at 5:20 pm

    laila harre is doing an excellent interview with mary wilson…

    ..just excellent..

  23. cricklewood 23
    29 May 2014 at 6:14 pm

    What chance Peter Dunne and Colin Craig look to stitch up something similar to Internet Mana?
    Would make sense Dunne’s seat plus Colin’s 3%
    Conservative Future anyone?

    • The Al1en 23.1
      29 May 2014 at 6:57 pm

      And that’s what’s lurking at the bottom of Pandora’s box now the $3m man and Hone have opened it.
      Say goodbye to that coveted 3 seat gain as you blow kisses to the moral high ground.

    • ianmac 24.1
      29 May 2014 at 7:53 pm

      Biased Bile from Paddy Gower! Hypocrite he is! Where was his anger for Banks or Hyde or Pete?

    • Olwyn 24.2
      29 May 2014 at 8:11 pm

      Did you look at the comments? Not a lot of people seem to agree with him.

      • geoff 24.2.1
        29 May 2014 at 8:33 pm

        I’ve noticed that with the tv3 news website in general. Fairly left leaning commentary in the majority has been my impression.
        Not like Stuff which is very much the opposite.

      • veutoviper 24.2.2
        29 May 2014 at 9:10 pm

        Just did and wow! Paddy lost it in his ‘opinion piece’ – and those comments really lay into him. Some of them excellent analysis – not in his favour. Is the revolution about to happen?

        PS – according to Paddy’s twitter feed, he went on leave last night;; long weekend in his home town, New Plymouth ? And suddenly this ‘contribution’.

    • blue leopard 24.3
      29 May 2014 at 8:19 pm

      lol, Poor wee Gower sounds like he is having a wee …er Paddy…

      My response to Paddy’s hyperventilating:

      Where was your passion when the National government ignored changing the MMP rules when they had a chance? Why didn’t they do that? This couldn’t have occurred if they had taken on board the recommendations.

      Oh wait! I believe the answer is contained in his article ‘Never, ever was it envisaged they would be used as a back-door entry for a German millionaire to get his proxy into Parliament.‘

      …wow! and that sounds like a pretty racist comment, there Paddy – what do you mean by that? – that it is o.k for NZ millionaires to rort the system? – is it just that you don’t want German born ones to do the rorting? Or is it more a thing about what political persuasion is involved when rorting of the system occurs?

      Pretty easy fix to this one. The next government who gets in needs to tighten the MMP rules. Political parties, which of you are going to do that? [Did Labour already mention they would redress that? (not sure)]

  25. Draco T Bastard 25
    29 May 2014 at 8:58 pm

    Inclusive Capitalism Initiative is Trojan Horse to quell coming global revolt

    In May 2012, HJS executive director Alan Mendoza explained the thinking behind the project:

    “… we felt that such was public disgust with the system, there was a very real danger that politicians could seek to remedy the situation by legislating capitalism out of business.”

    Which is, of course, what needs to happen.

  26. Jenny 26
    30 May 2014 at 6:03 am

    OPENING SPEECH IN THE FIRST READING DEBATE OF THE FEED THE KIDS BILL

    Hone Harawira – MANA Leader and Te Tai Tokerau Member of Parliament

    Wednesday 28 May 2014

    Tēnā koe Mr Speaker

    Mr Speaker, I move that the Education (Breakfast and Lunch Programmes in Schools) Amendment Bill be now read a first time.

    I nominate the Māori Affairs Committee to consider the bill.

    Mr Speaker, Nelson Mandela once said that “there can be no keener revelation of a society’s soul than the way in which it treats its children” and if I could add a comment, it would be “and blaming those too vulnerable to care for themselves and their children, speaks more about our selfishness than it does about the hopelessness of poverty.”

    Mr Speaker, back in April last year I was part of a big MANA Feed the Kids gig where we fed more than 1,500 kids up in Otara. They had heaps of fun and when they left they all took a lunch away, happily chanting “Feed the Kids”, and I thought to myself – these kids get it, their whanau get it, their teachers get it, and I sincerely hope enough of us get it too, because Treasury itself has told us there are now 285,000 kids living in poverty in Aotearoa, 100,000 of whom go to school hungry every day.

    Yes, it’s nice to know that KidsCan feeds some 10,000 of them most days and that the KickStart programme feeds about 12,000 a day, but the reality is that even with government’s announcement in last year’s Budget, nearly 80,000 children are still going to school hungry in Aotearoa, every single day.

    And yes, schools around the country have started their own breakfast clubs with support from teachers, students, parents, local businesses and the wider community – but they tell us that it takes a lot of hard work, and a lot of goodwill to keep it going, and that having secure funding would be a godsend.

    And the really embarrassing thing is that nearly every country in the OECD, apart from us, already runs programmes to feed kids at school.

    Some, like Finland and Sweden provide fully state-funded meals to every school student as part of a wider framework of child wellbeing – a commitment that sees them regularly top the international surveys in child health and educational achievement.

    Some provide free meals to kids with parents on low incomes and others provide free meals to schools in areas of high deprivation, but while the approaches differ, they all share the same view – backed up by the same kind of research and information from teachers, doctors, nurses and policy analysts, that is available to us here – that kids need a good feed every day if they are to develop into healthy, and well educated adults.

    Mr Speaker, New Zealand really needs to join the rest of the enlightened world and make a commitment to feeding our kids, starting with those in greatest need, to help them to grow well and learn well.

    Groups like the Child Poverty Action Group have long advocated for government-funded food in schools programmes as a simple and cheap step to reducing poverty.

    The report of the Children’s Commissioner’s Expert Advisory Group on Solutions to Child Poverty, released a year and a half ago now, did not recommend throwing in a few dollars only if the corporates gave some as this government has proposed – no – they recommended that “government should develop and implement a government-funded food in schools programme” and that “government has a responsibility to provide leadership and resources, to assist schools through a national strategy for food in Early Childhood Centres and schools in low decile neighbourhoods.”

    Mr Speaker – I have been humbled by the positive responses to MANA’s Feed the Kids Bill from a whole host of child, family, health, education, and faith organisations all around the country, who helped raise awareness about just how many of our kids are going to school hungry in Aotearoa, and what we should be doing about it.

    They have worked hard to remind us all that the crisis of child hunger and its devastating effects on brain development, health and learning means we need to urgently focus on feeding the kids rather than blaming the parents; that poverty has doubled in the last 25 years and children are its greatest victim; and that poverty won’t go away without big changes in employment, wages, housing and support for families in need.

    Mr Speaker – things have changed a lot from when everyone was scoffing at MANA for even talking about Feeding the Kids during Election 2011, to a TV poll last year that showed 70% of Kiwis support a government-funded food in schools programme; and to food in schools being the only policy issue to make the top 10 news stories in 2013.

    And much of that awareness has come about as a result of the excellent work and commitment of the Community Coalition for Food in Schools – which now has 30 members – and in particular, the efforts of Deborah Morris-Travers, former CEO of Every Child Counts and now Advocacy Manager for UNICEF NZ.

    Mr Speaker, the Children’s Commissioner’s Expert Advisory Group said that child poverty doesn’t just impact on children and their families – it costs all of us, a lot. In fact, it’s estimated that child poverty costs New Zealanders $6-8 billion a year – in health, justice system costs, and in lost productivity and a lower tax take – and yet we continue to be one of the worst performers in the OECD on child wellbeing.

    Our rates of preventable diseases like rheumatic fever are high, we have lower educational achievement than in other developed countries, and yet we’ll happily spend nearly $1.5 billion a year on prisons to feed one of the highest incarceration rates in the world.

    Unemployment is the highest it’s been for nearly 15 years, nearly half of all young Māori and PI are without work and are not in education or training, and the other half are getting ready to go to Aussie.

    Feeding the Kids won’t solve all these problems – but it is real, it is affordable, it is something we can do right now, and we know that it will help our kids grow up to be better, healthier contributors to society.

    We’ve costed the Bill to allow for a co-ordinator in each school to oversee the provision of breakfast and lunch in all decile 1-2 schools in Aotearoa; feeding more than 100,000 kids in our poorest communities; and using existing programmes like KidsCan and KickStart or working through other local initiatives.

    With very few exceptions schools have supported the Feed the Kids kaupapa because they know they’ll get more bang for their educational buck – kids will turn up to school on time, they’ll be settled and not disruptive, and they’ll be ready to learn.

    And while I’m at it I’d also like to thank all the secondary and tertiary students who backed this bill, because when young people say that hunger is their number one priority, and that food in schools is the best solution to it, then that says it all.

    Mr Speaker – I know the bill isn’t perfect; I hear the korero about feeding the kids being a parent’s responsibility, but the truth is that a lot of people have been so poor, for so long, that they struggle to make the right choices and often end up making the wrong ones. And all the while our kids go hungry …

    And I’ve heard a lot about increasing employment opportunities, and upgrading housing, and improving access to health and developing better educational pathways … and all of that is necessary and good, but it takes a long time to happen. And all the while our kids go hungry …

    And every other proposal I’ve heard from the Child Poverty Action Group, the Children’s Commissioner, health promotion agencies and advisory groups all the way up to the World Health Organisation’s Report on Child Health, makes a lot of sense to me.

    But all I want to do with this bill is make sure that as we work through all these other critical and important initiatives, our kids are getting fed.

    Mr Speaker – I welcome the calls to extend the Bill to include the Kohanga and ECE sector and decile 3-4 schools, and to allow those involved in school and community gardens to make a contribution to this discussion too, because this is an exercise that will require the efforts of the whole community, and I urge the House to vote this bill through at first reading so that the Maori Affairs select committee can call for submissions from those who know best, and those who care most, in order that we can develop a robust food-in-schools programme that enhances the well-being of our children, and enhances the future prospects of our society.

    • Jenny 26.1
      30 May 2014 at 6:10 am

      All that stands between this bill going to its second reading, where it will receive proper debate and the full consideration, of parliament is the single vote of that scum Peter Dunne.

      Just for this filthy act, every effort needs to be made, to ensure that Peter Dunne should not be returned to parliament as being morally and intellectually unfit for high office.