web analytics

Act MP caught out

Written By: - Date published: 12:56 pm, February 25th, 2009 - 42 comments
Categories: act, crime - Tags: , , ,

small-garrettRethinking Crime and Punishment Director, Kim Workman, has caught Act MP David Garrett being less than honest about how many extra prisoners his draconian three strike law world create (the answer is about 14,000).

In a particularly aggressive media release yesterday Garrett claimed Workman’s figures were false.

Unfortunately for Garrett, Workman’s OIA request on the matter turned up not only the figures that Garrett claimed were wrong but a letter from corrections to Garrett providing those figures and dated December 2007.

Some of you will recall how much energy Act Party leader Rodney Hide devoted to chasing down Winston’s lies about a little over a hundred thousand dollars worth of political funding.

My question is what will he do about one of his own MPs who appears to have lied about information critical to criminal legislation that could cost taxpayers billions?

42 comments on “Act MP caught out”

  1. burt 1

    All Garrett needs is a big sign with “NO” printed on it and he’ll be fine….

    If Rodney were to follow the standards set by Helen Clark then he can just ignore this and let Garrett tell more and more porkies. His supporters would defend him simply because they are stupid and the low standards would be ignored….

    I hope Rodney proves he has more integrity than HC.

  2. Peter Martin 2


  3. @ work 3

    Well thats his first strike…

  4. Graeme 4

    In a particularly aggressive media release yesterday Garrett claimed he had been informed by corrections that that figure was unobtainable.

    No he didn’t. At least not at the link you provide. Indeed the media release from Garrett provides a number that Corrections in fact gave him.

    One explanation for the difference between the figures is that Garrett’s figures rest on the definition of serious offence in his draft three strikes bill. There is a now a different definition, that both adds and removes offences.

    I suspect that both sets of figures are wrong, however, as neither seems to have taken account of the provision in the actual bill that ignores as strikes any offending which doesn’t result in a sentence of 5 or more years.

  5. IrishBill 5

    Graeme, you’re right. I’ll change that.

  6. @ work 6

    Sorry burt, you seem confused, were on thestandard not kiwiblog, maybe youd like to retrospectively move your comment to the correct site

  7. Duncan 7

    God, you are a dreadful bore Graeme. Do you ever contribute anything other than nitpicking and pedantry?

  8. Rex Widerstrom 8

    So, bottom line: Neither its creator nor Corrections nor anyone else has the slightest clue how many people will be flung into jail and left to rot as a result of this law.

    We have only the vaguest idea of how many more prison beds we’ll need, and while we’re waiting we’ll just double, triple and quadruple bunk people and let the poor COs sort out the resultant tensions and violence.

    We do have evidence that such a law is not particularly effective as a deterrent (for reasons Lew elegantly explains on this thread at Kiwipolitico) and could conceivably lead to some criminals choosing to kill robbery or rape victims to lessen their chances of being caught for a third strike.

    But hey, let’s do it anyway, huh? After all, it plays well to the cheap seats and that’s what governing is all about these days.

  9. Matthew Pilott 9

    Classic: “Garrett to Workman: ‘prove it’.”

    Workman’s release – we both got the same info, it said x, and I wonder why you chose to ignore it.

    Burt – are all Labour Supporters all ‘Stupid’? that’s the sum of your input to this conversation so far. the inane sniping from the edges discounted of course (’emotive BS Spin? Really? The two press releases make for an interesting contrast)…

    Are you upset that Garrett seems to have been caught out deliberately lying? He is an ACT MP – maybe you should be asking a few questions instead of trying to distract from the topic, Burt, or you’ll prove that the ‘Stupid’ ones support ACT.

    Well at least one ‘Stupid’ person; I’d hope most have more integrity that you, because you’re saying it’s fine for an MP to lie as long as the leader ‘acts with more integrity that HC’, whatever that emotive BS spin means.

    • burt 9.1

      Still smarting from being caught having no idea what you were talking about in the Once bitten thread…..

      To answer what might be your question: No I don’t unconditionally support the Govt based on the colour of their party flag. IF Garrett has been deliberately misleading the voters (and possibly parliament) then he should be censured. End of story.

  10. burt 10

    Matthew Pilott

    Burt – are all Labour Supporters all ‘Stupid’?

    The ones that unconditionally support Labour irrespective of what Labour do Yes. The ones who justify what Labour do based on “National did it as well’ Yes. The ones who fail to understand the difference between what is politically expedient and what is legally necessary yes. The ones who can’t differentiate between a party political broadcast and facts Yes.

    But the same also apples in the other direction. To keep things simple and to save poor Felix from needing to talk about me rather than the issue I’ll spell that out.

    Burt – are all Labour National Supporters all ‘Stupid’?

    The ones that unconditionally support Labour National irrespective of what Labour National do Yes. The ones who justify what Labour National do based on “National Labour did it as well’ Yes. The ones who fail to understand the difference between what is politically expedient and what is legally necessary yes. The ones who can’t differentiate between a party political broadcast and facts Yes.

    Burt – are all Labour ACT Supporters all ‘Stupid’?

    The ones that unconditionally support Labour ACT irrespective of what Labour ACT do Yes. The ones who justify what Labour ACT do based on ” Labour did it as well’ Yes. The ones who fail to understand the difference between what is politically expedient and what is legally necessary yes. The ones who can’t differentiate between a party political broadcast and facts Yes.

    Is that clear enough form you ?

    • Matthew Pilott 10.1

      Yes, Burt it’s much more clear than your original statment,

      If Rodney were to follow the standards set by Helen Clark then he can just ignore this and let Garrett tell more and more porkies. His supporters would defend him simply because they are stupid and the low standards would be ignored .

      which stated unequivocally that Supporters of Helen Clark are Stupid. Perhaps you should save the long-winded sarcastic replies for times where you didn’t make your point so badly in the original statement, it loses the effect otherwise and you look a tad silly.

      You also might want to make statements stronger than ‘I hope Rodney proves he has more integrity than HC.’ if you want any of us to believe you’re able to hold ACT to the same standard of any other party. I mean you wouldn’t to give the impression you think it’s ok for Garrett to lie, as long as when caught Hide does some emotive BS spin ‘integrity’ thing, do you? Is a ‘censure’ some emotive BS spin thing too, or is there more to it? What do you think should happen?

      Still smarting from being caught having no idea what you were talking about in the Once bitten thread

      No Burt, you’ve failed to make that point and have been failing since Jesus borrowed that $5 off you, but seeing as we’ve been over it enough and so has everyone else I knew better than to bother. Redlogix had another go, made the same point that’s been made all along and there’s still no sign of it getting through. You know I’m seriously debating deleting this because you’ll probably get all soap-boxey again. meh, it’s easy enough to tune out.

      • burt 10.1.1

        My opinion is that MP’s must be held to the highest ethical standard by their party leader. This opinion was most unpopular in the context of Helen Clark not standing up against Winston’s “NO’ episode. However I suspect the concept of MP’s being held accountable will be quite fashionable on this site when we are talking about National and/or ACT.

      • Felix 10.1.2


        “MP’s must be held to the highest ethical standard by their party leader.”

        (Assuming that the apostrophe is just a grammatical error and you haven’t missed a word out) Fair enough, but that’s not a relationship which ever existed between Clark and Peters, so why are you trying to suggest that in your next sentence?

        Good to know though that you won’t accept any dodging of difficult issues from your mate Rodney.

  11. Felix 11

    Who couldn’t predict that these SST freaks would be an albatross for ACT’s neck?

    It’s tempting to say “lie down with dogs – wake up with fleas” but in this case it’s more like fleas lying down with maggots.

    • Rex Widerstrom 11.1

      Yes, Act’s policy previously was, to me at least, the curate’s egg (parts of it were quite good… though I could say the same about the policies of almost any party except Dunne’s, since he doesn’t have any).

      But now the overwhelming stench emanating from this particular part of the egg is enough to so thoroughly turn my stomach I doubt I could bring myself to consume any of the rest of it.

  12. burt 12


    but that’s not a relationship which ever existed between Clark and Peters

    Well Clark wasn’t “His” party leader but she was the leader of the Labour-led govt and was therefore responsible for the conduct of ministers that made up that govt. It seems that I’m not going to get much traction here though because as you have pointed out HC only had responsibility for the govt and not Winston who we all know made his own rules and that was OK because he was keeping Labour in power.

    I guess if John Key comes out says he is comfortable with the position Garrett has taken we will be quite happy with that as well because Key is not Garrett’s leader ? Yes ?

    Come on cut the crap – it’s not acceptable when a minister of the govt tells porkies and is not held accountable by the PM. Irrespective of the technicalities of my grammar or the coalition arrangements. The flavour of the PM’s own party vs the ministers party provides wiggle room for apologists but is not a justification for doing nothing.

    • Ianmac 12.1

      burt: It is true that John Key has made a virtue of holding “every member of a Government that he leads to a very high standard.” He said this many times before the Election and after especially in relation to Peters. Seemed to be asking for trouble because sooner or later……………..

    • Felix 12.2

      So what are you expecting from Key if it turns out that Garrett has been telling porkies? And what do you expect your mate Rodney to do about it?

      What to you is an acceptable response, given the very high standards of conduct you expected from the previous lot?

      • burt 12.2.1


        The prat answer – Rodney is not my mate and I don’t know why you insist on this non-issue propaganda continually saying he is. Sure I know him and he knows my name when we meet, but that’s about as far as it goes really. If he never saw me again I don’t think he would miss me.

        The real answer: The first thing that needs to occur is for the facts to be established. Not wishy-washy mamby-pamby weasel words about it could be this or it could be that, but hard cold facts – the best most educated estimate of the prison population impacts out in the open for discussion.

        Secondly Rodney needs to front foot this. If he thinks Garrett was deliberately misleading in his answers then he must follow the established procedure for dealing with members of his party who have mislead the public. If Rodney determines that Garrett was answering to be best of his knowledge at the time (given the information in this thread, that is possible) then he still needs to coach Garrett on how to deal with these situations and make some public statements about Garrett having already used up one of his 3 strikes (as @work states way back up this thread).

        The last govt were appalling with regard to maintaining public confidence in the integrity of MP’s, the current lot would be well advised to set the standards high right from the start and keep them high. The way ACT dealt with Donna Huata vs how Labour dealt with Taito Field, Parker, Peters, Benson-Pope (add hundreds of names here..) gives me confidence that they will do the right thing. Time will tell.

        • Felix

          Why do you think Garrett should get “3 strikes”? What does that mean?

          • burt


            I actually don’t know. Before the previous bunch of reprobates showed how it’s done I thought serious issues like misleading the public or the house had serious consequences. Crickey under Labour not even misleading the house, the public and apparently the PM, while breaching electoral funding laws with undeclared donations had any significant consequences. Certainly no criminal consequences. So as for precedent to draw on I have no idea. I laughed way back when I saw what @work had written, It seemed appropriate.

            What would you suggest as appropriate course of action if Garrett is proven to be telling porkies?

          • Felix

            I don’t really know either, but at the very least I’d like to see it scrutinized visibly in the media so the populace can make their own judgments.

  13. Quoth the Raven 13

    That kind of incarceration rate would put us in leauge with Cuba, Russia, Rwanda and the US. We’re already worse than the likes of China, Uzbekistan, Kyrgyzstan and other stans. Slipping and sliding towards a prison state. Happy happy joy joy for the likes of Garret and Hide.

    • higherstandard 13.1


      I’m sure you know some of those states that you mention we are worse than have a somewhat more extreme solution to certain crimes than incarceration.

    • burt 13.2

      Perhaps Labour should move that an addition question be added to the referendum on smacking….

      A word-smithed version of;

      Should the ACT party ‘3 strikes your out’ policy be enacted during this term of the National-led govt?

  14. burt 14

    So just a random poll, If the impacts on prison population make the ‘3 strikes’ policy a bad policy then should we take the Monty Python approach ?

    “The only way to bring the crime rate down is to reduce the number of offenses”. If there were no offenses then the prison population would drop to zero quite quickly.

    I don’t think it makes any sense to say that the prison population as at today (status quo) is about right. Doing some sort todays level is OK more is bad, less is bad is just completely stupid IMHO.

    The issue here is how we deal with recidivist dangerous offenders, not the prison population as a consequence of changing how we manage dangerous repeat offenders. The horse must go before the card.

  15. burt 15

    For what it’s worthy, I think the [x] strikes your out philosophy has enormous merit. I don’t know if 3 is the correct number.

    Anyone who has ever had much exposure to criminal offending data would quickly note (aside from the obvious – all criminals have at least one conviction) that the vast majority of criminals have few convictions, many have up to a hundred, few have more than 1,000.

    Picking a number becomes a statistics game, capping people at 3 serious convictions will stop people getting hundreds or thousands of convictions. The question is, is the cost in terms of prisons worth it in terms of thousands of people that never became victims. Ask the Kuckenbecker family?

    IMHO the issue of prison population is a non issue in criminal justice policies. You structure the law to create order and public safety. The prison population is the consequence of that policy interacting with the current society. As long as you have chosen your policy well, and democratically, then the prison population is the cost of doing business.

    Just out of interest, has anyone got the numbers for how many people are currently on Home-D ?

    • RedLogix 15.1

      As long as you have chosen your policy well, and democratically, then the prison population is the cost of doing business.

      You actually KNOW that an ever increasing population of people rotting in evil hell-hole prisons has the inevitable result of causing MORE when they are inevitably released, bitter, dysfunctional and utterly without remorse or hope.

      What you are doing is a making an unspoken gamble with yourself. You calculate correctly that the probability of this particular person offending against YOU personally while they are in prison is zero.

      Yet you also calculate that the increased probability of that person offending against YOU personally when released is much less than the decreased probablity of them offending against YOU when they are inside.

      You personally expect to come out ahead on the gamble, while of course society as a whole inevitably comes out behind. In other words, like all good capitalists you are seeking to privatise the gains, and socialise the loss. You talk all about how much safer you are when criminals are IN prison, but never mention the increased risk when larger numbers of unrepentant, unreformed criminals are dumped back OUT onto the streets.

      To put this in another perspective burt, consider how you might feel about prisons as ‘cost of doing business’, if instead of living in a nation with millions of people to spread that cost over… it was just you and one other person living on your own on an isolated island. Imagine that this person had committed some offence against you, and for this reason you had the power to hold this person in prison, quite safely for just 12 months. But at the end of that time your power over them ceased, you HAD to release the prisoner, and you HAD to find a way to live together.

      Under this regime you can privatise the gain (keeping the offender locked up and unable to commit further offence for a period), but you can no longer socialise the potential increased loss when they are released. You and you alone get to personally bear the consequences. How might you be thinking about your prison system now?

      • Felix 15.1.1

        Of course ACT really wants to get rid of public-owned-and-run prisons so it’s not really in their interest politically to have them run well, or to seen to be run well.

        Meanwhile the SST wing of ACT is in all likelyhood laying the ground floor of a death-penalty campaign.

      • burt 15.1.2


        Your example of two people on an island is reductio ad absurdum but crosses over where Felix mentions the death penalty.

        The moral consequences of the death penalty are easily ignored in the criminal justice system of two people on an island.

        I said I didn’t know if 3 was the correct number. I think you need a limit for how many times you trust people to behave in society if they continually, in the most diabolical ways, repeatedly demonstrate no respect for the rights of other people.

        It’s not about ME being a gambler, it’s about societies right to exclude the few individuals who repeatedly show no respect for their basic human rights.

        • RedLogix

          Your example of two people on an island is reductio ad absurdum

          Not at all. It is simply a thought experiment. The point of it is to make you take personal responsibility for the consequences of your ideas. (You righties are big on personal responsibility aren’t you?)

          it’s about societies right to exclude the few individuals who repeatedly show no respect for their basic human rights

          No-one is arguing about the right of society to imprison offenders burt, but the problem is that the way you propose going about INCREASES the total long-term risk to society.

          But as with most right wingers, you privatise the short-term benefit of having more criminals IN prison, but attempt to shove onto everyone else the cost inevitably incurred when they are released OUT of prison.

          • burt

            Who said anything about releasing them apart from you ?

            Recidivist dangerous offenders = locked up for life.

            Following your example which you claim is valid. After my mate on the island has been released after the first year and immediately beats me up again (why he didn’t just kill me I don’t know but it’s your example) he is locked up for another year. Immediately after his release he beats me up again so he is locked up again.

            I tell you, I’m not looking forward to his release again because he’s going to beat me up immediately and I’ll need to lock him up again .

            Tell me one more time why after [x] number of times I’m sill only locking him up for a year and tell me again why I need to continue playing this game as long as we both live ?

          • burt

            “You righties are big on personal responsibility aren’t you?”

            Why do you want to make it personal ?.. I can also do that…

            You lefties are big on no responsibility aren’t you …. Why lock him up at all? Not locking up anyone will keep prison numbers down and isn’t that the only consideration ?

  16. Joshua 16

    Anyone else think that Garrett looks a bit like that crazy Austrian guy Fritzl, or whatever his name is/was?

  17. Garrett having already used up one of his 3 strikes (as @work states way back up this thread).

    That ‘stach is probably worth another strike IMHO…

  18. bobo 18

    He looks like Rodney Hide’s stunt double with hair.

Links to post

Recent Comments

Recent Posts

  • Significant investment in Raukūmara Pae Maunga to prevent Raukūmara forest collapse
    An iwi-Crown approach programme to restore the Raukūmara forest on the East Coast of the North Island and boost employment opportunities for whānau, particularly rangatahi/young people, will receive $34 million funding, Minister of Conservation Eugenie Sage has announced. “Raukūmara Pae Maunga is a partnership with Te Whānau-ā-Apanui, Ngāti Porou, and ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    4 hours ago
  • New partnership central to delivering more Māori housing
    Government agencies and partners are working closer together to provide more Māori Housing through the Te MAIHI o te Whare Māori – the Māori and Iwi Housing Innovation Framework for Action (MAIHI). MAIHI is a kaupapa Māori approach that drives a system change to give effect and impact on Māori ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    5 hours ago
  • Pacific Ministers meet to discuss regional economic priorities
    The Pacific Islands Forum Economic Ministers Meeting (FEMM) begins today and will focus on the major economic and social impacts of COVID-19 on the Pacific.  FEMM is an important congregation of Economic Ministers and senior officials from around the region, and for the first time, the annual meeting will be ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    6 hours ago
  • Formal apology and payment to George Nepata
    Cabinet has approved a formal apology and ex gratia payment to former soldier George Nepata, announced Defence Minister Ron Mark. This payment is to recognise the New Zealand Defence Force’s failure to provide Mr Nepata with a safe system of work in April 1989 when, as a result of an ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    10 hours ago
  • Report into Iain Lees-Galloway’s expenditure
    A report undertaken by Ministerial Services into Iain Lees-Galloway’s ministerial expenditure has found no evidence of any inappropriate transactions or spending. Ministerial Services undertook a line by line review of all his expenditure, including staff and spouse expenses for the period 1 January 2019 to 30 June 2020.  “I commissioned ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    19 hours ago
  • Managed isolation charges to start 11 August
    Managed isolation charges for returnees will come into force from 12.01am Tuesday 11th August, after they passed their last cabinet milestone today, Housing Minister Megan Woods said. “The new charging system balances the rights of New Zealanders to return home and helps reduce pressure on the managed isolation and quarantine ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    23 hours ago
  • Update on New Zealand and the Cook Islands travel bubble
    The Prime Minister of New Zealand Jacinda Ardern and the Prime Minister of the Cook Islands Henry Puna have welcomed the completion of phase one in the establishment of a travel bubble between New Zealand and the Cook Island. Negotiations on the text of an ‘Arrangement to Facilitate Quarantine-Free Travel ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 day ago
  • One-stop ‘jobs and training’ shop goes live
    The Government has launched a new online, phone and onsite service to help New Zealanders connect to a range of employment support and products for workers and businesses affected by COVID-19, announced Minister of Education Chris Hipkins and Minister for Social Development Carmel Sepuloni. Connected.govt.nz is a one-stop-shop for jobseekers, ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 day ago
  • MSD security guards to be paid Living Wage
    Security guards contracted to the Ministry of Social Development will be paid at least the Living Wage from next month supporting the Government’s commitment towards fair pay and employment conditions, announced Minister for  Social Development Carmel Sepuloni.   “MSD was  among the first government agencies to pay its employees the living ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 day ago
  • New strategy to ensure nature thrives
    The Minister of Conservation Eugenie Sage today launched Te Mana o te Taiao, the Aotearoa New Zealand Biodiversity Strategy - a way forward that envisions Aotearoa New Zealand as a place where ecosystems are healthy and resilient, and people embrace the natural world. “Many of New Zealand’s plants and wildlife species ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 day ago
  • Provider Languages Fund will support Pacific Wellbeing approach
    “Pacific languages, cultures and identity are essential to the health, wellbeing and lifetime success of our Pacific peoples and their communities in Aotearoa. The strength and resilience of Pacific Aotearoa is not only vital to their own prosperity but integral to the prosperity of all New Zealanders, and is particularly ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 day ago
  • COVID-19: More funding for schools and boost to construction sector
    ·       $38 million to help schools cover unexpected costs related to COVID-19 ·       $69 million upgrade for online learning ·       $107 million contingency funding to support school construction suppliers facing additional costs due to the lockdown. The Government is releasing $214 million from the COVID-19 response and recovery fund to ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 day ago
  • Stay safe on the tracks – Rail Safety Week
    Despite the Government installing safety upgrades around the country, people should still take care around rail crossings, said Transport Minister Phil Twyford launching Rail Safety Week. Phil Twyford said installing safety infrastructure is crucial, but we are encouraging people to be more careful around trains too. “We’re making good progress ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 day ago
  • Government backs Manawatū social housing project
    The Government is providing a cash injection to help Palmerston North City Council complete a programme to provide 78 social housing units for vulnerable tenants. The $4.7 million to build 28 units in the Papaioea Place redevelopment comes from the $3 billion set aside for infrastructure in the Government’s COVID-19 ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 day ago
  • Major funding boost for Predator Free Banks Peninsula
    A pest free Banks Peninsula/Te Pātaka o Rākaihautū is one step closer with a $5.11 million boost to accelerate this project and create jobs, announced Conservation Minister Eugenie Sage in Canterbury today. “This is a game changer for this ambitious project to restore the native wildlife and plants on Ōtautahi/Christchurch’s doorstep ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 days ago
  • Major investment for indoor sports in Hawke’s Bay
    A Government grant of $6.4 million will expand the Pettigrew Arena in Taradale with new indoor courts of national standard. “The project is likely to take 18 months with approximately 300 people employed through the process,” Grant Robertson said. “The expansion will increase the indoor court space up to 11 ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 days ago
  • New infrastructure for Far North tourist town
    The Far North tourist destination of Mangonui is to receive Government funding to improve waterfront infrastructure, open up access to the harbour and improve water quality, Infrastructure Minister Shane Jones has announced. A total of $6.5 million from the $3 billion set aside in the COVID-19 Response and Recovery Fund ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 days ago
  • Government remains committed to Women’s Cricket World Cup
    The Government has re-affirmed its commitment to supporting the hosting of the ICC Women’s Cricket World Cup, which the ICC has delayed from 2021 to 2022. “This is obviously a disappointing decision for cricket players and fans around the world and for the White Ferns and their supporters here at ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 days ago
  • Green light for Te Awa River Ride in $220m nationwide cycleways investment
    Cyclists and walkers will now have a safer way to get around Taupō, Tūrangi, and between Hamilton and Cambridge, with funding for shared paths and Te Awa River Ride, Associate Minister of Transport Julie Anne Genter announced today. “The Te Awa River Ride is the latest part of massive growth ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 days ago
  • Six major ‘shovel-ready’ cycleways funded in Christchurch
    Six major cycle routes will be completed in Christchurch thanks to funding from the Government’s investment in shovel-ready infrastructure as part of the COVID-19 recovery Associate Minister of Transport Julie Anne Genter announced today. $125 million will be invested to kick-start construction and fund the completion of the following cycleway ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 days ago
  • New Police facilities for Whanganui
    Plans are underway for a brand new state-of-the-art hub for Whanganui’s justice and social agencies, following confirmation the ageing Whanganui Central Police Station is to be replaced. Police Minister Stuart Nash has announced $25 million in new infrastructure spending to improve facilities for the wider community, and for staff who ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 days ago
  • Relativity adjustment for Waikato-Tainui and Ngāi Tahu
    An adjustment payment has been made to Waikato-Tainui and Ngāi Tahu under the relativity mechanisms in their 1995 and 1997 Treaty of Waitangi settlements, Minister for Treaty of Waitangi Negotiations Andrew Little announced today. The latest payments to Waikato-Tainui and Ngāi Tahu are $2,700,000 and $2,600,000 respectively to ensure the ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    4 days ago
  • Auckland rail upgrades pick up steam
    Deputy Prime Minister Winston Peters and Transport Minister Phil Twyford today kicked off the start of the Auckland NZ Upgrade Programme rail projects which will support over 400 jobs and help unlock our biggest city. Both ministers marked the start of enabling works on the third main rail line project ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    4 days ago
  • PGF support for Wairoa creates jobs
    The Provincial Growth Fund (PGF) investment of $3.78 million in Wairoa will create much needed economic stimulus and jobs, Under-Secretary for Regional Economic Development Fletcher Tabuteau announced today. PGF projects announced today include: $200,000 loan to Nuhaka Kiwifruit Holdings Ltd (operated by Pine Valley Orchard Ltd) to increase the productivity ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    4 days ago
  • Public and Māori housing to trial renewable energy technology
    Tenants in public and Māori housing may be benefiting from their own affordable renewable energy in future – a fund to trial renewable energy technology for public and Māori housing has today been announced by Energy and Resources Minister Megan Woods and Associate Minister for Housing (Māori Housing) Nanaia Mahuta. ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    4 days ago
  • $2.7m for Hokianga infrastructure
    Hokianga will receive $2.7 million to redevelop four of its wharves and upgrade its water supply, Regional Economic Development Minister Shane Jones has announced. Far North District Council will receive $1.8 million from the Provincial Growth Fund for the work on the wharves. “The work will include the construction of ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    4 days ago
  • New fund to support housing and construction sector
    A $350 million Residential Development Response Fund is being established to support the residential construction sector and to minimise the economic impact from COVID-19, the Housing Minister Dr Megan Woods has announced. “The Residential Development Response Fund will help to progress stalled or at-risk developments that support our broader housing ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    4 days ago
  • Government investment to boost Auckland’s community recycling network
    As part of a broader plan to divert waste from landfill, the Government today announced $10.67 million for new infrastructure as part of the Resource Recovery Network across the Auckland region. “This key investment in Auckland’s community recycling network is part of the Government’s Infrastructure Reference Group ‘shovel ready’ projects ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    4 days ago
  • Te Papa transformation starts at Cameron Road
    The Government is investing $45 million in the first stage of an ambitious urban development project for Tauranga that will employ up to 250 people and help the region grow, Urban Development Minister Phil Twyford announced today. Phil Twyford says the funding has been allocated out of the $3 billion ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    4 days ago
  • Low-emissions options for heavy transport a step closer
    Getting low-emission trucks on the road is a step closer with investment in infrastructure to support hydrogen vehicles, the Energy and Resources Minister Megan Woods has announced. The Infrastructure Reference Group has provisionally approved $20 million for New Plymouth company Hiringa Energy to establish a nationwide network of hydrogen-fuelling stations. ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    5 days ago
  • New training centre to upskill workers
    A new trades training centre to upskill the local workforce will be built in the South Waikato town of Tokoroa through funding from the Government’s COVID-19 Response and Recovery Fund, Education Minister Chris Hipkins and Regional Economic Development Minister Shane Jones have announced. The Government will contribute $10.84 million from ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    5 days ago
  • Subsequent children legislation to change
    The Government has agreed to repeal part of the Oranga Tamariki Act subsequent children provisions, Minister for Children Tracey Martin announced today. “There are times when children need to go into care for their safety – the safety and care of children must always be paramount,” Minister Martin said. “But ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    5 days ago
  • Funding to expand mental health support for Pacific peoples
    A $1.5 million boost to grow primary mental health and addiction services for Pacific peoples in Auckland, Hamilton and Canterbury will lead to better outcomes for Pacific communities, Associate Health Minister Jenny Salesa says.  Pasifika Futures has received funding to expand services through The Fono, Aotearoa New Zealand’s largest by ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    5 days ago
  • Funding boost for sustainable food and fibre production
    Twenty-two projects to boost the sustainability and climate resilience of New Zealand’s food and fibres sector have been announced today by Agriculture Minister Damien O’Connor. The $18m funding will deliver practical knowledge to help farmers and growers use their land more sustainably, meet environmental targets, remain prosperous, and better understand ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    5 days ago
  • Mature Workers Toolkit launched on business.govt.nz
    Employment Minister Willie Jackson welcomes an initiative that assists employers to get mature workers into New Zealand small businesses. The disadvantages that older people face in the workplace was highlighted in the whole of Government Employment Strategy.  In order to address this, a Mature Workers Toolkit has been developed and ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    5 days ago
  • Trans-Tasman cooperation in a COVID-19 world
    New Zealand and Australia reaffirmed today the need for the closest possible collaboration as they tackle a global environment shaped by COVID-19, Foreign Affairs Minister Winston Peters said. “In these challenging times, our close collaboration with Australia is more vital than ever,” said Mr Peters. Mr Peters and his Australian ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    5 days ago
  • Pike recovery efforts now in unexplored territory
    The recovery and forensic examination of the loader driven by survivor Russell Smith means the underground team are now moving into an area of the Pike River Mine that has not been seen since the explosion, Minister Responsible for Pike River Re-entry Andrew Little said. “The fifth and last robot ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    5 days ago
  • Government confirms CovidCard trial to go ahead
    The Government has confirmed a community-wide trial of CovidCard technology as it explores options for COVID-19 contact tracing. “Effective contact tracing is a vital part of the COVID-19 response,” Minister of Health Chris Hipkins said. “While manual processes remain the critical component for contact tracing, we know digital solutions can ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    5 days ago
  • Enhanced process for iwi aquaculture assets
    The government is proposing changes to aquaculture legislation to improve the process for allocating and transferring aquaculture assets to iwi. Fisheries Minister Stuart Nash has introduced the Maori Commercial Aquaculture Claims Settlement Amendment Bill to Parliament. It proposes a limited new discretionary power for Te Ohu Kaimoana Trustee Limited (ToKM). ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    5 days ago
  • Bill introduced to fix National’s Family Court reform failures
    The Minister of Justice has today introduced the Family Court (Supporting Children in Court) Legislation Bill – the next step in the ongoing programme of work to fix the failed 2014 Family Court reforms led by then Justice Minister Judith Collins.  The Bill arises from the report of the Independent ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    5 days ago