An unfair advantage?

Written By: - Date published: 10:47 am, May 20th, 2008 - 7 comments
Categories: articles, interweb - Tags: , ,

Oscar Pistorius now the chance to become the first amputee to compete on the track at the Olympics.

The 21-year-old who runs on artificial carbon fibre legs has been cleared to compete at the Beijing Olympics if he can make the qualifying time (he needs to take about a second off his personal best). 

Initially Oscar was barred from competing because it was felt that he had an “unfair advantage” over other competitors: the elongated carbon fibre running blades in place of his lower legs allow him to cover more distance per stride and aren’t vulnerable to the biochemical limitations of muscle. On the other hand, his supporters claim that the limbs are vulnerable to wind and rain and that he must expend more energy to start running.

There seems to be genuine scientific debate about whether he currently has an advantage or not. On balance things seem about equal. My guess though is that technological advances to the $50,000 running legs will continue and that before too long they will provide irrefutable advantage. What then?

Closer to home, Auckland swimmer and double amputee Nadya Vessey was recently reported to be awaiting fitting of a mermaid-style tail made by special effects company Weta Workshop. Presumably at some stage that could translate into a big competitive advantage. But is the mermaid tail really any different to the controversial new Speedo swimsuits which are claimed to have played a role in 37 world records since their introduction three months ago?

7 comments on “An unfair advantage?”

  1. randal 1

    they could chop off everybody elses legs and that would make it fair!

  2. Im sure the sport science eyes will work it out, I just hope any decision is not based on emotion.

  3. Felix 3

    Perhaps we could do away with live athletes altogether and just race robots.
    I’m sure there’d be drawbacks, but off the top of my head:

    1. You wouldn’t have to worry about them taking illegal enhancers.

    2. They’d be less likely to get on the piss and do dumb things that embarrass people at home.

    3. It might work out cheaper than the years of training that go into building live ones.

    4. Possibilities for exciting new events such as Demolition Hurdles.

  4. Felix:

    There is a robot Olympics.

  5. burt 5

    Who needs steroids – where will it end?

  6. Felix 6

    Cheers Brett, I’m checking them out now. Fantastic!

  7. Bring back the Greek Olympics: men only, no clothes, no teams.

Links to post

Recent Comments

Recent Posts

  • Safety focus in improved drug driver testing
    Improving the safety of all road users is the focus of a new public consultation document on the issue of drug driver testing. Plans for public consultation on options to improve the drug driver testing process have been announced by ...
    1 week ago
  • Making it easier to get help from Police
    Police Minister Stuart Nash says calling a cop suddenly got a whole lot easier with the launch of a ground-breaking new service for non-emergency calls. “The single non-emergency number ‘ten-five’ is designed to provide better service for the public and ...
    2 weeks ago
  • More Police deployed to the regions
    Frontline Police numbers have been boosted with today’s deployment of 77 new officers to the regions. Police Minister Stuart Nash today congratulated the recruits of Wing 325 who graduated at a formal ceremony at the Royal New Zealand Police College. ...
    2 weeks ago