An unfair advantage?

Written By: - Date published: 10:47 am, May 20th, 2008 - 7 comments
Categories: articles, interweb - Tags: , ,

Oscar Pistorius now the chance to become the first amputee to compete on the track at the Olympics.

The 21-year-old who runs on artificial carbon fibre legs has been cleared to compete at the Beijing Olympics if he can make the qualifying time (he needs to take about a second off his personal best). 

Initially Oscar was barred from competing because it was felt that he had an “unfair advantage” over other competitors: the elongated carbon fibre running blades in place of his lower legs allow him to cover more distance per stride and aren’t vulnerable to the biochemical limitations of muscle. On the other hand, his supporters claim that the limbs are vulnerable to wind and rain and that he must expend more energy to start running.

There seems to be genuine scientific debate about whether he currently has an advantage or not. On balance things seem about equal. My guess though is that technological advances to the $50,000 running legs will continue and that before too long they will provide irrefutable advantage. What then?

Closer to home, Auckland swimmer and double amputee Nadya Vessey was recently reported to be awaiting fitting of a mermaid-style tail made by special effects company Weta Workshop. Presumably at some stage that could translate into a big competitive advantage. But is the mermaid tail really any different to the controversial new Speedo swimsuits which are claimed to have played a role in 37 world records since their introduction three months ago?

7 comments on “An unfair advantage?”

  1. randal 1

    they could chop off everybody elses legs and that would make it fair!

  2. Im sure the sport science eyes will work it out, I just hope any decision is not based on emotion.

  3. Felix 3

    Perhaps we could do away with live athletes altogether and just race robots.
    I’m sure there’d be drawbacks, but off the top of my head:

    1. You wouldn’t have to worry about them taking illegal enhancers.

    2. They’d be less likely to get on the piss and do dumb things that embarrass people at home.

    3. It might work out cheaper than the years of training that go into building live ones.

    4. Possibilities for exciting new events such as Demolition Hurdles.

  4. Felix:

    There is a robot Olympics.

  5. burt 5

    Who needs steroids – where will it end?

  6. Felix 6

    Cheers Brett, I’m checking them out now. Fantastic!

  7. Bring back the Greek Olympics: men only, no clothes, no teams.

Links to post

Recent Comments

Recent Posts

  • Swiss tax agreement tightens net
    Opportunities to dodge tax are shrinking with the completion of a new tax agreement with Switzerland, Revenue Minister Stuart Nash announced today. Mr Nash and the Swiss Ambassador David Vogelsanger have today signed documents to update the double tax agreement (DTA). The previous DTA was signed in 1980. “Double tax ...
    2 weeks ago
  • Maintaining momentum for small business innovation
    Small Business Minister Stuart Nash says the report of the Small Business Council will help maintain the momentum for innovation and improvements in the sector. Mr Nash has thanked the members of the Small Business Council (SBC) who this week handed over their report, Empowering small businesses to aspire, succeed ...
    3 weeks ago