web analytics

Brits aim assistance to the low income

Written By: - Date published: 8:23 am, March 30th, 2009 - 22 comments
Categories: articles, tax, uk politics - Tags:

The irony of this article struck me when this week the well-off get the biggest boost to their wallet. From the Guardian

:

The chancellor is preparing to channel cash to poorer families in his budget as part of a mini-fiscal stimulus to kick-start the economy and protect the vulnerable. Senior cabinet figures are backing a campaign by more than 110 Labour MPs, including some ministerial aides, to top up benefits or the tax credits paid to low-income parents. The move comes as it emerged that Gordon Brown is trying to broker a £100bn deal at this week’s G20 summit to stop the world’s poorest falling victim to the banking crisis by extending loans and aid to developing countries that are at risk of poverty, disease and conflict. In an open letter published by the Observer today, the MPs argue that giving tax cuts to the middle classes may simply see money tucked away in savings accounts, but giving cash to those who really need it ensures they will spend it.

Remind me again why we are spending the most money on those higher up the food chain? And if you feel a little unsure out the wisdom of this approach does this article (from the SSTimes) make you want to reassess?

Record numbers violently abused South Auckland babies have been hospitalised with severe injuries in recent weeks, shocking police and child welfare agencies and leading to speculation that the economic recession is contributing.

Let’s hope the upcoming budget takes some bold steps to help those most in need – our country’s children (and can be the ones who are hardest to reach).

22 comments on “Brits aim assistance to the low income ”

  1. BLiP 1

    The reason National is spending the most money on those higher up the food chain (I assume you really mean thouse further up the income bracket) is that the rich have captured the National party and have sent down the instructions for the implementation of the hidden agenda to accelerate the transfer of wealth from the poor to the rich using “whatever it takes”.

    Geddit?

    • r0b 1.1

      the rich have captured the National party

      They didn’t need to “capture” it, they founded it.

      Great post Dance, interesting contrast with England. I haven’t much time for their “New Labour”, but they seem to have got this right.

      • BLiP 1.1.1

        They didn’t need to “capture’ it, they founded it.

        Puts paid to the suggestion National has some how transmogrified or that John Key had even a skerrick of concern for his beloved under class. More fool the voters.

    • Bill 1.2

      But that’s not just National, Blip, not just NZ and not just money that is being transferred. Here’s the opener from a lengthy, but well worth reading article from Matt Taibbi from rollingstone (link below)

      “The global economic crisis isn’t about money – it’s about power. How Wall Street insiders are using the bailout to stage a revolution.”

      According to Taibbi, the Fed has been ‘captured’ by the bankers. Meanwhile, we have a banker as PM. And Gordon Brown as a friend of the poor? Highly bloody unlikely!

      http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/story/26793903/the_big_takeover

      • BLiP 1.2.1

        Top link, thanks Bill. Confirms my fears that New Zealand voters were hoodwinked by National. Fingers crossed its just three years.

        • Bill 1.2.1.1

          Wish I could be so optimistic!

          I really don’t think it matters too much which party is running government. Labour were right of centre and, to give them the benefit of the doubt, probably thought they couldn’t move left given the larger environment they had to operate in.

          If Taibbi is correct, then by my reading we are on the cusp of an era of Corporatism writ large. National governments will then be more or less a side show of ever diminishing relevance. ( A process that has arguably been unfolding for some time now.)

          At the moment, financiers and their company’s are squabbling over who should assume ascendancy from the current bail out/ take over dynamic.

          Meanwhile, we are nowhere to be seen.

          Okay. There is the G20 demo’s and there is, depending on your views, Venezuela offering another way.

          Venezuela tends to be ignored when not being vilified ( so, no readily available info for people to act on) and G20 protests will count as nought if they do not act as a catalyst for a broader and deeper momentum coming from the streets. In the face of msm gearing up to give mainly negative coverage of the G20 protests….just read the British newspaper reports so far…. and the predilection for such protests to not translate into anything beyond their own immediacy anyway….

          Hope I’m being unduly pessimistic.

          • Joseph 1.2.1.1.1

            Just on the subject of G protests – I have never actually been informed of what they were about by news media. It has always been about riot squads and people throwing molotov cocktails.

          • BLiP 1.2.1.1.2

            I’m with you – I don’t hold out much hope for the long term prospects of the working class and can see corporate gulags springing up already – the rich have certainly decided they don’t want to be part of the community with their own gated enclaves.

            I also have a growing affinity for what Rave says – perhaps there is hope if the workers rise up and seize the means of production . . .

          • Bill 1.2.1.1.3

            The reply option has dropped from the bottom two comments, so I’m not sure where this is going to insert itself in.

            Anyway. In response to Blip’s growing sympathy to Rave’s revolutionary rhetoric.

            I agree there is no future in Social Democracy. Been thinking that for (wow, how time passes) 25 years now. All I really disagree with Rave about is the concept of Democratic Centralism. Lots of signals going up or towards the centre, possibly getting vetted along the way, and the informed centre sending commands back down to the (relatively) uninformed peripheries isn’t democratic.

            Taking over production and distribution is the easy bit. Organising production and distribution so that it is democratic, effective and avoids capture is the hard part.

          • Bill 1.2.1.1.4

            It has always been about riot squads and people throwing molotov cocktails

            You need to read these two so called news pieces Joseph, from the same newspaper, about the same incident…it’s just bloody classic.

            http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/crime/terror-probe-five-could-have-targeted-g20-1657600.html
            and

            http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/crime/activists-arrested-under-terrorism-law-1658031.html

  2. Santi 2

    Gordon Brown, really? he’s on his way out so this can only see as a desperate attempt to stay in power (sounds familiar, doesn’t it?).

    The Labour Party is toast.

  3. Another great headline but I wonder what the reality is.

    The so-called “rich” in NZ still pay a much higher rate of marginal tax and average tax in 2009 than they did 9 years ago. For obvious reasons, the post ignores the fact that in the same time WFF has also been introduced.

    I’d be interested to note what tax cuts have been introduced in the UK over the same period.

    It’s funny that the demands here to do what the US and UK do only seem to happen when you agree with their policies 🙂

  4. gomango 4

    So i have just read the kiwiblog story (and table) showing the effect changes, and compare it to this story. Can anyone actually explain the comment thats bandied around “most people are worse off” (not in this post, but more generally). I genuinely don’t understand – assuming farrar’s table is correct, earners on 20k or below see no change, everybody else is better off. Is it as simple as that?

    I don’t want to argue the merits of who gets what – just want to be clear on what the frame of reference is.

  5. gomango 5

    Thanks for the links but not really what i was asking for .

    How about this question – is that table correct? If it is incorrect, does anyone have one that is correct?

    I think you are arguing National versus Labour – I am just arguing April versus March.

    Is the unqualified statement “worse off than what would have been the case had Labours tax cuts been implemented” rather than just “worse off”. (Of course that is on the assumption Michael Cullen would have delivered those – we have seen that delivery not happen over previous elections.) But thats not the issue I’m trying to discuss. Just trying to verify that the KB table is correct ie people (on incomes > 20k, not in receipt of WFF) are better off in April versus March?

    • Pascal's bookie 5.1

      Labour didn’t win the election, so theorising about what MC might’ve done doesn’t matter. There was legislation passed bringing Labour’s tax cuts into effect. That was the law. If KB’s table doesn’t compare National’s new regime with that legislated labour regime, but rather with current rates (ie not counting Labour’s changes), then he is not really describing what National actually did.

      The honest thing to compare Nationals new regime with, is what things would have looked like if National had done nothing. (hint: Labour’s legislation would have come in to effect irrespective of speculations about Cullen, because Labour could not in realty change things, they lost the election)

      So the question might be asked which people are/will be better off next April, based on what National did.

      • Daveski 5.1.1

        PB 10 points for at least trying to defend the indefensible.

        The simple point as GMG points out is that people appear to be better off if they earn more than 20K.

        As you point out, what Labour would have/could have done is irrelevant given they were voted out.

        • r0b 5.1.1.1

          It is by no means “irrelevant” to the huge number of low income earners who are worse off under National than they would have been under Labour.

      • Pascal's bookie 5.1.2

        Daveski. What is it that you think I am defending?

        I’m glad you agree that what Cullen might’ve done is irrelevant. It’s been something that others on the right have been bringing up quite often and like you I think it’s silly. My comment explained why.

        In order to get this appearance that you speak of, does the KB table compare National’s package to Labour’s (which was the law they changed) or does he use the other method, which you agree is silly and dishonest?

        Kiwiblog crashes my dodgy old browser at the moment, so I don’t know….

  6. RedLogix 6

    I think you are arguing National versus Labour – I am just arguing April versus March.

    Well that would be nice if thought you were being sincere, but existing tax cuts were passed into law last year that would have come into effect this April. (Speculation to the contrary is just that…. idle speculation.)

    However new legislation has been passed recently that changes that law… the effect of which is that if you are on less than the median income (ie the lower 50% of wage and salary earners)… you will be worse off from April 1.

    See it can be managed without mentioning any red or blue elephants… just don’t look at the butter.

Recent Comments

Recent Posts

  • Tokelau Language Week reminds us to stay united and strong
    Staying strong in the face of challenges and being true to our heritage and languages are key to preserving our cultural identity and wellbeing, is the focus of the 2020 Tokelau Language Week. Minister for Pacific Peoples, Aupito William Sio, says this year’s theme, ‘Apoapo tau foe, i nā tāfea ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 days ago
  • NZ announces a third P-3 deployment in support of UN sanctions
    The Government has deployed a Royal New Zealand Air Force P-3K2 Orion (P-3) maritime patrol aircraft to support the implementation of United Nations Security Council (UNSC) resolutions imposing sanctions against North Korea, announced Minister of Foreign Affairs Winston Peters and Minister of Defence Ron Mark. “New Zealand has long supported ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • Pacific trade and development agreement a reality
    Pacific regional trade and development agreement PACER Plus will enter into force in 60 days now that the required eight countries have ratified it. Trade and Export Growth Minister David Parker welcomed the announcement that the Cook Islands is the eighth nation to ratify this landmark agreement. “The agreement represents ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 weeks ago
  • Securing a pipeline of teachers
    The Government is changing its approach to teacher recruitment as COVID-19 travel restrictions continue, by boosting a range of initiatives to get more Kiwis into teaching. “When we came into Government, we were faced with a teacher supply crisis,” Education Minister Chris Hipkins said. “Over the past three years, we ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 weeks ago
  • Border exceptions for a small number of international students with visas
    The Government has established a new category that will allow 250 international PhD and postgraduate students to enter New Zealand and continue their studies, in the latest set of border exceptions. “The health, safety and wellbeing of people in New Zealand remains the Government’s top priority. Tight border restrictions remain ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 weeks ago
  • First COVID-19 vaccine purchase agreement signed
    The Government has signed an agreement to purchase 1.5 million COVID-19 vaccines – enough for 750,000 people – from Pfizer and BioNTech, subject to the vaccine successfully completing all clinical trials and passing regulatory approvals in New Zealand, say Research, Science and Innovation Minister Megan Woods and Health Minister Chris Hipkins. ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 weeks ago
  • International statement – End-to-end encryption and public safety
    We, the undersigned, support strong encryption, which plays a crucial role in protecting personal data, privacy, intellectual property, trade secrets and cyber security.  It also serves a vital purpose in repressive states to protect journalists, human rights defenders and other vulnerable people, as stated in the 2017 resolution of the ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 weeks ago
  • Ministry of Defence Biodefence Assessment released
    The Ministry of Defence has today released a Defence Assessment examining Defence’s role across the spectrum of biological hazards and threats facing New Zealand. Biodefence: Preparing for a New Era of Biological Hazards and Threats looks at how the NZDF supports other agencies’ biodefence activities, and considers the context of ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 weeks ago
  • New Approaches to Economic Challenges: Confronting Planetary Emergencies: OECD 9 October 2020
    New Approaches to Economic Challenges: Confronting Planetary Emergencies: OECD 9 October 2020 Hon David Parker’s response following Thomas Piketty and Esther Duflo. Good morning, good afternoon, and good evening, wherever in the world you might be. I first acknowledge the excellent thought provoking speeches of Thomas Piketty and Esther ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 weeks ago
  • Kaipara Moana restoration takes next step
    A Memorandum of Understanding has been signed today at Waihāua Marae between the Crown, local iwi and councils to protect, restore and enhance the mauri of Kaipara Moana in Northland. Environment Minister David Parker signed the document on behalf of the Crown along with representatives from Ngā Maunga Whakahī, Ngāti ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 weeks ago
  • New Zealand and Uruguay unite on reducing livestock production emissions
    Agriculture Minister Damien O’Connor and Uruguayan Minister of Livestock, Agriculture and Fisheries Carlos María Uriarte have welcomed the launch of a three-year project that will underpin sustainable livestock production in Uruguay, Argentina, and Costa Rica.  The project called ‘Innovation for pasture management’ is led by Uruguay’s National Institute of Agricultural ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 weeks ago
  • 3100 jobs created through marae upgrades
    Hundreds of marae throughout the country will be upgraded through investments from the Provincial Growth Fund’s refocused post COVID-19 funding to create jobs and put money into the pockets of local tradespeople and businesses, Regional Economic Development Minister Shane Jones and Māori Development Minister Nanaia Mahuta have announced. “A total ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 weeks ago
  • Health volunteers recognised in annual awards
    Health Minister Chris Hipkins has announced 9 teams and 14 individuals are the recipients of this year’s Minister of Health Volunteer Awards.  “The health volunteer awards celebrate and recognise the thousands of dedicated health sector volunteers who give many hours of their time to help other New Zealanders,” Mr Hipkins ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 weeks ago
  • Community COVID-19 Fund supports Pacific recovery
    The Minister for Pacific Peoples, Aupito William Sio says a total of 264 groups and individuals have successfully applied for the Pacific Aotearoa Community COVID-19 Recovery Fund, that will support Pacific communities drive their own COVID-19 recovery strategies, initiatives, and actions. “I am keen to see this Fund support Pacific ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 weeks ago
  • Community benefits from Māori apprenticeships
    Up to 50 Māori apprentices in Wellington will receive paid training to build houses for their local communities, thanks to a $2.75 million investment from the Māori Trades and Training Fund, announced Employment Minister Willie Jackson today. “This funding will enable Ngāti Toa Rangatira Incorporated to provide its Ngā Kaimahi ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 weeks ago
  • Training fund supports Māori jobseekers
    Rapidly growing sectors will benefit from a $990,000 Māori Trades and Training Fund investment which will see Wellington jobseekers supported into work, announced Employment Minister Willie Jackson today. “This funding will enable Sapphire Consultants Ltd. to help up to 45 Māori jobseekers into paid training initiatives over two years through ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 weeks ago
  • Ruakura Inland Port development vital infrastructure for Waikato
    The Government is investing $40 million to develop an inland port at Ruakura which will become a freight super-hub and a future business, research and residential development for the Waikato, Urban Development and Transport Minister Phil Twyford, and Māori Development Minister Nanaia Mahuta announced today. The funding has been has ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 weeks ago
  • Appointments made to Defence Expert Review Group
    Defence Minister Ron Mark announced today the establishment of an Expert Review Group to review a number of aspects of the New Zealand Defence Force’s (NZDF) structure, information management and record-keeping processes.  The Expert Review Group’s work arises out of the first recommendation from the Report of the Government’s Inquiry ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 weeks ago
  • No active community cases of COVID-19
    There are no active community cases of COVID-19 remaining in the country after the last people from the recent outbreak have recovered from the virus, Health Minister Chris Hipkins said today. “This is a big milestone. New Zealanders have once again through their collective actions squashed the virus. The systems ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 weeks ago