web analytics

Contract and converge

Written By: - Date published: 11:13 am, August 27th, 2009 - 15 comments
Categories: climate change - Tags:

There’s a limited amount of carbon emissions we can make as a world in the coming decades if we are to avoid runaway climate change.

So, how to fairly share the remaining ‘safe’ emissions that can be made over the next 50 years?

The solution is called contract and converge. Click on the image below to see an animation on this concept from the movie The Age of Stupid (they’ve disabled embedding, sorry)

contract and converge

So, initially the allocation matches current per capita emissions in each country. The total amount that may be emitted falls each year but the per capita right to emit falls faster for people in big emitting countries and actually rises in the lowest emitters. By 2025, everyone on Earth has the same right to emit, and this right continues to shrink year on year so that in 50 years time emissions are less than 20% of what they are now.

The system is fair and equitable. It recognises that some people live more high carbon lifestyles at present but also says that ultimately the only fair way to share this limited resource is equally.

Poor countries who get rising caps over the first years could sell excess emission rights to other countries, which would end up being a source of income for these poorer countries. Richer countries would purchase a larger right to emit in those earlier years, easing their transition without letting them off the hook.

To get such a system in place, it would require the world’s nations to make a long-term commitment and the big emitters to step up and shoulder the biggest burden. Unfortunately, our leaders will probably lack the courage. Instead, we’ll get piecemeal and insufficient reduction targets that have more to do with politics than the scientific reality of the biggest threat we face as a species.

15 comments on “Contract and converge ”

  1. Anon 1

    Is this a real proposal on the table or a fictional idea?

  2. ieuan 2

    Nice idea, but it doesn’t have a hope in hell of working.

    Also there does not seem to be any allowance for population growth. The populations of India and Africa are still growing at a very high rate whereas the populations of most 1st world countries are stable or even falling (ignoring immigration).

    • So Bored 2.1

      You may be right that it has no hope in hell of working. The problem as I see it is that there is no commitment to anything else working either, as evidenced by the attitude of NACT to emmissions targets.

      We seem to be collective cigarette smokers, we know that if we continue smoking we die of lung diseases, nothing surer. In between whiles we all take a few more “breathers” and puffs of the fag, after all we are not dead today and we can all give up smoking tomorrow and fix things. So we carry on blithely smoking. Then follows the collective question of how did the cancer become terminal?

    • Bright Red 2.2

      You could incorporate population growth in but it couldn’t lift the total amount of emissions allowed, the cap would have to be spread thinner is all. The climate doesn’t care how many of use there are, just what the total emissions are.

      • ieuan 2.2.1

        It’s a bit hard to say to the US population that their carbon ration is lower than predicted because the African population is growing faster than anticipated.

        That is why per country emission targets or limits would work better (rather than limits on each individual). It also allows a country to plant more trees, invest in public transport etc to help meet its target rather that just trying to control the actions of each individual.

  3. roger nome 3

    Cheep shot ahoy!:

    I thought that was David Farrar on the top left for a while – rather apt given the colour (politically), size and consumption patterns of the individual.

  4. Lanthanide 4

    “Unfortunately, our leaders will probably lack the courage”

    I’m a bit sick of this dumping on “our leaders” all the time. It’s not “our leaders” that are the primary problem, it is *us*. “Our leaders” represent us – if they do something we don’t like, we replace them with leaders whom we think will represent us better.

    • Rob A 4.1

      hear hear. Lets face it, all politicians really care about is the next election. If we make it a make or break issue then it becomes one.

    • So Bored 4.2

      On the carbon issue we are all able to do something apart from vote: it is down to our personal consumption patterns. We might do as little as walk to the dairy, or use less packaged foods etc. We cannot wait for politicians or interest groups to do the right thing, we can lead them by the nose by our habits. Its where true market power comes in, consumer leadership.

      • Bill 4.2.1

        “Its where true market power comes in, consumer leadership.”

        Sorry SB, but that is utter bollox. Organised citizens can change shit. Not consumers. It’s simply not about consumption, it’s about production.

        I’d punt that the proportion of our contribution to CO2 ( as individuals) is very much higher in job related activity than in consumer/non-job activity.

        Job related CO2 includes travel to and from work and in a manufacturing setting, the CO2 belching industrial processes we make ourselves a part of eg making flat screen TVs or whatever that we know are shite in a CO2 context but that we keep doing ’cause “It’s a job.” ‘Cause ” I’ve got a family to support.” ‘Cause ” What else am I meant to do?”

        And if you are not a hands on factory or production worker then you might want to consider all those job related conferences and meetings that are flown to.

        And then you might want to think about the post from last week that highlighted suicide rates increasing with job losses and wonder how we get out of this if it is the doing of our jobs that is the main cause of CO2 levels but that we consider our jobs as so important that we will potentially will kill ourselves if they don’t have them!

        But maybe you believe it is the running of the car rather than its manufacture; the burning of the lightbulb rather than its manufacturing and distribution….Green Capitalism. Buy it?

  5. So Bored 5

    Bill, beat me for optimism…I started out with your view and concluded the current political / economic paradigm was not going to allow us to kick dependency. All you say is correct, except we can fight back even if in a minor way. Small actions by enough people have an effect, perhaps replace the words consumer leadership with consumer resistance. Its the Gandhi method. We can cause some pain to producers, and as you point out it will give us pain too.

    Its that or sit and do zilch, because the current set up wont change. As for markets, they represent exploitation of people and resources and as such can never be anything other than destructive. Green capitalism, forget it , its an oxymoron.

    • Bill 5.1

      Producers aren’t some off-planet life form..we, workers, are the producers. And we don’t have to do what we do. And we don’t need permission to not do what we are currently doing.

      I’m sick and tired of hearing that by buying a particular light bulb or some-such other utterly ridiculous course of action is going to have any effect whatsoever. It won’t. And any person who believes that it will is, or will become, a part of the problem.

Recent Comments

Recent Posts

  • Government's response to preliminary referendums' results
    Minister of Justice Andrew Little has acknowledged the provisional results of the two referendums voted on in the 2020 General Election. New Zealanders were asked whether they supported the proposed Cannabis Legalisation and Control Bill, and whether they supported the End of Life Choice Act 2019 coming into force. On ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 days ago
  • New testing requirements for international maritime crew arriving in NZ
    The Government is moving to provide further protection against the chance of COVID-19 entering New Zealand through the maritime border.  “Yesterday I instructed officials to consult with the maritime sector around tightening of the requirements for international maritime crew entering the country,” Health Minister Chris Hipkins said.  “Ultimately, this will ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 days ago
  • Fast-tracked Northland water project will accelerate economic recovery
    The Government has welcomed the decision to approve a new water storage reservoir in Northland, the first of a number of infrastructure projects earmarked for a speedy consenting process that aims to accelerate New Zealand’s economic recovery from Covid-19.  The Matawii Water Storage Reservoir will provide drinking water for Kaikohe, ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    4 days ago
  • Tokelau Language Week reminds us to stay united and strong
    Staying strong in the face of challenges and being true to our heritage and languages are key to preserving our cultural identity and wellbeing, is the focus of the 2020 Tokelau Language Week. Minister for Pacific Peoples, Aupito William Sio, says this year’s theme, ‘Apoapo tau foe, i nā tāfea ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • NZ announces a third P-3 deployment in support of UN sanctions
    The Government has deployed a Royal New Zealand Air Force P-3K2 Orion (P-3) maritime patrol aircraft to support the implementation of United Nations Security Council (UNSC) resolutions imposing sanctions against North Korea, announced Minister of Foreign Affairs Winston Peters and Minister of Defence Ron Mark. “New Zealand has long supported ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 weeks ago
  • Pacific trade and development agreement a reality
    Pacific regional trade and development agreement PACER Plus will enter into force in 60 days now that the required eight countries have ratified it. Trade and Export Growth Minister David Parker welcomed the announcement that the Cook Islands is the eighth nation to ratify this landmark agreement. “The agreement represents ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 weeks ago
  • Securing a pipeline of teachers
    The Government is changing its approach to teacher recruitment as COVID-19 travel restrictions continue, by boosting a range of initiatives to get more Kiwis into teaching. “When we came into Government, we were faced with a teacher supply crisis,” Education Minister Chris Hipkins said. “Over the past three years, we ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 weeks ago
  • Border exceptions for a small number of international students with visas
    The Government has established a new category that will allow 250 international PhD and postgraduate students to enter New Zealand and continue their studies, in the latest set of border exceptions. “The health, safety and wellbeing of people in New Zealand remains the Government’s top priority. Tight border restrictions remain ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 weeks ago
  • First COVID-19 vaccine purchase agreement signed
    The Government has signed an agreement to purchase 1.5 million COVID-19 vaccines – enough for 750,000 people – from Pfizer and BioNTech, subject to the vaccine successfully completing all clinical trials and passing regulatory approvals in New Zealand, say Research, Science and Innovation Minister Megan Woods and Health Minister Chris Hipkins. ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 weeks ago