web analytics

Corruption must never be tolerated

Written By: - Date published: 3:20 pm, October 1st, 2009 - 95 comments
Categories: bill english, corruption, national/act government - Tags:

I have to disagree with my comrade Zetetic’s post arguing that it’s best if Bill English stays in office.

Yes, this scandal has permanently destroyed English’s credibility and I can see how having a lame duck Deputy PM and Finance Minister plays into the Left’s hands. But I do think our touchstone should always be principle, not opportunism.

English saw nothing wrong and sees nothing wrong in using his power, his privilege, and the trust we the people have placed in him to manipulate the rules to take taxpayer money that was not intended for him. His dodgy trust dealings may skate just within the letter of the law but he clearly breached the intention of law and, in doing so, breached the trust we placed in him.

This country is extremely fortunate to be one of the least corrupt in the world. That has not happened by accident. It has happened because whenever corruption has appeared the blow-torch of public opinion, backed by strong institutions and principled politicians, has been turned on it and it has been burned out.

Corruption is anathema to our way of life. We cannot have our leaders exploiting their power for personal gain as English has clearly done. Wherever and whenever we find corruption it must be ruthlessly and completely purged, lest the contagion spread. English’s corrupt behaviour is a cancer that must be rooted out, even though it may suit us in the immediate term for him to remain.

English is corrupt and we must not tolerate corruption. Ever. He must go.

95 comments on “Corruption must never be tolerated ”

  1. outofbed 1

    I see where you are coming from and it is very commendable.
    If he goes , which it seems that he must if the Government is to retain any credibility.
    then it is a victory for the “blow-torch of public opinion”
    But if he stays the benefits for the left are huge.
    And it will certainly help no end to turn the tide
    All in all it is a win win.

    And I don’t really mind which option wins out

  2. mike 2

    Is this a piss take?
    If not how can you accuse someone of corruption who worked within the rules.

    Unlike the labour party who where caught breaking the law – changed the law and only begrudgingly paid it back and don’t get me started on it’s support parties…

    • snoozer 2.1

      you don’t think exploiting loopholes when you’ve been placed in a position of trust is corrupt?

      I wouldn’t want to employ you.

      • Rob 2.1.1

        Well in business, when you have the behaviours and practices that have been in place for a number of years with a number of people, you generally have to restructure in a very careful manner.

        Also you have to ensure that what ever solution you arrive at fits over the entire organisation.

      • Scribe 2.1.2

        I seem to recall the word “corrupt” essentially being banned from this site when applied to the Labour government. Now it’s all over the place. Interesting.

  3. Tim Ellis 3

    I see Marty that you’ve stooped to defaming people. Are you really that desperate for attention?

    [lprent: First this doesn’t defame under any normal legal definition, as Marty has elegantly defined what he opines is corruption and why. He has then suggested that English fits the criteria. That makes it a simple opinion about a definition of corruption and not an accusation. Besides corruption itself isn’t defined in NZ law as a criminal offense far as I’m aware (unlike malfeasance which is).

    Secondly read the judgement in Lange vs Atkinson which cheerfully makes it damn near impossible for politicians to get past a status hearing for defamation or libel cases. Effectively politicians or ex-politicians have very little ability to win a defamation or libel case about their activities in politics.

    Face it, you’ve descended into being a moronic spinner desperately spinning a line without enough understanding of what you’re talking about. Now that is probably a statement you could take a case over. However I’d simply have to prove that it was true – which is easy. ]

    • snoozer 3.1

      Tim, I see you’ve stooped to specious legal threats because you want to silence people’s free speech, rather than debating with them – because you know you can’t win the debate. Are you really that desperate to silence this issue?

      • Tim Ellis 3.1.1

        No snoozer I am not Bill English so I’m not capable of making legal threats in this regard.

        As for specious, if you are going to call somebody corrupt and allege criminal behaviour you had better have much better evidence than Marty has presented here.

        • snoozer 3.1.1.1

          Where does Marty allege criminal behaviour? umm, oh he doesn’t.

          “His dodgy trust dealings may skate just within the letter of the law”

          And, Tim, in a free society you’re allowed to call someone corrupt if their actions appear corrupt to you. Maybe you don’t want to live in a free society but, for now at least, you do.

          • Tim Ellis 3.1.1.1.1

            snoozer we don’t live in a society that is so free that there isn’t a consequence to defaming people. You’re not free to go around punching people you don’t like, either.

            • snoozer 3.1.1.1.1.1

              yeah but punching people is illegal. It’s not defamation to say someone’s actions are corrupt if you think they are on reasonable grounds, particularly if you’re talking about a politican.

              You need to learn your defamation law.
              You also need to learn the definition of corrupt.

              Face it, you’re not concerned about possible defamation. You just don’t like what Marty’s got to say and you’ve got no argument against it, so you try to scare people into silence instead.

            • Tim Ellis 3.1.1.1.1.2

              Actually snoozer I don’t think anything I say here at the Standard is remotely scary to anybody. I’m not a lawyer and I doubt you are either but I’d welcome an opinion on whether calling somebody corrupt is defamatory.

            • Yentel 3.1.1.1.1.3

              quite a backdown, Tim, from your first comment: “I see Marty that you’ve stooped to defaming people”. Now you don’t know if it’s defamation and are freely admitting you haven’t a clue.

              So full of bluster, so full of crap.

            • felix 3.1.1.1.1.4

              That’s right Tim, it’s “not remotely scary”. Which is all the more amusing because you do indeed “try to scare people into silence”.

              This is textbook trolling, Ellis-style – when someone says something you can’t answer without losing face, respond to what you wish they’d said and hope no-one notices the difference.

            • rocky 3.1.1.1.1.5

              If someone sues you for defamation, there are essentially three possible defenses, the strongest of which is that what you said was true. Unlike criminal law, where the burden is on the prosecution to prove the case beyond a reasonable doubt, in most civil law, including defamation, it is up to you to prove your defense.

              Possible defenses are:

              1. Truth. You have to prove that what you said was true.

              2. Honest Opinion (used to be called “fair comment”). You have to prove that the statement in question was your genuine opinion on a matter of public opinion (largely used for cases of criticising politicians).

              3. Privilege – you’re not liable if you can prove you were entitled to make a statement because it’s subject to absolute or qualified privilege.

              “Absolute privilege” applies to judges, lawyers and witnesses in legal proceedings, to MPs for things they say in Parliament, and to statements made by various officials dealing with “affairs of state”. There can be no liability in defamation for these statements, even if the person making the statement was motivated by malice.

              “Qualified privilege” applies if you had some kind of duty to make the statement to someone who has a corresponding interest in receiving it. The person making the statement must do so in good faith and without any improper motive. Unlike “Absolute privilege”, this defense doesn’t work if you acted out of malice or ill will.

              Examples of where “Qualified privilege” can be argued are: where the statement was a report of court proceedings, a statement made at a meeting of public bodies (ie, council meeting), or a statement made in the investigation of a crime.

              I expect the honest opinion defense would work if you were sued for calling Bill English corrupt.

              Marty G didn’t allege a criminal offense had been committed. He said he believed Bill English’s actions were contrary to the intentions of the law. Very different thing, and again, no doubt honest opinion.

              • lprent

                An interesting branch of the law. Have a look at the judgement in Lange vs Atkinson. That really expanded the opinion defense against politicians as also being in the public interest. Personally I always felt that it might have expanded it so widely as a reaction to the way Muldoon used defamation as a weapon against political opponents. There is some stuff around in the news about the hassle that Margret Lange (?) had even looking at taking a case because of the expansion.

                With the internet it also gets complicated because of there is a whole lot of issues about where the case should be heard and who can be made a party to the suit.

                I guess that you’re still having fun in law.

                • rocky

                  Sure the internet thing makes it difficult to sue Marty G when no one knows who he is. But someone could sue you Lynn as the owner of the site, and you could be liable for anything defamatory on the site (I seem to remember hearing a legal opinion somewhere that with blogs, you’re likely to be liable even for defamatory comments, but only if you moderate your blog. If you don’t moderate at all, you’re more likely to get away with it).

                  Of course Lynn if you were sued for defamation, in the disclosure period a judge could order you to give up the name of the person responsible for a post, and if you didn’t know who they were, at least their IP address.

                  It doesn’t even matter where the site is hosted. If you are the owner, you are subject to NZ law and the courts do have jurisdiction as much as they would if you made the comments on the street.

                  • lprent

                    If you don’t moderate at all, you’re more likely to get away with it).

                    Stephen Price in the Media Law Review.

                    but someone could sue you Lynn as the owner of the site

                    Actually I own the domain name…. The site is a co-op. The content on the site is ‘owned’ by the respective authors and commentators in so far as anyone can be bothered with it. It is running on free software on a rented virtual server that I’m not even paying for anymore (thanks to the generous people using the paypal button). I merely technically admin the site, do some moderation and sometimes write posts.

                    …in the disclosure period a judge could order you to give up the name of the person responsible for a post, and if you didn’t know who they were, at least their IP address.

                    Yep, and this is where it gets interesting at several levels. The big problem with defamation law is that question of the accuser not having to present a case. There is no prerequisite judgement about if there is a case to answer as there is in every other branch of the law.

                    In the disclosure period you have a countervailing argument of Marty’s privacy, explicitly stated in several areas in this site. So getting a judgement to give up the IP would require that judge would have to rule that the case presented by the accuser would have to override the explicit right of privacy on this site. That means that a lot of the accusers case would have to be prevented, especially why they did not think this was honest opinion. Personally I think by that time it would be getting too tenuous for a judge to do the order.

                    Anyway, I personally don’t remember numbers. I’d also be locked out of the site by people protecting their privacy and their own content. They’d have to get a court order to physically access the site to find that IP in the US courts. If the data hasn’t moved……

                    What the accuser is left with is to try and run a case against some-one who essentially ‘owns’ a domain name. Gets a bit tenuous….

                    • rocky

                      Your admission that your reasons for setting the site up this way is specifically to get around the law might make a judge rule that you are responsible for it.

                    • Tim Ellis []

                      Further LP, honest opinion is a defence, but it’s a defence that the defendant has to establish. If there’s a prima facie case of defamation to answer, then any attempt you might make to obstruct releasing the identity of the defendant wouldn’t be looked on too kindly, in my view. Not that I’m a lawyer, but I would have thought with all your legal training you might understand that.

                    • lprent []

                      That is the whole point. I disagree with the requirement that the accuser in a defamation case gets a free run.

                      So I’ve constructed the system here to be as difficult as possible to play the types of legal games that Crosby just did with Hager. As far as I can see your basis of argument is that I should lie back and enjoy being raped by some small minded rorter from dipton. I’m not obstructing anything, I just made sure that I reduced my potential legal exposure. If you think that is a problem then perhaps you should look at exactly what most of corporate law is.

                    • lprent []

                      If the accuser wishes me to release the private details of a third party to find out who they are taking a case against, then they HAVE to establish a case. That isn’t a defamation case at that point, it is getting an order to overturn privacy. To do that they will have to present at least part of their case to a judge to get an order (that I cannot comply with).

                      There is no bush-lawyering. It is simply designed to be difficult……

                    • Tim Ellis

                      Nice try, LP. A judge might just say you own the domain, you’re responsible, rather than play a part in your bush-lawyery games. I doubt a judge would decide that there is a right to privacy that overrides defamation.

        • felix 3.1.1.2

          You’re “not capable” of most of the shit you try to pull here, but it’s never stopped you before.

    • outofbed 3.2

      loved it

    • CuriO 3.3

      Yes but for a statement to be opinion it must also be based on a correct statement of fact. You are correct on that you have not committed defamation here. However TV3 may have. For weeks in the early part of the story they actually reported facts incorrectly. Therefore they don’t get the defence of truth. The only possible defence they have is discretionary privilege that is usually apportioned to the media. However in precedent cases the Media hasn’t reported facts incorrectly, and if so, not for such a length of time. I think TV3 will be hoping Bill is exonerated by the AG as he should be. Otherwise they are going to get sued and should lose.

      By the way I have commented on Bill’s situation very extensively in the story this post is based on, ‘he should stay’ or whatever it was called.

    • Tim Ellis 3.4

      Thanks for the legal advice LP, but if you don’t mind if I want legal advice I’ll consult an actual lawyer rather than a C++ programmer. Likewise I’ll refrain from offering you immigration advice. Given your partisan ruling last week that Felix and others hadn’t been personally abusive towards me, it doesn’t surprise me that you would engage in conduct that is contrary to your own site’s rules. No doubt you’ll have a valid and tribal reason for slagging off at me but I think you’re kidding yourself if you think you’re maintaining a higher standard of commentary than the sewer.

      [lprent: Ummm I suspect that you haven’t bothered thinking this through. I’m not just a programmer as you like to label me (I abhor people who think that labels describe a person obviously don’t talk to many – they are seldom simple enough for a single word). Programming is more like a passion that became an occupation. I trained in earth sciences, then moved into business and trained in that. But generally I pick up any knowledge that is floating around and study that.

      Before I helped to start this site I had a good look through the legal position on this site. Because I’ve done some law in several of my business courses, plus my ex was a lawyer (and I suffered legal principle through her training) and so are a number of friends and family. I’ve also been involved in political circles for a long time, and they tend to be mildly obsessed about legal responses to their statements. So it wasn’t too hard to find out and >understand the legal position on topics that affect this site. Also I consulted a couple of lawyers…

      So I’d say that you made yourself look like a vacuous fool to me when you brought up the defamation line. I’m sure that it might have worked on others, but I just expressed my contempt for your understanding.

      On the subject of moderation. we enjoy having a robust debate here. We just don’t like flamewars, so the guidelines are to prevent those. We also react to content relating to the site or authors. Read the policy. It is evident that you still don’t understand it. ]

      • Pascal's bookie 3.4.1

        Perhaps you should refrain from crying ‘defamation’ instead. Or at least defend it when challenged instead of crying like a big old WATB.

        (If you pay close attention you’ll see that my ‘abuse’ there is a conclusion, not a premiss. That’s significant to your complaint, shit-for-brains. What’s actually being attacked is the crappy nature of the things you say, and a conclusion is being drawn about why you say it.)

        • Tim Ellis 3.4.1.1

          That’s okay PB, I understand the source of your anger isn’t me, but how long it will take for the Labour Party to crawl its way back as a credible opposition.

      • felix 3.4.2

        Ellis-in-Wonderland,

        If you honestly want to improve the standard of discussion here (and I don’t believe for a moment – based on your utterly dishonest and cowardly behaviour to date – that you have any such interest whatsoever) then all you need do is fuck off and not come back. Don’t suppose that’s an option for you though. A job’s a job after all.

        • Tim Ellis 3.4.2.1

          No doubt yet again LP will deem this comment as not abusive or designed to reduce participation in comment threads. Hold your head up high Felix, you’re making these threads worse than the sewer.

          • felix 3.4.2.1.1

            …for you.

          • lprent 3.4.2.1.2

            Wrong. It fits outside the guidelines about when we moderate, although it is getting bloody close to the bounds.

            In this case felix made a point. The personal abuse is related to his opinion on that.

            What we stomp on is pointless abuse, typically just spinning a line because it sounds good or where it just disparages an entire group of people. Generally it is indefensible because it carries a whole pile of assumptions that are manifestly incorrect. For instance if I said that all people that disagreed with me were pin-brained rednecks. I’d be over that promptly and dropping hot coals.

  4. TightyRighty 4

    oh the humour that pours out this site. the amazing memory bypasses that go on. It’s not corruption, 3 speakers of the house have rubber stamped the Right Honourable Bill English’s actions. But, for the sake of argument, assuming it was, would you have a problem if he enacted retrospective legislation to validate spending ruled unlawful?

    • cocamc 4.1

      TR – LOL
      We’ll have to get some retrospective legislation else the lefts beloved Hunt and Wilson will be complicit in this activity and just as guilty

    • snoozer 4.2

      Speakers relied on English’s word, he was lying.

      • Ianmac 4.2.1

        Yes Snoozer. If the beneficiary misleads when making the application, they must at the first instance trust her/him. Did Bill mislead?

  5. outofbed 5

    “3 speakers of the house have rubber stamped the Right Honourable Bill English’s actions.”
    Yes they believed Bill word on his declaration
    Just for one wild moment speculate that Bill has been economical with the truth

    Who’s fault would that be the speakers or the dipper?

    • TightyRighty 5.1

      it’s not good to answer a question when the first question hasn’t been answered. weak, i believe, is the term for it.

  6. Tim Ellis 6

    Lest we forget the actual history, it’s great to have Marty revising it for us. Mr Field was removed from office by “principled politicians”.

    • snoozer 6.1

      Yeah Tim, there was Lockwood Smith for a start.

      Tim’s logic is that if Labour didn’t behave perfectly, National is allowed to behave worse.

  7. SPC 7

    The tradition is that the Speakers believe what the MP tells them. They rule on the basis of what they are told. Whether what they are told is true, or not, can become an issue at another time.

    The real corruption is that we have an entire (Tory) class of people who use Trusts to hide income and qualify for WFF and student allowances for their children. Then take $30million to subsidise their childrens private education (taken from Adult Education). It’s not surprising that the MP’s they vote for are little different.

    The real corruption is that it was so brave for Goff to accept the idea of a bi-partisan CGT when many MP’s own an electorate house and one in Wellingtomn as well (paid for by the taxpayer funded allowance) – given so many MP’s have a personal interest in there being no CGT (because they own more than one residence). And of course by owning a house in Wellington they need a (family) Trust to pay their housing allowance to, to justify receiving it. Bill is not alone.

    • Herodotus 7.1

      SPC sorry to be picky, “A Tory Class” what qualifications do you require?
      The systems you refer to were setup by the past Labour govt. I think this was a result of poor legistation and prep work by officials to allow such gapping holes re eligibility. I agree that once known these should be closed. I hear nothing out of the Beehive from any party/media to address this.
      p.s. There are legimate reasons for family trusts.

      • SPC 7.1.1

        You can qualify for the “Tory (privilege) class” by gaming the system to legally qualify for support when having no need of it and all while knowing that this support was not intended for those without any need for it.

        Transferring income or assets into a Trust to qualify for WFF, student allowances for children …

        While the exploitation of loopholes should result in them being closed (all those with Trusts having to apply especially for WFF and student allowances – undergo an audit of Trust arrangements (similarly for MP allowances), I don’t think the existence of loopholes in anyway exonerates the people who operate “unethically” albeit within the law.

        And while the two main parties are sitting on their hands while this is going on, we effectively tolerate this “legal “gaming of the system. There is no way the media and politicians would be so quiet on this if beneficiaries were the ones doing it. It’s a Tory middle class entitlement to smart operate the system privilege thing.

        And will MP’s do anything about it, they effectively use the taxpayer to buy a second house for them and they protect themselves and others form CGT.

  8. Gosh where have we heard these lines before “corrupt corrupt corrupt”. Don’t sink to the right’s level. English is not corrupt, he’s made some mistakes, there is a huge difference. Having him as our deputy PM is unlikely to lead to people fleeing the country out of fear or see flocks of investors go elsewhere because of our “corrupt finance minister”.

  9. Tim Ellis 9

    Nice to see that some on the Left are so courageous that they start attacking their own when people like Mr Quinn have the guts to put his name to his own ideas.

    • BLiP 9.1

      There was a time in New Zealand when one could have robust debates in public using their real name – people like you spoiled that.

      • Tim Ellis 9.1.1

        Nice try BLiP but I’ve never outed anybody. I’ve had a lot of people try and bully me about where I work though. From none other than commenters at the standard.

        • felix 9.1.1.1

          Nonsense, Tim.

          From what I’ve observed, everyone here is quite satisfied with your story that you work as a lowly auditor for a retail bank, a job which can be performed entirely at night, freeing up normal office hours for full-time blogging.

          I admit, it sounds like a fairly taxing lifestyle and I certainly don’t begrudge you your stimulants – whatever it takes, eh – but I can’t see why anyone would have cause to doubt your authenticity.

    • snoozer 9.2

      Hey Jake, you’ve got Tim standing up for you now. Ironic, because he’s probably sitting in your former office.

      I mean, come on, look at your post. You’ve internalised the Right’s lines and repeated them. Then DPF’s picked up your writing and paraded it saying ‘look, smart lefties think Bill’s done nothing wrong, all those other lefties are dumb’.

      You’ve allowed your view to be captured by the other side’s spin and, in doing so, given aid to them. Yup, doing well.

      Tim, I’ll criticise whom I want, left or right. Unlike you, I’m not resolutely blind to the failings of others on my side of the divide.

      • Tim Ellis 9.2.1

        Actually snoozer I’ve been quite open about what I do, only to have various people on here deride me for it and challenge me on whether I am real from the comfortable spot of anonymity.

        I doubt you would be making the attacks on Mr Quinn the way you do if you had to sign your own name to the slurs you make against him.

        • Yentel 9.2.1.1

          why is it a slur to criticise someone’s political actions?

          • felix 9.2.1.1.1

            Tim “Ellis-in-Wonderland” (nice one ak) has a new definition for just about any word or phrase you can think of.

            For example “personal attack” means mentioning someone’s name when you criticise their actions and “anonymous” means Tim doesn’t know your phone number and address.

  10. um, i was (not that it has anything to do with my post)

    • Joe 10.1

      No you weren’t. You were a junior media assistant to DBP before he got forced to resign. You weren’t very good either.

      Don’t pretend you were a press secretary. You reported to the press secretary.

      You might also want to be honest about the extent of your career as a “radio broadcaster”.

      • JakeQuinn 10.1.1

        I’m obviously not even sure who you are “joe” but i seem to remember coming back from the Justice ministry after leaving Benson-Popes office to work for Tizard and then a few months for Cullen. Im not sure what your angle is here, but i don’t want anyone else thinking i’m fibbing. Oh and I had the pleasure of co-hosting a breakfast show and being a production engineer in central hawkes bay in 2002.. Who are you?

        • mike 10.1.1.1

          No Jake I’m sorry but they are right and you are wrong – no matter how much proof you have about your own life – you are a liar

          It’s just the way folk around here deal with someone who dares to talk reason and doesn’t follow the ‘right is evil’ line

        • Joe 10.1.1.2

          Oh, I forgot about Judith Tizard. Great job you did on that one. I also know for a fact you never held the position of press secretary for Michael Cullen. What exactly did you do there?

          As for your broadcasting career, Central Hawkes Bay? Come on man, are we talking Dannevirke here? Waipuk?

          The reason I’m having a go at you for inflating your CV is that you’re just another empty careerist, and not even a particularly talented one, and yet you think you can lecture people like you’re some kind of expert.

          Your English comments were just idiotic, and show you’ve internalised your opponents’ spin. Your advice to Labour was exactly the worst possible course of action they could take.

          No wonder you’re being defended by the likes of Farrar, Tim Ellis and Mike. They know a useful idiot when they see one.

          IrishBill: Take it elsewhere joe.

          • Tim Ellis 10.1.1.2.1

            No what I see Joe is a coward who is attacking a real person from anonymity.

      • Rob 10.1.2

        Joe, you really are very nasty.

  11. Daveski 11

    This post is six months late (or early).

  12. Ianmac 12

    Marty. It is not as though I/we can decide the outcome for Bill English. But if he stays we can predict that X will happen. If he goes we can predicy Y will happen. That seems OK to me.

  13. deWithiel 13

    TightyRighty

    I realise facts are of little interest to right wing idealogues, but while Bill English might be a politician of the right and, technically at least, an Honourable, he’s neither particularly honourable nor is he a Right Honourable, ie a member of the British Privy Council. The last Rt Hon in the NZ Parliament was Helen Clark.

    • TightyRighty 13.1

      point noted, though points deducted for being a dork. the only honour Helen Clark brought to her time office was dishonour. paintergate, speedgate, doonegate, owen glenn, winston peters, mike williams, taito phillip field. lots of honour hiding somewhere in there im sure, though i can’t see it.

      • ak 13.1.1

        Paintergate! sheebus, Standardistas, righty nutjob nerves and sphincters jangling furiously here.

        You know it’s big when Ellis in Wonderland reverts to a limp litany of “you did it to” – and behold they now sink even lower with the screaming gall to accuse Labour of defamation for using the “c” word! – after a billion, baseless “corrupt, corrupt corrupt” chants from their own decrepit mob!

        Simply staggering. Keep on this one with a fury: as soon as young burt wades in with a few retrospectively validateds, you’ll know that Doubledippergate is case closed.

        • Tim Ellis 13.1.1.1

          ak, I’m pretty moderate. I have never screamed corruption from the rooftops. I’m not responsible for the extremists who have, just as you’re only responsible for the individual things you say, and just as the individual writers here at the standard aren’t responsible for the extremist things you say. This tribal them and us thing is puerile in my view.

          • BLiP 13.1.1.1.1

            Talking With Auditors Takes so long I can’t help but find puerile ways to amuse myself.

          • ak 13.1.1.1.2

            pretty moderate
            I know you are Tim, and glad to hear you have no wish to join the ugly extremists from your side of the great divide. In which case of course, you need take no offence from, nor need to reply to, my comment.

            puerile
            Ah well that’s where we disagree Tim. The people I have regularly “audited” over many years are rarely in boyish mood as a result of tory policy and attitude. Might I humbly suggest you venture on occasion beyond your desk: tears of the adult variety can be edifying for even the most cynical auditor.

  14. Bryan 14

    “This country is extremely fortunate to be one of the least corrupt in the world.”

    You’re kidding yourself. Private sector corruption in particular is becoming endemic in NZ. We just make it hard to prosecute, so the figures stay low and a blind eye can be turned.

  15. Victor 15

    Jake, Time, Mike . .. You guys can huff and puff all you like, but the problem is that JK has morphed from the hollow man to the invisible man. This ain’t going to die until the PM puts his body on the line for English. Until then the ‘dogs’ will run wild.

    The problem is that JK willl never put his body anywhere, for anyone, except JK. And for now, he is content to sun himself in Florida.

    Stew on, for the character of the man you backed is slowly becoming clear to us all. And until he is prepared to make a stand on this, English has to dangle . ..

    So there you go. Oh, and I think it is incredibly pathetic that JK has not deigned to comment on Samoa, Tonga – the worst tragedy to hit our region for god know how long. Maybe he can fly over it on the way home. Katrina anybody?

    • Victor 15.1

      Ok, I now see that John Key will go to Samoa Sunday. But his silence for so long was another disturbing anecdote that the NZ press did not draw attention to . . .

      • mike 15.1.1

        silence? there were press releases from John the same day it happened – can you read through the gimp mask?

        • Victor 15.1.1.1

          Mike,

          I looked up the press releases. There was a single plain vanilla press release from JK on 30 Sept. Nothing else. . . The bottom line is that Florida is too far away to be relevant. For god’s sake, Florida is too far away for a US politician to holiday in (but they tend to want to avoid white trash on their holidays, so avoid Florida. It would appear JK cannot differentiate).

          On the focus of this thread, where is JK’s explicit support for Bill?

      • the sprout 15.1.2

        kind of reminds me of New Orleans and another millionaire slacker “leader”

        • Victor 15.1.2.1

          And looking at the NZ Herald, it looks like Chris Carter’s on the ground presence and geniune empathy has trumped JK’s back by Sunday story .. .

  16. Victor 16

    Be sure to know who you are patronising

    So tell me where?

  17. Ollie 17

    Does that mean that the Greens should be forced to leave? their superannuation scheme owning their house, and them maxing out their allowances at 24,000 is ridiculous and unethical to the max!

    • Zetetic 17.1

      You’ve been reading too much Kiwiblog. You know that stuff rots the brain.

      The point of the out of town allowance is to fund the accommodation costs of MPs who are not normally resident in Wellington when they are there.

      The Greens’ out of Wellington MPs live in homes owned by the Green Party Superannuation Fund. They pay rent to that Fund. They claim the rent from Parliamentary Services. If it weren’t the Fund, there would be another landlord, but same situation. If the Greens had bought the houses individually and were paying mortgages, they would get those covered by Parliamentary Services too. They are paying market rents, not overpaying, which would be unethical.

      English was claiming the out of town allowance despite the fact he didn’t live out of town. He changed his trust so that he could exploit the loophole in the rules and he said his primary residence was in Dipton when based on the tests it is clearly in Wellington.

      English rorted the system to get an allowance that wasn’t intended for him.

      The Greens say ‘if someone’s got to own the properties we rent, it may as well be our Superfund’, there’s nothing ethically different in that than if they had bought the properties individually and were getting the mortgages covered – in fact, that would probably cost the taxpayer more because most rental properties are negatively geared.

      • The Greens say ‘if someone’s got to own the properties we rent, it may as well be our Superfund’, there’s nothing ethically different in that than if they had bought the properties individually and were getting the mortgages covered in fact, that would probably cost the taxpayer more because most rental

        I believe there’s a lower limit on the amount available if it’s an MP’s own property. Also, I certainly can’t see it costing more, because I understand the Greens are already claiming the maximum.

        • rocky 17.1.1.1

          There’s no lower limit on the amount available if the MP owns the property. But if the MP owns the property the allowance will only pay the interest, if the MP rents the property the allowance will pay the rent. Both up to the same limit.

  18. outofbed 18

    If the Greens are rorting the system
    Yes sure they should be held accountable

  19. Trevor Mallard 19

    While sometimes I think it is great that this debate is being had,and othertimes I worry about NZs reputation – I still can’t understand why Bill English decided to hand it to the left like this. Beyond belief really.

    • burt 19.1

      If National say the rules/laws are confusing and that others were doing it as well AND that this is how we have always done it so it’s right to validate it – will you agree with them? If not why not ?

    • outofbed 19.2

      a mixture of greed and arrogance i would say

  20. RichWhite&Fey 20

    “This country is extremely fortunate to be one of the least corrupt in the world. ”

    Err .. so tax rorts rife in the property industry have never existed, and Bob Muldoon never played favourites.

    Yeah right. Try telling that to people about to leave the country.

  21. Rodel 21

    Well done Bill. The best (Post modern?) spin I’ve heard this year.

    “….Obviously the system has struggled to accommodate my situation…..”

    The scary thing is that this guy, ‘managing’ our finances, our money hopes that people will accept this as truth but even worse he might believe it himself.

Links to post

Recent Comments

Recent Posts

  • Initial Mental Health and Wellbeing Commission report shows progress
    Health Minister Andrew Little welcomes the Initial Mental Health and Wellbeing Commission’s assessment that transformation of New Zealand’s approach to mental health and addiction is underway. “This is an important step in the Government’s work to provide better and equitable mental health and wellbeing outcomes for all people in New ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 days ago
  • Over $300m returned to COVID-hit travellers
    The Government’s Consumer Travel Reimbursement Scheme has helped return over $352 million of refunds and credits to New Zealanders who had overseas travel cancelled due to COVID-19, Consumer Affairs Minister David Clark says. “Working with the travel sector, we are helping New Zealanders retrieve the money owed to them by ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 days ago
  • Hundreds more schools join free lunches programme
    An additional 88,000 students in 322 schools and kura across the country have started the school year with a regular lunch on the menu, thanks to the Government’s Ka Ora, Ka Ako Healthy School Lunches programme. They join 42,000 students already receiving weekday lunches under the scheme, which launched last ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 days ago
  • Govt’s balanced economic approach reflected in Crown accounts
    New Zealand’s economic recovery has again been reflected in the Government’s books, which are in better shape than expected. The Crown accounts for the seven months to the end of January 2021 were better than forecast in the Half Year Economic and Fiscal Update (HYEFU). The operating balance before gains ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 days ago
  • Over half of border workforce receive first vaccinations
    More than half of New Zealand’s estimated 12,000 border workforce have now received their first vaccinations, as a third batch of vaccines arrive in the country, COVID-19 Response Minister Chris Hipkins says. As of midnight Tuesday, a total of 9,431 people had received their first doses. More than 70 percent ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 days ago
  • Boost in funding to deliver jobs while restoring Central Otago’s lakes and waterways
    The Government is significantly increasing its investment in restoring Central Otago’s waterways while at the same time delivering jobs to the region hard-hit by the economic impact of Covid-19, says Land Information Minister, Damien O’Connor.   Mr O’Connor says two new community projects under the Jobs for Nature funding programme will ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 days ago
  • Next stage of COVID-19 support for business and workers
    The Government has confirmed details of COVID-19 support for business and workers following the increased alert levels due to a resurgence of the virus over the weekend. Following two new community cases of COVID-19, Auckland moved to Alert Level 3 and the rest of New Zealand moved to Alert Level ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    4 days ago
  • Govt committed to hosting Rugby World Cup
    The Government remains committed to hosting the Women’s Rugby World Cup in New Zealand in 2022 should a decision be made by World Rugby this weekend to postpone this year’s tournament. World Rugby is recommending the event be postponed until next year due to COVID-19, with a final decision to ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    4 days ago
  • Support Available for Communities affected by COVID-19
    Community and social service support providers have again swung into action to help people and families affected by the current COVID-19 alert levels. “The Government recognises that in many instances social service, community, iwi and Whānau Ora organisations are best placed to provide vital support to the communities impacted by ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    4 days ago
  • Govt announces review into PHARMAC
    The Government is following through on an election promise to conduct an independent review into PHARMAC, Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern and Health Minister Andrew Little announced today. The Review will focus on two areas: How well PHARMAC performs against its current objectives and whether and how its performance against these ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    5 days ago
  • Impressive response to DOC scholarship programme
    Some of the country’s most forward-thinking early-career conservationists are among recipients of a new scholarship aimed at supporting a new generation of biodiversity champions, Conservation Minister Kiri Allan says. The Department of Conservation (DOC) has awarded one-year postgraduate research scholarships of $15,000 to ten Masters students in the natural ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    5 days ago
  • Speech to ANZLF Virtual Indigenous Business Trade and Connections Event
    I acknowledge our whānau overseas, joining us from Te Whenua Moemoeā, and I wish to pay respects to their elders past, present, and emerging. Thank you for the opportunity to speak with you all today. I am very pleased to be part of the conversation on Indigenous business, and part ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    5 days ago
  • Main benefits to increase in line with wages
    Social Development and Employment Minister Carmel Sepuloni announced today that main benefits will increase by 3.1 percent on 1 April, in line with the rise in the average wage. The Government announced changes to the annual adjustment of main benefits in Budget 2019, indexing main benefit increases to the average ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    6 days ago
  • Deed of Settlement signed with Ngāti Maru (Taranaki)
    A Deed of Settlement has been signed between Ngāti Maru and the Crown settling the iwi’s historical Treaty of Waitangi claims, Minister for Treaty of Waitangi Negotiations Andrew Little announced today. The Ngāti Maru rohe is centred on the inland Waitara River valley, east to the Whanganui River and its ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • Support in place for people connected to Auckland COVID-19 cases
    With a suite of Government income support packages available, Minister for Social Development and Employment Carmel Sepuloni is encouraging people, and businesses, connected to the recent Auckland COVID-19 cases to check the Work and Income website if they’ve been impacted by the need to self-isolate. “If you are required to ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • Statement on passing of former PNG PM Sir Michael Somare
    Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern has expressed her condolences at the passing of long-serving former Prime Minister of Papua New Guinea, Grand Chief Sir Michael Somare. “Our thoughts are with Lady Veronica Somare and family, Prime Minister James Marape and the people of Papua New Guinea during this time of great ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • Speech to the National Māori Housing Conference 2021
    E te tī, e te tā  Tēnei te mihi maioha ki a koutou  Ki te whenua e takoto nei  Ki te rangi e tū iho nei  Ki a tātou e tau nei  Tēnā tātou.  It’s great to be with you today, along with some of the ministerial housing team; Hon Peeni Henare, the ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • Drone project to aid protection of Māui dolphin
    The Government is backing a new project to use drone technology to transform our understanding and protection of the Māui dolphin, Aotearoa’s most endangered dolphin.    “The project is just one part of the Government’s plan to save the Māui dolphin. We are committed to protecting this treasure,” Oceans and Fisheries ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • New water regulator board announced as major Government reform moves forward
    Major water reform has taken a step closer with the appointment of the inaugural board of the Taumata Arowai water services regulator, Hon Nanaia Mahuta says. Former Director General of Health and respected public health specialist Dame Karen Poutasi will chair the inaugural board of Crown agency Taumata Arowai. “Dame ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • North Auckland gets public transport upgrade
    The newly completed Hibiscus Coast Bus Station will help people make better transport choices to help ease congestion and benefit the environment, Transport Minister Michael Wood and Auckland Mayor Phil Goff said today. Michael Wood and Phil Goff officially opened the Hibiscus Coast Bus Station which sits just off the ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • Supporting work to protect Northland reserve
    New funding announced by Conservation Minister Kiri Allan today will provide work and help protect the unique values of Northland’s Te Ārai Nature Reserve for future generations. Te Ārai is culturally important to Te Aupōuri as the last resting place of the spirits before they depart to Te Rerenga Wairua. ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • Critical step to new housing deal for Pacific communities
      Today the Government has taken a key step to support Pacific people to becoming Community Housing providers, says the Minister for Pacific Peoples, Aupito William Sio. “This will be great news for Pacific communities with the decision to provide Pacific Financial Capability Grant funding and a tender process to ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • Consultation opens on proposed Bay of Islands marine mammal sanctuary
    Conservation Minister Kiri Allan is encouraging New Zealanders to have their say on a proposed marine mammal sanctuary to address the rapid decline of bottlenose dolphins in Te Pēwhairangi, the Bay of Islands. The proposal, developed jointly with Ngā Hapū o te Pēwhairangi, would protect all marine mammals of the ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • Three District Court Judges appointed
    Attorney-General David Parker today announced the appointment of three new District Court Judges.    Two of the appointees will take up their roles on 1 April, replacing sitting Judges who have reached retirement age.     Kirsten Lummis, lawyer of Auckland has been appointed as a District Court Judge with jury jurisdiction to ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • Government announces list of life-shortening conditions guaranteeing early KiwiSaver access
    Government announces list of life-shortening conditions guaranteeing early KiwiSaver access The Government changed the KiwiSaver rules in 2019 so people with life-shortening congenital conditions can withdraw their savings early The four conditions guaranteed early access are – down syndrome, cerebral palsy, Huntington’s disease and fetal alcohol spectrum disorder An alternative ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • Reserve Bank to take account of housing in decision making
    The Reserve Bank is now required to consider the impact on housing when making monetary and financial policy decisions, Grant Robertson announced today. Changes have been made to the Bank’s Monetary Policy Committee’s remit requiring it to take into account government policy relating to more sustainable house prices, while working ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • Investment to reduce cochlear implant waitlist
    The Labour Government will invest $6 million for 70 additional adult cochlear implants this year to significantly reduce the historical waitlist, Health Minister Andrew Little says. “Cochlear implants are life changing for kiwis who suffer from severe hearing loss. As well as improving an individual’s hearing, they open doors to ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • Māori wards Bill passes third reading
    The Local Electoral (Māori Wards and Māori Constituencies) Amendment Bill passed its third reading today and will become law, Minister of Local Government Hon Nanaia Mahuta says. “This is a significant step forward for Māori representation in local government. We know how important it is to have diversity around ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • Government delivers 1,000 more transitional housing places
    The Government has added 1,000 more transitional housing places as promised under the Aotearoa New Zealand Homelessness Action Plan (HAP), launched one year ago. Minister of Housing Megan Woods says the milestone supports the Government’s priority to ensure every New Zealander has warm, dry, secure housing. “Transitional housing provides people ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • Second batch of Pfizer/BioNTech doses arrives safely – as the first vaccinations take place in the...
    A second batch of Pfizer/BioNTech vaccines arrived safely yesterday at Auckland International Airport, COVID-19 Response Minister Chris Hipkins says. “This shipment contained about 76,000 doses, and follows our first shipment of 60,000 doses that arrived last week. We expect further shipments of vaccine over the coming weeks,” Chris Hipkins said. ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • $18 million for creative spaces to make arts more accessible
    The Minister for Arts, Culture and Heritage Carmel Sepuloni has today announced $18 million to support creative spaces. Creative spaces are places in the community where people with mental health needs, disabled people, and those looking for social connection, are welcomed and supported to practice and participate in the arts ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 weeks ago
  • Moriori Claims Settlement Bill passes first reading
    Treaty of Waitangi Negotiations Minister Andrew Little today welcomed Moriori to Parliament to witness the first reading of the Moriori Claims Settlement Bill. “This bill is the culmination of years of dedication and hard work from all the parties involved. “I am delighted to reach this significant milestone today,” Andrew ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 weeks ago
  • Government action reduces child poverty
    22,400 fewer children experiencing material hardship 45,400 fewer children in low income households on after-housing costs measure After-housing costs target achieved a year ahead of schedule Government action has seen child poverty reduce against all nine official measures compared to the baseline year, Prime Minister and Minister for Child Poverty ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 weeks ago
  • Entries open for the 2021 Prime Minister’s Education Excellence Awards
    It’s time to recognise the outstanding work early learning services, kōhanga reo, schools and kura do to support children and young people to succeed, Minister of Education Chris Hipkins says. The 2021 Prime Minister’s Education Excellence Awards are now open through until April 16. “The past year has reminded us ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 weeks ago
  • Jobs for Nature benefits three projects
    Three new Jobs for Nature projects will help nature thrive in the Bay of Plenty and keep local people in work says Conservation Minister Kiri Allan. “Up to 30 people will be employed in the projects, which are aimed at boosting local conservation efforts, enhancing some of the region’s most ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 weeks ago
  • Improvements to the Holidays Act on the way
    The Government has accepted all of the Holidays Act Taskforce’s recommended changes, which will provide certainty to employers and help employees receive their leave entitlements, Workplace Relations and Safety Minister Michael Wood announced today. Michael Wood said the Government established the Holidays Act Taskforce to help address challenges with the ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 weeks ago
  • NZ’s credit rating lifted as economy recovers
    The Government’s handling of the COVID-19 pandemic and faster than expected economic recovery has been acknowledged in today’s credit rating upgrade. Credit ratings agency Standard & Poor’s (S&P) today raised New Zealand’s local currency credit rating to AAA with a stable outlook. This follows Fitch reaffirming its AA+ rating last ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 weeks ago
  • Speech to National Remembrance Service on the 10th anniversary of the Christchurch earthquake
    Tena koutou e nga Maata Waka Ngai Tuahuriri, Ngai Tahu whanui, Tena koutou. Nau mai whakatau mai ki tenei ra maumahara i te Ru Whenua Apiti hono tatai hono, Te hunga mate ki te hunga mate Apiti hono tatai hono, Te hunga ora ki te hunga ora Tena koutou, Tena ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 weeks ago
  • Government reaffirms urgent commitment to ban harmful conversion practices
    The Minister of Justice has reaffirmed the Government’s urgent commitment, as stated in its 2020 Election Manifesto, to ban conversion practices in New Zealand by this time next year. “The Government has work underway to develop policy which will bring legislation to Parliament by the middle of this year and ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 weeks ago
  • New creative service aims to benefit 1,000 peoples’ careers
    Minister for Arts, Culture and Heritage and Social Development Hon Carmel Sepuloni today launched a new Creative Careers Service, which is expected to support up to 1,000 creatives, across three regions over the next two years. The new service builds on the most successful aspects of the former Pathways to ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 weeks ago