web analytics

Cullen on Nat apologies

Written By: - Date published: 1:51 pm, August 27th, 2008 - 41 comments
Categories: humour, john key, national, spin - Tags:

Say what you will about his politics, you can’t beat Cullen for wit. Here he is on the similarities between Labour and National following Williamson’s enthusiastic statements of National policy: 

The full clip is here. Listen to Key plead to his caucus, and listen what he’s pleading for them to do – “If National wants to win an election it needs to be disciplined and it needs to be on message.”

‘Stay on message’; not ‘tell the truth’.

41 comments on “Cullen on Nat apologies ”

  1. monkey-boy 1

    Excellent announcement from Annette King today Labour have decided in principle to arm our police with tazers!

    bzzzzzzzzzzt –

    ooh, sorry.

  2. monkey, you’re obviously watching question time like i am.. therefore you should know it is the police commissioner who made the decision and he has written to MPs asking for their opinion: labour nzf, act, national all support it…

  3. Phil 3

    Good on Annette for having the Balls (metaphorically) to support the police on this.

    If you don’t want to be tasered, don’t break the law. It’s as simple as that Monkey.

  4. Jeeves 4

    “‘Stay on message’; not ‘tell the truth'”. Staying on message is not inconsistent with telling the truth, and you know it. Speaking of lying, I am pretty sure most people know when their motorcade is travelling at speeds that would cause an ordinary member of the public to lose their licence.

    On another note:

    If Labour pays UMR to ring me up and ask me how I feel about the statement that “John Key is not trustworthy” is that push polling? I’m not political expert, but it seems to me to be pretty close.

  5. lukas 5

    Phil… you serious?

    This was clearly a move to delay questions around WP.

    Love it from HC- “there is a conflict of evidence” What the crazy!!! someone is clearly lying

  6. monkey-boy 6

    Steve if that is the fantasy-world you choose to live in, great, don’t try to suck me into it too.
    Was it mere coincidence that on the day that Hide was going to repeat his questions of Peters after haveng been ejected from the house because Peters lied to the house about the questions being ‘sub-judicae’, King makes this announcement which will suppress further exposure of Peters, by closing off Question Time in favour of a general debate about Tazers?
    Given that Helen has had Owen Glenns letter which directly contradicts Peters since the 20th of this month, still will not do the right thing. Does Helen really need Peters for the ETS that much?

  7. Phil. I support tazers as long as they are used only when more deadly meanswould previously have been needed to prevent harm to police or others.. remains to be seen whether that’s how it works in fact.

    If would be very careful with lines like “if you don’t want to be tazered don’t break the law” because a) the tazer isn’t a punishment b) the Police don’t always get it right c)that argument is an argument for giving unrestrained power to the Statef to do what it chooses to people, after all, it will only hurt the guilty

  8. vto 8

    Phil “If you don’t want to be tasered, don’t break the law. It’s as simple as that Monkey.”

    Not everyone who finds themselves on the wrong side of the police has broken the law. That is also very simple.

    also, following your silly logic, why not arm the police with uzis then?

  9. Lew 9

    Lukas: “”there is a conflict of evidence’ What the crazy!!! someone is clearly lying”

    Yes. A conflict of evidence means someone is lying. Possibly more than one person. Suppose there are three people possibly lying: Winston Peters, Owen Glenn and Brian Henry. Your options are as follows:

    1. Believe one person, selected at random. Instant, 33% chance of getting the right answer.

    2. Believe one person, based on their reputation. Instant, impossible to calculate chance of success but probably a little better than 33%.

    3. Believe more than one person under either of the preceding. Instant, impossible to calculate the chance of success.

    4. Wait for the Privileges Committee report and believe one or more people based on its recommendations. High likelihood of success, the only downside is that it’s not instant.

    So – how much justice are you prepared to sacrifice for expedience?

    L

  10. monkey-boy 10

    “So – how much justice are you prepared to sacrifice for expedience?”

    Ah – the kind that lets the police loose on perps and innocent victims to be tazered?

    Looks like the shoe fits.

  11. Steve, putting the blame for this decision back on the police commissioner is just ridiculous. Annette King is squarely responsible.

    Oh, and I don’t care that Cullen, or Peters or anyone in this country is witty in their putdowns. If we’re going for wit, I’d rather have Clement, McKenzie and Waititi in the house…

    Bunch of clowns the lot of them.

  12. Lew 12

    Lee, you’re thread-jacking my respionse to a thread-jack. WTF?

    L

  13. monkey-boy 13

    sorry dude. I guess I just went feral for a minute.
    sorry.

  14. Lew 14

    Lee: Careful, you can get tazed for that.

    L

  15. randal 15

    whats the message?
    all they are doing is full on whingeing about getting a go.
    well the nats can go and get stuffed as far as I am concerned.

  16. randal 16

    capcha
    ‘make arguments’
    well make em
    dont fake em
    I can tell what comes out of some monkey machine and what comes out of a human mind
    see monkey man by the rolling stones
    let it bleed
    1969
    so far its all puerile tripe
    everybody waiting to get their hands on the cash cow
    your money
    well lets talk about something
    the future
    what do people really need and how do we get it
    how much of anything much do we need
    bit greeny
    rainforesty
    chainsaw massacre of 2008
    hahahahahahahahahahahahaha!
    gotta go

  17. You can’t beat Cullen for wit?????? Peters gives him a run for his money, and both men will be out of a job soon, perhaps they can do stand up together.

  18. Rakaia George 18

    Stand up? What as? Moral and Hardly?

  19. monkey boy 19

    oooh that’s a diss!

  20. Savage 20

    I think Winston is a dream-boat.

  21. Lew 21

    BD: “perhaps they can do stand up together.”

    Insult battle!

    In blue corner, the Rt. Hon. Winston Peters, former Treasurer, Minister of Foreign Affairs, patron of Fadgwick & Sons formal tailors, Honorary Life Member of Grey Power and raconteur-in-chief of NZ politics. His swaggering dismissiveness batters down all defences and renders opponents humiliated but hardly able to speak for laughing!

    In red corner, the Hon Dr Michael Cullen, Eternal Deputy Prime Minister, scrooge of the Noughties, heir to Michael Joseph Savage, and a pom only when it suits him. Opponents find themselves speared on his dry wit and tied in knots by his conveniently simple logic, only to find themselves agreeing with him and having to argue the contrary out of spite!

    Battle start! Winner get Billy T Award!

    L

  22. the sprout 22

    Any thoughts on who in National would come even vaguely close to Cullen in terms of wit and intellect?

  23. Well, there are several that can match him on smarminess. Even though he’s not very witty at all, IMO, he still beats all the Nats. Rodney Hide is the only MP that strikes me as truly witty. Cullen is hardly the epitome of intellect. Leaving aside their respective ideological biases I think English can give as good as he gets in any debate with Cullen on fiscal matters.

    Somebody has given Clark and Cullen some excellent advice. Always respond to opponents as though you are a teacher correcting a student’s misunderstanding. It sounds very convincing even if it’s completely wrong or doesn’t even address the actual point that is being rebutted. Of course, to be effective all the time it does help if the opponents are are wrong on crucial points most of the time. Which does seem to be par for the course in New Zealand politics.

  24. Ah the taser,

    The favourite torture instrument of the US pig.
    According to Amnesty International 300 people have been killed with this handy little gadget at the disposal of every cop in the USA.

    As for the “if you don’t want to get tasered don’t commit crimes brigade” watch this little video of a student getting tasered for asking John Kerry a question.

    This is also a goody

    And what about this one

    Yeah, tasers is a real good idea. The police here is just so honest and not at all violent or misogynist but than again perhaps in ten years we will have women coming forward telling us they have been raped by cops at taser point. Wouldn’t that be fun.

    300 people dead, people being tasered on campuses for asking questions or for protesting a speeding ticket, pregnant women. Giving police a weapon that “doesn’t” kill is giving a large group of small minded power freaks permission to torture and enforce through fear, not reason. Not the way we want to go folks, definitely not the way we want to go.

  25. higherstandard 25

    Eve

    Nope the AI report does not say that 300 people have been killed with tasers.

    “While medical examiners have usually attributed the deaths to other factors, such as drug intoxication, some medical experts believe that shocks from taser-type weapons may exacerbate a risk of heart failure in cases where people are agitated or under the influence of drugs, or have underlying health problems.”

    “AI has collected data on more than 290 cases of individuals in the United States and Canada who since 2001 have died after being struck by police Tasers. 15 of these were in Canada, the rest in the United States. Our sources include media reports, information from families of the deceased, and police and autopsy reports. While in most cases medical examiners have attributed death to other factors, such as ?excited delirium? associated with cocaine intoxication, AI has identified at least 20 cases where coroners have found the Taser served as a causal or contributory factor in the death and other cases where the Taser was cited as a possible factor in autopsy reports. ”

    In my opinion far better tasers than handguns and it is a reasonable position to suggest that if one is doing nothing wrong there is no risk of getting tasered – the vast majority of police in NZ remain good, honest people despite the occasional low life that make it through into the police force.

  26. RedLogix 26

    HS,

    The first time a video makes it to the net, showing an NZ cop repeatedly using a taser as an instrument of compliance or retribution, then the whole debate will erupt all over again as it did in Canada after their RCMP killed Robert Dziekanski at Vancouver airport.

    The problem is this. Tasers are NOT just non-lethal handguns.

    Guns are very likely to kill or maim, whereas tasers are much less likely to do so (although the risk is not as low as we have been told), and most cops are genuinely reluctant to use guns for a variety of perfectly good reasons. Killing someone on the job is a dammed traumatic thing to have to do, however cycnical one might be about the police and their motives.

    The other major police weapon is the baton. The problem with this is that is leaves bruises, injuries and persistent evidence but used properly usually does not kill. The police are far less reluctant to use batons for this reason, but unfortunately it can require the officer to get close to offenders with knives or baseball bats.

    Most people have been sold the idea that tasers are just a non-lethal version of a hand-gun. Indeed if the police only ever used them in situations where they would have used a gun instead, then tasers would be far less problematic. The controversy arises when they are used as a ‘non-evidence leaving’ substitute for a baton or situations where the use of a gun would never have been justified, to obtain compliance from a non-violent person, or retribution for things like verbal abuse.

    And in overseas jurisdictions this misuse of tasers appears to happen far more often than I am comfortable with.

  27. HS

    Yawn

    Thanks RL

  28. By the way HS,

    NIST now says that a small office fire can collapse a massively fortified skyscraper 47 floors high and build to withstand a nuclear blast. LOL. All in 6.5 seconds flat into it’s own footprint. Laughing even louder.

    Just to get you all fired up again. Dork.

  29. higherstandard 29

    Thanks Dear

  30. HS,

    God your thick, dream on in your safe little white middle class suburb.

  31. higherstandard 31

    I will dearie

  32. Phil 32

    HS points out just how wrong Trav’s claim with Tasers is… Trav comes back with a line about 9-11.

    Normal service here at TheStandard. Tune in tomorrow when we’ll here all about the magic car.

  33. Felix 33

    Red Logic is absolutely correct.

    Tasers used instead of guns = good.
    Tasers used instead of batons, wits, patience = bad.

    (anyone who thinks they’ll only be used in the first scenario is very, very naive.)

    Also, does anyone think this is not a stepping stone to fully arming the police? Because if it is, then any argument of “better tasers than guns” is nonsense at best if not duplicitous.

  34. Phil,

    I take it that like HS you don’t bother to check the links?
    Unlike many Standard readers I might add.

    Nah, I didn’t think so. Another one of the “Don’t confuse me with facts ,my mind’s made up” dummies, and yes the Honda civic now does 730 km per tank rather than 430 km. We save lots a $$$. LOL.

    Felix,

    Hear, hear.

  35. lukas 35

    Amazing…. you forgot to mention JK’s holiday home in Hawaii Trav

  36. Felix 36

    Play the ball, lukas. It’s just above your head there, just out of reach.

  37. Phil 38

    Felix/RedL

    I’m all for arming Police with handguns IF AND ONLY IF the quality of the training provided to police is drastically improved. The present policy seems to be one of “bums on seats”, with various parties claiming “we’ll put one/two/three thousand more police on the streets” without considering the quality of those new recruits.

    I wouldn’t give a gun, or a taser, to a monkey… but a well trained officer isn’t the same thing.

  38. Felix 39

    No-one has shown a need for the police to carry handguns or tasers.

    What is your rationale for the police being armed?

  39. Not only is arming police dangerous for us it is also dangerous for the policemen themselves. If the police is armed you can bet your bottom dollar that goons will arm themselves more too. And this will lead to more gun control so people who like to hunt will be treated with more suspicion and before you know it we have a country resembling the US.

    Civil society begins with the will to be Civil and if the police is the representative of us, the civil minded people they should not be armed with the same arms as the thugs they fear. If there is a situation in which there is a reasonable expectation of violence there is a special task force that is trained to deal with these situations.

    The police is a civil servant there to help victims of and record and investigate crimes.

    More guns whether on thugs or police will inevitable lead to more guns and killing.

    Tasers in the US are more an more used as a means of subduing citizens and not helping police catch more criminals. In fact more and more police officers are beginning to see the general public as a whole as the enemy. A dangerous situation.

  40. Phil 41

    “No-one has shown a need for the police to carry handguns or tasers”

    What would be your measurement for determining that need?
    How about; having police holding back medics from saving a dying victim, because they cannot assess and secure the crime scene due to a lack of equipment to deal with possible offenders.

    “If the police is armed you can bet your bottom dollar that goons will arm themselves more too.”

    I suspect that the shooting I alluded to above is a good example of the fact that the goons are already armed. Offering more firepower to the police would be starting to catch-up.

    “If there is a situation in which there is a reasonable expectation of violence there is a special task force that is trained to deal with these situations.”

    The special task force – the AOS – is small, and concentrated in the major cities. Deployment is slow, and often used as a glorified cleaning crew after ‘the horse has bolted’. Serious crime is not something that stands around waiting for a police response.

Recent Comments

Recent Posts

  • Twenty highlights of 2020
    As we welcome in the new year, our focus is on continuing to keep New Zealanders safe and moving forward with our economic recovery. There’s a lot to get on with, but before we say a final goodbye to 2020, here’s a quick look back at some of the milestones ...
    2 weeks ago

  • Cook Islanders to resume travel to New Zealand
    The Prime Minister of New Zealand Jacinda Ardern and the Prime Minister of the Cook Islands Mark Brown have announced passengers from the Cook Islands can resume quarantine-free travel into New Zealand from 21 January, enabling access to essential services such as health. “Following confirmation of the Cook Islands’ COVID ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 days ago
  • Supporting communities and landowners to grow employment opportunities
    Jobs for Nature funding is being made available to conservation groups and landowners to employ staff and contractors in a move aimed at boosting local biodiversity-focused projects, Conservation Minister Kiritapu Allan has announced. It is estimated some 400-plus jobs will be created with employment opportunities in ecology, restoration, trapping, ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 days ago
  • Border exception for some returning international tertiary students
    The Government has approved an exception class for 1000 international tertiary students, degree level and above, who began their study in New Zealand but were caught offshore when border restrictions began. The exception will allow students to return to New Zealand in stages from April 2021. “Our top priority continues ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 days ago
  • Tiwai deal gives time for managed transition
    Today’s deal between Meridian and Rio Tinto for the Tiwai smelter to remain open another four years provides time for a managed transition for Southland. “The deal provides welcome certainty to the Southland community by protecting jobs and incomes as the region plans for the future. The Government is committed ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 days ago
  • New member for APEC Business Advisory Council
    Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern has appointed Anna Curzon to the APEC Business Advisory Council (ABAC). The leader of each APEC economy appoints three private sector representatives to ABAC. ABAC provides advice to leaders annually on business priorities. “ABAC helps ensure that APEC’s work programme is informed by business community perspectives ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    4 days ago
  • Govt’s careful economic management recognised
    The Government’s prudent fiscal management and strong policy programme in the face of the COVID-19 global pandemic have been acknowledged by the credit rating agency Fitch. Fitch has today affirmed New Zealand’s local currency rating at AA+ with a stable outlook and foreign currency rating at AA with a positive ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    4 days ago
  • Additional actions to keep COVID-19 out of NZ
    The Government is putting in place a suite of additional actions to protect New Zealand from COVID-19, including new emerging variants, COVID-19 Response Minister Chris Hipkins said today. “Given the high rates of infection in many countries and evidence of the global spread of more transmissible variants, it’s clear that ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    5 days ago
  • 19 projects will clean up and protect waterways
    $36 million of Government funding alongside councils and others for 19 projects Investment will clean up and protect waterways and create local jobs Boots on the ground expected in Q2 of 2021 Funding part of the Jobs for Nature policy package A package of 19 projects will help clean up ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • New Zealand Government acknowledges 175th anniversary of Battle of Ruapekapeka
    The commemoration of the 175th anniversary of the Battle of Ruapekapeka represents an opportunity for all New Zealanders to reflect on the role these conflicts have had in creating our modern nation, says Associate Minister for Arts, Culture and Heritage Kiri Allan. “The Battle at Te Ruapekapeka Pā, which took ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • Better care for babies with tongue-tie
    Babies born with tongue-tie will be assessed and treated consistently under new guidelines released by the Ministry of Health, Associate Minister of Health Dr Ayesha Verrall announced today. Around 5% to 10% of babies are born with a tongue-tie, or ankyloglossia, in New Zealand each year. At least half can ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 weeks ago
  • Prisoner disorder event at Waikeria Prison over
    The prisoner disorder event at Waikeria Prison is over, with all remaining prisoners now safely and securely detained, Corrections Minister Kelvin Davis says. The majority of those involved in the event are members of the Mongols and Comancheros. Five of the men are deportees from Australia, with three subject to ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 weeks ago
  • Pre-departure COVID-19 test for travellers from the UK and the US from 15 January
    Travellers from the United Kingdom or the United States bound for New Zealand will be required to get a negative test result for COVID-19 before departing, and work is underway to extend the requirement to other long haul flights to New Zealand, COVID-19 Response Minister Chris Hipkins confirmed today. “The new PCR test requirement, foreshadowed last ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 weeks ago
  • PM congratulates New Year Honour recipients
    Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern has added her warm congratulations to the New Zealanders recognised for their contributions to their communities and the country in the New Year 2021 Honours List. “The past year has been one that few of us could have imagined. In spite of all the things that ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 weeks ago
  • David Parker congratulates New Year 2021 Honours recipients
    Attorney-General and Minister for the Environment David Parker has congratulated two retired judges who have had their contributions to the country and their communities recognised in the New Year 2021 Honours list. The Hon Tony Randerson QC has been appointed a Companion of the New Zealand Order of Merit for ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 weeks ago
  • New Year’s Honours highlights outstanding Pacific leadership through challenging year
    Minister for Pacific Peoples Aupito William Sio says the New Year’s Honours List 2021 highlights again the outstanding contribution made by Pacific people across Aotearoa. “We are acknowledging the work of 13 Pacific leaders in the New Year’s Honours, representing a number of sectors including health, education, community, sports, the ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 weeks ago
  • Supporting seniors to embrace technology
    The Government’s investment in digital literacy training for seniors has led to more than 250 people participating so far, helping them stay connected. “COVID-19 has meant older New Zealanders are showing more interest in learning how to use technology like Zoom and Skype so they can to keep in touch ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 weeks ago