She says early on that no-one wants the NZ housing market to crash, because people's homes are still the single biggest asset most NZ people will own. She doesn't really say anything else apart from that, or answer the question, other than 'all the levers' blather (meaning the levers that protect investors and some home owners). Building more supply features, but as far as I can tell this is increasing house prices.
Can someone please explain to me why property prices dropping would harm individual people? Is it a retirement thing (how so)? Or that people can borrow against it?
Doesn't it only become an issue when people want to sell? Some people will have houses worth less than their mortgage, is there not another way this issue can be solved. Wouldn't less buying and selling be a good thing?
The press question was about prices going back to what they were before covid ie a 27% drop. In what ways would this cause and to whom?
The ones who will be hurt most by a crashing market are first home buyers. They have the smallest equity and tend to be mortgaged to the hilt. Believe me I see it every day. Young couples really stretching it to get into housing. They are a baby or a job loss or an interest rate rise away from huge pressure.
The market could crash or correct because of an interest rate increase. If their equity disappears they may have nowhere to go.
Many who bought in the past year or so may well lose their input equity in the next year or two.
Those paying back the loan ahead of schedule now will cope with rising rates. Others can cope by moving to higher incomes via wage increases or take on extra work or they can take in boarders – incl a caravan in the yard.
If it goes that way (c 10-20% depending on when they bought in) the share of the mortgage paid which was principal (sans the interest) instead of rent becomes their effective equity. And that grows while they can meet the mortgage payments.
It would be really dumb to foreclose in a declining market when mortgage payments were being made. Banks do not make money being dumb.
What have bank licenses to do with foreclosing on those meeting their mortgage payments? More likely banks would just toughen up on new lending (as they are doing now in anticipation).
can the government not protect people in that situation?
But in the end, if young couples are having to take such risks to buy a house isn't that because of the disparity between income and property prices? And incomes are never going to keep up.
can the government not protect people in that situation?
They never have in the past. And how would they do it? Pay the banks the lost equity (ie reduce the loan by the size of the new market value)? I can see that going down with the general public like a bucketload of sick.
But in the end, if young couples are having to take such risks to buy a house isn't that because of the disparity between income and property prices?
Well yes it is to some extent, it is also due to the chronic shortage of house supply in NZ particularly in Auckland. This is a problem that has been allowed to fester for decades now. Developers aim their new builds at the top end of the market because that is where the profit lies. No money in building masses of cheaper houses – that requires more infrastructure to start with – more materials and smaller profit on each item. Back in the 0 ties I remember the assessment then that Auckland needed 13,000 + new homes per year. Never happened. That was almost 20 years ago. The down stream result is massive prices for the few houses coming on stream and desperate people willing to take on huge risks in order to find somewhere to live.
They have indeed done so in the past….by offering refinance at a discounted rate.
However with interest rates already nearing the zero bound that option has pretty much been removed, but there are potentially other actions they could take.
set up a gov entity to offer extended terms (say 40 years) rock bottom rates or shared equity options to criteria meeting applicants that the private banks need to foreclose on.
Housing corporation did a version of this in the 1980s
Nope the rate was around 11% compared to market rates of around 19% and the term was 24 years as opposed to a market maximum of 20.
Yes the cuurrent rates are low as i noted above but currently floating rates are around 5% and rising and some 80% of fixed mortgages are due for renewal in the next 12 months so there would be some scope.
Yes that is the nub of the problem. A "correction" of $200k – $300k on a median priced house could almost see a complete wipe out of any equity (and that is a 20% reduction in house price).
Suppose for some reason you were forced to sell the property you bought last year for $1m. You had a deposit of $500,000 and the bank loan of $500,000. If the property now sells for $800,000 you still owe the bank Around $500,000 so you are left with $300,000. A loss of $200,000. Your savings have reduced by $200,000 in a year. Even though over the past year you have invested a large portion of your income in paying the interest on that $500,000 loan.
I think that for many young couples that would be a significant problem
Now you might argue that you could now buy a similar property as the one you just sold for $800,000, but you would still have to borrow $500,000 to make the purchase. Your debt to loan ratio was initially 1:1, it is now 3:5 with no significant improvement in housing.
I understand how that works in terms of the numbers. What I'm saying is how is this a problem specifically, rather than an assumption of it being a problem.
So the problem in your example is they were forced to sell. Why were they forced to sell?
And then the problem is that they have to buy a less valuable property. How is this a problem specifically?
As far as I can tell the central issue for the second question is that people want to get ahead of an already reasonable standard of living. Where as half the country are just trying to stay afloat.
As far as I can tell the central issue for the second question is that people want to get ahead of an already reasonable standard of living. Where as half the country are just trying to stay afloat.
The people struggling to buy a home for themselves and family are equally trying to stay afloat – as we are only too well aware with the increasing demands on our food banks right now.
if someone is using a food bank, how can they afford to buy a home? I understand people who already own a home, one person loses their job, they no longer have enough income because the mortgage takes it all. But that's a different situation.
Need to sell: divorce/separation, death, job loss leading to foreclosure
Want to sell: downsizing, upsizing, new job, new school, family issues, horrible neighbours
Buying and selling the same market only causes issues if the remaining equity is not enough for a 20% deposit on the next property. With a drop of 30%, that means 46% equity of the current property price is needed to still have 20% equity at the new prices.
It also means people can't withdraw equity to improve their current house if it will put them below 20%. As above, not an issue if they have more than 50% of current prices, bit of an issue if they don't. That may seem like a minor issue, but not everyone uses that for a new car – other uses are home repairs and maintenance, modifications etc. The loss of that money means a downturn in economic activity which can turn into a recession if it is sharp enough.
Its not the big problem people perceive,there have been 10 mortgage sales this year nationwide,112 last year ,the peak during the Gfc (2009) was 2620 .
Crashing is only a real issue in conjunction with high unemployment, increasing interest rates should be covered by having responsible banks that have loaded stress loadings into their calculation for what the max. loan they are willing to give to clients. Banks have shown in the last 10 years that they are reluctant to force sales.
I will say as someone within the industry there are increasing examples of building invoking sunset clauses and then relisting, i 1 case 5 town houses with an added $200k on each. Easy $1m pity for those who had the dream smashed, and have to restart their house ownership journey
With property only increasing by 23% !!!! Should there be a drop of 18.7% we would still have prices at Dec 20 levels, those innocent victims would be those who have entered the market in the mid to later part of the current year, and would possible see their equity vanish, but if still employed they would still continue be able to pay the mortgage. IMO to make housing affordability a correction of 30% would make a difference in the long term for new entrants. That is returning to mid 2019 prices!!!! And once you are in the market it is the price to transition to the next level i.e. from town house/apartment etc to family 3/4 bedrooms etc, that is the issue.
if I'm understanding that right, the issue is more if prices drop and someone can no longer afford to pay their mortgage due to eg job loss?
What would be happening to the rental market in such a situation? eg could people move into a rental and have wealthier people rent their house to pay the mortgage? Would rents be going up or down? More or less supply?
Interest rates are at historic lows. There is really only one way they can drift in the near future and that is up. One of the tools the reserve bank has in its tool box is to raise the base interest rate (currently 0.75%). The bank is given the task of controlling inflation to within a range of 2 – 3% and one of the main methods it uses to reduce inflation is to raise the base interest rate. With the current supply shortages world wide and across the country inflation is increasing so we can expect to see interest rates rise in the new year whether we like it or not.
Inflation is rising because of Government Debt creation putting more money into the system which is chasing fewer houses and scarcity of building products (and almost everything else) due to supply problems – drop in manufacture due to lockdowns and transport bottle necks.
"Market Forces" – The Gods of the Copy Book headings return!
As I pass through my incarnations in every age and race,
I make my proper prostrations to the Gods of the Market Place.
Peering through reverent fingers I watch them flourish and fall,
And the Gods of the Copybook Headings, I notice, outlast them all.
how does more money in the system relate to house building/supplies shortages and thus causing inflation? Do you mean the cost of housing (building as well as property) increasing while people have more money is what causes inflation?
Doesn't building a lot more houses increase the property prices in the short and medium term?
Yes, its basically an issue that peoples debts become larger relative to the assets which secure them. Banks have been known to call for repayment on roll over in these circumstances so the issue is not purely an effect on sellers however.
The other thing to consider is debt repayment in similar to saving, so this works to reduce aggregate spending and income (e.g GDP). Incidentally borrowing works in reverse to this. So there is at least a possibility that debt repayment is prioratised, people pay back debts rather than going in cafes, and so the fall out is on the cafe staff and businesses who lose work. This happened under lockdown (people saved rather than going out) but there the government wage subsidy kept cafe staff paid. So if the govt manages to get the housing market into reverse they may need to support GDP to stop a recession resulting. That wage subsidy was easier to explain politically under lockdown.
Yes, its basically an issue that peoples debts become larger relative to the assets which secure them. Banks have been known to call for repayment on roll over in these circumstances so the issue is not purely an effect on sellers however.
Can the government not regulate that to protect home owners? Other than the bank selling out from under them, what's the problem with the debt/asset ratio changing?
The issues here are basically fairness. This will be a problem for recent buyers, so the question in fairness terms is should the government be influencing the housing market in ways which penalize people, and did they have reasonable warning of what was coming. Otherwise the debt/asset ratio changing will effect how much somebody carries over if they are moving. At that point its not an equivalent trade as they pay off the balance of the mortgage on the inflated purchase price, not the depressed sale price, even if they can make another purchase at a depressed purchase price.
Otherwise a bank needing some repayment is basically requiring saving as indicated below. I don't think its the preferred thing for banks to do, but it happens.
Fairness like being homeless or spending most of your benefit on rent and not being able to afford to feed and clothe your kids?
I assume you mean fairness of people that got in earlier compared to people that got in later. This is the problem of Ardern saying she doesn't want property prices to drop, people take it as assurance, bet on that, and then the govt can't actually move.
Yes, its that kind of fairness, and its not that home owners are the worst off members of the economy either.
But the problem with just contrasting house prices with rents is that house prices have a tenuous relationship with rents.
Looking at the situation a lot of landlords were in before 2010 many were basically satisfied with the capital gains and were largely not fussed about maximising the rents anyway. Though that attitude seems to have changed a bit since then. But I don't see a good reason falling house prices will necessarily result in lower rents anyway, they could well result in higher rents. A lot of the governments reforms in fact seem to be trying to get landlords to start making investments more like a business and to my mind this will mean more landlords focused on the bottom line. Best case scenario we don't know if these changes will push rents up or down, there are ways it could do either in practice.
The other problem I see is reading too much into what Ardern says anyway. Basically house prices are set by the trades happening in the housing market. The PM can say what she wants but at most its a signal about which kinds of policy her party will or won't implement, but the impacts of those policies are quite far from well defined. I suspect the main impacts are on which party various classes of people might support and the housing market impacts are largely very hard to evaluate.
' In wanting state tenants to experience the benefits of owning their own home, the government offered purchasers very generous terms: 5 percent deposit, a 3 percent mortgage rate, with a maximum purchase period of 40 years. Since this time thousands of tenants have purchased their state houses and become 'kings and queens of their castles'.
Introduced by a National Govt!
Also introduced by a National Govt…
'The National government introduced full market rents in 1991 to reduce the state role in housing provision. From the start, public debate over state housing policy in New Zealand has centred on this very issue: how far should governments intervene in the housing market. '
One of ours with a big mortgage will try to get bailed out by the Government if values drop dramatically and the house is worth way less than what they owe. She'll change her name to 'South Canterbury Finance.'
The other thing to consider is debt repayment in similar to saving, so this works to reduce aggregate spending and income (e.g GDP). Incidentally borrowing works in reverse to this.
Not quite getting that one. The government wants people to be spending rather than paying off debt? How does that relate to a drop in property prices?
This is basically a question of who is impacted by the resulting change in behaviour. The summary of the point here is that an expanding housing market with expanding debt does increase our total income and spending across the country. When that even just slows down (let alone reversing) then that part of total income and spending goes away. This is basically the same as people electing to save more and spend less of their income. The unfair part of this would be that the people who are unemployed are often not involved in the housing market, but are influenced by its effects none-the-less.
The reason I also mentioned the govt here is that its spending is a good way to soak up excess unemployment which may result from this occurrence, and it doesn't have an actual financial constraint and so should be mandated to act for social policy purposes.
I wouldn't say its necessarily that fragile as it has persisted for quite a while. But eventually its probably bound to result in an overindebted household sector and inequality. Its a simplification but you can divide the income of the economy (GDP) into 3 sectors, private domestic, public government and overseas. In order for GDP to grow one of those sectors must spend more and frequently borrow more to support that spending. Since the Rogernomics reforms the increased spending initiative has generally come from the private domestic sector taking on more debt. Those reforms were largely about pushing spending off of the public government sector and onto the private domestic sector. This was only really recognised as a problem when Key came in during 2008, but the Clark government surpluses were only possible with similar expansion of private domestic sector spending and debt.
The alternative is more public government spending to support incomes (and fewer govt surpluses, especially as NZ typically runs a balance of payment deficit). Unfortunately the government budget is often described as similar to a business, rather than the factually accurate claim that government deficits are needed to create space for private domestic saving and debt repayment. There needs to be a certain level of saving if everybody is going to be saving for their own retirement, or repaying housing debt but that will need public sector deficits otherwise that behaviour change will result in some level of recession.
I think its reasonable describing a process which started in 1983 (or even starting around 2000) as (arguably) eventually becoming more critical in 2021. And its at least arguable that its not even yet over-indebted, as you have noted several times why is there anything wrong with people in negative equity on their property as long as they keep a job. If follows they are not yet over-indebted in that case.
I'm not quite saying that. I'm asking people to be specific about the details of the issues rather than just saying reflexively 'oh that's bad'.
Because I want us to look at different solutions, and we can't do that without understanding what the problem is.
I would guess for some people who lost their jobs in the past 2 years, having negative equity was a bad thing. So there's a difference for how individuals (who vote!) feel about it, and how the government and economists look at it (collectively and for the good of the whole).
Someone has to lose out apparently. I'd like the left to look at why it still largely supports poor people being the ones that are worst affected. I know some of the rationales (Labour want to stop the underclass growing more than they want to end the underclass condition itself). I just think we could be more honest about it.
I suggest you need to be more specific then, what is the meaning of over-indebted? My phrase was taking the meaning to be that such a person was over-indebted when they are prone to being unable to make payments/repay their debt (+ some bare minimum of other living expenditure). But apparently you mean something else by saying people are over-indebted.
I also don't really get the reasoning about somebody who loses their job with negative equity. Losing a job is usually the bad thing and can lead to losing a house regardless of the owners equity position. But negative equity has many negative consequences such as higher interest rates and insurance costs, lack of flexibility, potential repayment pressures and other drains on income.
I didn't know what you meant by over-indebted, I took it to mean that someone was precarious because of that debt, not that they were already crashing.
The point about job loss is that people are being sold the idea that buying a house with precariousness built in is good (get on the property ladder!). Then when one half of a couple loses their job, they can't afford to live and end up using food banks. Had property been more affordable, and/or people more sensible financially in taking on debt with regard to the way the world is, that wouldn't happen.
But negative equity has many negative consequences such as higher interest rates and insurance costs, lack of flexibility, potential repayment pressures and other drains on income.
One of our longer term tenants fell into just this hole during the 2009 GFC. Based overseas they lost jobs, property and savings all at once and were forced to return to NZ. There's lot's more to their story that I won't retell here – but essentially they've never been able to recover from that setback.
Regardless of who you vote for I don't think many people want to see their properties value go down much. I certainly don't although it is only on paper these days. As you say, for those of us watching our Retirement come closer, the value of our biggest Asset is not something we hope to gamble with. For me it is a safety net, encouraged in previous years as a Retirement Plan. and in case we get a wave of negative whiners about Northland staying Red this is one Northlander content with the decision.
why does it matter in retirement what your property is worth? Isn't the issue more that you want the mortgage paid off by the time you retire? Which is more likely generally if property prices dropped.
If the next step of retirement is moving to a Village (for example) every bit of value may be necessary for a "comfortable" existence. With a mortgage in retirement is said to be a very uncomfortable, let alone if renting. Why do you think it would be good for your most valuable asset to be worth less? The only benefit I see would be rates reduction but being quite happy paying taxes and rates for the betterment of society that's not really a plus for me.
Why do you think it would be good for your most valuable asset to be worth less? A 30% reduction only brings back prices to mid 2019, so in your case ( as long as LTO prices also corrects) then your position remains unchanged. But with increased property LTO prices increase, and that is why retirement village are able to achieve growth and pay great dividends to their share holders. They pocket the capital gain as well as the deferred management fees up to 30% of your licence fee. One of the best positive cashflow businesses in NZ.
Why do you think it would be good for your most valuable asset to be worth less? The only benefit I see would be rates reduction but being quite happy paying taxes and rates for the betterment of society that's not really a plus for me.
I don't think it's good for the individual whose asset devalues, I think it's good for homeless and poor people who can't afford rent, and lowish income people who can no longer afford to buy a house ever.
The growth we use now is financial, not production….if growth stops then there is no wherewithal to pay interest (in aggregate)
Everything is predicated on that ability…lose it and the whole system collapses.
NZ has made housing lending its almost exclusive source of financial growth (more so than any other economy) …pretty much no one is confident enough to lend/borrow for any other purpose.
It means without growth there is no ability to extract interest (that is not to say individuals couldnt)….ultimately it means that borrowing becomes increasingly difficult and people, institutions, businesses need to save before investing….think about what that does to an economy…you cant buy that house (or anything) until youve saved enough to pay for it outright.
If our growth was based on production (as it was until the neolib revolution) we would still have problems because we have reached the limits of extraction and externalities (pollution/.waste)……it is the end of growth.
We are using finance to kick the can down the road….and the road is coming to an end.
People struggling to pay mortgages because they move up to higher interest rates (this may force some to consider boarders – albeit via caravans in the yard for some).
When unemployment insurance arrives and in what form (income related or a more Canadian form) – it will help (for a certain period at least) those not able to get ACC because of illness rather than accident. Until then an option, for those able to afford the cost, is income insurance.
Income and unemployment insurance are usually time limited…i.e 6 months. Not much help with a 30 year mortgage…and that assumes a) you can afford/have it and b) it is honoured
It does what it does – losing a job and taking months to find an equivalent, or being out of work for months and being forced to sell under duress in a falling market is something to avoid if one can and there is any risk.
History (recent) has shown that those who lose employment in a recession almost invariably take an income hit if and when they find alternative employment
That can be a cause…however whatever the reason the fact remains that lifetime earning capacity decreases and consequently ability to service debt is reduced.
I remember a housing boom followed by a big price drop in the late 1980's in the UK, prices fell by 30% in some areas and a lot of people owed more than their house was worth.
big contributor here…
‘Throughout the bubble, newspapers and media played a vital role in hyping property. No national newspaper was without a glossy property supplement and weekend papers were often equally filled with property ads, reviews of new developments, stories of successful purchases, makeovers, and a gamut of columnists relating their property experiences. TV and radio schedules were filled with further property porn – house-hunting programs and house makeover programs were regular features on every channel. Even in July 2007, Irish Independent journalist/comedian Brendan O’Connor urged people to buy property, even as the bubble was clearly bursting.[42] In April 2011, journalist Vincent Browne admitted that the Irish media had played an important role in adding to the frenzy of the Irish property bubble’
I was asking what happened in the UK after the values dropped 30%. There's this implication that it's inherently bad, I want the explanation for how, specifically
If you own a home worth $300,000, and then it’s worth $210,000, you still have a home.
GDP doesn't fall due to values. GDP is a measure of income, so when GDP falls, income falls, and business (often) cut back on staff to save costs.
The effect of the housing market prices is that when a seller sells in an increasing housing market (because a borrower borrows and is willing to pay) then that becomes their income. Maybe they then take that and buy elsewhere, but… Eventually somebody ends up selling a place and not buying in again, or downsizing and so can realize their housing trades as actual income.
And when that goes away as house prices go into reverse then that income stream vanishes from the economy so GDP can fall. Perhaps there is also a shift into repaying more debts which is actively taking that spending out.
On top of this – and effect most people overlook is that the banks become increasingly unwilling to lend without substantial owner equity. What this leads to is the paradox of the price falling but the deposit needed stays just as large or even grows.
Market turnover drops because those who aren’t compelled to will hold, and those who do have sell to will often lose their equity and finish up adding to the rental demand.
sorry, but this does sound completely bonkers. The only way that works if is the people at the top keep getting richer and the people at bottom keep getting poorer.
I realise everyone here hates on me as the resident bastard landlord. It's the price I accept for being open and honest about my experiences. But please spare me the 'bonkers'.
Also what is so frequently left out of these discussions is that most powerful reason why so many people are stuck renting is not just prices – although clearly they've become a serious hurdle – but even worse than this, the willingness of any bank to lend them any money at any price.
I don't think that is necessarily an implication, and there have been sustained periods when many economies reduced inequality while still having house ownership and trading (though clearly a more limited financial sector).
But you asked how an almost 30% fall in UK house prices resulting in a two year recession and 1100000 additional unemployed and that is a reasonable description of how this happens.
The main problem the government faces here being that if they are successful at tipping over the housing market they will need to take responsibility for all the economic fallout resulting from that and that will be unpopular.
Say you bought a house last year for 850.000. for what ever reason the value of houses falls and your house is now only worth 580.000 grand. You are still paying the mortgage of the house for 850.000. If you wanted to sell because say your life changes, you can no longer get 850.000 or even close to it, you are shit out of luck and 270.000 short on your loan. The bank will want its money – your fucked..
So it is not in anyones interest to flood the market with new houses as that will leave the people that bought houses over the last ten years in negative equity. Or in houses without value. And these people vote, and Labour ain't gonna piss of middle class voters.
I bought a property in a tiny 'town', a glorified garden shed ministry of works from 1949 house with the original water boiler (in gallons) and the floor covered in news paper from 1970 (very interesting read i kept that paper) for 100.000. I am that cheap, yes i am. This property is now valued at 400.000 (yes, a good laugh), and i could sell it to some deluded person from AKL/WLGTN for more then that if i wanted too, but nope it is my retirement hovel. The locals of course are currently priced out of the market, as no one there makes enough money to pay that much. If the price of my house dropped back to what it was originally i would not be worse of. Why? I never loaded anything on the mortgage. But the same can not be said for the majority of people that bought houses and believe themselves to be millionaires. Or that bought Dachas in my little retirement place to go to with their boats for a weekend hoon and bbq. All loaded on the mortgage of a property valued somewhere as a million +.
Jacinda has no real options here, other then building to rent – and building to cheaply rent, to take pressure of the market slowly and let the market cool down in a controlled fashion.
Watch interest rates go up, and watch the house of cards fall apart.
did you see the word loan? You don't loan your down payment, you loan the rest based on your down payment. So no matter what you paid down, in my scenario you OWE 850.000 dollar, and if you can not sell your house for that money you are short on the loan, and you lost your down payment.
I hope that this is plain enough english to bend your mind around.
Last if Labour or National or Act or anyone would give a fuck about tenants and first buyers we would have gotten a Captial Gains Tax in the first year of the reign of Jacinda, and we would not have had the shenanigans last year with the very very low interest rates that resulted in no help to businesses but allowed people with inflated assets to borrow against these inflated assets and buy up some more property bringing the market up. Also keep in mind that Housing NZ is also buying up houses on the open market, cause that is easier and prolly cheaper then building.
If you wanted to sell because say your life changes, you can no longer get 850.000 or even close to it, you are shit out of luck and 270.000 short on your loan. The bank will want its money – your fucked..
people say this so casually "you want to sell your house"
From what I can tell in the conversation tonight, what this boils down to is people want freedom and they're ok that poor people can't have freedom so long as they do. The liberal ones would like poor people to also have freedom eg to live in a house or to afford things other than rent, but if that can't happen, oh well.
People want to fly wherever they want, oh well, climate change.
People want to do whatever they want, oh well, covid spreads.
If someone owns a home even if you owe a lot of money on it, I think that is lucky.
And it's not like we don't know this shit. If someone buys into the market now, and overextends themselves, what were they thinking? That the market would keep growing their asset by a hundred thousand dollars a year forever?
Good on you for buying what you did where you did.
All human activity – everything we do from the moment we wake – has a risk or cost to it. In general as a society we have two broad pathways to mitigating these costs:
One is to innovate so as to reduce or even eliminate those costs – a progressive process that has over the past 200 years transformed the lives of ordinary people beyond all belief.
The other is to prohibit it. In some instances this is entirely warranted, but as a fundamentally coercive action we should reach for this option least and last.
yes. We will coerce in a pandemic, but not a housing crisis that affects poor people disproportionately. The political and middle and rising classes are adept at self care.
The problem I have with this is the utter lack of imagination. TINA all the way. The idea that we cannot make sacrifices and be creative and innovative at the same time is a modern conceit when human evolution is in part an adaptation in response to challenge.
That's because NZ is a well governed stable country, one of the top 20 or so in the world, that people want to live in;
But we have a dysfunctional building industry and amateur hour zoning regulations that make the cost of housing ridiculous. Keep in mind that the price of existing homes cannot get too far out of kilter with the cost of building new ones – and it's this cost that's underpinning price inflation across the whole market.
So high demand and low supply – basic shit really.
NZ is the only western country with no Capital Gains or wealth tax.
And wherever a government is incompetent enough to allow housing supply to fall behind demand the same basic rule applies – prices go up. Regardless of the local tax settings.
Its a return to the the enslavement of the Feudal system.
You have no idea of what medieval feudalism was actually like do you? For the vast majority of human history even the idea that an ordinary person might 'own their house' was unthinkable.
From what I can tell in the conversation tonight, what this boils down to is people want freedom and they’re ok that poor people can’t have freedom so long as they do. The liberal ones would like poor people to also have freedom eg to live in a house or to afford things other than rent, but if that can’t happen, oh well.
I think the situation’s dealt with even more basically than that by homeowners. At the emotional level. Homeowners can see that not owning a home makes many people fundamentaly financially & emotionally insecure. One job loss away from a benefit, with all the associated indignities that go with the govt granting you an allowance to sustain your & your family’s existence off the taxpayer.
Better to stay in your home & hope like hell prices don’t fall. It’s not callousness that makes them not worry enuf about those who can’t affird to buy houses. It’s fear.
I'm sure that is true for some people Gezza. I think it's why there is so much denial about climate from the relatively stable as well. If we look it straight in the face we realise how much we are about to lose and people would rather pretend.
Thing is, if you are content to stay in the home you own, you don't need to worry so much about a drop in price. Housing as investment is the problem here, not home ownership.
But of course it’s probably equally true that without some level of private landlordism there wouldn’t be enuf houses available to rent. For various reasons, not everybody always wants to buy the home they’re currently living in.
I suppose we could argue the government could build and rent out homes instead of private landlords, but given the track record of public servants for managing state housing stock here I’m not convinced that that’s ever going to the best solution either.
I only own my own home, which I consider to be grossly overvalued, but someone would buy it at more that the govt valuation around here. I watch the housing market, like you, scratching my head over how Kiwiland could have got into this situation & how on earth we are going to get out of it & make housing more affordable for Blazer’s Joe Lunchbox with a job and a stay-at-home or part-time-employed wife/partner & two kids.
Put some tenant protection laws in place, the greedier landlords will sell, the government and local bodies buy the properties and do a mix of social housing, community land trust management, and rent to own.
the CLT model is very useful because it takes out the investor aspect. If a CLT owns the land and housing, and never sells it, then the incentives change for everyone.
People who live in such housing could be given other incentives to save rather than investment.
But of course, if the economy now depends on the housing market, the government will actively resist any attempts to change how it works.
Its a good idea,as is soft loans expressly for first home buyers.
What happens though, is a right wing Govt gets in and reverses everything-sells off state houses,unwinds initiatives they consider detrimental to free market profiteering and the cycle continues on.
Its why the right hates the Cullen Fund,Kiwibank,and Kiwisaver….these entities mop up funds they want to administer and profit from.
Hard to see how the NACT could reverse a CLT trust system, or council owned social housing though. Not sure that NACT would start selling off state houses again, given the direness of the housing crisis.
I bought based on what i could pay in repayments (rent to myself) if shit hits the fan, and our society goes down the gurgler. But then my inner german is a pessimist who believes that the sky will fall down on us. 🙂
I am very old fashioned in the sense that if i can't afford it, i can also not buy it.
One thing that should come back is teaching basic economics and budgeting. WE have done away with financial literacy, or maybe it was the Nuns at my Convent who thought it important enough to teach us a few things that fall under 'life skills' rather then abstract math.
Concerns about Omicron in UK … Booster dose reduced to 3 Months after 2nd jab.
Given how significantly more infectious Omicron is … concerns that even if it is far less severe than Delta (as seems likely from available data) … hospitals still at risk of being overwhelmed.
Read an article yesterday in the German news that two jabs of Pfizer is no match for Omicron. They too are discussing shorter periods between the boosters and hopefully a specific jab in about 6 month.
Very brave and very stunning for this person to compete against mere biological non males. So very very brave and so very very stunning. NON Male sporting events is a good place to retire for mediocre males.
The woman in these races should just boycott any race meet that allows this shit happen , no ones going to go watch a confused man swim alone in a women's race
If they are on the swim team due to scholar ships and help with payments which is quite common in the US then they will have to go out there and lose every time in the name of inclusion, kindness, and men are women. As failing to comply could result in them being sanctioned, expelled, or suddenly charged. And that involves also the swimmer of the other teams that have to compete against this bloke.
Given the overwhelming data, we reject arguments that explain male advantage in sport as a by-product of social conditioning, or that cast it as a social construction more generally. That adult human males have a physiological advantage over adult human females in athletic performance is a matter of settled science.
Completed reads for January Lilith, by George MacDonald The Rime of the Ancient Mariner (poem), by Samuel Taylor Coleridge Christabel (poem), by Samuel Taylor Coleridge The Saga of Ragnar Lodbrok, by Anonymous The Lay of Kraka (poem), by Anonymous 1066 and All That, by W.C. Sellar and R.J. ...
Pity the poor Brits. They just can’t catch a break. After years of reporting of lying Boris Johnson, a change to a less colourful PM in Rishi Sunak has resulted in a smooth media pivot to an end-of-empire narrative. The New York Times, no less, amplifies suggestions that Blighty ...
On that day all the springs of the great deep burst forth, and the floodgates of the heavens were opened. And rain fell on the earth.Genesis 6:11-12THE TORRENTIAL DOWNPOURS that dumped a record-breaking amount of rain on Auckland this anniversary weekend will reoccur with ever-increasing frequency. The planet’s atmosphere is ...
Buzz from the Beehive There has been plenty to keep the relevant Ministers busy in flood-stricken Auckland over the past day or two. But New Zealand, last time we looked, extends north of Auckland into Northland and south of the Bombay Hills all the way to the bottom of the ...
This is a re-post from Yale Climate Connections by Jeff Masters When early settlers came to the confluence of the Sacramento and American Rivers before the California Gold Rush, Indigenous people warned them that the Sacramento Valley could become an inland sea when great winter rains came. The storytellers described water filling the ...
Dr Bryce Edwards writes – Last night’s opinion polls answered the big question of whether a switch of prime minister would really be a gamechanger for election year. The 1News and Newshub polls released at 6pm gave the same response: the shift from Jacinda Ardern to Chris Hipkins ...
Last night’s opinion polls answered the big question of whether a switch of prime minister would really be a gamechanger for election year. The 1News and Newshub polls released at 6pm gave the same response: the shift from Jacinda Ardern to Chris Hipkins has changed everything, and Labour is back ...
Over the last few years, it’s seemed like city after city around the world has become subject to extreme flooding events that have been made worse by impacts from climate change. We’ve highlighted many of them in our Weekly Roundup series. Sadly, over the last few days it’s been Auckland’s ...
A ‘small target’ strategy is not going to cut it anymore if National want to win the upcoming election. The game has changed and the game plan needs to change as well. Jacinda Ardern’s abrupt departure from the 9th floor has the potential to derail what looked to be an ...
When Grant Robertson talks about how the economy might change post-covid, one of the things he talks about is what he calls an unsung but interesting white paper on science. “It’s really important,” he says. The Minister in charge of the White Paper — Te Ara Paerangi, Future Pathways ...
The news media were at one ceremony by the looks of things. The Governor-General, the Prime Minister and his deputy were at another. The news media were at a swearing-in ceremony. The country’s leaders were at an appointment ceremony. The New Zealand Gazette record of what transpired says: Appointment of ...
I n some alternative universe, Auckland mayor Efeso Collins readily grasped the scale of Friday’s deluge, and quickly made the emergency declaration that enabled central government to immediately throw its resources behind the rescue and remediation effort. As Friday evening became night, Mayor Collins seemed to be everywhere: talking with ...
They called it an “atmospheric river”, the weather bombardment which hit NZ’s northern region at the weekend. It exacted a terrible toll on metropolitan Auckland and the rest of the region. Few living there may have noted a statement from electricity generator Mercury Energy labelled “WET, WET, WET!” This was ...
I know, that is a pretty corny title but given the circumstances here in the Auckland region, I just had to say it. The more oblique reference embedded in the title is to the leadership failures exhibited by Mayor Wayne Brown and his so-called leadership team when confronted by the ...
How much confidence should the public have in authorities managing natural disasters? Not much, judging by the farcical way in which the civil defence emergence in Auckland has played out. The way authorities dealt with Auckland’s extreme weather on Friday illustrated how hit-and-miss our civil defence emergency system is. In ...
Thanks for reading Frankly Speaking ! Subscribe for free to receive new posts and support my work.The recent leadership change in the governing Labour party resulted in a very strange response from National’s (current) leader, Christopher Luxon. Mr Luxon berated Labour for it’s change of leader, citing no actual change.As ...
A chronological listing of news articles posted on the Skeptical Science Facebook Page during the past week: Sun, Jan 22, 2023 thru Sat, Jan 28, 2023. Story of the Week New Study Reveals Arctic Ice, Tracked Both Above and Below, Is Freezing LaterClimate change is affecting the timing of both ...
Thanks for reading Frankly Speaking ! Subscribe for free to receive new posts and support my work.It was another ‘SHOCK! HORROR!’ headline from a media increasingly venturing into tabloid-style journalism:Andrea Vance’s article seemed to focus on the "million dollar sums from the Government as the country grapples with a housing ...
Dr Brian Easton writes: It’s the summer break. Everyone settles down with family, books, the sun and some fishing. But the Prime Minister has a pile of briefing papers prepared just before Christmas, which have to be worked through. I haven’t seen them. Here is my guess at some ...
What Was the Prime Minister Reading in the Runup to Election Year?It’s the summer break. Everyone settles down with family, books, the sun and some fishing. But the Prime Minister has a pile of briefing papers prepared just before Christmas, which have to be worked through. I haven’t seen them. ...
In case you hadn't noticed, FYI, the public OIA request site, has been used to conduct a significant excavation into New Zealand's intelligence agencies, with requests made for assorted policies and procedures. Yesterday in response to one of these requests the GCSB released its policy on New Zealand Purpose and ...
Farming leaders are watching closely whether Damien O’Connor keeps the key portfolios of Agriculture and Trade when Prime Minister Chris Hipkins restructures his Cabinet. O’Connor has been one of the few ministers during Labour’s term in office who has won broad support for what he has done ...
South Islands farmers are whining about another drought, the third in three years. If only we knew what was causing this! If only someone had warned them that they faced a drying climate! But we do know what is causing it: climate change. And they have been warned, repeatedly, for ...
Ok, there’s good news and bad news in this week’s inflation figures, but bad > good. Our inflation rate held steady but hey, at a level below the inflation rate in Australia. The main reason for the so/so result here? A fall in petrol prices of 7.2% offset the really ...
Dr Bryce Edwards writes: Since her shock resignation announcement, Jacinda Ardern has been at pains to point out that she isn’t leaving because of the toxicity directed at her on social media and elsewhere, rebutting journalists who suggested misogyny and hate may have driven her from office. Yet ...
Since her shock resignation announcement, Jacinda Ardern has been at pains to point out that she isn’t leaving because of the toxicity directed at her on social media and elsewhere, rebutting journalists who suggested misogyny and hate may have driven her from office. Yet there have been dozens of columns ...
The Clinical Magus: Of particular relevance to New Zealanders struggling to come to terms with the sudden departure of their prime minister, Jacinda Ardern, is Jung’s concept of the anima. Much more than what others have called the feminine principle, the anima is what the human male has made out ...
The Select Committee, considering the proposed RNZ-TVNZ merger, has come back with a report conceding many of the criticisms that were made of the original legislation. In what is one of the most comprehensive demolitions of a Bill submitted to a Select Committee, the Economic Development, Science and Innovation ...
Such are the 2020s, the age when no-one, it seems, actually respects the basic underpinnings of democracy. Even in New Zealand. This week, I stumbled across a pair of lengthy and genuinely serious articles, that basically argue that Something is Rotten in the state of New Zealand democracy. One ...
Buzz from the Beehive Hurrah. Today we found something fresh on the Beehive website, Beehive.govt.nz, which claims to be the best place to find Government initiatives, policies and Ministerial information. It wasn’t from Finance Minister Grant Robertson, whose reaction to the latest inflation figures would have been appreciated. So, too, ...
Smiling And Waiving A Golden Opportunity: Chris Hipkins knew that the day at Ratana would be Jacinda’s day – her final opportunity to bask in the unalloyed love and support of her followers. He simply could not afford to be seen to overshadow this last chance for his former boss ...
Extremism Consumes Itself: The plot of “Act of Oblivion” concerns the relentless pursuit of the “regicides” Edward Whalley and William Goffe – two of the fifty-nine signatories to King Charles I’s death warrant. As with his many other works of historical fiction, Robert Harris’s novel brings to life a period ...
To challenge the Government’s promotion of co-governance, to share power between Maori and public authorities and agencies, is to invite accusations of racism. An example: this article by Martyn Bradbury on The Daily Blog headed Luxon’s race baiting hypocrisy at Ratana. The article was triggered by National leader Christopher Luxon, ...
A very informative video discussion: Are we getting the whole story about Ukraine? | Robert Wright & Ivan Katchanovski Getting objective information on the situation in Ukraine and the cause of this current war is not easy. There is the current censorship and blatant mainstream media bias – which ...
Yesterday the Herald ran an op-ed from Mayor Wayne Brown titled “The case for light rail is lighter than ever” and a few things stood out. However, it’s getting more and more tricky to make a strong economic case for spending up to $29 billion on a single route of ...
This is a re-post from Yale Climate Connections by Samantha Harrington Imagine it’s a cold February night and your furnace breaks. You want to replace it with an electric heat pump because you’ve heard that tax credits will help pay for the switch. And you know that heat pumps can reduce ...
In 2005, then-National Party leader based his entire election campaign on racism, with his infamous racist Orewa speech and racist iwi/kiwi billboards. Now, Christopher Luxon seems to want to do it all again: Fresh off using his platform at this week's Rātana celebrations to criticise the government's approach to ...
Inflation is showing little sign of slowing down, posing a problem for freshly minted PM Chris Hipkins. According to that old campaigner Richard Prebble, Hipkins should call a snap election. If he waits till October, he risks being swept away. The dilemma for the new leader is that fighting an election ...
Buzz from the Beehive A great deal has happened since January 19. Among other things, a new Prime Minister and deputy have been sworn in and our leaders (past, present and aspiring) have delivered speeches at Ratana. Newshub reported that politicians of all stripes had descended upon Rātana for the ...
It’s a big day for New Zealand; our 41st Prime Minister has taken office and the new, “Chippy” era of politics is underway. Or, on the other hand, the Labour Party continues to govern with an overall majority and much the same leadership team in place. Life goes on and ...
New Zealand has another Prime Minister who does not have a basic grasp of the three articles of the Treaty of Waitangi. THOMAS CRANMER writes: It is simply astonishing that New Zealand’s next Prime Minister, Chris Hipkins, is unable to give even a brief explanation of the three articles ...
A statue of a semi-naked Nick Smith puts the misogyny debate into perspective. GRAHAM ADAMS writes … In the wake of Ardern’s abrupt resignation, the mainstream media are determined to convince us she was hounded from office mainly because she is a woman and had to fall on her sword ...
A Different Kind Of Vibe: In the days and weeks ahead, as the Hipkins ministry takes shape, the only question that matters is whether New Zealand’s new prime minister possesses both the wisdom and the courage to correct his party’s currently suicidal political course. If Chris “Chippy” Hipkins is ...
An editorial in the NZ Herald last week, titled “Nimbyism goes bananas as housing intensifies“, introduced Herald readers to a couple of acronyms that go along with the now-familiar NIMBY (Not in My Back Yard): “bananas” (build absolutely nothing anywhere near anyone) “cave” dwellers (citizens against virtually everything). The editorial ...
Back in the dark autumn of 2020, when the prospect of Covid was freaking the country out, Finance Minister Grant Robertson set himself and Treasury a series of questions about what a post-Covid economy might look like. Those were fearful days, and the questions in part reflected a series ...
Buzz from the Beehive Yet another day has passed without Ministers of the Crown posting something to show they are still working for us on the Beehive website. Nothing new has been posted since January 17. Perhaps the ministers are all engaged in the bemusing annual excursion ...
Incoming Prime Minister Chris Hipkins has already indicated he intends making the tax system “fairer”. That points to the route a government facing an election could take to tilt the odds towards winning in its favour, given Labour’s support in the last months of the Ardern era had been ...
NewsHub has a poll on the cost-of-living crisis, which has an interesting finding: the vast majority of kiwis prefer wage rises to tax cuts: When asked whether income has kept up with the cost of living, 54.8 percent of people surveyed said no and according to 58.6 percent of ...
Labour has begun 2023 with the centre-left bloc behind in the polls and losing ground. That being so, did his colleagues choose Chris Hipkins as the replacement for Jacinda Ardern because they think he has a realistic shot at leading them to victory this year, or because he‘s the best ...
Two Flags, Two Masters? Just as it required a full-scale military effort to destroy the first attempt at Māori self-government in the 1850s and 60s (an effort that divided Maoridom itself into supporters and opponents of the Crown) any second attempt to establish tino rangatiratanga, based on the confiscatory policies ...
The first of Kiwirail’s big network shutdowns to fix the foundations on our tracks is now well underway with the Southern Line closed between Otahuhu and Newmarket. This is following on from the network wide Christmas/New Year shutdown, during which Kiwirail say that nearly 1,300 people working across 69 different ...
This is a re-post from the Citizens' Climate Lobby blogIn last year’s passage of the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA), Congress included about $20 billion earmarked for natural climate solutions. The United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) is responsible for deciding how those funds should be allocated to meet the climate ...
You’ve really got to wonder at the introspection, or lack thereof, from much of the mainstream media post Jacinda Ardern stepping down. Some so-called journalists haven’t even taken a breath before once again putting the boot in, which clearly shows their inherent bias and lack of any misgivings about fueling ...
Over the weekend I was interviewed by a media outlet about the threats that Jacinda Ardern and her family have received while she has been PM and what can be expected now that she has resigned. I noted that the level of threat she has been exposed to is unprecedented ...
Dr Bryce Edwards writes: The days of the Labour Government being associated with middle class social liberalism look to be numbered. Soon-to-be Prime Minister Chris Hipkins and Deputy Prime Minister Carmel Sepuloni are heralding a major shift in emphasis away from the constituencies and ideologies of liberal Grey ...
A Different Kind Of Vibe: In the days and weeks ahead, as the Hipkins ministry takes shape, the only question that matters is whether New Zealand’s new prime minister possesses both the wisdom and the courage to correct his party’s currently suicidal political course. If Chris “Chippy” Hipkins is able to steer ...
The days of the Labour Government being associated with middle class social liberalism look to be numbered. Soon-to-be Prime Minister Chris Hipkins and Deputy Prime Minister Carmel Sepuloni are heralding a major shift in emphasis away from the constituencies and ideologies of liberal Grey Lynn and Wellington Central towards the ...
Following the surprise resignation of Jacinda Ardern last week, her replacement, Chis Hipkins, has said: Over the coming week, Cabinet will be making decisions on reining in some programs and projects that aren’t essential right now That messaging is similar to what Jacinda Ardern said late last year and as ...
Much of what will mark the early days of Chris Hipkins’ Prime Ministership would have happened anyway. By December, the Prime Minister and Finance Minister were making it clear the summer break and early days of this year were going to be spent on a reset of government policy. ...
Going to try to get into the blogging thing again (ha!) what with an election coming up and all that. So today I thought I'd start small and simple, by merely tackling the world's (second) richest man.I'm no fan of Elon Musk. You don't want to know why, but I'll ...
A chronological listing of news articles posted on the Skeptical Science Facebook Page during the past week: Sun, Jan 15, 2023 thru Sat, Jan 21, 2023. Story of the Week State of the climate: How the world warmed in 2022With a new year underway, most of the climate data for ...
Well, that was a disappointment. As of today, the New Zealand Labour Caucus opted for Chris Hipkins as our new Prime Minister, and I cannot help but let loose a cynical cackle. ...
Get ready for a major political reset once Chris Hipkins is sworn in as Prime Minister this week. Labour’s new leader is likely to push the Government to the right economically, and do his best to jettison the damaging perceptions that Labour has become “too woke” on social issues. Overall, ...
Things have gone sideways… and it’s only the third week of January? It was political earthquake time. For some the Prime Minister made a truly significant announcement. For others – did you have this on your bingo card? – a body double did so (sit tight, you’ll understand later, ...
The tools exist to help families with surging costs – and as costs continue to rise it is more urgent than ever that we use them, the Green Party says. ...
The Government is providing a further $1 million to the Mayoral Relief Fund to help communities in Auckland following flooding, Minister for Emergency Management Kieran McAnulty announced today. “Cabinet today agreed that, given the severity of the event, a further $1 million contribution be made. Cabinet wishes to be proactive ...
The new Cabinet will be focused on core bread and butter issues like the cost of living, education, health, housing and keeping communities and businesses safe, Prime Minister Chris Hipkins has announced. “We need a greater focus on what’s in front of New Zealanders right now. The new Cabinet line ...
Prime Minister Chris Hipkins will travel to Canberra next week for an in person meeting with Australian Prime Minister, Anthony Albanese. “The trans-Tasman relationship is New Zealand’s closest and most important, and it was crucial to me that my first overseas trip as Prime Minister was to Australia,” Chris Hipkins ...
The Government is providing establishment funding of $100,000 to the Mayoral Relief Fund to help communities in Auckland following flooding, Minister for Emergency Management Kieran McAnulty announced. “We moved quickly to make available this funding to support Aucklanders while the full extent of the damage is being assessed,” Kieran McAnulty ...
As the Mayor of Auckland has announced a state of emergency, the Government, through NEMA, is able to step up support for those affected by flooding in Auckland. “I’d urge people to follow the advice of authorities and check Auckland Emergency Management for the latest information. As always, the Government ...
Ka papā te whatitiri, Hikohiko ana te uira, wāhi rua mai ana rā runga mai o Huruiki maunga Kua hinga te māreikura o te Nota, a Titewhai Harawira Nā reira, e te kahurangi, takoto, e moe Ka mōwai koa a Whakapara, kua uhia te Tai Tokerau e te kapua pōuri ...
Carmel Sepuloni, Minister for Social Development and Employment, has activated Enhanced Taskforce Green (ETFG) in response to flooding and damaged caused by Cyclone Hale in the Tairāwhiti region. Up to $500,000 will be made available to employ job seekers to support the clean-up. We are still investigating whether other parts ...
The 2023 General Election will be held on Saturday 14 October 2023, Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern announced today. “Announcing the election date early in the year provides New Zealanders with certainty and has become the practice of this Government and the previous one, and I believe is best practice,” Jacinda ...
Jacinda Ardern has announced she will step down as Prime Minister and Leader of the Labour Party. Her resignation will take effect on the appointment of a new Prime Minister. A caucus vote to elect a new Party Leader will occur in 3 days’ time on Sunday the 22nd of ...
The Government is maintaining its strong trade focus in 2023 with Trade and Agriculture Minister Damien O’Connor visiting Europe this week to discuss the role of agricultural trade in climate change and food security, WTO reform and New Zealand agricultural innovation. Damien O’Connor will travel tomorrow to Switzerland to attend the ...
The Government has extended its medium-scale classification of Cyclone Hale to the Wairarapa after assessing storm damage to the eastern coastline of the region. “We’re making up to $80,000 available to the East Coast Rural Support Trust to help farmers and growers recover from the significant damage in the region,” ...
The Government is making an initial contribution of $150,000 to the Mayoral Relief Fund to help communities in Tairāwhiti following ex-Tropical Cyclone Hale, Minister for Emergency Management Kieran McAnulty announced. “While Cyclone Hale has caused widespread heavy rain, flooding and high winds across many parts of the North Island, Tairāwhiti ...
Rural Communities Minister Damien O’Connor has classified this week’s Cyclone Hale that caused significant flood damage across the Tairāwhiti/Gisborne District as a medium-scale adverse event, unlocking Government support for farmers and growers. “We’re making up to $100,000 available to help coordinate efforts as farmers and growers recover from the heavy ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By John Finnigan, Leader, Complex Systems Science, CSIRO ShutterstockOne of Australia’s leading climate scientists, Professor Will Steffen, died on Sunday. Steffen has been hailed as a leading climate thinker, selfless mentor and gifted communicator. He is survived by his wife ...
New Zealand’s reputation as a country mostly free from corruption in its public service and judiciary has been reaffirmed in the 2022 Transparency International Corruption Perceptions Index, Chief Ombudsman Peter Boshier says. But Mr Boshier ...
New Zealand is ranked second equal with Finland in the latest Corruption Perceptions Index, Denmark is now clearly at the top of the ranking. New Zealand’s score dropped one point to 87 while Denmark improved by 2 points scoring 90. This is only the third ...
Analysis: In juggling his cabinet, the new prime minister said he sought to balance stability with renewal, writes Toby Manhire.There were some massive shifts reflected in the first cabinet of Prime Minister Chris Hipkins announced this afternoon – it’s just we knew about them already. Specifically: Mt Albert MP ...
Auckland Emergency Management has issued an Emergency Mobile Alert (EMA) warning of the potential for further extremely heavy rain to hit the Auckland region tonight. The alert asks Aucklanders to act immediately if they see rising water, due to how quickly flooding can happen. They should evacuate to high ...
Ayesha Verrall will become the minister of health and moves to the front bench, taking the portfolio over from Andrew Little. Kieran McAnulty will join cabinet and take over the local government portfolio. Meanwhile, Little drops seven spots on the list, Phil Twyford is no longer a minister, and the ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Adam Graycar, Professor of Public Policy, University of Adelaide Just months after Australia legislated to establish the long-anticipated National Anti-Corruption Agency, our standing is back on the rise in Transparency International’s annual Global Corruption Perceptions Index. This is a small but important ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Sally Ferguson, Director, Appleton Institute, CQUniversity Australia Shutterstock After a few difficult years of lockdowns and travel restrictions, people are finally winging their way across the globe again; families are being reunited and sights are being seen. Yet the ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Kim Goodwin, Lecturer, The University of Melbourne Terren Hurst on Unsplash In May, we predicted Tony Burke’s joint portfolio of workplace relations and the arts was an opportunity to address some of the challenges facing the arts and cultural sector. ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Danny Kingsley, Visiting Fellow, Australian National Centre for the Public Awareness of Science, Australian National University Shutterstock Unless you’ve spent your summer on a digital detox, you’ve probably heard of ChatGPT: the latest AI chatbot taking the world by storm. ...
The Association of Salaried Medical Specialists welcomes former ASMS member Dr Ayesha Verrall into her new role as Minister of Health. "Dr Verrall brings significant professional experience sharpened by her time in Parliament serving as the Associate ...
Today the Prime Minister announced the appointment of Kieran McAnulty as the new Minister of Local Government. “We welcome Minister McAnulty to the role and call on him to follow the Review into the Future of Local Government’s recommendation ...
The Taxpayer’s Union has welcomed the appointment of a new Minister for Local Government and encouraged Kieran McAnulty to press pause on the Three Waters reforms. Taxpayers’ Union Campaigns Manager, Callum Purves, said: “A new Minister for ...
COMMENTARY:By Gavin Ellis It is unlikely that the Mayor of Auckland, Wayne Brown, took any lessons from the city’s devastating floods but the rest of us — and journalists in particular — could learn a thing or two. Brown’s demeanour will not be improved by a petition calling for ...
RNZ Pacific The headquarters of the Malvatumauri of National Council of Chiefs of Vanuatu has burned down. The fire broke out about 1am Monday local time. Police are investigating the cause of the fire in Port Vila. The Malvatumauri nakamal is a custom parliament for all Vanuatu’s chiefs. “This nakamal ...
Auckland mayor Wayne Brown is under fire for calling New Zealand journalists “drongos”, blaming them for having to cancel a round of tennis with friends on Sunday as the city dealt with the aftermath of record rainfall and flooding that left four dead. It comes after widespread criticism of ...
Things are acutely uncomfortable for Auckland Mayor Wayne Brown right now, but can he recover to save his mayoralty? Less than a month after Wayne Brown was sworn in as Mayor of Auckland, a leading figure in central government was asked privately how the city might handle this unconventional figure ...
The New Zealand Nurses Organisation Tōpūtanga Tapuhi Kaitiaki o Aotearoa (NZNO) welcomes Hon Dr Ayesha Verrall to the Minister of Health role. NZNO Chief Executive Paul Goulter said the organisation and its members are looking forward to working ...
Prime Minister Chris Hipkins has announced Jan Tinetti, Ayesha Verrall, Willie Jackson and Kiri Allan are being shifted up the Labour rankings, with Nanaia Mahuta and Andrew Little dropping down. Watch here. ...
Jamie Wall reviews Invincible by WJ Moloney, which covers Andrew (Son) White’s life and experiences of World War I, rugby and survival.“He saw it, and all the other memorials, was conceived and created for what was lost, by those who survived. Stark and imposing, thoughtfully designed and inscribed with ...
Prime minister Chris Hipkins will travel to Canberra next week to meet with Australian PM Anthony Albanese. “The trans-Tasman relationship is New Zealand’s closest and most important, and it was crucial to me that my first overseas trip as Prime Minister was to Australia,” Chris Hipkins said. The meeting marks ...
A state of emergency has been declared in Northland as the region braces for more rain. Metservice is forecasting up to 140mm of rain across Northland, with some areas in the north and east getting 220mm, peaking at 40mm per hour. The state of emergency is effective as of 1pm ...
Never thought you’d order Uber Eats from the Coffee Club? You might have and not even known it, writes Sam Brooks.I spend a lot of my time scrolling through the Uber Eats app. Only half of the time is it because I’m looking for something to eat. The other ...
Consumers have been warned to prepare for fruit and vegetable shortages as floodwaters in the upper North Island impact food safety. The weekend’s flooding will exacerbate supply issues caused by rainy conditions this summer in much of the country, leading to higher prices nationwide. Anne-Marie Arts of industry group United ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Kate Fitz-Gibbon, Director, Monash Gender and Family Violence Prevention Centre; Professor of Social Sciences, Faculty of Arts, Monash University In 2016, the Victorian Royal Commission into Family Violence released its findings following an exhaustive 13-month inquiry. In it were 227 recommendations to ...
In recognition of Te Tiriti o Waitangi, the Problem Gambling Foundation will launch a new wānanga series of online videos on Waitangi Day, featuring conversations with Māori influencers about the systemic injustices experienced by Māori including ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Eliza Middleton, Biodiversity Management Officer, University of Sydney Overall winner of the 2018 competition, a Growling Grass Frog (_Litoria raniformis_) by EnviroDNA @enviro_DNA@enviro_DNA, CC BY-NC Almost 2,000 native species are officiallylisted as “threatened” in Australia – but how many have ...
Youthtown is launching [email protected] with two online after school programs aimed at giving kids a safe and supervised environment. Minecraft Monday and Imagination Lab - STEAM Kits are hosted in secure online groups that enable children to get a ...
The more hard surfaces we build, the more stormwater we need to drain. Here’s how we can future-proof our urban design as climate change bites. We’ve built our cities to be vulnerable to – and exacerbate – major weather events such as the one we saw in Auckland on Friday. ...
The soaring cost of living is fuelling an education crisis for New Zealand children living in poverty. To coincide with the start of the new school year, KidsCan is launching its 2023 Back to School campaign with the aim to bring on board 450 new ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Nina Sivertsen, Senior Lecturer (Nursing), Flinders University Getty Images It’s good practice for employers to consult staff when forming policies or guidelines. However, for some staff from diverse backgrounds, this creates extra work and pressure. “Cultural load” in the ...
The New Zealand Taxpayers’ Union has launched a petition calling for schools to have the authority to make their own decisions about emergency closures based on local circumstances rather than be beholden to bureaucrats in Wellington. Taxpayers’ ...
Duncan Greive founded The Spinoff in 2014. Today he has decided to hand the torch to his colleague and friend Amber Easby. He explains why.I swear I thought of it first. Or at least, in parallel. I remember walking up the stairs to work on January 9, and for ...
Today’s launch of Waipuna aa rangi, the formal body set to represent hapū and iwi across Te Tai Tokerau and Tāmaki Makaurau in the Three Waters reforms, has been postponed by the ongoing extreme weather event. “The latest red warning for parts ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Clare Collins, Laureate Professor in Nutrition and Dietetics AO, University of Newcastle Pexels/Anna Shvets Ever feel a bit stressed or need a concentration boost? Research suggests one remedy may be right under your nose. Chewing has benefits for brain function, ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Danny C Price, Senior research fellow, Curtin University Midjourney, Author provided Some 540 million years ago, diverse life forms suddenly began to emerge from the muddy ocean floors of planet Earth. This period is known as the Cambrian Explosion, and ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Camilla Nelson, EG Whitlam Research Fellow at the Whitlam Institute, and Associate Professor, University of Notre Dame Australia April Fonti/AAP There is much to be excited about in Attorney-General Mark Dreyfus’s draft Family Law Amendment Bill 2023, the first in ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Michael Naylor, Senior Lecturer, Massey University Getty Images The clean-up from Auckland’s devastating floods last week is just beginning but insurance companies will need to start thinking about what the record-breaking weather event will mean for future coverage. Over ...
A coalition of anti-poverty and welfare advocacy groups has called for urgent government action to support people affected by flooding in Auckland, Coromandel, Bay of Plenty, and Waikato. The Fairer Future group - which called for increases in income support ...
<img src="https://img.scoop.co.nz/stories/images/2301/634c21cb071ff0232051.jpeg" width="720" height="221"> “Raising the legal age for buying cigarettes to 20 is a good move, but effectively banning e-cigarettes is disappointing ...
Hospital waiting lists grow Chris Hipkins is expected to announce his cabinet reshuffle today. There’s been some speculation that Andrew Little may lose the health portfolio to Ayesha Verrall. As Stuff’s Bridie Witton reported, Little said he was happy to stick it out as the health minister. ...
In the December 2022 quarter, 0.4 percent of home transfers were to people who didn’t hold New Zealand citizenship or a resident visa, Stats NZ said today. This compares with 0.4 percent in the December 2021 quarter, and 0.5 percent in the September 2022 ...
New Zealand is well behind the rest of the world when it comes to transferring money between banks. Shane Marsh and James McEniery discovered this when they were living in Singapore and started Aotearoa’s first real time payment mobile wallet. They aim to bring banking in New Zealand into the ...
MetService satellite imaging shows a deepening low moving towards New Zealand. It’s expected to bring more heavy rain to areas already impacted by the record-breaking rainfall on Friday that caused severe flooding in Auckland. Red and orange heavy rain warnings have been issued. Red warnings are issued when rain is ...
Our uniforms are overpriced and so packed with plastics they’ll outlive our great-great-grandchildren, write the student journalists of Balmoral Intermediate. Last year, Balmoral Intermediate’s student-run newspaper Kawepūrongo released a multi-part investigation into their polyester-packed school uniforms. The first instalment, titled “What Really Goes Into Our Uniform?” was initially sparked by ...
The Independent Police Conduct Authority has found that a Police dog handler’s decision to command his dog to restrain two young people while arresting them for attempting to steal a car was a justified, necessary and proportionate response in ...
While the upper North Island braces for more heavy rain, Auckland mayor Wayne Brown remains adamant he’s not resigning as a new text message about “media drongos” sent by Brown comes to light, writes Anna Rawhiti-Connell in this excerpt from The Bulletin, The Spinoff’s morning news round-up. To receive The ...
The Environmental Defence Society says that the National Environmental Standards for Plantation Forestry (NES-PF) are failing to protect the coastal marine environment from the significant adverse effects of sedimentation associated with plantation ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Danny C Price, Senior research fellow, Curtin University Midjourney, Author provided Some 540 million years ago, diverse life forms suddenly began to emerge from the muddy ocean floors of planet Earth. This period is known as the Cambrian Explosion, and ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Hugh Davies, Research Associate, Charles Darwin University The world’s largest wild population of water buffalo now roam Australia. As does the largest wild herd of camels. We have millions of feral goats and deer. For these introduced species, Australia is a paradise. ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Juliana Segura-Salazar, Research Fellow, The University of Queensland Planetary Resources We know the world must move to cleaner energy sources to head off the worst effects of climate change, but the technology required for the transition is very mineral-intensive. So ...
Two new polls put Labour under Chris Hipkins suddenly ahead of Chris Luxon’s National. Toby Manhire assesses some strikingly similar numbers. Come on now. The news in New Zealand is meant to yawn gently out of bed in January. A sprinkling of set-pieces, scene setting and sloganeering, that’s all. But ...
Filmed in rural New Zealand during the Covid-19 pandemic, Pearl was one of the biggest critical darlings of 2022. But, as Stewart Sowman-Lund reports, there are still no plans to release it here. It cost New Zealand taxpayers more than$1.5m. It was filmed entirely on our shores. It raked in ...
Increasingly frequent encounters between humans and sea lions in the Catlins and Clutha coast has conservationists calling for vehicle bans on beaches The world’s rarest species of sea lion is clawing its way back into prominence on Southland beaches - but road traffic on the seashore could send them back into ...
For political nerds and tragics the 2020 election was about as boring as it could get with no race to be seen and an inevitable landslide victory for Labour. Monday night’s polls show 2023 will be a return to MMP - a race down to the wire and the result ...
Carmel Sepuloni's appointment as Deputy Prime Minister has been rightly celebrated, but how will she fare as Chris Hipkins' right-hand woman? She's well-liked in the Labour caucus and seen as a safe pair of hands - but has Carmel Sepuloni got what it takes to be the Deputy Prime Minister? ...
The epic deluge and subsequent flooding across Auckland broke just about every record in the book. Newsroom has pulled the data together to show just how unprecedented this storm was. ...
Guy Somerset is Team Sussex I’m Team Sussex. I came to Harry’s memoir predisposed towards both him and Meghan. I believe them. They seem genuine. A bit flaky perhaps. A bit, yes, woke. But not the criminals they’ve been made out to be. Not the Machiavellian manipulators they’re portrayed as. ...
'When you have the support of many to help carry you and role models who completely smash glass ceilings, how can you not dare to dream?' Auckland University’s first female Pacific Pro Vice-Chancellor Pacific shares what the appointment of Carmel Sepuloni as Deputy Prime Minister means to her.Comment: Nafanua, well-known in ...
Multiple world champion archer Danielle Brown experienced the ultimate highs and lows of sport. Now with the help of two great Kiwi athletes, she's written an award-winning book, Angela Walker reports. Danielle Brown knows what inclusion looks like. It has enabled the archery champion to stand on the sport's highest ...
Dr Eric Crampton argues national and local regulation, including a clause in the Grocery Industry Competition Bill going through Parliament, make it more difficult for other players to enter the supermarket. ...
Loading...(function(i,s,o,g,r,a,m){var ql=document.querySelectorAll('A[quiz],DIV[quiz],A[data-quiz],DIV[data-quiz]'); if(ql){if(ql.length){for(var k=0;k<ql.length;k++){ql[k].id='quiz-embed-'+k;ql[k].href="javascript:var i=document.getElementById('quiz-embed-"+k+"');try{qz.startQuiz(i)}catch(e){i.start=1;i.style.cursor='wait';i.style.opacity='0.5'};void(0);"}}};i['QP']=r;i[r]=i[r]||function(){(i[r].q=i[r].q||[]).push(arguments)},i[r].l=1*new Date();a=s.createElement(o),m=s.getElementsByTagName(o)[0];a.async=1;a.src=g;m.parentNode.insertBefore(a,m)})(window,document,'script','https://take.quiz-maker.com/3012/CDN/quiz-embed-v1.js','qp'); Got a good quiz question?Send Newsroom your questions. ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Michelle Grattan, Professorial Fellow, University of Canberra Former deputy prime minister John Anderson is one of the six- member committee launched on Monday to spearhead the “no” case in the Voice referendum. The Voice No Case Committee’s “Recognise a Better Way” campaign ...
RNZ Pacific New Caledonia’s pro-independence Union Calédonian has proposed September 24 this year as the date by which an accord be reached with France to complete decolonisation. The party, which wants independence for the territory by 2025, has chosen the date because it will mark the 170th anniversary of New ...
Pacific Media Watch Radio Australia’s Pacific Beat reports today on how Fiji has fared under the draconian Media Industry Development Act that has restricted media freedom over the past decade. There are hopes that state-endorsed media censorship will stop in Fiji following last month’s change in government to the People’s ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Michelle Grattan, Professorial Fellow, University of Canberra Treasurer Jim Chalmers has rejected as “laughable” criticism he has turned his back on the Hawke-Keating reform era in his blueprint for “values-based capitalism”. In this podcast Chalmers also reveals he spoke with Paul ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Jo Caust, Associate Professor and Principal Fellow (Hon), School of Culture and Communication, The University of Melbourne It’s finally been launched. A new cultural policy for Australia. After years (actually decades) of neglect, Prime Minister Anthony Albanese today launched a new national ...
Ardern answering questions in the Monday stand up on housing. Starts around 28m
https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/national/457821/watch-live-prime-minister-jacinda-ardern-announces-any-changes-to-traffic-light-system
She says early on that no-one wants the NZ housing market to crash, because people's homes are still the single biggest asset most NZ people will own. She doesn't really say anything else apart from that, or answer the question, other than 'all the levers' blather (meaning the levers that protect investors and some home owners). Building more supply features, but as far as I can tell this is increasing house prices.
Can someone please explain to me why property prices dropping would harm individual people? Is it a retirement thing (how so)? Or that people can borrow against it?
Doesn't it only become an issue when people want to sell? Some people will have houses worth less than their mortgage, is there not another way this issue can be solved. Wouldn't less buying and selling be a good thing?
The press question was about prices going back to what they were before covid ie a 27% drop. In what ways would this cause and to whom?
If you think a market rising too quickly is bad – wait until you live through one that is crashing.
presumably I will at some point. But that doesn't answer my questions. I want someone to spell it out in the NZ context.
The ones who will be hurt most by a crashing market are first home buyers. They have the smallest equity and tend to be mortgaged to the hilt. Believe me I see it every day. Young couples really stretching it to get into housing. They are a baby or a job loss or an interest rate rise away from huge pressure.
The market could crash or correct because of an interest rate increase. If their equity disappears they may have nowhere to go.
Many who bought in the past year or so may well lose their input equity in the next year or two.
Those paying back the loan ahead of schedule now will cope with rising rates. Others can cope by moving to higher incomes via wage increases or take on extra work or they can take in boarders – incl a caravan in the yard.
If it goes that way (c 10-20% depending on when they bought in) the share of the mortgage paid which was principal (sans the interest) instead of rent becomes their effective equity. And that grows while they can meet the mortgage payments.
Which assumes the lending bank will not foreclose and that the RBNZ will allow the lending institutions to operate outside their licences.
It would be really dumb to foreclose in a declining market when mortgage payments were being made. Banks do not make money being dumb.
What have bank licenses to do with foreclosing on those meeting their mortgage payments? More likely banks would just toughen up on new lending (as they are doing now in anticipation).
can the government not protect people in that situation?
But in the end, if young couples are having to take such risks to buy a house isn't that because of the disparity between income and property prices? And incomes are never going to keep up.
They never have in the past. And how would they do it? Pay the banks the lost equity (ie reduce the loan by the size of the new market value)? I can see that going down with the general public like a bucketload of sick.
Well yes it is to some extent, it is also due to the chronic shortage of house supply in NZ particularly in Auckland. This is a problem that has been allowed to fester for decades now. Developers aim their new builds at the top end of the market because that is where the profit lies. No money in building masses of cheaper houses – that requires more infrastructure to start with – more materials and smaller profit on each item. Back in the 0 ties I remember the assessment then that Auckland needed 13,000 + new homes per year. Never happened. That was almost 20 years ago. The down stream result is massive prices for the few houses coming on stream and desperate people willing to take on huge risks in order to find somewhere to live.
They have indeed done so in the past….by offering refinance at a discounted rate.
However with interest rates already nearing the zero bound that option has pretty much been removed, but there are potentially other actions they could take.
Such as?
set up a gov entity to offer extended terms (say 40 years) rock bottom rates or shared equity options to criteria meeting applicants that the private banks need to foreclose on.
Housing corporation did a version of this in the 1980s
IIRC the terms were 25 years and 3% (that was a pretty small rate then) and the sums were around $25,000.
Current rates for a fixed mortgage are around 2.5%
Nope the rate was around 11% compared to market rates of around 19% and the term was 24 years as opposed to a market maximum of 20.
Yes the cuurrent rates are low as i noted above but currently floating rates are around 5% and rising and some 80% of fixed mortgages are due for renewal in the next 12 months so there would be some scope.
Yes that is the nub of the problem. A "correction" of $200k – $300k on a median priced house could almost see a complete wipe out of any equity (and that is a 20% reduction in house price).
https://www.nzherald.co.nz/business/nz-house-prices-hit-new-record-925000-up-238-auckland-now-13m/BNNOELUO2JVKP5VA43YYZNKQUQ/
in what ways is this a problem?
Suppose for some reason you were forced to sell the property you bought last year for $1m. You had a deposit of $500,000 and the bank loan of $500,000. If the property now sells for $800,000 you still owe the bank Around $500,000 so you are left with $300,000. A loss of $200,000. Your savings have reduced by $200,000 in a year. Even though over the past year you have invested a large portion of your income in paying the interest on that $500,000 loan.
I think that for many young couples that would be a significant problem
Now you might argue that you could now buy a similar property as the one you just sold for $800,000, but you would still have to borrow $500,000 to make the purchase. Your debt to loan ratio was initially 1:1, it is now 3:5 with no significant improvement in housing.
I understand how that works in terms of the numbers. What I'm saying is how is this a problem specifically, rather than an assumption of it being a problem.
So the problem in your example is they were forced to sell. Why were they forced to sell?
And then the problem is that they have to buy a less valuable property. How is this a problem specifically?
As far as I can tell the central issue for the second question is that people want to get ahead of an already reasonable standard of living. Where as half the country are just trying to stay afloat.
The people struggling to buy a home for themselves and family are equally trying to stay afloat – as we are only too well aware with the increasing demands on our food banks right now.
if someone is using a food bank, how can they afford to buy a home? I understand people who already own a home, one person loses their job, they no longer have enough income because the mortgage takes it all. But that's a different situation.
Need to sell: divorce/separation, death, job loss leading to foreclosure
Want to sell: downsizing, upsizing, new job, new school, family issues, horrible neighbours
Buying and selling the same market only causes issues if the remaining equity is not enough for a 20% deposit on the next property. With a drop of 30%, that means 46% equity of the current property price is needed to still have 20% equity at the new prices.
It also means people can't withdraw equity to improve their current house if it will put them below 20%. As above, not an issue if they have more than 50% of current prices, bit of an issue if they don't. That may seem like a minor issue, but not everyone uses that for a new car – other uses are home repairs and maintenance, modifications etc. The loss of that money means a downturn in economic activity which can turn into a recession if it is sharp enough.
so maybe maintenance and upgrade should be part of the income budgeting not the capital gains budgeting.
In the need to sell category, why can they not rent the property out?
Its not the big problem people perceive,there have been 10 mortgage sales this year nationwide,112 last year ,the peak during the Gfc (2009) was 2620 .
2620 is quite a lot though.
Who supplies that information?
Years ago there would be pages of Mortgagee sales in publications like the Property Press.
Those with vested interests realised this was not a' good look'and worked against ramping prices and profits and was discontinued.
A controlled drip feed of mortgagee sales became the new order.
In bull markets like NZ is having for the last decade or more, banks have no trouble finding buyers for distressed sales.
Corelogic
Yes Micky this happened in Queensland, so people took in boarders. Full Board and meals, with one price for Monday to Friday more for a full weeks.
How so.
We are told that buyers are stress tested at a much higher interest rate than the rate they take for the mortgage.
As first home buyers are actually living in their homes and paying less than rent,a drop in price/equity would mean little.
Losing their job would be worse.
Most have 30 year mortgages ,so in that time frame inflation should restore any equity and…some.
Why doesn't the Govt do something about it then?
Crashing is only a real issue in conjunction with high unemployment, increasing interest rates should be covered by having responsible banks that have loaded stress loadings into their calculation for what the max. loan they are willing to give to clients. Banks have shown in the last 10 years that they are reluctant to force sales.
I will say as someone within the industry there are increasing examples of building invoking sunset clauses and then relisting, i 1 case 5 town houses with an added $200k on each. Easy $1m pity for those who had the dream smashed, and have to restart their house ownership journey
With property only increasing by 23% !!!! Should there be a drop of 18.7% we would still have prices at Dec 20 levels, those innocent victims would be those who have entered the market in the mid to later part of the current year, and would possible see their equity vanish, but if still employed they would still continue be able to pay the mortgage. IMO to make housing affordability a correction of 30% would make a difference in the long term for new entrants. That is returning to mid 2019 prices!!!! And once you are in the market it is the price to transition to the next level i.e. from town house/apartment etc to family 3/4 bedrooms etc, that is the issue.
if I'm understanding that right, the issue is more if prices drop and someone can no longer afford to pay their mortgage due to eg job loss?
What would be happening to the rental market in such a situation? eg could people move into a rental and have wealthier people rent their house to pay the mortgage? Would rents be going up or down? More or less supply?
An interest rate of itself could deeply destabilise the market, eat into equity and raise mortgage costs and rents.
And if you have cash it could be the perfect time to buy.
do you mean interest rate increase? Why would that happen?
Interest rates are at historic lows. There is really only one way they can drift in the near future and that is up. One of the tools the reserve bank has in its tool box is to raise the base interest rate (currently 0.75%). The bank is given the task of controlling inflation to within a range of 2 – 3% and one of the main methods it uses to reduce inflation is to raise the base interest rate. With the current supply shortages world wide and across the country inflation is increasing so we can expect to see interest rates rise in the new year whether we like it or not.
if rises are inevitable why are people being encouraged to borrow with so little leeway?
Why is inflation increasing atm?
Inflation is rising because of Government Debt creation putting more money into the system which is chasing fewer houses and scarcity of building products (and almost everything else) due to supply problems – drop in manufacture due to lockdowns and transport bottle necks.
"Market Forces" – The Gods of the Copy Book headings return!
As I pass through my incarnations in every age and race,
I make my proper prostrations to the Gods of the Market Place.
Peering through reverent fingers I watch them flourish and fall,
And the Gods of the Copybook Headings, I notice, outlast them all.
how does more money in the system relate to house building/supplies shortages and thus causing inflation? Do you mean the cost of housing (building as well as property) increasing while people have more money is what causes inflation?
Doesn't building a lot more houses increase the property prices in the short and medium term?
"Why would that happen?"
http://bilbo.economicoutlook.net/blog/?p=48850
This describes one reason.
can you not summarise it for me?
"Central banks are resisting the inflation panic hype from the financial markets – and we are better off as a result"
Is the title, but it probably should be read in full for people new to the subject.
Yes, its basically an issue that peoples debts become larger relative to the assets which secure them. Banks have been known to call for repayment on roll over in these circumstances so the issue is not purely an effect on sellers however.
The other thing to consider is debt repayment in similar to saving, so this works to reduce aggregate spending and income (e.g GDP). Incidentally borrowing works in reverse to this. So there is at least a possibility that debt repayment is prioratised, people pay back debts rather than going in cafes, and so the fall out is on the cafe staff and businesses who lose work. This happened under lockdown (people saved rather than going out) but there the government wage subsidy kept cafe staff paid. So if the govt manages to get the housing market into reverse they may need to support GDP to stop a recession resulting. That wage subsidy was easier to explain politically under lockdown.
Can the government not regulate that to protect home owners? Other than the bank selling out from under them, what's the problem with the debt/asset ratio changing?
The issues here are basically fairness. This will be a problem for recent buyers, so the question in fairness terms is should the government be influencing the housing market in ways which penalize people, and did they have reasonable warning of what was coming. Otherwise the debt/asset ratio changing will effect how much somebody carries over if they are moving. At that point its not an equivalent trade as they pay off the balance of the mortgage on the inflated purchase price, not the depressed sale price, even if they can make another purchase at a depressed purchase price.
Otherwise a bank needing some repayment is basically requiring saving as indicated below. I don't think its the preferred thing for banks to do, but it happens.
Fairness like being homeless or spending most of your benefit on rent and not being able to afford to feed and clothe your kids?
I assume you mean fairness of people that got in earlier compared to people that got in later. This is the problem of Ardern saying she doesn't want property prices to drop, people take it as assurance, bet on that, and then the govt can't actually move.
Yes, its that kind of fairness, and its not that home owners are the worst off members of the economy either.
But the problem with just contrasting house prices with rents is that house prices have a tenuous relationship with rents.
Looking at the situation a lot of landlords were in before 2010 many were basically satisfied with the capital gains and were largely not fussed about maximising the rents anyway. Though that attitude seems to have changed a bit since then. But I don't see a good reason falling house prices will necessarily result in lower rents anyway, they could well result in higher rents. A lot of the governments reforms in fact seem to be trying to get landlords to start making investments more like a business and to my mind this will mean more landlords focused on the bottom line. Best case scenario we don't know if these changes will push rents up or down, there are ways it could do either in practice.
The other problem I see is reading too much into what Ardern says anyway. Basically house prices are set by the trades happening in the housing market. The PM can say what she wants but at most its a signal about which kinds of policy her party will or won't implement, but the impacts of those policies are quite far from well defined. I suspect the main impacts are on which party various classes of people might support and the housing market impacts are largely very hard to evaluate.
' In wanting state tenants to experience the benefits of owning their own home, the government offered purchasers very generous terms: 5 percent deposit, a 3 percent mortgage rate, with a maximum purchase period of 40 years. Since this time thousands of tenants have purchased their state houses and become 'kings and queens of their castles'.
Introduced by a National Govt!
Also introduced by a National Govt…
'The National government introduced full market rents in 1991 to reduce the state role in housing provision. From the start, public debate over state housing policy in New Zealand has centred on this very issue: how far should governments intervene in the housing market. '
The rules have changed to allow shared equity. Some will resort to this.
One of ours with a big mortgage will try to get bailed out by the Government if values drop dramatically and the house is worth way less than what they owe. She'll change her name to 'South Canterbury Finance.'
Not quite getting that one. The government wants people to be spending rather than paying off debt? How does that relate to a drop in property prices?
This is basically a question of who is impacted by the resulting change in behaviour. The summary of the point here is that an expanding housing market with expanding debt does increase our total income and spending across the country. When that even just slows down (let alone reversing) then that part of total income and spending goes away. This is basically the same as people electing to save more and spend less of their income. The unfair part of this would be that the people who are unemployed are often not involved in the housing market, but are influenced by its effects none-the-less.
The reason I also mentioned the govt here is that its spending is a good way to soak up excess unemployment which may result from this occurrence, and it doesn't have an actual financial constraint and so should be mandated to act for social policy purposes.
so the govt needs a runaway housing market to keep the economy afloat by people taking on more personal debt? Isn't that insanely fragile?
I wouldn't say its necessarily that fragile as it has persisted for quite a while. But eventually its probably bound to result in an overindebted household sector and inequality. Its a simplification but you can divide the income of the economy (GDP) into 3 sectors, private domestic, public government and overseas. In order for GDP to grow one of those sectors must spend more and frequently borrow more to support that spending. Since the Rogernomics reforms the increased spending initiative has generally come from the private domestic sector taking on more debt. Those reforms were largely about pushing spending off of the public government sector and onto the private domestic sector. This was only really recognised as a problem when Key came in during 2008, but the Clark government surpluses were only possible with similar expansion of private domestic sector spending and debt.
https://www.rbnz.govt.nz/statistics/key-graphs/key-graph-household-debt
The alternative is more public government spending to support incomes (and fewer govt surpluses, especially as NZ typically runs a balance of payment deficit). Unfortunately the government budget is often described as similar to a business, rather than the factually accurate claim that government deficits are needed to create space for private domestic saving and debt repayment. There needs to be a certain level of saving if everybody is going to be saving for their own retirement, or repaying housing debt but that will need public sector deficits otherwise that behaviour change will result in some level of recession.
Why do you say eventually? That's what is already happening.
I think its reasonable describing a process which started in 1983 (or even starting around 2000) as (arguably) eventually becoming more critical in 2021. And its at least arguable that its not even yet over-indebted, as you have noted several times why is there anything wrong with people in negative equity on their property as long as they keep a job. If follows they are not yet over-indebted in that case.
I'm not quite saying that. I'm asking people to be specific about the details of the issues rather than just saying reflexively 'oh that's bad'.
Because I want us to look at different solutions, and we can't do that without understanding what the problem is.
I would guess for some people who lost their jobs in the past 2 years, having negative equity was a bad thing. So there's a difference for how individuals (who vote!) feel about it, and how the government and economists look at it (collectively and for the good of the whole).
Someone has to lose out apparently. I'd like the left to look at why it still largely supports poor people being the ones that are worst affected. I know some of the rationales (Labour want to stop the underclass growing more than they want to end the underclass condition itself). I just think we could be more honest about it.
I suggest you need to be more specific then, what is the meaning of over-indebted? My phrase was taking the meaning to be that such a person was over-indebted when they are prone to being unable to make payments/repay their debt (+ some bare minimum of other living expenditure). But apparently you mean something else by saying people are over-indebted.
I also don't really get the reasoning about somebody who loses their job with negative equity. Losing a job is usually the bad thing and can lead to losing a house regardless of the owners equity position. But negative equity has many negative consequences such as higher interest rates and insurance costs, lack of flexibility, potential repayment pressures and other drains on income.
I didn't know what you meant by over-indebted, I took it to mean that someone was precarious because of that debt, not that they were already crashing.
The point about job loss is that people are being sold the idea that buying a house with precariousness built in is good (get on the property ladder!). Then when one half of a couple loses their job, they can't afford to live and end up using food banks. Had property been more affordable, and/or people more sensible financially in taking on debt with regard to the way the world is, that wouldn't happen.
But negative equity has many negative consequences such as higher interest rates and insurance costs, lack of flexibility, potential repayment pressures and other drains on income.
One of our longer term tenants fell into just this hole during the 2009 GFC. Based overseas they lost jobs, property and savings all at once and were forced to return to NZ. There's lot's more to their story that I won't retell here – but essentially they've never been able to recover from that setback.
You got it Weka….the ugly truth no politicians want to admit.
Regardless of who you vote for I don't think many people want to see their properties value go down much. I certainly don't although it is only on paper these days. As you say, for those of us watching our Retirement come closer, the value of our biggest Asset is not something we hope to gamble with. For me it is a safety net, encouraged in previous years as a Retirement Plan. and in case we get a wave of negative whiners about Northland staying Red this is one Northlander content with the decision.
why does it matter in retirement what your property is worth? Isn't the issue more that you want the mortgage paid off by the time you retire? Which is more likely generally if property prices dropped.
If the next step of retirement is moving to a Village (for example) every bit of value may be necessary for a "comfortable" existence. With a mortgage in retirement is said to be a very uncomfortable, let alone if renting. Why do you think it would be good for your most valuable asset to be worth less? The only benefit I see would be rates reduction but being quite happy paying taxes and rates for the betterment of society that's not really a plus for me.
Why do you think it would be good for your most valuable asset to be worth less? A 30% reduction only brings back prices to mid 2019, so in your case ( as long as LTO prices also corrects) then your position remains unchanged. But with increased property LTO prices increase, and that is why retirement village are able to achieve growth and pay great dividends to their share holders. They pocket the capital gain as well as the deferred management fees up to 30% of your licence fee. One of the best positive cashflow businesses in NZ.
That would be great IF Villages reduced their prices by 30%. Not holding my breath, while I still have some.
I don't think it's good for the individual whose asset devalues, I think it's good for homeless and poor people who can't afford rent, and lowish income people who can no longer afford to buy a house ever.
The answer in one word is 'growth'
The growth we use now is financial, not production….if growth stops then there is no wherewithal to pay interest (in aggregate)
Everything is predicated on that ability…lose it and the whole system collapses.
NZ has made housing lending its almost exclusive source of financial growth (more so than any other economy) …pretty much no one is confident enough to lend/borrow for any other purpose.
what is aggregate.
does that mean we have growth because we have borrowed money internationally?
What would happen if economic growth was based more on production?
aggregate= in total
It means without growth there is no ability to extract interest (that is not to say individuals couldnt)….ultimately it means that borrowing becomes increasingly difficult and people, institutions, businesses need to save before investing….think about what that does to an economy…you cant buy that house (or anything) until youve saved enough to pay for it outright.
If our growth was based on production (as it was until the neolib revolution) we would still have problems because we have reached the limits of extraction and externalities (pollution/.waste)……it is the end of growth.
We are using finance to kick the can down the road….and the road is coming to an end.
Bernard Hickey on the NZ economy…reality
New Zealand's economy is a housing market with bits tacked on | Stuff.co.nz
That’s a good read & an intelligent analysis.
A fall about 10% next year is my pick.
20% over 2 years would be OK too.
Other looming issues
People struggling to pay mortgages because they move up to higher interest rates (this may force some to consider boarders – albeit via caravans in the yard for some).
When unemployment insurance arrives and in what form (income related or a more Canadian form) – it will help (for a certain period at least) those not able to get ACC because of illness rather than accident. Until then an option, for those able to afford the cost, is income insurance.
Income and unemployment insurance are usually time limited…i.e 6 months. Not much help with a 30 year mortgage…and that assumes a) you can afford/have it and b) it is honoured
It does what it does – losing a job and taking months to find an equivalent, or being out of work for months and being forced to sell under duress in a falling market is something to avoid if one can and there is any risk.
History (recent) has shown that those who lose employment in a recession almost invariably take an income hit if and when they find alternative employment
In part, that's because people get forced into the first full time job they can find which may or may not suit their talents.
That can be a cause…however whatever the reason the fact remains that lifetime earning capacity decreases and consequently ability to service debt is reduced.
I remember a housing boom followed by a big price drop in the late 1980's in the UK, prices fell by 30% in some areas and a lot of people owed more than their house was worth.
then what happened?
Irish property bubble – Wikipedia
big contributor here…
‘Throughout the bubble, newspapers and media played a vital role in hyping property. No national newspaper was without a glossy property supplement and weekend papers were often equally filled with property ads, reviews of new developments, stories of successful purchases, makeovers, and a gamut of columnists relating their property experiences. TV and radio schedules were filled with further property porn – house-hunting programs and house makeover programs were regular features on every channel. Even in July 2007, Irish Independent journalist/comedian Brendan O’Connor urged people to buy property, even as the bubble was clearly bursting.[42] In April 2011, journalist Vincent Browne admitted that the Irish media had played an important role in adding to the frenzy of the Irish property bubble’
I was asking what happened in the UK after the values dropped 30%. There's this implication that it's inherently bad, I want the explanation for how, specifically
If you own a home worth $300,000, and then it’s worth $210,000, you still have a home.
It is not a problem if you can service the mortgage…supposedly stress tests are done at +3% of the mortgage rate you strike.
If people have to refinance at higher rates with reducing equity, problems occur.
The Irish example actually has a number of correlations with the NZ housing market now.
https://www.boleat.com/materials/the_1985_93_housing_market_in_the_uk_1994.pdf
GDP Fell -2.5% in 1991 and unemployment increased by 600000 during 1991.
GDP Fell -0.5% in 1992 and unemployment increased by an additional 500000 during 1992.
unemployment rose only because of the drop in the housing market?
I don't get it. If the GDP falls because of values (not actual production) how does that cause unemployment?
GDP doesn't fall due to values. GDP is a measure of income, so when GDP falls, income falls, and business (often) cut back on staff to save costs.
The effect of the housing market prices is that when a seller sells in an increasing housing market (because a borrower borrows and is willing to pay) then that becomes their income. Maybe they then take that and buy elsewhere, but… Eventually somebody ends up selling a place and not buying in again, or downsizing and so can realize their housing trades as actual income.
And when that goes away as house prices go into reverse then that income stream vanishes from the economy so GDP can fall. Perhaps there is also a shift into repaying more debts which is actively taking that spending out.
Good explanation.
On top of this – and effect most people overlook is that the banks become increasingly unwilling to lend without substantial owner equity. What this leads to is the paradox of the price falling but the deposit needed stays just as large or even grows.
Market turnover drops because those who aren’t compelled to will hold, and those who do have sell to will often lose their equity and finish up adding to the rental demand.
So what happens to the houses that are sold by the people who have to sell?
sorry, but this does sound completely bonkers. The only way that works if is the people at the top keep getting richer and the people at bottom keep getting poorer.
sorry, but this does sound completely bonkers.
I realise everyone here hates on me as the resident bastard landlord. It's the price I accept for being open and honest about my experiences. But please spare me the 'bonkers'.
Also what is so frequently left out of these discussions is that most powerful reason why so many people are stuck renting is not just prices – although clearly they've become a serious hurdle – but even worse than this, the willingness of any bank to lend them any money at any price.
the bonkers comment was to Nic
I don't think that is necessarily an implication, and there have been sustained periods when many economies reduced inequality while still having house ownership and trading (though clearly a more limited financial sector).
But you asked how an almost 30% fall in UK house prices resulting in a two year recession and 1100000 additional unemployed and that is a reasonable description of how this happens.
The main problem the government faces here being that if they are successful at tipping over the housing market they will need to take responsibility for all the economic fallout resulting from that and that will be unpopular.
Say you bought a house last year for 850.000. for what ever reason the value of houses falls and your house is now only worth 580.000 grand. You are still paying the mortgage of the house for 850.000. If you wanted to sell because say your life changes, you can no longer get 850.000 or even close to it, you are shit out of luck and 270.000 short on your loan. The bank will want its money – your fucked..
So it is not in anyones interest to flood the market with new houses as that will leave the people that bought houses over the last ten years in negative equity. Or in houses without value. And these people vote, and Labour ain't gonna piss of middle class voters.
I bought a property in a tiny 'town', a glorified garden shed ministry of works from 1949 house with the original water boiler (in gallons) and the floor covered in news paper from 1970 (very interesting read i kept that paper) for 100.000. I am that cheap, yes i am. This property is now valued at 400.000 (yes, a good laugh), and i could sell it to some deluded person from AKL/WLGTN for more then that if i wanted too, but nope it is my retirement hovel. The locals of course are currently priced out of the market, as no one there makes enough money to pay that much. If the price of my house dropped back to what it was originally i would not be worse of. Why? I never loaded anything on the mortgage. But the same can not be said for the majority of people that bought houses and believe themselves to be millionaires. Or that bought Dachas in my little retirement place to go to with their boats for a weekend hoon and bbq. All loaded on the mortgage of a property valued somewhere as a million +.
Jacinda has no real options here, other then building to rent – and building to cheaply rent, to take pressure of the market slowly and let the market cool down in a controlled fashion.
Watch interest rates go up, and watch the house of cards fall apart.
Your first 2 paragraphs are quite misleading…
1-the figures you quote make no allowance for a deposit,which is generally required-i.e 20% of k850,000=170,000.
Flooding the market with new houses is definately in the interests of first home buyers and renters.
People who are not home owners also …vote.
yes dear.
Happy to…help.
did you see the word loan? You don't loan your down payment, you loan the rest based on your down payment. So no matter what you paid down, in my scenario you OWE 850.000 dollar, and if you can not sell your house for that money you are short on the loan, and you lost your down payment.
I hope that this is plain enough english to bend your mind around.
Last if Labour or National or Act or anyone would give a fuck about tenants and first buyers we would have gotten a Captial Gains Tax in the first year of the reign of Jacinda, and we would not have had the shenanigans last year with the very very low interest rates that resulted in no help to businesses but allowed people with inflated assets to borrow against these inflated assets and buy up some more property bringing the market up. Also keep in mind that Housing NZ is also buying up houses on the open market, cause that is easier and prolly cheaper then building.
I saw this plain English and managed to bend my mind around it-
'Say you bought a house last year for 850.000.'
You should be clearer.Your new scenario suggests the house is bought for a lot,lot more than $850,000.
people say this so casually "you want to sell your house"
From what I can tell in the conversation tonight, what this boils down to is people want freedom and they're ok that poor people can't have freedom so long as they do. The liberal ones would like poor people to also have freedom eg to live in a house or to afford things other than rent, but if that can't happen, oh well.
People want to fly wherever they want, oh well, climate change.
People want to do whatever they want, oh well, covid spreads.
If someone owns a home even if you owe a lot of money on it, I think that is lucky.
And it's not like we don't know this shit. If someone buys into the market now, and overextends themselves, what were they thinking? That the market would keep growing their asset by a hundred thousand dollars a year forever?
Good on you for buying what you did where you did.
All human activity – everything we do from the moment we wake – has a risk or cost to it. In general as a society we have two broad pathways to mitigating these costs:
One is to innovate so as to reduce or even eliminate those costs – a progressive process that has over the past 200 years transformed the lives of ordinary people beyond all belief.
The other is to prohibit it. In some instances this is entirely warranted, but as a fundamentally coercive action we should reach for this option least and last.
yes. We will coerce in a pandemic, but not a housing crisis that affects poor people disproportionately. The political and middle and rising classes are adept at self care.
The problem I have with this is the utter lack of imagination. TINA all the way. The idea that we cannot make sacrifices and be creative and innovative at the same time is a modern conceit when human evolution is in part an adaptation in response to challenge.
Yes the basics for survival are food and SHELTER.
Ordinary people can no longer own a home in NZ.
If that's 200 years of progress….it certainly is…transformational.
Ordinary people can no longer own a home in NZ.
That's because NZ is a well governed stable country, one of the top 20 or so in the world, that people want to live in;
But we have a dysfunctional building industry and amateur hour zoning regulations that make the cost of housing ridiculous. Keep in mind that the price of existing homes cannot get too far out of kilter with the cost of building new ones – and it's this cost that's underpinning price inflation across the whole market.
So high demand and low supply – basic shit really.
Its not basic shit…at all.
NZ is the only western country with no Capital Gains or wealth tax.
The FIRE economy has fuelled investing ' in RE as the only rational asset class,and successive Govts encourage it.
As you know a 500k mortgage @8% costs around the same to service as a $1000,000 mortgage @4%.
This is a rigged,manipulated ponzi scheme ,a direct consequence of Q.E on an unprecedented scale.
Its a return to the the enslavement of the Feudal system.
NZ is the only western country with no Capital Gains or wealth tax.
And wherever a government is incompetent enough to allow housing supply to fall behind demand the same basic rule applies – prices go up. Regardless of the local tax settings.
Its a return to the the enslavement of the Feudal system.
You have no idea of what medieval feudalism was actually like do you? For the vast majority of human history even the idea that an ordinary person might 'own their house' was unthinkable.
What a coincidence-every single country in the western world has incompetent Govts=remarkable!
My reference to the Feudal system is a comparison to enslavement…just like the translation of the french….mortgage…I'm sure you are familiar with it.
From what I can tell in the conversation tonight, what this boils down to is people want freedom and they’re ok that poor people can’t have freedom so long as they do. The liberal ones would like poor people to also have freedom eg to live in a house or to afford things other than rent, but if that can’t happen, oh well.
I think the situation’s dealt with even more basically than that by homeowners. At the emotional level. Homeowners can see that not owning a home makes many people fundamentaly financially & emotionally insecure. One job loss away from a benefit, with all the associated indignities that go with the govt granting you an allowance to sustain your & your family’s existence off the taxpayer.
Better to stay in your home & hope like hell prices don’t fall. It’s not callousness that makes them not worry enuf about those who can’t affird to buy houses. It’s fear.
I'm sure that is true for some people Gezza. I think it's why there is so much denial about climate from the relatively stable as well. If we look it straight in the face we realise how much we are about to lose and people would rather pretend.
Thing is, if you are content to stay in the home you own, you don't need to worry so much about a drop in price. Housing as investment is the problem here, not home ownership.
Yes. Agreed.
But of course it’s probably equally true that without some level of private landlordism there wouldn’t be enuf houses available to rent. For various reasons, not everybody always wants to buy the home they’re currently living in.
I suppose we could argue the government could build and rent out homes instead of private landlords, but given the track record of public servants for managing state housing stock here I’m not convinced that that’s ever going to the best solution either.
I only own my own home, which I consider to be grossly overvalued, but someone would buy it at more that the govt valuation around here. I watch the housing market, like you, scratching my head over how Kiwiland could have got into this situation & how on earth we are going to get out of it & make housing more affordable for Blazer’s Joe Lunchbox with a job and a stay-at-home or part-time-employed wife/partner & two kids.
I'm fine with private landlords. I just think the government should set the rules around that to protect tenants more than investors.
Do you think private landlords would invest in residential property based just on yields?
Most landlords buy existing and by their ability to leverage, cut first home buyers out of the market.
The historic, untaxed ,capital gains are the incentive.
It is a very rational incentive.
Just like the banks (for whom this is their profit pot of gold),the property ponzi has become…too big to fail.
The implications for NZ society are…dire.
Agreed.
That was an excellent article by Bernard Hickey that you posted yesterday.
Put some tenant protection laws in place, the greedier landlords will sell, the government and local bodies buy the properties and do a mix of social housing, community land trust management, and rent to own.
the CLT model is very useful because it takes out the investor aspect. If a CLT owns the land and housing, and never sells it, then the incentives change for everyone.
People who live in such housing could be given other incentives to save rather than investment.
But of course, if the economy now depends on the housing market, the government will actively resist any attempts to change how it works.
But of course, if the economy now depends on the housing market, the government will actively resist any attempts to change how it works.
Bernard Hickey says the economy does depend on the housing market:
https://www.stuff.co.nz/business/opinion-analysis/124385961/new-zealands-economy-is-a-housing-market-with-bits-tacked-on
Its a good idea,as is soft loans expressly for first home buyers.
What happens though, is a right wing Govt gets in and reverses everything-sells off state houses,unwinds initiatives they consider detrimental to free market profiteering and the cycle continues on.
Its why the right hates the Cullen Fund,Kiwibank,and Kiwisaver….these entities mop up funds they want to administer and profit from.
Hard to see how the NACT could reverse a CLT trust system, or council owned social housing though. Not sure that NACT would start selling off state houses again, given the direness of the housing crisis.
I bought based on what i could pay in repayments (rent to myself) if shit hits the fan, and our society goes down the gurgler. But then my inner german is a pessimist who believes that the sky will fall down on us. 🙂
I am very old fashioned in the sense that if i can't afford it, i can also not buy it.
I feel we've lots a lot of traditional values that would be serving us well now.
One thing that should come back is teaching basic economics and budgeting. WE have done away with financial literacy, or maybe it was the Nuns at my Convent who thought it important enough to teach us a few things that fall under 'life skills' rather then abstract math.
It would be best if Jacinda just deferred all questions on house prices (and economics in general) to Grant Robertson.
Concerns about Omicron in UK … Booster dose reduced to 3 Months after 2nd jab.
Given how significantly more infectious Omicron is … concerns that even if it is far less severe than Delta (as seems likely from available data) … hospitals still at risk of being overwhelmed.
Read an article yesterday in the German news that two jabs of Pfizer is no match for Omicron. They too are discussing shorter periods between the boosters and hopefully a specific jab in about 6 month.
Watch the video of the race about halfway through the article to see the disparity in performance.
Fury as transgender UPenn swimmer, 22, who used to compete as a man smashes TWO US women's records in weekend competition and finishes one race 38 seconds ahead of her nearest rival – Daily Mail UK
Note the crowd's reaction to the record breaking finish compared to second place.
Then, make another entry on the log – SheWon.org.
Very brave and very stunning for this person to compete against mere biological non males. So very very brave and so very very stunning. NON Male sporting events is a good place to retire for mediocre males.
The woman in these races should just boycott any race meet that allows this shit happen , no ones going to go watch a confused man swim alone in a women's race
If they are on the swim team due to scholar ships and help with payments which is quite common in the US then they will have to go out there and lose every time in the name of inclusion, kindness, and men are women. As failing to comply could result in them being sanctioned, expelled, or suddenly charged. And that involves also the swimmer of the other teams that have to compete against this bloke.
Honestly I have nothing but contempt for this. Nothing to do with trans this or that – just cheating of a very low order.
You may have already spotted this essay – but makes a conclusive argument.
Poor old Smithy … it's all coming out in the wash.
“I’m the MP and you’re just the f…ing secretary”
.
Reminds me of this for some reason (25:08):