web analytics

Electoral finance: the proposal document that didn’t

Written By: - Date published: 5:00 pm, September 29th, 2009 - 7 comments
Categories: election funding - Tags:

Rob Salmond

Yesterday Simon Power released the Government’s Proposal Document about how to reform electoral finance. On the easy issues, he got it vaguely right. That is a start, at least. So we’ll have one electoral agency instead of three (good), we’ll keep the rules about political donations first proposed in the Electoral Finance Act (not great, but better than what came before), and we’ll have a ‘clear and certain’ definition of what counts as an election ad (that sounds very nice). So, props for that.

But on all the hard issues, the government proposal hasn’t actually proposed anything! See for yourself:

On spending limits, they want party and candidate limits to go up, but have no idea by how much. The new limit for candidates could be $21,000. It could by $210,000. They won’t say. The government doesn’t have an opinion on this, despite having had months to think about it since their previous Issues Document went out and submissions came in, and over two years since this issue became big in New Zealand. What have they been doing? Maybe prepping for Letterman took all their time.

They also don’t know about spending limits for parallel campaigns (such as the Unions, the Brethren, etc). They have two options: (1) don’t regulate them; or (2) regulate them. Very helpful. If we chose to regulate them, National says it will have ‘high registration threshold and overall expenditure limits,’ but won’t say what those thresholds or limits might be. Not even broadly. Does National think parallel campaigns should be able to spend more than political parties? The same? A certain percentage of? They don’t have a view.

Should the parallel campaigns be allowed to advertise on TV and radio? The Government, in its wisdom has ‘proposed’ two options: No, and Yes. It’s preference: [shrug]

On the regulated period, they think maybe it could be a five-week period. Or maybe six months. Or maybe something in between. Apparently they don’t have an opinion one just yet.

Remember all National’s fuss about Labour using Parliamentary funds to help them win elections? ‘A disgrace!’ they called it. Well, on whether to count expenditure of Parliamentary funds as election expenses, they kick that off to a committee. No opinion. Not even any options.

On the broadcasting funding (currently the only form of State Funding specifically for election campaigning), National says it wants to keep the funding (good), but think maybe they should let parties decide what to spend it on. Or require them to spend it on TV and radio ads. Or something in between. They really don’t have a view.

What all this means is that almost any electoral finance regime under the sun is currently being ‘proposed’ by the government. Do you want an Australian-style free-for-all at election time? You can just about get that out of the government’s proposal, with no limits for parallel campaigns, high limits for parties and candidates, and a short regulated period. Do you want the Electoral Finance Act to be reinstated instead? Well, you can get most of the way there under this proposal as well, with not much increase in party spending limits, meaningful financial restrictions on parallel campaigns, and a six month regulated period. Actually, you can go even further to the left than the EFA in some areas, by taking up the ‘free-for-all’ option on how much leeway to give parties with the broadcasting allocation, such that it basically becomes broad-based State Funding.

But, and this is the big point, we have absolutely no idea which of the myriad options the Government actually likes. That is normally the essence of a ‘proposal.’

The point of this document is apparently ‘to seek public input on Government proposals for new legislation.’ If the government’s proposals could be almost anything, and they won’t give us any specifics, then it is not ‘Government proposals for new legislation.’ How am I supposed to provide input on a Government proposal that isn’t there?

Either the government is just now finding out how hard it is to actually make a constructive proposal in this area of the law and is running scared, or we’re being set up by a sham ‘proposal’ to have the actual Bill appear, with no indication or warning, at the very end. Isn’t that what got National so angry with Labour and the Greens?

7 comments on “Electoral finance: the proposal document that didn’t ”

  1. r0b 1

    Very useful overview – thanks Rob.

    Either the government is just now finding out how hard it is to actually make a constructive proposal in this area of the law and is running scared,

    Entirely possible – after all, they have a lot of rhetoric and promises to live up to.

    or we’re being set up by a sham “proposal’ to have the actual Bill appear, with no indication or warning, at the very end.

    Hmm, if this is the case it will give John Key another chance to use his telling line: “We listened to the submissions. That does not mean we have to agree with them”…

  2. Draco T Bastard 2

    or we’re being set up by a sham “proposal’ to have the actual Bill appear, with no indication or warning, at the very end.

    Odds on that it’ll be urgent.

  3. burt 3

    Rob Salmond

    Isn’t that what got National so angry with Labour and the Greens?

    Yes it is, exactly that. But the problem is Rob, partisan hacks will defend them and they have the numbers to pass it – just like what happened when Labour did it.

    Now I know I sound like a broken record but, if partisan people defend self serving undemocratic shit like this when their team do it then what else can they expect but to have the other team do the same. Once, just once – when your team is doing stuff that draws a loud response from the opposition stand in the opposition shoes and question how you would feel being in opposition in their position.

    If when you team are in govt doing this self serving shit you are protesting as load as the opposition they will eventually need to stop doing it – then we just might start to reduce the number of crap things govt do because they have the numbers and the supporters. (Even when the supporters know what they are doing is wrong but back them anyway because their team is always right !)

    I’ll be joining this team to shout about national passing self serving laws – just like I did when Labour did it.

    Where was rOb’s indignation about it when Labour were doing it – where is DPF’s indignation now National are doing it – and last but not least where was your indignation when Labour were doing it and where were the complaint posts on the standard when Labour were doing it?

    • BLiP 3.1

      Frustrating as all-get-out when the same ole people go on about the same ole things. Makes me wonder why they don’t just publish a book and get the taxpayer to pay for it really.

      • burt 3.1.1

        Hey I could spend the tax payers money then get it validated and be your hero for using parliament to serve my own best interests.

  4. r0b 4

    For my part Burt I’ve replied on the other thread.

    Flexible Farrar

  5. Rob Salmond 5

    Burt

    “Now I know I sound like a broken record but, if partisan people defend self serving ‘

    Yes, we do go round and round on your claims about “partisan hacks’ quite a lot.

    Nevertheless, you asked for evidence of DPF criticizing National, and me criticizing Labour. I’ll let David point out his critiques of National if he likes, but:

    Here is me earlier this month criticizing Labour over its new stance on MMP on this very blog: http://www.thestandard.org.nz/labour-grasps-nettle-nettles-usually-sting/

    Here is me in 2008 conceding there were real problems with the EFA, and supporting a less partisan way of getting this work done:
    http://08wire.robsalmond.com/2008/09/08/hey-national-let-the-people-speak/

    In addition, I have a chapter in a book coming out next month in which I am very critical of Labour’s advertising in the 2008 election

    And if you trawl through the 08wire archives, I do not think you will find me defending the process that lead to the EFA much.

    True partisan hacks never attack their chosen party and defend anything their chosen party does (think Matthew Hooton). I do not think DPF is one of those, I do not think I am one of those, and I do not think The Standard’s authors are that, either (you’ll find plenty of criticism of Labour here if you look). I note that r0b found the evidence you sought in his case as well.

    So, again, I think your views about people with a partisan preference are pretty overblown.

Recent Comments

Recent Posts

  • NZ announces a third P-3 deployment in support of UN sanctions
    The Government has deployed a Royal New Zealand Air Force P-3K2 Orion (P-3) maritime patrol aircraft to support the implementation of United Nations Security Council (UNSC) resolutions imposing sanctions against North Korea, announced Minister of Foreign Affairs Winston Peters and Minister of Defence Ron Mark. “New Zealand has long supported ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    4 days ago
  • Pacific trade and development agreement a reality
    Pacific regional trade and development agreement PACER Plus will enter into force in 60 days now that the required eight countries have ratified it. Trade and Export Growth Minister David Parker welcomed the announcement that the Cook Islands is the eighth nation to ratify this landmark agreement. “The agreement represents ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • Securing a pipeline of teachers
    The Government is changing its approach to teacher recruitment as COVID-19 travel restrictions continue, by boosting a range of initiatives to get more Kiwis into teaching. “When we came into Government, we were faced with a teacher supply crisis,” Education Minister Chris Hipkins said. “Over the past three years, we ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • Border exceptions for a small number of international students with visas
    The Government has established a new category that will allow 250 international PhD and postgraduate students to enter New Zealand and continue their studies, in the latest set of border exceptions. “The health, safety and wellbeing of people in New Zealand remains the Government’s top priority. Tight border restrictions remain ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 weeks ago
  • First COVID-19 vaccine purchase agreement signed
    The Government has signed an agreement to purchase 1.5 million COVID-19 vaccines – enough for 750,000 people – from Pfizer and BioNTech, subject to the vaccine successfully completing all clinical trials and passing regulatory approvals in New Zealand, say Research, Science and Innovation Minister Megan Woods and Health Minister Chris Hipkins. ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 weeks ago
  • International statement – End-to-end encryption and public safety
    We, the undersigned, support strong encryption, which plays a crucial role in protecting personal data, privacy, intellectual property, trade secrets and cyber security.  It also serves a vital purpose in repressive states to protect journalists, human rights defenders and other vulnerable people, as stated in the 2017 resolution of the ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 weeks ago
  • Ministry of Defence Biodefence Assessment released
    The Ministry of Defence has today released a Defence Assessment examining Defence’s role across the spectrum of biological hazards and threats facing New Zealand. Biodefence: Preparing for a New Era of Biological Hazards and Threats looks at how the NZDF supports other agencies’ biodefence activities, and considers the context of ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 weeks ago
  • New Approaches to Economic Challenges: Confronting Planetary Emergencies: OECD 9 October 2020
    New Approaches to Economic Challenges: Confronting Planetary Emergencies: OECD 9 October 2020 Hon David Parker’s response following Thomas Piketty and Esther Duflo. Good morning, good afternoon, and good evening, wherever in the world you might be. I first acknowledge the excellent thought provoking speeches of Thomas Piketty and Esther ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 weeks ago
  • Kaipara Moana restoration takes next step
    A Memorandum of Understanding has been signed today at Waihāua Marae between the Crown, local iwi and councils to protect, restore and enhance the mauri of Kaipara Moana in Northland. Environment Minister David Parker signed the document on behalf of the Crown along with representatives from Ngā Maunga Whakahī, Ngāti ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 weeks ago
  • New Zealand and Uruguay unite on reducing livestock production emissions
    Agriculture Minister Damien O’Connor and Uruguayan Minister of Livestock, Agriculture and Fisheries Carlos María Uriarte have welcomed the launch of a three-year project that will underpin sustainable livestock production in Uruguay, Argentina, and Costa Rica.  The project called ‘Innovation for pasture management’ is led by Uruguay’s National Institute of Agricultural ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 weeks ago
  • 3100 jobs created through marae upgrades
    Hundreds of marae throughout the country will be upgraded through investments from the Provincial Growth Fund’s refocused post COVID-19 funding to create jobs and put money into the pockets of local tradespeople and businesses, Regional Economic Development Minister Shane Jones and Māori Development Minister Nanaia Mahuta have announced. “A total ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 weeks ago
  • Health volunteers recognised in annual awards
    Health Minister Chris Hipkins has announced 9 teams and 14 individuals are the recipients of this year’s Minister of Health Volunteer Awards.  “The health volunteer awards celebrate and recognise the thousands of dedicated health sector volunteers who give many hours of their time to help other New Zealanders,” Mr Hipkins ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 weeks ago
  • Community COVID-19 Fund supports Pacific recovery
    The Minister for Pacific Peoples, Aupito William Sio says a total of 264 groups and individuals have successfully applied for the Pacific Aotearoa Community COVID-19 Recovery Fund, that will support Pacific communities drive their own COVID-19 recovery strategies, initiatives, and actions. “I am keen to see this Fund support Pacific ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 weeks ago
  • Community benefits from Māori apprenticeships
    Up to 50 Māori apprentices in Wellington will receive paid training to build houses for their local communities, thanks to a $2.75 million investment from the Māori Trades and Training Fund, announced Employment Minister Willie Jackson today. “This funding will enable Ngāti Toa Rangatira Incorporated to provide its Ngā Kaimahi ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 weeks ago
  • Training fund supports Māori jobseekers
    Rapidly growing sectors will benefit from a $990,000 Māori Trades and Training Fund investment which will see Wellington jobseekers supported into work, announced Employment Minister Willie Jackson today. “This funding will enable Sapphire Consultants Ltd. to help up to 45 Māori jobseekers into paid training initiatives over two years through ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 weeks ago
  • Ruakura Inland Port development vital infrastructure for Waikato
    The Government is investing $40 million to develop an inland port at Ruakura which will become a freight super-hub and a future business, research and residential development for the Waikato, Urban Development and Transport Minister Phil Twyford, and Māori Development Minister Nanaia Mahuta announced today. The funding has been has ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 weeks ago
  • Appointments made to Defence Expert Review Group
    Defence Minister Ron Mark announced today the establishment of an Expert Review Group to review a number of aspects of the New Zealand Defence Force’s (NZDF) structure, information management and record-keeping processes.  The Expert Review Group’s work arises out of the first recommendation from the Report of the Government’s Inquiry ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 weeks ago
  • No active community cases of COVID-19
    There are no active community cases of COVID-19 remaining in the country after the last people from the recent outbreak have recovered from the virus, Health Minister Chris Hipkins said today. “This is a big milestone. New Zealanders have once again through their collective actions squashed the virus. The systems ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 weeks ago
  • Clean energy upgrade for more public buildings
    More public buildings will be supported by the Government to upgrade to run on clean energy, the Minister for Climate Change James Shaw announced today. Minister Shaw announced that Lincoln and Auckland universities will receive support through the Clean-Powered Public Service Fund to replace fossil fuel boilers. Southern, Taranaki, and ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 weeks ago
  • Schools back donations scheme for the second year
    More schools have opted in to the donations scheme for 2021, compared to 2020 when the scheme was introduced. “The families of more than 447,000 students will be better off next year, with 94% of eligible schools and kura opting into the scheme,” Education Minister Chris Hipkins said. “This is ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 weeks ago
  • Ruapehu cycle trails gets PGF boost
    The spectacular Mountains to Sea cycle trail in Ruapehu District will receive $4.6 million in funding from the Provincial Growth Fund for two additional trails, Regional Economic Development Minister Shane Jones announced today. “This is an exciting development for the local community, and one that will provide significant economic opportunities ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 weeks ago