Greening the government: economics

Written By: - Date published: 7:39 am, January 29th, 2018 - 92 comments
Categories: climate change, Economy, greens, james shaw, sustainability - Tags: , , , , ,

Remember how the Green Party campaigned on greening the government? Thought it was going to be a few tag on bits here and there? Think again.

Last weeks State of the Planet speech was another very good speech from James Shaw. It covered important ground, including the state of NZ and the planet (not good), and what the Green Party are planning to do about it. Shaw positions the Greens as now a government party, and all that entails.

He starts the speech with the assessment of the state of the planet and of NZ. If you are not already familiar with how bad things are, please go read Part One of the speech now. It’s sobering. He then gives an overview of sustainable economics theory, and finishes with a proposal for how NZ can “lead the way in moving the theory of sustainable economics into practice – and what a unique opportunity we have, right now, to do so.”

The main thing that Shaw is signalling in the speech is the urgent need for NZ to shift to a sustainable economy in order to avert catastrophe, particular with regards to climate change. He makes no bones about neoliberalism being at an end, but traditional lefties will be disappointed if they want to hear the Greens talking about pulling down capitalism. Instead Shaw is talking about what can we build to replace the current, obviously defunct economic system?

The cognitive linguist George Lakoff says that it is absolutely essential to have a compelling alternative frame if the old one is ever to be debunked. One of the reasons why it’s taking such a long time, I think, to get to a sustainable economy is that, although few people would argue against it, no one has been able to adequately describe it, in ways that sounded more credible than the linear, take-make-waste economy of the status quo.

Shaw name-drops prominent green sustainable economics thinkers from the past decades. Economics is not my field but I can’t overstate how exciting it is to see a government party and the Minister for Climate Change talking about core sustainability concepts such cradle to grave, biomimicry, and systems based sustainability, not just as informing the Green Party, but as actual paradigms for effecting change within the NZ government.

If you’re not familiar with green philosophy and thinking, it would be worth looking up Shaw’s references to get up to speed with what is going on here. This is sustainability in real terms, not the flakey concept that’s been appropriated by neoliberalism. Green thinking is a thing, and green politics is distinct from left wing politics. NZ is going to have to upskill on this over the coming years. The left too, who are still largely treating green politics as a nice to have that should fit in and around left wing paradigms. Shaw just got up and said, actually, we have to do real green politics if we want a chance at averting disaster, and here’s the plan.

So Shaw is centering green economics here. Boldly. Like others, I’m not that keen on the whole electric cars will save the world rhetoric that underpins much of the more superficial greening of industrialised nations, but what is exciting about this speech is that Shaw is talking about building systems of sustainability into government. That’s not tinkering around the edges or greenwashing, that’s effecting fundamental change across society.

As an example of new modelling, he references Doughnut Economics,

But I think Kate Raworth of Cambridge University has probably been most successful in creating a visual model that can compete with our traditional mental models about the economy. Essentially, two concentric circles, one inside the other.

Kate Raworth’s Doughnut Economics

From a deep green perspective this is still anthropocentric. I’d prefer models that place humans within ecosystems, but it’s a good stepping stone for most western minds who are still largely thinking in conventional, “linear, take-make-waste” economic terms.

There are now some very robust models out there – and enough evidence bubbling up from different companies and countries around the world that have been trying on various ideas – to give us a pretty good idea of what a sustainable economy looks like.

The Greens in Government will be using these new models of economic thinking that balance economic and environmental and social outcomes to guide us in our decision making. We urge others to start doing the same.

Shaw goes on to talk about what this would look like in practical terms. As expected, 100% renewable energy is there, not just electricity but transport fuels and industrial heat (100% renewable energy generation is in the Confidence and Supply Agreement for this reason).

We would have zero waste to landfill: waste would be designed out of industrial processes, and what little waste remains would be captured and reused, refurbished or recycled. Eugenie is currently reviewing the Waste Minimisation Act to achieve this outcome.

In fact, zero would be regarded as the goal in a number of areas – greenhouse gas emissions into the atmosphere, air pollution, chemical pollution, nitrogen and phosphorous loading, zero homelessness, and zero people living in poverty.

We’d be designing industrial processes, products and services that regenerate resources rather than deplete them.

Rather than crossing our fingers and hoping that GDP growth would trickle down into poverty alleviation, we’d be distributive by design, consciously building models of commerce that systematically increase wealth across the widest possible base so all of our people benefit.

The speech moves onto legislative frameworks. The plan is to use this term to build the structure that will enable NZ to move to a green economy in the coming decades. Somewhat controversially, Shaw references the neoliberal revolution in NZ as an example of how to create the architecture of an economy.

We were one of the first countries in the world to put in place the architecture of the current economy. In reality, legislatively, it came down to a handful of Acts of Parliament: The State Services Act, The Reserve Bank Act, The Public Finance Act, The Employment Contracts Act, and The Resource Management Act.

Shaw believe those five Acts have more than any others determined the economy since the 80s.

The Greens in Government now want to look at what the new cornerstones for the next thirty years might be that reshape the New Zealand economy to be one of the first truly sustainable economies in the world – that delivers for our environment and our people.

He lists the following as intentions for action in the near future,

  • have wider goals than simply achieving GDP growth.
  • immediately include child poverty reduction targets into the Public Finance Act
  • establish a more comprehensive set of social and environmental indicators and develop ways to include them in our economic reporting
  • the Zero Carbon Act
  • review the Waste Minimisation Act
  • with Labour, release a new Government Policy Statement on Transport which will radically shift investment in our transport systems
  • set up the Green Investment Bank to stimulate the flow of financial capital towards projects and businesses that reduce our climate pollution, and using world leading thinkers to design this.

It’s important to remember that this is a speech from the Green Party, not the government. Shaw is upfront about the need for the Greens to be in parliament beyond this term (that’s a heads up to activists and supporters). Their plan is ambitious, and I’ll be interested to see how much they can achieve of that over time. It’s very clear that it will only work with support and movement on the part of the other parties. Extra-parliamentary support will be critical too, so there is a lot here for activists to pay attention to. The Greens are frogwhistling to the people already on board with green politics, but they’re also being transparent to the whole of society about what they want and intend to do and why it’s important. And it’s an invitation.

No doubt there will be the usual criticism that the Greens are too small and don’t have enough power to make Labour do anything, but this misses the point. The Greens want change, not power, and they are very good at influencing policy by working the long game with integrity. That Labour front footed a bunch of traditional GP policy areas in the election was a win for the Greens when one looks through a green politics lens rather than the conventional macho, ‘power and leverage is all that matters’ one.

One of the key issues now in transitioning to a sustainable economy is whether Labour will be willing to be influenced by the Greens and how much. It’s a good sign that they’re already on board with the bare bones, and I’m immensely grateful that Jacinda Ardern is PM, because she appears to have the capacity to work with others and not hoard power for the sake of it. I haven’t said anything about NZ First, mostly because I don’t know where they fit in with all this, but Shaw sounds confident in the shared policy.

There is so much good stuff in this speech. I feel like I will be holding my breath for a while, waiting to see which way this falls. After 2 decades of NZ wanting the Greens but not enabling them to lead, I feel we have a second chance now to do the right thing.

Full speech is on the Green Party’s Facebook page and transcript is on their website.

92 comments on “Greening the government: economics ”

  1. Macro 1

    Thanks weka for such an excellent post and one that does sum up the Green vision for a sustainable world fit for everyone.
    The Young Greens are meeting this Auckland long weekend as usual up the valley at Harry and Jeanette’s, and they are the future, and are as enthusiastic as ever. 🙂

  2. Wayne 2

    A very good speech illustrating that for National, Shaw is fundamentally the political enemy. Everything he proposes is almost completely antithetical to National. To achieve Green goals, would inevitably involve massive government regulation and controls to enforce all these goals upon citizens and businesses. This is an essential part of the Green world view, the government controlling everyones choices. The shower head issue of 2008 would be repeated in a 1000 different ways.

    He would finish New Zealand as a place of competitively traded agricultural products, the very foundation of our prosperity for over 150 years.

    The idea that everything can be zero is absurd. No system can be made that efficient. For instance the costs of total recycling would be an impossible burden for productive enterprise. Shaw’s pathway is a pathway to poverty. Prices for most goods would dramatically increase, with the result that much less will be produced. Unemployment and recession would be the result.

    I am certain that National will build its own comprehensive position on environment policy, which will be quite different to that of the Greens. More focus on things like clean water, with greater riparian plantings to prevent stock access and nutrification. More research on the the most efficient fertilisers. Less focus on trains and trams, more focus on improving roads for autonomous vehicles – with more safety and more efficient use of road space. Which unlike the Green nirvana, are still likely to be mostly privately owned. A recognition that fossils fuels will still have their place (air and sea transport). More native and exotic forestry on marginal agricultural land.

    • Xanthe 2.1

      Gosh wayne so many canards so little space!

      Cant stomach any green party speeches right now but huge thanks Weka for your summary. This sounds a lot more like why I was a member of the greens many years ago. If Shaw can lead the party in the direction indicated my interest will be renewed

    • One Anonymous Bloke 2.2

      Man whose entire life has been funded by taxpayers believes government shouldn’t do things.

    • red-blooded 2.3

      Wayne, National has had 9 years in government to “build its own comprehensive vision on environment policy” – what did it come up with? They gutted the ETS, cut funds to DOC, buggered about with lowered water standards, increased subsidies for big irrigation schemes, seemed determined to build more and bigger roads while ignoring other forms of transport… Sustainability has never been valued as a core foundation within National Party policy.

      I’d agree with Weka that the Greens are further ahead with this thinking than Labour, although Labour has also been grappling with these issues for a long time, independently from the Greens. Wayne harkens back to the beat-up about shower heads towards the end of the Clark government. That was an example of his party’s smear and scare tactics having an effect. It helped them to gain power, but it was at the cost of the environment. We are now grappling with water shortage and contamination issues (and no, shower heads weren’t the answer by themselves, but they could have been part of a mindset shift that would have seen us treating our water resources more carefully). Remember the scaremongering and accusations around the ETS? Bill English with his misogynistic “mad cow’ sign and denials about climate change issues?

      Wayne, your comments here ignore the thrust of thought in the speech and the post, which was about the private sector working in a different way, not the takeover of the economy by the public sector. And I think everyone accepts that “total” is a very ambitious goal and is certainly not achievable in the short term, and that part of the strategy for achieving such a goal is mitigation, but there can be other goals along the pathway to “total” – nobody’s talking about a 360 degrees turn tomorrow (or even next year).

      How about opening up your mind to some new thinking?

      • Wayne 2.3.1

        I did read the speech. That is why I made the comment the the Green pathway would be dependent on government control and regulation at a level that would be unparalleled in any western society.

        It is a fair point, that in 2008 to 2017 National missed the environment boat. Obviously not completely but to a significant extent.

        I do expect National to rectify that during its time in opposition. That National will have a much more comprehensive environment policy. But it will be different to that of the Greens. Clearly there will be points of intersection and agreement. Presumably there will be consensus on clean water, riparian planting, marginal land planting, etc. Probably also on electric vehicles.

        But on many things, there is be a fundamentally different world view. And the zero targets for just about everything is where it will be evident. Greens believe in zero targets (land fill, energy production, etc). And that would effectively destroy our economy.

        National would think that zero targets would not only be impracticable, but also wrong. To attempt to do so will result in a hugely less efficient economy, with less production, less economic activity, more unemployment, more poverty.

        In my view you can’t have an industrial economy with no waste. It makes no sense to recycle everything. Many things yes, but not all, not even remotely all. The world is not actually short of mineral resources. In many cases it is vastly cheaper and more energy efficient (this latter point being particularly important) to mine new stocks, rather than to recycle everything.

        • One Anonymous Bloke 2.3.1.1

          National will “think” these things until the precise moment someone pays them to “think” something else.

        • Carolyn_Nth 2.3.1.2

          That is why I made the comment the the Green pathway would be dependent on government control and regulation at a level that would be unparalleled in any western society.

          Interesting, because it took a lot of government controls and regulations to hand over power to international corporates: see the raw [power of the TPPA that the Key government was working towards]; or the way economic power was handed to the landlords and real estate companies, while low income people had no power to ensure they could find somewhere safe and healthy to live, or to ensure adequate health care.

          This was Daddy state government, hiding behind a small government rhetoric.

          And thanks, Wayne, for demonstrating what I said in my earlier comment – Shaw’s Green politics are seen by right wingers as opposite to their values, and they will be resisted strongly by those with most power.

          The economy you say will be destroyed, Wayne, is not working for a large number of Kiwis, and will not work for even more in the future.

        • Chris 2.3.1.3

          So it’s put environmental d-day out a bit but essentially business as ususal? You’re such a tosser.

          • Wayne 2.3.1.3.1

            How about actually debating the issue, rather than just insults. However I guess if you are Green no debate is required because obviously everyone else is wrong (and bad).

            [how about you both stop with the insults and do the political points without that. – weka]

        • Rosemary McDonald 2.3.1.4

          “In my view you can’t have an industrial economy with no waste. It makes no sense to recycle everything. Many things yes, but not all, not even remotely all. The world is not actually short of mineral resources. In many cases it is vastly cheaper and more energy efficient (this latter point being particularly important) to mine new stocks, rather than to recycle everything.”

          Actually, let’s split that up into separate statements. Put some light and air in there.

          “In my view you can’t have an industrial economy with no waste.

          Why not, Wayne.

          It makes no sense to recycle everything.

          Why not, Wayne.

          Many things yes, but not all, not even remotely all.

          The world is not actually short of mineral resources.

          Endless, infinite? Able to be sustainably extracted?

          In many cases it is vastly cheaper and more energy efficient (this latter point being particularly important) to mine new stocks, rather than to recycle everything.”

          More mining, again. You got shares in mining Wayne?

          • Wayne 2.3.1.4.1

            Rosemary
            To take your specific comments. A zero waste economy. The last say 10% would cost vastly too much to recycle. It is not possible to recycle everything because too many sophisticated products have too many different minerals, components etc embedded in them to ever be economically separated. Particularly true of electronics, but no so with steel car bodies which can be readily recycled.
            No minerals are not infinite. But the earth is very large in comparison to humankind’s requirement. For instance the West Australia iron ore mines have enough ore for hundreds of years. For my entire lifetime we have always had 40 years of reserve oil. So called “rare earths” are not rare at all. Hundreds of years of reserves in the Andes and Mongolia. It is the reason why virtually all industrial products have got cheaper over time.
            A large number of Shaw’s assertions are contestable. For instance the assertion that arable land has reduced by a third. Simply not true. Food is actually becoming cheaper as a percentage of total global GDP. It is why famines are almost unknown (except where ther is a major war such as South Sudan) even though there is now 9 billion people.
            For a popular optimists view read last weeks Listener.

            • David Mac 2.3.1.4.1.1

              Zero is a fine target. If it is the ideal, I’m in favour of making it the target. Of course there will be decades of compromises we may never get there but if it’s where we want to be, it’s where we should be aiming.

              The Swedish road death toll target has been the same for several years. Zero. They’re well on their way.

            • Draco T Bastard 2.3.1.4.1.2

              It is not possible to recycle everything because too many sophisticated products have too many different minerals, components etc embedded in them to ever be economically separated.

              I’ve heard that argument about silicon chips and yet it must be complete bollocks.

              The silicon had to be refined to near perfect purity to be used as the base for the chip. It then has minute amounts added to it to turn it into an integrated circuit essentially making it impure again.

              The silicon must be refinable back to the first state. Same must apply to the gold and other metals used in it.

              And it really shouldn’t take any more energy than the mining and shipping in the first place. It’s going to be a more complex operation but we’ve either got or could develop the tools to have that complex operation work efficiently. May need some regulations to help maintain standards and probably government research on those tools.

              For instance the West Australia iron ore mines have enough ore for hundreds of years.

              And with the exponential growth in the use of those resources how long will it really last?

              Your statement is proof of your inability to understand maths.

              For instance the assertion that arable land has reduced by a third. Simply not true.

              Reality disagrees with your assertion.

              Food is actually becoming cheaper as a percentage of total global GDP.

              That has to do with productivity increases which uses less people to produce the same amount of food. But that increased productivity will meet the decreasing productivity of the soils as present farming practices destroy the land.

              You are, as per normal for RWNJs, talking out your arse.

              • Wayne

                Spare the insults, debate the issue.

                • One Anonymous Bloke

                  🙄

                  Put your delicate, easily-offended hand over the last sentence in DtB’s comment, read the rest of it and hey! presto! your wish came true!

                • I did. I even provided links and logic.

                  You only provided unfounded assertions that were easily proved wrong, i.e, you’re talking out your arse.

                  • Wayne

                    I had already done the reading on the reduction in arable land.

                    The US, China, India and Russia have around 40% of the worlds arable land. They have not had anything like a reduction of 30% in arable land, being land used for crops. Some land is not cultivated because it is no longer economic. Global supply chains that favour the most efficient farms particularly for grains, have meant that difficult small holdings are being retired. This is especially true in China with an ageing agricultural workforce.

                    But it is not the crisis that Shaw says, because total food supply is going up.

                    There isn’t an exponential growth in the use of steel, or coal, or a whole bunch of other minerals. In fact they are mostly quite stable with new production being similar year on year, or even declining in the case of coal and steel.

                    Rare earths have had huge growth because of the demand to electrify vehicles, but there are plenty of them to be mined for future demand. And as everyone applauds here, the car batteries can be recycled because they are sufficiently large that it is economic to do so.

                    • Pat

                      Your research abilities are sadly lacking….and youre a lawyer….god help your clients.

                      https://www.worldsteel.org/en/dam/jcr:0474d208-9108-4927-ace8-4ac5445c5df8/World+Steel+in+Figures+2017.pdf

                    • Wayne

                      Pat

                      Steel production has been static for six years (from the reference you attached). Aluminium is only growing slowly. Coal is declining.

                      Basically quite fast growth till the GFC, then pretty static since then, even though the global economy has recovered from the GFC, which was 10 years ago. The GFC forced efficiency which has proved a permanent gain.

                    • Pat

                      “… or even declining in the case of coal and steel.”

                      A 9% increase in the 6 year period you point (and a doubling since the turn odf the century)to is NOT a decline no matter how you spin it….shabby Wayne.

                      You have a proclivity to espouse an argument based on erroneous authoritative statements, whether deliberate or due to incompetence is irrelevant…the end result is the same…Bullshit.

                    • I had already done the reading on the reduction in arable land.

                      Really? So why did you go off on some unrelated bollocks?

                      The world has lost a third of its arable land due to erosion or pollution in the past 40 years, with potentially disastrous consequences as global demand for food soars, scientists have warned.

                      New research has calculated that nearly 33% of the world’s adequate or high-quality food-producing land has been lost at a rate that far outstrips the pace of natural processes to replace diminished soil.

                      The continual ploughing of fields, combined with heavy use of fertilizers, has degraded soils across the world, the research found, with erosion occurring at a pace of up to 100 times greater than the rate of soil formation. It takes around 500 years for just 2.5cm of topsoil to be created amid unimpeded ecological changes.

                      …because total food supply is going up.

                      [citation needed]

                    • Wayne

                      Draco,

                      In the US there has been a loss of arable land – to forestry and in many cases this is natural “second growth”. Most states in the midwest and especially on the north east have lost farmland. But it is not due to land degradation, or urbanisation.

                      In large measure due the mechanisation and agriculture subsidies taking land out of production.

                      The same pattern is repeated right through Europe. Way more forest now than 50 years ago. Virtually every pre WW 2 era photo in Italy and France shows much more agriculture than today. This was especially evident in Tuscany where I was for a few weeks last year. I did a huge amount of forest walking. It was mostly through 50 year old forests, with lots of abandoned farming cottages. In part this is due to EU farming policy. It is also due to much more highly mechanised agriculture. Small marginal fields are not suitable for machinery so they were taken out of production.

                      For somewhat different reasons this is happening in NZ. Shane Jones will accelerate it. No bad thing that marginal hill country goes back to forest. It will limit erosion and help clean rivers and streams.

                      The same will happen in China and SE Asia. All those picturesque hillside paddies will soon be a thing of the past.

                    • weka

                      “You have a proclivity to espouse an argument based on erroneous authoritative statements, whether deliberate or due to incompetence is irrelevant…the end result is the same…Bullshit.”

                      That’s a good summary. Thanks to everyone that called him on it today.

        • Chuck 2.3.1.5

          The Greens vision to have zero targets is not so far fetched in some areas. Landfill and energy production the more doable with current or developing technology.

          If the current Government is serious about reducing waste to landfill the first thing they can do is increase the current landfill levy to a minimum of $100 tonne.

          This will allow new systems to be implemented that will seriously dent the volume of waste being land filled.

        • David Mac 2.3.1.6

          Yes, I can see strong reasons for the Nats to ramp up their Enviro talk. Collectively, on hopping into bed with the Nats, the Greens said ‘Rather die a virgin thanks.’ There are some Green voters with a Nat bone in their body, more green than red. I can see sense in National wooing them.

          Not sure how they’re going to slag our govt’s handling of a situation with their signature all over it. Maybe we will of all forgotten how the rivers got like they are after a few terms.

          • Wayne 2.3.1.6.1

            The centre green voters may be swayed by a good National environmental policy, but the Green Party certainly won’t be. As they and their activists have very clearly indicated, the Greens are locked into Labour for the foreseeable future. The activists, in particular those supporting Metiria and now Marama, are very left, at least as I interpret their philosophical positions on virtually any issue you care to name.

            When I made the posts just after the election that the Greens also held the balance of power, it was more of a theoretical observation, not an expectation they would actually negotiate either way. In practise in the current parliament only NZF can perform that role, and they may not be in Parliament after 2020. And at least for 2020, NZF would not change from being Labours coalition partner, unless National got 46% to 47% and Labour was at least 10% behind.

            In my view the next election is likely to be virtually a FPP election between National (and a small amount of Act) and Labour/Green. NZF is likely to dip under 5%. The Maori Party won’t be back. TOP won’t get 5%. Act is good for no more than 2 seats.

      • How about opening up your mind to some new thinking?

        Conservatives almost instinctively reject any new thinking which is why they’re still stuck in the 15th century as to how they think things should work despite all the evidence showing that things don’t actually work that way.

    • patricia bremner 2.4

      Yes Wayne, more plasters and posturing while keeping the 1% happy. Typical.

    • Bill 2.5

      I think you’re right enough in surmising that we have a choice between light regulation and heavy regulation, up to and including the point of a command economy.

      Neither of those choices, nor any inbetween compromise, appeal. But happily there’s an other way, that sure, isn’t currently (How to say?) “in vogue”, that offers escape, relief or whatever.

      Abolish the market and democratically develop systems and rules for production and trade/distribution that are not predicated on individualism – that favour and reward co-operation.

      ie – Socialism 🙂

    • weka 2.6

      “A very good speech illustrating that for National, Shaw is fundamentally the political enemy.”

      Now you’re getting it Wayne. And please tell your mates, so we can stop with the whole the Greens will go with National bollocks (although you will have to give up that Dirty Politics tool).

      • Chuck 2.6.1

        LOL weka! as you know I am not a Green supporter, but understand there is more chance of turning water into wine than the Greens even entertaining the thought of going with Satan…sorry I mean National 🙂

        It does limit the influence the Greens have with Labour…

        The environmental / sustainability side of the Greens I can relate to (mostly).

        • weka 2.6.1.1

          “It does limit the influence the Greens have with Labour…”

          Not really. There are other ways to work than just the leverage one.

    • A very good speech illustrating that for National, Shaw is fundamentally the political enemy.

      Which proves, beyond doubt, that National is economically illiterate and the enemy of life itself.

      For instance the costs of total recycling would be an impossible burden for productive enterprise.

      Nature manages it.

      Prices for most goods would dramatically increase, with the result that much less will be produced.

      You mean that the market would actually work like it’s supposed to? That price signals would ensure that things on the market would be there because people need/want them and not because they’ve been made artificially cheap by government action?

      I am certain that National will build its own comprehensive position on environment policy, which will be quite different to that of the Greens.

      Your first statement was actually correct. National cannot do green because it’s antithetical to sustainability.

      Less focus on trains and trams, more focus on improving roads for autonomous vehicles – with more safety and more efficient use of road space.

      As I said – economically illiterate.

    • Keepcalmcarryon 2.8

      Complete failure by Wayne to address the fact that intensive agriculture as done by the National party is provably non sustainable.
      Undoubtedly there has been prosperity for 150 years especially for those who intensified with public irrigation money in to major polluters and sold to overseas buyers, or those who underwent tenure review and played the public for mugs pocketing millions.
      Said prosperity did not trickle down to the share Mikers out of work or farm workers on slave wages bought in from overseas. Prosperity for the landed gentry at public expense.
      And the public of course is left with low water tables, nitrate pollution and algal blooms to clean up and suffer loss of freedoms like swimming or fishing in our own rivers.
      You would accuse his mob of being thick except it’s far worse than that, it’s deliberate theft for their mates.

      • Stuart Munro 2.8.1

        They are as thick as thieves. Don’t forget 1080 – that’s not going down for conservation reasons, but in lieu of localized control of TB vectors to livestock.

    • barry 2.9

      At some stage we have to get to zero, or face extinction. We can’t keep using up the planet.

      Yes we might change technologies and stop using up the current resources, but eventually we run out of other options for resources to use up. We may be able to fudge it for our lifetimes and maybe our children will not notice, but nothing increases exponentially forever.

      Sustainability means zero. Not using more than you put back. yes, we can rob Peter to pay Paul a bit, but overall we have to be sustainable to survive. BAU is a certain road to destruction.

      http://www.dw.com/en/the-earth-is-exhausted-were-using-up-its-resources-faster-than-it-can-provide/a-39924823

      Earth-overshoot day is getting earlier every year. Every year since about 1980 we are getting deeper in debt and the increase in debt is growing. If it was numbers in a bank account then you could say that the economy is growing and so it is not as bad as it looks. But we only have one earth and it is not growing.

      So Wayne, when you say that business can not afford zero waste, then you are saying that the planet and future generations should subsidise them. If we are living off unsustainable agriculture then we are robbing the future for our current prosperity.

      Your arguments are arguments for the sort of economy that Shaw is talking about. we have ignored the externalities for too long. It is time to address the market failures.

      Regulation is necessary, regulation is always necessary. Without regulation the current economy wouldn’t function, we would have slavery and we would get sick from drinking the water.

      So i is not do we need some sort of zero waste, zero growth economy, but how do we get there?

      • weka 2.9.1

        +1000

        Wayne is a future eater.

        • Chuck 2.9.1.1

          The elephant in the room is this…Population growth.

          Approx. 83 million annual increase in the Earths population with estimates of just under 12 billion people by 2100 (from 7.6 billion in 2017). With Africa and Asia leading the charge.

          The demand on resources can only go in one direction – UP. Sure in some areas technology can assist. But not all.

          I am interested to know the GP policy (if any) on population control.

          • One Anonymous Bloke 2.9.1.1.1

            I am interested in whether you know that Earth has already passed ‘peak child’, and if you understand what that means for future population trends.

            Edit: also, when you say “population control”, is that something you think should be done to you and your family?

            • Chuck 2.9.1.1.1.1

              Yes, I have read various reports on peak child. And taking that into account the population being suggested is still 11 billion people by 2100.

              You have hit the nail on the head QAB…personaly (and everyone I know) would be horrified at anything near population control.

              So that is why I asked the question above…how do population growth and the resulting demand on the resources of the earth fit within GP policy? (which I guess is a nicer way of saying control).

              • One Anonymous Bloke

                Are you also aware of the work of Julian Simon, and its level of accuracy by comparison to say, Malthusian “analysis”?

                • Chuck

                  No, I need to have a read of his work. From the blurb I have just seen on Julian Simon he seems to suggest that humans are very good at finding ways to replace resources that become scarce.

                  • weka

                    Look where that landed us.

                    • One Anonymous Bloke

                      Using fibre-optics instead of copper wire? Using lightbulbs instead of candles? Using silicon chips instead of valves? Using aluminium instead of tin?

                      Reducing herd numbers and environmental impact whilst maintaining production levels?

                    • weka

                      Using coal and oil instead of living within out limits.

                      That humans are very good at finding ways to replace resources that become scarce is a boon, and a problem.

                    • One Anonymous Bloke

                      However, as you’ve already pointed out, the bulk of that use occurs in the less populated countries, and therefore isn’t really connected to “over”population concerns.

                    • weka

                      As I’ve also said, I think overdeveloped countries also have population issues.

                    • One Anonymous Bloke

                      I think those problems are the result of greed, inappropriate use of technology, and the political influence of a tiny minority.

                      For example, the rivers aren’t being poisoned to feed the burgeoning mass of Kiwis.

                    • weka

                      I agree, although I think it goes back a long way. Humans have been gone into overshoot many times over a long history.

                      I think there is an inherent problem here for the species around that creative drive, and the evolutionary drive to improve and prioritise resource use for survival. It needs particular politics and social organisation to not be a disaster.

                    • Chuck

                      “Using coal and oil instead of living within out limits.”

                      It may be blasphemy within GP circles, but oil and gas was a leap forward for the planet at the time when they started to replace wood and coal in the 19th century as the only means of energy production.

                      Oil has allowed us to build dams, solar panels, wind farms, geothermal plants etc. And basically is behind pretty much every advancement in technology and living standards the world has seen.

                      Of course, we need to phase out oil…as better cleaner options come on stream, no argument there.

                      I don’t think its a case of “living within our limits” as cutting down forests and burning coal as the only means of energy production was never sustainable and would have produced a worse outcome than oil (with population growth and the demand for energy).

                      Living within our limits, in this case, would have entailed seriously limiting the advancement in technology, and strict restrictions on just how many people could be sustained by wood and coal energy alone.

          • weka 2.9.1.1.2

            And yet it’s the less populated countries that have driven climate change. We don’t have to worry about population in Africa and Asia, just do the things we know works (empower women, reduce poverty). What we do need to be thinking about is population in *NZ. What’s the carrying capacity of the ecological systems here if we stop expecting poor countries to support us with goods and services?

            GP population policy is on their website.

  3. Carolyn_Nth 3

    weka, it is very good to see that the GP is moving proactively towards a green future.

    The point where Gr een commentators lose me is with this, which you say in your post:

    Green thinking is a thing, and green politics is distinct from left wing politics.

    I have looked at this kind of statement for a while, and have come to the conclusion that it involves muddled thinking: possibly a middle class fear of the demonisation of the left and socialism that has been prevalent in recent decades.

    Basically, if it looks, walks and talks like the left, it is left: at least a social democratic version rather than socialism.

    When it includes egalitarian pre-distribution of resources, social justice, resource sustainability, collaborative systems, etc, it is left wing.

    It seems to me a claim coming from a middle class fear of being seen to challenge the powers that be in any strong way: of not wanting to be seen strongly rock te boat. And, if that is the approach, then it is doomed.

    Power is not given up easily, and there is no way these on the right will stop resisting, especially if it’s stating in ways made to seem threatening and nicely said.

    • weka 3.1

      I’ve been trying to think of how to explain this. I think you could look at Bill’s comment below as an example. He just ran Haworth’s model through a fairly classic LW analysis of economics and draws some conclusions that make sense (I guess) in the context of that but don’t actually get to grips with green politics. Hence the comparing with ‘caring capitalism’ and the inference that capitalism is the central issue to grapple with. So the green things are a tag on, rather than being examined for their fundamental nature to effect change, including btw the ability to change society from capitalism.

      I don’t see what Shaw is doing as being about being afraid of being left. But the Greens are positioning themselves so that they’re not stuck in the ghetto of being perpetually Labour’s little sister. I’m certainly not afraid of being left wing 😉 and I see obvious differences, albeit with overlaps, between left and green politics.

      Obviously the GP policies are left wing, so this makes it hard for people to get (it’s a paradox). What I’m saying is that there are things about green politics that need to be understood on their own terms and that it’s not enough to do that within a traditional left politics lens. I get it because my politics are deep green and based in ecology so things like biomimicry make sense to me intuitively. Those things being presented don’t match what I’ve seen from the left. Parts of the left have adopted green thinking to more or lesser extent, but that’s a different thing than having those concepts as foundational. If cradle to grave was integral to LW thinking, we wouldn’t be having the kinds of environmental crises that we are.

      I also find the framing of green politics as muddle middle class thinking pretty patronising. My inability to express myself well enough shouldn’t be mistaken for green politics being flakey.

      • Carolyn_Nth 3.1.1

        I’m sorry, weka. nothing you say there has convinced me.

        I don’t see most of Green Politics as being flakey. I’m on board with it till people start saying it doesn’t fit into a left-right paradigm – and then I look more closely, and see a gaping hole in Green politics.

        Basically, Green politics challenges the elitist, hierarchical values of right wing capitalism, which puts it firmly on the left, IMO.

        The thing that is ignored in the beyond left & right paradigm, is the nature of power. There is nothing in the politics to provide a policy for combating the kind of right wing elitist politics, as expressed by Wayne.

        Trying to be inclusive will not work if there are those who want to retain privilege through inequalities. And to me, that amounts to a nativity – ie being nice, using reasoned arguments, etc, will not work against such entrenched right wing power.

        They will continue to appropriate and subvert.

        Everything I read online about Green politics, locates it on the left:

        Wikipedia: Green politics:

        Green politics (also known as ecopolitics)[1] is a political ideology that aims to create an ecologically sustainable society rooted in environmentalism, nonviolence, social justice and grassroots democracy.

        Supporters of green politics share many ideas with the ecology, conservation, environmentalism, feminism and peace movements. In addition to democracy and ecological issues, green politics is concerned with civil liberties, social justice, nonviolence, sometimes variants of localism[8] and tends to support social progressivism. The party’s platform is largely considered left in the political spectrum.

        to me, social justice and grass roots democracy put it firmly on the left.

        Green politics wikia on Green politics:

        Green platforms draw terminology from the science of ecology, and policy from environmentalism, deep ecology, feminism, pacifism, anarchism, libertarian socialism, social democracy, eco-socialism, and social ecology. In the 1970s, as these movements grew in influence, green politics arose as a new philosophy which synthesized their goals.

        I see nothing in Green politics about how it will counter, and work beyond the kind of right wing resistance, as for instance, expressed by Wayne. Without that, it will be assimilated and subverted.

        I have seen too much of how the right wing, wealthy elitists resisted the spread of socialist and social democratic values in and after the 60s and 70s, to be convinced there is any way forward without a plan of how to counter their powerful resistance.

        I don’t see it in Green politics – and that’s it’s big failing, IMO.

        • weka 3.1.1.1

          “I’m on board with it till people start saying it doesn’t fit into a left-right paradigm”

          I didn’t say that. I said that green politics is distinct from LW politics. e.g. it’s not a subset of LW politics, which is how it often gets treated. And that we need to understand what green politics is saying that LW politics isn’t.

          Lots of green politics people don’t bother with this conversation any more and just get on with things. Because as soon as I say something like green politics is distinct from LW politics, some LW people immediately position that within LW paradigms of L//R and then eventually we have to have another round of will the Greens really go with National etc. Or the argument you’ve just made about power as if that’s the only thing going on, and the conversation is always within LW constructs not green ones. And then we hit the inevitable problem of ‘look the conversation just became polarised left vs green’. Which misses the point.

          I wasn’t actually referring to that L/R spectrum stuff in the post (and there’s a limit to how long I want to debate this as if I was, because I’m really not saying that the GP can be right too, of course they’re left wing). I was pointing to the fact that there are things that need to be understood about our situation, they’re not currently being understood within traditional LW political analysis, and they are being addressed by green politics. For me that’s a good thing, because as a LW person I can do both and benefit from the differences (more than the sum of the parts). Political biodiversity.

          “The thing that is ignored in the beyond left & right paradigm, is the nature of power.”

          No, it’s really not. Have a look at the GP Charter again. It directly addresses the nature of power-over. But it also addresses other kinds of power.

          If I went and read wikipedia about traditional LW politics, say Marxism or anti-capitalism, I would get a good enough general understanding of the lay of the land. But I wouldn’t have the ability to understand what it was really about unless I either went and read primary course material, or read good secondary analyses.

          The fact that you and I are now having a conversation in the context of LW values and ideas instead of green ones, tells me there is a missing language here. If this were immersed in green politics we’d already be naturally including the concepts I referred to in the post. Biomimicry, cradle to grave, systems thinking.

          So I feel like I’m a feminist talking to a man who gets a bit of women’s politics but is missing the foundations. I have the same experience with Bill. Maybe this is a bit harsh, but it comes across as mansplaining.

          “I see nothing in Green politics about how it will counter, and work beyond the kind of right wing resistance, as for instance, expressed by Wayne. Without that, it will be assimilated and subverted.”

          Funny, as I see that is *exactly what the Greens did last year (countered the RW resistance). It was rough for sure, but they weren’t assimilate or subverted, I reckon they are stronger now than before.

          btw, I have no interest in being inclusive to Wayne and his allies unless they change. They are dangerous and should be treated as such. But if they do change, then that’s a different matter. That’s the door that the GP leave open too.

          • Carolyn_Nth 3.1.1.1.1

            You’re attributing potential slippages to me that I would never get into: eg saying the Greens might go with National.

            You did say: Green thinking is a thing, and green politics is distinct from left wing politics. [albeit followed by The left too, who are still largely treating green politics as a nice to have that should fit in and around left wing paradigms. – which I do agree with] green and left politics need to be strongly integrated, in my view.

            That first sentence was what I was responding to. That, sentence, to me, could result in opening the way to discussion about the Greens working with the Nats – rather than clearly owning Green politics being on the left – which clearly discounts working with the Nats.

            I’ve read much more than wikipedia on green politics. And I’ve frequently read the claim from green politicos/supporters, that the Green Party is beyond left and right.

            Comparing me to mainsplaining is condescending. I have thought a lot about this, and largely am on board with the Green Party. But, I have come to the conclusion that the GP does not have an adequate plan or analysis around power.

            I don’t see power mentioned anywhere in the Charter. maybe obliquely through appropriate decision making.

            It is alluded to in the values when it says to challenge oppression.

            Marxist/socialist policies and theories directly examine and have a policy for combating power differences. That is the basis of trade unionism, and solidarity of the working classes. It is about directly countering the power of the ruling classes.

            Where the labour movement and Marxism fall short, IMO, is that that they give priority to arrangement within the industrial/paid work system. I like that green politics incorporate the whole of society, and community-based organisations – this enables better discussions about issues of gender, ‘race’ and unpaid labour.

            So consequently I see them as somewhat complementary – not one being a subset of the other.

            And I think these issues do need to be dealt with head on, not avoided.

            You end your last comment with:

            Funny, as I see that is *exactly what the Greens did last year (countered the RW resistance). It was rough for sure, but they weren’t assimilate or subverted, I reckon they are stronger now than before.

            I disagree. I think the GP has been knee-capped. It was not fully up to responding to the viscous attacks on Metiria Turei. Ardern’s Labour has somewhat sidelined the GP, partly by appropriating a weakened version of green policies, focused more around the environment, and disconnecting that from the other planks of Green Politics.

            And now the task is for the GP to rebuild.

            I do like Shaw’s plans for targeting specific legislation that he sees as foundational to the current paradigm.

            To counter the power of the right wing elitists, it requires asserting power from above through government, in concert with power from below at a grass roots level.

            Some Green MPs are more immersed in such politics than others, IMO.

      • Bill 3.1.2

        Seeing as how you brought me into this…

        if you are saying mention of the profit motive and how it operates is “a fairly classic LW analysis of economics”, and by implication that Green understandings are different from that, then what Green understanding would it be that spoke to the fundamental drivers of capitalism?

        And what is the “foundation” of Green politics you assume others are missing?

        It can’t be solidarity (that’s left wing). It can’t be anti-capitalism (that’s left wing). It can’t be democracy (that’s left wing). It can’t, by your argument, be anything from a left wing tradition. So what is it? What label or name would you use; what descriptive analysis would you apply; what novel, meaningful and non-LW things does it have to say about the systemic nature of our situation today? And what new avenue of escape does it open up?

        I wouldn’t ever call myself “deep green”, but I’ve never met a political fellow traveler who didn’t have a serious concern for the environment and decry the various impacts of state and liberal capitalist driven industrialisation on environments (human and otherwise).

        And none of the things you’ve mentioned in these comments (from bio-mimicry to cradle/grave resource use) are exclusive green concepts. They’ve been around for years and centuries.

  4. Bill 4

    The speech was excellent, The ideas contained in Kate Raworth’s “Doughnut Economics” very worthy. And, but…

    There’s the question of incentive. The current economic incentive is profit. It takes precedence over everything else, including the nicest or sanest of ideas – not to mention life itself.

    So I wanted to find out what Kate Raworth had to say in terms of how the profit motive might be challenged and what she reckoned could be developed by way of alternative incentives.

    I went to kateraworth.com and word searched “profit”. I got one hit. And in the article that came up, the sum total of what was being said about profit was –

    Any company that presented only its profit and loss account would get laughed off the stock exchange.

    And here’s the thing. If a basic or core element of capitalism isn’t being addressed – one that informs it and moves it – then what have we got aside from an utterly naive proposal that we all “get into” some kind of ‘nice’ capitalism because we might want to be nice?

    Many companies and individuals advocated a version of “caring capitalism” back in the day. Some set up fairly benevolent and philanthropic ventures. None survive today. All got washed away, dragged down or wrecked by the various movements of profit and its undercurrents.

    • patricia bremner 4.1

      Survival of humanity and living species could become the driver. Many caring businesses were undermined by cheap competitions imported labour and other bad practices.

      • Bill 4.1.1

        Those things you mention result in higher profits. And higher profits translate into economic power and eventually political power too.

        “Could” is wishful thinking in a world snared and driven by short term profit.

        Case in point – BP. Remember how they did the whole “Beyond Petroleum” gig and made out they were going to be conscientious and what not?

        What do you think happened to all their enthusiasm for solar and wind and whatever? Well, they dumped their entire stock because dropping prices for solar made the whole caboodle a “bad deal” for shareholders.

        You think the CEO of BP doesn’t know that oil will be the end of us? Of course they know that. But they are paid to make decisions on specific grounds and return good dividends to shareholders. If they don’t do that, they get replaced.

        • patricia bremner 4.1.1.1

          Bill we used to do all plumbing with lead pipes, when it was discovered how dangerous that was, change happened. Lead was in our blood, in the atmosphere and going into the sea.

          Oil will go the same way, . because its derivative plastic is doing the same.

          People do change, many work in a green economy now.

          • Bill 4.1.1.1.1

            And the resistance to moving away from …lead piping, lead in petrol, cigarette manufacturing, CFCs, dangerous production techniques, the internal combustion engine – what drives the resistance?

            Is what drives the resistance in any way different to what drove the adoption and spread of those things in the first place?

            Maybe think of situations where profit no longer relied on the use of a given material because a cheaper one had been sourced, what happened to the resistance over continued use of the original material?

            I’d be willing to punt that the introduction of cheap, easily sourced and far more profitable plastic piping was behind any “dumping” of lead pipes – not any philanthropy on the part of capitalist enterprises. They, afterall, fought government regulation grounded in concern for the health/safety of citizens. They (and their singular focus on profit) are the reason why we have to have government regulation and legislation.

            (very late) edit – What is this “green economy” btw? We live in and by a “fossil economy”. If I’m a printer and use sustainably produced rubber based (and therefore bio-degradable) ink instead of pertro-chemical ink, I’m still in the fossil economy – not some green economy.

      • David Mac 4.1.2

        I don’t think the majority of NZers see ‘Profit’ as a dirty word.

        Mega profits funneling into the mouths of a few, profit at the expense of the quality of life of others. Astronomical executive salaries and those on the floor with holes in their boots. I think focus on this type of ‘Profit’ sub-heading could enjoy popular support.

        I don’t think I’d be anywhere near as mildly motivated as I am now if I was working for ‘Caring Communities’ rather than David Mac Inc. I’d get much more fishing in!

        • Bill 4.1.2.1

          ‘Profit’ as a phenomenon is neither dirty nor clean.

          But it has very predictable and, you might say “documented”, effects within a monetized setting in terms of production and distribution – and those effects are not good (widespread poverty, CO2, other pollutions everywhere…the encouragement and even celebration of some of our “less than desirable” traits)

          And like you say, it’s a very effective motivator.

          So we need to create an environment where profit loses its power and where other powerful motivations can come into play. I say “need”, but of course, we can just carry on with the same basic economics we have for the next few decades, and then watch it all unravel, fall over and implode in the face of physics.

          • Nic the NZer 4.1.2.1.1

            There are several problems with this view. First we should understand the question in Marx day was where do profits come from. Marx critique of capitalism was not that there should not be profits, it was to claim that they belonged to workers. I know of no critique of capitalism which points to accumulation of surplus being a property of capitalism (including surplus financial income).

            We should be worried by things like unreasonable profits, profits earned with significant harm to the environment or states putting profits ahead of the public good but there is simply no other compirable motivation available than paying for the output of others and this entails them being able to earn more than they immediately require.

            • Bill 4.1.2.1.1.1

              Nic, if you want an esoteric discussion/debate on Marx and his arguments around profit, you’re going to have to engage a Marxist.

              My comments have been about the profit motive. Y’know, the motivation for the doors on DC-10s being left unfixed because it would be cheaper to pay out for a planeload of dead passengers. (Turkish Airlines Flight 981)

              The profit motive that says it’s better to save capitalism for a few years than save globally integrated human civilisation for the medium and long term.

              The profit motive that decrees starving people have to starve while food from their region is exported.

              The profit motive that says, in short, that the price is always worth it.

              If you believe there is no other possible motivation besides profit, then you’ll have no interest in thinking of any other environment for production and distribution that might penalise individual competition and reward co-operation.

              In other words, we’re seeking entirely different conversations from each other.

              • Nic the NZer

                Sorry, but unless you can demonstrate that profits are an inherent property of capitalism (which they clearly are not) then it’s hardly worth considering this further and moving on to the question of how to move onto an alternative mode without profits.

                I am well aware there are a large variety of motivations which are not that of making a profit.

  5. eco maori 5

    Its excellent to have The Green party as part of the Coalition Government I agree that NZ can show the World how to live environmentally sustainable with all the natural resources we have . Jamie Shaw is a intelligent man .Ka kite ano

  6. patricia bremner 6

    Thank you Weka for this post. I read James Shaw’s speech with a growing sense of conviction that NZ is lucky to have this thoughtful being as part of the current government. He is knowledgeable and practical. I see the doughnut theory of economics as an interesting and tangible set of ingredients we could use to effect change.

    James is correct that the contracts act was one of the most misunderstood dangerous things implemented by the neo-liberal thinkers. In that part of his speech I felt he was pointing out that legislation with clever sustainable bones could turn the ship, as 5 pieces of key legislation set up the current neo-liberal model.

    He was indicating a need to reset from protest to policy implementation; a call for mature strategic group thinking to create the legislative bones needed. This is new territory for the Greens. A second time in government needs to lay foundations.
    He is pointing out that the ideal of pure democracy needs work, and their task is to take Labour and NZ First along with them, as well as convince NZ at large.
    No mean task. Why? Survival is why.

    • weka 6.1

      thanks, that’s lovely analysis. I’m hoping to do a second post about the societal change stuff he was talking about. That was just as exciting as the sustainability stuff.

      “In that part of his speech I felt he was pointing out that legislation with clever sustainable bones could turn the ship, as 5 pieces of key legislation set up the current neo-liberal model.”

      This. Smart, and that’s the move forward to something better that can appeal across the board, rather than the reactionary anti-neoliberal thing that too often ghettoises the left. Wayne is right above when he calls James Shaw National’s enemy, lol.

  7. Carolyn_Nth 7

    I like that James Shaw has focused on a small number of key acts:

    handful of Acts of Parliament: The State Services Act, The Reserve Bank Act, The Public Finance Act, The Employment Contracts Act, and The Resource Management Act.

    I would also like to see the Social Security Act included as a key one that needs changing.

    • patricia bremner 7.1

      Yes, you are right, but with better distribution another model might be possible ? UBI?

  8. Xanthe 8

    ActuallY i do not like the “donut economics” in that is sets Social aims in opposition to environmental sustainiable. This is both nonfactual and a very destructive attitude that is somewhat responsible for the derailment of the green movement contributing to further environmental degredation. What is needed now is a model that correctly places social advances as a consequence of environmental strength

  9. patricia bremner 9

    The doughnut economic cycle is based on the earth systems, so we would have better environmental outcomes surely?

    • Xanthe 9.1

      If you look at the diagram in weka’s post you will see that it places “ecological ceiling” in opposition to “social foundation” This thinking IS what prevents the green movement from gaining traction. Its “just wrong” ….. !

      • Carolyn_Nth 9.1.1

        Why is it wrong? The human living space is between what is possible within a context where there is an ecological ceiling, and is based on a social foundation. what exactly is the problem with that?

        And why do you see “environmental strength” (whatever that means) as an alternative to “ecological sustainability” – which is not exactly the same as “environmental sustainability”

      • weka 9.1.2

        I think you have misunderstood the model Xanthe. The way I see it, it’s saying these things are fundamental to having good human lives (the inner circle), and these things are the danger zones for humans doing too much (the outer circle). Between those two guidelines is a ‘sweet spot’ where human societies can live well and not trash the place. The social and environmental aren’t in opposition, they’re complementary. Live within these limits, create these foundations, and humans and the planet can be ok.

        Have a look at this (4 mins),

        https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PCAx3TG8LkI

  10. One Two 10

    Shaw can say anything he likes from his current position…

    • Carolyn_Nth 10.1

      You’re joking, surely….. no one could so misunderstand the GP this badly….surely?

  11. Pat 11

    “We were one of the first countries in the world to put in place the architecture of the current economy. In reality, legislatively, it came down to a handful of Acts of Parliament: The State Services Act, The Reserve Bank Act, The Public Finance Act, The Employment Contracts Act, and The Resource Management Act.”

    Hes right, however those changes were implemented with the vigorous support of Treasury, the Reserve bank, Cabinet, the business sector and largely the media….it was what they wanted and had lobbied for…whereas what JS is proposing is the antithesis and may even lack wide public support….think light bulbs and shower heads

    • patricia bremner 11.1

      “Think lightbulbs and showerheads”
      Many people in NZ and elsewhere have moved to water saving devices, and manufacturers have met that requirement and even provide a star system.

      Most are also moving to halogen lighting, example our now lit harbour bridge, an example of a lightbulb moment!! Cheap electricity and bulbs. Even counting establishment and maintenance this system is far superior to the conventional.

      So humanity does see the need to change, it is big money that has a problem with anything that affects profits, because they want increasing profit at the expense of people and the planet, “and devil take the hind most”. Sustainable profit would be fine.

    • weka 11.2

      I think the whole light bulbs thing was a sociopolitical reaction to the end of the Clark govt rather than being an indicator that NZers are inherently anti-change.

      Fair point about the institutional support for Rogernomics. Let’s hope that there are saner people around now. Also, there are centrist and RW people pointing to the failure of neoliberalism, so I suspect there are more people open to change now. That’s the value of Shaw framing this as green politics not LW politics.

      • Rosemary McDonald 11.2.1

        “…the whole light bulbs thing….”

        “Paul Glennie, Wellington City Council Team Leader of Strategic Planning; and Greg Skelton Chief Executive, Wellington Electricity. The latest LED lighting technology could save local authorities millions of dollars in electricity costs for street lights – but there are signs that energy and lines companies will raise their prices to make up for lost revenue. A study by Wellington City Council has shown it could make savings of between one and one point five million dollars a year based on current electricity tariffs, but a big risk with moving to the new technology – which provides better, brighter lighting and other advantages – is that any savings made, might be clawed back.”

        https://www.radionz.co.nz/national/programmes/ninetonoon/audio/20173753/could-savings-in-energy-efficient-lighting-be-clawed-back

        If folk don’t remember this from 2015, you really need to have a listen.

        Even just the first five minutes will tell us where the major roadblocks are to ‘greening’ our government.

        Anyone know if this is something that is known to the new Incumbents?

        https://www.radionz.co.nz/audio/player?audio_id=20173753

        • weka 11.2.1.1

          Haven’t looked at in a while, but the GP’s policies around power included some reform of the industry. I’m guessing the stumbling block would be Labour.

        • Nic the NZer 11.2.1.2

          Even if electricity companies earn similar income on the back of providing less electricity there is still a significant benefit to reducing government electricity use of course.

      • Pat 11.2.2

        It was indeed the reaction ( and back down in the face of) to the Clark Gov. intention to implement some minor sensible CC policies that I was referring to…..Im not convinced that the wider public or opposition political response to even more wide reaching policies will be any better received today.

  12. Ad 12

    Shaw needs to show he can do one piece of legislation before proposing a whole bunch more.

    The Zero Carbon Bill is a very long way off, and quite uncertain in its effects.

    Shaw also needs to show business wants this: when he does a speech like this there needs to be industry beside him. Leadership in business is not easy.

    • patricia bremner 12.1

      Business is not outside governance, although they try to form arrangements that effect that. Monseca, Treaties, or Cabals.

      The internet has informed and allowed the free exchange of ideas, which began with books, continued with newspapers radio and television, which were subverted by big money and vested interests.Now we are fighting to keep the internet free.

      There have been many models of sustainable socially and environmentally successful businesses, but they have been undercut by business pirates who plunder just as the original ones did. We need laws to alter that. Sustainable business practice law.

      Industry will come on board as their customers require ethical products. Organic use was considered to be quirky, ’till business profit grew, and ethical and sustainable land use was understood. Now it is a growing enterprise, interrupted by mega businesses which were supported by the previous government which allowed asset stripping, akin to modern piracy.

      The fact NZ has governance that supported piracy for years does not mean we have to continue to produce overwhelming waste and unsustainable practices, as business and their customers will all be affected by growing water shortages, heat waves and depletion and failure of many natural systems.

      We are confronted with systems overload on many levels in the natural world, and
      to change we need legislation which prevents unbridled greed.

  13. Sparky 13

    The problem with the Greens vision can be summed up in three words: Labour/ National/MSM.

Recent Comments

Recent Posts

  • The Song of Saqua: Volume VII
    In order to catch up to the actual progress of the D&D campaign, I present you with another couple of sessions. These were actually held back to back, on a Monday and Tuesday evening. Session XV Alas, Goatslayer had another lycanthropic transformation… though this time, he ran off into the ...
    4 hours ago
  • Accelerating the Growth Rate?
    There is a constant theme from the economic commentariat that New Zealand needs to lift its economic growth rate, coupled with policies which they are certain will attain that objective. Their prescriptions are usually characterised by two features. First, they tend to be in their advocate’s self-interest. Second, they are ...
    PunditBy Brian Easton
    13 hours ago
  • The only thing we have to fear is tenants themselves
    1. Which of these acronyms describes the experience of travelling on a Cook Strait ferry?a. ROROb. FOMOc. RAROd. FMLAramoana, first boat ever boarded by More Than A Feilding, four weeks after the Wahine disaster2. What is the acronym for the experience of watching the government risking a $200 million break ...
    More Than A FeildingBy David Slack
    15 hours ago
  • Peters talks of NZ “renewing its connections with the world” – but who knew we had been discon...
    Buzz from the Beehive The thrust of the country’s foreign affairs policy and its relationship with the United States have been addressed in four statements from the Beehive over the past 24 hours. Foreign Affairs Minister Winston Peters somewhat curiously spoke of New Zealand “renewing its connections with a world ...
    Point of OrderBy Bob Edlin
    17 hours ago
  • Muldoonism, solar farms, and legitimacy
    NewsHub had an article yesterday about progress on Aotearoa's largest solar farm, at "The Point" in the Mackenzie Country. 420MW, right next to a grid connection and transmission infrastructure, and next to dams - meaning it can work in tandem with them to maximise water storage. Its exactly the sort ...
    No Right TurnBy Idiot/Savant
    17 hours ago
  • NZTA does not know how much it spends on cones
    Barrie Saunders writes –  Astonishing as it may seem NZTA does not know either how much it spends on road cones as part of its Temporary Traffic Management system, or even how many companies it uses to supply and manage the cones. See my Official Information Act request ...
    Point of OrderBy poonzteam5443
    18 hours ago
  • If this is Back on Track – let's not.
    I used to want to plant bombs at the Last Night of the PromsBut now you'll find me with the baby, in the bathroom,With that big shell, listening for the sound of the sea,The baby and meI stayed in bed, alone, uncertainThen I met you, you drew the curtainThe sun ...
    Nick’s KōreroBy Nick Rockel
    19 hours ago
  • Welfare: Just two timid targets from the National government
    Lindsay Mitchell writes –  The National Government has announced just two targets for the Ministry of Social Development. They are: – to reduce the number of people receiving Jobseeker Support by 50,000 to 140,000 by June 2029, and – (alongside HUD) to reduce the number of households in emergency ...
    Point of OrderBy Bob Edlin
    19 hours ago
  • The Hoon around the week to April 12
    Photo: Lynn Grieveson / The KākāTL;DR: The podcast above features co-hosts Bernard Hickey and Peter Bale, along with regular guests Robert Patman on Gaza and AUKUS II, Merja Myllylahti on AUT’s trust in news report, Awhi’s Holly Bennett on a watered-down voluntary code for lobbyists, plus special guest Patrick Gower ...
    The KakaBy Bernard Hickey
    22 hours ago
  • A Dead Internet?
    Hi,Four years ago I wrote about a train engineer who derailed his train near the port in Los Angeles.He was attempting to slam thousands of tonnes of screaming metal into a docked Navy hospital ship, because he thought it was involved in some shady government conspiracy theory. He thought it ...
    David FarrierBy David Farrier
    23 hours ago
  • Weekly Roundup 12-April-2024
    Welcome back to another Friday. Here’s some articles that caught our attention this week. This Week in Greater Auckland On Wednesday Matt looked at the latest with the Airport to Botany project. On Thursday Matt covered the revelation that Auckland Transport have to subsidise towing illegally parked cars. ...
    Greater AucklandBy Greater Auckland
    23 hours ago
  • Weekly Roundup 12-April-2024
    Welcome back to another Friday. Here’s some articles that caught our attention this week. This Week in Greater Auckland On Wednesday Matt looked at the latest with the Airport to Botany project. On Thursday Matt covered the revelation that Auckland Transport have to subsidise towing illegally parked cars. ...
    Greater AucklandBy Greater Auckland
    23 hours ago
  • Antarctic heat spike shocks climate scientists
    A ‘Regime Shift’ could raise sea levels sooner than anticipated. Has a tipping point been triggered in the Antarctic? Photo: Juan Barreto/Getty Images TL;DR: Here’s the top six news items of note in climate news for Aotearoa-NZ this week, and a discussion above that was recorded yesterday afternoon between and ...
    The KakaBy Bernard Hickey
    24 hours ago
  • Skeptical Science New Research for Week #15 2024
    Open access notables Global carbon emissions in 2023, Liu et al., Nature Reviews Earth & Environment Annual global CO2 emissions dropped markedly in 2020 owing to the COVID-19 pandemic, decreasing by 5.8% relative to 2019 (ref. 1). There were hopes that green economic stimulus packages during the COVD crisis might mark the beginning ...
    1 day ago
  • Everything will be just fine
    In our earlier days of national self-loathing, we made a special place for the attitude derided as she’ll be right.You don't hear many people younger than age Boomer using that particular expression these days. But that doesn’t mean there are not younger people in possession of such an attitude.The likes of ...
    More Than A FeildingBy David Slack
    2 days ago
  • Farmers and landlords are given news intended to lift their confidence – but the media must muse o...
    Buzz from the Beehive People working in the beleaguered media industry have cause to yearn for a minister as busy as Todd McClay and his associates have been in recent days. But if they check out the Beehive website for a list of Melissa Lee’s announcements, pronouncements, speeches and what-have-you ...
    Point of OrderBy Bob Edlin
    2 days ago
  • National’s war on renters
    When the National government came into office, it complained of a "war on landlords". It's response? Start a war on renters instead: The changes include re-introducing 90-day "no cause" terminations for periodic tenancies, meaning landlords can end a periodic tenancy without giving any reason. [...] Landlords will now only ...
    No Right TurnBy Idiot/Savant
    2 days ago
  • Drawn
    A ballot for two Member's Bills was held today, and the following bills were drawn: Repeal of Good Friday and Easter Sunday as Restricted Trading Days (Shop Trading and Sale of Alcohol) Amendment Bill (Cameron Luxton) Consumer Guarantees (Right to Repair) Amendment Bill (Marama Davidson) The ...
    No Right TurnBy Idiot/Savant
    2 days ago
  • At last some science
    Ele Ludemann writes – Is getting rid of plastic really good for the environment? Substituting plastics with alternative materials is likely to result in increased GHG emissions, according to research from the University of Sheffield. The study by Dr. Fanran Meng from Sheffield’s Department of Chemical and Biological Engineering, ...
    Point of OrderBy poonzteam5443
    2 days ago
  • Something important: the curious death of the School Strike 4 Climate Movement
      The Christchurch Mosque Massacres, Covid-19, deep political disillusionment, and the jealous cruelty of the intersectionists: all had a part to play in causing School Strike 4 Climate’s bright bubble of hope and passion to burst. But, while it floated above us, it was something that mattered. Something Important.   ...
    Point of OrderBy poonzteam5443
    2 days ago
  • The day the TV media died…
    Peter Dunne writes –  April 10 is a dramatic day in New Zealand’s history. On April 10, 1919, the preliminary results of a referendum showed that New Zealanders had narrowly voted for prohibition by a majority of around 13,000 votes. However, when the votes of soldiers still overseas ...
    Point of OrderBy poonzteam5443
    2 days ago
  • What's the point in Melissa Lee?
    While making coffee this morning I listened to Paddy Gower from Newshub being interviewed on RNZ. It was painful listening. His hurt and love for that organisation, its closure confirmed yesterday, quite evident.As we do when something really matters, he hasn’t giving up hope. Paddy talked about the taonga that ...
    Nick’s KōreroBy Nick Rockel
    2 days ago
  • Bernard's Top 10 'pick 'n' mix' at 10:10 am on Thursday, April 11
    TL;DR: Here’s the 10 news and other links elsewhere that stood out for me over the last day, as at 10:10 am on Wednesday, April 10:Photo by Iva Rajović on UnsplashMust-read: As more than half of the nation’s investigative journalists are sacked, Newsroom’s Tim Murphy shows what it takes to ...
    The KakaBy Bernard Hickey
    2 days ago
  • Gordon Campbell On Winston Peters’ Pathetic Speech At The UN
    Good grief, Winston Peters. Tens of thousands of Gazans have been slaughtered, two million are on the brink of starvation and what does our Foreign Minister choose to talk about at the UN? The 75 year old issue of whether the five permanent members should continue to have veto powers ...
    2 days ago
  • Subsidising illegal parking
    Hopefully finally over his obsession with raised crossings, the Herald’s Bernard Orsman has found something to actually be outraged at. Auckland ratepayers are subsidising the cost of towing, storing and releasing cars across the city to the tune of $15 million over five years. Under a quirk in the law, ...
    2 days ago
  • When 'going for growth' actually means saying no to new social homes
    TL;DR: These six things stood out to me over the last day in Aotearoa-NZ’s political economy, as of 7:06 am on Thursday, April 11:The Government has refused a community housing provider’s plea for funding to help build 42 apartments in Hamilton because it said a $100 million fund was used ...
    The KakaBy Bernard Hickey
    2 days ago
  • https://www.politik.co.nz/?p=12733
    As the public sector redundancies rolled on, with the Department of Conservation saying yesterday it was cutting 130 positions, a Select Committee got an insight into the complexities and challenges of cutting the Government’s workforce. Immigration New Zealand chiefs along with their Minister, Erica Stanford, appeared before Parliament’s Education and ...
    PolitikBy Richard Harman
    2 days ago
  • Bernard's six-stack of substacks at 6:06 pm on Wednesday, April 10
    TL;DR: Six substacks that stood out to me in the last day:Explaining is winning for journalists wanting to regain trust, writes is his excellent substack. from highlights Aotearoa-NZ’s greenwashing problem in this weekly substack. writes about salt via his substack titled: The Second Soul, Part I ...
    The KakaBy Bernard Hickey
    3 days ago
  • EGU2024 – Picking and chosing sessions to attend virtually
    This year's General Assembly of the European Geosciences Union (EGU) will take place as a fully hybrid conference in both Vienna and online from April 15 to 19. I decided to join the event virtually this year for the full week and I've already picked several sessions I plan to ...
    3 days ago
  • But here's my point about the large irony in what Luxon is saying
    Grim old week in the media business, eh? And it’s only Wednesday, to rework an old upbeat line of poor old Neil Roberts.One of the larger dark ironies of it all has been the line the Prime Minister is serving up to anyone asking him about the sorry state of ...
    More Than A FeildingBy David Slack
    3 days ago
  • Govt gives farmers something to talk about (regarding environmental issues) at those woolshed meetin...
    Buzz from the Beehive Hard on the heels of three rurally oriented ministers launching the first of their woolshed meetings, the government brought good news to farmers on the environmental front. First, Agriculture Minister Todd McClay announced an additional $18 million is being committed to reduce agricultural emissions. Not all ...
    Point of OrderBy Bob Edlin
    3 days ago
  • Climate change violates human rights
    That's the ruling of the European Court of Human Rights today: Weak government climate policies violate fundamental human rights, the European court of human rights has ruled. In a landmark decision on one of three major climate cases, the first such rulings by an international court, the ECHR raised ...
    No Right TurnBy Idiot/Savant
    3 days ago
  • Which govt departments have grown the most?
    David Farrar writes –  There has been a 34% increase over six years in the size of the public service, in terms of EFTS. But not all agencies have grown by the same proportion. Here are the 10 with the largest relative increases between 2017 and ...
    Point of OrderBy poonzteam5443
    3 days ago
  • What’s to blame for the public’s plummeting trust in the media?
    Bryce Edwards writes  –  The media is in crisis, as New Zealand audiences flee from traditional sources of news and information. The latest survey results on the public’s attitude to the media shows plummeting trust. And New Zealand now leads the world in terms of those who want ...
    Point of OrderBy poonzteam5443
    3 days ago
  • Something Important: The Curious Death of the School Strike 4 Climate Movement.
    The Hope That Failed: The Christchurch Mosque Massacres, Covid-19, deep political disillusionment, and the jealous cruelty of the intersectionists: all had a part to play in causing School Strike 4 Climate’s bright bubble of hope and passion to burst. But, while it floated above us, it was something that mattered. Something ...
    3 days ago
  • Cow Farts and Cancer Sticks.
    What do you do if you’re a new government minister and the science is in. All of the evidence and facts are clear, but they’re not to your liking? They’re inconsistent with your policy positions and/or your spending priorities.Well, first off you could just stand back and watch as the ...
    Nick’s KōreroBy Nick Rockel
    3 days ago
  • Member’s Day
    Today is a Member's day. First up is James Shaw's New Zealand Bill of Rights (Right to Sustainable Environment) Amendment Bill, which does exactly what it says on the label. Despite solid backing in international law and from lawyers and NGOs, National will likely vote it down out of pure ...
    No Right TurnBy Idiot/Savant
    3 days ago
  • Bernard's Top 10 'pick 'n' mix' at 10:10 am on Wednesday, April 10
    Luxon in 2021 as a new MP, before his rise to PM and subsequent plummeting popularity. Photo: Lynn Grieveson / The KākāTL;DR: Here’s the 10 things that stood out for me from me reading over the last day, as at 10:10 am on Wednesday, April 10:Must read: Tova O’Brien describes ...
    The KakaBy Bernard Hickey
    3 days ago
  • What’s happening with Airport to Botany
    One of the few public transport projects the current government have said they support is the Airport to Botany project (A2B) and it’s one we haven’t covered in a while so worth looking at where things are at. A business case for the project was completed in 2021 before being ...
    3 days ago
  • Bishop more popular than Luxon in Curia poll
    Count the Chrises: Chris Bishop (2nd from right) is moving up in the popularity polls. Photo: Lynn Grieveson / The KākāTL;DR: These six things stood out to me over the last day in Aotearoa-NZ’s political economy, as of 7:06 am on Wednesday, April 10:The National/ACT/NZ First coalition Government’s opinion poll ...
    The KakaBy Bernard Hickey
    3 days ago
  • Silmarillion Fan Poetry: A Collection (2022-2024)
    It’s been some time since I properly exercised my poetic muscles. Prose-writing has been where it’s at for me, these past few years. Well, to get back into practice, I thought I’d write the occasional bit of jocular fan poetry, based off Tolkien’s Silmarillion… with this post being a collection ...
    3 days ago
  • At a glance – The Pacific Decadal Oscillation (PDO) is not causing global warming
    On February 14, 2023 we announced our Rebuttal Update Project. This included an ask for feedback about the added "At a glance" section in the updated basic rebuttal versions. This weekly blog post series highlights this new section of one of the updated basic rebuttal versions and serves as a ...
    4 days ago
  • Bryce Edwards: What’s to blame for the public’s plummeting trust in the media?
    The media is in crisis, as New Zealand audiences flee from traditional sources of news and information. The latest survey results on the public’s attitude to the media shows plummeting trust. And New Zealand now leads the world in terms of those who want to “avoid the news”. But who ...
    Democracy ProjectBy bryce.edwards
    4 days ago
  • Dead on target
    My targets for today are: 1 newsletter sent out by 4.30pm 800 words of copy delivered to a client by COB, as we say in the world of BAU1 dinner served by sunset GST returnSo far so good. Longer-term targets are: Get some website copy finished before I get on a plane on Saturday ...
    More Than A FeildingBy David Slack
    4 days ago
  • The PM sets nine policy targets- and in case you missed the truancy one, Seymour has provided some...
    Buzz from the Beehive Targets and travel were a theme in the latest flow of ministerial announcements. The PM announced a raft of targets (“nine ambitious Government Targets to help improve the lives of New Zealanders”) along with plans to head for Singapore, Thailand, and Philippines. His Deputy and Foreign ...
    Point of OrderBy Bob Edlin
    4 days ago
  • Climate Change: Unwelcome advice
    Yesterday He Pou a Rangi Climate Change Commission released two key pieces of advice, on the 2036-40 emissions budget and the 2050 target. Both are statutorily required as part of the Zero Carbon Act budgeting / planning process, and both have a round of public consultation before being finalised and ...
    No Right TurnBy Idiot/Savant
    4 days ago
  • In a structural deficit, the only real tax cut is a spending cut
    Eric Crampton writes –  This week’s column in the Stuff papers. A snippet: Tabarrok warned that America had two political parties – “the Tax and Spenders and the No-Tax and Spenders” – and neither was fiscally conservative. In the two decades after Tabarrok’s warning, the federal government ...
    Point of OrderBy poonzteam5443
    4 days ago
  • A Return to Kindness?
    New Zealanders are a pretty fair minded bunch. By and large we like to give people a go.Ian Foster, for example, had a terrible record as a head rugby coach. Like not even good, and did we let that bother us? Yeah, but also Nah. Because we went ahead and ...
    Nick’s KōreroBy Nick Rockel
    4 days ago
  • Aukus or not, New Zealand’s foreign policy is being remade
    Geoffrey Miller writes –  This could be a watershed week for New Zealand’s international relations. Winston Peters, the foreign minister, is heading to Washington DC for a full week of meetings. The surprisingly lengthy trip just happens to coincide with a major trilateral summit of leaders from the United States, ...
    Point of OrderBy poonzteam5443
    4 days ago
  • Back to the future, with a 2032 deadline
    Aiming to look visionary and focused, Luxon has announced nine targets to improve measures for education, health, crime and climate emissions - but the reality is only one target is well above pre-Covid levels. Photo: Lynn Grieveson / The KākāTL;DR: The six news items of note for me in Aotearoa-NZ’s ...
    The KakaBy Bernard Hickey
    4 days ago
  • Why Rod Carr is optimistic farmers can beat climate change
    The future of farming went on the line yesterday when the Climate Change Commission presented its first review of New Zealand’s target of net zero emissions by 2050. The Commission said New Zealand’s target was unlikely to be consistent with the 2015 Paris Agreement goal of holding temperature rise to ...
    PolitikBy Richard Harman
    4 days ago
  • Grifters, Bigots & Booling With the Dawgs
    Hi,I hope you had a good weekend. I was mostly in bed with the worst flu of my life.Today I’m emerging on the other side — and looking forward to what I can catch of the total solar eclipse rippling across parts of America today.Whilst hacking through a cough, I’ve ...
    David FarrierBy David Farrier
    4 days ago
  • Goldsmith spots a cost-saver in his Justice domain – let’s further erode our right (under Magna ...
    Bob Edlin writes – Chapter 39 of the Magna Carta (from memory) includes the guarantee that no free man may suffer punishment without “the lawful judgment of his peers.” This was a measure which the barons forced on England’s King John to delegate part of his judicial authority ...
    Point of OrderBy Bob Edlin
    5 days ago
  • Climate Adam: Is Global Warming Speeding Up?
    This video includes conclusions of the creator climate scientist Dr. Adam Levy. It is presented to our readers as an informed perspective. Please see video description for references (if any). Thanks to climate change, 2023 has shattered heat records, and 2024 is continuing where last year left off. With this devastating ...
    5 days ago
  • Brooke is on the TV, being a Minister!
    Brooke is on the TV, being a Minister! She is going to talk to Jack on the TV!It's hard to watch Jack on the TV without thinking to yourself:How can anyone be that good-looking,and also be even brainier than they are good-looking?Talk about lucky!But also, Jack works for the TV news. So ...
    More Than A FeildingBy David Slack
    5 days ago
  • There’s gold – or rather, energy without carbon – in that rock, but Jones reminds us of the Tr...
    Buzz from the Beehive Oh, dear.  One News tells us an ownership spat is brewing between Māori and the Crown as New Zealand uses more renewable energy sources. No, not water or the shoreline.  Ownership of another resource has come into the reckoning. The One News report explained that 99% of ...
    Point of OrderBy Bob Edlin
    5 days ago
  • Climate Change: Bad faith from National
    One of the weird features of the Zero Carbon Act was its split-gas targets, which separated methane, produced overwhelmingly by farmers, from carbon dioxide produced by the rest of us. This lower target for methane was another effective subsidy to the dairy industry, and was the result of a compromise ...
    No Right TurnBy Idiot/Savant
    5 days ago
  • Gordon Campbell on Israel’s murderous use of AI in Gaza
    This may seem like a dumb question– but how come Israel has managed to kill at least 33,000 Palestinian civilians in Gaza, including over 13,000 children? Of course, saturation aerial bombing and artillery shelling of densely populated civilian neighbourhoods will do that. So will the targeting of children by IDF ...
    Gordon CampbellBy ScoopEditor
    5 days ago
  • Total Eclipse of the Mind.
    All that you touch And all that you seeAll that you taste All you feelAnd all that you love And all that you hateAll you distrust All you saveEarly tomorrow morning as the sun is rising in Aotearoa many people across North America, from Mexico to Canada, will be losing ...
    Nick’s KōreroBy Nick Rockel
    5 days ago
  • So why do that degree… here?
    A report – and discussion – from the university front line… Mike Grimshaw writes – I have been involved in numerous curriculum and degree reviews over the decades and in all of them the question always skirted around is: “If you had to leave now with ...
    Point of OrderBy poonzteam5443
    5 days ago
  • The hunt is on for an asterix for farm emissions
    The Government is setting up its own experts group to review the goalposts for farmers to reduce methane emissions. Photo: Lynn Grieveson / The KākāTL;DR: The six news items of note for me in Aotearoa-NZ’s political economy as of 9:06 am on Monday, April 8 are:The Government is setting up ...
    The KakaBy Bernard Hickey
    5 days ago
  • Geoffrey Miller: Aukus or not, New Zealand’s foreign policy is being remade
    This could be a watershed week for New Zealand’s international relations. Winston Peters, the foreign minister, is heading to Washington DC for a full week of meetings. The surprisingly lengthy trip just happens to coincide with a major trilateral summit of leaders from the United States, Japan and the Philippines. ...
    Democracy ProjectBy Geoffrey Miller
    5 days ago
  • The Kaka’s diary for the week to April 15 and beyond
    TL;DR: The six key events to watch in Aotearoa-NZ’s political economy in the week to April 15 include:PM Christopher Luxon is scheduled to hold a post-Cabinet news conference at 4 pm today. The Climate Commission will publish advice to the Government this evening.Parliament is sitting from Question Time at 2pm ...
    The KakaBy Bernard Hickey
    5 days ago
  • 2024 SkS Weekly Climate Change & Global Warming News Roundup #14
    A listing of 34 news and opinion articles we found interesting and shared on social media during the past week: Sun, March 31, 2024 thru Sat, April 6, 2024. Story of the week Proxy measurement via Facebook "engagement" suggests a widely welcoming audience for Prof. Andrew Dessler's The Climate ...
    5 days ago
  • Their Money or Your Life.
    Brooke van Velden appeared this morning on Q&A, presumably paying homage to Margaret Thatcher. The robotic one had come in an 80s pink, shoulder-padded jacket, much favoured by the likes of Thatcher or Hosking. She also brought the spirit of Margaret, seemingly occupying her previously vacant soul compartment.Jack asked for ...
    Nick’s KōreroBy Nick Rockel
    6 days ago
  • Truth pulls its boots on
    It's a lot easier to pull off a lie if people don't know much about what you're lying about.Sometimes, watching Christopher Luxon, you get the impression he doesn't know all that much about it, either.​​ That's the charitable interpretation. The other is that he knows full well.He was on the ...
    More Than A FeildingBy David Slack
    6 days ago
  • Those of a certain vintage in this country will recognise that as a paraphrasing of the much celebrated Paul Holmes sign-off from his nightly current affairs show, yes, he of the “cheekie darkie” comment infamy (that one aimed at then-UN Chief Kofi Annan, and if unfamiliar with what followed in ...
    exhALANtBy exhalantblog
    6 days ago
  • Are You Missing Kindness Yet?
    In my last newsletter I asked how is Luxon this out of touch? Many of you, quite wisely, don’t do the Twitter thing so I thought I’d share a few of the comments from the cross section of humanity that you encounter there.The comment from Clandesdiner@boglyboohoo, not sure if that’s ...
    Nick’s KōreroBy Nick Rockel
    7 days ago
  • How NZ and Taiwan differ in disaster preparedness
    Peter Dunne writes –  Taiwan and New Zealand are two small island states with much in common. Both are vibrant, independent democracies, living in the shadow of an overbearing neighbour. (Admittedly, Taiwan’s overbearing neighbour has far more aggressive tendencies than our at-times overbearing neighbour!) There is a strong ...
    Point of OrderBy poonzteam5443
    7 days ago
  • Why Shane Jones sunk the Kermadecs Marine Sanctuary
    Bryce Edwards writes – Did vested interests prevent New Zealand from establishing a world-leading environmental marine reserve? There are strong signs that in killing off the proposal for a Kermadec Islands Marine Sanctuary, Shane Jones has been doing the bidding of several industries and groups that he’s closely ...
    Point of OrderBy Bob Edlin
    7 days ago
  • Nearly a month of it
    Hello! There has not been an omnibus for about three weeks because covid and bereavement got in the way.Here’s what you may have missed if you’re not a daily reader.Life’s Little Victories - I think I’ve dodged COVIDTwo Bar Blues - I haven’t Relentlessly Negative - Things seem to be ...
    More Than A FeildingBy David Slack
    1 week ago
  • Coastal court action flies under the radar
    Graham Adams says NZ’s coastline may end up under iwi control. Former Attorney-General and Minister for Treaty of Waitangi Negotiations Chris Finlayson is known for his forthright and sometimes combative language. In 2022, in discussing opposition to co-governance, he referred to “the sour right” and “the KKK brigade”. Last week, in ...
    Point of OrderBy gadams1000
    1 week ago
  • Does a Fiscal Debt Target Make Sense?
    Do we treat the government finances with the common sense that household’s manage theirs?It is a commonly held view that we should treat the government as if it is a prudent household. We don’t when it comes to its debt. Currently the government says it wants to constrain its net ...
    PunditBy Brian Easton
    1 week ago
  • Bryce Edwards: Why Shane Jones sunk the Kermadecs Marine Sanctuary
    Did vested interests prevent New Zealand from establishing a world-leading environmental marine reserve? There are strong signs that in killing off the proposal for a Kermadec Islands Marine Sanctuary, Shane Jones has been doing the bidding of several industries and groups that he’s closely connected with. As Oceans and Fisheries ...
    Democracy ProjectBy bryce.edwards
    1 week ago
  • Climate Change: Spite destroys success
    The clean car discount was a real policy success in pushing electrification of transport. It worked so well that EV adoption was running five years ahead of the Climate Commission's targets, giving us a real shot at decarbonising light transport. National killed it out of pure spite. And as expected, ...
    No Right TurnBy Idiot/Savant
    1 week ago

  • Huge interest in Government’s infrastructure plans
    Hundreds of people in little over a week have turned out in Northland to hear Regional Development Minister Shane Jones speak about plans for boosting the regional economy through infrastructure. About 200 people from the infrastructure and associated sectors attended an event headlined by Mr Jones in Whangarei today. Last ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    14 hours ago
  • Health Minister thanks outgoing Health New Zealand Chair
    Health Minister Dr Shane Reti has today thanked outgoing Health New Zealand – Te Whatu Ora Chair Dame Karen Poutasi for her service on the Board.   “Dame Karen tendered her resignation as Chair and as a member of the Board today,” says Dr Reti.  “I have asked her to ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    15 hours ago
  • Roads of National Significance planning underway
    The NZ Transport Agency (NZTA) has signalled their proposed delivery approach for the Government’s 15 Roads of National Significance (RoNS), with the release of the State Highway Investment Proposal (SHIP) today, Transport Minister Simeon Brown says.  “Boosting economic growth and productivity is a key part of the Government’s plan to ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    19 hours ago
  • Navigating an unstable global environment
    New Zealand is renewing its connections with a world facing urgent challenges by pursuing an active, energetic foreign policy, Foreign Minister Winston Peters says.   “Our country faces the most unstable global environment in decades,” Mr Peters says at the conclusion of two weeks of engagements in Egypt, Europe and the United States.    “We cannot afford to sit back in splendid ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    19 hours ago
  • NZ welcomes Australian Governor-General
    Prime Minister Christopher Luxon has announced the Australian Governor-General, His Excellency General The Honourable David Hurley and his wife Her Excellency Mrs Linda Hurley, will make a State visit to New Zealand from Tuesday 16 April to Thursday 18 April. The visit reciprocates the State visit of former Governor-General Dame Patsy Reddy ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    19 hours ago
  • Pseudoephedrine back on shelves for Winter
    Associate Health Minister David Seymour has announced that Medsafe has approved 11 cold and flu medicines containing pseudoephedrine. Pharmaceutical suppliers have indicated they may be able to supply the first products in June. “This is much earlier than the original expectation of medicines being available by 2025. The Government recognised ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    21 hours ago
  • NZ and the US: an ever closer partnership
    New Zealand and the United States have recommitted to their strategic partnership in Washington DC today, pledging to work ever more closely together in support of shared values and interests, Foreign Minister Winston Peters says.    “The strategic environment that New Zealand and the United States face is considerably more ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 day ago
  • Joint US and NZ declaration
    April 11, 2024 Joint Declaration by United States Secretary of State the Honorable Antony J. Blinken and New Zealand Minister of Foreign Affairs the Right Honourable Winston Peters We met today in Washington, D.C. to recommit to the historic partnership between our two countries and the principles that underpin it—rule ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 day ago
  • NZ and US to undertake further practical Pacific cooperation
    Foreign Minister Winston Peters has announced further New Zealand cooperation with the United States in the Pacific Islands region through $16.4 million in funding for initiatives in digital connectivity and oceans and fisheries research.   “New Zealand can achieve more in the Pacific if we work together more urgently and ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 day ago
  • Government redress for Te Korowai o Wainuiārua
    The Government is continuing the bipartisan effort to restore its relationship with iwi as the Te Korowai o Wainuiārua Claims Settlement Bill passed its first reading in Parliament today, says Treaty Negotiations Minister Paul Goldsmith. “Historical grievances of Te Korowai o Wainuiārua relate to 19th century warfare, land purchased or taken ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 days ago
  • Focus on outstanding minerals permit applications
    New Zealand Petroleum and Minerals is working to resolve almost 150 outstanding minerals permit applications by the end of the financial year, enabling valuable mining activity and signalling to the sector that New Zealand is open for business, Resources Minister Shane Jones says.  “While there are no set timeframes for ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 days ago
  • Applications open for NZ-Ireland Research Call
    The New Zealand and Irish governments have today announced that applications for the 2024 New Zealand-Ireland Joint Research Call on Agriculture and Climate Change are now open. This is the third research call in the three-year Joint Research Initiative pilot launched in 2022 by the Ministry for Primary Industries and Ireland’s ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 days ago
  • Tenancy rules changes to improve rental market
    The coalition Government has today announced changes to the Residential Tenancies Act to encourage landlords back to the rental property market, says Housing Minister Chris Bishop. “The previous Government waged a war on landlords. Many landlords told us this caused them to exit the rental market altogether. It caused worse ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 days ago
  • Boosting NZ’s trade and agricultural relationship with China
    Trade and Agriculture Minister Todd McClay will visit China next week, to strengthen relationships, support Kiwi exporters and promote New Zealand businesses on the world stage. “China is one of New Zealand’s most significant trade and economic relationships and remains an important destination for New Zealand’s products, accounting for nearly 22 per cent of our good and ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 days ago
  • Freshwater farm plan systems to be improved
    The coalition Government intends to improve freshwater farm plans so that they are more cost-effective and practical for farmers, Associate Environment Minister Andrew Hoggard and Agriculture Minister Todd McClay have announced. “A fit-for-purpose freshwater farm plan system will enable farmers and growers to find the right solutions for their farm ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 days ago
  • New Fast Track Projects advisory group named
    The coalition Government has today announced the expert advisory group who will provide independent recommendations to Ministers on projects to be included in the Fast Track Approvals Bill, say RMA Reform Minister Chris Bishop and Regional Development Minister Shane Jones. “Our Fast Track Approval process will make it easier and ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 days ago
  • Pacific and Gaza focus of UN talks
    Foreign Minister Winston Peters says his official talks with the United Nations Secretary-General Antonio Guterres in New York today focused on a shared commitment to partnering with the Pacific Islands region and a common concern about the humanitarian catastrophe in Gaza.    “Small states in the Pacific rely on collective ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 days ago
  • Government honours Taranaki Maunga deal
    The Government is honouring commitments made to Taranaki iwi with the Te Pire Whakatupua mō Te Kāhui Tupua/Taranaki Maunga Collective Redress Bill passing its first reading Parliament today, Treaty Negotiations Minister Paul Goldsmith says. “This Bill addresses the commitment the Crown made to the eight iwi of Taranaki to negotiate ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 days ago
  • Enhanced partnership to reduce agricultural emissions
    The Government and four further companies are together committing an additional $18 million towards AgriZeroNZ to boost New Zealand’s efforts to reduce agricultural emissions. Agriculture Minister Todd McClay says the strength of the New Zealand economy relies on us getting effective and affordable emission reduction solutions for New Zealand. “The ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    4 days ago
  • 110km/h limit proposed for Kāpiti Expressway
    Transport Minister Simeon Brown has welcomed news the NZ Transport Agency (NZTA) will begin consultation this month on raising speed limits for the Kāpiti Expressway to 110km/h. “Boosting economic growth and productivity is a key part of the Government’s plan to rebuild the economy and this proposal supports that outcome ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    4 days ago
  • New Zealand Biosecurity Awards – Winners announced
    Two New Zealanders who’ve used their unique skills to help fight the exotic caulerpa seaweed are this year’s Biosecurity Awards Supreme Winners, says Biosecurity Minister Andrew Hoggard. “Strong biosecurity is vital and underpins the whole New Zealand economy and our native flora and fauna. These awards celebrate all those in ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    4 days ago
  • Attendance action plan to lift student attendance rates
    The Government is taking action to address the truancy crisis and raise attendance by delivering the attendance action plan, Associate Education Minister David Seymour announced today.   New Zealand attendance rates are low by national and international standards. Regular attendance, defined as being in school over 90 per cent of the ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    4 days ago
  • World must act to halt Gaza catastrophe – Peters
    Foreign Minister Winston Peters has told the United Nations General Assembly (UNGA) in New York today that an immediate ceasefire is needed in Gaza to halt the ongoing humanitarian catastrophe.    “Palestinian civilians continue to bear the brunt of Israel’s military actions,” Mr Peters said in his speech to a ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    4 days ago
  • Speech to United Nations General Assembly: 66th plenary meeting, 78th session
    Mr President,   The situation in Gaza is an utter catastrophe.   New Zealand condemns Hamas for its heinous terrorist attacks on 7 October and since, including its barbaric violations of women and children. All of us here must demand that Hamas release all remaining hostages immediately.   At the ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    4 days ago
  • Government woolshed roadshow kicks off
    Today the Government Agriculture Ministers started their national woolshed roadshow, kicking off in the Wairarapa. Agriculture Minister Todd McClay said it has been a tough time for farmers over the past few years. The sector has faced high domestic inflation rates, high interest rates, adverse weather events, and increasing farm ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    5 days ago
  • PM heads to Singapore, Thailand, and Philippines
    Prime Minister Christopher Luxon will travel to Singapore, Thailand and the Philippines this week (April 14-20), along with a senior business delegation, signalling the Government’s commitment to deepen New Zealand’s international engagement, especially our relationships in South East Asia. “South East Asia is a region that is more crucial than ever to ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    5 days ago
  • Prime Minister launches Government Targets
    Prime Minister Christopher Luxon has announced further steps to get New Zealand back on track, launching nine ambitious Government Targets to help improve the lives of New Zealanders. “Our Government has a plan that is focused on three key promises we made to New Zealanders – to rebuild the economy, ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    5 days ago
  • Natural hydrogen resource should be free of Treaty claims entanglement
    Natural hydrogen could be a game-changing new source of energy for New Zealand but it is essential it is treated as a critical development that benefits all New Zealanders, Resources Minister Shane Jones says. Mr Jones is seeking to give regulatory certainty for those keen to develop natural, or geological, ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    5 days ago
  • Government responds to unsustainable net migration
    ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    6 days ago
  • New Zealand on stage at global Space Symposium
    Space Minister Judith Collins will speak at the Space Symposium in the United States next week, promoting New Zealand’s rapidly growing place in the sector as we work to rebuild the economy. “As one of the largest global space events, attended by more than 10,000 business and government representatives from ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    6 days ago
  • $4.9m project completed with marae reopening
    A significant marae has reopened in the heart of Rotorua marking the end of renovations for the Ruatāhuna Marae Renovation Cluster, a project that provided much-needed jobs and regional economic stimulus, Regional Development Minister Shane Jones says. Mr Jones was at the official reopening of Mātaatua ki Rotorua Marae today. ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    7 days ago
  • Pure Tūroa Limited to operate Tūroa ski field
    Ko Tahuarangi te waka – Tahuarangi is the ancestral vessel Ko Rangitukutuku te aho – Rangitukutuku is the fishing line Ko Pikimairawea te matau – Pikimairawea is the hook Ko Hāhā te Whenua te ika kei rō-wai – Hāhā te whenua is the fish (of Māui) whilst under the ocean ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    7 days ago
  • Methane targets to be independently reviewed
    Rebuilding New Zealand’s economy will rely on the valuable agricultural sector working sustainably towards our climate change goals.  Today, the Climate Change and Agriculture Ministers announced that an independent panel of experts will review agricultural biogenic methane science and targets for consistency with no additional warming. Agriculture Minister Todd McClay ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    7 days ago
  • NZ and Nordics: likeminded partners
    Foreign Minister Winston Peters has highlighted the strong ties that bind New Zealand and the Nordic countries of Northern Europe during a trip to Sweden today.    “There are few countries in the world more likeminded with New Zealand than our friends in Northern Europe,” Mr Peters says.    “We ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • First New Zealand C-130J Hercules takes flight
    The first New Zealand C-130J Hercules to come off the production line in the United States has successfully completed its first test flights, Defence Minister Judith Collins announced today. “These successful flights are a significant milestone for the New Zealand Defence Force, bringing this once-in-a-generation renewal of a critical airlift ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • Government to rephase NCEA Change Programme
      The coalition Government is making significant changes to the NCEA Change Programme, delaying the implementation by two years, Minister of Education Erica Stanford announced today. “Ensuring New Zealand’s curriculum is world leading is a vital part of the Government’s plan to deliver better public services and ensure all students ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • New Ngāpuhi investment fund Chair appointed
    Ben Dalton has been appointed the new board Chair of Tupu Tonu, the Ngāpuhi Investment Fund, says Treaty Negotiations Minister Paul Goldsmith and Associate Finance Minister Shane Jones. “Ben brings a wealth of experience in governance and economic development to the position. He will have a strong focus on ensuring ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • Education should be prioritised ahead of protesting
    Students should be in school and learning instead of protesting during school hours, Associate Education Minister David Seymour says. “If students feel strongly about sending a message, they could have marched on Tuesday when there was a nationwide teacher only day, or during the upcoming school holidays. It has become ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • Delivering on Local Water Done Well
    Cabinet has agreed on key steps to implement Local Water Done Well, the Coalition Government’s plan for financially sustainable locally delivered water infrastructure and services, Local Government Minister Simeon Brown says.  "Councils and voters resoundingly rejected Labour’s expensive and bureaucratic Three Waters regime, and earlier this year the Coalition Government ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • Peters to visit New York, Washington D.C.
    Foreign Minister Winston Peters will engage with high-level United States Government and United Nations officials in the United States next week (6-12 April).    The visit, with programmes in New York and Washington D.C., will focus on major global and regional security challenges and includes meetings with US Secretary of ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago

Page generated in The Standard by Wordpress at 2024-04-12T18:41:10+00:00