National still to scrap GP fee cap

Written By: - Date published: 3:18 pm, October 27th, 2007 - 15 comments
Categories: national - Tags:

Peter Bradshaw, at the Guardian, reviews Michael Moore’s movie Sicko:

Last week in this paper, Seumas Milne reported on the boa-constrictor-sized parasites of US private health insurance seeking to get their fangs into the British NHS. This magnificent new film from Michael Moore is a timely reminder of the grotesque mess that Americans have made for themselves with healthcare, and how insidiously easy it would be for the same thing to happen to us, little by little.

And on the subject of health, interesting to note that the GP fee cap is still marked for removal by National.

If you thought the public outcry might have been enough to have them reconsider, you’d be dead wrong.

Tony Ryall: “In light of the response [to the removal proposal] we are prepared to consider a monitoring regime to deal with public concern about relying solely on competition and patient pressure to manage fees.”(NZ Doctor, 10 Oct 2007)

15 comments on “National still to scrap GP fee cap”

  1. Murray M 1

    Trades people are permitted to charge what they feel they are worth. In times of shortage their labour charges are astronomical. Just because GP’s receive a Govt subsidy why should they not be able to charge what they feel they are worth. Incidentally we currently have a GP shortage. I wonder why?

  2. illuminatedtiger 2

    If National get in and implement such policies I will be taking myself, my family and my much needed skills elsewhere. I cannot and will not take the risk of being in a country with a privatized health system.

  3. let’s not forget privatising ACC too

  4. burt 4

    Price controls over private enterprise. Sounds like the lefties liked Muldoon’s policies after all. Funny they don’t like Helen Clark being compared to Muldoon. Isn’t it funny how being so myopically partisan makes you look so dim witted.

  5. Luke 5

    Burt – “Price controls over private enterprise”

    Remember it is in return for a subsidy from the govt so can hardly be compared to Muldoon era price controls. It’s certainly fair enough that in return for a subsidy to keep fees affordable, the government can enforce the fact that the fees are kept affordable.

  6. r0b 6

    “Price controls over private enterprise. Sounds like the lefties liked Muldoon’s policies after all.”

    Yeah right. So tell me Burt – what is it about affordable primary health care that is so repellent to you?

    “Isn’t it funny how being so myopically partisan makes you look so dim witted.”

    First true thing you’ve said on this blog.

  7. burt 7

    rOb

    Yeah right. So tell me Burt – what is it about affordable primary health care that is so repellent to you?

    Repellant… interesting choice of word because the fee cap is certainly repelling Dr’s from NZ.

    The level of the subsidy is the way to keep them affordable, not a fee cap. Some how the issue of affordability has become an issue the effects the Dr’s income because the social policy objective of keeping GP visits affordable just couldn’t be managed if the subsidy was increased… oh no what would happen top the $8b surplus if the govt used tax payers money to deliver services to tax payers rather than restrict private enterprise.

    The social policy objective (GP visits are affordable) is a good one, the delivery of the policy is typical Labour mentality. Dr’s are rich bastards and their income should be restricted so that govt can maintain a surplus while crowing about providing subsidies.

    I understand the issue though, Labour good – National bad. Labour provide a small subsidy and restrict fee’s so Dr’s shut up shop – is that good?

  8. frank 8

    Big, typical error – confusing the process with the outcome. Fee caps are PROCESS. Keeping GP visits affordable is OUTCOME. The Nats say the process is a poor way to achieve that outcome because it penalises GPs, who then abandon their practices – or never start them up. Finding a better way actually IS an important issue. Obviously Labour isn’t interested in that.

  9. r0b 9

    Burt – “Repellant. interesting choice of word because the fee cap is certainly repelling Dr’s from NZ.”

    Oh please. There are shortages of many kinds of medical professional (not just GPs), and that arises from many complex factors (not just a GP fee cap).

    “The level of the subsidy is the way to keep them affordable”

    The level of the subsidy may indeed be a subject for debate.

    “oh no what would happen top the $8b surplus if the govt used tax payers money to deliver services to tax payers rather than restrict private enterprise.”

    Grow up Burt. Similar ranting deleted for brevity.

    Frank – “Big, typical error – confusing the process with the outcome.”

    Excellent, let’s talk about outcomes.

    “Fee caps are PROCESS. Keeping GP visits affordable is OUTCOME.

    So Frank, how do we achieve the outcome of keeping GP visits affordable?

    “Finding a better way actually IS an important issue. Obviously Labour isn’t interested in that.”

    Well I for one am interested in that. If there is a better way than fee caps then I will support it. So please tell me your suggestion Frank – how do we keep GP visits affordable?

  10. Murray M 10

    Quite easy to keep things affordable in both primary and secondary care. Reward the workers at the coal face and stop wasting so much fucking money on the desk jockies.

  11. JamesK 11

    Murray M, what percentage of health employees do you think work at the desk and how many on the front line?

  12. r0b 12

    Frank? Burt? Still waiting for your suggestions here…

  13. slightlyrighty 13

    What use is a capped, subsidised fee to visit a doctor if there is no doctor to go and visit?

  14. Robinsod 14

    Can you not find a Dr, Slightly? I’ll give you a hint – look in the green pages at the front of your phone book.

  15. slightlyrighty 15

    Robinsod.

    I have a Doc, have had for some time. However there are parts of NZ where the number of GP’s is so low that new residents cannot register with existing ones as the books are full, and retiring GP’s are not being replaced, placing more stress on those left.

    The daughter of a colleague of mine has had to find a new doc in Stokes Valley, and has been told she may have to wait 6 months to get on the books of a local GP.

    Patients in Paraparaumu are having to travel very long distances to see a GP. There are currently 750 residents waiting to enrol with a GP who cannot do so. http://www.stuff.co.nz/dominionpost/4240043a23955.html

    It is my understanding that some of these people are having to travel as far as New Plymouth to get treatment. There are doctors, just not enough, who are not being paid enough and put under more stress to cope with an ever increasing shortfall.

    It is for these similar reasons that we no longer have a childhood oncology specialist at wellington hospital. Labour is failing to deal with the realities of this situation

Links to post

Recent Comments

Recent Posts

  • Confirmation bias
    Something slightly deeper. Facebook is an out of control dangerous institution that neatly divides us up into our own tribes and lets us reinforce our beliefs with each other while at the same time throw rocks ...
    Confirmation bias
    13 hours ago
  • Andrew Little leads NZ delegation on global anti-terrorism taskforce
    Justice Minister Andrew Little leaves for the United States today to take part in a global task force that’s tackling terrorism and anti-money laundering. “I’m looking forward to leading the New Zealand delegation to the Financial Action Task Force (FATF) ...
    2 weeks ago
  • Third reading: Arms (Prohibited Firearms, Magazines, and Parts) Amendment Bill
    Mr Speaker We have travelled a long way in eight days, since the bill was read a first time. It has been a punishing schedule for MPs and submitters and public servants who have played a role in this process. ...
    2 weeks ago
  • Legal framework for gun buyback scheme announced
    Police Minister Stuart Nash has announced a legal framework for the gun buyback will be established as a first step towards determining the level of compensation. It will include compensation for high capacity magazines and parts. Mr Nash has outlined ...
    2 weeks ago
  • Second reading: Arms (Prohibited Firearms, Magazines and Parts) Amendment Bill
    Mr Speaker, it is Day 25 of the largest criminal investigation in New Zealand history. Not a day, or a moment, has been wasted as we respond to the atrocity that is testing us all. That is true also of ...
    2 weeks ago
  • First reading: Arms (Prohibited Firearms, Magazines and Parts) Amendment Bill
    Mr Speaker, as we meet today New Zealand is under a terror threat level of HIGH. As we meet today, Police are routinely carrying firearms, Bushmaster rifles and Glock pistols, in a significant departure from normal practice. As we meet ...
    3 weeks ago
  • NZ-China economic ties strengthened
    Economic ties between New Zealand and China are being strengthened with the successful negotiation of a new taxation treaty. The double tax agreement was signed by New Zealand’s Ambassador to China and by the Commissioner of the State Taxation Administration ...
    3 weeks ago
  • Tighter gun laws to enhance public safety
    Police Minister Stuart Nash has introduced legislation changing firearms laws to improve public safety following the Christchurch terror attacks. “Every semi-automatic weapon used in the terrorist attack will be banned,” Mr Nash says. “Owning a gun is a privilege not ...
    3 weeks ago