http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=10907972 another journalists texts ‘hacked’, this time 2-3 months after the ‘cuppergate’ thing the police asked vodaphone for all of bradley ambroses txts, his txts to his lawyer, his txts to his fmaily, his txts to his sources & work colleagues, for what purpose? bloody nosey buggers. i think maybe we should all do what tony soprano used to do if he wanted to talk to his lawyer, face to face in a busy street somewhere, keep all private information away from the wires!
By arming what is effectively the mythical AQ (but referred to as “Rebels”), thus creating future terror threats which are then sold to the world via the propaganda wing (MSM) of the military/intelligence machine, such as what has been announced in the ME in the last 24 hours!
The television network said that a CIA team was working in an annex near the consulate on a project to supply missiles from Libyan armouries to Syrian rebels.
CIA chiefs were actively working to ensure the real nature of its operations in the city did not get out.
Part of the cover up appears to be seeking to hide how many of their own people died in Benghazi – If they are good with covering up losses of their own people to serve a purpose, then what care factor will they give to covering up, literally, anything at all!
Sources said that more Americans were hurt in the assault spearheaded by suspected Islamic radicals than had been previously reported
So only the losses suffered by the State Department in the city had been reported to Congress.
Starting to become clear to the most ardent of deniers by now, I would expect!
A quick look at Simon Lusk and the Slater child’s blog this morning is quite telling, they seem to be in a bit of a spin.
Every single one of their five “Must Read” posts is about how privacy is no big deal, journalists should pull their heads in and stop questioning the govt, and there’s NOTHING to see here.
Damn you Felix for making me go there and read that filth. Managed to fall over a vile anti-gay post (‘correcting’ the word lesbian for something the writer clearly thinks is hilarious but is just sad). You’re right though, they are scared. Good.
Yes the louder they yell that there is ”nothing” to see here gives the indication that there is in fact ”something” lurking in the background of this whole sordid little affair that ”we” would definitely like to see,
At first i thought the Friday ‘document dump’ was an attempt to head off the furore about the, at the time, breaking revelation that it wasn’t only phone records that the Henry Inquiry/Prime Ministers Office went after but the emails as well,
i do tho have the ‘sneaking suspicion’ that i have missed something, although the nature of what has been ‘missed’ escapes me also,
Give the Slippery little Shyster a couple of brownie points for, as David Shearer says, using weapons of mass distraction in His, the Prime Minister’s, efforts to wriggle out from under,
What we do know is that none of it, the phone records nor the emails, were sent ‘straight back’ by either the Henry inquiry or the Prime Ministers office, a rather large LIE pointed out by the ‘document dumps’ timeline when compared with the claims of the Prime Minister and other’s,
Given that on the Thursday afternoon befor the release of the Government’s email trail Dunne had already publicly stated that Henry had approached Him verbally asking for details of specific mobile phone conversations between Dunne and Vance there is then the prima facie evidence of all the information, phone and email, having been read by either the Henry Inquiry, the Prime Ministers office, or both, despite their continual denials of having done so…
That’s always a problem with multi-person blogs. Look at the conspiracy theories that got spun when several Standard authors chose to post on Shearer’s woeful leadership at the same time.
The difference of course is that we actually have separate pseudonyms for separate authors.
That was more of a cascade effect. The irritation levels had been bubbling for some time. Besides I barely mentioned Shearer in mine. I was having a go at the incompetent caucus as being useless. Shearer is just one of them and more of a symptom than the proximate cause.
“Lawyers are demanding a review of how police intercept private communications after a photo-journalist’s cellphone logs and messages, including exchanges with a lawyer, were obtained in and inquiry instigated by the PM.
Police seized the text messages of a photo-journalist involved in the “teapot tape” saga, including exchanges with his family, his lawyer and Herald on Sunday journalists.
Auckland University associate law professor Bill Hodge describes the police actions as “mind-boggling”.
What a good idea. If we fail to stop this bill there is more than one way to stop the spying. Close down the secret spybase in Waihopai. Turn its metal into ploughshares, or something else that’s useful. Let’s shut it down. Yeah, let’s tear it down.
“Last night I had the strangest dream, I ever dreamed before. I dreamed the world had all agreed to put an end to war…..
“Three cheers for the Dome Busters…..
The next protest outside Waihopai should be the biggest ever.
Pretty poor ShonKey Python work from Michelle Boag on (Q) Qeue + (A) Adore this morning – clumsy attempt to define attacks on democracy a mere trifle – “let’s focus instead on sleeper issues such as recreational schnapper catch and animal testing” says Michelle.
Interesting that with restrained vigour Corin Dann should correct her – paraphrasing – “……..this is about the credibility of the Prime Minister”. Wow ! Suddenly ?
We are getting closer and closer to the situation where eventually there’s going to be some journalist who will see Bernstein possibilities arising out of ShonKey Python’s Flying Circus. Possibilities which persuade said journalist to engage true journalistic ethics, even if only for selfish purpose.
Could Potty@Gower be said journalist ? His “part of the story” addiction would seem to acquit him well.
Boag’s line shows the agenda planned by the right wing cabal.
Repeal the dog testing.
Repeal the schnapper limit.
Prove to middle New Zealand you ‘listen’
Pass The GCSB bill while the passive New Zealand population follow the line that the spying issue is just a grumble from pesky journalists.
And get pliant shills like Hoskings, Boag….to sell the line.
Exactly Paul @ 6.1 – the manipulation value of this relative minutiae (schnapper etc) – “yes we hear you…..see how we listen…..” – did occur to me.
Not directly on point but please Paul – no mention of Hosking, on Sundays. Vaingloriousness, narcissism, entitled snippiness, risible mutton-dressed-up-as-lamb confusion – not something I care to address on a Sunday.
On point – any views on Michelle Boag’s role in parachuting ShonKey Python into NZ to meet the kaupapa devised post 1999 when the National Party was at its lowest ebb and the Evil Helen Clark was PM ? Who apart from Mich’ was on that committee ?
Boag is talking shit when she says animal testing should not be allowed for party pills……
Animal testing if allowed for alcohol
Animal testing is allowed for sports
Animal testing is allowed for all kinds of private, entertainment, pleasureable activities.
If some big fat slob requires some animal-tested medication for her condition that has arisen due to excessive eating and excessive drinking then what the fuck is the difference?
It was a sad feeling when I listened to Helen Clark as it became once more very clear what leadership talent we had and nothing like her has come along. Her comment about parity for women participation in politics however mad me sit up as the last thing we need is more M. Boag’s looking after 50% of the population. Interesting how MB phrased her comment on the living wage issue: … so that the board will say, don’t take our money (profit). Well that says it all. The gray people in the background that see everything around them as “theirs”. Reminds me on a bad mob movie theme.
Unfortunately we live in an age of personality politics.
The mind boggles at what sort of philosophical discussion we would witness, away from media frenzy and interviewers, between Helen Clark and John Key.
Key is a shallow populist who struggles to speak English, mixing metaphors and speaking largely in mono syllables. Clark is a thinker and articulate and sees the world and New Zealand’s role in it, in a totally different light.
That’s why Key’s minders get him interviewed by commercial radio disk jockeys and soundbite thinkers.
A good journalist would have noticed he’s here as a guest of the New Zealand Institute for the Study of Competition and Regulation (ISCR). Gok on their website and their supporters include Contact, Meridian, Westpac.
So an independent academic, then.
He’s just spouting the more competition BS that is the mainstay of modern economics and which has seen our power and telecommunications priced far beyond what they should be priced at. NZers know this but they don’t see a way to get the politicians to change it. We need to provide that way.
“NZers know this but they don’t see a way to get the politicians to change it. We need to provide that way.”
Could you please persuade Labour to adopt a policy of eliminating the market economy? And announce it – get David Shearer to announce that competition as the mainstay of the economy is bullshit and he will stop it. Please please.
It of course hasn’t entered your head that power prices to consumers have risen at rates which far outstrip the levels of inflation in the economy and such rising power prices are not reflected in any additional costs to generators or retail power suppliers other than by dint of a cozy little club raising such prices on that well known business imperative known as ‘coz we can’…
Electricity is a natural monopoly as such having more than one “supplier” increases costs. We could get rid of a lot of the bureaucracy inherent in the present system, especially the high paid CEOs, if we went to a government monopoly and thus decrease costs.
Economies of scale also apply. The generating equipment and distribution network cost close to a fixed amount every year no matter how much electricity is actually generated and so the way to keep the cost per household down you spread that cost across every household and business. Our present system breaks that economy of scale and thus increases costs per household and business.
Also, the present system uses a dis-economy of scale by charging per kilowatt hour. This dis-economy is realised by large companies paying less per kilowatt hour than households. This causes a misallocation of electricity. According to supply and demand, higher use should result in being charged more. Of course, by doing it this way they can hide the fact that households are subsidising businesses while keeping profits high.
A bigger joke is that you think it will never happen, here’s what an actual sick joke is vis a vis the retail price of electricity,
In the past 2 years urged on by a continual stream of (false) Government propaganda i have managed to trim my already minimal use of electricity by 10%,
During that same 2 year period the cost of that electricity from my retail provider has risen by a full 30%,
Don’t be so stupid to suggest that i switch to a cheaper retail provider as to my knowledge there is not one,
The only evident sick joke round these parts is your ego where you make claims of being an ‘economist’ unable to hire help at grandiose salary’s when evidenced by your comments you have very little clue about economics or anything else for that matter…
Paras 75 onwards provide a lucid explanation of retail price movements.
and I repeat NZ Power will NEVER happen. Zero chance. Under any government. There may well be a sign on a door in Wellington saying “NZ Power” but it will never do what Labour says it is going to do. Because when they win office they will receive the scary advice that it is a dog. Gee who would have thought? There will be a face saving announcement. When politicians get in they generally need to get with the programme if they want to get re-elected. Blackouts don’t win elections.
That is me for today – I’m off to crank up the spa at full power and turn on the heat pumps. 🙂
This is the guy that was rolled out by Labour to support NZ Power when it was announced. Now he calls the policy a “nightmare”
“It may look good, but it’s got lots of challenges,” said Wolak of the Labour-Greens policy. “You’re throwing the entire baby out just to get rid of the bathwater and you’re going to start over, as if you have all these problems.”
The Clobbering Machine
Just over a week ago, on Saturday 27 July, an unpleasant thread appeared in The Standard, entitled “Lazy Jono on 3 News invents a story”. Second-team TV3 jonolist Jono Hutchinson had mischievously quoted an incendiary remark by activist/commentator/provocateur Jenny in order to reinforce his—or more accurately, his boss Patrick Gower’s—allegation that Shearer and Cunliffe had squabbled in public at a protest meeting against the Snooping Bill.
The headmaster, Mr Prent, quickly administered a stern lecture to Jenny, and that of course should have been the end of it. Unwisely, though, Jenny answered back, and the headmaster dished out an even sterner scolding. Once again, that should have been the end of the matter. Unfortunately, however, the school yobbos and one or two thickies heard what was happening, and decided to get in on the act….
SCENE: The Back Benchers Tavern, Wellington. On the sound system, something mellow and atmospheric by the Phoenix Foundation—although the pleasant music is somewhat undermined by the deranged shouting of a drunken army officer bawling threats at a tall young man in one corner. The rest of the bar seems to have been taken over by a motley group of malcontents, complainers and vehement political junkies as well as various sad hangers-on, coat-tailers and vacuous gigglers. In fact, that’s exactly what has happened: a large group of Standard regulars are knocking back the hard stuff and dishing out the verbals. At one table sits the fearsome foul-mouthed feminist Queen of Thorns. All afternoon QoT has been slamming back tequila after tequila after tequila, occasionally snarling at anybody unwise enough to cast an apprehensive glance at her, “Don’t you DARE fucking label me!”. This terrifying Medusa is attended by various hapless minions, foremost among them the Labour Party apparatchik, self-appointed enforcer and tireless deliverer of spurious accusations, Te Reo Putake, AKA “Squealer”. As well as diligently agreeing with every one of QoT’s feisty feminist flare-ups, Te Reo Putake has been hovering over the proceedings like a rain-sodden black cloud, waiting for his chance to dump on Jenny’s parade.
Lounging at an adjoining table is the aforesaid contingent of hangers-on and gigglers, a rather pathetic and contemptible group comprising Morrissey Breen, Arfamo, Weka and Colonial Viper. They are all listening intently to Queen of Thorns as she lays into poor beleaguered Jenny….
QoT:[snarling] Right, so you didn’t provide the link because you weren’t actually transcribing the audio but we’re meant to take your word for it even though others can’t verify it. That would be you making shit up right there, wouldn’t it?
This frothing denunciation leads to an awkward silence. Nobody dares to speak. When the Queen of Thorns is up on her high horse like this, nobody has the courage to cross her, not even the notoriously feisty Jenny. An ominous gloom settles over the Standardista community. Even more ominously, it looks like now is the time for Squealer to unleash his burden…
Te Reo Putake:[roaring with choleric rage] Bullshit, Jenny. You made that up. It didn’t happen. QoT:[glowering] Gods forbid anyone question your integrity given your extensive history of making shit up to suit your own narrative, but care to link to the footage you’re claiming to transcribe? McFlock: omg, she’s turning into morrissey… Colonial Viper:[stupid giggle] Heh heh heh. That’s funny. weka: I’d like to know what bizarre universe it is we’ve all ended up in where we’re feeling compelled to speak up for Shearer. Planet Jenny. Arfamo: Lol. I feel your pain and I share it. Te Reo Putake: Just for fun, I’d like to suggest that future examples of lazy news reporting are tagged as ‘jonolism’. Like, “Hi, I’m a jonolist from 3 News!” EVERYONE: Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha! Te Reo Putake: Or “Look Mum I’ve won an award for my jonolism!” Mr Prent:[grimly] Heh! Almost worth doing as an object lesson. Arfamo: Lol. Jonolism is where reporters simply Garner their own news. Colonial Viper:[dopey chuckle] That’s funny.
Meanwhile, in a dark corner of the bar, a drunken and aggressive slob continues to dish out threats to New Zealand’s best journalist…. ARMY GENERAL WHO CANNOT BE NAMED: I have contacts in Afgh*n*st*n and I can have you fucking killed just like THAT! And I fucking will, you subversive communist al Qaeda fuckhead! JOHN STEPHENSON: You’re drunk, Rh*s. You’re making a fool of yourself.
NOTE: This is a reconstruction of an actual conversation.
If you want, you can follow the whole abject thing in its original form….
“It’s intention is to…”
…… possibly show that Morissey can be just as cynical about himself as he can be aout others (which to my mind is a good thing)
Never been there, i fear the place is a fire-hazard, humorous wee lampoon you have posted there. It’s intention is to…
There is a serious reason I repackaged and presented those dismal messages for the reconsideration of Standard regulars. It is to highlight something that greatly troubles me, and indeed should trouble anyone who values free and open discussion, conducted in a serious and civil tone.
I’m talking about a particularly malicious insult that our friend Te Reo Putake has regularly employed against me, and no doubt many others who have crossed him. QoT used it twice in that thread, against Jenny. This is the continued repetition of the lie that your opponent is “making shit up”.
Instead of dealing with the substance of an uncomfortable issue, some people resort reflexively to abuse, and the repetition of a sordid piece of rhetorical abuse. Te Reo Putake is undoubtedly the worst offender here, but felix has also indulged in it, and (as we saw) so has QoT. This is the scurrilous and cynical behaviour you expect to see on the crazier right wing blogs; to see it indulged in on a mostly excellent and thoughtful forum like The Standard is extremely worrying.
Tho i have no reason to support many of those you ‘name’ and in fact the opposite of that is true, my opinion is that while the accusation of ‘making s**t up’ is to a certain extent gutter language probably saying more about it’s users than anything else the substance of what they were pointing out could be said to be largely true,
A re-litigation of this whole issue seems unwarranted but i found one of Jenny’s comments about the Shearer interjection, whether it actually occurred or not, to be rather ludicrous,
To be able to infer from that one simple interjection, made or otherwise, that Shearer was Bullying Cunliffe would be, in my opinion, within the realm of ‘making s**t up’…
You do make shit up Morrissey. I’ve pointed it out several times when you’ve made up quotes you think you heard on the radio but never bothered to check.
I’ve pointed it out several times when you’ve made up quotes you think you heard on the radio but never bothered to check.
I have often conceded that not all of my transcripts are word-perfect. But they are always true to the spirit and substance of what has been said. If you want to object to my slant on an issue, or the way I have portrayed someone, that is fair enough, but you have occasionally taken the unwise option of following Te Reo Putake’s lead and claimed that what I write is all “made up.” That’s obviously the way he deals, or thinks he deals, with people at his LEC meetings, but such extreme and spurious tactics don’t work here. I would have thought you had more nous than to take such a lead.
Perhaps your most grievous misjudgement was when you claimed that Chris (Haw Haw) Trotter had not delivered a depraved and pretentious defence of the appalling Florida jury decision in the Trayvon Martin case; he had done exactly that, of course, but you made some ridiculous claim that I had not put his windy oratory “in context”.
We all expect better of you, felix, and I’m sure you will return to your normal high standards sooner rather than later.
Last time you actually said your transcript was accurate. It was nothing of the sort.
And you are wrong about Trotter. I posted the audio to prove it. He did not say what you said he did, literally or otherwise.
Your writing is funny and clever but it is an outright lie to call it “transcribing”. It is fiction, sometimes based on actual events, sometimes entirely imaginary.
I challenge you to post the links to the audio next time so people can judge for themselves.
Love you, felix. I take your point, but disagree about Trotter. He commented on that verdict, and it was all in support of the jury’s decision. I would provide a verbatim transcript if I could, but I can’t even get the link you provided to play on my computer.
Maybe some kind soul—Queen of Thorns, perhaps?—might like to assist me by providing a transcript.
… I don’t get it. Besides adding your own spin on something which people can easily read for themselves, what’s the point?
Nice attempt at shaming me with the drinking and “apparatchik” comments, though, they really add to your cred as the one-man Open mike crusade against whoever you’ve decided to paraphrase for the day.
Nice attempt at shaming me with the drinking and “apparatchik” comments, though,
The tequila detailing, and the “Don’t judge me” thing come straight from your website’s “About” page. The apparatchik dig was aimed at our friend Te Reo, not at you.
they really add to your cred as the one-man Open mike crusade against whoever you’ve decided to paraphrase for the day.
Those were direct quotes, not paraphrases.
And….I know we’ve had some rather spiteful exchanges, but I enjoy your writing, and I’ve even commented (positively) on some of your Daily Blog articles.
style, like beauty, is oft in the eyes of the beholder (as is comedy). But morrissey keeps claiming that his conceptual pieces are “accurate”, and I can never figure out whether he’s seriously delusional or just taking perfomance art to the next level, like Sacha Baron Cohen or Laibach.
….like Sacha Baron Cohen or Laibach.
Big difference between myself and Sacha Baron Cohen: I target the arrogant (Key and his cronies), the dishonest (Garth “Gaga” George), the vicious (Dr Michael Bassett, Garth the Knife McVicar), the pompous (Chris Trotter), the vacuous (Simon Farrell Green, Murray Deaker), the smug (Kerre Woodham), the hypocritical (“Sir” Graham Henry) and the corrupt (John “Cabbage Boat” Banks).
Sacha Baron Cohen’s targets are the poor, the kind, the polite, and the victims of war crimes. He is a brutal and reckless liar, and a fanatical supporter of an outlaw state.
Comparing that scumbag to me was a misjudgement on your part.
Laibach I do have some time for; those guys are a timely reminder that Slovenia produces better things than foolish and shallow poseurs like Slavoj Žižek.
I’m sure that when I call myself a tequila-drinking bitch who rejects labels, it’s very very different from when Morrissey calls me a tequila-drinking bitch who rejects labels.
But of course he’s ~dramatizing~ things so misogynist behaviour-policing is totally okay.
Context is meaningless!
I’m sorry to have to say that inanely shouting slogans does not enhance your credibility one bit. I think you’re trying to imply with your ranting that, for me, context is meaningless. That, of course, is a ridiculous accusation; I go to great pains to always put my writing in context.
Up is down!
Could you provide an example of my trying to say any such thing? Of course you can’t, but I am eagerly awaiting your tabling of the evidence.
Morrissey’s fantasies about the Jim Mora panel are completely accurate!
“Fantasies”? Oh, I see—you’re channeling Te Reo Putake! Bad idea, that.
Take your bullshit “praise” and go fuck yourself with it, mate.
The praise was genuine, but it appears you lack the grace to let bygones be bygones. I do admire your feistiness, but you should know that not everybody has my patience. I advise you to dial down the indignation a notch or two.
Jeez, Moz, I was tempted to be positive about this effort, especially since, for the first time ever, you accurately transcribed the quotes, but your hopeless drivel about me in your replies really only leaves room for one retort.
You’re making shit up.
Feel free to transcribe these words any way that makes sense to you, dude.
Jeez, Moz, I was tempted to be positive about this effort, especially since, for the first time ever, you accurately transcribed the quotes, but your hopeless drivel about me in your replies really only leaves room for one retort.
Oh puh-leeeease! Enough already with the wounded admonitions. I believe my characterisation imbued you with a demonic energy that will see the ladies flocking around you, you bad boy you.
You’re making shit up.
If that’s a technical term for lifting some banal online banter out of its usual obscurity and putting it into a Broadway production, then this writer, i.e., moi is…. http://finkorswim.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/12/guilty2.png
Feel free to transcribe these words any way that makes sense to you, dude.
Thanks dude. Keep up the good work.
Interesting, in today’s Herald, a retired, retiring Judge’s contribution to a book containing well known New Zealanders who are considered grumpy males,(are there not grumpy females),
This and the follow up article in the same Herald simply say ”if you are not wearing a suit and you have visible Tatts then you will receive from the New Zealand court system far less ”justice” than those who appear in suit without any visible body ink”,
In today’s Herald on-line, sorry i have never been able to do links from other than Googled web-pages,(and then not all of them are a great success),
The problem being my computer illiteracy being a self taught user AND the not inconsiderable fact that i am a lazy little sod lulled into the belief that i need no further skill other than the present level of self taught ‘getting by’…
With respect, I suspect that His Honour expresses tongue-in-cheek here. And that being the case I further suspect there will be a sides-split audience of some 120 plus who as we speak will be flicking off “HaHaHa !” emails to their brother.
If I suspect wrongly, I look forward NOT to reading His Honour on the day he is no longer hobbled by the proscriptions inherent in picking up the $250,000 plus annual stipend of a District Court judge.
Oh that on my next court appearance I have the wedge to engage the sartorial standard which sufficiently reflects my respect for the justice system and the learned judicial officer holding my immediate fate in his/her hands !
i favor that you suspect wrongly, the legal eagle quoted in the link kindly provided by Molly, a follow-up piece by a Herald reporter, echo’s, with a certain amount of reservation the learned Judge’s comments…
In all the talk on leadership contenders, one name that should be mentioned but rarely is.. Iain Lees-Galloway. I think he ticks all the boxes. Smart, articulate, left leaning and decidedly the thinking woman’s crumpet.
It is travesty that we are forced to bring in 17,000 migrants to rebuild ChCh when we have so many welfare recipients. Not all of these jobs require high skills.
The problem is not a lack of training places. It is a mixture of motivation, ability to relocate, and sadly very low skill levels, demotivation, and drug use.
The priority should be their children (and doing everything possible to discourage long term welfare recipients having children that will repeat the cycle). The existing children of welfare recipients should be a high priority for Government attention – both money and re-education.
Yeah well you better get on the blower to ShonKey Python and suggest that he not allow the portly gal from Waitakere to high-prioritise dog-whistles against beneficiaries.
Sounds to me like you’re not quite so enamoured by the performance of ShonKey Python’s Flying Circus as once you were Sryland ?
srylands you have been sucked in by your cults bull shit drug use amongst beneficiaries research has shown to be at a lower level than the general population!
you are just another cult victim who has swallowed your leaders BS (poison like those in jones town)
When you don’t have effective policy to create jobs for NZders its a cheap nasty solution to demonize those who can’t help them selves!
I have no idea what he said – I am not an apologist for the Government or the National Party. The current government is a left wing government. I’m simply telling you my view that Governments cannot create jobs. They can certainly adopt policies to destroy jobs. Just read through a list of Green Party policies to give you a heads up.
Given that in most developed economies the government is directly responsible for about 35-45% of GDP and probably around 20-30% of employment … your claim is ridiculous on the face of it.
More importantly however is that in the absence of government .. the private sector would not exist either.
The only way the Government can create jobs is to lower state sector productivity (it needs to do the opposite) or increase the size of the public sector (when it needs to do the opposite – and not nearly enough is being done on that front).
Channeling resources away from the productive sectors might “create jobs” but they are illusory.
We could use general taxation to pay people to paint rocks white. That of course would create jobs. But that is not the direction we need to head in. Small government and high productivity is the way to go.
No, we haven’t no matter how much you RWNJs think we have.
BTW, the low productivity is a) a load of BS, productivity has been increasing faster than wages and b) it hasn’t been increasing as fast as it should have because of the policy settings that allowed businesses to keep wages low.
The problem is business which has been enabled by government that believed the illusion of the neo-liberal paradigm.
In the 1980’s we shrunk the Government, cut state spending, cut services, wages and taxes. We have been falling behind comparable countries, ever since.
We have one of the best per capita resource bases in the world. The fact we are falling behind other similar sized OECD countries is an indictment of the policies of the last 30 years.
Note how the economy picked up under Labour’s slightly increased State involvement and the recession Richardson caused, when the rest of the world was not having one, by her cuts.
thats absolute bullshit srylands .
Look at what happened to Argentina when they copied your policies.
Your are just repeating a failed mantra.
Germany is the most successful economy in Europe why because they train young people like no other economy !
We had Shipley and Bolger trying your less govt more business model in the 1990’s we had 3 good years out of 9 revolving around tax cuts for the better off just before the elections (election bribes) they gave the economy a short term boost followed by a long period of decline in between elections!
What we got was less govt and less business!
You r trying to push the old right wing whore’s(thatcherism) explanation of how to run an economy like a home budget which is naive redneck BS!
productivity is very hard to measure and as you get more people into employment in your economies, productivity goes down same all over the world I have studied every economy going back to Egyptian times.
Your simplistic bullshit is just that, unresearched redneck moralizing bullshit!
So Srylands say due to your small government argument we have a foot in mouth out break or as we are about to see a company like Fontera implodes all because of poor oversight.
My guess is you will say something like ‘thats just market forces at work’, yet many jobs will be lost, not to mention our reputation, so yes governments do create jobs through good governance.
Another twit with the idea that, say, a Teacher, or a Doctor, working in the State sector, is not part of the “” productive sector””.
Do they suddenly only become “”productive”” LOL, only if they are privatised?
Srylands statement of course comes from the laffer curve idea.
That expansion of Government provision of services always displaces the private sector.
If that was really the case then you would expect the countries with extremely large State shares in the economy to be the worst off. Which is obviously not the case.
Countries with large State investment in the economy are the most successful. Some States manage with no private sector at all. (Not what I would recommend though).
Every one from Singapore to Norway, Germany and Denmark.
Countries which have high State spending either/or both percentage wise or per capita.
How are your low tax, small Government countries doing? Srylands.
Funny that everyone wants to immigrate to countries with high levels of State social spending.
Not many want to go to Somalia. Your ideal of small Government and unlimited/unregulated free enterprise.
Shrinking the States share of the economy is working so well in Greece, Spain, Ireland and Italy, Right!
You claim to be in business. How well would your business be doing without our State provided infrastructure?
Painting rocks white is of course silly. Neither a public nor private sector organisation would do this because:
1. The private sector organisation would not achieve a cash flow for doing so.
2. The public sector organisation would not achieve a political mandate for doing so.
Different means of accountability, same end result.
Now the cash flow mechanism is simpler, faster and more direct. If you can’t find the cash to pay the wages and overheads this month you must take immediate action. Indeed this is why the private sector is good at things that are relative low-risk, short-term and local in scope … like selling baked beans. The downside is that it’s very hard to get things done that you cannot extract an immediate direct cash-flow from.
By contrast political accountability works over more variable time-frames, with more variable responses. If a government ultimately loses the confidence of the people they eventually have to take some action. But there is a fair bit of flexibility, resilience and ability to spread risk over time. This is why the public sector is better at high-risk, long-term and globally scoped undertakings ….like education and health.
Taken to the next level – and this is already done in some sectors, car industry, defense etc…- is the use of robots in production and online shopping instead of shops. Who is really needed in such a “productive world”? It also means that there is no need to be governed as the corporates are not even overseen today, let alone under such circumstance.Tax take will decline to a mere trickle and the rulers of foreign politics and defense could as well be appointed directors of the corporate body. This would be the smallest government and highest productivity one can think of.
I belief we have to rethink the way society works, the sooner the better.
Beside your snide remark – yes ordinary people do actually go and get i.e. groceries – you have not come up with an answer to the issues our society is and will face. Slogans wont cut it.
Oh yes you do Srylands…….be honest now. And posing as a rightie who thinks ShonKey Python is actually Matt McCarten Left…….well…….you just look like a fuckwit.
Honesty is the best policy mate……wherever you’re at.
Have a Snickers bro’. You’re mean when you’re disappointed and outed for it.
Governments cannot (and should not try to) “create” jobs.
Actually, the government can and should create jobs. Saying that it shouldn’t is just making our society ever more dependent upon the rich which is, of course, what they want and why they created the fiction that governments shouldn’t. When governments go round looking after the people that they’re supposed to serve the capitalists lose power.
I’m simply telling you my view that Governments cannot create jobs.
Governments cannot (and should not try to) “create” jobs.
I don’t think Shitlands has ever been treated at a public hospital, been pulled over by a policeman, or had a letter delivered to his address, by the sounds of it. Or, he’s an idiot.
Whatever – there is too much drug use amongst welfare recipients. Go to the East Cape and talk to logging companies trying to recruit tree pruners. They struggle to recruit and retain young unemployed men because of drug testing. It is a serious problem.
Of course employed people will use more drugs than those on welfare – they have more money. Doesn’t mean that it is not a serious problem.
logging companies have also been exploiting workers, the word gets around young people don,t want to go out in work gangs to work for eight hours, when they get to work they are given the dangerous work with little training while the contract workers take the easy work easy money
The eight hours becomes 10 to 12 hrs work with no pay for the extra hours putting these workesr health safety at risk no pay for the extra hours and quite often no pay at all as alot of these contractors keep the wages and fob off young naive workers!
more blame shifting just like your leader!
then we should drug and alcohol test students whose parents are wealthy,as they are getting 70% of their fees paid for by the state mp.s are recieving 100% funding by the state drug test cops ird staff work and income defence force roading contractors etc etc.
I don’t think that employers who pay minimal wages for difficult dangerous and dirty work, far from home, are going to get the pick of the bunch, somehow.
The problem is not a lack of training places. It is a mixture of motivation, ability to relocate, and sadly very low skill levels, demotivation, and drug use.
The problem is a lack of training programs. It is also a mixture of incompetence by government, ability to forecast when builders would be required, and sadly, very low levels of intelligence.
FIFY
What’s not to like aye! It’s a win win situation. Those Chinese will work for nothing (their visas will be tied to a specific employer – just to keep track of them of course), and Fonterra can assist in some sort of feeding programme akin to weatbix and milk in schools. Perhaps something like corn product and milk whey.
Nathe-the-man Guy and Soimun Brudges can keep an eye on the whole scheme to ensure transparency and oversight.
I imagine their also botulism-intolerant too – but then what’s a few chinks between friends! We’ve still got the nargy-nation to work on for our next FTA – and who knows ….. something may still come of that South American jaunt earlier this year
It is travesty that we are forced to bring in 17,000 migrants to rebuild ChCh
You’re not forced to bring them in at all.
The problem is not a lack of training places.
No, it’s a lack of being supported through training either by the government or the businesses.
It is a mixture of motivation, ability to relocate, and sadly very low skill levels, demotivation, and drug use.
Well, I’m pretty sure that if you paid enough to cover expenses including the expense of relocating then people would be motivated. Drug use isn’t that much of an issue – never has been. If it was all those people drinking alcohol (a legal drug) wouldn’t have a job.
The priority should be their children (and doing everything possible to discourage long term welfare recipients having children that will repeat the cycle).
That “cycle” is a direct result of capitalism because capitalism forces poverty on the many. When people don’t have access to the needed to resources to better themselves, to make a go of life then they inevitably lose self-esteem and start to see no point in doing anything. Get these people to the resources they need and that cycle will come to an end but the capitalists don’t want that because then they’d actually have competition and wouldn’t be able to profit so much.
Supplying people with the means that they don’t have to get somewhere and set up somewhere to live is not displaying an attitude of ‘entitlement culture’, it is simply an attitude of addressing the practical obstacles that a person on welfare would have to getting those jobs in Chch.
Given the passage of a sweeping new law legalizing marijuana in the entire nation of Uruguay by their Congress on August 2 (with the apparent inevitable passage by the Uruguayan Senate this fall), the South American nation is likely to become the first nation to set the dominoes of a ruinous US drug war policy tumbling down.
And the sooner we legalise marijuana here in NZ the better as well.
Christ Draco T!!!!
This IS serious!
You do realise those bloody narco states COULD (possibly, maybe, at a pinch) be financing the Yell Kida!
What can be done?
This really IS a crisis!
I know …. let’s trust in our Proim Munsta and our agencies of state to protect us.
After all – we lekd them, and they’ve got OUR best, bestest, bestest bestest intrusts at heart! (AYE?)
Portugal and the Netherlands have already moved in terms of legalisation. Uruguay isn’t the first, but it is good seeing it happen in South America. As always, drug laws there are used to attack the poor, curb civil rights and excuse brutal militarised police forces.
Schrilands you are just wheeling out the same lines word for word letter for letter even the punctuation marks of other neo liberal has beens!
Show us some evidence your neo liberal moralistic crap works.I have researched and studied economics for over 30 years and have found no place your simplistic naive short sighted model works!
That apparatchik Beltway Grant Robertson on “democracy” on Beige Alert?! “Leonid Brezhnev* on democracy” would be less cynical, more inspiring and sincere.
Nice words. Coming from someone else, I might believe them.
Interesting. Looks like the MP will hold the balance of power.
MMP seat allocator has change a bit, lets see if this link works… this is based on the MP having 2 electorate seats, and there being an overhang of 1 seat. It assumes that UF don’t retain their seat (and that NZF are out for being under the 5%).
NACT = 58
Lab/GP/Mana = 60
MP = 3
Total seats 121
(can’t remember the rules, who gets for form govt in that situation?)
However if the MP lost all their electorate seats, the left would have a clear win. Would the GP, Mana and Labour work together on that? Apparently they’d rather lose the election.
My view on NZFirst, touch and go, But, always remembering that even under massive fire from the opposition and media at the time NZFirst still managed 4.8% of the party vote so i cannot see that Party being as low as 3%,
NZFirst tho will struggle, there is little impetus for ‘activists’ to support that Party in 2014 and the opposite is now true,
i take my view of the Mana Party from a basis of what occurred in the Ikaroa-Rawhiti byelection after which the Roy Morgan polled Mana at 1.5%, (a list seat in it’self),
Given that Mana, contesting Ikaroa-Rawhiti for the first time picked up 4000+ votes off of the Maori Party then there is no reason to believe that Mana will not end the 2014 campaign with up to 1.5-2.5% of the party vote,
Flavell on those numbers is GONE from Waiariki, his majority is only 1900 votes and Labour have nothing to gain by seriously contesting this electorate seat and lots to lose as this besides Hone’s Te Tai Tokerau is the next most winnable seat for Mana,
Sharples’s Tamaki-Makaurau is also a goner for the Maori party where Sharples holds it by a mere 1000 votes over Labour’s Shane Jones who should win it for Labour in 2014 although with a large chunk of the electorate and Party votes going across to Mana,
Auntie Tariana’s seat, meh???, i cannot pick it, don’t know who Tariana has picked to stand there and don’t know what sort of strength Mana have in the electorate, Labour i am picking to just win it with Mana picking up a good chunk of the Maori Party’s party vote,
The Maori Party party vote across NZ, i pick it to halve, and 90% of that halving of the Maori Party % to go to the Mana Party,
If there’s a overhang in Parliament 2015 it will be one of Mana Party MP’s…
Thanks, good to see some analysis of the Maori seats. Still, Mana made some big predictions in the past that haven’t come true, so I’m not sure that the MP can be ruled out so easily. The question then becomes, what would they do if they held the balance of power? Presumably go back to their electorates and members as ask?
The real problem is NZF, and Labour/left voters, including some here, who believe that a NZF list vote helps the left somehow. Would like to see someone explain that too.
The posit that a vote for NZFirst applied for the 2011 election, and i might add had Labour gained a couple of more % points than what it did would have come within a whisker of giving Slippery’s crew the kick,
But it isn’t Mana that is making such predictions, those are my very own little analysis of where Mana now stand in the Maori political pecking order and are based upon the Ikaroa-Rawhiti by-election,
In Ikaroa-Rawhiti the Maori Party lost 1/2 it’s 2011 vote all but a 100 of those votes went to the Mana Party,
A simple transfer of that Maori Party loss across all the Maori electorates will see them disappear from the Parliament, and, my rough calculations tell me that Mana would only need pick up 1/2 of those lost Maori Party party votes to gain 2.5% of that party vote,
The loss of that Maori Party party vote in 2014 is also why i see Labour as polling a bit lower than it’s actual support as the share of the Maori Party party vote that Labour will pick up is probably 1%…
Seriously???, i assume you mean what would the Maori Party do if by some fluke that party is still represented by an MP in the 2015 Parliament,
Go back to their electorate and members and ask, that a giggle, Te Ururoa would consult the nearest mirror and then phone all and sundry telling them He is open for Biz and please gentleman place your bids now…
“But it isn’t Mana that is making such predictions,”
Mana seemed confident that they would decimate the MP. They haven’t done that, yet. I think they will continue to grow, but not as fast as they were suggesting. That’s why I’m not entirely convinced of the collapse of the MP, but can live in hope (although I tend to think it’s for Maori to sort out, and I don’t know enough to know if the collapse of the MP entirely is a good thing or not).
Sorry, no, but I heard it straight from Russel Norman’s mouth before the last election. He might not have said actively campaigning (so I don’t know if it was on billboards, that sor of thing), but he definitely meant that GP policy was to go for both ticks.
When you vote, you don’t vote for someone who says that they’ll give you a fluffy unicorn, you vote for them if you have confidence that they will actually try to.
Beltway Grant doesn’t quite exude that impression from every one of his pores.
Sure, but the point we were discussing was people giving two ticks to the GP, because they think the GP needs two ticks, when the GP don’t and someone else would be better off with the electorate tick.
Your case sounds entirely reasonable to me, but I’m curious what you would do if electorate voting Robertson was tactically the better thing to do eg if it was a close contest between Labour and National. Or hypothetically, Robertson was standing in Ohariu and had a chance of ousting Dunne/UF. Would you still electorate vote away from Robertson (assuming that person met your unicorn criteria)?
“Criteria” is plural. “Criterion” is singular and more appropriate. Sorry about the pedantry – I do admit to being a wanker.
I see your point and agree, and pragmatically, I might get extremely drunk and tick Robertson if it were very close if Franks or Prebble were standing again, but I reserve my right to say that as a Wellington Central voter, I do not see Robertson as my representative.
His electorate office is literally right across the road from a WINZ office on Willis Street, he could see it right out his window, but that hypocrite doesn’t give a wet shit about the poor in real life.
“Tactical voting” for me means voting for the “least awful who’s likely to get a seat at Bellamy’s”, and that’s bad faith as far as I’m concerned. I deserve better than the least awful as my representative, I’ve lived here a lot longer than that opportunist and carpetbagging Beltway Grant doesn’t cut it.
“I’m curious what you would do if electorate voting Robertson was tactically the better thing to do eg if it was a close contest between Labour and National.”
There’s an assumption built into that question that supporting Labour is necessarily a tactical goal.
Also, there’s a difference between tactical voting and strategic voting.
“Tactical voting” for me means voting for the “least awful who’s likely to get a seat at Bellamy’s”, and that’s bad faith as far as I’m concerned. I deserve better than the least awful as my representative, I’ve lived here a lot longer than that opportunist and carpetbagging Beltway Grant doesn’t cut it.
I don’t think I’ve ever voted in an electorate where I felt like the candidate would be a good representative of me, so voting for me has always been more pragmatic, around what kind of govt is realistic, or what I don’t want, rather than thinking that I’m voting with any kind of purity.
“I’m curious what you would do if electorate voting Robertson was tactically the better thing to do eg if it was a close contest between Labour and National.”
There’s an assumption built into that question that supporting Labour is necessarily a tactical goal.
Also, there’s a difference between tactical voting and strategic voting.
Yes true, I can that it might be better for Roberston to have a low electorate vote and that that might serve the left better in the medium and long term. Maybe even the short term.
I guess the better example is Waitakere and having Sepuloni as the electoriate MP instead of Shipley. But that doesn’t really compare with Rhinocrates situation, who is stuck with a useless option.
I disagree that your interpretation of my voting has been tactical.
Tactical voting is what delivered Banks to parliament.
voting for me has always been more pragmatic,
Indeed, appropriate point,Weka, so I guess that we see conflicting idealisms, not ideologies.
I am an idealist when it comes to democracy. If I have to vote for a representative, then they have to represent me.
Still, while a candidate would never be “perfect” for me (too much hair, likes Dmitri Shostakovich and Brian Eno less than me, etc), I just simply cannot accept Beltway Grant as my representative under any terms. He has no loyalty to his electorate because he’s a parachute candidate, he has no loyalty to the traditional Labour voter or those whom Labour needs now.
I urge people to make moral and ideological choices about their representatives.
This is the issue: representatives are representative , not merely expedient.
That said, I hope that you have a better candidate for your electorate.
I guess the better example is Waitakere and having Sepuloni as the electoriate MP instead of Shipley. But that doesn’t really compare with Rhinocrates situation, who is stuck with a useless option.
Indeed – that would suddenly make things easy- albeit expensive (I really don’t have the budget for much good whisky).
I was very sad not to see Carmel Sepuloni win, especially considering her opponent, and by such a small margin!
Yes but the same could be said of Labour when they contest the Te Tai Tokerau and Waiariki seats,
Polling in the 30’s on the party vote Labour has got nothing to win even if they won both electorates,
Labour should they win both those seats will not gain any extra MP’s in the House and winning those 2 seats might cost Labour the election, the fact is should they not contest those 2 seats Labour will have the number of seats in the House dictated by it’s % of the Party vote and at least 2 seats in the House that Will Not ever vote for National…
Let’s put it like this: Natz gained 47% of the electorate vote in that Culmar Brunton Polling. Labour gained 39% and Greens 8%. If those who plan to waste their electorate vote on the Greens instead voted for Labour candidates, they would also have 47% of the electorate votes. An 8% swing in favour of Labour candidates could secure another 5 electorate seats at least. Basically if you vote for The Greens in your electorate, you may as well be voting for your National party candidate.
Never let it be said that i would have a moan about a mainstream media poll that shows the left in a good position,( and still a long way out from November 2014),
But, this poll strikes me as ‘funny’ in that it shows the Green vote to have jumped a massive 5% while showing only a loss of 4% in total from other Party’s,
What also does not quite compute is that 4% of ‘shown’ shift has come from the Conservative Party and National Party to the Green Party,
Now no matter how much i would be amused at such a wild swing in the mood of the electorate taking 4% from the far right of the spectrum across to the far left seems to me to be a little far fetched,
Of course, Labour for all i know may have picked up that far right vote decamping from National and the Conservatives at the same time as the same % of Labour voters scarpered across to the Green Party, all very confusing i know, and, i might add, slightly unbelievable,
Having had my moan tho, the Colmar Brunton is pretty much where i see the state of the party’s to be ( in my opinion),
Altho i pick Labour to be a little light and the Greens to have profited in this particular poll because of that light reading for Labour, (believe me i would like nothing better than to be proved wrong),
No Mana Party, i think that’s a mistake especially after the Ikaroa-Rawhiti by election result showed the massive gains Mana have made mainly at the expense of the Maori party…
Chuck on roughly 10% positive for the combined left to allow for the ah standard Brolmar bias, and allow for the Spygate traction to come (thank you Pascale), and sleep well Standardistas. For your sins (and yes we all sin dear, sorry thought that was your leg) three mail hairies, a hail holy queen for Peter may god rest his soul and fast from Shearerpoking for a week cold showers maybe, go now and sin no more, sorry sorry something on your cardy..
Fonterra’s handling of the contamination at their Hautapu Factory is unbelievable. I cant help but think the attempt to cover this up and the lack of openness and honesty we are seeing from Fonterra is related to the way our country is currently lead. Key and National have turned cover ups and dishonesty into an art form.
This Fonterra cock up is catastrophic…expect some fairly senior heads to roll this week….and I predict an eventual reversal of the 50 cent increase in the payout announced earlier this week (Thats probably best case scenario at this stage)
I wonder if HONESTY & INTEGRITY will play an important part in the 2014 election…should be good for the Green Party, clearly the only major party that has this in truck loads.
But real corruption and the Corporate state have now arrived in NZ.
Fonterra, too big to regulate. Farmers run the show. I see a Feds spokesman blames the testing and the media – after all, no-one died. (Since lost the link, mmmm…!)
Where is the Ministry of Primary Industries in all this? Hardly a suitable regulatory authority. Minister Guy spends most of his time talking up the benefits of irrigated dairying, and downplaying its effects on the environment.
And this is the Nats’ doing – they set up MPI. If the regulatory authority was the Min of Health things might have been different.
This will be the week that Key heads away on holiday again, my guess.
Federated Farmers vice president Dr William Rolleston begged people not to jump to conclusions.
”As far as we know no-one has got sick, it’s the testing that has brought this to the surface … and that has to be something that will help build Fonterra’s reputation,” he said.
MPI and Fonterra needed to do further testing, he said.
if the regulatory authority was the Min of Health things might have been different.
It would be the fault of the quasi autonomous company asure nz that would have oversight and would have some portion of the phytosanitary certification,whether they were informed or when is another matter.
testing would be especially difficult,if there was suspicion of the causative agent .i would suggest it would only be able to be tested at Wallaceville or an overseas certified lab.
Fonterra’s handling of the contamination at their Hautapu Factory is unbelievable. I cant help but think the attempt to cover this up and the lack of openness and honesty we are seeing from Fonterra is related to the way our country is currently lead. Key and National have turned cover ups and dishonesty into an art form.
This Fonterra cock up is catastrophic…
Saarbo, do you have something I can read that supports that. Because what I’ve seen on Stuff etc doesn’t.
Do you know what the actual risk is? AFAIK, they found the Clostridium botulinum bacteria in its inert, not its active form. That’s a different thing than botulism.
Don’t get me wrong, I think Fonterra rate fairly high on the evil scale, and are capable of covering up things to save their own butts. But, I don’t think they are stupid enough to allow botulism into the food chain and then go slow on resolving that, so am guessing the actual risk is pretty low. Unfortunately the MSM aren’t providing any useful information on that, so we’re pretty much in the dark.
Foodborne botulism is a rare illness caused by eating foods contaminated with botulinum toxin. Spores of C. botulinum are ubiquitous in the environment (3), but growth and elaboration of toxin occur only under particular conditions that include an anaerobic, low-salt, low-acid environment. Bacterial growth is inhibited by refrigeration below 4°C, heating above 121°C, high water activity,or acidity (pH <4.5) (4). Toxin is destroyed by heating to 85°C for at least 5 minutes, and spores are inactivated by heating to 121°C under pressure of 15–20 lb/in2 for at least 20 minutes (5).
Only what I have read in the media Weka. This happened in May 2012, why are we only hearing about this now? remember this is all in the shadow of the melamine disaster, Fonterra need to treat any contamination with real care and respect. China and Russia have stopped all Dairy imports from NZ. My thinking is that this is catastrophic.
Only what I have read in the media Weka. This happened in May 2012, why are we only hearing about this now? remember this is all in the shadow of the melamine disaster, Fonterra need to treat any contamination with real care and respect. China and Russia have stopped all Dairy imports from NZ. My thinking is that this is catastrophic.
I’m a bit confused by that. I agree that the health risks should be taken seriously, but that is separate from economic issues (my thinking is the slowing of the industrial dairying in NZ would be good for NZ).
Re the health issues, well I’ll say it again, we don’t know what the risk is, but it’s possible that it is very low. Clostridium is not synonmous with people getting ill from botulism. You need specific conditions for that to happen.
To put it another way, I think the real concern here is that the MSM haven’t reported what the actual risk is. If it turns out that Fonterra have been negligent and cavalier, then throw all kinds of shit at them.
The other factor is, how common or rare is it for a pipe to become contaminated in this way? How often do people in NZ get botulism? We don’t have a context to understand this within.
And industrially produced food is always going to have levels of unsafety that are specific to it. Look at the ecoli outbreaks in the US in recent years – they came from spinach that was grown with animal shit spread in the fields, and then the spinach was distributed via the industrial food supply chains and it was difficult for them to figure out where it came from and what the source was. I’d like to know how clear and efficient Fonterra’s supply chains are.
Yes, I understand where you are coming from Weka, I hope you are right. But we do know that the Chinese are incredibly sensitive since the melamine disaster which is completely understandable. Attached is the e mail from the fonterra Chairman yesterday, it raises a big question around TIMING. The problem occurred in May 2012 (Point 1), a POTENTIAL issue discovered in March 2013 (Point 7), Issue confirmed in July 2013 (Point 8)…..why did all of this take so long?
Fonterra let farmers know within a matter of hours whether there is contamination in their supply, why does it take Fonterra factories so long….its not a good look.
E mail from John Wilson to Farm Suppliers yesterday.
Good evening
1)Fonterra today advised eight customers of a quality issue involving three batches of whey protein concentrate (WPC80) produced at a single New Zealand manufacturing site in May 2012.
2)These companies are now investigating where the affected product is in their supply chains and if necessary, will initiate consumer product recalls.
3)There have been no reports of any illness linked to consumption of the whey protein. –4)Dairy products such as fresh milk, yoghurt, cheese, spreads and UHT milk products are not affected.
5)Food safety is Fonterra’s number one priority. Fonterra takes matters of public health extremely seriously and is doing everything it can to assist its customers to ensure any affected product is removed from the marketplace and that the public is made aware.
6)The business is working closely with New Zealand’s regulatory authority – the Ministry for Primary Industries – to keep New Zealand and offshore regulators informed.
7)Fonterra initially identified a potential quality issue in March this year, when a product tested positive for Clostridium. There are hundreds of different strains of Clostridium, the majority of which are harmless.
8)Product samples were then put through intensive testing over the following months. On Wednesday 31 July 2013, a test indicated the potential presence of suspected Clostridium Botulinum in a sample – a strain which can cause botulism.
9)This particular Whey Protein Concentrate (WPC80) is used by Fonterra’s customers in a range of products including infant formula, growing up milk powder and sports drinks – and that is why the business has acted with speed so any potentially affected product is removed from the marketplace.
10)Fonterra is continuing to work with customers and will provide more information as it becomes available.
Pono, Weka. We don’t really know the full health risks, but from what we do know, the reaction does seem a little disproportionate. Just like the recent reaction to the wrong paperwork which held tonnes of mutton on Chinese wharves.
What we do know however, is that the Chinese are rather sensitive to international criticism. Especially from arrogant minnows who cuddle up to Taiwan and Uncle Sam. Oh – and that our own dear wee PM recently accused them publicly of “spreading their tentacles” in the South Pacific.
Schrilands with all your neo liberal arguements can you show us some proof they work which countries or states work .name policy country or sate ,show,evidence or put
Up or shut up!
Schrilands with all your neo liberal arguements can you show us some proof they work which countries or states work .name policy country or sate ,show,evidence or put
Up or shut up!
New Zealand’s economic performance over the last six decades has been poor compared
with most other Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) countries.
Theory and evidence suggest that high levels of government expenditure, as a share of the
economy, can be detrimental to economic growth due to the economic costs of raising
taxation to finance expenditure
Economic theory suggests that a large government may undermine economic growth
through the cost of financing expenditure and differences in the rate of productivity growth
between the public and private sector.
A number of countries have smaller governments than New Zealand, including Australia and South Korea, with the larger governments generally being European.
The classic natural experiment is North and South Korea. North Korean economic policies are remarkably similar to those expounded by many The Standard contributors. Didn’t work so well.
The other example is Australia – much smaller government over the last 30 years compared to NZ, with deeper more competitive markets – The country has a population 5 x NZ’s but the sharemarket is 30x larger. Says it all. (Another reason we desperately need 100% privatisation asap)
And of course New Zealanders vote with their feet by moving there in large numbers.
Schrilands BS Australia smaller govt than NZ what absolute tossing lies.
Australia has out grown NZ because of cheaper housing better family tax credits concentrated population bigger govt subsidies tougher tarrifs Capital gains tax mining mining and mining!
Australia has a far bigger govt than us lower house upper house state govts wow!
You are just plain lying
Ok you will be rushed into the front bench of National Monday morning born leader liar!
Australia smaller govt than NZ what absolute tossing lies.” Tosser.
Bloody hell – you people don’t let facts get in the way do you? Australia has a much smaller government share of GDP than NZ – that includes ALL levels of government. In 2011 Australia had a government sector = 34% of GDP – in NZ it was 44%. The trend over the last 30 years has been for an overall widening of the gap.
And of course because government is smaller overall tax take is smaller too.
Mining explains a relatively small proportion of Australia’s economic performance – the resources boom was a help but it has been the services sector that has driven growth.
But feel free to ignore facts and carry on with your prejudices. Australia has grown despite some negative policies like PMV subsidies – NOT because of them
Australian government expenditure – at all levels of government has been between 5 and 10% of GDP SMALLER than NZ for 30 years. And the gap is increasing.
shrilands thats federal spending. mining has been booming for the last thirty years their population is concentrated which is cheaper to provide services.
that is federal govt spending it does not include state govt spending then when you look at the size of govt spending per person, Australia out spends us take mining out of the equation and your figures will look sick, unemployment has been higher in Australia most of that time
Australia spends more on health welfare defence infrastructure per head than we do!
The size of the Australian economy allows them to spend more on all fronts than us.
Another reason is health insurance and compulsory super savings aren’t included!
Compulsory super savings has cut the amount of govt super paid out as well!
Now the mining boom is over Australia is hitting the skids NZ will feel the effects!
Australia has way more tarrifs than us as well!
Where Australia is making faster gains is in education they spend way more than us Australian have better access to tertiary education with much better performing universities.
it is funny that you seem to attribute australia’s growth due to a single crude and highly debateable measure, while ignoring the many other factors that might also contribute to growth (including economies of scale: “Australia has smaller government.
Of course it spends more per head – it is a richer country” – and bigger in every way).
You can’t explain (let alone predict) a substantial part of a massive chaotic system with a single abstract measure. It’s just stupid to try.
Factual? More like stupid and irrelevant. NZ is poorer than most other OECD countries because we were idiots and followed the neolib free market prescription to the letter.
The fact you can’t see that is a serious problem undermining all your ongoing natter about what to do next.
Australia has smaller government.
Of course it spends more per head – it is a richer country.
Billions of NZD have been extracted out of NZ workers and companies to feed Australian bank shareholders over the last few years.
NZ is poorer than most other OECD countries because we have a poor productivity record. The policy response to that has been well covered by the Treasury.
Even if Labour wins the next election they will get with the programme and follow most of these policies. e.g say goodbye to NZ Power.
Really? You know which of the Treasury’s policy recommendations have been accepted by governments? You are really clear on that? I doubt you eben know what they are.
Other way around: if treasury is indeed consistent with your deranged political lens, then we can pick which policies were at least partial treasury recommendations. Privatisation, deregulation, removal of workers’ rights, and blaming the poor.
why should a worker bother to participate in “productivity” improvement when time and again its the worker who gets screwed by changes while the fat cat owners take 98c out of every new dollar generated.
its about share of income – too much now in the hands of owners, corporates and shareholders, not enough in the hands of ordinary workers and citizens
I’m not going to try again. That is such an idiotic claim.
The CTU recognises that productivity is central to prosperity. Sure they might have different views to Treasury about HOW to lift productivity but they also will have a lot in common, and the CTU would certainly not say “productivity is a crock”.
“Improving productivity has been identified as a key factor for New Zealand’s long term, sustainable economic growth and prosperity. Productivity levels affect our living standards, our ability to create jobs and our ability to afford education, health and other services.”
New Zealand Council of Trade Unions – Te Kauae Kaimahi
“Productivity is the biggest long-run determinant of wages and living standards.”
It is productivity stupid.
Your quote is as stupid as saying “humidity is the biggest long run determinant of precipitation”.
In a chaotic system, no single factor can be the deterimant of a desired outcome. In fact, the same input of that “determinant” can have dramatically different outcomes depending on what every single other factor is doing.
Treasury is wrong again treasury is loaded with right wing purists.
You look at every single industry in NZ and ask if they are improving productivity they are!
treasury is a right wing think tank subsidized by the tax payer.
so
Shrilands I wasn’t wrong STATE TAXES ie stamp duties land tax Varying state payroll taxes are not included in the OECD figure’s nor are3.5% + medicare contrbutions nor are compulsory 9% super contributions .so by the time you add those contributions into the overall figures theirs not a lot of difference!
Campbell live looked at that last week came to the same conclusion!
Manurfacturing has declined by 70% since the 1960’s 60% of Australia’s economy is service Industry.
Shril more lies from you federal govt taxes Aprox A$ 340 billion out $1008 billion
33% aprox as you have pointed out
State pay roll ,land taxes, stamp duties not included!
super contributions not included as they are seen as private investments
Medicare contributions not included as they are private contributions
We pay all of that to one govt so your facts are bullshit!
If smaller government is so great for the country, why is it that unemployment and inequality skyrocketed at the same time the NZ cut the size of its govt around 1990?
It’s all very well saying that smaller government is better for the country, but that means shit if you have no job and can’t afford to put shoes on your kids’ feet. In fact, it’s more like your “economic theory” isn’t so much a better economy as it is throwing as many people under the bus as possible, and then blaming them for being unemployed or otherwise in need.
Australia has a higher minimum wage, something like a partially functioning union movement, a huge number of government subsidies to business, government investment in infrastructure, mineral resources that they exploit regardless of environmental and social cost, an apprenticeship program, government gifts to first home buyers, and far more government bureaucracy than NZ. Hardly a model for us to follow, but more successful in purely economic terms. Oh, and while Kiwi workers do a lot of the heavy lifting over there, Kiwi executives powder their noses at bars next to the Sydney Harbour and complain about how we want to care for our environment, all while spouting their Randian delusions. Cocaine does that, it makes people delusional. It’s almost as bad as neoliberal economics.
“Fonterra yesterday announced three batches of a whey protein called WPC80, manufactured in May last year, may have been contaminated by a dirty pipe at the company’s Hautapu plant”
So if there was another contamination event this instant, we wouldn’t know about it till October 2014 earliest?
“Fonterra said it initially identified a potential quality issue in March this year, when a product tested positive for Clostridium”
“New Zealand has an independent, highly regarded judiciary, with a robust appeal process for people who feel they have been wrongly convicted,”
and
“It would be completely inappropriate for a Minister of the Crown to interfere in the court process.”
This is complete and utter bile. If anyone thinks Key’s full of lies and deceit and has ongoing and total contempt for the intelligence of our citizens, then they should know we’d be in for far more of Collins ever became PM.
Andrew Little has rightly pointed out that the appeal hasn’t been lodged yet. But even if it had there’d still be nothing to stop the government looking into whether there were grounds to put things right. The Crown would (or at least should) in fact be doing this if and when the need to prepare for an appeal arose.
Ultimately there’s absolutely nothing stopping the Crown looking at the case again because it would be done with a view to being of benefit to Teina Pora. For example, a party in any litigation can choose to agree with the arguments of the other side. This is how parties to litigation reach settlement!
Judith Collins is wholly disingenuous in trying to spin the line that it would be inappropriate for the government to “intervene” in the Pora case. Doing so is not “intervening” – if there’s prina facie injustice she in fact has a duty to act. What she’s in effect saying is that the government does not have the power to fix an injustice. That’s plainly wrong. I’d go further to say it’s just darn right nasty, uncaring, cold and inhuman. Heaven help us if she’s ever PM.
Her redneck voters will look at the guy and say “So what if he didn’t do this one. Being in prison will have stopped him committing other offences.” The vileness inherent in their thought processes knows no bounds.
Her supporters would be saying that. It’d be good if MSM challenged her on her flawed logic and lack of principle. It always amazes me when lawyers try to do what she’s doing because it shows she’s prepared to use personal bias and adherence to ideological dogma to override established public service ethics and basic legal principle. It’s sometimes difficult to know precisely how in particular cases this happens. I don’t know Collins well enough to say whether she could be called a narcissist or not, but it’s pretty clear a lot of the signs are there.
I know the type Murray Olsen. All hot pontification about cases and lives they know absolutely nothing of. Larry-Loudmouth-Williams-Radio-Live style.
But wait until it’s one of their own entitled little bastards in the dock. The most innovative excuses and rationalisations when it’s one of their own little bastards in the dock.
And of course it would be madness, what’s more patently unjust, for other than a rehabilitative sentence to be handed down. “We want counselling for this boy right now ! Blah Blah Blah !”.
Dealt with the type thousands of times. Thick socially retarded fuckwits.
Collins is right in the first instance and it’s routine stuff…….while the case is in progress…….etc etc.
I’m not absolutely sure where it’s at so far but I recall hearing mention of application for the exercise of the royal prerogative, a pardon. Seemingly because there appears to be no taste for it in the government (Collins) it is now heading to the Privy Council. Because of Collins, Collins can say – “case in progress……” Technically.
A cry-off of course. Given that Judith is so absorbed in her Thatcher pretensions we cannot reasonably expect any other response. The same personal trait led her to all sorts of extraordinary overtness (and the spending of a rather large amount of public money) re the Binnie report.
You see this is a 17 year old (now 38), never amounted to much, Maori boy with a criminal record. Yes, in the slammer for 21 years. And yes, a fact which senior police officers, damn, the Police Association, are calling to be investigated. Unprecedented.
I’d like to think that Judith would agree he’s entitled to a pardon as matter of urgency and twenty, no thirty million. If you can put a price on it at all…….
There’s the rub. The Justice Sow values the money and fears the ignominy of having to concede, more than putting right the travesty. After all………we’re only talking Maori boy criminal underclass here……..
“Collins is right in the first instance and it’s routine stuff…….while the case is in progress…….etc etc.”
With respect, that’s not quite the case. If an injustice is identified the Crown can choose to address it at any point, regardless of whether an appeal has been lodge, is being contemplated or not. This, of course, makes sense: if the Crown has done something to someone it later realises it shouldn’t have it has every ability to fix it. What’s also important to note is that this is over and above the Royal Prerogative, which is different again. You’re right in that Pora’s off to the PC because government isn’t listening, which highlights further Collins’ lie that her hands are tied because the matter’s “with the courts”. This is a particularly large amount of shit coming out of Collins’ mouth this time, probably more than usual, and which the nature of has got me thinking about whether she’s narcissistic.
I agree entirely Mary. Don’t misunderstand me. I’m identifying that Collins is technically right in one part alone of the broad legal picture.
Of course it is from there that Collins chooses to speak.
The “speak” is rubbish as a disguise or excuse for this boy not already having a pardon.
All of the Thatcher disdain mentioned above is true. As are the reasons for that disdain.
Florists usually like flowers, jockeys horses, dancers dancing.
How come this Minister of Justice has a problem with you know what ?
Anyway, thanks to Jonathan Krebs counsel for Teina Pora – personal commitment to get the case to London for the Privy Council irrespective of insufficiency if any of legal aid grant. Would gladly contribute.
Thanks North. I guess my point is that I think Collins is not technically correct on anything she’s saying on this particular issue. What is the “one part alone of the broad legal picture” you’re saying she’s technically right about?
Hi Mary. My apprehension was that the Privy Council appeal was already underway and accordingly Collins was technically able to invoke sub-judice even though that amounted to a sidestepping of the huge justice issue here. Sub-Judy-Say. Horrors !
Then I see from the Herald this morning that the appeal is not yet underway and that Collins is now prepared to consider a formal investigation. Something she was always able to engage of course, had she the will to do so.
So yes, my assessment of Collins’ behaviour is unjustifiably charitable. For my part I simply cannot understand how a minister responsible for “Justice” could drag her heels in this unprecedented case………concerns of senior police officers, the Police Association, forensic pshychiatric evidence etc etc.
All that aside a gathering momentum now appears. Hopefully it is such that even the Justice Sow cannot stem it. Who knows ? The minister’s “doing the numbers” in what is already something of a cause celebre might well persuade her to make like donning the cloak of “justice” rather than deviously obstruct.
All power to Teina Pora ! And once he is free, all power to a very high level ministerial or other enquiry to identify the how and whom in this travesty. And fix on a truly awesome sum in compensation.
There should be no hiding in the thickets of extant legislation (if any) to artificially limit the level of compensation. There must be special legislation if necessary. Mmmmm…….that’s where this minister is bound to be a problem.
Notwithstanding their pious talk Justice and Truth are basically malleable concepts to this crowd. Money and how they “look” is their real imperative. The evil unleashed on Teina Pora is surpassed only by the evil extinguishment of Susan Burdett’s life. It is our duty as a nation to make truly conspicuous amends, mindful that compensation of whatever striking level can never truly displace the evil Teina Pora has suffered.
In a recent interview with RNZ (14th of January), NZ Council of Civil Liberties Chair Thomas Beagle, in response to Simon Bridges condemnation of the post-Trump Twitter purge of local far Right and other accounts, said the following: “Cos the thing about freedom of expression is that it’s not just ...
Let’s be clear: if Trump is not politically killed off once and for all, he will become a MAGA Dracula, rising from the dead to haunt US politics for years to come and giving inspiration to his wretched family of grifters and thousands of deplorables well into the next decade. ...
Since its demise as an imperial power, and especially its deindustrialisation under Thatcher, the UK's primary economic engine has been its role as a money laundry, using its network of overseas territories as tax havens to enable rich people around the world to steal from the societies they live in. ...
Last month OMV quit the Great South Basin and surrendered its offshore exploration permits outside of Taranaki. This month, Australian-owned Beach Energy has done the same: Beach Energy Resources New Zealand has decided to abandon all of its oil and gas exploration permits off the South Island coast, including ...
The new Northland case has been linked to the South African strain of Covid-19, one of a number of new, more contagious Covid variants. Here’s how they emerge and why. Let’s start with the basics. The genetic material of the SARS-CoV-2 virus responsible for Covid-19 is a strand of RNA ...
MARVIN HUBBARD, US citizen by birth, New Zealand citizen by choice, Quaker and left-wing activist, has been broadcasting his show, "Community or Chaos", on Otago Access Radio for the best part of 30 years. On 24 November last year, I spoke with him about the outcome of the 2020 General ...
This is a guest blog post by Daniel Tamberg, Potsdam, co-founder and director of SCIARA GmbH. The non-profit organisation SCIARA is developing and operating a flexible software platform for scientific simulation games that allows thousands of players to explore, design and understand possible climate futures together. Decision-makers in politics, business, ...
Yesterday's Gone: Cold shivers are running up and down the spines of conservatives everywhere. Donald Trump may have gone, but all the signs point to there being something much more momentous in the wind-shift than a simple return to the status quo ante. A change is gonna come. ONE COULD ...
Is it possible to live and let live in the post-Trump era? The online campaign to vilify Christopher Liddell, ex-White House Deputy Chief of Staff and Assistant to Trump, makes for an interesting case study. Liddell is a New Zealander whose illustrious career in corporate America once earned him plaudits ...
A chronological listing of news articles linked to on the Skeptical Science Facebook Page during the past week: Sun, Jan 17, 2021 through Sat, Jan 23, 2021Editor's Choice12 new books explore fresh approaches to act on climate changeAuthors explore scientific, economic, and political avenues for climate action ...
This discussion is from a Twitter thread by Martin Kulldorff on 20 December 2020. He is a Professor at Harvard Medical School specialising in disease surveillance methods, infectious disease outbreaks and vaccine safety. His Twitter handle is @MartinKulldorff #1 Public health is about all health outcomes, not just a single ...
The Treasury forecasts suggest the economy is doing better than expected after the Covid Shock. John Kenneth Galbraith was wont to say that economic forecasting was designed to make astrology look good. Unfair, but it raises the question of the purpose of economic forecasts. Certainly the public may treat them ...
Q: Will the COVID-19 vaccines prevent the transmission of the coronavirus and bring about community immunity (aka herd immunity)? A: Jury not in yet but vaccines do not have to be perfect to thwart the spread of infection. While vaccines induce protection against illness, they do not always stop actual ...
Joe Biden seems to be everything that Donald Trump was not – decent, straightforward, considerate of others, mindful of his responsibilities – but none of that means that he has an easy path ahead of him. The pandemic still rages, American standing in the world is grievously low, and the ...
Keana VirmaniFrom healthcare robots to data privacy, to sea level rise and Antarctica under the ice: in the four years since its establishment, the Aotearoa New Zealand Science Journalism Fund has supported over 30 projects.Rebecca Priestley, receiving the PM Science Communication Prize (Photo by Mark Tantrum) Associate Professor ...
Nothing more from me today - I'm off to Wellington, to participate in the city's annual roleplaying convention (which has also eaten my time for the whole week, limiting blogging despite there being interesting things happening). Normal bloggage will resume Tuesday. ...
The Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weaponscame into force today, making the development, possession, use or threat of use of nuclear weapons illegal in international law. Every nuclear-armed state is now a criminal regime. The corporations and scientists who design, build and maintain their illegal weapons are now ...
"Come The Revolution!" The key objective of Bernard Hickey’s revolutionary solution to the housing crisis is a 50 percent reduction in the price of the average family home. This will be achieved by the introduction of Capital Gains, Land, and Wealth taxes, and by the opening up of currently RMA-protected ...
by Daphna Whitmore Twitter and Facebook shutting down Trump’s accounts after his supporters stormed Capitol Hill is old news now but the debates continue over whether the actions against Trump are a good thing or not. Those in favour of banning Trump say Twitter and Facebook are private companies and ...
This is a re-post from Yale Climate Connections Democrats now control the White House, Senate, and House of Representatives for the first time in a decade, albeit with razor thin Congressional majorities. The last time, in the 111th Congress (2009-2011), House Democrats passed a carbon cap and trade bill, but it died ...
Session thirty-three was highly abbreviated, via having to move house in a short space of time. Oh well. The party decided to ignore the tree-monster and continue the attack on the Giant Troll. Tarsin – flying on a giant summoned bat – dumped some high-grade oil over the ...
Last night I stayed up till 3am just to see then-President Donald Trump leave the White House, get on a plane, and fly off to Florida, hopefully never to return. And when I woke up this morning, America was different. Not perfect, because it never was. Probably not even good, ...
Watching today’s inauguration of Joe Biden as the United States’ 46th president, there’s not a lot in common with the inauguration of Donald Trump just four destructive years ago. Where Trump warned of carnage, Biden dared to hope for unity and decency. But the one place they converge is that ...
Dan FalkBritons who switched on their TVs to “Good Morning Britain” on the morning of Sept. 15, 2020, were greeted by news not from our own troubled world, but from neighboring Venus. Piers Morgan, one of the hosts, was talking about a major science story that had surfaced the ...
Sara LutermanGrowing up autistic in a non-autistic world can be very isolating. We are often strange and out of sync with peers, despite our best efforts. Autistic adults have, until very recently, been largely absent from media and the public sphere. Finding role models is difficult. Finding useful advice ...
Doug JohnsonThe alien-like blooms and putrid stench of Amorphophallus titanum, better known as the corpse flower, draw big crowds and media coverage to botanical gardens each year. In 2015, for instance, around 75,000 people visited the Chicago Botanic Garden to see one of their corpse flowers bloom. More than ...
Getting to Browser Tab Zero so I can reboot the computer is awfully hard when the one open tab is a Table of Contents for the Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, and every issue has more stuff I want to read. A few highlights: Gugler et al demonstrating ...
Timothy Ford, University of Massachusetts Lowell and Charles M. Schweik, University of Massachusetts AmherstTo mitigate health inequities and promote social justice, coronavirus vaccines need to get to underserved populations and hard-to-reach communities. There are few places in the U.S. that are unreachable by road, but other factors – many ...
Israel chose to pay a bit over the odds for the Pfizer vaccine to get earlier access. Here’s The Times of Israel from 16 November. American government will be charged $39 for each two-shot dose, and the European bloc even less, but Jerusalem said to agree to pay $56. Israel ...
Orla is a gender critical Marxist in Ireland. She gave a presentation on 15 January 2021 on the connection between postmodern/transgender identity politics and the current attacks on democratic and free speech rights. Orla has been active previously in the Irish Socialist Workers Party and the People Before Profit electoral ...
. . America: The Empire Strikes Back (at itself) Further to my comments in the first part of 2020: The History That Was, the following should be considered regarding the current state of the US. They most likely will be by future historians pondering the critical decades of ...
Nathaniel ScharpingIn March, as the Covid-19 pandemic began to shut down major cities in the U.S., researchers were thinking about blood. In particular, they were worried about the U.S. blood supply — the millions of donations every year that help keep hospital patients alive when they need a transfusion. ...
Sarah L Caddy, University of CambridgeVaccines are a marvel of medicine. Few interventions can claim to have saved as many lives. But it may surprise you to know that not all vaccines provide the same level of protection. Some vaccines stop you getting symptomatic disease, but others stop you ...
Back in 2016, the Portuguese government announced plans to stop burning coal by 2030. But progress has come much quicker, and they're now scheduled to close their last coal plant by the end of this year: The Sines coal plant in Portugal went offline at midnight yesterday evening (14 ...
The Sincerest Form Of Flattery: As anybody with the intestinal fortitude to brave the commentary threads of local news-sites, large and small, will attest, the number of Trump-supporting New Zealanders is really quite astounding. IT’S SO DIFFICULT to resist the temptation to be smug. From the distant perspective of New Zealand, ...
RNZ reports on continued arbitrariness on decisions at the border. British comedian Russell Howard is about to tour New Zealand and other acts allowed in through managed isolation this summer include drag queen RuPaul and musicians at Northern Bass in Mangawhai and the Bay Dreams festival. The vice-president of the ...
As families around the world mourn more than two million people dead from Covid-19, the Plan B academics and their PR industry collaborator continue to argue that the New Zealand government should stop focusing on our managed isolation and quarantine system and instead protect the elderly so that they can ...
A chronological listing of news articles linked to on the Skeptical Science Facebook Page during the past week: Sun, Jan 10, 2021 through Sat, Jan 16, 2021Editor's ChoiceNASA says 2020 tied for hottest year on record — here’s what you can do to helpPhoto by Michael Held on Unsplash ...
Health authorities in Norway are reporting some concerns about deaths in frail elderly after receiving their COVID-19 vaccine. Is this causally related to the vaccine? Probably not but here are the things to consider. According to the news there have been 23 deaths in Norway shortly after vaccine administration and ...
Happy New Year! No, experts are not concerned that “…one of New Zealand’s COIVD-1( vaccines will fail to protect the country” Here is why. But first I wish to issue an expletive about this journalism (First in Australia and then in NZ). It exhibits utter failure to actually truly consult ...
All nations have shadows; some acknowledge them. For others they shape their image in uncomfortable ways.The staunch Labour supporter was in despair at what her Rogernomics Government was doing. But she finished ‘at least, we got rid of Muldoon’, a response which tells us that then, and today, one’s views ...
Grigori GuitchountsIn November, Springer Nature, one of the world’s largest publishers of scientific journals, made an attention-grabbing announcement: More than 30 of its most prestigious journals, including the flagship Nature, will now allow authors to pay a fee of US$11,390 to make their papers freely available for anyone to read ...
This is a re-post from Yale Climate Connections by Gary Yohe, Henry Jacoby, Richard Richels, and Benjamin Santer Imagine a major climate change law passing the U.S. Congress unanimously? Don’t bother. It turns out that you don’t need to imagine it. Get this: The Global Change Research Act of 1990 was passed ...
“They’re here already! You’re next! You’re next! You’re next!”WHO CAN FORGET the penultimate scene of the 1956 movie classic, Invasion of the Body Snatchers? The wild-eyed doctor, stumbling down the highway, trying desperately to warn his fellow citizens: “They’re here already! You’re next! You’re next! You’re next!”Ostensibly science-fiction, the movie ...
TheOneRing.Net has got its paws on the official synopsis of the upcoming Amazon Tolkien TV series. It’s a development that brings to mind the line about Sauron deliberately releasing Gollum from the dungeons of Barad-dûr. Amazon knew exactly what they were doing here, in terms of drumming up publicity: ...
Since Dwight Eisenhower’s inauguration in 1953, US presidents have joined an informal club intended to provide support - and occasionally rivalry - between those few who have been ‘leaders of the free world’. Donald Trump, elected on a promise to ‘drain the swamp’ and a constant mocker of his predecessors, ...
For over a decade commentators have noted the rise of a new brand of explicitly ideological politics throughout the world. By this they usually refer to the re-emergence of national populism and avowedly illiberal approaches to governance throughout the “advanced” democratic community, but they also extend the thought to the ...
The US House of Representatives has just impeached Donald Trump, giving him the dubious honour of being the only US President to be impeached twice. Ten Republicans voted for impeachement, making it the most bipartisan impeachment ever. The question now is whether the Senate will rise to the occasion, and ...
Kieren Mitchell; Alice Mouton, Université de Liège; Angela Perri, Durham University, and Laurent Frantz, Ludwig Maximilian University of MunichThanks to the hit television series Game of Thrones, the dire wolf has gained a near-mythical status. But it was a real animal that roamed the Americas for at least 250,000 ...
Tide of tidal data rises Having cast our own fate to include rising sea level, there's a degree of urgency in learning the history of mean sea level in any given spot, beyond idle curiosity. Sea level rise (SLR) isn't equal from one place to another and even at a particular ...
Well, some of those chickens sure came home bigly, didn’t they… and proceeded to shit all over the nice carpet in the Capitol. What we were seeing here are societal forces that have long had difficulty trying to reconcile people to the “idea” of America and the reality of ...
In the wake of Donald Trump's incitement of an assault on the US capitol, Twitter finally enforced its terms of service and suspended his account. They've since followed that up with action against prominent QAnon accounts and Trumpers, including in New Zealand. I'm not unhappy with this: Trump regularly violated ...
Peter S. Ross, University of British ColumbiaThe Arctic has long proven to be a barometer of the health of our planet. This remote part of the world faces unprecedented environmental assaults, as climate change and industrial chemicals threaten a way of life for Inuit and other Indigenous and northern ...
Susan St John makes the case for taxing a deemed rate of return on excessive real estate holdings (after a family home exemption), to redirect scarce housing resources to where they are needed most. Read the full article here ...
I’m less than convinced by arguments that platforms like Twitter should be subject to common carrier regulation preventing them from being able to decide who to keep on as clients of their free services, and who they would not like to serve. It’s much easier to create competition for the ...
The hypocritical actions of political leaders throughout the global Covid pandemic have damaged public faith in institutions and governance. Liam Hehir chronicles the way in which contemporary politicians have let down the public, and explains how real leadership means walking the talk. During the Blitz, when German bombs were ...
Over the years, we've published many rebuttals, blog posts and graphics which came about due to direct interactions with the scientists actually carrying out the underlying research or being knowledgable about a topic in general. We'll highlight some of these interactions in this blog post. We'll start with two memorable ...
Yesterday we had the unseemly sight of a landleech threatening to keep his houses empty in response to better tenancy laws. Meanwhile in Catalonia they have a solution for that: nationalisation: Barcelona is deploying a new weapon in its quest to increase the city’s available rental housing: the power ...
This is a re-post from Yale Climate Connections by Jeff Masters, PhD The 2020 global wildfire season brought extreme fire activity to the western U.S., Australia, the Arctic, and Brazil, making it the fifth most expensive year for wildfire losses on record. The year began with an unprecedented fire event ...
A growing public housing waiting list and continued increase of house prices must be urgently addressed by Government, Green Party Co-leader Marama Davidson said today. ...
The green light for New Zealand’s first COVID-19 vaccine could be granted in just over a week, Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern said today. “We’re making swift progress towards vaccinating New Zealanders against the virus, but we’re also absolutely committed to ensuring the vaccines are safe and effective,” Jacinda Ardern said. ...
The Minister for ACC is pleased to announce the appointment of three new members to join the Board of ACC on 1 February 2021. “All three bring diverse skills and experience to provide strong governance oversight to lead the direction of ACC” said Hon Carmel Sepuloni. Bella Takiari-Brame from Hamilton ...
The Government is investing $9 million to upgrade a significant community facility in Invercargill, creating economic stimulus and jobs, Infrastructure Minister Grant Robertson and Te Tai Tonga MP Rino Tirikatene have announced. The grant for Waihōpai Rūnaka Inc to make improvements to Murihiku Marae comes from the $3 billion set ...
[Opening comments, welcome and thank you to Auckland University etc] It is a great pleasure to be here this afternoon to celebrate such an historic occasion - the entry into force of the Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons. This is a moment many feared would never come, but ...
The Government is providing $3 million in one-off seed funding to help disabled people around New Zealand stay connected and access support in their communities, Minister for Disability Issues, Carmel Sepuloni announced today. The funding will allow disability service providers to develop digital and community-based solutions over the next two ...
Border workers in quarantine facilities will be offered voluntary daily COVID-19 saliva tests in addition to their regular weekly testing, COVID-19 Response Minister Chris Hipkins said today. This additional option will be rolled out at the Jet Park Quarantine facility in Auckland starting on Monday 25 January, and then to ...
The next steps in the Government’s ambitious firearms reform programme to include a three-month buy-back have been announced by Police Minister Poto Williams today. “The last buy-back and amnesty was unprecedented for New Zealand and was successful in collecting 60,297 firearms, modifying a further 5,630 firearms, and collecting 299,837 prohibited ...
Upscaling work already underway to restore two iconic ecosystems will deliver jobs and a lasting legacy, Conservation Minister Kiri Allan says. “The Jobs for Nature programme provides $1.25 billion over four years to offer employment opportunities for people whose livelihoods have been impacted by the COVID-19 recession. “Two new projects ...
The Government has released its Public Housing Plan 2021-2024 which outlines the intention of where 8,000 additional public and transitional housing places announced in Budget 2020, will go. “The Government is committed to continuing its public house build programme at pace and scale. The extra 8,000 homes – 6000 public ...
Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern has congratulated President Joe Biden on his inauguration as the 46th President of the United States of America. “I look forward to building a close relationship with President Biden and working with him on issues that matter to both our countries,” Jacinda Ardern said. “New Zealand ...
A major investment to tackle wilding pines in Mt Richmond will create jobs and help protect the area’s unique ecosystems, Biosecurity Minister Damien O’Connor says. The Mt Richmond Forest Park has unique ecosystems developed on mineral-rich geology, including taonga plant species found nowhere else in the country. “These special plant ...
To further protect New Zealand from COVID-19, the Government is extending pre-departure testing to all passengers to New Zealand except from Australia, Antarctica and most Pacific Islands, COVID-19 Response Minister Chris Hipkins said today. “The change will come into force for all flights arriving in New Zealand after 11:59pm (NZT) on Monday ...
Bay Conservation Cadets launched with first intake Supported with $3.5 million grant Part of $1.245b Jobs for Nature programme to accelerate recover from Covid Cadets will learn skills to protect and enhance environment Environment Minister David Parker today welcomed the first intake of cadets at the launch of the Bay ...
The Prime Minister of New Zealand Jacinda Ardern and the Prime Minister of the Cook Islands Mark Brown have announced passengers from the Cook Islands can resume quarantine-free travel into New Zealand from 21 January, enabling access to essential services such as health. “Following confirmation of the Cook Islands’ COVID ...
Jobs for Nature funding is being made available to conservation groups and landowners to employ staff and contractors in a move aimed at boosting local biodiversity-focused projects, Conservation Minister Kiritapu Allan has announced. It is estimated some 400-plus jobs will be created with employment opportunities in ecology, restoration, trapping, ...
The Government has approved an exception class for 1000 international tertiary students, degree level and above, who began their study in New Zealand but were caught offshore when border restrictions began. The exception will allow students to return to New Zealand in stages from April 2021. “Our top priority continues ...
Today’s deal between Meridian and Rio Tinto for the Tiwai smelter to remain open another four years provides time for a managed transition for Southland. “The deal provides welcome certainty to the Southland community by protecting jobs and incomes as the region plans for the future. The Government is committed ...
Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern has appointed Anna Curzon to the APEC Business Advisory Council (ABAC). The leader of each APEC economy appoints three private sector representatives to ABAC. ABAC provides advice to leaders annually on business priorities. “ABAC helps ensure that APEC’s work programme is informed by business community perspectives ...
The Government’s prudent fiscal management and strong policy programme in the face of the COVID-19 global pandemic have been acknowledged by the credit rating agency Fitch. Fitch has today affirmed New Zealand’s local currency rating at AA+ with a stable outlook and foreign currency rating at AA with a positive ...
The Government is putting in place a suite of additional actions to protect New Zealand from COVID-19, including new emerging variants, COVID-19 Response Minister Chris Hipkins said today. “Given the high rates of infection in many countries and evidence of the global spread of more transmissible variants, it’s clear that ...
$36 million of Government funding alongside councils and others for 19 projects Investment will clean up and protect waterways and create local jobs Boots on the ground expected in Q2 of 2021 Funding part of the Jobs for Nature policy package A package of 19 projects will help clean up ...
The commemoration of the 175th anniversary of the Battle of Ruapekapeka represents an opportunity for all New Zealanders to reflect on the role these conflicts have had in creating our modern nation, says Associate Minister for Arts, Culture and Heritage Kiri Allan. “The Battle at Te Ruapekapeka Pā, which took ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Véronique Duché, A.R. Chisholm Professor of French, University of Melbourne In this series, writers pay tribute to fictional detectives on the page and on screen. When I first heard that Rowan Atkinson was to put on Maigret’s velvet-collared overcoat, I wondered ...
Auckland writer Olivia Hayfield* explains how she resurrected 16th-century playwright Christopher Marlowe to star in her new novel, Sister to Sister. Olivia Hayfield is a pen name. Real name: Sue Copsey. When I’m planning my modern retellings of historical tales, I read widely on the characters and see who leaps out at ...
The Pfizer/BioNTech mRNA vaccine could be approved as early as next week, Marc Daalder reports Medsafe will be asked to approve the Pfizer/BioNTech mRNA vaccine against Covid-19 on February 2, the Government has announced. The Medicines Assessment Advisory Committee (MAAC) is an independent panel that provides advice on some medicine approvals in ...
COMMENT:By Bryan Kramer, PNG’s Minister of Police who has defended Commissioner Manning’s appointment today in The National My last article, announcing that I intend to make a submission to the National Executive Council (NEC) to amend the Public Service regulation to no longer require the Commissioner of Police to ...
The Point of Order Trough Monitor was triggered today by the announcement of a $9 million handout for Southlanders – sorry, some Southlanders. The news came from the office of Grant Robertson who, as Minister of Finance, prefers to invest public money rather than give it away – especially when ...
Few people outside of her campaign team gave Chlöe Swarbrick any chance of winning in Auckland Central this year – but the Green Party MP was too busy to listen. Here’s how they turned the electorate green.First published November 12, 2020.Three Ticks Chlöe is part of Frame, a series of short ...
Interactions between parents and healthcare providers could have a big impact on the wellbeing of our children, according to new research. The way parents and healthcare providers interact has lasting implications for children’s health, new research has found – and that includes immunisation uptake.Released today, the report is based on research ...
The Opposition starts the political year calling for emergency, temporary legislation to free up house building National leader Judith Collins has set five priorities for her party over the next three years - but excluded climate change, education and Crown-Māori relations. Giving her first 'state of the nation' speech as party ...
One of the biggest challenges facing the Ardern government is in public health. New Zealand may have escaped the pressures heaped on other health systems by the Covid-19 pandemic but its health service has had its problems, not least those exposed in the first report from Heather Simpson and her ...
New Zealand’s Covid-19 Response Minister Chris Hipkins has revealed that 14 close contacts of the Northland community case have returned negative test results. Yesterday he announced two close contacts – her husband and hair dresser – were negative. In his tweet, Hipkins described the news as “encouraging”. However, New ...
Pacific Media Watch newsdesk Reporters Without Borders (RSF) has condemned the arbitrary and opaque experiments that Google is conducting with its search engine in Australia, with the consequence that many national news websites are no longer appearing in the search results seen by some users. The Australian, ABC, Australian Financial ...
Local Government Minister Nanaia Mahuta says councils can take stronger action against companies dumping contaminated waste water, even though they have identified loopholes in the law on fines. ...
Drag Race Down Under, part of the popular RuPaul’s Drag Race franchise, is filming in New Zealand. In their own words, local drag talent share what drag means to them and how it might be impacted by the show.RuPaul’s Drag Race is, quite simply, a television phenomenon. Love it or ...
For a long time, weighted blankets were considered a specialist device. Now they’re popular with even the most normal sleepers.Growing up, Temple Grandin spent time on her aunt’s cattle ranch in America, watching cow after stressed cow enter a squeeze chute and come out calm as the dead sea. She ...
Increased provisional tax thresholds, immediate low-value asset write offs and allowing the deferral of tax payments and use of money interest (UOMI) write offs were the most popular tax measures introduced by the Government to help businesses survive ...
The latest fleeing driver statistics show the numbers of incidents sky-rocketing out of control through 2020 with Police deciding the only tactic is to give up on chasing altogether, says Sensible Sentencing Trust. “The inconvenient truth is ...
With new revelations of the appalling racism behind Israel’s refusal to provide Covid-19 vaccines to 4.5 million Palestinians under its occupation and control, PSNA has renewed our call for the government to speak out alongside the United Nations ...
The Youth of NZ will be standing up for climate action once again, on January 26th outside of Parliament for School Strike 4 Climate NZ’s 100 Days 4 Action campaign rally. “COVID-19 may have stopped us in our tracks in the past. However, I tend ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Parwinder Kaur, Associate Professor | Director, DNA Zoo Australia, University of Western Australia Koalas are unique in the animal kingdom, living on a eucalyptus diet that would kill other creatures and drinking so little their name comes from the Dharug word gula, ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By S. Anna Florin, Research fellow, University of Wollongong Archaeological research provides a long-term perspective on how humans survived various environmental conditions over tens of thousands of years. In a paper published today in Nature Ecology and Evolution, we’ve tracked rainfall in northern ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Binoy Kampmark, Senior Lecturer in Global Studies, Social Science & Planning, RMIT University Since 2005, Germany’s Chancellor Angela Merkel has been one of the most stable and enduring of political forces, both in Europe and on the global stage. During her 16 ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Véronique Duché, A.R. Chisholm Professor of French, University of Melbourne In this series, writers pay tribute to fictional detectives on the page and on screen. When I first heard that Rowan Atkinson was to put on Maigret’s velvet-collared overcoat, I wondered ...
*This article first appeared on RNZ and is republished with permission. Experts are calling for hotels with sub-par ventilation systems to no longer be used as managed isolation facilities as health officials investigate how a Northland woman became infected with Covid-19 while staying at the Pullman hotel, Rowan Quinn reports. ...
Welcome to The Spinoff’s live updates for January 26, keeping you up to date with the latest local and international news. Reach me on stewart@thespinoff.co.nzOur Members make The Spinoff happen! Every dollar contributed directly funds our editorial team – click here to learn more about how you can support us ...
Good morning and welcome to The Bulletin. In today’s edition: Questions to be answered about case in the community, major companies flagrantly breaching wastewater consents, and Tenancy Tribunal decisions harming abuse survivors.As of this morning, we’re still waiting on some crucial information about the situation in Northland, after a person travelled ...
With democracy what now separates the US from its adversaries, Wellington can bet on more continuity than change in Washington’s hardline view of China. ...
We continue our week-long examination of writer Roderick Finlayson. Today: his daughter Kate on his doomed love for Poti Mita, whose family inspired him to write short stories about Māori life in the 1930s We all knew of Poti Mita and how important Pukehina was to Dad. He wanted ...
Sleepyhead is chopping and changing its ambitious plan to build a super-factory and a community of 1100 medium density houses on a block of farmland in the north Waikato. Sydney Turner set his grandsons Craig and Graeme to work on the factory floor, building mattresses. Now Craig and Graeme Turner own ...
Helen Petousis-Harris looks at the potential complications of vaccinating older New Zealanders - and how we should prepare Two weeks ago health authorities in Norway reported some concerns about deaths in frail elderly after receiving their Covid-19 vaccine. Are these deaths related to the vaccine? Probably not but here are ...
A change of plans for round-the-world single-handed sailor Elana Connor means she's helping Kiwi kids in foster care to go sailing - as she also seeks to 'demystify' the sport for women. Elana Connor wears a silver necklace engraved with the word “Fearlessness”. As she sails solo around the globe, it reminds her that ...
New Zealand rose to the occasion in its response to Covid-19. Will it do the same for climate change? Jack Santa Barbara looks ahead to the Climate Change Commission report. New Zealand’s management of the Covid pandemic clearly demonstrated the benefits of paying attention to the science and prioritising human wellbeing ...
Was Covid-19 and lockdown the catalyst for a new future for healthcare or did it just expose systemic inequity? In the latest of a series on the country's future infrastructure needs, Tim Murphy looks at how the long push to shift health's focus from hospitals to the community might have received a nudge ...
Not only is the New Zealand summer in danger of coming to a grinding halt, but we increase the risk that an almighty wreck might follow shortly afterwards. Here's what we can do, writes Dr Sarb Johal. While the rest of the world is wrestling with virulent new strains of the ...
For two decades, under both National and Labour governments, housing costs have risen far faster than wages. Here’s a horrific graph that shows by just how much.Last Thursday saw the first of what will no doubt be dozens of housing-related set pieces from Labour, wherein they announced 8,000 public and ...
The new Northland case has been linked to the South African strain of Covid-19, one of a number of new, more contagious Covid variants. Here’s how they emerge and why.Let’s start with the basics. The genetic material of the SARS-CoV-2 virus responsible for Covid-19 is a strand of RNA made ...
New Zealand’s richest citizen, Graeme Hart, has seen his fortune increase by NZ$3,494,333,333 since March 2020 – a sum equivalent to over half a million New Zealanders receiving a cheque for NZ$6,849 each, reveals a new analysis from Oxfam today. The New Zealand ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Tauel Harper, Lecturer, Media and Communication, UWA, University of Western Australia With a vaccine rollout impending, key groups have backed calls for the Australian government to force social media platforms to share details about popular coronavirus misinformation. An open letter was put ...
Selling out ACT’s Waitangi Day State of the Nation Address is set to sell out again. If you’d like to start the political year right over brunch with fellow ACT supporters (Saturday 6 February 10am-12pm, Mt Eden), please buy your tickets ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Jessica Kirkness, Postdoctoral research fellow, Macquarie University As government COVID updates have become a daily part of our lives over the past 12 months, so too has the sight of sign language interpreters on our screens. This has understandably had a huge ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Tim Dwyer, Associate Professor, Department of Media and Communications, University of Sydney Executives from Google and Facebook have told a Senate committee they are prepared to take drastic action if Australia’s news media bargaining code, which would force the internet giants to ...
*This article first appeared on RNZ and is republished with permission. Hundreds of companies have dumped contaminants - like blood, fat, and toxic chemicals such as ammonia and sulphides - into sewers in breach of their trade waste consents over the past year, RNZ can reveal. Anusha Bradley reports. Frank ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Morag Kobez, Associate lecturer, Queensland University of Technology In this series, our writers explore how food shaped Australian history – and who we are today. The history of cheese in Australia has, until recent decades, been a rather tasteless affair. Not so ...
On the edge of the Mataura River, a disused paper mill is filled with thousands of bags of toxic waste. Locals want to find out who’s responsible for it – and they want it gone before disaster strikes.First published November 10, 2020.The Paper Mill is part of Frame, a series ...
At the Chorus Fibre Lab, José Barbosa peeked behind the curtain of the internet and found something beautiful and very, very fast. The human mind is a daily swarm of notions, speculations, ruminations, thoughts and otherwise base-level brain puffs. Just to get through the grind of survival, we’ve evolved to mentally ...
*This article first appeared on RNZ and is republished with permission. The Ministry of Health is confident the Northland community case came directly from the Pullman Hotel and there is no missing link. In a press conference this afternoon, Director-General of Health Dr Ashley Bloomfield confirmed the strain of Covid in the ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Thomas Longden, Fellow, Crawford School of Public Policy, Australian National University Heat is more dangerous than the cold in most Australian regions. About 2% of deaths in Australia between 2006 and 2017 were associated with the heat, and the estimate increases to ...
Levin GP Glenn Colquhoun talks with books editor Catherine Woulfe about his new collection of poetry, Letters to Young People.Glenn Colquhoun is an acclaimed and accomplished poet. He has published four collections, including Playing God, in December 2002, which sold a massive 10,000 copies. He’s won a clutch of Montanas ...
Contrasting reactions to news of Grainne Moss’s resignation as Oranga Tamariki chief executive inevitably can be found in the blogosphere. Lindsay Dawson has recorded the ACT Party’s response to the resignation and hailed it as “spot on”. The statement was made in the name of Karen Chhour, described as a ...
Zendaya has been around for a decade, but she’s gone from Disney prodigy to pop star to acclaimed actress. Here are the highlights of the 24-year-old’s already impressive career.Shaking it up: Zendaya on DisneyThe world’s first encounter with Zendaya was a little Disney show called Shake It Up, a series ...
What’s it like to have your life governed by your gut? It’s crap, frankly.On my birthday last year I was given a bottle of fancy Aesop post-poo drops which clear the air after rigorous bowel activity – though on reflection, it may have been more of a gift for my ...
*This article first appeared on RNZ and is republished with permission. Negative tests results for two of the closest contacts of a woman who tested positive for Covid-19 after leaving managed isolation is a good sign, says Covid-19 Response Minister Chris Hipkins. Two of the closest contacts of a woman ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Adrian Dyer, Associate Professor, RMIT University At a dinner party, or in the schoolyard, the question of favourite colour frequently results in an answer of “blue”. Why is it that humans are so fond of blue? And why does it seem to ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Megan Davis, Pro Vice-Chancellor Indigenous UNSW and Professor of Law, UNSW We are on the eve of the nation’s annual ritual of celebrating the arrivals, while not formally recognising the ancient peoples who were dispossessed. Each year the tensions spill over, rendering ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Stephen Bright, Senior Lecturer of Addiction, Edith Cowan University While the public focus remains on COVID vaccines, the Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA) continues to evaluate a range of proposals around the provision of medical treatments in Australia. The regulatory body is currently ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Sara Wilkinson, Professor, School of the Built Environment, University of Technology Sydney Many of us who endured lockdowns in Australia are familiar with the surge in energy bills at home. But for older Australians who depend on the Age Pension for income, ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Michael P. Cameron, Associate Professor in Economics, University of Waikato Population growth plays a role in environmental damage and climate change. But addressing climate change through either reducing or reversing growth in population raises difficult moral questions that most people would prefer ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Julie Sonnemann, Fellow, School Education, Grattan Institute School is back for 2021, and some students will get extra help this year. Students who fell behind in their learning during the COVID-19 lockdowns of 2020 will be eligible for extra tutoring in Victoria ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Sarah Duffy, Lecturer, School of Business, Western Sydney University Australia Day used to be an obvious and uncontroversial occasion for brands to endear themselves to Australian consumers. No longer. There has been a decided shift over the past decade in commercial attitudes ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Joanna Mendelssohn, Principal Fellow (Hon), Victorian College of the Arts, University of Melbourne. Editor in Chief, Design and Art of Australia Online, University of Melbourne In January 1971, Art News published Linda Nochlin’s Why have there been no great women artists? Her ...
Welcome to The Spinoff’s live updates for January 25, keeping you up to date with the latest local and international news. Reach me on stewart@thespinoff.co.nz7.40am: Two close contacts of new Covid case test negativeThe husband of the new Northland case of Covid-19 has tested negative for the virus, along with ...
*This article first appeared on RNZ and is republished with permission Hundreds of staff won't come into work on Monday after a 56-year-old woman who later tested positive for Covid-19 visited about 30 locations in Northland and Auckland - a blow to businesses desperately holding on after a hard year. Harry ...
http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=10907972 another journalists texts ‘hacked’, this time 2-3 months after the ‘cuppergate’ thing the police asked vodaphone for all of bradley ambroses txts, his txts to his lawyer, his txts to his fmaily, his txts to his sources & work colleagues, for what purpose? bloody nosey buggers. i think maybe we should all do what tony soprano used to do if he wanted to talk to his lawyer, face to face in a busy street somewhere, keep all private information away from the wires!
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/africaandindianocean/libya/10218288/CIA-running-arms-smuggling-team-in-Benghazi-when-consulate-was-attacked.html
By arming what is effectively the mythical AQ (but referred to as “Rebels”), thus creating future terror threats which are then sold to the world via the propaganda wing (MSM) of the military/intelligence machine, such as what has been announced in the ME in the last 24 hours!
Part of the cover up appears to be seeking to hide how many of their own people died in Benghazi – If they are good with covering up losses of their own people to serve a purpose, then what care factor will they give to covering up, literally, anything at all!
Starting to become clear to the most ardent of deniers by now, I would expect!
Sigh *eye roll*
http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/politics/2012/12/benghazi_report_not_a_cover_up.html
Warren Commission was not a cover up!
A quick look at Simon Lusk and the Slater child’s blog this morning is quite telling, they seem to be in a bit of a spin.
Every single one of their five “Must Read” posts is about how privacy is no big deal, journalists should pull their heads in and stop questioning the govt, and there’s NOTHING to see here.
lolz boys, do you have to make it so obvious?
Ah, so Key’s lot ARE trying to hide something, and they have been over-riding democratic processes, along with undermining rights to privacy!
Damn you Felix for making me go there and read that filth. Managed to fall over a vile anti-gay post (‘correcting’ the word lesbian for something the writer clearly thinks is hilarious but is just sad). You’re right though, they are scared. Good.
Yes the louder they yell that there is ”nothing” to see here gives the indication that there is in fact ”something” lurking in the background of this whole sordid little affair that ”we” would definitely like to see,
At first i thought the Friday ‘document dump’ was an attempt to head off the furore about the, at the time, breaking revelation that it wasn’t only phone records that the Henry Inquiry/Prime Ministers Office went after but the emails as well,
i do tho have the ‘sneaking suspicion’ that i have missed something, although the nature of what has been ‘missed’ escapes me also,
Give the Slippery little Shyster a couple of brownie points for, as David Shearer says, using weapons of mass distraction in His, the Prime Minister’s, efforts to wriggle out from under,
What we do know is that none of it, the phone records nor the emails, were sent ‘straight back’ by either the Henry inquiry or the Prime Ministers office, a rather large LIE pointed out by the ‘document dumps’ timeline when compared with the claims of the Prime Minister and other’s,
Given that on the Thursday afternoon befor the release of the Government’s email trail Dunne had already publicly stated that Henry had approached Him verbally asking for details of specific mobile phone conversations between Dunne and Vance there is then the prima facie evidence of all the information, phone and email, having been read by either the Henry Inquiry, the Prime Ministers office, or both, despite their continual denials of having done so…
That’s always a problem with multi-person blogs. Look at the conspiracy theories that got spun when several Standard authors chose to post on Shearer’s woeful leadership at the same time.
The difference of course is that we actually have separate pseudonyms for separate authors.
That was more of a cascade effect. The irritation levels had been bubbling for some time. Besides I barely mentioned Shearer in mine. I was having a go at the incompetent caucus as being useless. Shearer is just one of them and more of a symptom than the proximate cause.
I don’t think Whaleoil is really “multi-author” though. As far as I can tell, Lusk writes the articles and Slater posts the videos.
He’s made up a few pseudonyms but if you look closely they all just post the stuff that Slater has always posted.
“Lawyers are demanding a review of how police intercept private communications after a photo-journalist’s cellphone logs and messages, including exchanges with a lawyer, were obtained in and inquiry instigated by the PM.
Police seized the text messages of a photo-journalist involved in the “teapot tape” saga, including exchanges with his family, his lawyer and Herald on Sunday journalists.
Auckland University associate law professor Bill Hodge describes the police actions as “mind-boggling”.
Herald on Sunday today.
http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=10907972
Just what Shonkey needs now, yet another shit storm, from yet another Journalist. It’s just not his week is it ?? (Fade out to laughter)
1. Vance
2. Stephenson
3. Ambrose
How many more?
What a good idea. If we fail to stop this bill there is more than one way to stop the spying. Close down the secret spybase in Waihopai. Turn its metal into ploughshares, or something else that’s useful. Let’s shut it down. Yeah, let’s tear it down.
“Last night I had the strangest dream, I ever dreamed before. I dreamed the world had all agreed to put an end to war…..
“Three cheers for the Dome Busters…..
The next protest outside Waihopai should be the biggest ever.
Now I know what Waihopai is doing.
Closing Waihopai should be an election issue.
Disagree. Much much more oversight of its uses should be an election issue.
Spying makes open warfare less likely, and shortens wars that occur in spite of it. Waihopai is a significant asset.
OAK
– Under attack – the threat from cyberspace
This was something interesting on BBC World Service
Thanks – Here it is 🙂
Pretty poor ShonKey Python work from Michelle Boag on (Q) Qeue + (A) Adore this morning – clumsy attempt to define attacks on democracy a mere trifle – “let’s focus instead on sleeper issues such as recreational schnapper catch and animal testing” says Michelle.
Interesting that with restrained vigour Corin Dann should correct her – paraphrasing – “……..this is about the credibility of the Prime Minister”. Wow ! Suddenly ?
We are getting closer and closer to the situation where eventually there’s going to be some journalist who will see Bernstein possibilities arising out of ShonKey Python’s Flying Circus. Possibilities which persuade said journalist to engage true journalistic ethics, even if only for selfish purpose.
Could Potty@Gower be said journalist ? His “part of the story” addiction would seem to acquit him well.
Boag’s line shows the agenda planned by the right wing cabal.
Repeal the dog testing.
Repeal the schnapper limit.
Prove to middle New Zealand you ‘listen’
Pass The GCSB bill while the passive New Zealand population follow the line that the spying issue is just a grumble from pesky journalists.
And get pliant shills like Hoskings, Boag….to sell the line.
do you get schnapps if you squeeze a schnapper really hard? 🙂
Exactly Paul @ 6.1 – the manipulation value of this relative minutiae (schnapper etc) – “yes we hear you…..see how we listen…..” – did occur to me.
Not directly on point but please Paul – no mention of Hosking, on Sundays. Vaingloriousness, narcissism, entitled snippiness, risible mutton-dressed-up-as-lamb confusion – not something I care to address on a Sunday.
On point – any views on Michelle Boag’s role in parachuting ShonKey Python into NZ to meet the kaupapa devised post 1999 when the National Party was at its lowest ebb and the Evil Helen Clark was PM ? Who apart from Mich’ was on that committee ?
good question …
Boag is talking shit when she says animal testing should not be allowed for party pills……
Animal testing if allowed for alcohol
Animal testing is allowed for sports
Animal testing is allowed for all kinds of private, entertainment, pleasureable activities.
If some big fat slob requires some animal-tested medication for her condition that has arisen due to excessive eating and excessive drinking then what the fuck is the difference?
… what a duh issue ….
It was a sad feeling when I listened to Helen Clark as it became once more very clear what leadership talent we had and nothing like her has come along. Her comment about parity for women participation in politics however mad me sit up as the last thing we need is more M. Boag’s looking after 50% of the population. Interesting how MB phrased her comment on the living wage issue: … so that the board will say, don’t take our money (profit). Well that says it all. The gray people in the background that see everything around them as “theirs”. Reminds me on a bad mob movie theme.
Unfortunately we live in an age of personality politics.
The mind boggles at what sort of philosophical discussion we would witness, away from media frenzy and interviewers, between Helen Clark and John Key.
Key is a shallow populist who struggles to speak English, mixing metaphors and speaking largely in mono syllables. Clark is a thinker and articulate and sees the world and New Zealand’s role in it, in a totally different light.
That’s why Key’s minders get him interviewed by commercial radio disk jockeys and soundbite thinkers.
So true FW & l97 🙁
This guy needs to get with the programme. NZ Power or bust!
http://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/BU1308/S00083/labour-greens-power-policy-is-bass-ackwards-wolak-says.htm
A good journalist would have noticed he’s here as a guest of the New Zealand Institute for the Study of Competition and Regulation (ISCR). Gok on their website and their supporters include Contact, Meridian, Westpac.
So an independent academic, then.
He’s just spouting the more competition BS that is the mainstay of modern economics and which has seen our power and telecommunications priced far beyond what they should be priced at. NZers know this but they don’t see a way to get the politicians to change it. We need to provide that way.
“NZers know this but they don’t see a way to get the politicians to change it. We need to provide that way.”
Could you please persuade Labour to adopt a policy of eliminating the market economy? And announce it – get David Shearer to announce that competition as the mainstay of the economy is bullshit and he will stop it. Please please.
It of course hasn’t entered your head that power prices to consumers have risen at rates which far outstrip the levels of inflation in the economy and such rising power prices are not reflected in any additional costs to generators or retail power suppliers other than by dint of a cozy little club raising such prices on that well known business imperative known as ‘coz we can’…
Why would retail electricity price movements match general CPI inflation?
Why should they rise at all?
Your question simply insinuates that retail price increases occur because of that other well know business imperative,’coz we can’…
Eloquent Bad !
Electricity is a natural monopoly as such having more than one “supplier” increases costs. We could get rid of a lot of the bureaucracy inherent in the present system, especially the high paid CEOs, if we went to a government monopoly and thus decrease costs.
Economies of scale also apply. The generating equipment and distribution network cost close to a fixed amount every year no matter how much electricity is actually generated and so the way to keep the cost per household down you spread that cost across every household and business. Our present system breaks that economy of scale and thus increases costs per household and business.
Also, the present system uses a dis-economy of scale by charging per kilowatt hour. This dis-economy is realised by large companies paying less per kilowatt hour than households. This causes a misallocation of electricity. According to supply and demand, higher use should result in being charged more. Of course, by doing it this way they can hide the fact that households are subsidising businesses while keeping profits high.
NZ Power is a sick joke. It will never happen.
A bigger joke is that you think it will never happen, here’s what an actual sick joke is vis a vis the retail price of electricity,
In the past 2 years urged on by a continual stream of (false) Government propaganda i have managed to trim my already minimal use of electricity by 10%,
During that same 2 year period the cost of that electricity from my retail provider has risen by a full 30%,
Don’t be so stupid to suggest that i switch to a cheaper retail provider as to my knowledge there is not one,
The only evident sick joke round these parts is your ego where you make claims of being an ‘economist’ unable to hire help at grandiose salary’s when evidenced by your comments you have very little clue about economics or anything else for that matter…
You need a lesson in basic economics.
“The Economics of Electricity”
http://media.nzherald.co.nz/webcontent/document/pdf/201323/Electricity2.pdf
Paras 75 onwards provide a lucid explanation of retail price movements.
and I repeat NZ Power will NEVER happen. Zero chance. Under any government. There may well be a sign on a door in Wellington saying “NZ Power” but it will never do what Labour says it is going to do. Because when they win office they will receive the scary advice that it is a dog. Gee who would have thought? There will be a face saving announcement. When politicians get in they generally need to get with the programme if they want to get re-elected. Blackouts don’t win elections.
That is me for today – I’m off to crank up the spa at full power and turn on the heat pumps. 🙂
This is the guy that was rolled out by Labour to support NZ Power when it was announced. Now he calls the policy a “nightmare”
“It may look good, but it’s got lots of challenges,” said Wolak of the Labour-Greens policy. “You’re throwing the entire baby out just to get rid of the bathwater and you’re going to start over, as if you have all these problems.”
This is very funny.
http://whoar.co.nz/2013/q-a-a-review-10/
(excerpt..)
“..then..bloody hell..!..knock me over with a feather..!..the compere woods asks some real journalist-type questions..
..when she asks tindall from the warehouse how anyone could live on the minimum-wage they pay..
..and that isn’t working for families etc just a taxpayer subsidy for low-wage employers..
..tindall shifts uncomfortably in his seat..and blames the inernet for him having to pay that low-low-wage to most employees..
..tindall then says he supports a low-wage economy..and wants to see it continue nto the future..’cos it will create jobs’…(!)..(ed:..f.f.s..!..)
..(ed:..now if that dosen’t firmly make the case for a govt-mandated living-wage..what the fuck would..?
..it is clear our ‘sam walton’..tindall..and his like…will never voluntarily pay that living wage to their employees..
..these multi-millionaire employers are more than happy for the rest of new zealand to continue to subsidise their riches/profits..for forever..”
phillip ure..
Do not rely on ‘journalists’ like Wood to protect your democratic rights.
Far too much in the pay and due to corporate interests.
I don’t suppose anyone saw the preferred PM figures from Q&A this morning? Can’t find it anywhere…
no change..
but dann is promising big shifts in the party polls released tonight..
phillip ure..
Key down 1pt to 41%. Shearer up 1pt to 13%.
Everyone who knows anything knows there’s generally a huge disconnect between preferred PM and any other half real scale.
Preferred PM is nothing more than His Strangeness Potty@Gower and Radio Loudmouth Live’s DungCan Gooner having, well…….fun?
pm down 1
shearer up 1
norman down 1
peters up 1
Norman was up 1pt. Winston didn’t change.
The Clobbering Machine
Just over a week ago, on Saturday 27 July, an unpleasant thread appeared in The Standard, entitled “Lazy Jono on 3 News invents a story”. Second-team TV3 jonolist Jono Hutchinson had mischievously quoted an incendiary remark by activist/commentator/provocateur Jenny in order to reinforce his—or more accurately, his boss Patrick Gower’s—allegation that Shearer and Cunliffe had squabbled in public at a protest meeting against the Snooping Bill.
The headmaster, Mr Prent, quickly administered a stern lecture to Jenny, and that of course should have been the end of it. Unwisely, though, Jenny answered back, and the headmaster dished out an even sterner scolding. Once again, that should have been the end of the matter. Unfortunately, however, the school yobbos and one or two thickies heard what was happening, and decided to get in on the act….
SCENE: The Back Benchers Tavern, Wellington. On the sound system, something mellow and atmospheric by the Phoenix Foundation—although the pleasant music is somewhat undermined by the deranged shouting of a drunken army officer bawling threats at a tall young man in one corner. The rest of the bar seems to have been taken over by a motley group of malcontents, complainers and vehement political junkies as well as various sad hangers-on, coat-tailers and vacuous gigglers. In fact, that’s exactly what has happened: a large group of Standard regulars are knocking back the hard stuff and dishing out the verbals. At one table sits the fearsome foul-mouthed feminist Queen of Thorns. All afternoon QoT has been slamming back tequila after tequila after tequila, occasionally snarling at anybody unwise enough to cast an apprehensive glance at her, “Don’t you DARE fucking label me!”. This terrifying Medusa is attended by various hapless minions, foremost among them the Labour Party apparatchik, self-appointed enforcer and tireless deliverer of spurious accusations, Te Reo Putake, AKA “Squealer”. As well as diligently agreeing with every one of QoT’s feisty feminist flare-ups, Te Reo Putake has been hovering over the proceedings like a rain-sodden black cloud, waiting for his chance to dump on Jenny’s parade.
Lounging at an adjoining table is the aforesaid contingent of hangers-on and gigglers, a rather pathetic and contemptible group comprising Morrissey Breen, Arfamo, Weka and Colonial Viper. They are all listening intently to Queen of Thorns as she lays into poor beleaguered Jenny….
QoT: [snarling] Right, so you didn’t provide the link because you weren’t actually transcribing the audio but we’re meant to take your word for it even though others can’t verify it. That would be you making shit up right there, wouldn’t it?
This frothing denunciation leads to an awkward silence. Nobody dares to speak. When the Queen of Thorns is up on her high horse like this, nobody has the courage to cross her, not even the notoriously feisty Jenny. An ominous gloom settles over the Standardista community. Even more ominously, it looks like now is the time for Squealer to unleash his burden…
Te Reo Putake: [roaring with choleric rage] Bullshit, Jenny. You made that up. It didn’t happen.
QoT: [glowering] Gods forbid anyone question your integrity given your extensive history of making shit up to suit your own narrative, but care to link to the footage you’re claiming to transcribe?
McFlock: omg, she’s turning into morrissey…
Colonial Viper: [stupid giggle] Heh heh heh. That’s funny.
weka: I’d like to know what bizarre universe it is we’ve all ended up in where we’re feeling compelled to speak up for Shearer. Planet Jenny.
Arfamo: Lol. I feel your pain and I share it.
Te Reo Putake: Just for fun, I’d like to suggest that future examples of lazy news reporting are tagged as ‘jonolism’. Like, “Hi, I’m a jonolist from 3 News!”
EVERYONE: Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha!
Te Reo Putake: Or “Look Mum I’ve won an award for my jonolism!”
Mr Prent: [grimly] Heh! Almost worth doing as an object lesson.
Arfamo: Lol. Jonolism is where reporters simply Garner their own news.
Colonial Viper: [dopey chuckle] That’s funny.
Meanwhile, in a dark corner of the bar, a drunken and aggressive slob continues to dish out threats to New Zealand’s best journalist….
ARMY GENERAL WHO CANNOT BE NAMED: I have contacts in Afgh*n*st*n and I can have you fucking killed just like THAT! And I fucking will, you subversive communist al Qaeda fuckhead!
JOHN STEPHENSON: You’re drunk, Rh*s. You’re making a fool of yourself.
NOTE: This is a reconstruction of an actual conversation.
If you want, you can follow the whole abject thing in its original form….
LOLZ, put another log on the fire….
Nice song. I think they play it at the Back Benchers sometimes….
Never been there, i fear the place is a fire-hazard, humorous wee lampoon you have posted there,
It’s intention is to…
“It’s intention is to…”
…… possibly show that Morissey can be just as cynical about himself as he can be aout others (which to my mind is a good thing)
Never been there, i fear the place is a fire-hazard, humorous wee lampoon you have posted there. It’s intention is to…
There is a serious reason I repackaged and presented those dismal messages for the reconsideration of Standard regulars. It is to highlight something that greatly troubles me, and indeed should trouble anyone who values free and open discussion, conducted in a serious and civil tone.
I’m talking about a particularly malicious insult that our friend Te Reo Putake has regularly employed against me, and no doubt many others who have crossed him. QoT used it twice in that thread, against Jenny. This is the continued repetition of the lie that your opponent is “making shit up”.
Instead of dealing with the substance of an uncomfortable issue, some people resort reflexively to abuse, and the repetition of a sordid piece of rhetorical abuse. Te Reo Putake is undoubtedly the worst offender here, but felix has also indulged in it, and (as we saw) so has QoT. This is the scurrilous and cynical behaviour you expect to see on the crazier right wing blogs; to see it indulged in on a mostly excellent and thoughtful forum like The Standard is extremely worrying.
Tho i have no reason to support many of those you ‘name’ and in fact the opposite of that is true, my opinion is that while the accusation of ‘making s**t up’ is to a certain extent gutter language probably saying more about it’s users than anything else the substance of what they were pointing out could be said to be largely true,
A re-litigation of this whole issue seems unwarranted but i found one of Jenny’s comments about the Shearer interjection, whether it actually occurred or not, to be rather ludicrous,
To be able to infer from that one simple interjection, made or otherwise, that Shearer was Bullying Cunliffe would be, in my opinion, within the realm of ‘making s**t up’…
Morrissey, there are no reliable witnesses, which means that making shit up is a condition we all share. Therefore it cannot be an insult.
You do make shit up Morrissey. I’ve pointed it out several times when you’ve made up quotes you think you heard on the radio but never bothered to check.
You do make shit up Morrissey.
No I do not. And you know it.
I’ve pointed it out several times when you’ve made up quotes you think you heard on the radio but never bothered to check.
I have often conceded that not all of my transcripts are word-perfect. But they are always true to the spirit and substance of what has been said. If you want to object to my slant on an issue, or the way I have portrayed someone, that is fair enough, but you have occasionally taken the unwise option of following Te Reo Putake’s lead and claimed that what I write is all “made up.” That’s obviously the way he deals, or thinks he deals, with people at his LEC meetings, but such extreme and spurious tactics don’t work here. I would have thought you had more nous than to take such a lead.
Perhaps your most grievous misjudgement was when you claimed that Chris (Haw Haw) Trotter had not delivered a depraved and pretentious defence of the appalling Florida jury decision in the Trayvon Martin case; he had done exactly that, of course, but you made some ridiculous claim that I had not put his windy oratory “in context”.
We all expect better of you, felix, and I’m sure you will return to your normal high standards sooner rather than later.
Morrissey.
Last time you actually said your transcript was accurate. It was nothing of the sort.
And you are wrong about Trotter. I posted the audio to prove it. He did not say what you said he did, literally or otherwise.
Your writing is funny and clever but it is an outright lie to call it “transcribing”. It is fiction, sometimes based on actual events, sometimes entirely imaginary.
I challenge you to post the links to the audio next time so people can judge for themselves.
Love you, felix. I take your point, but disagree about Trotter. He commented on that verdict, and it was all in support of the jury’s decision. I would provide a verbatim transcript if I could, but I can’t even get the link you provided to play on my computer.
Maybe some kind soul—Queen of Thorns, perhaps?—might like to assist me by providing a transcript.
“That’s funny :)”
Vintage Morrissey. Love it !
+1.
I’m sitting on the fence here but I do enjoy Morrissey.
[random guffaw]
LOL™
… I don’t get it. Besides adding your own spin on something which people can easily read for themselves, what’s the point?
Nice attempt at shaming me with the drinking and “apparatchik” comments, though, they really add to your cred as the one-man Open mike crusade against whoever you’ve decided to paraphrase for the day.
… I don’t get it.
Oh come on, Your Majesty! I think you get it perfectly well.
Besides adding your own spin on something which people can easily read for themselves, what’s the point?
Dramatization, my dear. It’s been going on since the days of THIS BLOKE….
http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-fk7zwBoZgXk/T1u9ChkNA4I/AAAAAAAAAJE/6_hcvMexHGA/s320/shakespeare.jpg
Nice attempt at shaming me with the drinking and “apparatchik” comments, though,
The tequila detailing, and the “Don’t judge me” thing come straight from your website’s “About” page. The apparatchik dig was aimed at our friend Te Reo, not at you.
they really add to your cred as the one-man Open mike crusade against whoever you’ve decided to paraphrase for the day.
Those were direct quotes, not paraphrases.
And….I know we’ve had some rather spiteful exchanges, but I enjoy your writing, and I’ve even commented (positively) on some of your Daily Blog articles.
The tequila detailing, and the “Don’t judge me” thing come straight from your website’s “About” page.
Context is meaningless! Up is down! Morrissey’s fantasies about the Jim Mora panel are completely accurate!
Take your bullshit “praise” and go fuck yourself with it, mate.
Are you sure that Morrisey didn’t capture your incandescent verbal style just write?
style, like beauty, is oft in the eyes of the beholder (as is comedy). But morrissey keeps claiming that his conceptual pieces are “accurate”, and I can never figure out whether he’s seriously delusional or just taking perfomance art to the next level, like Sacha Baron Cohen or Laibach.
Either way it’s not really my cup of tea.
….like Sacha Baron Cohen or Laibach.
Big difference between myself and Sacha Baron Cohen: I target the arrogant (Key and his cronies), the dishonest (Garth “Gaga” George), the vicious (Dr Michael Bassett, Garth the Knife McVicar), the pompous (Chris Trotter), the vacuous (Simon Farrell Green, Murray Deaker), the smug (Kerre Woodham), the hypocritical (“Sir” Graham Henry) and the corrupt (John “Cabbage Boat” Banks).
Sacha Baron Cohen’s targets are the poor, the kind, the polite, and the victims of war crimes. He is a brutal and reckless liar, and a fanatical supporter of an outlaw state.
Comparing that scumbag to me was a misjudgement on your part.
Laibach I do have some time for; those guys are a timely reminder that Slovenia produces better things than foolish and shallow poseurs like Slavoj Žižek.
I’m sure that when I call myself a tequila-drinking bitch who rejects labels, it’s very very different from when Morrissey calls me a tequila-drinking bitch who rejects labels.
But of course he’s ~dramatizing~ things so misogynist behaviour-policing is totally okay.
Context is meaningless!
I’m sorry to have to say that inanely shouting slogans does not enhance your credibility one bit. I think you’re trying to imply with your ranting that, for me, context is meaningless. That, of course, is a ridiculous accusation; I go to great pains to always put my writing in context.
Up is down!
Could you provide an example of my trying to say any such thing? Of course you can’t, but I am eagerly awaiting your tabling of the evidence.
Morrissey’s fantasies about the Jim Mora panel are completely accurate!
“Fantasies”? Oh, I see—you’re channeling Te Reo Putake! Bad idea, that.
Take your bullshit “praise” and go fuck yourself with it, mate.
The praise was genuine, but it appears you lack the grace to let bygones be bygones. I do admire your feistiness, but you should know that not everybody has my patience. I advise you to dial down the indignation a notch or two.
Jeez, Moz, I was tempted to be positive about this effort, especially since, for the first time ever, you accurately transcribed the quotes, but your hopeless drivel about me in your replies really only leaves room for one retort.
You’re making shit up.
Feel free to transcribe these words any way that makes sense to you, dude.
Jeez, Moz, I was tempted to be positive about this effort, especially since, for the first time ever, you accurately transcribed the quotes, but your hopeless drivel about me in your replies really only leaves room for one retort.
Oh puh-leeeease! Enough already with the wounded admonitions. I believe my characterisation imbued you with a demonic energy that will see the ladies flocking around you, you bad boy you.
You’re making shit up.
If that’s a technical term for lifting some banal online banter out of its usual obscurity and putting it into a Broadway production, then this writer, i.e., moi is….
http://finkorswim.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/12/guilty2.png
Feel free to transcribe these words any way that makes sense to you, dude.
Thanks dude. Keep up the good work.
Interesting, in today’s Herald, a retired, retiring Judge’s contribution to a book containing well known New Zealanders who are considered grumpy males,(are there not grumpy females),
This and the follow up article in the same Herald simply say ”if you are not wearing a suit and you have visible Tatts then you will receive from the New Zealand court system far less ”justice” than those who appear in suit without any visible body ink”,
What an ugly little prejudiced system we have…
Link ? Would seek it out myself if Herald did not routinely bury real stuff in favour of distracting pap. Keen to know whom the judge is.
In today’s Herald on-line, sorry i have never been able to do links from other than Googled web-pages,(and then not all of them are a great success),
The problem being my computer illiteracy being a self taught user AND the not inconsiderable fact that i am a lazy little sod lulled into the belief that i need no further skill other than the present level of self taught ‘getting by’…
I always appreciate the effort a person makes and until something is banned and I am unable to do it differently I can only do what I know.
For bad12 – Rough gear does you no good by Johnathan Milne.
Lolz, thanks Molly, add to my little excuses list above the fact that someone usually comes along and saves my bacon link-wise…
Never mind Bad12. Found it.
With respect, I suspect that His Honour expresses tongue-in-cheek here. And that being the case I further suspect there will be a sides-split audience of some 120 plus who as we speak will be flicking off “HaHaHa !” emails to their brother.
http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=10907875
If I suspect wrongly, I look forward NOT to reading His Honour on the day he is no longer hobbled by the proscriptions inherent in picking up the $250,000 plus annual stipend of a District Court judge.
Oh that on my next court appearance I have the wedge to engage the sartorial standard which sufficiently reflects my respect for the justice system and the learned judicial officer holding my immediate fate in his/her hands !
i favor that you suspect wrongly, the legal eagle quoted in the link kindly provided by Molly, a follow-up piece by a Herald reporter, echo’s, with a certain amount of reservation the learned Judge’s comments…
In all the talk on leadership contenders, one name that should be mentioned but rarely is.. Iain Lees-Galloway. I think he ticks all the boxes. Smart, articulate, left leaning and decidedly the thinking woman’s crumpet.
Whats not to like.
What’s not to like ? Mean sour old pikelets is what not to like. As a pretty dependable rule of thumb. Just generally
“Deal opens door for Chinese workers in Christchurch rebuild”
http://www.3news.co.nz/Deal-opens-door-for-Chinese-workers-in-Christchurch-rebuild/tabid/423/articleID/305702/Default.aspx
It is travesty that we are forced to bring in 17,000 migrants to rebuild ChCh when we have so many welfare recipients. Not all of these jobs require high skills.
The problem is not a lack of training places. It is a mixture of motivation, ability to relocate, and sadly very low skill levels, demotivation, and drug use.
The priority should be their children (and doing everything possible to discourage long term welfare recipients having children that will repeat the cycle). The existing children of welfare recipients should be a high priority for Government attention – both money and re-education.
Yeah well you better get on the blower to ShonKey Python and suggest that he not allow the portly gal from Waitakere to high-prioritise dog-whistles against beneficiaries.
Sounds to me like you’re not quite so enamoured by the performance of ShonKey Python’s Flying Circus as once you were Sryland ?
srylands you have been sucked in by your cults bull shit drug use amongst beneficiaries research has shown to be at a lower level than the general population!
you are just another cult victim who has swallowed your leaders BS (poison like those in jones town)
When you don’t have effective policy to create jobs for NZders its a cheap nasty solution to demonize those who can’t help them selves!
“When you don’t have effective policy to create jobs for NZders”
Governments cannot (and should not try to) “create” jobs.
Srylands……….does this shifted goal posts argument of yours apply even when the ShonKey Python Kool-Aid contained the promise of 170,000 new jobs ?
Or is that promise too inconvenient (and impossible) for you to address ?
Damn ! Just when I thought you were coming right…….
I have no idea what he said – I am not an apologist for the Government or the National Party. The current government is a left wing government. I’m simply telling you my view that Governments cannot create jobs. They can certainly adopt policies to destroy jobs. Just read through a list of Green Party policies to give you a heads up.
srylands How many jobs has national promised to create 170’000 was what your leader promised!
“How many jobs has national promised to create 170’000 was what your leader promised!”
No idea what he said. Don’t care. Governments don’t create jobs.
Given that in most developed economies the government is directly responsible for about 35-45% of GDP and probably around 20-30% of employment … your claim is ridiculous on the face of it.
More importantly however is that in the absence of government .. the private sector would not exist either.
The only way the Government can create jobs is to lower state sector productivity (it needs to do the opposite) or increase the size of the public sector (when it needs to do the opposite – and not nearly enough is being done on that front).
Channeling resources away from the productive sectors might “create jobs” but they are illusory.
We could use general taxation to pay people to paint rocks white. That of course would create jobs. But that is not the direction we need to head in. Small government and high productivity is the way to go.
/facepalm
Most jobs created by the private sector aren’t what one could call “productive” and, more often than not, they’re illusory as well.
Good job that nobody, except you, has suggested we do that.
The increasing poverty that that model has brought about over the last three decades proves you wrong.
“Small government and high productivity is the way to go.
The increasing poverty that that model has brought about over the last three decades proves you wrong.”
Because over the last three decades we have had low productivity and large government.
No, we haven’t no matter how much you RWNJs think we have.
BTW, the low productivity is a) a load of BS, productivity has been increasing faster than wages and b) it hasn’t been increasing as fast as it should have because of the policy settings that allowed businesses to keep wages low.
The problem is business which has been enabled by government that believed the illusion of the neo-liberal paradigm.
In the 1980’s we shrunk the Government, cut state spending, cut services, wages and taxes. We have been falling behind comparable countries, ever since.
We have one of the best per capita resource bases in the world. The fact we are falling behind other similar sized OECD countries is an indictment of the policies of the last 30 years.
Note how the economy picked up under Labour’s slightly increased State involvement and the recession Richardson caused, when the rest of the world was not having one, by her cuts.
We used to send aid to Singapore, FFS.
thats absolute bullshit srylands .
Look at what happened to Argentina when they copied your policies.
Your are just repeating a failed mantra.
Germany is the most successful economy in Europe why because they train young people like no other economy !
We had Shipley and Bolger trying your less govt more business model in the 1990’s we had 3 good years out of 9 revolving around tax cuts for the better off just before the elections (election bribes) they gave the economy a short term boost followed by a long period of decline in between elections!
What we got was less govt and less business!
You r trying to push the old right wing whore’s(thatcherism) explanation of how to run an economy like a home budget which is naive redneck BS!
productivity is very hard to measure and as you get more people into employment in your economies, productivity goes down same all over the world I have studied every economy going back to Egyptian times.
Your simplistic bullshit is just that, unresearched redneck moralizing bullshit!
So Srylands say due to your small government argument we have a foot in mouth out break or as we are about to see a company like Fontera implodes all because of poor oversight.
My guess is you will say something like ‘thats just market forces at work’, yet many jobs will be lost, not to mention our reputation, so yes governments do create jobs through good governance.
Another twit with the idea that, say, a Teacher, or a Doctor, working in the State sector, is not part of the “” productive sector””.
Do they suddenly only become “”productive”” LOL, only if they are privatised?
Srylands statement of course comes from the laffer curve idea.
That expansion of Government provision of services always displaces the private sector.
If that was really the case then you would expect the countries with extremely large State shares in the economy to be the worst off. Which is obviously not the case.
Countries with large State investment in the economy are the most successful. Some States manage with no private sector at all. (Not what I would recommend though).
Every one from Singapore to Norway, Germany and Denmark.
Countries which have high State spending either/or both percentage wise or per capita.
How are your low tax, small Government countries doing? Srylands.
Funny that everyone wants to immigrate to countries with high levels of State social spending.
Not many want to go to Somalia. Your ideal of small Government and unlimited/unregulated free enterprise.
Shrinking the States share of the economy is working so well in Greece, Spain, Ireland and Italy, Right!
You claim to be in business. How well would your business be doing without our State provided infrastructure?
Painting rocks white is of course silly. Neither a public nor private sector organisation would do this because:
1. The private sector organisation would not achieve a cash flow for doing so.
2. The public sector organisation would not achieve a political mandate for doing so.
Different means of accountability, same end result.
Now the cash flow mechanism is simpler, faster and more direct. If you can’t find the cash to pay the wages and overheads this month you must take immediate action. Indeed this is why the private sector is good at things that are relative low-risk, short-term and local in scope … like selling baked beans. The downside is that it’s very hard to get things done that you cannot extract an immediate direct cash-flow from.
By contrast political accountability works over more variable time-frames, with more variable responses. If a government ultimately loses the confidence of the people they eventually have to take some action. But there is a fair bit of flexibility, resilience and ability to spread risk over time. This is why the public sector is better at high-risk, long-term and globally scoped undertakings ….like education and health.
Taken to the next level – and this is already done in some sectors, car industry, defense etc…- is the use of robots in production and online shopping instead of shops. Who is really needed in such a “productive world”? It also means that there is no need to be governed as the corporates are not even overseen today, let alone under such circumstance.Tax take will decline to a mere trickle and the rulers of foreign politics and defense could as well be appointed directors of the corporate body. This would be the smallest government and highest productivity one can think of.
I belief we have to rethink the way society works, the sooner the better.
“and online shopping instead of shops. ”
You still go to “shops”?
Beside your snide remark – yes ordinary people do actually go and get i.e. groceries – you have not come up with an answer to the issues our society is and will face. Slogans wont cut it.
Oh yes you do Srylands…….be honest now. And posing as a rightie who thinks ShonKey Python is actually Matt McCarten Left…….well…….you just look like a fuckwit.
Honesty is the best policy mate……wherever you’re at.
Have a Snickers bro’. You’re mean when you’re disappointed and outed for it.
Actually, the government can and should create jobs. Saying that it shouldn’t is just making our society ever more dependent upon the rich which is, of course, what they want and why they created the fiction that governments shouldn’t. When governments go round looking after the people that they’re supposed to serve the capitalists lose power.
Your view is in direct contradiction of reality.
I don’t think Shitlands has ever been treated at a public hospital, been pulled over by a policeman, or had a letter delivered to his address, by the sounds of it. Or, he’s an idiot.
Whatever – there is too much drug use amongst welfare recipients. Go to the East Cape and talk to logging companies trying to recruit tree pruners. They struggle to recruit and retain young unemployed men because of drug testing. It is a serious problem.
Of course employed people will use more drugs than those on welfare – they have more money. Doesn’t mean that it is not a serious problem.
logging companies have also been exploiting workers, the word gets around young people don,t want to go out in work gangs to work for eight hours, when they get to work they are given the dangerous work with little training while the contract workers take the easy work easy money
The eight hours becomes 10 to 12 hrs work with no pay for the extra hours putting these workesr health safety at risk no pay for the extra hours and quite often no pay at all as alot of these contractors keep the wages and fob off young naive workers!
more blame shifting just like your leader!
then we should drug and alcohol test students whose parents are wealthy,as they are getting 70% of their fees paid for by the state mp.s are recieving 100% funding by the state drug test cops ird staff work and income defence force roading contractors etc etc.
Sure no problem with those suggestions. Well done.
nice – so that’s about half the population you want mandatorily drug-tested then, oh great hero of freedom.
+1
I don’t think that employers who pay minimal wages for difficult dangerous and dirty work, far from home, are going to get the pick of the bunch, somehow.
Not busy, today? Again?
You need to find a useful hobby.
The problem is not a lack of training places. It is a mixture of motivation, ability to relocate, and sadly very low skill levels, demotivation, and drug use.
The problem is a lack of training programs. It is also a mixture of incompetence by government, ability to forecast when builders would be required, and sadly, very low levels of intelligence.
FIFY
What’s not to like aye! It’s a win win situation. Those Chinese will work for nothing (their visas will be tied to a specific employer – just to keep track of them of course), and Fonterra can assist in some sort of feeding programme akin to weatbix and milk in schools. Perhaps something like corn product and milk whey.
Nathe-the-man Guy and Soimun Brudges can keep an eye on the whole scheme to ensure transparency and oversight.
Yes but most Chinese are lactose intolerant. Getting Fonterra to feed them – bad idea.
Srylands we here are BS intolerant so go back to KB like you promised a few days ago but as usual you blindly follow your leader in breaking promises
I imagine their also botulism-intolerant too – but then what’s a few chinks between friends! We’ve still got the nargy-nation to work on for our next FTA – and who knows ….. something may still come of that South American jaunt earlier this year
correction ‘their’ should read ‘they are’.
No doubt there will be a brown shirt along shortly though to rectumfy the sitch
‘
I used to be a shocking grammar Naz1 . . . then I saw this: http://youtu.be/J7E-aoXLZGY
Beautiful.
“A lack of training programmes”
Here is a list of (some free) courses – all with spaces available.
where is the list?
vacant as always, spylands
And srylands pulls out all the BS.
You’re not forced to bring them in at all.
No, it’s a lack of being supported through training either by the government or the businesses.
Well, I’m pretty sure that if you paid enough to cover expenses including the expense of relocating then people would be motivated. Drug use isn’t that much of an issue – never has been. If it was all those people drinking alcohol (a legal drug) wouldn’t have a job.
That “cycle” is a direct result of capitalism because capitalism forces poverty on the many. When people don’t have access to the needed to resources to better themselves, to make a go of life then they inevitably lose self-esteem and start to see no point in doing anything. Get these people to the resources they need and that cycle will come to an end but the capitalists don’t want that because then they’d actually have competition and wouldn’t be able to profit so much.
“Well, I’m pretty sure that if you paid enough to cover expenses including the expense of relocating then people would be motivated.”
God what an entitlement culture you live in.
Their support should be a bus ticket to ChCh. One way.
Srylands,
Supplying people with the means that they don’t have to get somewhere and set up somewhere to live is not displaying an attitude of ‘entitlement culture’, it is simply an attitude of addressing the practical obstacles that a person on welfare would have to getting those jobs in Chch.
Surely even you can see this point?
Are you willing to pay to go to work? Because that’s what you’re asking people to do.
“No, it’s a lack of being supported through training either by the government or the businesses.”
So a student allowance or a loan is not good enough? Bloody hell.
When it doesn’t cover the bills? No it’s not and nobody should ever have to borrow to do training.
Uruguay to Become First Nation to Fully Legalize Marijuana: Blow to Ruinous US War on Drugs
And the sooner we legalise marijuana here in NZ the better as well.
Christ Draco T!!!!
This IS serious!
You do realise those bloody narco states COULD (possibly, maybe, at a pinch) be financing the Yell Kida!
What can be done?
This really IS a crisis!
I know …. let’s trust in our Proim Munsta and our agencies of state to protect us.
After all – we lekd them, and they’ve got OUR best, bestest, bestest bestest intrusts at heart! (AYE?)
Portugal and the Netherlands have already moved in terms of legalisation. Uruguay isn’t the first, but it is good seeing it happen in South America. As always, drug laws there are used to attack the poor, curb civil rights and excuse brutal militarised police forces.
It would be nice to have intelligent discussions on this website without sryland continually derailing it.
So boring.
I don’t think it was intelligent before I came along.
🙄
Still here?
Schrilands you are just wheeling out the same lines word for word letter for letter even the punctuation marks of other neo liberal has beens!
Show us some evidence your neo liberal moralistic crap works.I have researched and studied economics for over 30 years and have found no place your simplistic naive short sighted model works!
We should all just ignore him. He says nothing of any value.
I know.
However he takes up so many space and we have to skim past all the comments to get to constructive discussions.
Grant Robertson on democracy in the Labour Party.
http://blog.labour.org.nz/2013/08/04/labours-policy-platform/
That apparatchik Beltway Grant Robertson on “democracy” on Beige Alert?! “Leonid Brezhnev* on democracy” would be less cynical, more inspiring and sincere.
Nice words. Coming from someone else, I might believe them.
*Not the worst, but certainly the dullest.
latest Poll
:
ONE News Colmar Brunton poll:
NAT 46%(dwn 3),
LAB 33%,
GRN 14%(up 5),
NZF 3%,
MAO 2%,
ACT 1%
CNSV 1%(dwn 1)
Congratulations to the Green Party. Thoroughly deserved.
Yes thoroughly deserved. Well done Greens.
Interestingly, the polling period was 27th to 31st July, so got much of the housing policy stuff, but missed much of the Henry inquiry blow up.
I thought the Greens would do well on the GCSB issue. Let’s hope they can sustain the momentum.
More deets here:
http://www.colmarbrunton.co.nz/images/ONE_News_Colmar_Brunton_Poll_report_27-31_July_2013_prelim.pdf
76% of polling was done after Labour’s housing announcement ..
Party which is disciplined, focused, consistent, competently led, not back-stabbing … gets more votes.
Party which isn’t any of those things … doesn’t.
This will be a surprise to nobody at all. So naturally, nothing will change.
Interesting. Looks like the MP will hold the balance of power.
MMP seat allocator has change a bit, lets see if this link works… this is based on the MP having 2 electorate seats, and there being an overhang of 1 seat. It assumes that UF don’t retain their seat (and that NZF are out for being under the 5%).
NACT = 58
Lab/GP/Mana = 60
MP = 3
Total seats 121
(can’t remember the rules, who gets for form govt in that situation?)
http://www.elections.org.nz/voting-system/mmp-voting-system/mmp-seat-allocation-calculator?asPercentage=1&partyName_0=ACT+New+Zealand&partyVote_0=1&electorateSeats_0=1&partyName_1=Alliance&partyVote_1=0&electorateSeats_1=0&partyName_2=Aotearoa+Legalise+Cannabis+Party&partyVote_2=0&electorateSeats_2=0&partyName_3=Conservative+Party&partyVote_3=1&electorateSeats_3=0&partyName_4=Democrats+for+Social+Credit&partyVote_4=0&electorateSeats_4=0&partyName_5=Green+Party&partyVote_5=14&electorateSeats_5=0&partyName_6=Labour+Party&partyVote_6=33&electorateSeats_6=0&partyName_7=Libertarianz&partyVote_7=0&electorateSeats_7=0&partyName_8=Mana&partyVote_8=0&electorateSeats_8=1&partyName_9=M%C4%81ori+Party&partyVote_9=2&electorateSeats_9=2&partyName_10=National+Party&partyVote_10=46&electorateSeats_10=0&partyName_11=New+Zealand+First+Party&partyVote_11=3&electorateSeats_11=0&partyName_12=United+Future&partyVote_12=0&electorateSeats_12=0&partyName_opt_0=Other+Party&partyVote_opt_0=0&electorateSeats_opt_0=0&partyName_opt_1=Other+Party&partyVote_opt_1=0&electorateSeats_opt_1=0&partyName_opt_2=Other+Party&partyVote_opt_2=0&electorateSeats_opt_2=0&partyCount=13&optPartyCount=3&action=Calculate+parliamentary+seats
Doesn’t seem to change much if UF keep their seat
http://www.elections.org.nz/voting-system/mmp-voting-system/mmp-seat-allocation-calculator?asPercentage=1&partyName_0=ACT+New+Zealand&partyVote_0=1&electorateSeats_0=1&partyName_1=Alliance&partyVote_1=0&electorateSeats_1=0&partyName_2=Aotearoa+Legalise+Cannabis+Party&partyVote_2=0&electorateSeats_2=0&partyName_3=Conservative+Party&partyVote_3=1&electorateSeats_3=0&partyName_4=Democrats+for+Social+Credit&partyVote_4=0&electorateSeats_4=0&partyName_5=Green+Party&partyVote_5=14&electorateSeats_5=0&partyName_6=Labour+Party&partyVote_6=33&electorateSeats_6=0&partyName_7=Libertarianz&partyVote_7=0&electorateSeats_7=0&partyName_8=Mana&partyVote_8=0&electorateSeats_8=1&partyName_9=M%C4%81ori+Party&partyVote_9=2&electorateSeats_9=2&partyName_10=National+Party&partyVote_10=46&electorateSeats_10=0&partyName_11=New+Zealand+First+Party&partyVote_11=3&electorateSeats_11=0&partyName_12=United+Future&partyVote_12=0&electorateSeats_12=1&partyName_opt_0=Other+Party&partyVote_opt_0=0&electorateSeats_opt_0=0&partyName_opt_1=Other+Party&partyVote_opt_1=0&electorateSeats_opt_1=0&partyName_opt_2=Other+Party&partyVote_opt_2=0&electorateSeats_opt_2=0&partyCount=13&optPartyCount=3&action=Calculate+parliamentary+seats
However if the MP lost all their electorate seats, the left would have a clear win. Would the GP, Mana and Labour work together on that? Apparently they’d rather lose the election.
http://www.elections.org.nz/voting-system/mmp-voting-system/mmp-seat-allocation-calculator?asPercentage=1&partyName_0=ACT+New+Zealand&partyVote_0=1&electorateSeats_0=1&partyName_1=Alliance&partyVote_1=0&electorateSeats_1=0&partyName_2=Aotearoa+Legalise+Cannabis+Party&partyVote_2=0&electorateSeats_2=0&partyName_3=Conservative+Party&partyVote_3=1&electorateSeats_3=0&partyName_4=Democrats+for+Social+Credit&partyVote_4=0&electorateSeats_4=0&partyName_5=Green+Party&partyVote_5=14&electorateSeats_5=0&partyName_6=Labour+Party&partyVote_6=33&electorateSeats_6=0&partyName_7=Libertarianz&partyVote_7=0&electorateSeats_7=0&partyName_8=Mana&partyVote_8=0&electorateSeats_8=2&partyName_9=M%C4%81ori+Party&partyVote_9=2&electorateSeats_9=0&partyName_10=National+Party&partyVote_10=46&electorateSeats_10=0&partyName_11=New+Zealand+First+Party&partyVote_11=3&electorateSeats_11=0&partyName_12=United+Future&partyVote_12=0&electorateSeats_12=1&partyName_opt_0=Other+Party&partyVote_opt_0=0&electorateSeats_opt_0=0&partyName_opt_1=Other+Party&partyVote_opt_1=0&electorateSeats_opt_1=0&partyName_opt_2=Other+Party&partyVote_opt_2=0&electorateSeats_opt_2=0&partyCount=13&optPartyCount=3&action=Calculate+parliamentary+seats
With just those party’s whoever the Maori Party sided with would form the Government…
Yep, but,
Will NZF reach the threshhold?
Will the MP get any seats, and will they hold their list votes?
My view on NZFirst, touch and go, But, always remembering that even under massive fire from the opposition and media at the time NZFirst still managed 4.8% of the party vote so i cannot see that Party being as low as 3%,
NZFirst tho will struggle, there is little impetus for ‘activists’ to support that Party in 2014 and the opposite is now true,
i take my view of the Mana Party from a basis of what occurred in the Ikaroa-Rawhiti byelection after which the Roy Morgan polled Mana at 1.5%, (a list seat in it’self),
Given that Mana, contesting Ikaroa-Rawhiti for the first time picked up 4000+ votes off of the Maori Party then there is no reason to believe that Mana will not end the 2014 campaign with up to 1.5-2.5% of the party vote,
Flavell on those numbers is GONE from Waiariki, his majority is only 1900 votes and Labour have nothing to gain by seriously contesting this electorate seat and lots to lose as this besides Hone’s Te Tai Tokerau is the next most winnable seat for Mana,
Sharples’s Tamaki-Makaurau is also a goner for the Maori party where Sharples holds it by a mere 1000 votes over Labour’s Shane Jones who should win it for Labour in 2014 although with a large chunk of the electorate and Party votes going across to Mana,
Auntie Tariana’s seat, meh???, i cannot pick it, don’t know who Tariana has picked to stand there and don’t know what sort of strength Mana have in the electorate, Labour i am picking to just win it with Mana picking up a good chunk of the Maori Party’s party vote,
The Maori Party party vote across NZ, i pick it to halve, and 90% of that halving of the Maori Party % to go to the Mana Party,
If there’s a overhang in Parliament 2015 it will be one of Mana Party MP’s…
Thanks, good to see some analysis of the Maori seats. Still, Mana made some big predictions in the past that haven’t come true, so I’m not sure that the MP can be ruled out so easily. The question then becomes, what would they do if they held the balance of power? Presumably go back to their electorates and members as ask?
The real problem is NZF, and Labour/left voters, including some here, who believe that a NZF list vote helps the left somehow. Would like to see someone explain that too.
The posit that a vote for NZFirst applied for the 2011 election, and i might add had Labour gained a couple of more % points than what it did would have come within a whisker of giving Slippery’s crew the kick,
But it isn’t Mana that is making such predictions, those are my very own little analysis of where Mana now stand in the Maori political pecking order and are based upon the Ikaroa-Rawhiti by-election,
In Ikaroa-Rawhiti the Maori Party lost 1/2 it’s 2011 vote all but a 100 of those votes went to the Mana Party,
A simple transfer of that Maori Party loss across all the Maori electorates will see them disappear from the Parliament, and, my rough calculations tell me that Mana would only need pick up 1/2 of those lost Maori Party party votes to gain 2.5% of that party vote,
The loss of that Maori Party party vote in 2014 is also why i see Labour as polling a bit lower than it’s actual support as the share of the Maori Party party vote that Labour will pick up is probably 1%…
Seriously???, i assume you mean what would the Maori Party do if by some fluke that party is still represented by an MP in the 2015 Parliament,
Go back to their electorate and members and ask, that a giggle, Te Ururoa would consult the nearest mirror and then phone all and sundry telling them He is open for Biz and please gentleman place your bids now…
“But it isn’t Mana that is making such predictions,”
Mana seemed confident that they would decimate the MP. They haven’t done that, yet. I think they will continue to grow, but not as fast as they were suggesting. That’s why I’m not entirely convinced of the collapse of the MP, but can live in hope (although I tend to think it’s for Maori to sort out, and I don’t know enough to know if the collapse of the MP entirely is a good thing or not).
if they held the balance of power in Nov 2014.
Are you suggesting that when they first had the choice to go with NACT, that they said they would consult with their members, but didn’t?
8% of people polled would give their electorate vote to the Green party. FFS!
Yes, so let’s have the people who say don’t vote tacitcally, come along and explain that now 😉
Although to be fair, the GP does campaign on two ticks, so that’s probably where the stupid is.
Green party campaign on two ticks? Got a link for that weka?
Sorry, no, but I heard it straight from Russel Norman’s mouth before the last election. He might not have said actively campaigning (so I don’t know if it was on billboards, that sor of thing), but he definitely meant that GP policy was to go for both ticks.
Because giving my electorate vote to Labour would mean voting for effing Robertson. I’d rather sandpaper my nipples.
Pretty sure that counts as tactical voting Rhinocrates.
Not that sophisticated. Pure and simple disgust.
When you vote, you don’t vote for someone who says that they’ll give you a fluffy unicorn, you vote for them if you have confidence that they will actually try to.
Beltway Grant doesn’t quite exude that impression from every one of his pores.
Sure, but the point we were discussing was people giving two ticks to the GP, because they think the GP needs two ticks, when the GP don’t and someone else would be better off with the electorate tick.
Your case sounds entirely reasonable to me, but I’m curious what you would do if electorate voting Robertson was tactically the better thing to do eg if it was a close contest between Labour and National. Or hypothetically, Robertson was standing in Ohariu and had a chance of ousting Dunne/UF. Would you still electorate vote away from Robertson (assuming that person met your unicorn criteria)?
“Criteria” is plural. “Criterion” is singular and more appropriate. Sorry about the pedantry – I do admit to being a wanker.
I see your point and agree, and pragmatically, I might get extremely drunk and tick Robertson if it were very close if Franks or Prebble were standing again, but I reserve my right to say that as a Wellington Central voter, I do not see Robertson as my representative.
His electorate office is literally right across the road from a WINZ office on Willis Street, he could see it right out his window, but that hypocrite doesn’t give a wet shit about the poor in real life.
“Tactical voting” for me means voting for the “least awful who’s likely to get a seat at Bellamy’s”, and that’s bad faith as far as I’m concerned. I deserve better than the least awful as my representative, I’ve lived here a lot longer than that opportunist and carpetbagging Beltway Grant doesn’t cut it.
“I’m curious what you would do if electorate voting Robertson was tactically the better thing to do eg if it was a close contest between Labour and National.”
There’s an assumption built into that question that supporting Labour is necessarily a tactical goal.
Also, there’s a difference between tactical voting and strategic voting.
“Tactical voting” for me means voting for the “least awful who’s likely to get a seat at Bellamy’s”, and that’s bad faith as far as I’m concerned. I deserve better than the least awful as my representative, I’ve lived here a lot longer than that opportunist and carpetbagging Beltway Grant doesn’t cut it.
I don’t think I’ve ever voted in an electorate where I felt like the candidate would be a good representative of me, so voting for me has always been more pragmatic, around what kind of govt is realistic, or what I don’t want, rather than thinking that I’m voting with any kind of purity.
“I’m curious what you would do if electorate voting Robertson was tactically the better thing to do eg if it was a close contest between Labour and National.”
There’s an assumption built into that question that supporting Labour is necessarily a tactical goal.
Also, there’s a difference between tactical voting and strategic voting.
Yes true, I can that it might be better for Roberston to have a low electorate vote and that that might serve the left better in the medium and long term. Maybe even the short term.
I guess the better example is Waitakere and having Sepuloni as the electoriate MP instead of Shipley. But that doesn’t really compare with Rhinocrates situation, who is stuck with a useless option.
I disagree that your interpretation of my voting has been tactical.
Tactical voting is what delivered Banks to parliament.
voting for me has always been more pragmatic,
Indeed, appropriate point,Weka, so I guess that we see conflicting idealisms, not ideologies.
I am an idealist when it comes to democracy. If I have to vote for a representative, then they have to represent me.
Still, while a candidate would never be “perfect” for me (too much hair, likes Dmitri Shostakovich and Brian Eno less than me, etc), I just simply cannot accept Beltway Grant as my representative under any terms. He has no loyalty to his electorate because he’s a parachute candidate, he has no loyalty to the traditional Labour voter or those whom Labour needs now.
I urge people to make moral and ideological choices about their representatives.
This is the issue: representatives are representative , not merely expedient.
That said, I hope that you have a better candidate for your electorate.
I guess the better example is Waitakere and having Sepuloni as the electoriate MP instead of Shipley. But that doesn’t really compare with Rhinocrates situation, who is stuck with a useless option.
Indeed – that would suddenly make things easy- albeit expensive (I really don’t have the budget for much good whisky).
I was very sad not to see Carmel Sepuloni win, especially considering her opponent, and by such a small margin!
Yes but the same could be said of Labour when they contest the Te Tai Tokerau and Waiariki seats,
Polling in the 30’s on the party vote Labour has got nothing to win even if they won both electorates,
Labour should they win both those seats will not gain any extra MP’s in the House and winning those 2 seats might cost Labour the election, the fact is should they not contest those 2 seats Labour will have the number of seats in the House dictated by it’s % of the Party vote and at least 2 seats in the House that Will Not ever vote for National…
Let’s put it like this: Natz gained 47% of the electorate vote in that Culmar Brunton Polling. Labour gained 39% and Greens 8%. If those who plan to waste their electorate vote on the Greens instead voted for Labour candidates, they would also have 47% of the electorate votes. An 8% swing in favour of Labour candidates could secure another 5 electorate seats at least. Basically if you vote for The Greens in your electorate, you may as well be voting for your National party candidate.
“Basically if you vote for The Greens in your electorate, you may as well be voting for your National party candidate.”
The answer is obvious then – vote for the National Party candidate. They are all left wing parties anyway.
Sure, just like Ronald Reagan and Bush Senior were left wing pro-union pro-worker pro-manufacturing Presidents.
Never let it be said that i would have a moan about a mainstream media poll that shows the left in a good position,( and still a long way out from November 2014),
But, this poll strikes me as ‘funny’ in that it shows the Green vote to have jumped a massive 5% while showing only a loss of 4% in total from other Party’s,
What also does not quite compute is that 4% of ‘shown’ shift has come from the Conservative Party and National Party to the Green Party,
Now no matter how much i would be amused at such a wild swing in the mood of the electorate taking 4% from the far right of the spectrum across to the far left seems to me to be a little far fetched,
Of course, Labour for all i know may have picked up that far right vote decamping from National and the Conservatives at the same time as the same % of Labour voters scarpered across to the Green Party, all very confusing i know, and, i might add, slightly unbelievable,
Having had my moan tho, the Colmar Brunton is pretty much where i see the state of the party’s to be ( in my opinion),
Altho i pick Labour to be a little light and the Greens to have profited in this particular poll because of that light reading for Labour, (believe me i would like nothing better than to be proved wrong),
No Mana Party, i think that’s a mistake especially after the Ikaroa-Rawhiti by election result showed the massive gains Mana have made mainly at the expense of the Maori party…
PS, the length of time between Colmar-Brunton’s, 3 months, may explain some of the strange looking shifts i was having my wee moan about,
That and the Brunton says that 2% of the fence sitters came off it and declared a prefferrence…
Chuck on roughly 10% positive for the combined left to allow for the ah standard Brolmar bias, and allow for the Spygate traction to come (thank you Pascale), and sleep well Standardistas. For your sins (and yes we all sin dear, sorry thought that was your leg) three mail hairies, a hail holy queen for Peter may god rest his soul and fast from Shearerpoking for a week cold showers maybe, go now and sin no more, sorry sorry something on your cardy..
And look where most of it has come from… the National Party.
Finally – an acknowledgement that unionism is the solution.
http://www.businessinsider.com.au/labor-unions-wages-2013-8
Fonterra’s handling of the contamination at their Hautapu Factory is unbelievable. I cant help but think the attempt to cover this up and the lack of openness and honesty we are seeing from Fonterra is related to the way our country is currently lead. Key and National have turned cover ups and dishonesty into an art form.
This Fonterra cock up is catastrophic…expect some fairly senior heads to roll this week….and I predict an eventual reversal of the 50 cent increase in the payout announced earlier this week (Thats probably best case scenario at this stage)
I wonder if HONESTY & INTEGRITY will play an important part in the 2014 election…should be good for the Green Party, clearly the only major party that has this in truck loads.
+1
Agreed. Absolute shocker.
But real corruption and the Corporate state have now arrived in NZ.
Fonterra, too big to regulate. Farmers run the show. I see a Feds spokesman blames the testing and the media – after all, no-one died. (Since lost the link, mmmm…!)
Where is the Ministry of Primary Industries in all this? Hardly a suitable regulatory authority. Minister Guy spends most of his time talking up the benefits of irrigated dairying, and downplaying its effects on the environment.
And this is the Nats’ doing – they set up MPI. If the regulatory authority was the Min of Health things might have been different.
This will be the week that Key heads away on holiday again, my guess.
Federated Farmers vice president Dr William Rolleston begged people not to jump to conclusions.
”As far as we know no-one has got sick, it’s the testing that has brought this to the surface … and that has to be something that will help build Fonterra’s reputation,” he said.
MPI and Fonterra needed to do further testing, he said.
”
Got it. Another Federated Farmers’ Classic!
if the regulatory authority was the Min of Health things might have been different.
It would be the fault of the quasi autonomous company asure nz that would have oversight and would have some portion of the phytosanitary certification,whether they were informed or when is another matter.
testing would be especially difficult,if there was suspicion of the causative agent .i would suggest it would only be able to be tested at Wallaceville or an overseas certified lab.
Fonterra’s handling of the contamination at their Hautapu Factory is unbelievable. I cant help but think the attempt to cover this up and the lack of openness and honesty we are seeing from Fonterra is related to the way our country is currently lead. Key and National have turned cover ups and dishonesty into an art form.
This Fonterra cock up is catastrophic…
Saarbo, do you have something I can read that supports that. Because what I’ve seen on Stuff etc doesn’t.
Do you know what the actual risk is? AFAIK, they found the Clostridium botulinum bacteria in its inert, not its active form. That’s a different thing than botulism.
Don’t get me wrong, I think Fonterra rate fairly high on the evil scale, and are capable of covering up things to save their own butts. But, I don’t think they are stupid enough to allow botulism into the food chain and then go slow on resolving that, so am guessing the actual risk is pretty low. Unfortunately the MSM aren’t providing any useful information on that, so we’re pretty much in the dark.
Foodborne botulism is a rare illness caused by eating foods contaminated with botulinum toxin. Spores of C. botulinum are ubiquitous in the environment (3), but growth and elaboration of toxin occur only under particular conditions that include an anaerobic, low-salt, low-acid environment. Bacterial growth is inhibited by refrigeration below 4°C, heating above 121°C, high water activity,or acidity (pH <4.5) (4). Toxin is destroyed by heating to 85°C for at least 5 minutes, and spores are inactivated by heating to 121°C under pressure of 15–20 lb/in2 for at least 20 minutes (5).
My emphasis.
http://wwwnc.cdc.gov/eid/article/10/9/03-0745_article.htm
Only what I have read in the media Weka. This happened in May 2012, why are we only hearing about this now? remember this is all in the shadow of the melamine disaster, Fonterra need to treat any contamination with real care and respect. China and Russia have stopped all Dairy imports from NZ. My thinking is that this is catastrophic.
Only what I have read in the media Weka. This happened in May 2012, why are we only hearing about this now? remember this is all in the shadow of the melamine disaster, Fonterra need to treat any contamination with real care and respect. China and Russia have stopped all Dairy imports from NZ. My thinking is that this is catastrophic.
I’m a bit confused by that. I agree that the health risks should be taken seriously, but that is separate from economic issues (my thinking is the slowing of the industrial dairying in NZ would be good for NZ).
Re the health issues, well I’ll say it again, we don’t know what the risk is, but it’s possible that it is very low. Clostridium is not synonmous with people getting ill from botulism. You need specific conditions for that to happen.
To put it another way, I think the real concern here is that the MSM haven’t reported what the actual risk is. If it turns out that Fonterra have been negligent and cavalier, then throw all kinds of shit at them.
The other factor is, how common or rare is it for a pipe to become contaminated in this way? How often do people in NZ get botulism? We don’t have a context to understand this within.
And industrially produced food is always going to have levels of unsafety that are specific to it. Look at the ecoli outbreaks in the US in recent years – they came from spinach that was grown with animal shit spread in the fields, and then the spinach was distributed via the industrial food supply chains and it was difficult for them to figure out where it came from and what the source was. I’d like to know how clear and efficient Fonterra’s supply chains are.
Yes, I understand where you are coming from Weka, I hope you are right. But we do know that the Chinese are incredibly sensitive since the melamine disaster which is completely understandable. Attached is the e mail from the fonterra Chairman yesterday, it raises a big question around TIMING. The problem occurred in May 2012 (Point 1), a POTENTIAL issue discovered in March 2013 (Point 7), Issue confirmed in July 2013 (Point 8)…..why did all of this take so long?
Fonterra let farmers know within a matter of hours whether there is contamination in their supply, why does it take Fonterra factories so long….its not a good look.
E mail from John Wilson to Farm Suppliers yesterday.
Good evening
1)Fonterra today advised eight customers of a quality issue involving three batches of whey protein concentrate (WPC80) produced at a single New Zealand manufacturing site in May 2012.
2)These companies are now investigating where the affected product is in their supply chains and if necessary, will initiate consumer product recalls.
3)There have been no reports of any illness linked to consumption of the whey protein. –4)Dairy products such as fresh milk, yoghurt, cheese, spreads and UHT milk products are not affected.
5)Food safety is Fonterra’s number one priority. Fonterra takes matters of public health extremely seriously and is doing everything it can to assist its customers to ensure any affected product is removed from the marketplace and that the public is made aware.
6)The business is working closely with New Zealand’s regulatory authority – the Ministry for Primary Industries – to keep New Zealand and offshore regulators informed.
7)Fonterra initially identified a potential quality issue in March this year, when a product tested positive for Clostridium. There are hundreds of different strains of Clostridium, the majority of which are harmless.
8)Product samples were then put through intensive testing over the following months. On Wednesday 31 July 2013, a test indicated the potential presence of suspected Clostridium Botulinum in a sample – a strain which can cause botulism.
9)This particular Whey Protein Concentrate (WPC80) is used by Fonterra’s customers in a range of products including infant formula, growing up milk powder and sports drinks – and that is why the business has acted with speed so any potentially affected product is removed from the marketplace.
10)Fonterra is continuing to work with customers and will provide more information as it becomes available.
John
Pono, Weka. We don’t really know the full health risks, but from what we do know, the reaction does seem a little disproportionate. Just like the recent reaction to the wrong paperwork which held tonnes of mutton on Chinese wharves.
What we do know however, is that the Chinese are rather sensitive to international criticism. Especially from arrogant minnows who cuddle up to Taiwan and Uncle Sam. Oh – and that our own dear wee PM recently accused them publicly of “spreading their tentacles” in the South Pacific.
The pink hand of Gooberdick strikes again.
Ok, but again, that’s an economic issue not a health one. Why should we care if the Chinese stop buying our diary?
an art form.
No, “art form” indicates skill and care.
Er, agreeing with you by the way 🙂
Fair point Rhino.
National are classic bull shit artists.
For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for Nature cannot be fooled.
Richard Feynman (Nobel Prize winner)
There are other opinions
John Key (arsehole)
haha, you are an Artist Rhinocrates!
Well, like an artist, I’m starving… or at least, forced by economics into brief periods of sobriety.
🙂
If all else fails you can stick your head under a rug with Shostakovich……Shostakovich gets more and more appealing
Schrilands with all your neo liberal arguements can you show us some proof they work which countries or states work .name policy country or sate ,show,evidence or put
Up or shut up!
Schrilands with all your neo liberal arguements can you show us some proof they work which countries or states work .name policy country or sate ,show,evidence or put
Up or shut up!
Here you go:
New Zealand’s economic performance over the last six decades has been poor compared
with most other Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) countries.
Theory and evidence suggest that high levels of government expenditure, as a share of the
economy, can be detrimental to economic growth due to the economic costs of raising
taxation to finance expenditure
Economic theory suggests that a large government may undermine economic growth
through the cost of financing expenditure and differences in the rate of productivity growth
between the public and private sector.
A number of countries have smaller governments than New Zealand, including Australia and South Korea, with the larger governments generally being European.
http://nzae.org.nz/wp-content/uploads/2011/Session6/64_Cook.pdf
The classic natural experiment is North and South Korea. North Korean economic policies are remarkably similar to those expounded by many The Standard contributors. Didn’t work so well.
The other example is Australia – much smaller government over the last 30 years compared to NZ, with deeper more competitive markets – The country has a population 5 x NZ’s but the sharemarket is 30x larger. Says it all. (Another reason we desperately need 100% privatisation asap)
And of course New Zealanders vote with their feet by moving there in large numbers.
Schrilands BS Australia smaller govt than NZ what absolute tossing lies.
Australia has out grown NZ because of cheaper housing better family tax credits concentrated population bigger govt subsidies tougher tarrifs Capital gains tax mining mining and mining!
Australia has a far bigger govt than us lower house upper house state govts wow!
You are just plain lying
Ok you will be rushed into the front bench of National Monday morning born leader liar!
Australia smaller govt than NZ what absolute tossing lies.” Tosser.
Bloody hell – you people don’t let facts get in the way do you? Australia has a much smaller government share of GDP than NZ – that includes ALL levels of government. In 2011 Australia had a government sector = 34% of GDP – in NZ it was 44%. The trend over the last 30 years has been for an overall widening of the gap.
And of course because government is smaller overall tax take is smaller too.
Mining explains a relatively small proportion of Australia’s economic performance – the resources boom was a help but it has been the services sector that has driven growth.
But feel free to ignore facts and carry on with your prejudices. Australia has grown despite some negative policies like PMV subsidies – NOT because of them
Look at figure 8 in this report:
http://www.treasury.govt.nz/publications/research-policy/tp/govtsize/14.htm
Australian government expenditure – at all levels of government has been between 5 and 10% of GDP SMALLER than NZ for 30 years. And the gap is increasing.
http://www.treasury.govt.nz/publications/research-policy/tp/govtsize/13.htm
It says a lot that you think the opposite is correct.
shrilands thats federal spending. mining has been booming for the last thirty years their population is concentrated which is cheaper to provide services.
that is federal govt spending it does not include state govt spending then when you look at the size of govt spending per person, Australia out spends us take mining out of the equation and your figures will look sick, unemployment has been higher in Australia most of that time
Australia spends more on health welfare defence infrastructure per head than we do!
The size of the Australian economy allows them to spend more on all fronts than us.
Another reason is health insurance and compulsory super savings aren’t included!
Compulsory super savings has cut the amount of govt super paid out as well!
Now the mining boom is over Australia is hitting the skids NZ will feel the effects!
Australia has way more tarrifs than us as well!
Where Australia is making faster gains is in education they spend way more than us Australian have better access to tertiary education with much better performing universities.
“that is federal govt spending it does not include state govt spending” WRONG
Really? BTW I wish you would use punctuation.
It includes ALL government spending, including state spending net of intergovernmental transfers.
Australia has smaller government.
Of course it spends more per head – it is a richer country.
This is just a silly debate about something that is factual.
it is funny that you seem to attribute australia’s growth due to a single crude and highly debateable measure, while ignoring the many other factors that might also contribute to growth (including economies of scale: “Australia has smaller government.
Of course it spends more per head – it is a richer country” – and bigger in every way).
You can’t explain (let alone predict) a substantial part of a massive chaotic system with a single abstract measure. It’s just stupid to try.
Factual? More like stupid and irrelevant. NZ is poorer than most other OECD countries because we were idiots and followed the neolib free market prescription to the letter.
The fact you can’t see that is a serious problem undermining all your ongoing natter about what to do next.
Billions of NZD have been extracted out of NZ workers and companies to feed Australian bank shareholders over the last few years.
Of course the Aussies are doing it right.
NZ is poorer than most other OECD countries because we have a poor productivity record. The policy response to that has been well covered by the Treasury.
Even if Labour wins the next election they will get with the programme and follow most of these policies. e.g say goodbye to NZ Power.
http://www.treasury.govt.nz/publications/research-policy/tprp
Listening to treasury is what fucked up the country in the first place. More of the same will merely continue the same trends.
Really? You know which of the Treasury’s policy recommendations have been accepted by governments? You are really clear on that? I doubt you eben know what they are.
Other way around: if treasury is indeed consistent with your deranged political lens, then we can pick which policies were at least partial treasury recommendations. Privatisation, deregulation, removal of workers’ rights, and blaming the poor.
Using high levels of unemployment as a tool to control inflation.
It is simple:
“Productivity is the biggest long-run determinant of wages and living standards.”
It is productivity stupid.
not about productivity; productivity is a crock
why should a worker bother to participate in “productivity” improvement when time and again its the worker who gets screwed by changes while the fat cat owners take 98c out of every new dollar generated.
its about share of income – too much now in the hands of owners, corporates and shareholders, not enough in the hands of ordinary workers and citizens
“not about productivity; productivity is a crock”
I’m not going to try again. That is such an idiotic claim.
The CTU recognises that productivity is central to prosperity. Sure they might have different views to Treasury about HOW to lift productivity but they also will have a lot in common, and the CTU would certainly not say “productivity is a crock”.
http://union.org.nz/workplace-productivity/challenge
“Improving productivity has been identified as a key factor for New Zealand’s long term, sustainable economic growth and prosperity. Productivity levels affect our living standards, our ability to create jobs and our ability to afford education, health and other services.”
New Zealand Council of Trade Unions – Te Kauae Kaimahi
Your quote is as stupid as saying “humidity is the biggest long run determinant of precipitation”.
In a chaotic system, no single factor can be the deterimant of a desired outcome. In fact, the same input of that “determinant” can have dramatically different outcomes depending on what every single other factor is doing.
Treasury is wrong again treasury is loaded with right wing purists.
You look at every single industry in NZ and ask if they are improving productivity they are!
treasury is a right wing think tank subsidized by the tax payer.
so
Shrilands I wasn’t wrong STATE TAXES ie stamp duties land tax Varying state payroll taxes are not included in the OECD figure’s nor are3.5% + medicare contrbutions nor are compulsory 9% super contributions .so by the time you add those contributions into the overall figures theirs not a lot of difference!
Campbell live looked at that last week came to the same conclusion!
Manurfacturing has declined by 70% since the 1960’s 60% of Australia’s economy is service Industry.
Shril more lies from you federal govt taxes Aprox A$ 340 billion out $1008 billion
33% aprox as you have pointed out
State pay roll ,land taxes, stamp duties not included!
super contributions not included as they are seen as private investments
Medicare contributions not included as they are private contributions
We pay all of that to one govt so your facts are bullshit!
Please Australia also has an additional layer of GVT state which increases its governance ratio above NZ
Schrilands what was liar key in south Korea for recently was it to get them to allow our exports in to their country!
“what was liar key in south Korea for recently was it to get them to allow our exports in to their country!”
What?
I thought you said Korea had more open markets
If smaller government is so great for the country, why is it that unemployment and inequality skyrocketed at the same time the NZ cut the size of its govt around 1990?
It’s all very well saying that smaller government is better for the country, but that means shit if you have no job and can’t afford to put shoes on your kids’ feet. In fact, it’s more like your “economic theory” isn’t so much a better economy as it is throwing as many people under the bus as possible, and then blaming them for being unemployed or otherwise in need.
Australia has a higher minimum wage, something like a partially functioning union movement, a huge number of government subsidies to business, government investment in infrastructure, mineral resources that they exploit regardless of environmental and social cost, an apprenticeship program, government gifts to first home buyers, and far more government bureaucracy than NZ. Hardly a model for us to follow, but more successful in purely economic terms. Oh, and while Kiwi workers do a lot of the heavy lifting over there, Kiwi executives powder their noses at bars next to the Sydney Harbour and complain about how we want to care for our environment, all while spouting their Randian delusions. Cocaine does that, it makes people delusional. It’s almost as bad as neoliberal economics.
“Fonterra yesterday announced three batches of a whey protein called WPC80, manufactured in May last year, may have been contaminated by a dirty pipe at the company’s Hautapu plant”
So if there was another contamination event this instant, we wouldn’t know about it till October 2014 earliest?
“Fonterra said it initially identified a potential quality issue in March this year, when a product tested positive for Clostridium”
Link: http://www.odt.co.nz/news/national/267332/fonterra-products-hit-botulism-scare
But they can’t even tell us what country and products contain the fouled whey 3 months later? This is bad on so many levels.
You are right. Given the time to discover the contamination I would have thought a lot more product may have been contaminated.
Judith Collins is talking absolute drivel when she says the government can’t intervene in the Teina Pora issue.
http://tvnz.co.nz/national-news/nothing-stopping-review-teina-pora-case-labour-5526358
She says:
“New Zealand has an independent, highly regarded judiciary, with a robust appeal process for people who feel they have been wrongly convicted,”
and
“It would be completely inappropriate for a Minister of the Crown to interfere in the court process.”
This is complete and utter bile. If anyone thinks Key’s full of lies and deceit and has ongoing and total contempt for the intelligence of our citizens, then they should know we’d be in for far more of Collins ever became PM.
Andrew Little has rightly pointed out that the appeal hasn’t been lodged yet. But even if it had there’d still be nothing to stop the government looking into whether there were grounds to put things right. The Crown would (or at least should) in fact be doing this if and when the need to prepare for an appeal arose.
Ultimately there’s absolutely nothing stopping the Crown looking at the case again because it would be done with a view to being of benefit to Teina Pora. For example, a party in any litigation can choose to agree with the arguments of the other side. This is how parties to litigation reach settlement!
Judith Collins is wholly disingenuous in trying to spin the line that it would be inappropriate for the government to “intervene” in the Pora case. Doing so is not “intervening” – if there’s prina facie injustice she in fact has a duty to act. What she’s in effect saying is that the government does not have the power to fix an injustice. That’s plainly wrong. I’d go further to say it’s just darn right nasty, uncaring, cold and inhuman. Heaven help us if she’s ever PM.
Her redneck voters will look at the guy and say “So what if he didn’t do this one. Being in prison will have stopped him committing other offences.” The vileness inherent in their thought processes knows no bounds.
Her supporters would be saying that. It’d be good if MSM challenged her on her flawed logic and lack of principle. It always amazes me when lawyers try to do what she’s doing because it shows she’s prepared to use personal bias and adherence to ideological dogma to override established public service ethics and basic legal principle. It’s sometimes difficult to know precisely how in particular cases this happens. I don’t know Collins well enough to say whether she could be called a narcissist or not, but it’s pretty clear a lot of the signs are there.
I know the type Murray Olsen. All hot pontification about cases and lives they know absolutely nothing of. Larry-Loudmouth-Williams-Radio-Live style.
But wait until it’s one of their own entitled little bastards in the dock. The most innovative excuses and rationalisations when it’s one of their own little bastards in the dock.
And of course it would be madness, what’s more patently unjust, for other than a rehabilitative sentence to be handed down. “We want counselling for this boy right now ! Blah Blah Blah !”.
Dealt with the type thousands of times. Thick socially retarded fuckwits.
Collins is right in the first instance and it’s routine stuff…….while the case is in progress…….etc etc.
I’m not absolutely sure where it’s at so far but I recall hearing mention of application for the exercise of the royal prerogative, a pardon. Seemingly because there appears to be no taste for it in the government (Collins) it is now heading to the Privy Council. Because of Collins, Collins can say – “case in progress……” Technically.
A cry-off of course. Given that Judith is so absorbed in her Thatcher pretensions we cannot reasonably expect any other response. The same personal trait led her to all sorts of extraordinary overtness (and the spending of a rather large amount of public money) re the Binnie report.
You see this is a 17 year old (now 38), never amounted to much, Maori boy with a criminal record. Yes, in the slammer for 21 years. And yes, a fact which senior police officers, damn, the Police Association, are calling to be investigated. Unprecedented.
I’d like to think that Judith would agree he’s entitled to a pardon as matter of urgency and twenty, no thirty million. If you can put a price on it at all…….
There’s the rub. The Justice Sow values the money and fears the ignominy of having to concede, more than putting right the travesty. After all………we’re only talking Maori boy criminal underclass here……..
“Collins is right in the first instance and it’s routine stuff…….while the case is in progress…….etc etc.”
With respect, that’s not quite the case. If an injustice is identified the Crown can choose to address it at any point, regardless of whether an appeal has been lodge, is being contemplated or not. This, of course, makes sense: if the Crown has done something to someone it later realises it shouldn’t have it has every ability to fix it. What’s also important to note is that this is over and above the Royal Prerogative, which is different again. You’re right in that Pora’s off to the PC because government isn’t listening, which highlights further Collins’ lie that her hands are tied because the matter’s “with the courts”. This is a particularly large amount of shit coming out of Collins’ mouth this time, probably more than usual, and which the nature of has got me thinking about whether she’s narcissistic.
I agree entirely Mary. Don’t misunderstand me. I’m identifying that Collins is technically right in one part alone of the broad legal picture.
Of course it is from there that Collins chooses to speak.
The “speak” is rubbish as a disguise or excuse for this boy not already having a pardon.
All of the Thatcher disdain mentioned above is true. As are the reasons for that disdain.
Florists usually like flowers, jockeys horses, dancers dancing.
How come this Minister of Justice has a problem with you know what ?
Anyway, thanks to Jonathan Krebs counsel for Teina Pora – personal commitment to get the case to London for the Privy Council irrespective of insufficiency if any of legal aid grant. Would gladly contribute.
Thanks North. I guess my point is that I think Collins is not technically correct on anything she’s saying on this particular issue. What is the “one part alone of the broad legal picture” you’re saying she’s technically right about?
I hope you can see this. It’s Teina Pora’s daughter, who has more dignity in her left nostril than the whole of the NAct caucus:
http://www.facebook.com/photo.php?v=470358289701338
Bugger you Olsen. Fucking crying.
thank you murray… we have a long journey to bring us back to decency and justice. kia kaha to this young woman …
Hi Mary. My apprehension was that the Privy Council appeal was already underway and accordingly Collins was technically able to invoke sub-judice even though that amounted to a sidestepping of the huge justice issue here. Sub-Judy-Say. Horrors !
Then I see from the Herald this morning that the appeal is not yet underway and that Collins is now prepared to consider a formal investigation. Something she was always able to engage of course, had she the will to do so.
So yes, my assessment of Collins’ behaviour is unjustifiably charitable. For my part I simply cannot understand how a minister responsible for “Justice” could drag her heels in this unprecedented case………concerns of senior police officers, the Police Association, forensic pshychiatric evidence etc etc.
All that aside a gathering momentum now appears. Hopefully it is such that even the Justice Sow cannot stem it. Who knows ? The minister’s “doing the numbers” in what is already something of a cause celebre might well persuade her to make like donning the cloak of “justice” rather than deviously obstruct.
All power to Teina Pora ! And once he is free, all power to a very high level ministerial or other enquiry to identify the how and whom in this travesty. And fix on a truly awesome sum in compensation.
There should be no hiding in the thickets of extant legislation (if any) to artificially limit the level of compensation. There must be special legislation if necessary. Mmmmm…….that’s where this minister is bound to be a problem.
Notwithstanding their pious talk Justice and Truth are basically malleable concepts to this crowd. Money and how they “look” is their real imperative. The evil unleashed on Teina Pora is surpassed only by the evil extinguishment of Susan Burdett’s life. It is our duty as a nation to make truly conspicuous amends, mindful that compensation of whatever striking level can never truly displace the evil Teina Pora has suffered.
http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=10908262