Interesting letter to the editor in the local rag this morning hauling ‘opinionist’ Beck Eleven up for her outrageous gender profiling and outright sexism over her recent repeated statements that she “doesn’t listen to old white men”.
She and others such as Michelle a’court have a history of sexism and bigotry based on a persons gender and age.
And of course it is something which goes on around here all the time, by the likes of Tracey (hi tracey)…
The examples of this are so numerous that it has become acceptable to label people on the basis of their gender, race and age. An example of this was on NatRadio a couple of days ago where a young female musician said similar about old white men. The broadcaster let it slide.
It is ok to label some parts of society on the basis of the gender, age and race. Apparently…
… interesting. And foolish because it permits the same labelling in return….. I mean, really, how much value is there in young white women opinions? Or any female opinions, no matter the age or race?
I can handle the ‘old’ bit – as it ever was, and even the ‘men’ – although it is based usually upon a duality of gender which is not related to the real world. The one that gets me is the ‘white’ bit – pink, eggshell, vanilla so many choices other than the obviously incorrect ‘white’ – now sure it is shorthand for privilege, so I let it go mainly for that.
marty, your argument fails.. justifying unacceptable racist, sexist and ageist behaviour (which is even decried by the perpetrator when subjected to the same) on the basis that some other people of the same race, age and gender are ‘privileged’ doesn’t fly
at all
the stereotyping continues unabated across all sectors of our population
vto…let it slide…your male chauvinism is showing( not your petticoats)…considering what women have been through at the hands of the male sex over the centuries…these women are survivors…show them some respect and leeway!
really Beck Eleven is a bloody good journalist as is Michele A’Court …as is Tracy!
What disappointed me recently was Michelle A’Court’s greeting David Farrar as a long esteemed mate on Jim Mora’s programme…made me want to puke Michelle
Farrar, the fat jonkey nact PR arse licking humpty dumpty , has been trying to reinvent himself ( his persona) as a mountaineer /tramper /environmentalist…!
He was about to pontificate on the film ‘Everest’ …and I pressed the STOP, NO MORE, I CAN’T STAND IT !…turn off button!
( how about that for a bit of female sexism …against the unctuous duplicitous corrupt right wing PR porcine male ?)
“considering what women have been through at the hands of the male sex over the centuries…these women are survivors…show them some respect and leeway!”
that argument doesn’t fly either chooky.
many many people and societies have been through shit.
this does not give them the right to belittle and abuse others
simple
as for “show them some respect”. Well no. Certainly not for the reason you suggest. Respect is earned – it doesn’t come solely because of your gender. Nor your race or age.
I do not respect a’court, or eleven, for the stereotyping they have indulged themselves in
They are indulging in the exact same behaviour as that they abhor
“The thing is respect isn’t earned by white cisgendered men, society already values their opinions and feelings above everyone elses. ”
Well you see arkie, that is exactly my point with Eleven and A’Court, if you read and think a little more closely on what was posted. They do not value the opinions of white men above everyone else’s. That is the entire point – they have even said they do not listen to “old white men” – their opinions are marked down, not up.
They do not value their opinions, on the basis of their age gender and race. Nothing else.
They are individuals and those are their individual actions, therefore these are not examples of sexism or racism, as racism and sexism are the institutional marginalisation of the women, POC and LGBTQA+.
Obviously the far more important examples of racism and sexism are those which are institutional in nature or those which occur against a minority (because of their more significant deleterious effects). It’s not entirely clear how well vto understands this most important point although he claims to.
Also obviously white males can be the targets of sexism and racism – it’s just rarer and that the effects are less harmful given their current position in our society. It doesn’t mean it’s okay or to be condoned etc etc. However I skimmed a bunch of what Beck Eleven wrote and it seems pretty inane and harmless so I’m not sure what instances vto is referring to.
It sounds like you arkie (as well as vto) are also being very dismissive of vto and making some fairly absolute statements about sexism and racism
Agree with your first paragraph Tim, exactly. Also second. It is the entire point and is not intended to minimise in any way the other forms of bigotry that exist and that are more harmful.
Re beck eleven – this is not the first time, there have been numerous instances but I have no links or the like to establish.
Yes vto but when have you ever been a victim of sexism or racism that has denied you access to work or meant your efforts are significantly less rewarded financially? And when have you been a victim of sexual or physical abuse based on your sex? Or a wrongful target of the police based on your race?
These examples are on an ENTIRELY different scale to taking cursory offence at someone writing ‘i don’t listen to old white men’ in the newspaper, although it’s easy to agree with the point that not listening to people solely because they are old, white and male is wrong. In the grand scheme of racism, abuse and suffering it’s just a very very small sidenote.
A very very small sidenote but still wrong and it should still irk us.
I should’ve said in the grand scheme of sexism, racism and abuse it’s a sidenote. In terms of suffering men have suffered plenty, conscription during wars, for example, but this abuse has been suffered at the hands of other men, while women typically suffer horribly at the hands of men during war.
“It is ok to label some parts of society on the basis of the gender, age and race. Apparently…”
I think you are confusing identity with prejudice. I don’t have a problem with anyone identifying me as a middle aged white woman, because that’s what I am. What I might have a problem with is say being paid less then men because of that.
I think what you are objecting to is the calling out of older white men by class for their privilge. Unless you can demonstrated that older white (probably wealthy) men as a class don’t have this privilge, your argument fails. Or perhaps you want us all to be colourblind?
I’ve seen ageism here on ts eg ridiculing Don Brash because of his age. And I’ve called people on that in the same way as I do when I see fat phobia or racism or misogyny. But there is nothing wrong with identifying that men like Brash, because of their age, gender, and class, are afforded things that other people in society aren’t. It’s not about women having a go at men, because an analysis could just as easily be about the differences between a 70 year man like Brash compared to a 70 year old man who’s been a labourer all his life.
No weka, I am not confusing the two different things you identify.
Sexism, ageism and racism will not disappear as long as people continue to get stereotyped on the basis of their age, race and gender.
For such a letter to make to The Press I would suggest means that the issue is reaching mainstream. Just like people of a certain political persuasion used to dismiss complaints of racism and sexism, so too are people of another political persuasion now dismissing complaints of racism and sexism.
I think you should do some research on white and male privilege . You’re coming across as the type of person who rails against the ‘racism’ and ‘discrimination’ in affirmative action.
Just to reiterate: White men are 100% NOT victims of sexism or racism.
Yes it is about privilege. You are complaining that you are the victim of sexism and racism, assuming you a white, cisgendered and male you are part of the privileged majority, this is what is patently absurd, by definition.
You need to get out more and listen to women, POC and LGBTQA+ instead claiming you are being belittled while you belittle their voices further.
You clearly have not read the link I posted, you clearly have taken the writing of these women you deride so personally that it has blinded you to your own lack of understanding. I have tried, but many better writers and thinkers have explained why the feelings you are expressing are misplaced, but you dismiss me out of hand and refuse to read them and accuse me of a limited understanding. The irony.
Jeez arkie, do you not see that that is exactly what you have done?
I am well aware of the ideas you speak of and do not need to re-read but they fail for reasons which have been covered many many many times.
The idea that because SOME members of a particular group of people in our society have certain characteristics and engaged in certain behaviour in the past, the entire group is open to justified belittling and abuse does not stack. Do you see where?
Seriously arkie. Hows about you put all your current ideas and tight subjective definitions and readings to one side for a moment and try stepping into the shoes of the old white man who penned the letter to the editor …….
to answer this …
‘The idea that because SOME members of a particular group of people in our society have certain characteristics and engaged in certain behaviour in the past, the entire group is open to justified belittling and abuse does not stack. Do you see where?’
Well for a start, I do not agree that old white men are subject to belittling and abuse because of what SOME members of the MSM write in their opinion pieces.
Do you not see how tiny this hill you are dying for is?
And secondly why don’t you put aside your anachronistic patronising views and listen to the lived experience of literally billions of women, POC and LGBTQA+?
Sure. I similarly do not believe that women are subject to belittling and abuse because of what SOME members of society think in their opinion minds
…
and there we are, right back at the nowhere point
the exact reason for posting in the first place
one bad turn begets another
edit” don’t go editing on me mid-reply please..
Why don’t you listen to the lived experience of this one old white man who penned the letter instead of trying to divert away from the old man? Irony for sure
Your reply at 5.35 crossed over… you do realise the sentiment that went with the comment don’t you? I wonder think not actually. I suspect steam is fogging your vision.
Now back to the subject of the post – the old man and his letter to the editor…
Why is it ok to dismiss / belittle all of a person’s views solely because of the persons age, gender or race please arkie? I would seriously like to know.
Why is it ok to dismiss / belittle all of a person’s views solely because of the person’s age, race and gender please arkie?
This is a straw man.
Now I’m not going to go through this whole thread post by post to convince you because your mind is made up but I will point out what made me join this discussion instead of continuing to ignore it. You began this thread with this:
Interesting letter to the editor in the local rag this morning hauling ‘opinionist’ Beck Eleven up for her outrageous gender profiling and outright sexism over her recent repeated statements that she “doesn’t listen to old white men”.
To start with you belittle her by titling her an ‘opinionist’ when she is a columnist and a journalist. Then you claim that her personal opinion is ‘outright sexism’. This is an incorrect claim and shows your lack of understanding of what sexism and racism are.
You then accuse other women of bigotry and sexism and then try and goad specific members of this forum into engaging with you because they had the temerity to point out your privilege and inaccuracies in your statements in other threads.
Then you replied to the measured and informative responses to your OP by doubling down on your misunderstanding of what constitutes prejudice, sexism and racism.
No-one can explain it to you if you refuse to listen.
it is exactly what happened to the old man who penned the letter to the editor
So Beck Eleven, Michelle A’Court and others specifically dismissed and belittled this letter writer personally? No, you both object to the personal opinion of Eleven in the statement that she doesn’t listen to old white men. That is her prerogative, it’s her column, you don’t have to read it, it doesn’t affect you other than to challenge the supremacy of opinions like yours. To say that it is bigoted ‘outright sexism’ is where you are so very wrong.
edit:
Ooh look vto, look who agrees with you! You’re in fine company now!
@vto
I have explained why this question is a strawman, how the starting point of your whole grudge is flawed. Evidently I cannot make you even consider that you are wrong on this issue. You and BM are welcome to continue your circlejerk but I will not engage you further.
you have explained no such things. What you have done is gone all around the outside yelling in, while being simply too scared to answer the question. Chicken
Once more for luck, in even a further revised version…
When is it, arkie, ok to dismiss / belittle the whole of a person’s views solely because of the person’s age, race or gender?
This is real life arkie, real life. Go talk to Beck Eleven and read her opinions. Go read the Press letter today – it is even the first one up. Real life. Facts.
Is there a glossary for this anywhere? I’m seeing LGBTQA+ as Lesbian Gay Bisexual Trans Quality Assurance Plus, but am sure that can’t be right. I’m also seriously hoping that POC isn’t Piece Of Crap.
Asexual’s an identity now? What’s next, Mildly Interested But Not Very When It Comes Down To It? Also, I don’t even want to think about “Pansexual” – hopefully they rule out non-humans and inanimate objects?
You’re dealing with privileged middle class socialist whities who’ve been indoctrinated to believe that white males are the root of all evil.
Older white males are the most evil.
Good to know you haven’t a clue about what the politics are that you are criticising.
For other people reading, it’s not that white, wealthy men are evil (I certainly know plenty who aren’t). It’s that the dominant paradigm (patriarchy, kyriarchy, dominator culture, whatever you want to call it), privileges certain people over others. And that privilege can take many forms from slight to outright evil. White, older, wealthy men get privileged way out of proportion in our society. Men are only responsible for that to the extent that they want to keep BAU which oppresses other people.
(it’s why I as a Pākehā don’t take Māori talking about racism personally, unless of course I am being racist, in which case all power to them not me).
Maybe Michelle A’Court has been sexist and ageist but I doubt it (based on examples vto has given in the past that turn out to be quite different than how he describes them). But even if she has, the politics of domination culture are still sound to everyone except those who want to retain their privileges at the expense of other people.
btw vto, you saying “I’m not confusing identity and prejudice” doesn’t necessarily make it so.
Hi weka, I understand all those points you make (except the ones you make about me…) but it misses my point about Beck Eleven dismissing and belittling people on the basis of their age, race and gender.
“but it misses my point about Beck Eleven dismissing and belittling people on the basis of their age, race and gender.”
AFAIK you haven’t shared what she actually said, so I can only go on previous conversations like this that we’ve had, where when I go and track down the actual comments being objected to I find that the person said something else entirely. Following from that I can only work with the general argument, which is that you appear to confuse identity and prejudice.
I don’t know Beck Eleven’s work, but I have read enough of Michelle A’Court to know that what you are saying is at odds with what I’ve read.
May I have a go at providing an answer to your question? “Is it ok to dismiss / belittle all of the views of all members of a particular group of people solely on the basis of their race, age or gender?”
Of course, I in no way claim to be speaking for arkie – only myself.
I think a lot hinges on the word ‘ok’.
One way of understanding that word is to replace it with, say, ‘rational’ or ‘justified’ (which usually means some evidence-based or logically-based reason for an action).
In that sense, clearly it is not ‘ok’ (i.e., ‘rational’, ‘logical’) to belittle or dismiss what someone says on the basis of their age, race or gender. That is, it’s hard to think of a formal (‘rational’, ‘logical’) reason that would justify that response.
But – of course there’s a but 🙂 – another way of understanding ‘ok’ is to think of it in terms of it being an ‘understandable human reaction’, in the ordinary or everyday sense of that phrase.
I’d argue that it is entirely ‘ok’ – in that sense – for someone to be so frustrated by their ‘lived experience’ of repeated comments from particular groups (perhaps over a lifetime and as reported by other people like them) to get to the point of just saying ‘I’ve had enough! I’m not going to listen to anything that anyone from that group says ever again’.
That seems to me to be a perfectly human and understandable – and in that sense valid – response. It’s ‘ok’.
And when it comes from a member of a group that has, quite objectively, been subjected to just such repeated negative experiences from members of another relatively privileged or more powerful group (men, white men, old white men, traffic wardens, bureaucrats, rich people or whoever) I can well understand the adoption of a dismissive or even a belittling reaction.
So, ‘yes’, it’s ‘ok’ – as in ‘perfectly, humanly valid’ – to (re)act in that way.
By contrast, it would hardly be ‘ok’, in the sense I’ve just used it, for someone who was a member of a group that had relative privilege and power to dismiss or belittle a person’s opinions just because of their gender, age or race.
That’s because it is not a ‘humanly valid’ (or moral) reaction – it wouldn’t make ‘human’ sense. It would be enraging, even. (Imagine a wealthy privileged person dismissing someone’s views just because they were poor.)
Here’s an example to highlight my argument:
Would you say, for example, that it’s not ‘ok’ for a survivor of genocide to dismiss the views of all members of the group who committed genocide against them?
Extreme, I know – although if you look at the history of how women have been treated in many different cultures, maybe not.
But, either way, I think it gets to the heart of things.
As I said, this is entirely my own thinking on display. It is not meant to represent anyone else’s view.
puddleglum, you always have such a good way of explaining your good views.
You are correct in that such a response is probably ‘humanly understandable’ and in that context it is ‘ok’. I would suggest though that that context is relenting to the weaknesses of humans and is a poor route to follow. In a wider good human behaviour context it is not ‘understandable’ or ‘ok’ because such feelings of revenge do not lead to good society. It is understandable but not ok – just like a lot of crime. The old saying of two wrongs do not make a right comes to the fore.
The example you used of genocide – is it ok for a survivor of genocide to dismiss any member of the group who committed the genocide? Well, like your dissembling of my question in order to fully answer, the same is required here..
.. using the naz1s.. if that member was an SS officer then I would have thought, in your context, extremely so. But if that member was just a German then no, not. The link is insufficient.
There must a be a sufficient link I think, to justify such a dismissal. To use a closer example, Beck Eleven may be well justified in dismissing all members of, say, an Old Boys Club which restricted female membership and had a history of mocking females and their endeavours.
… however to extend that to all old white males loses the link and becomes outright stereotyping and bigotry. This is exactly where Beck Eleven sits.
I suppose I do relent to the “weaknesses of humans quite consistently, although I think of it as being considerate of the very different lives that all of us experience (tempered by my sense of the power that someone has).
Yes, ti would be better if people were entirely insensitive to the harm that others do to them. But think what that might mean for your own reaction to Beck Eleven.
In your example of the ordinary German unfairly dismissed be a survivor of genocide. I put myself in that person’s shoes and ask ‘how would I like to react’. The answer is that I would hope I would be aware of the experiences that led that person to treat me in that way.
I would take the hit – knowing that it was relatively minor in the scale of things.
That’s what I would hope I would do.
But, of course, I am also a weak human so it may not work out like that.
Let’s not forget that we don’t even know what the letter to the Editor said, let alone what Beck Eleven said. So we don’t know if belittle on the basis of gender, age etc is the right descriptor.
Columnists like Beck 11, Hoskings, and Garner, who psychobabble about themselves tend to use the word ‘I” many times in their first sentences and are are best avoided.
Michelle A’court is different. She writes about issues- not so much about herself.
We the readers (well me) are maybe mildly interested in the personal opinions of these writers but are uninterested in their personal lives any more than they are interested in mine.
I like your answer to vto. Not sure if it represents what Arkie would like to see.
Couldn’t connect to your actual comment Puddlegum – the reply button wasn’t available.
Can feel Arkie’s frustration with vto, tho. Sometimes I just give up because the blokes just cannot see what you’re getting at …….. and boy, do those older white males (and younger white males) go on and on about stuff at times which they have not actually experienced . Its blinkin’ frustrating ….. and if you call it sexism, they don’t know what you mean. Cheers Arkie – keep at it !
Jenny, I did not miss what arkie was saying. Those matters are very real and important. What happened is that arkie kept diverting away from the particular and specific matter. It was total avoidance. arkie has still not answered the question raised.
Just because I kept to the post and didn’t divert down the path arkie wanted doesn’t mean I don’t agree the path exists.
And what on earth do you mean “go on about stuff which they have not actually experienced”? Instead of trying to second guess and assume all sorts of things (as arkie did too), why not just read the words written? It was about Beck Eleven’s dismissal of all old white men. It was not about sexism throughout society in all its myriad forms and scales. It was about her and her columns, and the old man who wrote the prime letter to the editor today, together with a couple of other similar instances by other opinionists.
If I might just tag on the end here Jenny. I haven’t had an exchange of views like this for quite a while on here. It is good and invigorating and healthy and believe it or not the ideas put forward by the likes yourself and arkie slot into the mind and whirr away – they have an impact.
But you know a funny thing… when first started bouncing around here I was pretty much solid rightish wing, but after ranting and listening and watching and arguing over a period of time my views were changed by the opinions and ideas around here. There are a coupe of other reasons for it (going back to roots for example) but fundamentally the good ideas around general left wing philosophy convinced and changed my politics….. but here is the funny thing … it hasn’t happened on the matter of the subject at hand. I find the left wing sexist and racist and ageist in particular circumstances such as this, and the arguments and the like put forward over numerous years have failed to convince otherwise, unlike so many other left wing ideas…
“I haven’t had an exchange of views like this for quite a while on here.”
I think it is great that others are taking up the challenge to explain the views that are so hard for you to fathom – I have tried a number of times over the years and although we have bantered away it really becomes frustrating, from both sides I’m sure.
Evidence mounting that Corbynism is a symptom of internal discontent on the Left, rather than a mood for change in the wider electorate…
In the first test of voting intention since Mr Corbyn’s election, Labour have increased their poll rating by just one point, up to 30 per cent. The Conservatives are up two points to 42 per cent, meaning their lead has stretched to 12 points in the ComRes poll.
So you went looking for evidence to confirm your personal beliefs and you found some on the internet. That level of proof is only recognised in Psychology.
On that basis most comments on this blog will attract your ridicule OAB.
Oh that’s right, they do.
So regardless of your obsession for trying to make my posts about me, are you are implying that the poll i linked to, and the others in the last week that indicated very similar results (replicated), are not ‘evidence’ that is equally significant for anyone interested in this matter?
I’m not trying to make them about you, Sheep, I am making them about your dubious assertions.
If Corbyn has the long-term strategy he’s been talking about, and given his party’s poll rating has gone up 1% in a week, can I conclude that the UKLP will be on 50% support after another 20 weeks?
Hey Lost Sheep-quick If you want more evidence for your beliefs..read the Press article today by an idiot Liam Hehir (how do you get a name like that?) who suggests that Donald Trump is more trustworthy than Jeremy Corbyn because nobody that principled could be trusted to do the right thing.
Funny logic these people have.
No problemo. I’m just a typical sensitive Celt when it comes to ribbing about such things as ginger hair, freckles, and funny (to sasanach ears) names.
(You’re comparing the latest Com Res with the last poll by the same company conducted specifically for the Independent on Sunday / Sunday Mirror (early August). However, Com Res conduced another poll in late August (for The Daily Mail), and that’s the one you should be comparing this latest poll with. Same Pollster, same methodology, just different client. So, Labour have, in fact, cut the Tory lead from 14 to 12 points)
You’re also cherry-picking polls. After making recent changes to its methodology, Com Res has a marked tendency to show bigger Conservative leads than other
major British Pollsters.
So, you carefully chose the one that finds the Tories lead by a significant 12 points, yet the others carried out since Corbyn’s win suggest Labour’s cut the Tory lead to anything from 5 to 8 points.
Notice, too, the increase in Labour’s share of the vote in the 4 local body by-elections carried out since his win.
In the real-life electoral tests that matter, the Corbyn-led Labour Party isn’t doing too badly at all.
You can spin those results around as much as you like Swordfish….but they still don’t add up to any evidence at all that Corbyn has made significant inroads into the current Non Left vote.
At best. I agree the evidence gives you grounds for hoping that it will occur, if that was your hope, just it also suggest there are grounds for believing it will not.
Hmm, you could also conclude that the tsunami of shite sent Corbyn’s way by major media has kind of…didn’t work. Not just ‘holding his own’, but going up a point or two. 😉
No disagreement with your 2nd paragraph – there’s still everything to play for.
But isn’t it great to see that Tory poll lead cut by the Corbyn-led Labour Party in every single poll conducted over the last week or so, despite the tsunami of vitriol he’s had to put up with from some particularly vile pricks in the British media. I can just imagine you punching the air with excitement, lost sheep. Happy days, happy days.
Even if Corbyn’s role is strictly short-term, the fact is he’s already transformed the UK Labour Party from a low-membership elite-driven cadre-Party (just as Blair and Brown had always envisaged) into a vibrant, revitalised grassroots mass-participatory movement (with a membership that’s now greater in number than that of the Tory,
Lib Dem and SNP parties combined). It’s that democracy in action, that power being unceremoniously ripped from the hands of the Westminster elite and their “professional” (but, generally inept) political operators that so upsets the insiders/enablers like the Phil Quins and Prof Tim Bales of this world.
They clutch their pearls in abject horror as those simply ghastly unwashed masses
take over, rudely usurping their carefully cultivated positions of power and presuming to want a hand in formulating policy if you please !!! Scandalous !!!
And, of course, Corbyn’s massively broadened the parameters of acceptable political discourse, realigning the Party with that solid core of social democratic values that continue to animate a majority of British voters. No more spineless capitulation to an increasingly unpopular austerity regime, no more advocacy of a privatisation agenda that’s been deeply unpopular with the British Public for more than a decade now. No more Tweedledum / Tweedledee politics, basically.
Whatever impact it ends up making on the voting public, as you point out it’s what Corbynism means for the Left that is likely to be the more significant immediate question.
I would suspect that Corbynism will turn out to have been ‘organised’ to some extent, by roughly the same groupings of people as organised/supported the ‘Occupy’ movement, and the Corbyn movement reflects both their frustration with current Left Wing politics, and a positive strategy to achieve change through involvement at the Parliamentary level.
If Corbynism succeeds in gaining ground electorally, I predict the Center Left will go with it, and a unified Labour will genuinely shift Left. At that point I will agree that it may represent a major turning of the tide politically.
Even the docile old Left might get down off the fence and show some signs of change here in NZ if that happens.
But if it doesn’t, which would be my prediction purely on the basis that there is no indication of support for a significant Leftist shift among Centrist voters, then I predict that a major schism will open up between the passive Center and an activist Far Left in British politics, including major turmoil in or even a break up of Labour, and ultimately a redefining of the Left into Hard and Soft factions that expend as much energy fighting each other as they do the Right.
So it’s all on the line really. And even if I’m not a fan of Corbyn’s specific politics, i do genuinely agree with you that it is fantastic to see people taking control through democratic action.
So what your saying is that Corbyn now has, on top of a massively increased and revitalised Labour membership, the entire occupy movement with all it’s networks activated and working for him.
To me, OLS is saying: If Corbyn succeeds in capturing the general electorate, Labour will permanently shift to the left. If he fails, we can probably expect a Labour/New Labour schism. Do you not agree?
No, I don’t: even the World Bank and IMF have noticed that “Neoliberalism” is a little bit shit. The precious English-speaking nations can’t be that far behind.
“There is now an increasingly active propaganda machine trying to sell the deal.
We will know on 3 October (2 October US time) whether the Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement (TPPA) will conclude or faces collapse. According to a calculated drip-feed of unofficial information, chief negotiators from the 12 countries will resume talks in Atlanta, USA on 26 September, with the ministers now scheduled to meet in for 3 days from 30 September to 2 October, and the chiefs continuing on until 4th….
‘John Key starts softening NZers up to signing the TPPA – check his dramatic change of language’ -by Martyn Bradbury
Groser would sell his grandmother to get TPPA through and we know that it only takes a game of golf with Obama to convince Key to give up the security keys to our country and our future.
it is being conducted in secret…the terms are secret…the discussions are secret …the potential outcomes for New Zealand are secret….it has not been discussed in Parliament( except by those who oppose its secrecy)
…that is NOT democracy…are you kidding?
jonkey nactional do not have a mandate from New Zealanders to sign a secret agreement
( as for calling yourself ‘Planet Earth’….are you kidding? (Orwellian Double Speak…right wing PR merchant is more like it)…this corporate designed Treaty will threaten New Zealand’s environment and New Zealanders’ control of Planet Earth’s well being in their own country of New Zealand)
Bullshit Planet Earth …..most negotiations of such importance to a nation are not as secret as these….and jonkey does not have a democratic mandate to sell New Zealand out to corporate interests
Wanting something really, really badly does not make a thing true no matter how many times you repeat it (and link to documents that disprove your assertion).
Paragraph 7.112 states that “In New Zealand, the power to take treaty action rests with the Executive.” In practice that means the Cabinet.
Cabinet decides whether to enter into negotiations, the negotiating mandate and any revisions to it, and what trade-offs are made to conclude a deal.
Cabinet then approves the signing of the agreed text by the Minister. This is a definitive step that binds the government to act in good faith towards its negotiating partners. The Cabinet manual makes it clear that by signing an agreement the executive indicates an intention for New Zealand to be bound to that text. This constitutes a good faith obligation under international law.
Parliament does not get to see the completed text until that stage. According to the Cabinet Manual, a signed TPPA would then be presented to Parliament, accompanied by a National Interest Analysis. These analyses have been widely criticised during the standing orders reviews and submissions on the International Treaties Bill for their lack of independence and balance, because they are prepared by the same Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade that negotiated the agreement.
The treaty is then referred to the foreign affairs, defence and trade select committee, which has the discretion whether or not to seek public submissions. But the select committee has no substantive power. The Cabinet Manual (para 7.119) makes it clear that the executive can move to ratify the TPPA while the select committee process is still underway.
Parliament does not elect the cabinet.
It is the Executive branch of government
You need to read up on how our representative democracy actually works.
Your mistakes are basic fundamental ones. Meaning It’s going to affect all your thinking that is built on that understanding.
It’s kinda shitty, but you’re going to have to go back to basics and unpack the lot.
“The method of selection of Ministers depends on party practice. The elected leader of the parliamentary National Party chooses his Ministers and assigns the portfolios. In the parliamentary Labour Party the number of Ministers to be appointed is determined and the required number is elected by the caucus.” http://www.teara.govt.nz/en/1966/government-parliament/page-7
not really. MMP was supposed to give us a more representative democracy but for various reasons that promise has never been fulfilled. The democracy we have is rudimentary at best and open to manipulation. Plus you’re probably not going to get very far arguing that this particular cabinet deserves democratic respect given how much anti-democratic action they’ve taken in recent years.
The polling conducted by Consumer Link between 14th and 21st November and 4th to 10th December shows consistently high levels of opposition to
1) keeping the text secret until it is signed (65% opposed, 14% for);
2) allowing foreign investors to sue the government in offshore tribunals for compensation for new environmental laws (61% opposed, 9% for);
3) the New Zealand government’s failure to reject those special rights foreign investors to sue (62% opposed, 12% for); and
4) making trade-offs that would result in a significant rise in what it costs the government to supply medicines to thepublic (52% opposed, 18% for) when Australia has completely rejected the concept.
In other words, the people are opposed to the TPPA – National will sign it against the will of the people and thus undemocratically. Just as they did with the sales of the power companies.
I wonder which they care about the most?
Whatever their donors want. What the people of NZ want won’t even get a mention.
OK, I was referring to the mandate (as expressed by the electorate last year) to enact their manifesto. I’m sure that if the majority are upset enough by this issue then they will vote them out in 2017. You might not agree, but to me that’s democracy.
In other words, the people are opposed to the TPPA – National will sign it against the will of the people and thus undemocratically. Just as they did with the sales of the power companies.
And then they rub our noses in it by giving us a referendum for the fucking flag.
On what we can expect with our health care AKA USA style. The CEO is also a former hedge fund manager.
Drug Goes From $13.50 a Tablet to $750, Overnight
By ANDREW POLLACKSEPT. 20, 2015
Specialists in infectious disease are protesting a gigantic overnight increase in the price of a 62-year-old drug that is the standard of care for treating a life-threatening parasitic infection.
The drug, called Daraprim, was acquired in August by Turing Pharmaceuticals, a start-up run by a former hedge fund manager. Turing immediately raised the price to $750 a tablet from $13.50, bringing the annual cost of treatment for some patients to hundreds of thousands of dollars.
As I have repeatedly said our healthcare is not going to turn into the USA healthcare system due to the signing of the TPPA.
The example you have given is of a company that has decided to go down the track of extreme price gouging primarily because they can in the USA. In virtually all cases in NZ, PHARMAC contract for the supply of a funded pharmaceutical and there is not the opportunity for companies to alter the prices.
As the product is well out of patent PHARMAC would simply choose to organise supply out of south east asia… possibly that’s what they do already.
The TPPA should fail on the fact that there is probably little to no access for our agricultural/horticultural products into key markets (US, Canada or Japan) and due to this little reason why we would enter the TPPA for anything other than wanting to be part of the club.
It’s very unlikely we’ll get any reasonable access to agricultural/horticultural markets in USA, Canada or Japan, these lobbies are hugely protectionist and no one has managed to crack them to date.
I still occasionally read Richard Scarry’s ‘Mother Goose’ collection to my daughter and I would love to know the derivation of those old children’s rhymes (the Dr Fell rhyme is one of them).
That is the point, nobody is allowed to see the documents. TPP is against democracy and a fundamental absurdity.
A few individuals about to sign a major deal that the public, law society and nobody else has a right to see prior to signing.
This Government shows how pathetic they are by, signing the ‘great deals’ with Serco and Sky City – already in trouble. Sheepgate etc, – who knows how many other sheep will be flown around the world as bribes by our idiots.
Village idiots should not be allowed the power to sign with the big boys.
And no, agriculture (which we are unlikely to get anyway) is not worth the rest of the country. Surprisingly there are markets out there, like Russia who could be buying our products, and when the big boys fall out with each other as they often do, little NZ can trade with them. Will be more access than be told without being told, no trade by our controlling government for political reasons.
“Village idiots should not be allowed the power to sign with the big boys.”
In case you haven’t noticed that’s how democracies work. If you don’t like the current lot of village idiots you get a chance to replace them with a new batch in a couple of years.
As for the old chestnut of ‘to hell with them lets just trade with Russia’ I would have thought a better position is that we should trade with whomever we want to (within reason).
As for the old chestnut of ‘to hell with them lets just trade with Russia’ I would have thought a better position is that we should trade with whomever we want to (within reason).
…so begs the point why do we need a trade agreement that seems more about stopping free trade and empowering foreign corporations to strip mine assets and taxes and destroy local jobs and undermine health and the environment, than free trade.
A recent case in the US the courts found that water was not considered a fundamental right for people. Is this a society where NZ wants to head and be part of? When we need to consult a 1000 page agreement to be allowed water, and governments are sued when they try to stop people smoking or the gun lobbyists persuade us all we need to arm our selves to the eyeballs to ‘keep safe’ like in the good ol USA.
Look I get that you don’t like the USA, they certainly can be odd and I don’t believe anyone in NZ wants NZ to be a carbon copy of their society and that your suggestions that the TPPA will preclude NZ being able to make its own regulations regarding gun laws and smoking cessation programs is hyperbole.
But the reason NZ is taking part in the negotiations is to see whether there is benefit for us – which there would be with a level playing field in relation to agricultural/horticultural exports – from my understanding the tariffs on these are fairly sizeable in the USA, Canada and Japan especially. It would be negligent not to be part of the discussions and I’m fairly sure all politic parties would agree on that point.
Whether there will be any benefits or an agreement out the back end I’m very doubtful about, as I said somewhere else I don’t think there’s any chance of North America or Japan agreeing to any significant freeing up of access for agricultural/horticultural products so can’t see why we would sign up.
No, that would be a completely different meaning from what I intended.
As I stated the reason NZ is taking part in discussion is to see if there is benefit in it for us (NZ).
If you are suggesting that they are only doing it is to see if there is benefit for vested interests is I believe overly cynical, which vested interests did you have in mind ?
“As for the old chestnut of ‘to hell with them lets just trade with Russia’ I would have thought a better position is that we should trade with whomever we want to (within reason).”
The wheels have been in motion for some time now for trade with Russia.
There has to be factory inspection and audits, it takes months but will be happening very soon.
While I agree that it’s not really a TPPA issue, as it doesn’t actually involve intellectual property as such, it is a prime example as to why capitalism and medecine make uncomfortable bedfellows.
An interesting paragraph:
With the price now high, other companies could conceivably make generic copies, since patents have long expired. One factor that could discourage that option is that Daraprim’s distribution is now tightly controlled, making it harder for generic companies to get the samples they need for the required testing.
So, basically, the cocksuckers boosted the price of a cheap and reliable medication that is used to treat toxoplasmosis and malaria, on the odds that they’ll have a decent window of price gouging before competitors can bring out generics and the price goes back down to the ballpark of ibuprofen. A window they’ll artificially extend by controlled distribution rather than intellectual property. All for a drug that is on the WHO essential medicines list and is needed more in the developing world than in the continental USA.
the market will fix that…..just hope you don’t need the medication.
as i said, this of course would never ever happen here, cause our hedge fund managers err ponytail puller would never ever do something here to enrich themselves.
@Sabine, i believe your comment was that NZ healthcare was going to go USA style under a potential TPPA, I don’t believe there’s any evidence to support that whatsoever.
Funding of services, medicines, distribution and staff is completely different in the USA and NZ, one system is pretty much user pays while the other is pretty much funded via the government.
TPP adds the ability for big pharma companies to deploy lawyers in ISDS tribunals against Pharmac for reducing projected future profits. Also expect to see clauses that force Pharmac to reveal its prioritisation process to said lawyers.
Sigh.. PHARMAC’s prioritisation process is very transparent, just have a look on their website.
In relation to any TPP clause that companies would use against PHARMAC reducing future profits who knows ?
The only thing i would be confident of is the first company to deploy such a maneouvre would struggle to ever have another medicine funded by the government in NZ.
There’s been a number of companies that have tried to go after PHARMAC via lawyers over the years but not surprisingly in the medium to long term (and even usually in the short term) PHARMAC have been the winners.
ISDS has been widely discussed in relation to TPP.
Big pharma are also on record wanting to crack non-transparent parts of Pharmac’s process for many years. Unlike us, not only have they seen TPP, they have had input into it.
Leaked drafts show the impact of both aspects. Believe whatever you want.
“Superficially, the language in the leaked text seems benign, but the underlying changes would give pharmaceutical companies a combination of new levers to undermine PHARMAC processes,” says Dr Laking. “What we see in the text is a variety of small changes – every one favouring pharmaceutical companies ¬– that multiply their force when added together.
I’d agree with some of the things George says and take a different view on some of the others.
As an example.
“One thing is certain – don’t expect the industry to play by gentleman’s rules – under the proposed changes, PHARMAC would be pressured to make important decisions within shorter time frames and under more intensive input and scrutiny from industry. There would also be more onerous requirements to release information which could then be used to challenge its decisions through a review process.”
I’d agree with that but don’t have a problem with PHARMAC having to make decisions more quickly, they have taken outrageous amounts of time to make decisions on certain products over the years whenever there might be a financial cost to the pharmaceutical budget. I also find it odd that we can on one hand argue that Pharmac shouldn’t release information on their decision making process (which in my opinion they do reasonably well) while arguing that we should be privy to all of the TPPA decision making process.
“The threat of an expensive law suit hanging over every decision would have an intimidating effect and would tend to make PHARMAC more hesitant about fighting to get the best deals for New Zealanders. The Australians have tried to close the investor-state loophole by explicitly excluding their equivalent of PHARMAC from being subjected to these lawsuits under the TPPA, but for some reason New Zealand has not done the same with PHARMAC.”
Now I’d see this in a different light, in that if this was to be the case PHARMAC would just slow decisions to a snails pace and make the requirements and hurdles to get new medications funded insurmountable. Pharmaceutical companies would still need to come to a commercial arrangement to get a new medicine funded as is the present situation and a situation which happily almost always favours PHARMAC as per their current consultations on funding new Hep C medications.
I guess we’ll all be more in the know if the deal ever goes through….. I still think that’s quite unlikely.
So on the one hand they’ll be forced to make decisions more quickly and on the other they’ll be able to slow access to our portion of the global pharmaceutical market down.
Um, you kind of reinforced Laking’s point there, Doc.
PHARMAC will be able to continue to use their operating procedures and policies to their best interest.
Where they allow products into the decision making process for example when issuing a request for proposals for the supply of new medicines for Hep C as per
They will be able to move products through faster and the decision making process may be more transparent – although most know what the decision will be based upon.
Where a company is seeking funding for a new product via application for inclusion on the pharmaceutical schedule the process might become more problematic the is currently the case depending on how problematic the company applying for the funding was.
Where a company is seeking funding for a new product via application for inclusion on the pharmaceutical schedule, looking at it from their perspective they’re going to get a smaller return on their investment because PHARMAC.
Take Hep C for example, with 2-3% of global population requiring treatment, it’s a huge market; that PHARMAC can slow access to our portion of it doesn’t strike me as very much leverage.
I hope the whole thing fails, but our government has already admitted they expect Pharmac’s budget to increase.
That’s partly because they know they are likely to make law changes to weaken Pharmac’s current arrangements as part of implementing TPP in NZ. Hence the weasel words around only preserving the ‘fundamentals’.
Our negotiators have been conceding goodness knows how much in our name, just so a few piss-weak Ministers with daddy issues can say they scored a deal with big ol USA.
And we’ve just seen the PM soften us up about the deal being merely “as good as we can get” rather than good. But hey, we elected these clowns and tolerated opposition parties too disorganised, ego-ridden and stupid to tie their shoelaces.
“Take Hep C for example, with 2-3% of global population requiring treatment, it’s a huge market; that PHARMAC can slow access to our portion of it doesn’t strike me as very much leverage.
…especially when you consider the political pressure for new drugs.”
Yes you’d think that, but time and time again the pharmaceutical companies roll over and do a deal at prices they could only dream of in the USA… it’s odd.
no my comment was just me stating that I don’t trust our current bankers and welfare bludgers in parliament to safeguard our current system that allows us to purchase medication at reasonable and affordable prices.
As for the differences between the US and NZ, they are very fluid and can be changed, and will be changed very quickly if an appropriate agreement is signed.
I do hope that you have a good health insurance, because you will need it in the future.
As for it can’t happen here, i suggest you have a look to see how it happened in the US of A where literally not having insurance will either bankrupt you or kill you.
Because you know what, wishful thinking is just that, wishful.
“As for the differences between the US and NZ, they are very fluid and can be changed, and will be changed very quickly if an appropriate agreement is signed.
I do hope that you have a good health insurance, because you will need it in the future.
As for it can’t happen here, i suggest you have a look to see how it happened in the US of A where literally not having insurance will either bankrupt you or kill you.”
Well we’ll have to agree to disagree as I can’t see the NZ health system becoming anything like the US health system under any agreement the government may or may not enter.
“So, basically, the cocksuckers boosted the price of a cheap and reliable medication that is used to treat toxoplasmosis and malaria, on the odds that they’ll have a decent window of price gouging before competitors can bring out generics and the price goes back down to the ballpark of ibuprofen. A window they’ll artificially extend by controlled distribution rather than intellectual property. All for a drug that is on the WHO essential medicines list and is needed more in the developing world than in the continental USA.”
Yep exactly, although it’s mainly a useful medicine in patients who are substantially immunosuppressed with toxoplasma than in others. WHO have a good number of alternatives that they source out of India and Asia hence it doesn’t really effect them. Pharmaceuticals supply and pricing in the US is odd (to be polite) hence the number of people that pop over the border to Canada.
Interestingly there’s a product for certain cancers in NZ (carmustine) which the worldwide supplier is trying to do the same thing. Old medicine hardly anyone making it anymore and the Indian company wants to put the price up many many fold around the world.
Fellow doctor here – I obviously agree it’s obvious our system won’t become the USA system overnight because of the TPPA but if you think our health system is safe from National I reckon you’re being naive. They’re just too smart to do too much too soon and get on the wrong side of public opinion.
Little changes add up and I wouldn’t underestimate what ponytail puller and his ilk are capable of – look at what dead pig fucker and his party are doing to junior doctors in the UK. For the past few years they’ve been biting away at the rights of doctors in the UK and getting more confident with every little success – did any of it mean they became satisfied and stopped there? No, now they are instituting a contract which means at least a 30% pay cut for GP trainees and a cut more like 10 to 15% for junior doctors in other specialties by redefining normal hours completely. It may mean the first strike action over there in over 20 years.
I don’t think anyone is being complacent, however, having practised in NZ for quite a few decades I haven’t seen any great change in the overall health system in NZ regardless of whether the blue team or the red team is the government of the day.
Re the NHS – from what i understand the ongoing restructuring and bureaucracy involved has turned a bit of a basket case into a potential shambles, although saying that the centres of excellence in the UK are still pretty impressive.
Pope Francis will be visiting the US Sept. 23 – 27. In his encyclical, released June 18, 2015, the Pope called for “all sector[s] of society to take actions to protect the environment.” http://nyti.ms/1iY49SM
Pope Francis Continues to Speak Out Against “Free Trade”
“The new colonialism takes on different faces. At times it appears as the anonymous influence of mammon: corporations, loan agencies, certain ‘free trade’ treaties, and the imposition of measures of ‘austerity’ which always tighten the belt of workers and the poor.” http://cnn.it/1KoEbAX
Today a story has broken about a charity trying to help people into homes up North. John Carter (Mayor of the Far north District) was interviewed on RNZ about it just after 8am. He called Internal Affairs “nuts” and mentioned he was on a “loopy rules committee.”
And then, by some huge coincidence Paula Bennett releases the report of the very committee that John Carter (former national MP) was talking about…
“The members of the Taskforce also heard loud and clear that there are several myths about rules and regulations that don’t actually exist. This includes the misconception that lolly scrambles have been banned, and that people can’t use three-step ladders.
“By breaking through this misinformation, New Zealanders will be better placed to focus on the serious rules designed to keep people safe and our economy growing.”
I wonder what the report and taskforce cost?
PS Thanks Weka for your comments above. Indeed there is a difference between identity and prejudice
An interesting take on the deeper implications of the Cameron story and how the wielding of power structures work.
“The PM, the Pig and musings on Power by Rob Fahey.
“Initiation ceremonies or “hazing” rituals, often of a painful, humiliating, transgressive or sexual nature, are a well-documented part of the culture of many organisations run by and for young men, especially those from positions of privilege or in elite institutions. …. By committing transgressive acts together, members develop a sense of sharing in a mutual secret, thus instantly creating trust; by overcoming some humiliation or pain, new members deepen their commitment to the group, as their internal logic reasons that if they are willing to endure such an ordeal, it must mean that the group is important and deserving of loyalty (otherwise, they would have made a terrible mistake and gone through all of that suffering for nothing). ……” http://www.robfahey.co.uk/blog/the-pm-the-pig-and-musings-on-power/
(I bet his mate Key will explain how to dodge the downsides of ridicule as he did with pony tails!)
The comments by Rob Fahey are backed up in America by the exclusive Yale “secret society” known as the Skull and Bones club. The Bush clan, including Dubya, his father and grandfather all belonged.
We now have 5 consecutive TV Polls (Colmar Brunton / Reid Research) putting the Opposition Bloc on 50-52% and the Govt/Broad Right Bloc on 48-49%.
Compared to Election Night:
Oppo up around 7 points
Broad Right down 5 points
Lab+Greens up 7-8 points
And a marked change compared to polls conducted during the first 8 months following the Sep 2014 Election.
First 16 post-election Polls = Govt ahead in all but 2.
Last 8 Polls = Oppo ahead in all but 2.
Clearly, National’s support is only holding up because of the near-total collapse of the minor parties of the Right. Meaning it’s 47% is no longer enough to hold onto power.
And yet, once again, (just like a couple of weeks ago with the last Colmar Brunton) the Dom Post summarises the latest Reid Research Poll findings as some sort of major triumph for National, The whole “defying gravity”/”as popular as ever”/”Key will be pleased”/”Good news for National” meme currently much favoured by the MSM.
Sharp Dom Post readers with only a passing interest in politics may have become a little confused as they got towards the end of the item and noticed the almost-in-passing comment that according to this poll “New Zealand First would hold the balance of power”. They may well have thought to themselves: “Well, hang on a minute, they’re saying National’s as popular as ever and that the poll’s good news for both Key and the Nats and yet surely something must have changed since the last election for NZF to be in a position to hold the balance of power according to its poll support ? I don’t understand, something’s not quite right here.”
Thanks Swordfish – your analysis is thorough and constant. Thanks for keeping us in touch with reality while we wend our way through the maze of mirrors.
Good work there Swordfish. The Key lot will be very aware of the realities and expect machinations agin the Left to increase.
If the trend continues then won’t it be a surprise to many who only take a passing interest.
But are you counting NZF as part of Oppo – if so, that is problematic surely?
I mean , is it really so cut and dried that Winston won’t go with the Nats if push comes to shove?
Parties who do not have a support agreement of some sort with the government of the day are collectively the Opposition. As you note, that does not necessarily make them part of a future coalition, but then media can hardly just include them on the government’s side either, can they?
TPPA – WALK AWAY! Auckland activists plan to collect 2000 signatures in 2 days outside Auckland University,
TODAY Tuesday 22 September and TOMORROW Wednesday 23 September!
TIME: From 12 noon to 5pm!
WHERE: Petitions on clipboards (under a BIG beach umbrella will be available for signing outside Auckland University – corner of Symonds St / Grafton Rd!
Petition wording:
“To the MP for Auckland Central – Nikki Kaye
We, the undersigned state:
That if this John Key led National Government does not ‘walk away’ from the secretive, undemocratic. pro-corporate ‘Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement’ (TPPA), then we pledge to campaign vigorously amongst our friends, families, neighbours and workmates, for the voting public to walk away from National.”
There will be banners / placards / street theatre!
(We understand that PM John Key and Trade Minister Tim Groser may be making an appearance, as they did outside the Titirangi Golf Course on Friday 18 September 2015 – see photo 🙂
Signed petitions will be presented to Nikki Kaye’s Auckland Central Electorate Office – Thursday morning 24 September 2015.
“The Trans Pacific Partnership deal is almost certain to be done and dusted in the next few weeks when chief negotiators and then Trade Ministers of the 12 countries meet in Atlanta, in the United States.”
Where have we heard THAT one before?
Wasn’t the TPPA supposed to have been ‘done and dusted’ ‘signed and sealed’ in Maui at the end of July 2015?
It ain’t over till it’s over, and a week IS a long time in politics!
Particularly given that the “Hearing of Legal Challenge to TPPA Secrecy set for Monday 28th September at Wellington High Court”
The legal challenge to the secrecy of the Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement (TPPA) negotiations will be heard in the High Court in Wellington at 10am next Monday, 28th September.
The hearing coincides with the meeting of chief negotiators in Atlanta, USA prior to a ministerial meeting from 30 September to 2 October, which is being billed as their final meeting to conclude the deal. Those talks are once again being conducted under conditions of secrecy.
The case involves judicial review of the blanket refusal by the Trade Minister Tim Groser to release eight categories of information sought by Professor Jane Kelsey of the University of Auckland under the Official Information Act.
The request reflected information the European Union Ombudsman had just recommended for release in relation to parallel negotiations between the United States and the European Union.
Other applicants include Consumer NZ, Ngati Kahungunu, Oxfam and the Association of Salaried Medical Specialists. …”
@swordfish the same trend is apparent in the msm’s reporting of the economy where all is sweetness and light despite growth heading below 2 per cent and the dollar plummeting
I watched those questions and they were useless in the extreme – key was all over them and using them as a way to poke fun and ridicule at the questioner. I have to say, and it sticks in my throat, that key outplayed any one of the many opposition questioners. It may be that we have to find a ‘better key’ to sort this one out – Lange for instance would have chewed him up but noone today looked even in the same league – key was smarmy, smartarsey and I wanted to spit at his jokey bullshit. Mr and Mrs kiwinobody would have fucken loved it.
On farming matters…why it is a bad idea for the New Zealand farmers’ cooperative Silver Fern Farms to sell out to the Chinese
Rod Oram discusses the government’s rejection of Shanghai Pengxin’s bid for Lochinver Station and further aspects of Shanghai Maling’s proposal to take control of Silver Fern Farms.
I disagree, BAD foreign investment deals are bad for the country is the point he is making – not even that – there is a very unequal relationship in the 50:50 Silver Ferns farms deals. It is not really 50:50 as the balance of power is to Shanghai.
But there’s no such thing as good foreign investment. As he points out, there is almost no economic difference between a foreign investor operating a business or a NZer (in fact, it’s likely to be a NZer operating it anyway). The only difference is that the profit goes offshore and that is truly bad for the country.
+100 very interesting and worth listening too. One to share.
In particular the governments Ra Ra stance on Silver Fern farms not mentioning it is not an equal relationship of 50:50 as the Shanghai Maling gets to control the budget (and therefore strategic direction) and veto the CEO. Not only that as Rod points out, the benefits will almost certainly flow to the Chinese supermarkets where the higher profits are made, and in the short term they can cause damage to Alliance by having the funds to outbid and cripple them to reduce competition.
Fresh after the leaky building fiasco after the National government ‘relaxed’ building permits to the private sector and let untreated timber be allowed under its BRANZ but somehow do not feel responsible for leaky buildings this little gem..
Government propose to let builders sign off own work
Yes, lets relax standards again, cos it worked so well last time! Lets not forget Pike river ‘relaxed standards’ and CTV buildings ‘relaxed standards’
I really want Dodgy Nactz and A development chums (Penny Webster ex ACT) and Shanghai Central builders signing off their own work!
Auckland already looks like a ghetto in many places, but we can make it so much worse!
Wonder who will pay for the F up’s the rate payers and tax payers per chance?
From 1 April 2005, the Levy will be $1.97 per $1,000 of building work for which there is a consent and will still only be collected on works valuedat $20,000 or more. This represents approximately 0.2 percent of building costs.
To me it looks like an inquiry was set up to find an ideological answer and has done so:
The door is ajar for letting builders sign off on the quality of their own work.
The proposal is among recommendations released today by the Government’s rules reduction taskforce, which was set up to look at the rules and regulations causing frustration for taxpayers.
The taskforce said self-certification should be encouraged for builders who meet set levels of qualification.
All fucken codswallop that will make building quality even worse because we can guarantee that this government will implement those recommendations.
Yeah, I noticed that. I went looking for the report but couldn’t actually find it. Perhaps it’s time we made it a mandatory aspect of journalism – reports to be linked.
It’s odd they don’t already, although I guess they could just be cut and pasting from a sparse press release. Still, they could refuse to print it without access to the source material.
Yes, I’ve often thought that if news organisations simply published the press release as the press release (as Scoop does transparently) rather than trying to claim it as a news story then that would be a ‘win-win’ – no criticism of journalistic effort and no confusion over how much was from a press release.
Of course, then the actual number of news stories (i.e., articles that require journalistic effort to report accurately and informatively) might look a bit slim.
Rod Oram – “Follow the money” – the future of business journalism
The feeble state of business journalism in New Zealand and around the world is but a subset of journalism’s general decline. To try to survive financially, many media organisations are increasingly blurring the distinction between journalism and advertising, devaluing both in the process. Yet, there has never been a more important time for business journalism.
Profound change is sweeping through business and economics and the societies they help shape. Journalists should be trying to explain what’s happening – the good and the ill – for the benefit of participants and public alike.
Wednesday 14 October, 6pm
Maidment Theatre, 8 Alfred Street, The University of Auckland
Doors open at 5.45pm, lecture starts at 6pm. The Maidment Bar will open from 5pm http://www.brucejesson.com/?p=624
also you can listen to Mike Joy’s 2014 lecture – Mike Joy delivered the 2014 Lecture entitled ‘Paradise Squandered; New Zealand’s Environmental Asset Stripping’. The full text is available on our web site. http://www.brucejesson.com/?p=527
Keys position on the Islander fella claiming climate refugee status
“Its a fucking joke” you can see Key laughing that thru the news interview
I dont blame the guy for trying, look at Keys he’s a Hawaiian overstayer getting free money from the govt, none of us would be worse off if he wasnt here, in fact get him to ring me and I will tell him to fuck off .
Keys position on the Islander fella claiming climate refugee status
“Its a fucking joke” you can see Key laughing that thru the news interview
I dont blame the guy for trying, look at Keys he’s a Hawaiian overstayer getting free money from the govt, none of us would be worse off if he wasnt here, in fact get him to ring me and I will tell him to fuck off .
Ok, I did a bit of digging. Here’s a snip from the letter to the Editor that vto refers to (I can’t access the whole thing without an account).
It’s somewhat ironic that in Beck Eleven’s column on Saturday (Sept 19) she indulges in gender stereotyping to reinforce her otherwise well-made points on the moral imperatives for posi…
The only references to old white men are this (it’s worth reading in context),
The best I can explain is recalling a tour through the Beehive where the walls are adorned by paintings of old white men with beards. They were the ones who decided the rules therefore they were the ones who got the step up in life.
If that’s not a type of scholarship I don’t know what is.
I’ll bet my bottom dollar that old white men with beards weren’t thinking about Maori or women’s rights because they were, unsurprisingly, thinking from their own perspective.
I don’t see how this is gender stereoptyping (she is describing actual paintings of actual old white men with beards, although I guess she could be exaggerating for effect – maybe not all of them are old, maybe some are clean shaven). She is also describing actual people in positions of actual power and making a political point about their access to that power on the basis of their gender, race and age (but presumably not their facial hair).
She then makes the point that they probably weren’t thinking about people who weren’t white and male and older, which I’ll admit is an exaggeration, but with a core of truth to it.
Nowhere in there do I see belittling of older white men. This is why I think vto is confusing identity and prejudice. Prejudice would be something like ‘all old men are bigots’. Which might indeed be how vto interpreted it, but it’s not the only interpretation. Myself, I would see those men as having a mix of understandings about gender and race, but the shared element they have is their privilege, which is the point that Eleven was making. She’s not extrapolating to all old white men, she’s just using that particular group of old white men as an example of a group of people with privilege.
I also don’t see the problem with calling old white men “old white men” when they patently are. Eleven talks about her experience of going to Te Matatini. Should she not describe most of the people there as Māori? Wouldn’t that just be weird?
If Eleven has made repeated statements that she “doesn’t listen to old white men” as vto claims, I’d like to see links to the actual statements.
Photo: Lynn Grieveson / The KākāTL;DR: My top six things to note around housing, climate and poverty in Aotearoa’s political economy in the week to July 27 were:1. The Minister for Ford Rangers strikes againTransport Minister Simeon Brown was again the busiest of the Cabinet ministers this week, announcing an ...
You got a fast carAnd I want a ticket to anywhereMaybe we make a dealMaybe together we can get somewhereAny place is betterYesterday’s newsletter, Trust In Me, on the report of abuse in state care, and by religious organisations, between 1950 and 2019, coupled with the hypocrisy of Christopher Luxon ...
New Zealand is again having to reconcile conflicting pressures from its military and its trade interests. Should we join Pillar Two of AUKUS and risk compromising our markets in China? For a century after New Zealand was founded in 1840, its external security arrangements and external economics arrangements were aligned. ...
The ‘50 Shades of Green’ farmers’ protest in 2019 was heavy on climate change denial, but five years on, scepticism and criticism about the idea that pine forests can save us is growing across the board. File photo: Lynn GrievesonTL;DR: Here’s the top six news items of note in climate ...
This morning the sky was bright.The birds, in their usual joyous bliss. Nature doesn’t seem to feel the heat of what might angst humans.Their calls are clear and beautiful.Just some random thoughts:MāoriPaul Goldsmith has announced his government will roll back the judiciary’s rulings on Māori Customary Marine Title, which recognises ...
In 2003, the Court of Appeal delivered its decision in Ngati Apa v Attorney-General, ruling that Māori customary title over the foreshore and seabed had not been universally extinguished, and that the Māori Land Court could determine claims and confirm title if the facts supported it. This kicked off the ...
Earlier this week at Parliament, Labour leader Chris Hipkins was applauded for saying that the response to the final report of the Royal Commission of Inquiry into Abuse in Care had to be “bigger than politics.” True, but the fine words, apologies and “we hear you” messages will soon ring ...
TL;DR: In news breaking this morning:The Ministry of Education is cutting $2 billion from its school building programme so the National-ACT-NZ First Coalition Government has enough money to deliver tax cuts; The Government has quietly lowered its child poverty reduction targets to make them easier to achieve;Te Whatu Ora-Health NZ’s ...
Kia ora. These are some stories that caught our eye this week – as always, feel free to share yours in the comments. Our header image this week (via Eke Panuku) shows the planned upgrade for the Karanga Plaza Tidal Swimming Steps. The week in Greater Auckland On ...
1. What's not to love about the way the Harris campaign is turning things around?a. Nothingb. Love all of itc. God what a reliefd. Not that it will be by any means easye. All of the above 2. Documents released by the Ministry of Health show Associate Health Minister Casey ...
Trust in me in all you doHave the faith I have in youLove will see us through, if only you trust in meWhy don't you, you trust me?In a week that saw the release of the 3,000 page Abuse in Care report Christopher Luxon was being asked about Boot Camps. ...
TL;DR: The podcast above of the weekly ‘hoon’ webinar for paying subscribers last night features co-hosts and talking about the Royal Commission Inquiry into Abuse in Carereport released this week, and with:The Kākā’s climate correspondent on a UN push to not recognise carbon offset markets and ...
TL;DR: As of 6:00 am on Friday, July 26, the top six announcements, speeches, reports and research around housing, climate and poverty in Aotearoa’s political economy in the last day are:Transport: Simeon Brown announced$802.9 million in funding for 18 new trains on the Wairarapa and Manawatū rail lines, which ...
The northern expressway extension from Warkworth to Whangarei is likely to require radical changes to legislation if it is going to be built within the foreseeable future. The Government’s powers to purchase land, the planning process and current restrictions on road tolling are all going to need to be changed ...
Text within this block will maintain its original spacing when publishedFirst they came for the doctors But I was confused by the numbers and costs So I didn't speak up Then they came for our police and nurses And I didn't think we could afford those costs anyway So I ...
Photo by Joshua J. Cotten on UnsplashWe’re back again after our mid-winter break. We’re still with the ‘new’ day of the week (Thursday rather than Friday) when we have our ‘hoon’ webinar with paying subscribers to The Kākā for an hour at 5 pm.Jump on this link on YouTube Livestream ...
Notes: This is a free article. Abuse in Care themes are mentioned. Video is at the bottom.BackgroundYesterday’s report into Abuse in Care revealed that at least 1 in 3 of all who went through state and faith based care were abused - often horrifically. At least, because not all survivors ...
Luxon speaks in Parliament yesterday about the Abuse in Care report. Photo: Hagen Hopkins/Getty ImagesTL;DR: The top six things I’ve noted around housing, climate and poverty in Aotearoa’s political economy today are:PM Christopher Luxon said yesterday in tabling the Abuse in Carereport in Parliament he wanted to ‘do the ...
About a decade ago I worked with a bloke called Steve. He was the grizzled veteran coder, a few years older than me, who knew where the bodies were buried - code wise. Despite his best efforts to be approachable and friendly he could be kind of gruff, through to ...
Some of the recent announcements from the government have reminded us of posts we’ve written in the past. Here’s one from early 2020. There were plenty of reactions to the government’s infrastructure announcement a few weeks ago which saw them fund a bunch of big roading projects. One of ...
TL;DR: My pick of the top six links elsewhere around housing, climate and poverty in Aotearoa’s political economy in the last day or so to 7:00 am on Thursday, July 25 are:News: Why Electric Kiwi is closing to new customers - and why it matters RNZ’s Susan EdmundsScoop: Government drops ...
Hi,I felt a small wet tongue snaking through one of the holes in my Crocs. It explored my big toe, darting down one side, then the other. “He’s looking for some toe cheese,” said the woman next to me, words that still haunt me to this day.Growing up in New ...
Yesterday I happily quoted the Prime Minister without fact-checking him and sure enough, it turns out his numbers were all to hell. It’s not four kg of Royal Commission report, it’s fourteen.My friend and one-time colleague-in-comms Hazel Phillips gently alerted me to my error almost as soon as I’d hit ...
TL;DR: As of 6:00 am on Thursday, July 25, the top six announcements, speeches, reports and research around housing, climate and poverty in Aotearoa’s political economy in the last day were:The Abuse in Care Royal Commission of Inquirypublished its final report yesterday.PM Christopher Luxon and The Minister responsible for ...
The Official Information Act has always been a battle between requesters seeking information, and governments seeking to control it. Information is power, so Ministers and government agencies want to manage what is released and when, for their own convenience, and legality and democracy be damned. Their most recent tactic for ...
TL;DR: The top six things I’ve noted around housing, climate and poverty in Aotearoa’s political economy today are:Transport and Energy Minister Simeon Brown is accelerating plans to spend at least $10 billion through Public Private Partnerships (PPPs) to extend State Highway One as a four-lane ‘Expressway’ from Warkworth to Whangarei ...
I live my life (woo-ooh-ooh)With no control in my destinyYea-yeah, yea-yeah (woo-ooh-ooh)I can bleed when I want to bleedSo come on, come on (woo-ooh-ooh)You can bleed when you want to bleedYea-yeah, come on (woo-ooh-ooh)Everybody bleed when they want to bleedCome on and bleedGovernments face tough challenges. Selling unpopular decisions to ...
Please note:To skip directly to the- parliamentary footage in the video, scroll to 1:21 To skip to audio please click on the headphone iconon the left hand side of the screenThis video / audio section is under development. ...
Given the crackdown on wasteful government spending, it behooves me to point to a high profile example of spending by the Luxon government that looks like a big, fat waste of time and money. I’m talking about the deployment of NZDF personnel to support the US-led coalition in the Red ...
TL;DR: My pick of the top six links elsewhere around housing, climate and poverty in Aotearoa’s political economy in the last day or so to 7:40 am on Wednesday, July 24 are:Deep Dive: Chipping away at the housing crisis, including my comments RNZ/Newsroom’s The DetailNews: Government softens on asset sales, ...
As I reported about the city centre, Auckland’s rail network is also going through a difficult and disruptive period which is rapidly approaching a culmination, this will result in a significant upgrade to the whole network. Hallelujah. Also like the city centre this is an upgrade predicated on the City ...
Today, a 4 kilogram report will be delivered to Parliament. We know this is what the report of the Royal Commission of Inquiry into Abuse in State and Faith-based Care weighs, because our Prime Minister told us so.Some reporter had blindsided him by asking a question about something done by ...
TL;DR: As of 7:00 am on Wednesday, July 24, the top six announcements, speeches, reports and research around housing, climate and poverty in Aotearoa’s political economy in the last day are:Beehive:Transport Minister Simeon Brownannounced plans to use PPPs to fund, build and run a four-lane expressway between Auckland ...
NewstalkZB host Mike Hosking, who can usually be relied on to give Prime Minister Christopher Luxon an easy run, did not do so yesterday when he interviewed him about the HealthNZ deficit. Luxon is trying to use a deficit reported last year by HealthNZ as yet another example of the ...
Back in January a StatsNZ employee gave a speech at Rātana on behalf of tangata whenua in which he insulted and criticised the government. The speech clearly violated the principle of a neutral public service, and StatsNZ started an investigation. Part of that was getting an external consultant to examine ...
Renting for life: Shared ownership initiatives are unlikely to slow the slide in home ownership by much. Photo: Lynn Grieveson / The KākāTL;DR: The top six things I’ve noted around housing, climate and poverty in Aotearoa’s political economy today are:A Deloittereport for Westpac has projected Aotearoa’s home-ownership rate will ...
You're broken down and tiredOf living life on a merry go roundAnd you can't find the fighterBut I see it in you so we gonna walk it outAnd move mountainsWe gonna walk it outAnd move mountainsAnd I'll rise upI'll rise like the dayI'll rise upI'll rise unafraidI'll rise upAnd I'll ...
There’s been a change in Myers Park. Down the steps from St. Kevin’s Arcade, past the grassy slopes, the children’s playground, the benches and that goat statue, there has been a transformation. The underpass for Mayoral Drive has gone from a barren, grey, concrete tunnel, to a place that thrums ...
This is a re-post from Yale Climate Connections Global society may have finally slammed on the brakes for climate-warming pollution released by human fossil fuel combustion. According to the Carbon Monitor Project, the total global climate pollution released between February and May 2024 declined slightly from the amount released during the same ...
TL;DR: My pick of the top six links elsewhere around housing, climate and poverty in Aotearoa’s political economy in the last day or so to 7:00 am on Tuesday, July 23 are:Deep Dive: Penlink: where tolling rhetoric meets reality BusinessDesk-$$$’sOliver LewisScoop:Te Pūkenga plans for regional polytechs leak out ...
TL;DR: As of 6:00 am on Tuesday, July 23, the top six announcements, speeches, reports and research around housing, climate and poverty in Aotearoa’s political economy in the last day are:Health: Shane Reti announcedthe Board of Te Whatu Ora-Health New Zealand was being replaced with Commissioner Lester Levy ...
Health NZ warned the Government at the end of March that it was running over Budget. But the reasons it gave were very different to those offered by the Prime Minister yesterday. Prime Minister Christopher Luxon blamed the “botched merger” of the 20 District Health Boards (DHBs) to create Health ...
Long ReadKey Summary: Although National increased the health budget by $1.4 billion in May, they used an old funding model to project health system costs, and never bothered to update their pre-election numbers. They were told during the Health Select Committees earlier in the year their budget amount was deficient, ...
As a momentous, historic weekend in US politics unfolded, analysts and commentators grasped for precedents and comparisons to help explain the significance and power of the choice Joe Biden had made. The 46th president had swept the Democratic party’s primaries but just over 100 days from the election had chosen ...
TL;DR: I’m casting around for new ideas and ways of thinking about Aotearoa’s political economy to find a few solutions to our cascading and self-reinforcing housing, poverty and climate crises.Associate Professor runs an online masters degree in the economics of sustainability at Torrens University in Australia and is organising ...
The Finance and Expenditure Committee has reported back on National's Local Government (Water Services Preliminary Arrangements) Bill. The bill sets up water for privatisation, and was introduced under urgency, then rammed through select committee with no time even for local councils to make a proper submission. Naturally, national's select committee ...
Some years ago, I bought a book at Dunedin’s Regent Booksale for $1.50. As one does. Vandrad the Viking (1898), by J. Storer Clouston, is an obscure book these days – I cannot find a proper online review – but soon it was sitting on my shelf, gathering dust alongside ...
History is not on the side of the centre-left, when Democratic presidents fall behind in the polls and choose not to run for re-election. On both previous occasions in the past 75 years (Harry Truman in 1952, Lyndon Johnson in 1968) the Democrats proceeded to then lose the White House ...
This is a free articleCoverageThis morning, US President Joe Biden announced his withdrawal from the Presidential race. And that is genuinely newsworthy. Thanks for your service, President Biden, and all the best to you and yours.However, the media in New Zealand, particularly the 1News nightly bulletin, has been breathlessly covering ...
A homeless person’s camp beside a blocked-off slipped damage walkway in Freeman’s Bay: we are chasing our tail on our worsening and inter-related housing, poverty and climate crises. Photo: Photo: Lynn Grieveson / The KākāTL;DR: The top six things I’ve noted around housing, climate and poverty in Aotearoa’s political economy ...
What has happened to it all?Crazy, some'd sayWhere is the life that I recognise?(Gone away)But I won't cry for yesterdayThere's an ordinary worldSomehow I have to findAnd as I try to make my wayTo the ordinary worldYesterday morning began as many others - what to write about today? I began ...
TL;DR: My pick of the top six links elsewhere around housing, climate and poverty in Aotearoa’s political economy in the last day or so to 7:00 am on Monday, July 22 are:Today’s Must Read: Father and son live in a tent, and have done for four years, in a million ...
TL;DR: As of 7:00 am on Monday, July 22, the top six announcements, speeches, reports and research around housing, climate and poverty in Aotearoa’s political economy in the last day are:US President Joe Biden announced via X this morning he would not stand for a second term.Multinational professional services firm ...
A listing of 32 news and opinion articles we found interesting and shared on social media during the past week: Sun, July 14, 2024 thru Sat, July 20, 2024. Story of the week As reflected by preponderance of coverage, our Story of the Week is Project 2025. Until now traveling ...
This weekend, a friend pointed out someone who said they’d like to read my posts, but didn’t want to pay. And my first reaction was sympathy.I’ve already told folks that if they can’t comfortably subscribe, and would like to read, I’d be happy to offer free subscriptions. I don’t want ...
National: The Party of ‘Law and Order’ IntroductionThis weekend, the Government formally kicked off one of their flagship policy programs: a military style boot camp that New Zealand has experimented with over the past 50 years. Cartoon credit: Guy BodyIt’s very popular with the National Party’s Law and Orderimage, ...
Day one of the solo leg of my long journey home begins with my favourite sound: footfalls in an empty street. 5.00 am and it’s already light and already too warm, almost.If I can make the train that leaves Budapest later this hour I could be in Belgrade by nightfall; ...
Do you remember Y2K, the threat that hung over humanity in the closing days of the twentieth century? Horror scenarios of planes falling from the sky, electronic payments failing and ATMs refusing to dispense cash. As for your VCR following instructions and recording your favourite show - forget about it.All ...
Climate Change Minister Simon Watts being questioned by The Kākā’s Bernard Hickey.TL;DR: My top six things to note around housing, climate and poverty in Aotearoa’s political economy in the week to July 20 were:1. A strategy that fails Zero Carbon Act & Paris targetsThe National-ACT-NZ First Coalition Government finally unveiled ...
Summary:As New Zealand loses at least 12 leaders in the public service space of health, climate, and pharmaceuticals, this month alone, directly in response to the Government’s policies and budget choices, what lies ahead may be darker than it appears. Tui examines some of those departures and draws a long ...
The Minister of Housing’s ambition is to reduce markedly the ratio of house prices to household incomes. If his strategy works it would transform the housing market, dramatically changing the prospects of housing as an investment.Leaving aside the Minister’s metaphor of ‘flooding the market’ I do not see how the ...
As previously noted, my historical fantasy piece, set in the fifth-century Mediterranean, was accepted for a Pirate Horror anthology, only for the anthology to later fall through. But in a good bit of news, it turned out that the story could indeed be re-marketed as sword and sorcery. As of ...
An employee of tobacco company Philip Morris International demonstrates a heated tobacco device. Photo: Getty ImagesTL;DR: The top six things I’ve noted around housing, climate and poverty in Aotearoa’s political economy on Friday, July 19 are:At a time when the Coalition Government is cutting spending on health, infrastructure, education, housing ...
TL;DR: My pick of the top six links elsewhere around housing, climate and poverty in Aotearoa’s political economy in the last day or so to 8:30 am on Friday, July 19 are:Scoop: NZ First Minister Casey Costello orders 50% cut to excise tax on heated tobacco products. The minister has ...
Kia ora, it’s time for another Friday roundup, in which we pull together some of the links and stories that caught our eye this week. Feel free to add more in the comments! Our header image this week shows a foggy day in Auckland town, captured by Patrick Reynolds. ...
TL;DR : Here’s the top six items climate news for Aotearoa this week, as selected by Bernard Hickey and The Kākā’s climate correspondent Cathrine Dyer. A discussion recorded yesterday is in the video above and the audio of that sent onto the podcast feed.The Government released its draft Emissions Reduction ...
Save some money, get rich and old, bring it back to Tobacco Road.Bring that dynamite and a crane, blow it up, start all over again.Roll up. Roll up. Or tailor made, if you prefer...Whether you’re selling ciggies, digging for gold, catching dolphins in your nets, or encouraging folks to flutter ...
Waiting In The Wings:For truly, if Trump is America’s un-assassinated Caesar, then J.D. Vance is America’s Octavian, the Republic’s youthful undertaker – and its first Emperor.DONALD TRUMP’S SELECTION of James D. Vance as his running-mate bodes ill for the American republic. A fervent supporter of Viktor Orban, the “illiberal” prime ...
TL;DR: As of 6:00 am on Friday, July 19, the top six announcements, speeches, reports and research around housing, climate and poverty in Aotearoa’s political economy in the last day are:The PSAannounced the Employment Relations Authority (ERA) had ruled in the PSA’s favour in its case against the Ministry ...
Te Rangi e tu nei (The sky above us) Te Papa e takoto nei (The land beneath us) Tatou katoa te hunga ora (To us all the living) Tena koutou katoa (Greetings) ...
A late change to charter school legislation will cheat educators out of fair pay and negotiating power proving charter schools are just a vehicle to make profit out of our education system. ...
In 2004 te iwi Māori rallied against the Crown’s attempt to confiscate our coastlines and moana with the Foreshore and Seabed Act. This led to the largest hīkoi of a generation and the birth of Te Pāti Māori. 20 years later, history is repeating itself. Today the government has announced ...
It has been five and a half years since the Royal Commission of Inquiry into Abuse in Care was established to investigate the abuse of children, young people, and vulnerable adults within state and faith-based institutions. Yesterday, the final report - Whanaketia through pain and trauma, from darkness to light ...
The Green Party is calling on the Government to take action off the back of the International Court of Justice ruling on Israel’s illegal occupation of Palestine. ...
On Friday the International Court of Justice reaffirmed what Palestinian’s have been telling us for decades: that the occupation and colonisation of Palestinian lands by Israel is illegal and must end immediately. They also called for reparations for Palestinian’s who have lived under Israeli occupation since it began in 1967. ...
Labour calls on the Government to act after the International Court of Justice (ICJ) ruled that Israel’s occupation of Palestinian Territories is illegal. ...
The 53.7 percent rise in benefit sanctions over the last year is more proof of this Government’s disdain for our communities most in need of support. ...
Aotearoa could be a country where every child grows up feeling safe, loved and with a sense of belonging in their whānau and community. But for some of our children, this is far from reality. Instead, they are trapped in a maze of intergenerational harm that they can’t escape on ...
Te Pāti Māori are calling for David Seymour to resign as Associate Health Minister in response to his call for Pharmac to ignore the Treaty of Waitangi. “This announcement is just another example of the government’s anti-Tiriti, anti-Māori agenda.” Said Co-leader and spokesperson for health, Debbie Ngarewa-Packer. “Seymour thinks it ...
The soaring price of renting is driving the rise of inflation in this country - with latest figures from Stats NZ showing rents are up 4.8 per cent on average while annual inflation is at 3.3 per cent. ...
National’s Emissions Reduction Plan will take New Zealand further from the economy we need to ensure the next generation has a stable climate and secure livelihoods. ...
Following consultation with named parties and thorough consideration of privacy interests, the Green Party is in a position to release the Executive Summary of the final report from the independent investigation into Darleen Tana. ...
Prime Minister Christopher Luxon should be asking serious questions of his Minister for Resources Shane Jones now it’s been revealed he misled the public about a dinner with mining companies that he didn’t declare and said wasn’t pre-arranged. ...
Te Pāti Māori have submitted to the Justice Select Committee against the Sentencing (Reinstating Three Strikes) Amendment Bill. The bill will further entrench racism in our justice system and fails to focus on rehabilitation. “Reinstating Three Strikes will empower a systematically racist system and exacerbate the overrepresentation of Māori in ...
The Transport and Infrastructure Committee is set to make a determination on the Residential Tenancies Amendment (RTA) Bill in the coming weeks. “This legislation will give landlords the power to kick our whānau out onto the street for no reason” said Housing spokesperson, Mariameno Kapa-Kingi. “Their solution to the housing ...
“National’s campaign was about tackling crime and the best they can do is a two-year long Ministerial Advisory Group,” Labour justice spokesperson Duncan Webb said. ...
“There are more examples of charter schools failing their students than there are success stories. The coalition Government is driving to dismantle our public school system and instead promote a privatised, competitive structure that puts profits before kids,” Jan Tinetti said. ...
“This government is choosing to deliberately mislead and withhold information, keeping our people in the dark about this government’s agenda and the future of our mokopuna,” said co-leader and spokesperson for Health, Debbie Ngarewa-Packer. The call comes after the demand from the Chief Ombudsman that Associate Minister of Health, Casey ...
“Today’s climate announcement by Simon Watts makes clear the National Government is simply paying lip service to meeting its climate change targets,” Megan Woods said. ...
National is choosing to make life harder for workers by taking away the rights our communities have fought hard for. Here's how they’re taking workers backwards. ...
Australia, Canada and New Zealand today issued the following statement on the need for an urgent ceasefire in Gaza and the risk of expanded conflict between Hizballah and Israel. The situation in Gaza is catastrophic. The human suffering is unacceptable. It cannot continue. We remain unequivocal in our condemnation of ...
Attorney-General Judith Collins today reminded all State and faith-based institutions of their legal obligation to preserve records relevant to the safety and wellbeing of those in its care. “The Abuse in Care Inquiry’s report has found cases where records of the most vulnerable people in State and faith‑based institutions were ...
Minister of Internal Affairs Brooke van Velden says the Government’s online safety website for children and young people has reached one million page views. “It is great to see so many young people and their families accessing the site Keep It Real Online to learn how to stay safe online, and manage ...
Tēnā tātou katoa, Ngā mihi te rangi, ngā mihi te whenua, ngā mihi ki a koutou, kia ora mai koutou. Thank you for the opportunity to be here and the invitation to speak at this 50th anniversary conference. I acknowledge all those who have gone before us and paved the ...
New Zealand’s payroll providers have successfully prepared to ensure 3.5 million individuals will, from Wednesday next week, be able to keep more of what they earn each pay, says Finance Minister Nicola Willis and Revenue Minister Simon Watts. “The Government's tax policy changes are legally effective from Wednesday. Delivering this tax ...
An experimental vineyard which will help futureproof the wine sector has been opened in Blenheim by Associate Regional Development Minister Mark Patterson. The covered vineyard, based at the New Zealand Wine Centre – Te Pokapū Wāina o Aotearoa, enables controlled environmental conditions. “The research that will be produced at the Experimental ...
The Coalition Government has confirmed the indicative regional breakdown of North Island Weather Event (NIWE) funding for state highway recovery projects funded through Budget 2024, Transport Minister Simeon Brown says. “Regions in the North Island suffered extensive and devastating damage from Cyclone Gabrielle and the 2023 Auckland Anniversary Floods, and ...
Indonesia’s Foreign Minister, Retno Marsudi, will visit New Zealand next week, Foreign Minister Winston Peters has announced. “Indonesia is important to New Zealand’s security and economic interests and is our closest South East Asian neighbour,” says Mr Peters, who is currently in Laos to engage with South East Asian partners. ...
He aha te kai a te rangatira? He kōrero, he kōrero, he kōrero. The government has reaffirmed its commitment to supporting the aspirations of Ngāti Maniapoto, Minister for Māori Development Tama Potaka says. “My thanks to Te Nehenehenui Trust – Ngāti Maniapoto for bringing their important kōrero to a ministerial ...
Transport Minister Simeon Brown has thanked outgoing Chair of the Civil Aviation Authority, Janice Fredric, for her service to the board.“I have received Ms Fredric’s resignation from the role of Chair of the Civil Aviation Authority,” Mr Brown says.“On behalf of the Government, I want to thank Ms Fredric for ...
The Government is proposing legislation to overturn a Court of Appeal decision and amend the Marine and Coastal Area Act in order to restore Parliament’s test for Customary Marine Title, Treaty Negotiations Minister Paul Goldsmith says. “Section 58 required an applicant group to prove they have exclusively used and occupied ...
Regulation Minister David Seymour says that opposition parties have united in bad faith, opposing what they claim are ‘dangerous changes’ to the Early Childhood Education sector, despite no changes even being proposed yet. “Issues with affordability and availability of early childhood education, and the complexity of its regulation, has led ...
After receiving more than 740 submissions in the first 20 days, Regulation Minister David Seymour is asking the Ministry for Regulation to extend engagement on the early childhood education regulation review by an extra two weeks. “The level of interest has been very high, and from the conversations I’ve been ...
The Coalition Government is investing $802.9 million into the Wairarapa and Manawatū rail lines as part of a funding agreement with the NZ Transport Agency (NZTA), KiwiRail, and the Greater Wellington and Horizons Regional Councils to deliver more reliable services for commuters in the lower North Island, Transport Minister Simeon ...
Local Government Minister Simeon Brown has announced his intention to appoint a Crown Manager to both Hawke’s Bay Regional and Wairoa District Councils to speed up the delivery of flood protection work in Wairoa."Recent severe weather events in Wairoa this year, combined with damage from Cyclone Gabrielle in 2023 have ...
Mr Speaker, this is a day that many New Zealanders who were abused in State care never thought would come. It’s the day that this Parliament accepts, with deep sorrow and regret, the Report of the Royal Commission of Inquiry into Abuse in Care. At the heart of this report are the ...
For the first time, the Government is formally acknowledging some children and young people at Lake Alice Psychiatric Hospital experienced torture. The final report of the Royal Commission of Inquiry into Abuse in State and Faith-based Care “Whanaketia – through pain and trauma, from darkness to light,” was tabled in Parliament ...
The Government has acknowledged the nearly 2,400 courageous survivors who shared their experiences during the Royal Commission of Inquiry into Historical Abuse in State and Faith-Based Care. The final report from the largest and most complex public inquiry ever held in New Zealand, the Royal Commission Inquiry “Whanaketia – through ...
With a week to go before hard-working New Zealanders see personal income tax relief for the first time in fourteen years, 513,000 people have used the Budget tax calculator to see how much they will benefit, says Finance Minister Nicola Willis. “Tax relief is long overdue. From next Wednesday, personal income ...
Workplace Relations and Safety Minister Brooke van Velden says a bill that has passed its first reading will improve parental leave settings and give non-biological parents more flexibility as primary carer for their child. The Regulatory Systems Amendment Bill (No3), passed its first reading this morning. “It includes a change ...
Two Bills designed to improve regulation and make it easier to do business have passed their first reading in Parliament, says Economic Development Minister Melissa Lee. The Regulatory Systems (Economic Development) Amendment Bill and Regulatory Systems (Immigration and Workforce) Amendment Bill make key changes to legislation administered by the Ministry ...
New legislation paves the way for greater competition in sectors such as banking and electricity, Commerce and Consumer Affairs Minister Andrew Bayly says. “Competitive markets boost productivity, create employment opportunities and lift living standards. To support competition, we need good quality regulation but, unfortunately, a recent OECD report ranked New ...
Minister of Internal Affairs Brooke van Velden says lotteries for charitable purposes, such as those run by the Heart Foundation, Coastguard NZ, and local hospices, will soon be allowed to operate online permanently. “Under current laws, these fundraising lotteries are only allowed to operate online until October 2024, after which ...
The Coalition Government is accelerating work on the new four-lane expressway between Auckland and Whangārei as part of its Roads of National Significance programme, with an accelerated delivery model to deliver this project faster and more efficiently, Transport Minister Simeon Brown says. “For too long, the lack of resilient transport connections ...
Sir Don McKinnon will travel to Viet Nam this week as a Special Envoy of the Government, Foreign Minister Winston Peters has announced. “It is important that the Government give due recognition to the significant contributions that General Secretary Nguyen Phu Trong made to New Zealand-Viet Nam relations,” Mr ...
Minister of Internal Affairs Brooke van Velden says newly appointed Commissioner, Grant Illingworth KC, will help deliver the report for the first phase of the Royal Commission of Inquiry into COVID-19 Lessons, due on 28 November 2024. “I am pleased to announce that Mr Illingworth will commence his appointment as ...
Foreign Minister Winston Peters travels to Laos this week to participate in a series of Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN)-led Ministerial meetings in Vientiane. “ASEAN plays an important role in supporting a peaceful, stable and prosperous Indo-Pacific,” Mr Peters says. “This will be our third visit to ...
Construction of a new mental health facility at Te Nikau Grey Hospital in Greymouth is today one step closer, Mental Health Minister Matt Doocey says. “This $27 million facility shows this Government is delivering on its promise to boost mental health care and improve front line services,” Mr Doocey says. ...
New Zealand is committing nearly $50 million to a package supporting sustainable Pacific fisheries development over the next four years, Foreign Minister Winston Peters and Oceans and Fisheries Minister Shane Jones announced today. “This support consisting of a range of initiatives demonstrates New Zealand’s commitment to assisting our Pacific partners ...
Associate Education Minister David Seymour says proposed changes to the Education and Training Amendment Bill will ensure charter schools have more flexibility to negotiate employment agreements and are equipped with the right teaching resources. “Cabinet has agreed to progress an amendment which means unions will not be able to initiate ...
In response to serious concerns around oversight, overspend and a significant deterioration in financial outlook, the Board of Health New Zealand will be replaced with a Commissioner, Health Minister Dr Shane Reti announced today. “The previous government’s botched health reforms have created significant financial challenges at Health NZ that, without ...
Minister for Space and Science, Innovation and Technology Judith Collins will travel to Adelaide tomorrow for space and science engagements, including speaking at the Australian Space Forum. While there she will also have meetings and visits with a focus on space, biotechnology and innovation. “New Zealand has a thriving space ...
Climate Change Minister Simon Watts will travel to China on Saturday to attend the Ministerial on Climate Action meeting held in Wuhan. “Attending the Ministerial on Climate Action is an opportunity to advocate for New Zealand climate priorities and engage with our key partners on climate action,” Mr Watts says. ...
Oceans and Fisheries Minister Shane Jones is travelling to the Solomon Islands tomorrow for meetings with his counterparts from around the Pacific supporting collective management of the region’s fisheries. The 23rd Pacific Islands Forum Fisheries Committee and the 5th Regional Fisheries Ministers’ Meeting in Honiara from 23 to 26 July ...
The Government today launched the Military Style Academy Pilot at Te Au rere a te Tonga Youth Justice residence in Palmerston North, an important part of the Government’s plan to crackdown on youth crime and getting youth offenders back on track, Minister for Children, Karen Chhour said today. “On the ...
The Government has welcomed news the NZ Transport Agency (NZTA) has begun work to replace nine priority bridges across the country to ensure our state highway network remains resilient, reliable, and efficient for road users, Transport Minister Simeon Brown says.“Increasing productivity and economic growth is a key priority for the ...
Acting Prime Minister David Seymour has been in contact throughout the evening with senior officials who have coordinated a whole of government response to the global IT outage and can provide an update. The Department of the Prime Minister and Cabinet has designated the National Emergency Management Agency as the ...
New Zealand and Japan will continue to step up their shared engagement with the Pacific, Foreign Minister Winston Peters says. “New Zealand and Japan have a strong, shared interest in a free, open and stable Pacific Islands region,” Mr Peters says. “We are pleased to be finding more ways ...
New developments in the heart of North Island forestry country will reinvigorate their communities and boost economic development, Regional Development Minister Shane Jones says. Mr Jones visited Kaingaroa and Kawerau in Bay of Plenty today to open a landmark community centre in the former and a new connecting road in ...
President Adeang, fellow Ministers, honourable Diet Member Horii, Ambassadors, distinguished guests. Minasama, konnichiwa, and good afternoon, everyone. Distinguished guests, it’s a pleasure to be here with you today to talk about New Zealand’s foreign policy reset, the reasons for it, the values that underpin it, and how it ...
Last summer when Matairangi burned, Ginny and Tom stood at the window of their lounge, watching kākā shoot skyward from the burning trees. From the distance, they looked to Ginny like pages torn from books and thrown into a bonfire. It was Tom, voice tight, who told her it was ...
Opinion: The Canadian short story writer Alice Munro – winner of the Nobel Prize in Literature in 2013 – died in May at the age of 92. Her work was about “the damage people inflict on one another in the name of love”, Deborah Treisman wrote in the New Yorker. ...
This month marks two years since the most powerful telescope ever built sent its first pictures back to earth. From its lofty vantage point, beyond the moon in orbit around the sun, the James Webb Space Telescope was tuned to observe the first stars and galaxies being born soon after ...
Comment: After Climate Change Minister Simon Watts’ preview several weeks ago, I had some optimism about the Government’s emissions reduction plan. Now I’ve read the discussion document, that hope has been dashed. How can the Government propose a plan that wants to take New Zealand taxpayers’ hard-earned money, and spend ...
Christopher Luxon: hurdles The little man from National jumps hurdles in his sleep. He’s quite good at it in his dreams and even though the reality doesn’t quite match up you have to give him credit for getting up every morning and crashing into the very first hurdle of the ...
Comment: It was a good two hours into the conversation when Tyrone Marks raised the most basic of questions when I first spoke to him in 2017. “They didn’t explain the things they did to me. They never told me why. And they still haven’t. There’s no explanation for it. ...
Madeleine Chapman rounds out Death Week on The Spinoff with a final recommendation. You can read all of our Death Week coverage here. Nothing forces you to reflect on your life and relationships quite like proximity to death. For those whose nearest and dearest have died, there are reasonably obvious ...
Whitney Greene takes us through her life in television, including the TV character she’d like to plan a funeral for and her cow lung catastrophe on The Traitors NZ. “If the phone rings, I have to answer it,” Whitney Greene from The Traitors NZ warns as we begin our My ...
Maddie Ballard reviews the debut essay collection of Pōneke writer Flora Feltham.In ‘The Raw Material’, the longest essay in Flora Feltham’s dazzling debut collection, the author heads out for a run after hours of weaving and sees the world turn to textile. “Pounding along the Parade, I saw the ...
Andy Christiansen, one half of the experimental rock-pop duo TRiPS, shares the tunes inspiring the band’s perfect weekend and new release. “Good speakers, good food, good music, no distractions”: that’s all you need to enjoy the psychedelic stylings of TRiPS, a new band formed by Fly My Pretties’ Barnaby Weir ...
Celebrating our quadrennial opportunity to become experts in a bunch of sports we never normally watch.The games of the XXXIII Olympiad are upon us. Paris will host this year’s showcase of sporting and athletic prowess, which means some late-night and early-morning viewing for us in Aotearoa.But what sports ...
The photograph is striking and beautiful, but also disturbing – a reminder that my love for John was often entangled in shame.The Sunday Essay is made possible thanks to the support of Creative New Zealand.In the spring of 1980, in Dunedin, shortly before his death, someone took a photograph ...
Get to know Babushka, our latest Dog of the Month. This feature was offered as a reward during our What’s Eating Aotearoa PledgeMe campaign. Thank you to Babu’s humans, Jo and Isabel, for their support. Dog name: Babushka (Babu for short) Age: 2Breed: Border Collie X poodleIf rescued, ...
Pacific Media Watch A Lebanese photojournalist who was severely wounded during an Israeli air strike in south Lebanon carried the Olympic torch in Paris this week in honour of her peers who have been wounded and killed in the field — especially in Gaza and Lebanon. Christina Assi of Agence ...
The first report in a five-part web series focused on the 15th Triennial Conference of Pacific Women taking place in the Marshall Islands this week.SPECIAL REPORT:By Netani Rika in Majuro Women continue to fight for justice 70 years after the first nuclear tests by the United States caused ...
Christopher Luxon has joined with Australia and Canada's leaders in voicing support for US President Joe Biden's ceasefire deal between Israel and Hamas. ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Michelle Grattan, Professorial Fellow, University of Canberra The 2022 election brought the “teal wave” into parliament. The next election will test whether teals, who occupy what were Liberal seats, and other independents can maintain their momentum. Joining us on the Podcast ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Ian Musgrave, Senior lecturer in Pharmacology, University of Adelaide Pixavri/Shutterstock A major Federal Court class action has been dismissed this week after Justice Michael Lee ruled there was not enough evidence to prove the weedkiller Roundup causes cancer. Plaintiff Kelvin ...
In The Week in Politics: politicians have to decide what to do about child abuse, Health NZ is booked in for major surgery and Darleen Tana returns. ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Clare Corbould, Associate Professor, Contemporary Histories Research Group, Deakin University Mainstream media are surprisingly muted at the prospect of the world’s most powerful nation being led for the first time by a woman – specifically a woman of colour, Vice President Kamala ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Rebecca Bennett, PhD Student, Associate Research Fellow, Deakin University Last week, a drone delivery company called Wing (owned by Google’s parent company, Alphabet) started operating in Melbourne. Some 250,000 residents in parts of the city’s eastern suburbs can now order food from ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Jonathan Foo, Lecturer, Physiotherapy, Monash University pikselstock/Shutterstock In the next 40 years in Australia, it’s predicted the number of Australians aged 65 and over will more than double, while the number of people aged 85 and over will more than triple. ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Katrina Grant, Research Associate, Power Institute for Arts and Visual Culture, University of Sydney Jonas Åkerström’s 1790 work, Session of the Accademia dell’Arcadia on August 17 1788.Nationalmuseum/Cecilia Heisser Ever wondered whether you’d have a better chance at winning an Olympic gold ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Alexandra Jones, Program Lead, Food Governance, George Institute for Global Health wavebreakmedia/Shutterstock On Thursday, Australian and New Zealand food ministers at state, federal and national levels met to thrash out what’s next for health star ratings on packaged foods. Now, after ...
The Abuse in Care report found many Pacific survivors lost their connections to their culture and language, resulting in trauma that has been carried from generation to generation. ...
In the regulatory review, ECC intends to suggest that ERO focus on curriculum delivery reviews rather than the Ministry, because it’s not efficient or effective to have two agencies with radically different approaches climbing over each other. ...
Te Rūnanga Nui o Ngā Kura Kaupapa Māori invites the current government to work in partnership with them to develop a pathway forward, including the development of a parallel pathway and meaningful policy and strategy for Kura Kaupapa Māori ...
If you haven’t started watching yet, Tara Ward begs you to reconsider. This is an excerpt from our weekly pop culture newsletter Rec Room. Sign up here. In the world of New Zealand reality television, we have many gems in our crown. There’s the delicious second season of the Celebrity Treasure ...
A new poem by Fiona Kidman. The clothes of the dead I did not keep my mother’s furry red beret for long nor the stringy scarves that adorned the necks of my aunts, although I have kept tag ends of gold, the rings and trinkets they wore, the brooches no ...
The government’s announcement that it will re-open the foreshore and seabed controversy by changing the rules on recognising centuries-old Māori customary title for a third time goes against the rule of law and New Zealand values,” Mr Tipa says. ...
The only published and available best-selling indie book chart in New Zealand is the top 10 sales list recorded every week at Unity Books’ stores in High St, Auckland, and Willis St, Wellington.AUCKLAND1 Lioness by Emily Perkins (Bloomsbury, $25) Roarrrr! Perkins’ brilliant, award-winning, Marian-Keyes anointed, darkly funny, long ...
The 2004 Act vested ownership of the foreshore and seabed in the Crown, extinguishing any Māori claims to ownership and causing widespread outrage and protests among Māori communities. ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Antje Deckert, Associate Professor (Criminology), Auckland University of Technology Getty Images Despite the connection between institutional harm and gang membership made clear in this week’s mammoth royal commission abuse-in care report, the government seems unlikely to soften its “get tough on ...
From Lewis Clareburt in the swimming to the start of the rowing – the first seven days of Paris 2024 promise to be big for New Zealand. There are few events that bring the country together quite like an Olympic Games. Nothing quite matches the excitement of getting up in ...
Groundbreaking local science just showed up in the most surprising of places: the season finale of The Kardashians. In the season five finale of The Kardashians last night, several members of the family gathered together in one of their signature empty, cream-coloured rooms to hear test results that had been ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Amin Saikal, Emeritus professor of Middle Eastern and Central Asian Studies, Australian National University The Middle East is on the brink of a possibly devastating regional war, with hostilities between Israel and Hezbollah reaching an extremely dangerous level. Washington has engaged in ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Laura Elizabeth Eades, Rheumatologist, Monash University Lupus is an inflammatory autoimmune illness, where the body’s immune system mistakenly attacks itself. Lupus can affect virtually any part of the body, although it most commonly affects the skin, joints and kidneys. The symptoms ...
A law firm that specialises in working with survivors of abuse in State care is disappointed that the Government fails to recognise that its boot camps can be directly compared to previous boot camps from the 1990s and 2000s. ...
Dying is a natural part of life, like updating your Wof or seeing your hairdresser, but without the word-of-mouth recs that help guarantee a good service. What if we changed that? Dying Reviews received by The Spinoff have had the names of organisations redacted while Hospice NZ collects further data. ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Jonti Horner, Professor (Astrophysics), University of Southern Queensland Mike Lewinski/Flickr, CC BY On any clear night, if you gaze skywards long enough, chances are you’ll see a meteor streaking through the sky. Some nights, however, are better than others. At ...
Despite having no bars or other designated spaces for lesbians, Auckland boasts a small but mighty lesbian museum. So how did it get here? The past 18 months has brought increasing hostility towards the queer community across Aotearoa. Kellie-Jay Keen-Minshull’s anti-trans rally in Tamaki Makaurau last March led to a ...
Poneke Antifascist Coalition has invited Wellingtonians to stand in solidarity with the Kanak people at 12pm today outside the French Embassy in Wellington. ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Peter Layton, Visiting Fellow, Strategic Studies, Griffith University Drones are the signature technology of the Ukraine war. A few miniature aircraft designs were used in the war’s early days, but an incredible array of drones have now evolved. There are different types, ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Mark Slee, Associate Professor, Clinical Academic Neurologist, Flinders University Francisco Gonzelez/Unsplash Migraine is many things, but one thing it’s not is “just a headache”. “Migraine” comes from the Greek word “hemicrania”, referring to the common experience of migraine being predominantly ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Lee White, Senior Lecturer and Horizon Fellow, School of Social and Political Sciences, University of Sydney Australia was slow to introduce minimum building standards for energy efficiency. The Nationwide House Energy Rating Scheme (NatHERS) only came into force in 2003. Older homes ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Steven Sherwood, Professor of Atmospheric Sciences, Climate Change Research Centre, UNSW Sydney The past century of human-induced warming has increased rainfall variability over 75% of the Earth’s land area – particularly over Australia, Europe and eastern North America, new research shows. ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Tony Heynen, Program Coordinator, Sustainable Energy, The University of Queensland A temporary stadium in the Champ-de-Mars, ParisEkaterina Pokrovsky/Shutterstock As Paris prepares to host the Olympic and Paralympic Games, the sustainability of the event is coming under scrutiny. The organisers have promoted ...
A night of karaoke and community in a pub that feels like a memory. You’d barely even notice it, unless you knew to look. Tucked away behind a liquor store on busy Constable Street is the capital’s last great pub. Newtown Sports Bar is an emblem of the pub culture ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Ian Wright, Professor in Marine Geology, University of Canterbury Louise Corcoran/Getty Images The decline in the number of doctoral candidates at New Zealand universities is a worrying sign for the country’s effort to build a knowledge-based economy. Aotearoa New Zealand’s ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Laurie Berg, Associate Professor, University of Technology Sydney defotoberg/Shutterstock Migrant worker exploitation is entrenched in workplaces across Australia. Tragically, a deep fear of immigration consequences means most unlawful employer conduct goes unreported. On Wednesday, however, the government officially launched a ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Vaughan Cruickshank, Senior Lecturer in Health and Physical Education, University of Tasmania Paris is about to host its third summer Olympics. While we don’t yet know what the legacy of this year’s games will be, let’s take the opportunity to reflect on ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Hugh Breakey, Deputy Director, Institute for Ethics, Governance & Law, Griffith University In the wake of the assassination attempt on former US President Donald Trump, there were calls from bothsides of US politics, as well as internationally, to reduce the brutal, ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Keith Rathbone, Senior Lecturer, Modern European History and Sports History, Macquarie University Two high-profile assaults on Australians in Paris have raised concerns about security ahead of the Olympic Games. On Saturday evening, a young woman was allegedly sexually assaulted by a ...
Dying is inevitable and, so it seems, is it costing a lot, writes Stewart Sowman-Lund in today’s extract from The Bulletin. To receive The Bulletin in full each weekday, sign up here.The cost of dying ...
The government took Joyce Harris's first baby and sent her off to a girls' home. Half a century on - and out of oceans of hurt - it asked her to be a mother figure. ...
It’s the deadliest fictional town in the country, but which death has been the most bonkers? Alex Casey looks back at 10 seasons of The Brokenwood Mysteries to find out. Warning: The following ranking story contains famous New Zealand actors appearing to be dead (not alive). The Spinoff has been ...
Water cremation is the biggest thing to happen to the death industry in the last 100 years. Alex Casey meets the people trying to bring it to Aotearoa. Through a set of mirrored doors down the industrial end of Christchurch’s St Asaph Street, death is getting a new lease on ...
Opinion: New Health NZ commissioner Lester Levy is authorised to assume operational leadership – chief executive Margie Apa is effectively relegated to his operational deputy The post All-powerful Levy is feudal baron of a $28b fiefdom appeared first on Newsroom. ...
Dara O’Biain the comedian and t.v presenter tweeted this link to the sharp as CassetteBoy
https://youtu.be/FBpQJ98rR4o
Almost beyond satire.
Didn’t Charlie Brooker write a show with a similar plot …Black Mirror.
https://youtu.be/RHTRVOGJRFA
And Frankie Boyle -http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2015/sep/21/jeremy-corbyn-non-conformist-british-frankie-boyle?CMP=twt_gu
Hahahaha. Hilarious.
Interesting letter to the editor in the local rag this morning hauling ‘opinionist’ Beck Eleven up for her outrageous gender profiling and outright sexism over her recent repeated statements that she “doesn’t listen to old white men”.
She and others such as Michelle a’court have a history of sexism and bigotry based on a persons gender and age.
And of course it is something which goes on around here all the time, by the likes of Tracey (hi tracey)…
The examples of this are so numerous that it has become acceptable to label people on the basis of their gender, race and age. An example of this was on NatRadio a couple of days ago where a young female musician said similar about old white men. The broadcaster let it slide.
It is ok to label some parts of society on the basis of the gender, age and race. Apparently…
… interesting. And foolish because it permits the same labelling in return….. I mean, really, how much value is there in young white women opinions? Or any female opinions, no matter the age or race?
Sound familiar?
yep I feel your pain
I can handle the ‘old’ bit – as it ever was, and even the ‘men’ – although it is based usually upon a duality of gender which is not related to the real world. The one that gets me is the ‘white’ bit – pink, eggshell, vanilla so many choices other than the obviously incorrect ‘white’ – now sure it is shorthand for privilege, so I let it go mainly for that.
marty, your argument fails.. justifying unacceptable racist, sexist and ageist behaviour (which is even decried by the perpetrator when subjected to the same) on the basis that some other people of the same race, age and gender are ‘privileged’ doesn’t fly
at all
the stereotyping continues unabated across all sectors of our population
as always
as always
vto…let it slide…your male chauvinism is showing( not your petticoats)…considering what women have been through at the hands of the male sex over the centuries…these women are survivors…show them some respect and leeway!
really Beck Eleven is a bloody good journalist as is Michele A’Court …as is Tracy!
What disappointed me recently was Michelle A’Court’s greeting David Farrar as a long esteemed mate on Jim Mora’s programme…made me want to puke Michelle
Farrar, the fat jonkey nact PR arse licking humpty dumpty , has been trying to reinvent himself ( his persona) as a mountaineer /tramper /environmentalist…!
He was about to pontificate on the film ‘Everest’ …and I pressed the STOP, NO MORE, I CAN’T STAND IT !…turn off button!
( how about that for a bit of female sexism …against the unctuous duplicitous corrupt right wing PR porcine male ?)
“considering what women have been through at the hands of the male sex over the centuries…these women are survivors…show them some respect and leeway!”
that argument doesn’t fly either chooky.
many many people and societies have been through shit.
this does not give them the right to belittle and abuse others
simple
as for “show them some respect”. Well no. Certainly not for the reason you suggest. Respect is earned – it doesn’t come solely because of your gender. Nor your race or age.
I do not respect a’court, or eleven, for the stereotyping they have indulged themselves in
They are indulging in the exact same behaviour as that they abhor
like children
The thing is respect isn’t earned by white cisgendered men, society already values their opinions and feelings above everyone elses.
It is you that sounds like the child throwing a tantrum,
“The thing is respect isn’t earned by white cisgendered men, society already values their opinions and feelings above everyone elses. ”
Well you see arkie, that is exactly my point with Eleven and A’Court, if you read and think a little more closely on what was posted. They do not value the opinions of white men above everyone else’s. That is the entire point – they have even said they do not listen to “old white men” – their opinions are marked down, not up.
They do not value their opinions, on the basis of their age gender and race. Nothing else.
They are individuals and those are their individual actions, therefore these are not examples of sexism or racism, as racism and sexism are the institutional marginalisation of the women, POC and LGBTQA+.
You sound really bitter and unempathetic.
“as racism and sexism are the institutional marginalisation of the women, POC and LGBTQA+.”
Horseshit
That is but one small part of the racism, sexism book. You are another part, it sounds like.
I’ll be here waiting when you have done the research to back up your eloquent rebuttal.
Keep believing those around you arkie
Keep dismissing those you disagree with.
Obviously the far more important examples of racism and sexism are those which are institutional in nature or those which occur against a minority (because of their more significant deleterious effects). It’s not entirely clear how well vto understands this most important point although he claims to.
Also obviously white males can be the targets of sexism and racism – it’s just rarer and that the effects are less harmful given their current position in our society. It doesn’t mean it’s okay or to be condoned etc etc. However I skimmed a bunch of what Beck Eleven wrote and it seems pretty inane and harmless so I’m not sure what instances vto is referring to.
It sounds like you arkie (as well as vto) are also being very dismissive of vto and making some fairly absolute statements about sexism and racism
Agree with your first paragraph Tim, exactly. Also second. It is the entire point and is not intended to minimise in any way the other forms of bigotry that exist and that are more harmful.
Re beck eleven – this is not the first time, there have been numerous instances but I have no links or the like to establish.
Yes vto but when have you ever been a victim of sexism or racism that has denied you access to work or meant your efforts are significantly less rewarded financially? And when have you been a victim of sexual or physical abuse based on your sex? Or a wrongful target of the police based on your race?
These examples are on an ENTIRELY different scale to taking cursory offence at someone writing ‘i don’t listen to old white men’ in the newspaper, although it’s easy to agree with the point that not listening to people solely because they are old, white and male is wrong. In the grand scheme of racism, abuse and suffering it’s just a very very small sidenote.
assault by way of playing with a ponytail is minor compared to assault by way of rape, yes I agree.
comparing the two is a complete nonsense though and only seeks to minimise situation of the woman who had her ponytail grabbed
A very very small sidenote but still wrong and it should still irk us.
I should’ve said in the grand scheme of sexism, racism and abuse it’s a sidenote. In terms of suffering men have suffered plenty, conscription during wars, for example, but this abuse has been suffered at the hands of other men, while women typically suffer horribly at the hands of men during war.
There’s sexism, racism and ageism, committed by individuals.
And there’s institutionalised sexism, racism, and ageism, committed by groups of individuals.
They involve the same things but differ in extent and impact.
considering what women have been through at the hands of the male sex over the centuries…these women are survivors…
Well, damn! Somebody gots to be giving ’em some money, or somethin’.
“It is ok to label some parts of society on the basis of the gender, age and race. Apparently…”
I think you are confusing identity with prejudice. I don’t have a problem with anyone identifying me as a middle aged white woman, because that’s what I am. What I might have a problem with is say being paid less then men because of that.
I think what you are objecting to is the calling out of older white men by class for their privilge. Unless you can demonstrated that older white (probably wealthy) men as a class don’t have this privilge, your argument fails. Or perhaps you want us all to be colourblind?
I’ve seen ageism here on ts eg ridiculing Don Brash because of his age. And I’ve called people on that in the same way as I do when I see fat phobia or racism or misogyny. But there is nothing wrong with identifying that men like Brash, because of their age, gender, and class, are afforded things that other people in society aren’t. It’s not about women having a go at men, because an analysis could just as easily be about the differences between a 70 year man like Brash compared to a 70 year old man who’s been a labourer all his life.
No weka, I am not confusing the two different things you identify.
Sexism, ageism and racism will not disappear as long as people continue to get stereotyped on the basis of their age, race and gender.
For such a letter to make to The Press I would suggest means that the issue is reaching mainstream. Just like people of a certain political persuasion used to dismiss complaints of racism and sexism, so too are people of another political persuasion now dismissing complaints of racism and sexism.
I think you should do some research on white and male privilege . You’re coming across as the type of person who rails against the ‘racism’ and ‘discrimination’ in affirmative action.
Just to reiterate: White men are 100% NOT victims of sexism or racism.
This is not about privilege
This is about stereotyping and belittling
As for your last line – you need to get out more, that is patently absurd. By definition. Sheesh.
Yes it is about privilege. You are complaining that you are the victim of sexism and racism, assuming you a white, cisgendered and male you are part of the privileged majority, this is what is patently absurd, by definition.
You need to get out more and listen to women, POC and LGBTQA+ instead claiming you are being belittled while you belittle their voices further.
No it is not about privilege.
It is about discrimination and stereotyping on the basis of gender, age and race. That is what these “opinionists” have said. Their words, not mine.
You clearly do not understand feminism, sexism or racism. I recommend that you do some reading, listening and thinking.
Your understanding is too limited arkie
is that all you’ve got?
You clearly have not read the link I posted, you clearly have taken the writing of these women you deride so personally that it has blinded you to your own lack of understanding. I have tried, but many better writers and thinkers have explained why the feelings you are expressing are misplaced, but you dismiss me out of hand and refuse to read them and accuse me of a limited understanding. The irony.
Jeez arkie, do you not see that that is exactly what you have done?
I am well aware of the ideas you speak of and do not need to re-read but they fail for reasons which have been covered many many many times.
The idea that because SOME members of a particular group of people in our society have certain characteristics and engaged in certain behaviour in the past, the entire group is open to justified belittling and abuse does not stack. Do you see where?
Good grief.
You clearly don’t then
And neither do you.
Seriously arkie. Hows about you put all your current ideas and tight subjective definitions and readings to one side for a moment and try stepping into the shoes of the old white man who penned the letter to the editor …….
to answer this …
‘The idea that because SOME members of a particular group of people in our society have certain characteristics and engaged in certain behaviour in the past, the entire group is open to justified belittling and abuse does not stack. Do you see where?’
Well for a start, I do not agree that old white men are subject to belittling and abuse because of what SOME members of the MSM write in their opinion pieces.
Do you not see how tiny this hill you are dying for is?
And secondly why don’t you put aside your anachronistic patronising views and listen to the lived experience of literally billions of women, POC and LGBTQA+?
The irony. It hurts.
Sure. I similarly do not believe that women are subject to belittling and abuse because of what SOME members of society think in their opinion minds
…
and there we are, right back at the nowhere point
the exact reason for posting in the first place
one bad turn begets another
edit” don’t go editing on me mid-reply please..
Why don’t you listen to the lived experience of this one old white man who penned the letter instead of trying to divert away from the old man? Irony for sure
And THIS is why you are wrong, why you do not understand what sexism, racism and privilege are and why you are sound like an MRA manchild.
Why is it ok to dismiss / belittle all of a person’s views solely because of the person’s age, race and gender please arkie?
Your reply at 5.35 crossed over… you do realise the sentiment that went with the comment don’t you? I wonder think not actually. I suspect steam is fogging your vision.
Now back to the subject of the post – the old man and his letter to the editor…
Why is it ok to dismiss / belittle all of a person’s views solely because of the persons age, gender or race please arkie? I would seriously like to know.
This is a straw man.
Now I’m not going to go through this whole thread post by post to convince you because your mind is made up but I will point out what made me join this discussion instead of continuing to ignore it. You began this thread with this:
To start with you belittle her by titling her an ‘opinionist’ when she is a columnist and a journalist. Then you claim that her personal opinion is ‘outright sexism’. This is an incorrect claim and shows your lack of understanding of what sexism and racism are.
You then accuse other women of bigotry and sexism and then try and goad specific members of this forum into engaging with you because they had the temerity to point out your privilege and inaccuracies in your statements in other threads.
Then you replied to the measured and informative responses to your OP by doubling down on your misunderstanding of what constitutes prejudice, sexism and racism.
No-one can explain it to you if you refuse to listen.
No it is not a straw man, it is exactly what happened to the old man who penned the letter to the editor. It is in fact real life.
Answer it if you can
Why is it ok to dismiss / belittle all of a person’s views solely because of that person’s age, gender or race please?
I wouldn’t worry about it.
You’re dealing with privileged middle class socialist whities who’ve been indoctrinated to believe that white males are the root of all evil.
Older white males are the most evil.
There’s no reasoning with such sad, pathetic self-loathing individuals, I just pity them.
So Beck Eleven, Michelle A’Court and others specifically dismissed and belittled this letter writer personally? No, you both object to the personal opinion of Eleven in the statement that she doesn’t listen to old white men. That is her prerogative, it’s her column, you don’t have to read it, it doesn’t affect you other than to challenge the supremacy of opinions like yours. To say that it is bigoted ‘outright sexism’ is where you are so very wrong.
edit:
Ooh look vto, look who agrees with you! You’re in fine company now!
BM it is important.
It is just nasty, shallow and a poor form of human conduct. Much like bullying and the like.
And it is acceptable to the left wing. And they can’t seem to see it.
The old white man who penned the letter sees it though – the wisdom and clarity that age provides eh
Oh, you are there arkie, I thought you were hiding from the question.. let me try again then …
Why is it ok to belittle / dismiss all of a person’s views solely because of the person’s gender, age or race please?
I wonder how long this debate can last…pretty impressive stamina from both protagonists so far.
Dunno Grindlebottom.
Maybe if I ask the question in a different way it might get answered…
Is it ok to dismiss / belittle all of a person’s views solely because of the person’s age, race or gender please arkie?
Looks on track to be won by whoever goes to bed the latest.
@vto
I have explained why this question is a strawman, how the starting point of your whole grudge is flawed. Evidently I cannot make you even consider that you are wrong on this issue. You and BM are welcome to continue your circlejerk but I will not engage you further.
Apologies to all for the length of this thread.
that is a total cop out.
you have explained no such things. What you have done is gone all around the outside yelling in, while being simply too scared to answer the question. Chicken
Once more for luck, in even a further revised version…
When is it, arkie, ok to dismiss / belittle the whole of a person’s views solely because of the person’s age, race or gender?
This is real life arkie, real life. Go talk to Beck Eleven and read her opinions. Go read the Press letter today – it is even the first one up. Real life. Facts.
Is there a glossary for this anywhere? I’m seeing LGBTQA+ as Lesbian Gay Bisexual Trans Quality Assurance Plus, but am sure that can’t be right. I’m also seriously hoping that POC isn’t Piece Of Crap.
LGBTQA+ I think stands for Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, Queer/Questioning, Asexual, the + alludes to other sexual orientations like Pansexual.
POC I think means person of colour.
Maybe I try the question yet another way….
Is it ok to dismiss / belittle all of the views of all members of a particular group of people solely on the basis of their race, age or gender?
There you go arkie, I pulled out the personal element for you per your upthread point. Care to have a crack now?
Positive discrimination.
Thanks for that lefties.
Asexual’s an identity now? What’s next, Mildly Interested But Not Very When It Comes Down To It? Also, I don’t even want to think about “Pansexual” – hopefully they rule out non-humans and inanimate objects?
I wouldn’t worry about it.
You’re dealing with privileged middle class socialist whities who’ve been indoctrinated to believe that white males are the root of all evil.
Older white males are the most evil.
Good to know you haven’t a clue about what the politics are that you are criticising.
For other people reading, it’s not that white, wealthy men are evil (I certainly know plenty who aren’t). It’s that the dominant paradigm (patriarchy, kyriarchy, dominator culture, whatever you want to call it), privileges certain people over others. And that privilege can take many forms from slight to outright evil. White, older, wealthy men get privileged way out of proportion in our society. Men are only responsible for that to the extent that they want to keep BAU which oppresses other people.
(it’s why I as a Pākehā don’t take Māori talking about racism personally, unless of course I am being racist, in which case all power to them not me).
Maybe Michelle A’Court has been sexist and ageist but I doubt it (based on examples vto has given in the past that turn out to be quite different than how he describes them). But even if she has, the politics of domination culture are still sound to everyone except those who want to retain their privileges at the expense of other people.
btw vto, you saying “I’m not confusing identity and prejudice” doesn’t necessarily make it so.
Hi weka, I understand all those points you make (except the ones you make about me…) but it misses my point about Beck Eleven dismissing and belittling people on the basis of their age, race and gender.
“but it misses my point about Beck Eleven dismissing and belittling people on the basis of their age, race and gender.”
AFAIK you haven’t shared what she actually said, so I can only go on previous conversations like this that we’ve had, where when I go and track down the actual comments being objected to I find that the person said something else entirely. Following from that I can only work with the general argument, which is that you appear to confuse identity and prejudice.
I don’t know Beck Eleven’s work, but I have read enough of Michelle A’Court to know that what you are saying is at odds with what I’ve read.
pressreader.com has a copy of the letter to the editor. Sorry, my internet machine isn’t playing ball so I can’t copy the link through ….
Note the letter writer also references previous instances of Beck Eleven doing this. She has a reputation for this poor conduct.
weka, is it ok to dismiss / belittle all of a persons views solely on the basis of their age, race or gender?
Hi vto,
May I have a go at providing an answer to your question? “Is it ok to dismiss / belittle all of the views of all members of a particular group of people solely on the basis of their race, age or gender?”
Of course, I in no way claim to be speaking for arkie – only myself.
I think a lot hinges on the word ‘ok’.
One way of understanding that word is to replace it with, say, ‘rational’ or ‘justified’ (which usually means some evidence-based or logically-based reason for an action).
In that sense, clearly it is not ‘ok’ (i.e., ‘rational’, ‘logical’) to belittle or dismiss what someone says on the basis of their age, race or gender. That is, it’s hard to think of a formal (‘rational’, ‘logical’) reason that would justify that response.
But – of course there’s a but 🙂 – another way of understanding ‘ok’ is to think of it in terms of it being an ‘understandable human reaction’, in the ordinary or everyday sense of that phrase.
I’d argue that it is entirely ‘ok’ – in that sense – for someone to be so frustrated by their ‘lived experience’ of repeated comments from particular groups (perhaps over a lifetime and as reported by other people like them) to get to the point of just saying ‘I’ve had enough! I’m not going to listen to anything that anyone from that group says ever again’.
That seems to me to be a perfectly human and understandable – and in that sense valid – response. It’s ‘ok’.
And when it comes from a member of a group that has, quite objectively, been subjected to just such repeated negative experiences from members of another relatively privileged or more powerful group (men, white men, old white men, traffic wardens, bureaucrats, rich people or whoever) I can well understand the adoption of a dismissive or even a belittling reaction.
So, ‘yes’, it’s ‘ok’ – as in ‘perfectly, humanly valid’ – to (re)act in that way.
By contrast, it would hardly be ‘ok’, in the sense I’ve just used it, for someone who was a member of a group that had relative privilege and power to dismiss or belittle a person’s opinions just because of their gender, age or race.
That’s because it is not a ‘humanly valid’ (or moral) reaction – it wouldn’t make ‘human’ sense. It would be enraging, even. (Imagine a wealthy privileged person dismissing someone’s views just because they were poor.)
Here’s an example to highlight my argument:
Would you say, for example, that it’s not ‘ok’ for a survivor of genocide to dismiss the views of all members of the group who committed genocide against them?
Extreme, I know – although if you look at the history of how women have been treated in many different cultures, maybe not.
But, either way, I think it gets to the heart of things.
As I said, this is entirely my own thinking on display. It is not meant to represent anyone else’s view.
puddleglum, you always have such a good way of explaining your good views.
You are correct in that such a response is probably ‘humanly understandable’ and in that context it is ‘ok’. I would suggest though that that context is relenting to the weaknesses of humans and is a poor route to follow. In a wider good human behaviour context it is not ‘understandable’ or ‘ok’ because such feelings of revenge do not lead to good society. It is understandable but not ok – just like a lot of crime. The old saying of two wrongs do not make a right comes to the fore.
The example you used of genocide – is it ok for a survivor of genocide to dismiss any member of the group who committed the genocide? Well, like your dissembling of my question in order to fully answer, the same is required here..
.. using the naz1s.. if that member was an SS officer then I would have thought, in your context, extremely so. But if that member was just a German then no, not. The link is insufficient.
There must a be a sufficient link I think, to justify such a dismissal. To use a closer example, Beck Eleven may be well justified in dismissing all members of, say, an Old Boys Club which restricted female membership and had a history of mocking females and their endeavours.
… however to extend that to all old white males loses the link and becomes outright stereotyping and bigotry. This is exactly where Beck Eleven sits.
Thanks vto – I always appreciate a response.
I suppose I do relent to the “weaknesses of humans quite consistently, although I think of it as being considerate of the very different lives that all of us experience (tempered by my sense of the power that someone has).
Yes, ti would be better if people were entirely insensitive to the harm that others do to them. But think what that might mean for your own reaction to Beck Eleven.
In your example of the ordinary German unfairly dismissed be a survivor of genocide. I put myself in that person’s shoes and ask ‘how would I like to react’. The answer is that I would hope I would be aware of the experiences that led that person to treat me in that way.
I would take the hit – knowing that it was relatively minor in the scale of things.
That’s what I would hope I would do.
But, of course, I am also a weak human so it may not work out like that.
Very nicely put puddleglum, that is a significant strand in the weave for sure
Let’s not forget that we don’t even know what the letter to the Editor said, let alone what Beck Eleven said. So we don’t know if belittle on the basis of gender, age etc is the right descriptor.
I tracked down the article by Beck Eleven being referred to, and commented here,
http://thestandard.org.nz/open-mike-22092015/#comment-1073453
Columnists like Beck 11, Hoskings, and Garner, who psychobabble about themselves tend to use the word ‘I” many times in their first sentences and are are best avoided.
Michelle A’court is different. She writes about issues- not so much about herself.
We the readers (well me) are maybe mildly interested in the personal opinions of these writers but are uninterested in their personal lives any more than they are interested in mine.
Hi Puddlegum
I like your answer to vto. Not sure if it represents what Arkie would like to see.
Couldn’t connect to your actual comment Puddlegum – the reply button wasn’t available.
Can feel Arkie’s frustration with vto, tho. Sometimes I just give up because the blokes just cannot see what you’re getting at …….. and boy, do those older white males (and younger white males) go on and on about stuff at times which they have not actually experienced . Its blinkin’ frustrating ….. and if you call it sexism, they don’t know what you mean. Cheers Arkie – keep at it !
Jenny, I did not miss what arkie was saying. Those matters are very real and important. What happened is that arkie kept diverting away from the particular and specific matter. It was total avoidance. arkie has still not answered the question raised.
Just because I kept to the post and didn’t divert down the path arkie wanted doesn’t mean I don’t agree the path exists.
And what on earth do you mean “go on about stuff which they have not actually experienced”? Instead of trying to second guess and assume all sorts of things (as arkie did too), why not just read the words written? It was about Beck Eleven’s dismissal of all old white men. It was not about sexism throughout society in all its myriad forms and scales. It was about her and her columns, and the old man who wrote the prime letter to the editor today, together with a couple of other similar instances by other opinionists.
If I might just tag on the end here Jenny. I haven’t had an exchange of views like this for quite a while on here. It is good and invigorating and healthy and believe it or not the ideas put forward by the likes yourself and arkie slot into the mind and whirr away – they have an impact.
But you know a funny thing… when first started bouncing around here I was pretty much solid rightish wing, but after ranting and listening and watching and arguing over a period of time my views were changed by the opinions and ideas around here. There are a coupe of other reasons for it (going back to roots for example) but fundamentally the good ideas around general left wing philosophy convinced and changed my politics….. but here is the funny thing … it hasn’t happened on the matter of the subject at hand. I find the left wing sexist and racist and ageist in particular circumstances such as this, and the arguments and the like put forward over numerous years have failed to convince otherwise, unlike so many other left wing ideas…
there is something in that. Imo.
“I haven’t had an exchange of views like this for quite a while on here.”
I think it is great that others are taking up the challenge to explain the views that are so hard for you to fathom – I have tried a number of times over the years and although we have bantered away it really becomes frustrating, from both sides I’m sure.
@vto
Read the whole thing as it unfolded – and decided I was far too privileged to have an opinion. 🙂
😆
Evidence mounting that Corbynism is a symptom of internal discontent on the Left, rather than a mood for change in the wider electorate…
In the first test of voting intention since Mr Corbyn’s election, Labour have increased their poll rating by just one point, up to 30 per cent. The Conservatives are up two points to 42 per cent, meaning their lead has stretched to 12 points in the ComRes poll.
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/jeremy-corbyn-has-failed-to-gain-labour-supporters-among-the-wider-electorate-poll-reveals-10509394.html
So you went looking for evidence to confirm your personal beliefs and you found some on the internet. That level of proof is only recognised in Psychology.
On that basis most comments on this blog will attract your ridicule OAB.
Oh that’s right, they do.
So regardless of your obsession for trying to make my posts about me, are you are implying that the poll i linked to, and the others in the last week that indicated very similar results (replicated), are not ‘evidence’ that is equally significant for anyone interested in this matter?
I’m not trying to make them about you, Sheep, I am making them about your dubious assertions.
If Corbyn has the long-term strategy he’s been talking about, and given his party’s poll rating has gone up 1% in a week, can I conclude that the UKLP will be on 50% support after another 20 weeks?
Only if I use Lost Sheep’s logic.
you really are a LOST sheep arent you?…sure you havent got scrapies or BSE ?
Hey Lost Sheep-quick If you want more evidence for your beliefs..read the Press article today by an idiot Liam Hehir (how do you get a name like that?) who suggests that Donald Trump is more trustworthy than Jeremy Corbyn because nobody that principled could be trusted to do the right thing.
Funny logic these people have.
Liam Hehir (how do you get a name like that?)
By being of Irish extraction?
Shall we now ask how a male New Zealander comes by the name of Lynn?
(Being of Celtic extraction myself I already know the answer.)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/%C3%93_hAichir
Fair comment. my apologies.
No problemo. I’m just a typical sensitive Celt when it comes to ribbing about such things as ginger hair, freckles, and funny (to sasanach ears) names.
Your usual bollocks, sheepy.
See my comment here for the various Party Support Polls conducted since Corbyn’s Election …http://thestandard.org.nz/open-mike-20092015/#comment-1072585
Labour cuts Tory lead in all four of them.
(You’re comparing the latest Com Res with the last poll by the same company conducted specifically for the Independent on Sunday / Sunday Mirror (early August). However, Com Res conduced another poll in late August (for The Daily Mail), and that’s the one you should be comparing this latest poll with. Same Pollster, same methodology, just different client. So, Labour have, in fact, cut the Tory lead from 14 to 12 points)
You’re also cherry-picking polls. After making recent changes to its methodology,
Com Res has a marked tendency to show bigger Conservative leads than other
major British Pollsters.
So, you carefully chose the one that finds the Tories lead by a significant 12 points, yet the others carried out since Corbyn’s win suggest Labour’s cut the Tory lead to anything from 5 to 8 points.
Notice, too, the increase in Labour’s share of the vote in the 4 local body by-elections carried out since his win.
In the real-life electoral tests that matter, the Corbyn-led Labour Party isn’t doing too badly at all.
See also … http://thestandard.org.nz/open-mike-20092015/#comment-1072579
for the large minority of supporters of other parties who say they are now more likely to vote Labour with Corbyn leading the Party.
You can spin those results around as much as you like Swordfish….but they still don’t add up to any evidence at all that Corbyn has made significant inroads into the current Non Left vote.
At best. I agree the evidence gives you grounds for hoping that it will occur, if that was your hope, just it also suggest there are grounds for believing it will not.
Hmm, you could also conclude that the tsunami of shite sent Corbyn’s way by major media has kind of…didn’t work. Not just ‘holding his own’, but going up a point or two. 😉
No disagreement with your 2nd paragraph – there’s still everything to play for.
But isn’t it great to see that Tory poll lead cut by the Corbyn-led Labour Party in every single poll conducted over the last week or so, despite the tsunami of vitriol he’s had to put up with from some particularly vile pricks in the British media. I can just imagine you punching the air with excitement, lost sheep. Happy days, happy days.
Even if Corbyn’s role is strictly short-term, the fact is he’s already transformed the UK Labour Party from a low-membership elite-driven cadre-Party (just as Blair and Brown had always envisaged) into a vibrant, revitalised grassroots mass-participatory movement (with a membership that’s now greater in number than that of the Tory,
Lib Dem and SNP parties combined). It’s that democracy in action, that power being unceremoniously ripped from the hands of the Westminster elite and their “professional” (but, generally inept) political operators that so upsets the insiders/enablers like the Phil Quins and Prof Tim Bales of this world.
They clutch their pearls in abject horror as those simply ghastly unwashed masses
take over, rudely usurping their carefully cultivated positions of power and presuming to want a hand in formulating policy if you please !!! Scandalous !!!
And, of course, Corbyn’s massively broadened the parameters of acceptable political discourse, realigning the Party with that solid core of social democratic values that continue to animate a majority of British voters. No more spineless capitulation to an increasingly unpopular austerity regime, no more advocacy of a privatisation agenda that’s been deeply unpopular with the British Public for more than a decade now. No more Tweedledum / Tweedledee politics, basically.
Whatever impact it ends up making on the voting public, as you point out it’s what Corbynism means for the Left that is likely to be the more significant immediate question.
I would suspect that Corbynism will turn out to have been ‘organised’ to some extent, by roughly the same groupings of people as organised/supported the ‘Occupy’ movement, and the Corbyn movement reflects both their frustration with current Left Wing politics, and a positive strategy to achieve change through involvement at the Parliamentary level.
If Corbynism succeeds in gaining ground electorally, I predict the Center Left will go with it, and a unified Labour will genuinely shift Left. At that point I will agree that it may represent a major turning of the tide politically.
Even the docile old Left might get down off the fence and show some signs of change here in NZ if that happens.
But if it doesn’t, which would be my prediction purely on the basis that there is no indication of support for a significant Leftist shift among Centrist voters, then I predict that a major schism will open up between the passive Center and an activist Far Left in British politics, including major turmoil in or even a break up of Labour, and ultimately a redefining of the Left into Hard and Soft factions that expend as much energy fighting each other as they do the Right.
So it’s all on the line really. And even if I’m not a fan of Corbyn’s specific politics, i do genuinely agree with you that it is fantastic to see people taking control through democratic action.
So what your saying is that Corbyn now has, on top of a massively increased and revitalised Labour membership, the entire occupy movement with all it’s networks activated and working for him.
That sounds terrible!!
So “your” “analysis” is exactly the same old right wing narrative that predates Corbyn and in fact predates you.
Polly wanna cracker?
To me, OLS is saying: If Corbyn succeeds in capturing the general electorate, Labour will permanently shift to the left. If he fails, we can probably expect a Labour/New Labour schism. Do you not agree?
No, I don’t: even the World Bank and IMF have noticed that “Neoliberalism” is a little bit shit. The precious English-speaking nations can’t be that far behind.
On the TPPA;
Labour, Greens and NZF should be taking the Leadership role and giving Jonkey Nactional ultimatums about NOT signing!
There has been NO democratic process here ….therefore there can be NO signing of the TPPA!
….anything else is a violation of our democracy !…and a usurpation of our country New Zealand!….any such signing is VOID!
This is a civil and constitutional emergency. This should be said in Parliament .
Our MPs were elected to protect New Zealanders and their democracy
’10 days till Groser swallows the TPPA rat?’
by Professor Jane Kelsey
http://thedailyblog.co.nz/2015/09/22/10-days-till-groser-swallows-the-tppa-rat/
“There is now an increasingly active propaganda machine trying to sell the deal.
We will know on 3 October (2 October US time) whether the Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement (TPPA) will conclude or faces collapse. According to a calculated drip-feed of unofficial information, chief negotiators from the 12 countries will resume talks in Atlanta, USA on 26 September, with the ministers now scheduled to meet in for 3 days from 30 September to 2 October, and the chiefs continuing on until 4th….
‘John Key starts softening NZers up to signing the TPPA – check his dramatic change of language’ -by Martyn Bradbury
http://thedailyblog.co.nz/2015/09/21/john-key-starts-softening-nzers-up-to-signing-the-tppa-check-his-dramatic-change-of-language/
+100 Chooky
Groser would sell his grandmother to get TPPA through and we know that it only takes a game of golf with Obama to convince Key to give up the security keys to our country and our future.
Nonsense Chooky, the TPPA needs to be ratified by our duly elected Parliament.
Why do you hate democracy?
If the democratically-elected government isn’t doing what you want, persuade a majority (or enough of a minority) to your way of thinking.
The only thing that the TPPA has to do with democracy is destroying it.
It is the Cabinet that ratify the TPPA, not the Parliament.
http://itsourfuture.org.nz/one-more-time-pm-parliament-does-not-get-to-ratify-tppa/
Thanks for clarifying, Tautoko Mangō Mata – the Cabinet appointed by our duly elected Parliament, specifically.
it is being conducted in secret…the terms are secret…the discussions are secret …the potential outcomes for New Zealand are secret….it has not been discussed in Parliament( except by those who oppose its secrecy)
…that is NOT democracy…are you kidding?
jonkey nactional do not have a mandate from New Zealanders to sign a secret agreement
( as for calling yourself ‘Planet Earth’….are you kidding? (Orwellian Double Speak…right wing PR merchant is more like it)…this corporate designed Treaty will threaten New Zealand’s environment and New Zealanders’ control of Planet Earth’s well being in their own country of New Zealand)
The “discussions are secret”, correct – most negotiations are – but the final agreement to be ratified by our elected representatives will be public.
There is no ratification.
Incorrect, read
http://mfat.govt.nz/Trade-and-Economic-Relations/2-Trade-Relationships-and-Agreements/Trans-Pacific/1-TPP-Talk/0-TPP-talk-10b-July-2015.php
Bullshit Planet Earth …..most negotiations of such importance to a nation are not as secret as these….and jonkey does not have a democratic mandate to sell New Zealand out to corporate interests
Not according to Prof Jane Kelsey
http://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/PO1312/S00148/explanation-of-nzs-treaty-making-process.htm
Wanting something really, really badly does not make a thing true no matter how many times you repeat it (and link to documents that disprove your assertion).
Correct, as per my comment 4.2.2.1 above
Er, no. That proves that what you said at 4.2.2.1 was wrong.
No.
Parliament does not elect the cabinet.
It is the Executive branch of government
You need to read up on how our representative democracy actually works.
Your mistakes are basic fundamental ones. Meaning It’s going to affect all your thinking that is built on that understanding.
It’s kinda shitty, but you’re going to have to go back to basics and unpack the lot.
Five years after ratification. So, still not democratic.
“The method of selection of Ministers depends on party practice. The elected leader of the parliamentary National Party chooses his Ministers and assigns the portfolios. In the parliamentary Labour Party the number of Ministers to be appointed is determined and the required number is elected by the caucus.”
http://www.teara.govt.nz/en/1966/government-parliament/page-7
John Key elected the current Cabinet.
John Key
electedselected the current Cabinet.Ta, Naturesong) FIFMe
Nope. Cabinet is appointed by the PM and has nothing to do with parliament.
OK – Cabinet is appointed by the leader of our democratically elected Government, fine with that?
Nope because it’s still not passed by the majority of our representatives. I don’t think that Cabinet is even a majority of the government.
Our system is not democratic. In fact, I’d go so far as to say that it’s anti-democratic. That it has, in fact, been designed to prevent democracy.
not really. MMP was supposed to give us a more representative democracy but for various reasons that promise has never been fulfilled. The democracy we have is rudimentary at best and open to manipulation. Plus you’re probably not going to get very far arguing that this particular cabinet deserves democratic respect given how much anti-democratic action they’ve taken in recent years.
They may not have your democratic respect, but they do have the NZ people’s mandate. I wonder which they care about the most?
No they don’t:
In other words, the people are opposed to the TPPA – National will sign it against the will of the people and thus undemocratically. Just as they did with the sales of the power companies.
Whatever their donors want. What the people of NZ want won’t even get a mention.
OK, I was referring to the mandate (as expressed by the electorate last year) to enact their manifesto. I’m sure that if the majority are upset enough by this issue then they will vote them out in 2017. You might not agree, but to me that’s democracy.
😆 at manifesto.
‘To further the personal financial interests of members of Cabinet Club.’
I checked their
websitelies prior to the election: “light on policy” is a charitable way to put it.It obviously isn’t. Democracy is doing what the people want and not what the corporations want.
In other words, the people are opposed to the TPPA – National will sign it against the will of the people and thus undemocratically. Just as they did with the sales of the power companies.
And then they rub our noses in it by giving us a referendum for the fucking flag.
DTB 100%
This is an excellent argument for civics to be a required subject at secondary schools.
Verily.
On what we can expect with our health care AKA USA style. The CEO is also a former hedge fund manager.
Drug Goes From $13.50 a Tablet to $750, Overnight
By ANDREW POLLACKSEPT. 20, 2015
Specialists in infectious disease are protesting a gigantic overnight increase in the price of a 62-year-old drug that is the standard of care for treating a life-threatening parasitic infection.
The drug, called Daraprim, was acquired in August by Turing Pharmaceuticals, a start-up run by a former hedge fund manager. Turing immediately raised the price to $750 a tablet from $13.50, bringing the annual cost of treatment for some patients to hundreds of thousands of dollars.
As I have repeatedly said our healthcare is not going to turn into the USA healthcare system due to the signing of the TPPA.
The example you have given is of a company that has decided to go down the track of extreme price gouging primarily because they can in the USA. In virtually all cases in NZ, PHARMAC contract for the supply of a funded pharmaceutical and there is not the opportunity for companies to alter the prices.
As the product is well out of patent PHARMAC would simply choose to organise supply out of south east asia… possibly that’s what they do already.
The TPPA should fail on the fact that there is probably little to no access for our agricultural/horticultural products into key markets (US, Canada or Japan) and due to this little reason why we would enter the TPPA for anything other than wanting to be part of the club.
How do you know? Have you seen the documents?
Opinion.
It’s very unlikely we’ll get any reasonable access to agricultural/horticultural markets in USA, Canada or Japan, these lobbies are hugely protectionist and no one has managed to crack them to date.
and that observation, which i happen to agree with, wont cause Grosser or Key to hesitate in signing
Possibly, we’ll just have to wait and see.
Either way I expect we’ll see the spin Drs working overtime.
as you are
How so ?
you are a doctor and you are spinning
Oh very good, well done.
marty mars…lol…+100 … but is he really really a doctor?…maybe a case of:
I do not trust thee, Doctor Fell,
The reason why – I cannot tell;
But this I know, and know full well,
I do not trust thee, Doctor Fell.
That’s a great little rhyme Chooky.
I still occasionally read Richard Scarry’s ‘Mother Goose’ collection to my daughter and I would love to know the derivation of those old children’s rhymes (the Dr Fell rhyme is one of them).
Very often they have political origins.
Who, for example, was ‘Dr Fell’?
The origin has some interesting resonances with current events 🙂
And I’m not sure if you meant to ‘paraphrase’ but the line is “I do not like thee Doctor Fell”
Fact-based opinion is spin now is it?
Pretty sure that is the exact definition of spin.
Also, I didn’t think the pun was that bad as to be upsetting.
So far as I can tell, NSD shares their honest opinion. Spin would be better described as dishonest opinion.
That’s fair.
But then the pun wouldn’t have worked.
Dishonest opinion is not spin – that is a lie. Spin is believing it imo.
It’s a reasonable assumption given recent news reports.
That is the point, nobody is allowed to see the documents. TPP is against democracy and a fundamental absurdity.
A few individuals about to sign a major deal that the public, law society and nobody else has a right to see prior to signing.
This Government shows how pathetic they are by, signing the ‘great deals’ with Serco and Sky City – already in trouble. Sheepgate etc, – who knows how many other sheep will be flown around the world as bribes by our idiots.
Village idiots should not be allowed the power to sign with the big boys.
And no, agriculture (which we are unlikely to get anyway) is not worth the rest of the country. Surprisingly there are markets out there, like Russia who could be buying our products, and when the big boys fall out with each other as they often do, little NZ can trade with them. Will be more access than be told without being told, no trade by our controlling government for political reasons.
“Village idiots should not be allowed the power to sign with the big boys.”
In case you haven’t noticed that’s how democracies work. If you don’t like the current lot of village idiots you get a chance to replace them with a new batch in a couple of years.
As for the old chestnut of ‘to hell with them lets just trade with Russia’ I would have thought a better position is that we should trade with whomever we want to (within reason).
As for the old chestnut of ‘to hell with them lets just trade with Russia’ I would have thought a better position is that we should trade with whomever we want to (within reason).
…so begs the point why do we need a trade agreement that seems more about stopping free trade and empowering foreign corporations to strip mine assets and taxes and destroy local jobs and undermine health and the environment, than free trade.
A recent case in the US the courts found that water was not considered a fundamental right for people. Is this a society where NZ wants to head and be part of? When we need to consult a 1000 page agreement to be allowed water, and governments are sued when they try to stop people smoking or the gun lobbyists persuade us all we need to arm our selves to the eyeballs to ‘keep safe’ like in the good ol USA.
Look I get that you don’t like the USA, they certainly can be odd and I don’t believe anyone in NZ wants NZ to be a carbon copy of their society and that your suggestions that the TPPA will preclude NZ being able to make its own regulations regarding gun laws and smoking cessation programs is hyperbole.
But the reason NZ is taking part in the negotiations is to see whether there is benefit for us – which there would be with a level playing field in relation to agricultural/horticultural exports – from my understanding the tariffs on these are fairly sizeable in the USA, Canada and Japan especially. It would be negligent not to be part of the discussions and I’m fairly sure all politic parties would agree on that point.
Whether there will be any benefits or an agreement out the back end I’m very doubtful about, as I said somewhere else I don’t think there’s any chance of North America or Japan agreeing to any significant freeing up of access for agricultural/horticultural products so can’t see why we would sign up.
“But the reason NZ is taking part in the negotiations is to see whether there is benefit for us ”
Irrespective of the validity of the rest of your arguments, I think many of us would object to the use of the word ‘us’ in that sentence.
Well it’s your prerogative to object if you want to.
ok. Your argument is ridiculous if you use the word ‘us’.
What word would you prefer ?
“vested interests”?
No, that would be a completely different meaning from what I intended.
As I stated the reason NZ is taking part in discussion is to see if there is benefit in it for us (NZ).
If you are suggesting that they are only doing it is to see if there is benefit for vested interests is I believe overly cynical, which vested interests did you have in mind ?
“As for the old chestnut of ‘to hell with them lets just trade with Russia’ I would have thought a better position is that we should trade with whomever we want to (within reason).”
The wheels have been in motion for some time now for trade with Russia.
There has to be factory inspection and audits, it takes months but will be happening very soon.
Please, no more Ladas.
Really ? That’s interesting, are they auditing our dairy production facilities ?
Save NZ was also expressing an opinion
Sabine posted a link to the same article yesterday.
While I agree that it’s not really a TPPA issue, as it doesn’t actually involve intellectual property as such, it is a prime example as to why capitalism and medecine make uncomfortable bedfellows.
An interesting paragraph:
So, basically, the cocksuckers boosted the price of a cheap and reliable medication that is used to treat toxoplasmosis and malaria, on the odds that they’ll have a decent window of price gouging before competitors can bring out generics and the price goes back down to the ballpark of ibuprofen. A window they’ll artificially extend by controlled distribution rather than intellectual property. All for a drug that is on the WHO essential medicines list and is needed more in the developing world than in the continental USA.
Profits before people’s lives.
the market will fix that…..just hope you don’t need the medication.
as i said, this of course would never ever happen here, cause our hedge fund managers err ponytail puller would never ever do something here to enrich themselves.
never ever
yeah
right
Tui
@Sabine, i believe your comment was that NZ healthcare was going to go USA style under a potential TPPA, I don’t believe there’s any evidence to support that whatsoever.
Funding of services, medicines, distribution and staff is completely different in the USA and NZ, one system is pretty much user pays while the other is pretty much funded via the government.
TPP adds the ability for big pharma companies to deploy lawyers in ISDS tribunals against Pharmac for reducing projected future profits. Also expect to see clauses that force Pharmac to reveal its prioritisation process to said lawyers.
reasonable points
Sigh.. PHARMAC’s prioritisation process is very transparent, just have a look on their website.
In relation to any TPP clause that companies would use against PHARMAC reducing future profits who knows ?
The only thing i would be confident of is the first company to deploy such a maneouvre would struggle to ever have another medicine funded by the government in NZ.
There’s been a number of companies that have tried to go after PHARMAC via lawyers over the years but not surprisingly in the medium to long term (and even usually in the short term) PHARMAC have been the winners.
ISDS has been widely discussed in relation to TPP.
Big pharma are also on record wanting to crack non-transparent parts of Pharmac’s process for many years. Unlike us, not only have they seen TPP, they have had input into it.
Leaked drafts show the impact of both aspects. Believe whatever you want.
@NSD what do you make of this?
Media release: Doctors for Healthy Trade, 11 June 2015.
I’d agree with some of the things George says and take a different view on some of the others.
As an example.
“One thing is certain – don’t expect the industry to play by gentleman’s rules – under the proposed changes, PHARMAC would be pressured to make important decisions within shorter time frames and under more intensive input and scrutiny from industry. There would also be more onerous requirements to release information which could then be used to challenge its decisions through a review process.”
I’d agree with that but don’t have a problem with PHARMAC having to make decisions more quickly, they have taken outrageous amounts of time to make decisions on certain products over the years whenever there might be a financial cost to the pharmaceutical budget. I also find it odd that we can on one hand argue that Pharmac shouldn’t release information on their decision making process (which in my opinion they do reasonably well) while arguing that we should be privy to all of the TPPA decision making process.
“The threat of an expensive law suit hanging over every decision would have an intimidating effect and would tend to make PHARMAC more hesitant about fighting to get the best deals for New Zealanders. The Australians have tried to close the investor-state loophole by explicitly excluding their equivalent of PHARMAC from being subjected to these lawsuits under the TPPA, but for some reason New Zealand has not done the same with PHARMAC.”
Now I’d see this in a different light, in that if this was to be the case PHARMAC would just slow decisions to a snails pace and make the requirements and hurdles to get new medications funded insurmountable. Pharmaceutical companies would still need to come to a commercial arrangement to get a new medicine funded as is the present situation and a situation which happily almost always favours PHARMAC as per their current consultations on funding new Hep C medications.
I guess we’ll all be more in the know if the deal ever goes through….. I still think that’s quite unlikely.
So on the one hand they’ll be forced to make decisions more quickly and on the other they’ll be able to slow access to our portion of the global pharmaceutical market down.
Um, you kind of reinforced Laking’s point there, Doc.
No you misunderstand.
PHARMAC will be able to continue to use their operating procedures and policies to their best interest.
Where they allow products into the decision making process for example when issuing a request for proposals for the supply of new medicines for Hep C as per
https://www.pharmac.health.nz/news/rfi-2015-08-10-hepatitis-c-treatments/
They will be able to move products through faster and the decision making process may be more transparent – although most know what the decision will be based upon.
Where a company is seeking funding for a new product via application for inclusion on the pharmaceutical schedule the process might become more problematic the is currently the case depending on how problematic the company applying for the funding was.
Where a company is seeking funding for a new product via application for inclusion on the pharmaceutical schedule, looking at it from their perspective they’re going to get a smaller return on their investment because PHARMAC.
Take Hep C for example, with 2-3% of global population requiring treatment, it’s a huge market; that PHARMAC can slow access to our portion of it doesn’t strike me as very much leverage.
…especially when you consider the political pressure for new drugs.
I hope the whole thing fails, but our government has already admitted they expect Pharmac’s budget to increase.
That’s partly because they know they are likely to make law changes to weaken Pharmac’s current arrangements as part of implementing TPP in NZ. Hence the weasel words around only preserving the ‘fundamentals’.
Our negotiators have been conceding goodness knows how much in our name, just so a few piss-weak Ministers with daddy issues can say they scored a deal with big ol USA.
And we’ve just seen the PM soften us up about the deal being merely “as good as we can get” rather than good. But hey, we elected these clowns and tolerated opposition parties too disorganised, ego-ridden and stupid to tie their shoelaces.
“Take Hep C for example, with 2-3% of global population requiring treatment, it’s a huge market; that PHARMAC can slow access to our portion of it doesn’t strike me as very much leverage.
…especially when you consider the political pressure for new drugs.”
Yes you’d think that, but time and time again the pharmaceutical companies roll over and do a deal at prices they could only dream of in the USA… it’s odd.
no my comment was just me stating that I don’t trust our current bankers and welfare bludgers in parliament to safeguard our current system that allows us to purchase medication at reasonable and affordable prices.
As for the differences between the US and NZ, they are very fluid and can be changed, and will be changed very quickly if an appropriate agreement is signed.
I do hope that you have a good health insurance, because you will need it in the future.
As for it can’t happen here, i suggest you have a look to see how it happened in the US of A where literally not having insurance will either bankrupt you or kill you.
Because you know what, wishful thinking is just that, wishful.
“As for the differences between the US and NZ, they are very fluid and can be changed, and will be changed very quickly if an appropriate agreement is signed.
I do hope that you have a good health insurance, because you will need it in the future.
As for it can’t happen here, i suggest you have a look to see how it happened in the US of A where literally not having insurance will either bankrupt you or kill you.”
Well we’ll have to agree to disagree as I can’t see the NZ health system becoming anything like the US health system under any agreement the government may or may not enter.
Yes they rob from the poor and the sick to give to themselves.
“So, basically, the cocksuckers boosted the price of a cheap and reliable medication that is used to treat toxoplasmosis and malaria, on the odds that they’ll have a decent window of price gouging before competitors can bring out generics and the price goes back down to the ballpark of ibuprofen. A window they’ll artificially extend by controlled distribution rather than intellectual property. All for a drug that is on the WHO essential medicines list and is needed more in the developing world than in the continental USA.”
Yep exactly, although it’s mainly a useful medicine in patients who are substantially immunosuppressed with toxoplasma than in others. WHO have a good number of alternatives that they source out of India and Asia hence it doesn’t really effect them. Pharmaceuticals supply and pricing in the US is odd (to be polite) hence the number of people that pop over the border to Canada.
Interestingly there’s a product for certain cancers in NZ (carmustine) which the worldwide supplier is trying to do the same thing. Old medicine hardly anyone making it anymore and the Indian company wants to put the price up many many fold around the world.
Fellow doctor here – I obviously agree it’s obvious our system won’t become the USA system overnight because of the TPPA but if you think our health system is safe from National I reckon you’re being naive. They’re just too smart to do too much too soon and get on the wrong side of public opinion.
Little changes add up and I wouldn’t underestimate what ponytail puller and his ilk are capable of – look at what dead pig fucker and his party are doing to junior doctors in the UK. For the past few years they’ve been biting away at the rights of doctors in the UK and getting more confident with every little success – did any of it mean they became satisfied and stopped there? No, now they are instituting a contract which means at least a 30% pay cut for GP trainees and a cut more like 10 to 15% for junior doctors in other specialties by redefining normal hours completely. It may mean the first strike action over there in over 20 years.
All I’m saying is: don’t be complacent.
QFT.
Hi Tim
I don’t think anyone is being complacent, however, having practised in NZ for quite a few decades I haven’t seen any great change in the overall health system in NZ regardless of whether the blue team or the red team is the government of the day.
Re the NHS – from what i understand the ongoing restructuring and bureaucracy involved has turned a bit of a basket case into a potential shambles, although saying that the centres of excellence in the UK are still pretty impressive.
And Lastly from the Pope
Pope Francis will be visiting the US Sept. 23 – 27. In his encyclical, released June 18, 2015, the Pope called for “all sector[s] of society to take actions to protect the environment.” http://nyti.ms/1iY49SM
Pope Francis Continues to Speak Out Against “Free Trade”
“The new colonialism takes on different faces. At times it appears as the anonymous influence of mammon: corporations, loan agencies, certain ‘free trade’ treaties, and the imposition of measures of ‘austerity’ which always tighten the belt of workers and the poor.” http://cnn.it/1KoEbAX
Today a story has broken about a charity trying to help people into homes up North. John Carter (Mayor of the Far north District) was interviewed on RNZ about it just after 8am. He called Internal Affairs “nuts” and mentioned he was on a “loopy rules committee.”
And then, by some huge coincidence Paula Bennett releases the report of the very committee that John Carter (former national MP) was talking about…
http://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/PA1509/S00364/rules-reduction-taskforce-report-released.htm
“The members of the Taskforce also heard loud and clear that there are several myths about rules and regulations that don’t actually exist. This includes the misconception that lolly scrambles have been banned, and that people can’t use three-step ladders.
“By breaking through this misinformation, New Zealanders will be better placed to focus on the serious rules designed to keep people safe and our economy growing.”
I wonder what the report and taskforce cost?
PS Thanks Weka for your comments above. Indeed there is a difference between identity and prejudice
An interesting take on the deeper implications of the Cameron story and how the wielding of power structures work.
“The PM, the Pig and musings on Power by Rob Fahey.
“Initiation ceremonies or “hazing” rituals, often of a painful, humiliating, transgressive or sexual nature, are a well-documented part of the culture of many organisations run by and for young men, especially those from positions of privilege or in elite institutions. …. By committing transgressive acts together, members develop a sense of sharing in a mutual secret, thus instantly creating trust; by overcoming some humiliation or pain, new members deepen their commitment to the group, as their internal logic reasons that if they are willing to endure such an ordeal, it must mean that the group is important and deserving of loyalty (otherwise, they would have made a terrible mistake and gone through all of that suffering for nothing). ……”
http://www.robfahey.co.uk/blog/the-pm-the-pig-and-musings-on-power/
(I bet his mate Key will explain how to dodge the downsides of ridicule as he did with pony tails!)
@ianmac
That is interesting. Thanks
The comments by Rob Fahey are backed up in America by the exclusive Yale “secret society” known as the Skull and Bones club. The Bush clan, including Dubya, his father and grandfather all belonged.
Puddleglum yesterday was very good too.
http://thestandard.org.nz/camerons-political-pork/#comment-1072969. 9.3.1.2
OR everyone has something on everyone else and so they share a mutual fear of being “outed” or revealed?
“OR everyone has something on everyone else and so they share a mutual fear of being “outed” or revealed?”
Probably why Key seems to be so dead scared of Slater, Collins, Williamson etc.
why National doesn’t completely fall about… they all have knowledge of where bodies are buried…
Right, so let me get this straight.
We now have 5 consecutive TV Polls (Colmar Brunton / Reid Research) putting the Opposition Bloc on 50-52% and the Govt/Broad Right Bloc on 48-49%.
Compared to Election Night:
Oppo up around 7 points
Broad Right down 5 points
Lab+Greens up 7-8 points
And a marked change compared to polls conducted during the first 8 months following the Sep 2014 Election.
First 16 post-election Polls = Govt ahead in all but 2.
Last 8 Polls = Oppo ahead in all but 2.
Clearly, National’s support is only holding up because of the near-total collapse of the minor parties of the Right. Meaning it’s 47% is no longer enough to hold onto power.
And yet, once again, (just like a couple of weeks ago with the last Colmar Brunton) the
Dom Post summarises the latest Reid Research Poll findings as some sort of major triumph for National, The whole “defying gravity”/”as popular as ever”/”Key will be pleased”/”Good news for National” meme currently much favoured by the MSM.
Sharp Dom Post readers with only a passing interest in politics may have become a little confused as they got towards the end of the item and noticed the almost-in-passing comment that according to this poll “New Zealand First would hold the balance of power”. They may well have thought to themselves: “Well, hang on a minute, they’re saying National’s as popular as ever and that the poll’s good news for both Key and the Nats and yet surely something must have changed since the last election for NZF to be in a position to hold the balance of power according to its poll support ? I don’t understand, something’s not quite right here.”
The not quite right bit is the journalists lying.
Thanks Swordfish – your analysis is thorough and constant. Thanks for keeping us in touch with reality while we wend our way through the maze of mirrors.
Good work there Swordfish. The Key lot will be very aware of the realities and expect machinations agin the Left to increase.
If the trend continues then won’t it be a surprise to many who only take a passing interest.
But are you counting NZF as part of Oppo – if so, that is problematic surely?
I mean , is it really so cut and dried that Winston won’t go with the Nats if push comes to shove?
Sure BUT National is ruling now without NZF. These polls suggest they would NEED NZF, so they are, therefore, not as popular as pre election.
Yep Tracey.
That’s the crucial point I think swordfish was making – and another excellent comment and analysis, swordfish. Concise, clear and well-reasoned.
Parties who do not have a support agreement of some sort with the government of the day are collectively the Opposition. As you note, that does not necessarily make them part of a future coalition, but then media can hardly just include them on the government’s side either, can they?
Who is in Auckland today and can help?
MEDIA ALERT!
“Making history to help stop this John Key led National Government signing the TPPA!’
Politicians understand ONE thing – VOTES!
Nikki Kaye is a National Government Cabinet Minister – sitting on a 600 vote majority over Labour’s Jacinda Adern.
https://gazette.govt.nz/notice/id/2014-au6200
“AUCKLAND CENTRAL
Candidates Votes Received
ARDERN, Jacinda 11894
KAYE, Nikki 12494 ”
Nikki Kaye is the Minister of Youth.
TPPA – WALK AWAY! Auckland activists plan to collect 2000 signatures in 2 days outside Auckland University,
TODAY Tuesday 22 September and TOMORROW Wednesday 23 September!
TIME: From 12 noon to 5pm!
WHERE: Petitions on clipboards (under a BIG beach umbrella will be available for signing outside Auckland University – corner of Symonds St / Grafton Rd!
Petition wording:
“To the MP for Auckland Central – Nikki Kaye
We, the undersigned state:
That if this John Key led National Government does not ‘walk away’ from the secretive, undemocratic. pro-corporate ‘Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement’ (TPPA), then we pledge to campaign vigorously amongst our friends, families, neighbours and workmates, for the voting public to walk away from National.”
There will be banners / placards / street theatre!
(We understand that PM John Key and Trade Minister Tim Groser may be making an appearance, as they did outside the Titirangi Golf Course on Friday 18 September 2015 – see photo 🙂
http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=11515195
Signed petitions will be presented to Nikki Kaye’s Auckland Central Electorate Office – Thursday morning 24 September 2015.
“The Trans Pacific Partnership deal is almost certain to be done and dusted in the next few weeks when chief negotiators and then Trade Ministers of the 12 countries meet in Atlanta, in the United States.”
Where have we heard THAT one before?
Wasn’t the TPPA supposed to have been ‘done and dusted’ ‘signed and sealed’ in Maui at the end of July 2015?
It ain’t over till it’s over, and a week IS a long time in politics!
Particularly given that the “Hearing of Legal Challenge to TPPA Secrecy set for Monday 28th September at Wellington High Court”
http://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/PO1509/S00277/legal-challenge-to-tppa-secrecy-set-for-28th-september.htm
Hearing of Legal Challenge to TPPA Secrecy set for Monday 28th September at Wellington High Court
The legal challenge to the secrecy of the Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement (TPPA) negotiations will be heard in the High Court in Wellington at 10am next Monday, 28th September.
The hearing coincides with the meeting of chief negotiators in Atlanta, USA prior to a ministerial meeting from 30 September to 2 October, which is being billed as their final meeting to conclude the deal. Those talks are once again being conducted under conditions of secrecy.
The case involves judicial review of the blanket refusal by the Trade Minister Tim Groser to release eight categories of information sought by Professor Jane Kelsey of the University of Auckland under the Official Information Act.
The request reflected information the European Union Ombudsman had just recommended for release in relation to parallel negotiations between the United States and the European Union.
Other applicants include Consumer NZ, Ngati Kahungunu, Oxfam and the Association of Salaried Medical Specialists. …”
___________________________________________________
Penny Bright
+1
@swordfish the same trend is apparent in the msm’s reporting of the economy where all is sweetness and light despite growth heading below 2 per cent and the dollar plummeting
Malcolm Evans aces it.
http://thedailyblog.co.nz/2015/09/22/malcolm-evans-rugby/
Yep!
An interesting list of questions in the House today for Question Time.
http://www.parliament.nz/en-nz/?document=00HOH_OralQuestions
Of the 12 allowed questions, six are exactly the same – ie To the PM “Does he stand by all his statements after almost seven years as PM?”
Q1 and 4 – Little
Q5 – Shaw
Q7 – King
Q9 – Kennedy Graham
Q11 – Ardern
And Q2 from Ron Mark to the PM is the usual wording – “Does he stand by all his statements?”
Hardly coincidence, methinks …..
OOps veuto. Snap
Not sure that line of questioning works well on a psychopath. Still, maybe they’re building up video clips for electioneering attack ads.
I watched those questions and they were useless in the extreme – key was all over them and using them as a way to poke fun and ridicule at the questioner. I have to say, and it sticks in my throat, that key outplayed any one of the many opposition questioners. It may be that we have to find a ‘better key’ to sort this one out – Lange for instance would have chewed him up but noone today looked even in the same league – key was smarmy, smartarsey and I wanted to spit at his jokey bullshit. Mr and Mrs kiwinobody would have fucken loved it.
That’s interesting. Question Time today has 7 identical questions to the PM, Two from Andrew, and the rest from Labour and Greens. Co-ordination?
“ANDREW LITTLE to the Prime Minister: Does he stand by all his statements after almost seven years as Prime Minister?”
Better find the Key claims?
On farming matters…why it is a bad idea for the New Zealand farmers’ cooperative Silver Fern Farms to sell out to the Chinese
Rod Oram discusses the government’s rejection of Shanghai Pengxin’s bid for Lochinver Station and further aspects of Shanghai Maling’s proposal to take control of Silver Fern Farms.
http://www.radionz.co.nz/national/programmes/ninetonoon/audio/201771603/business-commentator-rod-oram
Short version: Foreign investment is bad for the country.
I disagree, BAD foreign investment deals are bad for the country is the point he is making – not even that – there is a very unequal relationship in the 50:50 Silver Ferns farms deals. It is not really 50:50 as the balance of power is to Shanghai.
But there’s no such thing as good foreign investment. As he points out, there is almost no economic difference between a foreign investor operating a business or a NZer (in fact, it’s likely to be a NZer operating it anyway). The only difference is that the profit goes offshore and that is truly bad for the country.
And the IP is transferred overseas, which is permanent bad news for NZ.
+100 very interesting and worth listening too. One to share.
In particular the governments Ra Ra stance on Silver Fern farms not mentioning it is not an equal relationship of 50:50 as the Shanghai Maling gets to control the budget (and therefore strategic direction) and veto the CEO. Not only that as Rod points out, the benefits will almost certainly flow to the Chinese supermarkets where the higher profits are made, and in the short term they can cause damage to Alliance by having the funds to outbid and cripple them to reduce competition.
Rob Oram explains this very well.
Fresh after the leaky building fiasco after the National government ‘relaxed’ building permits to the private sector and let untreated timber be allowed under its BRANZ but somehow do not feel responsible for leaky buildings this little gem..
Government propose to let builders sign off own work
Yes, lets relax standards again, cos it worked so well last time! Lets not forget Pike river ‘relaxed standards’ and CTV buildings ‘relaxed standards’
I really want Dodgy Nactz and A development chums (Penny Webster ex ACT) and Shanghai Central builders signing off their own work!
Auckland already looks like a ghetto in many places, but we can make it so much worse!
Wonder who will pay for the F up’s the rate payers and tax payers per chance?
Local councils unfairly blamed for the cost of building consents: report
Which is, of course, what anybody with half a brain has been saying for years if not decades.
And I suspect that bit’s wrong too considering this:
To me it looks like an inquiry was set up to find an ideological answer and has done so:
All fucken codswallop that will make building quality even worse because we can guarantee that this government will implement those recommendations.
That first link is very light on detail.
Yeah, I noticed that. I went looking for the report but couldn’t actually find it. Perhaps it’s time we made it a mandatory aspect of journalism – reports to be linked.
It’s odd they don’t already, although I guess they could just be cut and pasting from a sparse press release. Still, they could refuse to print it without access to the source material.
Yes, I’ve often thought that if news organisations simply published the press release as the press release (as Scoop does transparently) rather than trying to claim it as a news story then that would be a ‘win-win’ – no criticism of journalistic effort and no confusion over how much was from a press release.
Of course, then the actual number of news stories (i.e., articles that require journalistic effort to report accurately and informatively) might look a bit slim.
Or they could use the time now freed up to investigate and provide critical analysis …
Naa, too hard.
Actions so far would indicate that they’d fire a few more journalists.
Journos who can think cost too much.
Current national Party staffer, troll and black hat computer hacker Benjamin Guerin pirates Gibson Group’s Sensing Murder on YouTube:
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCBMnwOsi50gkO7IFbg8QH3Q
Get ready for a good lecture from Rod Oram.
Rod Oram – “Follow the money” – the future of business journalism
The feeble state of business journalism in New Zealand and around the world is but a subset of journalism’s general decline. To try to survive financially, many media organisations are increasingly blurring the distinction between journalism and advertising, devaluing both in the process. Yet, there has never been a more important time for business journalism.
Profound change is sweeping through business and economics and the societies they help shape. Journalists should be trying to explain what’s happening – the good and the ill – for the benefit of participants and public alike.
Wednesday 14 October, 6pm
Maidment Theatre, 8 Alfred Street, The University of Auckland
Doors open at 5.45pm, lecture starts at 6pm. The Maidment Bar will open from 5pm http://www.brucejesson.com/?p=624
also you can listen to Mike Joy’s 2014 lecture – Mike Joy delivered the 2014 Lecture entitled ‘Paradise Squandered; New Zealand’s Environmental Asset Stripping’. The full text is available on our web site.
http://www.brucejesson.com/?p=527
Bruce Jesson journalism award http://www.brucejesson.com/?p=586#comment-683
Keys position on the Islander fella claiming climate refugee status
“Its a fucking joke” you can see Key laughing that thru the news interview
I dont blame the guy for trying, look at Keys he’s a Hawaiian overstayer getting free money from the govt, none of us would be worse off if he wasnt here, in fact get him to ring me and I will tell him to fuck off .
Keys position on the Islander fella claiming climate refugee status
“Its a fucking joke” you can see Key laughing that thru the news interview
I dont blame the guy for trying, look at Keys he’s a Hawaiian overstayer getting free money from the govt, none of us would be worse off if he wasnt here, in fact get him to ring me and I will tell him to fuck off .
we could argue that Key is a Planet Earth overstayer.
Following on from the conversation above re old white men,
http://thestandard.org.nz/open-mike-22092015/#comment-1073082
Ok, I did a bit of digging. Here’s a snip from the letter to the Editor that vto refers to (I can’t access the whole thing without an account).
It’s somewhat ironic that in Beck Eleven’s column on Saturday (Sept 19) she indulges in gender stereotyping to reinforce her otherwise well-made points on the moral imperatives for posi…
http://www.pressreader.com/search?query=beck&newspapers=1272&in=ALL&date=Today
This appears to be the column being referred to,
http://www.stuff.co.nz/the-press/opinion/72184859/beck-eleven-being-white-is-its-own-reward
The only references to old white men are this (it’s worth reading in context),
The best I can explain is recalling a tour through the Beehive where the walls are adorned by paintings of old white men with beards. They were the ones who decided the rules therefore they were the ones who got the step up in life.
If that’s not a type of scholarship I don’t know what is.
I’ll bet my bottom dollar that old white men with beards weren’t thinking about Maori or women’s rights because they were, unsurprisingly, thinking from their own perspective.
I don’t see how this is gender stereoptyping (she is describing actual paintings of actual old white men with beards, although I guess she could be exaggerating for effect – maybe not all of them are old, maybe some are clean shaven). She is also describing actual people in positions of actual power and making a political point about their access to that power on the basis of their gender, race and age (but presumably not their facial hair).
She then makes the point that they probably weren’t thinking about people who weren’t white and male and older, which I’ll admit is an exaggeration, but with a core of truth to it.
Nowhere in there do I see belittling of older white men. This is why I think vto is confusing identity and prejudice. Prejudice would be something like ‘all old men are bigots’. Which might indeed be how vto interpreted it, but it’s not the only interpretation. Myself, I would see those men as having a mix of understandings about gender and race, but the shared element they have is their privilege, which is the point that Eleven was making. She’s not extrapolating to all old white men, she’s just using that particular group of old white men as an example of a group of people with privilege.
I also don’t see the problem with calling old white men “old white men” when they patently are. Eleven talks about her experience of going to Te Matatini. Should she not describe most of the people there as Māori? Wouldn’t that just be weird?
If Eleven has made repeated statements that she “doesn’t listen to old white men” as vto claims, I’d like to see links to the actual statements.
Thanks weka,
A very reasoned and generous assessment.
oh look, another example of Eleven’s ageist, sexist views here http://www.stuff.co.nz/the-press/opinion/columnists/beck-eleven/8227168/Time-to-ban-the-rants-of-men-aged-over-50
there are others too, as indicated by the letter writer.
eleven has form and now a reputation
Yeah she’s crossed the line in that one you link to vto. Weka would be blind to not see deliberate belitting of old white men in there.