Metiria Turei stated the two (Labour & the Greens) have already had this discussion, both agreeing there would be no deal or endorsements, thus Willie should go back and talk to his boss.
Willie highlighted that failing to work together may allow the Māori Party to win a seat and go on to prop up a National Government.
Should the two do a deal?
[citation needed for where MT said that there would be no deal and that Willie should go back and talk to his boss. Not moderator intolerance for wasting moderator time – weka]
You say:
“Metiria Turei stated the two (Labour & the Greens) have already had this discussion, both agreeing there would be no deal or endorsements”
You ask:
“Should the two do a deal?”
Yes, the leadership have both agreed there will be no deal. However, I’m asking the public how they feel about it – not flogging it to them as you incorrectly asserted.
Additionally, even though the leadership have ruled it out, Willie (who is also Labour’s Maori campaign strategist) is holding discussions with Green Party candidates on the matter. Hence it’s not a totally dead horse, and it’s Willie that is attempting to flog it.
Labour and GP “working togetehr” is not the same as a deal.
From your link:
Mr Jackson says he’s currently talking to the Greens about their plans to stand candidates in Māori seats, over fears they’ll split the vote and allow candidates from the National-aligned Māori Party to sneak through the middle.
“The reality is the Greens are just talking about the party vote. Our Māori MPs went off the list and they’re looking at just winning their seats.”
He says it’s not a “dirty” tactic, because “National’s been doing it forever” in Ōhāriu and Epsom.
Jackson may talk about an agreement to not stand candidates, but the reality is the GP and Labour candidates each present and promote a different focus in their campaigns.
Yes. And The Chairman is right on this one. On Q&A (just finished) Willie Jackson reiterated the proposal in the Maori seats. He’s in discussions with the Labour leadership and members of the Green Party as we speak.
He is correct. The Greens have got to get over their “no deal” stance –
at least in the Maori seats. Some of those electorates are very tight and the Green’s could end up being the spoiler… thus allowing the Maori National Party to come through the middle and, together with their Pakeha counterparts, taking the treasury benches again.
Simon Wilson thinks the Greens are scared of NZ First being given priority over them should there be a Labour-led government elected. Well, the Greens need to decide what is their number one priority. Is it to be part of a left leaning government that in general terms will reintroduce a government of balance, fairness and justice for all its citizens? Or do they wish to remain in the wilderness with no chance of their more radical policies (and I agree with most of them) ever being put into practice? I know which is the more important. Do you Greens?
Q&A is worth a watch today. Both Willie Jackson and Kelvin Davis showed the Labour leadership how to conduct an interview that will resonate with the punters? Here’s hoping they take notice!
Labour also needs to consider why it is so weak that it continually needs the Greens withdrawing to prop it up. Better policies perhaps?
Also unless there is a significant overhang then Maori as a whole may well be better off under a general left government that does include Maori as MP’s even if the Maori seats are held by a variety of parties. And that left government may come about through campaigning in the Maori seats.
But lets try another scenario on for size. It’s possible that Metiria has dragged a huge chunk of vote towards the Greens from women ( who have always had to deal with WINZ or have a friend who has)
and young people – who have to deal with WINZ/studylink).
If the Greens plus NZF outweigh the Labour vote then we have a whole new game in town. Labour may be on the back foot -perhaps they got rid of Cunliffe too soon.
Labour also needs to consider why it is so weak that it continually needs the Greens withdrawing to prop it up. Better policies perhaps?
Nope. Labour has some damm good policies. It’s just that nobody is listening and that is – in part – because they’re not selling them well. It’s been a bug bear of mine where Labour is concerned for the past 8 years.They seem incapable of condensing them into succinct and simple packages that voters can readily understand.
And they also have some really, really bad ones that puts people off so much that their good ones can’t save them. I.e, their knee-jerk reaction of not supporting raising benefits by 20% despite knowing that National purposefully dropped them 20% below what’s liveable.
RedBaronCV +1
Here is a interesting interview from this morning on RNZ with economist Bill Mitchell, who calls out NZ Labour for being “neoliberal light” and the Greens as being neoliberals on Bikes, which I thought was quite funny….
Most of the Green radical policies will not become part of government policy even if they are in coalition (Lab/NZF/Green). Certainly not the one relating to welfare entitlements.
Probably they will get some of their environmental policies, but not those that will directly hurt Winston’s rural/provincial supporters. So more money for DOC, more public transport and perhaps incentives for electric cars. Also more water quality expenditure.
That’s funny because the most extreme policies proposed by ACT managed to make it into National’s Agenda. Why would you not think that Labour would adopt the Green’s policies as well as those of NZF to put together coherent programme? You seem to suggest that there is a conflict between the green’s policies and those of NZ First but provide no evidence of this.
[2 week ban for wasting my time. Next time, provide a link, and if it’s in a video provide the time. Don’t expect other people to do that work for you. – weka]
Metiria Turei stated the two (Labour & the Greens) have already had this discussion, both agreeing there would be no deal or endorsements, thus Willie should go back and talk to his boss.
Weka, I read that to mean that Metiria Turei has declared the parties have already had that discussion and TC is saying that its up to Willie to go back and talk to his boss. Btw, I recall Turei making a statement a day or two ago but not where I saw it. After all there’s been so much said over the past 10-12 days its impossible to remember where one read or saw anything.
I don’t care. It was ambiguous, I asked for clarity. He chose not to clarify. I’m sick of running interference on people’s comments that are misleading. People get 1 chance to make it really clear what they are meaning and what their source is, and they need to do the work on that not expect other people to, especially not moderators. I don’t have the time to do any backwards and forwards on this as a moderator. This is time I want to use writing posts.
This is only going to get worse closer to the election, and probably afterwards, so people need to take more care in how they frame their comments about political parties especially when presenting facts. In an environment where there are very large attempts to undermine the left by misleading statements, spin or outright lies, I have zero tolerance for it here.
TC used that part of his comment to set up a discussion in the way he wanted it to go. It’s deliberate. Which is fine, but it’s needs to be backed up clearly so that people can see it in context and make up their own minds.
🙂 We all get there in the end as moderators. Especially when the season of spinners is upon us.
You may have noticed that this is my general policy as well. If people can’t be unambiguous about what they are saying and choose to be obtuse about it, then I will often take the policy of spinning the absolute worst possible interpretation on there spinning and then using that to provide a reason to get the idiots out of my face and out of my valuable time.
It helps clear the deadwood out who are apparently incapable of robust debate because they can’t say what they think and why. I despise the meme pushers who are only interested in pushing a catch phrase and too gutless to stand up to try to defend their use of it.
I find that expressing my worst fears about what I think that they could possibly be saying helps both clear my head, and clears the forums for some better agree to disagree debates.
Be clear about what you are saying folks. The moderators are getting tired as the baseload of comments rises up towards election month. If you try to confuse it, you’re likely to lose your ability to say it here.
Sorry, my intent wasn’t to waste your time. I provided a link. However, I was unaware a time frame was also required for such a short clip. Moreover, the comments aired within the first minute of the clip.
Again, time wasting was not my intent and now that I know, it won’t happen again.
I see that the document that Jonathan Coleman “tabled” when answering the excellent questioning by Julie Anne Genter is now 9 months overdue.
Official Information requests
Document containing advice re Sugar Tax from MOH tabled during question time 13.10.2016
Request sent to Minister of Health by John Gray on October 13, 2016.
Long overdue.
Document tabled during Question Time on 13.10.2016 which contained advice from the Ministry of Health saying that there is no conclusive evidence around sugar tax.
Document tabled on 13.10.2016 during Question 8 of Question Time re advice from MOH on Sugar Tax
Request sent to Minister of Health by John Gray on October 14, 2016.
Long overdue. (9 months overdue)
What is most annoying about the idea of sugar tax is that sugar is a highly addictive substance. It’s not like it’s easy to choose differently overnight and the people most affected are low income earners (just check out any WINZ waiting line – full of carb and sugar addicts).
This is particularly offensive because the government has promoted a moderation approach to sugar which doesn’t work.
Essentially sugar tax just takes money from people the government themselves have mistrained people to think a little bit sugar is OK,
I’m getting a bit pissed off with the notion that the behaviour of the poor can be modified by taxing the shit out of them. The middle class don’t care about a sugar tax.
“The Greens are neoliberals on bicycles”. I love it! Serves them right for signing a silly fiscal responsibility agreement with Labour.
Maybe that is now immaterial since the Greens social welfare policy was released ( along with Metiria’s colossal fall from grace with the Right).
Surely the welfare policy would take us out of the fiscal responsibility parameters? After all we can’t have our cake and eat it too, or can we?
Labour plan to maintain a $4 billion plus surplus after their own welfare spend. The Greens costed increasing core benefit rates at $1.4 billion. Hence, they have the fiscal scope to commit to both and still maintain a reasonable surplus, thus still come across as being fiscally conservative.
That’s a good point and its true. They also have a higher ceiling of public spending compared with National who are headed on a track of greater and greater austerity down to 26-27% of GDP. A Labour Green government would be spending an additional $2-3bn in the first year more than National, 4-6bn in the second year and 6-9bn in the third year while National removes itself completely from universal provision in health, education and welfare in favour of so-called Social Investment approaches which rely on big data.
Prof Bill Mitchell mentioned above talked convincingly about why surpluses are bad for people when he spoke in Wellington on Friday. A link to the lecture is here. http://bilbo.economicoutlook.net/blog/?p=36534
We really can’t have our cake and eat it to. It’s just a pity that most people, including most economists and politicians, don’t understand that particular truism.
Think of it like this:
You have a cake, it’s sitting there on the plate. It’s a tasty cake so you eat it. After you’ve eaten it it’s no longer on the plate and thus you no longer have it.
Off the coast of Taranaki we have somewhere between 300 million and two billion tonnes of iron sand. This is presently being ‘eaten’ (Extracted and sold offshore) by an Australian firm at approximately twenty million tonnes per year. Once they’ve finished eating it we’ll no longer have it.
This applies to every single resource in a country.
But we can utilise our resources better so that we don’t have poverty. Of course, that would mean that we don’t have rich people either because rich people are the misuse of our resources.
Some resources are renewable and as long as they are used sustainably we can have our cake and eat it too.
I think the key to this is the ownership, i.e. who controls the resources, and I think that only public ownership has a chance of providing open & transparent processes and sufficient control. Private ownership inevitably leads to maximising profits and thus unsustainable use of resources; the cake will be gone before we know it.
Externalities and unintended consequences are passed on to others, be it, in no particular order, the next owners, the public, the neighbours, the next generation, the paying customers, etc. Public ownership is the best option IMO to deal with externalities in a holistic way.
In general, (natural) resources should only be used to benefit society as a whole, not to the advantage of a small minority. If it is owned by the public and used for the public then the profit motive won’t be the dominant force.
SOEs, or whatever shape they might have, will not compete but collaborate because they share the same owners and serve the same mission. Efficiency and productivity are equally guided by the same mission, which is to serve the needs of the whole of the nation, not just a (the) few.
Our current political system is not suited to such Utopian ideals. Our laws, or Constitution for that matter, are not either. And least conducive of all is the stranglehold of (neo)liberalism that still seems to mesmerise our politicians and a large segment of the population.
Is it possible to extend the cohesive bonds of family and local community to a national level? If so, how do we achieve this? And then at/to the next level …
Some resources are renewable and as long as they are used sustainably we can have our cake and eat it too.
Well, no. They’re sustainable within limits. If we exist within those limits then they’re permanently sustainable. If we go outside of those limits then they get whittled down even if they regenerate.
I think the key to this is the ownership, i.e. who controls the resources, and I think that only public ownership has a chance of providing open & transparent processes and sufficient control. Private ownership inevitably leads to maximising profits and thus unsustainable use of resources; the cake will be gone before we know it.
Almost, but not quite. We actually have public ownership of all natural resources in NZ. Even ownership of a house doesn’t convey ownership of the land or anything in it.
But we licence out the extraction of those resources and we don’t put in any restrictions on who it’s sold to. And although we put in place restriction on the speed of the extraction often times that ‘restriction’ means that the entire resource deposit will be completely extracted by the time the licence is up.
Our current political system is not suited to such Utopian ideals. Our laws, or Constitution for that matter, are not either. And least conducive of all is the stranglehold of (neo)liberalism that still seems to mesmerise our politicians and a large segment of the population.
Those licences are, in practice, transfers of ‘ownership’ with little democratic oversight and thus with little control. The OIA is a farce and no help (commercial sensitivity is off-limit); without having the right information it is almost impossible to ask the right questions, which is how counter-intuitive the whole OIA is. IMHO all information relating to publically owned resources must be made publically available without delay and restriction. At the moment the situation is the exact opposite but some people do know!! This is principally un- or even anti-democratic.
One genuine Q: has the ownership of water been sorted here in NZ or is it still “nobody owns the water”?
One genuine Q: has the ownership of water been sorted here in NZ or is it still “nobody owns the water”?
It’s still ‘nobody owns water’. National won’t change that as it would mean that we would charge for it if state ownership was recognised and that would kill off many of National’s donor’s businesses as they’re predicated upon not paying their full costs.
We often hear the catch-cry a vote for Winston is a vote for National. But with Hone also unwilling to commit, does it mean a vote for Mana is a potential vote for National?
How badly do you think his unwillingness to commit will impact his support?
“Party-Vote for either Mana or TOP = Wasted Vote … in my ever so humble opinion.”
That looks correct. The only guaranteed way to change the government is party vote green or labour and to tactical vote in the electorates to remove the national candidate.
It’s so simple, even voters can understand it.
Only remotely plausible chance of either Party crossing threshold is Harawira winning Te Tai Tokerau … but – despite deal with Maori Party – Davis still odds-on.
A remote possibility, yes, but I can’t see that happening so hold with the opinion of a wasted party vote.
Top are more likely to get a higher vote than Mana, though what percentage of that will come from the left is an unknown.
Left leaning voters who don’t vote green or labour could potentially, in a really tight race, result in a fourth national government. They could, even with a three party coalition, mean more influence for NZ1st than I’m sure most of us would ever want.
I don’t trust them to do the right thing, easy as it is, but I do hope, futile as it may or may not be, for the greater good wins out.
In the 2014 election the Conservatives got almost 4%, and then did the usual thing that our conservative religious parties did and started a standup pissing contest all over each other – probably funded by the National party and performed via the usual sources. Unlike NZ First who had a similar fate back in 2008, I don’t think we will see them this election.
Internet Mana and the Maori party both got slightly less than 1.5%, and I don’t think that their standing in front of voters has improved since then.
Act managed got 0.69%. Which is the same territory that I think TOP will get into. While Seymour has probably been less of a complete dickhead than his predecessors in the role, I don’t think that any strange multi-millionaire will be bothered to prop them up this election.
United Future managed to just edge out the Ban1080 party when they got 0.22%. That definitely puts them in the loopy brigade.
Plus I think that kiwi voters are just plain uninterested in the nutter fringes of politics this time around.
But with Hone also unwilling to commit, does it mean a vote for Mana is a potential vote for National?
Well, that would depend on the likelihood of Mana being willing to do a deal to keep National in power, wouldn’t it? And, given that that likelihood approximates to 0, the answer to your question is “No. No, it doesn’t. Have you been drinking?”
National is continuing with the Tenure Review process that involves a massive transfer of state owned precious and highly sensitive high country to their farmer mates who then sell off parts of it to developers at a huge profit. And I mean huge.
Labour’s policy is to immediately stop the Tenure Review process.
Both Qantas and Virgin will start increased security measures as a result – that’s for all of you considering flying shortly – whether to Australia or passing through.
I thank all I hold holy that this kind of plot hasn’t happened here yet.
Looking at the poll tonight Labour are in serious trouble. The support they have lost has seemingly moved over to the Greens who are on 15%, but at 24% Labour are in deep trouble. I’m wondering if their support is likely to fall another 2-3%, and I believe there is a serious risk of this, and meanwhile National continue to hold steady on 47% which is where have been more or less for nearly a decade. THe Labour leadership need to ask why their party has stubbornly remained 20ish points behind National for a decade
To answer the burning question, researchers have long observed that people often conform to majority opinion (i.e. during every election, some people jump on the bandwagon and shift their preference to the leading candidate or the most popular policy).
During elections, and major public policy events, much of the media coverage focuses on the “horse race,” or fluctuations in support for a candidate or policy. Reporting on public opinion not only affects support, but levels of engagement: donations, volunteering and turnout. These bandwagon effects can make polls self-fulfilling prophecies; the predictions of the polls come to pass because the polls not only measure public opinion but also influence public opinion and engagement.
24% (Labour) + 15% (Greens) + 11% (NZFirst) = 50%. The current National Party + mates arrangement is toast on this poll and Colmar Brunton is known to favour the centre-right. I’m not sure what the problem is…?
Hi Scott,
I’m well aware of voting Blocks, but I think that it is more complicated than simple blocks. labour now have andrew little publicly admitting that he has considered resigning. That is almost the worst thing to ever admit less than eight weeks from the election. With the Nats on 47% and Labour on 24% there simply cannot be a mandate for a party returning their worst ever election result to then proceed with forming a government. But the bigger immediate issue for Labour is being seen as a lost cause and voters simply don’t turn out to support a party that is perceived to have lost before polling day. Will this start a bleed of support for Labour?
You say you’re aware of voting block but then go on to single out labour’s vote.
47% plays 39% on this poll, so a swing of 4% ties it all up. Still all to play for on the run in as polls traditionally close up.
Good for the greens. Hope it continues. At least we can now put to bed the doom and gloom of MT’s ‘damaging’ winz admission.
Yawn. the National Party has to get more seats than the pro-New Zealand parties to form a government. Thanks for letting everyone know that you won’t respect the election result if that doesn’t happen.
Of course I’ll always respect the outcome of the election. We live in a democracy. But I can’t see how it is tenable for a party that is currently on track for its worst result to then proceed to form a Government that would deliver three years of stability, economic growth, and investment is social and infrastructure programmes. what I’d love for Labour to understand and importantly address is the core reason why they have been behind National by about 20 points for nearly a decade. I’m also a firm believer in NZ electing the government and Prime Minister. NOt Winston having the final say depending who will deliver to him the best baubles
Andrew little did not deny the poll, but I usually rely more on the poll of polls. The election is now less than eight weeks away, and I can’t see a reason for people of nz to change. The message Labour have been giving is not reasonating with the good people of NZ. I do want to ask my Local MP Grant Robertson , and also candidate Paul Eagle. In truth I don’t believe that Labour are being honest with themselves. This is not just some temporary slump, but a persistent feature for the past three elections and nine years. THere are several reasons, but I just can’t see any game changer ahead for Labour.
I love how honesty from politicians just blows some folks’ minds.
Acknowledging your flaws and asking colleagues whether you’re the best person for the job is actually a good thing – I’m fed the fuck up with incompetent ministers who sign off on shit that fouls up the pay of tens of thousands of people, or even endangers or kills people, and then they go on TV and say that it was someone else’s fault and they themselves are doing a good job. Was it Wilkinson who looked visibly surprised at the thought that she should resign after people died (Pike River ISTR?)?
Fuck it, we actually need politicians who admit their faults, who admit the decisions they made 20 years ago or the decisions they made 20 days ago maybe weren’t the best, or weren’t legal, or weren’t what one would expect of a leader. But they just fucking come clean if it’s relevant. I’ve had enough of bluster.
It isn’t actually more complicated than “simple blocks” though is it? If after the election National, say, can’t command a majority of votes in The House then either the Opposition Parties get to have a go at forming a government or we have a new election depending on the GG. Simply winning the biggest share of the vote doesn’t give any party the right to form a government.
labour now have andrew little publicly admitting that he has considered resigning.
Link?
With the Nats on 47% and Labour on 24% there simply cannot be a mandate for a party returning their worst ever election result to then proceed with forming a government.
In an MMP environment there’s no such thing as a mandate for one particular party over any other. If Peter Dunne could put together a governing coalition with him as the leader then we’d have the first Peter Dunne led government.
It is party strength in the House after elections that decides who is to govern. It is the parliamentary party or parties with the support of the House (and the ability to ensure supply – the money to fund the state’s functions) that provides the government.
Really can’t see the problem?
Let me help.
The problem is that Peters loathes the Greens, and they have completely opposed support bases.
There is no way a Lab/Green/NZFirst coalition can come together.
Besides, if Peters becomes kingmaker, would his supporters really want him to prefer Lab/Green to Nat?
“Besides, if Peters becomes kingmaker, would his supporters really want him to prefer Lab/Green to Nat?”
Yep.
The New Zealand Election Study has shown that NZF’s new supporters (at 2011 & 2014 Elections) have come disproportionately from Labour.
Colmar Brunton’s 2015 vote-switching analysis suggests that, more recently, NZF have been attracting support from Labour and National supporters in fairly equal proportion … but that still means a particularly large % of current intending NZF voters are former Lab supporters (they certainly greatly outnumber former Nats).
In addition (indeed, as a consequence of the above) … NZF supporters consistently show unusually strong antagonism towards the National Govt in various Issue Polls (eg 2014 attitudes to Key Govt’s Dirty Politics / Asset Sales / TPPA / Flag change etc). Interestingly enough, this antagonism towards the Tories is rivaled only by that of Green supporters.
The problem for you is that the more progressive party on the left is growing its share of the bloc, and the bloc doesn’t seem to be any the worse for it.
But if you cannot see the issue of the main opposition party being on 24% (or less) – they are simply not credible for opposition – little less government.
Hell, you’ve been polishing the national turd for years.
“Main opposition party” is valid in FPP. It’s sad you haven’t figured out that MMP can do a true coalition of equals. It doesn’t need to be 47:1:1:1.
It can be 30:20, 25:15:10, or even 20:20:20.
I just want you bastards out of government, and replaced by something vaguely left wing – the more left the better. I don’t care what the party names are.
On the back of the Barclay scandal and the media finally highlighting the homelessness crisis, this is nothing short of an absolute fucking disaster of a poll.
Trends are obviously what is more important, but the fact any single poll shows National at 47% on the back of the last month of negative headlines for them should be a huge cause of concern for anyone who wants to change the government.
Exactly. If the election gives this result with no left wing party even close to 30% … then National sitting well over 40% would absolutely be expected to have first shot at forming a govt.
Given the Greens have ruled out going into coalition with National this leaves a very sad coalition with NZ1 as the likely outcome.
“If the election gives this result with no left wing party even close to 30% … then National sitting well over 40% would absolutely be expected to have first shot at forming a govt.”
Why? I mean, some FPP people think that, but I can’t see any reason why National should have first crack if they’re on 42% and L/G are on 42%.
You haven’t said why James. All you’ve done is assert something without rationale. It’s MMP, why does it matter if there are two parties closer to each other in MP numbers? I could see that as an asset.
If the election gives this result with no left wing party even close to 30% … then National sitting well over 40% would absolutely be expected to have first shot at forming a govt.
Only if you buy into National self-serving delusion.
You are wrong. MMP has not changed the principle of Government formation. The Governor General determines who will be invited to form a government based on the advice of the prime minister. The PM will advise that he should be invited to form a government. Alternatively he will advise that the Leader of the Opposition be invited to form a government. In either case the support will need to be tested in the House. If the new government loses a confidence motion the new PM would resign.
The governor General would then ask the Leader of the opposition if he could form a government. If he said no, there would be a new election.
So in summary, MMP has not changed those conventions. Someone always gets ‘first shot’.
What you describe is that one person gets asked first and then someone else gets asked second and then we go for another election. But it’s not a first shot at forming the government but just first at being asked if they’ve already done so.
Before the GG asks the parties have already negotiated and have an answer and there’s no ‘first shot’ in those negotiations.
The MMP legislation makes a coalition of say 10 minor parties all on 5.5% equally possible as a coalition of one other party on 45% plus one of the other minors.
In one case you would have 10 parties trying to form a stable govt, the other just 2. While you are correct technically, I damn well know which would be accepted by the public.
I damn well know which would be accepted by the public.
The one that ends up as government. There’s nothing that the public can do to stop it.
And which one any sane GG would give assent to.
The GG doesn’t get that choice. If there’s a coalition in front of him saying that they can form a government then he has to accept that. If he doesn’t then he’s breaking the constitution.
If the undecided percentage is near 20%, surely it is utterly necessary for a state-funded TV news service to say so? Only 2 parties scored higher than 20%, which makes their speculation about what the make-up of parliament might be a big load of rocking-horse effluent.
I have no idea whether there is any regulatory requirement for such information to be reported, though i suspect probably not…especially if it upsets the narrative.
as indicated previously, these polls are almost worthless….turnout will be the key.
Quite frankly it should not be allowable to discuss a poll in the media unless you state the margin of error and the undecided. Corin Dann needs a strong reprimand.
It’s reasonable to assume the ‘undecideds’ in any poll result will eventually vote in a pattern similar to all those who have already made up their minds.
The good news is that in principle they’re ‘persuadable’ and are amenable to some event between now and the election causing them to swing. The bad news is we have no idea which direction such a ‘swing’ might be.
“It’s reasonable to assume the ‘undecideds’ in any poll result will eventually vote in a pattern similar to all those who have already made up their minds.”
Not sure about that. I can think of variables that would swing the balance differently.
To be perfectly straight about it, I’d much prefer the Nats had to go into coalition with TOP than NZ1 … but in reality that’s pretty unlikely.
Also keep in mind that TOP’s stated preference is to stay on the cross-benches and would only sign up to Confidence and Supply if they were the sole cab off the rank.
Interestingly TOP do seem to have doubled from just under 1% to 2% … but that could be equally just noise.
Even more than with NZ1st, a vote for TOP seems like a vote for national.
I don’t understand why any supposed lefties would wilfully and knowingly vote for the enemy.
We can only hope they come to senses on election day, do the decent thing, and resist propping up the nasty party by voting green or labour to change the government.
I this this is akin to the Missing Million arguement. The reality is polls do move around, but the danger for Labour is that they get to a point where they are perceived a hopeless losers like happened to Bill English in 2002. And the consequence of this is voter stay away in droves. GReen support at 15% gives them reason to be optimistic, but it is at the expense of Labour. THe Labour Green block cannot penetrate into Nationals steadfast baseline support that is constantly at 47% in nearly every poll
OK I’m happy with that observation. So let’s assume National lose 5% between now and the election and land up on 42%. The bulk of it will go to either NZ1 or maybe TOP. Still no problem forming a govt.
Even if Labour crawl back up over 30%, National are still in the driving seat.
The problem here is that Peters won’t say if he will treat the L/G vote as a bloc or will consider National the first party to talk to. And NZF voters are ok playing roulette.
Except in the past two major polls which had it at 42%. I can understand you righties getting all excited but what has happened here is that the support for the left has increased slightly and I am sure the right’s support is less than CB thinks.
I’m not so sure it’s completely useless. Mostly useless?
I hate to say it, but I’m thinking it might be showing that the Greens didn’t follow through very well on Metiria’s launch of the social security policy.
But yes. Just a one point snapshot in time. And the way NZ reports on polls is ridiculous (opaque). There should be two sets of percentages. One with undecideds removed from the sum total used in the calculation and one with them included in the sum total used in the calculation.
Might be too soon re the follow up (what’s the time lag on events and polls again?). But I tend to agree that the follow up has been dominated by defense against the reactionary forces. Two weeks seems reasonable, am hoping they’ve got some more cards to play soon though.
I’d have been looking for a shift beyond the specifics of social security to a broader platform espousing the general values that are in accord with the social security policy. So, to steal a phrase, hitting everything with a “for the many, not the few” refrain, as a clear indication that the status quo’s getting binned if the Greens have their way.
More policy releases in tune with the social security one could be in the pipeline (I hope so). But the policies on their own, without the engine that comes from generating a more general groundswell of sentiment within largish parts of society, are limited in their effect.
I’d be interested to hear if they’re engaging in any concerted recruitment drive at the moment – taking full advantage of any momentum they have at the moment and pushing it; getting feet on the ground to fight for every available vote.
It isn’t just this poll. Labour are drifting to utter catastrophe. It is all well and good to talk about the undecided vote, but given the lack of inspiration and passion so far in this election campaign from Labour they’ll probably just not vote at all. I reckon we are heading towards a 65% turn out max.
What is it about neoliberalism that turns Labour PLPs into technocratic, out-of-touch, smug and entitled collections of careerists? They are too fucking arrogant to see what should be obvious – they are in deep trouble and need to PANIC, completely rethink their whole fundamental approach to politics and just… just fucking grow some balls and show us they believe in something other than muggins turn.
Their policy so far has been too technocratic and timid, full of thickets of ifs and buts and maybes. They’re thinking seems stuck in 1990s, wedded to neoliberal economic orthodoxy and, frankly, their main tactic at the moment appears to be relying on National losing.
The Labour caucus is – yet again – completely missing in action, 54 days out from the election. The current crop of Labour politicians are completely useless at politics.
The Greens have outflanked them on the left, exploiting the Corbyn-Sanders effect and showing they might actually understand ordinary folks problems.
NZ First is killing them in the provinces. There vote is is 3-4% higher than this poll, mark my words.
LABOUR FUCKING NEEDS TO WAKE UP AND SMELL THE COFFEE!!!!!
When you recall that Phil Goff, and even the hated Cunliffe, were doing way better than this you really have to wonder.
Little’s best option is to see it through to the election and if Labour are under 35% then he, along with the rest of his front bench can resign with dignity, and give Adern a clean start.
Or they can wind the Party up and make a nice donation to the Greens with the proceeds 🙂
I think Labour might be hopeful of holding 25%. I’m thinking that their whole policy platform is simply never going to attract the vote of middle NZ.about 18 months or two year ago I had a good conversation with Andrew Little and we discussed capturing the imagination of NZ. In particular the centre where the election is won. But the influence of the left of the party, the unions, and I suggest also the lack of intellectual grunt that was present when Clark and Cullen were at the helm has prevented this from happening.
Playing musical cheers with the leadership is no good. The next losers up will be Gracinda, and they are lackadasical middle class careerists. All they represent is the inept PLP and their own technocratic ambitions. Little has got a useless caucus that is lazy and politically clueless. Labour has to re-think everything from the ground up, including how and who they select to be MPs, what they stand for and what the party exists to do.
At the moment, they stand for nothing and the PLP is full of under performing chumps like Ruth Dyson (remember her?) Jenny Salesa (who? never heard from her once, unforgivable when there are only 31 MPs) Megan Woods (Ever heard from her either? No? Me neither. Pathetically ineffectual on Canterbury issues and climate change), David Parker (last spotted in 2015 and heading for the exit), Trevor fucking Mallard (a burnt out political joke, it is a disgrace he occupies a valuable seat), Poto Williams (useless at scoring hits on the government, but that is OK because as far as i can tell, she was mainly selected to be spokesperson for political correctness and guardian of identity politics), Clare “vanishing majority” Curren, David Clarke, the invisible man in a caucus of hopeless invisible MPs, etc etc.
Labour has a caucus where six of their MPs are from Maori seats, and apart from Kelvin Davis none of them appear to do anything to justify their existence to the wider electorate. Given that these MPs represent fully 20% of the PLP, this is unacceptable. They need to pull their weight a lot more.
Labour only has 31 MPs. Only a handful seem to do anything, but with 31 MPs they ALL need to be working bloody hard. the rest are taking the piss out of their supporters and one can justly suspect they are lazy mofos in the best paying job they are ever likely to hold.
Well said, it appears that this current bunch of clowns want to lose this election just like last the one and some of the above are more worried about themselves than winning the election so we can bury this neo lib bullshit for good.
Some of these middle class toff’s within Labour need to be shown the door, if we get another piss poor result in this yrs election.
I’ll leave you some words of wisdom from my late grandmother who was born in Blackball and Labour Party member to the day she passed away in Nelson.
“If the Labour Party keeps bringing in these middle class toff’s, these middle class toff’s are going to wreck Labour for good forget it’s history/ roots (aka why it was formed) then it will be the fault of theses selfish middle class toff’s for driving away the workclass (the very backbone/ heart of the party as she would say) vote to possibly the greens or Winnie. Because they are too lazy and leave it up to tieless volunteers of workclass/ less privilege members of the party who believe in the party’s values, the very reason why the party exists, it’s endstate to a better place for a common good, as there is no I in team and the NZ Labour Party will be merely a party in name only by the time I’m passed away.”
Have to agree with you Sanctuary. The PLP – apart from Kelvin – has been entirely missing or misfiring in action. Lazy is one word for it, lacking intellectual leadership and fire is another.
Or perhaps the PLP has looked at the polling which has a corrupt, venal and nasty National still close to 50% at the end of three terms, on track for four or five – and just given up.
Well there is no question in my mind, the fundamental makeup of the NZ electorate has changed in the past decade or so.
Absolutely this is only one poll. At best it represents the Greens gaining a bit, completely at the expense of Labour. And Turei’s laudable outburst of honesty and political guts is almost certainly the reason for that.
NZ1 is categorically NOT a left wing party and counting on them for a left wing coalition is just magical thinking. Peters will do what Peters wants to do, and his parties policies are actually a bit to the right of, and more reactionary than National.
In total the left wing bloc that we can count on still only adds up to less than 40% and it’s been slowly but surely eroding for years. We can rearrange deck chairs to distract the panicking passengers all we like, but until we make an honest appraisal of what is really happening … the numbers will continue to disappoint.
Looking at the Labour PLP there is one thing that stands out like dogs balls – Like it’s Maori MPs, the Labour women’s caucus is not pulling it’s weight.
Having jumped up and down and demanded equal representation even at the cost of party unity, they’ve let the side down by selecting a bunch of useless do-nothings. It is as if getting women MPs into parliament is regarded as job done, rather than getting effective politicians into parliament who are hard workers, generate headlines, score hits on the government, and who happily also happen to be women.
I think you hit the nail on the head there and would throw a couple of the white middle class toff’s the so called political class in as well. My late grandmother had very strong views on the Labour Party’s women and Maori branches/ MP’s, but your comments sum it up very nicely as hers are probably not fit public comment. There is one thing that got grandmother going off like a belt feed mortar was the quota system and her favourite saying was “I bloody well don’t care if we 100 women, maori’s/ Pacific Islanders, LBGT or men as long as they were the best candidates at the time. Because you don’t see any NZ sporting teams have quotas base on race, gender or sexuality because they pick the best team to win also the quota system breeds lazyness and and sense of intitlement.”
Angry Andy was more impressive when he was bloody angry, being agreeable has made him bland, bland and more bland.There is so much going on with the Natz and he’s just quiet about it, he needs to be incendary, whats to lose.
Little is fine and will make a competent PM. The problem here is agitation on the left and with the swing vote, and Labour still not stepping up and trying to play it safe. We don’t do presidents in NZ, the issue here is Labour not Little.
Are you saying that Little could force the caucus and party to do his bidding on positioning and policy? Because I don’t think you are right about that. If the reason Labour are polling low is because they’ve chosen the safe path over the bold one, that’s not all in Little’s hands. The party as a whole needs to change.
I am agreeing with you James. LAbour are getting to the point whereby only their diehard supporters are going to vote. Everyone else will look for somewhere else ( maybe Winston First) to vote, or worse not vote and thereby propping up higher support for National. 100,000 Labour voters not turning out (missing 1.1million) translates into an effective increase in support for national of around 50,000 votes as they pick up a higher % off the overall vote. Also slightly higher support for greens and winston (as a %)
“Is it possible Little will resign in a desperate move to save his seat in Parliament, hoping Jacinda can keep them over 24%? They did this in 1990 with Palmer resigning for Moore six weeks out, and Jacinda is already on the billboards.”
Your dream is your unconscious mind trying to tell you something and Andrew Little is not Andrew Little but an archetype. James, I think you’re on the cusp of something special and it has little to do with 23 September.
WHEN are those parties who want to change this National-led Government going to pay attention and focus on this CORPORATE welfare MOUNTAIN instead of the SOCIAL welfare ‘mushroom’?
Seriously?
Here’s the ‘ball’!
How about picking up the bloody thing and ‘running with it’?
WHISTLE-BLOWER ALERT!
“WHERE’S NATIONAL’S ‘CORPORATE WELFARE’ REFORM?
This is the question I asked SIX years ago – and am still asking:
“PRESS RELEASE: Independent Candidate for Epsom Penny Bright:
“How many billion$ of public monies could be saved by ‘CUTTING OUT THE CONTRACTORS’?
3 November 2011
Where’s National’s ‘corporate welfare’ reform?
Which of the maor political parties are pushing for ‘corporate welfare’ reform and shrinking the long-term dependency of the private sector on our public monies?
Penny Bright
‘Anti-privatisation/anti-corruption campaigner’
2017 Independent candidate for Tamaki.
Exposing the $1.6 BILLION Tamaki ‘Regeneration’ – GENTRIFICATION $CAM.
2011- 2014- 2017 no where near 39 to 42 needed for Labour to govern.
Little and the ( little bit left ) neo liberal centrists have failed and its a bit rich to start talking about quitting when the numbers have been bad for ten years 8 weeks out from a general election that they should be winning.
Another three years of social and political corruption.
And Jacinda is NOT A LEADER IN WAITING !!!!!!!!!!!!!
“The most compelling reason offered Sunday evening for Little not to go sooner was that the party had already made its election year bill boards and campaign ads.
There was no more money for new ones so Little should be safe, was the rationale.”
another fizzer James – he’s staying, imo there is zero reason to change. Stupid polls as accurate as a bush. Only a fool would get worked about this like you are.
I have said it before . I believe that the “polls” are simply another campaign tool. The “result” is that which will (they think) do the most harm to the left.
All would do well to consider that even if you trust these polling results, over 60% of eligible voters do not support the continuation of the current government.
over 60%…and yes thats where the change of government lies and is achievable… what the incumbents will fight with any and all means at their disposal, and they are substantial however they must be careful not to overplay their hand.
The opposition must ignore the noise and carry on engaging at a personal level and have faith in their argument that change is necessary….most believe that already.
“The ONCB poll in late July 2014 had National 46%, Lab 30%. They ended up 5% lower in the election so based on 24% now Labour might get 19%”
_________________________________________________________________________________________
Reality:
Utter Bollocks ! …
CB late July 2014 … Nats 52%, Lab 28%
vs
2014 Election Result: Nats 47% (- 5 from CB Poll), Lab 25% (- 3)
I bet Labour’s internal polling is giving them the same message as it did at this point seven weeks from the general election in 2011 and 2014.
They don’t have enough support to win and their leader does not appeal.
Something must be wrong when they can put up English who still rates poorly as he always has and is still ahead of Labour’s fifth leader in nine years.
Buzz from the Beehive Transport Minister Simeon Brown dutifully issued advice to all road users to keep safe on our roads during the Easter weekend. He encouraged them to stay safe, plan their journeys ahead of time, and be patient with other drivers while travelling around this Easter long weekend. ...
Oliver Hartwich writes – New Zealanders recently learned about a new feature film. It will be about former Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern – and taxpayers will subsidise it to the tune of NZ$800,000. Ardern had nothing personally to do with either the film or the subsidy. But her government’s ...
TL;DR: Here’s the top six news items of note in climate news for Aotearoa-NZ this week, and a discussion above that was recorded yesterday afternoon above between and The Kākā’s climate correspondent : An independent review panel into the emergency response to Cyclone Gabrielle in Hawkes Bayconcluded “that ...
There are now only a few days left to give feedback on the Draft Government Policy Statement (GPS) on Land Transport 2024-34 (see our earlier post this week on GPS submission guides). As we’ve reported, the GPS is a disaster for Local Government, so we were particularly interested to hear ...
Willis has pledged to go ahead with the debt-funded tax cuts, despite growing opposition from her own supporters worried about appearing fiscally irresponsible. Photo: Lynn Grieveson / The KākāTL;DR: The five things that mattered in Aotearoa’s political economy that we wrote and spoke about via The Kākā and elsewhere for ...
Open access notables A survey of interventions to actively conserve the frozen North, van Wijngaarden et al., Climatic Change:The frozen elements of the high North are thawing as the region warms much faster than the global mean. The dangers of sea level rise due to melting glacier ice, increased ...
Bryce Edwards writes – New Zealand’s biggest-ever political donations scandal is finally at an end. But what is the conclusion? No one can really be sure. The Court of Appeal released its judgement on Tuesday about the Serious Fraud Office case against the NZ First Foundation. On ...
In 2015, then-Prime Minister John Key announced plans for a huge ocean sanctuary around the Kermadec Islands, banning fishing and mining from 15% of Aotearoa's EEZ. It was bold, it was ambitious, and it suggested that National might actually care about the environment. Except they fucked it up: Key failed ...
1. Who has just been given the accolade New Zealander of the Year?a. The Kokakob. The Cook Strait Ferryc. Fair God. Dr Jim Salinger 2. Which of these is an affront to decent society?a. Dame Edna Everageb. Mrs Doubtfire c. Dr. Frank-N-Furterd. Brian 3. Who is Penny Simmonds?a. The aspiring actress in Big ...
New Zealand’s biggest-ever political donations scandal is finally at an end. But what is the conclusion? No one can really be sure.The Court of Appeal released its judgement on Tuesday about the Serious Fraud Office case against the NZ First Foundation. On the face of it, the court found ...
Buzz from the Beehive Waves of rain are set to lash much of the North Island during Easter Weekend as a low-pressure system forms east of New Zealand, according to a weather forecast published in the past day or so. Niwa was warning of a “moisture-laden” long weekend, with rain expected ...
Look around us…Nicola Willis’ promises of balancing the books, of cutting spending without reducing services, and of delivering game changing tax cuts are disappearing before her eyes.Everyday we see stories of violent crime ending in horrific injuries, or worse. The cost of living worsens, whereas the PM claimed renters would ...
TL;DR: My top six news of note on the morning of Thursday, March 28 include:The Government will have to borrow between $10 billion to $15 billion more than previously expected in order to make up for a slowing economy and to pay for $14.9 billion of tax cuts, according to ...
This story by Naveena Sadasivam and Kate Yoder was originally published by Grist and is part of Covering Climate Now, a global journalism collaboration strengthening coverage of the climate story. The long-awaited jobs board for the American Climate Corps, promised early in the Biden administration, will open next month, according to details shared exclusively ...
Should landlords be able to deduct the interest on the loans they take out to bankroll their property speculation? The US Senate Budget Committee and Bloomberg News don’t think this is a good idea, for reasons set out below. Regardless, our coalition government has been burning through a ton of ...
Treasury’s first report on the economy since the change of government presents a damning indictment of Labour’s economic management. The problem for National is that it is so damning that logically, coupled with a rapidly slowing economy, Finance Minister Nicola Willis should respond to it by postponing or even cancelling ...
Budget tensions are becoming evident within the Coalition Government. Winston Peters made numerous political points in his speech to the NZF annual conference. But the attack on his own government’s fiscal policies raised issues of substance. ‘Today in the Sunday Star Times, journalist and former advisor to the Labour ...
Buzz from the Beehive The media – sure enough – have been binging on Finance Minister Nicola Willis’ release of the Budget Policy Statement and a statement headed Government announces Budget priorities This assures us – or rather, this parrots the Luxon team mantra – that the Budget “will deliver ...
The Ides of March brought me COVID followed by a bereavement. No wonder they tell you to be careful of them.I’m home now and have resumed the interrupted recuperation. Very much looking forward to getting back to regular things. Meanwhile, some thoughts…OneThis new Prime Minister guy just keeps getting more dire. ...
News that the Chinese ATP 40 cyber-hacking unit penetrated parliamentary internet networks in 2021 has renewed concerns about the PRC’s malign intentions in Aotearoa. But is the hack that significant given the length of time that has passed since its … Continue reading → ...
When Parliament passed the Intelligence and security Act in 2017, they assured us all that it was full of safeguards. Any intrusive surveillance of New Zealanders would be subject to a "triple lock", requiring the approval of the Minister and (supposedly independent) Commissioner of Intelligence Warrants, as well as post-facto ...
Eric Crampton writes – Richard Harman’s Politik newsletter provides a bit of the context that ought to have been showing up in other media reports on potential reductions in public service staffing. Media has been reporting on staffing cuts on the order of about 7%. Is that ...
Mike Grimshaw writes – It’s becoming increasingly apparent that many perceive free speech to have become the preserve of the politically right wing, the religiously conservative, the libertarian fringe, the anti-trans, the anti-Māori and…. well, just fill in with whatever groups or individuals you don’t like and don’t ...
Don Brash writes – As everybody who is not blind and deaf is aware, there is a huge political preoccupation with climate change at the moment, a widespread (though by no means unanimous) belief that global temperatures are rising mainly as a result of the greenhouse gases created ...
TL;DR: My six things to note in Aotearoa’s political economy on Wednesday, March 27 include:Chris Bishop laid out his vision for filling Aotearoa-NZ’s $100 billion infrastructure deficit in a speech yesterday, emphasising user pays and private funding, but failed to say how to achieve bipartisanship on population, public borrowing and ...
Bryce Edwards writes – Former Finance Minister Grant Robertson and former Prime Minister Chris Hipkins have been conveying how unhappy they are with the tax system. Last week in his valedictory speech, Robertson called for the introduction of a wealth or capital gains tax. And this week Hipkins ...
On February 14, 2023 we announced our Rebuttal Update Project. This included an ask for feedback about the added "At a glance" section in the updated basic rebuttal versions. This weekly blog post series highlights this new section of one of the updated basic rebuttal versions and serves as a ...
Buzz from the Beehive China has loomed large in Beehive considerations over the past 24 hours, largely because of that country’s mischief-making in the cyber espionage department. Two media statements emerged on that subject hard on the heels of the PM baulking at questions put to him on RNZ’s Morning ...
Chris Trotter writes – WHY IS THE NATIONAL PARTY doing so much for landlords, property developers, trucking, and construction companies, and so little for everybody who isn’t already pretty well-off? It’s as if protecting landlords’ investments and building apartments and roads now constitute the whole of National’s ...
Bryce Edwards writes – When she was campaigning to be Minister of Finance last year, Nicola Willis pledged that she would resign from the job if she failed to deliver tax cuts in her first Budget. Now, it’s that pledge, along with Prime Minister Christopher Luxon’s ...
Robert MacCulloch writes – The Reserve Bank has doubled staff numbers in five years to 510, with personnel costs rising to $80 million in 2023 from $32 million in 2018 – up by a whopping 150%. I guess when you print $50 billion and flood markets with liquidity, ...
The furore. In case you didn’t notice there was a controversy in the weekend involving dolphins in a little town off the South Island. Don’t panic, they haven’t declared independence and resumed whaling, this was simply a sailing event.The problem began when racing was cancelled on the opening day of ...
For 20 years or more, the case for a meaningful capital tax gains has been mulled over and analysed to death, including by the tax working group chaired by Sir Michael Cullen. More than once, the International Monetary Fund has said a CGT would be a good idea for New ...
TL;DR: My top 10 news and analysis links this morning include:Today’s must-read: The Public Health Communications Centre (PHCC) call for urgent preventive action and a risk assessment survey of long covid in this briefing noteLocal scoop: NZ road deaths surpass OECD rates, so why is the govt reversing safety plans? ...
This story was originally published by Grist and is part of Covering Climate Now, a global journalism collaboration strengthening coverage of the climate story. This story is part of a collaboration with Grist and WABE to demystify the Georgia Public Service Commission, the small but powerful state-elected board that makes critical decisions about everything from raising ...
This is a guest post from Robert McLachlan Global warming is accelerating; 2023 was off the charts. We need to stop burning fossil fuels. In New Zealand, transport accounts for half of all fossil fuels burnt. In the Emissions Reduction Plan, transport emissions fall 41% by 2035. As the ...
Labour productivity has been receding rapidly over the past two years, reversing a post-lockdown rise. Photo: Lynn Grieveson / The KākāTL;DR: My six things to note in Aotearoa’s political economy as at 6:26am on Tuesday, March 26 include:Workers have been treading water in output per hour worked for 12 years, ...
TL;DR: The key events to watch in Aotearoa-NZ’s political economy in the week to April 2 include:Today, Parliament resumes sitting at 2pm for the second week of a two-week session. Officials for SIS and GCSB report their annual reviews in public to the Intelligence and Security Select Committee from 5.10pm.Tomorrow, ...
Faced with a barrage of criticism over the promised tax cuts from usually supportive commentators, Finance Minister Nicola Willis yesterday reaffirmed her intention to include them in this year’s Budget. The Government is up against it over the cuts just about every way it turns. Commentators like Fran O’Sullivan, Matthew ...
Here’s my pick of today’s substack posts as of 6:26pm on Monday, March 25: writes via his substack that Market-rate housing will make your city cheaper writes via his substack about the problems talking to double-cab ute (truck) drivers about their vehicles. today about moments of radicalisation in ...
Buzz from the Beehive Just before Christmas, Finance Minister Nicola Willis delivered something that was pitched as a mini-budget and brayed about the decisive action being taken to repair the Government books and support income tax relief in Budget 2024. In a statement headed Fiscal repair job underway. she introduced ...
My sister Belinda asked Dad yesterday what one word would describe Mum best. He said: vivacious.If you only knew her from the photos on the slideshow we've made for today,you might wonder about that, because the camera tended to lie with Mum.If ever she saw a camera pointed at her, she ...
There are two major public consultations closing in the next week, Auckland Council’s Long Term Plan (LTP), and the draft Government Policy Statement on Land Transport (GPS). Closing dates and times: LTP closes Thursday 28 February, at 11.59pm – a minute to midnight! GPS closes Tuesday 2 April, at 12pm noon – note that’s ...
From Kiwiblog’s David Farrar – Bryce Wilkinson writes: Senior Fellow Bryce Wilkinson’s analysis reveals that since March 2009, New Zealand has spent $158 billion more overseas than it has earned, but its NIIP has only fallen by $32 billion.Statistics New Zealand shows that receipts from overseas reinsurers have ...
Is she hinting that the Coalition Government will have to back down on key promises it made in Opposition? Brian Easton writes – The Minister of Finance, Nicola Willis, is telling an evolving story about her fiscal challenges. In Opposition she was confident that she could ...
Dear Nicola Willis,Right now you’ve probably got lots of competing demands coming at you. Ministers who’ve inherited quite a mess, or so you’ve told us, looking for money in the budget to improve things. I imagine that’s why they came to parliament - to make things better.You’ll have to make ...
The Local Government, Transport and Auckland Minister hasthreatened councils with intervention if they don’t merge water assets to take them off balance sheet, just as the now-repealed Three Waters plan directed. Photo: Lynn Grieveson / The KākāTL;DR: My six things of note this morning for Monday, March 25 include:Simeon ...
A listing of 36 news and opinion articles we found interesting and shared on social media during the past week: Sun, March 17, 2024 thru Sat, March 23, 2024. Story of the week Thanks to John Mason having the stamina to sit down to watch "Climate - the Movie" ...
This morning the Q&A programme had Simeon Brown on to talk about National’s replacement for Three Waters. In case anyone’s forgotten the three are - drinking water, waste water, and sewerage. It’s quite important not to get them mixed up. In much the same way that you wouldn’t want to ...
Today’s newsletter comes with a mini-podcast conversation between me and my buddy Liv Tennet, talking about her time as a child actor in Lord of the Rings. It’s a conversation with a lot of giggles as she talks about falling off a horse, and becoming a meme. Read ...
The Desmog Climate Disinformation Database documents, "individuals and organisations that have helped to delay and distract the public and our elected leaders from taking needed action to reduce greenhouse gas pollution and fight global warming." It's a who's who of the organised climate change denial movement, in other words. In ...
Bob Edlin writes – A High Court judge has decided miscreants who have mana – or who claim to have mana – should be treated differently from miscreants who have none. It’s a ruling that suggests indigenous law-breakers have a better chance of securing a discharge without conviction ...
Welcome to the first, and possibly last, edition of Brickbats, Bouquets and Bull’s Wool. In which I’ll take a look at the events of the last week or so, and rate them.In such ratings the numbers usually have more to do with the opinions of the reviewer, than the actual ...
Roger Partridge writes – My earlier column this month, New Zealand’s highest court could be facing a turning point, prompted a flood of feedback from business readers and lawyers alike. A common query was what Parliament can do to restrain an overreaching judiciary. This week I discuss two steps Parliament ...
TL;DR: In today’s ‘six-stack’ of substacks at 6.16pm on Friday, March 22: writes about New Zealand's Building Boom—And What the World Must Learn From It over at his substack. challenges the Auckland Council’s use of a 3.8 degrees of warming forecast to oppose a wave-park and data centre project ...
Is she hinting that the Coalition Government will have to back down on key promises it made in Opposition?The Minister of Finance, Nicola Willis, is telling an evolving story about her fiscal challenges. In Opposition she was confident that she could deliver her promised income tax cuts. Appointed minister, she ...
Buzz from the Beehive Ministers of the Crown have drawn attention to one sector of the science sector which is unlikely to be subjected to heavy spending cuts, a state-funded broadcaster which is doing nicely, thank you, and a sporting event that had $5.4 million from the public purse puffed ...
Abbott’s Freestyle Libre sensors allow continuous glucose monitoring (CGM). The sensor is applied to the back of the patient’s arm, with a thin filament under the skin measuring glucose levels constantly. But it costs around $100 per sensor and must be replaced once every 14 days. Photo by BSIP/Universal Images ...
The Inspector General of Intelligence and Security (IGIS) recently released a report in which he exposes the existence of a foreign intelligence partner-controlled technological “capability” inside the headquarters of the GCSB, NZ’s 5 Eyes-affiliated signals intelligence collection and analysis agency. … Continue reading → ...
Peter Dunne writes – Nearly three decades after the introduction of MMP and multiparty governments there should be a greater level of understanding about their finer points than often appears to be the case. The reaction to the despicable outburst from the Deputy Prime Minister at the weekend highlights ...
The sweet kisses from fruit of summerHave slowly been turning dullerYou say, "those times"And "remember the daysWhen we went outside and there still was the shade?"Taking no reason into play…Autumn. Clear, blue days shortening to longer nights, growing colder. Aotearoa.That’s us. The temperature dropping, the looming car crash - so ...
Bryce Edwards writes – “It is often said that behind every great man is a great woman”. This is the pitch by the National Party Botany electorate branch to attend their “Ladies Afternoon Tea with Amanda Luxon”. For $110 including GST, you can turn up on Saturday 20 April ...
David Farrar writes – The Electoral Commission has published the expense returns for political parties for the 2023 election. I’ve put them in a table with how many votes a party got so we can see the spend per vote. National only spent $3.34 for every vote they got, almost ...
Winston Peters’ headline-making actions over the past week may have been a show of political power intended to strengthen his hand in Budget negotiations. It was no accident that his State of the Nation speech was as it was. He made it as New Zealand First Leader, not as Deputy ...
Photo: Lynn Grieveson / The KākāTL;DR: The five things that mattered in Aotearoa’s political economy that we wrote and spoke about via The Kākā and elsewhere for paying subscribers in the last week included:Former Labour Finance Minister Grant Robertson bowed out of politics this week, giving a series of exit ...
Graham Adams writes — If you love the law or sausages, as the saying goes, best not to look too closely at how they are made. And after watching the orgy of self-pity when Newshub’s closure was announced on February 28, television journalism should definitely be added to the list of those ...
Venerable New Zealand political commentator, Chris Trotter (https://bowalleyroad.blogspot.com/), is a sad creature these days. Once one of the most reliable Leftist writers out there – Economic Left at that – Trotter seems to have absorbed the worldview of Auckland culture-war obsessives. It is not for me to categorise what he ...
The cruelty of short-term memory loss is that each time you ask where she is, you get the fresh shock and grief of the news. That was Dad's day yesterday.Comfortingly, it seems to be less so today. Last night he looked crumpled, today he seems more settled. There's a card ...
The Coalition Government’s plan to ‘get Auckland moving’ is a cuts cover-up that will ultimately cost Aucklanders more to move around the city, says Labour Auckland Issues spokesperson Shanan Halbert. ...
Slashing the Ministry of Pacific Peoples by 40% will have a devastating impact on pacific communities and further highlights how little this government cares about anything other than cutting taxes for the wealthiest few. ...
Labour has proposed an urgent inquiry to investigate the ever-increasing profits of supermarkets, aiming to lower costs for shoppers and food producers alike, says Labour Spokesperson for Commerce and Consumer Affairs Arena Williams and Primary Production Spokesperson Cushla Tangaere-Manuel. ...
With 14% of jobs on the line at the Ministry for Ethnic Communities, the responsible Minister Melissa Lee is failing to stand up for the very communities she’s meant to be representing. ...
COURT OF APPEAL: TRIFECTA OF VICTORY FOR NZ FIRST, TRIFECTA OF FAILURE FOR OPPONENTS For the third time since April 2020, New Zealand First has defeated the Serious Fraud Office and all those complicit in a malicious attack against a political party going about its lawful business in a lawful ...
The Green Party stands with people who live in public housing, people in dire housing need, experts and advocates in demanding better than the Government’s archaic approach to housing those who need our support the most. ...
New Zealand has recently lost the hosting rights of some major international sporting events including the America’s Cup, the Rugby Championship, Netball World Cup, and the Wellington Sevens. We are now at a huge risk of losing SailGP as well. And it won’t stop there. The recent issues with SailGP ...
A Member’s Bill drawn this week would modernise insurance law and make things fairer and more transparent for consumers, Christchurch Central MP Duncan Webb said. ...
The Minister for Disability Issues has confirmed she was aware of funding issues in mid-December and did nothing to stop it. On 14 March, she signed off on changes that were announced and implemented on 18 March without any consultation with disability communities. ...
Green Party MP Julie Anne Genter says her members' bill is an opportunity for the coalition government to plug the gap in electric vehicle incentives. ...
The National Government continues to talk about irresponsible tax cuts that will only drive up inflation, despite the country entering a technical recession. ...
The Minister for Disability Issues must act urgently to reinstate flexibility around the funding for disability support and apologise to disabled carers. ...
This story has been initiated by a leftie shill reporter who proactively sought to call a member of a former band, which disbanded twelve years ago, give their biased appraisal of what was said in my speech, and concocted a ham-fisted attempt at a story that does nothing but show ...
The Government has accepted Labour’s change to the Road User Charge (RUC) discount for hybrid vehicles, meaning there will still be some incentive for people to buy greener vehicles. ...
Many in the mainstream media have taken what was said in New Zealand First’s State of the Nation Speech in Palmerston North on Sunday and deliberately, deceitfully, and ignorantly misrepresented what I said and why I said it. The headlines and commentary on the news stated that I compared ‘co-governance ...
Kicking the most vulnerable people out of state housing and pushing them towards homelessness will result in a proliferation of poverty and trauma across our most vulnerable communities. ...
Te Pāti Māori co-leader and MP for Waiariki, Rawiri Waititi has penned a letter asking MPs to support his members bill to remove GST from all food. The bill is expected to go through its first reading in parliament this Wednesday. “I’m calling on all political parties to support my ...
Good afternoon. Thank you for, in your very busy lives, turning up to this meeting today. On October 14th last year New Zealanders overwhelmingly voted for change. That is exactly what this new government is bringing. New Zealand First campaigned to ‘take back our country’ and stop the disastrous economic ...
This year is about getting real with Kiwis and discussing the tough issues, as the National Government exacerbates inequality and divides New Zealand, Labour Leader Chris Hipkins said ...
The Government adding Significant Natural Areas (SNAs) to its already roaring environmental policy bonfire is an assault on the future of wildlife that makes Aotearoa unique. ...
After 12 years of fighting to protect our moana we are finding ourselves back at square one and back at court. Today, the Environmental Protection Agency is sitting in Hawera to reconsider an application from Trans-Tasman Resources to dig up 50 million tonnes of the seabed in South Taranaki. This ...
Minister Shane Jones’ decision to step away from a seabed mining project is evidence of the murky waters surrounding the Government’s fast-track legislation. ...
The growth of Treaty of Waitangi clauses in legislation caused so much worry that a special oversight group was set up by the last government in a bid to get greater coherence in the publicservice on Treaty matters. When ministers first considered the need for tighter oversight in 2021, there ...
The growth of Treaty of Waitangi clauses in legislation caused so much worry that a special oversight group was set up by the last government in a bid to get greater coherence in the publicservice on Treaty matters. When ministers first considered the need for tighter oversight in 2021, there ...
The Coalition Government’s miscalculation saga continues as it has forgotten an eyewatering $90 million gap in its interest deductibility cost figures, say Labour Finance spokesperson Barbara Edmonds and Revenue Spokesperson Deborah Russell. ...
He Pou a Rangi Climate Change Commission has today released advice that says if the Government doesn’t act now New Zealand is at risk of not meeting its climate goals. ...
The Coalition Government has today confirmed it is abandoning first home buyers who are struggling to get ahead, says Labour Finance spokesperson Barbara Edmonds. ...
Transport Minister Simeon Brown has welcomed the passing of legislation to move light electric vehicles (EVs) and plug-in hybrid electric vehicles (PHEVs) into the road user charges system from 1 April. “It was always intended that EVs and PHEVs would be exempt from road user charges until they reached two ...
New Zealand is strengthening its ability to combat illegal fishing outside its domestic waters and beef up regulation for its own commercial fishers in international waters through a Bill which had its first reading in Parliament today. The Fisheries (International Fishing and Other Matters) Amendment Bill 2023 sets out stronger ...
Economists Carl Hansen and Professor Prasanna Gai have been appointed to the Reserve Bank Monetary Policy Committee, Finance Minister Nicola Willis announced today. The Monetary Policy Committee (MPC) is the independent decision-making body that sets the Official Cash Rate which determines interest rates. Carl Hansen, the executive director of Capital ...
Apartment owners and buyers will soon have greater protections as further changes to the law on unit titles come into effect, Housing Minister Chris Bishop says. “The Unit Titles (Strengthening Body Corporate Governance and Other Matters) Amendment Act had already introduced some changes in December 2022 and May 2023, and ...
Foreign Minister Winston Peters will travel to Egypt and Europe from this weekend. “This travel will focus on a range of New Zealand’s traditional diplomatic and security partnerships while enabling broad engagement on the urgent situation in Gaza,” Mr Peters says. Mr Peters will attend the NATO Foreign ...
Transport Minister Simeon Brown is encouraging all road users to stay safe, plan their journeys ahead of time, and be patient with other drivers while travelling around this Easter long weekend. “Road safety is a responsibility we all share, and with increased traffic on our roads expected this Easter we ...
About 1.4 million New Zealanders will receive cost of living relief through increased government assistance from April 1 909,000 pensioners get a boost to Superannuation, including 5000 veterans 371,000 working-age beneficiaries will get higher payments 45,000 students will see an increase in their allowance Over a quarter of New Zealanders ...
Ensuring social housing is being provided to those with the greatest needs is front of mind as the Government restarts social housing tenancy reviews, Associate Housing Minister Tama Potaka says. “Our relentless focus on building a strong economy is to ensure we can deliver better public services such as social ...
The Kermadec Ocean Sanctuary will not go ahead, with Cabinet deciding to stop work on the proposed reserve and remove the Bill that would have established it from Parliament’s order paper. “The Kermadec Ocean Sanctuary Bill would have created a 620,000 sq km economic no-go zone,” Oceans and Fisheries Minister ...
Dam safety regulations are being amended so that smaller dams won’t be subject to excessive compliance costs, Minister for Building and Construction Chris Penk says. “The coalition Government is focused on reducing costs and removing unnecessary red tape so we can get the economy back on track. “Dam safety regulations ...
The coalition Government is expanding the medium-scale adverse event classification to parts of the North Island as dry weather conditions persist, Agriculture Minister Todd McClay announced today. “I have made the decision to expand the medium-scale adverse event classification already in place for parts of the South Island to also cover the ...
The passing of legislation giving effect to coalition Government tax commitments has been welcomed by Finance Minister Nicola Willis. “The Taxation (Annual Rates for 2023–24, Multinational Tax, and Remedial Matters) Bill will help place New Zealand on a more secure economic footing, improve outcomes for New Zealanders, and make our tax system ...
Science, Innovation and Technology Minister Judith Collins and Tertiary Education and Skills Minister Penny Simmonds today announced plans to transform our science and university sectors to boost the economy. Two advisory groups, chaired by Professor Sir Peter Gluckman, will advise the Government on how these sectors can play a greater ...
The Budget will deliver urgently-needed tax relief to hard-working New Zealanders while putting the government’s finances back on a sustainable track, Finance Minister Nicola Willis says. The Finance Minister made the comments at the release of the Budget Policy Statement setting out the Government’s Budget objectives. “The coalition Government intends ...
The coalition Government will look at options to address a zoning issue that limits how much financial support Queenstown residents can get for accommodation. Cabinet has agreed on a response to the Petitions Committee, which had recommended the geographic information MSD uses to determine how much accommodation supplement can be ...
Cabinet has agreed to a short extension to the final reporting timeframe for the Royal Commission into Abuse in Care from 28 March 2024 to 26 June 2024, Internal Affairs Minister Brooke van Velden says. “The Royal Commission wrote to me on 16 February 2024, requesting that I consider an ...
The coalition Government is delivering an $18 million boost to New Zealanders needing to travel for specialist health treatment, Health Minister Dr Shane Reti says. “These changes are long overdue – the National Travel Assistance (NTA) scheme saw its last increase to mileage and accommodation rates way back in 2009. ...
The Government is recognising the innovative and rising talent in New Zealand’s growing space sector, with the Prime Minister and Space Minister Judith Collins announcing the new Prime Minister’s Prizes for Space today. “New Zealand has a growing reputation as a high-value partner for space missions and research. I am ...
Foreign Minister Winston Peters has confirmed New Zealand’s concerns about cyber activity have been conveyed directly to the Chinese Government. “The Prime Minister and Minister Collins have expressed concerns today about malicious cyber activity, attributed to groups sponsored by the Chinese Government, targeting democratic institutions in both New ...
Independent Reviewers appointed for School Property Inquiry Education Minister Erica Stanford today announced the appointment of three independent reviewers to lead the Ministerial Inquiry into the Ministry of Education’s School Property Function. The Inquiry will be led by former Minister of Foreign Affairs Murray McCully. “There is a clear need ...
State Highway 1 across the Brynderwyns will be open for Easter weekend, with work currently underway to ensure the resilience of this critical route being paused for Easter Weekend to allow holiday makers to travel north, Transport Minister Simeon Brown says. “Today I visited the Brynderwyn Hills construction site, where ...
Introduction Good morning to you all, and thanks for having me bright and early today. I am absolutely delighted to be the Minister for Infrastructure alongside the Minister of Housing and Resource Management Reform. I know the Prime Minister sees the three roles as closely connected and he wants me ...
New Zealand stands with the United Kingdom in its condemnation of People’s Republic of China (PRC) state-backed malicious cyber activity impacting its Electoral Commission and targeting Members of the UK Parliament. “The use of cyber-enabled espionage operations to interfere with democratic institutions and processes anywhere is unacceptable,” Minister Responsible for ...
Foreign Minister Winston Peters and Defence Minister Judith Collins today announced New Zealand will provide logistics support for the upcoming Solomon Islands election. “We’re sending a team of New Zealand Defence Force personnel and two NH90 helicopters to provide logistics support for the election on 17 April, at the request ...
The European Union Free Trade Agreement Legislation Amendment Bill received Royal Assent today, completing the process for New Zealand’s ratification of its free trade agreement with the European Union. “I am pleased to announce that today, in a small ceremony at the Beehive, New Zealand notified the European Union ...
Public consultation on the terms of reference for the Royal Commission into COVID-19 Lessons has concluded, Internal Affairs Minister Hon Brooke van Velden says. “I have been advised that there were over 11,000 submissions made through the Royal Commission’s online consultation portal.” Expanding the scope of the Royal Commission of ...
Hardworking families are set to benefit from a new credit to help them meet their early childcare education (ECE) costs, Finance Minister Nicola Willis says. From 1 July, parents and caregivers of young children will be supported to manage the rising cost of living with a partial reimbursement of their ...
A specialised Independent Technical Advisory Group (ITAG) tasked with preparing and publishing independent non-binding advice on the design of a "green" (sustainable finance) taxonomy rulebook is being established, Climate Change Minister Simon Watts says. “Comprising experts and market participants, the ITAG's primary goal is to deliver comprehensive recommendations to the ...
Defence Minister Judith Collins has thanked the Chief of Army, Major General John Boswell, DSD, for his service as he leaves the Army after 40 years. “I would like to thank Major General Boswell for his contribution to the Army and the wider New Zealand Defence Force, undertaking many different ...
25 March 2024 Minister to meet Australian counterparts and Manufacturing Industry Leaders Small Business, Manufacturing, Commerce and Consumer Affairs Minister Andrew Bayly will travel to Australia for a series of bi-lateral meetings and manufacturing visits. During the visit, Minister Bayly will meet with his Australian counterparts, Senator Tim Ayres, Ed ...
Government commits almost $3 million for period products in schools The Coalition Government has committed $2.9 million to ensure intermediate and secondary schools continue providing period products to those who need them, Minister of Education Erica Stanford announced today. “This is an issue of dignity and ensuring young women don’t ...
Good morning, it’s great to be here. First, I would like to acknowledge the New Zealand Institute of Building Surveyors and thank you for the opportunity to be here this morning. I would like to use this opportunity to outline the Government’s ambitious plan and what we hope to ...
Minister for Pacific Peoples Dr Shane Reti has announced the Government’s commitment to the Auckland Secondary Schools Māori and Pacific Islands Cultural Festival, more commonly known as Polyfest. “The Ministry for Pacific Peoples is a longtime supporter of Polyfest and, as it celebrates 49 years in 2024, I’m proud to ...
Before moving onto the substance of today’s address, I want to recognise the very significant and ongoing contribution the Breast Cancer Foundation makes to support the lives of New Zealand women and their families living with breast cancer. I very much enjoy working with you. I also want to recognise ...
New Zealand has notched up a first with the launch of University of Canterbury research to the International Space Station, Science, Innovation and Technology and Space Minister Judith Collins says. The hardware, developed by Dr Sarah Kessans, is designed to operate autonomously in orbit, allowing scientists on Earth to study ...
Introduction Thank you for inviting me to speak with you today and I’m sorry I can’t be there in person. Yesterday I started in Wellington for Breakfast TV, spoke to a property conference in Auckland, and finished the day speaking to local government in Christchurch, so it would have been ...
The Coalition Government is contributing more than $1 million to support the establishment of an emergency multi-agency coordination centre in Northland. Emergency Management and Recovery Minister Mark Mitchell announced the contribution today during a visit of the Whangārei site where the facility will be constructed. “Northland has faced a number ...
New Zealanders have enjoyed a broader range of voices telling the story of Aotearoa thanks to the creation of Whakaata Māori 20 years ago, says Māori Development Minister Tama Potaka. The minister spoke at a celebration marking the national indigenous media organisation’s 20th anniversary at their studio in Auckland on ...
Commercial catch limits for some fisheries have been increased following a review showing stocks are healthy and abundant, Ocean and Fisheries Minister Shane Jones says. The changes, along with some other catch limit changes and management settings, begin coming into effect from 1 April 2024. "Regular biannual reviews of fish ...
Opposition MPs and unions are criticising a proposal by New Zealand’s Ministry of Pacific Peoples to cut staff by 40 percent. The country’s largest trade union — The Public Service Association — says the ministry has informed staff that it is looking to shed 63 of 156 positions. Opposition MPs ...
A poem by Poetry Aotearoa Yearbook 2024 featured poet Carin Smeaton. Daughtr of the 90s when she gets promoted to usherette a baby blu eel carries her all the way up to mothership she’s hovering high she lets the underaged in to see keanu reeves she lets the only lonely ...
Analysis by Keith Rankin. Keith Rankin, trained as an economic historian, is a retired lecturer in Economics and Statistics. He lives in Auckland, New Zealand. My earlier article – Can ‘Good’ be the Greater Evil? – looked at the issue of how wars should end, and how Good versus Evil ...
The only published and available best-selling indie book chart in New Zealand is the top 10 sales list recorded every week at Unity Books’ stores in High St, Auckland, and Willis St, Wellington.AUCKLAND1 AMMA by Saraid de Silva (Moa Press, $38)A stunning debut novel reviewed by Brannavan ...
From Steve Martin to Ricky Stanicky, a pick’n’mix of things worth watching and listening to this long weekend. This is an excerpt from our weekly pop culture newsletter Rec Room. Sign up here. If you’re at a loss for something to occupy yourself with this Easter, don’t panic: The Spinoff’s got ...
Jesus had dinner with his 12 disciples right before he died. Noted historian Madeleine Chapman finds out who really deserved to be there.First published in 2018 but let’s be honest, the subject is timeless. As you sit on your couch this Easter Sunday, eating a chocolate egg you know ...
The newly-promoted Northern League club is on a mission to return to the National League for the first time in two decades. Plenty about domestic football in New Zealand has changed in that time – but the sense that this amateur competition is not an entirely level playing field remains. ...
Auckland Council has put a deadline on new weather-impacted property owners applying for categorisation as government funding looks set to run out. Councillors have voted to support a deadline of September 30 for property owners who haven’t accessed support to come forward and engage with the council’s recovery office. It ...
NONFICTION 1 BBQ Economics by Liam Dann (Penguin Random House, $40) “It’s official,” wrote Dann nine days ago in the Herald, where he works as business editor at large, “we’re in recession.” Yeah, great. He delivered the bad stats: “GDP fell 0.1 percent in the December 2023 quarter, compared with ...
Comment: Every year on February 2, a dozen men in tuxedos and top hats approach the burrow of a groundhog in Gobbler’s Knob, Pennsylvania and entice the beaver-like rodent to emerge and predict the weather. If the groundhog, named Punxsutawney Phil, sees its own shadow when it is summoned, legend ...
Loading…(function(i,s,o,g,r,a,m){var ql=document.querySelectorAll('A[quiz],DIV[quiz],A[data-quiz],DIV[data-quiz]'); if(ql){if(ql.length){for(var k=0;k<ql.length;k++){ql[k].id='quiz-embed-'+k;ql[k].href="javascript:var i=document.getElementById('quiz-embed-"+k+"');try{qz.startQuiz(i)}catch(e){i.start=1;i.style.cursor='wait';i.style.opacity='0.5'};void(0);"}}};i['QP']=r;i[r]=i[r]||function(){(i[r].q=i[r].q||[]).push(arguments)},i[r].l=1*new Date();a=s.createElement(o),m=s.getElementsByTagName(o)[0];a.async=1;a.src=g;m.parentNode.insertBefore(a,m)})(window,document,'script','https://take.quiz-maker.com/3012/CDN/quiz-embed-v1.js','qp'); Got a good quiz question?Send Newsroom your questions. The post Newsroom daily quiz, Friday 29 March appeared first on Newsroom. ...
By Anneke Smith, RNZ News political reporter A petition urging the New Zealand government to provide urgent humanitarian assistance to the Palestinian people has been tabled in the House. More than 200 people gathered on Parliament’s forecourt today and they were met by MPs from Labour, the Greens and Te ...
Pacific Media Watch The Paris-based global media freedom watchdog RSF (Reporters Without Borders) has appealed for information about the “disappearance” of Palestinian journalist Bayan Abusultan. She was reportedly last seen on March 19 among people “sequestered” in this week’s raid and siege of Al Shifa hospital by Israeli troops in ...
EDITORIAL:The Jakarta Post It happens again and again; indigenous Papuans fall victim to Indonesian soldiers. This time, we have photographic evidence for the brutality, with videos on social media showing a Papuan man being tortured by a group of plainclothes men alleged to be the Indonesian Military (TNI) members. ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Robyn J. Whitaker, Director of the Wesley Centre for Theology, Ethics, and Public Policy & Associate Professor, New Testament, Pilgrim Theological College, University of Divinity A strange and eclectic range of activities takes place across these few weeks of the year. Some ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Panizza Allmark, Professor Visual & Cultural Studies, Edith Cowan University It’s Easter weekend, which means many of us will be kicking back with the greatest hits on repeat. But whether you’re a boomer, or an ‘80s or ’90s kid, you might be ...
RNZ Pacific Fiji’s Acting Public Prosecutor has filed an appeal against the sentences of former prime minister Voreqe Bainimarama and suspended police chief Sitiveni Qiliho in their corruption case. Bainimarama was granted an absolute discharge for attempting to pervert the course of justice while Qiliho received a conditional discharge with ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Arosha Weerakoon, Senior Lecturer and General Dentist, School of Dentistry, The University of Queensland Casezy idea/Shutterstock How does toothpaste work? What did people use before toothpaste was invented? – Amelia, age 7, Meanjin (Brisbane) Thanks for your ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Brett Hallam, Associate professor, UNSW Sydney IM Imagery/Shutterstock Solar SunShot is well named. The Australian government announced today it would plough A$1 billion into bringing back solar manufacturing to Australia, boosting energy security, swapping coal and gas jobs for those ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Clare Dix, Research Fellow in Nutrition & Dietetics, The University of Queensland Easter is the time for chocolate. The shops are full of fantastically packaged and shiny chocolates in all shapes and sizes, making trips to the supermarket with children more challenging ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Emma Felton, Adjunct Senior Researcher, University of South Australia Even in a stubborn cost-of-living crisis, it seems there’s one luxury most Australians won’t sacrifice – their daily cup of coffee. Coffee sales have largely remained stable, even as financial pressures have ...
Mining company Trans-Tasman Resources has unexpectedly withdrawn its application for a consent to suck the valuable metals vanadium and titanium from the Taranaki seafloor, as it apparently wagers on the Government’s new fast-track process. It had spent two-and-a-half days putting its case to the Environmental Protection Agency’s decision-making committee, at ...
Contrary to the Associate Minister of Education’s claims, analysis of Healthy School Lunches Programme - Ka Ora, Ka Ako assessments has revealed it provides excellent value for the taxpayer dollar, as a groundswell of public opposition to Government ...
Greenpeace says wannabe Taranaki seabed miner Trans-Tasman Resources is likely banking on Christopher Luxon’s fast-track process to side-step proper scrutiny of its Taranaki seabed mining proposal by bailing out of the Environmental Protection Agency hearing ...
Kiwis Against Seabed mining today slammed Australian owned would-be seabed miner Trans Tasman Resources (TTR) for abandoning its application to the Environmental Protection Authority (EPA) to mine the seabed of the South Taranaki Bight. The company ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Katie Attwell, Associate Professor, School of Social Sciences, The University of Western Australia Ground Picture/Shutterstock Months after COVID vaccines were introduced in 2021, governments and private organisations mandated them for various groups. Health and aged care workers were among the ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Andrew Dzurak, Scientia Professor Andrew Dzurak, CEO and Founder of Diraq, UNSW Sydney Diraq For decades, the pursuit of quantum computing has struggled with the need for extremely low temperatures, mere fractions of a degree above absolute zero (0 Kelvin or ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Adrian Beaumont, Election Analyst (Psephologist) at The Conversation; and Honorary Associate, School of Mathematics and Statistics, The University of Melbourne A national Essential poll, conducted March 20–24 from a sample of 1,150, gave the Coalition a 50–44 lead including undecided, a reversal ...
The Taxpayers’ Union has today made a formal request under the Regulations of the People’s Republic of China on Open Government Information () for information held about how New Zealand Members of Parliament are spending taxpayer ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Robert Nelson, Honorary Principal Fellow, The University of Melbourne A Byzantine depiction of the Eucharist in Saint Sophia Cathedral, Kyiv.Jacek555/Wikimedia Commons, CC BY-SA A nasty quarrel arose in the 11th century over what kind of bread should be used in holy ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Patrick Hesp, Professor, Flinders University Patrick Hesp In some parts of Australia, coastal dunes are retreating from the ocean at an alarming rate, as waves carve up the beach and wind blows the sand inland. But coastal communities are largely ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Luke Heemsbergen, Senior Lecturer, Digital, Political, Media, Deakin University With an impressive 60% of the US smartphone market, Apple is undeniably big, but not a clear monopoly. Yet, years of innovation by Apple have effectively given the company its own exclusive ...
Whether you’re facing layoffs or are just an emotional junior staffer, it’s always a good idea to scout out a good crying place before you need it. It’s an incredibly hard time for Wellington. Across the city, thousands of public servants are hearing tough news about redundancies and layoffs. Government ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By James Miller-Jones, Professor, Curtin University Nuclear explosions on a neutron star feed its jets. Danielle Futselaar and Nathalie Degenaar, Anton Pannekoek Institute, University of Amsterdam, CC BY-SA How fast can a neutron star drive powerful jets into space? The answer, it ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Daryl Adair, Associate Professor of Sport Management, University of Technology Sydney Earlier this week, independent MP Andrew Wilkie accused the AFL of conducting “off the books” illicit drug testing to identify players using substances of abuse, then inappropriately withdrawing them from matches ...
The Government’s announcement that it will scrap plans for a vast marine sanctuary around the Kermadec Islands is ‘shameful’ and will make it impossible for Aotearoa New Zealand to meet its international commitments, says the World Wide Fund for Nature ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By John Quiggin, Professor, School of Economics, The University of Queensland Shutterstock The federal government has bowed to pressure from the car industry, announcing it will relax proposed emissions rules for utes and vans and delay enforcement of the new standards ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Suzanne Rutland, Professor Emerita, University of Sydney In his latest book, Jewish Life in Medieval Spain, Jonathan Ray focuses on the tumult of the 14th century in Spain – a time of the plague, civil strife and war between the two largest ...
While creating a slate of world-class shows, Whakaata Māori also developed a generation of world-class creatives. Television is an odd word. It mixes the Ancient Greek and Latin languages, and its most literal meaning is “far-off sight”. In the contemporary and living language of te reo Māori, “whakaata” as a ...
Yesterday the UN Security Council passed a resolution demanding an immediate ceasefire in Israel’s war on Gaza. This significant step and the deteriorating humanitarian situation in Gaza prompted an urgent debate in the New Zealand Parliament. Leader ...
The Government’s decision to reduce access to continuous glucose monitors (CGM) not only threatens the lives of children with type 1 diabetes and increases the potential for ‘Dead in Bed’ syndrome, but also threatens the health of their parents an ...
Apples are available year-round, but the wide variety on offer involves intensive scientific research – and large-scale commercialisation. What’s beautiful, red, sweet and crunchy? Tony Martin’s favourite kind of apple: Sassy. The CEO of apple and pear breeding organisation Prevar, Martin’s fondness for Sassy represents professional success as well as ...
Family violence specialist service Shine is calling on employers to stop asking for proof of domestic violence in order for employees to access domestic violence leave. The call comes five years after the introduction of the Domestic Violence ...
The Deputy Chairperson of the Finance and Expenditure Committee is calling for public submissions on the Budget Policy Statement 2024. The Budget Policy Statement 2024 (BPS) sets out the Government's priorities for the 2024 Budget. It explains the approach ...
Brutal government spending cuts that will see the size of the Ministry for Pacific Peoples slashed by 40% will hit Pasifika communities hard, the PSA says. The Ministry has told staff that it is seeking voluntary redundancies, and to redeploy and reassign ...
I live with five people I mostly love, but our different ideas about generosity are starting to really irk me.Want Hera’s help? Email your problem to helpme@thespinoff.co.nzDear Hera,This is a bit of a random one but here goes. I’m 22 and work an OK job (OK meaning I get paid ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Maria Nicholas, Senior Lecturer in Language and Literacy Education, Deakin University Earlier this month, the New South Wales government announced it would roll out programs for gifted students in every public school in the state. This comes amid concerns gifted school ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Christopher Rudge, Law lecturer, University of Sydney Massachusetts General Hospital In a world first, we heard last week that US surgeons had transplanted a kidney from a gene-edited pig into a living human. News reports said the procedure was a ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By David Tombs, Howard Paterson Chair of Theology and Public Issues, University of Otago The 5th-century Maskell panel showing Jesus in a loincloth.British Museum, CC BY-NC-SA When Jesus is shown on the cross, he is almost always depicted wearing a loincloth around ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Panizza Allmark, Professor Visual & Cultural Studies, Edith Cowan University Shutterstock When you think about a red object, you might picture a red carpet, or the massive ruby in the Queen’s crown. Indeed, Western monarchies and marketing from brands such ...
COMMENTARY:Jewish Voice for Peace The UN Security Council passed a resolution demanding an immediate ceasefire in Gaza on Monday — and for the first time since the beginning of the Israeli military’s genocide of Palestinians, the United States abstained rather than vetoing it. Security Council resolutions are legally binding, ...
Asia Pacific Report A New Zealand investigative journalist and author says the US spy system hosted by the Government Communications Security Bureau (GCSB) appears to be a controversial intelligence system used in global capture-kill operations. Writing a commentary for RNZ News today, Nicky Hager, author of Secret Power, a 1996 ...
While Nicola Willis wouldn’t give any details on its size, she said a package of tax cuts is definitely still coming in this year’s budget, writes Catherine McGregor in this excerpt from The Bulletin, The Spinoff’s morning news round-up. To receive The Bulletin in full each weekday, sign up here. ...
The Taxpayers’ Union is welcoming the investigation into the Department of Internal Affairs after it was revealed that the Department’s Chief Executive personally reached out to expedite a DJs passport application. Taxpayers’ Union Campaigns ...
Finance minister Nicola Willis delivers her first budget statement, and unwittingly helps Joel MacManus save his relationship. Nicola Willis strode into the Beehive Theatrette. Around me, on the green foldout seats, were the country’s top business and political journalists. They were all here to see her announce the Budget Policy ...
Twenty years ago today, Māori Television launched after much controversy. Jamie Tahana looks back on its survival and impact across two decades. Chad Chambers stepped onto the stage, the brim of his cap casting a shadow across his face. His smile beamed as bright as his white freezing works gumboots, ...
Read Willie Jackson’s excellent Orewa speech https://thedailyblog.co.nz/2017/07/29/breaking-willie-jacksons-explosive-orewa-speech-attacking-don-brash/
Great to see Mr Jackson put serious words to a serious speech.
Self serving wormtongue IMHO!
GP speaking truth to power, even if some voices shake:
At the link, a tweet with graph. Text says:
Aye. Go the Greens!
Now pair this up with a good cartoon…
Text of Willie Jackson’s speech at Orewa Rotary House last night. The event was a fundraiser for Marja Lubeck, the Labour Rodney candidate.
https://thedailyblog.co.nz/2017/07/29/breaking-willie-jacksons-explosive-orewa-speech-attacking-don-brash/
Willie Jackson challenges the Greens to work with Labour on winning the Maori seats.
http://www.newshub.co.nz/home/election/2017/07/end-is-nigh-for-m-ori-party-willie-jackson.html
Metiria Turei stated the two (Labour & the Greens) have already had this discussion, both agreeing there would be no deal or endorsements, thus Willie should go back and talk to his boss.
Willie highlighted that failing to work together may allow the Māori Party to win a seat and go on to prop up a National Government.
Should the two do a deal?
[citation needed for where MT said that there would be no deal and that Willie should go back and talk to his boss. Not moderator intolerance for wasting moderator time – weka]
But haven’t other people on this site stated categorically that Labour would ‘never do a deal’
Clearly Willie is attempting to negotiate one.
Clearly you are trying to flog a dead horse.
I’m not flogging anything.
I’m merely seeing what the feeling is out there for such a deal.
You say:
“Metiria Turei stated the two (Labour & the Greens) have already had this discussion, both agreeing there would be no deal or endorsements”
You ask:
“Should the two do a deal?”
???
That’s right. Seeing what the feeling is out there for such a deal.
Hence, your point is?
Additionally, you are aware Willie is having discussions with a number of Green Party candidates on the matter?
“… both agreeing there would be no deal or endorsements“
Yes, the leadership have both agreed there will be no deal. However, I’m asking the public how they feel about it – not flogging it to them as you incorrectly asserted.
Additionally, even though the leadership have ruled it out, Willie (who is also Labour’s Maori campaign strategist) is holding discussions with Green Party candidates on the matter. Hence it’s not a totally dead horse, and it’s Willie that is attempting to flog it.
Where do you stand on the matter?
See moderator note above.
Labour and GP “working togetehr” is not the same as a deal.
From your link:
Jackson may talk about an agreement to not stand candidates, but the reality is the GP and Labour candidates each present and promote a different focus in their campaigns.
Yes, but in this case they would be “working together” to do a deal.
And it’s an endorsement he is seeking, not for them to stand down.
Yes. And The Chairman is right on this one. On Q&A (just finished) Willie Jackson reiterated the proposal in the Maori seats. He’s in discussions with the Labour leadership and members of the Green Party as we speak.
He is correct. The Greens have got to get over their “no deal” stance –
at least in the Maori seats. Some of those electorates are very tight and the Green’s could end up being the spoiler… thus allowing the Maori National Party to come through the middle and, together with their Pakeha counterparts, taking the treasury benches again.
Simon Wilson thinks the Greens are scared of NZ First being given priority over them should there be a Labour-led government elected. Well, the Greens need to decide what is their number one priority. Is it to be part of a left leaning government that in general terms will reintroduce a government of balance, fairness and justice for all its citizens? Or do they wish to remain in the wilderness with no chance of their more radical policies (and I agree with most of them) ever being put into practice? I know which is the more important. Do you Greens?
Q&A is worth a watch today. Both Willie Jackson and Kelvin Davis showed the Labour leadership how to conduct an interview that will resonate with the punters? Here’s hoping they take notice!
Labour also needs to consider why it is so weak that it continually needs the Greens withdrawing to prop it up. Better policies perhaps?
Also unless there is a significant overhang then Maori as a whole may well be better off under a general left government that does include Maori as MP’s even if the Maori seats are held by a variety of parties. And that left government may come about through campaigning in the Maori seats.
But lets try another scenario on for size. It’s possible that Metiria has dragged a huge chunk of vote towards the Greens from women ( who have always had to deal with WINZ or have a friend who has)
and young people – who have to deal with WINZ/studylink).
If the Greens plus NZF outweigh the Labour vote then we have a whole new game in town. Labour may be on the back foot -perhaps they got rid of Cunliffe too soon.
Labour also needs to consider why it is so weak that it continually needs the Greens withdrawing to prop it up. Better policies perhaps?
Nope. Labour has some damm good policies. It’s just that nobody is listening and that is – in part – because they’re not selling them well. It’s been a bug bear of mine where Labour is concerned for the past 8 years.They seem incapable of condensing them into succinct and simple packages that voters can readily understand.
The Jackson/Davis interview is now online:
https://www.tvnz.co.nz/shows/q-and-a
Labour has conceded it is no longer a major party, that now sits only with national
[That was really stupid Red. Your ban’s now permanent]- Bill
[to clarify for others, Red changed their details to circumvent a short ban – weka]
[lprent: Really really dumb.. ]
That interview was terrible. Unconvincing in the extreme.
@Anne
And they also have some really, really bad ones that puts people off so much that their good ones can’t save them. I.e, their knee-jerk reaction of not supporting raising benefits by 20% despite knowing that National purposefully dropped them 20% below what’s liveable.
RedBaronCV +1
Here is a interesting interview from this morning on RNZ with economist Bill Mitchell, who calls out NZ Labour for being “neoliberal light” and the Greens as being neoliberals on Bikes, which I thought was quite funny….
http://www.radionz.co.nz/national/programmes/sunday/audio/201852897/bill-mitchell-modern-monetary
Also here is Ken Loach making it pretty clear that our ‘neoliberal light’ Labour party is a pretty sad state of affairs….
http://www.radionz.co.nz/national/programmes/saturday/audio/201852860/ken-loach-history-doesn-t-stay-still
Turn labour Left!
Most of the Green radical policies will not become part of government policy even if they are in coalition (Lab/NZF/Green). Certainly not the one relating to welfare entitlements.
Probably they will get some of their environmental policies, but not those that will directly hurt Winston’s rural/provincial supporters. So more money for DOC, more public transport and perhaps incentives for electric cars. Also more water quality expenditure.
We don’t need more water quality expenditure. We need farmers to stop polluting and we need a water market to stop over extraction.
As for the Greens welfare policy, it will never happen. They may as well had a policy launch about improving the quality of oats to feed unicorns.
That’s funny because the most extreme policies proposed by ACT managed to make it into National’s Agenda. Why would you not think that Labour would adopt the Green’s policies as well as those of NZF to put together coherent programme? You seem to suggest that there is a conflict between the green’s policies and those of NZ First but provide no evidence of this.
@Jan Rivers
Wayne’s playing standard RWNJ scare tactics. Inventing BS up out of whole cloth to try and scare people into voting National.
To weka
It was in the clip in the link I provided.
It also aired on 3news last night.
By the way, where do you stand on the matter?
[2 week ban for wasting my time. Next time, provide a link, and if it’s in a video provide the time. Don’t expect other people to do that work for you. – weka]
Metiria Turei stated the two (Labour & the Greens) have already had this discussion, both agreeing there would be no deal or endorsements, thus Willie should go back and talk to his boss.
Weka, I read that to mean that Metiria Turei has declared the parties have already had that discussion and TC is saying that its up to Willie to go back and talk to his boss. Btw, I recall Turei making a statement a day or two ago but not where I saw it. After all there’s been so much said over the past 10-12 days its impossible to remember where one read or saw anything.
I don’t care. It was ambiguous, I asked for clarity. He chose not to clarify. I’m sick of running interference on people’s comments that are misleading. People get 1 chance to make it really clear what they are meaning and what their source is, and they need to do the work on that not expect other people to, especially not moderators. I don’t have the time to do any backwards and forwards on this as a moderator. This is time I want to use writing posts.
This is only going to get worse closer to the election, and probably afterwards, so people need to take more care in how they frame their comments about political parties especially when presenting facts. In an environment where there are very large attempts to undermine the left by misleading statements, spin or outright lies, I have zero tolerance for it here.
TC used that part of his comment to set up a discussion in the way he wanted it to go. It’s deliberate. Which is fine, but it’s needs to be backed up clearly so that people can see it in context and make up their own minds.
Well done Weka.
🙂 We all get there in the end as moderators. Especially when the season of spinners is upon us.
You may have noticed that this is my general policy as well. If people can’t be unambiguous about what they are saying and choose to be obtuse about it, then I will often take the policy of spinning the absolute worst possible interpretation on there spinning and then using that to provide a reason to get the idiots out of my face and out of my valuable time.
It helps clear the deadwood out who are apparently incapable of robust debate because they can’t say what they think and why. I despise the meme pushers who are only interested in pushing a catch phrase and too gutless to stand up to try to defend their use of it.
I find that expressing my worst fears about what I think that they could possibly be saying helps both clear my head, and clears the forums for some better agree to disagree debates.
Be clear about what you are saying folks. The moderators are getting tired as the baseload of comments rises up towards election month. If you try to confuse it, you’re likely to lose your ability to say it here.
thanks for that Lynn.
I am pleased to agree with Karen.
Sorry, my intent wasn’t to waste your time. I provided a link. However, I was unaware a time frame was also required for such a short clip. Moreover, the comments aired within the first minute of the clip.
Again, time wasting was not my intent and now that I know, it won’t happen again.
See you all in a couple of weeks.
Interesting 2 min vid. Methinks someone is losing the plot 😉
If that’s a comment directed at my moderation, I’d prefer it be dealt with in the backend.
ffs dial it back a tad, aye? Willie Jackson is losing the plot.
Your comment could be read either way. Good that you clarified.
I see that the document that Jonathan Coleman “tabled” when answering the excellent questioning by Julie Anne Genter is now 9 months overdue.
Official Information requests
Document containing advice re Sugar Tax from MOH tabled during question time 13.10.2016
Request sent to Minister of Health by John Gray on October 13, 2016.
Long overdue.
Document tabled during Question Time on 13.10.2016 which contained advice from the Ministry of Health saying that there is no conclusive evidence around sugar tax.
Document tabled on 13.10.2016 during Question 8 of Question Time re advice from MOH on Sugar Tax
Request sent to Minister of Health by John Gray on October 14, 2016.
Long overdue. (9 months overdue)
https://fyi.org.nz/search/sugar%20tax/all
Lifting the lid on what they’ve been up to in health is the last thing national want.
What is most annoying about the idea of sugar tax is that sugar is a highly addictive substance. It’s not like it’s easy to choose differently overnight and the people most affected are low income earners (just check out any WINZ waiting line – full of carb and sugar addicts).
This is particularly offensive because the government has promoted a moderation approach to sugar which doesn’t work.
Essentially sugar tax just takes money from people the government themselves have mistrained people to think a little bit sugar is OK,
I’m getting a bit pissed off with the notion that the behaviour of the poor can be modified by taxing the shit out of them. The middle class don’t care about a sugar tax.
“The Greens are neoliberals on bicycles”. I love it! Serves them right for signing a silly fiscal responsibility agreement with Labour.
Maybe that is now immaterial since the Greens social welfare policy was released ( along with Metiria’s colossal fall from grace with the Right).
Surely the welfare policy would take us out of the fiscal responsibility parameters? After all we can’t have our cake and eat it too, or can we?
Labour plan to maintain a $4 billion plus surplus after their own welfare spend. The Greens costed increasing core benefit rates at $1.4 billion. Hence, they have the fiscal scope to commit to both and still maintain a reasonable surplus, thus still come across as being fiscally conservative.
That’s a good point and its true. They also have a higher ceiling of public spending compared with National who are headed on a track of greater and greater austerity down to 26-27% of GDP. A Labour Green government would be spending an additional $2-3bn in the first year more than National, 4-6bn in the second year and 6-9bn in the third year while National removes itself completely from universal provision in health, education and welfare in favour of so-called Social Investment approaches which rely on big data.
Prof Bill Mitchell mentioned above talked convincingly about why surpluses are bad for people when he spoke in Wellington on Friday. A link to the lecture is here.
http://bilbo.economicoutlook.net/blog/?p=36534
We really can’t have our cake and eat it to. It’s just a pity that most people, including most economists and politicians, don’t understand that particular truism.
Think of it like this:
You have a cake, it’s sitting there on the plate. It’s a tasty cake so you eat it. After you’ve eaten it it’s no longer on the plate and thus you no longer have it.
Off the coast of Taranaki we have somewhere between 300 million and two billion tonnes of iron sand. This is presently being ‘eaten’ (Extracted and sold offshore) by an Australian firm at approximately twenty million tonnes per year. Once they’ve finished eating it we’ll no longer have it.
This applies to every single resource in a country.
But we can utilise our resources better so that we don’t have poverty. Of course, that would mean that we don’t have rich people either because rich people are the misuse of our resources.
Some resources are renewable and as long as they are used sustainably we can have our cake and eat it too.
I think the key to this is the ownership, i.e. who controls the resources, and I think that only public ownership has a chance of providing open & transparent processes and sufficient control. Private ownership inevitably leads to maximising profits and thus unsustainable use of resources; the cake will be gone before we know it.
Externalities and unintended consequences are passed on to others, be it, in no particular order, the next owners, the public, the neighbours, the next generation, the paying customers, etc. Public ownership is the best option IMO to deal with externalities in a holistic way.
In general, (natural) resources should only be used to benefit society as a whole, not to the advantage of a small minority. If it is owned by the public and used for the public then the profit motive won’t be the dominant force.
SOEs, or whatever shape they might have, will not compete but collaborate because they share the same owners and serve the same mission. Efficiency and productivity are equally guided by the same mission, which is to serve the needs of the whole of the nation, not just a (the) few.
Our current political system is not suited to such Utopian ideals. Our laws, or Constitution for that matter, are not either. And least conducive of all is the stranglehold of (neo)liberalism that still seems to mesmerise our politicians and a large segment of the population.
Is it possible to extend the cohesive bonds of family and local community to a national level? If so, how do we achieve this? And then at/to the next level …
Well, no. They’re sustainable within limits. If we exist within those limits then they’re permanently sustainable. If we go outside of those limits then they get whittled down even if they regenerate.
Almost, but not quite. We actually have public ownership of all natural resources in NZ. Even ownership of a house doesn’t convey ownership of the land or anything in it.
But we licence out the extraction of those resources and we don’t put in any restrictions on who it’s sold to. And although we put in place restriction on the speed of the extraction often times that ‘restriction’ means that the entire resource deposit will be completely extracted by the time the licence is up.
QFT
Ta
Those licences are, in practice, transfers of ‘ownership’ with little democratic oversight and thus with little control. The OIA is a farce and no help (commercial sensitivity is off-limit); without having the right information it is almost impossible to ask the right questions, which is how counter-intuitive the whole OIA is. IMHO all information relating to publically owned resources must be made publically available without delay and restriction. At the moment the situation is the exact opposite but some people do know!! This is principally un- or even anti-democratic.
One genuine Q: has the ownership of water been sorted here in NZ or is it still “nobody owns the water”?
It’s still ‘nobody owns water’. National won’t change that as it would mean that we would charge for it if state ownership was recognised and that would kill off many of National’s donor’s businesses as they’re predicated upon not paying their full costs.
“along with Metiria’s colossal fall from grace with the Right”
lol
I didn’t know they had held her in such high esteem…
We often hear the catch-cry a vote for Winston is a vote for National. But with Hone also unwilling to commit, does it mean a vote for Mana is a potential vote for National?
How badly do you think his unwillingness to commit will impact his support?
Party-Vote for either Mana or TOP = Wasted Vote … in my ever so humble opinion.
Neither are likely to cross either threshold – hence Left vote down plughole in a (hoping against hope) potentially tight Election.
“Party-Vote for either Mana or TOP = Wasted Vote … in my ever so humble opinion.”
That looks correct. The only guaranteed way to change the government is party vote green or labour and to tactical vote in the electorates to remove the national candidate.
It’s so simple, even voters can understand it.
Only remotely plausible chance of either Party crossing threshold is Harawira winning Te Tai Tokerau … but – despite deal with Maori Party – Davis still odds-on.
A remote possibility, yes, but I can’t see that happening so hold with the opinion of a wasted party vote.
Top are more likely to get a higher vote than Mana, though what percentage of that will come from the left is an unknown.
Left leaning voters who don’t vote green or labour could potentially, in a really tight race, result in a fourth national government. They could, even with a three party coalition, mean more influence for NZ1st than I’m sure most of us would ever want.
I don’t trust them to do the right thing, easy as it is, but I do hope, futile as it may or may not be, for the greater good wins out.
Mine too.
When it comes down to the election, I don’t think that Mana, TOP, United Future, Act and probably even the Maori party will get more than 1%.
http://archive.electionresults.govt.nz/electionresults_2014/partystatus.html
In the 2014 election the Conservatives got almost 4%, and then did the usual thing that our conservative religious parties did and started a standup pissing contest all over each other – probably funded by the National party and performed via the usual sources. Unlike NZ First who had a similar fate back in 2008, I don’t think we will see them this election.
Internet Mana and the Maori party both got slightly less than 1.5%, and I don’t think that their standing in front of voters has improved since then.
Act managed got 0.69%. Which is the same territory that I think TOP will get into. While Seymour has probably been less of a complete dickhead than his predecessors in the role, I don’t think that any strange multi-millionaire will be bothered to prop them up this election.
United Future managed to just edge out the Ban1080 party when they got 0.22%. That definitely puts them in the loopy brigade.
Plus I think that kiwi voters are just plain uninterested in the nutter fringes of politics this time around.
But with Hone also unwilling to commit, does it mean a vote for Mana is a potential vote for National?
Well, that would depend on the likelihood of Mana being willing to do a deal to keep National in power, wouldn’t it? And, given that that likelihood approximates to 0, the answer to your question is “No. No, it doesn’t. Have you been drinking?”
Here is another reason to vote Labour-read about it:
http://www.eds.org.nz/our-work/policy/media-statements/media-statements-2017/media-release-nbsp-eds-critical-of-tenure/
National is continuing with the Tenure Review process that involves a massive transfer of state owned precious and highly sensitive high country to their farmer mates who then sell off parts of it to developers at a huge profit. And I mean huge.
Labour’s policy is to immediately stop the Tenure Review process.
Beatriz at Dinner is currently showing at the Film Festival. It’s a little heavy handed but worth a look.
Here’s the trailer.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bCLNTmNj5bI
[TheStandard: A moderator moved this comment to Open Mike as being off topic or irrelevant in the post it was made in. Be more careful in future.]
Australian terrorist plot to bring down an airplane foiled:
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2017-07-29/australia-foils-plot-to-bring-down-plane-pm-turnbull-says
Both Qantas and Virgin will start increased security measures as a result – that’s for all of you considering flying shortly – whether to Australia or passing through.
I thank all I hold holy that this kind of plot hasn’t happened here yet.
How to know that it happened, over there?
Because someone said so…
Not enough. Is it…
Then its best you play it no mind and just run along now….
http://www.smh.com.au/nsw/three-terror-raids-carried-out-across-sydney-20170729-gxlgip.html
http://www.theaustralian.com.au/national-affairs/national-security/police-conduct-terror-raids-across-sydney/news-story/43b9e1326594a9b2ed70d334c38f1bbd
https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2017/jul/30/australian-police-foil-elaborate-plot-to-detonate-bomb-on-plane
Why would you think posting different links from the same source proves anything more..
It doesn’t!
Wait to see how many arrested, are released…
Exactly as has happened over there many times, in recent years…
Looking at the poll tonight Labour are in serious trouble. The support they have lost has seemingly moved over to the Greens who are on 15%, but at 24% Labour are in deep trouble. I’m wondering if their support is likely to fall another 2-3%, and I believe there is a serious risk of this, and meanwhile National continue to hold steady on 47% which is where have been more or less for nearly a decade. THe Labour leadership need to ask why their party has stubbornly remained 20ish points behind National for a decade
The polls didn’t get it wrong – they were designed to shape public opinion.
They reflect public opinion. IFIFY
They shape public opinion:
24% (Labour) + 15% (Greens) + 11% (NZFirst) = 50%. The current National Party + mates arrangement is toast on this poll and Colmar Brunton is known to favour the centre-right. I’m not sure what the problem is…?
Hi Scott,
I’m well aware of voting Blocks, but I think that it is more complicated than simple blocks. labour now have andrew little publicly admitting that he has considered resigning. That is almost the worst thing to ever admit less than eight weeks from the election. With the Nats on 47% and Labour on 24% there simply cannot be a mandate for a party returning their worst ever election result to then proceed with forming a government. But the bigger immediate issue for Labour is being seen as a lost cause and voters simply don’t turn out to support a party that is perceived to have lost before polling day. Will this start a bleed of support for Labour?
You say you’re aware of voting block but then go on to single out labour’s vote.
47% plays 39% on this poll, so a swing of 4% ties it all up. Still all to play for on the run in as polls traditionally close up.
Good for the greens. Hope it continues. At least we can now put to bed the doom and gloom of MT’s ‘damaging’ winz admission.
Yawn. the National Party has to get more seats than the pro-New Zealand parties to form a government. Thanks for letting everyone know that you won’t respect the election result if that doesn’t happen.
I think it was Andrew that indicated that in that interview…
Of course I’ll always respect the outcome of the election. We live in a democracy. But I can’t see how it is tenable for a party that is currently on track for its worst result to then proceed to form a Government that would deliver three years of stability, economic growth, and investment is social and infrastructure programmes. what I’d love for Labour to understand and importantly address is the core reason why they have been behind National by about 20 points for nearly a decade. I’m also a firm believer in NZ electing the government and Prime Minister. NOt Winston having the final say depending who will deliver to him the best baubles
You can’t see it. True.
I note your confidence in Colmar Brunton.
Andrew little did not deny the poll, but I usually rely more on the poll of polls. The election is now less than eight weeks away, and I can’t see a reason for people of nz to change. The message Labour have been giving is not reasonating with the good people of NZ. I do want to ask my Local MP Grant Robertson , and also candidate Paul Eagle. In truth I don’t believe that Labour are being honest with themselves. This is not just some temporary slump, but a persistent feature for the past three elections and nine years. THere are several reasons, but I just can’t see any game changer ahead for Labour.
If Colmar Brunton’s track record is any indication (which it probably isn’t), the National Party will get about 42%.
As for Labour, the more Greens in Cabinet the better.
I love how honesty from politicians just blows some folks’ minds.
Acknowledging your flaws and asking colleagues whether you’re the best person for the job is actually a good thing – I’m fed the fuck up with incompetent ministers who sign off on shit that fouls up the pay of tens of thousands of people, or even endangers or kills people, and then they go on TV and say that it was someone else’s fault and they themselves are doing a good job. Was it Wilkinson who looked visibly surprised at the thought that she should resign after people died (Pike River ISTR?)?
Fuck it, we actually need politicians who admit their faults, who admit the decisions they made 20 years ago or the decisions they made 20 days ago maybe weren’t the best, or weren’t legal, or weren’t what one would expect of a leader. But they just fucking come clean if it’s relevant. I’ve had enough of bluster.
Yep
+111
And that’s something that we will never again see from National.
It isn’t actually more complicated than “simple blocks” though is it? If after the election National, say, can’t command a majority of votes in The House then either the Opposition Parties get to have a go at forming a government or we have a new election depending on the GG. Simply winning the biggest share of the vote doesn’t give any party the right to form a government.
Link?
In an MMP environment there’s no such thing as a mandate for one particular party over any other. If Peter Dunne could put together a governing coalition with him as the leader then we’d have the first Peter Dunne led government.
Once I got ‘educated’ on this topic by no other than the SYSOP:
https://thestandard.org.nz/preliminary-rm-results-nzf-jumps-to-9/#comment-1149035
Here’s a little more:
https://gg.govt.nz/office-governor-general/roles-and-functions-governor-general/constitutional-role/constitution
Really can’t see the problem?
Let me help.
The problem is that Peters loathes the Greens, and they have completely opposed support bases.
There is no way a Lab/Green/NZFirst coalition can come together.
Besides, if Peters becomes kingmaker, would his supporters really want him to prefer Lab/Green to Nat?
The majority of NZ1st and Greens policies mesh quite well.
Yes there is.
Probably.
NZ1st/Green mesh quite well. NZ1st and labour mesh even better.
NZ1st and National policies don’t mesh at all.
“Besides, if Peters becomes kingmaker, would his supporters really want him to prefer Lab/Green to Nat?”
Yep.
The New Zealand Election Study has shown that NZF’s new supporters (at 2011 & 2014 Elections) have come disproportionately from Labour.
Colmar Brunton’s 2015 vote-switching analysis suggests that, more recently, NZF have been attracting support from Labour and National supporters in fairly equal proportion … but that still means a particularly large % of current intending NZF voters are former Lab supporters (they certainly greatly outnumber former Nats).
In addition (indeed, as a consequence of the above) … NZF supporters consistently show unusually strong antagonism towards the National Govt in various Issue Polls (eg 2014 attitudes to Key Govt’s Dirty Politics / Asset Sales / TPPA / Flag change etc). Interestingly enough, this antagonism towards the Tories is rivaled only by that of Green supporters.
So, in a word, Yep.
Labour are on 24% and you cannot see that the problem is?
Lab down three.
Greens up four.
The problem for you is that the more progressive party on the left is growing its share of the bloc, and the bloc doesn’t seem to be any the worse for it.
Love your optimism.
But if you cannot see the issue of the main opposition party being on 24% (or less) – they are simply not credible for opposition – little less government.
You do realise that there’s three main opposition parties don’t you? And that together they get more support than National and it’s cling-ons.
you are being very generous if you think one of those parties will oppose the Nats after the election.
The only way of ensuring a change of government is getting Labour/Green to 48ish % – Labour 32%, Green 16%.
Any scenario which involves Winston is essentially a flipping the coin to see what happens
you miss the entire point – again.
Oh, I got your ‘point’ – I just didn’t think it had any relevancy.
Unlike like the authoritarians of the Right-wing – the Left doesn’t need nor want a ‘main party’.
Hell, you’ve been polishing the national turd for years.
“Main opposition party” is valid in FPP. It’s sad you haven’t figured out that MMP can do a true coalition of equals. It doesn’t need to be 47:1:1:1.
It can be 30:20, 25:15:10, or even 20:20:20.
I just want you bastards out of government, and replaced by something vaguely left wing – the more left the better. I don’t care what the party names are.
In that case you are going to be very disappointed.
Bold words for someone who’s most optimistic pollster still has them relying on winston peters.
BTW – if there wasnt an issue – why would Little talk about stepping down?
Because Corin Dann asked him.
Well we know that’s not true.
Not sure if you are using humour or telling porkies ?
Do you care about the poor of New Zealand?
Are you concerned by New Zealand’s youth suicide rates?
Corin Dann didn’t ask little about stepping down?
Damned sure I saw a clip where he did…
My recollection, too McFlock. Then, having asked that question, the same interviewer said on TV1 news that Little introduced the topic, IIRC.
Exactly which was a lie.
Its true. Remember media headlines around this? http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=11865741
Andrew Little’s response to Corin Dann confirmed he has the support of his mps/party.
Polls move around. Better to look at the trend over time.
“THe Labour leadership need to ask why their party has stubbornly remained 20ish points behind National for a decade”
It’s MMP, we’re way beyond that question. More important is the left bloc.
On the back of the Barclay scandal and the media finally highlighting the homelessness crisis, this is nothing short of an absolute fucking disaster of a poll.
Trends are obviously what is more important, but the fact any single poll shows National at 47% on the back of the last month of negative headlines for them should be a huge cause of concern for anyone who wants to change the government.
I am stressed and flattened by this.
This time in 2014 (h/t Swordfish on the National List post) Colmar Brunton had the National Party on 52%. They got 47%.
What does that tell you?
That tells us that the current Poll of Polls with National drifting down to about 42% is probably about right…
And where did it have Labour?
It also tells me that Labour were polling at 28% then and came in at 25% – using your Logic Andrew Little should be sharpening his CV.
Exactly. If the election gives this result with no left wing party even close to 30% … then National sitting well over 40% would absolutely be expected to have first shot at forming a govt.
Given the Greens have ruled out going into coalition with National this leaves a very sad coalition with NZ1 as the likely outcome.
“If the election gives this result with no left wing party even close to 30% … then National sitting well over 40% would absolutely be expected to have first shot at forming a govt.”
Why? I mean, some FPP people think that, but I can’t see any reason why National should have first crack if they’re on 42% and L/G are on 42%.
“why National should have first crack if they’re on 42% and L/G are on 42%.”
Because National IS on 42% and Labour are 24% and Greens 15%.
Labour (the lead party) on 24% is simply not credible.
You haven’t said why James. All you’ve done is assert something without rationale. It’s MMP, why does it matter if there are two parties closer to each other in MP numbers? I could see that as an asset.
Do you understand MMP?
Yup
Only if you buy into National self-serving delusion.
If Labour were on 42 % and National on 24% – I bet you would be saying that Labour should have the first shot at forming a government.
not so much if act were on 14% and rising.
But national has no friends…
I think that no party should have ‘first shot’. That’s not how MMP works.
It’s the parties that come together to form a coalition that is greater than 50% that forms the government.
There’s no ‘second shot’. There’s ‘have you got it or not’.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p3j2NYZ8FKs
You are wrong. MMP has not changed the principle of Government formation. The Governor General determines who will be invited to form a government based on the advice of the prime minister. The PM will advise that he should be invited to form a government. Alternatively he will advise that the Leader of the Opposition be invited to form a government. In either case the support will need to be tested in the House. If the new government loses a confidence motion the new PM would resign.
The governor General would then ask the Leader of the opposition if he could form a government. If he said no, there would be a new election.
So in summary, MMP has not changed those conventions. Someone always gets ‘first shot’.
Yes, the prime minister. Not based on relative percentages at the ballot box, which seems to be James’ position.
What you describe is that one person gets asked first and then someone else gets asked second and then we go for another election. But it’s not a first shot at forming the government but just first at being asked if they’ve already done so.
Before the GG asks the parties have already negotiated and have an answer and there’s no ‘first shot’ in those negotiations.
The MMP legislation makes a coalition of say 10 minor parties all on 5.5% equally possible as a coalition of one other party on 45% plus one of the other minors.
In one case you would have 10 parties trying to form a stable govt, the other just 2. While you are correct technically, I damn well know which would be accepted by the public.
And which one any sane GG would give assent to.
Lucky we have only three parties with a track record of cooperation and a fair amount of common ground, eh.
I damn well know which would be accepted by the public.
The one that ends up as government. There’s nothing that the public can do to stop it.
The GG doesn’t get that choice. If there’s a coalition in front of him saying that they can form a government then he has to accept that. If he doesn’t then he’s breaking the constitution.
Colmar Brunton poll (2/3): Refuse to answer 4%, undecided 16% (+1).
https://twitter.com/ColmarBruntonNZ
So 20% unaccounted for. Also what is the margin of error?
your onto it…20% of a weighted (probably incorrectly) result…the poll is almost worthless.
There is only one poll that matters
If the undecided percentage is near 20%, surely it is utterly necessary for a state-funded TV news service to say so? Only 2 parties scored higher than 20%, which makes their speculation about what the make-up of parliament might be a big load of rocking-horse effluent.
I have no idea whether there is any regulatory requirement for such information to be reported, though i suspect probably not…especially if it upsets the narrative.
as indicated previously, these polls are almost worthless….turnout will be the key.
Quite frankly it should not be allowable to discuss a poll in the media unless you state the margin of error and the undecided. Corin Dann needs a strong reprimand.
Now I see that Tracy Watkins repeats the same in Stuff. It is simply not good enough! https://i.stuff.co.nz/national/politics/95260532/labour-bleeds-while-greens-profit-from-metiria-tureis-fraud-bomb
Dann is one of the biggest shit stirrers that the MSM has.
It’s reasonable to assume the ‘undecideds’ in any poll result will eventually vote in a pattern similar to all those who have already made up their minds.
The good news is that in principle they’re ‘persuadable’ and are amenable to some event between now and the election causing them to swing. The bad news is we have no idea which direction such a ‘swing’ might be.
“It’s reasonable to assume the ‘undecideds’ in any poll result will eventually vote in a pattern similar to all those who have already made up their minds.”
Not sure about that. I can think of variables that would swing the balance differently.
Anyone know if there’s been research on this?
Well personally I might hope they’ll all finish up voting for Gareth Morgan … but that’s not terribly likely is it? 🙂
So he can get the nats over the line instead of NZ1st. Thanks for that.
To be perfectly straight about it, I’d much prefer the Nats had to go into coalition with TOP than NZ1 … but in reality that’s pretty unlikely.
Also keep in mind that TOP’s stated preference is to stay on the cross-benches and would only sign up to Confidence and Supply if they were the sole cab off the rank.
Interestingly TOP do seem to have doubled from just under 1% to 2% … but that could be equally just noise.
Even more than with NZ1st, a vote for TOP seems like a vote for national.
I don’t understand why any supposed lefties would wilfully and knowingly vote for the enemy.
We can only hope they come to senses on election day, do the decent thing, and resist propping up the nasty party by voting green or labour to change the government.
Even more than with NZ1st, a vote for TOP seems like a vote for national.
Why?
Their policy objectives have way more in common with the Greens than anyone else.
next election maybe 😛
I this this is akin to the Missing Million arguement. The reality is polls do move around, but the danger for Labour is that they get to a point where they are perceived a hopeless losers like happened to Bill English in 2002. And the consequence of this is voter stay away in droves. GReen support at 15% gives them reason to be optimistic, but it is at the expense of Labour. THe Labour Green block cannot penetrate into Nationals steadfast baseline support that is constantly at 47% in nearly every poll
Except this time in 2014, when Colmar Brunton had them on 52%.
I wonder how many of those million appear in their sample.
OK I’m happy with that observation. So let’s assume National lose 5% between now and the election and land up on 42%. The bulk of it will go to either NZ1 or maybe TOP. Still no problem forming a govt.
Even if Labour crawl back up over 30%, National are still in the driving seat.
Unless we have an unexpected change.
The problem here is that Peters won’t say if he will treat the L/G vote as a bloc or will consider National the first party to talk to. And NZF voters are ok playing roulette.
Except in the past two major polls which had it at 42%. I can understand you righties getting all excited but what has happened here is that the support for the left has increased slightly and I am sure the right’s support is less than CB thinks.
Um, from memory polls have seen National as low as 42%, what are you on about?
edit, snap micky. Plus one of the recent ones had L/G ahead of National.
nat/nz1 no change for either, lab down, grn up by slightly more, no real change for total labgrn.
Trend’s not looking so hot for labour, but nz1 still likely kingmaker
CB has a bias that reflects the leafy suburbs,and tends to over estimate both national and the greens 3.2 and 1-2.5% respectively.
They underestimate labour,NZ first and the maori party, which cumulatively is 4-5.5% being the overestimate for the former.
Interesting- on the RHS of Colmar Brunton twitter page, it suggests that I might also like (complete with twitter handles:
Corin Dann
Matthew Hooton
NZ National Party
David Farrar
Jordyn Williams
I don’t!
lol
That’s better than looking at where CB is on Labour’s poll of polls trend line (mostly below, I suspect)
Just useless noise.
Apparently:
I’m not so sure it’s completely useless. Mostly useless?
I hate to say it, but I’m thinking it might be showing that the Greens didn’t follow through very well on Metiria’s launch of the social security policy.
But yes. Just a one point snapshot in time. And the way NZ reports on polls is ridiculous (opaque). There should be two sets of percentages. One with undecideds removed from the sum total used in the calculation and one with them included in the sum total used in the calculation.
Might be too soon re the follow up (what’s the time lag on events and polls again?). But I tend to agree that the follow up has been dominated by defense against the reactionary forces. Two weeks seems reasonable, am hoping they’ve got some more cards to play soon though.
I’d have been looking for a shift beyond the specifics of social security to a broader platform espousing the general values that are in accord with the social security policy. So, to steal a phrase, hitting everything with a “for the many, not the few” refrain, as a clear indication that the status quo’s getting binned if the Greens have their way.
More policy releases in tune with the social security one could be in the pipeline (I hope so). But the policies on their own, without the engine that comes from generating a more general groundswell of sentiment within largish parts of society, are limited in their effect.
I’d be interested to hear if they’re engaging in any concerted recruitment drive at the moment – taking full advantage of any momentum they have at the moment and pushing it; getting feet on the ground to fight for every available vote.
“a controversial admission of DPB fraud has given the Greens a massive boost”
There ya go, bro.
Wanted to rent — Secluded Igloo or similar, for next two months. Depressed tenant, Rent paid in cash.
I think the poll was conducted at the beginning of July:
before Turei’s speech.
No that link you post is to an older poll. The Web site has not been updated to include the latest poll.
It isn’t just this poll. Labour are drifting to utter catastrophe. It is all well and good to talk about the undecided vote, but given the lack of inspiration and passion so far in this election campaign from Labour they’ll probably just not vote at all. I reckon we are heading towards a 65% turn out max.
What is it about neoliberalism that turns Labour PLPs into technocratic, out-of-touch, smug and entitled collections of careerists? They are too fucking arrogant to see what should be obvious – they are in deep trouble and need to PANIC, completely rethink their whole fundamental approach to politics and just… just fucking grow some balls and show us they believe in something other than muggins turn.
Their policy so far has been too technocratic and timid, full of thickets of ifs and buts and maybes. They’re thinking seems stuck in 1990s, wedded to neoliberal economic orthodoxy and, frankly, their main tactic at the moment appears to be relying on National losing.
The Labour caucus is – yet again – completely missing in action, 54 days out from the election. The current crop of Labour politicians are completely useless at politics.
The Greens have outflanked them on the left, exploiting the Corbyn-Sanders effect and showing they might actually understand ordinary folks problems.
NZ First is killing them in the provinces. There vote is is 3-4% higher than this poll, mark my words.
LABOUR FUCKING NEEDS TO WAKE UP AND SMELL THE COFFEE!!!!!
When you recall that Phil Goff, and even the hated Cunliffe, were doing way better than this you really have to wonder.
Little’s best option is to see it through to the election and if Labour are under 35% then he, along with the rest of his front bench can resign with dignity, and give Adern a clean start.
Or they can wind the Party up and make a nice donation to the Greens with the proceeds 🙂
I think Labour might be hopeful of holding 25%. I’m thinking that their whole policy platform is simply never going to attract the vote of middle NZ.about 18 months or two year ago I had a good conversation with Andrew Little and we discussed capturing the imagination of NZ. In particular the centre where the election is won. But the influence of the left of the party, the unions, and I suggest also the lack of intellectual grunt that was present when Clark and Cullen were at the helm has prevented this from happening.
Playing musical cheers with the leadership is no good. The next losers up will be Gracinda, and they are lackadasical middle class careerists. All they represent is the inept PLP and their own technocratic ambitions. Little has got a useless caucus that is lazy and politically clueless. Labour has to re-think everything from the ground up, including how and who they select to be MPs, what they stand for and what the party exists to do.
At the moment, they stand for nothing and the PLP is full of under performing chumps like Ruth Dyson (remember her?) Jenny Salesa (who? never heard from her once, unforgivable when there are only 31 MPs) Megan Woods (Ever heard from her either? No? Me neither. Pathetically ineffectual on Canterbury issues and climate change), David Parker (last spotted in 2015 and heading for the exit), Trevor fucking Mallard (a burnt out political joke, it is a disgrace he occupies a valuable seat), Poto Williams (useless at scoring hits on the government, but that is OK because as far as i can tell, she was mainly selected to be spokesperson for political correctness and guardian of identity politics), Clare “vanishing majority” Curren, David Clarke, the invisible man in a caucus of hopeless invisible MPs, etc etc.
Labour has a caucus where six of their MPs are from Maori seats, and apart from Kelvin Davis none of them appear to do anything to justify their existence to the wider electorate. Given that these MPs represent fully 20% of the PLP, this is unacceptable. They need to pull their weight a lot more.
Labour only has 31 MPs. Only a handful seem to do anything, but with 31 MPs they ALL need to be working bloody hard. the rest are taking the piss out of their supporters and one can justly suspect they are lazy mofos in the best paying job they are ever likely to hold.
Well said, it appears that this current bunch of clowns want to lose this election just like last the one and some of the above are more worried about themselves than winning the election so we can bury this neo lib bullshit for good.
Some of these middle class toff’s within Labour need to be shown the door, if we get another piss poor result in this yrs election.
I’ll leave you some words of wisdom from my late grandmother who was born in Blackball and Labour Party member to the day she passed away in Nelson.
“If the Labour Party keeps bringing in these middle class toff’s, these middle class toff’s are going to wreck Labour for good forget it’s history/ roots (aka why it was formed) then it will be the fault of theses selfish middle class toff’s for driving away the workclass (the very backbone/ heart of the party as she would say) vote to possibly the greens or Winnie. Because they are too lazy and leave it up to tieless volunteers of workclass/ less privilege members of the party who believe in the party’s values, the very reason why the party exists, it’s endstate to a better place for a common good, as there is no I in team and the NZ Labour Party will be merely a party in name only by the time I’m passed away.”
Rosa Beaurepaire, née Rosa Balderstone.
Have to agree with you Sanctuary. The PLP – apart from Kelvin – has been entirely missing or misfiring in action. Lazy is one word for it, lacking intellectual leadership and fire is another.
Or perhaps the PLP has looked at the polling which has a corrupt, venal and nasty National still close to 50% at the end of three terms, on track for four or five – and just given up.
Yep, rather like a old Black powder rifle going off all smoke, but no shot coming out.
Well there is no question in my mind, the fundamental makeup of the NZ electorate has changed in the past decade or so.
Absolutely this is only one poll. At best it represents the Greens gaining a bit, completely at the expense of Labour. And Turei’s laudable outburst of honesty and political guts is almost certainly the reason for that.
NZ1 is categorically NOT a left wing party and counting on them for a left wing coalition is just magical thinking. Peters will do what Peters wants to do, and his parties policies are actually a bit to the right of, and more reactionary than National.
In total the left wing bloc that we can count on still only adds up to less than 40% and it’s been slowly but surely eroding for years. We can rearrange deck chairs to distract the panicking passengers all we like, but until we make an honest appraisal of what is really happening … the numbers will continue to disappoint.
completely
[citation needed]
You made an assertion of fact. Please provide a link and an argument to support it.
You’re going to have to dig deep: even the NBR is reporting that The party has slumped three points to 24% while the Greens are up four to 15%.
So the Left bloc increased its vote by 1%. Not enough but certainly not the sky about to fall on our heads.
Or perhaps that’s the death rattle of the “centre left” you can hear 🙂
Looking at the Labour PLP there is one thing that stands out like dogs balls – Like it’s Maori MPs, the Labour women’s caucus is not pulling it’s weight.
Having jumped up and down and demanded equal representation even at the cost of party unity, they’ve let the side down by selecting a bunch of useless do-nothings. It is as if getting women MPs into parliament is regarded as job done, rather than getting effective politicians into parliament who are hard workers, generate headlines, score hits on the government, and who happily also happen to be women.
I think you hit the nail on the head there and would throw a couple of the white middle class toff’s the so called political class in as well. My late grandmother had very strong views on the Labour Party’s women and Maori branches/ MP’s, but your comments sum it up very nicely as hers are probably not fit public comment. There is one thing that got grandmother going off like a belt feed mortar was the quota system and her favourite saying was “I bloody well don’t care if we 100 women, maori’s/ Pacific Islanders, LBGT or men as long as they were the best candidates at the time. Because you don’t see any NZ sporting teams have quotas base on race, gender or sexuality because they pick the best team to win also the quota system breeds lazyness and and sense of intitlement.”
Angry Andy was more impressive when he was bloody angry, being agreeable has made him bland, bland and more bland.There is so much going on with the Natz and he’s just quiet about it, he needs to be incendary, whats to lose.
Worst poll result in 20 years (since CB started polling in 1995), and Andrew Little talks of quitting to give Labour a chance.
Im just cannot believe that this is a shock to some people.
I was rubbished when I said that Little might not even make it back with his list position – now its looking quite possible.
Little is a disaster.
I believe the only reason he wasnt rolled is that nobody wants to take over.
Little is fine and will make a competent PM. The problem here is agitation on the left and with the swing vote, and Labour still not stepping up and trying to play it safe. We don’t do presidents in NZ, the issue here is Labour not Little.
He is the ‘leader’ of Labour – He’s quite responsible for this disaster.
And there isnt a hope in hell he will be a PM (assuming you mean Prime Minister).
Are you saying that Little could force the caucus and party to do his bidding on positioning and policy? Because I don’t think you are right about that. If the reason Labour are polling low is because they’ve chosen the safe path over the bold one, that’s not all in Little’s hands. The party as a whole needs to change.
“Are you saying that Little could force the caucus and party to do his bidding on positioning and policy?”
Im saying he’s incapable of that.
lolz. We don’t do dictators on the left.
I am agreeing with you James. LAbour are getting to the point whereby only their diehard supporters are going to vote. Everyone else will look for somewhere else ( maybe Winston First) to vote, or worse not vote and thereby propping up higher support for National. 100,000 Labour voters not turning out (missing 1.1million) translates into an effective increase in support for national of around 50,000 votes as they pick up a higher % off the overall vote. Also slightly higher support for greens and winston (as a %)
Before you overegg your custard, this poll is much better:
http://www.newshub.co.nz/home/politics/2017/07/new-zealand-election-2017-the-big-issues-have-your-say.html
Both Greens and Labour lead the Gnats by a substantial margin.
Of course it could all be sampling bias – but so can the major polling companies’ work.
We really need a different sampling protocol if we want to make meaningful assertions based on the results.
From KB …
“Is it possible Little will resign in a desperate move to save his seat in Parliament, hoping Jacinda can keep them over 24%? They did this in 1990 with Palmer resigning for Moore six weeks out, and Jacinda is already on the billboards.”
Thats an interesting option.
lol
So cement in a poor result with a leaderless party in the hope of preserving his job?
Sounds like something a nat would do.
Well, they say that dreams don’t cost much, James…
Noooo – thats not my dream – I want him to stay.
I want National to win – and IMHO Little is helping that.
Another cheap dream, huh?
Well – Some dreams come true you know.
Yeah, but sometimes they are nightmares.
A nightmare for the poor and vulnerable- but does James care?
Hell no.
I don’t know if you are poor or vulnerable Ed – but I don’t care about you in the slightest
Do you care about the poor and vulnerable?
Simple question which you avoided answering.
Is that a no then?
Your dream is your unconscious mind trying to tell you something and Andrew Little is not Andrew Little but an archetype. James, I think you’re on the cusp of something special and it has little to do with 23 September.
Hi James.
The Left vote increased by 1%. National are down five from the same point in 2014.
Facts James. 😀
WHEN are those parties who want to change this National-led Government going to pay attention and focus on this CORPORATE welfare MOUNTAIN instead of the SOCIAL welfare ‘mushroom’?
Seriously?
Here’s the ‘ball’!
How about picking up the bloody thing and ‘running with it’?
WHISTLE-BLOWER ALERT!
“WHERE’S NATIONAL’S ‘CORPORATE WELFARE’ REFORM?
This is the question I asked SIX years ago – and am still asking:
https://www.google.co.nz/amp/s/m.scoop.co.nz/stories/PO1111/S00095/wheres-nationals-corporate-welfare-reform.htm
“PRESS RELEASE: Independent Candidate for Epsom Penny Bright:
“How many billion$ of public monies could be saved by ‘CUTTING OUT THE CONTRACTORS’?
3 November 2011
Where’s National’s ‘corporate welfare’ reform?
Which of the maor political parties are pushing for ‘corporate welfare’ reform and shrinking the long-term dependency of the private sector on our public monies?
Penny Bright
‘Anti-privatisation/anti-corruption campaigner’
2017 Independent candidate for Tamaki.
Exposing the $1.6 BILLION Tamaki ‘Regeneration’ – GENTRIFICATION $CAM.
2011- 2014- 2017 no where near 39 to 42 needed for Labour to govern.
Little and the ( little bit left ) neo liberal centrists have failed and its a bit rich to start talking about quitting when the numbers have been bad for ten years 8 weeks out from a general election that they should be winning.
Another three years of social and political corruption.
And Jacinda is NOT A LEADER IN WAITING !!!!!!!!!!!!!
STRENGTH UNITY AND BELIEF.
Wow – this is a headline that sums it up….
“The cost of replacing the billboards might be the only thing saving Andrew Little now”
https://www.stuff.co.nz/national/politics/opinion/95260787/The-cost-of-replacing-the-billboards-might-be-the-only-thing-saving-Andrew-Little-now?utm_source=dlvr.it&utm_medium=twitter
“The most compelling reason offered Sunday evening for Little not to go sooner was that the party had already made its election year bill boards and campaign ads.
There was no more money for new ones so Little should be safe, was the rationale.”
omg NO WAY outfriggingrageous
another fizzer James – he’s staying, imo there is zero reason to change. Stupid polls as accurate as a bush. Only a fool would get worked about this like you are.
Yeah – 9 years of stupid polls (and three elections) – and yet you still havent grasped the basic concept that people dont like Labour.
And some claim that the news media are not biased in favour of the Rort – I mean Right..
Well – it’s not like they want him to stay on because he’s doing such a great job is it ?
Personally I doubt it’s the cost of billboards- more that nobody wants the job.
Does it worry you we imprison so many in our society?
When you have no argument for labour and Little’s disaster poll results – try to change the subject.
Are you perturbed by the level of homelessness in our country?
I have said it before . I believe that the “polls” are simply another campaign tool. The “result” is that which will (they think) do the most harm to the left.
+100
Polls are there to manipulate the result not report it.
They are another tool of the 1%.
The hypocrisy of the rich.
And the right wing media.
And James.
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DF8El7AVoAA2NuO?format=jpg
The hypocrisy of Me Tu
And the left wing media
and all those people here that think Labour will get 30%.
The incomprehensibility of comments by RWNJs.
All would do well to consider that even if you trust these polling results, over 60% of eligible voters do not support the continuation of the current government.
Then those 60% needs to get out and vote.
over 60%…and yes thats where the change of government lies and is achievable… what the incumbents will fight with any and all means at their disposal, and they are substantial however they must be careful not to overplay their hand.
The opposition must ignore the noise and carry on engaging at a personal level and have faith in their argument that change is necessary….most believe that already.
Young Master Farrar becomes a little confused …
________________________________________________________________________________________
Tweet
David Farrar
Verified account @dpfdpf
“The ONCB poll in late July 2014 had National 46%, Lab 30%. They ended up 5% lower in the election so based on 24% now Labour might get 19%”
_________________________________________________________________________________________
Reality:
Utter Bollocks ! …
CB late July 2014 … Nats 52%, Lab 28%
vs
2014 Election Result: Nats 47% (- 5 from CB Poll), Lab 25% (- 3)
I bet Labour’s internal polling is giving them the same message as it did at this point seven weeks from the general election in 2011 and 2014.
They don’t have enough support to win and their leader does not appeal.
Something must be wrong when they can put up English who still rates poorly as he always has and is still ahead of Labour’s fifth leader in nine years.
I bet Bill can’t believe his luck.
Who or what will save the NZLP ???