Planet A – Concert & March

Written By: - Date published: 7:02 am, November 30th, 2009 - 73 comments
Categories: activism, Environment - Tags: ,

Mark your calendar, and turn out next Saturday for the Planet A Concert and March (the concert to be webcast live):

planet-a-march

In Auckland, Wellington and Christchurch, you’ll be able to march, dance, listen to speakers, sing, and jump on bouncy castles in support of a good outcome in Copenhagen. From a massive free public concert in Auckland featuring top NZ bands and special ambassador performances, to a march to Parliament in Wellington, to a kids day in the River City, this is your LAST CHANCE to get out and show that you want NZ to do the right thing on climate change.

In case you need reminding why it matters:

The world is now firmly on course for the worst-case scenario in terms of climate change, with average global temperatures rising by up to 6C by the end of the century, leading scientists said yesterday. Although the 6C rise and its potential disastrous effects have been speculated upon before, this is the first time that scientists have said that society is now on a path to meet it.

We need this day to be huge, people, so make sure you turn out. There is no Planet B.

73 comments on “Planet A – Concert & March ”

  1. Draco T Bastard 1

    http://www.copenhagendiagnosis.com/executive_summary.html

    Recent global temperatures demonstrate human-based warming: Over the past 25 years temperatures have increased at a rate of 0.190C per decade, in every good agreement with predictions based on greenhouse gas increases. Even over the past ten years, despite a decrease in solar forcing, the trend continues to be one of warming. Natural, short- term fluctuations are occurring as usual but there have been no significant changes in the underlying warming trend.

    Emphasis mine
    Can’t really get any clearer than that.

  2. This is a really good theme. There definately is no planet B.

    The basic premise is expressed really well by Blue Man Group here.

    Will John Key be there?

  3. You can help make the Planet A march a big one by sharing on Facebook:

    Magic link: http://www.facebook.com/sharer.php?u=http://www.signon.org.nz/planet-a

  4. ben 4

    terms of climate change, with average global temperatures rising by up to 6C by the end of the century

    Latest projection from the Hadley Center, was it? Brilliant.

  5. singularian 5

    So, do any of you guys thinks there is ANY doubt in the scientific methods used to come to these conclusions?

    • Andrei 5.1

      So, do any of you guys thinks there is ANY doubt in the scientific methods used to come to these conclusions?

      I actually doubt there was any science used in the methods used to come to these conclusions.

    • r0b 5.2

      No significant doubt.

      Some maybe, but you can doubt anything. Some doubt evolution. Some doubt that smoking causes cancer. Some doubt that America sent men to the moon. Some doubt that the earth is round.

      But when you put together the science with the observed phenomena – all over the world the ice reserves are melting – even that small doubt disappears. The world is warming. Human activity (greenhouse gas emissions) is the main cause. Anyone who says otherwise is a liar or a dangerous fool.

      [Edit: Case in point – Andrei is a dangerous fool]

      • grumpy 5.2.1

        Is “dangerous fool” similar to “useful idiot”?

        I don’t think it does much to advance your argument by insulting people who clearly are not “idiots”. Seems much like the tactics revealed in the hacked emails.

        • r0b 5.2.1.1

          Is “dangerous fool’ similar to “useful idiot’?

          Yup.

          I don’t think it does much to advance your argument by insulting people who clearly are not “idiots’

          But they are idiots. They have made up their mind what they want to believe and nothing will ever change it. They selectively cling to a few morsels of ambiguity plucked from the overwhelming tide of evidence, while actively ignoring the vast tide that doesn’t fit their view. They help create doubt and delay where doubt and delay endangers my children and my grandchildren. That makes me a wee bit cross, so I’m done being diplomatic. They’re idiots.

          Believe me I would rather not believe in climate change. It does nothing for me except provide pressure to change the way I live in ways that are sometimes inconvenient (inconvenient at first – it’s been great to ditch a car and get back to a bike!). I don’t WANT to believe in climate change. But I have to.

          • Andrei 5.2.1.1.1

            But they are idiots. They have made up their mind what they want to believe and nothing will ever change it. They selectively cling to a few morsels of ambiguity plucked from the overwhelming tide of evidence, while actively ignoring the vast tide that doesn’t fit their view.

            I don’t suppose it will ever occur to you that from my side of the fence that statement describes those who believe in AGW to a tee.

            Take this statement quoted in the post

            Recent global temperatures demonstrate human-based warming: Over the past 25 years temperatures have increased at a rate of 0.190C per decade, in every good agreement with predictions based on greenhouse gas increases

            The implication of that is we know the rate of change of global average temperature to within ± .001 C° which is ridiculous given that the input data is not recorded to this accuracy.

            Of course whatever the true figure is there is no causal relationship between that and human activity – the whole thing is predicated on assumptions some of them patently absurd

            • r0b 5.2.1.1.1.1

              I don’t suppose it will ever occur to you that from my side of the fence that statement describes those who believe in AGW to a tee

              Which fails with the fact that I don’t WANT to believe in warming. I really don’t.

              But it’s happening. Why is the Arctic ice melting Andrei?

          • ben 5.2.1.1.2

            R0b the I think mistake you and most warmists make is to lump those who deny that the world is getting warmer in with those who acknowledge the world is warming but who are some combination of a) unconvinced it is going to be a major problem b) recognise how little politicians can do to prevent it, c) fear the obvious dangers in handing over enormous power to politicians, and d) are not convinced scientists understand enough to justify such policy intervention before more is learned, and e) are not convinced the global warming movement has anything to do with the environment and has everything to do with collectivising the means of production. Undeniably, Copenhagen will move the world another few steps toward that end.

            The world is warming. Nearly every measurement confirms it. Casual observation confirms it. Few deny it.

            A more mature response is to separate the denialists from those who recognise warming but are skeptical that the problem is worth the risks and danger of the measures being proposed.

            • Pascal's bookie 5.2.1.1.2.1

              That’s not a problem for the mainstream ben.

              If the ‘OMG it’s creeping socialism’ crowd can’t distinguish themselves from the ‘Lalalala it’s not happening’ crowd, that’s their problem.

              I’d suggest you fight them off first, then we’ll talk.

            • r0b 5.2.1.1.2.2

              A more mature response is to separate the denialists from those who recognise warming but are skeptical that the problem is worth the risks and danger of the measures being proposed.

              I was asked about the denialist position, and was responding to a denialist.

              As to those who are “skeptical” of the risks, they need to explain why they hold that view in the face of the warnings of the overwhelming advice from climate scientists. Go and read the two relevant links in the original post. Much of the world will become effectively uninhabitable. That’s quite some risk to ignore.

            • lprent 5.2.1.1.2.3

              The problem for us on this side of the ‘debate’ about climate change is that we literally don’t hear people talking about what is required to mitigate climate change at a economic level. What we hear is mindless drivel by the likes of Andrei saying that human induced climate change is a myth. Which is patently false, speaks to a degree of illiteracy about science that is pretty crazy in this age, and appears to be completely faith based without substantive evidence.

              If you want to have a debate on the actual science / economics, then I’d suggest that you should starting fighting against the mindless hordes that comment drop absolute bullshit here and everywhere. Because when they sound ‘moderate’ they sound exactly like you. Right up until they’re pushed and they start sprouting crap.

              A good example of the ‘moderate’ stance is DPF who quoted calmingly from the IPCC 4 conclusions a month or so ago, without any apparent understanding of the limitations or it and previous reports. For f*cks sake, he even appeared to be illiterate enough to think that the IPCC report was a fixed datum rather than a checkpoint in a continuing process of data collection and assimilation. It is almost as pointless from my viewpoint discussing what the evidence says with someone like him (secure in his ignorance) or probably you, as it is to ‘discuss’ with Andrei with their version of faith based logic.

              Basically we do lump CCD’s and the minor mitigators like you together. From my viewpoint, you all appear to avoid looking closely enough at the topic to discuss it at any rational level. Suppose you start by running over what you think is likely to happen in the next 10 years and its implications for the 40 after that. Then discuss what is likely to come up in IPCC AP5 based on current evidence collected since AP4. Then we can figure out if you are rational, or if this is just another instance of the do-nothing tactical handbook – which is what I expect.

      • singularian 5.2.2

        So R0b – were ice reserves(?) static prior to the industrial revolution?

        Really though I’m not asking about that, it’s the methods used to arrive at these conclusions that appear to be the problem.

        When Jones said in July this year that the raw data used to build these models had been deleted in the 1980’s yet UEA said a couple of days ago that they will release all the data as soon as possible does that not ring a tiny bell for you?

        What data will they release? By the sounds of it the data will be the ‘adjusted’ data.

        If the raw data has been destroyed (that is a whole problem in itself surely?) then whatever Jones and co did to adjust the data can never be reproduced.
        Therefore the accepted scientific method cannot be adhered to which at the end of the day means that their models are crap.

        Also do you have any problems with what the emails reveal about the the peer review process?

        Anyone who says otherwise is a liar or a dangerous fool.

        Does this strike you as reasonable in relation to Science?

        • r0b 5.2.2.1

          So R0b were ice reserves(?) static prior to the industrial revolution?

          Over geological timescales not even remotely. Over the last couple of centuries, yes largely. Over the last 30 years the trend (with noise) is all one way. Melting.

          Really though I’m not asking about that, it’s the methods used to arrive at these conclusions that appear to be the problem.

          You don’t need a “method” to see the Arctic icecap melting, you need a pair of eyes.

          Does this strike you as reasonable in relation to Science?

          Science has its warts, but denialists are taking a microscope to the warts and ignoring the warthog.

    • quenchino 5.3

      While r0b makes his point clearly, another answer is this.. there is always doubt. There is no human certainty, most especially around a topic so complex and difficult as climate science.

      Is the AGW science perfect, final and absolute? Of course not. The rudiments of quantum mechanics (a considerably simpler topic) where discovered almost 100 years ago, yet just this week the CERN’s LHC has started operating, hopefully to uncover new science and further refine the models. Inevitably AGW science will also progress, progress that will come from new data, new observations, better modelling, more sophisticated analysis. These are tools that will over time reduce uncertainty.

      Cherry picking, misinterpreting, quote mining, and flat out lying, serves only one purpose… to increase fear, uncertainty and doubt.

      • grumpy 5.3.1

        The biggest fear I have is the creation of a Carbon Trading Market, which is predicted to be larger than the oil market.

        With the manipulation of existing “market” a recent problem – Oil, Food, Housing etc. creating another for the get rich quick brigade is something I would have thought the Left would want no part of?

        • quenchino 5.3.1.1

          Fair enough. But govts only really have two types of tool to effect change, regulation and taxation. A carbon trading market is a form of taxation, it uses market price signals to change behaviour.

          If you don’t like the market in action, then the other tool is regulation. Can’t see you liking that much either.

  6. singularian 6

    Cherry picking, misinterpreting, quote mining, and flat out lying, serves only one purpose to increase fear, uncertainty and doubt

    Yes, the emails reveal the hint of all those things.

    Does that fact that UEA had only ONE programmer for the incredibly complex models on the ‘team’ not worry you?

    Does the fact that they had NO trained statisticians on the ‘team’ not worry you?

    Does the fact that their data management seem to be nonexistent not worry you?

    This IS the future of the planet we’re talking about, right?

    • r0b 6.1

      Warts, warthog – see above. Why is the Arctic icecap melting?

      • ben 6.1.1

        r0b, bit of a silly response, really. The case for action does not depend on the climate changing. Everybody knows it does. The case for action depends mostly on the dire forecasts coming out of the climate scientists. The Hadley Center was the most respected of these groups. Before Climategate, we know they refused to share data, and refused to explain their processing of raw data. We also knew that there was a major divergence between ground and satellite measurements of temperature, only ground being subject to the sorts of manipulations of the Hadley center.

        The case for policy depends in good part on the quality of the work being done by Hadley and others, and now we know it is shoddy, at least for Hadley. The Nasa series was embarrassed when an unpaid amateur retired businessman, Steve McIntyre, picked up mistakes in the processing of their data. This forced Nasa to announce that 1934 and not 1998 is the warmest year recorded. NZ and Australian data has also come into question in the last 10 days.

        Before appropriating and reallocating $trillions, it is obviously important that the data behind be sound. Not perfect, but reasonably correct. Plainly, Hadley fails that test in every sense. What about the others? There is, it seems to me, a good case for delay in policy while the current mess is resolved.

        • r0b 6.1.1.1

          r0b, bit of a silly response, really.

          It isn’t a silly response at all. While you want more delay, the Arctic icecap is melting. Why?

  7. ben 7

    Here is what is ridiculous about the statement:

    The world is now firmly on course for the worst-case scenario in terms of climate change, with average global temperatures rising by up to 6C by the end of the century

    CO2 is expected to roughly double from pre-industrial levels by the end of the century. The relationship between CO2 and warming, excluding feedbacks, is well understood. Doubling from pre-industrial levels will add about 1-1.5C degrees to the temperature. We’ve already had about 0.6 degrees warming. Where does the other ~4.0-4.5C degrees come from?

    Feedbacks. The case for anything more than a modicum of warming depends on there being positive feedbacks in the climate system. And scientists are the very first to say: the jury is out on whether climate is net positive or negative feedback. It is a genuinely hard question, and may not even be answerable.

    The certainty in the quoted statement is therefore ludicrous. Most of the warming in IPCC scenarios is due to poorly-understood feedbacks, not the well-understood CO2/temperature relationship.

    A couple of strikes against high feedback:

    # High feedback greatly over-estimates past warming. If the climate is high positive feedback, it should have been much colder in the past than it was with lower greenhouse gases

    # high positive feedback systems are hard to find in nature – they have a tendency to destroy themselves. Earth’s climate has survived major shocks, which is prima facie evidence for low or negative feedback

    Climate Skeptic is a useful, science-based, amateur site to learn more about this.

    • lprent 7.1

      Bullshit. You’re assuming a linear process without buffering of both the gases and the heat. Problem is that we’ve been filling the buffers for more than a century, and they appear to be getting pretty damn full from the ocean current heat shifts, the ocean acidification, and the rather rapid ablation on the ice sheets.

      Your basic premise has a hole the size of Eurasia in it because it assumes that the adsorption rate of emissions and their effects will be the same this century as it was in the last century.

      Your second premise is that our emission profile is similar to something like a volcanic event. It isn’t – perhaps you’d like to use that feeble device you call a brain to figure out why? The key words are ‘sustained output’

      Do you not know ANYTHING about the science? You sound bloody ignorant to me.

      • ben 7.1.1

        You’re assuming a linear process without buffering of both the gases and the heat.

        I am quite certain that the difficulty researchers are having with feedback is not resolved by dropping an assumption of climate linearity! In any case, not an assumption behind anything I’ve said, quite obviously.

        In fact show me the wording or subtext that allows you to infer the three assumptions you put on me. Show me. Either you’re not reading what I wrote or you’re playing the straw man. Poor show.

  8. r0b 8

    The certainty in the quoted statement is ludicrous

    Given that it is the consensus of the overwhelming majority of the world’s experts in the field, the onus is on you to prove your claim. A few ramblings from an amateur website won’t do the trick.

    Feedback is happening now, with the release of vast amounts of methane from thawing Arctic tundra. Methane is a much more dangerous warming gas than C02. Feedback is happening now as melting ice stops reflecting light/heat away and lets land/sea absorb more heat. Feedback is not an abstract scientific idea, you can see it happening now.

    high positive feedback systems are hard to find in nature they have a tendency to destroy themselves. Earth’s climate has survived major shocks, which is prima facie evidence for low or negative feedback

    Pseudoscientific mumbo jumbo. Whatever Earth has is its climate, of course it survives. The question is whether the surviving climate is much fun for (or can even sustain) human life. The high positive feedback of thawing methane reservers, for instance, might not be a “high” to the Earth (planet will still be here), but it’s bloody high feedback to the climate from a human point of view (moves climate out of the inhabitable range for much of the planet).

    Short version – humans and the agriculture that sustains them are more fragile than rocks.

  9. Bill 9

    In a world organised along democratic lines there would be no problem with CCDers….’cause there’d be virtually no destructive production processes due to the moderating influence of inclusive democratic procedures.

    But we don’t live in very democratic times which gives rise to, putting it mildly, a few problems.

    Science presents evidence and likely consequences. But their message is being fed to and filtered by, the very people who have defended and encouraged the very activities that are the cause of the problem. (ie the media of the global family of corporates and politicians who serve to crisis manage the market economy that underpins the activities of the corporates)

    How is science expected to get it’s message to the public in an effective fashion when the means of communication between them and us are almost exclusively in the hands of entities whose futures depend on not treating climate change as a catastrophe to be avoided?

    Is there any more hope of science getting a message through as, say, an Innuit community watching it’s environment tube or any of the ‘million and one’ others who know from direct living experience that something is awry…that environments are changing faster and in ways cultural memories cannot account for?

    I think the answer is in the negative.

    And the solution lies in active disengagement from this market economy nonsense. When I say active, I mean that to leave control of resources in the hands of corporations could well mean a reduction in CO2 coming about by the simple act of absolute exclusion of the majority of us in the west from any production or consumer activity whatsoever. ( Already the reality if we look at humanity as a whole…billions in (for us) unimaginable poverty.)

  10. ben 10

    r0b

    Given that it is the consensus of the overwhelming majority of the world’s experts in the field, the onus is on you to prove your claim. A few ramblings from an amateur website won’t do the trick.

    Oh good, the standard appeal to authority.

    As I said, the temp increases beyond 1-1.5C depend on feedbacks, which I understand are far from settled among scientists. Without consensus on the either the sign or magnitude of feedback, you can’t have consensus on increases beyond 1.5C.

    Thanks for the example of a positive feedback system. It settles precisely nothing. Climate is, you know, complex.

    • r0b 10.1

      Oh good, the standard appeal to authority.

      Oh good, the standard appeal to a website you agree with.

      As I said, the temp increases beyond 1-1.5C depend on feedbacks, which I understand are far from settled among scientists.

      There may be debate about some details of the mechanisms, but not their significance or the fact that they are happening now.

      Say ben – why is the Arctic icecap melting?

      • ben 10.1.1

        r0b

        Oh good, the standard appeal to a website you agree with.

        Actually it’s the arguments on that site and others that I think are persuasive. Some of the arguments I have reproduced here. You could try addressing some of them. Instead what I have got in response is a set of fallacies – appeals to authority, mostly, and a classic ad hominem in the denialist/skeptic confusion, which persists.

        There may be debate about some details of the mechanisms, but not their significance or the fact that they are happening now.

        No. The research is trying to decipher the sign and magnitude of feedbacks. Fundamental stuff.

        Say ben why is the Arctic icecap melting?

        Do you think this proves feedback? Arctic warming tells us nothing about feedbacks. Is it direct effect or the feedback, or something else that’s driving Arctic warming? There is currently no way to know. Hard to see what justifies your apparent certainty when scientists themselves are unsure.

        • r0b 10.1.1.1

          Actually it’s the arguments on that site and others that I think are persuasive.

          Actually it’s the arguments of the overwhelming majority of real climate scientists that I think are persuasive.

          Some of the arguments I have reproduced here. You could try addressing some of them

          I have done so.

          Say ben why is the Arctic icecap melting?

          Do you think this proves feedback?

          “Feedback” is your new fetish now?

          Answer the question – why is the Arctic icecap melting?

  11. ben 11

    Pascal

    If the ‘OMG it’s creeping socialism’ crowd can’t distinguish themselves from the ‘Lalalala it’s not happening’ crowd, that’s their problem.

    I’d suggest you fight them off first, then we’ll talk.

    There’s no confusion about the difference among skeptics, I can assure you. It is the warmists who persistently make the mistake. For as long as you do, comrade, you’ll continue not to address the reasonable concerns skeptics raise, which it seems to me is incumbent on anyone who claims the mantle of science.

    • Pascal's bookie 11.1

      You misunderstand. To the majority, you look like you are in cahoots.

      You cite the same people, run very similar lines and are hardly ever seen disagreeing with each other. That’s your problem, no one else’s.

      I personally don’t claim the mantle of science, I’ll leave that to the scientists. If you are having problems getting your reasonable concerns addressed, that’s your problem. Again, I’d suggest that clearly distinguishimg yourseleves from the anti-science nutters would be a v.good start.

      Crying and acting like a baby? Not v.good at all.

      • grumpy 11.1.1

        PB, that response could have come from either side of the debate. Which sort of proves the point Ben is making.

      • ben 11.1.2

        Pascal

        You may not personally claim science, but of course the warmist camp does (and correctly so). If you are confused by the similar lines from each group it is because you haven’t seriously considered what is being said.

      • mickysavage 11.1.3

        Good point.

        How about all deniers cite their scientific qualifications before they try to persuade us as to their firmly held conclusions.

        And how about they mix the precautionary principle into their analysis to persuade the rest of us that inaction is a good thing.

        And finally how about they indicate if they will apologise to humanity in 20 years time if they prove to be wring.

        • ben 11.1.3.1

          How about all deniers cite their scientific qualifications before they try to persuade us as to their firmly held conclusions.

          What is it with the appeal to authority?

          Both the Hadley Center and Nasa have been and are being embarrassed by unpaid private and unqualified individuals checking their models. Qualifications are a poor source of authority. But since you raised it, a great many qualified scientists have also signed a petition against the consensus.

          And how about they mix the precautionary principle into their analysis to persuade the rest of us that inaction is a good thing.

          Fair call. Possibly the most persuasive argument in favour of action, IMHO. But the precautionary principle can also be invoked against the dangers of government action. History is littered with examples of the dangers of governments run amok. Yes, unlikely in this case. But possible, and correctly weighed against the risk of climate catastrophy.

          • mickysavage 11.1.3.1.1

            “What is it with the appeal to authority?”

            Easy. You are drawing very firmly held conclusions. I just wanted to measure your actual ability to do so. As to your further comments all I can say is prove it.

            And about that apology?

            • ben 11.1.3.1.1.1

              You are drawing very firmly held conclusions.

              How does your use of fallacy say anything about the firmness of my conclusions? About nothing.

              In any case what you say is simply untrue. I am genuinely uncertain what the best course of action is because a) important parts of the science are not settled, and b) the policy question is informed by much more than just climate. This is a truly complex issue and my comments reflect my respect for that complexity. Certainty of both problem and the solution is squarely in the warmist camp.

              • lprent

                ben: you are daft if you think that the science will EVER be settled. Possibly after we’ve terraformed a couple of hundred worlds… Since that hasn’t happened, then what you are saying is that you’d never be satisfied with the science. So you’re a true conservative. Too thick to look at anything that might be new. Also a bit short on the basic knowledge that would allow you to make an informed decision.

                In other words you’d prefer to do nothing.

                Too mindless to look at the science and understand it (in your previous comments you’ve made multiple errors in the theory as well as fact).

                Preferring to grab at any straw that says you don’t have to do anything. You look like another idiot who doesn’t have the vaguest idea of what you’re talking about. Wanting to look ‘reasonable’ without having to argue outside of whatever area you feel comfortable with.

                Looks like you’re another stupid CCD.

                • fizzleplug

                  I’m sure this has been said before, but personal attacks don’t make your argument more convincing. If you disagree with them, and find they can’t be persuaded in a few posts, personal attacks won’t change their minds. And I know from experience that it doesn’t make you feel better either, it just increases the blood pressure from arguing on the internet. It’s best to ignore them… even crazy people eventually get tired of talking to themselves.

                  I always think this about climate change – the majority of people agreeing with it don’t understand it, nor do those that disagree. Being popular is all that counts.

                  Personally, I’m apathetic. Climate change may be happening, but I don’t have to believe what scientists tell me (even intellectuals have their agendas – usually more funding haha). Any sufficiently advanced level of technology is indistinguishable from magic, and any technical scientific discussions of a certain level are babble to all but a few. And somehow, I don’t think those few frequent political blogs, so I don’t take anything on this blog (or any other blog) as being gospel.

                  If I did go to this, it would only be for a day in the sun (unlikely in Wellington) and any march to Parliament would finish as soon as we passed a bar. Politicians don’t care about us, regardless of what you believe. Neither side wants to make a difference, it’s all about power. All marching will achieve is sore feet, blocked roads, and idiots on TV with homemade placards (which incidentally, always strike me as pointless. I can just imagine someone standing up the front, ready to address the crowd, and seeing a placard that instantly changes their mind – “Oh you are right Ms Protester, I should go to Copenhagen. Your placard is so compelling in it’s simplicity!”).

                  Climate change – meh.

                  • lprent

                    I always think this about climate change the majority of people agreeing with it don’t understand it, nor do those that disagree.

                    My first degree was a BSc in earth sciences a bit less than 30 years ago. At that point it was a theory based on physics. There wasn’t the evidence to prove that it was happening one way or another. I’ve never actually worked in earth sciences – I did management and then computer programming. But I’ve always kept up with the evolving science in the area. I do know quite a lot about what is happening in this area – not exactly what you’re describing.

                    The supporting data had to be built starting from getting the monitoring systems in place and then accumulating data because it is figuring out what happens in a complex system. That was the late 70’s, 80’s and even up to the early 90’s.

                    The science basis was pretty well established by the early 90’s and almost entirely accepted by people almost everyone active in the field (ie climatology, earth sciences, and geology) as being an immediate threat (ie within the lifetime of people living). There is probably one of the highest agreements rates amongst any group of scientists working in the field that has happened in any field of science ever. The main things that they are arguing about for the last decade and a half has been how fast the oncoming disaster would hit and how big it would be.

                    The majority of the ‘skeptic’ scientists are people who trained in areas outside of earth sciences or who still have problems with the ideas of continental drift.

                    It is bloody irritating seeing dorks without any knowledge talking about issues that were covered in the earth sciences community 20 years ago in a far more skeptical and knowledgable basis.

                    So what you’re asking is that because others can’t be bothered making the effort to understand the issues, that I should be nice to them….

                    piss off… Why should I be nice to the lazy

                • ben

                  lprent

                  Not for the first time in this thread, the reply puts words in my mouth that I didn’t say. And, please, spare me the name calling.

                  I do not expect settlement for policy action to become appropriate. What I have pointed to is a major issue in the climate science necessary to support scary numbers like 6C that is completely unresolved: feedbacks. Neither the sign nor the magnitude of feedbacks is yet well understood. There is no consensus at all on that among researchers. Without feedbacks, climate will warm another degree in the next 100 years. The case for action depends largely on those feedbacks, yet the science on them is completely up in the air.

                  Policy is no free lunch, far from it. It will cost a fortune. Without really drastic taxes it will not have much effect on climate – we’ll get most of the warming we’d have got anyway. Many people can expect to stay in poverty longer because the cost of energy and price of food is increased, delaying development. The case for policy seems to turn on a) doing nothing could lead to global catastrophe, and b) ETS schemes and their descendants actually prevent global catastrophe. Now take those two long bows and multiply them.

                  Yeah. I’m skeptical.

                  Nope – I’m not a CCD. I have repeatedly acknowledged the climate is warming and AGW is real. What would be nice is if somebody here who is so certain of the need for policy action now could explain why policy is necessary right now when 80-90% of a 6C warming cited above depends on feedbacks nobody yet knows exists.

                  • r0b

                    ben – you’ve latched on to this magical concept of “feedbacks” as some kind of fetish to protect you from the evil truth.

                    Feedback loops are not magic, and they are happening. I’ve already discussed two, thawing arctic ice releases methane frozen in the tundra (there are billions of tonnes of it there), and decreases the reflection of heat from the Earth’s surface, both of which add to warming.

                    These effects are not mystical. The basics of feedback loops are well known, and the effects are happening. Really happening:

                    Meanwhile, the scientists have for the first time detected a failure of the Earth’s natural ability to absorb man-made carbon dioxide released into the air.

                    They found significant evidence that more man-made CO2 is staying in the atmosphere to exacerbate the greenhouse effect because the natural “carbon sinks” that have absorbed it over previous decades on land and sea are beginning to fail, possibly as a result of rising global temperatures.

                    The amount of CO2 that has remained in the atmosphere as a result has increased from about 40 per cent in 1990 to 45 per cent in 2008. This suggests that the sinks are beginning to fail, they said.

                    Professor Le Quéré emphasised that there are still many uncertainties over carbon sinks, such as the ability of the oceans to absorb dissolved CO2, but all the evidence suggests that there is now a cycle of “positive feedbacks”, whereby rising carbon dioxide emissions are leading to rising temperatures and a corresponding rise in carbon dioxide in the atmosphere.

                    explain why policy is necessary right now when 80-90% of a 6C warming cited above depends on feedbacks nobody yet knows exists.

                    Easy, you’re wrong, feedback exists and it is happening. Your ignorance will not prevent it.

            • mickysavage 11.1.3.1.1.2

              And what are your qualifications?

    • Draco T Bastard 11.2

      They stopped being reasonable concerns when the real science put the probability of AGW @ > 90%. At that point, they became unreasonable and very, very dangerous.

      • ben 11.2.1

        Draco

        Again, the skeptics accept climate change and AGW. Climate change and AGW is necessary but not sufficient to justify a policy response.

  12. ben 12

    r0b

    I was asked about the denialist position, and was responding to a denialist.

    No you weren’t. Andrei’s initial comment was to question the science in the measurement. What does that have to do with the denialist position? Warmists like Monbiot are also concerned about what’s going on at the Hadley Center.

    As to those who are “skeptical’ of the risks, they need to explain why they hold that view in the face of the warnings of the overwhelming advice from climate scientists. Go and read the two relevant links in the original post. Much of the world will become effectively uninhabitable. That’s quite some risk to ignore.

    This misses the point. One can legitimately accept everything the scientists say about climate, afterall that is their specialty, and reject the case for action on the (non-climate) grounds my questions raise, namely whether action is worth the cost, whether it will make enough of a difference, whether handing so much power to politicians is worth the risk, whether the climate science process is corrupted in some way (by group think, by funding, by political factors, by ideology) and producing unreliable results, and whether the consensus is being produced by more than just than the science.

    None of these are about climate per se and each is reason to pause before substantially interfering in economies to their great detriment. Perhaps it is worth doing that. But one cannot tell without proper, robust examination of each. It is not clear any of these concerns are being considered by leaders or scientists.

    I cannot find a climate consensus which does not consider these process and policy issues persuasive.

    • r0b 12.1

      No you weren’t.

      Don’t tell me what I was or wasn’t doing. I know Andrei from other threads. I was asked about the denialist position, and was responding to a denialist.

      One can legitimately accept everything the scientists say about climate, afterall that is their specialty, and reject the case for action

      So there costs that are worse than the possible deaths of hundreds of millions of people (possibly billions), and the trashing of much of the currently habitable area of the Earth? Seriously – that’s your claim? Because since you now accept the view of the experts, that’s what they say will happen…

      • quenchino 12.1.1

        Ben’s channelling the neo-liberal angst against the whole notion of government. The root idea is that governments are useless at best, dangerous at worst… you know… like where’s a good bathtub when you need one? And if national govts cause such anxiety, the idea of any form of global governance has them hyperventilating.

        Of course this idea was always going to meet the day, when a truly global problem arose that actually demanded a global response.

        • ben 12.1.1.1

          quenchino

          You are correct, I will freely admit – my reservations about climate policy are in part driven by the near ubiquitous history of governments achieving the exact opposite of what they set out to do.

          The bio-ethanol debacle is a case in point. Subsidise biofuels, divert crops to fuels production and create scarcity in food, and therefore drive up the price of food to everybody including the third world. Then discover that your biofuels process is a net contributor to CO2. However, in subsidising biofuels you have created a class of producers that depend for their survival on continuing subsidies and invest heavily in lobbying to get it. A lose lose for everyone including the environment, and one that is replicated in nearly every government program you can think of in every area.

          This is not a coincidence. Its not as if better people or different circumstances could have helped. The reason governments so frequently achieve the opposite is the planning problem: planners generally cannot ever get their hands on the information they need to make good and timely decisions. Because of this the ethanol debacle is unsurprising – we should expect debacles most times, except by good fortune.

          Of course, there is a role for government. But governments – especially unelected ones of the sort contemplated in the draft of Copenhagen – do not know when to stop, and regulation begets regulation. So, yes, I’m nervous about taking an institution that so frequently gets it exactly wrong and scaling it up to the global level. I am reasonably confident it will not help the environment at all and equally sure it will cost far more than anticipated. That in a nutshell is the record of government.

          • quenchino 12.1.1.1.1

            I’m not sure the bio-ethanol example is a good one. It was only ever a Bush Administration boondoogle to prop up the support in the MidWestern maize growing belt.

      • ben 12.1.2

        So there costs that are worse than the possible deaths of hundreds of millions of people (possibly billions), and the trashing of much of the currently habitable area of the Earth? Seriously that’s your claim? Because since you now accept the view of the experts, that’s what they say will happen

        Ok let’s talk about precautionary principle. The key word is possible, r0b. The experts do not say millions or billions will die. They say that event is very unlikely.

        It does not generally make sense to write policy on the worst case scenario, for at least three reasons. One, the scenario you paint is very, very unlikely (there is a consensus on that).

        Two, climate policy is not a one-shot deal – if we credibly learn that very bad outcomes are more likely than we thought, policy can change.

        Three, there are also catastrophe risks from taking action. Millions or even billions may also die from policy action. Governments have a rather bad record on human life through both intended and unintended consequences. Handing control of crop rotation decisions in China and India to an environmental planning board, which is plainly something that could happen down the road, has tremendous danger. Of course, millions or billions dead is unlikely. The expected cost of catastrophe either way turns on the relative likelihood of each event and the extent of the calamity that occurs under each.

        We can argue the merits either way until we’re blue in the face. The truth is I have no idea what the answer is, or even how to seriously think about it – my point is that neither do you, and neither does the consensus of scientists. Yet they are presenting ludicrous certainty in their forecasts and politicians ludicrous certainty in their call for action right now. This certainty, which is your own, is the product of leaving out the many confounding and unresolved issues that add ambiguity. It is not clear that policy action is needed now, important questions are unresolved, and the research process may be corrupted. It does not make sense to invest $trillions without thinking seriously about these and many other confounding matters.

        • BLiP 12.1.2.1

          The truth is I have no idea what the answer is, or even how to seriously think about it

          I know.

          • ben 12.1.2.1.1

            I know enough to be humble when looking at a very hard problem, Blip.

            • mickysavage 12.1.2.1.1.1

              So what are your qualifications?

            • r0b 12.1.2.1.1.2

              It isn’t “humble” to think, on the basis of reading a few like minded websites, that you have a better understanding of these issues than the consensus of the overwhelming majority of actual scientists/experts in the field.

              It isn’t “humble”, it’s profound arrogance. And before you dismiss this as “argument from authority”, I reply that it is not authority alone, but the data and science that underlies that authority, and furthermore that I much prefer that kind of authority to an “argument from ignorance”.

        • r0b 12.1.2.2

          The key word is possible, r0b. The experts do not say millions or billions will die. They say that event is very unlikely.

          No, that’s what you want them to be saying. What they are actually saying is that that is the course we are on:

          World on course for catastrophic 6° rise, reveal scientists

          Fast-rising carbon emissions mean that worst-case predictions for climate change are coming true

          The world is now firmly on course for the worst-case scenario in terms of climate change, with average global temperatures rising by up to 6C by the end of the century, leading scientists said yesterday. …

          6C rise: The consequences

          If two degrees is generally accepted as the threshold of dangerous climate change, it is clear that a rise of six degrees in global average temperatures must be very dangerous indeed, writes Michael McCarthy. Just how dangerous was signalled in 2007 by the science writer Mark Lynas, who combed all the available scientific research to construct a picture of a world with temperatures three times higher than the danger limit.

          His verdict was that a rise in temperatures of this magnitude “would catapult the planet into an extreme greenhouse state not seen for nearly 100 million years, when dinosaurs grazed on polar rainforests and deserts reached into the heart of Europe”.

          He said: “It would cause a mass extinction of almost all life and probably reduce humanity to a few struggling groups of embattled survivors clinging to life near the poles.”

          Very few species could adapt in time to the abruptness of the transition, he suggested. “With the tropics too hot to grow crops, and the sub-tropics too dry, billions of people would find themselves in areas of the planet which are essentially uninhabitable. This would probably even include southern Europe, as the Sahara desert crosses the Mediterranean.

          “As the ice-caps melt, hundreds of millions will also be forced to move inland due to rapidly-rising seas. As world food supplies crash, the higher mid-latitude and sub-polar regions would become fiercely-contested refuges.

          “The British Isles, indeed, might become one of the most desirable pieces of real estate on the planet. But, with a couple of billion people knocking on our door, things might quickly turn rather ugly.”

          Millions or even billions may also die from policy action.

          Mmm, yes, all killed by exploding green light bulbs I suppose. Sigh.

          • Andrei 12.1.2.2.1

            Mmm, yes, all killed by exploding green light bulbs I suppose. Sigh.

            No by hunger as food production declines, food storage and transport systems degrade because they are “emitters”.

            Don’t you nongs realize how much stupid green policies have already impacted world food prices and the consequences of that for the poor? And how much more they will be if you keep this nonsense up.

            There are real world problems, such as hunger, malaria, lack of clean water etc which are all but intractable but instead of focusing on them and addressing them our elite have gone into flights of fancy about hypothetical 6m sea level rises 100 years from now from scientists who don’t even follow the elementary rules of science. Tui moment these CRU fellows have ‘fessed” up now they have lost all the raw data that their projections are based on.

  13. BLiP 13

    The billions being spent by the polluters on science-fiction to sucker the denialists is obviously providing fuel, but, really, aren’t they all just psychologically disturbed?

  14. fizzleplug 14

    See, it’s that name-calling again that makes you not take you seriously. Calling me a dork without knowing me doesn’t make you superior, nor does rattling off your education history (well, it might make you feel superior). It just makes you look like what you accuse others of being.

    edit: this is in a funny place…

  15. ben 15

    Micky, would a PhD in meteorology change your mind about anything I’ve said here? I would hope not.

    Surely your view is not just about the authority of the messenger?

    • But I am pretty sure that you do not have any appropriate qualifications but you still insist on being as satisfied about the issue as someone who does have the necessary qualifications before you will commit.

      I do not want to shoot the messenger but if he is not passing the message on because he does not understand it I do have questions.

      So what are your qualifications and why should these allow you to hold up humanity from reaching agreement about what is the most important issue facing it?

  16. ben 16

    It isn’t “humble’ to think, on the basis of reading a few like minded websites, that you have a better understanding of these issues than the consensus of the overwhelming majority of actual scientists/experts in the field.

    It isn’t “humble’, it’s profound arrogance. And before you dismiss this as “argument from authority’, I reply that it is not authority alone, but the data and science that underlies that authority, and furthermore that I much prefer that kind of authority to an “argument from ignorance’.

    Nope. You misunderstand me. Again. I am not contradicting anything the climate experts say about climate, including the fact that the experts are up front about feedbacks being unresolved. That is what qualified scientists say. It is, they say, a very hard problem. And it matters: large temperature changes rely on feedbacks, not on the direct effect of greenhouse gas.

    My point is that their projections are not sufficient evidence for action. That is a question of more than climate science. It is one of economics, of international law, and of personal values, among other things. Action is costly. Climate change is costly. Both action and non-action could possibly be disastrous. There are trade offs. I am not convinced that the process being followed goes sufficiently beyond the climate, which it needs to do because other disciplines besides climate matter when writing policy. The case for policy rests on certainty which, by the scientists own admission, is not there. Scientists’ call for action takes them outside their area of expertise. That is what I contradict.

    I strongly suspect the policy process is corrupted, and that the environment will be harmed by resulting policy. The Hadley emails raise serious questions about whether the research is also partly corrupted. Surely it is reasonable to look into how serious this corruption is before committing trillions of dollars. For context, $50 billion is the total aid ever given to Africa, and 2 million die of dirty water there every year. Given the scale of funds involved, delaying climate change policy for just one year could see funds shifted toward a very real and certain problem.

    This would not be the first time unintended, but nevertheless real, group think among educated people has had adverse consequences. It is surely not arrogance to point to important things that remain uncertain and ask for some of that uncertainty to be resolved before diverting funds away from the many other problems still waiting to be solved.

    Your reliance on the qualifications of speakers is short sighted. There are any number of dissenting views on many aspects of the CC debate with PhDs.

    • lprent 16.1

      There are any number of dissenting views on many aspects of the CC debate with PhDs.

      So what. Who cares about what the degrees they hold – look at what their degrees are in. If they have a PhD in English Lit, Geography or Environmental Science, then they are just so much waste paper in this debate.

      If they have degree(s) in earth sciences, climatology, geology, or computer modeling then they become worth listening to. If they have degrees in more than one, then they are even more interesting. If they publish in a peer-reviewed paper then I really start taking them seriously.

      The CCDs have a lot of crap paper talking about things that they don’t know about. Sure there are a couple worth listening to with reasonable qualifications and experience for dissenting theories. Many are from the fossil age of geology, but still worthy of respect. But the majority of the scientific ‘support’ for CCD theories is just junk backgrounds in geography and the like, often paid. Most of the respected names on the CCDs lists are just a CCD idiot appropriating someones name from a paper as ‘supporting’ the CCD position.

      There is no equating junk science from the CCDs doing ‘summary’ slanted papers from other peoples research, with real scientists trained and working in the field doing research.

      You are just another fatuous pillock of a CCD without any understanding of the issue.

      • Andrei 16.1.1

        So what. Who cares about what the degrees they hold are in look at what their degrees are in. If they have a PhD in English Lit, Geography or Environmental Science, then they are just so much waste paper in this debate.

        If they have a degree in earth sciences, climatology, geology, or computer modelling then they become worth listening to.

        Rubbish – what counts is scholarship and academic rigour.

        If you are dealing with feedback effects on non linear systems then mathematics or physics is probably where your skills lie for example.

        As for computer models of the climate or any other complex system for that matter the meteorologist and mathematician Edward Lorenz showed and quantified their limitations many years ago now.

        A great deal of seminal science has been produced by people originally outside the field. And a great deal more by multi disciplinary teams.

    • Ben

      Your reliance on the qualifications of speakers is short sighted. There are any number of dissenting views on many aspects of the CC debate with PhDs

      I am just trying to work out if you have the slightest understanding of the subject or the intellectual capacity to understand the subject and if not I am wondering why you think your view is relevant?

Links to post

Recent Comments

Recent Posts

  • Mainstreaming Māori
    Mainstreaming need not be inherently anti-Māori. It will be if it is done badly because it will be anti-those-in need, and proportionally more of them are Māori.That the Coalition Government says it will deliver public services on the basis of need rather than, say, race deserves consideration, even though many ...
    PunditBy Brian Easton
    19 mins ago
  • National says “fuck you”
    The Justice Committee has reported back on the government's racist bill to eliminate Māori representation in local government. The report duly notes the Waitangi Tribunal's finding that the bill breaches te Tiriti, and the bill's inconsistency with our international human rights obligations - and then proceeds to ignore both. Instead, ...
    No Right TurnBy Idiot/Savant
    8 hours ago
  • Christopher Luxon is – Big in Japan
    This week our Prime Minister Christopher Luxon… mmm, let’s take a moment to consider just how good that sounds. Hope you weren’t eating.Anyway that guy. Better? That bloke from the telly, he said - what I would say to you is… I’m big in Japan. My kind of people, hard ...
    Nick’s KōreroBy Nick Rockel
    14 hours ago
  • Weekly Roundup 21-June-2024
    Tis the winter solstice! The shortest day and longest night of the year. The good news: we’re on our way back to summertime. Here’s another roundup of stories to brighten up your Friday. Our header image is from CRL and shows Waihorotiu Station lit up for Matariki 2024 The ...
    Greater AucklandBy Greater Auckland
    15 hours ago
  • Bernard’s mid-winter pick ‘n’ mix for Friday, June 21
    Our economic momentum remains anaemic, and it’s possible the tiny increase in GDP was a ‘dead cat bounce’. Photo: Lynn Grieveson / The KākāTL;DR: Per-capita GDP has fallen 4.3% from its peak over the last 21 months, which is more than it it fell in the Global Financial Crisis recession ...
    The KakaBy Bernard Hickey
    15 hours ago
  • The Futility of Punishment
    Hi,I was in Texas recently and couldn’t stop thinking about how in some parts of America they really like to kill their prisoners. As a society we tend to agree murder is wrong, but somewhere along the way Texas figured it’s fine if it’s after 6pm and the killing is ...
    David FarrierBy David Farrier
    16 hours ago
  • The new Beehive approach to the environment
    A persistent theme has been weaving between the Committee rooms at Parliament all this so-called “Scrutiny” week as MPs have probed Ministers and agencies about their work and plans. The question has been simply what the environmental price might be if the country begins to accelerate its infrastructure building to ...
    PolitikBy Richard Harman
    18 hours ago
  • Skeptical Science New Research for Week #25 2024
    Open access notables Climate Change Is Leading to a Convergence of Global Climate Distribution, Li et al., Geophysical Research Letters: The impact of changes in global temperatures and precipitation on climate distribution remains unclear. Taking the annual global average temperatures and precipitation as the origin, this study determined the climate distribution with the ...
    1 day ago
  • You take nicer pictures when you’re not drunk
    Readers keeping count will know it's more than five years since I gave up booze. Some of you get worried on my behalf when I recount a possibly testing moment. Anxious readers: today I got well tested.All the way across France I've been enquiring in my very polite and well-meaning but ...
    More Than A FeildingBy David Slack
    1 day ago
  • Cancer
    Turn awayIf you could, get me a drinkOf water 'cause my lips are chapped and fadedCall my Aunt MarieHelp her gather all my thingsAnd bury me in all my favourite coloursMy sisters and my brothers, stillI will not kiss you'Cause the hardest part of this is leaving youI remember the ...
    Nick’s KōreroBy Nick Rockel
    1 day ago
  • Gordon Campbell on why we shouldn’t buy new planes for the PM
    Its not often that one has to agree with Judith Collins, but yes, it would indeed cost “hundreds of millions of dollars” (at least) to buy replacement aircraft to fly the Prime Minister on his overseas missions of diplomacy and trade. And yes, the public might well regard that spending ...
    WerewolfBy lyndon
    2 days ago
  • The Stadium Debate – What About the Transport Options?
    A few weeks ago, Auckland Council took another step in the long-running stadium saga, narrowing its shortlist down to two options for which they will now seek feasibility studies. The recommendation to move forward with a feasibility study was carried twenty to one by the council’s Governing Body for the ...
    2 days ago
  • Bernard’s mid-winter pick ‘n’ mix for Thursday, June 20
    Social Development Minister Louise Upston has defended the Government’s decision to save money by dumping a programme which tops up the pay of disabled workers. Photo: Lynn GrievesonTL;DR: It has emerged the National-ACT-NZ First Government decided to cut wages for disabled workers from the minimum wage to $2 an hour ...
    The KakaBy Bernard Hickey
    2 days ago
  • Where the power really resides in Wellington
    The new Chief Executive of the Department of Prime Minister and Cabinet (DPMC) yesterday gave a Select Committee a brutally frank outline of the department’s role as the agency right at the centre of power in Wellington. Ben King, formerly a deputy Chief Executive at the Ministry of Foreign Affairs ...
    PolitikBy Richard Harman
    2 days ago
  • Climate Adam: Why we're still losing the fight against Methane
    This video includes conclusions of the creator climate scientist Dr. Adam Levy. It is presented to our readers as an informed perspective. Please see video description for references (if any). Carbon dioxide is the main culprit behind climate change. But in second place is methane: a greenhouse gas stronger than CO2, ...
    2 days ago
  • Climate Change: More ETS failure
    A few weeks ago, I blogged about the (then) upcoming ETS auction, raising the prospect of it failing, leaving the government with a messy budget hole. The auction was today, and indeed, it failed. In fact, it was such a failure that no-one even bothered to bid. Its easy to ...
    No Right TurnBy Idiot/Savant
    2 days ago
  • The Return of Jacinda.
    Oh, take me, take me, take meTo the dreamer's ballI'll be right on time and I'll dress so fineYou're gonna love me when you see meI won't have to worryTake me, take mePromise not to wake me'Til it's morningIt's all been trueEarly morning yesterday, well before dawn, doom-scrolling.Not intentionally, that’s ...
    Nick’s KōreroBy Nick Rockel
    3 days ago
  • How good is the interim NW busway?
    This is a guest post by Pshem Kowalczyk, a long-time follower of the blog. With great fanfare, just over six months ago (on 12 November 2023), AT launched its interim busway for the NorthWest region, with the new WX express service at the heart of the changes. I live ...
    Greater AucklandBy Guest Post
    3 days ago
  • Consumer confidence collapses after Budget, in contrast with rest of world
    The first widespread survey of consumers and voters since the Budget on May 30 shows a collapse in confidence. Photo: Lynn Grieveson / The KākāTL;DR: The belt-tightening and tax-cutting Budget delivered on May 30 has not delivered the boost to confidence in the economy the National-ACT-NZ First Government might have ...
    The KakaBy Bernard Hickey
    3 days ago
  • The end for the Air Force 757s
    The Air Force 757 that broke down with the Prime Minister on board in Port Moresby on Sunday is considered so unreliable that it carries a substantial stock of spare parts when it travels overseas. And the plane also carries an Air Force maintenance team on board ready to make ...
    PolitikBy Richard Harman
    3 days ago
  • At a glance – Was 1934 the hottest year on record?
    On February 14, 2023 we announced our Rebuttal Update Project. This included an ask for feedback about the added "At a glance" section in the updated basic rebuttal versions. This weekly blog post series highlights this new section of one of the updated basic rebuttal versions and serves as a ...
    3 days ago
  • It's not New Zealand they've never heard of, it's him
    Sometimes you’ll just be so dog-tired, you can only keep yourself awake with a short stab of self-inflicted pain.A quick bite of the lip, for instance.Maybe a slight bite on the tongue or a dig of the nails.But what if you’re needing something a bit more painful?The solution is as ...
    More Than A FeildingBy David Slack
    3 days ago
  • Some “scrutiny” II
    Last month I blogged about the Ministry of Justice's Open Government Partnership commitment to strengthen scrutiny of Official Information Act exemption clauses in legislation", and how their existing efforts did not give much reason for confidence. As part of that, I mentioned that I had asked the Ministry for its ...
    No Right TurnBy Idiot/Savant
    3 days ago
  • Gordon Campbell on why the Biden “peace plan” for Gaza is doomed
    After months and months of blocking every attempt by the UN and everyone else to achieve a Gaza ceasefire, US President Joe Biden is now marketing his own three-stage “peace plan” to end the conflict. Like every other contribution by the US since October 7, the Biden initiative is hobbled ...
    WerewolfBy lyndon
    4 days ago
  • Raised crossings: hearing the voice of vulnerable pedestrians
    This is a guest post by Vivian Naylor, who is the Barrier Free Advisor and Educator at CCS Disability Action, Northern Region, the largest disability support and advocacy organisation in Aotearoa New Zealand. She also advises on AT’s Public Transport and Capital Projects Accessibility Groups. Vivian has been advocating and ...
    Greater AucklandBy Guest Post
    4 days ago
  • Leaving on a Jet Plane
    So kiss me and smile for meTell me that you'll wait for meHold me like you'll never let me go'Cause I'm leavin' on a jet planeDon't know when I'll be back againOh babe, I hate to go“The true measure of any society can be found in how it treats its ...
    Nick’s KōreroBy Nick Rockel
    4 days ago
  • Bernard's mid-winter pick 'n' mix for Tuesday, June 18
    The election promises of ‘better economic management’ are now ringing hollow, as NZ appears to be falling into a deeper recession, while other economies are turning the corner. Photo: Lynn Grieveson / The KākāTL;DR: The economy and the housing market are slumping back into a deep recession this winter, contrasting ...
    The KakaBy Bernard Hickey
    4 days ago
  • Scrutiny week off to rocky start
    Parliament’s new “Scrutiny” process, which is supposed to allow Select Committees to interrogate Ministers and officials in much more depth, has got off to a rocky start. Yesterday was the first day of “Scrutiny Week” which is supposed to see the Government grilled on how it spends taxpayers’ money and ...
    PolitikBy Richard Harman
    4 days ago
  • The choice could not be more stark’: How Trump and Biden compare on climate change
    This is a re-post from Yale Climate Connections by Barbara Grady Illustration by Samantha Harrington. Photo credits: Justin Lane-Pool/Getty Images, Win McNamee/Getty Images, European Space Agency. In an empty wind-swept field in Richmond, California, next to the county landfill, a company called RavenSr has plotted out land and won ...
    4 days ago
  • Differentiating between democracy and republic
    Although NZ readers may not be that interested in the subject and in lieu of US Fathers Day missives (not celebrated in NZ), I thought I would lay out some brief thoughts on a political subject being debated in the … Continue reading ...
    KiwipoliticoBy Pablo
    4 days ago
  • Bernard's mid-winter pick 'n' mix for Monday, June 17
    TL;DR: Chris Bishop talks up the use of value capture, congestion charging, PPPs, water meters, tolling and rebating GST on building materials to councils to ramp up infrastructure investment in the absence of the Government simply borrowing more to provide the capital.Meanwhile, Christopher Luxon wants to double the number of ...
    The KakaBy Bernard Hickey
    5 days ago
  • You do have the power to change things
    When I was invited to come aboard and help with Greater Auckland a few months ago (thanks to Patrick!), it was suggested it might be a good idea to write some sort of autobiographical post by way of an introduction. This post isn’t quite that – although I’m sure I’lll ...
    Greater AucklandBy Connor Sharp
    5 days ago
  • Turning Away – Who Cares If We Don't?
    On the turning awayFrom the pale and downtroddenAnd the words they say which we won't understandDon't accept that, what's happeningIs just a case of other's sufferingOr you'll find that you're joining inThe turning awayToday’s guest kōrero is from Author Catherine Lea. So without further ado, over to Catherine…I’m so honoured ...
    Nick’s KōreroBy Nick Rockel
    5 days ago
  • Dissecting Tickled
    Hi,Tickled was one of the craziest things that ever happened to me (and I feel like a lot of crazy things have happened to me).So ahead of the Webworm popup and Tickled screening in New Zealand on July 13, I thought I’d write about how we made that film and ...
    David FarrierBy David Farrier
    5 days ago
  • New Zealand Webworm Popup + Tickled!
    Hi,I’m doing a Webworm merch popup followed by a Tickled screening in Auckland, New Zealand on July 13th — and I’d love you to come. I got the urge to do this while writing this Webworm piece breaking down how we made Tickled, and talking to all the people who ...
    David FarrierBy David Farrier
    5 days ago
  • What China wants from NZ business
    One simple statistic said it all: China Premier Li Qiang asked Fonterra CEO Miles Hurrell what percentage of the company’s overall sales were made in China. “Thirty per cent,” said Hurrell. In other words, New Zealand’s largest company is more or less dependent on the Chinese market. But Hurrell is ...
    PolitikBy Richard Harman
    5 days ago
  • Review: The Worm Ouroboros, by E.R. Eddison (1922)
    One occasionally runs into the question of what J.R.R. Tolkien would have thought of George R.R. Martin. For years, I had a go-to online answer: we could use a stand-in. Tolkien’s thoughts on E.R. Eddison – that he appreciated the invented world, but thought the invented names were silly, and ...
    5 days ago
  • 2024 SkS Weekly Climate Change & Global Warming News Roundup #24
    A listing of 35 news and opinion articles we found interesting and shared on social media during the past week: Sun, June 9, 2024 thru Sat, June 15, 2024. Story of the week A glance at this week's inventory of what experts tell us is extreme weather mayhem juiced by ...
    5 days ago
  • Sunday Morning Chat
    After a busy week it’s a good day to relax. Clear blues skies here in Tamaki Makaurau, very peaceful but for my dogs sleeping heavily. In the absence of a full newsletter I thought I’d send out a brief update and share a couple of posts that popped up in ...
    Nick’s KōreroBy Nick Rockel
    5 days ago
  • The Book of Henry
    Now in the land of Angus beef and the mighty ABsWhere the steaks were juicy and the rivers did run foulIt would often be said,This meal is terrible,andNo, for real this is legit the worst thing I've ever eatenBut this was an thing said only to others at the table,not ...
    More Than A FeildingBy David Slack
    6 days ago
  • Fact Brief – Is ocean acidification from human activities enough to impact marine ecosystems?
    Skeptical Science is partnering with Gigafact to produce fact briefs — bite-sized fact checks of trending claims. This fact brief was written by Sue Bin Park in collaboration with members from the Skeptical Science team. You can submit claims you think need checking via the tipline. Is ocean acidification from human ...
    6 days ago
  • Happiness is a Warm Gun
    She's not a girl who misses muchDo do do do do do, oh yeahShe's well-acquainted with the touch of the velvet handLike a lizard on a window paneI wouldn’t associate ACT with warmth, other than a certain fabled, notoriously hot, destination where surely they’re heading and many would like them ...
    Nick’s KōreroBy Nick Rockel
    6 days ago
  • Still doing a good 20
    Hello! Here comes the Saturday edition of More Than A Feilding, catching you up on the past somewhat interrupted week. Still on the move!Share Read more ...
    More Than A FeildingBy David Slack
    7 days ago
  • Coalition of the Unwilling?
    What does Budget 2024 tell us about the current government? Muddle on?Coalition governments are not new. About 50 percent of the time since the first MMP election, there has been a minority government, usually with allied parties holding ministerial portfolios outside cabinets. For 10 percent of the time there was ...
    PunditBy Brian Easton
    1 week ago
  • Of red flags and warning signs in comments on social media
    Somewhat surprisingly for what is regarded as a network of professionals, climate science misinformation is getting shared on LinkedIn, joining other channels where this is happening. Several of our recent posts published on LinkedIn have attracted the ire of various commenters who apparently are in denial about human-caused climate change. Based ...
    1 week ago
  • All good, still
    1. On what subject is Paul Henry even remotely worth giving the time of day?a. The state of our nationb. The state of the ACT partyc. How to freak out potential buyers of your gin palace by baking the remains of your deceased parent into its fittings2. Now that New ...
    More Than A FeildingBy David Slack
    1 week ago
  • The looting is the point
    Last time National was in power, they looted the state, privatising public assets and signing hugely wasteful public-private partnership (PPP) contracts which saw foreign consortiums provide substandard infrastructure while gouging us for profits. You only have to look at the ongoing fiasco of Transmission Gully to see how it was ...
    No Right TurnBy Idiot/Savant
    1 week ago
  • The Illusion of Power: How Local Government Bureaucrats Overawe Democratically-Elected Councillors..
    The Democratic Façade Of Local Government: Our district and city councillors are democratically elected to govern their communities on one very strict condition – that they never, ever, under any circumstances, attempt to do so.A DISINTEGRATION OF LOYALTIES on the Wellington City Council has left Mayor Tory Whanau without a ...
    1 week ago
  • Lowlights & Bright Spots
    I can feel the lowlights coming over meI can feel the lowlights, from the state I’m inI can see the light now even thought it’s dimA little glow on the horizonAnother week of lowlights from our government, with the odd bright spot and a glow on the horizon. The light ...
    Nick’s KōreroBy Nick Rockel
    1 week ago
  • Weekly Roundup 14-June-2024
    Another week, another roundup of things that caught our eye on our favourite topics of transport, housing and how to make cities a little bit greater. This Week in Greater Auckland On Monday, Connor wrote about Kāinga Ora’s role as an urban development agency Tuesday’s guest post by ...
    Greater AucklandBy Greater Auckland
    1 week ago
  • The Hoon around the week to June 14
    Photo: Lynn Grieveson / The KākāTL;DR: The podcast above of the weekly ‘hoon’ webinar for paying subscribers features co-hosts and talking with:The Kākā’s climate correspondent about the National-ACT-NZ First Government’s moves this week to take farming out of the ETS and encourage more mining and oil and ...
    The KakaBy Bernard Hickey
    1 week ago
  • Climate policy axed in broad daylight, while taxpayer liabilities grow in the dark
    In 2019, Shane Jones addressed the “50 Shades of Green” protest at Parliament: Now he is part of a government giving those farmers a pass on becoming part of the ETS, as well as threatening to lock in offshore oil exploration and mining for decades. Photo: Lynn GrievesonTL;DR: Here’s the ...
    The KakaBy Bernard Hickey
    1 week ago
  • Rage Bait!
    Hi,Today’s newsletter is all about how easy it is to get sucked into “rage bait” online, and how easy it is to get played.But first I wanted to share something that elicited the exact opposite of rage in me — something that made me feel incredibly proud, whilst also making ...
    David FarrierBy David Farrier
    1 week ago
  • Bernard's Dawn Chorus and pick 'n' mix for Friday, June 14
    Seymour said lower speed limits “drained the joy from life as people were forced to follow rules they knew made no sense.” File Photo: Lynn Grieveson / The KākāTL;DR: My six things to note in Aotearoa-NZ’s political economy around housing, climate and poverty on Friday, June 14 were:The National/ACT/NZ First ...
    The KakaBy Bernard Hickey
    1 week ago
  • Friendly but frank talks with China Premier
    It sounded like the best word to describe yesterday’s talks between Chinese Premier Li Qiang and his heavyweight delegation of Ministers and officials and Prime Minister Christopher Luxon and New Zealand Ministers and officials was “frank.” But it was the kind of frankness that friends can indulge in. It ...
    PolitikBy Richard Harman
    1 week ago
  • Skeptical Science New Research for Week #24 2024
    Open access notables Wildfire smoke impacts lake ecosystems, Farruggia et al., Global Change Biology: We introduce the concept of the lake smoke-day, or the number of days any given lake is exposed to smoke in any given fire season, and quantify the total lake smoke-day exposure in North America from 2019 ...
    1 week ago
  • Join us for the weekly Hoon on YouTube Live
    Photo by Mathias Elle on UnsplashIt’s that new day of the week (Thursday rather than Friday) when we have our ‘hoon’ webinar with paying subscribers to The Kākā for an hour at 5 pm.Jump on this link on YouTube Livestream for our chat about the week’s news with special guests:5.00 ...
    The KakaBy Bernard Hickey
    1 week ago
  • Geoffrey Miller: China’s message to New Zealand – don’t put it all at risk
    Don’t put it all at risk. That’s likely to be the take-home message for New Zealand Prime Minister Christopher Luxon in his meetings with Li Qiang, the Chinese Premier. Li’s visit to Wellington this week is the highest-ranking visit by a Chinese official since 2017. The trip down under – ...
    Democracy ProjectBy Geoffrey Miller
    1 week ago
  • The Real Thing
    I know the feelingIt is the real thingThe essence of the soulThe perfect momentThat golden momentI know you feel it tooI know the feelingIt is the real thingYou can't refuse the embraceNo?Sometimes we face the things we most dislike. A phobia or fear that must be confronted so it doesn’t ...
    Nick’s KōreroBy Nick Rockel
    1 week ago
  • Gordon Campbell on how moderates empower the political right
    Struth, what a week. Having made sure the rural sector won’t have to pay any time soon for its pollution, PM Christopher Luxon yesterday chose Fieldays 2024 to launch a parliamentary inquiry into rural banking services, to see how the banks have been treating farmers faced with high interest rates. ...
    1 week ago
  • Bernard's Dawn Chorus and pick 'n' mix for Thursday, June 13
    In April, 17,656 people left Aotearoa-NZ to live overseas, averaging 588 a day, with just over half of those likely to have gone to Australia. Photo: Photo: Lynn Grieveson / The KākāTL;DR: My six things to note in Aotearoa-NZ’s political economy around housing, climate and poverty on Thursday, June 13 ...
    The KakaBy Bernard Hickey
    1 week ago
  • Our guide to having your say on the draft RLTP 2024
    Auckland’s draft Regional Land Transport Plan (RLTP) 2024 is open for feedback – and you only have until Monday 17 June to submit. Do it! Join the thousands of Aucklanders who are speaking up for wise strategic investment that will dig us out of traffic and give us easy and ...
    Greater AucklandBy Connor Sharp
    1 week ago
  • The China puzzle
    Chinese Premier Li Qiang arrives in Wellington today for a three-day visit to the country. The visit will take place amid uncertainty about the future of the New Zealand-China relationship. Li hosted a formal welcome and then lunch for then-Prime Minister Chris Hipkins in Beijing a year ago. The pair ...
    PolitikBy Richard Harman
    1 week ago
  • Fossil fuels are shredding our democracy
    This is a re-post of an article from the Climate Brink by Andrew Dessler published on June 3, 2024. I have an oped in the New York Times (gift link) about this. For a long time, a common refrain about the energy transition was that renewable energy needed to become ...
    1 week ago
  • Life at 20 kilometres an hour
    We are still in France, getting from A to B.Possibly for only another week, though; Switzerland and Germany are looming now. On we pedal, towards Budapest, at about 20 km per hour.What are are mostly doing is inhaling a country, loving its ways and its food. Rolling, talking, quietly thinking. ...
    More Than A FeildingBy David Slack
    1 week ago
  • Hipkins is still useless
    The big problem with the last Labour government was that they were chickenshits who did nothing with the absolute majority we had given them. They governed as if they were scared of their own shadows, afraid of making decisions lest it upset someone - usually someone who would never have ...
    No Right TurnBy Idiot/Savant
    1 week ago
  • Exercising with the IDF.
    This morning I did something I seldom do, I looked at the Twitter newsfeed. Normally I take the approach of something that I’m not sure is an American urban legend, or genuinely something kids do over there. The infamous bag of dog poo on the front porch, set it on ...
    Nick’s KōreroBy Nick Rockel
    1 week ago
  • Helm Hammerhand Anime: First Pictures and an Old English ‘Hera’
    We have some news on the upcoming War of the Rohirrim anime. It will apparently be two and a half hours in length, with Peter Jackson as Executive Producer, and Helm’s daughter Hera will be the main character. Also, pictures: The bloke in the middle picture is Freca’s ...
    1 week ago
  • Farmers get free pass on climate AND get subsidies
    The cows will keep burping and farting and climate change will keep accelerating - but farmers can stop worrying about being included in the ETS. Photo: Lynn Grieveson / The KākāTL;DR: My six things to note in Aotearoa-NZ’s political economy around housing, climate and poverty on Wednesday, June 12 were:The ...
    The KakaBy Bernard Hickey
    1 week ago
  • Six ideas to secure Te Huia’s Future
    This is a guest post by our friend Darren Davis. It originally appeared on his excellent blog, Adventures in Transitland, which features “musings about public transport and other cool stuff in Aotearoa/ New Zealand and around the globe.” With Te Huia now having funding secure through to 2026, now is ...
    Greater AucklandBy Darren Davis
    1 week ago
  • The methane waka sinks
    In some ways, there may be less than meets the eye to the Government announcement yesterday that the He Waka Eke Noa proposal for farmers to pay for greenhouse gas emissions has been scrapped. The spectre of farmers still having to pay at some point in the future remains. That, ...
    PolitikBy Richard Harman
    1 week ago
  • At a glance – Does positive feedback necessarily mean runaway warming?
    On February 14, 2023 we announced our Rebuttal Update Project. This included an ask for feedback about the added "At a glance" section in the updated basic rebuttal versions. This weekly blog post series highlights this new section of one of the updated basic rebuttal versions and serves as a ...
    1 week ago
  • Climate Change: Farmers get what they wanted – for now
    Since entering office, National has unravelled practically every climate policy, leaving us with no effective way of reducing emissions or meeting our emissions budgets beyond magical thinking around the ETS. And today they've announced another step: removing agriculture entirely. At present, following the complete failure of he waka eka noa, ...
    No Right TurnBy Idiot/Savant
    1 week ago
  • Presumed Innocent?
    The blue billionaireDistraction no interactionOr movement outside these glazed over eyesThe new great divideFew fight the tide to be glorifiedBut will he be satisfied?Can we accept this without zoom?The elephant in the roomNot much happens in politics on a Monday. Bugger all in fact. Although yesterday Christopher Luxon found he ...
    Nick’s KōreroBy Nick Rockel
    2 weeks ago
  • Gordon Campbell on our doomed love affair with oil and gas
    What if New Zealand threw a fossil fuel party, and nobody came? On the weekend, Resources Minister Shane Jones sent out the invitations and strung up the balloons, but will anyone really want to invest big time in resuming oil and gas exploration in our corner of the planet? Yes, ...
    WerewolfBy lyndon
    2 weeks ago

  • Reserve Bank chair reappointed
    Professor Neil Quigley has been reappointed as Chair of the Reserve Bank of New Zealand Board for a further term of two years, until 30 June 2026.  “Professor Quigley has played a key role in establishing the new Board after the commencement of the new RBNZ Act on 1 July ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 day ago
  • School attendance increases
    School attendance data released today shows an increase in the number of students regularly attending school to 61.7 per cent in term one. This compares to 59.5 per cent in term one last year and 53.6 per cent in term four. “It is encouraging to see more children getting to ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 day ago
  • Record investment in public transport services
    The Government has announced a record 41 per cent increase in indicative funding for public transport services and operations, and confirmed the rollout of the National Ticketing Solution (NTS) that will enable contactless debit and credit card payments starting this year in Auckland, Transport Minister Simeon Brown says.“This Government is ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 day ago
  • GDP data shows need to strengthen and grow the economy
    GDP figures for the March quarter reinforce the importance of restoring fiscal discipline to public spending and driving more economic growth, Finance Minister Nicola Willis says.  Data released today by Stats NZ shows GDP has risen 0.2 per cent for the quarter to March.   “While today’s data is technically in ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 day ago
  • Women continue to make up over 50 per cent on public sector boards
    Women’s representation on public sector boards and committees has reached 50 per cent or above for the fourth consecutive year, with women holding 53.9 per cent of public sector board roles, Acting Minister for Women Louise Upston says. “This is a fantastic achievement, but the work is not done. To ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 days ago
  • Government supporting Māori business success
    The Coalition Government is supporting Māori to boost development and the Māori economy through investment in projects that benefit the regions, Regional Development Minister Shane Jones and Māori Development Minister Tama Potaka say. “As the Regional Development Minister, I am focused on supporting Māori to succeed. The Provincial Growth Fund ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 days ago
  • Better solutions for earthquake-prone buildings
    Building and Construction Minister Chris Penk has announced that the review into better managing the risks of earthquake-prone buildings has commenced. “The terms of reference published today demonstrate the Government’s commitment to ensuring we get the balance right between public safety and costs to building owners,” Mr Penk says.  “The Government ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 days ago
  • Prime Minister wraps up visit to Japan
    Prime Minister Christopher Luxon has just finished a successful three-day visit to Japan, where he strengthened political relationships and boosted business links. Mr Luxon’s visit culminated in a bilateral meeting with Japanese Prime Minister Kishida Fumio followed by a state dinner. “It was important for me to meet Prime Minister Kishida in person ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 days ago
  • Major business deals signed on PM’s Japan trip
    Significant business deals have been closed during the visit of Prime Minister Christopher Luxon to Japan this week, including in the areas of space, renewable energy and investment.  “Commercial deals like this demonstrate that we don’t just export high-quality agricultural products to Japan, but also our world-class technology, expertise, and ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 days ago
  • Strategic Security speech, Tokyo
    Minasan, konnichiwa, kia ora and good afternoon everyone. Thank you for the invitation to speak to you today and thank you to our friends at the Institute for International Socio-Economic Studies and NEC for making this event possible today.  It gives me great pleasure to be here today, speaking with ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 days ago
  • National Infrastructure Pipeline worth over $120 billion
    The National Infrastructure Pipeline, which provides a national view of current or planned infrastructure projects, from roads, to water infrastructure, to schools, and more, has climbed above $120 billion, Infrastructure Minister Chris Bishop says. “Our Government is investing a record amount in modern infrastructure that Kiwis can rely on as ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 days ago
  • Making it easier to build infrastructure
    The Government is modernising the Public Works Act to make it easier to build infrastructure, Minister for Land Information Chris Penk announced today. An independent panel will undertake an eight-week review of the Act and advise on common sense changes to enable large scale public works to be built faster and ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 days ago
  • NZ enhances North Korea sanctions monitoring
    New Zealand will enhance its defence contributions to monitoring violations of sanctions against North Korea, Prime Minister Christopher Luxon announced today.  The enhancement will see the New Zealand Defence Force (NZDF) increase its contributions to North Korea sanctions monitoring, operating out of Japan. “This increase reflects the importance New Zealand ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 days ago
  • Speech to Safeguard National Health and Safety Conference
    Good afternoon everyone. It’s great to be with you all today before we wrap up Day One of the annual Safeguard National Health and Safety Conference. Thank you to the organisers and sponsors of this conference, for the chance to talk to you about the upcoming health and safety consultation. ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 days ago
  • Ōtaki to north of Levin alliance agreements signed
    Transport Minister Simeon Brown has welcomed an important milestone for the Ōtaki to north of Levin Road of National Significance (RoNS), following the NZ Transport Agency (NZTA) signing interim alliance agreements with two design and construction teams who will develop and ultimately build the new expressway.“The Government’s priority for transport ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 days ago
  • Improvements to stopping Digital Child Exploitation
    The Department of Internal Affairs [Department] is making a significant upgrade to their Digital Child Exploitation Filtering System, which blocks access to websites known to host child sexual abuse material, says Minister of Internal Affairs Brooke van Velden.  “The Department will incorporate the up-to-date lists of websites hosting child sexual ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 days ago
  • New vaccine research aims to combat prevalent bovine disease
    A vaccine to prevent an infectious disease that costs New Zealand cattle farmers more than $190 million each year could radically improve the health of our cows and boost on-farm productivity, Associate Agriculture Minister Andrew Hoggard says. The Ministry for Primary Industries is backing a project that aims to develop ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 days ago
  • Making it easier to build granny flats
    The Government has today announced that it is making it easier for people to build granny flats, Acting Prime Minister Winston Peters and RMA Reform Minister Chris Bishop say. “Making it easier to build granny flats will make it more affordable for families to live the way that suits them ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    4 days ago
  • High Court Judge appointed
    Attorney-General Judith Collins today announced the appointment of Auckland King’s Counsel Gregory Peter Blanchard as a High Court Judge. Justice Blanchard attended the University of Auckland from 1991 to 1995, graduating with an LLB (Honours) and Bachelor of Arts (English). He was a solicitor with the firm that is now Dentons ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • Health workforce numbers rise
    Health Minister Dr Shane Reti says new data released today shows encouraging growth in the health workforce, with a continued increase in the numbers of doctors, nurses and midwives joining Health New Zealand. “Frontline healthcare workers are the beating heart of the healthcare system. Increasing and retaining our health workforce ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • Government to overhaul firearms laws
    Associate Justice Minister Nicole McKee has today announced a comprehensive programme to reform New Zealand's outdated and complicated firearms laws. “The Arms Act has been in place for over 40 years. It has been amended several times – in a piecemeal, and sometimes rushed way. This has resulted in outdated ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • Government delivers landmark specialist schools investment
    The coalition Government is delivering record levels of targeted investment in specialist schools so children with additional needs can thrive. As part of Budget 24, $89 million has been ringfenced to redevelop specialist facilities and increase satellite classrooms for students with high needs. This includes: $63 million in depreciation funding ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • Major health and safety consultation begins
    A substantial consultation on work health and safety will begin today with a roadshow across the regions over the coming months, says Workplace Relations and Safety Minister Brooke van Velden.  This the first step to deliver on the commitment to reforming health and safety law and regulations, set out in ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • Growing the potential of New Zealand’s forestry sector in partnership
    Forestry Minister Todd McClay, today announced the start of the Government’s plan to restore certainty and confidence in the forestry and wood processing sector. “This government will drive investment to unlock the industry’s economic potential for growth,” Mr McClay says. “Forestry’s success is critical to rebuilding New Zealand’s economy, boosting ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • Government cancels forestry ETS annual service charges for 2023-24
    Annual service charges in the forestry Emissions Trading Scheme (ETS) will be cancelled for 2023/24, Forestry Minister Todd McClay says. “The sector has told me the costs imposed on forestry owners by the previous government were excessive and unreasonable and I agree,” Mr McClay says. “They have said that there ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • Speech to the LGNZ Infrastructure Symposium
    Introduction Thank you for having me here today and welcome to Wellington, the home of the Hurricanes, the next Super Rugby champions. Infrastructure – the challenge This government has inherited a series of big challenges in infrastructure. I don’t need to tell an audience as smart as this one that ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • Government boosts Agriculture and food trade with China
    Trade and Agriculture Minister Todd McClay and Food Safety Minister Andrew Hoggard welcomed outcomes to boost agricultural and food trade between New Zealand and China. A number of documents were signed today at Government House that will improve the business environment between New Zealand and China, and help reduce barriers, including on infant formula ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • NZ and China launch Services Trade Negotiations
    Trade Minister Todd McClay, and China’s Commerce Minister Wang Wentao, today announced the official launch of Negotiations on Services Trade between the two countries.  “The Government is focused on opening doors for services exporters to grow the New Zealand’s economy,” Mr McClay says.  As part of the 2022 New Zealand-China Free Trade Agreement Upgrade ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • Prime Minister Luxon meets with Premier Li
    Prime Minister Christopher Luxon met with Chinese Premier Li Qiang at Government House in Wellington today.  “I was pleased to welcome Premier Li to Wellington for his first official visit, which marks 10 years since New Zealand and China established a Comprehensive Strategic Partnership,” Mr Luxon says. “The Premier and ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • Government and business tackling gender pay gap
    The coalition Government is taking action to reduce the gender pay gap in New Zealand through the development of a voluntary calculation tool. “Gender pay gaps have impacted women for decades, which is why we need to continue to drive change in New Zealand,” Acting Minister for Women Louise Upston ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • Funding Boost for Rural Support Trusts
    The coalition Government is boosting funding for Rural Support Trusts to provide more help to farmers and growers under pressure, Rural Communities Minister Mark Patterson announced today. “A strong and thriving agricultural sector is crucial to the New Zealand economy and one of the ways to support it is to ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • Latest data shows size of public service decreasing
    Spending on contractors and consultants continues to fall and the size of the Public Service workforce has started to decrease after years of growth, according to the latest data released today by the Public Service Commission. Workforce data for the quarter from 31 December 23 to 31 March 24 shows ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • Speech to the Law Association
    Thank you to the Law Association for inviting me to speak this morning. As a former president under its previous name — the Auckland District Law Society — I take particular satisfaction in seeing this organisation, and its members, in such good heart. As Attorney-General, I am grateful for these ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • 25 years on, NZ reaffirms enduring friendship with Timor Leste
    New Zealand is committed to working closely with Timor-Leste to support its prosperity and resilience, Foreign Minister Winston Peters says.   “This year is the 25th anniversary of New Zealand sending peacekeepers to Timor-Leste, who contributed to the country’s stabilisation and ultimately its independence,” Mr Peters says.    “A quarter ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • Inquiry requested into rural banking
    Promoting robust competition in the banking sector is vital to rebuilding the economy, Finance Minister Nicola Willis says.  “New Zealanders deserve a banking sector that is as competitive as possible. Banking services play an important role in our communities and in the economy. Kiwis rely on access to lending when ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • Ministry for Regulation targets red tape to keep farmers and growers competitive
    Regulation Minister David Seymour, Environment Minister Penny Simmonds, and Food Safety Minister Andrew Hoggard have today announced a regulatory sector review on the approval process for new agricultural and horticultural products.    “Red tape stops farmers and growers from getting access to products that have been approved by other OECD countries. ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • Government to reverse blanket speed limit reductions
    The Coalition Government will reverse Labour’s blanket speed limit reductions by 1 July 2025 through a new Land Transport Rule released for public consultation today, Transport Minister Simeon Brown says.  The draft speed limit rule will deliver on the National-ACT coalition commitment to reverse the previous government’s blanket speed limit ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • Chair appointments for NZSO, CNZ and NZ On Air
    Minister Paul Goldsmith is making major leadership changes within both his Arts and Media portfolios. “I am delighted to announce Carmel Walsh will be officially stepping into the role of Chair of the New Zealand Symphony Orchestra, having been acting Chair since April,” Arts Minister Paul Goldsmith says.  “Carmel is ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • Government focus on long-term food, fibre growth
    Food and fibre export revenue is tipped to reach $54.6 billion this year and hit a record $66.6b in 2028 as the Government focuses on getting better access to markets and cutting red tape, Agriculture Minister Todd McClay and Oceans and Fisheries Minister Shane Jones say. “This achievement is testament ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • Govt consulting on cutting red tape for exporters
    A new export exemption proposal for food businesses demonstrates the coalition Government’s commitment to reducing regulatory barriers for industry and increasing the value of New Zealand exports, which gets safe New Zealand food to more markets, says Food Safety Minister Andrew Hoggard.  “The coalition Government has listened to the concerns ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago

Page generated in The Standard by Wordpress at 2024-06-21T10:41:33+00:00