Raise the drinking age

Written By: - Date published: 11:30 am, July 1st, 2010 - 103 comments
Categories: drugs, health, john key - Tags: , ,

I was neutral in the debate on lowering the drinking age back in 1999. There were arguments on both sides. Some European countries manage a mature, responsible and family based attitude to alcohol that is much more healthy than a heavy handed regulatory framework. It would have been nice if NZ could have got there.

Ten years later it’s time to admit that we didn’t. As a culture we failed, and alcohol related problems have skyrocketed:

The figures […] show alcohol-related death rates have skyrocketed due to what experts describe as a binge-drinking culture entrenched in Kiwi youth. Coroners have noted alcohol as a feature of the deaths of 1100 Kiwis over the past decade.

Numbers across the country have risen from 41 in 2000 to 254 in 2008. In 2009, the figure sits at 137, but is incomplete as some inquests are still open.

Last month, Chief Coroner Neil MacLean released statistics showing 12 teenagers had died from binge-drinking since July 1, 2007. The issue was highlighted after the death of Auckland schoolboy James Webster, who died in his sleep last month after drinking straight vodka. …

National Addiction Centre director Doug Sellman said the figures were “very concerning”. The rising death rate correlated with increased heavy drinking among Kiwi youth after the lowering of the buying age in 1999.

Depending on how you define “alcohol related” death, some estimates are much higher, up to more than 1000 per year. Hundreds of medical professionals have called for the drinking age to be raised. The Law Commission has published a detailed report (“Alcohol in our lives:
Curbing the harm”) also calling for the age to be raised to 20. Other comments are here. And a range of “Prominent Kiwis” have joined the calls for drinking culture reform:

Two former governors-general are among a group of prominent Kiwis calling on politicians to shake up New Zealand’s alcohol laws. Led by former governor-general Sir Paul Reeves, the group will present a six-point statement at Parliament tomorrow, as the Government considers its response to a Law Commission report on alcohol issued earlier this year. …

Sir Paul said the group would urge the Government “to make the most of the current once-in-a generation-opportunity to find better solutions to our alcohol crisis”. The Law Commission’s review of alcohol legislation was a unique opportunity to change New Zealand’s drinking culture, he said.

“Positive new alcohol legislation needs to be introduced with urgency to deal with an increasingly out-of- control situation of heavy drinking in New Zealand.” The report recommended increasing the tax on alcohol, restricted advertising, raising the drinking age and lowering the legal blood alcohol limit.

Commission president Geoffrey Palmer has urged Parliament to enact the whole package of recommendations “rather than cherry picking the more politically palatable elements”. However, Prime Minister John Key has already ruled out an increase in alcohol tax and claimed the public was not in the mood for wholesale change.

I think the PM is wrong. The case for substantial change seems to be open and shut, and I think that the country (always excepting the “Talkback Taliban” of Kiwiblog and the likes) would accept it. Raise the drinking age, and enact the other measures needed to make it effective. Come on Key, show some leadership.

103 comments on “Raise the drinking age ”

  1. American Gardener 1

    Agreed – if the change hasn’t worked then it is time to try something different. Love your expression “Talkback Taliban” to describe the small group of right wing wing nuts lead by Redbaiter.

    • r0b 1.1

      Not my expression – but yes it is captures the essence perfectly.

    • jcuknz 1.2

      Probition didn’t work in the States and shades of it will not work here. The law review is a simple kneejerk non-solution by people who will not face the real problem … teaching moderation to a country that has gone wild … at least some sections of it.

  2. deemac 2

    there is no one simple solution, certainly not stopping adults (ie 18 year olds) from buying alcohol. Much better to deal with the actual problems (cheap RTDs, public drunkenness, bars serving intoxicated people etc) but that will be more complicated. Politicians (and police) like simple solutions but these rarely work, just make it look like you are “doing someting”.

    • r0b 2.1

      there is no one simple solution, certainly not stopping adults (ie 18 year olds) from buying alcohol.

      Sorry, call me old and grumpy, but there is no way an 18yo is an adult. (Some of them are remarkable young people to be sure, but not adults).

      The problem with your argument is the way alcohol related problems have shot up so quickly since 1999 when we allowed 18yos to buy alcohol. It looks like causation (in principle it could still be a coincidence, but does anyone really believe that?).

      Hence raising the age again seems to me like a sensible thing to try. Do it, give that 10 years, then see where we are.

      • Lew 2.1.1

        “Sorry, call me old and grumpy, but there is no way an 18yo is an adult. (Some of them are remarkable young people to be sure, but not adults).”

        Should their rights to marry, start families, vote, serve in the military and other such professions (all the usual examples with which I’m sure you’re familiar) be removed on the same grounds?

        I think not. I think granting marginally generous responsibility to the less-responsible youths in our society is a reasonable price to pay for not patronising and infantilising those who are more responsible.

        L

        • Quoth the Raven 2.1.1.1

          Lew – As an interesting aside I found this interesting The Case Against Adolescence

          Dumas and I worked out what makes an adult an adult. We came up with 14 areas of competency—such as interpersonal skills, handling responsibility, leadership—and administered tests to adults and teens in several cities around the country. We found that teens were as competent or nearly as competent as adults in all 14 areas. But when adults estimate how teens will score, their estimates are dramatically below what the teens actually score.

          Other long-standing data show that teens are at least as competent as adults. IQ is a quotient that indicates where you stand relative to other people your age; that stays stable. But raw scores of intelligence peak around age 14-15 and shrink thereafter. Scores on virtually all tests of memory peak between ages 13 and 15. Perceptual abilities all peak at that age. Brain size peaks at 14. Incidental memory—what you remember by accident, and not due to mnemonics—is remarkably good in early to mid teens and practically nonexistent by the ’50s and ’60s.

        • r0b 2.1.1.2

          Should their rights to marry, start families, vote, serve in the military and other such professions (all the usual examples with which I’m sure you’re familiar) be removed on the same grounds?

          Argue any of these case by case on whatever grounds you want, the rights and responsibilities of near adults is a legitimate area of debate. But the argument that an 18yo is an adult is incorrect, it shouldn’t be used as a justification for anything.

          For the record, I would certainly argue that 18yos should not be eligible to serve in the military.

          • Lew 2.1.1.2.1

            R0b, this looks like a No True Scotsman to me.

            Adulthood is socially-determined. At present, our society generally deems adulthood to occur at about 18ish, give or take. This is signified in legislation (voting, alcohol purchase age; age of complete sexual and familial majority, right to contract, etc.) and in culture (age at which is generally considered “acceptable” or “usual” to undertake certain activities not prohibited by law — such as play in an adult sports team, attend university. There are other cases where it’s lower (criminal responsibility at 14, partial sexual majority at 16; driving age of 16; arms license applicability at 16) and very few where it’s higher (ceremonial transition to adulthood at 21).

            In law and in social norms, at 18 a person is generally considered an adult. So by what definition are they not one?

            The problem with arguing the principle that 18 is not an adult is that it doesn’t just imply a legislative responsibility to prohibit alcohol purchase or consumption — it implies a responsibility to change (or consider changing) all these other rights as well, for consistency’s sake. Try selling a driving, sexual majority, arms ownership and age of contract rights of 20 and see how far you get. And then see what sort of society we have.

            Much better to simply argue the pragmatic case that teenagers have proven themselves too irresponsible for this specific set of rights. I’d still disagree, but you’re on stronger ground.

            L

            • r0b 2.1.1.2.1.1

              R0b, this looks like a No True Scotsman to me.

              Heh – possibly!

              Adulthood is socially-determined

              That’s the definition that counts in the end, and I accept that I am in the minority in arguing that society has it wrong. I think we have “the age of adulthood” wrong for three reasons:

              (1) The age was set when we knew a lot less about the brain and its rate of maturation than we know now.

              (2) Society has historically had a built in pressure to push the age as low as possible – more soldiers, more workers, more breeders.

              (3) Society has not adapted the age to keep pace with changes in society. The world today is a very different place to the world of a child growing up 50 years ago.

              For these reasons (and on the basis of some non trivial personal experience!) I believe that that the socially accepted definition of the age of adulthood is too low.

              for consistency’s sake

              Case by case – why an obsession with consistency when the cases are so obviously different?

              • Lew

                Case by case why an obsession with consistency when the cases are so obviously different?

                Bundle of sticks. They all rely on the same conditional: “is/is not an adult”. But how we determine adulthood is by assessing the different rights/responsibilities making up “adulthood”, and they largely draw strength from each other.

                You say* “18 year olds can’t handle their booze, therefore they are not adults”, and my retort that 18 year-olds can marry because they can also fight in wars, drive, vote, drink, etc. So by undermining one of those criteria you undermine the overall picture of adulthood. They can’t stand apart.

                L

                * actually, you don’t, but bear with me.

                • r0b

                  * actually, you don’t, but bear with me.

                  By all means.

                  Bundle of sticks. They all rely on the same conditional: “is/is not an adult’.

                  Why a bundle? It’s bad enough that one size (age) has to fit all individuals (who vary greatly). Why make it worse by insisting that it also has to fit all situations? Why must we insist that getting married, voting, buying alcohol, driving, and joining the army all have the same set magical age? We didn’t used to – we used to have a drinking age of 20, just for example. So why can’t we put it back?

                  You say* “18 year olds can’t handle their booze, therefore they are not adults’,

                  Not quite – but carry on:

                  and my retort that 18 year-olds can marry because they can also fight in wars, drive, vote, drink, etc. So by undermining one of those criteria you undermine the overall picture of adulthood. They can’t stand apart.

                  What “overall picture of adulthood”? I think you’re insisting on some strange binary classification that doesn’t and shouldn’t exist. Life is a progression of milestones and achievements, from well before adolescence until (we hope) the day we die. Why try and draw a sharp line at a set age and call everyone to the right of the line an “adult”? Why not case by case for the different issues?

                  If you aren’t convinced by the argument, be convinced by the facts. The drinking age used to be 20, apparently the lack of consistency did not cause society to fall apart. We can put it back if we want to. And it could save hundreds of lives a year.

                  A pleasure chatting, but work calls, I shan’t be back until tonight.

                  • Lew

                    Because they are all rated against the same test: adulthood. Justification as to why someone can/can’t do any certain thing is “they are/are not an adult”. The basis for lowering the drinking age was largely that 18 year-olds can do other “adult” things, so they shouild be able to do this one as well. It was to correct an inconsistency. To re-raise it to 20 requires you to make a case as to why it should be different from other “adult” activities, such as: being able to marry; enter into a contract; participate in pornography; and most crucially of all, vote and stand for office.

                    If your argument is that 18 year-olds are not responsible enough to drink, then it must surely follow that they are not responsible enough to do any of those things, particularly the last three. So you either contradict yourself by arguing they don’t require as much responsibility (I hope you’d agree that arguing that voting requires less responsibility than having a beer after work is plainly idiotic), or you find yourself arguing for an increase in the age at which all those activities are or ought to be permisible. Which is infantilising and patronising.

                    If you want to make an argument on the basis of harm reduction, then as I’ve said, you’re on stronger grounds. But I would say that such an argument speaks more in the favour of mitigation strategies than outright prohibition.

                    There are lots of things we could do to “save hundreds of lives a year”, such as cut the speed limit to 50kph, and 30 in town; or mandating that everyone’s TVs be operated by exercycle. But I don’t care as much about the policy outcome as I do about the consistency of the principles enacted — or more to the point, I have faith in the policy process to come up with an adequate policy solution if properly-principled actions are taken.

                    The argument of principle regarding adulthood is a dead end, and in my view just a manifestation of the creeping abolitionist conservatism of advancing age. In other words: yeah, maybe you are just old and grumpy.

                    L

                    • r0b

                      Because they are all rated against the same test: adulthood. Justification as to why someone can/can’t do any certain thing is “they are/are not an adult’.

                      Oh bollocks. They’re all rated against the same test: does society agree that the person meets the requirements to have that right. At one end of the spectrum it’s pure qualification – you don’t get to be a doctor when you pass a magic age, you have to get the degree. In the middle it’s a mix of age and qualification – a driver’s licence when you’re old enough and can pass the test. At the other end of the spectrum it’s pure age – you can vote if you’re old enough. This universal test of “adulthood” that you hold so dear is an illusion of your own making. You even say so yourself later on:

                      The argument of principle regarding adulthood is a dead end

                      So make up your mind!

                      If your argument is that 18 year-olds are not responsible enough to drink, then it must surely follow that they are not responsible enough to do any of those things,

                      Why must it surely follow? Why are you trying to cram the world in to a one size fits all straight jacket? I’m truly surprised at your apparent tunnel vision on this matter. Drinking is different because it kills people. (Yeah soldiers do that too, but that’s another debate).

                      There are lots of things we could do to “save hundreds of lives a year’,

                      There’s a lot more to it than that. The law commission report linked in the OP, please go and read Chapters 3 and 4.

                      just a manifestation of the creeping abolitionist conservatism of advancing age. In other words: yeah, maybe you are just old and grumpy.

                      I’m surprised to find that a hip young liberal like yourself is a closet old-ageist Lew. Careful, or I’ll round up my local chapter of grey power and we’ll come on over to your place and beat you up with our zimmer frames.

                    • Lew

                      I’m not arguing that there is a universal test for adulthood — I’m arguing that the various responsibilities are graded against each other. That’s not a very radical position.

                      If you’d like to argue that drinking requires less responsibility (or has worse consequences if exercised irresponsibly) than voting, driving or parenthood — or that all these can consistently be graded against their own independent, objective standards — then by all means, do so. I haven’t seen anyone do it convincingly.

                      For my part, r0b, (not knowing your age, even to the decade) I’m surprised that you’re taking such an aged-curmudgeon get-off-my-lawn-you-damn-kids position. It seems out of character for you.

                      L

                    • r0b

                      And there perhaps the matter rests. But do please read those chapters.

        • lprent 2.1.1.3

          I’d have to agree with Lew.

          When I was 18 in 1977, I’d had a potentially lethal car license from a few weeks after my 15th birthday, and owned a car when I was 17. I’d giving up my high paying relatively night shift factory job that I’d done while in the 5th, 6th, and 7th form and spent a year milking cows, birthing sheep, crutching and trying to keep the bloody stupid sheep alive. I’d helped destroy and build several buildings. I’d joined the territorials, done my training both as a soldier and as a medic, and was authorized to shoot people when ordered. I’d already spent a considerable amount of time on the range improving my shooting with my own legal weapons.

          In 1978 when I was still 18, I went to university and started working as a part-time barman. Early that year I had to take time off both to go to court to be convicted of underage drinking that had happened when I was on leave from army training.

          The real problem with underage drinking isn’t particularly the age of the kids or their maturity. The real issue is the bloody pathetic parents who never bother to train their kids in how to handle alcohol. My parents made damn sure that I knew how to drink and have safe sex from my early teens – before I started to do those things.

          Personally, if you want to change the law, then I’d suggest that a drunk and disorderly charge is laid on the parents when their kids screw up and when they are under 20. That is where the responsibility lies.

          • r0b 2.1.1.3.1

            That is certainly remarkable life experience in your case by the age of 18! But I don’t think that policy should be driven by the exceptional few. How much time have you spent with the 18yos of today? Do you think of them as adults?

            The real problem with underage drinking isn’t particularly the age of the kids or their maturity.

            Yeah it is.

            The real issue is the bloody pathetic parents who never bother to train their kids in how to handle alcohol.

            That’s the underlying cause, sure, and it’s a difficult one to fix – any suggestions how? Unless we can fix that cause (and I think that takes generations), then for now the age and maturity of those consuming alcohol is exactly the real problem.

            Hey – we finally found an issue to disagree on!

            • lprent 2.1.1.3.1.1

              Hey we finally found an issue to disagree on!

              Probably.

              I don’t think that 18yo’s are adults. However I also don’t think that they can ever be unless they’re given room to screw up in. They’re going to do it anyway sometime. It could be when they’re over 40 like some people I’m aware of, or when they’re 15.

              The question is if lowering the drinking age allows them to do it earlier, thus reducing the damage longer-term or not.

              But for me, the question is about responsibility. If I’m considered responsible enough to carry a weapon or drive a car – then I should also be considered responsible enough to learn how to drink acceptably.

              Current 18yo’s aren’t particularly adult. But hey – they’ve spent their lives being escorted to school.

              • Bunji

                Very much agree LP – we only become adults by being given the responsibility. And we only learn acceptable risk by risk taking. Our current problem is that kids aren’t allowed to take any risks until they’re suddenly given a car (to crash), full license to increase the teen pregnancy rate and access to as much alcohol as they can drink.

                On drinking, if parents aren’t going to teach responsibility (and evidence suggests otherwise), then:
                – raise the price so the young can’t afford as much, particularly on RTDs (alcohol has never been cheaper compared to average wage).
                – have stronger parent responsibility laws, where parents can face serious fines etc if kids are intoxicated.
                – reduce availability by the number and opening times of off-licenses
                – split the drinking age, so kids can learn to drink supervised in bars (by bartenders who face heavy fines for serving intoxicated people), before they’re given full license to drink outside of a pub.

          • jcuknz 2.1.1.3.2

            I agree with your point about the parents … not all parents but enough to be a serious enough problem. First enough of them show poor example by getting blotto in front of their children and secondly enough of them don’t teach moderation to their children.
            We are tackling drink driving by making it unacceptable, the same approach is the way to go with binge drinking. The prohibition required is not on younger adults purchasing alcohol but rather the producers pushing it and particulalry the candy flavoured drinks.

            >>>”Talkback Taliban’ to describe the small group of right wing wing nuts lead by Redbaiter<<< The expression also applies here don't forget. National Good-Labour Bad makes as much sense as National Bad-Labour Good.

            • lprent 2.1.1.3.2.1

              Actually, I suspect the most dickarse parents would be those who consider themselves to be ‘responsible’. Certainly many of the long-term basket cases I’ve seen spent time in private schools.

        • Andrew 2.1.1.4

          i agree. it’s madness to say that you can drive a car, get married, go and serve your country in the foreign war, vote, smoke cigarettes, to name but a few … but sorry sonny your not old enough to drink.

          raising the drinking age and the price to stop people drinking is crazy. you penalise every other person for the actions of a few. You can’t legislate against stupid, just making it illegal wont stop the problem. That kid that drunk himself to death stole the booze of his grandmother(?).

          Where are the families teaching their children about the dangers of drinking too much? If anyone is to blame its the parents.

        • Croc 2.1.1.5

          I think not. I think granting marginally generous responsibility to the less-responsible youths in our society is a reasonable price to pay for not patronising and infantilising those who are more responsible.

          As someone who graduated from Otago not too long ago I think you would find those who are ‘more responsible’ are a very small minority or don’t drink at all. There is hardly anyone I can think of who hasn’t put them selves in potential death situations from binge drinking at least once. This is not hyperbole.

      • Jenny 2.1.2

        r0b I agree with Demac here. This is typical punitive top down, authoritarian response that we can expect from National.

        What will be the result?

        Let’s see.

        Criminalisation of a whole generation of young people accustomed to being regarded with the same respect accorded all other citizens.

        I am sure the police will jump at the chance to ‘legally’ collect all those DNA samples and give thousands of young people a police record. No doubt this new legal hammer for turning thousands of currently law abiding young people into “offenders” will fall most heavily on Maori and Island youth.

        Studies have shown that it is not the age, it is the availability of cheap alcohol particularly spirits that is the prime causative factor in youth drinking.

        I haven’t been able to find the link but I read an article in New Scientist on youth drinking. Which found that price and availability, not the age limit which was the biggest influence in youth drinking more, and drinking irresponsibly.

        To blame all the drinking problems on just the decrease on the age limit is simplistic knee jerk politics. At the same time the age was lowered to 18, all sorts of other things were achieved by the alcohol lobby to make alcohol more freely available, from longer opening hours to selling it in super markets.

        According to what I have read, increasing the price of alcohol had a greater affect on youth drinking than raising the age limit.

        One of the side affects of raising the price, which New Scientist found reinforced the downward trend in youth drinking, was that when alcohol is set at a higher price, young people who still persisted in buying it, were frowned on by their peers for wasting money.

        Peer pressure coupled with the price rises, added to removing alcohol from supermarkets and corner shops, would give better results than punitive measures that National is seeking to enforce.

        In Australia when just such a tariff was imposed on the RTDs which are specifically designed to target the youth market, this market collapsed almost over night. So much so, that Independent Liquor the maker of these drinks was reported closing their Aussie factory to concentrate on their New Zealand market.

        Of course National would never impose the neccesary tarrifs to achieve similar results here, because besides having the desired affect of lessening the social harm alcohol causes, with the added benefit of not being punitive, these sorts of measures would cut into the billions of dollars taken in profits by New Zealand’s booze barons.

        Instead lets whack the youth.

        Good on you r0b for being a cheer leader for the Nats.

        • r0b 2.1.2.1

          Will reply to this later on tonight (no time right now), but just in passing:

          Good on you r0b for being a cheer leader for the Nats.

          I wanted to thank you for that comment. I’m going to treasure it always!

        • r0b 2.1.2.2

          Jenny: r0b I agree with Demac here. This is typical punitive top down, authoritarian response that we can expect from National.

          I’m sure someone will correct me if I’m wrong, but as far as I know this has always been a conscience vote. I really don’t think it’s a party based issue, seems to cut across, as per the debate between lefties in this very thread.

          Criminalisation of a whole generation of young people accustomed to being regarded with the same respect accorded all other citizens.

          A rise couldn’t happen over night of course, it would have to be phased in with a long lead time. It is certainly much easier to lower the age than to raise it.

          I am sure the police will jump at the chance to ‘legally’ collect all those DNA samples and give thousands of young people a police record.

          A different issue, but one that I agree we need to be very wary of.

          I haven’t been able to find the link but I read an article in New Scientist on youth drinking.

          Was it this one I wonder? Have a good read.

          Which found that price and availability, not the age limit which was the biggest influence in youth drinking more, and drinking irresponsibly.

          Since when does the age limit not have an impact on the availability?

          To blame all the drinking problems on just the decrease on the age limit is simplistic knee jerk politics. At the same time the age was lowered to 18, all sorts of other things were achieved by the alcohol lobby to make alcohol more freely available, from longer opening hours to selling it in super markets.

          Yes of course there are multiple factors. The drinking age is the headline of the post, and yes I’m defending my position on that. But please note that the original post quoted reference to the other actions needed, and that I concluded “Raise the drinking age, and enact the other measures needed to make it effective”. Drinking age is just the headline, of course it’s a package of measures.

          Instead lets whack the youth.

          No, let’s help stop them from killing themselves.

          Good on you r0b for being a cheer leader for the Nats.

          Once again, thank you for that, it truly made my day.

        • Lew 2.1.2.3

          In Australia when just such a tariff was imposed on the RTDs which are specifically designed to target the youth market, this market collapsed almost over night.

          Yes and no. The additional excise was imposed upon spirit-based pre-mixed drinks. One of its effects was the development of high-alcohol, sweet brewed drinks which escaped the tax. It’s trivial to ferment a sugar-water mix to create a 10%abv solution, add concentrated flavourings, additives, caffeine and carbonation and have precisely the same product. Hell, you can do this at home with bread yeast, white sugar and a soda stream kit.

          L

      • Bunji 2.1.3

        Correlation doesn’t imply causation, but it does waggle its eyebrows suggestively and gesture furtively while mouthing ‘look over there’.

        There were always going to be more drunken youths when you lowered the drinking age – the question is – are there fewer drunk people in their mid-twenties?

  3. Croc 3

    Not so long ago I would have vehemently disagreed with raising the drinking age, but now I tend to agree. Alcohol is an incredibly dangerous drug and should be controlled accordingly. New Zealanders have shown that we neither have the maturity or the will to drink sensibly and the government should deal with this accordingly to prevent further deaths.

    • Andrew 3.1

      how about cars? why not raise the driving age to 20 as well?

      • mcflock 3.1.1

        it would piss the farmers off.

        No real reason other than that against raising the driving age to 20.

        • jcuknz 3.1.1.1

          I was going to say that “I was 23 before I had the opportunity to get foolishly drunk and quickly decided it was a waste of my limited resources at the time” until I remembered going to the village pub in Somerset when I was 16yo on a fruit picking holiday [school organised] and getting almost legless on just two glasses of scrumpy. The other entertainment was Shakepeare at Stratford -on-Avon standing at the back of the stalls at a cut-price admission.
          Young people away from home will behave to excess unless given a better example by their parents. My guardian didn’t drink at all and his wife had a glass of Guiness for medicinal reasons each evening. The ideal situation seems to me that the climate or society when they leave home lets them have an innitiating excess but encourages moderation subsequently … obviously I am a foolish idealist.
          The sad thing about enough areas of society is that getting drunk is accepted as ‘normal’ behaviour. As a senior I object to price increases unless I can buy it tax reduced/free on my Gold Card. 🙂

          • Ms X 3.1.1.1.1

            In mitigation, I think you should add that scrumpy is very strong stuff indeed.

            I think that there are a number of issues here, marketing of alcohol aimed at young people and alcohol content therein being one. If you take a look at what is aimed at the young people of today from bras for six year olds to vile and violent movies and games, it’s a wonder that they can walk upright. I deal with a sizeable number of young people every week on a one to one basis, and I don’t think that they are any better or worse than they were 40 years ago. In those days it was common to drink 10 pints of something and drive home. When I arrived in NZ 24 years ago, young people were getting alcohol at 15 and celebrating rugby games just as they do today. Can we change the culture please and remove the blame from the youngsters? It is after all, not their fault that the whole western world is not happy unless bombed out of its brains one way or another. Leave the drinking age where it is – that way at least when they do go overseas they are less likely to make utter prats of themselves, or their country.

    • Ari 3.2

      Alcohol is certainly dangerous, but we need a better solution than simply slowing down people’s descent into binge drinking, or encouraging teenagers to flout a legal restriction without popular support.

      What’s really indicative of the angle of attack is that the middle-aged have pretty abysmal alcohol abuse statistics. It’s partially a matter of education, partially of terrible rolemodels, and partially of our culture of alcohol reliance*. The fact is that we have much larger fish to fry than when people start drinking, and that the minimum age is largely a distraction.

      If we cut down on unsafe drinking behaviour among the whole demographic without affecting the youth alcohol abuse statistics, I’d certainly be willing to admit we might THEN want to think about raising the age. But right now anyone who thinks this is just a youth problem is woefully ignorant.

      *By which I mean that people are reliant on alcohol to address social anxiety or to deal with bad moods.

      • Croc 3.2.1

        Yup I agree. There is no silver bullet and the alcohol industry needs a major overhaul. Multiple approaches are needed, raising the age is one of the tools that can be used.

        • Ari 3.2.1.1

          No, raising the age is a distraction that makes people who blame alcohol abuse on youth think that the problem has been solved.

          It’s certainly an approach that can be used if youth alcohol abuse doesn’t shrink with the rest of alcohol abuse as other solutions are put into play, but doing it right off the bat is going to make it much harder politically speaking to get any broad change on this issue.

          I don’t disagree that the excesses of drinking for young adults is a very real problem, mind. They are. The issue ought to be how to encourage people of all ages to drink in moderation, how to educate the public as to how many drinks is too many, and how to address the cultural perception that you can drown your problems or anxieties in alcohol.

      • Croc 3.2.2

        For New Zealanders aged under 25 years, alcohol-related trauma is a leading cause of death. In 2000, it was estimated that alcohol contributed to the deaths of 212 young people aged 1529 years.

        A large part of it is a youth problem

  4. The so-called alcohol crisis is really the crisis of capitalism.
    Why do you think kids binge drink? They are hounded to succeed, keep up the national standards, live on an unlivable wage, have their hormones regimented, are intellectually insulted by bansker antics, lies and corruption. Any intelligent kid wants to escape this sick, cruel reality they are destined for. Unless of course they give in and join them and drink themselves silly enough to live with it.
    Its hypocricy to raise the drinking age above the age of exploitation.
    I would ban booze advertising, ban alcopops, tax the booze barons with a swinging 40% windfall profits tax, and wait for the the marines to land to overthrow my regime.

    • Bright Red 4.1

      Opiate of the people – a release from the drudgery of the day to day for those in poverty.

      And idiots getting plastered.

    • Andrew 4.2

      rubbish, they drink because it’s cool, not because of any of your reasons.

      Edit: sorry, meant to say that kids drink because it’s cool. BR has a good point as well regarding lower socio economic society drinking to forget about the crappy life they have. That solution is not to increase the price as you will just take more money off them. Lift them out of the poverty they live in and give them a reason not to drink.

  5. kriswgtn 5

    And grog needs to be taken out of supermarkets and dairies as well.

    • jcuknz 5.1

      Nonsense that’s where I get my discount bottles of beer,. without the competition there would be no discounts. I still only have one drink a day whatever the price.
      I don’t see this as a current problem becuase I rarely drank in previous decades, so it is nothing to do with the meaningless of modern society … that is just politically oriented crap. If kids are given a reason to live and enjoy their work and play, as most are anyway I’m sure, then they will not resort to drink or drugs.
      To be political I would say we need to employ our youth, it is a government responsibility to have them transition from school to work rather than via dole or DPB. If instead of student loans there were allowances such as I had from my parents when I studied which precluded anything for alchohol, though I managed to smoke after serving two years in the Army. One pound room-rent, one pound course materials, and one pound to feed myself, buses etc … increased to two pounds after the first term and I pleaded for an increase. That was when a ‘worker’ got 6<7 pounds a week..
      But today people expect more as a 'right'. then my luxury was a radio hired for maybe one or two shillings a week. Very few people had TV, not sure if it had restarted after WWII. .

  6. butnahyeahnah 6

    I firmly believe that the legalization and regulation of NZ third most favorite drug, (you know the one: it does hardly any harm compared with NZ’s other two favorites), is really at the heart of this issue.
    The complete double standard that this govt (and the last Labour Govt) shows in its differing approach to various drugs is sickening and offensive.
    Re-Legislating the age of consumption will not change anything, science based policy will.
    Binge drinking is an inherited fault, just like moderate alcohol consumption is.
    Stop lying to your kids about the harms of various “social” drugs and I predict the problem will dissipate faster the one of HonKeys smiles.

  7. Kerry 7

    Personally I think that the age people can buy alcohol from off licences should be raised to 20 from pubs, restaurants, etc the age should be left alone. By 18 the majority of kids have already had a few years of drinking experience – with or without their parents knowledge or consent. In my view it much better if those experiences are in supervised places (such as a pub or somewhere that a responsible parent is going to be).

    • Lanthanide 7.1

      I agree. If any age change is done, it should be 20 for buying at stores, at 18 for pubs, bars, nightclubs etc.

  8. randal 8

    its all aquestion of mind over matter
    the liquor industry doesnt mind and we dont matter!

  9. A Nonny Moose 9

    Bollocks. It’s infantalizing youth to make age the sole focus. It’s lazy; makes adults feel like they’ve done something for their kids, when in reality it’s just more standing over them, shaking a finger and saying “I told you so”.

    TEACH them how to drink. Give them watered wine/a weak shandy when they’re 12. It’s not illegal to drink at any age, just to purchase it. Talk to your kids about it, and not just that “No no no” lecture that makes them sulk and rebel anyway. Talk about it at school, and not just those “Omg consequence DEATH” talks either. Check in with them if they want to party “Hey, if you want to have a drink, how about giving me a call if you’d like a ride home” or “well, if you’re going to drink, I’ll leave some water and a bucket by your bed” or…how about being the responsible driver yourself for the kids?

    10 years is not a “failed experiment”; a generation without change is a fail, because it shows a generation that has not learned new tools to deal with it.

    Antispam: “Lectures” Hah.

    • Bored 9.1

      Im with you Mr/s Moose,

      I got done in the 70s for underage drinking a few weeks before I was 20. Cost me $5 fine, and did not stop me. If we expect 18 year olds to take on the full responsibilities of citizenship, including the right to be killed for their country, perhaps we need to allow them to kill themselves with drink if they should so choose.

      I agree with the educative approach, but also feel there is something deeply materialistic and narcissistic with the way our society binges on everything. Old and young do it, the elders have not set a good example.

  10. Olwyn 10

    I have to say I largely disagree with you. A huge part of public debate in this country centres on who to constrain and why, without any consultation with whoever is being constrained. We have wages on a downward trend. We have unaffordable housing. We have plans to stamp out smoking. Alongside material privation with no end in sight, the attitude is “Don’t do anything that might kill you. Let us bore you to death instead.” That said, I do not think that alcopops should have ever been unleashed, and I do think it is possible to make steps toward cheerful, responsible drinking. Where the constraints should lie is where are afraid to place constraints – on the makers and sellers of alcohol. Advertising that presupposes binge drinking, for example. Pricing that drives people to stock up in bottle stores rather than go to the pub, which leads to the practice of getting drunk before going out, and so on.

  11. Lindsay 11

    Agree with Moose. I have offered my kids a sip of whatever I am drinking since they were young and neither has developed a taste (although the youngest has a way to go till the danger years). We have always discussed alcohol, smoking and drugs matter-of-factly and, touchwood, neither has exhibited any interest. I am hoping that all those cliches about self-worth, strong identity and unconditional love really will provide a pretty effective defence, though a 100% guarantee is impossible. The potential for parents to make a positive difference is far greater than that of legislation.

    • The Baron 12.1

      Yes it is – regardless of what the purchase age is set at.

      So why do you assume that raising the drinking age to 20 will stop 15-16 year olds from flouting the law; and also stop 18-19 year olds from joining them?!

  12. Oliver 13

    What drinking age??

  13. The Baron 14

    I find this debate so infuriating – mainly because people think that writing a new set of laws will make any difference what so ever. You can’t simply decree that such behaviours will end.

    As far as I am concerned, the de facto drinking age in New Zealand appears to be 16. Its that age that most parents appear to be willing to supply their child with alcohol – or at least, the age whereby most NZ teenagers appear to have absolutely no problem getting hold of some. What we set the purchase age at is likely to continue to be irrelevant if this “defacto” regime remains unchallenged. All you will do is hinder more 16+ year olds from drinking in a safe and controlled environment.

    For what it is worth, my own policy prescription is:
    – Leave the purchase age at 18. It is the logical “age of majority” for all of the other responsibilities listed, and is simply illogical to deny the right to drink from people who otherwise have so many other responsibilities as adults.
    – But crack down HARD on off license selling, and any supply of alcohol to minors. Actually make the purchase age mean something, rather than it simply being “the age when it gets easier to get pissed”. I’m thinking limits on the amount people can purchase at a bottlestore, and maybe stepped ages – i.e. you can’t buy spirits until youre 25; and different price signals. I don’t confess to know all the answers here!
    – Encourage people to drink in controlled environments like restaurants and bars where over-consumption and supply can be more readily controlled. Make it preferrable to drink socially on licensed premises than at home. Price signals again?
    – Make people more responsible for the consequences of their behaviour when drunk. If you need A&E due to doing something dumb because you were hammered, then here is the bill. Likewise, if you drink yourself into liver failure, back of the queue for replacement. This is an extension of the sort of approach we take to ciggies. Make individuals responsible for the costs that they are placing on society for their poor use of alcohol.

    We have to stop pretending that we can simply tell people what to do with regard to alcohol, and infantilising young people that clearly believe they have a right to drink. Steering towards safe alternatives and encouraging an appreciation of consequences of action will always work better than a simple ban and an ineffectual law.

    • Bored 14.1

      “I find this debate so infuriating mainly because people think that writing a new set of laws will make any difference what so ever. You can’t simply decree that such behaviours will end.”

      Thanks Baron, somebody had to say it loudly. I have people at work who are sticklers for rules, policy and process…the least trangression by somebody else draws howls for retributive action to make the “offenders” fall into line. We are a sick society when we believe that you can pass a law to solve a behavoiral problem, that enforcement is down to denial of access and retribution. I have always thought there was something deeply authoritarian in the Kiwi psyche.

  14. vidiot 15

    Simple solution – leave the drinking age at 18 for licensed (supervised) premises and raise the purchasing age for off license sales to 20.

  15. Michael 16

    I would prefer a split age restriction, if anything. Liquor stores/supermarkets should be 20, while bars and clubs should stay at 18.

    (Oops, vidiot beat me.)

    • Herodotus 16.1

      Why are so many here and in other places all in unison re 18 on licences premises and 20 to buy from stores. This to me is such an easy popularist part solution. I think many will agree it is not the silver bullet, but for me at least it is not making the issue any worse and most probablly a step in the right direction, yet it will require continual follow up from the experts as to what other measures will be required to build from this. I will be interested if this goes to a conscience vote the rhetoric that will accompany the reasoning to keep the status quo and who takes this side.
      Re the 18 as an adult, why then to we believe that you are not fit to gamble in a casino until 20, is this the pinacle to adulthood, to pay money into a casion?

  16. Rosy 17

    Ban advertising, raise the age of buying from off-licences and don’t forget alcohol companies are using the exact same strategies to get their product to young kids as the tobacco companies have so successfully done. Yes, parents should watch kids, but not at 18 – they as getting drunk well away from home (just live near student halls of residences and you’ll be aware of that – even the kids from ‘good’ families).

  17. rich 18

    So you don’t believe adults have a right to equal treatment and freedom from age discrimination?

    Alcohol problems are a symptom of social exclusion. Substance availability isn’t the cause, unfettered capitalism is the cause.

  18. Tiger Mountain 19

    “I’ve stopped drinking. But only while I’m asleep’ said soccer’s George Best in years prior to his liver transplant, after which he sadly resumed drinking until his demise.

    The sauce is a worry alright, the booze barons were certainly very naughty introducing entry level turps, aka ‘alcopop’. However you do have to cut the kids some slack amid some guidance. Commenter Andrew above got in one”give people a reason not to drink’ make life less miserable for people. Though I think there remains an inherited human existential liking for getting “out of it’

    I worry about wowserism however well intended or even necessary, because fundamentally it is a reactionary rather than progressive stance.

  19. Descendant Of Smith 20

    The bottom line is the drunker the working class are the more money can be made off them (not only from sales but from secondary aspects such as imprisonment – lawyers fees, private prisons, fines and so on).

    Any correlation with age has only come because it coincides with easier access to alcohol – increased opening hours, sales in supermarkets and dairies, cheaper drinks and as a result less drinking at home with parents.

    Age seems to me to be pretty much irrelevant in the whole discourse -price, access and marketing and lack of health support from those addicted are the bigger issues.

    There’s plenty of people over the age of twenty binge drinking and simply lifting the age won’t make too much difference if the other issues aren’t dealt with.

    Wasn’t too hard to access alcohol in the 70’s when I was 13 – 18. Drinking on a hill in Pukekura Park was usually a much preferred option than carrying on to church to pray to a god who didn’t exist.

  20. People tend not to have a problem supporting restrictions on behaviour if the restrictions won’t apply to them – the enthusiasm among over-20s for raising the alcohol purchase age to 20 is a classic example.

    In short – if alcohol’s such a problem, propose restrictions that will apply to you as well as to others. Otherwise it’s just another “Damn kids get off my lawn!”

    • r0b 21.1

      Too many of those damn kids can’t get off my lawn because they’re dead. Would those of you who don’t want to try and address the problem please come and drag away the bodies?

      No I’m not accusing anyone of causing these deaths, but I am trying to put the issue in your face. Sorry to be shocking, but dead kids is what we’re really talking about here. Unless you have another way to roll back the skyrocketing rates of alcohol related deaths and problems – then I’m all ears.

      • The Baron 21.1.1

        Those kids are, by in large, already banned from purchasing alcohol.

        How will reiterating a higher age change that, or solve the problem that you so passionately portray? Sorry R0B, but Psycho does have a point – its not the drinking age that’s the problem, its the flouting of it that is. And yelling “higher!” doesn’t solve that problem.

        • r0b 21.1.1.1

          And yelling “higher!’ doesn’t solve that problem

          How the (pardon me) hell would you know?

          The problem got worse when the age was lowered. What evidence do you have that it won’t get better when the age is raised? Medical and legal professionals collectively think raising the age (along with other measures) will help – why do you know better?

          • The Baron 21.1.1.1.1

            The problem coincided with the lowering of the drinking age – for 18-20 year olds you could therefor argue that to some degree correlation of those changes equals causation.

            Yes, I accept the argument that lowering the age to 18 may have made it easier for those under 18 to get alcohol. But that is not the end of that explanation – there is more to this than simply the age.

            Hence my point – you cannot pretend that all young people will see that the age has gone up and diligently stop drinking. They’re ignoring it or getting around it now – and my bet is that they will continue to ignore it then.

            You can see my more positive suggestions above.

            • r0b 21.1.1.1.1.1

              The problem coincided with the lowering of the drinking age for 18-20 year olds you could therefor argue that to some degree correlation of those changes equals causation.

              Yup.

              you cannot pretend that all young people will see that the age has gone up and diligently stop drinking.

              Of course not, not over night. These sorts of changes take years to filter through. That’s why it took 10 years for the consensus to form that lowering the age had been a mistake. But now that we can see it’s a mistake, we should go back, even if it takes a long time to make up lost ground, even if we don’t make up all the ground we lost. Why wouldn’t we try?

              There are many positive suggestions proposed in the links in the original post too, it isn’t just age, it’s a package of measures.

              You can see my more positive suggestions above.

              Nothing wrong with some of your suggestions but you said:

              I find this debate so infuriating mainly because people think that writing a new set of laws will make any difference what so ever. You can’t simply decree that such behaviours will end.

              That argument, such as it is, applies equally to all laws and all behaviours (including those required to implement your suggestions). Why have laws at all then?

              • The Baron

                But they don’t equally apply to other laws R0B. Good law making requires the law to be in step with its society – otherwise that law will be largely ignored, used selectively and be pretty ineffectual.

                Consider how ineffectual our copyright law is, which is arguably out of step with our new societal norms with regard to paying (or not paying) for films and music.

                I believe that alcohol is the same. You can make the purchasing age whatever you want, and it will only make a marginal difference to the problems that you refer to. It won’t stop those under that age from drinking – the purchasing age never has. This is because our societal norm is clearly out of step with that policy prescription. Conversely, a law against say murder works, because nearly everyone agrees that murder is a bad thing. Our law is reflecting the standards of our society.

                Think of it this way – do you really believe that rasing the drinking age is going to make a difference to the next generation of 16 year olds who want to go out and get hammered? Do you really think they’re paying attention to the law now? Why do you think they’ll pay attention when it’s raised even higher? And why do you think that a 10 year phase in will change those attitudes? Don’t you think something else is going on here, and that your focussing on the wrong solutions, for the wrong problems?

                • Bunji

                  Scarily I find myself agreeing with most of what you have to say on this topic Baron – I guess you can’t always be wrong 😀

                  Raising the age may well have the unintended consequence of more illegal drinking, away from sensible controls, as 16 yr-olds now expect access to alcohol; it could actually make the problem worse.

                  • The Baron

                    Hah. I can go back to ranting about randian superheroes and corrupt communists if you want me to?!

                    Seriously though, its a rare chance to talk policy without politics on this site – so perhaps it ain’t a surprise that its a bit more sensible.

                • r0b

                  But they don’t equally apply to other laws R0B. Good law making requires the law to be in step with its society otherwise that law will be largely ignored, used selectively and be pretty ineffectual.

                  I agree, so let’s find out what society wants to do about the drinking age. Note that “society” is bigger that “16 – 20 year olds who want to drink”, society is all of us. Not also that medical and legal professionals, and “prominent New zealanders” – all part of society – are calling for this change.

                  I believe that alcohol is the same. You can make the purchasing age whatever you want, and it will only make a marginal difference to the problems that you refer to. It won’t stop those under that age from drinking the purchasing age never has.

                  It made a difference when we lowered it. It won’t if we raise it?

                  Think of it this way do you really believe that rasing the drinking age is going to make a difference to the next generation of 16 year olds who want to go out and get hammered?

                  Not the next generation no, but the one after that, and the one after that, and…

                  Do you really think they’re paying attention to the law now? Why do you think they’ll pay attention when it’s raised even higher?

                  Yes I really do. Teens know exactly what the drinking age is, it’s a big issue for them. I have considerable personal experience of this matter!

                  And why do you think that a 10 year phase in will change those attitudes?

                  Why do you think it won’t?

                  Don’t you think something else is going on here, and that your focussing on the wrong solutions, for the wrong problems?

                  There are many things going on here, and many solutions that would spring from proper answers to society’s underlying woes – which is why I’m working pretty hard to bring about and suport left / green governments.

              • f_t

                “That’s why it took 10 years for the consensus to form that lowering the age had been a mistake”

                No consensus here. Or do you mean the knee-jerk consensus?

      • Jenny 21.1.2

        Unless you have another way to roll back the skyrocketing rates of alcohol related deaths and problems then I’m all ears.

        Really?

        Then R0B, why throughout your post did you ignore the strong recommendation of the Law Commission Report on the pressing need to raise the price of alcohol through excise taxes, and instead zeroed in on the punitive approach.

        A blind spot you share with the Nats. who also consciously ignored this recommendation from the Law Commission Report.

        You say you are sorry for resorting to emotive imagery against those of us who criticise Nationals punitive approach to “please come and drag away the bodies” of the “damn kids” on “my lawn because they are dead”.

        In any debate, resorting to this sort of emotive histrionics is usually the last resort of someone with a weak argument.

        In my opinion your accusation that those of us who don’t agree with you “don’t want to try and address this problem” actually applies more to you and the Nats.

        R0B do you really prefer do resort to punitive and heavy handed policing, to actually putting in place pollicies that have been proven to work, like increasing the price and with targetted levies and removing alcohol from our supermarkets and corner stores?

        R0B if you don’t choose to reply, your silence will count as an affirmation.

        [lprent: You’re lucky that I didn’t see this comment and its particularly irritating last paragraph until after r0b responded (he is too kind-hearted). I’d have just banned you for a week or so like I did with SHG a week or so ago. ]

        • r0b 21.1.2.1

          Then R0B, why throughout your post did you ignore the strong recommendation of the Law Commission Report on the pressing need to raise the price of alcohol through excise taxes, and instead zeroed in on the punitive approach.

          I did no such thing Jenny. I quoted the recommendations of the Law Commission report:

          The report recommended increasing the tax on alcohol, restricted advertising, raising the drinking age and lowering the legal blood alcohol limit.

          And I concluded as follows:

          Raise the drinking age, and enact the other measures needed to make it effective.

          If you’re going to have a go at me, get your basic facts right first.

          A blind spot you share with the Nats.

          As above, the blind spot is yours.

          In any debate, resorting to this sort of emotive histrionics is usually the last resort of someone with a weak argument.

          Is it indeed. Like those powerful emotive drunk driving adds and speeding adds that have been effective in changing public attitudes to these issues. Like the powerful, emotive, “It’s not OK” adds on family violence. Like the emotive “Never shake a baby” campaign. Weak arguments one and all.

          Nope, sorry this debate is about the number of dead and damaged kids that we as a society can tolerate in the name of youth drinking. Don’t like facing that? Tough.

          R0B do you really prefer do resort to punitive and heavy handed policing

          No I don’t. Did you actually read the post? Hint – paragraph 1.

          to actually putting in place pollicies that have been proven to work, like increasing the price and with targetted levies and removing alcohol from our supermarkets and corner stores?

          All part of the package of measures that I am supporting, as above.

          R0B if you don’t choose to reply, your silence will count as an affirmation.

          Just FYI, as a debating tactic, I consider that rather rude. Which may account for me being a little tetchy in this comment. Sorry ’bout that.

          • Jenny 21.1.2.1.1

            I apologise R0B (so hard to type your non-de-plume) Your right I probably didn’t read the small print in your post closely enough.

            It is just that, I feel offended, when I see proscriptive policies being promoted in banner headlines above more sensible common sense remedies.

            The solutions which grass roots communities themselves are calling for.

            Like banning corner bottles stores or raising the tariff on RTDs, or banning youth targeted advertising promotions. Which have been forced on us by the booze industry lobby.

            I feel offended at being accused of not facing up to as you put it

            the number of dead and damaged kids that we as a society can tolerate in the name of youth drinking. Don’t like facing that? Tough.

            I am deeply concerned about the dead and damaged “kids” as you call them in this country, and would support anyone who wants to do something positive that would make a real difference.

            Let us all put aside the tub thumping simplistic rhetoric behind calls for punitive actions. The problem of youth drinking (and all the other negative youth stats), is deeper and more societal based than just the age at which people are allowed to buy alcohol.

            Before the drinking age was lowered, New Zealand was already leading the world tables in negative youth statistics, being a world leader in youth suicides.

            Simple right wing knee jerk calls to raise the drinking age, whilst being a populist policy like, Three Strikes, or banning smoking in prisons, will not address the problem of youth drinking. As these sorts of populist policies don’t address the underlying causes.

            Symptomatic of the societal base of this problem is the level of disrespect for human welfare shown in a society which protects and defends the phenomenal profits of billionaire booze barons and other parasites, who are never called on to pay for the full societal harm of their products.

            Look at the advertising for cruisers and other such lolly water drinks, which are directly targeted at young people.

            Is this moral?

            Should it be allowed?

            R0B If you want to be punitive how about calling for legislation for hitting the booze barons and hitting them hard.

            How about calling on Labour to put up a private members bill to this affect.

            Or promising to do this on return to office.

            • r0b 21.1.2.1.1.1

              I apologise R0B (so hard to type your non-de-plume) Your right I probably didn’t read the small print in your post closely enough.

              My apologies too – I’d had a long day when I knocked out my grumpy reply.

              It is just that, I feel offended, when I see proscriptive policies being promoted in banner headlines above more sensible common sense remedies.

              Whether we like it or not, if the drinking age is one of the measures addressed, it is always going to be the headline issue. I’m in favour of raising it, and I’m not afraid of saying so. But is NOT my preferred option. As I tired to make clear in my post, my preferred option would have been for NZ to develop a mature and responsible attitude to alcohol. But we failed, so the question is what next?

              I am deeply concerned about the dead and damaged “kids’ as you call them in this country, and would support anyone who wants to do something positive that would make a real difference.

              As I recommended to Lew, I suggest that you read the Law Commission report linked to in the post, Chapters 3 and 4.

              Symptomatic of the societal base of this problem is the level of disrespect for human welfare shown in a society which protects and defends the phenomenal profits of billionaire booze barons and other parasites, who are never called on to pay for the full societal harm of their products.

              I quite agree.

              R0B If you want to be punitive how about calling for legislation for hitting the booze barons and hitting them hard.

              I don’t know that anything we do to “the barons” will have much of an effect on consumption, unless we legislate for alcohol to be sold like cigarettes – plain packaging and health warnings. But could the industry be better regulated and contributing more to the costs of the damage it causes? Hell yes.

              • Jenny

                Thank you very much R0B for your very gracious reply.

                could the industry be better regulated and contributing more to the costs of the damage it causes? Hell yes.

                I think getting rid of supermarket sales of alcohol would be a good start.

                Giving local bodies the power to refuse liqour outlets in their communities would be another good start.

                Banning all liquor advertising as per your suggestion would be another good one.

                And last but not least, highly targeted tarrifs on pre mixed, highly sugared, spirits laced drinks reflecting the societal harm they do.

    • Too many of those damn kids can’t get off my lawn because they’re dead. Would those of you who don’t want to try and address the problem please come and drag away the bodies?

      It would be nice if there were some law or regulation that would prevent deaths from drug abuse, but the reality is otherwise. What you’re proposing is that restrictions be applied to people other than yourself – why others and not you? If applying restrictions to 18-20-year-olds would be a good idea, why isn’t it a good idea for people our age? Because people our age don’t die? Well, that’s not true, is it? Because people our age don’t cause any problems for the Police or emergency services? Well, that’s not true, is it? Because people our age don’t commit crimes while drunk? But that’s not true, is it?

      This is the heffalump in the room – if it’s sauce for the goose, why not for the gander? If alcohol use needs restricting, surely it needs restricting for everybody.

    • QoT 21.3

      So true, Milt. Don’t you just want to cackle and slit your wrists at the number of people on this thread saying with complete sincerity, “Oh I USED to be in favour of a lower drinking age, but NOW [that it won’t affect me] I think it should be raised!”

  21. Dan 22

    I reflect back on a chat I had with a young Belgian exchange student. He loved his time in New Zealand but could not get over the Saturday night gatherings. In Belgium he enjoyed the gatherings to chat, enjoy music and get to know others, often the opposite sex. In New Zealand, he was saddened that the Saturday night was getting wasted and getting laid, two not-always-compatible aspirations.

    It is not so much the age but the social expectations that are at fault. The jockism encouraged by liquor advertising only helps set the climate.

    Overall, I think the younger ones are better at the drink-drive expectations, but are definitely over the top with their alcoholic excesses.

  22. MrSmith 23

    Let face it kids, National sold out to to booze barons under Shipley (remember!) and lowered the drinking age, don’t think for a minute they will raise it again, end of story.

    • Herodotus 23.1

      Did we not have a review of the drinking age 3-4 years ago, and we still got the same outcome. Mr Smith can you refreash my memory who held the greatest number of seats in parliament then?
      Both Nat and Lab have to take ownership of this, so both parties have sold out, or is there something missing that takes away partial blame towards Lab?
      http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=10409882

      • MrSmith 23.1.1

        Herodotus, please read my post again, no mention of reviews or labour. Altho you do have a couple of points.

        • Herodotus 23.1.1.1

          Mrs Shippley have valid reasons, it was something like that her children were mature enough to socialise and have a drink. Nice to see that good law is supported based on 2 examples. I looked but could not find and follow up comments made by Mrs Shippley. Many in 98(?) parliament I think made a mistake and could not have any understanding of the Genie that they were letting out of the bottle. It shows back 12 years ago that MP’s were out of touch, how things have not changed!! 😀

  23. Blue 24

    I have no patience with the ‘but 18 year olds can marry, vote, join the army blah blah blah’ argument.

    Fourteen year olds can babysit young children on their own. 16 year olds can consent to sex and drive cars solo (and sail solo around the world, apparently). 18 year olds can vote and join the army, but cannot gamble until they are 20. We still celebrate 21sts as the entry to adulthood, but the Government doesn’t consider you fully independent of your parents for student allowance purposes until you are 24.

    There are different ages that society considers appropriate for different things, not just one age at which, when you reach it, you can do anything and everything.

    My main concern with the age at 18 is that some students reach this age in their final year at high school and proceed to help their underage friends buy alcohol. The de facto drinking age is anything from 14-16.

    The most worrying thing was the scrap over school after balls, and hearing 16-year-olds who plainly thought they were entitled to alcohol even though they are underage, and furthermore that an absence of alcohol at an event would mean there would be no fun.

  24. outofbed 25

    Its all about the NZ culture and societal problems
    Why do young people feel the need to get high to be happy ?
    Teach self esteem to young children
    Change our society from a consumer driven quick fix one
    Have a social justice policy that makes society more equitable
    12.50 per hour working at Maccas I would get pissed every weekend too
    So self confidence hope , self respect and a more equitable caring society
    would do the trick
    I won’t hold my breath

  25. f_t 26

    By drinking age I assume you mean ‘the purchasing age’. There is no minimum drinking age in New Zealand. Though all persons under 18 years must be supplied with alcohol only by their parent(s) or legal guardian(s).

    So if their parents bought it for them, and they drink it at a private residence, then it doesn’t matter if they’re under 18.

    Also, if someone gives them alcohol in a private setting, it has to be shown that the giver had purchased the alcohol with the specific intent to give to them

  26. Galeandra 27

    Yes Dan “It is not so much the age but the social expectations that are at fault. The jockism encouraged by liquor advertising only helps set the climate.”

    Time for a little more Nanny State? There are many aspects to social unhealth that we need to address which invariably will lead to our treading on someone’s petunias.Public drunkenness, brawling, assaults, misuse of vehicles are behaviours that collectively manifest social immaturity. It is time for firmer parenting as was demonstrated over QB weekend when miraculous improvements in driving behaviour were achieved. Similar firmness is needed elsewhere. The lessons the young and their elders need to learn are that there are limits to personal freedoms, and if they cannot rule themselves, then others will do it for them. This applies to classroom behaviours, workplace expectations or whatever.

  27. prism 28

    Itspathetic to read so many posts that talk about teaching moderation, education etc. I expect pie in the sky from young people not willing to have any of their pleasures circumscribed to lessen the harm that has been caused by the misguided experiment. But some I feel are older, but still unwilling to accept change for the greater good. It used to be that you could drink ehrn with adults at a meal in restaurants, that would be good to go back to.

  28. Ag 29

    If it is that much of a problem, make it illegal for people aged 18-20 to purchase and drink anything more potent than beer. They can still go to the pub and drink alcohol, but it will make it much harder for them to get completely plastered.

    It’s a reasonable compromise. Trying to ban 18 year olds from drinking won’t work, as New Zealanders are a lawless people.

    Only idiots think that abstinence works.

    • jcuknz 29.1

      Abstinence does work it is prohibition that doesn’t ….I’ve been largely abstinent for most of my life from choice and more important things to do with my resources and only started regular drinking in recent years for medicinal reasons [ red wine supposedly good for cardiac patients … though when I had my quad by-pass back in 1984 we were allowed a single stubbie each evening…. makes one wonder if anyone really knows ].
      Another aspect to the subject … the possible lack of self confidence which makes people want to get into groups, and the easiest grouping is in a pub or similar drinking situation. Lack of confidence to be on your own and do your own thing.

    • jcuknz 29.2

      I’d suggest that Kiwis are a mix of do-gooders who make silly laws for the best of reasons and people who ignore those laws becuase they are silly. 🙂

  29. You seem to forget John Key and the supermarket owners own vineyards and sell wine for a profit.

    Why is he going to increase prices or make it harder to get, stuff the country, stuff the people, there is money to be made and you just have to realise that making money is far more important than a country or it’s people.

    Can you amagine how much of the health bill we could save if the price of booze went up so people could not afford to buy so much.

  30. What a serious step backwards raising the alcohol purchase age would be.

    The problem lies not in access and supply, not in the age, alcohol licence locations, hours, or forms, but lies in the “how”, in the “how” our society views alcohol and drunkenness. To change that we need to focus on:
    “(1) Placing clear (and duly enforced) expectations on drinking behaviour and parental supervision behaviour
    (2) Changing the way people see and think about alcohol and drinking, and changing the information, strength of beers, and cheap supervised environments available to them”

    “As the article “Italian Teens Frown on Binge Drinking’ highlights, countries with the safest, responsible, and harm-free drinking cultures generally have liberal alcohol access laws and drinking and purchase ages under 18 (some have no drinking age at all!). The difference in these successful countries is that (1) drinkers themselves, young and old, look down with disdain upon binge and destructive drinking and model good drinking behaviours; and (2) “People learn how to drink from an early age within the safe and supporting environment of the home.”

    Raising the purchase age is not just ineffective and unfair, it is counter productive.

    Once again, we need to focus on the “how”

    • Jenny 31.1

      Thanks, for your considered and well put, contribution to this debate. (Much better than my intemperate efforts.)

      More light, less heat. Way to go Andreas!

      • Andreas T 31.1.1

        Thanks.

        I really worry that the want to get “tough’ on alcohol harms and want “far reaching’ change is going to lead to reactionary change on the seemly simplest of solutions. I worry that people will hammer the access and supply because it seems the best way will make a immediate difference.

        I’m sure it will make a difference. I’m sure if we hammer access and supply we will further pervert the efforts to get the law and culture to match and to get a long-term cultural shift.

        That’s why I wrote that short report NINE STEPS TO CHANGING THE “HOW” Because I fear if we go any further away from focusing on the behaviours and direct environment, then we are just going to step even future away from “solutions”.

        Garh!

  31. Bill 32

    Why isn’t alcohol subject to a legally enforced weights and measures regime?

    At present you might buy half a dozen spirits in one place and feel fine. Problem is that there is no way to know how much you actually consumed. None.

    Next time you buy half a dozen of the same spirit, the amount you consume can be radically different.

    Spirits have no legally set volume of liquid per measure. Everything is arbitrary. The measures don’t even have to pour a consistent amount to be used.

    Less of an issue, but an issue nonetheless is that beer glasses come in a variety of sizes. Just because you ask for a pint and are sold a pint doesn’t mean that you actually received a pint.

    All very good for the profit margins and utterly ridiculous in terms of keeping a track of actual consumption.

  32. Jenny 33

    Youth MP kicks National’s kneejerk reaction to youth drinking into touch.

    capcha – reasonable

Links to post

Recent Comments

Recent Posts

  • Auckland’s City Rail Link will fail immediately… in the best possible way
    This post was originally published on Linked In by Nicolas Reid. It is republished here with permission. Here’s the thing: the City Rail Link is almost certainly going to be overcapacity from day one, with crowding on the trains at peak times. In the simple terms of popular transport ...
    Greater AucklandBy Greater Auckland
    1 hour ago
  • You can’t always get what you want
    Grant Robertson is leaving Parliament for two new careers, having been frustrated and blocked from achieving some of his biggest political ambitions. So, he is returning to Dunedin, and, unusually for a former finance minister, with seemingly no ambitions to enter the business world. Instead, he will become Vice Chancellor ...
    PolitikBy Richard Harman
    3 hours ago
  • At a glance – Was Greenland really green in the past?
    On February 14, 2023 we announced our Rebuttal Update Project. This included an ask for feedback about the added "At a glance" section in the updated basic rebuttal versions. This weekly blog post series highlights this new section of one of the updated basic rebuttal versions and serves as a ...
    12 hours ago
  • Sharp-elbowed and loving it
    It doesn't seem to take a lot to persuade someone who feels they work their guts out that in fact no one is working as hard as me.It doesn't seem to take a lot to persuade someone who knows somebody taking the welfare system for a ride that they’re all ...
    More than a fieldingBy David Slack
    16 hours ago
  • Sharp-elbowed and loving it
    It doesn't seem to take a lot to persuade someone who feels they work their guts out that in fact no one is working as hard as me.It doesn't seem to take a lot to persuade someone who knows somebody taking the welfare system for a ride that they’re all ...
    More Than A FeildingBy David Slack
    16 hours ago
  • Then why did she do it?
    Earlier in the month, Cancer Minister Casey Costello was caught lying to the media about whether or not she had requested advice on cutting tobacco excise tax to benefit the cancer industry. She repeated her lies in Parliament. But today, she stood up and pretended to apologise for "causing confusion" ...
    No Right TurnBy Idiot/Savant
    16 hours ago
  • Is Applying “Tough Love” To A “Fragile” Nation The Right Answer?
    The Question Christopher Luxon Needs To Ask –  And Answer: How was it possible for a nation of barely three million citizens to create and maintain an infrastructure that functioned, schools and universities that turned out well-educated and enterprising citizens, a health system that kept its people healthy, and a workforce ...
    17 hours ago
  • The limits to realism.
    Realism is a school of thought in the field of international relations (IR). It provides a theoretical framework for analysing the behaviour of States in the world political system. Like other theories (which in the IR literature include idealism, liberalism, … Continue reading ...
    KiwipoliticoBy Pablo
    17 hours ago
  • UNSOCIAL MEDIA – Following the Trolls
    From TODAY FM archives — Wilhelmina Shrimpton and Simon Morrow take a deep dive into trolling and cyberbullying. From the high profile to the general public, Kiwis across all walks of life are being targeted, and some are paying the ultimate price. So what drives us to troll, who is ...
    The PaepaeBy Peter Aranyi
    17 hours ago
  • Govt prescribes stiff medicine for some beneficiaries while easing access to drugs containing pseudo...
    Buzz from the Beehive One of two new announcements on the government’s official website  – given plenty of publicity by the mainstream media over the past 24 hours – has been pitched as the first steps in a “reset” of the welfare system.  Stiff medicine for beneficiaries, in effect. The ...
    Point of OrderBy Bob Edlin
    19 hours ago
  • We’re not as fragile or as lazy as Luxon says
    Luxon says his government is one that is “prepared to make those hard decisions”. File Photo: Lynn Grieveson / The KākāTL;DR: Prime Minister Christopher Luxon has adopted the language of Ruth Richardson before her 1991 ‘Mother of All Budgets’ in arguing for benefit sanctions to bolster the Government finances, which ...
    The KakaBy Bernard Hickey
    20 hours ago
  • Talking over the Silence.
    Please open the doorNothing is different, we've been here beforePacing these hallsTrying to talk over the silenceIf I was to describe what I do, or at least the way it sometimes feels, then talking over the silence wouldn’t be a bad way to do so.Not that there aren’t other voices ...
    Nick’s KōreroBy Nick Rockel
    21 hours ago
  • LINDSAY MITCHELL: National needs to go further
    Lindsay Mitchell writes – In today’s State of the Nation speech Christopher Luxon talked repeatedly about getting young people off welfare. It seems that National has devised a traffic light system which will use increasing levels of sanctions – welfare deductions – when beneficiaries fail to meet their ...
    Point of OrderBy poonzteam5443
    22 hours ago
  • Gordon Campbell on National spreading panic about the economy
    It is a political strategy as old as time. Scare the public with tales of disaster and stampede them into supporting your ideological agenda because they believe There Is No Alternative. Yet, if the NZ economy truly is as “fragile” as PM Christopher Luxon says it is… Then how come ...
    1 day ago
  • The promise of passive house design
    This is a re-post from Yale Climate Connections by Sarah Wesseler Imagine a home so efficient that it could be heated with a hair dryer. That’s the promise of a passive house, a design standard that’s becoming increasingly popular in the architecture community for its benefits to occupants and the climate. ...
    1 day ago
  • Deep in the Uncanny Valley of AI
    Hi,Before we get started, some very big fun Webworm news. I am launching a new journalism fund called Big Worm Farm!A really great thing that’s happened with Webworm over the last four years is that it’s grown. That’s great for a few reasons.Firstly — it means the work here gets ...
    David FarrierBy David Farrier
    1 day ago
  • Introducing: Big Worm Farm
    Hi,I’m excited to tell you about Big Worm Farm.Put simply, the main aim of Big Worm Farm is to support investigative journalists from around the world to be able to devote dedicated time to research and report on a specific story, to be published on Webworm.The stories will capture the ...
    David FarrierBy David Farrier
    1 day ago
  • Why Massey is broke
    The Tertiary Education Commission has named the two universities it says are at high risk financially. They are Massey and Victoria. The Commission appeared before Parliament’s Education Select Committee yesterday and offered a revealing and rare insight into the complex world of university economics. Its Briefing to the Incoming Minister ...
    PolitikBy Richard Harman
    1 day ago
  • You keep Luxin' when you oughta be thruthin'
    Christopher Luxon’s campaign to win last year's election continued yesterday with a speech.Channelling possibly Bruce Willis in Die Hard, he was all, I'm not going to dress it up, I'm going to level with you guys: the state of the nation is fragile.The thing he’s maybe missing is that it ...
    More Than A FeildingBy David Slack
    2 days ago
  • The PM spoke of the need for tough choices – and then opted to beat a retreat when gays and Gaza a...
    Buzz from the Beehive The PM’s State of the Nation speech – according to a Newshub headline – was a ‘buffet of buzzwords’ and full of ‘nonsense’. Fair to say, the quoted words were attributed to Opposition politicians, who were unlikely to say the speech was visionary and inspiring: PM ...
    Point of OrderBy Bob Edlin
    2 days ago
  • Keynesian Wisdom.
    When the facts change, I change my mind - what do you do, sir?John Maynard Keynes (1883-1946)This posting is exclusive to Bowalley Road. ...
    2 days ago
  • BRIAN EASTON: Puffing policy
    Public policy towards tobacco consumption remains politically sensitive. Brian Easton writes – In 1983, a young researcher was told by a medium-level Treasury official that Treasury policy was to abandon excise duties on tobacco. The senior Treasury economist that I consulted, famed for his commonsense, snorted ‘we ...
    Point of OrderBy poonzteam5443
    2 days ago
  • Is 2.8% per year population growth too much?
    TL;DR: The Government is reviewing migration settings that produced 2.8% population growth last year and is looking at a longer-term strategy of matching population growth to the ‘absorbtive capacity’ of Aotearoa-NZ’s infrastructure.Our population grew last year at its fastest rate since 1947, when large numbers of troops returning from World ...
    The KakaBy Bernard Hickey
    2 days ago
  • Tough Choices & Tough Love.
    I've been trying to hurt youI've been holding you tightI've been learning to love youAm I doing it right?How are you still breathingWith my hands all over your heart?How do we start healingIf we can't keep out the dark?Yesterday the Prime Minister delivered his State of the Nation, for no ...
    Nick’s KōreroBy Nick Rockel
    2 days ago
  • Will the 2024 RLTP be yet another debacle?
    A couple of years ago, Auckland Council and Auckland Transport found themselves in court over the 2021 Regional Land Transport Plan (RLTP). A non-profit alliance for transport decarbonisation, All Aboard Aotearoa, argued that among other factors, the RLTP was unlawful because it failed to give effect to the 2021 Government ...
    2 days ago
  • 2024 SkS Weekly Climate Change & Global Warming News Roundup #07
    A listing of 31 news and opinion articles we found interesting and shared on social media during the past week: Sun, Feb 11, 2024 thru Sat, Feb 17, 2024. Story of the week Based on mission alignment, our Story of the Week is certainly Can we be inoculated against climate ...
    2 days ago
  • Immigration Issues.
    Help is comingI heard a whisperWhite caps turningThe breath of summerA distant drummingAnd liar birds callingEscape the anguish of our pastAnd prayOne of the major challenges of the the 21st century will be the mass migration of human beings around our globe.Some seeking economic opportunities, others fleeing repressive regimes, war ...
    Nick’s KōreroBy Nick Rockel
    3 days ago
  • Trust us, we know what we’re doing
    The best trick the National Party ever pulled was to fabricate their reputation as the responsible ones.This would be the National Party that denied us the New Zealand Superannuation Scheme that—Brian Gaynor wrote back in 2007would be worth more than $240 billion today and would have transformed the New Zealand ...
    More Than A FeildingBy David Slack
    3 days ago
  • The Left’s Timidity
    It is not just Karl Marx – even the most enthusiastic supporters of the market economy (not least Adam Smith) will concede that its normal operation inevitably leads to a concentration of wealth in relatively few hands. Some, at least, of these enthusiasts will accept that such a concentration is ...
    Bryan GouldBy Bryan Gould
    4 days ago
  • OLIVER HARTWICH: Absurd – NZ courts can now decide on climate change
    Oliver Hartwich writes – The World Justice Project ranks New Zealand 7th out of 142 countries on its ‘Rule of Law Index’, narrowly ahead of Australia’s 13th place. However, Australia still has hope – if only because of a recent decision by the Supreme Court of New Zealand. The ...
    Point of OrderBy poonzteam5443
    4 days ago
  • Still waiting on that turnaround
    Hello! Here comes the Saturday edition of More Than A Feilding, catching you up on the past week’s editions.Friday: Week in review, quiz style2. Shane Jones’ demeanour in mocking and deriding climate activists can be observed in what other realm of human behaviour?a. Gleeful little boys pulling wings off fliesb. ...
    More Than A FeildingBy David Slack
    4 days ago
  • Mihi Forbes and the great Atlas conspiracy
    Graham Adams writes — Last week, Mihingarangi Forbes made an extraordinary claim while interviewing David Seymour on Mata Reports, a taxpayer-funded current affairs programme which, she says, looks at events through an “indigenous lens”. She asked him about Act’s links to the Atlas Network, which fosters connections between centre-right ...
    Point of OrderBy gadams1000
    5 days ago
  • Puffing Policy
    Public policy towards tobacco consumption remains politically sensitive. In 1983, a young researcher was told by a medium-level Treasury official that Treasury policy was to abandon excise duties on tobacco. The senior Treasury economist that I consulted, famed for his commonsense, snorted ‘we need the money’. He explained that no-excise-duty ...
    PunditBy Brian Easton
    5 days ago
  • Luxon is one of three prime ministers pressing for a ceasefire in Gaza – but the two-state solutio...
    Buzz from the Beehive Two days after hundreds of people rallied outside the New Zealand parliament and the US embassy in Wellington to protest against what they maintain is genocide in Gaza,  Prime Minister Chris Luxon joined with the Prime Ministers of Australia and Canada to express their  concerns that ...
    Point of OrderBy Bob Edlin
    5 days ago
  • All jellied up with possum grease
    1. Shane Jones, addressing the energy industry, called climate concern what?a. The only sane responseb. Undeniably valid c. Our last best hope d. A "religion" 2. Shane Jones’ demeanour in mocking and deriding climate activists can be observed in what other realm of human behaviour?a. Gleeful little boys pulling wings off fliesb. Gleeful ...
    More Than A FeildingBy David Slack
    5 days ago
  • Equality comes to Greece
    The Greek Parliament has voted for marriage equality: Greece has become the first Christian Orthodox-majority country to legalise same-sex marriage. Same-sex couples will now also be legally allowed to adopt children after Thursday's 176-76 vote in parliament. Prime Minister Kyriakos Mitsotakis said the new law would "boldly abolish a ...
    No Right TurnBy Idiot/Savant
    5 days ago
  • CHRIS TROTTER:  Iron in her soul.
      “Battle not with monsters, lest ye become a monster, and if you gaze into the abyss, the abyss gazes also into you.” – Friedrich Nietzsche   Chris Trotter writes – TELEVISION NEW ZEALAND is to be congratulated for inviting Chloe Swarbrick onto its Q+A current affairs show. The Green MP ...
    Point of OrderBy poonzteam5443
    5 days ago
  • The Hoon around the week to Feb 16
    Net emigration of New Zealanders overseas hit a record-high 47,000 in the 2023 year, which only partly offset net immigration of 173,000, which was dominated by arrivals from India, the Philippines and China with temporary work visas. Photo: Lynn Grieveson / The KākāTL;DR: The five things that mattered in Aotearoa’s ...
    The KakaBy Bernard Hickey
    5 days ago
  • Stop Whispering.
    There's nothing to sayAnd there's nothing to doStop whispering, start shoutingStop whispering, start shoutingYesterday our government surprised a few of us by standing up for something. It wasn’t for the benefit of people who own holiday homes and multiple investment properties. Neither were there any tobacco companies or fishing cartels ...
    Nick’s KōreroBy Nick Rockel
    5 days ago
  • “I'm Not Keen on Whataboutism, But What About…”
    Hi,Not sure how your week is going, but I’ve had a pretty frustrating one. I’ve been trying to put my finger on it, and I think it’s perhaps distilled in this message I got on Twitter:What got me a bit riled up is that it was a response to the ...
    David FarrierBy David Farrier
    5 days ago
  • Gordon Campbell on National passing bad policies under urgency
    If National really had faith in its welfare policies, it wouldn’t be ramming them through Parliament under urgency – a step that means the policies can’t be exposed to select committee debate, public submissions, expert commentary, media scrutiny and all the normal democratic processes that this coalition appears to hold ...
    5 days ago
  • Weekly Roundup 16-February-2024
    It’s Friday so once again here”s our roundup of some of the articles that caught our attention this week. This Week in Greater Auckland On Monday Matt looked at the Government’s war on Auckland. On Tuesday Matt covered the ongoing issues with the rail network. On Thursday Matt ...
    Greater AucklandBy Greater Auckland
    5 days ago
  • The Dawn Chorus for Friday, February 16
    The six things to note in my view at 6.30 am on Friday, February 16 in Aotearoa-NZ’s political economy are: Read more ...
    The KakaBy Bernard Hickey
    5 days ago
  • Iron In Her Soul.
    “Battle not with monsters, lest ye become a monster, and if you gaze into the abyss, the abyss gazes also into you.” – Friedrich NietzscheTELEVISION NEW ZEALAND is to be congratulated for inviting Chloe Swarbrick onto its Q+A current affairs show. The Green MP for Auckland Central is the odds-on ...
    5 days ago
  • Dig this
    Resources Minister Shane Jones yesterday told a breakfast hosted by Energy Resources Aotearoa precisely what they wanted to hear. “We campaigned to rehabilitate relegitimise and stand up for working families who derive their income,  derive their hope and derive purpose in regional New Zealand through a flourishing, growing, forward-leaning energy ...
    PolitikBy Richard Harman
    5 days ago
  • Skeptical Science New Research for Week #7 2024
    Open access notables Physics-based early warning signal shows that AMOC is on tipping course, van Westen et al., Science Advances: Here, we show results of the first tipping event in the Community Earth System Model, including the large climate impacts of the collapse. Using these results, we develop a physics-based and ...
    5 days ago
  • A rejection of the rule of law
    No Right TurnBy Idiot/Savant
    6 days ago
  • Shrugging-Off The Atlas Network.
    Upholding The Status-Quo: The Left’s election defeat is not the work of the Atlas Network. It is not even the work of David Seymour and Act. It is the work of ordinary citizens who liked the Right’s stories better than they liked the Left’s. If the Right’s stories were made ...
    6 days ago
  • BARRIE SAUNDERS: Treaty Principles – all rather problematic
    Barrie Saunders writes – When ACT’s leader said they wanted legislation to state what the Treaty principles mean, my first thought was this will be controversial and divisive.  Clearly it is. The first reference to the principles of the Treaty were contained in the 1975 Act establishing the Treaty of ...
    Point of OrderBy poonzteam5443
    6 days ago
  • Luxon Rejects The “Rejection Election” At His Peril.
    Fitting Right In: National retailed a reactionary manifesto of right-wing, racially-charged policies to the electorate throughout 2023. No talk back then of ignoring the overwhelming political preferences of the voting public and making a strong stand on principle. If Luxon’s pollsters and focus-groups were telling him that the public was ...
    6 days ago
  • Valentine’s Day went unnoticed on the Beehive website – but it is not “baa, humbug” to celeb...
    Buzz from the Beehive None of our ministers – a quick check with the Beehive website suggests – found cause to mention, let along celebrate, Valentine’s Day. But two ministers – Agriculture Minister Todd McClay and Rural Communities Minister Mark Patterson – ensured that National Lamb Day did not pass ...
    Point of OrderBy Bob Edlin
    6 days ago
  • Are You A Leftist?
    Nothing To Lose But Our Chains: The emancipatory movement which the Left, understood correctly, has always been, cannot accommodate those who are only able to celebrate one group’s freedom by taking it from another. The expectation, always, among leftists, is that liberty enlarges us. That striking-off a person’s shackles not ...
    6 days ago
  • An unlawful directive
    An interesting question in the Parliamentary written questions feed today, from Jan Tinetti to the Minister of Education: Has she or her Office directed the Ministry of Education to not release Official Information Act material prior to the full twenty working days, if so, why? Given that ...
    No Right TurnBy Idiot/Savant
    6 days ago
  • I’ve been doing this all wrong
    Here are six words that are not easy to say but god it can feel good when you finally say them:I’ve been doing this all wrongFive years ago today I said to myself:What if I'm doing this all wrong?Five years ago today I said to Karren: I think I’m going to ...
    More Than A FeildingBy David Slack
    6 days ago
  • New study suggests the Atlantic overturning circulation AMOC “is on tipping course”
    This is a re-post from RealClimate by Stefan Rahmstorf A new paper was published in Science Advances today. Its title says what it is about: “Physics-based early warning signal shows that AMOC is on tipping course.” The study follows one by Danish colleagues which made headlines last July, likewise looking for early warning signals ...
    6 days ago
  • Valentines from ACT.
    Some of us make a big deal out of Valentine’s Day. We’ll buy the flowers, eye watering though the price spike might be. Say the things we should be saying anyway, although diminished by being scheduled for delivery. Some of us will even write long free-form newsletters with declarations of ...
    Nick’s KōreroBy Nick Rockel
    6 days ago
  • Tax cuts paid for by 13k more kids in poverty
    MSD advised the government that the indexation change it passed under urgency last night is likely to put around 7,000 extra children (and potentially up to 13,000) into poverty. Photo: Lynn Grieveson / The KākāTL;DR: The Government has reverted indexation for main beneficiaries to price inflation from wage inflation under ...
    The KakaBy Bernard Hickey
    6 days ago
  • Fuel Tax Fight and Rail Fail update
    The two stories we covered at the start of the week continue to be in the headlines so it’s worth looking at the latest for each of them. Regional Fuel Tax Mayor Wayne Brown promised some ‘argy-bargy’ over the government’s decision to cancel the Regional Fuel Tax and he’s ...
    6 days ago
  • Climate Change: Arsonists
    Today, a major fire broke out on the Port Hills in Ōtutahi. Like its 2017 predecessors, it is almost certainly exacerbated by climate change. And it is still burning. The present government did not start the fire. But they piled the tinder high last time they were in power, gutting ...
    No Right TurnBy Idiot/Savant
    6 days ago
  • I don’t know!
    http://en.kremlin.ru/events/president/news/73411 7 examples And who actually makes the decisions? Vladimir Putin: I don’t know. America is a complex country, conservative on the one hand, rapidly changing on the other. It’s not easy for us to sort it all out.   Tucker Carlson: Do you think Zelensky has the freedom to negotiate the settlement to this conflict? Vladimir Putin: I don’t know the details, of course it’s difficult for me to judge, but ...
    7 days ago
  • Fresh thinkers
    Fresh thinking will always give you hope.It might be the kind that makes you smite your brow, exclaiming: Why didn't we think of that! It's obvious!It might be the kind that makes you go: Dude you’re a genius.Sometimes it will simply be Wayne Brown handing Simeon Brown his weasel ass ...
    More than a fieldingBy David Slack
    7 days ago
  • It is not about age, it is about team.
    Much attention has been directed at Joe Biden’s mental lapses and physical frailty. Less attention has been spent on Donald Trump’s cognitive difficulties and physical limitations, with most focus being devoted to his insults and exaggerated claims (as if they … Continue reading ...
    KiwipoliticoBy Pablo
    7 days ago
  • ROBERT MacCULLOCH: Fletcher Building – it is time to break up NZ’s most useless company.
    Robert MacCulloch writes –  Gosh, the CEO of Fletcher Building, Ross Taylor, says today’s announcement of a half-year loss of $120 million for the company is “disappointing” and was “heavily impacted” by the Convention Centre losses. He must be crying all the way to the bank (to quote Las ...
    Point of OrderBy poonzteam5443
    7 days ago
  • Mortgage rates seen high for even longer
    Government and borrower hopes for early mortgage cost relief look likely to be thwarted. Photo: Lynn Grieveson / The KākāTL;DR: Stronger-than-expected US inflation data out overnight is expected to delay the first US Federal Reserve rate cut into the second half of 2024, which in turn would hold mortgage rates ...
    The KakaBy Bernard Hickey
    7 days ago
  • Member’s Day
    Today is a Member's Day, the first of the new Parliament. And to start the Parliament off, there's a bunch of first readings. A bunch of other bills have been postponed, so first up is Duncan Webb's District Court (Protecting Judgment Debtors on Main Benefit) Amendment Bill, followed by Katie ...
    No Right TurnBy Idiot/Savant
    7 days ago
  • Three Waters go down the legislative gurgler – but what should we make of Local Water Done Well?
    Buzz from the Beehive Local Government Minister Simeon Brown – it seems fair to suppose – was flushed with success after the repeal of Labour’s divisive and unpopular Three Waters legislation. As he explained, repealing this legislation is a necessary first step in implementing his government’s Local Water Done Well ...
    Point of OrderBy Bob Edlin
    7 days ago
  • Gordon Campbell on five of Luxon’s Gaza absurdities
    Earlier this week, PM Christopher Luxon met with 48 public service CEOs to make sure they were on board with his plans to cut spending on public services so that National can proceed to give the revenue away to those New Zealanders least in need. This wasn’t the only absurdity ...
    7 days ago
  • Love and the Fairer Sex.
    This morning I woke early with many thoughts in my head of things said, events of the week, things that matter. I’m afraid none of them involved Seymour, Willis, or Luxon so if you’re looking for something political maybe take the day off and come back tomorrow. You won’t find ...
    Nick’s KōreroBy Nick Rockel
    1 week ago
  • He stood up to Muldoon and Lange and the Fji army
    Gerald Hensley, who died aged 88 on Saturday, was the key official who presided over the tumultuous events that followed the election of the Lange Labour Government in 1984. He was also instrumental in helping a key Fijian official escape the country during one of the 1987 coups. A diplomat ...
    PolitikBy Richard Harman
    1 week ago
  • At a glance – Has Arctic sea ice returned to normal?
    On February 14, 2023 we announced our Rebuttal Update Project. This included an ask for feedback about the added "At a glance" section in the updated basic rebuttal versions. This weekly blog post series highlights this new section of one of the updated basic rebuttal versions and serves as a ...
    1 week ago
  • Halo dunia!
    Selamt datang di WordPress. Ini adalah pos pertama Anda. Sunting atau hapus, kemudian mulai menulis! ...
    1 week ago
  • The PM wants a turnaround
    As a treat today I have lined up a favourite in the music slot. I love Turnaround, I cannot hear it too often, and I feel in need of a treat when I make myself listen to the Prime Minister the way I did this morning.He too, has favourites that ...
    More Than A FeildingBy David Slack
    1 week ago
  • The PM wants a turnaround
    As a treat today I have lined up a favourite in the music slot. I love Turnaround, I cannot hear it too often, and I feel in need of a treat when I make myself listen to the Prime Minister the way I did this morning.He too, has favourites that ...
    More than a fieldingBy David Slack
    1 week ago
  • ELE LUDEMANN: Trusting locals
    Ele Ludemann writes- A government-knows-best and predilection for central control was another unfortunate feature of the 2017-2023 Labour governments. One of the worst polices as a result of that was what started as Three Waters and became several more. The National-led government is much more trusting of locals ...
    Point of OrderBy poonzteam5443
    1 week ago
  • Legislation to flush away Three Waters has become a certainty – but we must wait for details on th...
    Buzz from the Beehive A  three-day information drought was broken, just after Point of Order published yesterday’s Buzz from the Beehive, and two significant ministerial announcements were made. First, the Budget will be delivered on 30 May, telling us which genuine savings have been made by eliminating waste and which ...
    Point of OrderBy Bob Edlin
    1 week ago

  • Greater support for social workers
    The Coalition Government is enhancing the professionalism of the social work sector and supporting the vulnerable people who rely on them, Social Development and Employment Minister Louise Upston says.  The Social Workers Registration Legislation Amendment Bill passed its third reading in Parliament today. It amends the Social Workers Registration Legislation ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    14 hours ago
  • Government delivers greater freedom and choice for sick New Zealanders
    The coalition government is delivering on its commitment to making principled decisions by getting rid of red tape that doesn’t make sense and allowing sick New Zealanders greater freedom and choice to purchase effective cold and flu medicines. A bill amending the Misuse of Drugs Act 1975 is being introduced, and changes to the Medicines ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    21 hours ago
  • Government begins reset of welfare system
    The Coalition Government is taking early action to curb the surge in welfare dependency that occurred under the previous government by setting out its expectations around employment and the use of benefit sanctions, Social Development and Employment Minister Louise Upston says. In 2017, 60,588 sanctions were applied to beneficiaries who ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 days ago
  • State of the Nation
    Ka nui te mihi kia koutou. Kia ora, good morning, talofa, malo e lelei, bula vinaka, da jia hao, namaste, sat sri akal, assalamu alaikum. Thank you for coming to my first State of the Nation as Prime Minister. Thank you for coming to a speech where I don’t just ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 days ago
  • West Coast tourism attractions officially open
    Regional Development Minister Shane Jones will attend the official opening of two highly anticipated tourism projects on the West Coast today – Pike29 Memorial Track, dedicated to the memory of the Pike River miners, and Pounamu Pathway. “The Pike29 Memorial Track is a way to remember and honour the men ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    5 days ago
  • Independent ferry service advisory group in place
    Appointments to the Ministerial Advisory Group tasked with providing independent advice and assurance on the future of KiwiRail’s inter-island ferry service have been made, State Owned Enterprises Minister Paul Goldsmith says. “It’s important for New Zealand that KiwiRail is focused on ensuring safe, resilient, and reliable ferry services over the ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    6 days ago
  • Joint statement from the Prime Ministers of Australia, Canada, and New Zealand
    The Prime Ministers of Australia, Canada and New Zealand today issued the following statement on reports of Israel’s planned military operation in Rafah. We are gravely concerned by indications that Israel is planning a ground offensive into Rafah.   A military operation into Rafah would be catastrophic. About 1.5 million Palestinians ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    6 days ago
  • Govt will deliver on expanded breast screening
    The coalition Government has made the first steps in delivering on its promise to  extend free breast screening to women aged 70-74, Health Minister Shane Reti says. “As part of the 100 day plan, the Government has now met with officials and discussed what is needed in order for the ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    6 days ago
  • Government announces woolshed roadshows in support of sheep farmers
    The Government celebrates National Lamb Day (15 February 24) and congratulates sheep farmers on the high-quality products they continue to produce. Agriculture Minister McClay hosted bipartisan celebrations of National Lamb Day with industry representatives at Parliament this week to mark the anniversary of the first frozen lamb exports that left ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    6 days ago
  • Speech: Address to the NZ Economics Forum
    It’s great to be back at the New Zealand Economics Forum. I would like to acknowledge everyone here today for your expertise and contribution, especially the Pro Vice-Chancellor, Head of the Waikato Management School, economists, students and experts alike. A year has passed since I was last before you, and ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    6 days ago
  • Government tackling high construction costs
    The Government is focused on reducing sky-high construction costs to make it more affordable to build a home, Building and Construction Minister Chris Penk says.  Stats NZ data shows the cost of building a house has increased by 41 per cent since 2019, making housing even more unaffordable for Kiwi ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    6 days ago
  • Labour’s Three Waters legislation repealed
    The Coalition Government’s legislative plan to address longstanding issues with local water infrastructure and service delivery took an important step today, with the repeal of Labour’s divisive and unpopular Three Waters legislation, Local Government Minister Simeon Brown says. “Repealing this legislation is a necessary first step in implementing our Local ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    7 days ago
  • Cost of living support for beneficiary households
    The Coalition Government is delivering on its commitment to ease the cost-of-living by increasing main benefit rates in line with inflation and ensuring the Minimum Family Tax Credit threshold remains aligned with this change, Social Development and Employment Minister Louise Upston says. The Social Security (Benefits Adjustment) and Income Tax ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    7 days ago
  • Government announces agriculture delegations to better support Primary sector
    The coalition Government has announced ministerial delegations to support key areas across the Primary sector to deliver for New Zealand’s food and fibre sector, Agriculture Minister Todd McClay announced today. “I will be supported in my roles as Minister of Agriculture, Trade, Forestry and Hunting and Fishing, by three Associate ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • Waikato MoU reinforces Govt’s commitment to increase NZ doctors
    The Government has taken an important step forward in addressing a critical shortage of New Zealand-trained doctors, with today’s signing of a Memorandum of Understanding for a third medical school, Minister of Health Dr Shane Reti has announced.  “Today’s signing by the Ministry of Health and the University of Waikato ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • Speech – Lunar New Year 2024
    Annyeonghaseyo, greetings and welcome all. It is my pleasure as the Minister for Ethnic Communities to welcome you to the first Lunar New Year Event in Parliament. Thank you to our emcees for greeting us in the different languages that represent the many cultures that celebrate the Lunar New Year. ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • More funding to Hawke’s Bay and Tairāwhiti
    Urgent work to clean-up cyclone-affected regions will continue, thanks to a $63 million boost from the Government for sediment and debris removal in Hawke’s Bay and Tairāwhiti.                                                                                                   The funding will help local councils continue urgent work removing and disposing of sediment and debris left from Cyclone Gabrielle.   “This additional ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • Budget will be delivered on 30 May
    Plans to deliver tax relief to hard-working New Zealanders, rebuild business confidence and restore the Crown’s finances to order will be unveiled on 30 May, Finance Minister Nicola Willis says. The plans will be announced in the Budget which is currently being developed by Ministers.  “The last government’s mismanagement of ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • Government advances Local Water Done Well
    The Coalition Government is continuing work to restore council ownership and control of water assets by repealing Three Waters and appointing a Technical Advisory Group to provide expert advice on the implementation of Local Water Done Well, Local Government Minister Simeon Brown says. “The Government will pass a bill to ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • New diplomatic appointments
    Foreign Minister Winston Peters has today announced five new diplomatic appointments.  "Strong and effective diplomacy to protect and advance our interests in the world is needed now more than ever," Mr Peters says.  “We are delighted to appoint senior diplomats from the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade to these ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 weeks ago
  • Speech to the Committee for Auckland
    It is great to be here today at this event as Minister for Auckland and Minister ofTransport. Let me start by acknowledging each one of you and thanking the Committee forAuckland for hosting this event and inviting me to speak here today. The Committee for Auckland has been a symbol ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 weeks ago
  • Getting Transport Back on Track in Auckland
    Transport Minister Simeon Brown has today confirmed his high-level transport priorities for Auckland, in the lead up to releasing the draft Government Policy Statement on Land Transport. “Our economic growth and productivity are underpinned by a transport network that enables people and freight to move around safely and efficiently. At ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 weeks ago
  • Government to axe Auckland Regional Fuel Tax
    Transport Minister Simeon Brown has confirmed that the Auckland Regional Fuel Tax will end on 30 June 2024. “Today, I can confirm that the Government has agreed to remove the Auckland Regional Fuel Tax in line with our coalition commitments, and legislation will be introduced to parliament to repeal the ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 weeks ago
  • Minister Calls for Work to Tackle Kina Barrens
    Changes to fishing rules and a significant science programme are being undertaken to address kina barrens, says Minister for Oceans and Fisheries Shane Jones. “There has been tremendous interest from iwi, communities and recreational fishers who had raised concerns about such kina infestations being a major threat to Northland’s marine ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 weeks ago
  • Government law and order crackdown begins
    The coalition Government is making good on its promise to restore law and order by removing government funding for Section 27 reports and abolishing the previous Labour Government’s prison reduction target, Justice Minister Paul Goldsmith and Corrections Minister Mark Mitchell say.  “In recent years, the development of Section 27 reports ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 weeks ago
  • Greater focus on getting people into work
    The coalition government will refocus employment efforts and the welfare system so that supporting people who can work into jobs is the number one priority, Social Development and Employment Minister Louise Upston says. “Of concern in the labour market statistics released by Stats NZ today was the number of youth not ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 weeks ago
  • One year on, NZ appeals for release of Phillip Mehrtens
    Foreign Minister Winston Peters has appealed to those holding New Zealand pilot Phillip Mehrtens in remote Papua, Indonesia, to release him immediately.  Phillip Mehrtens was taken hostage a year ago on 7 February in Paro, Papua, while providing vital air links and supplies to remote communities. “We strongly urge those holding ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 weeks ago
  • Ministers reaffirm Pacific connections this week
    Foreign Minister Winston Peters and Health Minister and Minister for Pacific Peoples Dr Shane Reti are reaffirming the importance of New Zealand’s connections to the Pacific by visiting Tonga, Cook Islands and Samoa this week.  “New Zealand enjoys strong and long-standing relationships with our Pacific partners - especially in Polynesia, where we ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 weeks ago
  • Rt Hon Christopher Luxon – Waitangi speech
    E ngā mana, e ngā reo, e ngā iwi, rau rangatira ma. Tēnā koutou katoa. He tino mihi ki te mana whenua o tēnei rohe.  Mihi mai, mihi mai, mihi mai. Te whare e tū nei, tēnā koe.                               He-wāhi whakahirahira tēnei mō Aotearoa. Ka huri nga whakaaro, ki nga mate. ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 weeks ago
  • Government awards primary sector scholarships to students
    Six university students studying agriculture and science have been awarded scholarships as part of the coalition Government’s efforts to boost on-the-ground support for farmers and growers. “The coalition Government is committed to improving support and operating conditions for farmers and growers,” Agriculture Minister Todd McClay says. “We’re backing a range ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 weeks ago
  • High Court Judge appointed
    Attorney-General Judith Collins today announced the appointment of Wellington Barrister Jason Scott McHerron as a High Court Judge. Justice McHerron graduated from the University of Otago with a BA in English literature in 1994 and an LLB in 1996. From 1996 to 1999 he worked as a solicitor in the ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 weeks ago
  • New Zealand provides further humanitarian support to Gaza and the West Bank
    Foreign Minister Winston Peters has announced that New Zealand is providing a further $5 million to respond to the extreme humanitarian need in Gaza and the West Bank.  “The impact of the Israel-Hamas conflict on civilians is absolutely appalling,” Mr Peters says.  “That is why New Zealand has contributed $15 ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 weeks ago
  • Government consults on expanding COVID-19 Inquiry terms of reference
    The Government is delivering on its commitment to enable public input into expanding the scope of the Royal Commission of Inquiry into COVID-19 Lessons, says Internal Affairs Minister Brooke van Velden. “As committed to in both the ACT-National and NZ First-National coalition agreements, the public will be given the opportunity ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 weeks ago
  • Tai Tokerau Water Boost
    A further $5 million loan has been advanced to the Tai Tokerau Water Trust for Te Waihekeora Reservoir, Regional Development Minister Shane Jones says.  “Water is a precious resource, Kānoa – Regional Development and Investment Unit at the Ministry of Business, Innovation, and Employment have done amazing work in the ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 weeks ago
  • Fast track consenting in the fast lane
    The Government is progressing changes to resource management laws as part of its 100 Day Action Plan, with the first steps taken to establish a new fast-track consenting one-stop shop regime. “This new regime, which forms part of National’s coalition agreement with New Zealand First, will improve the speed and ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 weeks ago
  • JOINT STATEMENT ON AUSTRALIA-NEW ZEALAND MINISTERIAL CONSULTATIONS (ANZMIN) 2024
    Deputy Prime Minister and Minister for Defence the Hon Richard Marles MP and Minister for Foreign Affairs Senator the Hon Penny Wong hosted New Zealand Deputy Prime Minister and Minister of Foreign Affairs Rt Hon Winston Peters MP and Minister of Defence Hon Judith Collins KC MP on 1 February ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 weeks ago
  • Minimum wage set for cautious increase
    The adult minimum wage rate will increase by 2 per cent to $23.15 an hour from 1 April 2024, Workplace Relations and Safety Minister Brooke van Velden announced today. “This Government is committed to striking the right balance between protecting the incomes of our lowest paid workers and maintaining labour ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 weeks ago
  • Increased security improves ED safety over summer
    Increasing the number of security staff in emergency departments (EDs) over the busy Christmas and New Year period improved the safety of both staff and patients, Health Minister Dr Shane Reti says. 200 additional security staff (93 FTEs) were provided to 32 EDs in response to concerns raised by ED ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 weeks ago

Page generated in The Standard by Wordpress at 2024-02-20T19:19:41+00:00