web analytics

BORA vs pandemic mandate

Written By: - Date published: 2:30 pm, November 23rd, 2021 - 13 comments
Categories: covid-19, health, law - Tags: , ,

The New Zealand Bill of Right Act 1990 (BORA) is an interesting act because it is what I would call a balancing act in that it enshrines certain rights but they are not absolutes. There are requirements that new or updated legislation are tested by the people responsible for making legislation and subsequently by the interpretation of the courts.

They balance the rights of individuals against state actions (ie not against employers or corporations) against the other needs of society.

There have been a number of recent cases taken using BORA arguments against the vaccine mandates. So far in the High Court they haven’t succeeded. I had a look at the most recent decision from November 8th.

Sections 4-6 state…

4 Other enactments not affected

No court shall, in relation to any enactment (whether passed or made before or after the commencement of this Bill of Rights),—

(a)hold any provision of the enactment to be impliedly repealed or revoked, or to be in any way invalid or ineffective; or

(b)decline to apply any provision of the enactment—
by reason only that the provision is inconsistent with any provision of this Bill of Rights.

5 Justified limitations

Subject to section 4, the rights and freedoms contained in this Bill of Rights may be subject only to such reasonable limits prescribed by law as can be demonstrably justified in a free and democratic society.

6 Interpretation consistent with Bill of Rights to be preferred

Wherever an enactment can be given a meaning that is consistent with the rights and freedoms contained in this Bill of Rights, that meaning shall be preferred to any other meaning.

Legislation.govt.nz – New Zealand Bill of Rights Act 1990

This makes sure that BORA has a role in enactments by interpretation in the courts (s6). But it doesn’t override explicit enactments (s4) unless it can be shown that the limits are unreasonable in our society (s5).

So for a motion using BORA to succeed, the applicatents have to claim that the relevant legislation or the interpretation by the crown are unreasonable to them as individuals. The crown has to demonstrate that it is reasonable and justified on the needs of our society.

The high court challenges to date have been by aviation security employees, midwives, and a group representing some doctors and teachers who oppose mandatory vaccination orders. This is where the crown via the Ministry of Health has issued an order that their employers are required to make sure that their employees in certain positions are vaccinated before they are able to work in those positions.

The claims all assert a challenge to the validity of the orders under the Covid-19 Public Health Response Act 2020 and that they are therefore unlawful because they violate s11 of BORA.

11 Right to refuse to undergo medical treatment

Everyone has the right to refuse to undergo any medical treatment.

Legislation.govt.nz – New Zealand Bill of Rights Act 1990

The problem in law is that no-one is being forced to undergo a vaccination. It is a choice that the applicants are having to make between being vaccinated, demonstrating a reason for a very rare exemption, moving to a position that isn’t covered by the order (difficult with the professions in the cases), or not being employed by areas covered by those orders.

They are being coerced in that they may lose their jobs as a result of the orders. This appears to have been recognised by the both the courts and the crown’s lawyers in court.

It is interesting reading the latest decision.

[30] It is a matter of degree whether practical pressure to undergo a medical
treatment will be taken to have limited the right to refuse that treatment. Here the level
of pressure is significant and amounts to coercion. The employees are forced to be
vaccinated or potentially lose their jobs. This involves both economic and social
pressure. I accept that the right is accordingly engaged, and that it is limited by the
Order. The key question in this case is whether this limitation is demonstrably
justified.

Four Aviation Security Service Employees v Minister of Covid-19 Response – [2021] NZHC 3012 8 November 2021.

Other claims under BORA were rejected out of hand. The right to life (s8) sounds like complete bullshit since the risk of death walking a dog is higher than dying from this vaccination. The right to freedom of thought conscience and religion (s13) isn’t affected – people are welcome to believe what they like. The right to freedom of expression (s14) appears to be unrelated at all to employment – all employers can and usually do constrain that during work hours.

Essentially the Judge accepted the evidence that the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine in use in NZ wasn’t experimental (s10 of BORA), had been provisionally approved for use with covid-19, and was used here. It had been fully tested, the provisional nature of the consent was due to the time it would take to go through the whole approval process in a ongoing pandemic.

Questions of s19 of BORA were raised by the judge on the basis of discrimination – however no evidence was proffered by the applicants.

BORA and other enactments provide nothing that asserts a right for an individual to be employed. Nor are any employers required to employ people who don’t fit the reasonable requirements for a position.

So what was left was the validity of the order under Covid-19 Public Health Response Act 2020, which got denied on the basis that it did conform to the legislation and that the vaccine was demonstrably useful for reducing the transmission of the pre-delta variants of Covid-19. It was also likely to reduce the transmission of delta. There was no requirement for the respondents to prove scientifically that it was able to do the latter. That would cause measures to be taken too late.

[68] In any event the second point is that the statutory prerequisite for making an
order is not that the measure will reduce transmission. Rather, the measures must
“contribute or [be] likely to contribute to preventing the risk” of outbreak or spread.
They are measures that only have to “contribute” to preventing a risk. These
provisions contemplate a risk minimisation approach. That is particularly clear when
the text of the enactment is interpreted in light of its purpose.

Four Aviation Security Service Employees v Minister of Covid-19 Response – [2021] NZHC 3012 8 November 2021.

Challenges on the basis of the medical act and employment law were given short shift.

[74] The answer to these submissions is found in the provisions of the Act.
Section 13(1)(a) provides that a COVID-19 order may not be held invalid just because
it authorises an act or omission that is inconsistent with the Health Act. More
generally, orders made under the Act can be taken to prevail over the provisions of the
Health Act because it addresses particular measures relating to COVID-19.

Four Aviation Security Service Employees v Minister of Covid-19 Response – [2021] NZHC 3012 8 November 2021.

[75] Finally Ms Grey argued that the Order improperly purported to delegate
statutory duties to employers or employees. She argued that this conflicted with the
general principle that a delegated power could not be sub-delegated. She referred
particularly to the duties of employers under cl 8 of the Order, and the obligation of
employees under cl 7 not to carry out work unless they have been vaccinated. The
answer to this argument is, again, in the wording of the empowering provision. This
expressly allows orders made under it to require persons to undertake specified actions or comply with specified measures associated with activities, provided that they meet
the statutory standards that I have already addressed. […] I do not accept
this involves any impermissible sub-delegation.

Four Aviation Security Service Employees v Minister of Covid-19 Response – [2021] NZHC 3012 8 November 2021.

Which really left s11 of BORA and if that was applicable. In a lot of respects that comes down to the question of who is required to provide a evidence and argument to the court to help it make a decision. The judge rightly points out that the burden falls to both sides.

[86] When it is alleged that statutory powers have been exercised in a manner that
limits fundamental rights in a way that is not demonstrably justified, and it is
established (or, as here, admitted) that the right is in fact limited, the burden falls on
the Crown to put forward evidence that the limitation is demonstrably justified. But
if the applicant then wishes to establish that what that Crown’s evidence establishes is
factually wrong, it still has the burden to persuade the Court of this.

Four Aviation Security Service Employees v Minister of Covid-19 Response – [2021] NZHC 3012 8 November 2021.

From the judgement it appears that the Crown fulfilled this requirement, but the applicants did not.

[87] In the present case the Crown has filed relevant evidence from Dr Bloomfield,
Dr Town and from Mr James (the Group Manager of Medsafe). The evidence of
Dr Bloomfield and Dr Town, and the underlying information to which they have
referred, forms the evidential basis for the Crown’s argument that the measure is
demonstrably justified. The applicants initially filed no expert evidence of this kind.
Dr Febery put relevant publications and articles before the Court, particularly in her
evidence in reply. I accept that that material is to be properly considered by the Court
in its assessment of whether the measures are demonstrably justified, but it is not
expert evidence of the kind filed by the respondents.

Four Aviation Security Service Employees v Minister of Covid-19 Response – [2021] NZHC 3012 8 November 2021.

Further opinion was provided outside of the normal court processes and was considered but not tested in court.

The rest of the judgement was pretty routine from there on, and lot of judges commentary was focused on on what I’d describe as incoherent blathering by the applicants and their witnesses. It amused me. For instance on the evidence about the ability of the vaccine to reduce the risk of transmission of Delta

[106] This evidence was disputed by Dr Thornley, who said that Dr Town’s evidence
failed to “recognise or address the many studies which now confirm that the Pfizer
vaccine is ineffective at stopping transmission of the Delta variant”. I have looked
carefully at Dr Thornley’s evidence to understand the basis for that conclusion. One
of the key studies he referred to had been addressed by both Dr Febery and Dr Town.
It is from the University of Oxford involving significant community surveillance. But
that study does not seem to me to stand for Dr Thornley’s conclusion. […]

[107] I do not take evidence from this study as confirming that the vaccine is
“ineffective at stopping transmission” as suggested by Dr Thornley. Moreover his
evidence then went on to say, in relation to the various studies that have been presented
in evidence, that “there is clearly a mix of epidemiological evidence, some suggesting
some effectiveness of the COVID-19 vaccine [in reducing transmission], some
suggesting none”. That is very different from saying that the evidence now confirms
that the vaccine is ineffective at stopping the transmission of the virus.

Four Aviation Security Service Employees v Minister of Covid-19 Response – [2021] NZHC 3012 8 November 2021.

So when it came to considering s11 of BORA.

[125] Apart from the factors I have already addressed it is also important to note that
those in the position of the applicants are not actually compelled to be treated. They
retain the option to refuse vaccination. The implication is that, if they are unable to
be redeployed by their employer, their employment may be terminated. That has
happened for the applicants. But what they have lost is their job, rather than their right
to refuse to be vaccinated. That is relevant to assessing the proportionality of the
measures imposed here. The Act is not being used to literally compel vaccination for
anybody

[126] I accept that the evidence that the vaccine materially reduces transmission of
the Delta variant is uncertain. This has not been proved in a scientific sense. I
conclude that it does contribute to reducing transmissibility, and that it accordingly
contributes to minimising the risk of the outbreak or spread of COVID-19. But it is
an open question that may be more readily demonstrated as further evidence comes to
light. On the scientific evidence as it currently stands the measure can be justified on
a risk minimisation basis given the implications of an outbreak, or the spread of
COVID-19.

[127] I accordingly conclude that the measure is demonstrably justified, and the
Order is accordingly not invalid for being inconsistent with the Bill of Rights.

Four Aviation Security Service Employees v Minister of Covid-19 Response – [2021] NZHC 3012 8 November 2021.

Which perfectly sums up the current course of this pandemic and the trade offs with between the community needs and those of individual rights. You can’t manufacture a individual right that doesn’t actually exist in the legislation to countervail the right of the Crown to protect the overall community.

In the absence of the kind of absolute certainty, of the type that we currently have in the course of a rolling set of waves of a pandemic, then the assessment of community risk lies with the Crown and they make orders on that basis.

And in any case the Crown are required by the relevant legislation to continue to assess risk and to adapt their orders to quit.

The other recent decisions on various issues around mandates were similar in nature.

I’m pretty sure that these decisions will keep moving up the legal system. I can’t see that the Court of Appeal would have much to say because it appears that the High Court dealt with a urgent matter as well as could be expected and most of the procedural issues were from applicants side. So eventually it will be interesting to see how the Supreme Court deals with it.


BTW: My interest in this post comes from a article by Michael Andrew writes about recent cases in “The unvaccinated v Chris Hipkins” (paywalled at BusinessDesk). I’d have liked to have quoted from my subscription to it – however there is an bloody obnoxious javascript copy blocker on the site. Unlike the NZ Herald there is content worth reading on BusinessDesk. So I’m not planning on dumping my subscription. But I am irritated by whatever dimwitted dickhead added that junk javascript to that site. I’ll see if I have time to find or code and publish a counter measure.

13 comments on “BORA vs pandemic mandate ”

  1. Chris 1

    Yes, it will be extremely interesting to see how the SC approaches these kinds of challenges, both under the BORA and the HRA. It does look as though the nature of the subject matter gives the Crown a real advantage defending its actions, but it will also mean that the strength of the specific protections will get a good work out. That said, my feeling is that even if an applicant manages to shoehorn their claim into the statutory framework, for example by raising valid comparisons for a discrimination claim, or showing their situation is captured by one of the 13 grounds under the HRA, the importance of the particular policy will prevail. I just can't see the SC wanting to interfere with the government's covid response. Courts don't like to do that, and the medical health of the nation gives them an easy reason to hold back and let the government do its job.

  2. In times such as these is when the usually unsung legal writing 'heroes' such as Parliamentary Counsel in the Law Drafting office come into their own with their focus on Bora and how legislation and regulations (orders) fit together. There was a piece of land related law that needed working on in dead of night under urgency and it was just such a privilege for me as an adviser to see these people from Parliamentary Counsels office. Crown Law and departmental solicitors plus a very knowledgeable constitutional lawyer who happened to be deputy PM at the time, hammer out the draft legislation.

    I think if there are any obiter dictum statements coming out or any concerns from a judgement they would be dealt with very quickly under urgency to fix them up. The health issue is so important.

  3. Ad 3

    Supreme Court is the right place for it legally and I look forward to it.

    Over 92% of New Zealanders have been part-vaccinated so there is no issue with the courts being a proper mirror to what is socially acceptable.

    Perhaps rather than expanding the NZ underclass, over 2022 the employment mandates coupled with the "traffic light system" will drain the swamp of irrationality and our outsiders.

    It is remarkable that our great feared waves of social media contrarian opinion actually dissolves to nothing when faced with the stark facts of your job, your rent and your mortgage.

    • RedLogix 3.1

      It is remarkable that our great feared waves of social media contrarian opinion actually dissolves to nothing when faced with the stark facts of your job, your rent and your mortgage.

      May however remain a resolutely undissolved lumpen in the ballot booth.

      • Ad 3.1.1

        Even with all Melbourne's protests storming the National Memorial, in the cold light of Parliament yesterday Pauline Hansen still got the slapdown when it came to the vaccine mandate debate.

    • Julian Richards 3.2

      I hope they're right.?!

      *also a correction to your statement is required: "over 92% of New Zealanders have been part vaccinated so there's no issue…."

      92% of eligible New Zealanders have been partly vaccinated. Of that the actual total % of New Zealanders partly vaccinated once you include the under 12 year olds (approx 16-17%) in the equation of 'New Zealanders' total population party vaccinated is an approx modest 75%.

      "Oh won't somebody think of the children…. " the non-vaccinated will be blamed for their vaccination/protection even though the youth are at highly minimal risk of covid19 and in a very good position to end the generational viral pandemic. Then New Zealand will achieve 92%.

      #notantivax

      Just thinking out loud

      • Julian Richards 3.2.1

        Excerpt from Lancet medical journal;NZs vaccination strategy… 'Note the contributors'

        "Where vaccination is not allocated to the 0–15 year olds[5] or the 0–11 year olds, the maximum attainable total population vaccine coverage is 79.8% or 84.9%. At a high R0 value of 4.5 or higher, these maximum total coverage levels are not enough to achieve HIT. Therefore, opening borders without vaccinating the under-12 group or the under-16 group were predicted to result in a large number of cases, hospitalisations, and deaths. For instance, where 0–11 year olds are not vaccinated and R0=4.5, the high-risk targeting strategy with a high uptake level 80% (over the maximum 84.9%) and a vaccine of 90/80% effectiveness was predicted to have lower deaths and total hospitalisations and more community cases."

        https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lanwpc/article/PIIS2666-6065(21)00165-6/fulltext

        The return to normal is NOT around the corner. Traffic lights ahead for quite some time… More discussions needed?

        • Julian Richards 3.2.1.1

          "and a vaccine of 90/80% effectiveness" … Six months down the track %effectiveness NOT looking so good. Not tracking well, 'red light'. Guaranteed mandatory boosters for all, 'green light'. And so on?

          Thinking… 

          • Ad 3.2.1.1.1

            So let me see …

            – Lowest .5% worldwide per capita for COVID mortality

            – Lowest 1% worldwide per capital for COVID infections

            – Health system adequately managing the stress of a 1-in100 year event

            – Lowest unemployment rate and plummeting underutilisation rate in the OECD

            – Booming economy, simultaneously weaned off multiple bulk low quality exports

            – One of the most popular governments in the world

            – In short New Zealand's government (particularly for its size and capacity) has been for nearly two years the best managed in the world.

            Wherever your "thinking aloud" is going, I challenge you right now to show how your "thinking aloud" will deliver better results than that.

            • Julian Richards 3.2.1.1.1.1

              Your 'challenge' is little more than ego. No single person is holy right or has the golden ticket!

              This is why A.i will be so much better than humans at anything and everything, A.i works together to problem solve just as a super organism should! And humans have this capability, but compromise and corrupt on our accent to the dizzying economical hieghts of monetary 'success'.

              To qoute Wal-E "I don't want to survive, I want to live"

            • Julian Richards 3.2.1.1.1.2

              Emotions don't care for facts. As seen by your triumphant display.

  4. DS 4

    This makes sure that BORA has a role in enactments by interpretation in the courts (s6). But it doesn’t override explicit enactments (s4) unless it can be shown that the limits are unreasonable in our society (s5).

    OK. There's a wee misunderstanding here. Ironically, it's (partly) the same misunderstanding advanced by the plaintiffs (see paragraphs 54-58 in the decision).

    For regulations and administrative decisions, you don't get to s6 and s4 of BORA. Basically, unless a statute has explicitly authorised unjustified BORA violations, subordinate decisions and orders made under that statute are thrown out under s5. Game over, unless the respondents can justify the infringement on rights. Which, in this case, they can, of course.

    Here, the plaintiffs were trying to get a reinterpretation of the Order under s6. But s6 doesn't apply to regulations and administrative decisions. It only applies to statutes themselves, and this case does not concern the primary statute, only the downstream Orders.

    Incidentally, if you can't reinterpret a statute to make it consistent with BORA, the statute is applied anyway under s4. There is no scope for courts overturning statutes, thank goodness.

  5. Foreign Waka 5

    You could add this for emphasis. I personally belief that people should have the right to chose but also the obligation to wear the consequences.

    https://bmcmedethics.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1472-6939-13-16

Leave a Comment

Recent Comments

Recent Posts

  • NZ secures new Pfizer COVID-19 medicine
    New Zealand has secured supplies of another medicine to treat COVID-19, Health Minister Andrew Little announced today. “In October, New Zealand was one of the first countries in the world to make an advance purchase of a promising new antiviral drug, molnupiravir,” Andrew Little said. “Today I am pleased to ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 hours ago
  • Strong Pipeline for Construction Sector
    Strong pipeline ahead for the construction sector Infrastructure activity forecast to reach $11.2 billion in 2026 Construction sector now the fourth biggest employer with more than 280 000 people working in the industry Residential construction the largest contributor to national construction activity. Minister for Building and Construction Poto Williams says ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    5 hours ago
  • Regenerative agriculture research receives Government boost
    The Government continues to invest in farm sustainability, this time backing two new research projects to investigate the impacts of regenerative farming practices, Agriculture Minister Damien O’Connor announced today. Soil health and regenerative agriculture “We’re contributing $2.8 million to a $3.85 million five-year project with co-investment by Synlait Milk and ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 day ago
  • David McLean appointed as KiwiRail chair
    David McLean has been appointed as Chair of KiwiRail Holdings Ltd, the Minister for State Owned Enterprises Dr David Clark and Minister of Finance Grant Robertson announced today. “Minister Clark and I are confident that David’s extensive business knowledge and leadership experience, including his time as former Chief Executive and ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 days ago
  • New Ambassador to Turkey announced
    Foreign Affairs Minister Nanaia Mahuta today announced the appointment of Zoe Coulson-Sinclair as New Zealand’s next Ambassador to Turkey. “Aotearoa New Zealand and Turkey’s relationship is one of mutual respect and underpinned by our shared Gallipoli experience,” Nanaia Mahuta said. “Turkey is also a generous ANZAC Day host and has ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 days ago
  • Announcement of new Consul-General in Guangzhou
    Foreign Affairs Minister Nanaia Mahuta today announced the appointment of Rachel Crump as New Zealand’s next Consul-General in Guangzhou, China. “China is one of Aotearoa New Zealand’s most significant relationships – it is our largest trading partner, and an influential regional and global actor,” Nanaia Mahuta said. “As the capital of ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 days ago
  • Government marks International Day of Persons with Disabilities
    The Government joins the disabled community of Aotearoa New Zealand in marking and celebrating the International Day of Persons with Disabilities, Minister for Disabilty Issues Carmel Sepuloni said. The theme for this year’s International Day of Persons with Disabilities is “Leadership and participation of persons with disabilities toward an inclusive, ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 days ago
  • Deputy Inspector-General of Intelligence and Security, and Advisory panel member appointed
    Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern has announced the appointments of Graeme Speden as the Deputy Inspector-General of Intelligence and Security, and Ben Bateman as a member of the Inspector-General’s Advisory Panel.  “These are significant roles that assist the Inspector-General with independent oversight of New Zealand’s intelligence agencies,” Jacinda Ardern said. “While ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 days ago
  • Five million COVID-19 tests processed
    Associate Minister of Health, Dr Ayesha Verrall has congratulated testing teams right around New Zealand for reaching the five million tests milestone. Today, an additional 31,780 tests were processed, taking the total since the beginning of the pandemic in 2020 to 5,005,959. “This really is an incredible and sustained team ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 days ago
  • Funding for extra ICU capacity
    Care for the sickest New Zealanders is getting a major boost from the Government, with plans to spend hundreds of millions of dollars on expanding intensive care-type services, Health Minister Andrew Little announced today. “Through good planning, we have avoided what the COVID-19 pandemic has done in some countries, where ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    4 days ago
  • “THE LEGAL AND CONSTITUTIONAL IMPLICATIONS OF NEW ZEALAND’S FIGHT AGAINST COVID.”
    Speech to the New Zealand Centre for Public Law Tēnā koutou katoa Thank you for providing this opportunity to speak with you today as Attorney General. I’m here to talk about the constitutional consequences of Covid -19. I love the law. The way it exists with the consent of the ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    4 days ago
  • The legal and constitutional implications of New Zealand’s fight against COVID
    Speech to the New Zealand Centre for Public Law Tēnā koutou katoa Thank you for providing this opportunity to speak with you today as Attorney General. I’m here to talk about the constitutional consequences of Covid -19. I love the law. The way it exists with the consent of the ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    4 days ago
  • Pharmac Review interim report released
    Health Minister Andrew Little has released an interim report by an independent panel reviewing the national pharmaceuticals-buying agency Pharmac. Pharmac was established in 1993 and is responsible for purchasing publicly funded medicines for New Zealanders, including those prescribed by GPs or administered in hospitals. The review, chaired by former Consumer ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    4 days ago
  • Appointment to Network for Learning board
    Former MP Clare Curran has been appointed to the board of Crown company Network for Learning (N4L), Education Minister Chris Hipkins says. Hon Clare Curran served as a Member of Parliament for Dunedin South from 2008-2010. During this time, she held a number of ministerial portfolios including Broadcasting, Communications and ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    4 days ago
  • Putting home ownership within reach of Pacific Aotearoa
    Pacific community groups and organisations will get tools to help them achieve home ownership with the implementation of the Ministry for Pacific Peoples (MPP) Pacific Housing Initiative, said Pacific Peoples Minister Aupito William Sio. In July 2021, MPP launched the Pacific Community Housing Provider Registration Support programme and the Pacific ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    4 days ago
  • Coastal shipping will help keep New Zealand’s supply chain buoyant
    Transport Minister Michael Wood today welcomed the release of the Coastal Shipping Investment Approach State-of-Play report as an important step towards a more sustainable coastal shipping sector, which will further diversify New Zealand’s supply chain. “This Government is committed to strengthening our domestic supply chain by making coastal shipping a ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    4 days ago
  • Response to Human Rights Commission's reports into violence towards disable people
    Tēnā koutou, tēnā koutou, tēnā tātou katoa.   Thank you for that introduction Hemi and thank you for inviting me to respond on behalf of Government to the release of these two important reports (Whakamanahia Te Tiriti, Whakahaumarutia te Tangata -Honour the Treaty, Protect the Person and Whakamahia te Tūkino kore ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    4 days ago
  • Law change strengthens petroleum decommissioning regulation
    Petroleum permit and licence holders operating in New Zealand will now have an explicit statutory requirement to carry out and fund the decommissioning of oil and gas fields after a new law was given Royal assent today, says Energy and Resources Minister Dr Megan Woods. Once in effect The Crown ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    5 days ago
  • New Zealand Response to assist peace and stability in Solomon Islands
    The New Zealand government has announced that it will deploy Defence Force and Police personnel to Honiara to help restore peace and stability. “New Zealand is committed to its responsibilities and playing its part in upholding regional security,” Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern said.  “We are deeply concerned by the recent ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    5 days ago
  • Continued growth in volume of new home consents
    In the year ended October 2021, 47,715 new homes were consented, up 26 per cent from the October 2020 year. In October 2021, 4,043 new dwellings were consented Canterbury’s new homes consented numbers rose 31% to higher than post-earthquake peak. New home consents continue to reach remarkable levels of growth, ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    5 days ago
  • Saddle up for summer with cycle trail funding
    New investment will keep the best of New Zealand’s cycle trails in top condition as regions prepare to welcome back Kiwi visitors over summer and international tourists from next year. “Cycle tourism is one of the most popular ways to see the country ‘off the beaten track’ but the trails ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    5 days ago
  • New Zealand provides additional funding to COVAX for vaccine delivery
    Foreign Affairs Minister Nanaia Mahuta today announced additional funding will be provided to COVAX to support vaccine delivery in developing countries. “New Zealand remains cognisant of the dangers of COVID-19, especially as new variants continue to emerge. No one is safe from this virus until we all are and this ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    5 days ago
  • COVID-19 Community fund providing support for 160 organisations focused on women and girls
    Minister for Women Jan Tinetti today announced financial support will be allocated to the 160 successful applicants for the COVID-19 Community Fund, to support organisations helping women/wāhine and girls/kōtiro in Aotearoa New Zealand affected by the pandemic. “COVID-19 has had a disproportionate effect on women around the world including in ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    5 days ago
  • Government delivers reactivation package as Aucklanders reconnect for summer
    A new support package will help revive economic, social and cultural activities in our largest city over summer, and ensure those in hardship also get relief. The Social Development and Employment Minister Carmel Sepuloni and the Economic and Regional Development Minister Stuart Nash have announced a Reactivating Tāmaki Makaurau Auckland ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    5 days ago
  • Mobile services and broadband come to Chatham Islands for first time
    World class mobile and broadband services have been switched on for the 663 residents of the Chatham Islands, Minister for the Digital Economy and Communications, David Clark and Minister for Economic and Regional Development, Stuart Nash announced today. “This eagerly awaited network will provide fast broadband and mobile services to ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    5 days ago
  • Crown accounts reflect strong economy amid pandemic
    The Government’s financial accounts continue to reflect an economy that has performed better than expected, despite the latest Delta COVID-19 outbreak. The Crown accounts for the four months to the end of October factors in the improved starting position for the new financial year. Core Crown tax revenue was $2.5 ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    5 days ago
  • Applications open for new 2021 Resident Visa
    The first round of applications for New Zealand’s new 2021 Resident visa open today (6am). “This one-off pathway provides certainty for a great many migrant families who have faced disruption because of COVID-19 and it will help retain the skills New Zealand businesses need to support the economic recovery,” Minister ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    6 days ago
  • More Vietnam Veterans to receive compensation for Agent Orange Exposure
    Minister for Veterans, the Hon Meka Whaitiri announced today that two new conditions associated with Agent Orange exposure have been added to the Prescribed Conditions List. Under the 2006 Memorandum of Understanding signed between the Crown and representatives of Vietnam veterans and the Royal New Zealand RSA. Vietnam veterans in ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    6 days ago
  • Government commits to international effort to ban and regulate killer robots
    Minister of Disarmament and Arms Control Phil Twyford announced today that New Zealand will push for new international law to ban and regulate autonomous weapons systems (AWS), which once activated can select and engage targets without further human intervention. “While the evidence suggests fully autonomous weapons systems are not yet ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    6 days ago
  • New freedom camping rules – right vehicle, right place
    Tougher freedom camping laws will be introduced to prevent abuse which has placed an unfair burden on small communities and damaged our reputation as a high quality visitor destination. Tourism Minister Stuart Nash has confirmed that new legislation will be introduced to Parliament following an extensive round of public consultation ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    6 days ago
  • Government invests to support a classic Kiwi summer
    Vaccinated New Zealanders can look forward to Kiwi summer events with confidence, while artists and crew will have more certainty, following the launch of details of the Arts and Culture Event Support Scheme, Minister for Arts, Culture and Heritage Carmel Sepuloni announced today. “The Government recognises that the arts and ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    6 days ago
  • Grace period for expired driver licences cruises into 2022
    Due to the ongoing Delta outbreak and extended lockdowns, all New Zealand driver licences and licence endorsements that expired on or after 21 July 2021 will now be valid until 31 May 2022, Transport Minister Michael Wood announced today. “This further extension to the validity of driver licenses recognises that ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    6 days ago
  • Delivered: 1,000 extra transitional homes
    A further 1,000 transitional homes delivered  New housing development starts in Flaxmere, Hastings  The Government has delivered the next 1,000 transitional housing places it promised, as part of its work to reduce homelessness. Housing Minister Dr Megan Woods is marking the milestone in Hastings at a new development that includes ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    6 days ago
  • Traffic light levels announced
    The levels at which different parts of New Zealand will move forward into the COVID-19 Protection Framework this Friday have been announced. Northland, Auckland, Taupō and Rotorua Lakes Districts, Kawerau, Whakatane, Ōpōtiki Districts, Gisborne District, Wairoa District, Rangitikei, Whanganui and Ruapehu Districts will move in at Red The rest of ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • Financial support to move to traffic light system
    A new transition payment will be made available particularly for affected businesses in Auckland, Waikato and Northland to acknowledge the restrictions they have faced under the higher Alert Levels. Transition payment of up to $24,000 as businesses move into traffic light system Leave Support Scheme and Short Term Absence Payment ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • New Ambassador to Russia announced
    Foreign Affairs Minister Nanaia Mahuta today announced the appointment of Sarah Walsh as New Zealand’s next Ambassador to Russia. “Aotearoa New Zealand and Russia have a long-standing relationship, engaging on a range of regional and global interests including disarmament and Antarctica issues. We also work together as members of the East ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • New Permanent Representative to the UN announced
    Foreign Affairs Minister Nanaia Mahuta today announced the appointment of Carolyn Schwalger as Permanent Representative to the New Zealand Permanent Mission to the United Nations in New York. “Aotearoa New Zealand is a founding member of the UN and we have worked hard to ensure our stance on human rights, ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • Further COVID-19 economic support for Cook Islands and Fiji announced
    Foreign Affairs Minister Nanaia Mahuta today announced a further package of support for the Cook Islands and Fiji for COVID-19 economic support and recovery. “Aotearoa New Zealand remains committed to supporting our Pacific fanau and vuvale to respond to the impacts of COVID-19 on their economies, and move towards long-term ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • New law will clear the air for tamariki in vehicles
    From today, it’s illegal to smoke or vape in most vehicles carrying children aged under 18 years old - whether the vehicle is moving or not. “Second-hand smoke poses an unacceptable risk to our tamariki and rangatahi,” Associate Minister of Health Dr Ayesha Verrall said. “We know children in vehicles ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • Nine countries designated very high risk
    Nine southern African countries are being added to the very high risk countries list following public health advice around the newly discovered COVID-19 variant Omicron, COVID-19 Response Minister Chris Hipkins said. This afternoon, a public health risk assessment was carried out to assess the emerging evidence and any risk to ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago