web analytics

RMA reforms … be very afraid

Written By: - Date published: 9:00 am, January 20th, 2015 - 95 comments
Categories: act, Environment, greens, housing, labour, national, national/act government, peter dunne, sustainability - Tags: , , ,

Key my work here is done

In 2013 National released proposals for reform of the Resource Management Act.  I blogged about the changes here.  The announcement by Minister Amy Adams is here but for some freaking reason the document appears to have disappeared from MFE’s website although there is this Web Archive download of the page.

The reforms followed the usual modus operandi of the Government.  Use anecdotal evidence to justify sweeping changes.  Announce a whole lot of different areas of reform.  Move quickly and trust that confusion will set in.

At the time I said this:

National is utterly predictable.  Bash beneficiaries, weaken employee protection, attack the trade unions, and trash the environment represents for it business as usual.

Yesterday it announced its proposal for further changes to the Resource Management Act.  Most of the changes are technical and it will be difficult to get ordinary Kiwis upset with what is proposed.  But the changes are at best misguided and will do nothing to maintain existing environmental protection.

When you read the press release the proposes do not appear so bad.  The one plan idea is something that Auckland is doing already.  And who can disagree with increased accountability?

The headline grabbing proposal will be increasing the supply of useable land so that there is a decade’s worth available for projected growth.  National sees a political imperative in appearing to be doing something about housing affordability.

The Minister will be given greater power to intervene.  The party that championed [attacks on] Nanny State is more than happy to give itself increased power as long as it is the party in control.

The Summary of Reform Proposals also released yesterday contains worrying detail.

Sections 6 and 7 of the RMA are to be consolidated into one section.  This is a retrograde step.  Section 6 currently states that the protection of various environmental features are matters of national significance.  Section 7 sets out other things that need to be considered.  Consolidating them will weaken the protective imperatives in the Act.

The proposed new wording for the section has a number of damaging changes.  The new section would remove the need to protect outstanding natural features and landscapes unless they are specifically identified.  The protection of historic heritage from inappropriate subdivision and development is watered down.  The ethic of stewardship for the environment is removed.  The maintenance and enhancement of amenity values will no longer be a consideration.  And the maintenance and enhancement of the quality of the environment disappears as a principle.

A new principle is added.  If passed the effective functioning of the built environment, including the availability of land to support changes in population and urban development demand, will be a major consideration when making decisions under the RMA.

When you compare the existing wording of sections 6 and 7 to what is proposed you can see that it is intended that the environmental protection provided by the RMA will be weakened.

Both Labour and the Greens opposed the proposals.  Maryan Street said at the time:

By saying that these reforms will open up land for affordable housing is the most deceitful part of John Key’s approach. The government has lots of levers it should have pulled over the last five years to address our critical affordable housing shortage. Now when the noise around it has become too loud for the National Party to ignore any longer, they try to pretend that the RMA has been the problem.

The real danger is that the RMA is being turned into an Economic Development Act and environmental protections are being sacrificed in the process.

And the Greens Eugene Sage said this:

The changes to the Act’s purpose and principles are based on ideology rather than any evidence or substantive analysis of the need for change.  As the Ministry for the Environment’s on the Minister’s February 2013 discussion document says, “ Submitters were concerned there was an absence of reliable evidence – beyond anecdotes and case studies- on which statements were made. Such concerns were evident irrespective of the submitters’ position regarding the intent of the Discussion Document.”

The bill stalled.  Peter Dunne grew a spine and along with the Maori Party told John Key they would not support the bill.  National and in particular Amy Adams had a great deal of egg on their faces.  National then said that they would review the proposals after the election.

Nick Smith is to announce proposed changes to the RMA tomorrow and to release a treasury paper on the issue.  As Ad noted this is frankly weird.  Surely the Ministry for the Environment, not Treasury, should be the department to announce changes.  I agree we have reason to be very afraid.

Presumably the previous proposed changes will again be announced.  Smith has said that the reforms will also address what changes to strategic housing area laws will be made as the SHA provisions are subject to a sunset clause.  I anticipate that major features of the changes will be the head on attack of any concept of a compact city, the further removal of rights of individuals and communities to have a say in proposed developments and further measures to make the RMA developer friendly.

The Act is meant to be there to provide some environmental protection.  Environmental standards are getting worse, not better.  I think we have reason to be very afraid with what National is intending.

 

 


lprent: As anticipated National is pressing ahead with the same failed plan from last time

Smith signalled that National was reviewing the most contentious of its proposed reforms of the RMA, covering changes to the act’s principles – a move critics have argued would aid development – but otherwise the tone of today’s speech was consistent with the last term.

In other words a figleaf to allow the “blue-greens” to hide their wee genitals behind.

Green MP Julie Anne Genter puts it more clearly in “RMA changes won’t build more homes

The National Government must stop using the Resource Management Act as the straw man for its own failure to build more homes and put an end to the country’s housing crisis, the Green Party says.

Indeed. Despite the blustering bankrupt at Whaleoil whining from the cheap seats that Auckland City Council has been dragging its feet on the Special Housing Areas, the reality is that the legislation was as unnecessary as the these RMA ‘reforms’ are.

The reality is that even if the price of fuel drops to half of what it is now, the jobs aren’t out in the rural countryside that Nick Smiths mates have land-banked. There isn’t enough fast efficient public transport to get residents to jobs.

So the only houses that will be going out that far are supersized MacMansions that will have no effect on house prices driven by the lower end of the market. And developers aren’t building affordable homes. RMA changes make absolutely no difference to that equation.

Basically this government is in the process of dismantling the only long-term solution for affordable homes. The purchasing power of the State Houses.

Stupid fools in National are doing the ideological stupidity again – just as they foisted leaky building on us..

 

 

95 comments on “RMA reforms … be very afraid”

  1. millsy 1

    Making money trumps clean air, water and natural vistas.

    Money money money. I want money. Who cares if we have to wear gas masks to work in town or the local river is choked with toxic waste.

    • Murray Rawshark 1.1

      You’re missing the point. If you can own enough of the new houses, you’ll never have to work again.

  2. framu 2

    WTF is treasury even doing being associated with this anyway? – its high time they stopped being a politicised wing of the public service – or – form their own party.

    And for gods sake media –

    1) stop using what the any MP claim a bill will do as a gospel version of the intent of a bill
    2) start pointing out that increasing land supply wont = cheaper houses!!!!!!!! (the nats and acts own frickin ideology says otherwise for starters)

    ————————————————————-

    and do we have to discuss Little coming out this morning with (paraphrasing) “we also support this bill but could everyone please stop for 20 minutes while i explain the detail of what im saying” – for gods sake – all anyone took from that story was “labour supports nationals RMA reforms”

    Couldnt we have had something more like “Labour supports an honest, independant review of the RMA, but with nationals track record we are highly skeptical of the real purpose of this bill”

    Why the hell are labour ALSO talking about this as if the nats intent is good and fair reform – its not, so why play their framing on the issue.

    Stop jumping on the band wagon – find better ways to say things – drop the “me too” – be the opposition for a change

    ————————————————————-

    OK – rant over, sorry folks. (the RNZ piece this morning got me riled up a bit) 🙂

    • Ross 2.1

      framu, no need for apology. If that is what Little said this morning then, to paraphrase what you eloquently said, WTFF. Little is an Obama to me (so far). Glimpses of promise that get trashed by action on the ground. Yes, framu, we do need to discuss!

      • framu 2.1.1

        its the continual “following the framing” and a utter inability to think of a better way to say something in a simple, concise fashion that gets me

    • Ross 2.2

      Just listened to the audio. Yes, the ONLY message in it is, Labour supports hobbling the RMA. Period. That isn’t what Little was actually saying and good party faithful will no doubt leap to his defense. But perception is all and the message most will hear is, Labour supports National. WTF do we need an opposition for then?

      Couldnt we have had something more like “Labour supports an honest, independant review of the RMA, but with nationals track record we are highly skeptical of the real purpose of this bill”

      How about: “These people have trashed the economy, attacked the poor and defenseless, enriched their mates, massively increased inequality and are rampant climate change deniers. If you think that Labour would support them to bugger the RMA you’re crazy. The answer is NO and we will be doing everything in our power to make sure it doesn’t happen.”

      • tracey 2.2.1

        now “we” on the Left have to trust (based on what??) that if Little succeeds in making the middle think he wll keep on the Nat programme but with a nod to poor folks now and then, he will in government give more of a shit about the poor than the middle?

        • framu 2.2.1.1

          true

          but the take away from the interview was very much national lite – which hasnt worked

          considering these are people who have professional comms people to support them i think we could expect some better use of the english language that demonstrates that labour arent out to get middle NZ – BUT – they arent national lite

          Its not like labour havent ever had their detailed communications reduced to a soundbite that works against them before

      • framu 2.2.2

        “That isn’t what Little was actually saying and good party faithful will no doubt leap to his defense. ”

        yes – thats true. Im very much talking about “the punters in punter land” here

  3. tracey 3

    Hiding the Minister responsible from any backlash?

    Did peter Dunne die after the election? And the Maori Party?

    • Lanthanide 3.1

      “Did peter Dunne die after the election?”

      He was being interviewed this morning on RNZ, saying that he knew absolutely nothing about this new bill because National had not spoken to him about it, and he was taking a ‘wait and see’ approach. He thinks the current RMA forms a good baseline where environmental concerns are a fundamental part of any development, but expects that with National’s changes the environmental concerns will instead just be “one of many” for any development.

  4. saveNZ 4

    In dirty politics type of way, the MSM and government message is to get rid of the RMA and to fast track through subdivisions and consents.

    However who does this benefit? The landowners and people sitting on greenfield land or land in the inner city which can be further subdivided for more houses and apartments or people who want to build a house that infringes on others rights. It also benefit corporations who want to pollute. With the TTPA it will be multi nationals right to pollute.

    Fancy a mine next to you, a McDonalds, not being able to collect rainwater in the future but have to pay some corporation for water. It is all in the cards. You won’t get any sunlight into your home as your neighbour exercises his right to go above the height to boundary guidelines. effectively privatising public spaces. (i.e. the right of shared space in-between dwellings). Remember the high rises in the CBD that were built right next to each other blocking up the windows, welcome this to a suburb near you!

    There is not a lot of current amenity protection for landowners but it is going to be reduced even further under National.

    The assumption is that the land is the issue for expensive housing in NZ, has been carefully created by the powerful and their ‘focus’ groups but the real reason is far more varied and complicated.

    Building materials is virtually a monopoly. In spite of the leaky building fiasco no building company has ever been held to account as far as I am aware.

    Transport is a major issue, you can build further out, but it costs to drive in everyday.But no consideration is given to this. Current occupants of the city will now have to battle with the 1000’s of new drivers commuting in, everyday.

    The crack down of builders have made them very unwilling to work on cheaper developments or renovations. They prefer the 4 bedroom 3 bathroom central city McMansions, money no object and less risk. There could have been an insurance scheme adopted by council (like earthquake commission levy) but no, just put the onus on the little guy.

    Council fees are horrendous. Last year council increased their fees for resources consents by about 65% as far as I can make out in Auckland.

    Immigration is on the rise, and investing in property one of the ways to get citizenship!

    It is making the poor poorer as Kiwis are being forced out of their houses as land is subdivided around them and build up without looking at it’s effects on neighbours and amenity.

    How this is manifesting is that one neighbour wins by developing a large house out of height to boundary, taking views and sun, without having to do any expert work like structural engineering or geo tech reports or even use a qualified architect or traffic plans (if out of main centres). This is ‘fast tracked’ as supposedly it is ‘helping’ create more houses. However it is not only not affordable, it is driving the prices up in the area, taking away builders from cheaper projects and changing the culture of an area.

    The council do not seem to understand that you need to encourage smaller houses to make them more affordable and more sustainable to reduce living costs in them.

    Planners are salivating like Pavlovs Dogs in a frenzy of destruction to create the world’s most unlivable city in Auckland and probably Christchurch too.

    The ratepayers and taxpayer will pick up the bill as all the issues come to light which are supposed to be picked up in resource consent states but not being assessed properly in the frenzy.

    And the houses, well lets face it, even few current landowners will be able to afford Auckland, they will be tenants in their own cities.

    The writing is on the wall, 1% of landowners are soon to own 99% of the world’s resources and NZ is a total example of how that is working.

  5. Yep the final looting has begun. I said several years ago the the eye of Mordor is upon us. Behold the pending blackness!

    • Heather Grimwood 5.1

      Looting?…..I call it out-and-out rape of our wonderful piece of the globe, it’s beauty and open spaces reduced even in my lifetime through greed.

  6. saveNZ 6

    Pollute More to help the Poor!

  7. saveNZ 7

    Don’t assess just regress!

  8. saveNZ 8

    It’s a pity Labour is being so NationalLite on this, as property rights is one of the big issues for Kiwis and a good way to get support from middle NZ. A house is most Kiwi’s biggest asset and retirement policy and and changes that property are very important to their owners.

    Having a home devalued by a high rise or McMansion, beach covered in oil, fracking coming to a national park near you, trees of importance cut down in your neighbourhood tends to make even hard core National voters think twice. Amenity although devalued in RMA, is actually what makes most people live in a city or suburb and stay there. It is very important to the public.

    Not up on what Labour has to say but judging from comments…… NationalLite.

    PLEASE CUT THE CRAP!

    NZ likes the “cut the crap” version of Little not the NationalLIte.

    Did someone say in this comments…grow a spine?

    • tracey 8.1

      when the “right” to own a home goes up against the environment… just whose side do ya reckon labour will come down on?

      I dont get why the solution has to be one thing (de regulation and sacrifice of environment) over another (log jamming development). We are fucking human beings, why cant we use our creativity? Cos of vested interests, personal and company… Surely we can balance this stuff?

      People Environment Money

      rather than
      Money
      people
      Environment

      or
      environment
      people
      money

      • Naturesong 8.1.1

        Environment
        People
        Money

        No environment = no people, no money.

        If you want people and money, don’t poison your lands or gut your fisheries.

        • McFlock 8.1.1.1

          But if environment is strictly prioritised above all else, there’s no room for people.

          I don’t think we’re anywhere close to that stage, but the fact is that if we wanted the environment to be perfect then all of NZ would be like one of those DoC islands that have highly restricted access for fear of the harm that visitors might do.

          Similarly, chasing the money for cheaper rail cars (despite being a false economy anyway) stuffed a lot of NZ workers’ quality of life.

          I agree with Tracey – it’s a compromise between $$, quality of life, and the environment.

    • Wayne 8.2

      Generally being immediately adjacent to a “McMansion” (or several) will increase the value of your property. It tells buyers that you are in a suburb that is increasing in value.

      • One Anonymous Bloke 8.2.1

        Is this another of your deeply held beliefs, or do you have some real world reason to make that statement?

      • vto 8.2.2

        Hi Wayne, what do you think of this Cree chief’s statement some 200-plus years ago? Uncannily accurate wouldn’t you think? What is your government doing about it? For example – Amy Adams upping the pollutants allowable in rivers to a point that makes them undrinkable? Congratulations – your government has brought this wise chief’s statement to its end point.

        RMA reforms … be very afraid

        “When all the trees have been cut down,
        when all the animals have been hunted,
        when all the waters are polluted,
        when all the air is unsafe to breathe,
        only then will you discover you cannot eat money.”

        What do you think?

      • saveNZ 8.2.3

        Not if a McMansion is poorly designed and infringes on another property’s light, space privacy and views.

        For some people their home is not about money, it is seen as a ‘living’ space to raise a family and their amenity is actually more important to them the property values rising!

        • Wayne 8.2.3.1

          saveNZ,

          Fair point. I was making a more general point about how increases in house quality (provided they are not the ugliest thing on the planet) in a suburb generally raises the capital value of the suburb. And there is a vast amount of evidence to support that proposition

          As it happens, I live in a 100 year old Historic Place Cat 3 house in Bayswater, Auckland, so McMansions are not really my thing.

          Question – would you regard the PM’s place in Parnell as a McMansion, or is it too tastefully done to fall into that category.

          • vto 8.2.3.1.1

            Key’s Omaha beach house is a mcmansion and an old yucky one at that.

            Wayne, I would be interested in your thoughts on my reply to you just above ….

            • Wayne 8.2.3.1.1.1

              VTO,

              Taking the Cree statement literally, it is correct.

              But is that really the choice in front of us?

              For instance in North East US, the area of forest is increasing as marginal farm land is left to revert back to forest.

              The same is true in New Zealand. Much of the back country in inland Whanganui, the East Coast, and inland Hawkes Bay has reverted back to bush, since it was burnout as farmland 70 to 80 years ago. Overall the area of forested land in New Zealand is increasing. High quality farmland, however, is being more intensively farmed, which can raise water quality issues. But they are solvable.

              As for urbanisation, yes, it uses some land, often good land, but as a percentage of the overall area, it is quite small. And if people grow vegetables and fruit trees, it still retains a proportion of its productive output, even if it is not measured in a monetary way (though of course the money spent through garden centres does go through the economy). In fact the total biomass of a well developed suburb may not be much less than farmland, given how intensively people develop their gardens. There must be studies done on this.

              In Auckland, the water and air quality is improving. I know this in my own area of Ngataringa Bay. Over the 14 years that I have been living beside Ngataringa Bay, the water quality has significantly improved (not that I would yet risk eating the shellfish – but maybe tests would show that they are actually OK).

              Fundamentally I am an optimist about our capacity to improve our environment.

              Incidentally there has been great fishing in the Hauraki Gulf this year. The workups around the Moko Hinau Islands were amazing, so the fishery as measured anectodally by me over many years seems pretty good.

              • vto

                Wayne, great answer which neatly avoids the important and damaging issues and swings the matter to more easily and pleasantly swallowed ideas – you should be a politician…

                ..example being your claim about water quality. Water quality in New Zealand rivers has been comprehensively shown to have significantly deteriorated over the last few decades, of that there is no doubt, Yet you talk about perhaps one minor watery place where it is improving. To take that further – as stated above, Any Adams river water standards allow rivers to deteriorate further to such a level that we cannot swim in them or dink from them. That is pollution. For money.

                So …. overall I give you no pass mark on the realities, but a pass mark as a politician in nicely avoiding the issue and painting a more pleasant picture. If only such skills were useful to the human race… eh wayne.

              • Halfcrown

                “Fundamentally I am an optimist about our capacity to improve our environment.

                Incidentally there has been great fishing in the Hauraki Gulf this year. The workups around the Moko Hinau Islands were amazing, so the fishery as measured anectodally by me over many years seems pretty good.”

                Yeah right. Have you seen this?
                http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=10744343

                Once again nothing but rightwing bullshit.

          • One Anonymous Bloke 8.2.3.1.2

            Vast, yet un-linkable, apparently.

          • saveNZ 8.2.3.1.3

            My definition of a McMansion is when it is all about the size…. everything upsized, and too small for the section so you get large houses generally gated (to keep the riff raft out) and very dominant in the space. They are modern not historic (nope I would not say your place or the PM’s place in Parnell a McMansion as historic so have a sense of place). They are a pastiche of design. Car parking tends to be a feature. They tend to be multi-storey as low rise is just not dominant enough. You have to be the biggest – big is best and greed is good!

      • Murray Simmonds 8.2.4

        Jeeze, Wayne!

  9. Stickler 9

    When the Resource Management Act was at the planning and drafting stage, Treasury’s representative on the committee doing the work so strongly objected to the focus on environmental management and protection that she withdrew from the committee’s report and recommendations and wrote her own separate paper with a blueprint focussing on development. Historic fact.

    So it’s no surprise that Treasury sees the issue as revolving round a nail, because a hammer is its only instrument. Money, money, money, which one acquires via ripping shit out of the environment.

    By the way, did you notice that Nick Smith’s laying of the blame for Auckland’s housing problem made no mention of the massive contribution to housing costs made by the inflated prices of building materials in this country. That must remain the Rort Which Has No Name, so long as the construction sector continues to make big donations to Party funds.

    • framu 9.1

      of course he wouldnt – that would draw attention to the fact that what they are really doing is giving a govt funded kick back to developers

    • tracey 9.2

      Hi Stickler, can you post a link to the Treasury official resigning and their paper?

    • Murray Rawshark 9.3

      Fletchers have been given carte blanche by all governments since the 1930s. They basically began as a government department under private ownership. I’ve known a couple of builders who have had real problems with them. They really need bringing to heel. But they’re only one element of the problem, and all the problems lead back to capitalism.

  10. Any thing Nick Smith has to do with will mean maximum dollars in to the coffers and minimum dollars out, just as he did while in charge of ACC.

    His use by date is well past.

  11. Leaving aside whether these particular reforms are appropriate or not, the RMA badly needs reform if affordable housing is to be a realistic goal.
    At the moment council zones land they propose is suitable for development and gives it a classification eg medium density residential. This is land they deem is appropriate for that particular density of housing. One would assume therefore that if an interested party came along and put forward a development proposal that was fully compliant then the application would be straight forward and would be processed in due course. At the moment this is not the case.
    Here are some observations based on knowledge of a project I am very familiar with. Firstly, the RMA process has largely been hijacked by mid level bureaucrats who hide behind a plethora of excuses to frustrate and delay projects that they don’t personally agree with. Coupled with this the elected officials are generally just not smart enough or able enough to find their way through this morass, and are frequently mislead by council officers.
    Planning and RMA staff frequently use the flimsiest of pretexts to push projects into suspension so that their statutory obligation to process applications within a time frame can be avoided. In the case I am referring to this delayed the project by 18 months during which time council increased their development levies from $15k per lot to $33k per lot. Over a 100 lot subdivision this increases costs by $1.8m, all of which is unbudgeted and can only be passed on to the new home owner. $18k increase from one fiscal period to another is huge and in the recent environment unjustifiable. Now if the fee was applied at the time of application there would be some onus on council to be more effective.
    In the particular subdivision I am referring to the application was compliant in every respect, but it still took 18 months and along the way council required design changes that they ultimately changed their minds over.
    15 months into the application Council indicated that they would not provide water and sewerage connections. This in spite of the applicant being told during prepurchase due diligence that connections would be available. So after committing to a multimillion dollar purchase based on councils advise on zoning and connections council accepted the application and 15 months later resiled from their advice and also lifted their development charges. Their attitude was if you don’t like it take it to the environment court! It was only the threat of civil litigation over an inducement to buy, false advice and inducement to spend money on the application they didn’t intend to process that they saw sense.
    The land was zoned, council advice was obtained during due diligence, a compliant application was made, and that should have been the end of it.
    At that time council did not have an Environmental Officer and they expressed concern that there may be a water course in the construction area and they required an opinion from an eminent consulting firm. This advice unequivocally supported our position, but the council officer didn’t like it and forced another peer opinion from another eminent consulting firm which we also had to pay for and which also confirmed the first firms opinion. Council then decided that they would hold things up until they appointed their new Environmental officer.
    Now the point of all the above is this. Ratepayers in general have no idea how shonky their councils are in business dealings with other parties. After 30 years in general business where honourable people did what they said they would do, and paid their bills, it has been an absolute shock to see first hand how inefficient, dishonest and fraudulent some council staff can be. An example. Council decided they wanted over sized sewerage pipes to allow for another future development that would soon take place. They asked the developer if he would install these and council would pay the difference. As construction was already underway a meeting was held on site, pipes were sent back, new ones delivered, and the price increase agreed with a handshake and work continued. When the developer went in to council to pay their $1m+ fees they deducted the approx $40 k for the pipes only to be told by 5 mangers sitting around the table that they had changed their minds about paying for the difference in pipe sizes. Now in my view this is totally fraudulent behaviour, especially as they said to the developer ‘if you want to pick up your 221c then you will have to suck it up’.
    Later they decided they wanted to reroute some of their own sewage lines through a corner of the development and were told it would cost them $40k. They paid up without question.
    There is a lot more I could say about council, but then people would probably think I was exaggerating, which hand on heart I am not.
    So in summary my experience is that council staff right up to director level freely tell porkies when it suits them. They lose files, reneg on their own advice, delay and procrastinate all the time whilst making public noises about affordable housing. What a joke. To make matters worse in the Auckland area the same tired old elected officials in the separate area councils have turned up on the Super City council. So we have as a group an under qualified, under experienced elected council operating in an increasingly more complex environment.
    Len Brown was interviewed on TV3 3-4 weeks ago and he proudly proclaimed the number of new permits issued in their affordable housing drive. I just about chocked. My partner and I with no other resources or organisation got more houses built on our own!
    What I want to impart here is that whether or not these are good changes, and I am not confident about this one way or the other, the RMA does badly need overhaul.

    • tracey 11.1

      “freely tell porkies when it suits them. They lose files, reneg on their own advice, delay and procrastinate all the time whilst making public noises about … (fill in the gap here). What a joke.

      I agree with this but I don’t have as much trouble with Planners who work from the Legislation and understand it much more. The biggest problem Joe and Josephine Average faces is with the works department and the council officers . Mmany do not truly understand the BA, let alone the RMA and have a “because I said so” attitude to any challenge or question. Council officers in the works department seem to set their backs against professionals, so I often get my clients to call them directly. They treat owners with respect and because they are confidant they know more than average owners.

      Council, especially Auckland is HUGE and the power they wield enormous.

      There is a middle ground but I dont believe the regulations are the problem nearly as much as the revenue gathering and “just do what we tell you” attitude. Worst of all, speak to two different officers, get two different versions, and then one denies ever saying it.

      The RMA is a big piece of legislation. Because of this our media will not read it, wont put a specialist on it, will go for soundbites from politicians, and a developer and in about 6 weeks MSM will print an article actually analysing the changes. the public will understand the changes only through soundbites.

      In a nutshell Once was Pete, I sympathise with your scenario BUT I believe you are mainly talking about a culture not the RMA per se. Some of your problems may have BA based as well, which is separate from RMA. Councils remain full of people who wield power well beyond their experience or knowledge levels. That wont change with a new RMA.

      • Once was Pete 11.1.1

        Thanks for the response. You are definitely right about the culture but one aspect of reform needs to be in the way councils respond. Seriously, sometimes council staff dream up such nonsense to sideline an application, and there is no recourse to this except to grit your teeth and try and place nice, otherwise it gets worse.
        if fees were set at the time of application at least it would put responsibility on council to respond in a timely manner.

        • tracey 11.1.1.1

          They are never untimely chasing fees.

        • One Anonymous Bloke 11.1.1.2

          It isn’t even though the statistics are hard to find, and yet the only argument the property developers can muster is that there was this dog, whose previous owner flatted with a guy who had a girlfriend who built a house, and resource consent was hard to obtain.

          Still, I expect it’s more cost effective to join Cabinet Club: why go to the trouble of constructing an argument when you can simply pay the National Party to change the law?

        • framu 11.1.1.3

          “if fees were set at the time of application at least it would put responsibility on council to respond in a timely manner.”

          that actually sounds like a good idea (though im just the “man in the street”)

    • millsy 11.2

      Whine whine whine.

      Perhaps you should just not turn this country into a parking lot, traitor,

      And development fees pay for parks and libraries.

    • vto 11.3

      Once was pete, your post there is so full of shit I have printed it out and flushed it down the dunny.

      • millsy 11.3.1

        That’s a good one…

      • Once was Pete 11.3.2

        Don’t be such a dipstick! These costs go straight on to section costs. Explain to me (if you can) how a 220% increase in charges after application is made helps new home owners.
        You don’t know me, you don’t know what I do, and you don’t know the merits of my position, so you have no basis for calling me a traitor. What do you want – for people to sleep in their cars or under a bridge? Some short advice for you Millsy, if you can’t discuss like an adult, stay out of the dialogue.

      • Once was Pete 11.3.3

        Actually, every word the truth and lots left unsaid. Happy to sign and affidavit on it or swear to it in court. The surveyors, engineers, and environmental consultants all have the same opinion. Why do you think the planning consultancy sector has mushroomed so much? It is because consent applications are a minefield and a nightmare. You obviously have absolutely no experience or understanding of this area.
        Another bigot who is unable to discuss and resorts to abuse.

        • One Anonymous Bloke 11.3.3.1

          Obviously the shiny new legislation will be immune from official incompetence and/or malice /sarc.

        • vto 11.3.3.2

          Yes it was abuse. It was abuse because, contrary to your claim, I deal with Councils and RMA resource consents constantly and have done so since inception in 1991. On a larger scale.

          I see two types of people dealing with Councils and resource consents.

          One, those that engage with Council early and frequently, treat them with respect, and approach the process with care and professional attention. Never a problem. Never. Don’t have the problems you encounter and hear of – ever.

          Two, those who whinge and complain, even before they have got underway, treat staff with disrespect and bad mouth them, do not understand or anticipate the process, and just barge in loaded with arrogance and abuse. They always have problems. I wonder why.

          You know the funny thing owp? I see people like you all the time and you make it easier for people like us because the Council staff would rather deal with us so we go to the top of the pile – ha ha ha, suck it up dick. Seen it loads of times. Keep up the good work – couldn’t do without you.

          • tracey 11.3.3.2.1

            I agree that the two categories you speak of exist BUT there is a third. Well-meaning people who ask questions innocently and end up unwittingly rubbing an officer up the wrong way, and bingo, delays and problems.

            PART of the officer’s job is to help people understand the process. I speak from the point of view of someone who is usually in the owners section, not the developers section which is streamlined and dealt with differently to ordinary folks 😉

            • vto 11.3.3.2.1.1

              True. Seen that too. Unfortunate – really unfortunate – for the owner, the Council, and wider policy-setting, as such problems get inflated to the point where a bad government uses it as an excuse to implement changes to the RMA which are damaging i.e. current situation

    • One Anonymous Bloke 11.4

      OWP uses one piece of anecdata in support of the mantra we’ve heard so many times. Funny, that after all this time the acolytes can’t quote the statistics that “presumably” support the anecdata.

      Perhaps that’s because the statistics show the RMA was working or something. Perish the thought.

      • Once was Pete 11.4.1

        What a load of rubbish. You have jumped to a false conclusion and fallen in a heap. Firstly, all our relationships with builders, consultants, suppliers, council and others are always carried out in a collegial and respectful way. We only employed top ranked consultants and advisors. You would not be able to find one person in our orbit who would say otherwise. Only a fool goes in to any contact in an adversarial manner. You obviously have a very narrow experience base, because if you talked around the planning consultants in Auckland they would pretty much tell you what I did. And, as for experience we have been in the field a lot earlier than 1991.
        Nothing prepares you for the experience of going to a meeting with council to be told after 15 months there will be no connections for water or sewerage in spite of council advising before purchase that these would be available. It also doesn’t help that the deputy water engineer couldn’t muster a complete sentence in English, or that the sewerage engineer simply said I made a mistake in advising you that a connection would be available before you purchased the land. If land is zoned for a purpose it has a corresponding value. If council arbitrarily decides not to grant some of the rights allowed under the zoning the land no longer has that value.
        Nothing also prepares you for the experience of council officers requesting construction changes for their own reasons and agreeing to pay the difference in costs for them then to reneg. That is just straight fraud. The only reason there wasn’t a complaint was that we were constructively working our way to a 221c.
        As our project application was rolling through we had an approach from consultants employed by government to survey applicants on their experiences so I can tell you we have made all these comments on official forms.
        Just because you are in denial doesn’t mean something isn’t true. Finally, you don’t know if you have seen people like me because you don’t know the first thing about me.

        • vto 11.4.1.1

          I suspect you were trying to reply to my post to you just above.

          I stand by my points and as stated appreciate your work as it makes it easier for us …..

          You do appreciate don’t you that your complaints have nothing whatsoever to do with the RMA and the proposed amendments and everything to do with relationships with Council. Changing the RMA will not change this one iota. End. of. story.

          • Once was Pete 11.4.1.1.1

            Your points are invalid because you have made some erroneous assumptions.
            Not true. The fact that the Act does not give adequate control over the process allows these abuses. The fact that council officers can easily sidestep their statutory response time commitments gives rise to a whole host of issues. You clearly have quite limited experience and understanding.

            • vto 11.4.1.1.1.1

              Nope. It is you who has the limited experience and understanding as evidenced by your lack of success and eternal complaints.

              You should learn how to deal with Councils and the RMA competently and properly so you have no problems. Like us.

              But as stated above, incompetents make it easier for us so do keep up your approach.

              edit: your lack of understanding is further evidenced by the fact you think Council bureaucracies, and more importantly their culture, can be changed by act of Parliament. I mean, seriously, such an idea is bordering on the ludicrous.

              Change your approach fulla – not everyone has your problems.

              • None so blind as those who cannot see. This morning the chair of the Local Bodies Assoc, the spokesperson for The Urban Renewal Action Group. Len brown, and the chair for The property developers Assoc all without qualification issued press releases endorsing the need for changes to the act. Indeed the chair of the Local Govt Assoc specifically mentioned the industry that has developed around the act, the slowness of the bureaucracy, the difficulty for citizens to progress their applications and the increased costs.
                Of course council can be changed by consequences. tying councils to costs at time of application puts responsibility on them to be more efficient.
                I am beginning to wonder what universe you have lived in but it is certainly not the same as the one inhabited by the rest of us. To claim as you did in an earlier comment that you had never ever in effect heard of problems like this underlines my impression that you have very limited and quite low level experience.
                You have also made unwarranted assumptions about how we might have dealt with council. All totally unfounded.

      • Once was Pete 11.4.2

        You clearly didn’t read my post because I clearly stated at the start that I was making no comment about the specific changes being proposed. What I have described is pretty much typical for projects in the Auckland council region. There are very serious shortcomings in the current process which need to be addressed if affordable housing is to be a serious goal.

        • One Anonymous Bloke 11.4.2.1

          If the process were the problem it would be revealed in the stats, if it’s Auckland specific it’s probably the fact that right wing gimps like Rodney Hide know jack shit about writing local government legislation.

          Still, my neighbour used to work for a guy whose lawyer knows a property developer, and he agrees with you.

    • Murray Rawshark 11.5

      Sounds like the culture of council workers needs an upgrade, not the RMA. I had problems with some idiots out West Auckland, who were just downright rude and totally unwilling to help. I suspected they were bitter because they’d failed the intelligence test to be prison screws.

  12. Paul 12

    “When all the trees have been cut down,
    when all the animals have been hunted,
    when all the waters are polluted,
    when all the air is unsafe to breathe,
    only then will you discover you cannot eat money.”

    Cree Prophecy

    • vto 12.1

      Fuck me that Cree chief’s vision of the future was uncannily accurate. And that future is here, amply aided by John Key and his band of fools..

      “When all the trees have been cut down,
      when all the animals have been hunted,
      when all the waters are polluted,
      when all the air is unsafe to breathe,
      only then will you discover you cannot eat money.”

      So what do National Party supporters say to the Cree chief I wonder? I suspect bluff, bluster and abuse before they run away to their headhole in the sand

  13. Paul 13

    “You must teach your children that the ground beneath their feet is the ashes of your grandfathers.
    So that they will respect the land, tell your children that the earth is rich with the lives of our kin.
    Teach your children what we have taught our children, that the earth is our mother.
    Whatever befalls the earth befalls the sons of the earth.
    If men spit upon the ground, they spit upon themselves. “

  14. Paul 14

    “Treat the earth well.
    It was not given to you by your parents,
    it was loaned to you by your children.
    We do not inherit the Earth from our Ancestors,
    we borrow it from our Children.”

  15. wyndham 15

    “The Minister will be given greater power to intervene. The party that championed Nanny State is more than happy to give itself increased power as long as it is the party in control.”

    Something wrong there Micky – – – “championed” ??

    • mickysavage 15.1

      Right you are, will change this to “championed attacks on” …

    • Murray Rawshark 15.2

      I suspect that party will be happy with increased power as well. Both main parties are suffering from a sickness and cannot trust Kiwis. I’d call that a Freudian slip.

  16. vto 16

    In my long experience those who complain about the RMA are those who try to foist ridiculous schemes onto the community and environment. They are most always nutters, psychos and unrealistic idiots. We deal with the RMA all the time and have done so since its implementation – it is absolutely fine.

    These others are simply lazy and just want to eat the environment rather than grow their own garden, just as the colonists did. This government and its supporters have not moved on in 150 years – they still operate with colonial mindset.

    Fear for our future people

    • Sookie 16.1

      I am a Planner and I endorse vto’s comment wholeheartedly. I also appreciate what Once Was Pete is saying as well, but would venture most of his problems stem from the LGA and infrastructure and development contributions boffins, not Planners 🙂
      I wonder if Nick the Prick has watered down the gutting of Part II, the heart the RMA, which I was mostly horrified about. Probably not alas.

  17. William 17

    Just as a sidenote, the other “usual modus operandi of the Government” that is happening here is that it is being announced while Key is overseas.

  18. saveNZ 18

    The other big component are the ‘secret council’ deals with environmental barristers lawyers and lobbyists for zone changes to make money for their owners. The unitary plan ‘consultation’ was full of lobbyists to make sure their ‘clients’ will be making money. Not about actually making the city a better place.

    Here’s a few lobbyist from the ages… some from the days where the Herald was actually respected as a newspaper.

    Big names in Franklin Rd fight
    Two prominent owners want to move eight villas for more intense development
    A rich lister, a high profile QC, a prominent media couple and an arts doyen are locking horns over the future of Franklin Rd, which attracts hordes of visitors to its street display of Christmas lights.

    Property mogul Michael Friedlander and newly appointed QC Marie Dyhrberg are seeking changes to the council’s Unitary Plan to allow them to remove eight villas for more intensive development.

    http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=11299361

    Lawyers plotted heritage coup

    Three Remuera lawyers almost convinced the Auckland City Council to sign a deal allowing thousands of heritage homes to be demolished in the city.

    Derek Nolan, an environmental lawyer and partner in Russell McVeagh; Brian Latimour, a litigation lawyer and partner in Bell Gully, and his wife Shanla; and barrister Tim Burcher are the three parties who almost pulled off a secret deal on Tuesday to allow the demolition of up to 7600 heritage homes.

    The deal, masterminded by council planning boss John Duthie and his number two, Penny Pirrit, fell over on Tuesday when Mayor John Banks intervened to stop it.

    http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=10497849

    These are just a couple that got publicised….

  19. millsy 19

    Two words Pete: State Housing. That is how you sort housing affordability. Plus you bring back the various home ownership subsidies that were in place before the 1990’s.

    But it looks like you are anti state housing, given that you would rather support giving developers free reign to do what they want, and cripple councils abilty to raise funds for parks and libaries.

    Anti union, anti state housing, anti parks, anti libararies.

    And you claim you are left.

    Seems like you have you have your head so far up Key’s ass that you can taste what he had for dinner (what is Bronagh’s cooking like BTW?).

    Plus you think WhaleOil, is a stand up guy, even though he would string union members up with piano wire. But then again, you would be in good company.

    • Gosman 19.1

      That will just increase demand for land. Without an increase in supply of land the cost of housing will continue to rise and will do so even faster than now.

      • millsy 19.1.1

        So how are you going to force people who own land to subdivide it or sell it to property developers?

        • vto 19.1.1.1

          Legislate, like many other countries.

          Land ownership does not give the land owner unfettered rights to do with it as they wish, contrary to what many people think.

  20. One Anonymous Bloke 20

    This time, when the National Party commits manslaughter, sheet it home to your local MP and harry them for it to the grave.

    It’s only fair.

  21. I hope that Auckland Transport runs afoul of the RMA, their latest mad tarmac-fest is going to sacrifice 6 historic and beautiful pohutukawas so that Ponsonby residents can save 2 minutes on a shopping trip to St Lukes.

  22. vto 22

    gosman and others keep crying “increase the supply of land”….

    but “increase the supply of building product” is an infinitely more useful way to bring down the cost of housing..

    people have no idea how the Fletchers / Carters / Holcim cartels rip us off… bust them wide open. Allow them to own/control no more than 20% of the market….

  23. One Anonymous Bloke 23

    Nature affects property values. Better abolish it.

  24. Tanz 24

    Course, those not affected by lack of housing can afford to be smug and to throw stones. The RMA is a ridiculous set of rules, our building costs are four times higher than those overseas, and there is far too much red tape, which bossy leftie councils love. The young have a right to home ownership too, at the moment they are locked out, what of that? Don’t you lot want your grandkids to own their own homes, without major imput from parents etc, as our generation was able to do.

    • millsy 24.1

      Bring back housing corp loans and deposit capitalisation and build more state housing. Not oavr over evrerything.

      • Tanz 24.1.1

        Isn’t that how Paula Bennett got to own a house? Housing corp loan, and post grad degree, both not allowed anymore for those in similar situations as to what she was once in.

        • millsy 24.1.1.1

          Yep.

          And award wages for her waitressing job. She probably had penalty rates in the weekend.

    • vto 24.2

      Wake up Tanz. Do some reading.

      Yes, building costs are four times higher – see my point two up for the reason why – right wing plays to the already rich.

      The RMA has very little impact on house prices. You are a fool to believe Nick Smith who is a well known and habitual liar.

  25. Tanz 25

    I don’t believe anything Nick Smith says. But I do think the RMA is very over complicated. But the true driver of Auckland’s outrageous house prices (quite often for absolute piles of do up rubbish) is overseas investment, but no one seems to want to address this, neither Labour or National. So, our future generations are going to be renters/tenants/and beholden to overseas landlords. Betrayal by govt.

    • vto 25.1

      Interesting. I agree completely about the foreign ownership of land issue.

    • Lanthanide 25.2

      “but no one seems to want to address this, neither Labour or National”

      I guess you weren’t paying attention to Labour’s election campaign, where they would restrict ownership of NZ properties to citizens (living anywhere), or permanent residents?

  26. Ad 26

    The first ten developers to go positive in the media on this will all be core National Party donors. Listen and name them.

    Feel the money flowing in, and flowing right back, via the banks.

    Nice and legal.

Links to post

Recent Comments

Recent Posts

  • Week That Was: Keeping New Zealand moving
    We're keeping New Zealand moving, one progress-packed week at a time. Read below to find out how we're creating jobs, protecting the environment, looking out for the health of New Zealanders', and upgrading our critical infrastructure - and that's only this week. ...
    15 hours ago
  • Week That Was: Keeping New Zealand moving
    We're keeping New Zealand moving, one progress-packed week at a time. Read below to find out how we're creating jobs, protecting the environment, looking out for the health of New Zealanders', and upgrading our critical infrastructure - and that's only this week. ...
    15 hours ago
  • Government backs Northland innovation and enterprise park
    Hon Shane Jones, Minister for Regional Economic Development The Provincial Growth Fund is providing up to $19.5 million to boost innovative primary sector businesses and create training and job opportunities for Northland locals through the construction of an innovation and enterprise park at Ngawha, Regional Economic Development Minister Shane Jones ...
    18 hours ago
  • Green Party unveils Clean Energy Plan
    The Green Party is today unveiling part one of its plan for a fossil-fuel free Aotearoa, including an immediate ban on new industrial coal boilers. ...
    2 days ago
  • New Zealand First calls for tahr cull halt
    Mark Patterson MP, Spokesperson for Primary Industry New Zealand First is supporting calls by hunters and the New Zealand Tahr Foundation (NZTF) to halt a large scale cull of Himalayan Tahr by the Department of Conservation in National Parks. The calls are supported by a 40,000 strong petition and the ...
    7 days ago
  • Response to Spin-off allegations
    Rt Hon Winston Peters, Leader of New Zealand First New Zealand First leader Winston Peters today scoffed at suggestions that a team of six political operatives have been dispatched to New Zealand to assist his campaign. ‘As President Ronald Reagan once said, ‘there they go again.’ ‘The clickbait journos can’t ...
    7 days ago
  • Jenny Marcroft MP to represent New Zealand First in Auckland Central
    New Zealand First is pleased to announce Jenny Marcroft as the party’s election 2020 candidate for the Auckland Central electorate. Jenny spent years working in Auckland Central, having spent a vast proportion of her broadcasting career there. She says she, "knows the place and knows the people." Ms Marcroft says ...
    1 week ago
  • Creating jobs and cleaning up our rivers
    New Zealanders deserve healthy rivers and lakes that are safe to swim in - but they have been getting worse for decades. That's why, with our latest announcement, we're investing in projects that will help clean up our rivers and lakes and restore them to health, within a generation. ...
    1 week ago
  • Jacinda Ardern: 2020 Labour Congress Speech
    Jacinda Ardern's speech to the 2020 Labour Party Congress. ...
    1 week ago
  • Kelvin Davis: 2020 Labour Congress Speech
    Kelvin Davis' speech to the 2020 Labour Party Congress. ...
    1 week ago
  • Week That Was: Another week of major progress
    This week we moved into the second half of 2020 - and our Government delivered another week of big changes and major progress for New Zealanders. Read below for a wrap of the key things moments from the week - from extending paid parental leave, to making major investments in ...
    2 weeks ago
  • Green Party opposes RMA fast-track bill that cut corners on environmental safeguards and public cons...
    The Green Party has opposed the COVID-19 Recovery Fast-track Consenting Bill which shortcuts normal consenting processes under the Resource Management Act (RMA), reduces public participation and narrows environmental considerations. ...
    2 weeks ago
  • Site of new freight hub revealed
    Hon Shane Jones, Minister of Regional Economic Development A regional freight hub for the lower North Island will be built just northeast of Palmerston North, Regional Development Minister Shane Jones has announced. The Government is investing $40 million through the Provincial Growth Fund to designate and buy land and design ...
    2 weeks ago
  • Greens call for Guaranteed Minimum Income to alleviate skyrocketing debt with MSD
    Green Party Co-leader Marama Davidson is calling for the introduction of a Guaranteed Minimum Income to lift hundreds of thousands of people out of poverty and prevent more families entering into further debt with the Ministry of Social Development.  ...
    2 weeks ago
  • Winston Peters: Facts matter when taxpayer money is on the line
    There has been renewed focus on New Zealand First acting as a handbrake on the Government after our decision to not support Auckland light rail. We are a handbrake for bad ideas, that is true, but our track record since 2017 has seen New Zealand First constructively also serve as an ...
    2 weeks ago
  • Bill raising minimum residency requirement for NZ Super passes first reading
    Mark Patterson MP, New Zealand First List MP New Zealand First’s Fair Residency for Superannuation Bill passed its First Reading in Parliament today. The Bill makes a significant change to NZ Super by raising the minimum residency requirement from 10 to 20 years, after age 20. “Currently, a migrant of ...
    2 weeks ago
  • Harsher penalties for assaults on first responders one step closer
    Darroch Ball MP, Spokesperson for Law and Order A New Zealand First member’s bill in the name of Darroch Ball introducing a six-month minimum prison sentence for assaults on first responders has passed its second reading in Parliament. The new offence of "injuring a first responder or corrections officer with ...
    2 weeks ago
  • Criminal Cases Review Commission delivers Coalition promise
    Fletcher Tabuteau MP, Deputy Leader of New Zealand First New Zealand First welcomes the launch of the new Criminal Cases Review Commission, gifted with the name from Waikato-Tainui - Te Kāhui Tātari Ture, announced in Hamilton today by Justice Minister Andrew Little. “New Zealand First has long believed in and ...
    2 weeks ago
  • Greens welcome huge new investment in sustainable projects
    The Green Party is celebrating over $800m in new funding for green projects, which will get people into jobs while solving New Zealand’s long-term challenges. ...
    2 weeks ago
  • New Zealand First demands answers from Meridian Energy
    Mark Patterson MP, Spokesperson for Primary Industries New Zealand First is appalled that Meridian seems to have been unnecessarily spilling water from its dams to drive up its profits."While New Zealanders have been coming together in some of our darkest hours, we don’t expect power gentailers to waste water and ...
    2 weeks ago
  • Getting New Zealand moving again: June 2020
    We wrapped up the first half of 2020 with a busy month, taking additional steps to support New Zealanders as we continue with our economic recovery. We rolled out targeted packages to support key industries like tourism and construction, helped create jobs in the environmental and agriculture sectors, and set ...
    2 weeks ago
  • Māori union leader appointed to Infrastructure Commission board
    Hon Shane Jones, Minister for Infrastructure Infrastructure Minister Shane Jones has welcomed the appointment of Maurice Davis and his deep infrastructure and construction experience to the board of the Infrastructure Commission. Mr Davis (Ngāti Maniapoto), is the seventh and final appointment to the board led by former Reserve Bank Governor ...
    2 weeks ago
  • Click-bait journalism at its worst
    Rt Hon Winston Peters, Leader of New Zealand First New Zealand’s click bait journalism is taking a turn for the worse, with yet another example of sensationalist, wilful-misrepresentation of the facts. “New Zealand First has worked constructively with its Coalition partner on hundreds of pieces of legislation and policy, and ...
    2 weeks ago
  • Green Party proposes transformational Poverty Action Plan
    The Green Party is today unveiling its Poverty Action Plan, which includes a Guaranteed Minimum Income to ensure people have enough to live with dignity.     ...
    2 weeks ago
  • PGF accelerates Rotorua projects
    Rt Hon Winston Peters, Deputy Prime Minister Fletcher Tabuteau MP, Under-Secretary for Regional Economic Development The Rotorua Museum redevelopment and Whakarewarewa and Tokorangi Forest projects will be accelerated thanks to a $2.09 million Provincial Growth Fund (PGF) boost, Deputy Prime Minister Winston Peters and Under-Secretary for Regional Economic Development Fletcher ...
    2 weeks ago
  • Week That Was: Getting people into jobs
    This week, we rolled out the next steps of our recovery plan, with new infrastructure investment, extra support for tourism operators, and a new programme to get Kiwis into agriculture careers. The global economic consequences of COVID-19 will continue to be a challenge, but we have a detailed plan to ...
    3 weeks ago
  • Coalition commitment establishing Mental Health Commission delivered
    Jenny Marcroft MP, Spokesperson for Health New Zealand First welcomes the passage of the Mental Health and Wellbeing Commission Bill through its final reading in Parliament today fulfilling a coalition agreement commitment. “This is an important step in saving the lives of New Zealanders and delivers a key coalition commitment ...
    3 weeks ago
  • Whakatāne gets a $2.5m ‘turbo boost’
    Whakatāne has been given a $2.5 million boost to speed up previously funded projects and create more than 450 jobs in the next decade. Of those, the equivalent of 160 full-time jobs could be delivered in the next six weeks. Deputy Prime Minister Winston Peters is in town to make ...
    3 weeks ago
  • $2.5m PGF funding to speed up economic recovery in Whakatāne
    Rt Hon Winston Peters, Deputy Prime Minister Fletcher Tabuteau MP, Under-Secretary for Regional Economic Development The Provincial Growth Fund (PGF) is investing $2.5 million to accelerate three infrastructure projects in Whakatāne, Deputy Prime Minister Winston Peters and Under-Secretary for Regional Economic Development Fletcher Tabuteau announced today. “This package is about ...
    3 weeks ago
  • Shane Jones calls out those holding drought-stricken Auckland ‘to ransom’ over water
    Infrastructure Minister Shane Jones is throwing his weight behind a bid by the Auckland Council to fast-track the more than doubling of the city's water allowance from the Waikato River. And he's coming out strongly against anyone who plans on getting in the way of this campaign. "It is my ...
    3 weeks ago
  • Another Green win as climate change considerations inserted into the RMA
    The Green Party is thrilled to see changes to the Resource Management Act (RMA) that mean consents for large projects can be declined if they will have significant climate change implications that are inconsistent with the Zero Carbon Act and Aotearoa New Zealand’s Paris Agreement obligations.  ...
    3 weeks ago
  • New Navy vessel Aotearoa to arrive in New Zealand
    Hon Ron Mark, Minister of Defence The Royal New Zealand Navy’s new ship, Aotearoa, set sail for New Zealand on 10 June from the Republic of Korea, and is due to arrive in Auckland tomorrow, announced Minister of Defence Ron Mark. “Aotearoa is the Royal New Zealand Navy’s new fleet ...
    3 weeks ago
  • Racing Industry Bill passes third reading
    Rt Hon Winston Peters, Deputy Prime Minister, Minister for Racing Racing Minister Winston Peters has today welcomed the Racing Industry Bill passing its third reading, creating the legislative framework for revitalising the racing industry while limiting the need for future government intervention. “For too long our domestic racing industry has ...
    3 weeks ago
  • Green Party seek amendment to ensure all prisoners can vote
    The Green Party has today put forward an amendment to the Electoral (Registration of Sentenced Prisoners) Amendment Bill to ensure all people in prisons can vote in general elections. ...
    3 weeks ago
  • Green Party welcomes new approach to delivering light rail
    The Green Party welcomes the decision to not proceed with Public Public Investment (PPI) delivery of Auckland’s light rail project and to instead run the process through the public service. ...
    3 weeks ago

  • District Court Judge appointed
    Stephen Clark, Māori Land Court Judge of Hamilton has been appointed as a District Court Judge with jury jurisdiction to be based in Hamilton, Attorney-General David Parker announced today. Judge Clark graduated with an LLB from Auckland University in 1988 and was admitted to the Bar in the same year. ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    16 hours ago
  • Hawke’s Bay Airport agreement protects jobs, safeguards terminal development
    The Crown will provide a loan to Hawke’s Bay Airport to ensure it can trade through COVID-19 economic impacts, support the region’s recovery and protect up to 200 jobs. The Crown has a 50 percent shareholding in Hawke’s Bay Airport Limited (HBAL), with Napier City Council holding 26 percent and ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    18 hours ago
  • Funding boost for four cultural events
    Four celebrated Māori and Pasifika events will receive up to $100,000 each in funding from the new Creative and Cultural Events Incubator fund, Economic Development Minister Phil Twyford announced today. The four events that were successful in the inaugural funding round are: Kia Mau Festival, Wellington Māoriland Film Festival, Otaki ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    20 hours ago
  • Inaugural launch of Kiribati Language Week
    The Minister for Pacific Peoples, Aupito William Sio is pleased to announce the inaugural launch of Kiribati Language Week as part of the 2020 Pacific language Weeks programme. “I am so pleased that this year we are able to provide resourcing support to the Kiribati community in Aotearoa which will ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 days ago
  • New support package for wildlife institutions
    Wildlife institutions affected by a loss of visitor revenue during the COVID-19 lockdown are set to receive government support with nearly $15 million of funding available announced Minister of Conservation Eugenie Sage.  “Eco-sanctuaries, zoos, aquariums, wildlife parks, and wildlife rescue, hospital and rehabilitation facilities provide crucial support for the recovery ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 days ago
  • 300,000 students to benefit from free mental health services
    The Government is expanding and accelerating frontline mental health and wellbeing services at tertiary education institutes (TEI) to help students manage ongoing stresses related to COVID-19. “The lockdown has been hugely disruptive for students. Many of them have had to relocate and move to online learning, isolating them from their ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 days ago
  • Gang crime, meth harm targeted in Waikato
    The Minister of Police says a major operation against the Mongrel Mob in Waikato will make a big dent in drug harm and violent offending linked to organised crime networks. “Senior leadership of the Waikato Mongrel Mob has been taken out as a result of Operation Kingsville, which resulted in ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    4 days ago
  • Supporting victims and families to attend mosque attack sentencing
    The Government is extending the border exception criteria to enable some offshore victims and support people of the Christchurch mosque attacks to attend the sentencing of the accused beginning on 24 August2020, says Immigration Minister Iain Lees-Galloway. “We want to support our valued Muslim brothers and sisters who were directly ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    4 days ago
  • Boost for community freshwater restoration projects
    A project to support volunteer efforts to look after streams and rivers is getting a boost thanks to support from DOC’s Community Conservation Fund announced Minister of Conservation Eugenie Sage today.  “The government is backing efforts to look after waterways with $199,400 for the Mountains to Sea Conservation Trust from ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    4 days ago
  • More support for women and girls
    Minister for Women Julie Anne Genter today announced that funding for the COVID-19 Community Fund for women and girls will be doubled, as the first successful funding applications for the initial $1million were revealed. “Women and girls across the country have suffered because of the effects of COVID-19, and I ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    4 days ago
  • Crown accounts stronger than forecast with higher consumer spending
    The Government’s books were better than forecast with a higher GST take as the economy got moving again after lockdown, Finance Minister Grant Robertson says. The Crown Accounts for the 11 months to the end of May indicate the year end results for tax revenue will be stronger than forecast. ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    4 days ago
  • Govt releases plan to revitalise wool sector
    A plan to revitalise New Zealand’s strong wool sector and set it on a new, more sustainable and profitable path was unveiled today by Agriculture Minister Damien O’Connor. The newly-released report - Vision and Action for New Zealand’s Wool Sector - was developed by the Wool Industry Project Action Group ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    4 days ago
  • Funding for Predator Free Whangārei
    Community efforts to create a Predator Free Whangārei will receive a $6 million boost, Regional Economic Development Minister Shane Jones and Conservation Minister Eugenie Sage announced today. The new funding, through Government company Predator Free 2050 Ltd, will create around 12 jobs while enabling the complete removal of possums over ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    4 days ago
  • New Zealand to review relationship settings with Hong Kong
    Foreign Affairs Minister Winston Peters has announced that the New Zealand Government is reviewing the settings of its relationship with Hong Kong. “China’s decision to pass a new national security law for Hong Kong has fundamentally changed the environment for international engagement there,” Mr Peters said. “New Zealand remains deeply ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    5 days ago
  • Funding for Whangārei’s infrastructure projects revealed
    Regional Economic Development Minister Shane Jones has announced details of a multimillion-dollar investment in Whangārei for infrastructure projects that will help it recover from the economic fallout from the COVID-19 pandemic. More than 200 jobs are expected to be created through the $26 million investment from the Government’s rejuvenation package ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    5 days ago
  • Managed isolation and quarantine update
    Following a second incident in which a person escaped from a managed isolation facility, security is being enhanced, including more police presence onsite, Minister Megan Woods said. “The actions of some individuals who choose to break the very clear rules to stay within the facilities means that more resourcing is ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    5 days ago
  • Funding for Kaipara district community waste programmes
    Waste reduction and recycling programmes in Kaipara are set to get a boost with Associate Environment Minister Eugenie Sage today announcing a $361,447 grant from the Ministry for the Environment’s Waste Minimisation Fund (WMF) Sustainable Kaipara. “The new funding will allow Sustainable Kaipara to partner with local schools, kura, community ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    5 days ago
  • Government will support the people and economy of Southland
    The Government will support the Southland economy in the wake of multinational mining company Rio Tinto’s decision to follow through with its long signalled closure of the Tiwai Point aluminium smelter. “This day has unfortunately been on the cards for some time now, but nevertheless the final decision is a ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    5 days ago
  • New transformational tools for the Predator Free 2050 effort
    New tools being developed to help boost Aotearoa’s Predator Free 2050 effort were unveiled today by Minister of Conservation Eugenie Sage and Under Secretary for Regional Economic Development Fletcher Tabuteau. A new rat poison, a camera with predator recognition software to detect and report predators, a new predator lure and a ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    5 days ago
  • New Armoured vehicles for New Zealand Army
    The Coalition Government has approved the purchase of a fleet of Bushmaster vehicles to replace the New Zealand Army’s armoured Pinzgauers, Defence Minister Ron Mark has announced today. The new fleet of 43 Australian-designed and built Bushmaster NZ5.5 will provide better protection for personnel and improved carrying capacity. “The age ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    5 days ago
  • Community-led solutions to prevent family violence
    The Government’s three prevention frameworks to reduce family violence in Aotearoa were launched this week by Associate Minister for Social Development Poto Williams.   The frameworks were developed in partnership with communities around New Zealand, and build on the work the Government has already begun with its new family violence prevention ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    5 days ago
  • Govt confirms investment in better radiology and surgical services for Hawke’s Bay
    The Government is pleased to confirm funding for improvements to radiology and surgical services at Hawke's Bay DHB, Health Minister Chris Hipkins says.     "The Minister of Finance the Hon Grant Robertson and former Health Minister Dr David Clark approved funding for Hawke's Bay DHB’s redevelopment of their radiology facilities ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    6 days ago
  • Specialist alcohol and drug addiction services strengthened across New Zealand
    •    New funding for four beds at Napier’s Springhill Residential Addiction Centre •    A new managed withdrawal home and community service, and peer support before and after residential care at Tairāwhiti DHB  •    A co-ordinated network of withdrawal management services throughout the South Island •    Peer support in Rotorua and ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    6 days ago
  • Coastal Shipping Webinar
    Introduction, seafarers and POAL Good morning everyone, I am delighted to be online with you all today. Before I begin, I have to acknowledge that COVID-19 has disrupted the maritime sector on an unprecedented scale. The work of seafarers and the maritime industry is keeping many economies around the world ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    6 days ago
  • Support for resilient rail connection to the West Coast
    A $13 million investment from Government will create jobs and improve the resilience of the rail connection between Christchurch and the West Coast, Infrastructure Minister Shane Jones and Regional Economic Development Under-Secretary Fletcher Tabuteau say. The funding comes from the tagged contingency set aside in Budget 2020 for infrastructure projects ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    6 days ago
  • Major investment in safe drinking water
    The Government is investing $761 million to assist local government upgrade under-pressure water services across the country, Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern and Local Government Minister Nanaia Mahuta announced today.  The announcement was made at the site of the water bore that was found to be the source of the fatal ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    6 days ago
  • Supporting stranded seasonal workers to keep working with more flexible options
    Recognised Seasonal Employers and migrant seasonal workers stranded in New Zealand will be able to continue working and supporting themselves with more flexible hours and roles, says Immigration Minister Iain Lees-Galloway. The time-limited visa changes are: Stranded RSE workers will be able to work part-time (a minimum of 15 hours ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    6 days ago
  • Relief for temporary migrants, employers and New Zealanders who need work
    The Government is making immediate short-term changes to visa settings to support temporary migrants already onshore in New Zealand and their employers, while also ensuring New Zealanders needing work are prioritised, Immigration Minister Iain Lees-Galloway says. We are: Extending temporary work visas due to expire by the end of 2020 ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    6 days ago
  • Freshwater commissioners and fast-track consenting convenor appointed
    Professor Peter Skelton CNZM has been appointed as Chief Freshwater Commissioner and Alternate Environment Court Judge Craig James Thompson as Deputy Chief Freshwater Commissioner for the newly established Freshwater Planning Process (FPP). Environment Minister David Parker today also announced the appointment of Chief Environment Court Judge Laurie Newhook as the ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    7 days ago
  • Appointment of Judge of the High Court
    Auckland Queen’s Counsel Neil Campbell has been appointed a Judge of the High Court, Attorney‑General David Parker announced today. Justice Campbell graduated with a BCom and LLB (Hons) from the University of Auckland in 1992. He spent two years with Bell Gully Buddle Weir in Auckland before travelling to the United ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    7 days ago
  • Feedback sought – Commercial Film and Video Production Facilities
    The Associate Minister for Greater Christchurch Regeneration, Poto Williams, is seeking feedback on a proposal to better enable the development and operation of commercial film and video facilities in Christchurch. The Proposal, developed by Regenerate Christchurch in response to a request from Christchurch City Council, asks that powers under section ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    7 days ago
  • Govt launches bold primary sector plan to boost economic recovery
    The Government has launched a bold plan to boost primary sector export earnings by $44 billion over the next decade, while protecting the environment and growing jobs. Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern today released Fit for a Better World – Accelerating our Economic Potential, a 10-year roadmap to unlock greater value ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    7 days ago
  • Wellbeing of whanau at heart of new hub
    A new approach to prevent family harm that encourages greater collaboration across government and community groups is being celebrated at the opening of a new facility in Auckland. Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern today opened the Multi-Disciplinary Family Harm Prevention Hub Te Taanga Manawa in Lambie Road in Manukau. The facility ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    7 days ago
  • New Report on Auckland Port Relocation
    The Government has released a major new report on the options for relocating the Port of Auckland’s freight operations while deferring any decision on the issue. “That decision needs to be informed by policy analysis that is still to be completed. As a result it will be up to a ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    7 days ago
  • Dual place names for Te Pātaka-o-Rākaihautū / Banks Peninsula features
    The history of Rāpaki is being restored through the inclusion of te reo in thirteen official place names on Te Pātaka-o-Rākaihautū / Banks Peninsula and around Lyttelton Harbour/Whakaraupō, the Minister for Land Information, Eugenie Sage, announced today.   “I am pleased to approve the proposals from Te Hapū o Ngāti ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    7 days ago
  • Government and Air New Zealand agree to manage incoming bookings
    Bookings for seats on Air New Zealand flights into New Zealand will be managed in the short term to ensure the Government is able to safely place New Zealanders arriving home into a managed isolation or quarantine facility, says Housing Minister Megan Woods.  “Last week Air Commodore Darryn Webb and I ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    7 days ago
  • $80 million for sport recovery at all levels
    Grant Robertson has today announced the first major release of funding from the $265 million Sport Recovery Package announced at Budget 2020.  “Today we’re setting out how $80 million will be invested, with $54 million of that over the 2020/2021 financial year for organisations from community level through to elite ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    7 days ago
  • Keeping ACC levies steady until 2022
    The Government is maintaining current levy rates for the next 2 years, as part of a set of changes to help ease the financial pressures of COVID-19 providing certainty for businesses and New Zealanders, ACC Minister Iain Lees-Galloway says. “New Zealanders and businesses are facing unprecedented financial pressures as a ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • Extended loan scheme keeps business afloat
    Small businesses are getting greater certainty about access to finance with an extension to the interest-free cashflow loan scheme to the end of the year. The Small Business Cashflow Loan Scheme has already been extended once, to 24 July. Revenue and Small Business Minister Stuart Nash says it will be ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • New investment creates over 2000 jobs to clean up waterways
    A package of 23 projects across the country will clean up waterways and deliver over 2000 jobs Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern and Environment Minister David Parker announced today. The $162 million dollar package will see 22 water clean-up projects put forward by local councils receiving $62 million and the Kaipara ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago