Dr Norman said “there might be a few votes” for the new party, but “maybe not a lot”. “I mean, who wants to relive the battles of the 1980s and 1990s? We’re in 2011 for God’s sake. We need a progressive force that actually deals with where we are now, not tries to refight the 1980s and 1990s.
Here’s the thing Russel, we are refighting the 1980’s and the 1990’s. We’ve got a government comprised of a lot of the same people, with the same backers, running the same agendas and seeking the same outcomes.
I know you’re jockeying for position and you probably think you’re playing smart politics by trying to scare your voting base off Mana but I think that you (and Phil) should consider one of the meanings of Mana:
This is the recognition that people give for your deeds and actions. Just because a person is born from great lines does not necessarily mean that they will have great mana amongst the people. The mana a person is born with sets them off, but the way that they conduct themselves throughout life will either strengthen their own personal mana, and by that the mana of their tupuna, or weaken their own personal mana.
I think it’s time you asked yourself whether the way you’re conducting yourself has enhanced your own Mana or if it has made you look like just another self-interested politician.
Update: it seems the Dom Post quotes might have been a fit of pique. Russel has posted the following on his facebook page:
Sorry, I overly personalised my critique of the Mana Party in the DomPost. I was asked about whether they are a threat to the Green vote, which I don’t think they are. I was trying to make the point that there is an important political distinction between the old left and the greens but this came across as overly personal. My apologies. As I said on Backbenches last week, I wish them luck.
Good stuff. It takes a fair bit of decency to front up and apologise in politics and as a longtime Green supporter I’m bloody pleased. I doubt we’ll see any such fortitude from Goff.