web analytics

The difference between Don Brash and Southern & Molyneux

Written By: - Date published: 2:38 pm, August 8th, 2018 - 66 comments
Categories: Abuse of power, Deep stuff, democracy under attack, don brash, political alternatives, Politics - Tags: , ,

We are into round two of the debate concerning the right to freedom of speech in Aotearoa New Zealand.

By a cruel twist of fate the subject matter is now Don Brash, former National Party leader, and who previously was the applicant for a super injunction that for a time prevented the publication of Nicky Hager’s book Hollow Men.  Brash is also part of the free speech coalition an entity set up to preserve the rights of Lauren Southern and Stefan Molyneux to insult people and say what they like.  If only Brash was as enthusiastic in protecting the rights of, for instance, Renae Maihi who is being sued by Bob Jones for pointing out that a recent column of his was abjectly racist.

And as Morgan Godfrey and Alexander Bisley have pointed out Brash only supports free speech as long as it is in English.

But the subject of his speech was pretty innocuous. He should have been able to speak.

The question has been asked, can a leftie actually support Molyneux’s and Southern’s rights to freedom of speech but not Brash’s?

That is the situation I find myself in.

With regards to Molyneux and Southern I have said this:

This is why so many of us are so upset at Molyneux and Southern being given air time.  Their claims are stupid, motivated by greed and malice, dangerous, and a threat to our settling sense of multiculturalism.  Most of us want to improve our knowledge of and appreciation of different cultures because they add so much to our way of life.  There is nothing to be afraid of.

I accept that New Zealand has some significant issues to work through but I do believe that we are basically on the right track.  The last thing we need is a couple of fascists to attack what is a central tenet of our way of life.

And this:

And dang it but this leftie thinks that we should not have to allow publicly provided facilities to be used for the propagation of monetised hate speech with strict entry requirements.  Especially if they have in the past deliberately picked fights with muslims and acted to disrupt the efforts of others to save refugees from drowning.

They were never stopped from talking.  But I was happy for their ability to speak to be frustrated and for the response to them to be loud and passionate.  Because to me their speech was clearly monetised hate speech and did not deserve to be treated in the same way as honestly held but ignorant views.

My objection to Southern and Molyneux was perfectly captured in this comment by the Failed Estate author Jim Parker:

There’s a pattern emerging. This woman, Milo, the Information Wars guy and Australia’s assortment of provocateurs have latched onto a business model. This involves calculatedly creating outrage to generate notoriety and ‘brand’ awareness. The politics is neither here nor there. What’s important is getting noticed and monetising that attention. It’s the desperate last days of neoliberalism and these outrage manufacturers are the ultimate expression of its bankruptcy as an idea.

Brash is a bit different.  It is not so much a business model, just the overuse of the dogwhistle.

And you have to draw a line.  His speech, particularly about race relations, is often wrong, but at least he is attempting to drum up support for the use of conventional means to achieve his goals.  Trying to get people to sign a petition that is recognised by statute is entirely different to trying to get people to riot for the sake of interesting youtube clips.

The problem is that thanks to the amplification of social media the current left right political split is so intense, and America shows what can happen when the left lose.  The hard right in the States has become particularly emboldened, and race relations as well as the rights of minorities is suffering.  The extreme right is very dangerous. Which is why the left is so focussed on them.  There is a great deal at stake.

And elements of the right are so extreme.

Like Infowars.  It is amazing that Alex Jones should have been able to create a business model out of what he was saying and I am not surprised that his social media feeds have been reversed.  He was just too insane for words.  This particular outstanding effort is today’s winner of the weirdest thing on the internet award but highlights what a waste of broadband he was.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uWd6XgBVIcg

But can I say the left is getting a bad  rap out of this.  We do not necessarily want to ban, just confront.

Like last Saturday in Auckland.  A small group of Fascists gathered for a protest at Aotea Square.  Unite Union obviously heard about it and turned up to oppose.  Someone had designed a wonderful list of songs highlighting diversity and this was played loudly in the direction of the Tommy Robinson supporters.  And people chose to celebrate diversity by dancing.

What was really interesting was the interaction between the groups.  Initially interactions were tense.  As time went by there was a great deal of interaction between the groups and a lot of individual discussions occurred.  By the end of the protest both groups were on reasonable talking terms.  It was a typical New Zealand scene.  I don’t think any minds were changed.  But both sides were prepared to defend and debate their points of view and in the case of Unite with style and passion.

So let Don speak. But don’t expect the left’s response to be quiet or respectful.

66 comments on “The difference between Don Brash and Southern & Molyneux ”

  1. Superb piece, MS. There is always a line to be drawn, as you say. Brash and the Canadian racists are on a continuum and obviously Brash feels a kinship with them, however that doesn’t mean we should treat all three the same.

    The money aspect is important too. The Canadians make obscene amounts of cash from race baiting and that does differentiate them from Brash. I presume Brash is well off, having milked the taxpayers teat most of his working life. His current efforts to silence maori at local Government level have the feel of a retirement project.

    If only he’d taken up fishing, he could be baiting hooks, not the tangata whenua.

    I’ve noted elsewhere that I once shook Don the Reasonable Racist’s hand. That was when he was Nat leader and looking to become PM. I got a bit of stick for it from mates, but to me, that’s a normal Kiwi response to meeting an opponent.

    Southern and Molyneux are not my opponents, however. They are the enemy of all that is good and decent in New Zealand (and in the very similarly civilised country of Canada). They operate at a different level to Brash and for a very different purpose.

  2. Puckish Rogue 2

    “So let Don speak. But don’t expect the left’s response to be quiet or respectful.”

    As long as its legal its all good

  3. The difference is Southern and her mate are FOREIGNERS.

    Coming to our country , stirring up crap about issues that do not even remotely pertain to us. They should clean their own backyard up before snooping around ours. And we have every right to decide when and if someones message is toxic and harmful to our way of life.

    That’s our sovereign democratic right and freedom of speech to do so.

    Irrespective of whether they wish to claim a Pyrrhic victory for their cause on having access denied. They got the short shrift here and their only recourse is then to claim a weak victory in defending ‘freedom of speech’. And anyone can see right through that spurious line of reasoning.

    Now Mr Brash ,… is another kettle of fish entirely. He is a NZ citizen. And while some may not agree with him, at least on the whole his messages pertain directly to the prevalent issues facing NZ politics today. And its up to us to either oppose or agree with that message. We will deal with our own the best way we see fit to.

    Let Mr Brash speak.

    But don’t lets see any more of this importing of extremist foreigners here to do your own dirty work for you if your own arguments don’t stand up to scrutiny. Especially ones who are irrelevant to NZ issues and only seek to harm our way of life.

    • Gosman 3.1

      So the VC should resign in your opinion?

      • WILD KATIPO 3.1.1

        The VC should have a jolly good talking to.

        This is not a foreigners paradise where they think they can just come here , spout off their toxic irrelevant nonsense and stir up trouble without even a buy you or leave , – but when one of our own citizens wishes to speak then we deal with that accordingly.

        That’s where I personally draw the line.

        Don Brash is a long time NZ citizen , has held prominent positions and whether we like him or not , he has a right to speak on issues that pertain to NZ , – perceived or otherwise. And if his views do not hold up to scrutiny, so be it.

  4. Ad 4

    “Like last Saturday in Auckland. A small group of Fascists gathered for a protest at Aotea Square. Unite Union obviously heard about it and turned up to oppose. Someone had designed a wonderful list of songs highlighting diversity and this was played loudly in the direction of the Tommy Robinson supporters. And people chose to celebrate diversity by dancing.

    What was really interesting was the interaction between the groups. Initially interactions were tense. As time went by there was a great deal of interaction between the groups and a lot of individual discussions occurred. By the end of the protest both groups were on reasonable talking terms. It was a typical New Zealand scene. I don’t think any minds were changed. But both sides were prepared to defend and debate their points of view and in the case of Unite with style and passion.”

    It’s a good story, if you’re espousing more contests between views. If you thought the line needed to be drawn there, clearly they proved you wrong.

    It illustrates that the left who want to ban speakers should trust New Zealanders to engage with respect. The patrician left. It cuts right against the weak-assed crap like the Massey Vice Chancellor afraid of a voice or two being raised.

    As for monetising speech being bad, well, monetised speech is in every single broadcaster in New Zealand except RNZ. It’s a fact that’s been with us for a wee while and it hasn’t killed us. If the left were making money hosting speakers for the good of their parties, no-one would complain.

    Just as two other examples, the Minister of Finance spoke at Sky City today to a bunch of investors giving a standard State of the Nation, and you can guarantee that wasn’t free.

    Minister Twyford will be keynote at the Building Nations conference on Thursday. Tickets are sold out at nearly $2,000 a head.

    I agree lines have to be drawn. If they have to be drawn by the courts occasionally, that’s the right thing to occur. Courts are used at the extremes of Alec Jones-type contest with Whaleoil. And it’s not like the Courts are tilting in Whaleoil’s favour are they?

    It’s not like the left are losing ground here: we’re in power. We should afford a little more contesting of ideas.

    • Draco T Bastard 4.1

      As for monetising speech being bad, well, monetised speech is in every single broadcaster in New Zealand except RNZ.

      It’s not monetised speech that’s the problem but monetised hate speech.

      Whether you like it or not hate speech is illegal in NZ.

      • Ad 4.1.1

        It does the left no favours when they retreat of labelling speech hateful. Again, if needs be the courts can do that.

        Currently the only chance we get to do that as a whole and trusted public is in an election. Even though that speech has been as full of hate as Don Brash could muster, the left still beat him.

        Trust the people and they will reward you.

      • Dennis Frank 4.1.2

        I haven’t seen evidence of hate speech. Perceptions of it by some individuals seem to have marginal relevance only, while a consensus around the existence of such continues to fail to manifest. A successful prosecution would establish relevance. Is the only reason Brash has not been prosecuted his deep pockets?

  5. Cinny 5

    Excellent post Micky.

  6. OctusSpherus 6

    Innocuous is right. I read his speech notes and damn near fell asleep.

  7. Bill 7

    Reads to me like there’s a confusion between the principle of free speech on the one hand and the content of any given speechon the other. And a subjective (and pre-emptive) evaluation of the latter being used to justify stomping down on the former.

    No one, contrary to what’s written in this post, has the right to say what they want. There are obvious caveats around incitement.

    Southern and Molyneux did not incite anything, (How could they have?) but this nonsense claim about them being fascist, as opposed to just plain stupid (politically), and that claim then being accepted “as read” and used to do battle in grand pappy’s imagined 1930s/40s shadow to shut them down, isn’t just merely acting from a purely subjective standpoint, but is incredibly authoritarian to boot.

    A coach and horses can be driven through Southern and Molyneux’s political positions with consummate ease and could have/should have been done in the unlikely event their booked presentation caused any ripples.

    But robbing them of this new platform where they can now, and with some reason, claim to be victims of anti-free speech stuff is much more difficult. As is also the case with Tommy (EDL) Robinson, who was similarly gifted a platform of moral high ground by idiots.

    Are there differences between Brash on one side and Mollyneux and Southern on the other? Yes. Does any difference have anything whatsoever to do with the price of cheese (ie – the principle of free speech)? No. Has monetisation got anything to do with anything? No.

    I can fully understand the authoritarian left calling out anything and everything that doesn’t accord with their own political authoritarianism as being fascist, and then getting all hard on it as they manipulate people and imagine executing a storming of the Winter Palace Mk II (it’s what they do and have always done).

    And I fully understand and support those who turned up to Aotea Square to celebrate diversity and community.

    What I don’t understand is this wholly arbitrary justification for killing speech from people who don’t have that old “communist”* wheelbarrow to push (unless they’ve been hoodwinked by “the communists”*).

    You’re post doesn’t help on that front and more, since you finally rest your objection on something that Jim Parker wrote that undermines all your protestations and claims about “hate speech” and “fascism”, well…my confusion’s compounded.

    Question. In the future, who get’s to decide whether any given speaker or speech is acceptable? Is it just going to be down to whether enough of a stink can get whipped up by whoever?

    And if it is going to come down to that, then how long before you reckon good people are on the wrong side of that mob menatility, or silenced by it; before some quite fascistic culture determines who can have a voice and what can be voiced? From where I’m sitting, the first steps down that lamentable path have been taken (and that’s without mentioning anything about corporations like the BBC killing political discourse, or providers of digital platforms being gifted the role of judge and jury on political speech).

    * obviously not a reference to actual communism or communists insofar as authoritarianism is the antithesis of communism.

    • McFlock 7.1

      Their desire for outrage is commercial and apolitical. What they say is political.

      The people who feel invested enough in their political messages to donate to their pages, pay to see them speak, and buy their merchandise… those people aren’t apolitical at all.

      Just to find some sort of milestone for semantic comparison, Bill, would you regard the Charleston marchers as being in the ballpark of “fascist”? You know, the torchlight march where they chanted that “the Jews will not replace us”?

      Because I regard them as being close enough to the term as to not have any practical distinction from it.

      • Bill 7.1.1

        What I do and don’t see as “in the ballpark” of fascist/authoritarian/fucked-up isn’t relevant.

        Neither is any comparison between a public march or protest, and a person merely speaking to a self selecting audience.

        • McFlock 7.1.1.1

          Yeah, it actually would let me see if we’re even close to using the word in a similar fashion.

          Because if we have at least some commonality in the use of the word, at least we’d be debating about what S&M are rather than just talking past each other yet again.

          • Bill 7.1.1.1.1

            I don’t care what S&M are – they have a right to speak to people who want to listen to them. The only caveat is that (or those) that exist around incitement.

            And no, they have no right to expect others to provide them with a platform, though, as No Right Turn has pointed out, there is the question of the Human Rights Act when it comes to pulling the rug out from under them.

            A bit like “cake lady” then. Turn them down, but don’t drop yourself in it by contravening the HRA.

            • Robert Guyton 7.1.1.1.1.1

              “A bit like “cake lady” then. Turn them down, but don’t drop yourself in it by contravening the HRA.”
              Spot on, that.

            • McFlock 7.1.1.1.1.2

              I agree with the cake lady thing.

              But I believe S&M shouldn’t have been allowed into the country in the first place. Because of what they are. Whether they run close to incitement or over it, their followers are a threat to the rest of society. Including both of us.

    • Was the message of Southern and her little buddy a wholesome uplifting one to encourage peaceful and harmonious cultural interactions ?. No . And quite possibly that should be the litmus test by which we judge things.

      Perhaps that’s why also , in lieu of lacking sufficient laws or legal body’s to either define what is and what isn’t a detrimental message that could potentially lead to social unrest and / or harm there was such a backlash.

      The other thing was that they were foreigners presenting irrelevant nonsense about issues that were not even applicable to this country . Unlike Brash who is a NZ citizen , and is part of the evolving race relations debate in this country – for better or for worse. He is relevant, – Southern was not.

      There are countless times when Police officers intervene when someone is yelling and stirring up a potentially violent situation , – and they do it to diffuse a situation. And yet all the ‘ offender’ did was yell etc.

      IE : Intent.

    • Pat 7.3

      that….and the fact they are the most successful recruiters for that which they so mindlessly oppose.

  8. McFlock 8

    Yeah, the comparison with the nestle chocolate dude is especially apt – both university-controlled venues cancelling objectionable events on safety grounds.

    However, in the case of milo the threats were clear, had been moderated as much as possible, and still was a danger to public safety.

    With Brash, the threat seems to be less clear, the presenter less likely to be a firebrand, and tensions are still much less heightened and with lower numbers of people.

    Gosman is wanking on about demanding resignations, but it’s not really all that catastrophic. Maybe a bit worse than dumping the Critic magazines a few weeks back.

  9. Draco T Bastard 9

    Because to me their speech was clearly monetised hate speech and did not deserve to be treated in the same way as honestly held but ignorant views.

    Instead of seeing it as a free-speech issue perhaps we should see it as a business issue and ban that type (monetised hate speech) of business. There are precedents for banning business models that are detrimental to society. No one advertises as Assassin for Hire in the local rag for example.

    • Ad 9.1

      The New Zealand electorate is quite happy to have the Communist League of New Zealand actively contest elections, as it has for decades. They support the violent overthrow of most things.

      As of course you do.

      Sure, the local Communists aren’t very popular. But they advertise their wares, and who are we to stop them?

      • WILD KATIPO 9.1.1

        Nuuuuuuuuuuuu…. formed in 1969 by a bunch of students who protested the Vietnam war among other popular items of the day…

        But they were hardly the Red Brigade or the Weathermen . LOL !

        And if they did have violent intent,… how long do you think it would be until the GSCB and SIS along with the NZ Police infiltrated their number?

        And I certainly think they never advertised their wares as being ‘assassins for hire’.

        🙂

        • Ad 9.1.1.1

          Ok you’re on.
          I’m doing a post on why we need more radicals.

          • WILD KATIPO 9.1.1.1.1

            Goody. But make sure they are ‘nice’ radicals. And excluding neo liberals because they are not nice.

          • Robert Guyton 9.1.1.1.2

            I reckon there’s a natural limit on the number of radicals in any population, be they human or aphid.

        • Bewildered 9.1.1.2

          Why don’t communist and fascist get the same level of vitriol, both ideologies killled millions, communism more so and greater number of thier own people I always find it strange why it’s ok to be a communist as far as the left is concerned but not a fascist where each are equally abhorrent Just one of the many double standards, selective morality and contradictions that comes out from the left

          • WILD KATIPO 9.1.1.2.1

            Yeah but some of us are more old school pre 1984 ‘centrists’ and dislike fascism and communism with equal abhorrence. Yet due to being that type of old schooler we now get branded as ‘left’ by the so called ‘orthodox’ and radical neo liberals…

            Maybe Ad could do a post on not very nice radical neo liberalism …?

          • Draco T Bastard 9.1.1.2.2

            both ideologies killled millions, communism more so and greater number of thier own people
            And capitalism even more so. In fact, fascism is just another form of capitalism.

            And Marx would never have recognised either the USSR or China as communist.

            • KJT 9.1.1.2.2.1

              Actually. US capitalists body count now exceeds both Stalin and Hitler, combined.

              • Draco T Bastard

                Yeah, that bit was supposed to be quoted. It was actually by Bewildered who’s simply believing and spouting the lies of those who want to prove communism/socialism as bad but who never look at the death toll of the capitalists in their never ending wars.

          • Anne 9.1.1.2.3

            Who said its OK to be a communist? The reason we are talking about fascism is because at this point it is the extreme ideology which is causing all the trouble.

            Communism as practiced by the Soviet Union is no longer a threat to world peace. Of course that could all change one day just like it has with fascism, but I guess this might be a bit too bewildering Bewildered.

            • Dukeofurl 9.1.1.2.3.1

              Communism is still the official idelogy of the people’s republic of China

              • Anne

                Yes. and there is no guarantee sometime in the future it won’t become a threat, but at this point it is relatively benign even if its human rights record leaves a lot to be desired.

            • Bewildered 9.1.1.2.3.2

              The ideology has killed millions as recent as Cambodia, where ever it has been practiced the impact on humanity has been atrocious To say it’s ok now is to argue if a facist comes out and says I am a new fascist ( ie the S& M type) not like the historical ones all is ok, Draco get out of jail card by speaking the mind of a guy who died a hundred years ago is getting pretty desperate to simply abdicate communist ideology that led to the of death of millions in the 20th century is shameful

              • Oh , what a load of complete and utter selective bollocks !

                Who was Pinochet , then ?

                —————————————————–

                [ ‘ The dictatorship was established after the democratically-elected socialist government of Salvador Allende was overthrown by a CIA-backed coup d’état on 11 September 1973.

                The regime was characterized by the systematic suppression of political parties and the persecution of dissidents to an extent unprecedented in the history of Chile. Overall, the regime left over 3,000 dead or missing, tortured tens of thousands of prisoners,[1] and drove an estimated 200,000 Chileans into exile.[2] The dictatorship’s effects on Chilean political and economic life continue to be felt. Two years after its ascension radical neoliberal economic reforms were implemented, in sharp contrast to Allende’s leftist policies, advised by a team of free-market economists educated in American universities known as the Chicago Boys ‘ ].

                ———————————————————

                Just one example of a fascist and their genocides.

                Communism , fascism . All of em bad bastards.

              • McFlock

                Basically, the stated objective of communism is stateless peace for everyone. The objective of fascism is everyone else is under the control of the fascists. The stated belief of Nazis is everyone else dies.

                I dislike the political predictions of Marx: Communism is always a bit “no true Scotsman”. Every regime that called itself Communist at the time is written off by “true Communists” as merely the pre-Communist stumbling block of the “Dictatorship of the proletariat”, and sadly failed to achieve true Communism.

                Marx was outstanding at pointing out the flaws of capitalism. His solution to it is a bit hand-wavy, unfortunately. But at least he managed the first bit, which was more than anyone else managed at the time.

                • [‘ But at least he managed the first bit, which was more than anyone else managed at the time ‘].

                  Yeah I guess so , but there always seems such a gulf between the academics , the idealist and the purist and what gets translated into reality. And that’s the problem. All good intentions and a framework of theory ,… but in creeps the power-heads and the opportunists.

                  The French revolution is a classic example of an out of control situation that started off with all good intentions of egalitarianism ( kind off) which led on to the wholesale slaughter of royals , innocent or not , anyone opposing the slaughter , anyone who even remotely opposed the revolution , – and eventually , – even the guy who pushed for the executions the hardest (Robespierre ) . And then finally,… into the conquest of Europe by Napoleon and countless more deaths.

                  And that insanity became almost a blueprint for both communism and fascism of the future.

                  • McFlock

                    Well, Marius went a bit nuts in Rome too, if I recall correctly.

                    The French Revolution had its share of intellectuals, but it was more a mob mentality.

                    One could also argue that the problem with Marx is that his abstract predictions were in the same line as “Jesus will come again”: for the first few hundred years of Christianity, the operating condition was “any day now”. Marx created painfully researched documentation of factory conditions in England, and coupled it with a Hegelian dialectic of “feudalism, capitalism, then after a brief transition that will have seen many previous failed attempts, Communism and mung beans”.

                    Meaning every revolutionary sees themselves as being the culmination of history.

                    The right wing fringes are more about “we don’t have power. We want total power. Then we’ll be in charge”.

                    Communism tends to fuck up because its “the workers should be in power. We are the sword of the workers. Some workers don’t like us. Those workers must be secret capitalists. We will kill them on behalf of the workers”.

                    • Pretty much finding myself agreeing, tbh.

                      One thing I picked up on is the Hegalian dialectic,… that’s an interesting one which we see being used all the time by manipulative politicians of all political stripes,…

                      [ ‘ Comprising three dialectical stages of development: a thesis, giving rise to its reaction; an antithesis, which contradicts or negates the thesis; and the tension between the two being resolved by means of a synthesis. In more simplistic terms, one can consider it thus: problem → reaction → solution’].

                      Well , in simple terms… create a situation ( thesis ) , then give the polar extreme ( antithesis ) – after that ,- swoop in with the answer they desired all along ( synthesis).

                      Basically , – manipulation. And they do it to us all the time in countless ways. That’s why politicians have such low ratings with the public regards trustworthiness.

                      Another thing I’m glad you mentioned is that … the temporal activist often views themselves as you put it , …’ as every revolutionary sees themselves as being the culmination of history’. It is often at this point that the world has moved on… Che Guevara was one such. There are many more. They outlive their use by dates and find themselves out of step.

                      But the damage and harm that extremists often cause by distorting the original idea to achieve their aims often negates all the best work of those extremists. And they are rejected. I believe it is simply a human tendency. A type of social entropy ,… in a sense.

                      Extremes, … and the violence that often accompany’s it ,…is never a long term solution or even a short term one. And it is more often than not the very same thing that kills the movement after time.

                • Draco T Bastard

                  Every regime that called itself Communist at the time is written off by “true Communists” as merely the pre-Communist stumbling block of the “Dictatorship of the proletariat”, and sadly failed to achieve true Communism.

                  Well, they didn’t achieve True Communism. If they had they would have been a participatory democracy with no hierarchy.

                  And the “Dictatorship of the proletariat” is an oxymoron. You can’t actually have one. The proletariat is all of the people and the only way they could make decisions is through a democratic system with no dictator in sight.

                  The USSR and China and The Democratic Peoples Republic of Korea ended up as dictatorships precisely because they’re not communist and never were.

              • KJT

                Cuba seems to be doing rather well. Compared with the hotbeds of Dictatorship, crime and corruption in the surrounding “Capitalist” US client States.

              • Draco T Bastard

                Draco get out of jail card by speaking the mind of a guy who died a hundred years ago

                Actually, I pretty much only speak my own mind.

                You, on the other hand, only seem to spout the lies that you’ve been told by those higher up the pecking order of your ideology.

      • Draco T Bastard 9.1.2

        The New Zealand electorate is quite happy to have the Communist League of New Zealand actively contest elections, as it has for decades. They support the violent overthrow of most things.

        [citation needed]

        As of course you do.

        That’s just an outright lie.

    • Chris T 9.2

      Why?

      Does it make your argument easier to defend?

      It is a free speech issue

      Attached to this is what qualifies as hate speech

      Because its obviously a hazy line of what is and what isnt between people going by recent events only courts can decide this no matter how much the people deciding they are the countries censors think otherwise

      • WILD KATIPO 9.2.1

        In one aspect perhaps the people in this country are the censors ???

        Southern certainly seemed to get the bums rush from them…

        Sure is a multi faceted topic.

        • Chris T 9.2.1.1

          Fair point, but not entirely true

          They had a venue. The venue owner just did a runner on them just before the event.

          • WILD KATIPO 9.2.1.1.1

            Well , perhaps the venue owner exercised their freedom of choice… 🙂

            And,…lets not forget also, Southern and sidekick were free to search for another venue… but they didn’t,… which also begs the question… just what substance did their message have if they didn’t even have the organizational skills for a plan B?

            They must have known in advance they were not particularly popular… but chose to pull the martyr thing instead… kinda weak, really…

            • Chris T 9.2.1.1.1.1

              It kind of more begs the question of how they are supposed to find one that holds that many people in such a short amount of time

              It’s all irrelevant now any way

              What is done is done

              Protesters (apparently making a bomb threat according to a couple of papers) – 1
              Free speech – 0

              • I reckon it just about pans out equal… Protesters shouldn’t do some of the things they do nor should people like Southern go around trying to troll and stir up unnecessary social turmoil.

                And you would of thought if they were so popular and being supported by some very wealthy individuals in NZ that finding another venue would have been a cinch.

        • Robert Guyton 9.2.1.2

          …bums’ rush, eh…

      • Draco T Bastard 9.2.2

        Does it make your argument easier to defend?

        What argument?

        Attached to this is what qualifies as hate speech

        Defined in law – look it up.

        • Chris T 9.2.2.1

          trying to switch it from a free speech issue to a business issue

          • Robert Guyton 9.2.2.1.1

            “But the subject of his speech was pretty innocuous. He should have been able to speak.”
            Bet he would have gone off-script. That Brash; he’s a cagey one!

  10. Stuart Munro 10

    Well I back the chancellor.

    It’s simply ludicrous to let raddled old political roués like Brash hide behind principles they do not and have never espoused.

    It’s like swallowing the manufactured rage of Chinese speculators over Twyford’s revelation of their existence, and buying their specious racism arguments.

    Brash’s freedom of speech has not been curtailed. There is nothing more to be said.

    • Chris T 10.1

      “Brash’s freedom of speech has not been curtailed”

      Has at the uni

      As has the students right to hear

      • WILD KATIPO 10.1.1

        He’ll be back ,… with his corned beef and peas.

        Don’t worry.

      • Dukeofurl 10.1.2

        What was the essence of the Free Speech Coalition legal case then, it wasn’t that their Free speech was curtailed. It was about a judicial review to the venues right to cancel.
        Yet they ignored any legal avenue that involved freedom of expression- the NZ term

      • Stuart Munro 10.1.3

        Crikey – haven’t Massey students heard of skype? My Korean colleagues used to set up teleconferences at the drop of a hat.

        I guess I can understand their not being bothered enough to though.

  11. Jenny 11

    As reported on TV1 News tonight, Auckland University who have invited Don Brash to speak, had previously banned Hone Harawira from speaking, allegedly for fear of protesters.

    What is the difference between Don Brash and Hone Harawira

    Well quite obviously their skin colour is a different shade.

    If the University of Auckland don’t want to be seen as biased they need to invite Hone Harawira to the same stage with the same amount of speaking time as Don Brash.

    If the University and Brash don’t agree, then I for one will be protesting.

    Will the University call off Brash’s speech because of protesters?

    Don’t hold your breath.

    Free Speech at Auckland University. Maori needn’t apply

    • Would actually be good to have them both up on stage.

      And get a real political debate going.

      Its time for this country to grow up.

      • Jenny 11.1.1

        There is no such thing as free speech
        Te Reo Putake

        In the interests of fairness and real free speech, to provide a counter balance to Brash’s dangerous white supremacist lies, and because of their past history of banning him, it is incumbent on the University of Auckland to invite Hone Harawira onto the same platform. (or if Harawira is not available at short notice, Harawira’s spokesperson Joe Trinder.)*

        Brash shouldn’t be allowed to speak until Hone Harawira is given equal right.

        Now I would pay real money for that.

        *(For those who don’t know him, Joe Trinder is the author of the Mana News Website, the official website of the Mana Movement.)

        HOBSON’S LEGACY IS NOT HOBSON’S PLEDGE
        Mana News – September 18, 2017

  12. Nick K 12

    Jeez, Brash doesn’t have greater rights to freedom of expression than S&M (heh!), they both have the same rights, measured against the limits in the Bill of Rights Act.

    You should understand that, Mickey.

Recent Comments

Recent Posts

  • Govt helps supermarket shoppers get a fair deal
    Urgent Budget night legislation to stop major supermarkets blocking competitors from accessing land for new stores has been introduced today, Minister of Commerce and Consumer Affairs Dr David Clark said. The Commerce (Grocery Sector Covenants) Amendment Bill amends the Commerce Act 1986, banning restrictive covenants on land, and exclusive covenants ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    13 hours ago
  • Prime Minister: Wellbeing Budget 2022 speech
    It is a pleasure to speak to this Budget. The 5th we have had the privilege of delivering, and in no less extraordinary circumstances.  Mr Speaker, the business and cycle of Government is, in some ways, no different to life itself. Navigating difficult times, while also making necessary progress. Dealing ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    15 hours ago
  • Future resource management system implementation funding
    Budget 2022 provides funding to implement the new resource management system, building on progress made since the reform was announced just over a year ago. The inadequate funding for the implementation of the Resource Management Act in 1992 almost guaranteed its failure. There was a lack of national direction about ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    15 hours ago
  • Funding certainty for quality public media
    The Government is substantially increasing the amount of funding for public media to ensure New Zealanders can continue to access quality local content and trusted news. “Our decision to create a new independent and future-focused public media entity is about achieving this objective, and we will support it with a ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    15 hours ago
  • Funding boost secures Defence capabilities
    $662.5 million to maintain existing defence capabilities NZDF lower-paid staff will receive a salary increase to help meet cost-of living pressures. Budget 2022 sees significant resources made available for the Defence Force to maintain existing defence capabilities as it looks to the future delivery of these new investments. “Since ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    15 hours ago
  • Budget 2022 supports resilient and sustainable cultural sector
    More than $185 million to help build a resilient cultural sector as it continues to adapt to the challenges coming out of COVID-19. Support cultural sector agencies to continue to offer their important services to New Zealanders. Strengthen support for Māori arts, culture and heritage. The Government is investing in a ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    15 hours ago
  • Minister of Finance: Wellbeing Budget 2022 Speech
    It is my great pleasure to present New Zealand’s fourth Wellbeing Budget. In each of this Government’s three previous Wellbeing Budgets we have not only considered the performance of our economy and finances, but also the wellbeing of our people, the health of our environment and the strength of our communities. In Budget ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    16 hours ago
  • Wellbeing Budget 2022 Speech
    It is my great pleasure to present New Zealand’s fourth Wellbeing Budget. In each of this Government’s three previous Wellbeing Budgets we have not only considered the performance of our economy and finances, but also the wellbeing of our people, the health of our environment and the strength of our communities. In Budget ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    16 hours ago
  • Coronial delays addressed by Budget 2022
    Four new permanent Coroners to be appointed Seven Coronial Registrar roles and four Clinical Advisor roles are planned to ease workload pressures Budget 2022 delivers a package of investment to improve the coronial system and reduce delays for grieving families and whānau. “Operating funding of $28.5 million over four ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    16 hours ago
  • Paving the way for better outcomes for disabled people
    Establishment of Ministry for Disabled People Progressing the rollout of the Enabling Good Lives approach to Disability Support Services to provide self-determination for disabled people Extra funding for disability support services “Budget 2022 demonstrates the Government’s commitment to deliver change for the disability community with the establishment of a ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    16 hours ago
  • Investing in education so all Kiwis can succeed
    Fairer Equity Funding system to replace school deciles The largest step yet towards Pay Parity in early learning Local support for schools to improve teaching and learning A unified funding system to underpin the Reform of Vocational Education Boost for schools and early learning centres to help with cost ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    16 hours ago
  • Primary sector backed to grow and innovate
    $118.4 million for advisory services to support farmers, foresters, growers and whenua Māori owners to accelerate sustainable land use changes and lift productivity  $40 million to help transformation in the forestry, wood processing, food and beverage and fisheries sectors  $31.6 million to help maintain and lift animal welfare practices across Aotearoa New Zealand A total food and ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    16 hours ago
  • More support for first home buyers and renters
    House price caps for First Home Grants increased in many parts of the country House price caps for First Home Loans removed entirely Kāinga Whenua Loan cap will also be increased from $200,000 to $500,000 The Affordable Housing Fund to initially provide support for not-for-profit rental providers Significant additional ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    16 hours ago
  • Budget lifts up to 14,000 children out of poverty
    Child Support rules to be reformed lifting an estimated 6,000 to 14,000 children out of poverty Support for immediate and essential dental care lifted from $300 to $1,000 per year Increased income levels for hardship assistance to extend eligibility Budget 2022 takes further action to reduce child poverty and ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    16 hours ago
  • A booster for RNA research and development
    More support for RNA research through to pilot manufacturing RNA technology platform to be created to facilitate engagement between research and industry partners Researchers and businesses working in the rapidly developing field of RNA technology will benefit from a new research and development platform, funded in Budget 2022. “RNA ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    16 hours ago
  • Unleashing business potential across NZ
    A new Business Growth Fund to support small and medium sized enterprises (SMEs) to grow Fully funding the Regional Strategic Partnership Fund to unleash regional economic development opportunities Tourism Innovation Programme to promote sustainable recovery Eight Industry Transformation Plans progressed to work with industries, workers and iwi to transition ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    16 hours ago
  • Securing the wellbeing of Pacific communities
    Budget 2022 further strengthens the economic foundations and wellbeing outcomes for Pacific peoples in Aotearoa, as the recovery from COVID-19 continues. “The priorities we set for Budget 2022 will support the continued delivery of our commitments for Pacific peoples through the Pacific Wellbeing Strategy, a 2020 manifesto commitment for Pacific ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    16 hours ago
  • Government delivers timely support for whānau
    Boost for Māori economic and employment initiatives. More funding for Māori health and wellbeing initiatives Further support towards growing language, culture and identity initiatives to deliver on our commitment to Te Reo Māori in Education  Funding for natural environment and climate change initiatives to help farmers, growers and whenua ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    16 hours ago
  • Government delivers critical infrastructure
    New hospital funding for Whangārei, Nelson and Hillmorton 280 more classrooms over 40 schools, and money for new kura $349 million for more rolling stock and rail network investment The completion of feasibility studies for a Northland dry dock and a new port in the Manukau Harbour Increased infrastructure ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    16 hours ago
  • A health system that takes care of Māori
    $168 million to the Māori Health Authority for direct commissioning of services $20.1 million to support Iwi-Māori Partnership Boards $30 million to support Māori primary and community care providers $39 million for Māori health workforce development Budget 2022 invests in resetting our health system and gives economic security in ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    16 hours ago
  • Investing in better health services
    Biggest-ever increase to Pharmac’s medicines budget Provision for 61 new emergency vehicles including 48 ambulances, along with 248 more paramedics and other frontline staff New emergency helicopter and crew, and replacement of some older choppers $100 million investment in specialist mental health and addiction services 195,000 primary and intermediate aged ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    16 hours ago
  • A Secure Future for New Zealanders’ health
    Landmark reform: new multi-year budgets for better planning and more consistent health services Record ongoing annual funding boost for Health NZ to meet cost pressures and start with a clean slate as it replaces fragmented DHB system ($1.8 billion year one, as well as additional $1.3 billion in year ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    17 hours ago
  • Cost of living package eases impact on households – 2.1 million Kiwis to get new targeted payment
    Fuel Excise Duty and Road User Charges cut to be extended for two months Half price public transport extended for a further two months New temporary cost of living payment for people earning up to $70,000 who are not eligible to receive the Winter Energy Payment Estimated 2.1 million New ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    17 hours ago
  • Budget highlights underlying strength of economy in face of global headwinds
    A return to surplus in 2024/2025 Unemployment rate projected to remain at record lows Net debt forecast to peak at 19.9 percent of GDP in 2024, lower than Australia, US, UK and Canada Economic growth to hit 4.2 percent in 2023 and average 2.1 percent over the forecast period A ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    17 hours ago
  • Budget 2022: A secure future in difficult times
    Cost of living payment to cushion impact of inflation for 2.1 million Kiwis Record health investment including biggest ever increase to Pharmac’s medicines budget First allocations from Climate Emergency Response Fund contribute to achieving the goals in the first Emissions Reduction Plan Government actions deliver one of the strongest ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    17 hours ago
  • Budget 2022: A secure future
    Budget 2022 will help build a high wage, low emissions economy that provides greater economic security, while providing support to households affected by cost of living pressures. Our economy has come through the COVID-19 shock better than almost anywhere else in the world, but other challenges, both long-term and more ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    17 hours ago
  • Health Minister to attend World Health Assembly in Geneva
    Health Minister Andrew Little will represent New Zealand at the first in-person World Health Assembly since the start of the COVID-19 pandemic, to be held in Geneva, Switzerland, from Sunday 22 – Wednesday 25 May (New Zealand time). “COVID-19 has affected people all around the world, and health continues to ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 days ago
  • New efforts to counter illegal timber trade
    New Zealand is committing to trade only in legally harvested timber with the Forests (Legal Harvest Assurance) Amendment Bill introduced to Parliament today. Under the Bill, timber harvested in New Zealand and overseas, and used in products made here or imported, will have to be verified as being legally harvested. ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 days ago
  • Deaths in New Zealand lower than expected so far during the pandemic
    The Government has welcomed the release today of StatsNZ data showing the rate at which New Zealanders died from all causes during the COVID-19 pandemic has been lower than expected. The new StatsNZ figures provide a measure of the overall rate of deaths in New Zealand during the pandemic compared ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 days ago
  • New law helps secure New Zealand’s maritime domain
    Legislation that will help prevent serious criminal offending at sea, including trafficking of humans, drugs, wildlife and arms, has passed its third reading in Parliament today, Foreign Affairs Nanaia Mahuta announced. “Today is a milestone in allowing us to respond to the increasingly dynamic and complex maritime security environment facing ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 days ago
  • Trade and Export Growth Minister to travel to Bangkok for APEC
    Trade and Export Growth Minister Damien O’Connor is set to travel to Thailand this week to represent New Zealand at the annual APEC Ministers Responsible for Trade (MRT) meeting in Bangkok. “I’m very much looking forward to meeting my trade counterparts at APEC 2022 and building on the achievements we ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 days ago
  • Government welcomes historic pay-equity deal
    Settlement of the first pay-equity agreement in the health sector is hugely significant, delivering pay rises of thousands of dollars for many hospital administration and clerical workers, Health Minister Andrew Little says. “There is no place in 21st century Aotearoa New Zealand for 1950s attitudes to work predominantly carried out ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 days ago
  • Government delivers new ICU space at Christchurch Hospital
    Health Minister Andrew Little opened a new intensive care space for up to 12 ICU-capable beds at Christchurch Hospital today, funded from the Government’s Rapid Hospital Improvement Programme. “I’m pleased to help mark this milestone. This new space will provide additional critical care support for the people of Canterbury and ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 days ago
  • Next steps for specialist mental health and addiction services
    Budget 2022 will continue to deliver on Labour’s commitment to better services and support for mental wellbeing. The upcoming Budget will include a $100-million investment over four years for a specialist mental health and addiction package, including: $27m for community-based crisis services that will deliver a variety of intensive supports ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 days ago
  • 195,000 children set to benefit from more mental health support
    Budget 2022 will continue to deliver on Labour’s commitment to better mental wellbeing services and support, with 195,000 primary and intermediate aged children set to benefit from the continuation and expansion of Mana Ake services. “In Budget 2022 Labour will deliver on its manifesto commitment to expand Mana Ake, with ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 days ago
  • Belarusian leaders and defence entities targeted under latest round of sanctions
    Foreign Minister Nanaia Mahuta has today announced sanctions on Belarusian leaders and defence entities supporting Russia’s actions in Ukraine, as part of the Government’s ongoing response to the war. “The Belarusian government military is enabling the illegal and unacceptable assault on Ukraine’s sovereignty,” Nanaia Mahuta said.  “Under the leadership of ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    4 days ago
  • Queen's Platinum Jubilee Tree planting event at Government House
    Just after World War 2, there were incentives to clear forest and bring land into agricultural production. In places, the land had been stripped bare as forests were felled for sheep grazing. Today, you only have to look at the hills around Taihape and see the stumps of a once ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    4 days ago
  • Supercharging decarbonisation & transforming the energy system
    The drive to decarbonise industry and further accelerate preparations for a sustainable, more resilient future will get a boost from the Climate Emergency Response Fund in Budget 2022 by supercharging efforts to encourage the switch to cleaner energy options and transform the energy system. “Today is a momentous day ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    4 days ago
  • Climate investments provide path to economic security
    ​​​​​​The Government is investing in New Zealand’s economic security by ensuring climate change funding moves away from short-term piecemeal responses and towards smart, long-term investment. Climate Emergency Response Fund (CERF) established with $4.5 billion from Emissions Trading Scheme revenue Initial allocation of $2.9 billion over four years invested in emissions ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    4 days ago
  • Transport to drive down emissions
    Rolling out the Clean Car Upgrade programme, supporting lower- and middle- income families transition to low-emission alternatives through a new scrap-and-replace trial Helping low-income households lease low emission vehicles Supporting the rapid development of urban cycleway networks, walkable neighbourhoods, healthier school travel, and increased accessibility and reliability of public ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    4 days ago