Written By:
mickysavage - Date published:
11:26 am, November 19th, 2024 - 6 comments
Categories: act, david seymour, making shit up, national, national/act government, Politics, spin, treaty settlements, you couldn't make this shit up -
Tags:
You have to admire David Seymour’s ability to completely misrepresent reality.
Like yesterday in this Herald opinion piece where he calimed that the Treaty Principles Bill “commits to protecting the rights of everyone, including Māori, and upholding Treaty settlements. It commits to give equal enjoyment of the same fundamental human rights to every single New Zealander. The challenge for people who oppose this bill is to explain why they are so opposed to those basic principles.”
Or where he claimed that te Tiriti created a partnership between races.
Or that there are groups who want to “nullify the debate”.
Committing to protecting the rights of everyone sounds great but is nothing more than what existing law achieves. Seymour’s bill does not provide added protections. Check out the New Zealand Bill of Rights Act 1990 or the Human Rights Act 1993 if you need confirmation.
And suggesting that you have to change the Treaty of Waitangi principles to preserve fundamental human rights and if you oppose this you are also opposed to human rights is the gaslight to end gaslights.
Making a virtue of upholding treaty settlements is weird. Of course they should be upheld. The Bill would however nullify every treaty right that has not been formally recorded in a settlement deed. I wonder why Seymour did not mention this.
And te Tiriti is clearly not a partnership between races. it is an agreement reached between the Crown and Māori.
As for nullifying the debate I presume that Seymour means opposing the circus that he has created. As the Waitangi Tribunal has found if enacted his bill would be “the worst, most comprehensive breach of the Treaty / te Tiriti in modern times. If the Bill remained on the statute book for a considerable time or was never repealed, it could mean the end of the Treaty / te Tiriti.”
Seymour is that interested in a civilised debate on his bill that when former National Party Minister Christopher Finlayson said that the bill was doing great damage he said that Finlayson was showing haughtiness and bitterness.
And when former National Prime Minister Jenny Shipley said that Seymour was inciting civil war he cast aspertions on her tenure at Mainzeal.
Shipley’s comments were prescient and thoughtful.
I was young enough to remember Bastion Point, and look, the Treaty has helped us navigate. When people have had to raise their voice, it’s brought us back to what it’s been – an enduring relationship where people then try to find their way forward.
And I thought the voices of this week were completely and utterly appropriate, and whether they breach standing orders, I’ll put that aside.
The voice of Māori, that reminds us that this was an agreement, a contract – and you do not rip up a contract and then just say, ‘Well, I’m happy to rewrite it on my terms, but you don’t count’.
I would raise my voice. I’m proud that the National Party has said they will not be supporting this, because you cannot speak out of both sides of your mouth.
And I think any voice that’s raised, and there are many people – Pākehā and Māori who are not necessarily on this hīkoi – who believe that a relationship is something you keep working at. You don’t just throw it in the bin and then try and rewrite it as it suits you.
She was scathing in her description of what Seymour is doing:
I just despise people who want to use a treasure – which is what the Treaty is to me – and use it as a political tool that drives people to the left or the right, as opposed to inform us from our history and let it deliver a future that is actually who we are as New Zealanders … I condemn David Seymour for his using this, asking the public for money to fuel a campaign that I think really is going to divide New Zealand in a way that I haven’t lived through in my adult life. There’s been flashpoints, but I view this incredibly seriously.
And there are reports that National and NZ First want to shorten the select committee process for consideration of the bill. And that National MPs are being deluged with emails and that their support is taking a hammering.
And as I type this thousands upon thousands of Hikoi marchers are descending onto Parliament.
And David Seymour has not ruled out speaking to the crowd.
I suspect that he is grinning from ear to ear.
It is hard to imagine a better example of gaslighting than what he is doing now. Or another time when a minnow party has been allowed to create this amount of chaos in pursuit of the redneck vote.
The current rise of populism challenges the way we think about people’s relationship to the economy.We seem to be entering an era of populism, in which leadership in a democracy is based on preferences of the population which do not seem entirely rational nor serving their longer interests. ...
The server will be getting hardware changes this evening starting at 10pm NZDT.
The site will be off line for some hours.
https://youtu.be/mLRjFWDGs1g?si=saap00SpIznneOFx
A cunning and very dangerous man, should never have been let near the levers of power. Almost makes me regret MMP.
He claimed he wanted a debate.
The Maori are bringing the marae to Whanganui a Tara.
The first principle of the Treaty is that there were two parties to it.
And as for dawn birdsong, Maori are using Seymour to declare their indigenous peoples right to be consulted (a right to declare before the world – UN, UNDRIP) in such matters.
All indigenous peoples will champion it.
Which is why the National Party realise his methods are counter-productive, he has become the extremist that might have to be purged to ensure re-election (think the move to Birch by Bolger).
In line with the idea National are loosing support I am going to email my local (National) MP and suggest I am considering not voting for them as their handling of this affair has been atrocious.
A line about fiscal responsibility in tough times will not go amiss
The Treaty of Waitangi Act (October 10 1975) established the Waitangi Tribunal.
A land march arrived on Oct 13 1975 to demand it do "good work"
Some parties that want to fast track this bill to oblivion, are themselves out to remove references to the Treaty from legislation and also undermine the role of the Waitangi Tribunal.
The story is that there is no catch.
Just avoid using adjectives to describe Seymour and it is, as easy as.
https://www.stuff.co.nz/politics/360491786/treaty-principles-bill-opens-submissions-however-there-catch